** **

**FOREWORD. **

**ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: ORGANIC SYSTEMS **

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’ * *

*Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe*

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.”

*Einstein*, on the entangled forest man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’ -whose study is the theme of this blog.

__This blog is dedicated to the organic philosophy of science called systems sciences, and its logic-mathematical formalism, the scalar fifth dimension of space-time.__

*The Foreword**, given the encyclopedic nature of the blog, ** tries to explain briefly the meaning of those 2 concepts. It is the same in all posts so you can escape it if you have read it already. The rest of the post will define the physical scales of the galatom.*

Systems sciences are based on the alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

** **According to *Deism* the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to *Mechanism*, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other side is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are self-replicating, *but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and we shall see in our sections of History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.*

So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:

An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

Indeed, a machine is an organism of metal fast evolving through the customary ages of all organisms – in the XIX c. ‘humans’, who catalyze their evolution did its bodies of metal, then its hearts-engines, in the II Industrial evolution, then its metal-minds in the XX c. and now in the Industrial r=evolution 4.0 put them together in organic robots.

So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is just a simplex version of organicism. *It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms: *

In the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon?

There are obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things.

But the deepest reason of them all is the fact that to make an organism we need at least two ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also INFORMATION, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy.

Only then when we properly define information and add it to the mix, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).

But what is entropy and information, in simple self-evident terms? The answer is obvious: entropy is motion, and motion is time, change. And information is form, and form is dimensional space. Time=motion and Space=dimensional form become then the two substances of which all what exists is made, and in their analysis we must start our inquire about why indeed the Universe and all its parts are a fractal super organism of time=motion=entropy and space=form, made to the image of its whole.

The proofs? That is the easiest part. Look around you, all what you see are forms that occupy space, and move in time. Everything you see is a form of space with a time motion. There is nothing else and so all is a proof that reality is indeed made of space-time organisms, as the motto of this web says.

**General Systems: 5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe.**

New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.

*Planck on the informative seed or mind that will reproduce and evolve into a larger super organism or mental world. *

For those with little time, a brief introduction to a subject that could easily fill an encyclopedia Britannica:

The Universe is a fractal scalar, organic system of 5 Dimensions of space-time. The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’, which amazing enough since it was discovered at the beginning of science with telescope and microscopes, was not formalized till I introduce its metric equation in the milieu of systems sciences.

In mathematical science for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space, and time to gives us a co-invariant system that allows to travel through such dimension. The fifth dimension has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equations for a given number of scales co-existing in an organic network is S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.

It means when we become smaller within such organic network, our time clocks accelerate. And vice versa. For example, in your organism the equation relates the cellular genetic scale, whose time cycles run much faster than your biological cycles. As information is stored in the form and frequency of time clocks, it follows that in all nature’s organisms, smaller systems code the information of larger systems.

In the next graphs we show 3 classic examples of biology and physics, now properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in space.

In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume:energy content of its orbital sphere):

Why this law is so important? Because *it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.*

Each ‘stience’ therefore specializes in the study of a nested super organism, or scale of the fifth dimension (∆±¡), We study 3 fundamental super organisms of the 5th dimension. The ‘galatom‘, whose metric equation is H(Planck constant of angular momentum) x C (speed of light) = C, whereas h is an obvious ‘cyclical time clock’ and C an obvious measure of speed-distances in space. And indeed, smaller scales have faster turning particles, and larger systems move in slower cycles. (Vortex law: Vo x Ro = k).

In biology we study families of animals such as mammals where larger organisms have slower metabolic cycles. In history we study social organisms, whose cycles of life and death, will define the evolution of nations and civilizations. And in each of those organisms, smaller systems code larger ones. So the quantum numbers of particles code matter, genes code biologic organisms, and memes code societies.

We define them two fundamental systems one in space and one in time, taking place in the fifth dimension:

An entangled super organism in space, in which the synchronicity between 3 scales of the organism, its atomic/cellular/Individual, thermodynamic/organic /social and gravitational/ecosystemic/global scales in physical/biological/social organisms form a complex interacting, entangled system we shall call a super organism, whose study discovers ‘Isomorphic=equal laws’ regardless of what kind of system we study. Because the system is entangled, and made of 5 obvious components, we need a new logic, ‘pentalogic’ as all the elements communicate and interact together. Those elements common to all systems of nature are identified as:

‘**space**‘, ” §paœ that is ‘types of dimensional form’, and we find to have 3 only ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 clear organic functions in the super organism, lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic body-waves that iterate its forms and spherical particle/heads that gauge information.

**Time****,** that is types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).

**Scale**, the 3 aforementioned scales for any super organism

**Mind****.** And this allow us to identify a ‘center that process’ information from the outer world, and controls the internal networks of the system, with a given language, which we shall call a mind, regardless of its automatic processing or consciousness. As it coordinates and maintains the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, *which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.*

**Entropic limits****: **In time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆1<<∆-1.

All this allow us to define any system in time, by its life and death cycle which we shall call a **worldcycle** (taken from 4D physics, worldline, which now with a new dimension becomes a worldcycle. Since indeed any scalar super organism’s *existence can easily be defined as a travel through the 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as all systems are born as a seminal, smaller form, in the ∆-1 lower scale, grow fast with its faster time speed, emerge in the ∆º body scale and are part with its head/particle of a larger social world, in the ∆+1 scale.*

How then a system travels through those scales? Very simple, it does so accelerating in its life cycle, emerging, living in the larger world, and then dissolving back to its parts in the death moment:

In each of those cycles the mind lives through its actions, which are the 3 passive, simplex aei actions in its placental cycle and the 3 complex iœu actions in its worldcycle.

Amazingly enough with this simple scheme of 5 pentalogic elements, tracing 3 relative worldcycles, the first ‘placental worldcycle’ as it evolve in the relative safe ‘womb’ of a maternal system, the life cycle, as it tries to survive in an outer ecosystem, and for the most organized systems, a 3rd worldcycle as it forms part of a larger super organism, we will be able to order everything in the Universe, every event and every phenomena, which the researcher has studied for decades.

The existence of a new dimension of space-time is the most important discovery of science in a century, since Einstein formalized the fourth dimension, but this expansion and formal organization of science is much wider as it *applies to all sciences, not only physics. *

So we study further the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information and coordination of its citizens-cells.

So this is most important upgrade of spacetime theory since Einstein’s 4D formalism – which corresponds to the limit of 5D metrics in a single scale, that of the galatom’s light spacetime.

**The predictability of time-cycles.**

In the graph, the predictability of time-cycles can be done at 3 levels:

**S: Continuous, spatial pure mathematical**simple cycles, using calculus and derivatives, proper of mathematical equations; that of generational causal bio-logic cycles, often survival encounters between predators and prey.**T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns of sequential repetitive actions**, taking place at different times. AS THOSE ACTIONS ARE discontinuous, the patterns are LONGER in time.**∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of longer wholes,**species as opposed to individuals in biology, galactic, star or geologic life cycles as opposed to smaller life beings, which are longer BY VIRTUE of the 5th DIMENSIONAL METRIC, $ x ð = Cst (ab. C:st), which implies that from the smaller scalar perspective any longer cycle happening in the fifth dimension is much longer.

Because ‘human scientists’ ONLY recognize the first type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, and ignore the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their CAPACITY TO define the future is far more smaller than a ‘stientist’ that understands those 3 scales. So for a ‘stientist’ of ∆st, of which among humans there is the ginormous number of…1 (: me, I and myself 🙂 I can predict the future of any system including WITH DEEP TIME AND CYCLICAL PATTERNS, the future of social sciences, economics and history which I have been doing for 30 years as my small print books on the subject can testify:

An important question though must be clarified even if we go further into this specific post that introduces the 5 Dimensional motions of the Universe, which has to do with the ternary properties of the Universe as all is made of space, time and scale, and hence it has mathematical=spatial, logic=temporal and organic=scalar properties, *which unfortunately humans fail to recognize, as they have become specialized in ‘mathematical=spatial only properties’ due to the prominent role of physics and its digital machines of spatial measure in our systems of knowledge.*

*As it is impossible to make sense of reality if we do NOT include ALL THOSE PROPERTIES, as expressed previously in the 5 elements of reality.*

So in this blog we are making exact predictions of social sciences and prove it with 30 years of published books and papers far more exact than those of CIA, World Bank, and any think tank you might thought of, because we know the 3 LEVELS OF PREDICTABILITY OF TIME SYSTEMS. And all that uau! NOT with billions of dollars IN data, and AI machines to do IT, BUT my feeble, 1.5 kilograms of dirty water aka 1 brain, which has been doing it and handling it for free since the 90s, since I ended my Columbia u. master and started to churn self-paid small print books with predictions of history and economics that have been happening TO the letter.

Why I am NOT an AI machine as most people think I should be to forecast the future and solve the form in which the future of systems is GENERATED, has to do with a fact most scientists accustomed just to use data put in mathematical models FAIL to grasp about the fractal, organic Universe and its SCALES of ‘time-length’:

A system on the entangled fractal Universe has TOPO-BIO-LOGIC properties derived of its spatial, mathematical structure, its temporal, logic structure and ITS SCALAR, organic structure as parts co-exist into larger wholes and this gives the whole an organic structure.

As it happens, the MATHEMATICAL, topologic structure IS the shortest time span, as it is about SOCIAL NUMBERS, herds of equal forms that move in space, which is a slice of the whole time FLOW. AND SO mathematics is good for detail and spatial calculus which is what instantaneous derivatives do – but NOT for CHANGES OF age/phase, as derivatives cannot happen in points that have a fractal change.

So to the rescue come the LOGIC structure of the Universe, which studies time causality, between events and has a longer span. This logic structure is based in the CYCLICAL PATTERNS OF TIME clocks, which as your watch or any orbital day-year is cyclical and repeats in LONGER TIME FRAMES, so we can predict LONGER TIME FRAMES from the logic patterns of cyclical time.

And HERE human scientists ARE ALREADY AT LOSS, because since Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosion that destroy the information of reality stored in THOSE CYCLES OF TIME CLOCKS, its patterns and frequency, MANKIND CHANGED its cyclical understanding of time for a lineal time that SEEMS NOT TO REPEAT so they have MISSED its capacity to understand the cycles of time, of history and economics, with its OBTUSE lineal time models. And so they cannot EVEN CONCEIVE the predictability of economics and its SUBMISSIVE placebo democratic capitalist system where POLITICOS are ruled by companies ‘subventions’ and so do what is GOOD for the profits of economics according to the evolutionary patterns of machines. Which leads us to the THIRD level of DEEP TIME, that is, of the patterns of evolution of the Earth’s life species, including machines, as first mentioned by Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word superorganism for Gaia and deep time for the slower 5th dimensional clocks of larger organic systems.

THIS IS THE LEVEL OF DEEPER forecasting of time cycles, which I also use in my webs, but as humans stopped their understanding of time predictability in the first level of mathematical calculus, obviously they cannot understand what we do here.

Which leads to a final question: Why humans prefer a mechanical, mathematical simplex view of reality instead of embracing the whole? The answer might not be so much a problem of the Universe but of the human mind; as organisms are self-centered and select information from their point of view. So to be the center of the Universe is a survival strategy, which has made humans as they became over powerful on other organisms of Earth, reject a view of reality more objective, even today as machines clearly evolve into organisms, and we shall return to those themes, in our organic analysis of history and mathematical definition of the mind.

However a philosophy of science is a ‘thought experiment’ not a practical endeavor. So we care only for a profound ‘communion’ with the ultimate whys of reality, trying to understand the Universe as an entangled whole.

Indeed, the philosophy of systems science considering how timespace organisms follow similar laws. In that sense, the method of knowledge of the fractal, organic Universe is quite different from our present way of thought, which is analytic, and cheers the ‘cataloging’ of differences between beings – Systemics is a synthetic method and cheers the finding of similarities between them, extracting ‘disomorphic=equal laws’ .

Humans though embarked in a journey of ‘mechanical, mathematical’ dissection of reality which is fine but made them loose the forest view – and I dare to say most don’t even care anymore to know if they are looking at a forest at all.

The blog though only differentiates the ‘trees’ of the forest in the fourth line, which was meant to be a collaboration with a team of specialized scientists, each one casting his trees on the shadow of the ‘standard’ 12+1 set of ‘Disomorphic laws’ that define the common nature of all time-space organisms explained in the 3rd line (and briefly introduced in the next paragraphs).

As this collaborative effort has not happened the blog is incomplete.

Yet for those interested in the trees, the second line offers quite a ‘tree’ vision of the main sciences of the nested Universe departing from the largest one, the galatom, down to the smallest ones, the mind-languages stored in our infinitesimal neurons.

On my view, as Descartes put it when finishing his much briefer introduction to analytic Geometry on a book which he cherished more for his philosophy of science – as we do – but came to matter more for its maths, the detailed part on specific stiences and species is good enough for a single scholar so ‘I will leave work to be done by future researchers’; Human or more likely AI which will no doubt enjoy the handling of huge data in parallel fashion and will need an organic explanation of why it will soon become conscious 🙂

L§, ¡man . Philosopher of Science.

**SUMMARY**

**INTRODUCTION:** THE FRACTAL ORGANISM OF THE GALAXY.

Scales=physical stiences, from wholes to parts:

**∆-2,3:** Atomic supœrganisms: quantum, atomic scale. Electromagnetism & special relativity.

**∆º±1:** Thermodynamic time§pace supœrganisms, human scale

**∆±3,4:** Gravitation: Mass scale.

‘If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe’. Carl Sagan

**Foreword.**

**INTRODUCTION: ORGANIC GALAXIES**.

**ITS SCALES, SPATIAL PARTS AND TIME CYCLES**

As usual we recommend to read at least the introductory pages of the main post of the web, to understand what the 5Dimensional fractal Universe an its fundamental elements, Space, Time, ∆-scales and linguistic @-minds, the four components of all Supœrganisms of Time-space are.

**The organic properties of fractals and the Universe.**

**∆±3: THE GALAXY AS AN ATOM: ITS 5 Ð METRIC **

The galatom is a super organism. Thus it must follow the same metric 5Ð equation, $(lineal size) x ð (cyclical time speed) = K, in all its scales to be able to act as a super organism in which spacetime beings, made of temporal energy and spatial information can travel through its 3 co-existing organic scales and exchange energy and information between them.

We though must be more precise in the understanding of what is energy and information. They are similar terms. Energy is ‘motion with a little form’ and information, form with a little motion, whereas motion is one of the two ‘limits’ of reality, either social collective scattering entropic motion or ordered individual locomotion, and form the other extreme, either pure linguistic form that stores in its ‘dimensions of space’ the ‘seed’ of information, which once given motion will ‘vitalize’ the system, or that form in action, form-in-action, in=form=@tion.

So energy and information are two sides of the same coin: *a mixture of form and motion that can be transferred thanks to the metric equivalence of all scales of a **super organism, between them: $t • §ð = K (energy, momentum).*

This requires an immediate translation of the 3 elements of 5Ð metric:

K: The concept of a 5Ð constant is akin to the concept of energy.

§ð: The cyclical clocks of time of a physical system are defined by its angular momentum, itself subject to its own 5Ð sub-metric, the vortex equation: Vo x Ro = K

$t: The lineal distance-speed of the system, is guided by the singularity ‘mind’ or center of the active magnitude of the system (physical point of masses or charge), manifest itself externally through the lineal inertia motion, which maintains the center of charge or masses at relative rest as it moves lineally.

Thus the 3 conserved physical quantities, angular and lineal momentum and energy, relate loosely to the 3 elements of the simplest 5Ð metric equations:

$t (lineal momentum) x §ð (angular momentum) = Energy

We say loosely because contrary to belief physical sciences are NOT an exact science at all but one of increasing degrees of complexity and refinement in the calculus departing from idealizations, which in reality as in all complex systems only cover the basic case. However this generalization is of great use to 5Ð physics as IT ALLOWS to use all formulae to show first principles (as we shall do using to unify scales Newtonian physics).

5Ð physics *is not so much concerned at least at this pioneering state with evolving further mathematical physics but interpreting them as part of the general properties of the fractal Universe in all its scales. *

And that is indeed the case with the parallelism between 5Ð metric and conserved quantities. So we have to ‘start’ a scalar analysis of the galatom firing the metric for all its mathematical physical equations describing the scales and Ðimotions of the species within the galatom.

What should be this K is then the first question, easily resolved as we find that the *only constant that travels through scales is the concept of ‘Energy’. And so immediately we find also in each scale a fundamental equation of energy,** as the fundamental 5 Ð Metric of all physical systems within the galatom: *

*K (E) = $(h) • ð(ƒ) = $(k) • ð (T) = $(c²) • ð (M).*

The connection thus is made between the fundamental conserved elements of physics, energy, lineal and cyclical momentum, and the 3 elements of a 5D metric equation.

Most 5D metric equations can then be expressed with the ‘reproductive’, x, algebraic operandi but *in the full understanding of the pentalogic Universe, the relationship between the lineal and cyclical, spacetime dimotions we find in most 5D metric equations, might vary, to express a different type of process happening within the parts of the Supeorganism.*

Hence we use the more ‘general’ symbol • for 5D metric operations, as usually will mean x but not always so.

**The cosmological metric.**

This metric equation however should not happen for the region outside the galaxy, where the ‘constant of curvature and energy’ to use two similar terminologies for ð and $, must be different – and today by lack of proper measures is referred as the cosmological constant, Λ, which we take as a first approximation to the 5Ð metric outside the galaxy, as it gives us values, either as a ‘flatter curvature’ or as a ‘weaker’ energy than the ch and G constants for the galatom… So we write for the ‘dark world’ outside the galatom a different 5 Ð metric:

2. K (Λ) = $ ð

Whose speculative nature so far, make us unconcerned for the time being with its value beyond what it has been said, restricting its use to the science of cosmology… Yet to stress its value looks promising, since larger Russian dolls of the nested Universe are less curved, ‘weaker’ in ‘curvature=tension=strength of attraction’ ($) and slower in their time clocks, the cosmological constant, which has a much smaller value in terms of ‘energy’, indeed seems to be what astrophysicists think of it, the constant of energy of the intergalactic vacuum, defining a new ¡±4 scale of the Universe. Further on, as it turns out to be ‘repulsive energy’, it fits the galatom’s similarity with atoms that makes its external forces similar to repulsive electromagnetism.

**Relationship of forces and momentums with energy conservative cycles: the dual states.**

The essential element of all superorganisms is its clock, which synchronizes the whole system and as such rule the system. That clock centers are mind centers, as they reflect in semantic forms its spatial mind creating its mental territories, is essential for you to see the will of the dimotions of the program of exist¡ence move with super-fluidity over the different changes of plane, topology age and mind-state.

*The whys. What is energy, time, space, universal constant, across the 3 physical scales.*

^{th}dimension), ∆-thermodynamic matter scale and ∆+1 cosmological, gravitational scale:What is energy then remains the fundamental first question of science we must clarify. It is not possible to clearly define energy in physics with a single formula, which becomes the first surprise of a seemingly ‘exact’ science. But we do have 3 equations for it, in the 3 scales of relative size of the Universe, which we shall call, ∆-1: quantum scale, ∆-Thermodynamic scale and ∆+1: gravitational scale:

**∆-1: E= h v; ∆: E= kT; ∆+1: E= c**

^{2}M*Now this requires to remember the reader from the posts on ‘constants’ and philosophy of physics that ‘energy’ must be regarded by virtue of E=hƒ as a parameter of the ‘speed of time cycles’ of a system, which increase by S x T = k in the lower scales. *

So we probe smaller scales with more energy, because we use smaller wave-lengths, which are a cyclical motion, elongated as a wave. The being that has faster time cycles (smaller in size by 5D metric) has more energy; so energy IS a parameter of time more than space, and indeed it appears constantly as such but OF CYCLICAL TIME, not lineal time-motion. Energy MEASURES the total sym of time cycles of a being and the wonder of it AS IT PROVES THE EQUALITY OF ALL SCALES OF REALITY is that it transcends to ‘fulfill’ the needs of a slower larger time-cycle being, making truly equal the existence of beings in all scales.

Next we must notice is that the common term, E, which is more clearly ‘entropy’, is equivalent to the other 3 dimotions in the vital state as a T.œ:

^{2}m, our time clocks emerge in slower motion.

^{2}, where Mass is a cyclical time vortex of gravitation, which attracts the faster it turns; E is the energy it stores and c

^{2}is a plane of expansive light-space, the entropy factor.

*much more important concept of time, in 5dimensional physics,*related to the meaning of the Universal Constants of ‘Energy and Time’, of the 3 fundamental planes of the 5th dimension and its physical systems, the ∆-1 quantum scale, the ∆-Thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 cosmological scale, which will truly explain the equations and meanings of physics.

^{2}x M, whereas c² is the constant of action of the Gravitational scale and M, Mass, the cyclical vortex of time, the clock of Gravitational systems.Of the 2 terms used to define Energy, one is always a constant, so we can group, h, k and c

^{2}into the concept of Constant, C.And the other terms, v-frequency, T-temperature, and M-ass, should be logically a term, which measures something similar.And indeed the 3 terms are related to a

**CONSTANTS OF SCALE**

The limits between Planes of Exist¡ence cannot be crossed, but have a ‘hyperbolic’ limit beyond reaching infinity and an ‘elliptic’ limit of zero, as the metric equation of 5 Ð, the equations of energy in physical system, try to cross its barriers.

Humans however have reduced the formalism of energy beyond some intelligent use in languages of verbal thought to mathematical physics and its definition in terms of the *single arrow of lineal time-motions. So as usual in humind sciences revolving around simple locomotions, energy is just translated as work – that is the displacement of a form along a lineal path of motion that ‘spends’ the energy of the being.*

Still energy and its related physical concept of action are measured with the fundamental parameters of physics, in two modes:

– Action as the product of energy and time, and action as the product of momentum and distance. Two important distinctions that offer insights on the meaning of energy, momentum, time and space (distance), studied in more detail in other posts.

We could in that sense make a serious statement on the relationship of those 4 elements:

*Space is a slice of a present cyclical flow of time, and momentum a present slice of a conserved cyclical flow of energy.*

* Hence from our knowledge of physics: E x T = P(Momentum) x S (distance). *

* So we write: E/P = T/S*

An essential equation that puts in relationship the 4 most important parameters of modern physics, in its ‘fractal form’ (pieces of energy and momentum) and its continuous mode (newtonian absolute time-space). And the obvious fact that the conservation laws derive (Noether’s theorem) of the conservation of time (conservation of energy closed cycles) and conservation of space (conservation of momentum).

Vital energy, the enclosed cyclical forms and motions within the space whose boundary conditions are given by the membrane, and lineal momentum, the motions with a ‘finality’ we perceive guided by a ‘relatively still mind-point-singularity’ that focuses the energy and information transferred through the angular momentum membrane.

So with this proper understanding of the abstract 3 conserved fundamental substances of reality, space, time and the vital energy with them, we then observe the infinite variety of those themes, which can be explained either as a game of 3 perpendicular ‘lineal’ dimensions (the usual approach of science due to its error of lineal time, hence the dimension of ‘perception and information’ or height dimension of maximal projective geometry, the dimension of ‘length’ and motion or entropy, the one physicists recognize as a time arrow, and the width dimension of iteration and reproduction.

In the graph, on the left some basic formulae of physics expressed in terms of space-quanta and time clocks of different scales of reality. In the right those 3 fundamental scales, the j+1 gravitational, the ∆-thermodynamic and the ∆-1 quantum scale.

This paradoxical duality is at the heart of all the processes of nature, becoming the new fundamental equation of all sciences:

$ (quanta of spatial size or entropy) x *ð* (frequency of cyclical time or information) = ∆±1 (Conserved Energy of the 5D Plane, sum of a series of constant of space-time actions for the fractal beings of each scale).

– Whereas **$, (|-S)** will be a parameter of Size or lineal space when perceived in stillness, or entropy (also denoted in mathematical physics by the symbol **$**) defined as an expansive, decelerating motion, when perceived dynamically – which increases the ‘space’ or res extensa of the system, decelerating to a halt.

In its complete description sometimes we should write |-S, for Lineal motion-form, Space Plane, Past, Entropy and Energy arrows, when *considering the 5 fundamental perspectives, or isomorphic laws encoded on the bidimensional space elements of the Universe: to be lineal, toroid in mental, geometrical form (|); to be ‘Space, res extensa’; to be a ‘bidimensional flat plane’, to be the Past, dead arrow, hence to be entropic disordered motions in terms of functions and motions through the 5 ^{th} dimension, and to be ‘kinetic energy’ in the Present ∆ø-plane.*

– **Tƒ or ð **will be a parameter of cyclical time, which increases its cyclical speed as it becomes smaller. Time cycles are ‘Ti-me’, ‘in-form-ation’ from the perspective of its fixed form and transference through the 5

^{th}dimension; ƒuture, old age, from the perspective of the worldcycle view – as the last age before entropic death, and o in its cyclical clock-like vortex form.

The Planck–Einstein relation connects the particular photon energy *E* with its associated wave frequency *f*:

- E=hf

This energy is extremely small in terms of ordinarily perceived everyday objects.

Since the frequency *f*, wavelength *λ*, and speed of light *c* are related by f=c/λ , the relation can also be expressed as

So we have a spatial view and a temporal view of the same concept, and as the spatial view hc is more informative and gives us a new constant is preferred. What this tells us is that the energy of the wave is closely related to its length in space, and so we must consider that the different *wavelengths of the light do have different ‘time clocks’ in terms of E even if for human beings, as they are observed as simultaneous space, we ‘freeze’ its time clock into an equalitarian standard.*

In other words a photon of frequency, high is telling us its inner clock of time is ‘faster’ and when it dies, it becomes equalized as ‘space’ with its time clock frozen, giving us many ‘cycles’ of time, which amounts to a larger E-ntropy.

So the reader must see sometimes, specially in non-corrected old graphs, any of those combinations – the most likely an E for Entropy/kinetic energy for Space and an I, for informative Time. And its combinations ExI, as symbol of present:

– ∑e x ∏ i, will therefore be present, or ExI, since the present is dynamic and outside fundamental physics and Geometry in biological and social sciences, people use the concept Energy and Information most often with a wider, loose meaning similar to the two fundamental elements of reality.

*ð *note that while those concepts are similar, as all we shall use here, to classic physics, the 5 Dimensional, cyclical structure of the fractal space-time that makes up all systems and entities of the Universe does introduce slight changes in all its concepts, so we shall remark them as we go along, explaining its physical systems.

Why entities enact those space-time cycles, what kind of cyclical space-time actions do exist?

In the graph, the 3 Universal constants of time cycle, are somehow ‘rotary momentums’ that act as envelopes that appear when the previous Universal constant scales=goes to zero… And so we must find a transition region between both scales, in which the being still has ‘frequency of a quantum wave’, ‘temperature of matter’ and even ‘mass’ of the cosmological scale.

But the being will be definitely belonging to one of those 3 scales. I.e. humans have a very small quantum wave associated to its particle, but h is so small from our scale that it really doesn’t matter. And we do have some mass, but it is irrelevant – it is the Earth’s mass what attracts us, and we move through electronic repulsion. We are indeed thermodynamic/electric molecular beings.

E= h-k-c are therefore the envelopes, which implies that mass IS always counted on terms of ‘black holes’…. and when we are NOT yet into a c-envelope mass is NOT yet there…

We are still swimming between two waters, mass and thermodynamics.

So when mass is formed, thermodynamics, the lower scale in size, moves to zero T must be zero, mass appears in the larger scale which is the temperature of black holes…

So when frequency of the ‘wave’ (particles do NOT HAVE FRQUENCY) TENDS TO ZERO, the red color comes with temperature appears in the larger scale because it IS WHEN thermodynamics appears, we can hardly see it…

It follows also that the frequency tends to zero when size appears, and temperature tends to zero when space expands (cooling the system)…

And so the inverse must be also certain,

when temperature tends to infinite we enter the small realm of quanta (smaller frequency), when frequency tends to infinite we enter into the small realm of the atomic nuclei (the strong force), and when mass tends to infinity (c-speed), we must enter the smaller realm of temperature…

BUT AS INFINITY DOES not exist, what we observe is the cut off of exponetnail asumptici, growth, the e-function of entropy and death and so before we reach infinity we explode and indeed it is through the explosion of entropy that we transform into the smaller realm. That is mass explodes into temperature radiation. and so on.

It is not ha but the frequency of the hƒ wave and hence the ‘energy’ associated to the quantum level what tends to zero…

And so it is also the ‘temperature’ of the thermodynamic ensemble which comes to zero… it is the coldness.

But what all this means is an acceleration of the time-clocks of each of those 3 scales:

ƒ, T, m are the frequencies of the envelope of the time-clock, and the time-clock IS in each scale in lineal or angular frequency, h, k and c either lineal or closed (as in c- around the black hole), so the envelop is the ‘scale’ of the 5th dimension we observe.

And energy the ‘constant metric of the fifth dimension’. We shall call then energy the 5th dimension metric we study ultimately, as it remains the same, simply that as the rod of measure h, k, c in space enlarges, obviously the time clocks must diminish in frequency, that is ƒ is in numeric values much larger than temperature, much larger than mass, which we indeed in our intuitive units give with different values, frequencies go to millions of Herz, temperature to thousands, mass to kilos… as it is worth to remember we are ‘working on human scalings and so our reference matters to define the 5D in absolute terms.

On the other direction however, when mass tends to infinite, when temperature tends to infinite, when frequency tends to infinite, we ENTER into the range of the next scaling.

But as 0 is a limit, infinity must have a limit, hence we must cut-off infinity in the point of entropy in which it becomes disorder. Temperature infinity thus comes when gas is disordered into molecular particles, frequency infinity thus comes to a close, when the wave collapses into a particle, and mass tends to infinite however when it collapses into the black hole:

In the graph, the two inverse directions on the limits of planes of existence – which mathematically are a limit that tends to zero in one extreme and a hyperbolic growth that tends to infinity, *never reach as in a Klein’s non-euclidean disk the two limits without self-destruction. As the system goes to infinity, it becomes finally exploded entropically in a ‘decelerated’ back to the past process, ¡+1<<¡-1. *

And viceversa, when it moves to zero it finally stops all motion and dies. Those two limits are generalized as the two forms of death by excess of energy (accidental death in humans) and information (3rd age of warping). And so we need to cut-off both extremes – singularities that tend to zero, and infinities, as physicists do with renormalization procedures in quantum fields BUT NOT with the singularities of big-bang theory.

**GALATOM’S 5D ****METRIC**

The galatom’s metric 5Ð equation:

$(c) x ð(h) = K… is then for all its scales the key to understand how the galatom acts as a super organism in which energy and information (K) can travel through its internal scales; *as it allows the transfer of energy and information (two sides of the same coin, as we consider energy, ‘motion with a little form’, and in-form-ation, ‘form with a little motion’, that is the approaching ‘Ðimotions’ that come from pure entropy (motion with no distinguishable form) and pure form (language/seed/mind with no motion))…*

So we can see the ‘metric equation’ as the ‘approaching’ greys coming from the two limits of absolute speed-distance (c) and absolute form-no motion (h); where those greys are ‘combinations of c and h (with some other elements), that become ‘frozen’, middle-term positions of the gradation of ‘energies’ with equal metric.

So we have a ‘starting’ metric for all the mathematical physics involved within the galatom and a direct translation to classic physics in the concept of energy (and its similar concept of information, ‘energy with more form’).

In that regard, the constant of the fifth dimension can be equated *to Energy and so next comes to distinguish the different values of $t (distance-lineal speed/inertia) and §ð (angular, cyclical time clocks).*

So we classify the possible ‘K(E)’; that is the scales in which the galatom interacts, as a physical organism, in the 3 ∆±¡ scales of the galatom.

And this gives us immediately in the Planck system of natural units, 2 super organisms, the charge:

Q²4̦πεo= h(ð) x $ (c)

And the mass:

GM²=h(ð) x $ (c)

With our ‘thermodynamic scale’ in between.

If we prioritize the scales in which perception is maximal, AS WE perceive masses directly, and observe its cosmological orbital vortices, a proper 5Ð physics teacher would translate the *entire jargon of electromagnetism to that of Newton’s vortices (being Einstein’s via Poison a more detailed analysis of them).*

Then to fully grasp what a charge or a mass is we realize that actually such vortices are *also composite elements (this being a philosophical embedded feature of all fractals that can be decomposed in ternary scales/ages/topologies).*

So instead of ‘E’ or ‘charge’ or ‘mass’, it is the product of the charge or mass, *as a center or non-E point and its G, Q constant* of curvature/tension/scale what gives a better, meaningful concept, GM and Ke as *scalar products of 5Ð; so we can relate then those parameters to the ‘static-space’ and ‘temporal-moving’ state of its 5Ð parameters:*

Q, G(Space-state: S=curvature, T=Attractive tension) x M², Q² (S=population density, T=motion frequency) = H(ð) x ($ (c).

Since the Thermodynamic metric is PV= NkT, whereas PV plays the role of GM/Ke and NkT the role of hc, which we do NOT measure directly in our scale. Thus the mass and charge have two components equivalent to a volume in space and an inward pressure motion or gradient in time (ST), which gives us a ‘vital space’ of energy for both species.

While in the other side of the ch metrics we find for thermodynamic systems, an obvious measure of ‘speed/kinetic energy’, temperature, on the ‘large scale’, playing the role of c and a unit of ‘information’ nK, which actually is the inverse parameter of entropy.

Since the human scale is one dominant for entropic, disordering information; hence unlike the spin units for the limiting ‘ordered’ charges and masses of the quantum and cosmological scale, our unit of information or informative time arrow is entropic (measured in gases). But if we were to consider the solid state, that entropy would be decreasing and so we would talk of the inverse procedure, of creation of information by reduction of temperature.

So those are the 3 scales of the galatom, whose equations will be studied in tehefourth line in more detail, as this is an easier verbal analysis of its organic structures.

Those are thus the limits of the galatom we shall study here.

In true form what those 2 components, hc, really mean is:

*The existential force=momentum of galactic systems: hc*

That is why they are all pervading, and when properly understood in connection with the operand of algebra, they will define an extreme number of elements and ‘Dimotions=forces’ that mediate the actions of physics.

For example, when we study the strong nuclear force as an entropic death of particles, in the simplest Yukawa formalism, we use the entropic e¯ª function that ‘extracts’ from them its ‘existential force’ hc.

So we found the two key parameters of the ‘galatom’, the superorganism in which we exist.

This concept $=c; ð=h, gives us a product $ð, which is the fundamental constant of any system of nature, its existential force or capacity to move lineally $ and spin its information, ð; and as usual in the entangled universe, we will have different forms of ‘measuring it’… conceptually and physically but we shall call generally the 5Ð metric of a system or in terms of its ‘value’, the *existential force or existential momentum of the system, its ‘power’ to survive. And so it is closely related to the vital Energy of the system, which other systems will absorb as in the case of the decay of pions in the strong force… as indeed happens in Einstein’s formulae: E=hc/λ*

Let us re-examine this formula, as it tells us a lot on the nature of physical light spacetime systems as we are, in the context of the fifth scalar dimension:

Paradoxically the minimal unit of the galatom, the ‘planckton’, defined by its existential force, hc, has more energy the smaller λ, its wavelength is.

The explanation though is immediate in 5D metric: as the larger wholes are ‘ghosts’ rising from the lower scales, obviously they must have a lesser quantity of energy, because they are ultimately parasites of its parts. So the inner Russian dolls of reality concentrate more ‘energy and information’ to supply the potential ghost-wholes that will enclose them.

So we talk of a ‘nested Universe’, in which the space and time, form and motion, relative h and c parameters that define the existential constants of the being grow for larger wholes (larger c-like speeds) made of smaller informative parts (denser h-like informative positions). And this implies that outside the galatom, there must be other scales, with larger than c speeds and lower than h-uncertainties-temperatures, informative ‘cooler’ orders – more focused angles of perception – similar jargons…

SO the compound constant of the 5th dimension for the galatom is simple and as such it will be all pervading when considering the meaning of the ‘real constants’ of the Universe:

5D Galatom Supœrganism’s metric: $(c) x ð (h) = Constant.

How then can we relate the ‘human’ constants of perception (length, mass and time) to the galatom’s ‘real objective, natural constants’?

Easy… As there was a genius of physics that figure them out:

*G, the constant of curvature that encases the quantum world and absorbs its ‘energy’ to make it emerge in the upper cosmological scale.*

*Thus the key constants of space and time can be extracted from those constants*

*considering them in terms of S=T; as all spatial forms can be seen as temporal motions, all ‘cyclical motions’ can be reduced to wave planes, and so for each specific ‘human parameter’, we need to do both a dimensional analysis but also study in terms of either motion or form or combined Dimotion the true meaning of those universal constants and its composites.*

*a different region of the Universe.*

**The human units of lineal time and lineal space.**

In planck units then the human units must be infered, from the original ones that now include also MASS and CHARGE or rather GM and KQ.

So for example the unit of length is not suitable in Planck Units but in Planck units with the added mass, as GM/c².

which becomes then a radial unit for the mass Universe, in which black holes are the fundamental element to consider:

This unit of measure, GM/c² then becomes also the essential unit (M) for black hole theory. And it is of interest to notice that at r=2, the c-speed becomes the rotational c-speed, and so that is truly the ‘circular length’ or ‘πLp’ unit of length in the curved universe (as 2r=d, hence πM is the diameter of the ‘black hole’ itself the veritable unit of mass, as the electron (a black hole in Carter’s paper that we subscribe) is the unit of charge in the lower scale, with h and ~~h, ~~playing the same role.

*time and space have the same units but time has a c², reproductive factor added. So we might say that a worldcycle of time, is the reproductive sum of a ‘step in space’ in enough numbers to complete the worldcycle.*

Area, or bidimensional length is then Gh/c³; because it appears as the ratio of two bidimensional constants of ‘form’, the curvature of the larger cosmological scale, and the angular momentum (which in relativity appears as a bivector or dyhnamic area, r x p) – the two relative limits of informative ‘form’ of the galatom divided by the ‘cube’ of the galatom length-speed, a volume.

What this Planck’s length or area mean seems then obvious, as we have defined h-‘planckton’ as the spin, rotary mind-information of the minimal particles of the Universe; *so we talk of the minimal bidimensional ‘perception’ of reality by a physical system known to man; this is thus the minimal unit of information, the absolute minimal pixel a particle in its spin-position of perception will absorb to create the virtual world we call the Universe. *

This becomes more obvious when we pass the constants to the other side in an equality of ‘correspondence’ based in the co-invariance of 5D metric, ST=K.

Then we obtain: G/c³ = Planck area/h

So the gravitational being that observes huge volumes of c-space for its pixels of information is equivalent to the quantum being that observes small planck areas with its spin of angular momentum.

What physicists make of it, obsessed by ‘the arrow of entropy and locomotion’, of ‘energy’ NOT of information is rather, oh well, i shouldn’t say it – comic? They are obsessed by this distance because they expect to find there ‘quantum gravity effects’ to unify all its forces-energies of motion, when gravity as a force simply does not exist, it is noticeable to those particles, busy busy constructing its informative world.

But in a surprising insight then marred by the ‘again’ wrong concept of entropy of black holes, it was also identified as the minimal area of information in the surface of a black hole, which acts as the ‘black star’ brain of the galacell, discussed in other posts.

So indeed, a black hole as a computer of Bcb atoms and top quarks should be the most perfect ‘informative machine’ of the Universe, controlling in its 5D reality across its internal scales of particles and logic paths, the outer galaxy as a **non-Euclidean point** ‘penetrated’ by gravitational ‘force units’ (neutrinos?=gravitons?) BENT into its inner mind; which has somehow been proved by Maldacena, when establishing that the information in 5D of a black hole is homologic of the 4D information of the electromagnetic galactic plane its body (as the homunculus in the brain is a representation of the whole organism it controls).

Thus we obtain area in terms of dynamic information, as opposed to area in terms of pure energy of motion, which would be its c² units (the flat radiation in which a 3D mass becomes flattened and expanded), since the square of a system is a bidimensional form, related to spatial components, (which in terms of pure motion, will be acceleration – concepts those further elaborated in the study of analysis as reflection of changes in space and time).

*All those concepts based always in the understanding of S=T, that is all spatial forms can be seen as temporal motions, all ‘cyclical motions’ can be reduced to wave planes, and so on.*

What then about time? As it happens, Planck’s time is Lp/c, so the equation for Time duration becomes simply, GM/c³, but this is understood to be the absolute minimal *time duration unit for the galatom Universe; and hence the minimal step-stop of all the possible 5 Dimotions of that galatom. *

What is then the minimal step-stop unit of reality in any system? Its quanta of ‘time-death’ of course; in the case of the galatom, its ‘big-bang moment’, when the black hole for reasons not to be considered at this stage explodes-dies in a quasar or blazard; which indeed is the time set for the hyperbolic (cosmic) big-bang in physical sciences: 10ˆ-43. Accordingly another way to write this unit is: h~~/~~mc² or in terms of Dimotion, the very definition of Entropy as a composed dimotion that destroys the information of a system: 1D/4D: ~~h~~( §ð) / E(S∂) in Existential algebra.

**C, H, K: 5D ****GALATOM’S**** CONSTANTS **

Two immediate consequences of this duality of stopping and moving, particle and wave states are evident. First we find an ¡logic cause to the constancy of light speed: particles in still state entangled when they emit bosons of information, regardless of the motion around them, in its fractal local space, so c-speed is always measured as c.

It is then obvious that even locomotion the less relevant dimotion is more than a simple measure of ‘speed’. ONLY obsessed physicists as high priests of time with his shallow ‘brief history’ of those ‘5 Dimotions reduced to the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion can really think tracing speeds and worldlines is the meaning of its existence. Because physicists make weapons of mass destruction unable to love even their own species and so do humans embedded in a civilization of machines of entropy and dog-eat-dog people, who cannot emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms… we have converted the less important arrows in the meaning of the Universe.

But in that constant S-T, stop and MOVE, game of information and motion, it il NOT with locomotions, overrated and exhaustively studied by humans but with its inverse Dimotion, that of the mind that perceives in stillness. So there is a duality between motion and stillness, which allow us to define the state of ‘mind perception’.

Which finally leads us to the last element we cannot avoid any longer to fully define the Universe in both objective and subjective terms, the 2 dimensions of the Mind, as a membrain, self-centered into a singularity whose linguistic mappings and ternary syntax reflects the world of ternary beings of space-time in which the being exists, performing its survival actions.

Specifically in the Light space-time ‘galatom superorganism’ in which humans co-exist, all systems have a speed of reproduction of information of c-speed above which all the other planes of light exist¡ence happen. So as the system becomes more complex its motion implies the reproduction of multiple layers of being, in adjacent ‘wave-like’ states of reproduction of information.

And so the fastest form is the one that must reproduce less information, life itself, all other particles, atoms and atomic configurations are slower.

Because C-speed is the speed of reproduction of information along all the ∆±¡ scales of a system, it follows that larger systems that try to be synchronous as supœrganisms must have constants of reproduction of speed, faster.

What other ‘constants’ matter to a system? Obviously a system must have 3 constants, for the 3 parts of the being.

So we define the 3 physiological constants of physics in terms of its 3 ‘galatom’s parts’ and scales:

**c as speed or c²**as space area to keep the bidimensional holographic principle of information, is the constant of maximal speed of reproduction of form in the ∆+¡ relative planes of galatom’s ‘fractals’ (all of us made of evolved light particles). In fact all systems of nature should be able to reproduce form as ‘light space-time systems’ at c-speed. However as this happens in different scales; the larger parts of the galaxy as they reproduce through the path of c-speed diminish its translation, in an inverse form to the in-form-ation they must reproduce: V (ST) = $(λ) x ƒ (ð). If in terms of scale, it must be considered the constant of the ∆+1 gravitational scales, in terms of topology it must considered the constant of the vital ‘plenum’ body-wave of energy of the galatom as a superorganism. As such is the main constant of our island-universes.**h or rather h/2π=**is the constant of ‘informative gauging’, the ‘particle-state’ constant, the informative particle-head constant of all systems of light that gauge information in reality, and as such is the second most important constant of Nature. It belongs to the ∆-¡ planes. h will then become all pervading in theory of information and the building of all kind of social structures with particles and atoms. H is measured as Energy x Time or Momentum x Distance, which gives us the ‘long time’ cyclical and ‘short time’ open paths of the ‘Galilean paradox’ (all lineal motions become closed paths with enough time, momentum becomes energy and distance in space motion in time).~~h,~~**K**is then the constant of ‘motion-entropy’, for all atomic systems in the intermediate thermodynamic plane of reality; and as such it corresponds to the ‘limbic/potential’, moving elements of atomic supœrganisms, made to the image and likeness of its larger supœrganism, the galatom, in its ∆º ‘human-size’ plane. K is measured in terms of entropy also.

And so we have 3 constants of Nature to define the galatom, each of them normally associated to a ‘parameter’ of frequency of its time cycles to give us the time-energy total for the system measured. This implies each of those 3 constants will associate to a ‘membrane’-frequency parameter specific for each local system:

- Mass, the enclosure for energy systems at the cosmological scale, which allows when an energy is enclosed within a domain to calculate its ‘weight’ or frequency of its angular enclosure as a mass vortex of accelerated time (Principle of equivalence mass-acceleration: E=hƒ+e=mc2, M=ƒ(h/c2).
- ƒrequency for the quantum-photon scale, or rather density of photons in a single point of space, in its color configuration, for the quantum h-scale: E=hv
- Temperature, for the entropic, human thermodynamic ¡0 plane, which also measures the ‘frequency’ of vibration of an enclosed ‘gas-like’ system’ as perceived thermodynamically in the UPPER scale above the quantum ensemble of particles and molecules it is enclosing with the concept of ‘heat-temperature’ of the upper scale.

It also follows that those ‘enclosures’ – frequency of a radiation measured in the upper plane, temperature of a molecular ensemble also measured in the upper plane, and gravitational mass of an ensemble measured in the cosmological scale, are ∆+1 membrane enclosures of ∆º relative ensembles and as such the parameters of frequency, temperature and mass belong to a larger plane than the vital energy particles they trap. The minimal quanta of each scale, h, c and k become in this manner ‘gatherered’ to extract from them from the perspective of the larger scale energy, entropy or information: h accumulate in a single parameter of ‘wholeness’ as a color perceived by our electronic eyes, which extract information from it; k becomes then multiplied by nT to give us the ‘whole heat’ sensation provided by the system from where we shall extract motion.

It is difficult to stress the importance of the 3 vital constants of the galatom, in all formulae of physics, which will study normally ‘fractal supœrganisms’ of matter within the galatom and its 5 Dimotions of exist¡ence. And the *ginormous number of conceptual insights we can get in all fields of physics by the proper understanding in organic terms of the vital constants of Nature, and physical systems, which will loose its ‘abstract’ outlook. *

How this work will require a thorough analysis of each of the main equations of physics, but it seems obvious that those dimotions involving entropic actions such as radiation, will see a ‘decay’ of exponential nature (the maximal speed of dissolution of any function of nature), involving ratios that transform one of those parameters into the other constants, such as in the equations of radiation (Planck’s law), where we observe the constant of decay, transforming kT into hƒ and vice versa, as temperature becomes radiation or radiation is upgraded into measure as heat (and appears as a huge temperature, which is not the proper way to measure it, since we should just refer in the quantum scale to frequencies, being temperature the untranslatable state for measuring molecular activity).

We could in that sense more properly consider that frequency is ‘grouped’ into ‘colors’ of temperature, and ‘transfers’ its activity to the higher scale, beyond the Curie limit.

By the same token in the other direction, we could consider that ‘heat’ is transferred to mass and so mass systems ‘cool down’ the previous scale as they acquire mass-energy (translation movement in the upper scale).

We must then ‘feel’ the transition between scales and gradient within scales as a constant trans-form-ation of a kind of space-time into the other, as temperature either becomes frequency after increasing beyond its 10.000 range of ‘stability of molecules’; and so at a point temperature as the membrain of the thermodynamic ensemble disappears.

And so once the ‘temperature’ network that absorbs the frequency to make it in thermodynamic equilibrium the motion-substance of its whole disappears, frequency explodes on its own (quantum effects multiply past the Curie barrier over thermo-magnetic ones). And the inverse can be said of the formation of a ‘gravitational membrain’ which will enclose a mass as it cools down and thermodynamic heat becomes motion of a cooled down mass, susceptible of interfere with the larger ‘scalar field’ of the galaxy, where the field of mass resides.

It is then not possible to ‘have mass’ unless the interaction happens by changing your ‘rod of motion’ (coming closer to c-speed and entering then in the cosmological scale of fields, where the particle will ‘feel’ mass through the magnetic interaction increasingly with new energy motion). So slow, inner particles of a molecular ensemble, dominated by thermodynamic forces and the more so, smaller, faster spin-related quantum particles without much of a c-speed lineal motion relative to its local region, able to conserve those thermodynamic and quantum membranes will not require it.

**REPRODUCTION**

Why entities repeat their space-time actions? Are they survival actions, vegetative, mechanical, conscious actions? And why systems synchronize their space-time actions creating complex ‘organic beings’ made of multiple, simultaneous space-time actions? All those kind of fundamental questions about time cycles disappear from the scientific discourse.

** **Thus the 3rd canonical element of 5D physics are the laws of the fractal 5th dimension of scales of size and different speeds of time of the Universe.

Now, we will try to develop in more detail according to the method of this web, and the Universe at large – to repeat with increasing degrees of complexity the simplex universal principles and elements, the Universe straight forward as IT IS, without all those limiting hang-ups of physics.

And before we introduce the 5^{th} dimension, we must give you a first glimpse to the mathematics that will make it ‘so evident’ as it is to experience .

Today in Physics, the most important of those dualities is no longer the Galilean paradox of the moving-still Earth but the Paradox of Complementarity of quantum physics, between the motion state or ‘wave state’ and the form state or ‘particle state’ such as:

– A particle constantly stops to gauge information, from its particle point of view and moves with its wave state. And both co-exist as a body and head co-exist in a biological organism.

This organic interpretation of the Principle of Complementarity of quantum physics will have enormous consequences to clarify the spooky effects of both Einstein’s Relativity theory and Quantum physics, which we will deal with in other more specific posts.

So we must always consider the duality of still space-distance and moving space, lineal motion vs. still time-information and cyclical time clocks in motion.

The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.

Physicists though had not properly defined all those concepts.

On one side Energy was an overstretched ‘bag’ where to fit all motions of the Universe in all its scales. What it truly means in that sense is ‘the sum of all the formal motions of a system through its entire worldcycle. So it will be a key concept also in the model of fractal and cyclical time, akin to the ‘quantity of formal motions of any scale of reality’. So it is in fact another way to express the fundamental dual law of science is: ‘

“All what exists is energy that converts Spatial Extension back and forth into temporal information: $t<=>ƒð: Energy=$pt x ƒð”.

And so in 5D metric, there are infinite ‘parallel Universes’, but not in parallel realities, but in this fractal reality: each planet was a different history, as each fractal nebulae of an electron, all its possible histories, and each 10 scales of the 5th dimension a similar Universe but with different ‘universal constants’… Infinity and Absolute Relativity reaches its true dimensions, blowing up the mind, as equations keep falling into place.

As in the same manner that hc and temperature emerges as ‘cold mass’ in the cosmological scale of the galatom, for the same token, mass in our scale should be transfered to the dark world of the halo of likely heavy ultradense quarks beyond the c-speed limit and the 0 K activity of temperature… It is the…

**Beyond the galaxy: the dark world.**

In the graph one of the clearest proofs of Human ego, which *makes scientist to belief first their mind-mirror-languages, models and theories above experimental truths and facts, even in the case of physicists that say to revere the experimental method is the denial of the ginormous number of facts that prove that ‘outside the open ball’ of the galatom, in the lower ¡-4 plane of particle-points (quantum scale) and waves (quantum potential) and the outer i+4 plane **of black holes (gravitational scale), systems go faster than light, for lack of a better model (obviously this is a fact consequence of 5D metric, as smaller time clocks run faster, so all vortices accelerate inwards). A few ‘sanguine’ cases:*

- The spin of particles creates a magnetic momentum that CANNOT be explained unless particles rotate faster than light. So they do rotate faster than light, which explains also why we only see certain spin positions in the constant stop and motion duality: when they move they do faster than light and we don’t see its motion. So we only see its stopping positions.
- Black holes are gravitational vortices with c-speed in the event horizon, so they must keep accelerating and finally through its axis expel energy and matter at faster than light speeds, proved by galactic jets that reach (graph right) up to 10 c speeds.
- The realist quantum potential of Bohm-Broglie interpretation of physics is non-local and non-locality, meaning (faster than light speeds) is essential to the proved entanglement processes.
- Non-locality is also clear in gravitational fields at astronomical level.
- The expansion of space between galaxies if considered a motion (time view of space distances) is a faster than light speed.

In this simple balanced Universe we just need to accept the experimentally and theoretically sound hyperluminal ‘stretching’ of space coming out of those Kerr black holes. Physicists are at pains with it, because of the concept of a single ‘space-time continuum’, that of ‘light space-time’, which therefore cannot go faster than light. But in the ‘dark world of entropy between galaxies’ without hardly any ‘light background’ there restriction doesn’t apply. Since Einstein’s postulate of c-speed is limited to our electromagnetic scale. So of a series of ‘5 Dimensional scales, ruled by the simple metric S x T = K, allowed faster than c-speeds outside the ‘scale of light’, needed both in cosmology to explain the dark entropy expansion of intergalactic space, and in quantum physics to make the realist, entangled Broglie model of a quantum potential lower hyperluminal scale possible.

*In more specific articles we shall deal with the mathematical aspects of quantum theory – basically a translation to ‘time o-1 unit spheres of probability’ best suited for fast, small time space entities, of the laws of the 1-∞ hyperbolic ‘present-space-body wave’ equations of thermodynamics, thoroughly equivalent in Measure theory, such as: *

$t(thermodynamic statistics) ≈ §ð (quantum probabilistic mechanics)

As we show in the post on force unification, then q and g becomes: curvature **(S**pace view) vortices **(ð**ime view) of two scales **(∆±i** view) on the two upper and lower limits of **@-**mind perception; solving the hierarchy problem and ultimately *completely opening our experimental understanding of quantum worlds, as we can see it in reverse from within as macro-galaxies. Protons then appear as top quark positive frozen stars, aka black holes; electrons as strangelet negative halos, and in between the far less dense photons become stars.*

IT IS ESSENTIAL TO UNDERSTAND THAT LANGUAGES ARE MIRRORS WHICH ALWAYS WILL REFLECT A PART OF THE WHOLE INFORMATION WITH A BIAS, AND DIFFERENT DETAIL AND THE MORE DETAILED the mirror of mathematical formalism, the more difficult to see the forest. Further on as the entangled Universe has multiple elements 5 Dimotions there are mirrors who focus more in one or another view.

What we call PRECISE physics IS such because humans NO LONGER CARE TO UNDERSTAND with the synoptic verbal, logic language what they talk about. So they just care to measure with maths and the praxis of using those measures to construct GPS, MACHINES etc. Then the ego-paradox makes them believe that is truly the whole matter -as Kepler with his God as a clocker.

Specifically the previous unification equation of the two similar – NOT equal scales of physics can be cast in 4 basic Dimotion perspectives (as usual the entropic death dimotion is a complete different anti-view that is not coded or reflected):

The fundamental sub discipline of mathematical physics, mechanics of motion, have gone a full cycle from its initial geometric vortices of motion (Newton) throughout the gradient work of Poison, and the energy-present analysis of actions, lagrangians and hamiltonians (its most algebraic description), back into geometry with the simultaneous motion-pictures of relativity.

We shall through the study of those ages and its relationships with the parallel advance of mathematics, come to the conclusion all are self-similar descriptions which stress some different element of the ∆ºst reality of mechanical motions (Einstein focused in spatial, simultaneous pictures, Newton in the vortex motion, Poisson in the ∆±1 potential fields and gradients between scales and Lagrangians into the present and energy world cycles as zero-sums).

The huge jump in quality and complexity of mathematics happened when we move from the first geometric understandings of physical motions into its scalar understanding. BUT as the last Tiƒ-elements (curved vortices of time, masses and charges) are refined in understanding from Leibniz, to Poisson to Einstein, we shall complete the cycle, returning topologically to a description of motion (Einstein’s relativity) which integrates the original Newtonian cyclical form of gravitation and the integral/derivative analysis through Non-Euclidean geometry and topology to give us a complete description of all elements of motion.

However pedantic scholars enamored with EFE and the precision of Einstein’s simultaneous, detailed analysis of those locomotions seem to forget that his true discovery is the principle of equivalence between gravitation, mass and acceleration that defines a mass as an informative Dimotion of time, an accelerated clock, as charges are in the quantum scale, and this is truly the principle we shall use to unify forces and charges. In mathematical details that can be done with the four formalisms of the graph, of increasing difficulty and from the point of view of gravitation, the simplest jargon of Newton, or electromagnetism – as Heaviside did with gravitomagnetic equations and EFE as the ADM formalism hints at.

So we can consider the simpler newtonian view, the MOST important as the wider, less detailed more comprehensive ðime view of the phenomena of physical time clocks, and for that reason we have used it here. The Einstein formalism IS a simultaneous measure of maximal ‘precision’ of detail, which INCLUDES TOGETHER BOTH SCALES of gravitation (∆-3 plane) and the energy-matter of electromagnetic worlds that ‘flows’ through it, in feeding paths along the gravitational faster, lower scale. So we are getting with more information more precision. Yet both descriptions, the shallower Newtonian description in a single plane with larger time-latitude and Einstein’s means the same. If we complete Wheeler’s famous conceptual dictum: ‘the scale of gravitational spacetime guides the Locomotion of waves of energy and electromagnetic particles, which in-form and curve the scales of gravitational space-time’.

In between those two points of view; which we might call the temporal, newtonian view and the spatial, mental, formal view of details of Einstein an write it in I-logic as ∆ð (Newton) ≈ (Poisson) ≈ §@ (Einstein); we had the intermediate Poisson’s gradient formulae.

So those would be the 3 relative views and then we have the one which *is really conceptually different which is the Lagrangian, Hamiltonian formula, which is to so much focused on the past to future motion to form field>particle view of the simplex dimotions of the system* but in a ‘present-energy’ complex social view and reproductive view of the whole ensemble of elements together, based in the conservation principles of ‘least time’ and efficiency of the system.

Contrary to belief the REAL new perspective was NOT Einstein’s more detailed analysis of Newton but Lagrange>Hamilton complex, social conservative least time principle.

So let us unify in the simplest way with the Newtonian formalism.

But the most comprehensive will be the energy-present analysis of combined spacetime *actions*, lagrangians and hamiltonians (its most algebraic description).

All in all we can resume those 5D metric that explain faster than c-speed in both extremes of our galactic world: when we get into particles and its internal ‘minimal radius’ of rotation – the spin – we cross to faster than light speeds. So happens in the other extreme of wave-states, when a wave ‘enlarges’: Rotating waves spin faster at greater radii and at some point go faster than the speed of light. That is the premise of the Rotating Wave. It resolves a lot of things that would otherwise look weird.

Beyond all that, there is probably more layers of underlying reality that go even much faster than zitterbewegung (zitter for short) which is a billion billion times a second. Why stop here?

All those processes though happen NOT within the galaxy as its space-time IS light (background radiation) and so, obviously nothing can go faster than light in a Universe in which the minimal unit of reproduction of information (a light wave) goes at c-speed, since ALL other forms of the galaxy are evolutions of this information. And so as more information must be reproduced it takes longer to reproduce it in adjacent space, which is the way motion as a reproduction of information takes place:

The fastest form is the one that must reproduce less information, life itself, all other particles, atoms and atomic configurations are slower.

In the graph, the larger superorganism of the galaxy is the universe, and as such its limit of c-speed reproduction must be only the limit of the Universe of forms evolved from the primary simplest $t state of light-waves, reproducing its frequency=color and 3 dimotions of electric height-information, wide magnetic energy and c-reproductive speed.

The Universe however is not perceivable but both at quantum potential level (Bohm’s realist interpretation) and beyond the galaxy in the phenomena perceived as acceleration of space between galaxies exxpands the capacity to reproduce information AS a larger superorganism will NEED a larger c-speed of reproduction for the system to be able to create instantaneous, simultaneous, organic networks within its-elf.

The conclusion is obvious: the galaxy atom is the ‘solid’ last scale above and below perceived from the ∆º humind, at i=±3, the scale of perception of forces as pure motion or pure form in the limits of our ‘being’.

**GALATOM: UNIFICATION OF SCALES**

All this said the first principle to include in the study of the Galatom is the organic principle of co-existence of scales, which MUST follow as a super organism the laws of synchronicity and simultaneity defined by the 5D metric, $t x §ð; which REQUIRES that the limiting ¡±1 scales ARE able to synchronize its behavior with each other. This implies we MUST be able to unify the TIME CLOCKS of both scales, which in the case of physical systems are its ‘3 vortices of accelerated time, charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies’. And so we DO require a Unification equation, at least on the ‘less detailed’ more ‘temporal, dynamic’ formalism (as scales are similar not equal), which in the case of gravitation is Newton’s vortices:

As we show in the post on force unification, then q and g becomes: curvature **(S**pace view) vortices **(ð**ime view) of two scales **(∆±i** view) on the two upper and lower limits of **@-**mind perception; solving the hierarchy problem and ultimately *completely opening our experimental understanding of quantum worlds, as we can see it in reverse from within as macro-galaxies. Protons then appear as top quark positive frozen stars, aka black holes; electrons as strangelet negative halos, and in between the far less dense photons become stars.*

And so we can establish *2 fundamental Disomorphisms to study the whole as a series of kaleidoscopic mirrors:*

-The atom-galaxy, for quantitative, mathematical physics modelling.

The concept of course has been around for long. EFE (Einstein’s field equations) applied to galaxies (Einstein-Walker formalism) is actually modeled to simplify calculus with galaxies as hydrogen atoms; Schrodinger’s equation was used by Wheeler to find a quantum formalism for the Universe; string duality considers universes and quantum strings the same; astronomers model stars around central black holes as photons, etc. But without *a deep philosophical model of the fractal Universe provided in this blog, all those mathematical Ðisomorphisms have been merely considered ‘techniques’ of calculus. *The reader thus should be aware the mathematical physics – albeit complex to the level of specialists, do exist and what we shall beyond the Unification equation in Newtonian terms, introduce here is the depth of philosophical analysis and the Disomorphic properties of atomic galaxies.

-The second Ðisomorphism is that of the galaxy-cell (treated in cosmology) which shows the organic properties of astrophysical galaxies. This is to my knowledge completely new stuff, but rather obvious: DNA-black holes with gravitational forces, and protein, lineal strangelets, encase the vital space-time of electromagnetic and gravitational flows of energy between both, which structure the waves of the galaxy. And both control the mitochondria stars that become on the long term the energy food to reproduce more black holes and strange stars (pulsars). 20 years ago this seemed madness, but today everything comes together to the surprise of astronomers to validate the organic model of galactic growth.

Below you see the scales of the big-bang, we escaped chemical lesser thermodynamic big-bangs, so you have the non-existence – background radiation as we explained in other articles can only realistically be produced by a single species in the cosmos a black hole the side of the moon, proved experimentally.

So again when we apply realism to physics and abandon the belief that all inflationary mathematics, are real, we are left always with a single candidate in economical nature to be the substance of beings: a soup of heavy quarks in black holes, a black hole moon macho for the background radiation (a black hole that eats a moon will have exactly the same temperature required to reproduce redshift background radiation at 2.7 k).

The universe is a perfect architectonical, deterministic eternal building of superorganisms tracing worldcycles of life and death…

Once this corrections are done and light space-time kept for those regions where we see light, we find above, a slower thermodynamic scale and below a faster intergalactic scale, which i would call simply ‘dark scale’ of faster than light rotary top quarks bc-atoms, and dark entropy expanding vacuum.

And then top quarks can merge perfectly and cb-atoms being formed…

Now physicists think this is not happening because the interaction of top quarks and cb atoms is so fast, their rotary motions are so incredibly fast, billions of interactions in a second, that they think they cannot act with the strong force whose coupling constant is slower, if they rotate at less than c-speed.

But if they rotate faster than c-speed, which is proved by the ‘billions of time per second frequency when they switch on-off from quarks into antiquarks at faster than c, and the accelerated vortex beyond the event horizon of efe equations, heavy quarks can become stable cb-atoms and top quark bosons.

So by symmetry with pulsars black holes will be dark stars with a center of top quarks and a cover of cbc atoms.

Why do i think they are like pulsars which have strange quarks in the center and light atoms in the surface – hence with top quarks in the center cb-atoms in the sufrace. Because the universe is perfectly symmetric, in scales, forms and it is economic, iterative and so pulsars and black holes are symmetric frozen stars as einstein wanted.

So the two symmetric decuplets of quarks must form the same particles, the 3 symmetric scales of matter, quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational, must have similar forms, and the 3 parts of the galaxy must host each of those 3 ‘subspecies’:

In the graph, galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.

In the graph the ‘gala cell’, an organism of stars, joined by a network of ‘nervous, gravitational information’, composed of the 3 relative families of mass, of increasing density, which act as the ‘dna-informative centre’ (top quark stars, aka black holes, as top quarks are the only ∆-1 ‘points’ with the same density that black holes ), the protein, hard membrane (strangelet halo of dark matter – witten hypothesis), and a visible electromagnetic network of ‘stars’, the energetic mitochondria that becomes the food that reproduces both strangelets and black holes. It is a simple organic scheme that explains the whys of physical particles, and the ternary structure of galaxies, similar to that of an organic system of the universe. Yet such models are not even explored by astrophysicists, as they are based in organic concepts, which physicists by ‘dogma’ cannot accept.

All this is what einstein asked for in everything he wrote about philosophy of science, the limits of mathematical equations, the hypothesis of frozen stars, the relational nature of space-time, and the use of c-speed limits only in phenomena related to light – you name it: ‘leibniz is right, there are infinite time clocks in the universe but it so we have to change physics principles’…

Which is what i do in those texts. But i don’t deny einstein as the singularity guys who deny his affirmation that black holes only will be real when they have a cut-off substance, and believe as creationist mathematicians do that if they ‘talk’ numbers alas reality appears.

Fact is the black hole is a frozen star, the dark world goes beyond c-speed between galaxies, since special relativity and c-speed is only the speed of the luminous space-time of galaxies, which is also the substance of the background light radiation. Beyond galaxies and within black hole obviously the light limit doesn’t work, because there is no light there to impose the limit.

The galaxy atom is the ‘solid’ last scale above and below perceived from the ∆º humind, at i=±3, the scale of perception of forces as pure motion or pure form in the limits of our ‘being’.

As such the equivalence of both scales unified by a fractal simple equation rises many philosophical questions. From a point of view of astrophysical description it introduces two different perspectives over the same phenomenon: as we can see galaxies from a much larger scale, that of the human looking at the galaxy atom, and as outsiders, observing how electromagnetic energy between atoms is equivalent to dark entropy between galaxies, or we can adopt the smallish point of view as particles of a galactic star, a mere dust of space-time on the mythocondria of the gala cell. It is precisely in the description of physical systems from wildly knew perspectives what enriches the analysis of the galaxy atom in gst physics.

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism:

We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein).

So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ-> mc²=hƒ-> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

But all those vortices have a central point of pure form, of stillness, where t=0, and so they must be also considered the minds of physical systems as in crystals, which are clear images of the whole territory of the physical system:

The reproduction in minds of mappings of the larger fractal Universe is the origin of its scales, and implies that any part regardless of size will have a relative singularity-point around which a hyperbolic body-wave will iterate its cyclical motions under the same ‘Ðisomorphic laws’ of reality – and all of them will give us the essential laws or first principles regardless of size, with maximal detail of knowledge in the systems closer to us (biological systems) and maximal generalization in the most remote systems of minimal perception of form (Cosmological systems).

Einstein’s relativity *implies* the existence of infinite time clocks, and Planck’s quantum discoveries the existence of broken, fractal pieces of energy, form with motion as the substance of reality.

It is then obvious that the fundamental supœrganism of physic is the Galatom, a super organism that extends through the ∆±3 planes of human perception, the atomic quantum plane, the thermodynamic and the cosmological gravitational one. It must then be truth on the laws of 5D metric that we must find *a metric for the 3 planes in which the atomic and galactic plane can be reduced to each other accelerating its time cycles and reducing its spatial lengths, such as ð x $ = K, which is the a priori condition of 5D metric for a super organism to exist, as entities within it can travel through the co-existing planes (Klein’s definition of a dimension of space-time which remains co-invariant).*

This is the definition of the so long seemed for:

**UNIFICATION OF CHARGES AND MASSES ON 5D METRIC.**

**Unification’s simpler mathematical formalism.**

Much of the early work on five dimensional space was in an attempt to develop a theory that unifies the four fundamental forces in nature: strong and weak nuclear forces, gravity and electromagnetism. German mathematician Theodor Kaluza and Swedish physicist Oskar Klein independently developed the Kaluza–Klein theory in 1921, which used the fifth dimension to unify gravity with electromagnetic force. Although their approaches were later found to be at least partially inaccurate, the concept provided a basis for further research over the past century. Since they were *right – the fifth dimension will unify both forces but in a fractal manner, unbeknownst to physicists.*

We shall only so how the power of 5D³ by finding the unification equation of charges and masses (general relativity) and upgrading worldlines to worldcycles (special relativity), as we have already dealt with the constancy of light speed (entanglement of electrons which emit information in relative stillness to each other).

Future, time arrows in physics are cyclical vortices of gravitation or charge or thermodynamic eddies, with a singularity of zero-motion in its center, which we do observe in thermodynamic vortices as we cannot ‘see’ inside a quark or top quark star (black hole). It is the arrow of future, as it is an attractive arrow that forms lineal entropic fields into form and will be the ‘final destiny’ of the quanta of an entropic field. We shall study for the three main scales of the supœrganism of the galaxy, which is the main physical system in which humans exist as its thermodynamic level.

Whereas the Universal Constants (G, Q), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales. Its formalism, *M= **ω*^{2}*r ^{3}/U.C.(G,Q) *is its Unification Equation.

Since if we substitute *for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1 ^{st} ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain Q with a 10^{40} higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that *solves its hierarchy problem.

*As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex.* It also proves the isomorphism between electromagnetic atoms and galaxies, H-atoms of the cosmic scale. *Since when* we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and electronic orbitals star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos. Organicism gives the ‘why’ of Galacells that have DNA- + Top Quark proton holes, star mitochondria that feed them & strangelet halos.

This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply *to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:*

Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)^{2} × radius^{3}/ mass

If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe *both*, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but *also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.*

And so we have an essential equivalence between K and G for the two ‘enclosure’ ∆±1 scales of human existence, the quantum faster, stronger attractive curvature=speed of the electromagnetic vortex and the slower G-VORTEX, which allow us to unify as we did previously both fields. And *translate the somewhat dull language of electromagnetism to that simpler of gravitation, showing some fascinating results, such as the **proton showing the schwartzschild radius, Rg = 2GM/c² equation of a black hole in the larger scale when put on gravitational jargon.*

Let us go into the task, of putting some numbers to the conceptual model, completing Einstein’s work with its long seeked…

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{-7 }rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{-11} kg-1 m^{3} rad. sec.^{-2}

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10^{16 }rad. sec.^{ -1 }= w (electron);

5.3 × 10^{-11 }m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10 ^{-27} kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39 }stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: *G(k)M/c ^{2}*.

But since in that expression *M* is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the *Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.*

*Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world*.

To notice those results, the *first theoretical deduction* of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three *standard forms of proof in science.*

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:

For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time.

He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.

So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.

What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow. Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate.

**The 2 fundamental scalar vortices of time: Charges and Masses.**

Let us then deduce from the previous metric, the main equations of the different world-plane constants, starting for the best known, remembering that T=1/Tƒ:

F= GmM/L² = ma

a = GM/L² GM = L³ x Tƒ² where G is the constant and M the ∆-scalar magnitude, Tƒ², the dimension of cyclical time (angular acceleration) and L³ the dimension of volume.

The same equation, substituting G for Q and M for charge, as we show in the Unification Equation of charges and masses gives us the value of a charge as an ∆-scalar magnitude, when we use the Bohr model to calculate the attractive charge of the first spherical S-orbital of an electron (obviously the complexity of non-circular electronic orbitals defy this simple calculus).

Thus both M and E are the scalar magnitudes of the two upper and lower limiting world-planes of human existence, as accelerated vortices, the ‘active magnitudes’ of those 2 fields.

How does a vortex of charge and mass becomes constructed geometrically? We must understand that all systems tend to curve a |-Motion into a cyclical, finally accelerating inwards vortex: |>Ø>o. Those 3 phases of a motion will give birth to a ‘ternary structure’, the commonest of the Universe and its simplest ones are those of nature:

In the graph we can see the 3 relative topologies: as a |-Motion curves into a field, it moves inward accelerating, till it reaches the zero point, in which it will often will split its ‘formal’ and ‘energetic content:

On one side it will slow down and be perceived as a stop- mapping, in the central zero point, on the other side it will be deflected and change its dimensional direction upward as a hyperbolic tube that becomes finally a lineal flow. In physical fields, the simplest systems, it means we will find a field, which will accelerate inwards (gravitational, charge field) and then it will create a ‘less energetic’ upwards-downwards ‘gravito-magnetic’ field, completing the 3 ‘topological membranes’ of a whole system.

This field will basically have the 3 components and write with the generic equation of all fields:

F= A x E, where F is the force, A the active magnitude (Charge, mass) and E the vectorial structure of the field.

* A proof of the ∞ ∆-scalar nature of space-time, composed of isomorphic lineal forces of ‘spatial energy’ and cyclic, clock-time vortices of ‘informative time’, charges in the ∆-1 quantum scale, and masses in the ∆+1 cosmic scale are the recently found ”excited S-orbitals’ of the Milky Way: 2 bubbles of electromagnetic energy with the same form that ∆-1 atomic orbitals have in its excited states. The Metric of its isomorphism is the Unification Equation of Charges & Masses and its U. Constants (Q.G.).*

As such the equivalence of both scales unified by a fractal simple equation rises many philosophical questions. From a point of view of astrophysical description it introduces two different perspectives over the same phenomenon: as we can see galaxies from a much larger scale, that of the human looking at the galaxy atom, and as outsiders, observing how electromagnetic energy between atoms is equivalent to dark entropy between galaxies, or we can adopt the smallish point of view as particles of a galactic star, a mere dust of space-time on the mythocondria of the gala cell. It is precisely in the description of physical systems from wildly knew perspectives what enriches the analysis of the galaxy atom in ∆§ð physics.

But in the scalar REALITY, gravitation makes points LARGER when we observe them in the scale of the fifth dimension where they do interact above us, and will EASILY evaporate our ’empty bubble’ of light-light beings.

**THE LAGRANGIAN FORMALISM.**

All this said the most comprehensive will be the energy-present analysis of combined spacetime *actions*, lagrangians and hamiltonians (its most algebraic description) and the most innovative *as it is based not in the 1st and second Ðimotion of informative perception (singularity p.o.v.) and accelerated locomotion (¡-1 points falling into the singularity) but IN THE VITAL ENERGY OF THE WHOLE internal region of the physical T.œ. And within that region, the law origin of all the formalism is the Least Time law found first by my fellow Basque countryman Mr. Fermat. *

The principle deserves an entire post on its own, so we shall not comment it here. But as usual it must be observed from the pentalogic of all the elements that determine that any ‘form moving’ within an enclosed physical domain, will follow predetermined paths, that can only be predetermined from its lower ¡-1 scale in which the system feeds. In other words, all systems follow when moving under the ‘modular will’ of its limbs/potentials the gradient that maximizes its conservation of energy.

We, or future researchers, shall through the study of more advanced mathematics, come to the conclusion all are self-similar descriptions which stress some different element of the ∆st reality of mechanical motions (Newton focused in the vortex time motion, Poisson in the ∆±1 potential fields and gradients between both scales, Einstein fully completed both views with absolute detail CLOSING THIS VIEW with derivative spatial, simultaneous pictures, and Lagrangians added into the mix, present and energy world cycles as zero-sums).

As we shall see when studying ‘GENDER’ symmetries, this is essentially the same duality between male past>futureparticle<field states and female, present energy wave states. The conceptual richness of ∆St though cannot be brought so early into this page. Since as we said humans are fast loosing their verbal, conceptual intelligence in the digital, audiovisual mathematical computer-mediated age. So all what they expect is a couple of ‘conceptual sentences’ and then the ‘researcher to get into maths’ and that is what they call ‘doing science’.

The huge jump in quality and complexity of mathematics IN MECHANICS happens when we move from the first geometric understandings of physical motions into an undetailed larger, single scale view in Newton, to its scalar understanding.

BUT THIS being a fundamental law of complexity, as we want to get more detail, the quantity of information and complexity of calculations for the mind mirror increases much further so it really is not worthy – minds have been made to hold a reduced but clear conceptual view. If we are today so worked up with Einstein’s gravitational view is because we have huge computers ‘surrogating’ as our minds with huge calculation details and then the human ego pumps up its sense of knowing this artificial construct even if as it happens it really understands so little of the whys behind we provide.

I am sorry, I do all my calculations by hand and use my computer as a typewriter precisely because MY GOAL IN SCIENCE WAS TO UNDERSTAND INTERNALLY WITH MY MIND LANGUAGES WHICH ARE LOGIC VERBAL THOUGHT AND VISUAL TOPOLOGY MORE THAN digital numerical computing, reality to ‘FEEL’ a full human mind. This today is ignored, even despised but as I see it, all those Nobel Prizes of supercomputer power are ‘attachments’ to the procedures of their computers, which in the future I imagine will truly put together both, mechanical calculus and ‘logic thought’ and would be really the next generation of intelligence.

In concept all this means that as the whole Tiƒ-elements (curved vortices of time, masses and charges) are refined in calculus from Leibniz, to Poisson to Einstein, man completed the topologic description of motion (Einstein’s relativity) WHICH ads to the original Newtonian cyclical form of gravitation and the integral/derivative gradient of poisson the Non-Euclidean geometry of. the fractal points of those vortices to give us a complete description of all elements of motion.

Of more interest though is the immediate correspondence between the gravitational Einstein’s description which is only attractive and includes as a parameter the energy and relativistic motion of those masses, with the STRONG FORCE INSIDE THE ATOM-GALAXY, which is also very cumbersome to calculate as it includes the gluon-energy-force to the quarks. Another proof that inner gravitation in galaxy atoms and inner strong forces in atoms-galaxies must BE SELF-SIMILAR and so atoms are galaxies, and therefore *the external force of dark entropy between galaxies IS NOT the same FORCE than inner gravitation, as the strong force of the atom is 10 times stronger and different to the **electromagnetic weaker more entropic force outside the atom. This IS THE REAL conceptual break through, which explains why outside atoms-galaxies there are faster entropic >c motions. *

You see the real importance of ∆St is NOT in the new mathematics but in the new ‘conceptual whys’ that will enormously reduce the myriad of kaleidoscopic and fantaphysical images maths with NO LOGIC operate today in physics, making physicists the classic savant idiots, the ‘stupids’ of Schopenhauer, as they do NOT understand the whys. So they don’t know what is real and what is not and with no direct experience just expanded the strong-gravitational force within the galaxy atom to the outer world of electromagnetic like repulsive forces between galaxies.

So we can now with a CLEAR CONCEPTUAL picture that corresponds properly with the different mathematical formalisms, albeit restricted to where they correspond, a proper view of the ‘galacell’ in present organic functions or galaxy-atom in mathematical formalisms and scales as a superorganism which as usual in this blog WHERE WE REPEAT AD NAUSEAM, CONSIDER NOT necessary to do the mathematical formalism of experts BUT FULLY ACKNOWLEDGE THEM in awe of the enormous work done by mathematical physicists etc – shall show in a picture. We use Pictures of ‘wholes’ to show the synthetic view of the parts of the being and its dimotions. And we use conceptual I-logic thought to describe its functions. a single researcher with no help the expert reader should be satisfied with what we add to his billions of $ in University grants and supercomputers and years of hardworking with math-equations.

But if he is humble enough to understand the enormous conceptual breakthroughs we are adding to all stiences, we will be grateful to have this new ‘whole forest’ view, NOT done for a change by a Computer powerpoint modeling but by a human VERBAL brain.

But those ARE secondary themes to the GREAT whys of 5D and cyclical time, which solves philosophically the issue. Further on as scales of 5D are self-similar as all fractal scales are but NOT equal, an absolutely exact unification is impossible, so the precision of Einstein wouldn’t work. Hence it is easier specially for this philosophical post to show indeed that both, charges and masses are accelerated dimotions of timespace – and there is NOT a solid particle in the center of a mass or charge (first graph) but rather a dimotion, which in the center ‘splits’ INTO A still point (t=o), of likely informative perception, on the eye of the Eddie, or black hole and a ‘lineal dimotion’ of maximal speed, dark entropy at v>c in black holes, column of air in eddies, magnetic field through the axis of the charge, in a canonical equation of ‘death’ and split of the still, informative and entropic, moving components of the beings absorbed by the Eddie – light spacetime in gravitational wholes, water or air in eddies; as the graphs shows for different entities:

*IT IS THEN obvious we must correct 2 errors to understand the immortal Universe: entropy & big-bang .*

**S@≈∆ð view of atoms and galaxies and its Q, G forces.**

The formalism of 5D-fractal Universes ads to experimental facts, (E) and the Correspondence principle with classic science (C), the Disomorphic, organic method of extracting the whys of reality from the scalar properties of the 5th dimension (∆) and the symmetries between formal space, space-time energy and time motion (S≈T), cupped by the critical analysis of the @-mental distortions of inflationary languages as mirrors of the Universe. So we have a much deeper insight on the ‘whys’ of both, experimental facts and classic science modelling. It is then obvious that most corrections on classic science to match ‘experimental fact’ today often ignored to uphold the classic theories come from the understanding of the fractal structure of space and cyclical nature of time.

Let us consider the case of astrophysics: cyclical time defines the vortices of space-time of the 3 scales, or singularity-masses (gravitational scales), thermodynamic vortices (eddies) and charges (quantum vortices), which can be unified as attractive vortices (time view) or space curvatures of the 3 scales:

In true form the Universe has 3 informative, organic properties which our simplified single time-space continuum misses: because it is made of scales it is organic, as those scales transfer energy and information between them, creating networks and organic structures; because it is made of similar beings, is mathematical as a number is just a society of undistinguishable clones, because it is made of space, it is ternary and topological, as space is a geometry of 3 topologies, planes, spheres and hyperboles, and finally because it is made of motions=changes=times, NOT of space=form, a Maya of the senses, it is temporal, in constant flow of motion, but also sentient, as our still perception of it, is a ‘mental, still, linguistic, formal image’ which happens also in other singularity (crystal images in physics, still seeds of information in life).

All those properties that are inherent to reality – organic scalar structures, topological, ternary geometries, temporal motions through 3 ages of existence and sentient linguistic still singularities make a complex fascinating reality we shall describe in this blog with multiple different languages, as each monad/singularity maps the Universe in its mirror image with a different biased perspective.

**T.O.E. The unification equation of the charge and mass scales of the 5 ^{th} dimension.**

Now once you learn to speak the most beautiful of all those jargons, the common language of all fractal space-time beings, Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian ‘i-logic’ mathematics, (the needed 2300 years overdue upgraded of the sciences of temporal logic and spatial geometry) you will upgrade also your chip, tuning your mind, your ‘spatial I=eye and temporal Wor(l)d’, to that of other species of the Universe.

Then you will as I have done for decades, walk through the world seeing the organic life in every physical, biological and social system of the Universe.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

The DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts the vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane. The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls. So happens with a planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it. And the galaxy has in its center a black hole.

And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets, when the Physicist, duly programmed to extinguish the species according to the Fermi paradox, busy-busy recreates the big bang on Earth (yes I know to be more popular, I should not remember you of this, so you can wonder on the halls of knowledge unaware of the entropic motions of the Universe, but as Mr. Descartes, the very unpopular frozen philosopher would put it ‘c’est la vie’, what is at stakes here, not only the stifled knowledge of the mind, granted if you keep on reading).

Thus ‘Lineal Space, Es’, energy means an expansive motion that ‘extends space’, a planar lineal motion that we see as static space, as dimensions of length and width, or as an explosive decelerating motion.

Now that we know the fundamental difference between ‘open space’ and cyclical time, we can move onto the second fundamental principle of ‘physical sciences’, the Principle of relativity. Again, here a mathematician Poincare defined it at the same time that Einstein, and on my view more clearly, when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. And this is enormously important.

Since if we cannot know when a thing is moving or is merely a ‘form’, we must always consider this duality. If we see a particle, it is a ‘vortex of motion’ besides having a cyclical time-like form. If we see a dimension of length, it is space moving besides being a still distance. On this difference almost ‘every mathematical tool’ of calculus (differentials and integrals), every system of Nature (which we see simultaneously as a still organism, and moving through its worldcycle of life and death), the duality of quantum, discontinuous reality and moving, continuous one, etc. etc., almost all phenomena of all sciences is based. I call it the “Galilean Paradox’, to differentiate its much wider meaning from those sponsored by physicists, as again we shall apply it to all sciences. So we write it again:

*Relativity Principle (Galilean Paradox): S=T: “All what exists is a motion with form”.*

Soon we will realize that indeed, all what exists is motion with form, nothing is truly still. And so cyclical time seen as form is ‘information’ and as motion is a ‘vortex-like clock’, and open space seen as form is ‘distance’ and seen as motion is ‘lineal speed’.

There is a convention though to call time ‘motion’ and ‘space’ stillness. This is Ok in the ‘limit’. As time accelerates (as all cyclical motions, which require 2 points, a torque and have angular acceleration) and in fact as paradoxical as it seems a cyclical motion by the law of the vortex is faster than a lineal motion, which as in a big-bang explosion, decelerates. (We shall deed with the error of considering the expansion of the distance-space of the Universe as an acceleration in our post on astrophysics).

So in the limit by the law of the vortex, Vo x Ro = k, time cycles accelerate inwards as vortex do, and in the process they attract ‘space’. So black holes, masses and charges do exactly so. And so in the limit we can say that ‘time is motion’ (the classic definition of it) and space is distance, dimension.

And this fact of T.Œ will allow us easily to unify the equations of charges and masses, what physicists call T.O.E, or Theory Of Everything, a minor result of T.Œ, the Theory of the Organic Everything, which I write with Œ to distinguish both.

**Consequences of the fractal unification of charges and masses**

We obtained theoretically, for the first time, the value of Q from G; always obtained through the experimental method, the three legs of the scientific method are met in the fractal unification equation:

**Logic consistence. The Universe is a fractal of multiple space-times, self-similar in structure.**

Mathematical accuracy. The same vortex of space-time allows calculating theoretically the values of those vortices.

Experimental proof. The experimental calculation of Q coincides with the theoretical value, which has a probability to happen of less than 1 in a trillion, if this coincidence were by chance and not because the Universe is indeed a fractal of self-similar scales and charges are gravitational, quantum vortices.

Because no other approach has yielded a consistent, experimental logic and mathematical unification, it is obvious that a charge is a self-similar (but not equal) membrane of space-time.

Further on, a third type of force or vortex of space/time, which is even smaller in space and faster in time, the bidimensional strong force, defines quarks. And its cosmological equivalent, bidimensional black holes, seem to be similar in properties and morphology. Thus, we can also relate with the same principle of equivalence the strong force and gravitational force. We already showed the Bohr radius to be a Schwarzschild radius, and since astronomers study the stars around galactic black holes as electronic nebulae and have found that the central black hole is actually a swarm of them, as a quark is actually a fractal of gluons, the self-similarities keep growing.

In our analysis of the errors of truth of science, we considered the hyperbolic error the most common among human beings. Now we can apply it to the real structure of the Universe and its different membranes of space-time. We exist only in one of those membranes, the membrane of light space-time, which is Euclidean in form, whose space dimensions are given by the three lineal perpendicular fields of light.

And yet physicists think Einstein’s special relativity, which studies our local, fractal membrane of space-time (the membrane of Euclidean light-space and its entire evolved electroweak species that inhabit that space), found a tautology. Since we exist in that “light medium,” the speed of light c is the limit of speed of our world. Yet he thought c was the limit of speed of all the systems and sizes of the Universe.

Indeed, imagine that you exist in a war medium. If you flow with the water, you will not be able to go faster than the water. Because we float, so to speak, in light, the space-time of the galaxy, we can’t go further than light.

But we have observed beyond the galactic light space, intergalactic, dark, gravitational space with z=10 c speeds. This is in fractal space/time theory, with its decametric, multiple membranes of space-time, the limit of speed of the bigger cosmological world of dark/gravitational energy and quark/black holes. But scientists have invented an enormous number of ad hoc solutions to deny that in the bigger world of galaxies that float in that dark world, speed is faster.

Enough to say that the symmetry is based on what we call the paradox of Galileo, the fact that all what we observe can be seen as a fixed form or a moving one, like the Saturn’s rings mentioned before. When we see a mass as a motion, it is a vortex; when we see it as a fixed form, it is a particle. When we see a force as a motion, it is energy; when we see it fixed, it is space.

The classic example is given in cosmology: are the galaxies that are moving at z=10 c moving at ten times the speed of light, or is space creating distance, expanding? In the appendix, we shall deal with that theme when we study in depth the meaning of the big bang.

In this appendix, dedicated to the physical Universe, we have now to consider the fundamental symmetry of the Universe between lineal forces of space and cyclical, informative particles of time.

So *we consider proved the organic nature of the galaxy as its quantum and cosmic scales can be unified in 5D metric, showing it is possible for energy and information to travel across the scales of the superorganism of the galatom, hence creating a superorganism as all other ternary systems unified by a single time-space coinvariant 5D clock.*

**General relativity a fast over view. The symmetry of relativity in time, the 3 ages of EFE.**

The 3 ages of time in cosmology applies to EFE’s (Einstein’s field equations) 3 main solutions 3 hypothetical different Universes, they represent the structure of any space-time, including our galaxy, an island Universe through its 3 ages.

It is also possible to make a complex mathematical treatment of the 3 ages of galactic systems: the 1st age of the system will be the Entropy age, the 3rd age the information age, and the middle age is one of balance, ES=TO, when the reproduction of most particles took place. We are in that period.

– Max. Es (Youth): The Entropy age is Lemaitre’s big bang solution that expands space. This solution in the fractal model of space-time applies only to the vacuum space between galaxies.

-Es=It: The steady state Universe is Einstein’s solution. It applies to the entire Universe.

– Max. It: Kerr’s solution of a rotary black hole, which is the third age of an implosive Universe that reverses time coordinates as matter falls back into the central Worm Hole of any space-time.

However because time space fractal and dual, while those solutions in a wider outlook will be applied successively to each age of the Universe, they are also applied in space to the fractal parts of the whole. Thus the big-bang solution applies to the intergalactic space, which astrophysicists study and erroneously apply to the entire Universe (given their dogma of a single continuous space-time).

The informative solution applies to our galaxy. But it does not mean a travel backward in time but an informative vortex, a cyclical clock of time – the galaxy in which we exist with an arrow of information different from the expansive arrow of the intergalactic space of dark Entropy and tired light.

And so we get adding all the expansive motions of intergalactic space and the implosive vortices of galactic mass, a relative balance that is the present steady state applied to the whole; since in each phase of reality all yangs have some yin and all yings seed of yang.

__Its Universal ratios/constants of Entropy and form.__

In the space-time of the Universe, in the same manner that any other three ages can be related by the different ratios of Entropy and information or vital constants of a being, those three ages are defined mathematically by the constant of action that relates the Entropy and information of the Universal space-time, Lambda & G.

Indeed, the constants of any system are ratios of transformation of the Entropy and form of any system, I/E=K or proportions of Entropy and form, Exi=K. Thus constants evolve and change as the Entropy and information of a system changes with time. In biology, is known that vital constants, change as an organism gets old and becomes wrinkled and warped, increasing its information and diminishing its capacity to process Entropy, changing its metabolic constants and speed of information/thought.

Dirac, Brans-Dicke, and others understood this in cosmology. Indeed, G is a ratio of the mass=information and Entropy= distance of a system. And we already saw how a change on those ratios allowed us to unify and measure the Entropy and form of the 3 membranes of the Universe (strong, gravitational and light forces).

In the equations of Einstein that define the three ages of a galactic space-time and perhaps an entire Universe, that relationship is given by the cosmological constant that measures the Entropy of the gravitational vacuum, l, which Nottale used to measure the minimal fractal quanta of gravitational Entropy. The constant changes with the 3 ages of any fractal space-time or island Universe. In a young, expanding space, l is positive, but so close to zero that it easily becomes negative, causing a warping or big crunch. And so l will also change through the 3 ages or solutions of Einstein’s equation, till reaching the informative age of the galaxy in which we exist.

Recap. The 3 ages of the Universe correspond to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s equations: The young big-bang; the reproductive, steady state or big-banging and the cyclical, informative age, occurring in galaxies, or Gödel’s solution. They apply in space to the expanding space, imploding, galactic vortex and both together create the present balanced steady state.

**The symmetry between motions in time and space.**

Space-still vs. time-motion duality is the causal alpha of it all (but not the omega, W, meaning, which we will find to be organic, biologic, embedded in the world cycle, represented by W). So we must go deeper into it, and follow now its ‘other fundamental expression’ – the ternary principle of ‘creation’, ‘diversification’ and ‘formation’ of entities departing from its time motions or still spatial states.

We deduce its original components from the interplay of the 3 motions of time:

**>** The arrow of information that increases from upper to lower scales, faster in its time cycles: Tƒ (Uo)<Tƒ(U-1). This arrow appears most often in physics as an accelerated vortex (Vo x Ro = K being the simplest 2-dimensional form) or clock of time with increasing frequency, till it ‘collapses’ into a particle-point or reverse its time arrow into:

**<** The arrow of entropy and decelerating expanding size that increases from lower to upper scales of larger size: Sp(Uo)>Sp (U-1).

**≈** And their relative present combinations, in which the system combines, Sp and Tƒ, fields and particles, limbs and heads of energy and information into reproductive bodies and waves which repeat in an eternal present the entities of existence.

In this case the entropy/energy arrow will show limbic/long fields of planar toroid energy, the arrow of accelerated cyclical motion the form of particles and heads that gauge information and the arrow of relative present iteration the body/wave form. And so in practice we tend to talk of ‘momentums’ of existence, that is Active Magnitudes that we shall call Œ, Functions in ‘existence’, which move through several planes of space-time.

This interconnection or duality between the stop and go dual motions/forms of entities in existence is a necessary complexity of the dialectic nature of the Universe, not only between relative Œ-points that communicate flows of attractive, imploding information and expanding, repelling energy, but within the entity which often displays both states, with different geometric position.

The previous symmetry defines all beings, as vital spaces whose ternary organs, perform the 3 functions=motions of time. Since all systems are made of the same 3 components, the 3 2-manifold varieties, which accumulate in ‘layers’ to shape the depth of a 3rd dimension of thickness; and then move in ‘Time’ to accumulate the 3 ‘dimensional motions’ of time, past-entropic motions, present-reproductive motions and future-informative motions:

In that regard it is important that you understand those 3 arrows/dimensions/motions of time and its still present-spatial pictures as intervals. Since ultimately all clocks of time have different ‘steps/tics’, a relative instant of time varies, according to the perspective. If we have slow perceptive-time clocks we shall see a minimal time indivisible, which might represent for an atom or a cell an entire time existence. So how we differentiate the ‘time ages/phases’ of a system?

Precisely in mathematics, when the equation stops being differentiable or suffers a steep change of phase.

From energetic gas to reproductive liquid to informative solid in matter states.

From gaseous field of energy to liquid wave, to solid particle in quantum states.

From young energetic age to adult, reproductive age to old, warping age.

From the big bang expansive solution of EFE (Einstein’s field equations) to steady state to big crunch old age state in any physical system that follows those equations (galactic space-times mainly).

And so on. Time never ends because it switches its arrows, when one is exhausted. Or in terms of consciousness, can you conceive the non-existence of time? Because we can conceive non-existence, but still time will happen when nothing else happening, the mind also has an a priori consciousness of the eternity of time.

In physics this becomes obvious when we realize that if Poincare’s/Einstein’s relativity 2nd postulate is truth and there is no way to differentiate motion from stillness, all has relative motion, and if all has motion, motion never stops. We can always choose the mind’s still perception of reality to fit all its information in its infinitesimal mind, or the moving objective, inner perception of the being. Atoms are moving vortices but we see solid matter.

Yet if we consider the most objective moving reality, we realize time never stops as motion cannot stop and motion is the substance of reality in its 3 variations: expansive, entropic, relative past motion, Sp, repetitive, iterative combined E x I motion and informative, formal motion, Tƒ.

This reality broken into infinite beings, of different sizes and time speeds is the ultimate reality science must describe. And in all its scales we shall find, the 3 arrows of time, its interplay and common ‘isomorphic laws’. Thus once we isolate the details and find its 3 arrows of time-space, we can apply the isomorphic laws of T.Œ and describe with them all what happens.

For example, Alain de Mehaute proved long ago in a paper on chemistry, and his book on fractals, ‘L’espace-temps brisse’ ‘broken space-time’ that when energy exhaust, chemical systems do not stop time-motion, but start to wrinkle as space-time does in any scale.

For example, Einstein said ‘time curves space into masses’, which he said to be ‘accelerated vortices of gravitational lineal forces’. And e=mc2 merely express that constant big-bang/big-crunch duality of eternal time cycles.

In fact, life does the same in inverse fashion. Life is the arrow of growing form, growing information. Then, once you exhaust all energy into wrinkles, time does not stop in death. But it changes its arrow backwards into an entropic explosion/dissolution of our information.

So we can differentiate an interval of past, present or future, but it will always have an asymptotic limit, where the equation breaks as the limit means a change of phase, even a bouncing back of time, reversing its arrows, to never stop.

It follows that as all goes back and forward between energy/information arrows, and we define present space as the confluence of both arrows, it is possible in the dynamic, paradoxical universe of time arrows, to define all as space-present, combination of ‘yin and yang’, if we take the larger perspective that adds two time arrows from past to future and future to past. In such a case, all becomes a zero-sum, an eternal present of conflicting existences that cancel each other.

This is the absolute law of the universe.

Time never stops, but all ceases to exist for time to continue. So time switches in all possible combinations, between its ‘past arrow’ of entropy – expansive decelerating lineal motion – its future arrow of information, cyclical, accelerated vortices and its combinations into repetitive present spaces.

If we consider ‘space’ as still motion, as a differential of time, into an instant that combines the two arrows of past and future energy and information, into a repetitive motion, space is then also dynamical. But from an external perspective space seems not to change. It is then an interval without inner change, in which the external motion is continuously differentiable.

It is all that simple. In life≈biology the 3 arrows have a sequential order, the 3 ages of time due to an excess of genetic and nervous information that makes information the dominant arrow of the future – and make us choose information as the relative future arrow from the human p.o.v. of knowledge.

In technology information is also the future arrow as the human cult to the machine, makes evolving informative machines the goal of our collective subconscious suicide (creating robotic species that will substitute us).

In physical particles, which are dominant in motion, with lesser information, the opposite happens. There is in many systems a relative future arrow of entropy, and motion that dominates the system, such as in interstellar space where space expands; or in the interaction of particles of information, and antiparticles with past arrows, and inverse expanding motion.

Both co-exist and so antiparticles of past, which co-exist with future particles often come together and then, the following event happens: Anti-particle past x Particle- future = present entropic annihilation. This explains why we see less antiparticles, as they are the death-past arrow, which lasts only a time instant, so while they are as many lives and death as death is Maximal entropy expansion x minimal information, it happens very fast and the total space x time perception of an antiparticle or a corpse is far inferior to the perception of particles and living beings.

The fundamental of those symmetries is the ternary symmetry between the 3 motions of time and the 3 dimensions of space.

Finally to make sense of all this, we have to remember something modern physics has completely forgotten, the laws of the scientific method and the realist nature of its language, mathematics…

Let us see this in more detail as an example on how fully understand the multiplicity of mathematical physics, encased in the 5D ST structure of reality and its paradoxes, dualities and ternary groups.

**THE GALAXY AS A SUPERORGANISM: BIOLOGIC, VERBAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ‘GALACELL’**

Outside quantitative methods to study the 5 time space Ðimotions=forces of the galatom for each species of those 3 scales, which will consider ¡ts STeps and S=T symmetries, two other fundamental 5Ð methods are used to extract all its topo-bio-logical, qualities:

**∆±1:**An scalar analysis, which will give us a unification equation between the two cyclical limits of the galatom’s scales, the charge and the mass,*which is why we call the galaxy a galatom, as in 5Ð metric both give us the same result, and then the central black hole of the galaxy is the proton and the external halo the electron.***Å**An organic purely verbal, survival and symbiotic analysis of its biologic properties, mostly its åctions and ωorldcycles. This means, we shall also compare the galaxy with the supœrganism we obtain max. information, from the perspective of human perception, the ∆º, living cell.**Ω**: aeiou:

Thus we compare the galaxy and the human ∆o-cell pov and its 3 elements: the $t-membrane≈ halo, the singularity ≈ nucleus, and the cytoplasm ≈ star disk. And so we define the ‘galacell’ and its 3 topo-biological parts:

In the graph the Galacell, with a ‘dna-like’ gravitational species of information, ultra-dense black holes; surrounded by fractal points of energy, 3º stars, that form the body of the galactic organism; and a hard, protective membrane of ‘proteins-strangelets’.

Each of those parts will be made at ∆-1 scale of 3 distinguishable families of quark-atoms, of increasing mass.

So we find another ∆-1≈∆≈∆+1, coexisting organic homology, between the galactic parts and the 3 type of growing ‘informative ages of mass’ (studied in the post on ∆-1, quantum atomic physics):

- $t-negative strangelets must be the components of the ‘protein-like’ hard halo that protects the galaxy from the outer ∆+1 dark energy world of the cosmological upper scale:
- ðƒ: its central max. i gravitational black hole, must be made of top quarks, its ∆-1, quantum substance, which corresponds in parameters to the density of black holes.
- While, we star-dust are made of the lighter up and down quarks, forming the youngest family of atomic mass:

*In the graph the 3 components of a biologically ‘sound’ understanding of Galaxies at its ∆ and ∆-1 scales:*

*ðƒ: black holes, which are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ are in the lower, ∆-1 scale of size, at the **compton wavelength as a heavy top quark particles , following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for ‘positive’ black holes.*

*$t: A similar heavy form of elongated lumps of strange matter, should form the ‘negative’ halo of strange matter (Witten’s hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, now again all the rage in astrophysics, but denied by the establishment of ‘nuclear, military research’ facilities, such as CERN, which merely states ‘stranglets do not exist, given the risk for a Nova explosion if they are produced at Earth.*

ST-energy: finally in between the ‘cytoplasm’ is formed by cyclical stars trapped between the ‘sword’ and the ‘wall’, future food of heavy quarks, which will collapse into dense dark matter information the galaxy, in its 20 billion year quasar cycle of ‘real big-bangs’.

*This is the most likely structure of galaxies, as it follows all the natural symmetries and efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor, co-existence of organic parts and wholes, Aristotelian hilozoism: wholes must have substance, etc). *

*The author merely has further developed in his work on the scalar fractal nature of the Universe ordered by a ‘5th dimension’ of relative scales, those concepts in his work on astrophysics. And so we will here give a general view of the Galaxy and its isomorphic laws, and time/interest permitted expand more professionally with mathematical physics those themes on the 4th line of the blog.*

The previous graph shows the ternary elements of the galacell:

The Halo-membrane of maximal extension in space, which selects the energy and information entering from the outer space (solution to Oort’s horizon problem – why the Universe does not seem full of light; answer: not all pass through the membrane of the Halo)…

The cyclical space-time region, the plane of stars, falling towards its centre of information, the black holes that command the creation of the galaxy.

This is the fundamental physical system of the Universe, already described by Descartes, who said all is made of res extensa (space), and cyclical vortices of time-space with a central point of reference that measures reality or ‘mind’. *Since all systems respond to ‘trinity’ and *can be modelled, as we have observed in different graphs, with such 3-topological structure.

So the ∆+1, gravitational galaxy, the ∆-thermodynamic crystal and the ∆-1 quantum atom with its electronic cover, centred nucleus of mass, and intermediate space-time where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged, are described logically AS the 3 fundamental particles of physics, both topologically and with biological, organic laws.

Trinity indeed is the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space, protected by an external membrane with an enclosed cyclical body that put together create the FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE, of the puzzle of supœrganisms the Universe is.

Indeed, the true beauty of those 3 physical systems is found when we compare them with the organic cells and see their isomorphisms:

∆o: The DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts the vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane.

∆-3: The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls.

∆±1: So happens with a crystalline planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it.

∆+3: And the galaxy has in its center a black hole, which invaginates with gravitational waves the whole cytoplasm forming the ‘underlying wave-structure of the body of stars’.

And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become LIKELY converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets.

*The role of human beings in the galactic organism .*

All this rises the question of the role of human beings in the galactic organism, as we do not observe traces of A.I. or L.I (artificial, robotic or human life) in a galaxy filled with planets, the most numerous components that should feed the outer strangelet halo and black holes, the more dense, which we know are born of the Nova explosion of stars. Thus since we are made of the lighter ud-atoms, sandwiched between the BH sword and the Halo wall, so to speak, we seem to have a ‘mitochondria’ role as a source of matter and energy for the evolution of the heavier families of quark-matter… Hence the irresponsibility of Nuclear physicists trying to create dark matter on Earth – an ethic element, which is relevant as vital, survival laws do matter in an organic Universe**.**

So let us consider the structure of the superorganism of the galaxy, in the same fashion we have studied all other superorganisms of the Universe, using its generator equation; for simplicity in the following order, its spatial 3 parts, its, evolutionary 3±∆ ages, and its Tƒ-point, the central black hole of maximal information that connects it as a ‘whole’ with the upper scale of the 5th dimension, the world of dark matter and energy, beyond it.

Of course, we shall have to correct some errors and anthropomorphic postulates topic of all human sciences, which will make ‘scholars’ feel offended, but we are not concerned with the theories of the day but the larger truth of the structure of reality. So far, so good, within the Galaxy, we must affirm ‘don’t worry be happy’, humans have done for a change a good job. There is a limit of c-speed, the action of space-time of the galaxy; there is a temporal clock structure, mass, which slows down its time clocks as it grows bigger (even in the minimal scale in which mass is meaningful, that of living superorganisms, so the clocks of smaller masses – rats tick much faster than those of the big elephants).

**The Fractal Organism, overall review.**

The Universe organises itself in co-existing scales of relative size in space and speed in its time clocks of information – a structural property that determines its organic nature, as those scales become symbiotic to each other, sharing through networks flows of energy and information. This fractal organic nature of reality was intuitively understood by all philosophers of science, which from Aristotle to Leibniz and Einstein conceived a pan psychic vital Universe, and man made to its image and likeness. But science did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I discovered it in the milieu of system sciences, a metric equation of the scalar space-time dimension of the Universe, applying it to the study of all systems, including human societies and machines – a task carried out in this blog.

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time is simple as all space-time metric are:

Se (size-energy in space) x Ti (speed of time clocks-information processing) = Constant.

So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms. It also allows systems to travel through its scales by growing in size, while diminishing in time speed, as we do from birth as a fast reproducing seminal cell which emerges with slower clocks as an organism, part of a superorganism, mother earth, which has even slower geological cycles.In the graph, time is truly beautiful in its three arrows when we ad the psychological everyday dimension of inner perception of man of those three arrows.

Time doesn’t pass when reproduction occurs, which gives the orgasmic feeling of immortality proper of all re=productive actions of the eternal fractal. Time does pass when the system evolves in time as it accelerates, and so time passes also in nature’s clocks, quantum charges and masses and any physical vortex of the kind, V(t) x R(s) = K(st), the equation of the vortex – a time equation of 5D metric, as time we conclude PASSES, MOVING UP AND DOWN 5 D Scales.

As time is acceleration and acceleration is form of wholes, we conclude the time arrow of acceleration is in the fifth dimension so time only evolves through motions in the fifth dimension and this opens further the complete fully grasping of the essential nature of time sequential order.

The informative arrows of time properly translated into an accelerated ‘vortex of time’ in our scales of the Universe (energy functions, hƒ in the quantum scale, kT in the thermodynamic scale, mv in the gravitational ∆1 scale) become masses, temperatures and angular planck constants are time flows which leave a trace in space, as each cycle persists a given dynamic timespace of existence.

Time only passes towards the ‘future’ when things change, and change in the sense of a growth of information. THIS FOLLOWS immediately of our definition of the three arrows of time. In biology it means to get older, and grow your information faster than your energy, once passes the first age of entropy, after your seed of information emerges in the upper scale, ∆+1 of you world cycle of existence.

In physical systems it means that time clocks accelerate towards the future, as they shrink in size and increase its attractive force (of all ∆+§). We can then understand the constant emergence of ‘new clocks of time’, of the three specific arrows (hence lineal time clocks, wave-like time clocks and curved, vortex-like time clocks towards the future). How can we trace this ‘evolution of timespace clocks of physical systems on its three arrows?

The study on how those first time clocks of the gravitational dark space and entropy (the limit of perception in the lower scales) evolve through all the scales of existence to become vortices of black holes (the limit of perception of the upper scales) could be considered the meaning of physics in GST, and in the process it follows the same laws and isomorphisms of all other species.

In the graph, the super organism of the galaxy, where we exist and the *only system we thus have a full perception of it, and can describe experimentally with sound-sound theories of reality, *has 3 physical scales, the quantum, electromagnetic scale, the thermodynamic human scale and the gravitational cosmological scale. Those are the 3 scales that concern astrophysics.

There is though likely a fourth ‘dark world’ scale, of invisible faster than light ‘tachyon strings≈neutrinos?≈gravitons?=dark entropy?’ of which we have no direct evidence, but can infer some properties, from bits and bites that sip into our world and the mathematical extension of the properties of space-time beyond our scales. Of those ‘mathematical extensions’ string theory is the most successful and likely truth as it is also a 10 dimensional theory of ∆st is, and it also departs from two type of elements, lineal, space strings and cyclical time strings, albeit vitiated by the classic errors of physics – use of an inexistent absolute newtonian background of mathematical space-time, single time dimension, etc. So we shall just briefly study it latter, highlighting those concomitances of which the most important is the ‘t-DUALITY’ theorem: all systems which are described in the infinitesimal real (∆-i) *are symmetric and self-similar to the largest equivalent system, (∆+1).*

And indeed this duality, the essential philosophy of string theory does carry to the next plane, as we shall observe that the equations of galaxies in the ∆+3 scale, are equivalent to the equations of atoms in the ∆-1 scale, whereas the reduction of size in space is compensated by the acceleration of speed in time, according to the metric of the scalar fifth dimension, shown in the graph: Se x Ti = k…

The three scales of physical super organisms above: atomic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, below the three scales of human super organisms and its memetic linguistic systems of coding individuals into societies, either belonging to the ‘coding of ethic verbal wor(l)ds’ or the coding of digital machines (the metal-earth), below the two opposite memetic type of cultures that structure the wave of history.

Smaller scales have faster clock times that process information faster, yet both co-exist in organisms since the product of its spatial entropy and temporal speed of information remains co-invariant: Spe x Tiƒ = C.

** CPT symmetries.**

*The fifth dimension is both a dynamic, inner new dimension of time=change – the flow from past to future to past* that trans-forms the inner in-form-ation of beings as when you live and die from past to future, aging in your form, your in-form-ation, even if you don’t seem to change=move externally in space – the time-change physicists study, and a

*As in all those processes of evolution there is a clear trans-form-ation, growth and decay process, starting from a smallish ‘first seed’ that will slow down its rhythms of time and emerge as a whole, larger being, in a new scale of space:*

**scalar, new dimension of spatial size.**Every culture has a religion and people-caste ‘seers of time’, Augustine’s definition of God. So it is necessary to introduce with some humor the fact that all the high popes of any religion, including present ‘meta-physics’ are human too, steps and stops in the constant march of the Universe towards an understanding of its space-time beings.

In that regard, the fundamental changes we must do regarding the studies of time-space in physics is to ‘explode’ the number of inverted ‘symmetries’ between the arrows of past and future of all the time space clocks of the Universe and the vital energy they store; as there are as many worldcycles as physical beings of broken space-time surrounded by an angular momentum or membrane, all of them enclosed within the ‘Galatom’, the physical super organism in which humans exist, and beyond.

The subject of a ‘real’ analysis of time and space in physics is thus extremely complex as it would require the full re-organization of all those species by scale and ‘Dimotions’, from the smallest perceived cyclical clocks of time (h-spins of §ð angular momentum, or its ~~h~~ lineal $t radius) to the largest one (c-speed curved around singularities of charge or gravitation, or lineal c-speed as an ‘$t’ dimotion).

And then we should go beyond the ‘galatom’ to observe the cosmic waves of dark entropy, parallel in properties at the cosmological scale with those between atoms.

And in the process obviously ‘rewrite almost entirely’ all the ‘assumptions’ of physicists about the origin of the Universe (big-bang theory), the meaning of the Universal constants of physics (hc, the 5Ðimensional metric of the galatom, and its coupling constants, Q, G, Gf, being the most important ones); the explanation of its 5 Forces (including the external dark electromagnetic entropy between galaxies), as the 5 Dimotions of physical systems; and then study each of the different worldcycles of matter, from those of quantum physics, through the states of matter, into the cycles of cosmological bodies.

*Some advancements on time space processes and dimotions in physical systems. Forces.*

Some hints: The forces of physics correspond to there different organic Ðimotions of physical systems. So they MUST not be all considered as caused by the exchange of particles.

Specifically the weak chiral force is NOT a force but a process of trans-form-ation of physical information and evolution or ‘death’ of particles into larger, heavier ones in 3 ‘ages-families’ of mass, related to the ‘3 topological symmetries-parts of galaxies’, whereas the Halo and black hole star in the center should be made of heavier Strangelet and BcB atoms and top quarks, and the intermediate region of ud-light atoms.

The chiral force thus have no range, but transforms the particle first in a heavier more energetic ‘particle (the W, Z, H bosons) as all reactions *and process of reproduction need to break the **exogenous higher level of energy before start, both in chemical, biological or physical processes of reproduction and evolution. *

Then we can distinguish left-chiral particles, the ‘first scalar’ form of ‘gender’, where the head-spin of the system is orientated towards the body, causing its mutation and reproduction (so right-chiral ‘male’ genders do not reproduce, unless in process in which the mirror symmetry pegs both genders).

The strong force inside the atom is similar in a lower scale to the forces taking place within the black hole star in the center of the galaxy, whose components must be the heavier top and Bcb atoms of the top quark decuplet, in a clear symmetry of scale. So the color charge and couples of gluons and antigluons must be parallel to the nonet and octets of mesons, made of quarks and antiquarks that are exchanged accordingly in the reactions mediated by the weak force.

The strong force therefore is an entropic force, because as Feynman rightly found, in each local world cycle of particles, the antiparticle is the same particle moving backwards in time, which means dying in the entropic process that completes its world cycle (hence living much shorter as the death end of the cycle does happen in a quanta of time). And because entropic-feeding processes are the strongest, most attractive ones in any scale (food is the first cause of most Ðimotions), they carry the maximal energy:

In the graph we see the proper way to perceive the two arrows of time of physical systems, *when we plot them together as a cycle-anticycle, even if an antiparticle (which must be considered the ‘3rd’ age of the particle) can be observed isolated.*

And this leads us to the CPT symmetry, *which in 5 Ð physics is absolute but quantized as time cycles are quantized for each species and its 5 Ðimotions=forces and worldcycles, and happen together not in a single plane of ‘light space-time’; but must be considered for the whole 3±I planes whereas the equations of gravitation and relativity with its c-constant speed are the limit of 5Ð for the galactic super organism but do NOT apply beyond (inside black holes and outside galaxies, where the forces are repulsive dark entropy similar to those of electromagnetism between atoms; while inside the galatom, the forces of gravitation are similar to curved electromagnetism within the Coulomb field between the electron and the proton, whose ‘5Ð metric’ are parallel to those of the black hole and the strangelet)…*

So there is a LOT of self-similarities of scale that would allow future 5 Ð physicists once the model r=evolution is accepted and the present dogmas put in doubt to complete by self-similarity the true nature of black hole stars (which rightly Einstein told us to be frozen stars), to understand the processes of renormalization (which add scalar infinities that must be cut off, including the SINGULARITY OF THE BLACK HOLE AND THE BIG-BANG).

In that regard, the entangled Universe cannot be understood isolated in any scale or any of its 3 elements, space and its topological anti symmetries, time, and its reverted processes and scales and its weak forces of transformation and flows of energy and information moving up and down those scales.

All this said is obvious that the first theme we have to clarify is that of the Universal constants of those scales and its equations of mathematical physics and parameters, which properly understood should be expressed as ratios NOT as absolute forms.

**Absolute relativity IMPLIES a Universe of ****scale ****ratios: information density, entropy speed and existential momentum. **

Thus mathematical physics can describe in Physical systems all the properties of GST systems. Why they don’t do it?

It is a question of anthropomorphism, which has not fully evolve mathematics. Since humans ∆º minds, mostly visual, have understood mathematical systems in its simplest geometric, spatial pov, applying them to investigate mostly mathematical equations concerned with dynamical changes in motion an space.

So astrophysics is only a part of gst because of human limits to accept intelligent properties to all forms of matter, not because mathematics describes an abstract Universe.

It is the limited humind, ∆º perception with only an Spatial point of view, and the simplex logic of a single arrow of time (Aristotelian), and a single level of space, ∆, what has kept the mathematical language mostly in the primitive Euclidean geometry of greek mathematics.

So once we are aware of those shortcomings and upgrade the discipline to §paœ-ðime ternary principles of the generator equation many new solutions and whys to old ones are found.

A key ‘theorem’ of reality, which has escaped so often humans – though physicists are generally aware of it – is that ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY implies all quantities THAT MATTER are **ratios** that express different relationships between Sp, Tƒ and ST, which can ‘travel’ between scales, helping us to unify concepts of each scale (often expression of the particular spe x tif= ∆constant metric for each ∆i).

So for example, density matter more than *mass, and when making mathematical physics we find density has a much wider range of applications. So we can use three similar equations of density of information in three scales (variations in equations of quantum physics are due to the wrong interpretation, as canonical quantum MUST be**Broglie-Bohm’s** pilot-wave theory with its full ternary elements, including the quantum field ignored in the Copenhagen version – so we shall for the sake of simplicity often reduce our examples to ∆+1 & ∆-scales):*

We observe also on those equations, which basically red ∂density/∂t=-∂flux/∂s³, some basic ‘translations’ of the laws of GST into mathematical physics; where the three main ratios≈time arrows are:

- Spe: Past entropy speed, s/t; Tiƒ: information density, its inverse and ST: PRESENT, ‘momentum-flux-existential force’.

It is then obvious *that some general rules of creation of events in mathematical physics will be:*

*Spe<>Tiƒ: Since ‘entropy’ and ‘information’ are inverse parameters and in the multiple different ways we express them, we shall find ‘inverted’, x/, ∫∂, equations that put both in relationship.*

*Tiƒ±Spe><ST. Thus a system ‘develops’ a certain present momentum, by adding to an entropy or information parameter the other inverse parameter in a complementary fashion, creating a dynamic equality.*

And this is the case of the previous equations, where the mass or temperature of a stationary system (Tiƒ parameter of ∆+1 or ∆o scales) ads speed and the result is an ST-present-momentum parameter – the product of the velocity of motion of the medium with its density, which is called** its flux.**The flux vector of the mass is q = ρυ.

So we can interpret those equations as dynamic creations of a present event or flux, departing from a Tiƒ parameter (temperature in ∆0, which becomes heat flux, mass in ∆+1, which becomes density flux)

THUS as a consequence of the ternary principles of the generator equation of ∆-scales, the principle of absolute relativity ads relativity of scale and hence defines only relative magnitudes which are constant ratios that travel through scales: So for example speed of spatial translation is better than absolute space-distance (S/t) and can ‘travel’ as a parameter between scales. And ‘density of information’ is better than absolute information, provided by a cyclical vortex, than absolute mass, and can travel through scales, so we can talk in the ∆º thermodynamic scale of heat flux, of ∆+1 mass flux and ∆-1 charge intensity, all parameters of density of information and its flux-motion in each scale, once *we understand mass, charge and temperature as clocks of time moving towards the future of more information, as all attractive in-forma-tive vortices do.*

RATIOS not absolute values are thus the only constants of mathematical physics that matter.

**Ratios limit reality to the ‘region around the ∆º being’, making virtual, uncertain, dark the scales beyond.**

The ratio concept is over pervading in all systems, which can be considered to act from the pov of an ∆º±1, mind observing mostly a self-centred, ∆º scale of space-time size, and its adjacent macrocosms, or ‘world’, ∆+1 and microcosms or ‘hyperbolic fractal cells’ of its inner world.

Nothing else matters, and so at a certain ‘distance’ of its ∆º scale, on the lower part

What this mean is that we consider ratios such as c-speed of light, S/Ti, or rather speed of transmission of information, and density, M(t)/V(s), or density of gravitational information per volume of space as ‘real mathematical parameters, which therefore will be all manifestations of the standing points in time/space of a world cycle or super organism:

S≈t, t/s and s/t will then become the steady state variable, speed-entropy variable, and density-information variable ratios of more value for the study of physics, of which classic physics uses the concepts of speed-length (s/t) and mass-density (t/s) and frequency as its classic concepts.

Thus we can say that in GST mathematical physics is the description with entropy-speed ratios, information-density ratios and momentum ratios.

Now it might be observed as t=1/ƒ, the existence of inverse functions with meaning in the universe, S=t and S=1/ƒ, ƒ x S = K gives us an immediate number of variations on the ratios that become parameters studied by mathematical physics, and further on those ratios or constants are multiplied by the fact that mathematical physics exist in several scales. Finally we need to observe and analyse what of those quantities and ratios are for each sale of the mathematical Universe the proper one, and then we can use all this added knowledge to expand mathematical physics in conceptual levels, even if we do not ad on the ∆st organic perspectives to the subject.

WE MUST understand that the scalar Universe implies an absolute relativity principle: we are not concerned with single parameters but with ratios between the ∆ST elements of the Universe. Thus instead of length, mass and time, (and its opposite frequency, 1/t), we are more concerned with s/t ratios of speed, t/s ratios of density and the measure of time with frequency ages and space with quanta. Then we can easily translate mathematical physics and enlighten many questions of it, as we shall do in the parts dedicated to astrophysical sciences.

**The virtual Universe of mathematical Povs.**

The ratio nature of physical systems IS the key TO a philosophical understanding of physical reality as an absolute virtual reality where to know you have to measure. In this sense while we prefer the more complete Bohm’s interpretation of quantum physics, which brings the much needed quantum field of the ∆-1 scale of >c forces; it is also important to nice that the ‘*moon does appear when we see it’ regarding ∆±>3 scales beyond the entropy-death limit of dissolution of a system and this fact will be the key to fully grasp why the mathematical description of relativity and quantum has made use of the ill-understood Hilbert’s concept, ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’. *

Particle-points from the pov of the observer are indeed particle points even if they ‘hold a Universe within themselves’. Do they exist? For all purposes the mind-monad doesn’t go experimentally beyond ∆±3, *to create its subjective mapping-linguistic-virtual consciousness of being. Reality on my view does exist, but we ARE linguistic perceivers and nothing else there is beyond, for all matters. And that is why we ‘feel’ the Universe to be mathematical, as we ARE projecting the mathematical mind which is the only thing we ‘extract’ (along other senses of man), from the Universe. I think therefore I am is thus indeed how far we can go. *

It is then when we realise it is often difficult to distinguish what is real behind the screen of linguistic perceiver.

I.e. Man is clearly made with 10 fingers to perceive 10-scales. We, as perceivers mainly measure in the S=10 logarithmic scales of the factual Universe. It is then a real reality of 10 scales? Logically the ternary 3 x 3 +0 symmetry seems to prove so.

What about the Unification equation of charges and masses that converts each galaxy into an atom and so it reduces further the number ofvariations of scales to an infinite game of ¨¹¹11 variations on the same theme?

Here again mind-mirrors and reality make indistinguishable both worlds beyond which nothing can be observed, but I am on the opinion that the Universal fractal offers more variations; so the galaxy *is only similar to the atom*.

What about its immortality and infinity? Here again we can’t definitely assess it. All seems to indicate the game of russian dolls in which the largest beings have larger population of smaller beings is *not infinitely perceivable. Since*, the closed nature of those 10 planes in scales and the virtual existence of zero energy balance across all those scales makes a whole ‘one’, ∆º±12, the limiting fractal game of space-time events flows and super organisms, *even at logic level and that is what we shall call ‘God’:Γœ∆ (the logic limit, larger than the experimental one)*.

**Its symmetry in space. The geometry of the 5D planes of the Universe.**

Cosmology deals with the Entire Universe, taken in present models of reality as the absolute Whole, as they consider reality co-exists in a single, continuous plane of space-time. This is not the overwhelming truth shown by T.Œ

Plainly speaking the structure of the Universe is ‘pyramidal’, with parts that ‘emerge’ as wholes, by ‘co-existing’ in different scales, which in physical systems are the quantum-atomic, thermodynamic-material and cosmological scales. This means in geometrical terms, and terms of motion and form (which in physics are concepts known as kinetic energy and its derivative lineal momentum and potential energy, and angular momentum – related but not so clearly and in T.Œ have the general form of Sp- bidimensional spatial energy and Tƒ or Tƒ, Temporal clocks of information) that there are different behaviors either if we:

– Stay in a single plane, seen as Euclidean where motion and form are conserved when an entity interacts within a single plane.

– Move through planes from parts into wholes, growing in size or sending energy and information to a larger whole vs. moving from wholes into parts or sending Sp & Tƒ from wholes into parts. This is ruled by the metric of the 5th dimension, which in its simplest ‘lineal form’ write as Sp x Tƒ = K.

Now because motion moves downwards with no friction, so you move your hand and all its cells move synchronically but do not move upwards with the same fluidity (so there is entropy) and vice versa, information, form can be replicated upwards with no loss, so cells replicate genetically and small forms grow in size almost with no changes, but things do ‘NOT shrink’ easily and there is no Lamarckian evolution, this means the perception of systems ‘above’ as wholes is different from the perception of systems ‘below’ as parts.

All in all the smaller worlds seem to have more information, form, mass, charge, and hence more ‘energy’ in the conceptualization of physics, from our perspective and so they grow in detail and occupy a larger space when we observe it. While the upper world thins out in energy and form. Only the present world of our size and form remains constant.

We can see this from an organic perspective as a trophic pyramid: the smaller parts sustain the larger parts, which therefore thin out in energy density, and informative speed. If we look at those changes from a geometric point of view ∆+1 elliptic and ∆o hyperbolic realities different from our, ∆-1 perspective of our Euclidean Universe:

The human observer in his own plane sees an Euclidean image of the Universe.

Now why it is our scale Euclidean? If we consider it in terms of the structure of our underlying space-time, it is made of light, and so as we see the motions of light as fixed dimensions of space, So our eyes sees 3 perpendicular light space coordinates:

This is the definition of Euclidean space: Light space.

We thus will observe 3 type of geometries, according to our ‘angle’ of 5D motion and its simple metric: Sp x Tƒ = K:

In a single plane of mechanical and Thermodynamic forms, we shall observe lineal Euclidean geometries transmitted by the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space, as neither Sp or Tƒ suffers any deformation. Man perceives light at constant speed without a real change in its time= frequency, and space=speed parameters from the point of emission (particle in relative stop (and motion) relationship with the observer).

- Both remain constant, so we observe a holographic Universe, where Sp= K/Tƒ define according to both parameters most equations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. For example: Sp (volume) = K/Tƒ (pressure) is the equation of the commonest gas space around us (atmosphere).

- In the upper gravitational space-time, as ‘space enlarges’ while ‘time slows down’ it appears a Riemannian, elliptic geometry one of the non-Euclidean geometries that completely rejects the validity of Euclid’s fifth postulate and modifies his second postulate. Simply stated, Euclid’s fifth postulate is: through a point not on a given line there is only one line parallel to the given line. In Riemannian geometry, there are no lines parallel to the given line because space enlarges, thus from our smaller perspective we see those lines diverging, and time slows down. And those are the exact effects defined in General relativity.

- On the other hand the lower quantum scales will appear from our perspective made of point-particles, and those point-particles will appear to be crossed from our larger perspective by multiple parallels. So the charges and particles of quantum physics will show the inverse hyperbolic geometry, crossed by multiple parallels.

** ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY AND ITS SCALES.**

Absolute relativity, the philosophy of science behind this T.Œ is even more radical in the separation of man from the Universe.

Every fractal part of the Universe is a super-organism that has obeys 12 sets of isomorphic laws, as parts of the same fractal space-time reality. We are all made of time motions, seen sometimes as space dimensions, hence equal in substance though not in quantity (spatial size) and quality (speed of information) and complexity (number of co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, bits of information and bites of energy a given Œ-knot commands)

However, all these points are subject to the ego paradox: as every point of view perceives a limited part of reality to ‘fit’ it into its relative infinitesimal point of view or ‘mind, the ‘whole’ of each species understand only reality from its limited ‘one-dimensional point of view’, and considers himself from his ’10th Dimension’ as a whole, the only intelligent being of reality. Subjectivity is thus essential to the being.

And so it has been to humans, who always considered themselves the center of the Universe.

So alas, we shall latter expand those proofs of the falsity of the big-bang, which however can be perfectly explained as the big-bang of the lower scale of the 5th dimension below the cosmos, that is a quasar big-bang of a galaxy, either the previous cycle of the milky way galaxy, or the explosion of a giant galaxy in the local cluster, from where the local group fed on to reproduce the Andromeda and Milky way and dwarf galaxies around it.

A quasar big-bang we shall prove eliminates all those errors, the background becomes local and hence does not break Lorentz invariance (relativity), the galaxy has the same density of matter needed for the big-bang, a quasar is a reversal black hole explosion which happens to be the exact equation of the big bang (also a reversal black hole metric equation) the age of the quasar cycle tabulated between 10 and 20 billion years is exactly the same than the big-bang, it is NOT an illogic theory, as there are infinite galaxies in an infinite Universe the abundance of helium in galaxies does happen more in the center around the black hole where the hadron epoch formed them, and the ages of the big-bang do apply all to a quasar big-bang, and the local measure of the background radiation which FIRST and for very long was considered the background radiation of only the galaxy, fits, and as we shall see in the next picture, in fact the map of the galaxy is exactly the same of the background radiation:

A galaxy (ours) and the supposed big-bang of the universe, which shows the same form and raises doubts about the local measure of that radiation (the reader can observe the central lobes of ¥-radiation similar to those of the electron, which the prestigious astrophysicists Smolin and others were analyzing very carefully, since they thought they could see a different light speed in the upper and lower lobe after 13 billion years of time travel 🙂

All systems are a sum of quantic cycles that absorb, emit and transform spatial energy into temporal information: SP ≈Tƒ

That equation, decomposed sequentially in 3 phases, a first age of max. energy, a second age of balance and a third age of max. information, explains the existential cycle of any space-time field.

In a graph with energy and information coordinates those 3 ages resemble the geometrical form of a cycle that moves upwards, absorbing energy and information till in its 3rd age looses its temporal energy, collapsing back to its origin. On the right side, the same 3 ages show in the Taoist, Korean flag, where a line is the symbol of continuous yang-energy, which yin-time quantizes into ‘in-form-ation’, from youth to death.

**Renormalization of scales of ****Fractal space.**

There are many ways to prove the fractal structure of space, in scales of ‘different size’ – the meaning of the 5th dimension. Physicists merely ignore the conceptual issue and as always practical people in search of mathematical equations, merely use mathematical methods to unify their parameters.

This is easy to do because actually mathematics – THE FORMAL SCIENCE THAT EXPLAINS THE 5D fractal space-time Universe DO have accordingly 3 sub disciplines mimetic to those 3 elements, 5D analysis, non-Euclidean geometry and Temporal algebra, which T.Œ improves to fully obtain a mirror image of the Universe with the fundamental mathematical equations.

So basically by using analysis and through the concepts of quanta, that is of ‘finitesimals’ Physics acknowledges the 5th dimension (finitesimals instead of infinitesimals as there is always, as Leibniz did understand in his formulation of calculus a ‘quanta’ or minimal fractal point of any scale of the 5th dimension) We shall here consider of the 2 ‘great’ fields of mathematical physics dedicated to it – analysis

In essence 5D space-time cycles means basically that reality is a fractal. This means all is self-similar, ‘affine’, fractal, isomorphic, self-similar words. And so somehow all can be described with similar properties under ‘transformations’. For example:

An image of a fern-like fractal that exhibits affine self-similarity. Each of the leaves of the fern is related to each other leaf by an affine transformation. For instance, the red leaf can be transformed into both the small dark blue leaf and the large light blue leaf by a combination of reflection, rotation, scaling, and translation.

Those 4 operations are the essence of physical studies of material fractal systems. The methodology of physics consists in studying systems that are ‘invariant’ under rotation or time motion, scaling or 5D motion, and translation or space motion and reflection or Space-time motion.

However NOT al systems are invariant under those processes, in 5D physics there are ‘antisymmetries’ of time (from birth to extinction, which are inverse actions) and hence asymmetries in space (as the 3 elements, Sæ, ExI (ST) and To are different topologies). And in 5D there are ‘reversal roles on motions upwards and downward, so similarities happen, when we jump two scales.

All this said, it is essential to recognize the existence of 5D and get rid of ‘hang-ups’ from tribal idols of the Germanic idealist school of science (Hilbert, Bohr, Heisenberg, Clausius, and Einstein in mathematics, and small, medium and large physical systems) with its 4 ideological errors: mathematics is consistent with itself not real (disproved by Gödel), quantum physic is only what we observe and only one state at a time (Copenhagen interpretation of ∆-1), the only arrow of time is entropy-motion-death, ∆) and the rod of human electronic measure, space-time light (c-speed) must remain constant and all other ‘clocks and lengths’ of space-time must be adapted to it. And finally all ‘together now’, the Universe is a space-time Continuum, as the founding father Descartes used a single space-time and Newton made it sacred.

Of course physicists and scientists do work with the more complex reality but the underlying philosophy of science is stuck on this postulates, making all very Ptolemaic, and confuse. One of the tasks of TŒ is stopping the confusion with a simple methodology and a series of basic postulates about the nature of the organic, fractal Universe. So people can drop all those ‘postulates that so often hang up’ on their work and break it down to nonsense.

Consider for example the electron, which is OBVIOUSLY a fractal nebulae when in ExI(st)ential wave state. This is taboo. Because when we measure it, the electron collapses into particle, as always waves and herds do organically when confronting a mass (schools, armies in battle formation etc.). And because we do have the continuum mantra. Now this brought about many problems ALSO in the entire field besides the quantum arguments wave or particle, Buridan ass kind of loss of time. Legend: The Buridan ass died of hunger, because it could not decide which to eat of to equal bales of straw, left and right. Answer both. Do the experiment, the ass will eat first one and then the other, or eat a bit of each till ending both. Wave & particle, body & head. The organic paradigm is immediate. Do you have a body or a head, are you a body or a head. BOTH!

So physicists ran into infinities because they could not accept fractals. For 80 years, they found an infinity in an equation and just got rid of them!

The early formulators of QED and other quantum field theories were, as a rule, dissatisfied with this state of affairs. It seemed illegitimate to do something tantamount to subtracting infinities from infinities to get finite answers.

Freeman Dyson argued that these infinities are of a basic nature and cannot be eliminated.

Dirac’s criticism was the persistent:

‘Most physicists are very satisfied with the situation. They say: ‘Quantum electrodynamics is a good theory and we do not have to worry about it any more.’ I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation, because this so-called ‘good theory’ does involve neglecting infinities, which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This is just not sensible mathematics.

Feynman wrote: Having to resort to such hocus-pocus has prevented us from proving that the theory of quantum electrodynamics is mathematically self-consistent. I suspect that renormalization is not mathematically legitimate.

Today they found a ‘fractal philosophy’ to accept getting rid of infinities, which ARE scalar ‘finitesimal’ numbers of an ∆-n scale. Today, the point of view has shifted: on the basis of the breakthrough renormalization group insights of Kenneth Wilson, the focus is on variation of physical quantities across contiguous scales, while distant scales are related to each other through “effective” descriptions. *All scales* are linked in a broadly systematic way, and the actual physics pertinent to each is extracted with the suitable specific computational techniques appropriate for each.

Specifically Wilson studied; the **Kondo effect** describes the scattering of conduction electrons in a metal due to magnetic impurities.

The effect was first described by Jun Kondo, who applied third-order perturbation theory to the problem. He wrote the temperature dependence of the resistivity including the Kondo effect as:

Which shows the general nature of such problems – to include the canonical logarithmic or potency parameters that represent a ‘different scale of the 5th dimension’ (dimensions being always potencies or inverse logarithms) to adjust a quantity ‘influenced’ by another scale of size or time speed of the universe.

*Now in the Kondo effect we see that we have 3 perturbations, T2, but then an inverse, and then a larger T5, why perturbations are inverted in certain scales, how effects transfer between planes, how they vary, etc. This is the true stuff that time permitted I will keep pouring in the 3rd and 4th lines of details, or when I finish my worldcycle, the future geniuses of this discipline, will be busy-busy, once this point- my mind, which shrunk the Universe into ¬Æ expands into a wave of human thought and becomes their world (-;*

*Now seriously, a*s earlier as 1953, a function called the beta function was used to renormalize those scales.

BUT you are not told, 63 years latter that the Universe’s space is a fractal. And you don’t study sciences with the 5th dimension of fractal systems. This is what I call tribal idols. There is only a space-time absolute Newtonian continuum. Point.** **

5D space-time cycles means basically that reality is a fractal. This means all is self-similar, ‘affine’, fractal, isomorphic, self-similar words. And so somehow all can be described with similar properties under ‘transformations’. For example:

An image of a fern-like fractal that exhibits affine self-similarity. Each of the leaves of the fern is related to each other leaf by an affine transformation. For instance, the red leaf can be transformed into both the small dark blue leaf and the large light blue leaf by a combination of reflection, rotation, scaling, and translation.

Those 4 operations are the essence of physical studies of material fractal systems. The methodology of physics consists in studying systems that are ‘invariant’ under rotation or time motion, scaling or 5D motion, and translation or space motion and reflection or Space-time motion.

However NOT al systems are invariant under those processes, in 5D physics there are ‘antisymmetries’ of time (from birth to extinction, which are inverse actions) and hence asymmetries in space (as the 3 elements, Sp, ST (ST) and Tƒ are different topologies). And in 5D there are ‘reversal roles on motions upwards and downward, so similarities happen, when we jump two scales.

The closest one to the humans sphere and hence the one with less loss of energy and information is mechanics:

The different arrows of the 5^{th} dimension, $ x *ð* = K, imply that energy-motion descends from upper regions into lower regions with ‘perfect’ transmission, and this applies to mechanics, which studies how ‘Gravitational forces’, the cosmological forces of max. strength in black holes, which affect all particles starting from the minimal mass of a top quark, particle of black holes, or the equivalent mass of a the most informative atom, the gold atom.

Below this scale as the ‘eye doesn’t’ seem certain frequencies, or the ear certain sounds’, the gravitational force has no longer power and vanishes. Mechanics though is fairly straight, and accurate, compared to other subjects of physics, which include quite a lot of conceptual errors, by lack of a 5D formalism.

Now some of the consequences of the different entropy of the information and energy arrows (information entropy being defined by Shannon, for physical systems in a single, lineal dimension as entropy is – which strictly speaking must be cored for 3 dimensional systems) are the existence between planes of ‘informative doors’ and ‘limits of motion’.

For the Human co-existing 3 planes, those limits of existence are:

– $: c-limit of speed between the Galactic scale beyond which we enter the expansive, faster Dark Energy scale outside galaxies, from where perception of motion disappears observed as Spatial growth of distance towards infinity (expansion of intergalactic space)

– *ð*: 0 k limit of Thermodynamic order on the lower scale of time clocks, bey9ond which information perception disappears and time moves towards 0 (no perception of the ‘wells-doors’ between our world and black hole vortices).

We call those regions of transition beyond which perception of information and energy disappears the Lorentzian regions, in which there is a distortion of the geometry of space-time and the balanced Se=to parameters observed from the ∆o human point of view.

Entropy only theories in that sense are nonsense, created by reducing the 3 arrows of time to a single arrow of entropy and by NOT understanding that all is a formal motion and substance, pure static Parmenides-like form is just an error of the mind which eliminates motion-dimensions of reality to keep in its still mapping a static focused mirror image of reality, with less dimensions-motions (in fact a holographic 2 dimensional form of information that eliminates 3 dimensions of reality, the motion of time cycles, the depth, 3^{rd} dimension of space planes and the5th dimension of scales not observed directly).

So we can now distinguish in more detail several key events of the 2 x 2 flows of motion and form from two N±1and L±2 planes of existence, in the first motion what we call a co-existing synchronizing flow, in the second case a death process in which the present ‘plane’ is jumped over, (quantum jump) and pure entropy is formed.

-. When a system dies, the $t-Past (∆-1) > ST-Present (n) > *ð§* Future (∆+1) is reversed WITHOUT the present. There is then a ‘quantum jump’ in a quanta of space-time, in which ALL the information, *ð§*, of the system is erased directly into an ∆-1 field of pure disordered energy, expanding in space, and this is the concept of disordered entropy we so often use. And write in ¬Æ as *ð§* < (Present jumped) < Se, or ab. as *ð§* <<$t, the mathematical and logic definition of death in ¬Æ.

All form (mass or charge) is devolved to the 2 lowest scales. This in physics is M+1 <©≈©<E-1, that is the mass which is the §*ð* state, becomes pure entropic, expansive radiation, after jumping << twice through the present ∑e x ∏I -light wave. As c is the constant wave of present space-time of our world.

– However in most cases energy and information is transferred back and forth from the field to the particle through the intermediate present wave-body, which processes it and transforms it for the field or the particle to use it. And this can be done with 0 entropy of energy and information either way when the system is absolutely efficient, which happens for all systems in certain balanced states mostly on the middle age ST, or for information in the old age of minimal energy, Tƒ, and for energy in the 1^{st} age of minimal information.

And this is what we mean by different arrows.

Namely a young state, which is ‘all energy’, can obviously transfer energy better, so a youngster is a better athlete. There is no inference of the negative, inverse formal arrow because the kid is pure motion. So he deliver entropy , motion ad maximal

And vice versa the solid, crystal, old man delivers information with minimal energy, pure form, because that is all what he has.

While in the middle the body-wave has both energy (entropy) and information (form) and then we must wonder how both become entangled and how they are transferred.

Now because only in the conception phase information is moved upwards with maximal quality (palingenetic process of fetus conception) and in death energy is moved downwards with maximal quality (pure entropy explosion) JUMPING over the present states, by palingentic acceleration of time cycles which are ‘void of any energy content’ and compressed for the efficient actions of time evolution on the 5h dimension (hence the fact that in 9 moths we evolve perfectly without entropy because the program has masterly selected only those formal motions that are efficient, eliminating the entire entropy of information provoked by the chaotic process of evolution), we shall then wonder what happens between the Tiƒ-1 (seed) >> to+1 <(ST<se) conception of the being, in which a seed of the lower scale emerges as a perfectly formed organism, relative social point of the ∆+1 social scale, and the death in which to+1 << Tiƒ-1 reverses into a seed.

It is call ‘existence’ as a messed up mixture of energy and information, and this is the time of entropy and information combined, created, destroyed, you name it.

Here though because the ‘principles of conservation of angular and lineal momentum, and its worldcycle integrals of internal and external kinetic energy, apply, the overall conservation of cyclical and lineal motions is assured what happens is that according to efficiency and the Darwinian program of selection the Universe selects the species with maximal momentum) physical systems) and with maximal existential force (max Head information x Max. body force).

** 5D METRIC OF PLANES AND SCALES**

Thus we can consider a general equation for all the previous ‘forms of matter’ and deduce some important general conclusions for all the fields of physics – specifically as an introductory note the powerless of T.Œ, the whys of general relativity space-time geometry and the unification equation of charges and masses.

This would be then a Generator equation of all ‘Spatial components of physical systems’:

**Γ****.** Se: accelerated entropy field <ST: energy wave <Tƒ: informative, Active magnitude

We shall use therefore 3 terms, which are more akin to the mathematical parameters of physics, but quite different in meaning when we add the asymmetric flows of energy and information of the 5th dimension:

- Se-1: ‘entropic field’, which is a field that expands space, transmitting an accelerated motion to the ‘physical system’ proper, made of a wave and a particle.
- ST: The wave carries energy in the physical sense, both stored as potential energy, hence a form of information and as a lineal path of motion, or kinetic energy, hence related to the accelerated entropic field; which can be deviated into ‘smaller actions’, of angular and lineal momentum – the 2×2 conserved magnitudes as the ST wave is the ‘present state’ of the system, hence the immortal physical constant. Thus ST is indeed a balanced mixture of the entropic, accelerated field and the implosive vortex:
- Tƒ+1: The Active magnitude or particle, which is also an accelerated field moving inwards. A clock time in different dimensions: Vo x Ro = K, being the simplest vortex in 2 dimensions, the quark, in 3 dimensions the charge, in 4 dimensions the mass.

Those are the elements to consider to describe all physical systems, which will be a reasoned mixture of cyclical and lineal motions in different dimensions, with different orientations, and chirality’s, along 3 relative scales, through which entropy of energy upwards and information inwards, will deform our perception of both directions, according to the metrics of the 5th dimension:

*In the graph, the metrics of the 5th dimension, Se x Tƒ = K, and its inverse arrows of informative entropy (downwards) and energetic entropy (upwards) establish the difference perceptions human have of its geometries and volume of information: we will find elliptic geometry upwards (general relativity), Euclidean in our plane, and hyperbolic downwards (wave states dominant on quantum physics). On the other hand, we will find much more information downwards (quantum multiple paths and fractal electrons, and sum over histories), as the speed of time clocks are much faster (hence we see many world cycles of particle together from our slower world); that upwards (slow paths of galaxies). Finally this in terms of curvature will appear as a huge increase of curvature in the lower scales (Q-constants) compared to the upper scales (weak G-constant). allowing a simple unification equation of both scales. Those results can be achieved with great detail using the more complex formalisms of quantum and relativity, but as we shall show now (as all sound models are similar), we can achieved the same ‘whys’ of the most seek after answers of mathematical physics, just with a sound conceptual reasoning and simple maths:*

According to those metrics, Time vortices accelerate downwards the speed of its time cycles, making smaller vortices more attractive Tƒ-Particles with increasing information, and hence the smaller spaces paradoxically more complex, storing more energy too. Reason why electromagnetic ‘smaller forces’ are much more attractive than gravitational.

We already considered 2 basic effects of those processes, WHICH ARE AT THE HEART of all the ‘big whys’ of modern physics, and when properly developed in the 4th line will give us all the results seek for the past century – the explanation of physics, __the unification of charges and masses, and the reasons of General Relativity strange space-time physics__.

**THE ORGANIC PERSPECTIVE: wholes.**

In that regard, the classifications of physical scales from the human perspective can be done with the previous ‘procedures’:

The simplest classification is to consider below human beings the quantum scale of ∆-electromagnetic forces; then the human thermodynamic ∆-scale of molecular matter based on heat and then the ∆+1 gravitational scale based on mass.

We could then consider the ‘objective’, external breaking of those scales each one in ternary scales, studied them independent of man, with the ‘main organic system of each scale’; the electromagnetic atom, the thermodynamic molecule (whereas a planet is just the largest scale of them), and the cosmological mass, (where the galaxy seems to be the medium sized scale). This is likely the more ‘grounded’ analysis, with the ‘intermediate’ maximal minimum, or ‘co-existing’ elements. Such as the molecule is the largest form of the electromagnetic scale, the moon the lowest form of the gravitational scale, and so on. We can then talk of 3 x 3 scales around those organic forms:

– ∆-1_{1}: Photon; ∆-1_{2}: atom; ∆-1_{3}: Molecule.

– ∆01: molecule; ∆02: Matter-Planet-Human; ∆03: Solar System

– ∆+11: Solar System; ∆+12: Galaxy; ∆+13: Cosmos.

**RATIOS OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS IN ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY.**

Now, the most important consequence of the scalar nature of the Universe is the fact that ‘absolute values’ hold no importance. They are mere mirages of the humind. Systems ARE RELATED BY RATIOS, often between scales, ‘power laws’, which fade as we cross scales, as renormalization understands.

So it is more important a ratio – density over mass; voltage over intensity and so on.

Physical systems respond to all the properties of GST systems, but humans ∆º minds, mostly visual, hence mathematical in its scientific pov, apply to them and investigate only mathematical equations of dynamical changes in space – the first Dimotion or Locomotion, V=s/t=λ ƒ≈ st (i-logic jargon).

So astrophysics is only a part of 5D³, the ∆º perception with an S-LANGUAGE view, where the logic level is of one arrow of time (Aristotelian), the level of space description a single scale, ∆, and the language the primitive Euclidean geometry of greek mathematics.

So once we are aware of those shortcomings and upgrade the discipline to Space-Time ternary principles of the generator equation many new solutions and whys to old ones are found. Here we are only concerned with a basic analysis of the big-bang, the Unification equation and the role of man in the Universe.

Let us then get into the ‘knots and bolts’ of mathematical physics, now that we have the minimum understanding of the Universe and its 5D³ laws.

**Main magnitudes of $, ð and ST (actions and energies).**

This said we can start the fun, relating classic physics to GST.

FIRST WE CONSIDER the obvious equivalence between the 3 magnitudes needed to describe e any equation of physics in each scale: a time parameter (frequency, temperature), a space parameter (distance, speed) and an ∆-scale parameter (mass or charge). It is perhaps the simplest obvious proof of the correspondence of physics and GST.

Indeed in the graph, we see that physics is all about 6 simple magnitudes, and they are simpler for PURE space-entropy and PURE time/form:

**$:** Length-speed to Pure space, (when we consider the paradox of relativity or Galileo paradox, which makes them 2 sides of the same coin). As entropy has the minimal number of dimensions (so do any limb/field parameter in any system)…

**ð:** Then we have a MAGNITUDE to measure PURE cyclical time frequency, ‘time’-DURATION, the ‘humind’ parameter for FREQUENCY the real one such as T=1/ƒ.

It is therefore the main parameter of the ‘membrane’ of the system, the frequency of the wave that envelops it, or the frequency of a circular motion that repeat itself.

So those 2 parameters are fairly straightforward as they are ultimately pure one-dimensional length and numerical frequency, and in certain way we can consider them due to *such purity, also the pure parameters of mathematical geometry, the line, and mathematical time, the number. Which again shows the experimental nature of pure mathematics.*

**∆±i:** And then we are left with four parameters, *all of them related to the third element of reality, for each scale, energy.*

Now, here is where all the complexity comes as humans are a complete ‘mess’ in their definition of energy, sometimes confused with entropy as in e=mc2 explosions, sometimes confused with informative parameters, as when in that equation they consider mass, which is a singular vortex. So in practice, the four parameters of scale have many interpretations and each one will need a bit of thought in its own:

**∆+3,4:** Mass is related to the maximal scale, and equivalent to energy on that gravitational, galactic scale. Hence its ‘weakness’ when perceived from our point of view as a force, since in fact is a parameter of an informative attractive, accelerated singularity, closer to the parameter of frequency time in that largest scale. As acceleration (seen in motion), is itself equivalent to curvature (acceleration seen static – paradox of Galileo), mass is therefore more of a time parameter for an upper scale. But *as we are ultimately inside the galaxy where the mass parameter measures the vortex, it is not so easy to perceive as a frequency, accelerated vortex, smaller and easier to visualise, or as the frequency of a wave-present state. *

**∆±1:** Next Temperature, is also a parameter in our human scale of the energy carry by the system but his vibrational speed (Hence carrying both motion and form, which are the two elements of present-energy T x S parameters),, since even in gases, we obtain it from the repetitive collisions we measure on the motion of entropic gases confined within a ‘volume’; so with form.

**∆-2:** It comes then charge, which we measure not in Particle, Tiƒ state, but as intensity of a wave-flow of electrons, and corresponds obviously to the quantum scale.

**∆-3:** And finally we measure candelas of luminous intensity for the minimally observed scale, the ∆-3.

So while each of those parameters of scale does have its complexity as they are quite arbitrary choices of humans, they do their job giving man a reference to each of the four scales of reality.

**∆±4:**Obviously the dark world is NOT measured, but we do have actually a measure of the distance/acceleration/motion of entropy between galaxies, on the dark entropy, wrongly called dark energy of the galaxy a hole in relative balance with its mass in a proportion of 3 to 1, which seems to give more value to entropy forgetting that in fact, this is *a dimensional measure,, and while we see the full dimensionality of vacuum space, mass is measured by man with a single dimension/scalar number that warps the other ones. *

*So in fact, the proportion is 1 to 1 and the Universe never expands nor it contracts.*

So those are the parameters of physics that suffice also in GST to explain once the concepts are streamlined, the structure of reality in each scale and its generator equations and events, sub equations of the generator.

We can then move to define all kind of equations of each scale in terms of those parameters and show they respond to isomorphisms actions and laws of any other super organism of the Universe.

In that regard, when the proper understanding of present states of energy are considered, it is better to use composite of two of such parameters, as momentum (the simpler present parameter, as energy will be its integral through a conservative time cycle).

To understand think on the ‘sentence’ every yin has a yang, so energy are entropic motion with little form, and in/form/ation, forms with little motions and both type of parameters, with ‘mixed’ e x ƒ elements *are chosen by humind membrains depending on the ‘use’ we have for such scales. *

And so we shall generally ascribe mass as a measure of time-frequencies or accelerated clocks with little motion, temperature as a measure of entropic motions with little form, while electric current and candela more ‘balanced’ measures of energy on those scales.

All those questions about what physicists measure with their huminds, in which moments and states, for which duration (momentum being a present quanta of time, energy its whole worldly, mass measuring an enclosure, though self-centred into a singularity which actually is a zero point of no attraction mass, and so on, shows how ambivalent is the supposed perfectly known human physics…

**Extension of the metric. The main equations of mathematical physics in the three scales.**

H, k, µ, K, C and G are the 6 more important constants of Nature. As we have already unified k and G as the constants of curvature=acceleration of the singularities of the quantum and galactic scale, our interest shall focus in the other four as the Proportionality constants that measure the present space-time of the four fundamental scales of the Universe.

Each of those proportionality constants can be seen from 4 perspectives according to the Rashomon effect as:

∆: constants of proportionality of each scale and as such as:

Est: Parameters of Energy (space-time present), which therefore will be composed of:

T: Frequencies of time (Time Cycles) &

S: Units of distance (Entropic past)…

So those four perspectives are fundamental to understand them.

Moreover as each constant can be considered from a ‘material perspective’ as the Unit of space-time of each scale, which ultimately form the parts of the unit of the next scale, each of the constant will be multiplied by a human character of population in space or frequency in time to give birth to the unit of the next scale. So:

h x quantiser ≈ k x quantiser ≈ µ x quantiser ≈ C x quantiser = Mass

This is the ideal understanding of those constants, according to 5D³. But human perception of those scales might be distorted in many ways as we know, so our parametrisation. Thus the study of those scales through its constants of action *is a form of deep thought to comprehend also how the human light>electronic mind measures and perceives the Universe. In the next graph we observe the human mind equations and parametrisation of those constants.*

In the graph, the four fundamental constants that define 5D metric equations on the 4 planes of the fifth dimension.

The Planck constant is the ∆-2, quantum constant of proportionality between its entropy and information. We shall call a Planckton.

The Boltzmann constant is the ∆-1 thermodynamic constant or Bolton.

The magnetic constant is the ∆+1 electric constant or magneton

The c constant is the dark world constant or Ceton.

Finally the Planck Units, which eliminate the humind membrain bias to fully grasp the meaning of the parameters of physics:

We have now all the elements needed to understand in ∆st terms the supœrganisms of physics in each scale. LET’s the games begin!

The first thing we notice reinforcing our Unification equation is that in Planck units the equations for mass and charge, are essentially the same, √c divided by the curvature constant of each scale, G or 4πk (eo=1k). As G has incorporated in its newtonian deduction 4π, they are indeed both the same. So *our analysis was correct, both scales are merely differentiated by the curvature, which by the Galilean paradox are also equivalent to acceleration, (and in fact treated in both cases with second derivatives, which ‘extract’ the ‘essence’ of a system up two scales/dimensions).*

This solved, obviously the interest concentrates on c, the product of the absolute minimum quanta of space and the absolute maximal quanta of space perceived by the electronic humind membrain. As h is the minimal unit of information and c the maximal unit of reproduction, we can see this product as the ‘complementarity spin-particle-angular momentum x energy-bodywave system of physical nature.

This is thus the ‘real thing’. The ultimate PlanCkton, the body-head supœrganism of the physical Universe; and *when we carve=curve it on the small world, we get a charge, and when we ‘feed it’ into the large world we get a mass.*

Simple, isn’t?

When charges are measured in units of qP, we have e = 0.30282212088 as in vital ‘mathematics’ we systematically deny ‘scaling’ beyond the 3 ∆-scales of a real supœrganism, (those smaller decimals are at best perturbation effects of other scales), numerology and exactitude in decimals becomes irrelevant beyond the second decimal. So e=0.30, o.3 Planck charges.

In other words, 10 e = 3 Planck charges & 10/3 quark charges = 3 Planck charges.

If you distribute them through different ‘dimensions’, of space-time, you can then see them really meaning the same. I.e. 3 quarks in a temporal sequence give you an electron, 3 electrons in a temporal sequence, plus a quark gives you the ‘whole’ Planck charge, that you must consider then to be the full ‘body-head’ charge of the atom.

This natural unit of electric charge, 3 electrons + a quark must then be considered as the *next scale of organisation of hc*

And so this solved; we must deduce the same concept for mass, where the Planck mass is so huge that it must by force relate NOT to the scale we live in but to the next scale which is the Black hole intergalactic scale. So the Planck mass is the bare minimum black hole unit, and mass, again appears as a cosmological constant, the absolute maximal perceived on the galactic scale – we being, residual resonances of that mass higher world.

So we can envision our known Universe as made of a fundamental being, the PlanCkton, with an h first head photon, followed by a tail of light space-time… *with parameters of Energy and Distance…*

**The quantum world… The photon and electron super organism, its conversion and actions.**

Each of those constants must be then understood as a partial view of the generator equation of the T.œ of the quantum scale. Specifically the time space organism we are observing is the photon which is a complex entity, but the amplest minimal being of our light>electronic universe.

It is then when the fundamental elements of the quantum world studied by physicists appear, *as evolutions, symmetries and entities constructed from the fundamental PlanCkton*.

As we can discharge, the *units of the galactic scaling that do NOT belong to the quantum world. So*, MKS is no longer appropriate when studying physics at the microscopic level (atom, nucleus, nucleons, quarks, etc …). Now the basic units are the electron-volt (eV) and the Fermi (F or fm)).

And using the values of h, Planck’s constant and c, the speed of light we obtain in this new system the fine structure constant (α), Bohr radius and the electron Compton wavelength given by equations:

In the graphs we see that the fine structure constant is not ‘a fundamental constant’ in the sense of ‘numerology’ (Eddington, etc.) but merely the feeding ratio which builds UP the electron as a dense cloud of photons curved by the k-constant.

Which leads to an *essential need for understanding what combinations of dimensional parameters in physics are ‘meaningful’ to describe ‘whole super organisms of space-time’. So we must seek for combinations that describe an Spe x Tiƒ field-particle duality or an ST merged wave. and those are the Ke², hc, GM combinations with a ‘curvature-acceleration-time future parameter’ (k, h, g) and an energy element (e,c,m).*

The first of those is thus the hc, ‘head of angular spin=photonic state, tail of wave-distance motion’ system. And not surprisingly is the ‘densest-smallest’ in potential information, when measured in terms of ‘energy-distance’.

As hc value is 1241 Mev per femtometer, that is it packs in the size of a nucleon radius enough energy to reproduce 1 and ±1/3rd of a nucleon, it follows that the collapse of a wave of light into a virtual particle is not at all difficult or strange, as it will still leave a remnant for the vital space and ‘electronic enclosure’ (often expansions of the neutron into a Hydrogen atom).

On the other hand if that conversion is into an electron, it gives origin to a ke² configuration, where again we can consider k, a constant of curvature (distance-measure) and e² a dual electron, hence a tridimensional perpendicular dual harmonic sphere which encloses a 3 D space.

It is also in accordance with 5D metric that the smaller photon is denser than the larger particle, in the russian doll game. So the transition between the h-quantum photon to particle planes is fairly straight and well established through those universal constants.

What about Mass? Can we apply a simple dual ‘dimensional equation’ to express a more complete concept of Mass as we do with the hc photon or the ke² electron? Yes, and as usual is a ‘standard’ gravitational ‘parameter’, gM, which has the units *of 5D metrics again: volume in space (Spe) / angular acceleration (third kepler’s law, definition of a vortex of time). In the graph we can see that law, the first realisation of 5D metric, as the different planets are ordered in a vortex of increasing speed, the closer it comes to the Earth. When the vortex is in balance the orbit closes into itself, but all vortex are by definition minimally accelerated, so those planets will end up being swallowed by the planet.*

So we have 3 ‘standard’ overwhelmingly used in physical equations, parameters for the 3 ‘particle-future-informative-still’ states of the 3 main physical forms,** the hc, photon, the ke² electron and the gM mass,** where one component is as a ‘still dimensional perception’ curvature, as a moving perception a parameter of accelerated time clocks, and the other a parameter of a ‘wave volume’ constrained by the force.

It is interesting to notice the difference of terms in the electron, which appears as a square, (so does in fact c speed in almost all equations such as e=mc² and properly written its Maxwell’s speed equation: c²≈k/µ; reason why we must conclude that we talk in both cases of ‘bidimensonal surfaces’, in light and electrons (obviously the spherical harmonics of the vibrating membrane that encloses the atom – themes more complex which have to deal with the different speeds of quarks – with faster clocks than the human electron clock; ways of sealing with two electrons of inverse spin the membrane of the atom, etc. )

The equivalence of all those ‘dual dimensional elements’, product of a curvature/angular momentum and a spatial measure (squared often to obtain a volume), which always adopt the general form of S³/T²=Active magnitude (scalar x curvature: Gm, Ke², hc), is observed also in the square definition of Planck’s Mass: GM²=c.

**Similarity and Symmetry confused with equality.**

Yet as a final comment/warning cause of many confusions on physical concepts, we are equalling all those equations through the maximal ‘entropy’=minimal information E-parameter (most often used as energy<entropy dissolving dynamic arrows), hence making WRONG ASSUMPTIONS OF EQUALITY, = being in abstract the wrong concept, as it does NOT mean equality but SIMILARITY OR SIMMETRY. ONLY WHEN properly understood in logic terms the symbols and operandi of mathematical physics, we can make sense of those equations.

i.e. MASS IS NOT ENERGY, MASS can through the ‘symmetry’ between informative states and entropic states, become ‘dead’ and explode into entropy, through the intermediate conversion into the ‘minimal units’ of the dark world, c-squares of space-time, giving ‘back’ to a simpler ∆-1 scale without mass membranes, and liberating its ‘quanta’ – those c square bidimensional units of space-time.

And so if we want to ‘conceptually’ understand mathematical physics is NOT enough just to manipulate as a computer mechanon equations and ‘similarities’ as absolute equalities, to get finally some weird representation of a ‘thing’ in terms of parameters of other thing and scale.

It is like saying that you are a dinosaur, because you can equate your vital mass to a bunch of ‘simpler amino acids’, after your e=m, dissolution, and then you are a bunch of amino acids to which you apply a ‘genetic transform’ and come up with another amino acid combination called a Dinosaur.

Mass does not appear as a membrane when we operate with smaller ‘amino-acids’, aka particles which have no mass, and do not feel at all the gravitational field below the ‘size’ of the minimal quanta of mass, likely around the weight of a top quark ‘unit’ of a black hole top quark star, around the last ‘raw’ of atomic heavy metals, on the row of lead, gold, mercury, uranium, etc. which are ‘sensible’ to mass and can obviously act with such a force… Below that row mass effects are negligible and we enter fully into the ‘intermediate forces’ of magnetism (maximal order, iron row) or heat (maximal effect in our light atomic row, and the molecular games established on it.)

It is ALWAYS troublesome to use absolute equality concepts when comparing ‘different super organisms and parameters of the 3 physical planes, the quantum electrodynamic, the human thermodynamic/magnetic and the gravitational planes.

Of those 3 planes the more complex as it is the better observed plane is the human plane, and here again we must as we reach higher detail analyse the essential limited, constrained domain, which is that of light atoms of the ud-quark lighter family.

*So we enter in the analysis of the table of elements and its social scales, §, within the same intermediate physical plane, ∆0, sandwiched between the realm of hc and the realm of Gm, in the realm of ke², our mind-world. *

This realm can be then ‘differentiated’ in 3 clear groups:

– The thermodynamic scale, dominant in molecular, subtle complex systems made with the first light rows of non-metallic atoms, OUR WORLD and its triad of OXYGEN (Max. Spe) the entropy of life beings, carbon (max. s=t) the structural body and Nitrogen (max. i) the informative brain of life.

-The magnetic scales, dominant in magnetic domains, with the top predator ferromagnetic atoms, which for that reason are the most energetic of the Universe of light ud-masses, perfectly ordered in scales of millions of atomic units, organised by magnetic ‘membranes’, around the triad co-ni-fe, where iron is the structural body, cobalt the radioactive entropy and nickel the informative element.

-The mass scales, dominant in mechanic domains, with the top predator heavy metals, gold-mercurium-lead, where lead is the final entropic element of the cascades of radioactivity, mercury the liquid, amalgamating, creative balanced atom and gold the informative one, which would allow to ‘design’ metal-bacteria with radioactive skins to fuel with a ‘clock of life’ that ends in inert lead, the liquid mercury, in which amalgamated atoms will be guided by DNA-gold brains.

Such perfect cellular metalife of course would kill and poison by radioactive pollution life in this planet as it multiplies feeding on heavy metals, within months. So it is in the models of history one of the many ‘lethal’ developments of nanotechnology humans should avoid but won’t likely do given their astounding infantile, entitled, ‘enzymanic’ comprehension of reality.

As ALL SYSTEMS OF NATURE PROPERLY DESGINED AS PERFECT TERNARY SUPERORGANISMS WILL DISPLAY THE ACTIONS OF FEEDING ON ENERGY provoking the entropic death of weaker elements, required.

So the first supœrganism of reality is the hc planCkton but we cannot see it, only measure it externally through the ‘angular momentum’, the spin of its scanning head, and its body-wave, as it moves along the path of its quantum potential, ∆-1 scale. We know it will end up becoming part of the electron, its ∆-scale, because it has the same dimensions that the square electron, multiplied by its constant of curvature; hence if the bidimensional wave of the electron is squared to create a three dimensional volume, and the curvature stops the light wave, the transformation is complete, by the 1/137 ratio.

So we write: ∑hc (plancktons) = 3D curved electron. And this is indeed the meaning of an electron nebulae. Today we can observe closely the electron and all what we see indeed is either a nebulae of light or the constant ‘rays’ of light photons ‘trapped into the 3D curved geometry’ of k-urvature.

Now that we know the meaning of those h and c constants and its dual states, as curvature and distance, it is interesting to compare both scales in many ways and we do so by translating the somehow more complex electromagnetic jargon to the ‘simplest’ of all ‘valid’ formulations of a singularity (Rashomon effect), which is Newton’s vortices. It is then interesting to compare the Bohr radius with the Schwarzschild radius, which turns out to be equivalent to a proton vortex of the black hole, cosmological scale: 2GM/c²

We thus have a few basic elements of the 5+5 s≈t light-electron system in place.

**h and c in different versions**

It is also of interest to compare the ‘wave state’ of planckton, hc and the ‘feeding state’ as it feeds a mass: M = ƒ(h/c²), which *keeps absorbing light as angular momentum, *and the third inverse state of mass ‘vomiting’ c² quanta into entropic space M= E/c², which the reader can notice is the same equation but with ‘inverse’ directionality, where now ƒh becomes pure entropy, being expelled from the mass.

So h and c and its relationships with mass are essential concepts of nature.

Indeed we come in contact with the 3 most important constants/parameters of the Human world – our electronic mind perception of the Universe, which is how ultimately our atomic elements and those of digital machines perceive reality. This must be clear: we see our electronic mind-mapping of the Universe, a visual world which misses a lot of reality. Our mind space-time is light and *those 2 constants are the main constants of light; c is the rod-constant of speed-distance-space, and h is the time constant, reason why it is quantised, since ‘clocks’ tic, go and stop and only when they stop we see its hour. Remember the paradox of Galileo: minds perceive information in stillness, and their bodies move them. So quantised parameters are time parameters.*

Moreover h is measured in angular momentum, and so it is a cyclical time parameter, and it is the parameter that processes information, which is the exact meaning of time: the cyclical information stored in time cycles. So as electronic minds which perceive light space-time as information, we have those 2 parameters that will be ever pervading, with so many ‘branchings’ as any time-space system which builds an entire world starting with two single elements. For example, the entire String theory departs from lineal space strings and cyclical time strings; the entire computer ‘world’ is built with O and |. So with h and c we come to construct most of our reality.

This simple truth, which so far escapes physicists is a first conceptual brick to reconstruct our mind-world.

So what h/c² means? There are several ways t explain its meaning. The simplest one is to think on m as we just have described: the curvature/speed (Galileo’s duality: speed=distance) of the vortex of time. So h can be seen as the curvature of time in the quantum realm, c as the speed of propagation of that information in the larger gravitational scale. Another way to see that ratio is to make it homologous to the ‘ratio of Lobachevski’s to define a geometry or ‘mind view’, and it expresses our ‘worldview’ as one very flat, since Lobachevski’s flatness depend on the ratio: Max. flatness=Min. t/Max. S. So humans see a very flat Universe.

One with little curvature, strength, density of ‘mass’; attractive power, speed. But curvature accumulates through frequency. So while <<h/cc means a flat, light universe, the ƒ factor might determine a very dense mass, if its frequency of rotation is huge, as in a tiny black hole with a huge c-speed in the horizon.

So we live sandwiched between a minimal quantum clock, h, or more exactly , a radian, 57º, which can be considered as the angle of ‘vision’ of the Planckton entity, similar to the angle of vision of most ‘life beings’, like the horse in the graph.

Notice that the horse has two eyes and a binocular view with an h/2π= So we could say it has a ‘head-spin’ of h/π.

Consider now a ‘one eyed’ horse-head/particle, it would have an h/2 spin, which would Handicap his view. Now translate this homology to the particle. A boson has more spin, it is a better form to move than a fermion. If you bring closer two one-eyed horses chances are they collide. You cannot bring closer two fermions, they will annihilate together. But the more ‘visual’ bosons can walk in huge packed herds. Those HOMOLOGIES are serious. If we accept that all space-time beings have their laws derived from its substances, time-clocks do ‘perceive’ and process information through its pi apertures.

On the other hand, c comes from the largest possible world we perceive, the border between the gravitational and light world. As such it is a constant of length-speed, which c-speed coming from the larger scales of the galaxy and the dark world beyond.

Remember – smaller systems process faster information so our quantum of time-information had to come forcefully from our ∆-i scales; and larger beings have more distance-entropy>energy, and so our c-speed comes from the larger∆+i galactic scale.

And with those 2 elements, as computers do with O and | and strings with lines and cycles, we construct the Universe.

The electron thus needs at least 2 ‘quantum numbers’ for its body-wave state spin and its particle-head state spin. The body wave spin represents its energy, the particle spin represents its information. And, departing from it, it deploys the simplest of all actions as it absorbs a spin of angular momentum to fill the converging gap till arriving to the singularity.

And vice versa, when emitting an action, outwards, the particle state of an electron, will deliver in a quantum of time, a single quantum action of an h-planckton of entropy> energy: e=hƒ.

As te Unit of time and energy, both thus differ, as energy *is the whole value of an entire world cycle, and an action a minimal part of the whole; so in the energy formulae, h is complete, in the spin, is a smaller part.*

How then the mass relates to the spin if the mass is the largest possible angular momentum, in the galactic scale? We need thus an intermediate state, to ‘sip’ some of the energy-momentum of the spin, through the magnetic/thermodynamic intermediate scale. And this happens indeed, as the spin is connected to a magnetic field that puts the spins of electrons or particles in resonance and simultaneity. Then it extracts from the the energy that the magnetic field itself looses to the mass field that surrounds magnetic fields. So energy-motion sips forward.

Think then of the magnetic and mass vortex as the ‘envelops: the magnetic cyclical flow ‘parasites’ as envelop the spin charge, and the mass cyclical vortex parasites the magnetic flow. And this is expressed in a simple equation µ m = e S; and the various effects which seem to confirm the magnetic field *makes appear ‘mass’, hence absorbs energy to make it become ‘mass’, in smaller particles, and transfers its magnetic momentum to angular mass momentum in a lot of processes.*

So membranes ‘absorb energy-momentum’ from smaller scales emerging as a new vortex, and this is what we show in the last picture of a thermodynamic vortex, the best observed, made of smaller ‘action vortices’ converging towards its singularity.

And we will return to those ‘concepts’ in the 4th line, studying its mathematical formulae to fill it with concepts. Enough to say that we have 3 basic eddies of time:

∆-1> h-photons, electrons whose magnetic momentum orders millions of atoms into the ∆-scale, which transfers by way of studied phenomena, such as the giro magnetic effect and the g-ratio, its motion to the mass-vortex…

In that regard, as we study in depth those scales it will be apparent that magnetism brings ‘order’ information, while the electric field brings entropy, motion and heat in larger measure, and in general terms those are the dualities and ‘scalar’ flows: information flows from spin to magnetic fields to mass; entropy>energy flows from the quantum potential to the quantum orbital body-wave part of the electron, to the electric hot field, to the light side of the e=mc2, properly written as M<<cc.

This is the ‘simple scheme’ of emergence of information and entropy through the scales. The details of course and the variation on those dual, inverse arrows are enormous but that is the task of the ‘details’ done by physicists with astounding merit and detail. A philosopher of science must respond to the homologic whys and the properties of the ultimate substances space and time.

And now for the spooky effect of that transfer, which is THROUGH RESONANCE, that is simultaneous synchronised motion, bring about by the magnetic field, which in this manner perceives and imitates the turning around and will transfer itself to the mass, whose full comprehension requires a thorough analysis of the equations of gravitomagnetism and electromagnetism, similar but with inverse rotational orientations, a clear inversion between scales that makes possible to ‘evolve into new scales of the fifth dimension’ as also fermions can do, so we have also a chain of beings:

On one hand, spin 1, no mass, never closed into a full circle -photons (bosons) and gravitons (whose spin 2 on relativity is open to discussion, specially if we consider the logic choice of neutrinos and the neutrino theory of light, latter discussed in more detail)

On the other side spin 1/2 electrons+quarks (fermions)> atomic and molecular systems; which do NOT travel so much through space, creating it but do travel upwards, in social scales of the fifth dimension, through time.

Enough of this, as it is conceptually more difficult but essential to fully grasp the inverse duality between photons and fermions.

**The Human Perspective.**

Now, it is obvious that this structure reduces the planes worth to study to ‘7’ planes, with a central human plane, ‘matter’ and 3 above and 3 below.

Then we approach more to what we perceive, which is NOT all what there is there, and adds the DEFORMATION humans experienced when perceiving those 3 scales above and below – and then beyond the first 4^{th} invisible scale.

This is the preferred structure recognizing both the organic, objective and subjective perspective. The quantification and antisymmetries then are added as the 3^{rd} layer of complex description of each scale.

And so we should talk with ∆_{o}, as the human matter-thermodynamic scale of the other scales with ‘reference’ to human perception of them.

So first let us see what is the nature of that deformed perception in general terms.

t is indeed essential for the reader to understand that linguistic mappings, stifle and deform the objective similarity of all beings.

So all kind of distorted images that carry a certain truth are possible, and relatively correct, but ONLY an objective analysis from the widest possible perspective, will make sense of all of them.

This widest Theory Of Everything, naturally can only be proposed by a Philosopher of Science, whose task is precisely to understand all the varieties of ‘formal motions’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ in space and time, measured by the infinite frames of reference of the Universe.

While each science and scientist will study a particular form and type of species in its detail, with more or less deformation according to the linguistic models it proposes, its specific ‘ego-centered paradox’ and the ‘worldly profession’, it engages with. Which of course the Philosopher of Science must also explain, to the chagrin of the different ‘Religions’, ‘Cultures’ and ‘Minervas of the North’, and the sure solitude that will engulf his work.

So how can we differentiate subjective truths, and biases? Tƒ that aim the philosopher of science has created the ‘Scientific method’, which the likes of Aristotle and Descartes established, and the likes of Galileo and Newton usurped and deformed.

But as we said all relative truths carry certain information, which is valid to create a mapping of reality and that is why subjective versions of reality do work and remain standing. Indeed, Ptolemy could perfectly establish the orbits of planets with the Earth at its center, just adding epicycles. But it was a very complicated motions. Thus Science considers the fundamental ‘tool’ to distinguish a higher objective truth from a subjective one, called Ockham’s razor: the simplest theory of reality which can explain the maximal number of facts is a more objective truth.

This was the merit of Descartes, the true founder of modern science, which we have upgraded to our ternary analysis of all systems of the Universe, in what we shall call, T.Œ, the Theory of the Organic Everything, as all those ternary systems made of cyclical times, lineal spaces and self-centered territorial points of view that organize them, will show clear ‘organic patterns in its form and actions.

Let us then, keep narrating, the next installment of the history of western thought, and its duality between the Philosophers of science, who know better vs. the Physicists, who have more power – explain in modern terms the findings of Descartes, with the help of the new mathematical tools of topology and fractal geometry those discoveries, in more detail.

**Energy equations.**

The first equations to consider of mathematical physics are the equations of energy, which integrate in each scale a given spatial quanta, according to its ‘population’ for unit of time.

Such as: Energy = ∑ Sp, whereas ∑ varies according to the quantity of simultaneous ‘spatial quanta’ we measure in a given ‘time clock’ of different speed or ‘density of information’.

So we shall find an entire range of different species, with different ‘energy power’, regarding their ∑ Sp total value. If we call each of those Sp quanta a ‘quanta of lineal momentum’, or quanta of space, then we can consider that (kinetic) Energy is the integral of the lineal momentum of the system.

In the graphs, the 3rd element needed to understand the fractal structure of the Universe is the 5th dimension, which orders all systems according to their relative size in space or ‘quanta’, multiplied by the frequency of its time clocks, to create larger super organisms or physical systems. It is the interaction between the minimal quanta of each scale and its time clocks, what defines the main laws of science and describe those systems, both in space as synchronous organisms and in time, as systems that live through world cycles of increasing ‘accelerated’ time frequency. In brief, any system can be decomposed into a minimal quanta of space, a Universal constant, multiplied by a time frequency or population of quanta. So in Physics we have 3 equations that integrate al the quanta in space of a system and its frequency of population: E=hv, for the quantum scale, E=knT for the thermodynamic scale and E=mc2 for the gravitational scale.

Yet similar equations can define the different fractal systems of other sciences. For example, humans have a DNA unit cell multiplied by billions. And this social structure of reality defines a series of ‘eusocial scales’ of growth, from particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, societies, solar systems, and galaxies, that defines a new arrow of time-space, the 5th dimension. It is the absolute ARROW OF TIME, as wholes must appear after the parts, they evolve socially.

So eusocial love, the arrow of evolution of parts into wholes IS the most important arrow of reality – a fact understood by Darwin (species not individuals evolve) by prophets of eusocial love (humans should evolve socially into a global super organism without nations and wars), and of course by every little part of the Universe that come together into ‘integral sums’ of Energy. In the graph above, we describe the 3 main bidimensional space-quanta of physical systems, a bijector of angular momentum (H-planck) of the ∆-1 quantum scale, an entropic K-Boltzmann quanta of the ∆ Thermodynamic scale, and an ∆+1 quanta, the constant of c-speed. Below we show the ternary parts of all those systems, integrated in physical sciences with the scalar parameter of energy (an integral of the lineal momentum and angular momentum or Sp and Tƒ elements of the system). So in physics we write the generator equation of all physical systems, as the ‘conservation principle of energy and information’:

Ei= ∆-1 h(sp) x ƒ (Tf) -> ∆ k (Sp) x nT (Tƒ) ->∆+1: m x cc

This is the lower left graph In the right graph, we show pictures of those scales, proper of all ST beings of our human Universe, according to their size and time speed.

So energy is ultimately a relative present quanta of time, a concept essential to 5D time space, which we shall define here

**Comparing energy and motion. **

Now in this very brief introduction to i-mathematical physics we have defined already some of the fundamental parameters of mathematical physics – the Tiƒ vortex of information of the ∆±1 scales (charges and masses), the 3 Energetic quanta of space, and its relative frequency of present time (frequency, temperature, speed), and finally we have defined speed as the reproduction of form, along a path, confirming the meaning of Energy as the product of a space-quanta, and a reproductive ‘wave’, in present time.

The implications though from an organic perspective are daring, as speed is reproduction of form, and since ‘locomotion’ was the only NON organic type of motion, it turns out that all the motions of the Universe are organic.

Now we would like to call attention to an element of this analysis not considered yet, the role of the 5^{th} dimension in those essential parameters of physics.

So we will be able to understand better the principles of conservation of energy and momentum, and its meaning, as well a that of speed as reproduction of a wave of form, over a lower, ∆-1 scale of reality.

Let us start by an obvious question: if something moves, this something must also be defined, and as it is usually an active magnitude, defined as a time vortex (a mass, a charge, a molecule), what moves is a temporal form with maximal information, of a lower scale of reality. Thus the entity that moves is NOT in the same plane of existence where motion is detected.

And so while energy is an scalar value which can be considered to exist in a single plane and define the ‘unit of space-time’ of the being or existential force (and so happens with its equivalent, Tiƒ, mass or charge, conversion, E=M), speed is a vectorial quantity in which there is the need to express the existence of two parameters of two scales, the active magnitude, the scalar, and the plane in which the motion takes place, the vector.

Speed thus, shows the being swimming between two waters, its internal ‘energy structure’ as active magnitude and its external space-time cyclical action in the ∆+1 world. And as such it is better expressed as a function of lineal momentum (external entropic or steady state action) or angular momentum (external, informative action), since the function of momentum includes the active magnitude of the being.

So Energy (entropic, Spe view) < = > Mass/Charge: Active magnitude (Tiƒ view) is the ‘being in itself’, a scalar.

And Momentum is the being and its action in the external world, P, L (lineal, angular momentum).

It should then seem apparently that momentum is larger than energy, as it adds to the Active Magnitude a new cycle in a larger scale, but – and this is the beauty of the harmony between parts and wholes, which repeat across scales the same functions – we measure, actually energy as the integral of the momentum of the being in its larger scale. So we can establish a picture on what the existence of physical systems, and by extension all systems means:

– Entities do have an internal Energy content, which can be perceived as entropic capacity (kinetic energy) or informative capacity (Potential energy), and we shall call together Present, ST, or Ei.

It is its present capacity to act in the ∆-scale of existence as a whole. And we can calculate this capacity in terms of its ∆-1 ‘cellular/atomic (space) and time tics’:

∆Ei=∆-1:∑ Sp.

where ∑ is a quantizer of the relative synchronous number of space-quanta (h-planck, k-Boltzmann, m-ass) of each ∆±1 scale.

It is this formula, the one mathematical physics considers for its 3 main scales: E=hƒ; E=nkT; E=1/2mv^{2}

But then the entity as part of a larger ∆+1, will merely become a scalar point, a quanta or unit of momentum of that larger world, where it will again move and become cell/cycle unit of space-time of the larger whole, *emerging again as momentum, from the ∆+1 perspective.*

Thus with its internal Active Magnitude/Energy capacity the being will ‘act’ externally by displaying in the world, a momentum, becoming an ‘atomic/cellular part’, or ‘action/cycle’ (Space vs. time views), a space-time cyclical action, *as ∆-1 micro-quanta.*

*And this constant switch on between micro-beings, part of macro-beings, Active Magnitudes (Ei), becoming the static source that provides the momentum for the larger being, which integrates all those micro-momentums to become a larger Active Magnitude, Ei, which again becomes the source that provides momentum for a larger scale, is how the Universe proceeds in its relentless growth of scales.*

*It therefore becomes essential to know how the micr**o**-points transcend and emerge, giving away their energy-information to the larger wholes, without exhausting it all and making it all coming to a halt.*

*Why this does not happen is obvious: because the ultimate essence of the Universe is a quantity of motion, which never stops, the ultimate reality is a volume of motion, which can be fixed into ‘fleeting forms’, by any mind that sees a synchronous parts as a mental form, and so in the below, any monad can stop reality into a virtual world, in the larger reality any of those ‘stopped’ mental space will be a huge flow of motion. *

When we see it in that ‘wider picture’, it is of little relevance the mental measures a certain language-world establishes on the whole universe of eternal motions. Still because we humans, make sense of it, and create the world we see around, with many other similar mathematical minds, it is important to understand in this new picture of infinite planes, what are the…

** CONSERVATION LAWS & QUANTITIES BETWEEN SCALES.**

The UNIVERSE CONSERVES quanta of PRESENT SPACETIMES. Ei, our symbol for the dual state of energy-mass (entropy/active magnitude, time-motion/still space) of any scale.

Those present spacetimes, become ‘de facto’ reproduced presents, when the cycle closes into itself (there is a closed energy loop, where work is not done, hence even if there has been a motion, there is not an expenditure of it). This is difficult to grasp for the mind who thinks there is constant friction and things get spent, and a source of much confusion and errors in all sciences, from the famous error of Aristotle who thought heavier objects felt faster, to the exploited error of the masses who think they have to work hard to earn a living, as if energy were NOT eternal in a Universe where the ultimate substance IS motion and the Maya, is the fixed form.

What does happen though is that when a space-time cycle does not close, it becomes entropic and part of its Ei ‘escapes’, and it is absorbed by the medium or other beings. So we must differentiate what happens to closed time cycles which are preserved (and for example in General relativity such accelerated vortices live longer according to the twin paradox that lineal paths), vs. lineal open cycles which suffer tear and spend the Ei or ‘exi=st-ential force’ of the being.

So 3 are the ‘set of parameters’ or conceptual formulae of physics, which deal with all this elements, the concept of ‘Force’, of “momentum’ and of “energy’, which are the elements used in the ‘actions’ of physical system, and we need to find some general rules for any scale in which those 3 elements combinations of Sp and Tƒ ≈ ST ≈ Ei presents become.

Time Existences. The forms and motions of its beings, reproduced constantly in present waves of times, in which past-energy and future-information combine.

Time existences, T.œ is thus a theory of conservation not of the spatial egos, fixed mappings of an ever moving Universe, but of the motion itself and its 3 past, present and future dimensional motions. That is what is all about. The eternally immutable, perfect, ever variable all and nothing cancelling and paradoxical, ±∆TS, and its conservation laws.

The constancy of existences…

Existential Algebra, æ, deals with the development of the symmetries of space-time, between the 3 2-manifolds of space and the 3 motions of time, its symmetries, |-Space, O-Time and Ø-presents, and its asymmetric combinations, (forms which combine |-time (entropy), O-Space (information) and |-Present (death) or O-Present (emergence).

It is though difficult for the non-initiated into the paradoxical, combinatorial of Æ to fully grasp the logic of it. We are always playing with quantized arrows of temporal motion, which aggregate into a scalar zero sum, in as much as time conserves by the mere fact that it cancels its past and future arrows into presents. Thus we consider a fundamental equation for all sequences of existential algebra:

*Past x Future = Present*

but why the X symbol and not the + symbol? When an equation of Æ changes its symbols? What is the events in which superposition, ±, works and when the X holds, and when the log applies?

The 3 scales of operandi of reality conform to the ± of space, X of sequential algebra and potentiation of integral in both space and time. We might say thus there are 3 forms of growth spatial sums, cyclical world cycle products and 5D integrals – 3 operandi for 3 forms of transcendence, emergence, and dissolution, multiplication and reproduction, sum and rest of energy, product and division of information, emergence or dissolution of the world cycle of an existence.

And calculating all about it, existential algebra, Æ, and its laws regulate it all.

Let us start then our analysis of existential waves by giving some order to it, starting from the simplest proposition.

All is time. Time is motion. Since all is motion and motion never stops time and the Universe, all is eternal. Eternal motion however can vary. The game is thus about variations of motions. Motions are of 3 types in a single dimension, lineal, curved inwards into circles, curved outwards into hyperbolas. Those 3 forms hold for 2 manifolds, in which toroid (lineal), spherical (curved) and hyperbolic (hyperbola) are the 3 varieties. Thus when time and space mix, 2-manifolds of time-space are of the 3 same varieties: |-S fields/limbs <, O-T heads/particles > and Ø-ST bodies/waves ≈

__Logic-mathematical proof. __The Universe is immortal=∞.

The probability of It not to be immortal but of finite time, T=K, is quasi-null: K/∞ = 0%.

Since the reminder the Universe would be in non existence, non existence would have an infinite duration.

Thus a finite existence, divided by the total existence K/K+∞ =0, gives us the probability of existence of a Finite T Universe, and we, within it. By reductio ad absurdum if the probability of existence of a finite universe but the probability of existence of an immortal Universe is 1. Since we exist, we must deduce, that the Universe exists for ever: T=∞, ∞/∞=1 probability.

In brief the Universe either existed never or existed always. Since now it exists, it must stretch for ever and duration must be infinite T=∞, and the probability of being, 1.

A finite time on the other hand mean a O% of the total duration, a T+∞≈100%

Thus the chance that at any moment we are in existence in a finite time Universe is null.

__Therefore it conserves time, in its three |xO=Ø varieties.__

Now because we exist in present, the Ø varieties are the most common of them all. A variety of bidimensional space time normally is unlike the 2 variety of | and O, a composite, so we talk of the fundamental addition of 3 different topologies such as

**Γ**. T² + S² + sT +St = O

As the most common ‘equation’ of space-time fractals and hence of mathematical physics. Where we have 4 points of view, the Œ-Point of view, which observes all the elements of the wave, the |se variety S2, the Tƒ variety, T² and its 2 present combination max. S x Min. T and max. T x Min. S.

Tƒ notice that this kind of equation gives us the equations of most conics, if we consider the perpendicular X, Y axis to represent the functions of time and space. Thus in mathematics we study analytic geometry as a Cartesian graph of X and Y parameters, where X-space and Y(t) elements carry also its special meaning when we substitute Y for i.

Those terms will be clarified when we study mathematical physics.

Tƒ notice here that the mathematical method used here to explain reality is the inversion to the data -g authoring, analytic method. We depart from the top synthesis, the conservation of time motions and derive from it all human languages, mirrors of this Universal Grammar of:

X(S) + Y (T) = St +Ts

whereas St= -Ts are the inverse ‘energy’ and ‘information’ combinations of present, and

X(s) ±Y(T) the pure functions of space and time.

What this equation simply means is the join sum of 3 elements of space time, the head/particle (Tƒ) the limb/field (Se) and the hyperbolic body with its two limits of maximal space x min. time St and maximal time for minimal space, Ts.

This equations through its partial differentials that show sums of them across space or time, with analysis being the language of the transcendence and dissolution of planes of existence, are the kind of equations we will find when analyzing the 4 åctions of space-time of physical particles, states of matter and cosmic bodies, in the U|∆>2| Universes studied by physicists.

Once this is clear we are obliged to state that the Universe conserves time. Since if it does not conserve it, in infinite existence time would have already been exhausted. And yet time keeps going.

And this is what the equation shows. This equation when differentiated gives origin to Hamiltonians and Lagrangians, as it expresses the constant conservation or rather balance of time and space, as we can write it as:

(T +S)²=0

If we consider then T the function of time and S of space, its final sum equals zero and this is to say a lot. Let us consider for example the that T represent the kinetic energy (function of space) and S the positional potential energy (function of time). Their sum in calculus of variations is a minimal function accepted. As both remain invariant. The invariance of T+S, is thus one of the fundamental invariants of the Universe, and we could even state the origin of the ± symbology. Each represent a T.Œ of time motion, kinetic energy, lineal motion, potential energy, cyclical motion of its active magnitude, mass or charge.

So Time is conserved, and since there are infinite fractal time spaces to be conserved, we must consider conservation laws and Universal constants that maintain its same value through the passage of time in terms of the Metric of the 5th dimension. Thus we can write a series of conservation laws, which will apply to any system of vital space-time, not only to physical systems.

This law can be reduced to a formula: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ, as each fractal space-time will try to conserve, its spatial energy and temporal information. And yet it will extract that energy and information from other species, because the total time must not change. So the individual goal of each species conservation rests from other species’ Sp x Tƒ content.

Thus here we have a contradiction worth to study in depth, in an infinite, eternally moving Universe, time is conserved, but since time is motion, what is conserved is the eternal Tao, the eternal symmetries and transformations of stop and go beats, cycles that become lines that become cycles across 3 dimensions of space of time of Universal Planes.

This is the content of the 7th isomorphism, which is highly formal, more logic, mathematic and physical.

Since it deals with:

- All the Universal constants of physics, the vital constants of biology and medicine, the chemical constants of gases, the sociological constants of population, and all other constants, which ‘specify’ and ‘diversify’ all the varieties of dimensional beings, its scales, ratios of åctions of exchanges of energy and information.
- All the Principles of Conservation which define precisely the ‘stability of the Universe, such as the Conservation of momentum in Physics, the homeostasis in Biology, the repetitive genetic information of biology. This principles are the essence of the Universe, which truly embody the metric of the 5th dimension, in as much as they ‘are’ the manifestation of the ‘conservation’ of motion and form (or its more complex energy and information parameters). And could be enunciated through the metric of the 5th dimension with a simple, but most important laws of the Universe, the principle of conservation of ‘space-energy’, ‘form-time’ and its ∆-planes that combine both.

*‘All systems of the universe try to conserve its dimensions of temporal motion, its dimensions of spatial form and its ∆±1 planes of existence invariant’.*

And this is often shown in the existence of Universal constants related to those Dimensions of space and time and ∆-planes of existence, or in the existence of quantities conserved which are a combination of the main ‘parameters’ of space, time and ∆-existence. Let us consider those 2 themes in certain depth.

- The philosophy derived of those facts: the conservatism of the Universe,
*provoked by the cyclical inertia and memorial nature of the cycles of time.* - The existence of a mathematical ‘perfect’ image of the game of existence, which is also ruled by ‘mathematical’ constants and reflects in its highest existential algebra and non-Euclidean geometry relationships the template of the game of existence.

Let us consider those 4 themes in more detail. With some examples expanded in each specific analysis of the 1 to 9 planes of the Universe.

**Conservation principle.**

The Universe is guided by a simple principle: Conservation of the total space and time. But since space is a quanta of time, when we integrate space along a function of time (which can be many in different scales of reality, energy, mass, time, etc.) we obtain a conserved quantity. Thus analysis, the study of variations and integrals through time of closed and ± cancelling functions, which make the time of the Universe conserved, are essential to T.Œ.

Conservation of Time is all, but time has the long dimension from past to future of 5D metric and social evolution from part into wholes, and the short dimension of åctions of space-time, time cycles, ±∆Sp, I, 4 primary åctions of absorption and emission-reproduction of information by an observer, ∆ï,o and of energy, ∆a,e

Now the conservation of time, becomes the conservation of the two geometric forms of time, Lineal motion or energy and cyclical form or information and its quantities are conserved in a single plane of space-time as the conservation of lineal and angular momentum, kinetic and potential energy.

Now we shall generally speaking talk of Kinetic energy, as |-lineal time, and Potential energy as cyclical time.

As we have related expansive entropy to lineal space we can write the inversion of both:

Tƒ=1/T=1/S, where lineal Time becomes ‘distance’ in space.

Yet between ∆-planes of existence the principle breaks and there is a constant leak of energy in its 2 åctions, external form and internal reproduction, from the upper scales to the lower ones as defined by Existential algebra: Aa: ∆-3<∆-2; Ae: ∆-2<∆-1 . And a constant leak of energy motion in its two åctions, from the

‘All systems of the universe try to conserve or increase its dimensions of temporal motion, its dimensions of spatial form and its ∆±1 planes of existence invariant’.

Max. Sp X Tƒ (S=T)

This principle however translates in many different ways according to which forms and motions (Tƒ and Sp) we look to.

If we look at an individual he will try to increase its existential force, Sp X Tƒ but to do so it will have to diminish that of other element. For that reason to find conservation we need to see at a closed total system. This is the meaning of a plane of existence. But are planes of existence closed systems? The answer is ‘almost’. But there is ‘energy’ – motion escaping from up to down, and form, information escaping from down up. And this makes more difficult to establish clearly rules of conservation. When you move *you are moving all your cells with you, thus you are transferring motion to those cells. On the other hand they produce forms and code your genes, so they transfer information to you. How can we consider then the system closed?*

Simply by considering that the transfer of motion down is *somehow equivalent to the transfer of form upwards. This is difficult almost impossible to quantify except for very simple physical systems, where we have clear definitions of momentum, motion, energy etc.*

*It is thus a qualitative hypothesis to fully grasp the obvious order of the Universe. It tells us also a lot about the way upper planes are created, by smaller planes which gives them form and how larger forms mobilize smaller one, giving them ‘force’. And this happens also to us – the force that moves us gravitation, is given by the planet and the planet is moved by the star, and the star is moved by the black hole. But we hold the complex forms of the planet in its bidimensional spherical membrane of information, and the planet has more solid form than the stars…*

This structure of the Universe thus makes ‘conservation principles’ not so rigorous as physicists make us belief. An obvious case is the violation of parity, another, the loss of energy of beta decay, solved with the ‘invisible neutrino’ which is NOT a particle of the light space-time membrane (but this in a continuous model of space-time of course is not acknowledged).

Still we can try and find undoubtedly an enormous number of parts of the Universe which try to maximize their function of existence, Sp X Tƒ and for that aim maintain the equality S=T which is the maximal value of a product of 2 (5×5>6×4…)

Now the question is to translate those 2 generic terms ‘motion and form’ or in more complex mixed forms, which include scalar parameters of various ∆-scales (mass, temperature, charge), its equivalents – lineal and angular momentum, energy and information (not the concept of Shannon, one-dimensional information but form in action, which defies easily a quantifying parameter).

Still we can try to do it the only way we can, the way humans perceive it. Let us consider the equality on its limits: not perceived motion without form – gravitational forces, and not perceived form without motion, rotational superfluid zero degrees, perfectly ordered cyclical motion.

Both are equal as S=T = 0 (not perception of them).

So next we must move to form with some motion and motion with some form, namely *a wave, which physicists say carry motion proportional to its wave length and Shannon said it carries information, proportional to its frequency (for transversal waves). And here we can have yet another equality, which is what we seek for:*

V= λ (Se) x ƒ (Tƒ)

And so we find a first Universal constant that combines the length-distance in space of a wave and its frequency, cyclical time.

it is an important one called speed. The trick being that in ∆ST we measure cyclical time, the inverse of duration. So Speed is no longer a ratio but a product, the product of the two fundamental, simplest possible parameters of the existential force, Se x Tƒ of a species, the wave…

**The 3 conservation laws: Energy ≈ 5 ^{th} dimension; lineal momentum: open space; angular momentum: closed time.**

PHYSICS, when trying to find the laws of conservation of the Universe they found 2 laws, the law of conservation of angular momentum, which is a cyclical motion, self-centered into a point; and a lineal motion.

The conservation of momentum is associated in quantum mechanics with the proposition that it makes no difference where you do the experiment, the results will always be the same. As independence in space has to do with the conservation of momentum, independence of time has to do with the conservation of energy.

And so we must deduce that there is NOT absolute space, as the location in space is completely independent on the result of an experiment. So all space is self-contained to the event of space-time and region affected by the experiment.

Then there is the conservation of time. If we turn our ‘experimental apparatus’ in a ‘time-like cycle’, this too makes no difference, and so the invariance of the world to angular orientation is related to the conservation of angular momentum; which means all worldcycles of time have a total zero-value, as they close into themselves in the same point.

So we found that the Universe conserves cyclical motions of time and lineal motions of space.

Then there is the conservation of Energy, which is roughly speaking the ‘integral sum of lineal and cyclical momentums’.

In quantum mechanics it turns out that the conservation of energy is very closely related to another important property of the world, things do not depend on the absolute time.

We can set up an experiment at a given moment and try it out, and then do the same experiment at a later moment, and it will behave in exactly the same way. From this we can deduce the principle of conservation of energy. It is a rather subtle and interesting thing, which can only have an explanation:

Absolute Time, duration, which integrates a series of lineal and cyclical motions, adding them to the extent of creating a new scale of the fifth dimension, IS FRACTAL. It does not exist as a continuous lineal infinite time in a single continuous space plane.

As such absolute time does not affect any event happening in time, which therefore is a self-contained process, a cycle related to the internal time of the event.

A Time cycle is therefore a closed, fractal cyclical proposition.

But we can add, integrate time cycles and that creates the illusion of absolute duration; and we can integrate space surfaces and that creates the illusion of absolute extension.

This is what Leibniz called relational space and relational time.

Leibniz would have said that ‘all substances are made of cyclical motions with different speeds = different clocks of time.’ And different vital spaces, fractal parts. And all together create the illusion of absolute space and absolute time.

But we can ad a third element, the ‘Integral of spaces and times’, which give us the concept of Energy, similar to that of a 5^{th} dimension integral. So on the regions of reality where we can conserve Energy, we are observing a process of scalar, social growth of elements of the 5^{th} dimension. And this gives us the fundamental equations for each scale of physical systems, which are the equations of energy for each of those scales:

E_{∆-1}=hƒ for the quantum ∆-1 scale, Eo= RT for the scale of thermodynamics, and E_{∆1}=1/2 mv^{2} with the limit E=mc^{2} for the gravitational scale.

Whereas as we can observe, a given Plane of the 5^{th} dimension conserves a ‘constant of bidimensional space’ (h, k, m) and a different speed of time cycles, (ƒ, T, v).

We can study then the interaction of those 3 elements, how they transform into each other through the ‘frontiers’ between those 3 scales, and what it means the different combinations of those formula, specifically the one that defines each constant:

H = E x T, R (or n k) = E / T and m = E/c^{2}

In this form they represent the constant of action of energy and Time of each of the 3 scales akin to the co-invariant law of the 5th dimension. It simply means that in each scale of the 5^{th} dimension there is a certain constant ‘rod of measure of space and time that varies (never mind here that we, humans use for certain measures of time, the frequency, and for others the period: T=1/ƒ).

The enormous field open by the study of the 3 scales of the Universe, its constants of space-time, its time frequency clocks and its 5 Dimensional growth in social scales of energy, is a huge field, which we cannot ‘attack’ in this post.

All this said, it is essential to recognize the existence of 5D and get rid of ‘hang-ups’ from tribal idols of the Germanic idealist school of science (Hilbert, Bohr, Heisenberg, Clausius, and Einstein in mathematics, and small, medium and large physical systems) with its 4 ideological errors: mathematics is consistent with itself not real (disproved by Gödel), quantum physic is only what we observe and only one state at a time (Copenhagen interpretation of ∆-1), the only arrow of time is entropy-motion-death, ∆) and the rod of human electronic measure, space-time light (c-speed) must remain constant and all other ‘clocks and lengths’ of space-time must be adapted to it.

And finally all ‘together now’, the Universe is a space-time Continuum, as the founding father Descartes used a single space-time and Newton made it sacred.

In that regard, we shall save from the bonfire of vanities and weapons, which is the worldview of anthropomorphic religions and physical sciences only one figure, Mr. Einstein; as he did respect Philosophers of Science – always acknowledging the influence of Mach in his worldview, Mathematicians, using the 5^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry to r=evolve physics; introducing a first version of a Universe built with infinite cyclical times (so he would quip ‘I seem to be the only physicist that understand that there are infinite times in the Universe running at different speeds), even Mr. Leibniz (‘Leibniz is right, but if so we must throw all physics and start to build it from scratch).

Pity, when he got older he yielded to them, since the Bomb, he sponsored with his letter to Roosevelt make him globally famous. So he corrupted and stop having a laugh to Minkowski and the like. Ultimately, Einstein the r=evolutionary of time, of his youth, couldn’t build all physics from scratch. And could not complete the mathematical r=evolution of Non-Euclidean geometry he did start. So we will just do that. Because one thing is for sure. We won’t corrupt. Physicists will never accept us. And we will not build a bigger bomb to get their respect.

Let us leave it like that – in Einstein’s last sentence: ‘Time is what a clock measures; there are infinite of them, and each has a different speed’…

And ad, for that to happen, all clocks of time must be cyclical, closed motions. So they are finite, they break space into pieces, and each time cycle has a different speed because its ‘perimeter’ has a different length. And because they are finite, as Leibniz explained, absolute time is only the sum of all the time cycles of the Universe, put together as in a puzzle that seems a single plane but is made of infinite little pieces.

Space on the other hand is open. It might seem not that important to set the record straight to understand this fundamental quality that differentiates time from space, but it is the *key to it all.*

Philosophers though realized of the deformation of time and have often called the interpretation of cyclical time by physicists as lineal space, the ‘spatialization of time’.

Physicists like Hawking have quipped back saying ‘we do not understand mathematics’ and that is why we are envious of his concept of time. Let us have a look at that opinion. Now, arguably the two most important mathematicians of the classic age were two philosophers of science, Mr. Descartes who founded Analytic geometry and started modern mathematics, and Mr. Leibniz, who founded calculus – yes, he, not Newton published first the laws of calculus, though Fermat, an amateur Basque scientist, and fellow countryman, seemingly had figure it out all earlier on…

And as it happens, both Mr. Descartes and Mr. Leibniz were the fathers of the modern scientific concept of cyclical time, precisely because *they understood mathematics far better than any physicist did. *And in those texts we *will evolve mathematics, as nobody has since those 2 completing the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean mathematics, needed to define cyclical time and fractal space,* since mathematics got stuck 150 years ago, into reforming only the 5^{th} postulate of Geometry, and so now is a contradiction between 4 Euclidean and one non-Euclidean.

So we shall prove, we do know as our predecessors in the study of cyclical time, Mr. Descartes and Mr. Leibniz much more mathematics than physicists do. And that is WHY we reason on terms of cyclical times.

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi of that age, founding fathers of science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, dis grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

So Descartes, contemporary of Galileo, said that all what exists was made of open space, which he called ‘res extensa’ and closed, cyclical time, which he called ‘vortices’. Nobody understood him though because while Galileo had failed to be ‘the delight of philosophers’, his lineal time had become of great use to artillery masters, which carried the day and made him one of the wealthiest men of renaissance Italy.

Descartes meanwhile had to make his living selling his mind to ‘artillery masters’, till queen Cristina, the ‘Minerva of the north’, knowing he had a poor health, perversely made the 53-year-old Descartes rise before 5:00 AM to give her philosophy lessons, even though she knew of his habit of lying in bed until 11 o’clock in the morning.

She also ordered him to write verses to celebrate her role in the Thirty Years’ War and the statutes for a Swedish Academy. While delivering them to the queen at 5:00 AM, he caught pneumonia and died, saying ‘in winter men’s thoughts freeze like the water’. And so his most important discovery along analytic geometry, the nature of the 2 principles in which reality is founded floundered for a century long.

There is here a pattern which will be repeated between philosophers of science sponsors of an organic sentient universe, of cyclical time and fractal space, ending in relative oblivion vs. the military physicists of lineal time and military power that carry the day and we shall see the pattern in the lives of each century masters of space-time studies: Galileo vs. Descartes, Newton vs. Leibniz, Boltzmann vs. Darwin, Einstein vs.…

And we will return to that historic understanding of perhaps the biggest blunder of mankind, many times, with examples of the eternal fight for the soul of man and his knowledge of the Universe, between us, the ‘good intelligent guys’ (-: philosophers of science and them, the ‘bad stupid ones’, the ‘physicists’ O-: Pity the sheeple goes always with them.

**The 2 asymmetric arrows of the 5th dimension. Physical sub disciplines.**

In that regard it is obvious that the asymmetry of the 5th dimensions MATTER a lot to understand matter and each of the different sub disciplines of physics. So let us enumerate them, with those basic new concepts:

__Mechanics__ is the science concerned with the motion of bodies under the action of forces, including the special case in which a body remains at rest, relative to the observer; that is, as a ‘form of space’, Se, whose symmetry with the same form in motion, Tƒ, requires to analyze Galilean Relativity, as both are indistinguishable.

__Relativity__ gave birth to a lot of literature on physics, considered essential today to understanding of time as a whole, but in true form only related to the first time=change action of reality, ∆a-ccelerations, that is external changes of a particle, when existing in the relative ∆+1 scale of the being.

__In the framework of modern physics__, classical mechanics can be understood to be an approximation arising out of the more profound laws of quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity. However, that view of the subject’s place greatly undervalues its importance in forming the context, language, and intuition of modern science and scientists. Our present-day view of the world and man’s place in it is firmly rooted in classical mechanics. Moreover, many ideas and results of classical mechanics survive and play an important part in the new physics.

It is in fact the other way around, mechanics, ∆o, IS the more accurate and Relativity, U1, and quantum physics, ∆-1 are ‘distorted’ by the asymmetric arrows of 5D and the limited energy transferred from lower scales (quantum bias to information) and information from upper scales (darkness of gravitation).

Thus the task of T.Œ is to ‘open up our eyes’ to the laws of the invisible world of gravitational, dark energy and matter (dealt with in ∆>|3| cosmology) and solve the imbalance or excess of information on quantum physics, which requires functionals (multiple functions) and multiple stories (all the possible information) of the system to be fully analyzed.

Those though are themes treated in ‘General physics’ that studies all the scales together. And will be considered in the ∆<2 and ∆>2 posts of the 4^{th} line.

This said, in many posts, regarding the limited scope of Galilean and Einstein’s relativity, we should not dwell on these themes.

In the graph, human mechanics is concerned with the ‘absorption’ of entropy-motion from the larger gravitational scale of the Universe, U1, by particles of the human scale, ∆o.

– ∆+1<∆o:

Thus, the main field of mechanics is the relationship between matter, ∆o assembles of atoms, without regard for its ∆o Thermodynamic properties and the larger U1 gravitational scale, where mass effects start to appear at the range of Planck’s mass constant, the average mass of a gold atom, and a top quark particle, the boson unit of a black hole, which is the ultimate source of gravitation, in this galaxy.

It follows that the laws of mechanics are laws that follow the isomorphisms of exchanges of energy and information from Un and U∆+1. The U∆+1 scales provides motion to Un and this motion is superfluid, with no loss, unlike the inverse process in which Un scales provide motions to the U∆+1 scale, and this motion is entropy (with loss and disorder).

*Hence it requires a different treatment. And we can establish 2 parallel fields, according to the 5D arrow they represent:*

*– Mechanics: ∆+1<∆o; Heat: ∆o < ∆-1, in which all the energy of the upper scale transfer as motion in the lower scale. So when you move the hand, all your atoms move in synchrony and when you heat a gas all the energy become kinetic motion. In that regard it is easy to see its parallelisms:*

*Heat: *According to the law of energy conservation, the change in internal energy is equal to the heat transferred to, less the work done by, the system. If the only work done is a change of volume at constant pressure, the enthalpy change is exactly equal to the heat transferred to the system. Since all the energy is transferred to the lower scale. H = U + PV : Thus Enthalpy is an energy-like property or state function—it has the dimensions of energy, and its value is determined entirely by the temperature, pressure, and composition of the system.

*– Thermodynamics, ∆-1<∆o; where we must add a factor of energy that stays in the lower scale, so only the Gibbs Free energy is available: G=H-ST. G is the available energy, and S x T the entropy that increases with temperature. Thus the more we ‘strain’ to transfer motion through temperature, the less energy we have available, as the lower system WANTS to keep its balances of existence unchanged, and so it has A resistance to get away from its point of equilibrium, as it happens with mass when we try to accelerate it into its ‘Lorentzian region’ of death (c-speed).*

*Thus entropy is only the proof that each scale tries to maintain its balance.*

In that regard, we should consider, ST, the energy of ∆-1 NOT available to work, G a parameter of ∆o, the energy available to work, and H = U + PV is the enthalpy of the system, the overall energy, of both scales, that is the sum of the internal energy (∆-1 scale) and the product of the pressure and volume of a thermodynamic system (∆o parameter).

– ∆-2< ∆1. Electrodynamics (Quantum Mechanics), which deals with the transfers of motion from the particle state to the atomic states, and again we find entropy (loss of motion), which is not transferred and kept into the particle state – albeit expressed as probabilities which do NOT enter the path of least action of maximal probability.

In other words, the present formalism of quantum mechanics is expressed on terms of ‘information-time’ not on terms of its symmetry of ‘energy’ as thermodynamics but both concepts are equivalent

If we understand both Thermodynamics and quantum mechanics in terms of the fundamental equation of physics (Hamiltonian), we shall find a better expression of those parallelisms, only that in quantum mechanics as the graph shows there is maximal information, so we have to use ‘functionals’ (all the possible informative paths a particle might travel), while in thermodynamics we can get away with simpler functions. This subject though is beyond the conceptual parallelism we have established well beyond the ‘introductory level of the 2^{nd} line’ (Should go in 4^{th} line time permitted, or others will do).

So now we go back to our Generator and it symmetries, to describe the elements of each physical subspecies of those scales as organic systems. Which is after we understand it in scales, the next knowledge we extract from beings.

**Recap.** The UNIVERSE IS made of bidimensional cyclical times and fractal spaces, which merge together to form a holographic 4 dimensional being. The order of all those fractal systems of space-time requires a further 5th dimension of relative scales and sizes in space and frequencies or speed of its time cycles.

The outcome is a 5 Dimensional metric Universe, in which each relative scale of size is studied by a different science.

Now, that we have introduced two of the essential elements of 5D Fractal space-time – 5D Fractal space, we shall consider the 2^{nd} key element, cyclical time and its 3 relative ages-dimensions-motions of past-present and future. To do so first we shall obvious consider according to the correspondence principle, what physicists have so far understood of time, very little initially but quite a lot when we interpret properly their equations.

Yet to fully grasp this reductionism it is needed a historic introduction to realize of the daring consequences of the physical way of ‘constructing’ our world of thought.

**The static and dynamic description of a being: its 12 dimensions, its 12 isomorphisms.**

It is the tenant of relational space-time that all scales are self-similar, As each science merely studies space-time the species of a given fractal scale of the 5th dimension. We should be able to define each scale with the same parameters, of the supœrganism, a 12 dimensional being.

And so the isomorphic method is simple: we focus in each supœrganism of the Universe and express its 12 dimensions, and once we have defined the being, study its structure in ternary ‘groups’ as a ternary being in space (topological analysis), as world cycle in time (temporal analysis). Then we study each of its 3 Planes of existence, and the ‘networks that cross them through’ controlling upwards and downwards the system.. And then we study its mind as a whole and its actions of survival, as it plays externally its game of existence.

A second aprroach to the being is what i call the isomorphic method, followed in the 4TH line, which puts more emphasis in the causality of those actions, starting by the mind-singularity as it builds the being, *since all beings are born of a mirror-language of information that stores the entity’s plan of creation, coded in its language – genetic, memetic, quantum numbers – which will generate a biological, social or physical being.*

Then we start through the mind and the language, see how the actions of the mind web the networks of the organism and once it emerges as a living being we an see how it develops its actions, and live as a super organism which through a world cycle, travelling through the fifth dimension performs those actions in the larger world till it dies.

Thus the static approach describes its 12 dimensions, which is a good approach for a science as physics is where the two upper and lower ∆-3,4 limits are hardly understood – yes, they are described mathematically through a process of discovery with a lot of numerology and magic, but as maths are nor understood as an experimental language, the result is by force incomplete.

So we shall in this introduction to 12D physics merely use the static approach, describing the 12 dimensions of all beings. Though the full analysis made time permitted in the four line will use the dynamic method so we can see how the being develops in 12 isomorphic stages/elements starting from the mind and the language it speaks to model the Universe… *becoming in this manner somehow the being itself.*

It is in that sense a logic thought to consider that physical systems *have mathematical singularities as computers do that ‘compute reality’ and sense the mathematical language, unlike man in an intuitive manner as having vital information in itself. As we want to approach that view, we have made a fast introduction to mathematical languages that we will keep doing as we describe those scales.*

**The two forms of describing the scales; the humans self-centred approach and physical size approach.**

Also there are three ways to describe in orderly manner the scales. The common approach of physicists GOES from minor to major, even if it is not the causality that works in the Universe. The true form to do it rightly is from the human scales of maximal perception as all are isomorphic-self similar and those are better seen.

But as this is the ‘second line’, again we use a more classic approach – *inverse to that of physicists from major – the galaxy and Universe to minor, considering first the error of the big-bang, then the organic galaxy and then down the different perceived scales till the most unperceived, and complex one, quantum physics, which will be a good introduction to the third part of mathematical physics*. Only in the four line we shall use the self-centred approach departing from thermodynamics and classic mechanics.

Why we do so should be obvious to the reader: *∆st is a philosophy of science, of the whole, a synoptic organic method, and so it work best with ‘wholes’ and describing them NOT mathematically but organically.*

Now imagine a civilisation that would not ‘speak mathematics’ but can observe the galaxy. Would he have a language to explain ‘meaningfully’, what is all about? Yes, the organic language and the explanation of the galaxy as a super organism, we shall see IS as meaningful or even more than its mathematical description merely as ‘motions’.

Let us then consider why this is the proper epistemological system. The galaxy is quite well known, and then as we go down, we enter immediately in the mechanical explanation of our external world and the thermodynamic inner world of our cellular beings.

In the graph, only the 2 scales of ‘matter’ directly connected to the human experience, the cellular thermodynamic inner, ∆º plane and the ∆1 mechanic plane do not suffer deformation by our lack of direct perception of all its parts and wholes. So they are the proper two scales to start the analysis of physical systems. Further on, as lower planes have more information and larger planes more entropic motion, the distortion of perception that happens looking upward, where we loose information till reaching the ‘dark world’ beyond the galaxy darkened in 96% of its reality, is different from the lower scale in which we increase our information as both the number of quanta and the speed of its clocks increasing. Hence the different mathematical tools we need to observe both inverse scales.

Now the analysis of all the elements of space in the 3 scales of physical systems (Se-light space, ST-waves and Tƒ cyclical time clocks) will be obviously too extensive for this introduction so we merely will consider here a few themes:

– First define the relationship between space and energy: se and sp, two sides of the same coin by introduce the still-moving lineal and cyclical parts (Galileo’s paradox and Holographic principle of bidimensionality of time and space state).

– Then study together the space and time symmetries, which is the form and function of the different parts of beings as Tƒ, Tiƒ, Se, Sp.

– Then study together the 5D planes and space symmetry, which explains the fractal structure of the Universe. We shall consider the philosophical aspects of space as a fractal through different 5Dimensions (in other posts we formalize it with fractal equations).

– Finally to consider in other posts the analysis of Tƒ, ST wave and Se fields.

We have study the Tƒ-cyclical time vortices masses and charges, unifying them through the metrics of the fifth dimension in the isomorphism of the zero point.

– Se: We will consider revisiting special relativity the meaning of the Se-field or light speed, which is the constant of space of our Universe (hence a fixed parameter) both in philosophical and mathematical terms. But this part will be put on the description of the first scale of reality – that of light space (∆-3).

And we shall study some elements of the ST-wave transformations, which communicate the two Tƒ, and Se fields in our universe in the analysis of light space-time, as it is really the mother fall battles.

So basically here we give an over all geometric-topological understanding of the space-symmetry, which will be further analyzed in physical terms of parity and chirality on the 3^{rd} and 4^{th} lines.

So what changes as we move into larger sizes of the Universe?

The simplest ternary fractal analysis is that of the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scale; but as we already know the Universe can divide any ternary system into sub-fractal scales. So we can keep adding intermediate scales. All in all, we human beings do NOT have an infinite perception of all the scales of the 5^{th} dimension. So with the information we have, the following scales are ‘self-evident’, because they do have an Energy ‘different formula’, a different space/action constant, a time clock or similar scalar parameter and finally a scaling around the 10^{10} scales.

**∆-i planes** will be better studied with ‘hyperbolic geometries’, which multiply its forms and ‘statistical mechanics’ that allow to handle huge populations; and that is the case of the ∆º and ∆-1 thermodynamic and quantum planes…

…which will add ‘errors of perception’ that seem to shape a ‘weird world’ but according to the tenants of self-similarity of all planes of the fractal Universe should be ‘logically resolved’ with the paradox of the still mind and its reduced capacity to handle information, mirrored by mathematical equations.

Hence the use of operators and functionals (functions of functions) which allow to accumulate in ‘each point’ as it ‘spreads’, infinitesimal parts when we go lower another quantum scale, in quantum statistics. Yet ultimately the quantum scale will obey the ‘dictum’ of Einstein, which rightly stated as a reasoned believer on space and time as the ultimate substances of reality, in the path of Leibniz, that ‘ultimately quantum mechanics will be quoted with statistical thermodynamics’. Such is the right philosophical manner to consider its equations and solve its seemingly illogic contradictions as we do in this post.

In the graph, we see a good visualisation of that hyperbolic multiplication of parts and its deformed geometry

**∆+i planes… On **the other hand the larger scales become ‘elliptic’ as the mathematics of relativity because we loose information as larger wholes are synoptic ‘membrains’ which enclose smaller parts and synchronise its motions,* limiting its ‘choice of paths (statistical concept of entropy as the degrees of freedom, which become reduced as order increases and information diminishes in larger wholes). *So the larger scales become non-lineal, elliptic, with minimal information and growing social order.

And again we distinguish the ‘mechanical’ matter closer scale, where we can use non-deformed Newtonian laws, and the ‘Lorentzian region’ on the ‘non-euclidean limiting membrain’ (Black hole singularity at zero T and region outside the halo at v>c, where those laws break and only through Lorentz transformations can be properly measured from the point of view of mankind.

This is the merit of special relativity, which allow us to see with a deformed human bias, apt for human scale and rod of measure, the close to c-speed particles, which however from their subjective point of view, would feel and behave as if they were in a non-deformed mechanical world.

Thus the proper way to study all those scales is from the human scale first, and then to navigate downwards with statistical mechanics and integrals of population and upwards with derivatives that ‘make synoptic’ analysis and its ‘standing points’ that extract the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian key information about changes of ‘states/phases/ages’ and ‘topological non-euclidean geometries’ that study how ‘points sink’ information into their inner singularity vortices:

*the proper way*to study reality is accepting the epistemology of truth, which tells us that all planes are self-similar; hence the planes which we observe closer, are those we perceive better and extract more truth of it – the human ∆0, inner, cellular thermodynamical scale and the ∆1, mechanical v<<c matter scales

*.*

*you can consider ∆•st the final wrap over the whole scaffolding of astrophysics, as it completes in parallel to string theory, with the ultimate substance of reality, space and time, the search for the logic laws that order the Universe.*

**Quantum Scale:**

_{∆-1}Whereas the value for the H-‘Planckton’ constant of space-action, measure as a bidimensional angular momentum ‘bivector’ (p x r) is;6.626 ×10

^{−}

^{34 }Joules per secondAnd the time clock is obvious, the ‘frequency’ of the wave.

**∆: MOLECULAR STATES: CRYSTAL.**

*parameters of entropy (Boltz*

*man) and information (temperature).*

**Thermodynamic scale:**3/2 K (s) x T (Tƒ) = E

_{o}T-emperature is a clock and S, the constant of Spatial Extension is in our lower biological scales of cellular bio-chemical behaviour the ‘thermodynamic being’ – the blots, its 5D social constant.We must understand that in each scale the’successful species’, which will grow into a new super organism is cellular, clonic, equal and if we perceive them in huge spatial amounts then it appears as having a higher frequency-energy. So as humans grow in scales, social scales between planes respond to the accumulation of an identical particle=number into big vital energy volumes. So:- Temperature is our time clock frequency, so hotter systems act faster than cold ones (reptiles need to get hot, and hot animals have higher metabolisms, and so on.

**Boltzmann constant**(

*k*

_{B}or

*k*), named after Ludwig Boltzmann, which relates energy at the individual particle level with temperature. And has the dimensions of entropy.The accepted value in SI units is 1.38 10

^{−}

^{23J}oules per Kelvin.So here again the translation is immediate: k is the quanta of S, understood dynamically as entropy, or measure of expansive disordered motion – a slightly different concept to the concept of physics, totally mislead.

^{12}range.

^{12 }different mind-worlds, which in themselves are 12ˆ12

^{12}time symmetries of the same being, or as Wheeler put it, there are not 10

^{80}particles in the Universe, but 10

^{80}moments of the same particle? If you are to ask me I would say yes. Nothing exists because all what exists is a being that exists in

_{12}12

^{12 }space-time inward mirror reflections of itself, within its

_{12}12 dimensions and I will call this World-Universe the absolute God – and if you understand what I say, go up in smoke (-;Just notice this. The same distance in time that takes a ray of light to cross the space of an atom, 10

^{-18 }seconds, it is in inverse symmetry, the same distance in time that takes an atom to reproduce itself into the space of a Galaxy, 10

^{18}seconds, with man’s time the observer in the middle (12

^{0}second in time).

^{12}dimensional being, but picture this, a 4 Dimensional regular simplex polyhedron has 5 volumes of 3 dimensions, 10 faces of 2 dimensions, 10 edges and 5 vortices, and as we increase the number of dimensions, we find a similar symmetry between the more extended space states and the more intense motions in time.

**Electric/Magnetic energy.**

^{th}dimension, with a constant and a flow with variable density (the ultimate unifying concept of a time speed, which measures the density of information of the system). It is called the Poynting vector:E= 1/µ EB

*µ*

_{0}= 4π × 10

^{−}

^{7 NA }

^{−}

^{2}And:e

_{o}= 8.85 × 10

^{−}

^{12}F/m

^{12}and we do have a ‘space constant of action’ and a parameter of the density of information or ‘time clock speed’ of the system.

^{12}blocks. And do contact often with the mass scale. This is not really the case of the lowest quantum scale of particles, which are essentially massless, and only contribute to the mass scale in their moment of ‘conjugate’ death, as they transform from particle into antiparticle, becoming a ‘spin zero’ (pion, Higgs) inert entity for a short time interval.How they interact with the larger scale depends on how much ‘new social scales’ we deal with in either temperature or magnetism. For example, individual magnetic dipoles of simple atoms are quite irrelevant for the mass scale. But those ‘perfect atoms’, which can socially evolve fully a new 12

^{12 }scale, the so called ‘Magnetic domains that not surprisingly have around a billion atoms with spins oriented in parallel form’, become a unit of a new fractal ∆-scale of magnetism; and this ‘cells’ of magnetism, are clearly interacting with mass factors.

^{th}dimension our functions SWITCH from lineal entropy to cyclical information. So the magnetic field, which in the lower scale NEVER closes a loop, and so it is in eternal motion as the membrane of entropy of the charge, becomes in the next ‘Domain’ 12

^{12}scale a ‘fixed form’ of information (used as such to store information in magnetic tape). While the electric charge, which is, a fixed point of information in the lower scale becomes in the larger ‘domain’ of a magnetic current a flow of entropy motion (intimately connected with thermal entropic effects, through heat and resistance laws).

_{∆-1 }> ∑It

_{∆}< |s

_{∆+1}

Whereas we use the equivalent | and O symbols for entropy and information. The number of consequences of this law in all systems is huge. For example, if It is any fractal point, it will act in the upper scale of his nation or body as an entropic, ab=used cell, and it will ab=use is smaller ∆-1 micrŒ-Points. As in value terms, contrary to belief, what moves is ab=used by an Aristotelian central point of view that uses its energy and controls it.In that regard from the perspective of the human scale, a system of the quantum scale will be described macroscopically in terms of temperature for systems, which are of larger entropy use to our scale, mostly gases and to a certain extend liquids, which are defined only by the mass density, temperature and ‘speed’. There is not therefore need to define its electric or magnetic properties, which are limited in liquids. While solid systems are more often subject to electric and magnetic properties, in as much as:

‘Thermal properties refer to the bulk system, as indistinguishable, hence a continuous Lineal Space, magnetic properties refer to the parts of the whole, hence referred to its informative cyclical properties.,

Thus in the world of ‘charges and particles’ the 3 sub-scales are the quantum, thermal and electric/magnetic scales. Then the next huge vortex of time-space is the mass of the galaxy, and in this scale we do have also 3 sub-scales clearly defined, though humans being rather immersed on them on the bottom of its pyramid have not so easily resolved (as we know information travels better from lower scales so we do have a much better understanding on the thermal, magnetic and quantum world)

**MASS SCALES
**

it is essential to understand how a new scale creates a dual force of present space-time, let us say gravito-magnetism, and then it splits it into a ± entropy information reversed directions, which allows the separation of two worlds, one with the + and th other the – branching of the new born dual force.

In this manner as a force of electricity suffers the creation of a magnetic enclosure, it should also provokes the apparition of a mirror hierarchical force, as that energy contributes to the mass attraction of the being. a new scale of external force thus can always be a projection of a lower ∆-1 scale, but the proper way to perceive it is also given it a ± creative processing, as the breaking of the symmetry of the present constant of the lower ∆-1 force, transcends and emerges into a split of 2 functions.

Mass and magnetism thus have relationship, so do spin and mass, how those different cyclical motions provoke a larger scale of the 5th dimension and how much of its inner energy perceived sometimes as a loss of order or entropy is displaced from scale to scale forms an important part of GST.

In general, though the simple growth of dimensions happens in units of 1 from frequency to area, to dual period to volume:

*In the graph, when we move to mass scales, the Organism is mass-energy, its cyclical parameter angular momentum, its energetic parameter lineal momentum. So mass and angular momentum are closely related by a lineal proportion and energy and lineal momentum by an integral equation. The game has ‘emerged’ into a new scale, which as it grows in sizes looses connection with the previous thermodynamic and electrodynamics scales. So the game renews itself.*

In the next scale above humans, if we consider a dual description escaping the ∆-molecular, thermodynamic scale, the organism of the gravitational world is a mass. And here we have difficulties to define its quantum form, as all seems to indicate under the machine principle and the symmetries of the Unification equation that this scale is the galaxy.

Thus we humans are in relationship with the mass vortex, rather closer to a Planck constant or a photon of minimal energy below the range of mass. This is obviously proved by the fact that the Planck mass or minimal possible level of influence of the mass state is enormous.

And yet we do feel residual gravitational forces, which clearly shows the enormous range of scales of the Universe, its most remarkable feature. So in the same manner the quantum atomic scale ranges in trillions of relative social scales, the mass scale above and below its natural unit – the galaxy and its central black hole has at least 3 ranges. We could consider then the cosmological ternary symmetry of its possible ‘black hole states’, which are the moon MACHO black hole, or planetoid, the star Black hole, or novae and the cosmological black hole or central galactic black hole, which could be compared to the photon, electron and molecular scale of the charge world.

Regarding the nature of the mass organisms, and its parts at those scales, they belong to geology and astrophysics. But as we said, the range of effects of its force as the range of effects of the electromagnetic force is much wider than one could calculate.

There is no doubt about it. This is the world which has an enormous array of species and social scales of evolution, formal exchanges of energy and information, yet all within the description of Non-Æ, fractal, cyclical space-time analysis.

Its scales will then be 3 as the fractal symmetry of the 5^{th} dimension requires, in which we shall find its constants of space-entropy and social numbers (time frequency) growing both together in inverse fashion to maintain the co-invariance of its social plane.

**Human mechanical scale.**

In that regard the perception of ‘mass’ for the human observer is rather different from its perception of ‘charge’. And yet we can find again our ‘Energy’ equations relating the fundamental elements of the mass scales.

So now, as we enter the human mass scales, the human being is more conscious of the quanta of space action, which we perceive directly, unlike the invisible ultra small quanta of the charge world.

What is that ‘quanta of space action’. Obviously the concepts of ‘speed’ and acceleration. We act on our world through speed actions, angular speed and lineal speed. So if the quanta of angular momentum will be ‘h’, and the quanta of lineal kinetic motion, will be ‘temperature’, in the mass scale, we have its 2 ‘conserved’ quantities, angular and lineal momentum, and we could consider a general non-quantitative but rather qualitative description of our world as:

E(t) = ∑ S (O-angular momentum x |-lineal momentum), which are the ‘steps’ in space of the full time flow of energy that encompasses all the space-time formal motions of the being or system studied.

The quantitative equation being, kinetic energy = ∫ lineal momentum

And so now we arrive to our scale as a human superorganism, in which our energy is basically mechanical related to the kinetic and potential energy of our planet and so we do have to scale to our ‘relative size’ and find a new equation for our main form of energy, potential energy related to the mechanical work of moving over the Earth. And so we do find the corresponding equation of energy:

E= gh m

Where g is the value of the gravitational constant/acceleration on planet Earth multiplied by h, the relative height of the system. And mass the first appearance of a mass vortex as an entity of space0time (see the Unification equation of charges and masses, to fully grasp the nature of mass as a time vortex in the previous post on cosmological 5D). And not surprisingly as we are in the human scale, g is measured as 9.8 m per second, again jumping around 10^{10 }new scales.

But g is not a Universal constant, but the constant of our planet, because we are now in full in the subjective human point of view, and we must add to the potential energy of the system its kinetic energy, which would be expressed in similar terms:

E= ½ v^{2} m

Whereas obviously v should be in this human subjective scale, the constant of human speed, which alas for a fit, adult male athlete is around 9.8 meters per second.

All those formulae, however are essentially variations of a more fundamental concept applied to human existence, ‘Force’, F=m x a is in that sense on the human scale, the defining relationship between a constant of entropy, ‘a’ expansive motion and a constant of form, of information, mass.

And this again introduces a theme which goes beyond this introduction – the slight changes happening in the way humans perceive the elements of each scale, force vs. energy and work, speed vs. angular momentum vs. acceleration, and so on.

And how as we transcend scales, given the fact that space turns into time, energy into information, what is in a lower parameter a function of form might become in the next scale a function of energy.

This is what happens in the case of ‘mass’, which becomes in the next scale the source of energy no longer constant, while it is speed what becomes now a constant-limit.

Of course it all seems confusing, paradoxical, but that is the ‘core’ nature of the Universe so difficult to understand by the one-dimensional human mind…

**Solar system scale.**

And so now we come to the solar scale, where the sun through nuclear radiation mostly produces Energy, transforming mass fully into energy:

E_{∆+1}= c^{2} x m (Tƒ)

And not surprisingly we are again finding a bidimensional constant related to space actions, the constant of light speed, in which mass transforms itself according to its relative density (nuclear reactions). And we do have a jump of around 10^{10} scales.

As the speed of light is 3 x 10^{8} meters per second.

Here is where we can wonder about the value of this constant c-speed that cannot be crossed.

If the clock of ‘time’ of these scales is speed, equivalent to temperature or frequency, the question is ‘why there is a barrier’ of speed, c, which cannot be crossed.

It is easy to see why when we compare speed with Temperature. The c-barrier is a barrier between two ‘scales’ of reality, the scale of light space-time and electronic mass we live and the creation of denser states of matter, strangelet and top quark mass, of much higher density.

As a system change from a liquid to a solid state, *Temperature no longer varies, as speed no longer varies, and all energy comes into the transition phase of state.*

So happens in the c-speed, which is NOT an absolute barrier of the Universe, but a barrier similar to that found between a lighter gas and a liquid or solid state, as we shall soon consider when studying the process of antisymmetric creation of the Universe.

The advantage of T.Œ indeed is to have this capacity to compare phenomena in different scales even in different sciences, which has always been done in science, but without understanding the underlying game of 5D fractal space and cyclical time and its dualities and ternary symmetries origin of them all. So the fractal Universe is always self-similar (not equal) in tis processes and that difficult to accept qualitative not quantitative, topological not geometrical ‘generalization’ as a form of deep knowledge is what we brought here.

This we have to stress many times: qualitative, homologies is true knowledge, not only detailed mathematical how measure, but deep why understanding, which is what T.Œ. ads.

So we can also among any other similar processes compare the c-speed limit with the transitions that happen in all other scales when a ‘denser’ form is created from a wave, in this case instead of a ‘fluid present wave of light’ converted into mass wen reaching the barrier of change of state, we can put an example of al liquid wave, which moves from a laminar state to a cyclical vortex state:

In the graph, we see that when we reach a certain key speed, V, a laminar flow of bidimensional sheets of lineal speed no longer accelerates but for a while maintains its speed and all the energy is absorbed by the laminar flow. Since it is CREATING the equivalent to the mass increase in a c-speed barrier on an accelerator. In this case it is a vortex creation within the liquid. This vortex, are accelerated clocks of time on the liquid, equivalent to the charges on the electromagnetic space or the masses on the galactic space and as such it absorbs more energy than the wave state (it is by definition more dense, as vortices accelerate inwards, Vo x Ro = K).

This comparisons also strongly prove by homology that indeed temperature and speed are the clock-like parameters of both scales, which measure the frequency of the ‘steps’ of the space-time process.

So in this constant dance of parameters that switch between space and time state, entropy and information, speed acts in certain phenomena as the constant, in others as the ‘time frequency’ (as in the motion of a wheel measure in ‘revolutions per minute’) and in a sense as the ‘energy’ element, sum of all the steps of form of a certain wave motion… so we can write also:

V (∆)= l (s) x ƒ (t).

Perhaps the major difficulty for humans to grasp reality is its paradoxical logic, a theme argued in the next posts on the non-Aristotelian structure of mathematics, and when we define the mind as a ‘spatial fixation’ of the fleeting constant, changing motions and values of reality.

In a way all form of knowledge is the attempt by a mind to fix reality but reality always transmutes.

The beauty of physical systems, and the 5^{th} dimension inversion of value, dualities and ternary symmetries is for those with enough flexibility to see how ‘the flow of time, space and planes of energy, constantly transmutes and still keeps its meaning.

Nowhere those transmutations are more obvious that in the borders between waters on the changes of states, of ages of planes of topologies that happen on the maximal and minimal of the ‘calculus’ of variations of any function of existence.

In that regard, perhaps the fundamental law of the 5^{th} dimension is the law of transmutation that we will repeat again:

**| **_{∆-1}: O_{∆}: **| **_{∆+1}

Which ultimately can be understood in terms of the 3 organic functions in space and 3 ages in time of the worldcycle of existence of any system of space-time, which switches in those functions as the overall system evolves and interacts with other space and time parameters of larger and smaller systems, in either its entropic field-gas, wave-liquid, crystal-particle state.

Now what is mass is not so clear, and what is time in the mass world is less clear, as all this is very subjective/human and humans use lineal time, which is an erroneous very limited version of it. And they measure it on the human scale with clocks, which makes it even more messier. As landau ironically put it: there is no uncertainty of time in quantum physics, I look at my clock and I know what time is. So we need to do some technical specifications for experts.

Mass is the cover and the zerŒ-Point of a whole cosmological entity, and space is its vital space within. And this is the easiest way to visualize it. But in lineal time obviously classic science – relativity – dealt with time and space concepts in a different way.

In relativity, the 3 momentum coordinates and the energy are the 3D space and lineal time parts of a space-time vector, the four-momentum.

And the length of this four-vector is proportional to the rest mass *m*.

So Energy here is still the whole space-time formal motions of the system, through its total ‘time duration’, and so it can be related to the ‘total volume’ of the worldcycle of the system, to its Integral Whole Energy; whereas the derivatives of the Energy are the space-slices measured in terms of momentum.

Mass thus become the whole of this worldview of the system, the product of its ‘spatial steps-momentums’ and its whole lineal duration. This physicists describe as the ‘block’ of the worldline of the being.

This works then also when Dirac introduced relativity and hence mass concepts into quantum physics of particles.

In his equation rest mass then became proportional to an eigenvalue of the 4-momentum operator, the proportionality constant being the speed of light:

P_{op} y= mc y

It is this repetitive concept of mass density as the enclosure and frequency of a ‘space-step’, the c-speed of light, which is the ‘Spatial Extension constant’ of the mass scale rather than the speed of light, what surfaces once and again in those equations.

In the same Dirac equations, mass appears also as a factor of a conjugate of a particle and antiparticle with a spinless zero annihilation of the ± up and down spins into a scalar. In brief, the relationship between the particle and mass scales appears only when the lower charge scale dies and emerges in the upper scale. This is again a constant fact of all emergent systems. The lower scales diffuse into the larger ones. So we do not use spdf orbitals describing molecular systems but the simple lineal and cyclical duality of |-sigma and O-pi orbitals.

The details are all those complicated quantum formalisms, which physicists hardly interpret. So for example, they did not realize that what matters in the mass factor of a Dirac conjugate is the life-death switching of particle- antiparticle states that cancels all other now neutral forces letting mass surface, but thought merely on the chiral and anti-chiral property of particles and antiparticles as the ‘thing’ that ‘makes mass exist’.

**Dark energy/neutrino scale: beyond the ****galaxy.**

And so we arrive to the last scale of which we humans have any ‘idea’, which is the cosmological scale, in which the obvious constant of Spatial Extension should measure the ‘speed’ of dark energy, and we could consider different formulations of the Lambda, Cosmological constant of expansion of space between galaxies, but as this theme is on my view in the present format highly speculative, and has been treated in the previous post on cosmological 5D, we leave it here.

Just to mention for fun, the complete messed up situation of classic physics in this issue (:

The dimension of Λ is a length^{−}^{2} in Einstein’s relativity and it has been calculated, if the cosmic big-bang is certain (which as we clearly explain in 5D cosmology is not) to have the value of ~1 x10^{−}^{52} m^{−}^{2 }astoundingly small, which seems to contradict all what we are telling here.

And yet, when the same physicists calculate the constant on their theories of unification, the value that comes up is a Mass measure of the order of the Planck Mass , elevated to the 4 canonical dimensions of our models , as we convert points of a lower scale to a larger one. But alas, the measured cosmological constant is smaller than this by a factor of 10^{−}^{120}. This discrepancy has been called “the worst theoretical prediction in the history of physics!” LOL.

**RECAP**

In Physics we find the same 3±1 ages or ‘states’ of matter and 3 ∆±1 scales for all systems known to man:

– The ∆-1 scale is the quantum world. The fractal principle classifies all quantum subspecies.

I.e., Strings have 3×3+1 Ds across 3 scales of ∆-1 strings, ∆-branes and ∆+1 particles. There are 3 ages of quarks & electrons of ∆ information and -∆ size (Max.Tƒ=Min.Spe). S/T dualities define also n-p pairs, boson forces & Universal constants.

– The human ∆-scale in which we observe 3 States of matter, the ‘energetic’, gaseous state, the liquid E=O balanced state and the informative, solid state, between ‘plasmatic birth (∆-1) and ‘big-bang’ extinction, when informative vortices (∆+1 masses and ∆-1 charges) become energy, according to Einstein’s equation (E=mc^{2}), written in Planck’s notation as E<=>M(O). Since mass is a 2-manifold vortex of gravitational information (graph): *ExT=K, E=Mc ^{2}. Hence M=K/T=Kv; where v is the rotational speed of the mass vortex proportional to its attractive power – a clock cycles which carries the information of the Universe in the Tiƒ frequency of its cycles.*

While on ∆+1 Earth matter follows 3 ages cycles (water, nitrogen cycle, rock cycles, etc.)

– Finally in the Cosmic scale ∆-1 atoms, which gather into ∆-stars, which become parts of social ∆+1 galaxies.

Further on a wealth of solutions to fundamental questions of physics, derive from 3×3+1 dimensional metric. I.e:

– Antiparticle’s travel to the past in Feynman’s diagram. They are particles ‘death processes’ (Max. Se=Min.Tƒ) of minimal duration, which explains its perceived scarcity since its total space-time momentum is minimal.

– Einstein’s 3 topologic varieties=solutions of his 2-manifold spatial metric, according to the value of the cosmological constant, are symmetric to the 3±1 ages of the Universe’s cycle: The post-big-bang young age of expansive energy, the steady state solution of a balanced Spe=Tiƒ ‘adult’ age and the 3^{rd} big crunch, informative collapse (Max. Tiƒ) followed by its big-bang explosive death, mimicked in galaxies, born as gaseous nebulae of max. E, which become balanced spirals and collapse into black holes of dark matter, to explode in quasar big-bangs^{2}: Se-Big-bang>ST-steady state>Tiƒ-Black hole Vortex.

– Thus we resume the 3 ∆±1 scales of the cosmos, with the Fractal Generator of Physical Beings: ∑∑_{∆-1}ST-Bosons>∑_{∆}Tiƒ-Charges> ∏_{∆+1}Tƒ-Masses.

**The Euclidean Mind of light-space. Kant.**

Newton indeed believe mainly in 2 things: Yahweh and absolute lineal time and space, a background abstract reference set up by God, who talked to him with comets.

So he studied the Cartesian graph, when reading ‘La geometrie’ which he acknowledged was the beginning of his interest for science.

But for him the graph and its lineal coordinates were not merely the human mind-world, but the graph that represented ALL of reality, which he blew to cosmic proportions and affirmed to be the graph of the absolute Universe and its space-time. This is NOT truth, and we will bring here a simple proof, derived from Kant’s realization that we ‘see light space-time’, because the ‘human mind is Euclidean’, which latter influenced the perception of painters, creating impressionist, as they realized also that we do NOT paint reality but light, THE RELATIVE SPACE-TIME our electronic eyes measure:

A light quantum has the 3 perpendicular dimensions of the informative electric field, the magnetic entropic field and the lineal c-speed that reproduces the wave. And those are the 3 exact perpendicular dimensions of our perceived space, as our eyes are electronic and feed on the information of light – hence also establish light as its fixed rod of measure or constant space, (relativity) but the universe has multiple world-views, and some are non-Euclidean (gravitational worldwide) some are atomic (smelling worldview) etc. Human eyes and mechanical eyes though are electronic, and their bits of information visual, hence Euclidean:

*In the graph the Euclidean world is caused by the 3 perpendicular arrows of light space-time to which we add the social colors. 2 more elements are needed to define our human space-time, first the organic relationships between our electronic eyes that feed on light, and the properties of information – as information is perceived in stillness, in an stop and go motion, similar to that of a film – so electrons go and move as waves, stop and feed and perceive light as particles, entangling its distances with other electrons in ‘fixed’ distances. Hence c-speed is always constant, our rod of space, as relativity proves, without giving the proper i-logic explanation.*

**The rod of measure of human systems – c speed.**

c speed is a rod of measure Einstein accepted ‘by electronic eye-decree’ to set all other parameters. So they are all let to vary (as in any differential equation where we do partial derivatives), including energy and mass in this paper. They are variations that are needed keep c-constant. But we could construct an equally sound model of the Universe keeping time-duration constant. The ‘of course’ here is a tricky rhetoric argument improper of Mr. Einstein, which reminds me of the vastly inferior original paper of Mr. Hawking on the evaporation of black holes (there he uses verbose rhetoric like every two other sentences, dealing with his ‘imaginary black holes’ at will of his ‘imagination’).

Einstein is obviously on other league, and prudently he puts this bastard ‘of course’ on a footnote. But this kind of rhetoric always shows that the author is not ‘safe’ and ‘sure’ of his arguments. How could he be? He knows he has never demonstrated but considered c-speed constant as a postulate to build his relative Universe. And it is fine and it works on the galaxy measures from our mind point of view. But he cheats us here a bit, with the of course that contradicts his previous statements kind of shamed for needing a postulate.

After all, most errors in all sciences come from Postulates: the entire building of mathematics is wrong because of the 5th postulate with no proof: a single parallel cross a point. The entire building of economics is false and it is leading the Earth to its collapse because of the wrong postulate of Mr. Smith ‘the wealth of nations is its quantity of money’, a mere language of information, supported in informative metals (gold, silver, chips of gold in e-money computers) with no value per Sp, whose ‘valuation’ of life beings is minimal (zero value for life) and his valuation of metal-weapons, by affinity of substance maximal. So in capitalist societies maximal wealth occurs in periods of global war, as today, when the maximal price of weapons that kill the maximal number of humans rise GDP to stratospheric levels.

You see, there are many onion levels in a deeper analysis of reality.

So two of our comments are positive: the universe is simple, logic, temporal and those were important tools on all the work of Einstein.

And one is negative. Mr. Einstein as most humans like to go beyond what is there and then commit errors of sweeping generalization. As physicists do today with big bang theories of the Universe. And they did with the c-constancy of light. Errors then multiply in an inflationary manner as all information is inflationary, and an entire building of not-quite-right models of reality builds up, as errors seem to sustain each other, into a growing expressionist building of broken angles about to fall, whenever a better architect pushes one of the faulty foundations of the entire architecture.

This is called a paradigm shift, as the part of the building sustained by the faulty foundation falls and the new architect reconstructs only that part, given the historic significance of the ‘Corresponding’ science, which still holds.

We shall thus start our rebuilding, commenting on the Paradigm shifts of science, according to Thomas Kuhn’s work on the nature of scientific revolutions.

Let us then repeat all our previous statements on the relative model of c-speed with a slower, simpler ‘tempo’, as this repetitive symphony of a Universe built only with 3 motions of time and its ‘still, relative perception’ in space, is indeed a simple world, whose complexity arises from ternary repetitive symmetries.

, as those below us have more numerous quanta and seem as a ‘single plane’ to hold more information than those able us which seem at ∆+1 to be ‘more evanescent, slower and less dense’. What we are not often aware in physical studies is that both scales co-exist in continuity on the time sphere of synchronous motions as symbiotic elements of a singularity-membrane system enclosing a world together.

RATIOS never quantities of absolute value thus which matter for us to discuss how the systems evolve through those scales are not the parameters of measure of them (e) by human entropic thirsty vultures but the frequency value/scales of temperature, mass and waves, and specially the constants of angular momentum, h, entropy, k, and speed-distance, C.

A THOSE *ARE THE MINIMAL ELEMENTS WITH WHOM THE HUMAN MIND CONSTRUCTS ITS PERCEPTION OF PHYSICAL SPACE.*

In the graph we put the basic formulae that through the ‘leveller’ of entropic measure humans from that distorted entropic pov, observe them.

We must then make first a philosophical reflection against naive realism: those are mental measures by the mind of man who ‘creates’ our bidimensional visual view of reality and as such we cannot make ‘why-physics’ without endophysics, discussions about how mind’s geometries construct systems.

Look at the right side, the 3 most important equations of the Universe those of energy, in the 3 scales, the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales.

They are ALL cases of 5D metric as the unification equation and so the question here since Energy is present is to define the two other parameters as parameters of entropy and form in the three main scales.

Let us then consider some basic conceptual analysis of those equations. If we compare e=hv and e=mc², the two limiting equations we obtain:

*m=v (h/c²)*

A key equation of GST physics as it shows mass to be the frequency of the enclosing membrane of a larger scale, as v is on the quantum scale. Yet the constant that relates both, is *Lovacevski’s expression of the relative curvature of the human mind-view, (tƒ/Sp ≈ h/c²). That is we are converting ‘mentally’ a world into the other, with new parameters, and a new mind view, that of the human being, which transforms the much faster frequencies of the time clocks of the quantum world, through the lobachevski’s constant that amounts to a parallel transformation of the mind view from the one a quantum atom might have to the far less curved slower mind view of the human being.*

h/c² converts our perception of light-charge, electronic world/mind into the ∆+1 scale of the mass-density-time-information world of gravitational beings. How this is done by the mind and converted into digital measures in physical systems goes beyond the scope of this introduction.

Entropy, a concept loosely related to all the forms of possible motion, is the key transfer between scales which looses less form as it has none (: (:

Entropy are ALL the potential modes of motion of a being, ‘packed’ we imagine in near-simultaneous, ‘faster’ space-time cycles, in ‘solid, tiƒ’ systems than in simpler gaseous $pe- systems, which can be reduced finally to lineal entropy. Yet as motion never ceases absolute entropy cannot be erased as it is the pure lineal motion with no form, or its reciprocal, the pure curvature-form without motion. On those limits the building up of potential simultaneous forms, in a ‘possibly’ enlarging and decreasing, fast and slow hierarchy of scales of the fifth dimension, gives a ‘physical, extra-dimensional space-time’ where to locate the different phenomena of physics of transfers of entropy, energy and information, which are ‘not accountable’ in a single space-time continuum but need other scales where to ‘hide its variables’.

Consider the most famous case of the quantum field of a broglie realist analysis of quantum physics.

As Bell has stressed,… “That the guiding wave, in the general case, propagates not in ordinary three-space but in a multidimensional-configuration space is the origin of the notorious “nonlocality” of quantum mechanics.” The quantum wave however must be ∆-1 in relationship to the particle, and as the particle is already in ∆-3, we come to the conclusion, the quantum field that guides with its speed Q/∂t, the wave-particle dual perceived states of the quantum system exists in the dark world of >c speeds, which explains its non-locality – that should have a ‘limit’ on the usual range of 10³ c new ‘scales’ of ‘stretched’ ∆§cales.

P*resent energy waves reproduce the information of a system, translating it through space – which abstract physics expresses as the law of ‘conservation≈reproduction’ of energy.*

Finally another key question is the *way in which energy might transit between scales. *We know it does in the case of light. This is called the Maxwell invariance of light waves at scales. So as ‘present energy’ transits only in a super organism, in ‘simultaneity’ and ‘synchronicity’ without deformation,* we must consider the three physical scales, the organic scales of the galaxy… but beyond the galaxy, as dark ‘entropy’ changes the parameters of light-energy (expanding space, in a dead≈entropic process of light), the limits of the galaxy as an organism, are its ‘halo’ of strangelets… (Witten hypothesis latter study as A gst symmetry between the quantum and cosmic scales).*

Energy does transit therefore between the three scales of the galactic supœrganism.

The problem though is that what humans call energy is not exactly the same concept than the pure arrow of energy-reproduction of the Universe, most often is used to measure entropy – the capacity a system has to transfer motion to other system. I.e. in most equations of energy, such as e=mc², the equation measures the entropic expansion of space produced by the death of the mass. When we measure e=hv, the photoelectric effect, the entropy of the H-particle of frequency v becomes the measurable element, as the photon ‘feeds’ the electrons.

So WE ARE mostly measuring entropy instead of energy, and the change is needed conceptually, specially in the case of dar entropy between galaxies today called dark energy, which balances the immortal Universe, as it is equal in value to the Mass implosion of those galaxies:

In the graph the proper interpretation of the co-existing regions of space-time, dark entropy between galaxies, compensated by the positive curvature of galaxies, renders a flat curvature for an immortal Universe of zero sums of expansive dark entropy and implosive dark quark matter.

The importance of the cosmological constant as a relative curvature must be understood in the broadest of all homologies, as curvature is the form in which a higher perceiver observes a faster, smaller time cycles. Curvature becomes then in terms oF Lobachevski’s factor of Curvature in the geometry observed, h/c in humans, if we are dealing in time or in its symmetric space with a region of past-entropy, future-accelerated-maximal curvature, or a wave present region of fluctuation.

An in all of them we have a formula with a quanta of space, and a growing TIME-frequency of information, and both balance each other as we move up and down in the world cycles of life and death, from seminal seeds of information of smaller, higher frequencies, to slower wholes.

Those equations on the other part are dynamic excellent equations to search for the **main components of each Γ• supœrganism of the Universe.**

Since we immediately spot, H as the supœrganism of the light scale, which we shall consider the minimal **photon, **z≈mass, as the **nucleon mass, as **the minimal supœrganism of the gravitational scale and k, the Boltzman constant, which we shall consider a **phonon** as the unit-cell of thermodynamics.

Thus, what we have in those equations is a particle of energy<the photon, nucleon and phonon, measured in its total entropy, when in a dying << process.

Phonons become then the knot of time vibrations of the thermodynamic scale. And the more curvature/motion, energy/momentum they store the more temperature and total entropy if dissipated will generate.

Each of those equations thus ‘couple’, a physical, ∆±1 •singularity and its ternary Γœ supœrganism.

Those three ‘ratios’ that evolve into quantifiable social groups, are dynamic knots of time cycles, which appear to us in different forms depending on his state. In those equations of ‘entropy’, a population of h, k or Z will suffer a frequency acceleration in its reproductive speed≈motion along a path, in which they will be annihilated (e=mcc being the proper formulae NOT the sole kinetic energy of the system). So it will be the photon that impacts the electron in e=hv, and the heat wave

The easiest why to translate then is the quantum formulae, as frequency is directly plugged in:

E= H (quanta of space in the ∆-i scale) x ƒ (frequency of the wave)… It follows then:

E= k (quanta of entropy in the thermodynamic human, ∆-scale) x nT (Frequency of time).

*The cellular scale is therefore the essential, non-distorted scale in which the parameters are more clear. K, Boltzmann’s constant is written in entropy units, and T, the temperature constant, is responsible for the metabolic frequency of living beings.*

Then in the next gravitational, world scale, we do have two formulae: E=1/2 mvˆ2 and E=Mcˆ2.

Which one is ‘time and which one is space’ comes then from our previous mass equations: M=ƒ(h/c²).

All this said an interesting element to explain before going further is the application/meaning of the 3 scalar magnitudes of physics, temperature in ∆º, frequency in ∆-1 and mass in ∆+1. As they must be judged to belong to the ternary elements and the ternary ∆º±1 scales:

-Temperature (∆º scale, ST-open ball) measures the ‘wave-body’ equilibrium of the thermodynamic human scale, and as such it happens in all the delocalised vital space of the wave body.

-Frequency, (∆-1 scale, cyclical clock-like membrane) measures the smallish quantum wave frequency of the cyclical or sinusoidal ‘surface-membrane’ (electron, wave packet envelope) of the smallish physical scale, *in as much as we are the larger observer so we see better from the lower smallish being its ‘outer cyclical-clock like closed membrane). So that is the scalar we measure.*

– Mass, (∆+1 gravitational scale, *ð* magnitude) is inversely the *ð* measure of the largest galactic or Earth’ system in as much as it is the huge ‘being’, in which we are enclosed; and so we feel the mass curvature of our space-time as we are part of its ginormous system (and ultimately of the galaxy’s singularity black hole, which determines the G-constant of curvature for each specific galaxy, as Mach had it).

The key element to fully understand mathematical physics is the study of the fractal generator and the different relationships between the three states and topologies of the being, which synchronise in time and relate in constant ratios in space the limb/field/entropic, body-wave-iterative, particle-head/informative states of the being.

The key ratios, constants and elements off mathematical physics then represent elements of such generator and its different states and sub-systems.

*For example, the fine structure constant has three interpretations*, which represent the entropic, informative and reproductive relationship between the light ∆º and electronic, ∆+1 scales of physical systems:

– *ð*: The square of the ratio of the elementary charge to the Planck charge:

α= [e/q(P)]²

– $pe:The ratio of two entropies≈motions: the motion needed to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between two electrons a distance of d apart, vs. the ‘entropy≈energy’ of a single photon of wavelength: λ 2 πd (or of angular wavelength d):

α = eˆ2/ 4 π ε ~~h~~ c

-ST: The ratio of the velocity of the electron in the first circular orbit of the Bohr model of the atom, which is 1/4 π ε e²/~~h ~~ to the speed of light in vacuum, c.

This is Sommerfeld’s original physical interpretation. And so we observe that the comparison of the two fundamental particle-systems of the physical world, the electron, ∆+1 and the photon ∆º, become ‘connected’ by the symmetries between its Sp<st>Tƒ elements.

The connected parts of the system in this manner give birth very often to a series of universal constants that define the system and are the most extended in its applications for the larger ∆±3 §cales of the galaxy atom.

And of course all pervading appear the h/c² ‘lobachevski’s ratio between curvature and distance of the humind.

The entire model of quantum physics translated to GST is perhaps the more satisfying intellectual endeavour of GST physics, which I painstakingly took in my youth, as I translated the 11 volumes of Lindau’s masterpiece soviet encyclopaedia of physics, which had the added beauty of considering the right dual hegelian philosophy of logic and lobachevski’s acceptance of the realist nature of mathematics. But according to plan won’t be poured in the fourth line till the very end of this web *as the human scales matter more to us; and often the beauty of any manifestation of the game, even if it is as specific and limited as Albinoni’s lost, found and rewritten **addagio in G minor, is far greater and richer in languages closer to the human spirit as music – which Schopenhauer rightly defined as the ultimate language essence of the game – might be. *

Yes of course, the fine structure constant which defines the relationship between the ∆+1 electron scale and its ∆º photon ‘cells’ is much more important than the chords in G minor, but essentially they all refer to the same combinatorics of the fractal generator.

It must be noticed then that for *all structures of Nature, generated by the ternary symmetries of ∆st, there must be at least a unifying single parameter, which all the parts of the system will **synchronise together, and this will be the fundamental constant of the system, most likely a ‘time clock’, rhythm at the heart of the œ-being.*

I.e. for humans it is the second that synchronises the heart beat, the eye-thought glimpse and the leg 1 meter steps. It is then from this first fundamental time parameter, which locates roughly the system within certain Sp x Tƒ=∆§cale from where we can build the three key Universal constants, s x t=momentum, t/s=density, s/t=speed, of the system.

Ie. in a human system the second will give us the step of a meter, which defines the steps of space, st-e(n)t(ro)p(y) units, which for man is a meter, the common length of our legs. So we can obtain our speed, 4 km, hour, consider the usual decametric ratios of acceleration (so our speed can reach 9 x 4 = 36 km.)

It is precisely that hidden ‘full program’/structure of the supœrganism applied to all systems from a simpler electron-photon quantum ensemble to the human beings, which will unify it all.

As *a system is determined within a range of variations by the need to balance its different elements. I.e. a being with a ‘second’ time clock, belonging to the human biological ∆º scale should not display a limb/field step of much more than a second. As such the adjustable harmonies of all the beings of all the scales of reality is what makes so constant the ratios, parameters, relationships and decametric, ternary scales of the universe, which is an enormous puzzle constantly rewritten with the same letters by the game, but unlike Borges’ Babylon library, we do not have a chimp just banging the typewriter but an ‘excellent grammatical master’ with a penchant for ternary syntax.*

So for a computer the Herztian clock-speed determine in turn all the other ‘symmetric, symbiotic and balanced’ elements which will be connected to it. And you would expect them to be balanced to the capacity of thought of the computer. For a faster insect we will have a smaller steps; for a larger dinosaur a slower metabolic clock, and so on.

**E<cc>M and Beyond: the c-t limits.**

Finally in the gravitational scale, the three states are defined by the E($)<CC>M(ð).

It is interesting then to observe how in the transition of scales as temperature the measure of frequency-time in the ∆• thermodynamic scale disappears (∆t’=∆t γ).

So mass increase and its inverse temperature decrease transfers the ‘∆-thermodynamic,ð, to the ∆-gravitational, ð=m.

And the same limit below, is found for the inverse transfer of the parameter of temperature to that of magnetisation, the external cyclical clock of atomic fields in the quantum ∆-1 scale:

Since the magnetization is (approximately) inversely proportional to temperature. This fact is encapsulated by **Curie’s law:**

M= C B/T

where M is the resulting magnetisation, B is the magnetic field, measured in tesla, T is absolute temperature, measured in kelvins and C is a material-specific Curie constant:

In that regard, as the parameters change when we change scale, we are confronted with a problem, which is the enormous ambivalence of human languages in the use of those 2 fundamental words, space and time, and its ternary formal motions, Sp, SxT: ExI and Ti.

So we need to attach certain mathematical, geometric and logic concepts to our verbal terms to avoid so much ambivalence. Let us then return to Descartes and put some properties attached to those 3 symbols, which we advance ARE the ‘ultimate’ formal motions we care for, Spæ, ExI, Tiƒ.

**$: Spe or Lineal, Spatial Entropy**, is ‘res extensa’, something extended in ‘space’. So it is a motion that expands in space, as in a big-bang. And contrary to belief as it expands in space it decelerates in ‘time’ so it looses its ‘time motion’ till it becomes truly what ambivalent words tends to call Space- a still form. Thus space tends to slow down and extend itself; it does have motion but becomes finally a ‘flat’ extension.**ð:****or Informative time cycles**, which carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and cyclical form of its cycles, is INVERSE in properties, as it actually accelerates inwards, as it becomes smaller, as all vortex do, V x Radius = Constant. Thus waller radius, turn faster, as it happens with angular momentum, black holes or hurricanes. And they become ‘taller’.

So this shows some fundament facts of **$ vs. ð. **They are inverse. They are both FORMAL MOTIONS; but space has LESS of both, motion and form, curvature; it is flat on the long term, and slow to stillness, and Time is faster and a cycle, which tends to be tall. So we can ask also define them by dimensions. Of the 4 dimensions used today, space tends to have 2 of them, length and width, and time, width and height. And so they combine in the ‘width’ dimension, which brings us the 3rd element:

**Spe x Ti: E x I: Reproductive, wave-bodies**that combine the entropy of space and the form of time clocks into ‘meaningful’, workable parameters, ‘energy’ (entropy with direction) and information (form with meaning).

** The arrow of energy.**

$patial entropy is too often measure as energy when from a wave or form that stores energy a death, explosive process converts it back to a expansive, entropic field. Such is the case of e=mcc, an e=hv, and e=kt, in the three main scales of physical systems. Then we can compare them all as they are all sources of expansive motion. The beings of energy and its frequency world cycle, which we ad on to know how many ‘actions’ of space-time it has been involved in the event, complete then the proper measure of those three entropy symbols in more meaningful terms. a QUANTA is then defined as the unit of the st-state of a being, as a ‘cellular population unit’, of a space-time body-wave, whose frequency multiplies its ‘extension’ in time beats/actions, in which we measure/adsorb it.

The energy ST-ate is the balanced one, which iterates and reproduces hyperbolically a form. As such ‘waves are energy’, ‘fields are entropy and particles are information states’.

Energy is the main parameter physics uses to calculate physical world cycles which in computed for the whole existence of the physical event becomes a conservative zero cycle that does not spends energy. The energy of the system thus represents the simplest quantitative value of the capacity of the being to exist, its top predator force, total momentum, length and density of its worldccyle etc.

We thus need to make a whole redefinition of energy to fully grasp world cycles.

As we shall explore both concepts together, we will also observe the symmetries which energy display in space as world cycles do with the super organisms they create.

Now the funny thing as usual is that the seemingly perennial super organisms in space are the fleeting mayas of the world cycle of time, the dynamic motion patterns of information, form-in-action which is what truly states on the long term. So goes for energy, which stays while the fleeting physical systems mutate.

How much energy of activation is required to change then states=ages of matter in the different scales, and how new states emerge of transformations of previous states and how differently each state treats entropy and information, its parameters and details of different of such states-arrows of time, for different topobiologial ensembles represents a huge amount of all what mathematical physics studies.

It is then a key concept of the Universe of multiple clocks of time that an energy ‘conservative world cycle’ which represents the whole existence of an ∆-i scale, becomes for an ∆+i scale a ‘quanta of time’, perceived in a ‘synchronous moment(um) of space’, as fast cycles become ‘fixed forms of space’ for a slow observer (see key article on synchornicities).

Energy in that sense is a ‘memorial tail’ of time world cycles, ‘frozen’ as a space piece of ‘planckton’ or an ‘entropy Bolt’ for an ∆+i slow informative being. Yet the Universe has its complexity in its repetitions and synchronicities that transform space forms into time functions and vice versa.

But we can consider of the many perspectives (quantum as ∆-i, has more information, less perception and so it is deservingly the more complex of all forms of human knowledge) its dimensions of angular momentum, which ad to the cyclical π motion of the particle’s momentum (p) the radius, r, or distance to the Tiƒ, hence it is the best way to observe without ‘seeing it’, both the coordinated relationship between the Tiƒ and the membrane, which are so often in constant relationship through invaginated paths (as in cells, where the DNA -center connects through the golgi membranes with the eternal membrane).

So h, we might state is an excellent key parameter as it includes information on the Tiƒ x Spe membrane-informative nuclei of the quantum system. And so as S x T = St (meaning entropy x information = present energy) we really have in such simple formula, e=hƒ=h/t->h=ext a packed information on a system, whose energy – the parameter *that emerges in our scale of existence, and we have already related to the world cycle of existence of a being – is quantised in as much as h represents the world cycle’ of **existence of the light space-time at the minimal scale of the ‘observable human Universe. *

We could say that h is the minimal quanta of space-time, the minimal being, the ‘plankton’ of the gravitational sea, reason why in our texts we call it ‘planckton’ the minimal unit of life of the galactic, light space-time universe encoding in its 3 parameters r (ST) x m (tiƒ) x v (Spe) the needed ternary structural information of it. As we can define a carbohydrate with the CNO(+h) elements. How many variations of h-species there are is the zoo description of quantum physicists, the details…

*So in brief in the gravitational scale, m is the tiƒ fixed scalar and v the entropy element, with the momentum being the present parameter of us, the beings within the open ball/vital space of the system; in **quantum we revere elements, now the fixed element is not the tiƒ but the membrane (as perceived by us in quantised h-quantities of angular momentum) and so the variation is not an v-lineal speed but a Tƒ, frequency.*

And by the same rules of ternary symmetries in our ∆º intermediate scale, the concept that shall dominate is neither of those spe/tiƒ extremes outside our ‘equilibritum’ but the present wave, which is in the thermodynamic equation, E=pv (resolved) = KnT, the true meaning of Temperature as a measure of a ‘heat wave’, specifically the ‘amplitude of the vibration’.

**RECAP. ***The 12th dimensional view: 3 topologies in space, 3 ages in time, 3 scales of size, and a ‘warping whole’ or mind-program.*

In that sense there is a clear more complex formalism of 5^{th} D metric: a 12 dimensional analysis of the 3×3+0 subsystems of most organisms, from the 12 dimensional formulation of the supposedly simplest strings to the 10 *Physiological systems of the Human being, in which the 12 ^{th} system, the nervous system is the whole that integrates all other forms.*

*12 is indeed the perfect number, the tetraktys of the Pythagorean, 3 x 3 sub-systems dedicated to reproduce, information and energy in the 3 scales with the ‘black bole’ in the center of the 3 triangles, coordinating them all and connecting the system with the above ∆+1 social larger scale.*

The 12 isomorphisms of the galaxy-atom, the mind dimension is external to the being – ‘its membrain’, or central knot connected to the sensorial membrane that connects the whole ∆-1 region of the being and its 9 dimensions with the exterior ∆+1 region, and as such it is an ∆ø scale, in the region between border – the ‘constrains’ of the domain that define the function of the being (reason why in existential algebra, only constrained functions do exist). In the graph, we represent the universal mind by a bubble of dark matter strangelets surrounded the galaxy-atom, a galaxy for the mind-view, an atom for the larger, next scale of the Universe.

*In the graph of the galatom we see 3 topological space isomorphisms, 3 age-time isomorphisms, 3 scalar isomorphisms, and the 2 membrain isomorphisms of ‘whole’ fractal mind-point that emerges in an upper scale (here shown for the entire galactic ‘family’ in a simulation of the dark world upper scale universe.*

In the graph, the 3 fundamental elements of the Universe and all its parts:

- 3 topological forms in space, which become the organic parts of maximal entropy (lineal toroid limbs/fields), information (spherical heads/particles) and maximal reproduction (hyperbolic body-waves), which put together create all the systems of the Universe.
- = 3 symmetric arrows of time that give function to those forms: entropic big-bang expansions of space or relative past of a system disordered at death; the inverse, informative cyclical clocks of time that process the information of those systems, and its iterative, relative present body-waves that repeat the system, so it seems not to change in time.
- Below, its relative scales, ∆, of size, each one hosting species of different speed in its time clocks, studied by a different science.
- Thus all its species≈ systems can be studied with the same laws, derived of its common topological, spatial and biological, temporal properties, as all what exists is defined as a system made of particles/heads of temporal information that guide a complementary body/wave which reproduces the system over a field/territory of energy.

The 12 Ðisomorphic laws of nature (dynamic study of the world cycle) are closely related to those organic, scalar, ∆, topological, ST and mental, linguistic perspectives on all supœrganisms in space, worldcycles in time, of all beings tracing its exi•st±¡ences.

Now, once we have surveyed in a more disordered meaningful manner the Fractal Generator, its sciences, and its fundamental particle in 5D Space-time, the Worldcycle of a Superoganisms and its ∆ST dualities and ternary symmetries – that is, the thoughts of God, we need to enter into the details and create a formal frame for the analysis of every species of space-time of the Universe, across the different scientific scales of the 5th dimension.

This is done by extracting 3 x 3 ±1@ fundamental properties and elements of the ∆ST, scalar space-time and mental o-points that conform those species.

So we will consider 12 set of equal laws, elements, space forms and time events that all super organisms obey in their world cycles of existence, across the scales of the 5th dimension

‘The Universe is a 12 dimensional, ternary space-time fractal. made of infinitesimal parts, that co-exists in three simultaneous topological regions of space, three sequential cycles of time extended across three scales of the fifth dimension, perceived by a single mind, its 10th & 12th dimensions.’

How the Universe reproduces its actions, super organisms, species and planes of energy and information? Through its ternary logic as nothing exists, if it does not have three topologies of space, three sequential ages in time and extends through three scales of size. Reason why we can describe all systems of reality with the fractal generator.

Reality is a 12 dimensional game of space and time, based in a physical property called Galilean relativity. The fact that we cannot distinguish motion and form, so both *dimensions of motion=time and form=space, happen together. This holographic symmetry makes reality a game of N, s=t dimensions, which create space-time symmetries, go and stop motions and sets the stage to study dual st systems of at least 2 dimensions, one of space-form one of time-motion and the ‘reproductive’ perception of both together, the ‘third dimension of space-time’.*

Starting with those simple principles then we can build different systems of bidimensional frames of reference, starting from the 2 simplest studied by human scientists, mostly physicists, the bidimensional system of motion and form, whereas humans have adopted by convention, according to natural reasons, latter studied in detail, the dimension of length as the first dimension of motion, to measure motions, distances and trajectories in space and the dimension of height as the first dimension of form, of in-form-ation.

It follows then that we must keep labeling dimensions and use bidimensional or four-dimensional graphs of time space, where by the simple method of giving twice the dimensionality to each one, i.e. distance and motion, define lineal space and lineal time, in the X coordinates, height and vibration, are ‘motion space-time related dimensions’ of height.

In general also we can use algebraic conventions to represent those dimensions. So we give negative values to the dimension of information and positive values to the dimension of motion, and in this manner we can rest and operate in classic algebra. So for example, in Einstein’s special relativity the dimension of motion sums in the Sx, Sy, Sz coordinates and the dimension of temporal information, of motion, -ct, rests. This is a classic way to represent the inverse first dimensions of space and time all together, and why Einstein’s equation work.

We can then move to tridimensional pairs, for 6 dimensions and so on, let us then study them in an exhausting manner, realizing of a simple algebraic rule: time dimensions can be modeled with negative numbers that rest to space dimensions by adding motion to a form, and vice versa. We adopt this convention as it suits better present mathematical physics. Then the second dimensions of negative time is the i-complex map, or its ‘squared’ value, recommended in many physical equations (where the unit is i²=-1, c²= k/µ and so on).

Those are different conventions which we shall study in mathematical physics, but show the way the Universe is built up: adding balanced S=t dual dimensions according to the Galilean paradox.

In that sense the ‘sciences’ of the machines, ultimately of power, physics and economics are by far the less respectful of the scientific method and the less inclined to accept anything that does not appear as a short of ‘true dogma’ – from the big-bang to 4D formalisms, to the c-speed limit of light, to entropy theories of time, you name it, physicists are experts in categorical statements of truth utterly false. But they *won’t go back to school:*

And so the enormous beauty of the fractal Universe implies that any part regardless of size will have a relative singularity-point around which a hyperbolic body-wave will iterate its cyclical motions under the same ‘isomorphic laws’ of reality – and all of them will give us the essential laws or first principles regardless of size, with maximal detail of knowledge in the systems closer to us (biological systems) and maximal generalization in the most remote systems of minimal perception of form (Cosmological systems).

Since any of its physical, biological and social parts FOLLOWS the same laws. To study them we haver deviced a method based in the structural analysis of the five dimensions of any system through its Generator and its Rashomon ‘truths’ that considers 5D perspectives on any entity of space-time:

-The **temporal** perspective, the **spatial** perspective and its** ∆§ planes and scales** of existence, the **singularity-mind** perspective and its **actions**, the dynamic **‘a(nti)sysmmetric’ operandi** of exchange of energy between them, ≈ ≥ >…

This view is more concerned with ‘structure’, with ‘algebra’, with ‘spatial form’, with the ‘superorganic simultaneous being’.

So for a more thorough analysis through the dynamic flows of time of which the ‘super organism’ is a still photography, we need a ‘generational’ perspective of the being from birth as a seed/mind that organizes and grows and emerge into a larger whole world, lives 3 ages and dies. And this view is the one we obtain with the study of the world cycle in greater detail through the Ðisomorphic method, departing from that seed, its generator, the ways it creates bidimensional fields and ternary networks to emerge as a whole being, which will live through its infinitesimal actions, accumulated into ages, 8 phases of a lifecycle, 3 ages, 10 social scales swimming across 9 planes…. Yes no numerology here. The astounding architectonical Universe is there for those who can see to admire and worship and study as IT IS with all its elements, even if they cannot be ‘measured’ with the clocks of physicists and its light c-rod.

And so we shall do the study of physics here as it will be taught in the future in time, on a dynamic manner, through the Ðisomorphic method.

**Symmetry of space, time & scales, the true, realist NOT magic ‘whys’ of physics.**

The Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

# PART II.

# REVIEW OF ∆±4 SCALES IN 5D PHYSICS

**O SCALE. NON PERCEIVED FORCES: GRAVITATIONAL STRINGS: BIDIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE.**

Consider the simplest form of the Universe a unit interval, I, (O,1), It is a bit of Entropy or motion, distance or space (both perceptions are correct).

This open string I, can convert itself in a circle π, with a diameter 1, the original string. The circle will be made of 3 D turning around with an aperture of 0.14, and a so this entity, with a zero point in x=0.5, which can perceive through 0,14 apertures a 4% of the external Universe, with a 96% of dark space blinded by 3 i-strings that turn around it, is the simplest time-space organism, the pi point. The pi point as it turns to be reflects quite well the ultimate web of our gravitational space-time over which the electromagnetic space-time we see exists.

The Universe is bidimensional both at small and large scales (Holographic Principle), but its units, Non-Euclidean points, reproduce in fractal patterns till emerging as a 4-dimensional social network of space-time, the Universe we live in. This discovery of the most successful model of quantum gravity (casual, dynamic triangulation, galactic scales), shows that even the simplest space-time membrane of gravitation is built with the isomorphisms of social networks. But in its deepest meaning the fact that the Universe in the limits of perception of man has ONLY 2 SPATIAL DIMENSIONS, WITH NO TIME-HEIGHT DIMENSIONS, means we are ‘touching’ two immortal limits of reality that might be the absolute scalar limits of the Universe – a philosophical question which belongs to the metaphysics of i-logic time.

Ultimately we are made of pi circles. This simple bidimensional form has therefore a lineal |-Entropy space configuration and a O-closed one and from the Planck scale this strings of space and time can create our 4D Universe, as casual triangulation has proved:

The scales of physical space departing from that bidimensional, gravitational, invisible world of strings are studied by astrophysics. The scale of strings of space and time, of quarks and gluons of strong forces, of ¥-light and electrons of electromagnetic forces, the human scale and the gravitational, cosmic scale.

**I. LIGHT SPACE-TIME**

**A fast survey of time in modern physical sciences. Lineal External motions≈changes.**

Beyond lineal, Galilean Time in the XX century, physicists widened their comprehension of time, in two separate new senses – that of Einstein’s relativity, and that of quantum physics in the realm of particles:

*In the graph, the 2 most important new perceptions of time of modern physics after Newton->Galileo’s vision of lineal time, were those of Einstein->Minkowski’s light cones and Feynman’s space-time diagrams. In the light cone, time is still considered just a parameter of external space-motions, but it appears for the first time the concept of an arrow of ‘future time information’ – that is the information of a different space-time point, which in the future light can reach. This represents the arrow of future information of 4D models.*

** **Einstein ‘did know’, when he said: I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different speeds. Leibniz is right, but if so, we have to rebuild the entire foundations of physical sciences from its beginning… but he didn’t do it. Instead, lineal germans forgot all what he had truly discovered and ‘blocked’ the advance of cyclical time with their lineal 4D space parameter to keep the illusion going.

**T**he classic interpretation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity by Hermann Minkowski, a Lithuanian-German mathematician, it has been clear that physics has to do not with two entities, space and time, taken separately, but with a unitary entity space–time, in which, however, time like and space like directions can be distinguished. The Lorentz transformations, which in special relativity define shifts in velocity perspectives, were shown by Minkowski to be simply rotations of space–time axes. The Lorentz contraction of moving rods and the time dilatation of moving clocks turns out to be analogous to the fact that different-sized slices of a sausage are obtained by altering the direction of the slice: just as there is still the objective (absolute) sausage, so also Minkowski restores the absolute to relativity in the form of the invariant four-dimensional object, and the invariance (under the Lorentz transformation) of the space–time interval and of certain fundamental physical quantities such as action (which has the dimensions of energy times time, even though neither energy nor time is separately invariant).

This fact is important in 5D physics regarding the metric, E= S x T, when we enter in details on mathematical physics, not so much in other sciences, where the quality of the actions matter more than its equations. It is in that sense important to realize that what is ‘conserved’ in a single plane of space-time, is the ‘quanta of space’ or physical constant, H-constant in the quantum scale, K-Boltzmann constant in the thermodynamic scale and c-speed constant in the gravitational scale. The fact that they are measured in 3 different parameters, action (h), entropy (k) and speed (c), will require some understanding of the biased observation of those constants by humans, more proper of the specialized articles on physics.

What matters here is to corroborate some important aspects on 5D:

– The space of each scale is conserved, and in that sense infinite, it does not expand neither varies (no creationist theories of a single space-time continuum).

– Time varies in its frequency (inverse of duration and the true parameter to use to measure cyclical time: T=1/ƒ), but its product with the energy of the system does not vary in a single plane.

– Time speed=information varies and energy flows between scales, but (and this is a law of 5D which obviously is not advanced by Einstein, unaware of the fractal structure of the Universe), for a 3-∆±1 scales of the Universe both are conserved. And this is truly the meaning of the 5D co-invariance. It means that for each closed system, or ‘worldcycle of existence of a being’ between birth and extinction the system lives and dies into a zero-sum its total time and space.

All this are important Correspondences with Einstein’s work expanded to the 5^{th} dimension, which will be mentioned often when studying the key parameters and events and spatial quanta of 5D space-time beings namely their worldcycle between life and death, and its structure and co-existence in 3 synchronizes scales or states (fields-waves and particles).

In essence, because Einstein, worked with a single plane, and lineal time, Minkowski defined (left image), worldlines. In 5D we will define worldcycles, which is what experience sees. And we will define a total zero sum on a worldcycle of life and death, so time is conserved or rather erased in equal zero sums. Because death is an entropic explosion of information into expanded space across 2 entire planes of the 5^{th} dimension, 3 are the planes in which aw worldcycle exist. As we are born in a cellular scale and evolve into organic and social scales but die back to the cellular scale in entropic death (matter dies back into the radiation, minimal particle scale).

What about the concept of lineal time in Relativity, both Galilean and Einsteinian. Here we must warn the reader of the overblown importance given to the concepts of time in physics which are not only restricted by linearity but by the limits of its philosophy of time.

In the widest sense time is ALL forms of change in the Universe and 5D T.Œ does explain them all. For example the worldcycle of life and death is the key to understand the survival program of the Universe, its ages and horizons of evolution; the 5^{th} dimension and its arrow of time of parts and wholes to explain the evolution of the Universe and the life and social evolution of humanity. And so on.

__The limits of special relativity. The meaning of light constancy of space-time rods of measure.__

Yet all what mattered to Einstein, as to physicists, who are merely those who study the ‘external motions/energies of beings’ was to measure exactly the paths in space of beings, in relationship to the human frame of reference. So what really he did was to establish a new rod of measure, -constant c speed- for the entire Universe, expanding a notch more human objectivity from the valley of Abrahamic religions (chosen race/land) to the species (oikoumene religions), to the planet (Buddhism, Greek Naturalism), t to the sun (Copernican revolution), to the galaxy (that exists on a background of fixed light space-time). This of course was NOT the final frontier. In 5D we expand further to all scales of space-time, AS LIGHT IS ONLY ONE OF SUCH SCALES of measure size and time speeds.

It is not even the speed of light (though light moves at such speed, other beings do). It is rather the ‘rod of measure of space, of galaxies, and its lowest perceived human scale, which is electronic and feeds, absorbs, gauges and measures reality as fixed distances with the light it absorbs.

Thus the organic paradox merely explains the limit of light speed with the Galilean paradox of relativity: all what moves is a distance in still perception and when 2 electrons measure light is because they entangle and lock its distances with other electrons, fixing their distances (and causing all other fractal parts of the Universe to change their coordinates).

This is the true meaning of relativity: the stillness is not that of light but of the electrons that measure light in their stop and go motions, provoking the changes in parameters of all other parts of the universe around them.

And so ultimately the speed of light is how fast information can be transmitted externally between electronic ‘minds’, through its informative wave of light space-time.

But the corrections finally made physicists to measure accurately or at least from an electronic mind point of view, the distances of the Universe. And thus it was a huge success.

Since in physics, all what matters about time is a single equation of spatial external translation, V=s/t, and the same in relativity where time is ct, hence vt, hence s/t x t = S, a mere parameter of space disguised as ‘all types of time’, as no other of the time-motions of realty are mathematized on those equations. So physicists would do much better and help mankind broad his horizons if they were more humble and explain that whenever they talk of time, they just mean ‘speed’ of external motion. And that is what has its curious properties of spatialization (as it is in fact just a lineal spatial motion) etc. So the properties of ‘time studied in relativity physics’ are those related to motion in space (we shall see other time notions in physics, such as expansive motion in space, or entropy and present, simultaneous measure etc. in due ‘time’).

In the center of the cone we see, the ‘slice’ of present, instantaneous space, or 4 Dimension of time, which represents the modern version of Newton’s ‘instantaneous’ absolute space, perceived in an infinitesimal quantum of time, again used merely to measure external motions=changes of time: V=∂s/∂t.

Einstein went into further detail in those measures, using instants of time to give us the ‘still photographs’ (curved geometry) of the cyclical, physical Newtonian ‘time-clocks’ or masses. So if Newton had given us a ‘long time’ view of the clocks of the Universe, in lineal equations, now Einstein said that ‘time curves space into mass’, and added precision to the instantaneous measures of the largest clocks of time of the Universe, showing their curvature and establishing they accelerated inwards, increasing the future information of matter systems (Principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration). So we live in one of such mass vortices of accelerated information (the galaxy centered into a black hole) – reason why it is so important to know cyclical time. We DO not live in the outer Lineal Space between galaxies which expands and represents a relative past arrow of death, disorder and decelerations.

__The paradox of the Twins.__

In those themes, of interest is also the paradox of the twins, proved in science, which in layman terms is badly explained. It really means that ‘lineal, entropic motions’ are faster in time and live shorter than cyclical, closed paths. Again this relates directly to the laws of the 5^{th} dimension and the definition of life and death and entropy treated latter in detail. Essentially, time is cyclical, and a cycle in terms of ‘space’ implies a certain acceleration (at least angular, often with decelerations and accelerations in motion). This is what truly slow down time. While lineal motion accelerates it. In terms of death and life we write two equations:

Max. S x Min. T = Death (a big bang explosion of expansion in space with no time)

Max. T x Min. S = arrow of Life towards higher information (a series of information cycles with slow time happening in minimal space).

S=T, arrow of balance and immortality.

In that regard, by the principle of correspondence, we can clarify directly from the equations of 5D physics, which apply to all systems, not only physical (as those equations of life and death) the laws of any science including obviously physical sciences. We do NOT need to go into the ‘explanations’ of those facts provided by physicists, as that would be just pedantic writing – they are available in any book of relativity, for example, in the previous case of the twin paradox. What we shall do when dealing with facts of science is toe extract them from the larger, wider formalism of 5D fractal, cyclical space and time, which is truly the jargon ABOVE that of any science.

Of course I do not expect mankind to adopt that jargon, now in m lifetime, but it is just a question of ‘time’ perhaps in the future when Asians find cyclical time amenable, that all this is rediscovered and then it will explode, as it often happens in science with relative amateur or conflicting authors, as this one, from Mendel to Sancho (-;

Fact is the simplicity of 5D and its wider range of application makes the Universe far more fascinating and intelligible that it is now.

So in brief, each plane of existence conserves the actions of space-time, either measured as ‘actions’ in quantum physics as molecular motion or as speed in gravitation and its associated ‘momentums’.

__Linearity and continuity in space the single arrow of past-entropy-death of physicists.__

On the other hand time≈ information and ‘energy’ are parameters that are conserved together and flow through different scales of reality. So we should talk of ‘energetic information’, or ‘formal motions’, as the parameter that systems use to coordinate the 3 co-existing planes of its worldcycle and organism.

We will try to keep the exact wording only on physics, as for other sciences what matter is the quality of our conceptualization. Energetic information, present formal motions, Space-time beings, all those concepts are synonymous. When separated we rather use past-entropy and future-information as they are more telling.

Death in that sense is the breaking of the balance between those 2 arrows that come together into the ‘actions of energetic information’, which all systems use to display in its present relative ∆-planes of existence.

This duality of past-entropy-death and future-information-life was better Understood by Feynman, who defined in the left graph, antiparticles as relative past flows that annihilated future flows or particles. Feynman took thus a bolder step, with its time-space perpendicular coordinates, considering that light-space ‘travels’ in present time (green photon), as a reproductive wave, and antiparticles (right) travel backwards in time, as they indeed do. Since they represent the entropy of death.

A third concept of time in physics is less advanced, and still hangs on despite Feynman and Einstein:

The concept of ‘entropy’ as the only future arrow of time, or death arrow of expansive disorder, obtained in XIX c. studies of expansive gas.

__Einstein’s contributions to the debate. General relativity and mass. E=Mc2__

Unfortunately cosmologists have expanded that arrow to the entire universe, because they don’t understand Feynman, Einstein and their findings: that ‘time curves space into accelerated vortices of mass-information’ in galaxies, which balance the entropic arrow of expansive space between galaxies (hence both arrows as in E<=>Mc^{2}, the fundamental equation of time in physics balance each other).

Now here again, Einstein, a man of certain merit, gave us some contributions, which were ill understood philosophically by Minkowski, (special relativity), and better understood by Gödel, who corrected Minkowski with his solutions to general relativity.

A careful analysis of this, far more important theory, along the equation of Entropy and Time in physical systems (E < = > Tm) would have easily revealed the 3 arrows of space-time of the universe, which in physical terms could be called in the 3 scales of reality (the ∆-1 quantum, ∆-thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational main scales – latter studied in physical posts in more detail breaking them according to the fractal ternary principle in more subscales):

– Past, Lineal motion, expansive motion entropy (∆-scale), formless gravitational vacuum (∆+1 scale) and electromagnetic, quantum vacuum (∆-1 scale). Those 3 vacuums ARE defined by humans with 3 ‘constants of space’, H, k, and C, the 3 more important constants of physics. Why those 3 constants measure different ‘parameters’ (H: actions or angular momentum: k, entropy; and C: speed) is a very interesting question about how humans and 5D in general deforms our electronic mind perception of lower and upper scales of reality. Ultimately the observer paradox MEANS and we shall constantly bring it to explain the bias of human knowledge, that what we see of other scales relates to how electrons see it. We are what we eat. In this case we are what electrons eat as relative ‘energy and information’ (t2 concepts also wroth deep thought before equations are settled).

– Future, Cyclical time clocks of accelerated inward, implosive motion, photons, charges (∆-1 scale), masses (∆+1 scale and atoms (thermodynamic scale). Again here physicists have looked for a unification equations of charges and masses and its forces, which is a trivial result of 5D metric. THIS IS WHAT they call T.O.E. the saint grail of finding an equation that relates the constant of gravitation and electromagnetism and its cyclical charges and masses (its clocks of time). LOL, how little they ask and how little they solve.

– Liquid Waves of present, repetitive, hyperbolic, reproductive Time which only Feynman in his diagrams fully realize, but Einstein also worked out in its simultaneous present measures. This is the most important, balanced, eternal product of Future x Past arrows that reproduces both, the confluence point.

So the Universe is constructed with those 3 arrows. And all together form a worldcycle, not a worldline, which goes through them in zero-sums from past, young entropic ages to present, repetitive ones to future particle, old age, informative still moments. But amazingly enough in the beautiful formalism of General Relativity (the true merit of Mr. Einstein, the rest being most from others, mostly simple and of little value in its interpretation), we do have a solution that shows it.

Indeed, Kurt Gödel proposed solutions to the equations of general relativity whereby time like world lines can bend back on themselves. Unless one accepts a process philosophy and thinks of the flow of time as going around and around such closed time like world lines should not exist. This final attack from within to the lineal duration time of Abrahamic Religions and military physics however puzzled everybody and Einstein, despite coming from his best friend, did not like it at all. Kuddos for Gödel, who also showed Mr. Hilbert that we do NOT imagine points, lines and planes, because if mathematics is also a realist science, albeit in need of a proper ¬Æ grammar, which this Basque, Fermat-like amateur will provide for future professional scientists to boast how smart they are (_;

This, Einstein insisted as he obtained first that equation in its inverse form: M=E/c^{2}, in his paper ‘can energy create mass?’

And he added, ‘the separation between past, present and future is an illusion’. So did Feynman, with its deep insight on the 3 ‘time arrows’ of particle physics: present, reproductive waves of light-space and ‘bosons’, past arrows of entropic antiparticles and future arrows of informative particles that last much longer in time. So another fascinating, ‘immediate’ equation of 5D physics are the equations of life and death for all systems of the Universe such as:

Life arrow: Max. Time duration x Min. Space extension: Max. T x Min. S

Death arrow: Max. Space expansion (big-bang, dissolution of organisms into cells and atoms) x Min. Time (instant of death).

Yet again, the sum of both: Max. T x Min. S + Max. S x Min. T = zero-sum, which makes all scales and closed systems of the Universe eternal presents. In physics this is the meaning of Feynman’s diagram:

Past anti particle x Future-particle = Present light wave, whereas particles last max. Time as they collapse space into minimal size and antiparticles last minimal time while they expand space annihilating particles in the moment of death.

As such Feynman’s work is more advanced that the outdated entropy theory and the so much praised Einstein’s revolution of space-time, who still missed, the ternary fractal, multiple Nature of times and the existence of its 3 time arrows. He simply ‘froze’ space-time in present slates to measure with differential equations (by definition infinitesimal moments) as Galileo did, every instant of an external time=change = physical motion. But the long time arrow of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, studied by the 5th dimension, and by Theory of Evolution meant nothing to him.

Neither the cyclical time arrow of 3 ordered time ages, past-energy, present reproduction and future information, which define the existence of all ‘world cycles’ from human life to matter. Though he found its dual equation, Energy (expansive entropy-past)<≈light-present-wave: c²>M(time vortex-future) he still ignored its essential meaning. So he would say ‘time is what a clock measures’; and used it fundamentally as Galileo, only to study of the all the types of time motions of the Universe, for the analysis of external time-motions, which is the restricted ‘job’ of physicists.

Time however has besides present, differential, external motion-measures in space (Galileo’s V=∂s/∂/t and Einstein’s S²=Sx²+Sy²+Sz²-(ct)²), other type of time-motions, mainly informative evolutions (Evolutionary theory in Biology, vortices of evolution in masses, historic vortex of evolution, future 3rd age of maximal form and in-form-ation), and present, reproductive wave-bodies.

**Special Relativity: Time is not the 4 ^{th} dimension of space.**

The key question regarding Relativity on the fractal paradigm, once Causal, Dynamic Triangulation has shown that from a bidimensional, holographic Universe we can build the 4 dimensions of Relativity, by fractal ‘reproduction’ (modeled as a diffusion system through fractal space) is the meaning of the 4 dimension of time in Einstein’s equations. The answer is in the previous sentence: *present reproduction. Space-time is a self-organizing, emergent network of Non-Euclidean points that form a ‘body-background’ for future growth of more complex particle, by expanding a present sheet of space.*

Indeed, when we apply the in-depth-philosophy of fractal space-time structures to illuminate the why of those 2 masterpieces of mathematical physics, CDT and Relativity, all becomes conceptually cleared. The first blue print the Universe creates is the sheet of present space-time by the fractal growth of a previous smaller scale. CDT doesn’t inquire about the ‘meaning’ of that time arrow but clearly establishes its nature as a reproductive, fractal arrow; while the jargon of relativity defines present with the term ‘simultaneity’. This in this and the next paragraph we shall translate the jargon of quantum and relativity physics the general jargon of multiple spaces and times and correct some errors of classic relativity, clarifying its concepts as we have done with other theories.

* Dimensions as motions of time and fixed space.*

In the graph, dimensions are not only static forms of space but also dynamic time dimensions, which are created by the motions of time arrows since fixed space, according to the duality of the Galilean Paradox has always a degree of motion.

In fact we live in a membrane of light-space, whose Entropy /motion and dimensions are those of light quanta that constantly evolve, warp and produce virtual particles, while other particles dissolve in scalar big-bangs returning to the vacuum light-space.

Moreover in the Organic Universe dimensions are finite, reaching always a limit – either the limit of the membrane or ecosystem or the superorganism in which we measure.

Those dimensional distances in our light-membrane are given by the maximal distance/life span of light, which contrary to belief dissolves itself back into the gravitational space membrane after 10 billion years of fractal reproductions in the gravitational space-time quanta. In a diffeomorphic being, like a human being those dimensions grow till the limit of our space-time membrane, and so on. Thus, beyond the limits of a certain superorganism, there is a discontinuity from microcosms into macrocosms, which can only be ‘bridged’ with transitional spaces.

In the case of physical space we talk of two membranes of space-time, the smallest of which is our Euclidean, 3-dimensional light-space and the bigger one, the non-Euclidean gravitational space,. And between both membranes there are ‘doors’ called black holes and ‘transformative’ forces, called weak forces which transform particles from one membrane into the other, and flows of Entropy and information that can transcend through a transitional space-time known in Relativity as a ‘Rosen bridge’.

Dimensions are complex motions, interpreted according to the Galilean paradox (dual motion/form analysis), also as forms of static space, in the same manner you see a car ‘line’ in a night still picture or a ‘fixed wheel’ when it rotates too fast.

*The partial application of Non-Euclidean Geometry by Einstein*

Those clarifications are needed to consider some conceptual revisions to General Relativity regarding its meaning reach and limits due to its analysis of only a single space continuum and a single time arrow.

The result is only an approximation to reality, with some errors and deep insights, which works as long as we establish a conventional rod of space-time measure – the postulate of c-speed as absolute – and deal with phenomena in a single space-time continuum, either in the light-space studied by special relativity or the gravitational space studied by general relativity.

Indeed, what Einstein did was to apply a mathematical advance, the discovery of the 5^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry to the understanding of gravitational space. Now that we have corrected the other 4 postulates, we can resolve and advance much further the Physics of space-time into the new paradigm of a Universe made of scalar membranes, each one a network of non-Euclidean, fractal points, whose Sæ-exi,To parameters (universal constants of Entropy, information and reproduction) and exi actions (existential forces) define all the events and forms of reality.

In that regard, Time and its natural language logic, is the first language of God, wider than mathematics. For that reason, Frege and Hilbert were able to derive the isomorphisms of mathematics from the isomorphisms of logic time, the ‘true language of God. Albeit a dualist logic more complex than the simple, lineal logic of Aristotle that physicists use in its spatial study of time. So time is a deeper phenomenon that encompasses all the spaces that there were and will be transformed by 4 possible arrows of time; and what truly matters is to learn the logic rules that transform in each species, a fractal, vital space, from past to future, between birth and extinction, guided by one of those 4 main time arrows.

*The restricted formula of time-change as motion of space.*

In that sense, the image physicists have of reality is restricted by the concept of lineal time and a single arrow of entropy, which also limits the solution of physical questions and introduces errors as the cosmological big-bang or the evaporation of black holes, mentioned before.

Physicists have spatialized time, defined with a single dimension, as a parameter of changes in motions and space, t=s/v.

This limited study of only one type of change, however is often forgotten, creating conceptual errors, such as the fantasy of time travel (as they don’t realize there are infinite clocks of time in the Universe and so all time travel is local, within a certain organism as in the processes of death.)

In fact, when physicists confront the phenomenon of time, they do so only from the perspective of spatial change, a very limited part of the entire realm of time=changes. And so both, Galilean relativity and Einsteinian relativity are theories about the motion and Entropy of space, its invariances and isomorphisms, not a theory about all types of Time-change as this work is. And when someone like Hawking affirms that time travel is possible because time-motion gets to zero in a black hole, he merely forget he is speaking about the time-motion defined in the previous formula, t=s/v or its self-similar Einsteinian version not about the sum of the infinite time cycles of the Universe that remain unchanged.

The readers must be therefore aware of the limits of study of time *in any physical theory, from Galilean to Einsteinian Relativity. *Today, when Physicists talk about time they talk about is a parameter, t, which appeared first in an equation of speed, V=s/t, that Galileo found when studying translational change in space or ‘spatial movement’. Furthermore, because that rate of change in space is considered infinitesimal, V=ds/dt, they talk about present changes in space, which Einstein defined with his concepts of ‘present simultaneity’.

This was fully understood by painters, who started to paint simultaneous, present time, in a single bidimensional space, as the sum of fractal movements (Duchamp’s staircase models and Picasso’s cubist perspective), but surprisingly enough the people who grasped with more difficulty the concept of spatial, present simultaneous analysis of time, were the same physicists that had invented this model of time analysis.

Moreover, ever since physicists have denied there are many other ways in which time=change happens in the Universe, beyond the limited study of ‘changes in speed’ that Physics analyzes. This has been explained many, many times to Physicists, since Bergson and Poincare explained to Einstein and Minkowski that they were ‘spatializing time’, or rather analyzing how vacuum space changes in time, (so Poincare could establish with Topological analysis self-similar equations to those of relativity).

Yet there are many other things besides vacuum space that change in time. We humans change in time our morphology (not our speed). Evolution changes in time the form of many species. Time is thus a synonymous in most sciences of a change in form, in the in-form-ation of species. And this type of informative change is basically ignored by Physics. This shows a general misconception of the meaning of Time in Physics, which has been termed as ‘simplistic and reductionist’ by philosophers of science. Because indeed it is.

Time is philosophically defined as ‘change’ and divided in the study of ‘translational change’, which is carried out by Physics, and the study of ‘morphological change’; which is carried out by Biology. In that regard, Galileo defined only a limited type of time-change, translational change, with his equation, V=s/t. He ‘spatialized Time’ (Bergson), reducing the study of Time to a single process of change, movement.

*Special relativity: the study of the light-membrane.*

On the other hand, special relativity studies changes in the motions of the light-space membrane, *departing from a rod of Measure – light speed – taken as a convention.*

Einstein chose a postulate without proof, the postulate of c-speed as absolute. Of the 3 elements in the definition of time-motion by physicists, V=s/t, he could have taken any of them as absolute, but he chose light-speed. This is merely a matter of choice, as if we want to make a metric space able to ‘measure’, we need a ‘fixed rod’ value, which Einstein chose to be c-speed. Again, we could consider light speed variable and fix instead the time cycles/frequencies of light (so red light with lesser frequency/form travels faster than violet light and finally dissolves into non-local gravitation without form, dying about 10 billion years after birth – which solves some key problems such as the expansion of intergalactic space).

Yet since we humans have a biological brain that fixes all light rays and extract instead the ‘color/form’ information of light, the convention of C-speed establishes a rod to create metric spaces and reduce the fluctuations of topological, real spaces. So far, so good, but as we shall see this convention to achieve the measures of relativity becomes a much bigger error when c-speed limits are applied to the gravitational membrane, when they should be limited to its use in the galaxy of light, since it is a limit caused by the substance of the light-space membrane, light itself.

Ultimately a true theory of space-time Relativity, the concept that matters in Einstein’s work, means that speed is also relative to the scale we observe and c-speed limits only apply to vacuum space and other forms with higher information (since the general formula of speed in all systems is speed=energetic space/temporal information; so forms with higher information are slower, as they have to build in each translational step all its form across multiple planes of complexity).

But Einstein in his analysis of space-time still used a single ‘continuum space-time’, the abstract Cartesian plane, and was interested only as all practical physicists by the creation of a ‘metric space’ in which instrumental measures were possible. He did not realize that time-space was discontinuous and at least structured into st-planes, the gravitational space of masses and gravitational forces that move faster than light and have a density of order inferior to 0 K (black holes, quarks, intergalactic dark Entropy, etc.) and the light-membrane limited to c-speed.

This error was understandable, since we can only observe the light space that fills up with background radiation the entire galaxy and imprints gravitational space, ‘forming’ it into light. Hence in the galaxy indeed, light space imposes a c-limit of speed to all motions; but that is not the case when we go beyond light space into intergalactic gravitational space that experience shows to move up to 10 c speeds according to the natural decametric scales of the Universe.

*Galilean Relativity: the error of Cartesian, continuum space.*

The 2^{nd} error of relativity, the continuity of space-time is caused by a misunderstanding of the curved, geometrical nature of time and its dimensions, caused by the Cartesian plane of lineal time: To draw a clock-cycle of temporal information we need at least 2 dimensions, as morphology requires form, in-form-ation; and so lineal time with a single dimension cannot study it. Thus when Descartes and Galileo simplified time into one dimension, he eliminated the analysis of morphological change and information, the 2^{nd} arrow of the Universe, from most disciplines of science.

All cycles have 2 directions or arrows to complete its form. In the pre-scientific age, those 2 arrows of relative past and future were understood as the 2 sections of curved times cycles. So times are indeed, as Einstein thought, curved, to the point of closing themselves into causal cycles that return all beings to their origin, but they have 2 dimensions, height and rhythm. So it does space. Each local times ‘curves the Entropy of space’, creating fractal in-form-ation (masses and forces in physical, evolving information in biology, etc.). Since a cycle needs 2 directions to close into itself and create a form.

Entropy consists in an amorphous, relative surface of undifferentiated quanta, a plane without form, which the creation of time cycles shapes into information and makes it recognizable, thanks to its 2 dimensions. Both geometries, cycles of time and planes space, are bidimensional. When both systems merge, the sum of fractal, bidimensional fields of time and Entropy, create only one more, 3^{rd} intersecting dimension of combined time-space, *width,* which has a rhythm of temporal movement, the 4^{th} dimension of time=change that we observe as *reality*.

Unfortunately the error of Descartes and Galileo, which simplified cyclical time into a single-dimensional line, had as a first consequence the reduction of time in human sciences to a lineal duration, measured with a scalar number, similar to the way we measure space. It is what philosophers of science call the ‘spatialization of time’. Now spatial time becomes a secondary parameter to calculate spatial and energetic motions and processes – not an objective of knowledge in itself. Accordingly, Galileo defined time as a measure of ‘translational, spatial change’, of movement in lineal space or speed (V=S/T), simplifying time into a lineal number, defined in terms of movement and space.

*Light and dark Entropy Interaction: gravitational space warping.*

Physicists are always referring only to the arrow of time=change in the motion of beings (t=v/s), which is by tautology a function of space. Thus, Philosophers talk of the spatialization of time, which is made dependent of Entropy and movement. Einstein was perhaps the only physicist aware of this error when he said ‘I seem to be the only person that believes there are many times with different rhythms’. So when his followers say that time is the 4^{th} dimension of space, he did not agree; but he pointed out that even in Relativity Time has an inverse, negative sign, so its properties must be opposite to those of space.

But physicists ignored his dictum: ‘we cannot send wire messages to the past’, he insisted. And when Meyerson, the French philosopher of time published a rebuttal of Minkowski’s reductionist theory of time as the 4^{th }dimension of space, *‘La deduction Relativiste’,* 1928, and he could express his ideas without the enormous peer pressure, usual in this profession of fundamentalist scientists, he praised it as one of the most remarkable books written about the relativity theory from the standpoint of epistemology (the scientific method) and explicitly agreed with its rejection of the spatial interpretation of a world-line of Minkowski.

Time motion in Relativity has a negative sign, since it refers to the implosive arrow of information that contracts space, NOT to the expansive arrow of spatial Entropy and entropy. Time in General Relativity is the factor that warps Entropy into information, evolves form, trans/forming the Entropy of gravitational space into the frequency of form of light-space. Time in special relativity warps the Entropy of the vacuum, as light imprints its form. Thus Time is –t^{2} in the equation of Special Relativity:

*s ^{2} =x^{2} +y^{2} +z^{2} – c^{2 }t^{2}*

Space is positive and time is negative because it forms, contracts space into a wave-frequency that carries information.

Yet the why of that warping of the gravitational membrane by light-information Einstein could not understand since it required fractal, Non-Euclidean models of discontinuous space-time to describe how form evolves. So Physicists ignored the informative effect that warps Entropy into form.

*Einsteinian relativity inherits the error of spatial time.*

Let us study that conclusion in more detail. This tendency increased further when Einstein used the same concept of translational, spatial change to define time. In that respect, it is popular to talk of time as ‘the 4 dimension of space’ in Relativity.

This is a misconception of Einstein’s equations, which do not include all time=changes, as the 4^{th} dimension of reality, but only spatial change, moving space, what Galileo defined as S=vt.

In Einstein’s formalism moving space writes as ct, since Einstein studies phenomena that happens as the speed of light; so vt becomes ct (where c is light speed).

Thus s=ct, the 4^{th} dimension of Special Relativity, is not time but ‘moving space’, defined as the product of translational change=lineal time-duration, t, and light speed, c. And so there is no philosophical advance respect to Galilean Relativity that already defined time as a change/dimension of moving space.

Yet this capacity of time to measure change in space is only a fraction of the properties and modes of change that time measures in the Universe, and reveals nothing about the frequency and form of physical time cycles.

Though Einstein latter, in his General Relativity went deeper and discovered that Time is a curved clock geometry, which in the Universe bends space into masses, in his initial work, ‘Special Relativity’ he was still a classic physicist who declared as Galileo did that ‘time is what a clock measures’ and so he still used the Galilean, lineal concept of time-speed, v=s/t, to define it.

However, Einstein never said that time is ‘only’ a dimension of space as lesser physicists say today routinely. This reductionist, ‘spatial concept’ of time was provided by Minkowski and Einstein opposed to it, saying ‘that time behave differently since wires didn’t travel to the past’.

Time indeed is causal, logic and defined by time arrows which are not symmetric; that is left and right are equal but motion to the past (informative flow that devolves into Entropy) and motion to the future (Entropy flow that evolves into information) have different properties. This is known in the wording of classic physics as the ‘breaking of symmetry’ in processes that involve time evolution (those mediated by the weak force), or ‘chirality’ in other systems of physics and chemistry.

Yet the simplification of Minkowski became popular among physicists, as it allowed to keep Galileo’s tradition of studying time as a lineal parameter dependent of speed (V=s/t).

In that sense, though this work is conceptual to facilitate its comprehension to a wider audience and so we have reduced equations to a minimum, it is worth to consider that spatial vision of time in Special Relativity in more detail, given the simplicity of its mathematical equations.

Think first of two dimensions, the surface of a sheet of paper, for example, of length x and width y. The shortest distance s between two opposite corners is given by Pythagoras’ theorem: s^{2} = x^{2} + y^{2}. If we now go to three dimensions, the shortest distance between two opposite corners of your room, for example, one on the floor and the other in the opposite corner on the ceiling, where the room is x long, y wide and z high, is given by: s^{2} = x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}. So what happens if we go to four dimensions, trying to include ‘lineal time’ and ‘moving space’ and measure the space-time interval between two camera flashes, for example, one happening at one corner of your room and the other happening at the opposite corner but a few seconds, t, later?

We might think, if we follow the concept that time is just another dimension of space that the answer would be: s^{2} = x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} + t^{2}, but we would be wrong:

– First, cycles of temporal information, as we have seen, are inverted to spatial Entropy, so the term t^{2} must be negative.

– Second, time is not space, and we are measuring space.

We are just adding now a time-related term of moving space or speed – Galileo’s formula – to our measure; we are not adding pure time but moving space, so to be able to add apples=spaces and pears=time we have to convert time into moving space and we do so with Galileo’s equation v=s/t, hence s=vt, which means we ad, s=vt. Now, the big question arises: what kind of moving space we are measuring?

Or in other terms, what is V; the speed of the space we are measuring? The answer of Einstein was ‘light’, since the velocity of light was found to be equal in all systems, regardless of the speed of the observer, light was a kind of space-time itself, uninfluenced by the movement of the relative points we were measuring.

So Einstein added a corrective factor of measure or 4^{th} coordinate of space, related to the translational speed of the light-space between the 2 relative points we were measuring. Light-space, the space our eyes see, is made of light, a quantum of Entropy. Space is not static but, as the impressionist painters thought, we see light-space and so we have to add a parameter to correct for the movement of that light space to make accurate measures: s=vt=ct, moving light space. It is not pure time, cyclical time or frequency or lineal time or duration.

Thus, it is absurd to say that time is the 4^{th} dimension of space. What we should say is that light-space has movement, s=ct, a parameter to ad in any measure of translation, in a Universe of moving spatial energies. And the relativity equation adds those underlying moving flows of spatial Entropy and speed: s^{2} = x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} – c^{2}t^{2}, which gives us the space-time separation, s, between two points of any space-time subject to motion. Finally, rather than measuring the distance across an extended interval of space-time, it is important to deal only with the separation of adjacent events separated by an infinitesimal change in the coordinates, dx, dy, dz, dt.

So the correct expression of the infinitesimal separation of 2 adjacent events is now: ds^{2} = dx^{2} + dy^{2} + dz^{2} – c^{2}dt^{2}. This is called the metric of flat space-time. If we want to include ‘curved’ space-time then we put a coefficient, not equal to one, in front of each term, dx^{2} etc., which bends the specific coordinates. This allows the possibility that a trajectory in space-time might be ‘curved’, which was the big discovery of Einstein, by creating many adjacent points and joining them in all types of trajectories in space-time, as those you trace in your daily life.

In order to find out the separation between two events you have to add up, or integrate all the infinitesimal ds intervals along the light path. And then it is when things can get as complex mathematically as you want, allowing you better measures of the shapes and movements of the Universe.

This is all what there is to it: an improvement on Galileo’s study of translational space. Yet in that equation time is not a 4^{th} dimension of space, but a measure of the speeds of the space-time background. The 2 important discoveries of that equation are the curved nature of space-time; and the use of c instead of v as the speed of that spatial background. Einstein realized that the wobbling of space could be incorporated adding ct as a parameter of translational change, which he did. But he did not added time as a 4^{th} dimension but the moving properties of the fractal space-time or light-space on which our electromagnetic world builds itself.

*Informative contraction: light imprints gravitational space.*

Einstein latter adapted Galileo’s formula to a fluctuating space-time background adding the implosive, -ct, arrow of gravitation to all translational movements. Thus he realized that Time in Physics also has a component of morphological change, as time warps Entropy into in-form-ation, not only in evolutionary processes, but also warps the Entropy of vacuum into in-form-ative masses.

And this is in fact the most important finding of the previous formula, which becomes crystal clear when we consider a ‘standard’ plane of two arrows of time, Entropy and information, which is represented by negative, imaginary numbers.

Thus what the negative symbol behind the ‘square’ of time, easily reduced to an O number really means is that the imprinting or reproduction of the light wave over the gravitational space in which imprints its information provokes a contraction of form, proportional to the informative time cycle and reproductive speed of the wave of light, according to the general isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times, in a phenomena comparable to the dragging of any motion over an opposite flow. Since indeed, what light does from its p.o.v. is to feed on an opposite flow of gravitational forces where it reproduces itself, and in doing so it obviously suffers a drug, like the recoil of shooting a gun or the slowing speed of a plane dragging Entropy from air through its wings

*Absolute Relativity: c is not the limit of speed of the Universe.*

It is yet another proof of the scalar structure of the Universe, as electrons which emit light first ‘connect’ through the gravitational non-local plane (giving birth to the entanglement process) and when they are locked they emit a flow of light. A fact which also explains the Postulate of absolute speed of light as a ‘local effect’, NOT an universal law; since electrons only emit light when they are locked, and we can only observe light when our instruments lock with the emitter and so there is no a sum of speeds as Michelson thought (though there are several ways to measure this, and so Relativity is right as a system of measure but wrong as a philosophy of time-space).

This postulate is further proved wrong by the fact that the diffeomorphic principle of relativity establishes a relativity of space and time, but speed=v=s/t is a parameter of space and time; hence the limits of speed are relative according to the scales we study; which means C is only the limit of the light-space membrane in which we inhabit but not the limit of gravitation that is the force of the other membrane of the Universe.

Yet, those conceptual clarifications born of a model of multiple space-time membranes and time cycles were not available when Relativity was deduced in mathematical terms, and so new errors in the conception of time appeared soon. Minkowski first though that time was the ‘4^{th} dimension of space’. Then, because of the mentioned error of a single arrow of time for the entire Universe, Physicists thought that when they measure NOT the change in translational time of the formula of speed, v=s/t, but all the time of the Universe and time travel was possible.

Yet when time appears with a negative term, it doesn’t mean, as people like Minkowski or recently Hawking think, that time is traveling to the past. Such patent nonsense comes out of the generalization of the parameter t=s/v, the equation which defines time in physics (or –ct in Einstein’s improved formula), to the entire range of time=changes of reality, including morphological time-change.

Special Relativity uses time, as a t parameter of space and speed as physicists always do, in this case to measure moving spatial Entropy – the flows of gravitational and electromagnetic space-time that act as the scaffolding of the world we inhabit. The fact that a century later most physicists still think that all what matters about time is its use as a parameter of translational change, s=ct, shows how much time has been degraded and distorted in modern science due to its lineal simplification in Galilean Physics and Cartesian geometries by the concept that there is only one arrow of time for all the cycles of the Universe, which is ‘what a clock measures’ (Einstein, Galileo).

The concept of a fractal point and the relativity of space and time and its parameter of speed, only absolute within the limits of a certain space-time brane, has 2 immediate formal generalizations:

*‘The maximal speed of a space-time membrane corresponds to the limit of speed of its more extended, less formal spatial substance, such as ” exi=k∆ -> max. c = c (max. e x Min Tiƒ).’*

In other words, because we live in the light membrane, the limit of speed is c. If we were in the gravitational world, the limit of speed will be that of Gravitational forces > c; if we consider from the relative point of view of our size, the world of life beings, the limit of speed is that of the cheetah and so on.

The second, deeper consequence of absolute relativity and the difference between space displacements and temporal displacement is even more radical: because measure is relative to the point of view of the observer, the Universe is not a metric space but a topological space, in which distance and speed are absolutely relative and do not change the type of reality we describe. This again solves many questions of physics and we shall return to it, when analyzing in more detail black holes as a ‘sample case’ of the applications of Multiple Spaces-Times to cosmology.

**The conceptual error of the 3±i forces and the conceptual reasons of Lorentz Transforms.**

Let us put a couple of classic errors of absolute space-time carried to the two limits of our physical perception – the theory of forces and the Lorentz transforms, analyzed with a bit more of depth.

Some time events such as the electroweak force is treated as a lineal force of space, despite provoking no translation, happening in a point of space elongated in time and transforming particles.

So while the 4 vector of Einstein’s relativity accurately deals with the duality of 3-dimensions of lineal space and one scalar cyclical time-point magnitude (x,y,z,t in special relativity, 3 momentum vector and energy in general relativity), the equivalent ‘4-vector’ of universal forces across the 5th dimension is totally ignored (3 spatial forces, in the 3 different scales of space-time, the inner atomic strong force, the human electromagnetic scale force and the cosmic gravitational force, and 1 temporal/transformative force across scales of the 5th dimension or electro weak force).

Now for the future physicists there is a huge entirely new Universe to explore as he will streamline and develop the mathematical physics of the 5th dimension, its forces and events and complete the Copernican revolution of relational space-time.

In this blog time permitted we plan in the future, once the simpler model of the 2 first lines is completed, with an overall review in the first line of the principles of relational space-time and a description on general terms of all those systems across the different St¡ences of the 5th dimension (one for each plane from quantum physics, through chemistry, biology, geology to cosmology), we shall include in the 4th line some of the advanced mathematical physics required to streamline the 4 forces of nature, while in the previous article, ∆±1o we define the equation of unification of the 3 spatial forces.

The advanced physicist, if any will notice that basically the unification of the electroweak and electromagnetic force, consists in *a symmetry between the spatial state of the force (¥-forces) and the temporal state (weak force). So the weak force is the time state of the electromagnetic force (hence its carriers are heavier=faster clock-times with more mass, while the photon which does not close its cycles has no mass, only the energetic spatial state of ‘time’). *

*He will also notice that the Lorentz transformations are the limiting regions of our light space-time, when again there is an inversion of space and time states, as the systems of light space emerge into the upper and lower, nested ∆±4, 3 gravitational and dark energy/matter scales.*

All those transformations can be described with a hyperbolic graph of time-space, as time freezes into space-form and hence it tics slower to a halt, increases its mass-form and finally splits its Sæ>To functions into pure radiation without information (gravitational waves) and pure form with maximal angular motion (<o K black hole state). But it is only the space-time parameters of light, which are transformed hyperbolically in its inverse time-space parameters, when emerging into the large scale. This happens for all systems that ‘invert’ its parameters when travelling between planes of the 5th dimension.

To the point that we generalize the concept of Lorentz transformations and Einstein’s Rossen’s bridge to all travels between two scales of the 5th dimension.

** Beyond Einstein’s c-speed**. **Science expands our point of view on the universe. Paradigm’s shifts**

Stience though is philosophically the understanding of the mind of the Universe – metaphorically the ‘thoughts of god’, certainly not the subconscious collective of a bronze age tribe – but the isomorphic laws that apply to all beings, and ‘all its details’, all its species, with all the information of them, from ‘an objective point of view**’**, that of each species for each being.

Therefore sciences goes against the ‘ego paradox’ of subjective thought proper of ‘religions’ and ‘human selves’, and has grown step by step, through its widening of the point of view it has adopted to perceive the Universe, away from man.

General Systems Theory and its formalism, isomorphic scalar space time, means thus a new step into the objective view of the Universe, since:

-On one hand goes away from the human point of view and considers all systems equally gifted with the qualities of life, and social organization.

– On the other it takes a point of view a notch further removed from the human point of view.

In this article we shall consider how this ‘further away’ from man has improved science step by step, first departing from religious myths of ‘chosen of god’ (Abrahamic religions), then departing from the Earth as center of the Universe (Copernican revolution) then departing from our species as the center (Darwinian revolution), then departing from the solar system as the center (Einsteinian revolution) and now departing from our scale of space-time as the center of reality (IST revolution).

Yet because those changes of objectivity collide directly with human subjective ‘essence’ as minds with a fixed point of view, they are extremely difficult to spread even within the scientific community.

And so that is the reason, when Slocum, the first one-man sailor around the world arrived to South Africa, the president Kruger did not want to receive it.

He had proved once more the Earth round, and not the center… in the XIX c. That is why more than 1/2 Americans still believe a personal god created man and reject evolution.

And that is why I have found extraordinarily difficult to explain 5D ST even to scientists that reject the concept of a Universe of infinite scales of size, where man’s size is not privileged respect to atoms, viruses, planets or stars.

We shall thus end commenting on the Paradigm shifts of science, according to Thomas Kuhn’s work on the nature of scientific revolutions.

From subjective myths and anthropomorphic ego trips into an objective view of the Pantheist Universe.

Science though is philosophically the understanding of the ‘thoughts of god’ – the common laws that apply to all beings, and ‘all its details’, all its species, with all the information of them, from ‘an objective point of view’, that of each species for each being.

Therefore sciences goes against the ‘ego paradox’ of subjective thought proper of ‘religions’ and ‘human selves’, and has grown step by step, through its widening of the point of view it has adopted to perceive the Universe, away from man.

General Systems Theory and its formalism, isomorphic scalar space time, means thus a new step into the objective view of the Universe, since:

-On one hand goes away from the human point of view and considers all systems equally gifted with the qualities of life, and social organization.

– On the other it takes a point of view a notch further removed from the human point of view.

In this article we shall consider how this ‘further away’ from man has improved science step by step, first departing from religious myths of ‘chosen of god’ (Abrahamic religions), then departing from the Earth as center of the Universe (Copernican revolution) , then departing from our species as the center (Darwinian revolution), then departing from the solar system as the center (Einsteinian revolution) and now departing from our scale of space-time as the center of reality (IST revolution).

Yet because those changes of objectivity collide directly with human subjective ‘essence’ as minds with a fixed point of view, they are extremely difficult to spread even within the scientific community.

And so that is the reason, when Slocum, the first one-man sailor around the world arrived to South Africa, the president Kruger did not want to receive it.

He had proved once more the Earth round, and not the center… in the XIX c. That is why more than 1/2 Americans still believe a personal god created man and reject evolution.

And that is why I have found extraordinarily difficult to explain 5D-ST even to scientists that reject the concept of a Universe of infinite scales of size, where man’s size is

**Dimensions of motion and form: the growth of scales in physical systems.**

*Multiple space dimensions, like the 5 ^{th} dimension the artist fails to render in the hypercube do not exist in reality. Those objects are mathematical, linguistic fictions caused by the fact that any language of information is inflationary, as literary fictions are. *

*The beauty of some mathematical theories, as the beauty of literature obscure those self-evident facts. The fifth dimension is in fact a dimension of time evolution, which co-exists within the broken spaces left by networks, as all dimensions are fractal networks, with a limited fractal dimension defined by the quantity of space occupied by the networks. This in non Euclidean algebra is explained by the fact that irrational numbers do NOT exist (the are ratios which never have a fixed value but turn around a rational number above and below, hence called ‘Dedekind cuts’), and yet their number of dark spaces or cuts in a network is so huge that the holes of irrational numbers amount to infinity compared to the number of rationals (one of the classic Cantor’s paradoxes of infinity).*

In the graph the 3 spatial dimensions are good enough. We need then to consider a new set of 3 temporal motions that will convert each ‘cube’ or sphere of the 3^{rd} dimension into a fractal, finitesimal point that will move in a larger Universe creating new dimensions again in number of 3, which then will become fixed spaces due to the duality of motion and form, time and space, and grow into new ternary social networks, which will again move on the relative vacuum of a larger world to form a new dimensional triad. In this manner the 5^{th} dimension grows, plane after plane of ternary space-time symmetries.

The Universe is made of 2-manifolds of time-motion and space-form, which combine into holographic universes, and further more complex combinations, to a maximal of 3-manifolds of time and space such as:

Dimensions of time – Dimensions of space ≤|1|; Max. Dimensions of any ∆n=6

And then after those dimensions are filled up the system ‘emerges’ into a larger scale of the 5^{th} ‘transversal’ dimension of eusocial evolution, as part of a bigger whole.

Let us begin by describing informally how one should think about manifolds. The underlying idea is that manifolds are like curves and surfaces, except, perhaps, that they might be of higher dimension. Every manifold comes with a specific nonnegative integer called its *dimension*, which is, roughly speaking, the number of independent numbers (or “parameters”) needed to specify a point. The prototype of an n-dimensional manifold is n-dimensional Euclidean space Rn, in which each point literally *is *an n-tuple of real numbers.

An n-dimensional manifold is an object modeled *locally *on Rn; this means that it takes exactly n numbers to specify a point, at least if we do not stray too far from a given starting point. A physicist would say that an n-dimensional manifold is an object with n *degrees of freedom*.

So far so good. So physicists do work well the theme, IF THEY KNEW THE PREVIOUS RESTRICTIONS, instead of using silly-nilly concepts of ‘pure spatial forms’, WHICH IS DUE to their ‘chronic sickness’ (space confusion of time arrows).

** ****GRAVITATIONAL SCALE. THE SPATIAL SYMMETRY**

That is the distance-energy or past field of spatial size of the system multiplied by the speed, quantity of its information-time clocks are constant, within the range of variations, which allows systems to perform actions of energy and information, in present physical system within a certain range for EACH of the planes of existence of physical systems. Let us then consider the main elements of that Generator equation of physical systems starting as usually in an inverse fashion to the mathematical analysis of physics – that is from the synthetic, organic whole and its larger points of view.

**Tœs**: This gives origin in physics to certain modes of ‘future’ cyclical time vortices, spin numbers, photons, strong quarks, electrons, charges, magnetic moments, thermodynamic molecules, masses, angular momentums, cosmic bodies, solar systems, ud stars, strange stars and top black holes, galaxies and Great Attractors, which are the ‘Tƒ’ elements of all those scales and subscales, between the minimal observed form, a fermion spin and the maximal one, the Great Attractor region of the Local Universe. They are all sub-vortices of the 4 fundamental Planes of the Universe, where the 4^{th} is only partially perceived (the cosmic scale outside galaxies of ‘neutrino strings’ ‘Higgs bosons’, dark energy and dark matter), but we do have more vortices than the 3 perceived ones, the electromagnetic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, as we must apply the ternary principle and break each of the 3 fundamental scales in 3 sub-scales).

**Waves:**

Now those Tœs are ‘static, point-particles’ that share information and energy among them, from their relative static points of view, as the Universe has infinite relative frames of reference (this is one of the great findings of physics that still applies to 5D systems: the principle of relativity). It means that Tœs command a territorial region, in which they have an internal structure of 3 sub-parts, but also are in an outer bigger world in which they communicate with their Tœs on the upper ∆+1, equal ∆ and lesser ∆-1 scales, giving origin to a fundamental ‘second postulate’ of ¬æ. It those œ are fractal points (first postulate), called fermions crystals, solids, stars and black holes, they will then communicate ‘bosons, liquid flows, electromagnetic, sound or liquid waves or electronic current or jets of matter between them:

Future-Tƒ<≈Present wave-field≈> Future Tƒ, giving origin to the second component of physical systems. And again in each scale we will recognize a relative present state with similar properties and symmetries in each scale.

So those flows of communication gives origin to the certain modes of ‘present’, reproductive wave-liquid states in each scale. So in essence bosons, waves, liquids, electric currents and jets and streams of cosmic matter and stars reproduced by black holes are in each scale the same wave fields.

What is then the main parameter of the relationship between the Spe, Tƒ and ExI elements of each of those scales. Simply the constants of space-time actions that relate in the simplest possible form, those 3 elements the Metric of the 5^{th} dimension:. K = E x T. That is the constants of Action of Physics, in its 3 scales K (H)= E x T, (quantum field) K (k) = E x T (Thermodynamic Field); K (M)= E x (µ^{-1}/e).

Those 3 constants of action, the Planck constant, H, the Boltzmann Constant, K, and the mass Constant, M, are the fundamental elements which define the 3 planes of physical systems in the 5^{th} dimension (quantum, thermodynamic and cosmological planes). Thus their translation into the simplex Metric of 5D physics is the first step to build the entire building of Physical sciences, with a comprehensive understandable, isomorphic formalism, which will return physics to the realm of reality and show the pantheist equality between all the systems of the Universe.

Now we have to a fundamental theme of reality, the constancy of present body waves of existence, through its reproductive actions, which will be deal with when we revise relativity. But we advance is the key to understand ‘what formal motions’, the substance of the Universe truly mean, and how the interaction between form and motion, in the case of waves, frequency and form.

Now the simplest expression of speed in terms of cyclical time, instead of lineal time (V=S/T) is to substitute, T, Duration by its inverse, 1/T, or frequency, which introduces more information about the system. Hence we transform then lineal space length, for the ‘steps’ of the system that moves, l, the wave-length or limb-step of the system.

We have in this simple manner translated external motion into internal motion, external absolute time into internal time clocks of the wave or particle, which as De Broglie proved are in tune with each other (showing that the system is synchronized and hence part of the same organism).

This translation of an external lineal motion into an internal space-time cyclical motion is essential to T.Œ and specially 5D Physics. Then we can consider a new well-known equation of speed, that of wave speed:

∆(C : present constant speed)= Spe (l) x Tƒ (ƒ)

This relationship which is one of the key expressions of the co-invariance of the 5^{th} dimension in physical systems relates to the internal frame of reference of the system for which its speed does NOT vary as he tries to translate it into the external speed in the world in which it becomes the principle of lineal inertia as the speed outside will not vary if he is NOT submitted to external ±∆æ actions of acceleration, deceleration that change its trajectory. But now we realize that the present wave is actually reproducing its form, its waveform as it moves with a given frequency of steps.

And in physical systems such as light over vacuum, waves on the water, AC, alternate currents, where information and energy is transported without the transport of mass, what truly happens is exactly that: the vibration of the original Tƒ form is transmitted along the lower ∆-1 field of micro-points transporting FORM AND MOTION in an ordered way, what we call ‘energy’ (motion with direction as opposed to æ, expansive entropy with chaotic directions) and information (form that moves along the path of energy).

It follows that all waves MUST obey this simple reproductive equation and as we study different ways to define ‘form’ and ‘motion’ in physics, with the dualities of lineal motion ≈ still distance, cyclical form≈ temporal clocks with frequency, and its different interpretations in each scale (so for example, Tƒ will always be defined in terms of lineal duration as 1/T so we will have to invert the terms, motion will be considered often ‘tension’, or ‘length’ in space of a system, and so on,

This immediately raises some questions of importance. Such as what is the relationship between the aforementioned constants of actions of the 3 main physical scales, H, k, and M, which we shall call a Planckton (minimal unit of existence of the quantum world, similar to the Plankton minimal unit of the sea – NOT the abstract, Germanic idealist interpretations of Heisenberg), a Bolt (from Boltzmann.).

**Sp- Fields**

All the capacity of waves and particles to exist comes from Fields, the Sp, lower scale of pure entropic, expansive, accelerated motions.

They are the lower scales of which in the parlance of physics, waves and particles are considered ‘excitations’, in the jargon of T.Œ eusocial evolutions into tighter denser waves of energy and information and even denser particle forms, knots of waves, themselves ‘excitations’ that ‘make emerge’ efficient workable energy and form from the entropic, loose herds of field quanta.

So we talk also of a series of fields from the simpler, smaller to the larger fields of the Universe, of which the fundamental ones are the ‘strong-field, of the internal region of atoms, of minimal size the electroweak field of light waves of galactic size, the thermodynamic field of heat waves of molecular size.** **

So finally we arrive the other way around to the first part that all physical theories study, the simplest fields. Here we observe one fundamental different or rather complementarity of the way classic physical and 5D physics work: we develop reality from the whole and its generator equation downwards studying first the organic structure of the system in time and space, its T.Œ and actions and then going down we study the wave- EXI present systems and finally the Sp-Entropic, accelerated motions of the micro-fields of ∆-1 particles and lineal momentums which rise and give the energy and micro-clocks that the whole will use.

This of course is a matter of choice, made in T.Œ not to bust the balls of scholars but to complement what they have done. Indeed, the human scholarship today studies mainly the upward arrow of social evolution of the 5^{th} dimension –w without even recognizing it is a social evolution. So, and this is what we criticize, describe the upper systems of reality as emerging from the lower systems, but without recognizing the interrelationship symbiosis and existence of an arrow from the upper T.Œ elements through its survival actions that order the lower systems.

So physicists consider particles to be ‘excitations’ of fields hence some kind of secondary ‘thing’ which does not matter as much as the field itself. Biologists consider organisms, ‘constructs’ of Genes without realizing that once the organism is formed, it is the self, which directs the drives of existence of the being, towards energy information, reproduction and social evolution.

By bringing T.Œ, which is composed playing with words of a series of œ-points which play the game of Tao, of Temporal existence, and survival, by bringing Temporal beings, Time space Organic Existential Beings, into the game, and understanding perception by O-minds that gauge information, we complete the description of the Universe. We of course enlighten also the meaning of the lower scales and use the same formula and evident data, but we add, double reality.

All this said, fields do matter. As without them the emerging more complex social scales that interlock with them and create ternary co-existing structures will not exist, so for each plane of existence we must find a past-relative herd of micrŒ-Points, which are treated as indistinguishable particles by the wave-particle system, from where it extracts energy and information ordering it.

How this is explained in physics, varies according to the ages of its logic and mathematical understanding. Today they like to use a very abstract jargon taken from the abstract jargons that poisoned the understanding of mathematics during the Germanic idealistic age, to which they add expressions and mathematical forms that are easily susceptible to become algorithms of computer models of the Universe. Fine, but we want people to understand what they say, so we are not going specially in this second line to be concerned with the jargon of symmetry breaking SO3 groups, Lie Algebras, transformations invariances, bispinors and Operators, but try to explain in simple understandable terms how things happen.

And so now we can state the following fields, which are always a plane under the present –wave-body/head-particle system, which is NOT an excitation but an eusocial evolution of the field, such as:

∑œ-field quanta≥Reproductive wave≥ Collapsing particle with more dimensions of Form and lesser speed-distance in space.

Thus a field is a series of undistinguishable point-particles called quanta, which can be descried by a constant of action, within the metric so the fifth dimension, ST=K, undistinguishable in each scale, which a wave will reorder and give information to in patterns, which are the wave forms, in a first step, giving it certain properties, which are not pure chaotic energy without distinguishable form. The wave thus is the first ‘stage’ of creation of order-information, which sometimes might lower the energy of the field or at least establish within the field a certain potential gradient and directionality. And finally in the point of maximal density of wave or gradient, there will appear a particle or T.Œ or point of view of the field, in which the field acquires maximal density of information.

So Gravitational fields become distinguishable as masses collapse the energy-momentum tensor, which is the ‘wave’ state of the vacuum field. And those are the 3 ‘states’ of increasing eusocial evolution described by general Relativity with its formalism, and 3 elements, each one describing a part of the ternary physical system of gravitation:

The EFE (Einstein Field equations) can then be written as:

Tƒ: G_{µv }+ L g_{µv }= 8 π G / c^{4 }T_{µv}

Using __geometrized units__ where *G* = *c* = 1, this can be rewritten as the two sides of the Tƒ<≈>Ex Tƒ (Future-particle≈ Present-wave equation of a physical system)

Tƒ: G_{µv }+ L g_{µv }= 8 π T_{µv } : ST

Thus the expression on the left represents the curvature of space-time as determined by the metric; which is the Tƒ Element of the field; the expression on the right represents the matter/energy content of space-time; which is the wave of energy and information or ST element of the field. And the element in the middle Lgµv is the Plane of the 5^{th} dimension or Cosmological Constant that expresses the energy of the vacuum from where the other two elements are born, which accordingly is extremely high

The EFE is then in the parlance of classic physics interpreted as a set of equations dictating how matter/energy (body-wave) determines the curvature of space-time (the Tƒ state of gravitation).

These equations, together with the geodesic equation , which dictates how freely-falling matter moves through space-time, form the core of the mathematical formulation of relativity:

Whereas the geodesic equation merely describes the behavior of a T.œ particle of mass in the field, without considering the ExI wave so it is a Sæ>To description of it, (Past to future), while EFE can be considered a more complete EXI-present description or wave description of it. We latter deal with that essential duality of physical description of systems, which represent or two fundamental equations of time:

Past x Future = ∂ Present (momentum description in physics)

For example, for an electromagnetic wave, the momentum density (whereas momentum is the commonest expression of a past x future, speed x particle parameter) is given by the Poynting vector:

, which puts the momentum in relationship with the electric and magnetic field-wave. On the other hand the full description of the wave INDEPENDENT of the time flow, is a common equation, which gives us the whole worldcycle of the system, as a conservative system, a closed system, presented either as a scalar or energy or the variation of that energy within the whole function of existence of the being:

**Present-wave (Energy full Hamiltonian description in physics)**

Whereas the limited momentum description or small steps in space or parts in time can be integrated, ∫momentum=Energy, to observe the larger whole description of the worldcycle. For example, in quantum physics we will obtain the famous Schrodinger’s wave, which in the simplest time independent representations write:

Which the reader should observe is similar to the equation of the Gravitational Plane of Einstein. N one side two values ad up, one related to the particle state of the system, as it ha the momentum of the particle and on the center the potential energy of the system, related to the enteral fields of the wave. On the other hand we observe the same equation that in Einstein’s: the product of the energy and the information of the wave (its wave function, y).

Now from the previous equations we can deduce general rules of T.Œ applied to the planes of mathematical physics:

The ‘superposition’ rules of waves of present, which are ‘democratic’, and add up its values. Since their lower scale over, which they are formed, is made of ‘indistinguishable quanta’. And this will be the key to understand waves as opposed to particle, the past x future systems, which are hierarchical, multiplicative.

The clear equivalence between the equations of T.Œ and those of physics despite its quite different jargon.

The duality of existence of body-heads/ waves-particles, of which too much writing has been done for something quite simple: waves and particles go together organically.

The similarity of all the scales of the Universe, truly a fractal with few differences between those scales, which on one side makes harmonic the entire universe, from the other, will provoke as we shall see quite clear errors on the confusions of physics between different planes and space and time states – i.e. which is the scale of the big bang, if as we shall see the processes of a quasar big-bang (galactic big bang) are quite similar to those of a cosmos; the big bang of neutrons are quite similar to those of a pulsar?

And finally, the fact that physicists do NOT see that pantheist Universe and do NOT think those scales are similar because they use different jargons and the aberrations of perceptions across different scales of the 5^{th} dimension distort their view of the Universe.

Now of course General Relativity in as much as *it describes all the fields of the system above the particle level, including the thermodynamic, gravitational, and *electromagnetic fields and its energy(Sæ)óMass (To) elements, in any number possible ARE the culmination – no doubt about it – of 400 years of search for the understanding of the external motions of space-time systems in the Universe, from the largest perspective we have of it, with enough information to make accurate predictions.

And as such along the formalism of quantum physics for the somewhat independent lower scale of charges and particles they represent a fundamental achievement of the human kind. And yet they are both, very limited analysis of the whole informations and energies and motions, internal and external and actions of existence of all its infinite points. And it couldn’t be otherwise because only the Universe has all the information about itself and all its beings.

This is why it is important to have a T.Œ, which does give us a synthetic view of the whole forest, given the enormous amount of information stored in the details. It is a fact that this monumental work of the spatial, external vision of time=motion is mostly useless to the individual human mind, and had not been with the help of an alien mind, the mathematical digital computer, it would remain basically a cumbersome tool of little use, easily substituted by Newton’s and Poisson’s had Hamilton’s simplified versions of it.

It is important to realize that the Einstein field equations alone are not enough to determine the evolution of a gravitational system in many cases. They depend on the stress–energy tensor, which depends on the dynamics of matter and energy (such as trajectories of moving particles), which in turn depends on the gravitational field. If one is only interested in the weak field limit of the theory, the dynamics of matter can be computed using special relativity methods and/or Newtonian laws of gravity and then the resulting stress–energy tensor can be plugged into the Einstein field equations. But if the exact solution is required or a solution describing strong fields, the evolution of the metric and the stress–energy tensor must be solved for together.

To obtain solutions, the relevant equations are the above quoted EFE (in either form) plus the continuity equation (to determine evolution of the stress–energy tensor): T^{ab}_{;b }=0.

This is clearly not enough, as there are only 14 equations (10 from the field equations and 4 from the continuity equation) for 20 unknowns (10 metric components and 10 stress–energy tensor components). Equations of state are missing. In the most general case, it’s easy to see that at least 6 more equations are required, possibly more if there are internal degrees of freedom (such as temperature) which may vary throughout space-time.

So we can see the limits of a T.œ of analytical physics without the organic paradigm, the understanding of the common space-time ages of all systems and the simple ternary symmetries of 5D space and time. Since a lot of perspectives are missing and on the fundamental field of study of physics, ∆±e, motions and energy actions, the Universe and its multiple points of view with multiple freedoms makes things truly difficult – even today with the help of an alien mind which is distorting and let us be frank atrophying the human mind with its digital computer ways of thought and modeling reality.

The same will happen in quantum physics, where we find now due to the growing levels of energy and information of smaller scales according to the metrics of the 5^{th} dimension such an enormous number of particles, in possible states, creating time cycles so fast, and with so limited perception of them, that again we could state the same – just changing ‘large’ for ‘small’, the culmination – no doubt about it – of 400 years of search for the understanding of the external motions of space-time systems in the Universe, from the smallest perspective, etc.

But what physics needs specially for the rest of mankind to understand reality and the meaning of it all, is not more precise analysis of the paths of electrons and stars – this can be of use to the electronic industry and the programmer of telescopes – but the full integration into the larger view of everything that we shall provide din this text, and the correction within that architectonical structure ad simplification of jargons to give those equations meanings within the context of the proper understanding of a Universe of space-time beings. That is, the simplification of the Ptolemaic epicycles more abundant in quantum physics than relativity, to make sense of it all.

Now latter we shall consider many of these proper interpretations, and the paradoxes of classic physics regarding the cosmological constant due to their null understanding of the dualities of space-time and how to properly interpret it, but the example suffices in this 2^{nd} line to fully grasp what is a Physical equation of a field: a ternary Spatial description of a symmetry of space-time.

This field though is the field of Gravitation, of which contrary to belief we ONLY know to be fully operative in the Galaxy in the scale in which we have reliable measures NOT in the cosmos, and that will be latter discussed in detail.

Indeed, there might be above it, between galaxies – and I believe that should be the case according to the growing planes of the 5^{th} dimension, a Bigger field, which therefore has faster than c-light space-time and denser rotational vortices of time of < 0 temperature of informative order, made of top quark stars (aka black holes) and Higgs fields of tachyon, scalar distance-speed, cause of the inflaton phase of expansive big-bangs, and the breaking of symmetry (death and reabsorption) of our galactic Universe. And we will return to it, being so important both for theoretical and practical reasons today (as we are exploring those particles that devour our matter and make it matter of the dark energy/matter world outside galaxies, today on earth hence the dangers they might devour us, as we explain on our activist web)

**The limits of the galaxy scales of the Universe. Relativistic mass. Interactions at C-speed.**

*The 2 membranes of space-time, the quantum and gravitational membrane interact in e<=>o events of transference of Entropy and information in the limits of the existential function of the light membrane: the limit of Entropy-speed, c; the limits of temperature-form, 0 k, in quarks, black holes and regions of transition between light and gravitational space.*

Galactic space is made of light actions, C=Spe x Tƒ, which can be perceived as Entropy/motion (c-speed) of in/form/ation (photons): the background radiation is thus the primary substance of the vacuum. If we were to extract all the radiation actions, the vacuum would disappear and the underlying scale of pure gravitational, ‘boson, tachyon strings’, infinitely thin (Nambu’s Actions, redefined as a background independent action of fractal dimensions) would appear. This would paradoxically thin out the informative height of vacuum and elongate it, as its relative speed=spatial Entropy/temporal information, v=e/o=e/0 is infinite, non-local from our p.o.v.

This is what happens in intergalactic space, as the door between both membranes, the galactic, rotational Kerr black hole, thin outs electromagnetic radiation, (gravitational redshifts) through the event horizon, accelerates it (equivalence principle, left graph) in its reproductive, ‘Klein’ intermediate space, and jettisons it as curled quark mass (left graph of superluminal 10 c motion) and dark, tachyon Entropy (central pic, blue jet), back to intergalactic space that seems to expand, accelerate from the p.o.v. Have fixed distances.

Those 2 space-times create 2 different world membranes or mediums, with different Entropy/information limits:

The gravitational world is beyond c speed and under 0 K; that is it has more order in its quark vortices and more speed in its dark Entropy; it is bigger, more powerful. In between there is our hot, entropic, < c-speed world.

In the graph another way to express the ‘symmetry’ sides of the Thermodynamic World. We could say that the 0 K temperature is the ‘triple point’ of the Universe, the absolute thermodynamic equilibrium. A triple point is the expression in space of the time ages of ‘gaseous entropy: Max Spe’, liquid balance, ExI, and crystal solid, Max. Tƒ, of the Thermodynamic system, and the point of maximal equilibrium or ‘potential well’ of a Gibbs Ensemble. The triple point of the Universe is then consider the superfluid liquid state of zero viscosity and zero entropy proper of perfect quark gluon liquids, which can go down to further lower temperatures or super solid states of order in the dark work or larger temperatures or molecular states of entropy, which cancel each other.

The transitions between both membranes are described by the Lorentz Transformations (left graph):

When Entropy arrives to the limit c of the light space-time, its membrane ‘curls’ the Entropy into a whirl of space-time, evolving into cyclical mass, the stable form of physical in/form/ation, becoming electrons and quark particles.

Further increases of relativistic Entropy=mass evolves quarks into forms of higher mass and reproduces them into pairs.

What happens when you accelerate to c speed is a discontinuous process of ‘evolution’ (from ‘ud’ to s, in the first step, and so on); and then a process of fission/reproduction. So Entropy not only evolves the particle but it splits it into 2, as when quarks absorb Entropy and produce a jet of ‘quarkitos’: S*E->Tƒ(m)->Tƒ(m+m∑).*

While on the other extreme, black holes relax light into gravitational strings. So most of the ‘particles’ and dynamic events we perceive in the Universe are phase transitions between both membranes; reason why physicists say that particles are ‘frozen states’ of the parameters of temperature and speed through which a hypothetical big-bang of our galaxies or Universe evolved.

Thus the particles and forces we perceive in the Universe are born in the verge between both worlds. Light is in the Entropy verge between both worlds. Electrons are in its lower Entropy state, the Bohr radius, as we have shown, in the verge of the quark world, acting as the event horizon of a micro-black hole – a proton.

*The non-local speed of gravitation.*

But how can we prove that gravitation is non-local, instantaneous, and able to relate all the parts of the Universe in a synchronic way? There is the evidence of 10 C jets of matter coming out of black holes. Indeed, the non-local speed of gravitation can be proved in several ways, but perhaps the easiest way to prove it is with the concept of complex speed…

The simplest one is the definition of speed, v=s/t understood as: *V=Spatial Entropy Temporal/Information.*

Because gravitational force has no information (it is the simplest, lineal scaffolding in which our light-form is imprinted), then:

*Gravitational speed =Entropy/ 0 Information=Infinite*.

But it is a relative ∞, since Cantor Set theory proves that ∞ are relative and the absolute infinite (the set of all sets) do not exist. By this we mean that the informative network of dark, gravitational Entropy that structures the Universe is like the nervous network that send simultaneous orders to all the cells of the body and seems instantaneous to all those cells, infinite only in as much as it reaches the limits of our Universe, cell of a hyper-universe in a reality of ∞ scales.

This is proved, since a fractal wave of gravitation can reach according to General Relativity up to 10^{10} million years light. Thus a single gravitational wave can cross in a single fractal jump, the entire Universe. And indeed, the ‘instantaneous, present space-time Universe’ reaches till around 10^{10} million years light, the so-called Universal horizon. This explains also 2 ‘spooky’ phenomena: the entanglement between electrons that seem to relate and communicate information at distance instantaneously: they do so through the gravitational, non-local plane. It explains why the limit of c-speed, which only applies to our light-membrane. It also explains how the Universe has a synchronic structure without recurring to the magic, entropy only ‘big-bang’ (astrophysicists say that their structure that requires all those galaxies to interact together was acquired when the Universe was so small that they could communicate at c-speed.)

*Recap*: the limits of our light universe are c-speed and 0 K of information but the gravitational universe should be faster, bigger and more ordered, colder than our Universe. Lorentz Transformations and black holes are the doors and bridges between both Universes.

Now of course infinite local action at distance in the dark world is a relative human microscopic perception, but in fact it will be a relative infinity of decametric scales, 10 c for ‘matter’, 100 c for ‘waves’ and 1000 c for ‘fields of the dark world. This is the theoretical natural ternary scales of all systems of the 5D Universe (including organic and social scales: i.e, the individual is S^{o}=1, the family S^{1}=1o in 3 generations, the clan, S=100, the Tribe, S=1000, and that closes the ‘genetic’ scales of a society, moving then to a new language-form, the geographical society (city, city-state, nations). 10 are the scales in space and time (symmetric to each other); and so again, we have to consider what ‘we perceive’ experimentally WITHOUT the obsession of classic physics for c-speed, which is only the barrier of the universe in which space-time is made of light (Galactic Universe). And this is the data astronomers ideologically deny now for almost a century, to ‘protect’ their ‘idol’, Einstein’s relativity, which we will now immediately study, revis(it)ing, with 5D, after we observe the ‘real data of cosmology’.

– Quasars expel matter at 10 c in a lot of galaxies such as the famous 3C of the image (this is considered to be an optical effect, of the angle of observation, as they are supposed to come towards us, which could only be statistically for 1% of them, not for the 10% of galaxies that vomit matter, which show that speed and on top some as the 3C above, with a clear, sideways perspective. So this is according to 5D theory a fact.

– Redshifts reaches between 10 C and 100 C in far away galaxies. This is explained with the ‘dirty trick’ of considering that is NOT SPEED BUT IS SPACE THAT EXPANDS. LOL, speed and space-distance is the same under relativity as we cannot distinguish motion from distance, so according to relativity this is just change the name from red to crimson. The waves of dark energy that create space between galaxies ARE moving between 10 and 100 z=c

– Finally the supposed ball of fire in the limits of the ‘little bang’ of the atomic-Universe is considered to reach up to z=1000 c, and that is indeed the limit of theory. Beyond that, there should be ANOTHER larger scale of ∆+6 atoms for which we are not even dust of space-time…

**THE 4 DIMENSIONS=ARROWS OF LIGHT-SPACE**

**The mind of space-light.**

We live in a Mind of light-space-time. It is not though the entire Universe, but the world the mind constructs with the help of a rod of measure, absolute c-speed and 3 dimensional space, Euclidean space.

For that reason what is not light-space doesn’t seem real for us. Yet this world of light with its light properties, perpendicularity, Euclidean form, developed by Descartes in his book the world as the basis for modern science, with a Cartesian graph in which the mind of man occupied the zero point, should differ from other worlds constructed with other rods by other species of mind. An exophysical theory must be in that sense objective and consider the wider structure of all spaces times.

Once this is clear, we can study the peculiarities of the light space-membrane departing from its 4 dimensions, which are not only the dimensions of our mind perception but those of light as an entity made of time cycles, imprinted and reproduced over a simpler Entropy, space and evolved informative into electrons, what our mind is made of.

**Universal constants of light**

Heisenberg’s uncertainty is a right formalism but a false interpretation of the generator equation of light-space that relates the arrows of Entropy and information, in the specific form it has in the quantum world of light actions of Entropy and time:

*Entropy × Temporal Information = Constant (H in the quantum world, K in Einstein’s relativity)*

The meaning of the previous equation is easy to grasp in terms of the duality of Space-time Constant, Q and G.

H is the equivalent of Q for the lineal energies of our light-membrane, as it relates the Entropy and form or frequency of a lineal, transversal wave of light.

So, if h is the ratio of transformation of frequency/form into Entropy and q the ratio of transformation of Entropy into form, in the electromagnetic world, what is the ratio of reproduction of electromagnetism? C, which was defined by Maxwell equations as a ratio between the electric and magnetic fields that merge together to create a wave of light, which reproduces its form contracting, warping the gravitational membrane of dark Entropy.

Further on c is the limit of speed of our space-time membrane. This is a tautology; since in fractal relativity space is the Entropy of the vacuum, a force: The membrane of light-space in which we exist is made of Entropy quanta, which constantly pops out and ‘informs’ itself , creating particles with Entropy and form (h= Entropy × information). Planck called these minimal actions, combinations of the lineal and cyclical motions of Entropy and time, the quanta of our light space-time. Yet Quantum physicists, always kin of Pythagorism, created the uncertainty dogma, saying actions are NOT made of the 2 motions of the Universe, but are ‘mathematical entities’ – a measure of the uncertainty of the vacuum. So particles are not born as evolutions of the 2 motions of reality, but they are born of the ‘uncertainty’ or ‘probability’ of the mathematical Universe. It is all simpler and more real. The space-time fluid of light is made of h-quanta and so those h-quanta can suddenly evolve socially in more complex forms and create particles. That is all what there is to the uncertainty principle.

Yet we must also deduce from the existence of different U.C. and ratios of speed/distance and informative rotation that the Universal constants of c-speed, Q-charge and H-light Entropy are specific of our Universal membrane and those of the gravitational membrane must be different.

*Recap*. According to the paradox of Galileo the eye fixes the Entropy and form of light-space into a mental construction of 3 dimensions, a Cartesian graph, which already Descartes defined as the ‘world’, the spatial image of the mind – not the entire Universe. Thus the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light quanta, our space-time, are tautologically the 3 dimensions of our space. This in turn explains many events of the electromagnetic world. Those are also the 3 organic ‘arrows’ of time of light, which has electric information, magnetic Entropy and reproduces its form combining both into a c-reproductive field as the equations of Maxwell show.

**The arrows of time in the light world.**

We exist as evolved forms of a light space-time field, our limit of speed in this light Universe is c and the 3 dimensions of our Universe are height/electric field, width/magnetic field and length/reproductive field. Thus Cartesian space-time merely reflects the space-time medium of our light Universe and its 3 perpendicular dimensions. Yet for light the meaning of those 3 dimensions is organic: the informative, energetic and reproductive arrows of its field are equivalent to the energetic, reproductive and informative functions of any other relative space-time.

Those Entropy/Information cycles are obvious in biology, but in matter we have to translate the dimensions and events of abstract particles and forces, to understand their 3 Time-Space cycles:

– Entropy Cycles, Tƒ<ΣSe: The main physical event that transforms information into Entropy is the emission of space fields by temporal particles, as in the big-bang or in atomic, fission and fusion processes. Those actions are produced, ‘extracted’ from an accelerating vortex of space-time that acquires stability through those constant emissions.

– Informative Cycles, ΣSe>Tƒ: The fundamental process of creation of in/form/ation in the physical world is the collapse of spatial fields into particles, charges or masses that spin around those gravitational or electromagnetic, spatial forces, creating knots of information, called particles. For example, when a photon comes closer to an electronic charge, its frequency increases till the photon collapses into the orbital vortex of the electron. The same happens when the electron collapses and becomes a pion of higher mass closer to the nucleus. We can consider those processes in abstract as processes of creation of information /frequency, or in organic terms as processes of feeding, or in terms of Time Arrows as the evolution of particles (photons and electrons) into species of higher physical information.

Light ‘imprints’ with form, with information and in the process ‘corrugates’ by a factor –ct (special relativity) the gravitational, extended, ‘faster’ space-time membrane of dark Entropy in which it ‘feeds’. This –ct factor which prompted Minkowski to think that time was the 4 dimension of space merely means that ‘physical time’, the change in motion of physical entities, in this case a wave of light displacing in the gravitational vacuum, informs, forms, warps that vacuum by a factor –ct. If the reader grasps this simple notion – a field of light informs and corrugates the Entropy of gravitation it can also have a good laugh to 100 years of quantum musings about the ‘4^{th} dimension of space’.

And so we define 3 scales of evolution of Entropy into form that diminish the ‘lineal speed’ of a force and increase its informative, rotational mass: photon >Electron >quark. It follows that the photon has faster lineal speed and less mass than the electron c/10, which is a relative fractal of dense, evolve ‘photons’, perceived as a whole or as a nebula. And the electron has less mass than the quark, which is a relative, fixed point of pure mass, perceived either as a fractal of gluons or a whole.

It follows that the isomorphisms of electronic systems are self-similar to those of light, as an electron is just an evolved form of light.

**The multiple views on wave speed**

Wave speed is a wave property, which may refer to absolute value of:

S: phase velocity, the velocity at which a wave phase propagates at a certain frequency

∆: group velocity, the propagation velocity for the envelope of wave groups and often of wave energy, different from the phase velocity for dispersive waves

ST: signal velocity, or information velocity, which is the velocity at which a wave carries information

Tiƒ: front velocity, the velocity at which the first rise of a pulse above zero moves forward

**∆-2,3: QUANTUM WORLDS**

**Œ:** The supœrganism of the quantum world is the atom. Its ∆-1 scale are particles; its ∆-2 scale are fields of forces, ¥-rays for the electron, the gluon for the quark.

**∆-1 (seed)>∆-atom:** The atomic simplest unit, the hydrogen has a seed state, with a neutral zero-sum charge, the neutron (storing only spin, and mass); which can split through beta decay and expand into a ternary symmetry, with its central up quark, external electron, both with similar energy-mass, and dual ∆-2, 3, emission of a neutrino and a photon, *the entropic fields of the quark and the electron, which fill its intermediate space-time *background; creating the simplest atomic supœrganism, the hydrogen atom, WHOSE generator is:

**Γ(H-atom):** ST (Electron-membrane) < dual network of entropy and information going between both, made of ¥-rays and neutrinos> Tiƒ quark nucleus.

The quantum world has an enormous array of sub-species and social scales of evolution, and events with exchanges of entropy, energy and information, yet all fall within the description of Non-Æ, fractal, cyclical space-time. So we could write an encyclopaedia of quantum and thermodynamic physics to describe the entire world of atoms, and maybe in the future it will be done.

**§10:** The 3 ternary scales of atomic systems are its families departing from its units, the hydrogen and helium, which can be roughly classified in light atoms (no metal), metallic atoms and heavy, radioactive atoms, which can be seen in space as increasing social scales, and in time in its symmetry of growing population, as the ages of those scales, with radioactive decay as its death.:

Thus 3±∆ are the families of atoms, as the social symmetry of the 5^{th} dimension requires. And for each of them we shall find its constants of space-entropy and social numbers (time frequency) growing both together in inverse fashion to maintain the co-invariance of its social plane.

**∆-scales:** But a more profound classification of atoms in the social domain corresponds to the planes of social networks, which divide the quantum world in the particle/atomic/molecular scales regarding its physical laws, entering finally in the thermodynamic world with different space-time constants. so we talk in those terms of the:

**DISTORSIONS OF PERSPECTIVE: ****Space≈topological-Mind mappings.**

We can then to see how this works consider a mind’s topological description of the whole fifth dimension and the deformation of its constants of space, which ONLY in our scale (K) appear as ‘entropy’, but become lineal for larger wholes and angular form smaller ones, as those transitions between scales keep adding a degree of ‘informative’ or ‘entropic distortion, which will change the geometrical outlook of the higher or lower scales.

WE SET CLEARLY the differences in the laws of events and systems that happen in a ‘present’ single scale, that happen between lower and upper scales (arrow of larger sizes) and vice versa, the inverse distortions that happen when we go under to smaller regions with larger information, as we show in the graph, since the distortion becomes a ‘geometrical one’:

In the graph, the geometrical perception from ∆º, the human self-centred perspective (ab.pov) differs from the way we perceive information from the upper scale, seen as an only attractive gravitational vortex of future time-masses (relativity theory, equivalence principle) from the perspective of an elliptic geometry that reduces the size of the whole masses by speeding up its perception as motion.

The question though to be considered is how those systems behave ‘longitudinally’ in a given scale of the fifth dimension once the being has either emerged as a seed of higher information from the lower ∆-1 scale, or as it dissolves into a whole ‘mass of dissolving dead parts’ in a hyperbolic path to the ∆-1 scale.

In the left side the perception of lower scales is a lovacheski’s geometry, which multiplies the whole in its self-similar parts to get to the infinitesimal, which is the ‘piece’ on the membrane of the border o the whole, such as tƒi=∑Spe-1, the infinitesimal components of the membrane. Thus quantum and relativity descriptions of upper and lower scales differ

Now this very brief note on the mind’s games in its distortion of reality at topological, ternary level is a good introduction to the final element of any human science, the mind’s distortion due to anthropomorphic ego-trips which deny the ‘mind/sentient’ nature of all systems of Nature…

‘All lines are approximations or parts of a larger worldcycle’

That is a key element of GST and hence the Universe, which is lineal in small distances but on the long term in time or in space, becomes a curved cycle, and will in the more complex posts about the topology of the different minds of the Universe, one of my most pleasurable ‘trips’ of knowledge ever (:

A simple proof: look around you, yes! the Earth seems flat for your micro-state, but alas! Magic! if you grown in p.o.v. to a satellite it curves.

INDEED, the larger ∆-whole is always the complete cyclical world cycle, the smallish part, a step, a lineal approximation to the whole. This again has a huge consequence in physics – the 3 formalisms of the Universe are:

- lineal quantum physics (∆-1 scale)
- hyperbolic, Cartesian, human world, ∆-scale.
- Ellipitic curved non-lineal Relativity, cosmic geometry, ∆+1 scale.

Again a theme of 4th line which truly explains from the mind/language p.o.v. the differences of those 3 quantum/thermodynamic /gravitational formalisms.

Thus a key first principle to clarify in order to unify the whole range of scales of physical systems, is the understanding of the different ‘zones’ of each scale of physics, as systems *have in the border between the four scales of physical systems studied by science, different behaviour, given the fact that information and entropy follow different inverse paths going upwards, downwards, or sidewards in any Universal system:*

The growth of a system between scales follow a decametric, 3 x 3 +0 pattern of social evolution of increasing complexity easy to model with scalar, lineal equations that approach the Spe x Tiƒ = Konstant metric of 5D.

Yet when it approaches the upper limit of emergence of a whole, the entropy and energy poured is absorbed in the creation of a the Tiƒ singularity of higher density of information; and so a resistance ensues as the information of the whole grows (which in physics is observed by the formation of black holes, eddies in a fluid or quantum particles), and so the metric ‘finds a wall’. And viceversa, in the lower scale, there is lower limit in which the tiƒ of the system disappears, so there is a sudden ‘expansion of space’, when the regime changes to disordered chaos, observable on the gaseous state, the ‘dark entropy expansive scale’ outside the galaxies.

**T-TIME SPEED**

**distortion…**

Information in that sense is always ceteris paribus – a part of it, whose total information only exists fully within itself. SO THE TRUTH is not i a single theory but the sum of all ∆ + • + s +t perspectives also in equations of science.

We have already considered briefly an example of those ∆ and t distortions, as it is the one more often used in physics – the relativity concept of a worldline vs. the ∆st reality of worldcycles.

** TO BE CONT’ED.**

**The error of discontinuity. Points with parts.**

Thus the web takes sides in the dispute between Einstein and Planck: the last experimental and theoretical studies seem to prove that space and time are quantic, discontinuous as Planck said. From that fact we deduce that each piece of space has a quantity of quantic energy and each cycle of time carries an amount of information. Yet since all what exists is made of energy and information from the previous homology we deduce *that all beings, including human beings, are made of quantic cycles of temporal information or ‘bits’ and quantic pieces of spatial energy or ‘bites’, and the Space-Time Universe is a sum of quantic beings made up with those 2 substances*.

Scientists don’t analyze temporal energy in all its quantic details because they study space and time through Mathematics, which has, as all languages, a limited capacity to carry information. So it simplifies reality, making each entity of the Universe with an inner content of information and energy a number, represented as a point, defined by Euclid as ‘a form without breath’, without ‘information’.

Then, once the inner content of those points are gone, mathematics puts all those points together into an abstract graph called the Cartesian Space/Time graph, which seems to us ‘a continuous reality’, though it is only a simplified, linguistic representation of the Universe.

Since, when we look at the real beings of the Universe in detail, those points have parts, a content of ‘energy’ that lasts a quantity of time cycles. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they become spheres, points with breath, with parts: an atom, a cell, and a star…

Something without breath, without dimensions – as Euclid defined a point – is something that does not exist. Abstract points are fantasies. They are not real. Anything you draw will have a size, a minimum of 2 dimensions in paper, and 3 dimensions in reality. Look at yourself: your Head is a point with 3 dimensions, not a number in a mathematical statistics. The Space-Time Continuum becomes then the space-time discontinuum, made of infinite quanta of temporal energy, which ‘act’ together to create the forms of the Universe.

We live in a Universe made of quantic actions, of moving temporal energy. Reality is done by infinite discontinuous actions exerted by all type of beings, product of their spatial energy multiplied by their temporal information. Space/time is not a static, fixed “mathematical image” created by our mind – but it moves constantly, acts through its quantic pieces. We are an organic system that “acts”, processing spatial energy with our quantic bodies and temporal information with our brains. Planck expressed with that name, taken from the organic philosophy of Leibniz and Hegel, the fact that the Universe is not material but organic, made of cyclical forms in perpetual change and movement.

*All continuous, static forms become discontinuous and mobile when observed in detail.*

Mathematics simplify reality. How they do it? Making each organism of the Universe a point, and putting them all together into an abstract graph called the Cartesian Space.

We cannot though know all the information of reality with a single language, a simplified mirror that our mind puts on the Universe.

Thus the space-time continuum is a simplification of a quantic reality caused by the fact that in mathematics a plane of space is not made of points with volume, but of abstract points without volume. In reality however all what exists when observed in detail, is made of discontinuous points with volume. If you look at a table in detail you will see discontinuous points called molecules, made of discontinuous points called atoms, made of discontinuous points called protons and electrons, made of discontinuous points called photons, made of discontinuous points called Plank Quanta. And that minimal scale of smaller, discontinuous points with volume, with dimension, is what we call the Organic point, the first Unit of In-form-ation, of form in the Universe.

The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws. It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:

The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).

– And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being. Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second. The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy.

We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms:

The discontinuous, discrete Universe of space-time can also be expressed in terms of form and motion, stop and go, space and time symmetries

And the duality particle – wave. You move as a wave, but then you expel energy. You gauge information as a particle, when you stop. You do not move as a particle, because it is much slower.

Let us consider this important symmetry, from its 30 years old first graph, in which I was defining ‘speed of reproduction, TxS, the function of present (-; as a teenager )-:

Thus it follows that momentum is a complete description of the system, as Mass is the Tƒ element and speed the wave element, on a given field.

While the field is ‘hidden’ on the wave space-length, which is a quanta by quanta step growth of the system.

From this relationship we can find some basic concepts of cyclical time, such as density of information and the related ‘mass-charge’ value. What matters here now is to understand two things:

A particle is just the next scale of a wave, in which all those memorial motions of the wave when the ‘particle’ stops, clump together into the point in which the particle stopped collapsing the wave into a particle, whose ‘mass’ is related to the frequency of the wave (number of M-cycles which collapse in the point). Thus by definition a Mass is related to:

– The speed of the wave and the internal clock of the wave (in this the best work is still the first article of De Broglie in which ill-understood he explains how mass and group-wave are in fact two versions of the same concept with the same clock, origin of quantum complementarity principle).

It follows some very interesting deductions:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

– An external observed which has the perception of ‘particles’, will find the motion of the wave in the ‘lower plane’ as ‘invisible’, thin, ghostly. Here is where we find the ‘pi irrationals’, as the wave NEVER CLOSES ITS PI-CYCLES, which do not exist by definition.

In the point of the particle, the particle acquires a new dimension as the coming M-quanta of the Planck frequency or Mass frequency (the quanta of mass, not being discussed in this level).

Now, this was one of my first discoveries on 5D physics, back in the early 90s, truly one of the first milestones of my work. As it turns out a few years ago it appeared a model of physics based in that concept.

(This has constantly happened for 30 years so I lost the count of models and solutions in all sciences that mimicked my work on T.Œ and are now standard or not of science, among them the most notorious memetics, dark matter calculus – that 95%, black hole growing importance in astrophysics – at the time of my first models of galacells they did not even imagine there were black holes in the center of all well formed galaxies, they still do NOT know they are top quark stars, hopefully they won’t learn it making them at home, epigenetics in biology and palingenetics / development laws and the confirmation of the 2008 crisis in economics predicted as earlier as 93).

**PILOT WAVES**

**The interaction, $-field/gas, ≈Wave/**** liquid****, ð-particle/solid**

Let us consider now a more professional analysis of a complex case, the solution of the correct interpretation of quantum physics with 5D³ to show really the most useful element of ∆st analysis: its capacity founded in logic principles that apply to all relational space-time beings in any scale of the Universe, to resolve questions and illuminate equations of classic science.

The essential parameter of truth about ∆ST systems is the experimental closeness of the human observer, which is maximal in our thermodynamic scale. Hence the second fundamental truth, once we accept the self-similarity of all scales is to accept that Thermodynamics must carry its laws to other scales. This is in fact the origin of the expansion of ‘gaseous entropy’ as the arrow of time of all scales by physicists, which however forgot the other two states/time ages of matter. And so as Einstein wanted it is only a question of time that quantum becomes an extension of statistical mechanics.

And this means of course that the pilot wave theory IS the true interpretation of quantum physics – as we can model it perfectly with the ‘states’ of the thermodynamic scale.

**Pilot wave theory: correcting anthropomorphic mind errors in quantum physics.**

Let us put a simple example, of the application of the concepts of entropy *as a relative ratio, compared to the other 2 states of the fractal generator, to validate a key aborted r=evolution of science; the pilot-wave theory.*

In GST the duality wave-particle, equivalent to the duality body-head of biological systems is self-explanatory. As all systems have a reproductive body, guided by an informative head, which moves thanks to lineal energetic limbs, all physical systems have a particle-form, often found, as in light waves on top of the wave-body, or higher point to focus information over the lineal field that provides its energy of motion.

Yet, this explanation is organic, regardless of its quantitative measure regarding the value of the energy, the speed of reproduction of information of the wave and the position of the particle. Physicists however to my surprise during my period of conferences were *not interested, *on this why to the 100 years conundrum of the Principle of Complementarity of physics. For them, it was simply outside the realm of their research as *organic, biological properties of Nature, are not mathematical, as they use to explain such bio-logical, logical, in-form-ative characteristics the logic-verbal language of man. *

Still, to make more amenable to physicists those posts on physical systems we will use extensively topological varieties to define such organic ternary structures. Since in a Universe of a single space-time sheet of 4 dimensions there are only 3 possible topologies, the lineal field/hyperbolic wave/spherical particle system we just explained can be considered a full topological system that combines the 3 topological varieties of the Universe into an organic form:

*Spe (Lineal -field/limbs) < St-hyperbolic wave-body > tiƒ (informative, cyclical particle/head).*

* **In the graphs, the 3 components of a physical, quantum system, the particle, the wave and the lineal field over which it moves. Lacking a real understanding of the 5D structure of the Universe, *

*physicists can only describe the mathematical how of the process with the quantum wave equation of the graph and its visual depiction as we observe simultaneously the particle-head guiding, ‘piloting’, (right picture) the reproductive wave-body that moves, extracting energy-motion from the lineal field, which is expelled on the back of the wave. *

*All this is described mathematically but we do interpret it also organically. As physical systems do have as all other systems both, topological and organic properties, following in its form the 3 canonical topologies of the mathematical language, and co-existing in 3 relative scales of reality as ∆-1 fields, ∆-waves and ∆+1 particles.*

To start with the proper interpretation of any system requires the ternary principle which only the pilot-wave theory includes with its three fundamental elements on the mathematical formulae, the particle state (left side schrodinger equation) better express in the polar formulation of bohm, the wave energy state, right side, and the field, entropy state the guiding equation:

Once we have the three elements of its generator equation, we can study as Bohm does all the elements of the ‘electron’ and its ‘best’ generator equation available to quantum physics, and in doing so learn also the elements of GST applied to quantum theory:

A collection of particles has an associated matter wave, which evolves according to the Schrödinger equation. Each particle follows a deterministic trajectory, which is guided by the wave function; collectively, the density of the particles conforms to the magnitude of the wave function.

The wave function is not influenced by the particle and can exist also as an empty wave function. *But the particle does need the wave function to exist, as your head needs its body-wave to sustain it. And so a clear arrow of causality we shall find in all ternary ensembles of the 3 ðime§pace limbs-fields>body-waves>particle-heads appear also in quantum systems. A wave NEEDS a field to ‘in-form’ with its ‘motion-steps:λ- frequencies’, and a particle needs a **wave to curl into closed inward, accelerated clock-like cycles.*

And for the three to walk together, the clock will be synchronised to the wave-frequency which will be synchronised to the ‘scattering= expansion’=entropy=motion of the field. So happens ‘organically’ between your eye-thoughts, body-heart rhythm and steps over the field land of earth.

This third element, the quantum field, though is NOT part of the particle-wave complementarity being; so as an external element it must be in a different ∆§cale, lower in form, in/form/ation.

Hence the definition of speed as transmission of information, v=s/ti, gives for its lesser form, ti->0, v=s/ti->∞ ,

Which explains its nonlocality compatible with faster-than-light, as its communication of information is lesser than that of light.

**Yet as information is defined as DIMENSIONAL FORM,** and light provides us with 4 dimensions of information (length-speed, height-electric field, width-magnetic field and frequency-color-social evolution, its ∆§calar field), in a bidimensional universe (holographic principle), bidimesional gravitation (Einstein, AMD formalism) can carry ‘flat information’ in two dimensions between those particles, which is enough to entangle them, and synchronise distant ‘spooky effects’.

And that is the ‘distance-information’ particles can obtain as they are guided by the quantum field ‘ahead’

As the *field of entropy does NOT transport more information, only on distance and motion, in an scattering, ‘disorganising’ way*, a Q(v)>C is empirically compatible with relativity. As our knowledge of it comes from the wave equation, it is NOT a hidden variable; but the wave, which processes it towards the particle-head, in polar coordinates (from where Bohm, extracted it, by switching from s=t wave state to particle/field s>t<s state…

**Quantum synchronicity.**

‘The guiding wave propagating not in ordinary three-space but in a multidimensional-configuration space is the origin of the notorious “nonlocality” of quantum mechanics. It is a merit of the de Broglie-Bohm version to bring this out so explicitly that it cannot be ignored’. *Bell*

It is a fact that a few physicists often the top ones have had deep insights on the laws of the fifth dimension, but none has come to make a proper definition of some basic terms such as ‘dimensionality’, as we have done here. HENCE the lullabies they sing, without much ado, as in string theory with its ’10 dimensions’, which are indeed NOT the prove of its falsity but in fact of its close explanation of reality… once we encase it within the larger more accurate frame of 5D³.

Where then the quantum field propagates? Obviously in the scale below light at ∆-4, which as we see it from above, will seem to our •humind to have more dimensions in ‘configuration space’ (: don’t worry about the funny words of mathematical physics.

All this said we must now tackle a bit of history on the ‘USUAL SUSPECTS’ – arrogant physicists, carrying the day with an egotist vision of reality vs. serious ones with humble relativism when consider themselves an infinitesimal of the Universe. I talk of the choice of Copenhagen over Paris. Bohr over Broglie.

An important form of explaining any stience is by making a ‘history’ of the real science, and *whenever a branch has made a mistake and created a wrong distorted view, follow the rightful branch and go ‘into pure theoretical true space-time of linguistic nature, evolving the history of the science thereafter.*

We shall try to do the same here and so we can consider those sub-posts.

Let us then do so for the science of quanta to trans-form it into the stience of quanta (Gst).

The problem here is that the stience of quanta is mathematically correct but interpreted wrongly as we have explained in previous posts. So the correct interpretation is Planck->Einstein->Broglie->Scrodinger->Bohm->Sancho, NOT, Planck->Bohr.. etc. Solvay, 27 Let us then pick up at that point, and follow the ‘less travelled road’ of Broglie. On the next screenshot from an excellent book on the matter:

Broglie, a French aristocrat intuitively like Einstein follows the right path in correspondence with 5D metric and ST symmetries and laws. Indeed, Broglie realises mass is the frequency of a closed cycle=clock of time. So *any mass or wave that closes a cyclical period becomes a particle (definition of particle as a time clock of physical scales). *

*This astounding hindsight gives us a first simple beautiful equation, the clock of a particle is proportional to its mass, ƒo=mo, multiplied by a constant ratio between the ‘space constants of the ∆+1 gravitational scale (bidimensional light: c2) and the ∆-1 light scale (bidimensional h-action).*

We first get a huge insight on the fact that the true constant is c2, a bidimensional, opening, field of light space, entropic expansion of pure light space, that is…

And so we have a clock of time, which defines a particle, proportional to its mass, multiplied by the ratio between the spatial constants of its ∆±1 scales.

He had defined the minimal bit of informative light space-time minds, its logic clock, and now he was going to define the wave-field over which it ‘glides’, the phase wave or quantum potential of the lower ‘graviton’ world (which he then will explain in another ‘silly-nilly rejected’ fascinating insight on the nature of light, in his ‘neutrino theory of light’…

Genius till the end. But let us not advance further. What he found at this stage was a quantum potential, which should be in fact a neutrino potential or sea of faster than light tachyon, smaller neutrinos? whose physical consistence is independent of our incapacity to observe it. How this ‘lower russian doll’ is connected to the larger astronomical scale of newtonian gravitation is also a debatable question. Do all systems who are closed feel a ‘gravitational potential regardless of scale’ on virtue of a general, universal resonance among all closed time cycles, regardless of scale?

In any case his photons with minimal mass, hence connection to that larger gravitational, ‘galactic vortex’ where mass do have its full range of newtonian power, do have an internal ‘mass clock’ (might have other clocks of other scales of its complex inner system), which can ‘fine-tune’ with a ‘field wave’ or ‘quantum potential’, faster than light, non-local, which provides it ‘energy’ to move as an EM engine would do ahead, guided by the faster wave, with which it has synchronised its Tiƒ PROVOKING A RESONANCE phenomena, which is the a priori (3rd equality postulate) condition for an action of space-time to take place.

ONCE thus both, the particle and the field are in resonance (synchronous time periods), the particle e*extracts motion stored as energy from the gravitational field, moving ahead in the direction of the pilot field (the word wave is contradictory, here, it is in fact an entropy, scattering ∆-1 field of max. motion). *

So this is the correct interpretation. When a 2 slit experiment is performed, creating a ‘huge’ colliding barrier for the electrons, some of them ‘splash’ dying entropically 2 scales down into the gravitational guiding pilot wave, which guides the remaining particles through its entropic scattering ‘bohemian paths’

The results being the same, the B2 (broglie-bohm) realistic theory, is thus the forgotten true departure for sound interpretations of quantum physics.

**Time related problems in quantum physics interpretations.**

In the image we can see how the Bohmian paths converge in the middle region where the density of probabilities are maximised.

It is just discussing about the angels on a pin to consider different interpretations by ‘errors’ of measure due to the uncertainty caused by the ‘far away region of time speeds and space sizes’ to which the subject belong.

** A paradigm’s change: Bohm’s realist interpretation of quantum physics.**

*“This idea (pilot-wave theory) seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored”* J.S.Bell.

The equations of quantum physics work, and must be interpreted. the interpretation accepted, copenhagen is anthropomorphic, subjective, and so we prefer the objective B2 MODEL (Broglie->Bohm), whose rejection at Solvay was a matter of power in physics – a dilettante french aristocrat and then a communist ex-patriot searched by the FBI, versus the full power of the German-Jewish industrial elite of the Heisenberg-Bohr idealist school (in the graph).

It was nasty, carried by second lackeys of Bohr notably Pauli, a cut-throat infamous bestard who would say ‘it is not even wrong’ to despise a rival theory. The french aristocrat of course was from a more polite environment. With Bohm it was worst, one of those elite members of science who DO HAVE ALSO ETHICS, like Einstein, of whom he was the favourite student and collaborator, both communists, lost his American passport, and gave us also the full completion of the Broglie theory of particle-wave duality, to which he added the potential quantum field of ∆-4 ‘neutrino background space-time to complete the meaning of the Schrodinger’s equation essentially an Ælgebraic equation of ‘Existential Algebra’ that reads causally as ‘time dependent’:

*Present wave = Past-quantum potential + Future -Particle state:*

In the graph, Schrodinger’s equation, **which in polar-particle state shows** even a simpler description of the 3 parts of the quantum world IS THE GENERATOR equation of the ∆-3 plane. So here we have the translation of the Generator, and we can start to do physics on A KNOWN KNOWN SCALE, unlike the Neutrino ∆-4 scale.

We do know of course that as ∆-i always ‘codes’ ∆-i+1 scales (where i is the scalar index, which amazingly enough 🙂 -not so we chose it for a reason, is closely related to information, its negantropic effect on ‘positive energy’ and the imaginary root of -1:) the light field must be born of a neutrino field-wave.

And so it is also DE BROGLIE’S THEORY OF NEUTRINO-LIGHT, the other ‘missing’ fundamental piece of the structure of quantum physics whose TRUE PIONEERS ARE:

Planck->Einstein->De Broglie->Schrodinger->Bohm

*THIS IS THE CANON, and the key for GST to accept the canon is the simple transformation of the wave, hyperbolic formalism into the polar formalism of a particle, with the addition of the Cartesian formalism of the field. *

As frames of reference define the function and form of the being, such as the ‘simplest expression of an equation in a frame’ shows its true nature. i.e. A circle is simpler in its polar equation, just a number for the radius than in a cartesian ‘hyperbolic plane’.

Of course, once we know, we can put more elements of GST to the cocktail and explain the magnificent findings of Broglie->Bohm:

**The ‘weirdness’ of the fractal Universe, applied to the ‘weirdness’ of quantum physics.**

On the positive side the weirdness of quantum physics has parallels clear in the weirdness of 5D ∆ST• beings, which make quantum physics and relativity so fascinating for the understanding of the fractal Universe, and *the errors of quantum and relativity interpretations so obviously caused by the simplex 4D Space-time continuum of present philosophy of science. A few elements which are shown in modern physics of the small and the huge ∆±3,4 scales (quanta, relativity), that coincide and are explained by 5D ST• Beings.*

- Quantum physics requires either non-locality or travel of information to the local past, two fundamental features of ¬Æ: a relative past entropic field and a relative future particle of information converge into a Present wave of energy. In terms of speed, it can be seen as non-locality for entropy; since the time it takes to travel to the future upper scale, is compensated by his origin into the past. And viceversa – a travel to the past for information is perceived as arrival in present. So both collapse into the present to create the ‘actual’ reality from the potentials stored in the past and the logic decisions obtained in the future.
- Quantum physics occurs in a configuration space, or Hillbert space and have multiple generalised coordinates, showing that each particle is the central point of view of an æ-cartesian mind, enacting its @tions of exi=stence.
- Quantum physics shows the superposition of the ternary elements of the being – its quantum potential field, its schrodinger wave, and its particle positions, at the same time, as the system is a ternary system.
- Quantum probability in its Bohr’s interpretation is a time interpretation (on probabilities not populations), because
*the speed of time of quantum systems according to 5D metric, Max. V(Tiƒ) ≈ Max. -i (∆-index). That is, smaller systems have longer time cycles and when a slow system as a human being is, observes a quantum faster system, it can only observe it IN TIME-long spans, SO IT APPLIES, time-related concepts, such as**probability, AND THIS IS THE ORIGIN OF QUANTUM WEIRDNESS in the copenhagen interpretations.* *Schrödinger picture vs. Heisenberg picture*

The ambiguity of perception, space-time is further re-stated by the symmetry between both pictures:- One can take the observables to be dependent on time, while the state σ was fixed once at the beginning of the experiment. This approach is called the Heisenberg picture. One can, equivalently, treat the observables as fixed, while the state of the system depends on time; that is known as the Schrödinger picture. Conceptually (and mathematically), the two approaches are equivalent; choosing one of them is a matter of convention.Both viewpoints are used in quantum theory. While non-relativistic quantum mechanics is usually formulated in terms of the Schrödinger picture, the Heisenberg picture is often preferred in a relativistic context, that is, for quantum field theory.
- It is then a fundamental task of correction and harmonisation of quantum physics and any ∆±>|2| STience for that matter, to make explicit which phenomena are better described in space (Max. Spe x Min. Tiƒ, or entropic < motions) and which one in time (>, Max. T).

There is of course, remaining there the observations to which we must NOW AD INTERPRETATIONS OF GST, ORGANIC, TOPOLOGICAL AND OF COMPLEX TIME CAUSALITY.

So the collapse of the wave comes directly of two facts:

- Particles guide ‘ahead’ any system of waves of present as the relative future position of the whole. So THEY COLLIDE FIRST.
- systems have defensive particle-tight configuration when its pilot guide wave sends him ‘contraction’ information of a larger momentum coming into its territorial region. So observers DO influence and bring about the collapse of the wave.

*Synchronicity of the three ‘time-clocks’ of the three parts of a supœrganism.*

We can now return to the analysis of the three parts together, particle-head/wave body and field.

And the first characteristic we observe is the synchornicity of the clocks of the field, wave and particle, which indicates they do form an œ:

we obtained the unification equation of masses an charges, the future-forms/states of the scales of physical systems, from the precondition of synchronicity in the metric timespace clock parameters of the fifth dimension. This precondition is the same than de broglie applied to obtain its quantum wave-particle duality origin of modern quantum physics, which wrongly rejected for almost a century its sound pilot (particles) wave (body) field (quantum ≥c entropy field) ternary generator of its ‘polar/cartesian’ s<>t/s≈t’ canonical description of an electronic quantum wave.

The general Unification Constant of those vortices, adapted to the condition of ‘co-invariance’ in the clocks of the three scales for the ∆±4, galactic system to be ‘a synchronous supœrganism’ is as in all ‘Broglie systems’, one in which there is a smooth transition of the clocks, along the metric of the fifth dimension that allow transfer of entropy energy and information between scales.

So the three clocks of the system are synchronised and from this we deduce the unification equation:

Let us then start, once we have explained what charges and masses are (time vortices) with the big prize, THE UNIFICATION EQUATION of charges and masses, since a mass or a charge, is just a vortex of cyclical time.

The immediate adoption to mathematical physics of time is the concept of energy, but time as future only passes when it accelerates and time as past when it decelerates. Both arrows of time are felt as such in the perception of time, origin of the world cycle of a system between three scales – perception will see also precludes that this virtual weld becomes indistinguishable between the two limits of time charges and masses humans perceive. So the virtuality of all existences zero sums of + entropy – information = present momentum.

Physical systems as ratio systems of density and speed in several scales of reality shows in a dynamic way the interplay of all the elements of ∆ust of space-time.

In an ideal ‘system of knowledge’ stiences should start with the study of biological existences, as they are the best described, closest stiences to man. Hence to know OTHER sciences we can extract the maximal isomorphic understanding of its trinity species from them.

Indeed, the ‘quantum and anti-quantum paradox’, prevents to achieve full objectivity in social sciences and quantum physics, because the observer is either too small (social sciences) or too big (quantum physics) to extract information of the observable without influence it (huge physicist changing small observable: quantum uncertainty) or being influenced (small social scientist catering the class power of the huge observable – society – in which he is inscribed: anti-quantum uncertainty.)

*entropic feeding*

Now one of the most fascinating results associated to de broglie shyncronized clocks is the consideration of the feeding functions of entropy: as the particle increases the frequency of its mass at the c speed it synchronises itself with its feeding photons and so the increase of mass is parallel to the frequency motion as each turn of the particle means a feeding bit and a clock cycle of its internal time, which decelerates proportionally. Why only this increase happens at c speed should be obvious: only at that speed the system can feed on the being, which chases, which is light. So in the multifunctional universe there is also a non-mental view of relativity effects worth to consider.

So the synchronicity which starts the ‘coordinated actions of the three parts of the physical entity can be accounted from an organic perspective: entropy processes release motion that other system absorbs. A mass is a vortex, which has a clock that ticks every time the particle turns. This is synchronised to the tic of the wave that carries the system and give us the common speed of particle and wave ‘chasing’ the quantum field of likely neutrino quanta ‘eaten’ at the limiting c-speed.

Two elements on those equations thus remain essential to quantify those processes: h/c², which is the constant of lobachevsky’s curvature of our light space-time, as it curves speed-entropy-c and forms the first quanta of energy, angular momentum, h, which shows once more that reality is always bidimensional (something that often removes ‘imaginary’ problems by considering as physicists do, square quantities the ‘real ones’ – probability conjugates, square momentums and so on).

So the equation to study here is really: m² – m² v²/c² or or ν² – ν² v²/c².

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental function of beings, the ‘momentum’ of a past x Future particle and the wave requires a more profound analysis. Since in fact *physical systems do have both states together as we do, waves and momentums, bodies and heads. And this is the huge discovery of quantum physics not properly understood.*

*In the graph, each system is in fact 10 dimensional, when we take the concept of dimension in mathematical terms as a structural parameter of the being – its 3 scales in 5D, 3 spatial parts and 3 time ages, plus the Œ point focus of its æ,e, ï,œ,û actions, which will further add new dimensions as we observe then the ‘œ-point’ in its interaction with ‘external world-beings’ through several planes of existence. Yes, the beauty of the Universe resides in its complex simplicity and the web of relationships of each part with its wholes.*

*Yet NEVER humans do explain the WHOLE but just a part and often in physical sciences where the œ studied is far removed (Max. ï distance from the human observer), reduce the study to a single perspective, often the most degrading, from the lower ∆-1 point of view and from the æ-ction of motions). This is a tiresome human ego-trip of one-dimensional scholars who spend their life to prove that their perspective IS the only one that matters, (one of the reasons I abandoned the field earlier in my life, ‘evil=antilive memes’ and ‘stupid=one-dimensional memes’ define most humans I found in ‘existence’).*

*Yet the proper analysis might be shrunk according to the importance of those 4 elements eliminating by this order: the 5 actions of the Œ-point (maximal external point of view, which removes also the ‘will’ of the being); the 5D ±1 Planes above and below (social world and cellular/quanta point of view), the temporal ages from conception to extinction, focusing on the Adult maximal reproductive, present age (limiting the widest temporal zero-sum point of view to a quanta of present time), and finally the Spe-field/limbs & Tƒ-head/particle point f view, focusing on its body-wave central part).*

*Thus if we want to reduce the essence of a phenomenon to a single cause though we must choose that which is the ‘central’ Œ-ssence of the system: its present, body-wave, individual plane of the being SINCE IT IS THE MOST EVIDENT PERSPECTIVE. In the case of physical entities, this is a PRESENT wave in reproductive motion, (‘female’ balanced perspective). So quantum physicist in the perspectives of physical entities focused on the wave-particle duality, observing from the human removed p.o.v. the reproductive motion of the Spe-field>ExI-wave<Tƒ-Particle, its fundamental perspective, (left side). The phenomenon is fascinating because it illustrates many of the properties of 5D ST reality and deals directly with the oldest logic paradoxes – today largely forgotten on the ‘computerized age of science’ when the mere feeding of mathematical models to mental-machines by ‘human bee-workers’ summarizes science: what is the MEANING OF MOTION?*

*This paradox never resolved since Parmenides affirmed the point of view of the particle – motion is NOT possible, only form exists, and Zeno proved it with its paradoxes (Achilles and the turtle, the motion of the arrow; while Heraclitus considered the point of view of the Wave – motion is constant as the particle-ego-informative fixed point does NOT exist).*

*On the other hand the informative point of view of the particle, dominating the wave and using it to guide its motion, was foreseen by Einstein and developed by De Broglie, with its idea of a pilot wave. They were the 2 pioneers of the field (De Broglie developed the first mathematical particle-wave equations); and yet both were ignored. Instead the perspectives today considered are, NOT SURPRISINGLY!, the ego paradox and mathematical abstract model (Germanic idealist Copenhagen interpretation), and the energetic lineal degrading point of view (waves and particles as ‘excitations’ of the energy of the ∆-1 field – Feynman’s perspective.)*

Now we shall do a bit more of a detailed analysis on the first concepts of quantum physics as they would illuminate its relationship with the physics of 5D, restricted to the earlier discoveries of Einstein, De Broglie and Schrodinger, as we have already mentioned them.

de Broglie found that all physical ‘quanta’ had a body-wave and a head-particle as they move over an energy field. He had found the simplest organism of nature, which we will see is isomorphic to all the similar organisms of different size of the Universe:

Spe (lineal field) < ExI – wave < Spherical Particle of information.

And so he wrote the simple equation: λ (wave) x P (particle with momentum) = H (Planckton)

Now the meaning of this equation properly written would be V (Spe-field) > l (ExI-wave) > m (Tƒ) = H

That is, the description of a space-time system, a Planckton, from the perspective of its interaction with the entropic gravitational field provided by the quark-mass in the center of the atom.

This Planckton though will have MANY roles according to its space-time program of cyclical actions (±∆æ: motion field, e-nergy food for other particles, ∆ï: bit of information, ∆œ: reproductive wave and ∫œ=û: colors).

So it is NOT a mechanical species – and this realization– that quantum particles are truly complex beings with multiple properties and behaviors not so easily described as the simpler analysis of our motions in space by mechanics is WHAT TRULY CONNECTS quantum physics and T.Œ.

Of course we humans are also complex beings besides our mechanics of ∂a (actions of motions) but we do not try to explain actions such as reproduction (particle decoupling), gauging of information (spin z-orientation) and social evolution (magnetic distribution), with ‘mathematical equations’ as those are like the 3 body-problem, actions which ‘have a restricted quantity of information available’ as in the 5D fractal space-time Universe, there are infinite Œ with external membranes that protect information from outer analysis.

That is the essence and beauty of the free, individual scale of the Universe. NOBODY knows ALL the information of any entity except the entity itself, which is the only one with 1-probabiluty of absolute information.

Humans though have megalomaniac pretensions of being God-like, trying control-freak behavior with reality INSTEAD of understanding the living whys of those particles.

All this said, we can then consider a fast survey of the mathematical elements of the H-planckton-wave duality fusion the ‘organic perspective’.

**De Broglie’s Wave Theory**

Quanta of light had never, of course, been treated in this manner; but de Broglie saw no reason why particles of matter, since they, too, are “isolated fragments of energy,” should not also have an associated internal periodic process. When the particle is at rest the frequency of the internal process is* v0* and the energy of the particle is* hv0,* following the Einstein equation. Another Einstein energy equation can also be applied to the particle at rest,

(m0 is the particle’s rest mass), this one being derived from the theory of special relativity. When the two energies are equated the rest frequency of the internal periodic process is found to be

The frequency* v0* follows the internal process according to the particle’s “own clock.” A fixed observer, who sees the particle moving with velocity v = ß*c* (ß =* v/c),* finds a different frequency V1, which must be less than* v0* by the factor 1— ß2,

due to the relativistic “dilation” of time intervals. This, however, is not the frequency which the quantum theory associates with a moving particle. Write the quantum theory frequency as* v,* so that, according to the two Einstein equations above, the particle’s energy is either* hv* or to the fixed observer who sees the particle moving with velocity *v = ßc.*

The problem of reconciling the frequencies* v* and* v1* was central to de Broglie’s investigation. It determined the “whole trend” of his work. He solved the problem in a formal way by assigning the frequency* v* not directly to the internal periodic behavior of the particle, but to a* wave* that accompanies the particle through space and time in such a way that it is always in phase with the internal process. This is, then, a traveling wave whose phase at time* t* and at the point* x* where the particle is located is (assuming linear motion) in which* u* is the “phase velocity” of the wave (the velocity of a particular wave crest). The phase velocity* u* is now evaluated by making the two phases the same.

Two properties of de Broglie’s particle waves have been determined, the frequency* v* and phase velocity* u.* A third property, the wave-length X, can be related to these two with an equation common to all wave motion.

The real strength of de Broglie’s argument lies in the various simple and highly suggestive uses he found for his particle waves. One of these develops a remarkable “wave equation” for the particle momentum. Begin with the relativistic equation for the momentum, *p = m _{0}v/ 1* — ß2, and transform it to wave language as follows:

The symbol* v,* as before, represents the wave number. A momentum equation,* p = hv,* known to the world as the “de Broglie equation,” has been brought forth with a mathematical and physical appearance very close to the Einstein energy equation E ==* hv.* The two equations *E = hv* and* p* =* hv* put in a particularly acute form the difficulties of the wave-particle duality. Each equation has a “particle quantity” on the left, a “wave quantity” on the right and the ever-present Planck’s constant standing between.

The phase velocity of the de Broglie particle waves has the seemingly impossible property that it is greater than the velocity of light (the particle velocity* v* is always less than* c,* so that* u = c2/v* >* c). *How can the motion of these mysterious waves possibly relate to the actual motion of a particle? De Broglie demonstrated that the physically significant wave velocity is not the phase velocity but the “group velocity,” the velocity of the reinforcement regions formed when many waves are superimposed.

IN brief, THE WAVE HAS THE SAME VELOCITY IN ITS BODY THAN THE HEAD, AND A FIELD-WAVE GOES AHEAD SEEING THE MOTION THAT THE BODY-HEAD WILL HAVE.

**Practical analysis: the Galilean paradox in electronic and light motions.**

For that reason, we can always consider a stop and go motion in physics; which has enormous repercussions in theoretical physics and the understanding of relativity and the Lorentz transformations, treated elsewhere in those texts:

In the graph, the stop and go motion of electrons and the virtual creation and extinction of particles in the light space-time sheet, have a quite different enlightening description in relational space-time physics. Some of the phenomena involved:

Electrons and anti-electrons are time past to future (life longer) and future to past (death shorter) time arrows. As such both inverse functions past-entropy (antiparticle) x future-information (particle) = Present light space-time, annihilate giving birth to the relative ‘present-space’ of our galactic world, light space-time.

Light space-time condensates into virtual particles, Spe>Tƒ, evolving the field of motion into a particle of charge, which then dissolves back in Tƒ<Spe, an antiparticle event. Both collide giving birth to present, and any of those similar space-time equations provide an insight in the particle-antiparticle duality. Further on it explains why there are less antiparticles in total space-time, as they are as many in space, as many ‘deaths as lives’ we might say, but death is an instant, so we do NOT see as many antiparticles that last so little as we do not see many corpses in the our daily life – even if there are as many as living on the long count.

Further on, because information is perceived and emitted in stillness, the previous process of stop and go, electronic stop, emission of ¥ rays, motion, stop perception of ¥ rays, means that in relativity we can also construct a new metric in which time and length remain constant and what changes is the speed of light, since we are perceiving (Michelson’s experiment) a process of electronic stoppage every time it emits and perceives light, hence LIGHT becomes c-constant because to emit it and perceive it the electron stops, IN RELATIONSHIP to its lower ‘gravitational space-time’ in which the electron co-exists.

Then how do we measure and operate in frames of reference that are still and moving is the knots and bolts of Galilean and einsteinium relativity? Relativity though is an incomplete theory in its explanation of what studies. It studies only a membrane of space-time of the 5th dimension, that of c-speed/time in as much as it is light space-time, the medium where we ‘float’. Over what that light imprints itself (gravitational space) is of not concern here. Suffice to say that in the game of Russian dolls, the gravitational doll is larger and encases with points of faster rotational time frequency (black holes) and lines of faster lineal momentum (strings), the light space-time. The transition between both worlds thus imply as always in any up and down transition along the 5th dimension a change in the speed of time and size in space of each quanta and bit of spatial energy and temporal information.

In what concerns though our world we live in a region of speeds and densities of space and time, which we might call the thermodynamic range, which is well in the stable zone of light space-time (well above, O k and below c – speed).

This entire revis(it)ed Relativity analysis could itself fill a bulky book, and give us deep insights on the way our mind or an electronic instrumental mind bias the perception of motions and stillness. It is not though a main theme in an introduction.

*Recap*: Time is change. Physics is dedicated to measure particles and forces in space and time with the restricted concept of ‘time-clock’ – the study of change in the cyclical motions of beings with an instrument called ‘the clock’ and a single language, mathematics. Logic is dedicated to the wider analysis of all types of time-changes, with all types of instruments and languages. It follows that the Logic definition of Time as change is wider and more important for a General Theory of Time than the Physical definition of time clock.

The Galilean Paradox is equivalent to the isomorphism and isotropism of the Universe at small scales, in the region of the infinitesimals, ∆ˆ^{-1} quanta of the upper scale. Regardless of their true content of energy and information in close view, the quanta of a Universal scale appears as infinitesimal indivisible, in the quantum’s scale.

In that regard the perspectives that do matter are the ones of the 10 components of the generator:

**The truth of present quantum physics.**

Now once we have dealt with the basic notions of light space and its similar forces, it is time to get more classic and referential with canonical physics – the quantum model, correcting though some of its errors of ‘subjectivity’, ‘mathematical reductionism’ and ‘experimental limits with the OLE method, of non-human Objectivity, multiple linguistic points of view and Experimental Evidence, to the service of truth (and the added classic methodology of Minimalism, Correspondence and cyclical predictability): Œ=Mc2.

Seriously, if there is any scientific discipline where those errors are paramount is in quantum physics because against the rightful opinion of the 3 foremost physicists of the XX century, and pioneers of the discipline, Planck, Einstein and Schrodinger, for whom I have a deep respect, the ‘idealist’, ‘polemist’, gregarious and influential tern of Bohr, Heisenberg and Born imposed their ‘Germanic, Hegelian, imaginary, abstract entelechies of mathematical only interpretations’ very much on the Mood of Mr. Hilbert and the rest of the ‘gothic’ thinkers of that age, for whom ‘mathematics was imaginary’ as Hilbert famously started his ‘axiomatic method’, let us imagine a point, a line and a plane.

THIS WON’T DO in a T.Œ, which pretends to describe objectively, experimentally and linguistically with all the mind mirrors available to man the Universe.

So we will NOT accept quantum subjectivity. Electrons ARE NOT IDENTICAL because we just can perceive them ONLY IN THOSE TERMS and hence extract from them only statistical and probabilistic information, as WE DO WITH molecules in thermodynamics, pigs in farms and with PEOPLE in economics. Those are OUR limits, but we are to suppose that while the same probabilistic laws work for insurance companies with humans, atoms in crystals and particles in quantum theory ALL systems are made of particles which differ in position and momentum (externally measured) and have ‘internal parts’ which will differ, on close view. And so on and so on. So we consider absurd and arrogant that an economist would tell all humans are equal because he handle us with money, the constant of action of economics. This was the jump of the Copenhagen interpretation we reject. We DO use probabilities in insurance, thermodynamics and quantum but that does NOT mean humans, and molecules and particles are INDISTINGUISHABLE if we had enough information on them. To believe so is to substitute the limits of our perception with the subjective vision that what man measures is the ONLY reality that exists.

It is far more important and intriguing to realize that THROUGH 5^{TH} DIMENSIONAL PLANES, information and energy does not transfer and so the human mind IS limited to know not all but only part of the information of a being.

Thus if we call 1 the total information of a being, there will be a probability of truth which in T.Œ we calculate according to the OLE method, as the product of Objectivity, Linguistic Complexity and Experimental evidence.

It is not important to quantify but to qualify ANY theory by its objectivity (human detachment of it), and reject subjective theories. So this is the point where we can give 1 or 0 value, to objective or subjective theories. Copenhagen interpretation is subjective of 0 value. Schrodinger’s is 1 value. And Einstein’s though not realized, is a potential 1 value (to explain as the rest of science, that is with correspondence to other theories quantum physics).

THUS THIS WILL BE THE ACCEPTED VIEW, NOT the rejection of the experimental facts (duality particle-wave, which as we have seen has an immediate explanation in the ACTUAL fact all systems do have an ST>Tƒ, wave-particle structure or body-head in biology), but THE SEARCH FOR logic, isomorphic explanations to those quantum facts. As we just have done with the duality, or in previous paragraphs with the collapse of the wave when observed, as all moving systems collapse into tight particle-configurations when ‘attacked’ by a perpendicular force that invades its vital space from armies to schools to fractal electronic waves. WE DO NOT ACCEPT LAZY, CUCKOO idealist German outdated arrogant Hilbert-like pseudo-Nazi religions of science all the rage in the XX century which in history did give birth with the same conceptual Hegelian views to Nazism, Communism and the like. Point.

Then the other 2 legs of truth to sustain a theory, Linguistic Complexity and experimental evidence, which can be quantified (and the equivalent, MC2, minimalism, correspondence and cyclic predictability, associated to the OLE elements as we refer in the foreword to this article.)

Linguistic complexity according to the isomorphisms of Nature implies that if we can describe a system with an organic, 5D structure, hence from an organic point of view, if we can describe it through its life-death cycle in time, hence from a causal, logic point of view, and we can describe it through its symmetries of space, hence from a mathematical, topological point of view (either using a continuous differential model of geometry or a discrete arithmetic model of quanta – both are equivalent as we explain in U±∞ on mathematics and on our analysis of space-time symmetries), and finally we can describe it mentally, from the perspective of a linguistic 0-point of mind and its 5 actions of survival, considering the possibility that that system can receive and emit information either through time-logic languages or mathematical spatial forces (and this can be objectively evaluated by experience), we DO have a maximal 1 truth in our model.

__So we shall give 1/4 values for Organic, Mathematical, Causal and Mental/action/survival analysis.__

On that view, the present quantum ‘so much praised’ mathematical description, considered even in Britannica, the ‘highest intellectual achievement’ of the XX century, is still 1/4^{th} of the truth of quantum physics, that of an external, human observer, which limits itself (without Copenhagen interpretations) to 1/4^{th} of the truth of quantum physics. Now let us not be stingy and consider that while not acknowledging it, quantum physics does give us a lot of information on the cyclicality, organic structure and causal symmetries of its physical systems and rise those bits and bites here and there to around ½ of truth. We will then try to fill up the rest with organic, mental and cyclical time models to grasp the whole of it.

Since finally the Experimental evidence, is indeed close to 1. We cannot extract more knowledge of quantum physics from the human perspective (1 is the truth humans can extract from a system, obviously, only the system has ALL the information about itself, so we are here on the Heisenberg concept that we do have to explain the observed facts, but NOT on his theory that THE OBESERVED FACTS IS ALLW HAT THERE IS TO IT, this is the idealist, arrogant human part on it). Now there is not further important experimental evidence requires since the kind of nuclear physics experiments taking place in quantum (accelerators, creation of big-bangs and black holes on earth) put mankind at risk of extinction and an extinct researcher knows nothing, so it is a potential risk to put to waste the obtained 1 x 1 (Schrodinger -Einstein interpretation completed in this blog) x ½ (modeling which is mathematically maximal, but lacks recognition of the organic phenomena it describes, such as the wave particle duality and collapse, or the social hierarchies between quanta and wholes, etc., which we will also complete in this blog)

All in all we give quantum theory ½ of truth, we do have hopes that with the help of T.Œ, if not this researchers old and sick and unable to complete the herculean job, but easily a few dedicated physicists on his paths, will be able to complete an put quantum to the level of the known-known physical systems, between the molecular –chemical scale and the geological surface system, of the earth which are qualified today as 1×1 x 1 (limited information starting on the interior of the sun and the planet).

And so we MUST apply the isomorphic method to quantum physics. We MUST explain all together its discoveries with all those isomorphic perspectives, and top the discipline with the organic, causal, topological explanation of its ‘constants’, of which we already offered a teaser on the previous paragraph.

But things have gotten worse since the times there was at least an argument between Schrodinger and Einstein on one side and Bohr, Born and Heisenberg on the idealist, ego-centric human point of view. The latter won and now there is NO argument, not even interest on understanding the ‘other properties’ of quantum systems, as after II world war, the evolution of chips made quantum physics just an industrial praxis, no longer a theoretical search for the ultimate truths of nature (and no, to classify the zoo of particles is not to find the ultimate answers, as to classify species of ants is NOT to resolve the theory of evolution, the answer, which will always be a synthetic T.Œ departing from experimental evidence).

And now our big statement: Physics, as most human scientific endeavors, during the age of ‘electronics’ and metal-minds, due to the excess of irrelevant information obtained with those machines (breaking Minimalist, simple symmetries), bias towards mathematical only models (the language of those mental machines) and the pumping up of the human observers’ ego, an infinitesimal ever more stupid by atrophying his brain to metal machines (loose of objectivity) is widely breaking the scientific method.

And the result of this is the perception that because the Human Observer does NOT see enough of the quantum and cosmic scales, they ARE different (here the observer limit is confused with the observable), and even more bizarre theories (anthropic principle, where the Universe is created to create man not man is created by the Universe), the big bang (the observer must know it all and since man is finite in time and space so it is the Universe to fit it with all its properties into his minimalist mind), entropy only theories (here the militaristic, lineal, visual ‘white man’ physicist, crossed with the visual Neanderthal genetically and memetically with the history of weapons, decides that the Universe is lineal and energetic, dying into the future because that is his worldly military profession as physicist), and so on and so on.

All this we shall repeat as the Universe repeats its truths, is pure scientific error, because we shall show ALL scales of reality are similar follow the 10 isomorphisms and symmetries of those equations and can be described, ascribing differences to two simple reasons:

– Human subjective errors.

– Fractal structure of the universe in which each fractal scale is SIMILAR not equal, so there are indeed variations between a cell and a human, but both are living beings with the same space-time functions and topologies.

Now we keep for latter the argument on the objectivity of relativity theory, and give you the analysis of the observable Tiƒ, masses and charges and how they indeed are proofs of the fractal nature of the Universe, as both can be unified through the metric of 5D as the two time clocks of the largest and smallest observable scales of the Universe.

__Connecting knots: De Broglie, mass, frequency and time and energy dilation__

But this is NOT the internal property of mass, which is a vortex of accelerated gravitational time, E=mc2+E=hƒ->M=ƒ(K).

We shall latter a more detailed analysis on the first concepts of quantum physics and its relationship with 5D, physics around those 2 Einstein equations and De Broglie’ interpretations of it, as he found that all physical ‘quanta’ had a body-wave and a head-particle as they move over an energy field:

Se (lineal field) < ST – wave < Spherical Particle of information.

And so he wrote: λ x P (mv ) = H (Planckton)

Written in 5D as Vs (Se-field) > l (ST-wave) > m (Tƒ) = H

But while this is now standard 1^{st} course of physics, what is of interest in De Broglie original paper is its disquisitions about the difference between the wave internal clock and the particle clock, as he focused on the ‘time element’ of E=Hv, and how *time changed its clock slowing down as the wave-particle increased its speed-length in the 5 ^{th} dimension, by a proportion, which we should now remark is equal to Einstein’s increase of energy of the system in Special relativity, such as, if we consider that an increase in the speed of the wave is in fact a growth of the wave space-distance: ∆ L = -∆Tƒ x ∆Sp=K,*

So we can now return to the 4 theories of mass, the Sp-Energy Hamiltonian, Se-Poisson gradient, Tiƒ-Einstein’s forms and Tƒ-Newton’s/Kepler time-space vortex which gave us the simplest Unification Equation for all of them… to do some conceptual thinking (as usual we stress physical numbers are ok and equations will be dealt with in 4^{th} line, concepts do matter though and must be clarified in this 2^{nd} line first).

__The 3+∆ perspectives of gravitational forces.__

Let us thus consider a more advanced application of the isomorphic=linguistic method to make sense of the evolution of a specific branch of physical systems – the study of gravitational forces and its isomorphisms, which give birth to 3+0 different type of equations to describe the same system from the perspective of those 3+0 systems.

An important fact of all sciences is the parallelism of the formulation, both in qualitative and quantitative terms of any law of science, which seem all seemingly close to the truth (the total truth of a system, by definition only exists in the system itself, which carries all its information).

This now can be explained, considering that epistemological truths require as all forms and motions, a ‘perspective’ or point of view, which in a Universe with 4 essential components, which we shall resume in 4 words, ‘fractal actions of space and time’, gives us a total of 4 basic interpretations of all systems.

Whereas the total truth available to human perception, would be the sum of them all. Let us consider an example, as we have used elements of its structure in this introduction: the 4 explanations of the laws of gravitation, which correspond to the spatial-formal-relativistic, temporal-moving-Newtonian, scalar-gradient-Poisson and action-lagrangian perspectives of the analysis of gravitational forces:

*The evolution of the concept of mass, from classic physics, in which the rubber-model of relativity considered mass a solid substance in the center of the gravitational space-time whirl, to the pictures of bubble chambers in which the vortex seems not to have anything in its center, as a hurricane does, to the fractal understanding of those vortices of mass as composed of many smaller fractal vortices.*

** ***In the graph, 3+∆ different descriptions of gravitational space-time. While most physicist would only consider the first one (description of the form/curvature of space-time with Einstein’s equation), as it is the most modern/detailed; in reality they represent 4 relative ceteris paribus analysis of the ‘scalar space-time’ of gravitation, which stress the 3 relative elements of all systems, its ‘motion’, which can be seen as ‘form’ (Galilean Paradox), and ‘exists’ not only in a single plane but in a ‘5th *dimension’ with an scalar gradient of size or speed.

Hence Newton’s central equation describes a vortex in motion, Einstein describes the form of space-time and Poison, the gradient of increasing acceleration of the field. We shall often find in science a binary or ternary equivalent description of a system. Only one-dimensional humans tend to think the ‘last’ one is valid.

For example in quantum physics we have the static, formal perception of Heisenberg’s Matrix, and the wave-motion perception of Schrodinger. Of the many new disciplines of knowledge open by scalar fractal space and cyclical time, the reorganization of all theories according to its relative truth, integrates all of them as partial visions of the ‘total truth’ about a system, which will require at least those 3 points of view.

Finally the perspective of a cyclical zero sum, between birth and extinction is provided by Lagrangian/Hamiltonian Mechanics, and the principle of stationary actions, which states for physics the basic pattern of a worldcycle, in which an entity will choose on a trajectory of possible multiple histories, certain maximal and minimal ‘zero’ points that make it go through the 3 ‘phases’ of a space-time cycle and end in a zero point.

And the 4 will be valid with different uses. Scholars will prefer the more complex. In this blog as a norm we shall use them all but stress the simplest one, as it is normally the ‘first historic analysis’, which highlights the most important elements. I.e. Newton’s theory of an accelerated mass turning in a vortex like motion goes to the core of what ‘gravitation is’: a force that transform lineal space into cyclical clocks of time.

Einstein’s analysis of the entire space-time as an static form filled with curvatures provoked by energy and mass, simply is too abstract and mathematically complex to discover that simple truth (though Einstein did made clear the concept with its Principle of equivalence: gravitation ≈ acceleration, hence it follows easily that a mass is just the final phase of that accelerated, cyclical vortex of gravitation). We shall consider this kind of questions in depth when we get to complete the 4th line of this endeavor (maybe in 2016).

Now, contrary to belief, if we were to consider one of those 4 systems only, it is Newton’s the one more important, because it goes to the essence. As a rule *the first ideas, the simplest models are those who give us the deepest understanding, and those are the time-motion perspective, while the last more complex, static analysis give us the highest details – and that would be the Einstein’s perspective.*

It means that we must rely on the work of Einstein and Riemann on *a fractal, topological analysis, not on a probabilistic description to understand *mass, black holes, and big bangs of quark-gluon soups*.*

Because of the mathematical complexity of fractal relativity, we shall consider here a simplified approach to those themes, using Newton’s description of a fluid vortex, which is 90-percent-plus accurate, and focus on the conceptual principles. But there is available literature in the work of those and other fractal pioneers to fully grasp the meaning of mass, gravitation, black holes, quark condensates and the consequences for mankind of making those hurricanes of space-time on Earth.

The mathematical modeling of cyclones as fractals has been verified by practical observation. A large tornado harbors multiple suction vortices inside the column of dust, and subsidiary whirls continually form and dissipate around the bottom edges of a tornado.

This is the simplest image of what a black hole is: a series of quark spins that form the densest space-time fluid of the Universe.

Today, the previous picture of a vortex of space-time dragging masses into a black hole has become a commonplace in the analogical research of black holes to the point that physicists study black hole properties with “dumb holes” made with atomic superfluid vortices. It is a very pertinent comparison. The difference is that what it falls into the black hole are the tiniest forms of the gravitational membrane: fractal strings and their wholes, quarks and gluons. That is why a black hole erases our light reality: it sucks, folds, and packages in the form of a superfluid all the quarks and matter of our Universe. In fact, the proof of that theory and the falsity of black hole evaporation have come with the first experiments that tried to make a dumb black hole of atomic superfluids that absorb sound phonons instead of light phonons. They did it at Haifa just a year ago; they were atomic superfluid vortices, Bose-Einstein condensates that turned at supersonic speeds inside the vortex, absorbing sounds. They were self-similar to quark holes that absorb light, but they did not evaporate or emit the slightest trace of sounds. So they were called dumb holes. This means quark holes will not evaporate either.

**Transformations of Fractal Space/Energy and Fractal Information/Clocks of Time**

We now have enough understanding of the mathematical structure of fractal beings as networks of self-similar cells/points with a content of lineal energy and cyclical information to understand what we mean by a Universe made of fractal space and fractal time.

The simplest one of those beings in our Universe is the drawing we made of an electromagnetic field. This entity defined by Planck as H, an action of energy and time, has two fields, one of magnetic energy and one of electric form. Yet it is also a piece of fractal space-time that occupies a space and has a clock/frequency rhythm. We are all made of evolved pieces of light, which is absorbed and evolved into electrons, which are the electroweak substance of which reality is made. And when we put together all those pieces of reality, the medium of light-space in which we exist and all the evolved beings of light, we get the Universe. Imagine a sea of water where the medium is water and the pieces that swim on it are indeed evolved forms of water (we have 90 percent of water in our bodies). All together form the ocean.

The ocean is not an “abstract” space-time Cartesian coordinates. In essence, any fractal space-time can be defined as a medium of formless space, made of a network of simple bites of energy, inhabited by more complex informative beings. And each of those beings can also be modeled by the complementarity principle with two elements—a body of spatial, energetic cells/points and a head or particle made with a network of fractal cycles of information.

Even the simplest particles, quarks, are made of networks of smaller particles called gluons while electrons are nebulae of smaller particles, ultradense photons, shown in the most recent pictures of electrons, which seem as a bundle of curved light rays. The topology and structure of those organic networks might vary, but all comes to the same shapes: force and lines of energy create the vital spaces of reality, and cycles and clocks of information create the clocks of time of the Universe.

A fractal is a system of self-similar cells generated by a feedback equation that transforms energy into information. This complex definition of a fractal being can be made more precise when we understand the meaning of the generator equation of a fractal in the real world, beyond the language of mathematics. Any informative code can be a generator equation of a fractal being. A human fractal is generated by the code of information of the genome; a mathematical fractal is generated by a much simpler equation. The Universe and all its systems are in that sense fractals with different generating equations of different complexities. Yet what unify them all are the two “essential” geometries that combine to paint the four-dimensional fractal beings of the Universe, spatial energy and temporal information. And this is what fractal theorists^{9} mean by a Universe made of fractal energy and information.

In simple mathematical terms, if we call energy *e* and information *I*, we can then write the generator equation of all the fractal beings of the Universe as a feed-back cycle that transforms energy into information back and forth, generating all its space-times. And that fractal equation is nothing else than the principle of conservation of energy and information quoted before in this book:

*All what exists is a fractal being that transforms back and forth energy into information: e< =>Tƒ.*

We don’t need to go in this book in complex mathematical analysis, as we are interested in explaining the simplest fractal networks of quarks that form black holes and quark stars. Notice though the difference of the two mathematical symbols of the previous equation: The symbol that gathers together space particles is a sum, which means that space particles form “waves,” loosely organized that move around a field of energy in which they feed. The symbol used for informative particles is a multiplication symbol, which means informative particles form networks, “knots.” For example, in a neuronal network, each particle is fixed and connected to many other particles. The result is that a network of informative cells can form a “mirror,” which can reflect an “image” that “gauges” reality into a language and so it can create a “mind.” The result indeed is that herds of lineal, moving particles “absorb” energy and move, and knots of cyclical information, gauge and perceive.

Further on, knots can be broken in their connections so Tƒ networks can become herds of energy by losing its “connective dimension” and vice versa.

When mathematics evolved, those symbols evolved. So instead of sums and multiplications, modern physics use differential and integral equations to describe energy and information; and then in the twentieth century, we use fractal equations for information or chaotic equations for entropy.

All this is a more complex view needed to explain the behavior of electronic nebulae that sometimes act as a network (and indeed your mind is basically a mirror image made with electronic nebulae) and sometimes as a wave-flow. This is the ultimate meaning of duality. So all can exist in two states in many different scales: masses or charges or clocks or heads are all species of information, but they swim over a field or body of energy and sometimes gauge information and sometimes move. What then creates the stability of the Universe? A fundamental law of the Universe called invariance of its motions, forms, and scales.

The three invariances of the Universe are the invariance of motion proved by Einstein, the invariance of scale proved by Nottale, and the invariance of form proved in this blog. They are the three principles that hold together and explain the self-similarity of all the species of the Universe. In other words, while there are infinite different species of energy and information, their “shapes” are invariant in any scale and their motions (perception of shape as movement) are also invariant.

In the graph, informative clocks of time are cyclical and surfaces of energy are lineal to maximize their functions: informative systems resemble a spiral or sphere since those geometries store maximum information in minimum space, accumulating its cycles/cells in the informative dimension of height, from black holes to heads and nervous systems. Bites and bodies of energy resemble the line or plane since that opposite geometrical form covers the shortest distance between two points, the maximum extension with minimum volume, accumulated in the width dimension as space. In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the bodies and heads of humans, animals, or machines because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.

Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between two points and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms because cycles store maximal information in minimal space. For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common, but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like the missile. On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines. And those chips order bodies of metal with digital information.

THIS said, it is obvious that the first correction on quantum physics deal with the way we humans perceive fast cycles of time as pictures of space, because our slow time clocks see the entire life of a quark or electron as a single spatial picture of it.

**Quarks as Time phases.**

In the graph, one of the classic confusions of space-physics is the description of time events and time forces as space-events. Quarks as they switch colors evolve through the 3 ages of life and then die as particle-antiparticle string a new cycle of existence after extinction and renewal, the total cycle of life of the quark though is interpreted as a spatial form: 3 quarks and a meson.

Now, if we consider quarks are in space, then the minimal charge of the Universe is 1/3^{rd}, and this – physicists don’t seem to have reflected much about it – imply that electrons are composite particles, because they have 1 charge.

What is their composite? Obviously the 3 dimensions of space. That is the perception in space of a ternary fraction: 3 dimensions in space, would then imply that quarks are bidimensional vortices, similar to those of galaxies (bidimensional vortices). And thus we are again in some fundamental properties of 5D physics – bidimensionality of space and time. This brings then the nice description of the 3 colors as dimensions in space, which explains then why gluons have 2 colors, they are bidimensional ‘strings’ so to speak (here the connection with the original string boson theory) and the reader will observe that geometrically we have 8 angles to complete a cube, and they are not commutative if you turn a book with those angles. That simple is the spatial perception of it.

So finally we come to the final element of the physical reality, spin. And here is where as in the case of the weak force we do have to end our nice gauge-symmetries in fractal cyclical space-time, because we are dealing with 5D forces of evolution.

In brief, spins, magnetic moments, masses and weak forces are social evolutions of cyclical motions of time, which IS how you ‘ascend and descend’ through the scales of the 5^{th} dimension and so the actions here involved unlike the symmetries of space and time cycles in a single plane, are NOT conserved as there are reproductive social actions that emerge as new wholes, of myriad of tiny parts: Œo ∑œ<∑œ>U+1.

So neither spins nor weak forces conserve the CP symmetry of the system, which in the case of spins it means they can switch up and down, + and – and have several different values and orientations, as quantum physicists do.

So it is not an essential theme beyond the full ‘spherical cycle of boson waves (0-scalar Higgs field with no ‘loss’ of time turning around just moving faster than c-speed in lineal fashion; 1 rotary motion in a full 360 degrees for photons).

And so this brings us to the analysis of ‘symmetries in the 5^{th} dimension’, which are slightly different from the concepts, easier to grasp of space-time symmetries in the single plane.

* *

* ***THE SPACE GENERATOR SYMMETRY OF THE ELECTRONIC WORLD**

Maxwell equations describe all the actions in time and forms in space of an electric field.

Now, the previous laws have 2 formulations that define the time and space symmetries of the system, which we shall study in more detail as we advance on this post.

In the previous formulation they explain the ‘actions’ electric fields perform (as always a differential is a shorter time description, or n-1 action, ∂a, e, i, o u; an integral over time or space is a larger description either the world cycle or the simultaneous space description of the being).

Thus in a geometric sense as ‘Integrals’ of ‘space’ they explain the Space symmetry of the electric system:

Se(Magnetic loop-membrane) <ST: electric wave> Tƒ (Electric point-particle charge)

1.Tƒ: The first Gauss law as the first law of gravitomagnetism does in gravitational cosmic space-time, defines the electric ‘informative’ attractive force of the electron, that is its action of gauging information in an spherical form, as the sphere is the topology that shrinks without tearing, allowing the electron to focus the information of the external universe. It does also allows to study the social structure of an electronic field in its static form.

It does define the central point of the Electromagnetic ‘species’ and allow us to configure once more the ‘electromagnetic species, in its Œn electronic form which is self-similar to that of the light species (wave form).

In it derivative action description it does obviously represent the informative gauging quantum time moments of the charges.

- The second integral defines the Se external membrane of the electric system, its magnetic field, telling us it does not sink in a loop. Does it is the canonical definition of an external membrane that surrounds the electric charge in a lineal flow or traces a larger loop through a cyclical electric field, acting as the ‘larger, external’ membrane or entropic element of the field. In its derivative version it represents the energetic action, defensive shield of the field.

3, 4. The third and 4th equations define the intermediate region, or interaction between both, the magnetic and electric field, explaining that both ‘reproduce each other’. It is thus the ‘body-wave’ element of the electric system, which is as always, a compound of interactions between both elements. In its derivative action formalism it does explain the reproductive actions of the system, as a varying electric field creates a magnetic field and a varying magnetic field creates an electric field.

And, further on, the 4th Maxwell addition defines the creation by varying electric and magnetic fields of an electromagnetic n-1 field of the lower scale, which is THE KEY law to understand the interaction of electric and magnetic field with is lower social scales, completing in this manner the description of the system.

**The ∆->∆+1 interactions. **

It only rests to understand how ‘electric waves’ relate to the larger gravitational, thermodynamic scales. That is, how electrons collapse into the larger scales of mass (quantum wave collapse into particles), how they interact with gravitational fields (relativity description). What is the relationship between the n-electronic scale and the upper molecular, thermodynamic fields. But all those descriptions have been customarily analyzed from the perspective of the lower quantum or upper relativity theories, so it makes no sense to study them here.

There are no infinitesimals of magnetic fields? Why, simply speaking because magnetic fields ARE the membrane of the electron world, and hence are not point charges.

But by the antisymmetry of scale, we can find them at the cosmic galactic-atomic scale. This prediction seems to be confirmed with the concept of a magnetstar but requires further research.

In terms of classic mathematical physics they will tell you because it is an effect of relativity (4D metric).

In terms of scales I will tell you that it is because from 5D perspective, the magnetic field ‘brings’ as all membranes energy to the Tƒ-electronic point by connecting it with the upper gravito-magnetic field.

That is the magnetic field emerges in larger units, as membranes do (DNA is in your cells, the external protein membrane however dominates the larger skin). So magnetism exchanges energy and information, ±∆e,i, with the cosmic, gravitational field above the system.

And hence it is also the field that carries the social actions of electrons. It is the field which evolves socially electric charges into larger simultaneous, fixed spatial ordered whole configurations, both in the atom (magnetic social number that regulates the electron orbitals) and the electric flows.

When electricity though becomes ‘naked’ (superconductivity), it does expel the magnetic field (Meissner effect) to move faster taking off its ‘social structural’ membrane.

So there is another huge field (Physics is sooo large)-: The connection between the electromagnetic field, the magnetic social equations, and the gravito-magnetic equations of a weak gravitational field (Heaviside equations of gravity, which are essentially those of general relativity), which help us to understand how the arrow of motion travels downwards, from gravity into magnetic fields, the upper ‘crust’ of the electric field and how upwards the magnetic field of a mass organizes its spin and through the dragging effects fine tunes informatively the configuration of social systems.

But as always in those interactions at a certain level of ‘strength’ of the gravitational larger field magnetism disappears and the new force achieves its full classic configuration.

So the analysis of the perpendicular 5D interactions is as always an emergent process that brings us from:

-Electronic charges, into the emergence through social electric motions of magnetic membranes, to the emergence through massive moving charges of magnetic fields of planets and stars connected to the Gravitomagnetic fields – via Heaviside unification equations of gravitational space-time, and vice versa, downwards through Gravitomagnetic dragging effects, which induce rotation in smaller masses, which induce magnetic fields which induce electric fields which move electric charges.

So as always upwards information, form is created with no entropy and downwards, motion is transferred with no entropy.

The electromagnetic field is the ‘5D across planes’, field which brings us to the ∆o human pov the information of other planes, and in doing so it changes the parameters of its waves, ‘travelling across’ the 5th dimension itself. This little understood phenomena: the deformations light space-time suffers in its travel through 5D planes as it enlarges its time frequency cycles through the microscope is also a factor to be taken into account.

Why then there are not magnetic monopoles becomes clear, as in each whole, the infinitesimal is an identical, clone particle – cells in human organisms, electric charges in individual atoms. While the magnetic field is the ‘wrap around’ closed time cycle of the upper social scales of ∆-1 electromagnetic quanta.

**Multiple Spaces-Times in Matter: Atoms & Molecules**

*In the graph, both in the quantum and cosmic world the geometrical inversions between Entropy and information and its perpendicular ST fields of motion define electromagnetic fields .*

The holographic principle explains how bidimensional fields of Entropy and information come together, through perpendicularity to create 4-dimensional systems.

The perpendicularity of those fields is thus a key feature to create 4-dimensional world, and it is established by the general rule that the body will have a flat, energetic arrow of feeding and the head will have a tall, high diffeomorphic orientation, relative to the ecosystem of Entropy and form in which the entity exist.

If we consider those 2 inversions of form: lineal Entropy vs. cyclical information and flat vs. tall perpendicularity between Entropy and information systems, forces and charges /masses in the physical world, we can define many physical events as transformations of lineal waves and fields of Entropy forces into cyclical or high particles and cycles of information, whose ratios of transformation in each of the scales of the Universe are called Universal constants.

In the graph, the isomorphisms of electric and magnetic fields are defined by those relative perpendicular morphologies. The ratios of transformations of Entropy into form define some of their Universal constants: 2 perpendicular fields of magnetic Entropy and electric information define in Maxwell equations the c-constant of light, which in organic terms is the ‘reproductive constant’ of the wave of light, caused by the constant process of creation that the interaction of the magnetic, spatial body of light and its informative, electronic particles, cause.

All those processes ‘form’ the energetic, formless gravitational vacuum into electromagnetic shapes: The Maxwell screw defines a flow of Entropy that accelerates as its perpendicular, temporal vortex diminishes its spatial radius, increasing its speed; the Earth’s rotation creates a lineal flow of magnetism; while an inverse, lineal electric flow creates a cyclical, magnetic vortex.

In the graph, we can observe how the inverse properties of relative Entropy and information fields explain the why of many physical phenomena. If we add the dual structure of fractal space-time, roughly constructed by 2 membranes, our visible, Euclidean space-time, made of light and the invisible, larger sea of gravitation made of dark Entropy, with its wider Non-Euclidean topology, we can deduce all the isomorphisms of physical science and its whys with far more insight that quantum physics does.

Let us just indicate from the perspective of the whys of the arrows of time of an electron, as we did for light, some basic events of the electronic and atomic world:

– <=>: Reproductive, communicative cycles: They happen when 2 particles communicate through forces, made of small, spatial particles, called bosons, repeat their waveform in space with a reproductive speed that imprints over the energetic field of vacuum space the in/form/ation of the particle.

– Social cycles: Particles create herds=waves of moving space-time quanta (dynamic, temporal perspective) related by EXO networks (static, spatial perspective).

Social processes are all pervading in the Universe, from waves of bosons that sometimes come together into single condensates, to networks of atoms that become molecules or combined processes, such as waves of stars that form spiral galaxies.

Thus, waves and forces are spatial bosons that communicate Entropy and information between temporal particles, called fermions, either charges or masses. It is the so-called boson/fermion inversion, the fundamental equation of quantum physics:

*T _{1} (fermion particle) < *∑

*sxt (boson force) > T*

_{2}(fermion particle)Existential=generational cycles: Again, we can adopt 2 points of view about particles. If we consider each particle/wave cycle a life/death cycle, particles have very short generational cycles. If we consider the next particle/wave cycle the same particle, particles are immortal.

In any case all those cycles can be summarized and formalized specific cases of the fractal, generator equation of the 2 arrows of time, spatial Entropy and temporal information: ∑∑ ∏Tƒ.

As we grow in scales of physical form, the nature of those cycles change slightly but the basic Entropy and information morphologies that define them are maintained. Since fractal, scalar paradigm is defined by its 3 invariances, invariance of relative motions (Einstein), invariance of scales (Nottale) and invariance of topological formal Time arrows (Sancho).

Those Time Arrows or dimensions of any fractal space/time are the 4 guiding whys or wills of any entity of the Universe:

– Entropy arrows that expand form into Entropy.

– Information arrows that form Entropy into information.

– Reproductive arrows that reproduce the Entropy and form of a complementarity system in other zone of space-time.

– Social arrows that create superorganisms by associating in complex networks Non-E particles of self-similar properties. This 4th arrow of social evolution is the cause of ‘scalar relativity’, as systems are made of parts that associate in wholes, which share the functions and morphologies of its parts. Yet scales are never equal as quantum physicists pretend, only self-similar. So the properties of a galaxy made of stars and black holes, made of quarks and electrons are self-similar to those of quarks and electrons.

For example, in the next social plane that gathers atoms into molecules, the 3 main cycles of Entropy, form and the reproductive combination of both, become the 3 states of matter:

-Energetic gas state, (max. spatial extension and energetic speed).

-The balanced, reproductive liquid state, S=T, which creates the more complex forms of life.

-The 3^{rd}, informative solid age, which has temporal, informative properties (cyclical vibration, high density of form and minimal space). While the spin or temporal movement of particles that gives them mass emerges in the macro-plane of molecules as a ‘vortex’ that attracts those molecules.

*The boson-fermion equation, fundamental event of physics.*

What the boson-fermion interaction means is that both, masses and charges are accelerating vortices which produce constantly, as they decelerate, ‘fractal actions of constant speed’ and increase the curvature of space in the dimension of height, through which they emit most of those actions, as electric or magnetic quanta. In the case of an electromagnetic vortex part of its acceleration becomes also transformed in the Unruh radiation that increases the temperature of the accelerating vortex. In our macrocosmic Universe it means a friction that decelerates the vortex and increases also its temperature. In gravity the interaction of the 3 dimensions is also evident: As the G-deformation of the vortex grows, so it grows its speed and acceleration. Unification follows when we consider charge and mass merely 2 types of vortices that can be derived from a 5^{th} fractal dimension of time, that can accelerate inwards, imploding space (and then we have the arrow of gravity) or decelerate outwards widening space and diminishing curvature (then we obtain, as Kaluza did, the electromagnetic arrow).

The perception of those dimensions becomes more complex if we introduce the errors of the mind that tends to average accelerations and decelerations into constant speeds and converts speeds into static distances or spaces. We say that the mind uncoils an accelerating time dimension into a wider static field of space, or a fixed density of space-time called a mass. This is easy to understand. Take for example, the representation of those 3 parameters, space, speed and acceleration in a Cartesian system of coordinates. Space is longer: it is a length in the x-coordinates without any angle, flat. Then we raise the dimension of height/time, and obtain a diagonal, straight line that represents a constant speed. Yet because it has an angle, the line is shorter in X-space coordinates. Fact though, is that the being that has speed is in fact moving a longer length, but we have transformed that longer length into a temporal height/form in the graph. Finally acceleration is represented by a parable that finally becomes a height line and so it occupies the less quantity of X-space. Yet an accelerating being will reach the longest distance of all the 3 beings in the shorter time.

What those accelerating beings peel off as friction or radiation, or speed is called in quantum Physics an action, which is a fundamental constant in all beings. In the quantum realm the accelerating vortex produces an h-constant action of Entropy and time; in the macro physical realm it produces a Temperature or radiation as in the Unruh case. So to avoid collapsing into a singularity of infinite speed, what particle’s vortices do is to peel off h or T actions, modes of constant speed, made of Entropy and time. So we can move from the Equivalence Principle of Relativity to the Gauge and Action principles of quantum physics.

*Conclusion*

Thus in physical space all what exists are 4 motions of time, and those 4 motions define a Universe in perpetual motion, perpetually creating and destroying organic systems of Entropy and information.

Yet because the physical Universe is the simplest of all systems, its main event is a transformation of Entropy into information, of vacuum space into vortex-like masses and charges, which cannot be reduced further. And so the simplest ‘events in time’ or ‘types of change/arrow of motions’ in the Universe are lineal energies that move (boson forces) and cyclical forms that turn around, storing information in their patterns of form and frequency.

And this explains why the boson/fermion inversion is the main law of quantum events and why E<=>M(t)c^{2} is the main law of the mass membrane. And we write it also as feedback equation since in physics Entropy/information events are reversible. So in the same manner Entropy can curl into mass, mass can explode into Entropy.

Indeed, if we depart from pure lineal motion or entropy (perceived statically as extension or space), then by ‘curling’ and ‘warping’, we can obtain cyclical forms (masses and charges), in the same way that by crunching a paper we obtain warps, angles of form. This primary event, E->O, diminishes the space, extension, lineal motion or speed (self-similar concepts) of space and increases its form. Thus, we obtain from Entropy ->Information. While the 2^{nd} causal arrow of that feedback equation explains the destruction of form and creation of Entropy, I->E, which is the ultimate meaning of the big-bang and all other mini-big bangs (novae, supernovas, beta-decay, Bombs) of the physical world of matter.

Reason why Einstein said that ‘time warps space into masses’ – meaning that Entropy curls into cyclical vortices of mass – while Darwin said that ‘Time evolves the morphology of life beings’; and deduced first the equation M=E/c^{2 }even if the Atomic bomb made more famous the destructive inversion

*Recap*. All the events of quantum particles can be explained as events Generated by the fractal equation of spatial Entropy (boson waves) and temporal information (fermion particles).

**Physical constants are Entropy/form ratios of space-times.**

Universal constants show ratios of Entropy, form, and ST=reproduction of space-time membranes. So they can all be written as partial equations of the Generator Equation of spatial Entropy and temporal information: SPe<ST>Tif.

The relationship between the Constants, O & e of those space-time membranes or ‘forces’ is a simple rule, known to physicists as the Law of Range: Max. E = Min. O and vice versa, which is a particular case of the inverse properties of Entropy and form.

In the widest ecosystem of physics and its 2 gravitational and light space-time membranes, those Universal constants are related to the informative density and spatial distance of the vortices of masses, charges and lineal flows of forces of those 2 membranes.

Because there are 2 membranes of space-time, the light space-time membrane we see and the dark, gravitational, bigger, faster space-time membrane we don’t see, the Universal constants of both membranes are different. This means that black holes and quarks beyond the event horizon keep accelerating faster than light, and the Entropy they expel through their poles, called dark Entropy is also faster than light, which is the limit of speed of our membrane of space-time, light. Thus, the specific physical constants used to describe the e/o ratios of the vortices of Entropy and form of the cosmological and quantum world of masses and charges differ in value, as they express those different Entropy/form ratios. Yet since there is invariance of topological form, the only difference between electromagnetic and gravitational fields will be the extension/speed in space of its forces and the informative frequency of its vortices of temporal information that will give us different Universal constants, which are ratios that measure the speed of transformation of spatial Entropy into cyclical frequency. Thus we write a generic, topological, invariant equation for all space-times which will differ in its specific Constant (T/S):

*F = UC (Tiƒ/Spe) Mm (t) /Dd (s)*

*Recap*. We measure universal constants as ratios between the frequency of a mass/charge or in-form-ative volume of the particle and its spatial distance. And so the faster the frequency of the ratio and the smaller the spatial extension, the stronger the Universal constant will be and the faster the exchanges of Entropy and form between the particles/vortices will happen. It results in 3 forces: the gravitational, macrocosmic force, the electromagnetic force and the strong microcosmic force of increasing strength and speed of rotation as we diminish our size.

**Forces & particles of the 2 universal membranes**

*In the graph, the Universe is made of 2 space-time membranes, the light world of charges and stars and the string world of quark masses and black holes. We live in the electromagnetic scales, which form a network whose dark spaces are occupied by quarks (∆-1 inner world of atoms), and in the biggest eusocial structures we know of electromagnetic matter (∆+1 galaxies) by black holes, whose parameters correspond to top quark condensates.*

*The basic forces that create distance-space and information between them are boson strings of gravitation condensed into gluons and strong forces in the quark-mass membrane and Planck actions of light, condensed into photons in the electromagnetic scale. Those gluons and photons herd further into cyclical particles made of such fractal parts, associated into cyclical networks, called quarks and electrons. Self-similar structures form the nebulae of stars called galaxies, and the condensed of quarks called black holes. The only error of such standard model, reflected in the previous graph is the weak force which is not a spatial force but describe time events of transformation of particles between both scales.*

The 2 membranes of space-time have 2 theories that must be put together to explain the dual Universe:

– Quantum theory that describes the electromagnetic membrane, not the cosmological world. Both are self-similar (as we have shown with the equation of fractal unification), but not equal. Thus, while we can admire that self-similarity, the use by quantum cosmologists of quantum equations to describe the cosmological world is erroneous.

– Relativity, the theory of gravitational forces and black holes, which are super fluid quark stars. And so it should be fusion with the theory of strong forces and quark masses.

Since each of those scales has also a fractal structure, we have to define its fractal quanta:

-Masses are vortices that grow from string actions (Nambu’s actions of boson, tachyon strings corrected to fractal dimensions and background independent.) Those motions reproduce and evolve into gluons, which are the fractals that evolve into quarks, vortices that are the fractal parts of quark stars.

Since our electrons surround those quarks, locking them inside charges must be fractal vortices with a larger number of dimensions than those bidimensional masses. So 3 bidimensional quarks of 3×1/3^{rd} =1 charge must lock their mass in the x,y,z planes to enter in a 3-dimensional exchange of Entropy and information with the electrons of our light-space. So quark masses attract electrons with their gravitational force inwards, and electrons shield themselves with their electromagnetic force outwards. The balance of that tug of war is a complementary atom.

In that regard the entanglement of both membranes is dynamic and based in the network structure of non-Euclidean spaces in which its points are connected by ‘lines of communications’ which are waves of smaller particles; leaving in between dark spaces which allow the other membrane to entangle itself; as it happens with the blood/reproductive and nervous/informative network of a human vital space. In the case of the 2 membranes of space-time the membrane of dark Entropy/matter (gravitational membrane) plays the role of the nervous/informative network that connects the blood/electromagnetic network.

We talk of 2 space-time networks, defined by 2 spatial forces – lineal strings of gravitation and lineal waves of light – and 2 clock-vortices of time: gravitational masses and electronic charges.

The emergence of those st-1 worlds into the st+1 scale of galactic entities (where we are the st-relative intermediate scale sandwiched between both) is caused by the eusocial evolution of enormous quantities of those fractal units: vortices of quarks made of ‘strong’ forces, whose fractal particles are gluons, gather together as fractal parts of quark stars, pulsars and black holes.

While our world – the light space we inhabit – is sandwiched between quarks and galaxies

Its smallest actions are h-Planck constants, which are the fractal parts that form light photons, which are the fractal parts gathered into an electron nebulae, the basic clock of time of our world, whose plasma herds (ionized state), associated with complementary protons creates the world stars. Finally vortices of star herds form galaxies, which turn around their Kerr black holes, and so are self-similar st+1 objects of the st-1 atoms positioned in space by the gravitational force of the central quarks.

Thus, the invariance of topological form and scale of all those vortices that makes macrocosms emerge from microcosms is caused by the complementary structure of its central mass vortices that anchor the electronic and star Entropy of our light membrane:

Quarks anchor atoms and black holes anchor galaxies.

*Recap*. Our space-time is made of h-quanta of light. We exist as evolved forms of a light space-time network anchored by the nuclei of atoms, made of quanta of strong forces, called gluons and quarks belonging to the gravitational space-time membrane.

**Some precisions on the formalisms of both membranes.**

A quanta, which is interpreted as an abstract, probabilistic number in quantum theory is a fractal piece of space-time, a complementary system made of bites of spatial-Entropy and bits of temporal-information. This is self-evident even in quantum theory, where Planck defined those quanta as actions with the dimension of Entropy and time.

The Universe is indeed made of actions of Entropy and time, as when we say ‘I don’t have more Entropy or time to do this’. We are not solid spatial forms, a Maya of the senses, so common among ‘naïve realist’ physicists, accustomed to touch the solid metal of their machines, but we exist in a spiritual Universe made of actions of Entropy and time, which occupy a vital space and have a time rhythm. And each of the self-similar fractal worlds/membranes of the Universe has a minimal unit or fractal quanta, a type of st- point with a different volume of Entropy and information that defines the space-time membrane.

We exist in the space-time membrane of light made of h-quanta. And its formalism, later studied in more detail is well-known to physicists (quantum physics), and requires some modifications on its interpretation to adapt it to the wider concept of fractal spaces and cyclical times (Correspondence principle).

But there is another space-time membrane of gravitational quanta, whose formalism requires more changes, since being an invisible membrane, we humans cannot use easily the experimental method to study them, especially when considering the st-1 quanta so small, in the Planck length scale that there is no way we can observe and prove our models. So we are left only with proper formalisms of its macrocosmic entities and effects, which Einstein described with general relativity.

As of two day two formalism, which require further corrections are useful to that aim: the formalism of boson, tachyon strings defined by Nambu’s actions, adapted to a background independent world (they are the actions that create the membrane, not actions that float in an abstract metric coordinates), and the use of fractal dimensions and non-Euclidean geometries, unknown to physics.

Another formalism used to describe the gravitational minimal units is the one elaborated by Nottale^{6}, whose unit is λ, lambda, also called the cosmological constant. In scale relativity, Nottale defined this constant as Λ = 1/L2, the minimal unit of the gravitational Universal membrane, where L is the minimal length of that membrane, the smallest piece of space. It is essentially a string, but string theory must overcome the error of Newtonian Absolute Space to become useful to describe the gravitational scale, as its minimal unit ‘independent of the abstract background of membrane space-time’.

Such formalism which borrows from the work of those 2 pioneers is part of the more complex ‘courses’ of Multiple Spaces-Times, beyond the scope of this introductory lectures.

The other formalism that is not completed is the formalism of weak forces, since Physicists unaware of the temporal nature of those events have tried unsuccessfully to describe it with the same spatial exchange of particles (Higgs mechanism^{7}) when weak forces are temporal events, and the W and Z particles brief states in the process of transformation of particles of our electromagnetic membrane into masses of the gravitational membrane. Reason why those forces break the symmetry – as time is not symmetric but hierarchic and why the Higgs has not been found and will never be found – it is a particle only needed if it was a weak force.

Unfortunately we cannot perceive the lambda scale of strings. But, essentially with those 2 membranes the strong gravitational world and the electromagnetic world and its 3 ±i scales, we can explain all the physical properties, events and entities of reality.

*Recap*. The formalism of the light-membrane is described by quantum physics and it is correct, except for the errors in the description of the temporal, weak force. The formalism of the gravitational membrane departs from its minimal unit, the boson, tachyon string, which must be adapted to a background independent gravitational membrane of which it is its minimal action and the fractal, finite nature of dimensions.

**The 3 scales of the 2 membranes.**

Why there are 3 main scales of social evolution in both membranes? The trivial answer is that we are always sandwiched between a lower and upper scale and so we always perceive 3 even if the number of scales might be infinite.

And so from the human p.o.v. any entity or system of Entropy and information stretches in 3 scales.

For example, your organism is basically a fractal of biological Entropy and information extended in 3 scales, cells, individuals and societies, of which you are a relative cell.

In the physical, fractal, Non-Euclidean structures of the 2 membranes of space-time, there are also 3 basic scalar structures:

A complementary atom extends on both membranes. In each of those membranes, quanta evolve and form social groups, emerging into a new topology, a higher scale of Entropy and form:

-The scale of h-quanta form light and electronic nebulae, made of dense photons.

– While its inner gravitational world of quarks can be decomposed in 3 scales: The lambda scale of ‘strings’ are the components of gluons, which are the components of quarks.

Emergence of parts into wholes of a higher scale is possible due to the other 2 invariances/dualities of physical systems: invariance of topological form and motion allows invariance of scale.

What about the cosmological world? Again we must consider that cosmological systems have 3 scales, the scale of particles, (quarks, electrons and atoms), which are the units of cosmological bodies, black holes, quark stars and electronic stars, which are the atoms of galaxies. Those 3 scales thus interact in all the organic networks of galaxies.

There might be another scale, the Universe, where galaxies are atoms of the Universe (and the Einstein-Walker model of cosmology treats them in fact as Hydrogen atoms); which would itself be a unit of a hyper-universe, whose ‘explosion’ at an even faster ‘infinite speed’ that dark Entropy, would explain the ‘inflationary age’ of the big-bang. But there is little evidence of this final scale today, and an enormous number of Pythagorean and hyperbolic errors in the formulations of the cosmological big-bang *in a single space-time continuum *to take serious that theory.

*Recap*. All what we can be sure of, is what we can perceive – the limits of our existence, sandwiched between atoms and islands-universes, the original name Kant gave to galaxies.

**Dimensions of particles and Universal membranes.**

In that sense, to fully grasp the difference between both worlds, the dark and light world, we must understand the basic isomorphisms of fractal dimensions. Dimensions are in any system of the Universe, as in the case of light, arrows of time (motions of Entropy, information and reproduction), perceived according to the Paradox of Galileo also as ‘spatial surfaces. Thus, they are always local, fractal dimensions which are limited by the extension of the ‘species’ in which those dimensions create a ‘vital space’. So dimensions are dynamic as the species they create grows or shrinks, evolves into more complex beings or becomes destroyed. Entities grow in dimensions as they grow in size.

Further on, more complex informative species ad dimensions.

This happens normally when a form is bigger and has inner particles. But in the case of quarks it happens, because the quark is faster and has more inner speed/form.

All in all, the total number of dimensions of a system is relative to our detail of analysis. For example, those quarks are made of one-dimensional strings, made of non-Euclidean points (each one with its 3 inner dimensions), which have a total of 3 × 3 dimensions (3 of their Non-Euclidean points and 3 of the string of points). That is why physicists in detail use 9+1 time dimension to study strings, but from our perspective without detail, they are just one-dimensional lines of a quark vortex.

Yet if we transcend to the world of quarks we consider them 1-dimensional. So those strings form gluons and quarks, which from our higher world are perceived as bidimensional mass-vortices.

Finally 3 color-locked quarks interact with the world of light of 3 dimensions, and the world of electrons of 4 dimensions, which are the 3 dimensions of Euclidean space and one of form, of color.

On the other hand, the biggest entities have more dimensions, as they include the smaller entities within its whole. It is the law of fractal dimensionality. It states that a fractal part of a bigger st-scale of information has fewer dimensions such as:

*Law of dimensionality: Fractal ∑∆-1 = 1/3 ^{rd} Dimensions of st*

Since any st-Point will have 3 inner dimensions. Thus the dimensions of information of any system grow with a cubic power law as the system grows in scale. In simple terms, a 3-dimensional being transcends as a mere cellular point of the new whole.

Those 3-inner dimensions, as in the case of light, are ultimately the dynamic arrows of time, or wills, or physiological networks, or organic drives of the being.

For example, a human being has 3 dimensional networks, which are our physiological systems. The blood network of Entropy, the nervous network of information and the endocrine network of reproduction. Those are the 3 systems around which cells and organs build up. So humans can be described as a 3-dimensional network with 3 wills: to absorb Entropy for our blood/ digestive system, to absorb information for our sensorial/ informative system and to reproduce through our hormonal system.

*The abstract, geometric description of dimensions is secondary to the functional, dynamic, organic meaning of those dimensions. The how is less revealing than the why. *The why of dimensional motions are the search of Entropy and information of any entity, whose paths become fixed in space and appear as dimensions. Or they are the reproductive strings of self-similar cells that form the physiological network of Entropy or information of the system.

In the quantum world, the constant exchanges of Entropy and information of the electron with the external Universe are described with 2 simple quantum numbers that correspond also to the complex actions in space-time of its cellular photons and the of time:

-The 2 first numbers describe at photonic scale, the reproduction of photons, part of the wave (main number) and its social evolution (l number). At the electronic level they define its e<=>I, Entropy level and formal structure.

-The spin number defines two clone electrons, often reproduced with different spin in a particles deocupling and the magnetic number the social organization of those electrons established by an external magnetic field. Thus those numbers describe the ‘paths’ of particles in search of its dimensional arrows of Entropy and information.

The dimensions of light are also the dimensions of the energetic/magnetic field, the informative/electric field and the reproductive length-speed, or social evolution (color/frequency).

In that regard, it is also interesting to observe the relationship between both planes, the light plane which ‘feeds’ as the lower st-1 space the dense fractal, cellular points of light of the electron. When considering the basic isomorphisms between planes of space-time we noticed that a force, st-1 of Entropy, becomes st-bits of information of the upper scale, which uses them as pixels to gauge information. Thus the magnetic, width field that acts as Entropy in light becomes the informative, electron magnetic number.

Life beings also have a dimension of height/information that is maximal in man, the most informative being of the cosmos, and a dimension of Entropy/length which is maximal in energetic predators.

*Recap*: Dimensions are morphological expressions of the arrows of time, seen as fixed forms of space.

**The corrections of quantum physics.**

*Particles and antiparticles, positive and negative charges must be explained as space-time antisymmetries, which can be seen according to the Galilean paradox, both as inverted events in time, as in the left Feynman diagram or as geometrical inversions in space (right diagrams). They are the why of most physical dualities that classic physics fails to understand.*

All the errors of interpretation of quantum physics derive also from the ignorance of the key dualities of the Universe:

-Duality of motion in time=distance in space.

-Duality of 2 space-time membranes, gravitation & light.

-Duality of wholes, made of fractal parts of a smaller scale.

-And duality of the arrows of form and Entropy natural to all complementary beings, which create 2 more complex arrows, energetic reproduction and informative, social evolution.

When we use those whys to interpret the magnificent scaffolding of mathematics and metric space times of measure built by quantum theories all becomes resolved. So we shall try to give meaning and explore the whys of quantum physics with the new tools of multiple spaces and times.

Let us then start with a basic clarification brought about by the knowledge that all cyclical patterns and forms are ‘time-clocks’ that carry the information of the species we study. This means particles are cyclical states and waves are energetic states; and cyclical properties such as spins are time-clocks that carry information while energetic states are lineal, extended forces.

The main error of quantum physics is the lack of understanding of the properties of temporal information, the cyclical nature of time and its multiple rhythms and clocks, obscured by the equalization of all those rhythms with a time-clock. This error is enhanced by the experimental limits of human instruments (uncertainty principle):

Time cycles and spatial flows cannot be differentiated in the quantum realm, as they can in the biological world, due to the minimal duration of ticks of time of quantum particles, which therefore are observed as space trajectories.

This is due to the black hole paradox: Max. Tƒ = Min. Se, which means the smaller the particle is the faster its cyclical, rotational clocks turn. So in experimental physics, you never get images short enough to ‘feel the tick’ of time. Time cycles appear as those pictures of a fast turning wheel, which seems a solid disk without motion. So particle’s cycles appear; as printed ‘images’ on the bubble chamber.

Yet once we understand the dualities and forms of time-clocks and spatial, lineal flows, there are easy ‘key elements’ to know when we are seeing ‘sequential time events’ instead of ‘spatial trajectories’. For example, systems that are ‘bilateral’, 2, are space-like, left-right. While systems that are composed of 3 elements are time-like, where each element represents the past, present and future states. So there are not 3 quarks but quarks in 3 time states/colors. And so in time the same quark changes its 3 states creating a charge of 3 x 1/3=1. More often we find that a ternary state is both, an organic structure in space and a ternary wave in time. And so the ternary topologies form the particle state, and the 3 phases of the wave represent the particle in time. 3 is thus the evolutionary limit, which explains why so many systems are ternary systems: 3 neutrinos evolve increasing information as a wave; 3 mass families are the 3 horizons of evolution of quark-masses, and so on.

Further on, particles must be classified in 2 different membranes, that of light and that of gravitation, which we do not perceive. Thus it is easy to classify those particles, as we did in previous paragraphs: the easiest criterion is its ‘visibility’. So gluons, quarks, boson strings, gravitons, black holes and neutrinos, which are not observables, are gravitational species.

Because time ‘bends Entropy into cyclical vortices’ masses or charges, depending on which of the two membranes of space-time we study (since both are self-similar as we showed by finding its unification equation), we can also differentiate the particles that are clocks of time and store most of the information in both systems (electrons and quarks), and particles which are lineal, energetic states (light and gluons).

Because the universe is in symmetric balance, as there are electric and magnetic fields in light to balance each other, and there is a repulsive, lineal electromagnetic, transversal wave and an attractive cyclical electronic particle; so there must exist an attractive, cyclical gravitation and a repulsive, transversal gravitational wave. Thus we conclude that dark Entropy is merely the transversal, repulsive gravitational waves that come out of galactic black holes.

Finally, since the formalism of temporal information is inverse to that of Entropy (meaning that Entropy moves forwards, information stops motion or reverses backwards with negative, imaginary numbers), and both cancel each other, we can distinguish, which are the parameters of Entropy and information of a field or particle.

For example, in electrons, the informative component is given by the imaginary parts of the Abelian phase of its mass field; and both fields – the real, energetic field and the informative imaginary component – are at a 90 degrees angle and when one is maximized the other is nullified. So even if our perception doesn’t distinguish both terms we can now which one carries the information of the system and which one the motion.

For the same reason the 4 quantum numbers can be easily classified as representing the 4 basic arrows of an electron:

- E:
*The principal quantum number*(*n*= 1, 2, 3, 4, …) denotes the eigenvalue of Hamiltonian (H), i.e. the Entropy. This number therefore has a dependence only on the distance between the electron and the nucleus (i.e., the radial coordinate, r). The average distance increases with n, and hence quantum states with different principal quantum numbers are said to belong to different shells. *The azimuthal quantum number*(*ℓ*= 0, 1, …,*n*− 1) (also known as the angular quantum number or orbital quantum number) gives the orbital angular momentum. In chemistry, this quantum number is very important, since it specifies the shape of an atomic orbital and strongly influences chemical bonds and bond angles. Thus it is the number that defines the form, or ‘static information’ of the system.*The spin projection quantum number*(*m*= ±½), is the intrinsic angular momentum of the electron or nucleon. This is the projection of the spin_{s}*s*= ½ along the specified axis. And it defines when a particle decouples producing two electrons, its ‘male’, ‘female’ forms, as only two electrons with inverse spin can reproduce. Results indicate that up to two electrons can occupy a single orbital – but they must be male and female, with ‘different spin’.*The magnetic quantum number*(*m**ℓ*= −*ℓ*, −*ℓ*+ 1, …, 0, …,*ℓ*− 1,*ℓ*) yields the projection of the orbital angular momentum along a specified axis. L_{z}=*m**ℓħ*.

It defines the number of electrons with clonic form but different relative orientation there can be in a shell, hence it is the ‘social arrow’ that defines the organization of a number of similar elements in the system. And also allows the system to understand an external magnetic field and organize its social evolution as a herd of electrons.

- However two electrons can never have the same exact quantum state nor the same set of quantum numbers.
- Further on, according to the isomorphisms of emergence between scales:

-The 2 energetic/informative arrows are represented by the 2 first numbers, the main number represents the reproductive wave of photons (lower scale) that shape the energetic volume of the electron as it displaces, imprinting the surface of Entropy around the nucleus. The second number represents the ‘changes in the shape’ of that electronic path, due to the absorption= feeding of a photon that evolves formally into the electron.

-Then the other 2 numbers, the magnetic number and spin mean the same for its information components: the spin represents the reproduction of two electrons, which are born with two orientations – short of the masculine and feminine sex, and the magnetic field is the language of social evolution that affects the electron as it is his ‘informative perception’ that can change the spin and orientate the electron from an external field.

This trivial explanation of the why of the 4 quantum numbers, using the theory of Multiple Spaces-Times however will be denied by most abstract physicist, for whom organicism is a taboo concept born from the anthropocentric nature of human beings and the mechanist approach to science of the founding fathers, whose memes are learned and repeated without much reflection by all texts on physics. Yet what marvels of a model of multiple, vital spaces and time arrows applied to quantum physics, is how easily data becomes structured into a ‘plan’ with meaning, explaining the whys of all previously paradoxical quantum processes.

Indeed, once those precisions are made we can truly clarify all the mysteries and meanings of the parameters of quantum physics, from spins to waves to complementarity isomorphisms, to spooky effects. For example, since a time state is an informative, *still* state with the ternary phases of time cycles and its hierarchical, non-commutative causality – given the fact that it is not the same a motion to the future (whereas Entropy becomes information) than a motion to the past (where information becomes Entropy), the meaning and mystery of spins becomes resolved:

Systems with 3 spin positions (spin number 1), are still systems and the 3 spins form a rotational clock.

Systems that are in motion have 1/2 spin number – 2 positions and they are bosons which display a spatial main lineal motion and its inverse negative ‘informative’ motion, creating a simple beat forwards, backwards. This beat is natural to all complementary systems that last, and so we find that an alternate currency of electrons is more stable and lasting than a continuous one as it has an Entropy/information beat in its motion.

Those rules of course are also useful to detect erroneous theories that cannot happen since they mix properties of time particles with spatial properties and vice versa.

For example, the Higgs cannot exist because it is a scalar boson^{7}. And by definition, a scalar field with no rotation will not act as a boson moving at light speed.

Further on a boson cannot have mass as it does not close its cyclical trajectory so it does not form an attractive vortex, reason why light and gluons don’t have mass.

The same concept applies to forces, whose range law I just an expression of the Black hole paradox (max. Entropy=Minimal information/mass). So we can distinguish forces belonging to the strong-mass membrane – gluons – and forces belonging to the electromagnetic membrane – photons. And then forces belonging to the bigger cosmic membrane of gravitation, gravitons, which are boson strings of tachyon speed.

This leaves the 4^{th} force, the weak force that has no range and time parameters that change the in/form/ation of the particle, and also breaks the symmetry of space (left-right). So it is obviously not a spatial force but a time event, which further explains why we have never found its ‘boson force’, the Higgs^{7}.

The same error invalidates super symmetry and hence all string theories except the original one, which properly understood as background independent and using fractal co-dimensions of finite size extended through several relative scales of gravitational complexity should become departing from its Nambu’s minimal action and Planck length, the proper formalism of gravitons.

Thus, while the formalisms of most quantum theories are correct all those limits of perception added to the errors of using a single clock-time and a single space, explains why so many ‘whys’ are confused in quantum physics to the point that Feynman finally said: ‘the why is what you don’t ask in quantum physics’. We do and that is what this paragraph is about: the why of the perceived phenomena of quantum physics.

Finally physicists ignore the black hole paradox so they don’t understand that protons, neutrons and all other particles do not live eternally. On the contrary their life/death cycle is their complementary cycle between informative states and energetic states, either the clock of particle/wave complementarity or the clock of particle/antiparticle, past to future and future to past cycles.

And so their existential cycles are really short. But they do not disappear because what physicists see are ‘generational waves’, given the fact that at the quantum level unlike in our informative-dominant world of biology, past to future and future to past arrows are reversible. So as a very simple jellyfish does, turning his clock backwards when it gets old and becoming young again to turn the clock forwards; particles and antiparticles go forwards and backwards and forwards in time. Bosons and electrons move forwards in energetic motions and backwards in informative motions. Light imprints once and again a photon of information that becomes an energetic wave that becomes a photon.

And so what physicists call the life of a particle is its longer generational cycle, which can last an enormous number of self-repetitions, but should neither be eternal.

Indeed, it seems that light beams and light-evolved entities (stars) have a mean cycle of 10 billion years, after which they suffer an energetic big-bang expansion – stars explode into Novae and light gets tired and expands in a redshift process, returning to its gravitational, non-local lower scale of dark Entropy. This of course explains why far away light red shifts and seems to expand space: it is dying and beyond those mean 10 billion years an increasing ‘darkness’ is observed in the Universe, which a simple Gauss curve of probabilities show to be almost absolute beyond the x+1/3^{rd} 13.3 billion years range.

Again physicists don’t see both, the dual space and time views of the Universe but only the temporal big-bang, which considers a cosmos in time failing to analyze it in space as a simultaneous system connected by non-local gravitation. So they think darkness is not caused by the spatial death of light, which they merely use as a clock of cosmic time, thinking therefore that beyond those ages we enter into a temporal darkness – and the Universe didn’t exist.

*Recap*. Quantum errors derive from the confusion of time clocks with spatial trajectories and the ignorance of the dualities of spatial Entropy and temporal information; and its rejection of organic theories of reality.

**Informative inflation: The error of multiple dimensions.**

After rejecting so many trendy theories of modern physics, I am afraid many practitioners of the ‘baroque’ age of information of quantum theories will ignore this text, so we must do further clarifications on the why of that multiplication of impossible theories.

The inflation of baroque theories of physics, which take the classic age of Metric spaces and its proper theories (Relativity and quantum physics) beyond its scope and reach, has caused many false theories without empirical proof, which try to correct and extend the metric paradigm beyond its power of resolution, without taking into account the needed corrections and widening view provided by the new tools of topology, fractal points and Non-Euclidean postulate. The main reasons of that inflation of false or unproved theories are:

– The fact that information is inflationary. This is self-evident. A language of the humankind maps out reality with far less Entropy. So it is rather easy to construct many linguistic images of a single reality, as we can find many mirror images of an object. And all of them will carry a minimal truth. But the theory that matters to us is the one that has the perfect focus with a given language. Again, if we focus an image with a camera, there would be many images similar to the object but only a point of perfect focus. So all those alternative theories with many dimensions are just half-truths, bad focused, linguistic and mathematical images of a single reality. We are however here concerned with the dimensional theory that has the perfect focus, both in logic and mathematical thought.

– A 2^{nd} problem is the Pythagorean belief that mathematics is the only language of science and any mathematical theory must be truth. This absolute belief in a language fails to recognize the limits of linguistic knowledge. And it is proper of a young language, which evolves from an age of simple, dogmatic truths to a more sophisticated baroque age. Mathematics has been applied as the ‘language of God’ to the Universe only for 4 centuries. So scientists are believers in their language with a dogmatic degree that verbal writers only practiced in earlier, religious ages, when the written word was also considered the language of God. Pharaohs would just say, ‘it is written’. And that meant it was truth. Then philosophers of language found out the relativism of all linguistic statements. And finally an inflationary age of verbal information – the age of fiction thought – has settled down after millennia of using words.

This inflationary age happened in mathematics only a century ago and the relativism of those theories was exposed by the work of Gödel. Yet the believers still rule in science and so it is a fact that Gödel has been cornered and considered a heretic both in physics and mathematics for denying that ‘God speaks mathematics’ (Galileo). It is however about time for science to accept the linguistic limits of mathematics as verbal writers accepted the meaning of fiction in verbal thought precisely when Cervantes wrote the first fiction novel of the modern age, Don Quixote. Instead, scientists must accept that after Gödel we need experimental proof to show a mathematical theory certain.

– A third source of errors is the mechanist dogma that denies organic interpretations of physics, which are self-evident as quantum probabilities in time are easily transformed into spatial population of fractal knots of electromagnetism in space (real, mass side of the phase equation.)

The denial of Hylomorphism (the opposite philosophy of the platonic pythagorism of physicists who believe mathematics are truth per se, declared by Aristotle – all informative languages must have a physical, experimental truth to be real) and the denial of organicism (complex, vital arrows in physical systems – reproductive repetitions and eusocial evolution) are so pervading in quantum physics that is truly surprising… because all the fundamental isomorphisms of quantum physics are organic in nature.

The Complementarity law requires particles of information and fields of Entropy and one cannot exist without the other. Quantum theories are called gauge theories because all require that particles gauge, measure, hence process information as perceptive beings do, in order to interact with each other. The 2 fundamental particles, electrons and quarks constantly reproduce jets of new particles, hence they absorb Entropy. And finally all particles evolve socially into more complex systems, as cells do in organisms. So those are the same 4 arrows of time of all fractal systems of the Universe, which in mathematical, quantum equations are expressed through the different quantum numbers; as those informative/energetic processes take place in orbital paths and through the emission and absorption of electromagnetic Entropy and form.

Fact is we do not see 10-dimensional hyper-strings around us, because dimensions are diffeomorphic, fractal and attached to a temporal function/arrow. And they are topological and so in a 4 dimensional Universe there are only 3 topologies, 2 bidimensional substances, Entropy and form (Holographic Principle) that combine to create finite vital spaces with a time duration – the entities of reality. And that structure is enough to explain all systems.

Only then departing from such fractal 4-dimensional beings, we can build another plane of more extended dimensions in which each beings is a point of a bigger network of spacetime.

Further on, the 3 dimensions of time change, past-present and future parallel to the 3-topologies of space, energetic planar membranes, cyclical present, reproductive volumes and hyperbolic informative centers create harmonies of forms and functions, which have to be study with the rules of causality and logic, considering always the Galilean paradox: motions in time are equivalent to dimensional forms in space.

In its simplest creative processes, those logic chains and dualities mean that dimensions grow in time as points displace creating lines, lines displace creating planes, planes displace creating cubes, and cubes displace creating momentum, mv, where v becomes the 4^{th} dimension, as the cube moves tracing the first trajectory of a bigger plane of existence.

And the same process describes a point that becomes a cycle that rotates into a bigger sphere that moves along a new cyclical trajectory, creating a 4^{th} new dimension of a bigger plane.

So a 4-dimensional cube is not the fancy cube of hyper-dimensional geometry but a 2 dimensional plane of space or cycle of information that grows in height as a flat sheet of Entropy reproduces its form, or rotates cyclically and then, moved along a temporal path, with v or w lineal or cyclical speed.

We then obtain a translating cube. Since reality follows the dimensions of normal time and space, not the hyper cubes of idealized mathematics.

What truly happens is that a wave or form that displaces along a given path reproduces its form, its information, creating, reproducing a new dimension, which first is measured as speed and then leaves a solid trace behind. So when we emit a ray of light, light imprints and forms gravitational space creating a form with a new dimension of length. Only recently, physicists used this common sense definition of dimensionality in String Theory: where a string moves along a perpendicular path creating a plane and then again creating a cube of pure space.

In that regard, physicists’ role is not to invent mathematical fantasies but to *limit mathematical models to the physical reality in which the inflationary information of mathematics is restricted by the resistance of Entropy to acquire complex forms.*

*So only certain efficient geometries and topologies exist, and the enormous numbers of imaginary, unstable particles do not matter, as the inflationary universe keeps creating forms but few survive.*

Thus good physics describe only what reality shows: the constant, discontinuous, growth and extinction of dimensional beings, which can be seen as fixed forms or in movement (so a wheel spinning or a planetoid circling Saturn might seem a fixed dimensional form, when observed without detail). Yet once the 3 dimensions of space are filled up, the object will create moving, translation dimensions as its trajectories shape new cycles, or it will create real dimensions of form, if it reproduces in ‘biological radiations’, growing from micro-forms into macro-forms.

In both cases we would see how the object ads a new dimension that enlarges its world. For example, imagine a 3-dimensional living sphere, a cell. As it reproduces, it fills now a macro-dimension and after multiple processes of dimensional reproduction, it will create a macro-organism that has 6 dimensions, the 3 of microcosmic, cellular space, and the 3 of macrocosmic organic space.

Then again, if that individual organism, the first of its species, multiples, and organizes itself into a society, an ant-hill or a human society, it will expand in macro-macro space, again filling up 3 bigger macro-macro dimensions of space, till reaching 9 dimensions, whose growth can be measured as a t-duration with lineal time, giving us 9 (classic space) + 1 (lineal time) dimensions in ‘classic physics’. In this manner because space-times are fractal, moving geometries and dimensions are finite processes of reproductive growth, when we talk of multiple dimensions we don’t have to invent spatial geometries, and follow Minkowski’s definition of time as a spatial dimension, but just describe reality, as it is, and consider each movement or reproduction of form with a certain frequency, a dimension of time. In those terms, many ‘mysterious’ objects of the physical universe described mathematically with multiple dimensions, conceptually ill-defined, become now real, complex space-time fields, extended across fractal spaces from micro-worlds to macro-worlds, as your 9+1 dimensional organism extended in 3 scales, from cells to individuals to society, is.

Such 9+1 dimensional strings (expressed in lineal time and classic Euclidean space) are thus an error due to the ignorance of the Galilean Paradox: dimensions are initially moving and reproductive cycles of times perceived as fixed forms and distances. Yet those dimensions are dynamic, since they grow and occupy a volume creating new macro spaces – the fractal scales of reality – from microcosmic photons to macrocosmic galaxies.

For example, a moving photon-point reproduces a bidimensional line/wave, which wobbles upwards and creates finally a 4 dimensional macro-space of light with length-speed, electric height, magnetic width, and frequency-rhythm. In the same way a cycle of time can rotate upwards and sideward becoming a 4-dimensional mass or charge also with length, height, width and rhythm. A 5 dimensional object would then be a mass creating a new, lineal trajectory, giving birth to 5-dimensional, lineal momentum (a mass moving in a line); or a 5 dimensional rotating mass with angular momentum. Thus, reproductive movements and rotations create dimensions, which give origin to a growing fractal reality of repetitive, scalar forms – the vital reality we see. Unfortunately, in XX C. Physics, since Minkowski’s invention of a spatial, 4^{th} dimension of time, most of the dimensional work done in physics is just about fancy mathematical objects, which have little to do with the real n-dimensional, space-time.

All languages are inflationary. So in the same way ‘hair is blue’ and ‘hair is green’ are 2 beautiful sentences, however false, physicists can create all kind of fanciful geometries, however false. Fact is reality doesn’t have 10, not even 4 continuous fixed, space dimensions, but it is constructed with fractal, scalar dimensions that grow from micro to macro worlds.

So we should apply 2 fundamental isomorphisms of scientific truth, the Occam principle (truth is the simplest explanation of reality) and the experimental method (truth is a description of real phenomena) to the problem of multiple dimensions. Reality is not born out of the complex geometry of 9 dimensional continuous spaces. Its complexity grows with the creation of dimensions that start as the temporal, reproductive movement of a form that becomes a fixed structure of space, and again reproduces its movement in time or inversely extinguish its dimensional form. Yet since those dimensions are limited, fractal dimensions they end when the wave ends its reproduction or the particle ends its movement – so they can be increased ad infinitum as the form grows into new macroforms.

-Such fractal, scalar nature also implies that we should always consider the interaction of both membranes, gravitational and electromagnetic membranes, instead of trying to simplify them. In that sense, physicists try to unify the micro-world of electro-magnetism and the macro-world of gravitation, without realizing they are 2 different scales of the Universe: to unify them is like trying to unify the existence of human beings and their macro-scale of societies; or the properties of cells and the ecology of its macro-organisms with the same equations/isomorphisms of behavior. What is relevant is to explain the relationships and self-similar isomorphisms of invariance that happen between those scales.

All in all what this means is that the holy grail of present physics, the scalar boson with a new field never found on Nature, the Higgs, and the super symmetric inflation of background dependent, 10 plus dimensional strings don’t exist. And an enormous number of virtual, unstable particles don’t live long enough to be relevant except as failed games of the inflationary game of reproduction of fractal information. So once we have limited the theme of our inquire to what is real – stable particles described by classic quantum numbers – in the realm of evolved light-space forms, and quantum gravitation (strong force and its boson strings, gluon and quarks), which is what quantum theory studies we can go on illuminating its whys with the tools of multiple spaces and times.

*Recap*. Information is inflationary, so it is the mathematical language, whose enormous number of possible theories about reality must be contrasted with the experimental method and the logic principles in which existence is based. But physicists are ‘Pythagorean’, so they cannot accept truths, which are not written with mathematical equations. This means till modern times despite Gödel’s work about the errors of mathematical equations; they have ignored the isomorphisms of information and morphological change. Unfortunately many of such simple solutions will require time to be adopted, as there is in a Universe of inflationary information, many ill-devised theories based in the faulty, previous paradigm of metric spaces, whose practitioners will have a hard time to abandon.

**Whole and parts: quantum waves.**

There is finally the problem of jargons, which is especially difficult when dealing with quantum physics, which is the less understood in conceptual terms of all the scales. As IT IS THE CLEAREST CASE OF ANTHROPOMOPRHIC, OBSERVER’S HUMAN POINT OF VIEW, analysis since Ptolemy, due to the self-centered ego-centered Germanic idealist culture that discovered it. Some examples of this needed translation following Einstein’s wishes:

- Uncertainty principle: h is the minimal space-time being of the perceived light space-time Universe, it is NOT an abstraction, but an angular momentum, a cycle of time, enclosing a vital space with energy, hence a unit of energy and Time, and Se x Tƒ, ‘FINITESIMAL’. So of course, there is always a remnant H, and H is the cellular unit of future creation of more complex social particles. Thus we shall call it Planckton, by analogy with the minimal unit of the trophic pyramid of sea life. Now, Heisenberg merely tell us that because the observer will always find this remnant to observe, and on top it will destroy it as it measures-absorbs its energy and information, it will be delocalized on position, or energy-momentum. He does explain it from the perspective of the observer, which is like a whale telling us that the ‘tasting’ of Planckton has the uncertainty of tearing it before tasting it.

- Wave-particle duality, which are just the balanced ST and Tƒ states, which are preferred to move (ST state) in a steady speed or to gauge information, with its inward accelerated motion. Wave state is further preferred as any ‘group’ knows, when motion or defensive state. So an army, a school of fish or flock will always be in wave state when moving and particle tight formation when attacked by a predator or enemy army. This duality of all scales also explains why in small slits, the wave moves through several slits and appears at the other side’s screen as a wave.

- Fractal nebulae, they are not probabilities in time, but as Schrodinger explained, density of populations in space, as we do see a simultaneous picture of them all in a single still, so it is the perception of the electronic wave at its ST level, under the symmetry of time or space perception, events as probabilities or fractal populations, both studied with the same statistical ‘bell-curves’ and Gaussian tools.

- Spooky entanglement, which deals with the fact that most motions and information transfers required the translation in a lower faster Se x Tƒ = k scale of the 5th dimension. So as chemical cells often transfer information through faster electric neurons of a different 5D plane of existence; or as we do talk through faster invisible phones despite being verbal beings, information between particles transfer through the non-local, lower gravitational scale of ‘dark energy’, making possible entanglement, and simultaneous, immediate perception of information, which we do not see as it is transferred in a relative infinite speed, v=S/Tƒ= Se/0 gravitational perceived information = ∞ speed.

Now, we deal with the full translation of all spooky quantum effects to the isomorphic laws of T.œ in other parts of the blog. Some are that simple to translate in organic terms, some are caused by the asymmetry of 5D arrows, which causes more information in lower scale – hence the sum over histories and use of functional operators, to meet so much information, and the impossibility in this introductory post to get into detailed mathematical physics on quantum theory (only the simpler equations of upper scales of less information, mechanics and partially thermodynamics, will be translated).

The number of facts we shall explain with those isomorphic functionals is as in all other systems studied in this blog enormous – namely when/if the 4th line of the blog is finished, ‘all’ the facts of physical states/systems will be derived from them.

Thus all analysis of a single plane must be though combined with the 5th dimension duality of infinitesimals and wholes, so we can then define as the particle, the fractal, condensed, organic function of the wave, Tƒ, position, mostly around a fixed quark-gravitational points; then the herd, loose state, reached most often when in motion as an electronic herd and then the wave-field of light. So an electron is a condensed state of a wave of dense h-Planck light space-time fields, and this explains their behavior in quantum fields similar to that of any herd that moves loosely in any scale and becomes a knot in a static, solid crystallized form or when in defensive mood. So the army becomes a ball and the school of fishes and the electronic wave when defied by an enemy, predator or high energy human observer’s ray-bomb:

Fields, waves and particles are the ternary symmetry of physical spaces in its Se-field, Tƒ-particle and ST-wave states. As such they are the main protagonists of mathematical physics. And its evolution into each other by increasing the frequency, that is the speed of the Tƒ, time vortex is shown in the graph above.

It thus rests to study the isomorphism of physical actions to fully grasp the meaning of physics, and then study in more detail those isomorphic, frozen species, the atoms, the galaxy and in between matter states.

*An electron is a herd of photons that gathers into a particle or expands as a wave, depending on which strategy maximizes its survival and movement, as a school of fishes does in front of a predator. The herd even splits its ST fields (P _{1}, P_{2}) when it finds an obstacle and later merges back those space and time fields into a compact form. Yet Physics ignores the bio-logic strategy of the electron and uses a probabilistic explanation of the wave/particle principle to keep its mechanist ideas on matter.*

*It also ignores that the 2 components of an ‘Abelian’ Phase space, which defines the mass-field of the electron, are an energetic and informative component (the imaginary number) since its concepts of space-time are still monist, continuous, ‘infinite’.*

The units of both membranes, the gravitational and electromagnetic membrane are time actions, ST, product of the minimal spatial Entropy and cyclical time of both membranes. Here due to our limited space we shall not study the gravitational membrane, whose minimal quanta of lambda length and Planck time creates a lineal and cyclical string, or action of gravitational time; which becomes a gluon/neutrino wave in the next scale and then a quark wave.

We shall consider only some aspects of the self-similar wave of light bosons (h-plankton or ‘photons’) that condensate in cyclical phase space forming a De Broglie mass-wave, or electron whose pattern is defined by the real, lineal energetic component and imaginary, informative, height-dimension of its algebraic equations.

What is the ‘it’ that Schrodinger & Dirac equations describe? The duality between a whole and its fractal parts explains the nature of Physical Actions, microscopic quanta of Entropy and time that any physical vortex emits or absorbs to communicate with its environment, complete its existential cycles and stabilize its accelerations: Actions are projections of the form of a given being in the external Universe, achieved thanks to the use of Entropy that ‘translates’ in space its in-form-ation:

*Present Macro-Organisms (∆) -> Micro-Actions (∆ _{-1})*:

*Max.E x Max.Tƒ (Organism)-> **Σ** Min. e x ∏ Min.Tiƒ (Action)*

*Σ**ST=K*

Both, in organisms and actions the arrows of Entropy and information merge in constant ‘presents’ – systems that exist longer *precisely because *their Entropy and information* are* in balance. A present organism is a cellular system with 2 poles – one dominant in Entropy or relative body/field, and one dominant in information, or relative head/particle, which constantly relate to each other by exchanging small bites and bits of Entropy and information, called actions*, Min. **Σ**S x Tƒ=K*.

A physical action, defined by the specific equation of a Universal action applied to the scale of electromagnetism, writes also ExT=K(h). Where Entropy and Time are inverse functions, whose product is always a balanced constant. Thus as inverse functions the growth of one of those 2 elements E or T means the diminution of the other. From where Physicists deduce a series of fundamental isomorphisms of physics, studied in detail in the non-abridged version of this book (Heisenberg Principle, Law of Force ranges, etc.)

The same law applies to any Universal action. For example, humans who process biological information sleep in absolute zero movement-space. They maximize information by minimizing Entropy. So happens with thinkers, which are quiet people when reflecting upon information, or informative chips which occupy little space and work better in coldness.

The exchanges of actions between beings resolve the paradox Leibniz encountered in his analysis of Space-time monads: how the different space-time beings communicate each other, creating the networks and complex systems we observe in the Universe? The answer is through microscopic actions.

Actions are microscopic ‘cells’ of the bigger organism – in terms of cyclical time, they are minimal frequencies, compared to the complex, bigger organism made of knows of multiple events), the duality of macro-knots of frequencies and individual actions define a fractal Universe organized in scales or ‘planes’ of space-time of different size and temporal duration. Any organism, in that sense, extends in 3 ±i relative planes of size and duration.

The natural St plane, for example, in the human case, our individual scale of existence; the microscopic, cellular plane, in which the Entropy and information of any entity’s action develops. In the human case, it is the cellular scale, which provides the Entropy and information for our actions. And finally, the social macroscopic, +st plane, in which the individual is often a microscopic action, part of a whole mass that performs a social cycle. So humans gather in masses that perform social actions that change their macroscopic scale, nation or civilization – while particles gather in waves and life beings in herds.

Thus, all organisms combine their S x T actions in knots we call cells, which gather together in constant species, creating an ∞ variety of relative Space-time beings, perceived simultaneously together as a present, continuous Universe.

Any entity in the Universe extends across 3 relative scales, the minimal scale of ‘actions’ of Entropy and time, the scale of cellular knots in which multiple cyclical actions gather together, and the scale of organisms and ecosystems made of multiple cells.

In those 3 cases reality is dynamic, as all those scales are made of moving cycles and fields of Entropy and time, despite the fact that we might see them as static forms.

The platonic, mathematic paradoxes of Quantum Theory can be explained in organic terms. Since, as Einstein said God doesn’t play dices and the Universe is not a mathematical probability but a dual, biological and geometrical game of herds and wholes.

The experimental proofs of quantum physics back organicism, in the image, the wave/particle behavior self-similar to that of organic herds, and a picture of an electron, which has the form of a nebula of fractal micro-points, self-similar to the whole.

We understand quantum waves and particles in terms of the structural duality of a Universe made of organic wholes or ‘particles’ that can be observed in its st_{-1}, lower plane of existence as a wave of cellular, fractal, quantum parts.

In the graph, the wave-particle duality shows that physical particles behave in an organic form: an electron wave explodes into its multiple quanta (which seem to be ‘cellular’ condensates of st_{-1} photons) as it reaches a thin barrier in order to cross it. Light also divides itself into a herd of photonic quanta when it passes a slit.

In fact, fractal particles split their spatial and temporal fields, SxT when passing those apertures. Then sometimes they successfully mix both fields back together recreating the electron and sometimes fail to do that. Hence there are 2 possible solutions to the previous event, which fractal physics express as a quadratic probability when the electron reconstructs itself (sxt) or a null probability (s¹t) when it doesn’t; and we explain as a biological process. Further on, since life is caused by the social organization of cells into a higher plane of existence, those wave/particle fluctuations can be explained as particles that ‘die’ and ‘resurrect’ constantly.

The biological nature of those events is even clearer in the inverse process: when a spatial force, for example, light, comes closer to an informative, complex particle like an electron it evolves into a cellular, compact form – a dot of the photonic nebulae of the electron that integrates itself as a ‘probabilistic point=cell’ of the electron. On the other hand, when a researcher hits with a high Entropy beam an electronic wave, it collapses into a particle, as a school of fish clumps together in front of a bigger predator.

*Recap*. Physicists say that the wave solutions of the space-time field collapse, affected by the observer. It is the abstract, statistical way of saying that a wave of light is a herd of h-quanta, which evolves, imploding its form when it is absorbed by an electron of higher form. Yet the why of that how is biological, not ‘mathematical’, since as Einstein put it in his critique of a probabilistic interpretation of quantum waves, ‘God doesn’t play dices’.

**Populations vs. Probabilities: Fractal, Quantum Particles.**

We have now a general, simplified overview of the arrows of time and the topologies of space, which can be applied to resolve some of the basic riddles of quantum physics.

The first fact we must define, once the arrows of time are understood in its dualities, morphologically in space and dynamically as a series of events in time, is the duality of any physical system, composed of a relative energetic, past event/force and a relative informative, future event/particle. If we see reality fixed in space it will appear as a force/particle system; if we see it moving in time, it will appear as a relative energetic past wave that evolves and devolves constantly into a relative future particle of information. Our choice of reality as fixed or moving, in space or time is merely a question of the mind and how it perceives, according to the Paradox of Galileo, which stated that the Earth moves and doesn’t move, depending on our choice of perception. This is the solution to the quantum paradox of uncertainty.

Further on, in physical systems there is not at first sight an apparent dominant arrow of future, since we are making spatial pictures of them. That is why quantum physicists often confuse temporal events with spatial forces (such as the weak event or the mass-clocks that Higgs describes with spatial forces and particles).

They also don’t realize of the anti-symmetry of time and believe that moving forward in time (life arrow) is the same that moving backward (the death arrow). For the same reason Physicists confuse anti-particle events with particles in space – when they are 2 arrows of time of the same entity. All this happens because a cycle of space-time in electrons and particles is just too short and so physicists often make pictures of the entire event/life & death of the particle. So the particle life and antiparticle death is confused with a spatial cycle when in fact it establishes also an order of time, between life as a particle and death as an antiparticle.

The same life-death cycle happens when a particle dies and explodes back in a wave similar to star big-bang.

Tƒ make it all more confusing, physicists ignore the duality of the ages of time that become organs in space of a fractal organism. So sometimes a wave is the death of a particle but sometimes it is the spatial, organic energetic field, over which the particle/head exists as a complementary organism.

Only when all those dualities are understood, we can re-classify and re-order in a systematic manner all the forces, events, particles and systems of quantum physics in a complex, clear pattern.

In organic terms, the wave of a quantum system is the reproductive body of the system and the particle its informative state and both co-exist together (Complementarity system) as a dual system, whose energetic limbs are the fields of forces that displace the system.

Like life systems, particles have an order called the life/death cycle, first dominated by the arrow of information through the 3 life ages and then exploded into death by the arrow of Entropy. Thus physical systems do have temporal causality and anti-symmetry: they exist first slow as informative particles and then die fast in big-bangs as anti-particles or as disordered waves. Because the relationship between the informative-time speed of a system is related to its spatial size (ExTi=k), by the chip/mouse/hole paradox (smaller chips calculate faster), we can consider that the particle/wave duality or the particle/antiparticle duality are; when observed not as fixed space or dual organisms, but as casual events in time, the life cycles of physical matter, which are extremely short, as they are extremely small. In other cases though, they are part of a complex topological organism, acting as body, Entropy and form of a ternary Non-Euclidean structure:

_{Relative Entropy=past (Entropy field)}*<Body/Wave: present> ^{Future=information=particle}*

In the previous equation, we added a bidimensional representation to the standard feedback wave: The information or future particle is as the relative past Entropy field, far less observable that the present body wave that mixes both, Entropy and information to create the combined field, reason why the phase space of a mass wave is not easily perceivable. The key to differentiate both types of entities, past and future, Entropy and form, motion and stop, E<=>I, as separate entities are the inverse properties of time that the present merges in a holographic form.

Thus, we distinguish for each ternary creation and form, the whole system and then its energetic parts more visible in space and its informative events more durable in time.

The symmetry between time and information on one side and its inverse symmetry between Entropy and space on the other, for the experiences theorist who fully grasp the isomorphisms of multiple times and spaces is the most revealing tool to classify reality and understand its events and isomorphisms as specific sub-equations of the generator of space and time.

Most dual particles are not spatial but transformational particle/antiparticle events of short duration and most bosons are wave /particle generational events, as they constantly switch between its big bang wave event and particle state. And so we write the anti-symmetry of time in those physical systems as a duality, a temporal, past to future life/death, informative particle/big bang cycle:

_{Big Bang arrows (energetic, expansive state)}<*Dual system*> ^{Big crunch (informative state)}

All those different spatial, ternary systems and dual events happen in all the scales of the Universe, the quantum scale, the solar scale, the galactic scale and perhaps a higher scale of relative Universes made of cellular galaxies, in increasing time lengths. So we write for the Universe at large:

_{Past Expansive dark Entropy}<Steady state:present cosmos>^{Future Implosive Galaxy}

Thus in that cosmological scale the galaxy follows a generational cycle from the big-bang to the big-crunch, through a steady state of minimal creation of mass, in which we live.

If we were to observe in absolute detail two photons in 2 cycles, probably we would observe slight differences in its configuration; as we do when we see two Chinese, father and son, which at first look are both called Cheng and both look the same.

The dual cycle that matters most to us is obviously the one of creation and destruction of mass: the arrow of time bends space into mass (M=e/c^{2}), and the arrow of entropy explodes form into Entropy (E=Mc^{2}). Einstein said that the separation between past and future is an illusion. Those 2 equations of Einstein show the equal importance of both arrows of time, Entropy and mass/information. However when we transcend into beings with higher information, the dominance of information creates the order of future that we, biological beings, experience, and philosophers have always called the 3 ages of life.

The mysteries of quantum physics can also be explained from an organic perspective. In the graph, we observe 2 of those solutions:

– Particles choose to behave as a herd of fractal parts or as an organic whole, when they cross through doors and slits. Particles interact with the electronic beams of particles we use to detect them, modifying its position and speed (Uncertainty principle). In the graph, we can see that behavior: An electron is a herd of photons that gathers into a particle or expands as a wave, depending on which strategy maximizes its survival and movement, as a school of fishes does in front of a predator. The herd even splits its ST fields (P_{1}, P_{2}) when it finds an obstacle and later merges back those space and time geometries into a compact form. Quantum Physics ignores the bio-logic strategy of the electron and uses a probabilistic explanation of the wave/particle principle to maintain its mechanist, abstract ideas about matter. The misunderstanding of the dualities of time/information and Entropy/space make thoroughly confusing its explanation of time and space parameters in those processes. In the right picture, we can notice the self-similarity of the atom with a spiral galaxy. Both have a center black hole zone where the quark proton and quark hole are. But self-similarity is not identity, so even if quantum cosmologists try to use quantum isomorphisms to study the Universe, it is more meaningful to study directly the cosmos with satellites and telescopes, than replicating mini-big bangs of quarks on Earth.

In fractal space-time electrons become nebulae of self-similar fractal parts which can be described with fractal equations of the type biologists use to define cells as fractal parts with self-similar functions to those of the whole electronic organism. So only a fractal organic description of the quantum world, resolves its paradoxes and contradictions.

The alternative to all those proofs of the organic structure of the Universe is a Pythagorean fantasy called the Copenhagen interpretation. It considers the Universe uncertain as the herd of quanta is not a population described as any other group with percentages of the whole (which in statistics has a probability 1), but according to Bohr et al, those probabilities are real and the Universe is made of numbers. Indeed, quantum physics has finally achieved the religious goal of the founding fathers, Kepler and Galileo, God not only speaks mathematics but the Universe is mathematical.

This is nonsense, of course. Yet anytime a physicist in the past century has tried to put forward the organic, logic paradigm, his work has been ridiculed, while entire institutions of learning are dedicated to explore Everett’s thesis that each point of an electron nebulae is in a different, parallel Universe! All of them though shown in the same picture, hence cameras are machines that travel through infinite Universes! at the same time! This Bohr/Everett alternative is thus an absurd, abstract, illogic interpretation, which defies the 3 legs of the scientific method; logic consistency, mathematical accuracy (as the results are often uncertainties, singularities and infinities, cleaned up ad hoc) and experimental evidence obtained with the first pictures of electronic nebulae, 40 years ago:

The electron appeared as a fractal of smaller, self-similar electronic cells, dense, smaller electronic parts that adopt either a herd/wave configuration or a tight, organic, particle-like one. Or else, we would have observed in this Universe only a single electron point. Further on, the behavior of an electronic herd, when bombarded by massive particles, as those humans use to observe them is self-similar to that of any crowd, from fishes that come together when they are attacked by sharks, to soldiers in a battle field. 40 years have passed and yet the mathematical models of electrons as fractals are ignored by abstract, mechanist scientists.

The platonic, mathematic paradoxes of Quantum Theory can be explained in organic terms. The quantum world is not a mathematical probability but a ternary, geometric game of reproductive fractal herds=bodies and particles=knots of information, displacing over lines=fields of forces.

The equation of Entropy and information, Spe × Tiƒ = h(k) that defines quantum physics is not an uncertainty but a fluctuation. It is the equation of existence of ‘Planckton’, the minimal action of Entropy and time of the light Universe, which sometimes evolves into informative particles or relaxes further into space-waves. Thus the equation has two limits of death as Entropy and evolution as form. The particles that appear from the vacuum are those evolutions of form of the h-quanta, the substance of which our light space-time is made. The uncertainty of measure is only in our instruments which cannot measure at the same time the wave/body and photon/head states of the quanta. As you cannot make a dual picture of yourself as a whole body or a cellular network: you need to focus the picture in macro or microscopic scales.

*Recap*. We understand quantum waves and particles also in terms of the structural scales of a Universe made of organic wholes or particles that can be observed in its st_{-1}, lower plane of existence as a wave of cellular, fractal, quantum parts. In this book we hardly touch the ternary scales of all systems that also structure particles as wholes of smaller particles and parts of bigger structures. So atoms are parts of molecules and wholes of particles. And the self-similar isomorphisms of hierarchical planes determine many of the events and relationships between particles, atoms and molecules.

**Time motions. Physical Death. Big-bangs and antiparticles.**

__ __*In the graph, when we observe an electron we see it jumping backwards and forwards in time in an erratic trajectory, as it becomes its particle and antiparticle.*

Traveling in time towards the past means in the restricted, spatial, geometrical definition of time in physics, an inverse, cyclical movement as the one created when moving backwards the needle of a clock. Since physicists ‘extract’ their concept of time from a spatial definition of movement: v=s/t. Thus physical time is only the analysis of change in the motion and geometry of space; and traveling backwards in time in both, the previous Galilean equation of relativity or Einstein’s equation is merely a geometrical change of direction or a contraction in the ‘dual’ perception of space as distance or c-speed.

In physical space there are also dual dissolutions in space, which are processes of death, the best known a big-bang process that annihilates particles and antiparticles into a release of pure Entropy and annihilates a black hole into a Supernova or quasar of pure Entropy: A dual process of palingenesis happens in those death processes when the big-bang gives birth to an accelerated birth. So black holes trigger the palingenesis and fast evolution of stars and a cosmic big-bang, the big-banging of particles.

The antiparticle is the 3^{rd} age (inverse in Entropy/information parameters to the first age) and final death of the particle, reason why it lasts so little and its parameters of time are towards the past. This explains further 2 unexplained facts of astrophysics: why there are less perceived antiparticles. Simple: because the total perception we have of particles is its ‘existential force’=Entropy x Time and they last in time much more than the antiparticles, which die fast. In the same manner all men die but they die so fast that we see much more living humans than corpses around us.

A second interesting consequence of the antiparticle travelling to the past as the dying state of the particle is the fact that while physicists observe them as being born together in the same point and fusioning again in the point of death, the real path is, since the antiparticle travels to the past, that of a single particle when we observe them with the arrow of future information (Feynman diagram of the graph of palingenesis). The particle is born, explodes where it meets the antiparticle in the conventional drawing. Then it dies explodes into Entropy and leaves a remnant ghost, the antiparticle that moves backwards in time and fades away in the point of birth of the particle. *But there is only a particle at each moment in the time loop, reason why *for example, we have never observed black hole evaporation, which is based in the existence of two particles. This phenomenon happens in all scales. In the next scale of electrons, the same

In the previous graph we observe one of such processes. The graph shows the sum of the life (blue) arrow and death (red/antiparticle travelling to the past) arrow of an electron, which appears and disappears constantly in its path forwards. Thus, the motion of virtual photons and electrons seems to correspond to a series of life-death cycles shown as particle=life arrows/antiparticle=death arrows or wave (st-1 plane)/particle (st-plane) fluctuations, which include a ‘quantic jump of spacetime’ in which the particle disappears becomes its antiparticle moves to the past and re-appears in a relative present location, displaced both in time and space coordinates, proving the constant cycles of creation and destruction and the fluctuation between hierarchical past and future states of all palingenetic systems of the Universe.

Yet the same process happens in our biological death. Those who have survived death feel an explosion of light in the brain/informative human particle. Then memory rewinds backwards its path till youth, when you will awake in the lower plane of existence as a mere cell. This is equivalent to the death of the antiparticle that ‘reverses’ its coordinates till it meets its final death in the point of birth (hence it seems two particles are born in that point but one is the death particle returning to its past). At that point it dissolves in the lower vacuum plane.

The best known case of travel in time in physics is the virtual particle/antiparticle systems that constantly pop out in the Universe. Antiparticles seem to travel to the past while particles travel to the future and both annihilate themselves. What we observe here is 2 particles with different geometrical directions that together complete a ‘cycle of physical existence’. We could say that the particle is the 1^{st} age of the entity, from past to future and the antiparticle its devolving age from future to past or 3^{rd} age of the entity and together form a closed loop of space-time, an existence. Or in some cases, the particle is the life arrow and the antiparticle the death arrow. So we have to see them consequentially, one after another in time, even if when we measure them in present-simultaneity, as they are so fast we see the entire life of the particle in an instant of space. So they seem to us mere geometrical shapes.

The entire cycle of Time change is often perceived together, when studying flows from past to future in those fast, simultaneous phenomena that become then fixed loops of space. In any case a death/back in time travel never goes beyond the limits of the entity that experiences it. Those geometrical time travels do not influence the entire, absolute time of the Universe, as Hawking naively thinks, when he talks about black holes as time machines because their ‘t’ parameters are inverse. Or when he thinks that black holes evaporate because antiparticles make them ‘travel to the past’. Antiparticles are only the final stage of the life of a particle, which quantizes its existence in 2 broken phases that don’t affect the absolute time of the Universe. It is that absolute Time the one Einstein studies with its Equations.

*Recap*. Processes of death mean a short travel to the past in which information rewinds. Yet while we travel to the past we do not co-exist in both states as some physicists unaware of the process think it happens with dual particle/antiparticle systems.

**ATOMIC SYSTEMS. THE ATOMIC ORGANISM AND THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.**

**The atom the organism of the lower scales of physics. The ternary, i-logic topological structure of atoms.**

*An atom is a space-time field divided in 3 species, informative masses or quarks, energetic gravitational and electromagnetic networks and an intermediate space-time, the electronic nebulae, which bends light into ‘fractal’, ultra-dense ∆-1 photons of light**, which put together create the electronic nebulae.**. As such it can be studied with the same 5D space-time structural ‘generator’ of any other scale of the 5th dimension.*

In the graph, an atom is a space-time field divided in 3 space-time zones: its informative quark center, the nucleus; the external reproductive membrane, made of electrons, which evolve socially in bigger Spe x Tiƒ membranes when atoms become molecules; while informative, gravitational and energetic, light networks shape their intermediate space-time.

The topology of the atom is thus clear. The electron acts as an external ‘spherical plane’, a membrane of Entropy. In the center quarks are the informative vortices. In between Entropy and form is transferred with forces, which often decouple, reproducing new particles and antiparticles. There are 3 informative families of quarks-mass, due to the evolution of information in 3 ages or horizons of increasing form: each quark family is thus an age in the evolution of informative matter.

Astrœ-physics, by the unification of charges and masses, into a single group, that of time vortices, with a symmetry of scale, based in Log10 functions, is both a cosmological and atomic science.

In the strict sense, unlike astrophysics, which studies only the external motions of physical systems in space, and dedicates to the study of the other 5 motions, generation, growth, evolution, diminution and extinction, ‘partial theories’ (big bang theories of explosive deaths and births, H-R diagram of evolution of stars, etc.), atomic systems have been studied in more detail due to the closeness of observations. So molecular atomic systems, are perfectly described with an architectonical precision as they build up our scales of existence. Trouble in definition start within the atomic scale when our observing instruments, which CANNOT be smaller than the electronic mind that observes, try to analyze the minimal quanta of information of our universe, h-quanta, and of our space, c², light space times.

__ __Let us then now that we have revis(it)ed classic single time-space theories of reality, depart from the classic age of the 3^{rd} paradigm of metric spaces (quantum relativistic models of reality), without further ado.

Since what was done beyond Einstein Dirac and Nambu, the last of the classics, is mostly baroque, inflationary, metalinguistic theories proper of all paradigms of thought that failed to include mass, as the information of the Universe that balances the energetic entropy of spatial forces (single big-bang theory that fails to include dark matter/Entropy, Thermodynamic of black holes that misunderstands the nature of the event horizon belonging to our light-universe, super symmetry and superstrings that fails to understand the isomorphisms of balance that forbid its existence, the expanding Universe that fails to consider the implosive, galactic vortices, which balance that expansion elsewhere in this work) and move on to present the universe with the ternary dimensions of time (ages of all time events) and space (3 functional topologies of all st-points or ‘worlds’ of space-time.)

In the graph, an atom is a space-time field divided in 3 space-time zones: its informative quark center, the nucleus; the external reproductive membrane, made of electrons, which evolve socially in bigger ST membranes when atoms become molecules; while informative, gravitational and energetic, light networks shape their intermediate space-time.

The topology of the atom is thus clear. The electron acts as an external ‘spherical plane’, a membrane of Entropy. In the center quarks are the informative vortices. In between Entropy and form is transferred with forces, which often decouple, reproducing new particles and antiparticles. There are 3 informative families of quarks-mass, due to the evolution of information in 3 ages or horizons of increasing form: each quark family is thus an age in the evolution of informative matter.

The final event of death of those families is a ‘decay’ or quantum big-bang. In our lighter up and down quarks, it is the beta decay, the dual mini-big-bang of a neutron due to the conversion of a balanced, reproductive down quark into an informative up quark (proton, big crunch formation) and an energetic electron (expansive electronic membrane).

As in all processes of death we assist first to the dissociation of the informative’ and energetic elements of the organic system.

Since death is caused by the destruction of the networks of the upper plane of reality, which created a form.

So the Neutron dissociates its informative quarks and electronic, slightly negative, external membrane, provoking a dual big-bang and big crunch, breaking into the 2 parts of its balanced state.

Thus we write the reaction as an event of the generator equation:

_{Electron=energetic past}*<Down quark=balanced Present> ^{Up=informative future}*

* _{Electron (E)}* ×

^{Up quark (Information)}= Down quark (balance)The up quark has half of the mass of the down quark, and we know a down quark switches into an up quark in a beta reaction that explodes a neutron into a proton and electron, components of the Hydrogen atom. In other words the balanced neutron splits into an expansive electron and an implosive proton. This is the equivalent of a quantum dual big-bang/big crunch, a far from equilibrium process in which the neutron expands its membrane into an electronic big-bang and implodes its quarks into a tighter proton configuration.

*Recap*. Atoms are st-points with 3 topological spaces, the spatial membrane or electron, the hyperbolic center or quark-gluon soup, and the intermediate, ‘bigger’, reproductive space where exchanges of electromagnetic and gravitational forces give birth to virtual particles.

**Events in time and organisms in space.**

All those processes give origin according to the duality of the ‘Galilean paradox’ *to both events in time and forms in space*, which further illuminate many questions unresolved in classic quantum physics – as we can always consider the existence of 2 different realities, *a causal event and a ternary organism, *and so we have two options to explain many phenomena before explaining only with either a spatial or a temporal perspective*:* For example, a proton is a uud triplet of quarks in space, but in time you might consider that a down quark, which switches into an up quark and electron, splitting its mass-vortex in 2 and then evolves back into a down quark.

So you can also write the ternary structure as an event in time: *d(ST)->u (Tƒ)+e(Spe)->d(ST)*

And so we can consider the whole process to be an existential cycle of a single down quark. Both events are real and in certain conditions the process will be a temporal event and in others will create a spatial organism. The difference is clear: when we consider the process as an event, reality becomes warped from a big spatial, extended, multiplied world into a tighter, faster, temporal non-redundant Universe. And so this ‘antisymmetry’ between time functions and spatial forms happens when we consider the ‘antisymmetry’ between big-bang & big-crunch ages of fast d=evolution in time, in a limited space vs. the spatial, organic ages or steady states, described by the equations of Einstein. And since we are apparently in a steady state age for the Universe, most likely the previous spatial description is the reality of the atom: 3 quarks, locked as relative, past-Entropy, present balanced and future-informative subspecies.

The reality of studying the Universe both in time and space, as either an event or a form is one of the key methods of ‘Complex physics’ as a science which uses two arrows to describe the Universe. Yet because physicists lack those methods, they often confuse an event in time with a form in space and vice versa. Ultimately the proton and neutron are two phases of the same being in 2 different states of time that physicists first confused with 2 different species of space.

-The mystery of their 2/3 and 1/3 charges become also resolved in a temporal perspective: the up quark emits a negative electron, giving up a charge and becoming a down quark that later absorbs the quark and becomes an up quark again.

An easy way to solve when a process is a spatial duality or a time event is the fact that time events often don’t have parity, mirror symmetry, a spatial property, as it happens with the Beta decay. What this means is that because information and Entropy have different properties, the arrow of Entropy->information and the arrow of information->Entropy, its inverse process, are different. And so indeed, while neutrons decay easily giving birth to an electron in a few minutes – another proof that it is a fast process of death; the inverse process hardly ever happens.

Another puzzle of physics is the difference of masses between particles. The general rule is simple: when a lineal Entropy, E, accelerates till light speed, the limit of our light membrane, it starts to curl into a cyclical speed, which is the definition of a vortex of mass. Thus no mass becomes mass. Yet further on, this transformation can be further increased by a topological transformation, from a reproductive, cyclical vortex toroid topology to a hyperbolic, more massive one. The balanced, reproductive cyclical toroid donuts can switch into the inner informative dual donuts (simplest hyperbolic topology). And as the hyperbolic topology adds up more ‘toroids in the dimension of height, and the vortex of mass, VoxRo=K, increases its speed mass increases geometrically, reason why a black hole, a hyperbolic topology with asymptotic T-parameters, is the most massive object of the Universe.

This topological transformation could be a possible reason why a down quark has the mass of 2 up quarks: the down quark might switch back and forth its reproductive single-torus topology into a dual torus, becoming more complex and heavier but smaller. In this manner we can find many topological whys to the abstract description of particles and transformative events between them.

Consider now the temporal interpretation of color, a feature that makes quarks stable in triplets.

It was discovered when physicists realized that quarks with the same spin could occupy the same position. So they considered they have color. But they never clarified what color is. We interpret color in simple Euclidean Geometry as the orientation of 3 bidimensional, cyclical vortices of mass – 3 quarks, that are perpendicular to each other – and so they can occupy the same 3-dimensional space. *This explains why 3 quarks of 1/3 ^{rd} charge together emerge in the electromagnetic world and can interact with a 3-dimensional electron of 1 charge*. It also explains why they are locked in a stable configuration: they cannot be deconfined without ‘disappearing’ from our 3-dimensional world as point-particles; reason why we perceive them as joined by an extremely strong and attractive force.

In detail, using complex Non-Euclidean topology the picture is somehow more complex, but the previous simplified analysis is clear enough to explain why some quarks have 2/3_{rds} of charge, 2 donuts, and some 1/3^{rd}, one donut; and how they can interact with 1-charge electrons.

Further on we can understand why gluons, the particles exchanged by quarks have 2 colors. This again is self-evident: if you try to communicate a bidimensional long plane and a perpendicular plane you must travel in a right angle. So a gluon that exchanges Entropy and form between 2 quarks of different perpendicular/color orientation must have 2 colors.

2/3^{rd} charge quarks would be from the perspective of its gluon parts, chaotic, perpendicular, bidimensional attractors (Lorenz-type); 1/3^{rd} quarks would be self-similar to single gluon attractors (Rossler type). Gluons are bundles of strings with a boomerang like open topology – hence without mass, as they don’t close the cyclical vortex. And as they interact with quarks, they will change their spatial orientation, carrying away their color.

The principle of physics that matters here is diffeomorphic *orientation,* Obviously when we switch from Euclidean to non-Euclidean space and from continuous to fractal dimensions, the topologies of those orientations become much more complex and we should rather talk of ‘puzzles’, hyperbolic, 2/3^{rd} charges; toroid, 1/3^{rd} charges, and curved planes (gluons) that respond to the 3 basic topologies of the Universe; and become locked together in complex patterns, as proteins and other cellular components do in the cell, *to emerge as a whole Non-Euclidean Point of our 3-dimensional world* – a proton.

Thus color is a geometrical feature that evolves the bidimensional world of quarks into the 3-dimensional world of electrons, creating a holography of our world. Quantum physicists know that information is bidimensional and the Universe holographic but they don’t know why. Because the classic, abstract, algebraic description of quarks, based in group symmetries cannot express this easily. Thus, without topological analysis, without the enlightenment of its why with the new paradigm, the theory of quarks and gluons tell us only that each quark has a color, different from the other 2 colors of the triplet and gluons have 2 colors.

The topological analysis shows that the fractal scale of quarks and gluons is similar to a fractal, liquid cell, which is *the fundamental structure mimicked by all Non-Euclidean points, hence, self-repeated in many self-similar scales, as we shall see when* explaining galaxies as cells of the Universe; where black holes are the DNA/informative element and stars the mitochondria/ energetic network.

*Recap*. We can perceive, according to the Galilean Paradox all realities as forms in space or events in time. Physicists study quarks only as events in space, so they miss the explanation of its fractal charge: 3 locked quarks as events in time add to 1 charge; and miss the topological non-Euclidean interpretation of down, up quarks and gluons whose hyperbolic, toroid and curved plane topologies add up to form a st-point of 4 Dimensions that surfaces in our holographic Universe.

**Two Quark Triangles and 2 Universal Membranes. Families of mass.**

*There are 6 quarks, whose mass increases as the speed of their space-time vortices increase. Physicists divide them in the III horizons of evolutionary mass, with increasing mass/information. Yet they ignore the reason of those 3 families (the 3 horizons of any evolutionary system of Entropy and information); they ignore why they have different masses (because the speed of their vortices increase); they ignore why they have fractional charge (because they are bidimensional vortices, which must lock in triplets, to form a 3-dimensional space-time, harmonic with the electronic, 3-dimensional world we live in); and they ignore which kind of fractal cosmological forms they create (pulsars and black holes):*

On the other hand, it is important to understand and classify particles, the understanding of the 3 ‘ages of evolution’ of information represented by the 3 families of mass and quarks, which are ALSO IN CLOSE SYMMETRY WITH THE UPPER cosmic scale, and the 3 regions of the galaxy, the Top quark star center (black holes modeled as top quark frozen stars, with positive top quarks as the boson cut off substance), the middle region of up and down light human quarks and the external negative charged, strangelet halo. Thus the symmetry is obvious:

3 ages of evolution of mass of increasing form: I, II and III families of quarks.

3 regions of the galaxy: Top quark black holes, up and down matter, negative strangelet halo.

Symmetry between atoms and galaxies (protons positive top quark holes, negative electrons, strangelet halo)* *

Unlike the usual spatial classification of quarks in pairs proper of classic physics, in complex physics, we divide the Universe in 2 membranes, the dense, informative, gravitational, mass/quark membrane and the electronic, light one and we consider species of the gravitational, informative membrane to be tendencially ‘time events’, as information and time are related, and so quarks and black holes are better described with 3 temporal horizons and hyperbolic topologies.

In the graph, a more detailed analysis of the parameters of the main particles of the standard model. For simplicity, Neutrinos, which *are better described not as particles in space but wave- events in time that transfer momentum between both gravitational and electromagnetic scales (reason why their ‘3 species’ mutate in time, as they travel to the earth), *are ignored: The 6 quarks of the standard model are reordered in 2 ternary groups. In the bottom left, we observe the electromagnetic membrane and its elements. In the upper right side we observe the gravitational, quark world.

The graph, which is the standard model of Complex Physics, applied to quarks, requires no Higgs. Instead the top quark of self-similar mass in the upper vertex becomes the final evolutionary state of the Z+W particles which in a weak event transform lighter particles into ‘dark quarks’.

Its enormous mass means it should exist a new decametric ‘scale’ of super-strong forces, and the proper model to study the breaking of symmetry is not the Higgs but the Technicolor theory, whereas super strong top quarks should turn faster than light, be components of black holes and emit dark Entropy at 10 C speed, the next scalar force of the Universe that fills intergalactic space.

However in reactions at lower energies, Z and W particles never reach enough stability to become ‘parts’ of a top and so they quickly devolve into lower mass-states, which explains most of the reactions observed in accelerators, mediated by temporal, weak forces, which therefore have no spatial symmetry.

If we order particles by mass self-similarity in triads we observe 2 different atoms and 2 different quark-gluon soups, made of 3 types of quarks, dominated by their heavier quarks of each triangle:

– The up and down quark create the light atom. Yet when they are deconfined in a quark-gluon soup they are dominated by the most massive strange quark, which creates the superfluid vortex of ‘strangelet’ liquids or ‘ice-9’, responsible for Nova explosions.

– Charm and bottom quarks form a dark atom, dominated by the most massive top quark in a dark gluon soup, which we shall call ‘gas-9’, as it would be the most explosive substance of the Universe, responsible for Super-Novae and quasars and maybe the big-bang of a cellular Universe.

Thus if strange quarks create strange soups, top quarks will do the same with dark atoms; and if strangelets are components of strange stars, top quark liquids will be the components of top black holes.

This symmetric scheme is unknown to physics; so it lacks a visual understanding of what dark atoms (bcb particles) are, and why strangelets and top quark liquids are stable enough to form quark stars:

In the light world, the ud quarks and electron form the light atom. In the dark world, the cb quarks and the tau electron form the dark atom. The reader can now see that basically the two worlds are differentiated by a fractal scale of 1000=10^{3} Electron volts. In terms of static, fractal dimensions, this merely means that the world of top quarks is warped by a new SU_{3} group of dimensional form. *It is more complex, more informative as it has 3 more dimensions of warping; or 3 more degrees of rotational speed in a dynamic perspective.*

Imagine that inside the original vortex of our light-quarks there is not the eye of a hurricane, but another scale, another vortex, another medium, rotating 10 times faster in 3 dimensions. Thus this inner world extended into lineal Entropy will mean we need 10^{3} = 1000 times more Entropy to create it.

The rotational speed of that inner vortex will be 10 times higher – 10 c – but the Entropy needed to create the new 3-dimensional fractal world or inner scale of motion of those top quarks will be 10^{3 }fractal dimensions of rotational speed/mass. Thus the dark world of heavy quarks is 10 times faster and 1000 times denser ^{9}.

For the same reason the electron of the lighter world is lighter than the tau electron of the dark world. If our light world is a 0.c<10 c world the dark world is a c<10 c world.

Once this concept is clear, the self-similarities become evident: the world of 0.1c light atoms, which creates our matter and the world of c-strange quarks that creates quark stars must be matched by a world of dark atoms and top quarks, which creates the world of black holes. So black holes are top quark stars.

Let us show how the quarks of the 2 membranes increase their mass (we round here figures so the reader can easily follow them)*:*

In the graph, the strange quark is the top predator quark of our triangle of light matter made of udu atoms. It is between 30 and 100 times heavier than our matter. While the top quark is the top predator quark of the triangle of dark matter and its bcb atoms, and it is around 100 times heavier than those bcb quarks. The strange quark and top quark are around 100 times heavier than the ud and bc atoms.

Since the equation of a mass vortex is U.C. × Mass = w^{2} × r^{3}, mass is proportional to the square of the rotational speed, w, of its vortex. So we have 3 decametric scales of rotational speed:

C/10, the speed of rotation of electrons, and the ‘ud’ system of quarks of our atoms, which in this manner are in harmony with the electron vortex that traps them.

<C speed for the strange quark or top predator quark that causes the breaking of symmetry of our matter, as it creates a faster attractive vortex, deconfining the quarks of our world, liberating them, and blowing the electronic wave into radiation.

In the graph, the bosons of both worlds are also self-evident: The photon is the boson of the electromagnetic world and the gluon is the boson of the gravitational membrane. The symmetry between the 2 quantum theories of electrons and quarks is a clear proof of that symmetry.

Both theories differ because the quark-gluon soup is more informative and has a more complex, ‘network-like’, ∏-structure, while the electron is basically a herd, with a loose ∑-structure.

The 2 forces (electromagnetic and strong forces) and the species evolved from them also change the parameters of Entropy and information of both worlds, according to the basic symmetry of the Universe, e × O = k, *expressed in quantum physics by the law of range*. The lighter world thus extends further in range/space and weighs nothing. The tighter world of dark quarks extends shorter in range and weighs/attracts one hundred times more.

It is only left to explain the role of the muon, which weights exactly what the strange quark weighs and the Z+W= top, which weighs the same also than the top=Higgs particle.

So again we find a clear symmetry between them: Those particles are *self-similar to the top and strange quark, perceived from the other side of the dual membrane; they are their self-similar ‘ghosts’ in the light world. *And they can be found as evolutionary steps in the creation of strange quarks and top=Higgs quarks in the processes of transformation of electronic membranes into dark, strong gravitational membranes.

And the Higgs^{7}? It is not needed and it is an impossible particle since a scalar boson breaks the isomorphisms of complex physics and a new force/membrane it is an invention without experimental evidence that would also break the symmetry of complex systems (like an organism with ‘2 nervous systems’). The evolution of lighter matter into the top, mediated by the Z and W particles (which should be considered the same particle in a time perspective; that is, the +, neutral and – states), is performed by a top quark/antiquark condensate (Nambu), which breaks the symmetry of all other types of matter, converting it into more tops that will condensate into a quark star or black hole. In biological terms, to break the symmetry means to kill as a top predator quark, the strongest particle of the Universe, all other forms of lighter matter, to feed on them and to convert them into a self-similar form of yourself.

In the same manner, the strange quark breaks the symmetry of our lighter quarks transformed into strange quarks and strange liquid (strangelets). It follows that SUSY particles, which also contradict the isomorphisms of balance between Entropy and mass/information and have never been found, do not exist either^{9}.

Because quantum physicists lack the tools of complex physics and the understanding of mass as information, all this is blurred in their equations. They do describe perfectly all those reactions with enormous mathematical accuracy as Ptolemy described better than Copernicus the movements of planets. But to do so they need complicated mathematical models as Ptolemy did. A model of complex physics with both arrows, Entropy and information, is far easier to understand as it explains topologically and in terms of cyclical, causal time events many whys of particle physics.

*Recap*. Mass is physical information – an *accelerated, *bidimensional vortex of mass (dynamic perception) called a quark, which can be described also in space (Galilean Paradox) as a non-Euclidean network of fractal gluons (static perception described by QCD theory). Quarks must be understood as ternary events in evolving time, and classified in triads, belonging to two different scales of the gravitational world – the strange world with c-rotational speed that interacts with our world and the dark world of top quarks that rotate at 10 c speed and form quark-gluon condensates called black holes. They are vortices of top quarks, the top predator particle of mass-information of the Universe.

**∆º. THERMODYNAMIC HUMAN SCALE.**

So we have finally arrived to the human thermodynamic scale, that small vibration that ‘parasites’ all other scales, left alone mostly by the serious ‘dense’ forms of reality, dark matter and dark entropy, our mostly heated, entropic reality of disordered motions and gaseous bubbles.

What we are, nothing but dust of space-time

**The laws of thermodynamics.**

We can now tackle in reverse order the three laws of thermodynamics, as expressions of the three states of matter:

*Tiƒ: Solid crystals. 0 entropy, pure till mind-information: *

*The third law of thermodynamics* states that the entropy of a perfect crystal at absolute zero, or 0 kelvin is zero. This means that in a perfect crystal, at 0 kelvin, nearly all molecular motion should cease in order to achieve ΔS=0. A perfect crystal is one in which the internal lattice structure is the same at all times; in other words, it is fixed and non-moving, and does not have rotational or vibrational energy. This means that there is only one way in which this order can be attained: when every particle of the structure is in its proper place.

The mind is indeed a o-mapping of all reality where motion is ‘expelled’ for the form to be absolute and reflect by the ‘determined’ actions of the being, which sees its mind as the deterministic still universe – what it is.

*ST: Energy: The first law, we agree states that present energy is conserved.*

*Spe: the Second Law of Thermodynamics, corresponds to the ‘entropy-disorder’ state, hence it is tautological:*

The total entropy of a thermodynamic system tends to increase over time, approaching a maximum value. It is the one we just commented; as it merely refers *that as time passes, the branching of ternary e-states or paths of the future increase, and the information from ∆º of the system becomes more confuse and less deterministic (in a ceteris paribus analysis that does not consider the order inflicted by the membrane and the singularity).*

Since its discovery, this idea has been the focus of a great deal of thought, some of it confused. A chief point of confusion is the fact that the Second Law applies only to isolated systems; which again is a confusing term, which really means *fields or open balls that do not have into account its interaction with the central singularity of order, or the enclosing membrane that constrains and further orders the system*. For example, the Earth is not an isolated system because it is constantly receiving entropy>energy in the form of sunlight and it constantly receives order from the cycles of heat and cold weather and magnetic and continental drift ‘programming’ of history and evolution and further on it receives order from all the mind-points of its neural network aka life-beings on the surface.

And in any case what physicists talk about here is *their confusions of order vs. disorder, that is they should say, ‘A system tends to isomorphic equilibrium in its wave-entropy, St<S elements, as a pre-condition for the singularity-mind and its tiƒ ‘upper, ∆º+1 wholeness scale, to ‘order’ them and extract its e/10 ‘share’ to ’emerge’ in the ∆+1 conscious of the whole, unit-scale.*

Now, equipped with all those confusing motions, the physicist comes as an amateur to the field of philosophy of the wholeness, and affirms that the universe may be considered an isolated system (why? does he have a ginormous googleian size-number to see it all? or an infinitesimal, smallness to perceive its potential tiƒ)…, so he comes then to state that its total entropy is constantly increasing… as he fits an ever increasing number of angels on a pin.

So let us also start parallel to physics with the analysis of

**The zero sum of entropy. The program of Existence as a zero sum.**

*The entropy of the Universe is constant as the worldcycle is a zero sum of entropy. Tƒ fully understand this we must rewrite the equation of entropy in terms of 5D functions.*

*∆S=* entropy *dS *is equal to this amount of energy for the reversible process divided by the absolute temperature of the system:

We have assumed the temperature is constant but what truly is constant is entropy because it is a reversible closed cycle with the process of death and the asymptotic arrows between planes of existence that balance the missing quantities in a single plane, when we consider the ‘inverse loop’ taking place in the i±2 transfers and actions of death:

Thus dS=0, and d Q r/T=0 becomes a Lagrangian where the active clock of time is temperature and Qr the energy of the system.

From where we can consider different equations of thermodynamics.

Thus the main difference of cyclical time, vs. lineal time is the concept of entropy, in the cyclical Universe the entropy of the Universe for the whole system is zero. And so it is for all relative systems, as they are balanced by transfers between planes of existence, notably the positive order acquired in the long arrow of informative social evolution, ∆+1, and then in the fast explosive death reversed process, when the wave falls fast into the past, erasing all its information of future, higher planes of existential organization: ∂’’œ<<∑∑∆-2

*Now to understand quantum jumps through 2 Universal ∆-planes, an amazing feat that puts in contact a macrocosms with its lowest cellular/atomic planes, we should consider this astounding explosion of expansive Entropy to be balanced with the total gain in entropy by the same system during its arrow of Life:*

*Life Cycle: Tƒ-1: Seminal wave: ∑ S (life semi-action-cycle, h/2) = ∑ ∆-1> ∆<Max. Energy (youth) > Reproductive ∑œ wave > Max. Information: Tƒ+1 = ∆S-2: Death*

*In the act of death the expansion of entropy which jumps down at exponential rhythms the social creative process that lasted an entire life, the growth of information and order, or arrow of future of life becomes disintegrated in an instant.*

*So it happens in physical matter in the process of nuclear bombs, novae, quasars and big bangs. The difference is that the creative process from biochemical molecules to cells and fetus emerged into the ∆-scale for a long life which lasted so much time, but changed so little the volume of vital space of the system, explodes now in a quantum of time, dissolving all its networks.*

*It is precisely that difference of speed of life <<<< to death in the acceleration and deceleration of the process of collapse what creates an apparent winning arrow for entropy. But this idea would be misleading since for a much longer period a particle, a soul of a living, biological entity, a crystal in a planet has created order, at a very slow tempo. Time might be considered subjective in this orderly long time processes and perhaps it is. That is we can construct a frame of reference in which time cycles do not suffer accelerations and decelerations in positions of change of state, from relative past, to present to futures and back.*

*But the overwhelming evidence is this:*

*– The maximal speed of destruction of information is in the negative max. ∆S moment of death, which lasts hardly any time: ∆S x ∏ Tƒ = Death, disorder*

*– The creation of information in slow, cold environments is the opposite arrow that lasts much more in time but hardly consumes any external information.*

*Both should be balanced completing the conservative laws of fields with equipotential, immortal paths of eternal motion.*

*A Space-Time cycle of finite Duration, or life-death cycle is thus defined as:*

*∆-1, ∑∆-1>S∆<ST>Tƒ<<S∆-2 if we are to use algebraic notation of the different partial equations of a world cycle.*

*If we define the function, W=∫∫∂ (a,e,I,o,u) dtds=0, as the worldcycle or function of existence of a system between birth and extinction, this is the fundamental equation we seek to resolve for any being.*** **

Now when the meaning of temperature is understood we can consider again, the fundamental events of all the scale of physics with an enhanced understanding of the meaning of its parameters.

Tƒ start with the frequency of the light wave, the charge an accelerated vortex like the mass, with its curvature Q, and G, form a system of clocks of time which define perfectly a beat, related to an energy, which is inverse. And so we find ourselves with different degree of integration worldcycle or minimal forceful action, of such parameters, as:

H = E x V, T = d Q/ d S= d Q x dO, which we call Order, the inverse function to entropy.

And so on: , we define a simple law of the least action, to unify the fundamental equation of ach of those scales:

F= A x E, -∂H/∂q=dp/dt and its inverse function, ∂H/∂p=dq/dt

Indeed, in cyclical time, we consider that entropy has as a secondary feature the quantity of information of the system, multiplied by conserving its actions in the multiple hyperbolic S∆-1,2, fields of existence

Thus in the scales of matter we find, the functions of existence, in the actions, H, T,

Those 5 actions determine therefore a *Program of existence, which all systems follow in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious manner. And thus we can also write the 5 ^{th} isomorphism, as a Generator Equation of all the actions of the Universe, written as a dynamic, temporal feed back equation or a static, organic, structural, spatial equation:*

*∑Se <=> Tƒ ….. or Se x Tƒ= ST±4*

*Whereas:*

*∑ represents the social gathering of individuals into Universals (∂u).*

*S signifies the motions in space, (∂a).*

*e signifies the increases of structural energy of the system, ∂e.*

*<=> in the dynamic expression or X in the structural one, signifies the combination of Se and Ti which gives birth to ‘reproductive’ actions and offspring: ∂œ.*

*And Ti signifies, the perceptive actions of the being, ∂i*

*And this 5 actions are represented also in the ‘philosophical equation’ Sp x It = ST, whereas E≈ ∂e, S≈∂a, I≈∂I, x≈∂o, ST≈ ∂U*

Again we use any of the different expressions of the Generator Equation, despite the initial confusion it might create, so the readers learns to ‘change its chip’ from the quantitative, single, exact analysis of reality to a conceptual, qualitative, multiple, ‘fractal’, iterative perception based in similarities and homologies, parallelisms and conceptual complexity.

Ultimately only when he changes his mind’s frame and accepts those enriching dualities and isomorphisms he will be able to acquire the ‘enlightened’, ‘Buddhist’ perception of the pantheist Universe required to fully integrate itself within the whole.

This is the Program of Existence that all systems follow to survive, deduced from the structural elements of any fractal Superorganism of scalar space and cyclical time, which will try to maintain stable its ST-form and reproduce it beyond death in small ‘actions’ and full ‘reproductions’ of the being, such as:

∑œ Reproductions of a being across its ST±4 planes is the existential game we all play.

We can write the Generator equation, as ∑ExI=ST, this alternative ‘old expression’ of the Generator means that to “Exist’ is to absorb and emit entropy/energy and information in a series of actions, ∑, which try to maintain a system in balance with its space-time environment. And all this is managed by the relative zero-point, Tƒ, of the system:

To Exi=st is therefore a tautological word. The rules of existence are in that sense common to all beings. What will vary is the specific form in which a certain particle, head or informative centre, Tƒ, manage to survive by its actions. Or fail.

** ****GRAVITATIONAL SCALE. THE SPATIAL SYMMETRY**

** General Relativity studies the space-time ages of the cosmos.**

In a wider analysis, if we were to consider a single clock-time for the entire Universe (by adopting the hypothetical rhythm of the Universal superorganism and its 3 ages between its big-bang birth and big crunch warping) vacuum space will appear as ‘a slice of reality’ or ‘dharma of present’ that times constantly move from past to future according to the logic of time arrows, till it will warp it into a big-crunch.

And that evolving form of universal space and its 3 ages of a big-bang birth, a steady longer state and a final big-crunch, which correspond to the 3 solutions to Einstein’s spacetime equations, are what General Relativity studies. But those equations are just a particular case of the wider ‘3 ages’ of any organic space-time studied with the 3 elements of the Generator Equation, E<=>I.

Yet classic Physics studies only geometrical, translational time, but not the evolving and devolving morphologic changes studied in biology, except in the 3 solutions to the equations of Einstein, since they take the entire Universe (or rather a galactic space) as an organism. For that reason temporal change in Physics means merely a geometrical change of direction as when we move backwards a clock in space or we move backwards a particle that becomes an antiparticle – ”but we don’t evolve or devolve the entire Universe as Hawking thinks nor we move towards the Absolute past or the future when we change the clock’s needle position in space. You might argue that for the clock’s own definition of time, geometrical change and temporal change are the same and this thesis is worth to explore as we shall do latter, since it is indeed rather accurate to consider that for each space-time field a morphological change of information is a temporal change, given the relationship between both. So if we could change the warping, informative morphology∆y of our face and straight it up, filling it with biological, energetic cellular space we could become younger, but the Universe will continue its infinite fractal clock rhythms independent of our form. This is self-evident and Einstein already explained it to Minkowski a century ago, when he vehemently protested with the use of the sentence ‘time is the 4^{th} dimension of space’; because ‘time behaved ‘somewhat’ in a very different form to space’ and the Universe is made of multiple times.

Still Physicists who have had always since Galileo a strong desire to become Metaphysicists chose to ignore the admonitions of Einstein and have developed a ‘metaphysics of space with its multiple dimensions’ that we need to clarify before going further into our analysis of cosmological time. This work is harsh with such concepts and the physicists that keep sponsoring them, because the concept of spatializing time is erroneous and prevents the advance of Time knowledge. It translates into 3 false dogmas: a single arrow of time called entropy that ignores the informative arrow of gravity in many of its analysis of the Universe; a space-time continuum that ignores the fact that we are not placed into an abstract frame of reference, but we are made of fractal space=vital Entropy and time cycles; and the use of a single spatial, geometrical linage, mathematics to explain it all, that ignores often the fundamental language of time, causal logic, expressed better with verbal thought.

Under such a dictatorship of Physics, for long logic and bio-logic, verbal sciences like Evolution or social sciences, which study long range changes in biological and human species, have been considered lesser sciences. It is said that Gell-Mann lobbied with the Nobel institution to prevent economics from becoming a Nobel Prize with this sentence, ‘what is next, anthropology?’ And he only calmed down when he was said that mathematical economics was to be the focus of the prize. It is also said that Feynman to quote the other great physicist of the post-war era asked their students never consider the ‘why’ of physical events, a conceptual, logic question but only the descriptive how that mathematics could achieve.

For that reason, it should not surprise us that verbal concepts such as past, present and future, the 3 dimensions of ‘bio-logic time’, totally escape them, as a clock measures time in digital numbers not in relative, ‘morphological, d=evolving ages’, which is what past, present and future study. Instead they use the limited t=s/v parameter, as if it were the parameter of all time changes. This is absurd. When I get old is not because I change my speed in space, but because my body suffers morphological changes study in biology. Time in Physics is ‘spatial, translational, geometrical change’. Within that limited scope, as a ‘parameter of change in space’ physical studies on time are relevant. All other generalizations of time by ‘Meta-Physicists are ‘science-fiction’ of which modern Physics is full of examples.

Those errors show even today, when Einstein established the geometrical, cyclical nature of time, as ‘physical clocks’ that bend Entropy into mass, in the use of lineal, infinite, absolute time by all other physical theories. Such limited definition of time in modern science as a lineal number or duration, instead of a frequency of cyclical form, of in-form-ation, is the biggest handicap to a proper understanding of Reality, given the fact that Time is one of the 2 fundamental Universal parameters. Yet time as a lineal duration becomes a secondary variable, which carries as any line does, very limited information. So scientists focus in the study of a single parameter, or arrow of the Universe – the entropic arrow of expanding space or Entropy – and fail to recognize the second arrow – the patterns, frequencies and repetitions caused by the cyclical inertia of time events that tend to store and repeat information in a discontinuous, cyclical manner.

The result is an unneeded complexity, a plethora of errors and ill definitions and the belief that the Universe is chaotic, since the variable that creates order and information – time – is so poorly understood. To explain that order we describe the Universe without simplifying its 2 original parameters, analyzing the interaction between the Entropy of space and the formal frequencies of time, and how they shape together the species of that Universe.

Nevertheless, the task is daunting because science has worked with a single arrow of lineal Entropy or entropy for 4 centuries. So there is an enormous resistance to accept a 2^{nd} arrow of information and define time in complex terms, as the parameter that causes morphological, informative change. This aberration is recent in the history of knowledge. Prior to Galileo, all philosophers understood time as synonymous of all kind of cyclical changes, not only physical translation.

Further on, all pre-Galilean cultures defined time intuitively in cyclical terms, as a form with a frequency. Physicists only study a type of time-change, translational change in space. Thus, when they talk of time as the 4^{th} dimension of space they are merely talking of a very small part of time phenomena, the measure of movement in space, with time clocks. Only within those restricted parameters of Galilean physics, time is indeed a dimension of spatial movement.

What is moving in that space/time background? And how that movement can be introduced in the simplified, mathematical static models of time and space, proper of the Cartesian plane that scientists use to describe the Universe? Both questions are related to the concept of moving dimensions of space-time, which now substitute the simplified, static concept of fixed space-dimensions. What is an act of arrogance and ignorance is to consider that the most important feature of time is to be a parameter of movement in space. So what matters about time is to be in all sciences the parameter of change, through is 3 dimensions, past, present and future.

Recap. Time travel in physics is a geometry change as when we move a cycle of time backwards, but it does not affect the overall time of the Universe. Morphological Time studied by evolution and the ages of time events composed of Entropy and information are only studied in physics with the 3 ages/solutions to the equations of Einstein.

# ∆+1: Mass scale

** **

Mass* is as all other emergent time enclosures of a surface of energies*, a symbiotic creation of a new ‘species’ of physical systems, in which 3 elements come together as a whole:

Spe<ExI>Tƒ, whereas the formation of a Tƒ-membrane-center invaginating the ExI world, over an Spe-field, ‘CREATES’ the new emergent plane, in which the fundamental laws and parameters and operandi and ratios/constants of all TŒ systems will then appear ‘magically’. As such the fundamental element of a new physical system, as a new biological system is the complementarity body-head, wave-particle, vital space, enclosure, centered into a ‘center of gravity’ point, born of the shrinking of a Poincare’s Conjecture that becomes real:

The creation of a physical system requires the formation of a membrane, in 2 or 3 dimensions (4 or 5 dimensions in the more complex relativity and 5D full model systems), which becomes the external informative membrane that will develop an enclosure to a volume of vital space-energy, and form within that volume a ‘mirror’ image of the world in which the system exists, by shrinking according to the Poincare conjecture the membrane into a central point (in the graph the point is external, but it will be in the center of ‘gravity’ of the system). At that point a new physical/biological/topological system of reality is formed, with the following minimal structural elements.

In the graph the 5 Dimotions of Mass and its 3 planes of existence in the galatom, as well as its entangled relationships with the key Universal constants. The graph is from wikipedia’s 5 fundamental properties of mass, showing the homology between 5D and classic science:

Mass’ 5 Ðimotions are thus self-evident and entangle according to the ‘Rashomon Effect’ mas with all the scales of the Galatom.

2 Dimotion: Locomotion

From bottom up, we observe first the **Compton wavelength, which** is a quantum mechanical property of a particle,equal to the wavelength of a photon whose energy is the same as the mass (mass-energy equivalence) of that particle.

The standard Compton wavelength, λ, of a particle is given by λ=h/mc.

And it relates to the speed of a mass, as follows. V=s/ð, where ð is the cyclical frequency of information or mass parameter (E=mc2+e=hƒ->Mass=h/c2 ƒ.

As mass is the frequency of rotation of a cosmic time vortex:

Thus the more information a locomotion reproduces the slower it moves.

It is the only quantum property relevant, as mass effects are hardly sensed by particles except in magnetic fields that emerge from them, and then contribute to the mass of the system.

- Now the beauty of the scalar Universe is that it is both,
*background independent in its last ‘perceived’ scale but not necesarilly the last of reality, the c-constant light space-time scale of Einstein’s work, as his theory of relativity is; but it is bakcground dependent at the quantum electromagnetic scale, meaning there is below the electromagnetic scale, the gravitational last scale of reality we no longer perceive (invisible gravitation, a curvature of spacetime). So it reconciles one of the many conundrums of physics and other sciences we shall resolve here.*

**4Ð: Entropy. I**n the human scale, mass as entropy (Death of mass) is self-evident, E=mc²

3Ð Mass reproduction, is merely that frequency of repetitive cyclical motions as an accelerated time vortex. This is perceived as inertial mass – that is the resistence of the vortex to move which is proportional to its rotational speed, in the same manner a rotational vortex is more difficult to deform and move, it has more inward inertial in its ‘divergence and curl’.

Then the 2 key ¡+1 cosmological properties:

**1D: G**: its curvature, which in the ideal mass (a minimal cosmological hole), is the Schwarzschild radius, with a c-speed cuvature, which ‘finally’ converts lineal light into a ‘membrane’ that isolates the black hole.

It defines ultimately the amount of information stored in the frequency and length of that circle, which is maximal for the black hole, ‘mind’ of the galaxy defined by that radius.

**5Ð.** The mass then can be also considered an attractive force that is in-form-ative, social, gathering masses into bigger lumps of social matter. And so we have the standard gravitational parameter, GM.

In that regard the key concept of mass is to be the limit of the ‘5D metric’ of the galatom in the upper, ∆+1 plane. And as such its Metric equation is as simple as the ‘Planck Unit’ of mass, albeit written as a GM² expression (to get rid of unneeded √):

**METRIC EQUATIONS OF THE GALATOM.**

The galatom is a super organism, which must follow the same metric 5Ð equation:

$(c) x ð(h) = K… in all its scales to be able to act as a super organism in which energy and information can travel through its scales.

And that is indeed the case, so we have a ‘starting’ metric for all the mathematical physics involved within the galatom.

Next comes then to classify the possible ‘Ks’, that is the scales in which the galatom interacts, as a physical organism, in the 3 ∆±¡ scales of the galatom. And this gives us immediately in the Planck system of natural units, 2 super organisms, the charge:

Q²4̦πεo= h(ð) x $ (c)

And the mass:

GM²=h(ð) x $ (c)

With our ‘thermodynamic scale’ in between.

It is then interesting, following the Disomorphic method, in which we prioritize the scales in which perception is maximal, to fully grasp what as charge and a mass is to realize that actually the product of the charge or mass for its curvature is a better meaningful concept, GM and Ke.

Since the Thermodynamic metric is PV= NkT, whereas PV plays the role of GM/Ke and NkT the role of hc, which we do NOT measure directly in our scale. Thus the mass and charge have two components equivalent to a volume in space and an inward pressure motion or gradient in time (ST), which gives us a ‘vital space’ of energy for both species.

While in the other side of the ch metrics we find for thermodynamic systems, an obvious measure of ‘speed/kinetic energy’, temperature, on the ‘large scale’, playing the role of c and a unit of ‘information’ nK, which actually is the inverse parameter of entropy.

Since the human scale is one dominant for entropic, disordering information; hence unlike the spin units for the limiting ‘ordered’ charges and masses of the quantum and cosmological scale, our unit of information or informative time arrow is entropic (measured in gases). But if we were to consider the solid state, that entropy would be decreasing and so we would talk of the inverse procedure, of creation of information by reduction of temperature.

So those are the 3 scales of the galatom, whose equations will be studied in tehefourth line in more detail, as this is an easier verbal analysis of its organic structures.

**The 3 families of mass.**

Let us then now that we have revis(it)ed classic single time-space theories of reality, depart from the classic age of the 3^{rd} paradigm of metric spaces (quantum relativistic models of reality), without further ado.

**Two Quark Triangles and 2 Universal Membranes. Families of mass.**

There are 6 quarks, whose mass increases as the speed of their space-time vortices increase. Physicists divide them in the III horizons of evolutionary mass, with increasing mass/information. Yet they ignore the reason of those 3 families (the 3 horizons of any evolutionary system of Entropy and information); they ignore why they have different masses (because the speed of their vortices increase); they ignore why they have fractional charge (because they are bidimensional vortices, which must lock in triplets, to form a 3-dimensional space-time, harmonic with the electronic, 3-dimensional world we live in); and they ignore which kind of fractal cosmological forms they create (pulsars and black holes):

On the other hand, it is important to understand and classify particles, the understanding of the 3 ‘ages of evolution’ of information represented by the 3 families of mass and quarks, which are ALSO IN CLOSE SYMMETRY WITH THE UPPER cosmic scale, and the 3 regions of the galaxy, the Top quark star center (black holes modelled as top quark frozen stars, with positive top quarks as the boson cut off substance), the middle region of up and down light human quarks and the external negative charged, strangelet halo. Thus the symmetry is obvious:

3 ages of evolution of mass of increasing form: I, II and III families of quarks.

3 regions of the galaxy: Top quark black holes, up and down matter , negative strangelet halo

Symmetry between atoms and galaxies (protons positive top quark holes, negative electrons, strangelet halo)

Unlike the usual spatial classification of quarks in pairs proper of classic physics, in complex physics, we divide the Universe in 2 membranes, the dense, informative, gravitational, mass/quark membrane and the electronic, light one and we consider species of the gravitational, informative membrane to be tendencially ‘time events’, as information and time are related, and so quarks and black holes are better described with 3 temporal horizons and hyperbolic topologies.

In the graph, a more detailed analysis of the parameters of the main particles of the standard model. For simplicity, Neutrinos, which are better described not as particles in space but wave- events in time that transfer momentum between both gravitational and electromagnetic scales (reason why their ‘3 species’ mutate in time, as they travel to the earth), are ignored: The 6 quarks of the standard model are reordered in 2 ternary groups. In the bottom left, we observe the electromagnetic membrane and its elements. In the upper right side we observe the gravitational, quark world.

The graph, which is the standard model of Complex Physics, applied to quarks, requires no Higgs. Instead the top quark of self-similar mass in the upper vertex becomes the final evolutionary state of the Z+W particles which in a weak event transform lighter particles into ‘dark quarks’.

Its enormous mass means it should exist a new decametric ‘scale’ of super-strong forces, and the proper model to study the breaking of symmetry is not the Higgs but the Technicolor theory, whereas super strong top quarks should turn faster than light, be components of black holes and emit dark Entropy at 10 C speed, the next scalar force of the Universe that fills intergalactic space.

However in reactions at lower energies, Z and W particles never reach enough stability to become ‘parts’ of a top and so they quickly devolve into lower mass-states, which explains most of the reactions observed in accelerators, mediated by temporal, weak forces, which therefore have no spatial symmetry.

If we order particles by mass self-similarity in triads we observe 2 different atoms and 2 different quark-gluon soups, made of 3 types of quarks, dominated by their heavier quarks of each triangle:

– The up and down quark create the light atom. Yet when they are deconfined in a quark-gluon soup they are dominated by the most massive strange quark, which creates the superfluid vortex of ‘strangelet’ liquids or ‘ice-9’, responsible for Nova explosions.

– Charm and bottom quarks form a dark atom, dominated by the most massive top quark in a dark gluon soup, which we shall call ‘gas-9’, as it would be the most explosive substance of the Universe, responsible for Super-Novae and quasars and maybe the big-bang of a cellular Universe.

Thus if strange quarks create strange soups, top quarks will do the same with dark atoms; and if strangelets are components of strange stars, top quark liquids will be the components of top black holes.

This symmetric scheme is unknown to physics; so it lacks a visual understanding of what dark atoms (bcb particles) are, and why strangelets and top quark liquids are stable enough to form quark stars:

In the light world, the ud quarks and electron form the light atom. In the dark world, the cb quarks and the tau electron form the dark atom. The reader can now see that basically the two worlds are differentiated by a fractal scale of 1000=10^{3} Electron volts. In terms of static, fractal dimensions, this merely means that the world of top quarks is warped by a new SU_{3} group of dimensional form. It is more complex, more informative as it has 3 more dimensions of warping; or 3 more degrees of rotational speed in a dynamic perspective.

Imagine that inside the original vortex of our light-quarks there is not the eye of a hurricane, but another scale, another vortex, another medium, rotating 10 times faster in 3 dimensions. Thus this inner world extended into lineal Entropy will mean we need 10^{3} = 1000 times more Entropy to create it.

The rotational speed of that inner vortex will be 10 times higher – 10 c – but the Entropy needed to create the new 3-dimensional fractal world or inner scale of motion of those top quarks will be 10^{3 }fractal dimensions of rotational speed/mass. Thus the dark world of heavy quarks is 10 times faster and 1000 times denser ^{9}.

For the same reason the electron of the lighter world is lighter than the tau electron of the dark world. If our light world is a 0.c<10 c world the dark world is a c<10 c world.

Once this concept is clear, the self-similarities become evident: the world of 0.1c light atoms, which creates our matter and the world of c-strange quarks that creates quark stars must be matched by a world of dark atoms and top quarks, which creates the world of black holes. So black holes are top quark stars.

Let us show how the quarks of the 2 membranes increase their mass (we round here figures so the reader can easily follow them):

In the graph, the strange quark is the top predator quark of our triangle of light matter made of udu atoms. It is between 30 and 100 times heavier than our matter. While the top quark is the top predator quark of the triangle of dark matter and its bcb atoms, and it is around 100 times heavier than those bcb quarks. The strange quark and top quark are around 100 times heavier than the ud and bc atoms.

Since the equation of a mass vortex is U.C. × Mass = w^{2} × r^{3}, mass is proportional to the square of the rotational speed, w, of its vortex. So we have 3 decametric scales of rotational speed:

C/10, the speed of rotation of electrons, and the ‘ud’ system of quarks of our atoms, which in this manner are in harmony with the electron vortex that traps them.

<C speed for the strange quark or top predator quark that causes the breaking of symmetry of our matter, as it creates a faster attractive vortex, deconfining the quarks of our world, liberating them, and blowing the electronic wave into radiation.

In the graph, the bosons of both worlds are also self-evident: The photon is the boson of the electromagnetic world and the gluon is the boson of the gravitational membrane. The symmetry between the 2 quantum theories of electrons and quarks is a clear proof of that symmetry.

Both theories differ because the quark-gluon soup is more informative and has a more complex, ‘network-like’, ∏-structure, while the electron is basically a herd, with a loose ∑-structure.

The 2 forces (electromagnetic and strong forces) and the species evolved from them also change the parameters of Entropy and information of both worlds, according to the basic symmetry of the Universe, e × O = k, expressed in quantum physics by the law of range. The lighter world thus extends further in range/space and weighs nothing. The tighter world of dark quarks extends shorter in range and weighs/attracts one hundred times more.

It is only left to explain the role of the muon, which weights exactly what the strange quark weighs and the Z+W= top, which weighs the same also than the top=Higgs particle.

So again we find a clear symmetry between them: Those particles are self-similar to the top and strange quark, perceived from the other side of the dual membrane; they are their self-similar ‘ghosts’ in the light world. And they can be found as evolutionary steps in the creation of strange quarks and top=Higgs quarks in the processes of transformation of electronic membranes into dark, strong gravitational membranes.

And the Higgs^{7}? It is not needed and it is an impossible particle since a scalar boson breaks the isomorphisms of complex physics and a new force/membrane it is an invention without experimental evidence that would also break the symmetry of complex systems (like an organism with ‘2 nervous systems’). The evolution of lighter matter into the top, mediated by the Z and W particles (which should be considered the same particle in a time perspective; that is, the +, neutral and – states), is performed by a top quark/antiquark condensate (Nambu), which breaks the symmetry of all other types of matter, converting it into more tops that will condensate into a quark star or black hole. In biological terms, to break the symmetry means to kill as a top predator quark, the strongest particle of the Universe, all other forms of lighter matter, to feed on them and to convert them into a self-similar form of yourself.

In the same manner, the strange quark breaks the symmetry of our lighter quarks transformed into strange quarks and strange liquid (strangelets). It follows that SUSY particles, which also contradict the isomorphisms of balance between Entropy and mass/information and have never been found, do not exist either^{9}.

Because quantum physicists lack the tools of complex physics and the understanding of mass as information, all this is blurred in their equations. They do describe perfectly all those reactions with enormous mathematical accuracy as Ptolemy described better than Copernicus the movements of planets. But to do so they need complicated mathematical models as Ptolemy did. A model of complex physics with both arrows, Entropy and information, is far easier to understand as it explains topologically and in terms of cyclical, causal time events many whys of particle physics.

Recap. Mass is physical information – an accelerated, bidimensional vortex of mass (dynamic perception) called a quark, which can be described also in space (Galilean Paradox) as a non-Euclidean network of fractal gluons (static perception described by QCD theory). Quarks must be understood as ternary events in evolving time, and classified in triads, belonging to two different scales of the gravitational world – the strange world with c-rotational speed that interacts with our world and the dark world of top quarks that rotate at 10 c speed and form quark-gluon condensates called black holes. They are vortices of top quarks, the top predator particle of mass-information of the Universe.

**Mass theory**

On the other hand, extended objects (as opposed to point-masses) can have any mass. Do they have in its center ‘top quarks’. Not necessarily.

Let us remember that a system does have a membrane and a center, which is the last part to be formed.

The liquid present state does NOT have a particle center. It is a liquid enclosed by a pressure surface, a wall, a surface tension. A wave does NOT have a center, unless the photon is formed at certain ‘level’ of frequency, it has only the enclosure.

Mass effects thus do not require a ‘pure mass center’, with ‘zero-temperature’, but there is this huge region in between, with ‘cool temperatures’ and heavy masses, and centers of mass which do have some motion, but are quite cool, normally dense, solid states and crystals, or regions of high density pressure, in which there are mass and thermodynamic combined effects and also electromagnetic interactions.

This is how the Universe is built. It is NOT one-dimensional but ternary. Most entities have 3 states interplaying and none is pure.

As the Chinese said when all is yin and all is yang, the system backs off, as those perfect future and past states are somehow dead states.

So in our Universe we do exist as humans in liquid, gas and solid state, and the liquid middle state dominates, we do have electromagnetic, gravitational and thermodynamic processes, and thermodynamic processes dominate.

That is the fun and complexity of it: the 3 scales co-exist, as you co-exist as cell, organism and social number of a nation.

But it is important to fully grasp the rules of exchange of energy and information between scales, the regions of lineal relatively placid dominance of a certain state and those where there is an exponential growth or decay as one ‘scale’ dies into the lower or upper scale becoming the ‘other;.

Now, in the 5^{th} dimension we jump a full scale at the 10^{10-12}magnitudes, which as we shall repeat ad nauseam are the mean stars of a galaxy, ties of a dna molecule, galaxies of the cosmological horizon universe, cells in a regular superorganism, and so on.

So as we come two scales from quantum particles into thermodynamic and magnetic systems into mass systems, this is the proportion we must find, which is there:

Approximately 10^{19 } protons (10^{21} electrons) give us a Planck mass (minimal black hole).

And approximately 10^{12} atoms give us a magnetic domain.

Now to fully grasp the formation of those scales, one has to look at the formation of organisms – yes I know every physicist will raise its eyebrow, but I am talking as a philosopher of science which sees unity in al sciences, not as a ‘me, I and myself is all what matters physicist, who only accepts its mathematical specific way to treat reality’…

And if the ‘postulate of philosophy of science’, the Ockham’s razor – all systems are similar and simple following the same isomorphic laws holds, biology is the master science because is the one we observe with more detail – reason why we model galaxies as ‘cells’, and atoms as simple organisms.

So how does a simple organism formed? First, and this is thoroughly backed in the observation of physical scales, the ‘FIELD’ or lower entropic, motion scale of ‘forces’ connecting different micro-quanta appears, then the membrane and finally the o-point of view.

It is the reversal of time arrows that makes creation come from micro to macro elements, from minimal form and maximal energy elements.

So for example in life, it was first the ‘water’ what appeared, then the proteins were formed and somehow they started to form circular rings, bubbles, which were empty and finally it appeared the central rnass, the nucleotide acids with the nitrogen heads that ruled the system, and the only then ‘life appeared as a whole ternary system.

And this is how we must consider the creation of a gravitational system

First we must consider the creation of a ‘field’ in which ‘Pressure’, the ‘membrane element’, and ‘emerging attractive forces’, between atomic particles, form a diffuse field without center, more like a ‘liquid’ rubbing of molecules with van der waals forces.

But as the relative not yet rest mass of the system increases and the energy quiets down, a ‘thin membrane’ or ‘enclosure’ which is not to be seen under the Galilean paradox of motion=form, yet as a ‘solid’ dense form of mass, but as a cyclical force-motion with an inward, gradient element, encloses it. This inward force is what we measure as ‘pressure’.

It is pressure ‘against’ temperature: PV= nKT.

A pressure and volume are parallel, but Pressure is more efficient than volume, in adiabatic reactions, an increase of pressure, that diminishes ore the volume of the system, from a gas to a liquid-solid state, lowers the temperature and increases the mass ‘density’ to a point in which there is both, the gravitational field and the membrane, the water enclosed by the proteins.

Or put in other terms if Clausius stated, “Heat does not transfer spontaneously from a cool body to a hotter body.”, pressure will heat the body reversing with gravitational forces the arrow of entropy.

And if, in an ideal entropic gas, as pressure increases, the product PV increases faster, in real gases, at lower temperature the increase of Pressure upsets that of Volume , which drops much faster increasing the mass density.

And if we consider crystals, we find even more clear examples of the growing informative order, which will finally develop the ‘rest mass’ of the being.

And as pressure increases the solid atoms in the center, the mass effects appear, how early and how much they count, depends on the strength of the other forces, the electromagnetic forces, the ferromagnetic forces the temperature forces.

Nature is NOT simple in the details. It is simple in the general laws. So we are not ENTERING here in what a good physicist or specialist knows well, the details on how those parameters interact and cancel each other, fight for dominance, as it happens in life in the interaction we see closer between membrane proteins, water forces of osmosis, DNA control of the cell, mitochondria energy production, ATPs, etc.

But the process is obvious. It is clear that for atomic forms below the threshold of the magnetic triad, Iron-Nickel-Cobalt, we are in the kingdoms of radiation, of electromagnetic flows, of stars, where the equilibrium between ‘pressure’ and ‘radiation’ maintains a balance, where thermodynamic and electromagnetic flows can interact as the two ‘gradients’ of a living, liquid plasma world. We are not ions so we shall not enter at this stage, into the final frontier on how all this affects the way existence and perception happens, and how the actions of ∆±e, I, reproduction and social evolution of stars go through. The material is there, plus we offer an analysis form the perspective of the points of view and the pan geometries they display in other sections of these posts.

What matters here is this. At a certain point ‘pressure wins’, and so we insisted for decades that in the center of stars and planets we will NOT find a very hot liquid core, as it was canonical, but a ‘Chrystal, cold’ and massive, created by the dominant pressure, which becomes a mass center.

Alas, now it has become canonical that in the center of planets there are crystals not liquid hot balls.

Humans being thermodynamic beings tend to exaggerate from their world point of view the value of heat.

I have always in my personal analysis for 30 years considered the power of cold order, and information. For example, I am quite sure that there should be a model to use the gas-solid palladium-hydrogen concept to create cold fusion, as all systems can arrive slow with more cold order or hot with faster ‘time clocks’ (as temperature is the clock of the ∆-thermodynamic scale), to the same point, in cold process the order is higher.

So cold fusion must happen. Another matter, which I haven’t calculated is how ‘fast’. Probably too slow to make it worthy but maybe not. So far the theme is not yet settled.

The same happens with crystal formation: slow crystal formation under ‘pressure’ creates excellent diamonds. Fast crystal formation with low pressure and high temperature forms glass, with amorphous nature.

‘Death processes do not obey the conservation laws’

Notice here something miss? That’s right: the positive proton yields a negative pion! This is surely impossible to readers according to charge conservation rules.. The above excerpt does not say what charge these pions have except they are somehow created from protons. Since protons are positive this indicates the created pions must also be positive, in which case they could not decay into negative muons. Physicists say that somehow cosmic ray produce both, muons (negative) and anti muons (positive). So charge is conserved. But if anti muons are produced in equal numbers, we should observe them equally at sea level. Instead the literature indicates a vast abundance of muons only.

Now all this said Particles do have a moment of rest mass, a single moment, which we will latter describe, the moment of death, when they become antiparticle.

All systems do have a day and night a rest and a motion, a stop and go. Masses show in Dirac’s equation that acquire mass in the moment in which they are conjugated with the anti-article which is the reversal moment of death. So instead of giving up to the larger emerging scale a ‘quanta of space’ (as for example atoms do giving the outer electron to the valence forming matter or to the electronic flow that glues metal, but only the outer shell), mass receives its quanta from a moment of time. Precisely when the inversion between life-time and death-flat space particle and antiparticle stops into rest mass the being.

Only in the moment of death, mass resurrects.

Think of yourself when you die, and become a flat space surface, no longer a tall frequency of time motions, but flat space and you give your form and energy to Gaia and its lesser beings, insets of the lower life scale.

Well, it is the same concept. But particles resurrect easily into antiparticles and particles back again, as we observe in the quark-antiquark process, which gives its energy first to the meson (particle-antiparticle duality) of the nuclear force, where we find the contribution to the mass field.

It is not though a stable ‘mass rest’ but exactly what we just said, the contribution to the gravitational field of the equations of Einstein, the entropic contribution of the death-devolving moment.

And again you must grasp the ternary symmetries of the Universe at this stage Trust me it is a conceptual effort what physicists won’t like to do, but as important more indeed that the equations we are explaining.

The field comes first, reason why physicists say that waves-membranes and p.o.vs -particles are excitations of the field. In a way they are right. But how the field appears. The field is a force field of acceleration gradient, hence an entropic field. And entropy is the arrow of past-death of a system.

So this Dirac contribution is what creates ‘first’ the gravitational field, in the particle-antiparticle meson moment.

It is NOT enough to create the mass center. And that is why at the level of quantum scales we can only consider the ‘contribution of Dirac’s instant – the particle conjugate’.

The membrane must be considered to come from the next magnetic and thermodynamic scales, at the point it balances the radiation.

And then it comes the ‘center’, and when the center becomes the pure black hole. Ah, then it comes the nova, and the sudden explosive growth of ‘mass’. And we thermodynamic beings go to hell.

On the atomic table, this mass effect clearly starts with the more informative series of metal, in the 6^{th} period, where the other effects start to become subdued.

If we consider the micro-quanta of mass the top quark, it has a similar weight to the gold atom, the informative gold atom which in accelerators they are bombing to create heavy quarks

On this range of the gold barrier, is where we find that a single atom might have some control of a gravitational field to act with this ‘new weapon’. There are several factors that might consider this ‘thin red line’ of gold and mercury and lead’ the region where atoms might have the first sense of mass. Indeed, the gold atom at this stage is a red single power force able to move with finesse, to the point that you can create bridges with a single gold atom, and the gold properties are quite amazing in that respect. In terms of information, form, ‘rest’ mass.

So I would say that at quanta level the top quark and the 6^{th} period might be the absolute limit where mass effects start to subdue electromagnetic effects.

In that sense, Helium, Iron and Gold are the 3 top predator atoms of the table for their control of the 3 scales of the perceived Universe.

And what truly matters to us is to ‘relate them’ through simultaneous measure.

Einstein did that for some physical time cycles of light and gravitation (accelerated mass vortices which are clocks of gravitation as he explained in his principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration).

This is called 4D metric, in which Einstein synchronized through measures different time cycles and its different speeds using a more sophisticated form of ‘calculus of infinitesimal’ present time moments than Galileo who had done the same with a simpler formula of infinitesimal, present measures v=∂s/∂t.

But we need now to expand all those previous, simplified models, as we are discovering with advanced tool an infinity of new time cycles, besides the physical, frequencies of light speed and the clock like vortex of masses that Einstein studied.

**u+3>4: SUPER-GRAVITATION. COSMIC AND GALACTIC SCALES**

**The Advances of Fractal Relativity: Fractal, Fluid Space-times**

Physicists do not understand those simple truths—even a century after Einstein applied Mr. Riemann’s discovery of the fifth non-Euclidean postulate, which defines a point as a cyclical motion in space—because of a basic error of “materialist physics”: Since nuclear physicists do machines and bombs, which are made of dense metal, they tend to believe in “solid things.” So this kind of spiritual thought on motions and events is unreal to them. Instead, they “decided” that the principle of equivalence only affected to the gravitational force but somehow “stopped” in an obscure point where the rotational acceleration of the mass vortex clashed with something “solid,” like a “rubber ball,” which had to be the “mass.”

In the graph, our growing understanding of masses in terms of a fluid, relativistic vortex is an interesting proof of the distance between mathematics and reality since mathematics merely offer an abstract, simplified picture of reality with equations we have to interpret in terms of real objects observed in the Universe. That is the case of a mass, which once Einstein’s equations were published was first depicted as in the left picture, like a ball that was *curving downward* the space-time of the Universe. But that image is not logic and it has no relationship with the Universe we observe since any vortex, including those of air and water, have no solid ball in the center, but merely deflect the cyclical motion upward, transforming it again into lineal, perpendicular motion.

And this is what we observe in masses and charges, which are cyclical vortices, which first transform lineal motion into cyclical motion, creating the charge or mass and then deflect that cyclical motion, expelling it as less curved lineal motion through its poles, as a magnetic, electric, or dark energy flow.

So physicists moved recently toward the second more logical and realistic version of the vortex of mass, *curving inward*, illustrated by a fluid or gas vortex in pictures 2 (a fluid vortex) and 3 (a hurricane). This third picture of the hurricane applied by analogy to a mass vortex shows clearly how a bidimensional mass forms by curving energy. Each of the mini vortices that accelerates inward toward the center of the black hole will be a particle, a quark, which acquires mass as it rotates faster, diminishing in radius (according to the previous vortex equation). In the more complex mathematics of relativity, those equations that explain how energy becomes mass as we approach *c* speed (E=mc^{2}) become the so-called Lorenz transformations.

As you can see, the vortex comes inward toward the condensed center *in which it will fuse with other quarks into a single diminishing vortex, called an Einstein-condensate, that packs very close one quark over another, turning at light speeds in a state of highly ordered matter.*

In the graph, we observe also the evolution of true science, thanks to our advances in mathematics and logic. First, in the beginning of the century, when Einstein published, *only gravitation, the force external to the mass was treated under the Principle of equivalence, between force and acceleration.* The mass was still considered a solid substance, a Maya of the senses, which fix the quantum fluctuations of energy and information into a still image of the Universe, a knot of information called the mind. But the fixed images of the mind are not reality. Reality, as we entered into deeper experimental evidence, turned out to be always vibrating, moving, fluctuating at all scales we have perceived it. In the center, we see a bubble image of a particle.

There are not solid substances but a constant flow of motions that happen in different scales of fluid space-times, each one made of a sea of minimal “actions” with energy and information that act as the medium of that world—the gluons of the strong space-time of quarks, the h-Plancks of the weak world of electromagnetism, the -strings of the dark energy of gravitation (as per Nottale and others). And in the mediums known to man, the air molecules of nitrogen and oxygen, or the water molecules, which allow also the creation of hurricane and tornado vortices. In the new physics of complexity, we are all part of fractal discontinuums, mediums and scales of vibrating energy and form, and all the abstract simplifications of the “ancients,” while useful to allow calculus, become from a philosophical perspective hyperbolic or Pythagorean, monist, mechanist aberrations of thought.

Notable properties of this new world are a series of logic dualities and self-similarities called correspondences and invariances that relate those scales. Each new scale becomes created by the fractal sum of all the micro vortices that become a whole one in the next scale of size of the physical Universe, adding new dimensions. For example, a well-known correspondence is established between a mathematical description of a quark-gluon soup as a fifth-dimensional world of strings and a fourth-dimensional world of quark vortices. What this means is that -strings are the one-dimensional units of the superfluid dark energy that form those bidimensional quarks, which themselves lock in three perpendicular vortices to create fractals our three-dimensional electronic word. And so dimensions are always fractal, emerging as objects of a next scale, but the sum of all the fractal, finite dimensions from the small to the bigger world always adds up to four infinite continuous dimensions.

Yet all those fractal parts of the different scales of superfluid space-time are not solid substances but actions of energy and informative time. Planck again discovered this more than one hundred years ago, when he found the fractal unit of the membrane of light space-time we inhabited and called it action of energy and time. Yet the solid image never died away. What fractal theorists have done is to add to the “membrane of electroweak space-time made of light forces and electrons” another membrane of “gravitational masses” made of strings, gluons, quarks, and black holes. *S*o in the same manner, we have two basic physical mediums that create vortices in our planetary scale, hurricanes made of quanta/fractal parts of atomic air and tornados, made of quanta/fractal parts of atomic water. In the Universe at large, we have two mediums, the light space-time made of “light quanta” (our membrane) and the gravitational world made of strings, fractal parts of gluon quanta (which form the superfluid vortices of quarks) and gravitational dark energy that form the cosmological space-time.

This duality, clearly established in the work of Nottale and others, reshapes our classification of forces in two systems, one of electroweak light entropy and other of strong gravitational mass. It is important to define properly the terms of that duality, so ill understood by the “ancients,” the quantum entropy theorists, rooted in the physics of the past millennium:

- Electroweak, massless forces made of electromagnetic light and electrons belong to our membrane of Euclidean space-time, defined in classic physics. This is our world and it is defined by expansive entropy, spatial, lineal forces.
- Yet this world is in a tug-of-war with the strong, cyclical, massive dark world of quarks that bends this space into cyclical clocks of bidimensional, temporal information, and the quark vortices inside the atom. And this strong world of quarks that bends electrons has also a lineal force, the dark gravitational energy flows that structure the interstellar space.

The easiest way to perceive those two universes is to consider the primary Universe not our Universe, but the world of quarks connected by long strings of dark gravitational energy, which form a universal web over which *the electromagnetic world becomes a rubbery cover, as a series of copper cables are coated with rubber or our neurons with myelin. The quarks of strong forces are covered by electronic surfaces, which communicate between them through flows of electromagnetic light that runs over the thinner, faster wires of dark gravitational energy, which is the intimate scaffolding of reality.*

In the cosmological world, quark quanta form the hyper dense black holes and quark stars. Indeed, in the same manner, we have found certain planets to have cold crystal cores; it might be possible that some stars have in the center a superfluid core of quarks, with organic membranes/discontinuities that separate them from the thermonuclear world of hydrogen and helium that forms the core of lighter sun like stars. It is a simple, beautiful vision of a Universe in which all dual systems are also made of fractals of smaller systems.

So we always have to account for two complex types of non-Euclidean geometries, which the ancients dismissed with their continuous Euclidean analysis of Cartesian space: the duality between energy, explosive and informative, implosive systems that balance each other and the scalar structure in which quanta with fractal dimensions emerge into a higher scale.

A human is also made of organic molecules, fractal parts of a cell, fractal parts of a human organism, fractal parts of a society. And each of those entities can further be divided in an informative nuclei (the DNA in the cellular scale, the brain in the organic scale, the government and informative castes in societies) and a reproductive body (the cytoplasm, the body, the reproductive, working class).

All this was finally understood in the simplest scales of physics, thanks to the work of fractal and complexity theorists, which in the past two decades expanded our mathematical and theoretical view of the principle of equivalence to encompass all the fractal structures of space/time and the work of multiple experimentalists who validated it with observations. They are the founders of the fractal paradigm of science, which could be to twenty-first-century science what the quantum paradigm. I recommend the work of Mr. Nottale, an astronomer, who established the minimal unit of gravitational space-time and related the two membranes through fractal equations and my work on non-Euclidean mathematics, still simple but with huge future.

Now we keep it simple because logic meaning is more intense. For example, when we consider topology, the first perspective is the ‘concept of topology as geometry with curvature motions’. Thus we prefer the simpler concepts of Gauss and Lobachevski, to introduce this essential ternary symmetry.

But obviously the last conception of topology in terms of sets of points is the most accurate. And yet only mathematicians will get an intuitive picture of it. So we keep it simple in terms of topological networks.

In that regard a fundamental error proper of the human mind is to discharge simpler, older models as if they had no truth at all, when a new more pedantic, detailed analysis comes in, so for example, nobody would dare to study gravitation in Newtonian or even Poisson’s terms, since Einstein brought relativity, and yet as we shall see, the ‘fixed’, formal analysis of Einstein (based in curvatures, which he found to be, of course of our 3 types in the entire space-time of the Universe) is complemented by the more dynamic vortex-like vision of Newton and the gradient analysis of poison.

In fact we will study in epistemology, in the future, the ternary structure in time of information theories, which grow in complexity and accuracy but filling in details, BUT do not invalidate simpler analysis, as all realities are ‘ternary’ in form and function, and 3±i is indeed the fundamental number of the universe.

Why the existence of bidimensional time cycles, which carry information is not explained by science? The reason is the Galileo’s paradox ignored by physics: the fact that, when observed in detail, all what exists is in motion – hence it is an event in time – and yet most things we see seem static, quiet – hence, they look like forms of space. Yet space is merely the short perception of a Time motion – a cycle or trajectory of an entity from past to future, seen as a simultaneous form. All what is perceived as a form of space is part of a long motion in time – a clock-like cycle that carries information.

Galileo’s paradox shows that the 2 ultimate substances of our physical models of reality – masses and vacuum space – which seem ‘fixed forms’ have motion:

Masses and charges are cyclical vortices that curve the lineal energy/motion of the 2 forces of pure space –light and gravitation– into whirl-like vibrations. So a charge is caused by the cyclical warping of a lineal motion called light into electronic vortices; and a mass is caused by the cyclical warping of another lineal force with energy-motion, called gravitation, into mass vortices (E=Mc^{2} in Relativity.)^{11}

This again is not clear to physicists, because there are two theories of mass – that of Einstein, called Relativity and that of quantum theorists, which sponsor their own theory about mass, called the Higgs Theory. Yet Einstein’s theory of mass, General Relativity, is the basic theory of gravitation and mass in the Universe, proved right by multiple events of cosmology.

So Relativity should stand as the most probable truth. In such theory the Principle of Equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration defines a mass. According to that principle, acceleration and mass are the same, as when you accelerate in a rocket, car or lift and feel heavier. But since there are only two types of accelerated motions, lineal, energetic forces and cyclical vortices (whirls of space-time), and gravitation is a whirl of space-time, Einstein came to the conclusion that you could describe reality as a combination of two motions, cyclical motion with more form, ‘informative’ motion, origin of masses, which are whirls of space-time that attract like hurricanes do, accelerating towards its center, and lineal forces, energetic, expansive fields.

Space is not static, but a type of energy or motion that ‘occupies space’, which has extension. And since the shortest distance between two points is a line, the motion with more extension is lineal motion. Thus, the purest space is lineal motion. Once we realize of this paradox of perception, all what exists become a ‘form in motion’, a time motion.

And so we define two types of essential motions in the universe: lineal forces and bodies, which specialize in lineal motions or energetic motions and cyclical particles (masses and charges) and heads, which specialize in cyclical motions that create forms and are often perceived as static information. In the graph we see that duality between the still perception of energy as ‘space’ and clock-cycles as information and its real motions. Several facts explain those perceptive paradoxes:

– The ‘expansion of space’, a key feature of the Universe, is synonymous of motion. Since that expansion can either be described as a ‘growth’ of space between galaxies (big-bang theory) or as a measure of the speed of galaxies that move away from each other (z-red shift theory). So vacuum space and energetic, lineal motions are synonymous.

– All what we perceive as static has, in detail, some motion. Thus, in the same way we perceive in the night a moving car as a fixed line of space, we perceive the space of the Universe as static though it is expanding, moving. And we perceive the Earth as static even if it is rotating (Paradox of Galileo).

– A 3^{rd} proof of the temporal, motion-like nature of reality comes from the role of light in our perception of space: The last substrata of physical, vacuum space is light, (BG radiation) – a force in motion that shares the 3 Euclidean dimensions of canonical space, because both concepts vacuum space and light are synonymous: the 3 perpendicular dimensions of Euclidean space, width, height and length, are equivalent to the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light-space – the electric= informative=height field, the magnetic=energetic=width field, and the length=reproductive field (since a light wave reproduces its form in the length dimension).

Thus, we ‘see’ space as made of 3 perpendicular dimensions, because its substance ‘light-space’ is made of 3 perpendicular motions. Both concepts are the same: the 3 dimensions of static vacuum space are the 3 arrows=motions of light: its energetic, magnetic field, its informative, electric field, and its reproductive, e x i, field of speed. Those 3 motions occupy and create vacuum space. While the 4^{th} arrow of social evolution of light is what we call ‘colors’, which gather many photons into a single color and complete our perception of space. The equality between spatial dimensions and light motions – the substance of space – is proved by the condensation of vacuum space into light photons.

Yet the mathematical, probabilistic depiction of that phenomenon obscures its cause among physicists. On the other hand, painters know this equivalence since the impressionist, pointillist schools discovered that we paint light, not space.

We add to light-space a 2^{nd} spatial force, gravitation, which we do not perceive, but seems to curve the Euclidean geometry of light-space, according to Einstein’s relativity.

Thus, there are 2 space membranes: light-space, the space we perceive; and gravitational space, which we do not perceive directly, though we know it exists because its force/energy affects reality. So the total space of reality is shaped by the combined creative effect of two expanding energies, gravitation and light. Thus, space and its dimensions are *not* an abstract, mathematical reality that exists independently of light and gravitation – an error caused by the use of an abstract, continuous Cartesian graph that seems a form of space, independent of the entities that exist within it. Space is made of those 2 moving forces, reason why we cannot move faster than light-space, the maximal motion-distance of our perceived Universe.

*Recap: *What we call vacuum space is the static, ‘dimensional’ perception of the energy/motion of light and gravitational forces that fill the vacuum. What we call a mass is the static perception of a whirl of vacuum energy, a clock-like, cyclical motion of time. Hence, since all is motion, including the 2 ultimate substances of reality, the energy of space and the forms of masses and charges, all is in constant change, all is time. Thus, we exist in an eternal Universe, made of time motions, which our perception fixes into a continuous, still reality.

Thus our first approximation, to the unification of charges and masses, using first the simplest Bohr and Newtonian model is right because the concepts behind those models are right, the details not so much – in the 4th line the more complex mathematical physics of Relativity and Heisenberg Matrix with the Hamiltonian will be used to obtain similar results.

In that regard we must stress that first concepts must be right. Physics today often uses wrong concepts due to its lineal definition of time, continuous concept of space and lack of 5d metric to unify all the scales of the universe and explain the duality of entropy and information.

Yet, it covers those conceptual errors, as in the cosmic big bang studied in the previous post with a lot of ‘Latin’: complex computer models that always seem right, by the hypnotic power of difficult mathematical calculus, its nice PowerPoint pictures and billion of $ spent in experimental machines – mostly to find nothing we don’t know already as a little whisper of Gravitational waves, or an irrelevant particle of the weak interaction (the Higgs). I use none of that ‘rhetoric’ here, as I am a proud believer in human brains – have always done my calculations by hand (-; and yet, this introductory paragraph give us more whys on modern physics that all the research of post-war scholars, who of course will not have any of it (-; Why? Because the universe is simple and not malicious. So simple principles MUST RULE the foundations of a Theory of Everything. (-;

**Einstein’s Equivalence: Bidimensional mass. Dimensions of gravitational space-time.**

In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: iƒ (relativity)≈ Ti (newton) <-> Se (Poisson)≈ Sp (Lagrange):

iƒ -relativity is a still formal, *informative,* description in ‘present’ of the gravitational space-time)

Ti- Newton is a moving vortex of Time, less detailed and more dynamic.

Se-Poisson is a potential static field of entropic motions, with a gradient-direction.

Sp- Hamiltonian-Lagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.

“I want to know God’s thoughts . . . the rest are details.”, said Einstein. Yet those thoughts are logic principles, the details are mathematical equations, which evolve with new developments in calculus, while the principles stay.

In that sense, it is a common mistake of Pythagorean physicists who believe God speaks only mathematics to consider that Einstein’s work on general relativity is unrelated to Newton because he uses different mathematics. Thus, Pythagorean physicists, who consider mathematics the only language of reality, think that Einstein explains a completely different view of the Universe, which invalidates totally Newton’s work. This view is wrong and leaves unexplained the very obvious fact that Newton’s description of gravitational forces works so well that it was considered an absolute truth till the twentieth century and is still used for most calculus of forces on Earth *because both are based on the same logic principle of equivalence, which in the hierarchy of science dominates over the different detailed mathematical descriptions of it. *

Moreover, it is known to the historian of physics that Newton’s equations were evolved by Poisson and Poisson was the departing point of Einstein, which is the departing point of fractal relativity, the twenty-first-century version sketched in this book. Yet the principle of equivalence between accelerations and masses is *not the departing point of Higgs and Hawking’s entropic black holes, which deny Einstein’s principles, and so regardless of their mathematical complexity, they are wrong because their logic principles are false*.

So we must consider a different view on the evolution of gravitational theory. Newton, Poisson, and Einstein’s theories are right because they describe the same *logic principle of equivalence*, with the best mathematical models available to each age. And since logic is in the hierarchy of the scientific method, superior to mathematics, from where it derives—as Gödel, Russell, and Frege proved, deducing the laws of mathematics from those of logic—what matters is to understand the logic principles of the Universe, which will then be described “in higher detail” with each new paradigm of mathematics. What this means is that as mathematics have grown in detail and precision, new physicists have applied the new mathematics and increased the detail of their calculus.

Yet the physical principles, events, and concepts that truly define the phenomenon physicists describe have not changed. So when those principles are changed by false principles as Higgs and Hawking do in mass and black hole theory, the results are false regardless of the mathematical detail they use to reinvent the Universe.

This is clearly shown in theory of mass by the three phases of evolution of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, all of which can be used to calculate trajectories of masses, because all of them follow the three legs of the scientific method. The first paradigm was Newton’s paradigm, which used a simple formula of a gravitational vortex to describe them. And they worked fine for most calculus and they are still used. Then Poisson, Lagrange, and Hamilton refined those calculi. And finally Einstein used Poisson formulation of the gravitational force and took it a step further with the use of non-Euclidean maths.

What we have done is to take Einstein’s work further by using the next age of evolution of mathematics, fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics and the laws of endophysics, which includes the limits of human perception on those equations (Galilean paradox, changes in the speed of time around black holes), which solve the problem of the uncertainty of measure introduced by the observer.

But any of those three-plus-one ages of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration are good enough to explain what mass is; and none of the quantum alternatives, despite the complexity of its maths, is truth because they deny the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, considering mass an external property given by solid particles (the Higgs) that transfer it magically to all other entities of the Universe, not an internal property of the topological structure of space-time, its accelerated, cyclical motion.

Any of those models—Newton’s forces, Einstein’s relativity, or our non-Euclidean fractal description of the two membranes of the Universe—bring enough understanding of what a mass is. Yet because Pythagorean physicists ignore the underlying logic principles that rule their equations, they believe in the mathematical model of the day and when new mathematics appears, they think the old model was totally wrong. So they thought, as Alexander Pope put it, that “God created Newton and there was light,” but when Einstein came with new maths, they threw Newton’s work as if it were a fantasy when it had worked perfectly for three centuries in calculating all kinds of motions in the Universe. Newton had embedded the same true principles in his work—the principle of equivalence between accelerations and forces, masses and motions (F=m × a).

Next, Poisson and Hamilton applied the new refined tools of differential calculus to the study of the motion of planets, which was previously described by Newton with simpler operandi. So they found out another key principle of the Universe of energy and information—the law of minimal energy, which states that any system of the Universe tries to keep its internal energy and information, follows the path that saves more energy between two points.

Then when Riemann developed non-Euclidean mathematics, Einstein applied them to the previous work of Newton, using the notation of Poisson, to find a more precise analysis of gravitational mass vortices, by making a series of “simultaneous,” present pictures of those cyclical motions and adding the influence of the gravitational membrane that underlies our world of light and electroweak masses.

We could resume the differences between the classic formulation of Newton and the modern one, considering that Newton formulated the description of the whole, and its dynamics in an extended space and time duration, while Einstein formulated the detailed topology of the vortex in each non-Euclidean point of its space and in the simultaneity of each present moment of duration.

The description of those vortices in the scale of charges and quarks can be also done with two degrees of detail, as we do here, considering them whole vortices or as the so-called QCD theory of strong forces does, in detail, considering each fractal quanta (gluon and quark) at each moment of time and aggregating them together. Yet while the whole description of quarks we shall do here is less accurate than the detailed one, brought about by quantum chromodynamics, it provides a more logical, comprehensive overview, which is the aim of this book, since all those mathematical descriptions are truth as long as they describe accurately the equivalence principle between forces and accelerations. If we compare them with a verbal description, we could say that all of them have the same core sentence, the principle of equivalence, but the description of it grows in detail. If Newton, for example, said Jesus had dark hair, Einstein refined the analysis and said Jesus had dark hair with brown touches in his forehead, and fractal relativity refines the sentence further, saying Jesus had long dark hair with brown touches on his forehead and a white stripe on his temples. But the essential concept remains: Jesus had dark hair, that is,

*All the past forces-fields of entropy energy and future particles-clocks of the Universe are accelerated motions balanced in present inertial waves.*

This principle, so stated, is what physicists dropped with a single arrow of entropy; and due to the excessive specialization of their mathematical models of enormous detail the general vision of the forest of all physical events, the equivalence principle is lost. For that reason, I have always preferred the opposite approach: to study first the forest, the principles of physics, with a limited mathematical precision, achieved by not using computers in my calculations and accepting as supreme guides the laws of the scientific method (Objectivity->Symmetric Minimalism; Linguistic Correspondence; Cyclical Experimental evidence: Œ=Mc^{2}) and the well-established principles in which previous theories were founded. And only at the end, once the forest is mapped, I have considered some of its specific trees in more detail.

It is thus the comprehension of the principles of equivalence between the forces of the Universe and the two types of accelerations (F=m × a) and its invariance under change of position or scale in the Universe, not the mathematical details that casts further light on the meaning of mass and charges in the Universe.

Let us then summarize so far the meaning of that principle in Newton and Einstein’s work. Newton defined that principle with a simple formula: F= m × a; that is, the forces of the Universe are made of two elements, which we must consider to be both accelerated motions. Yet since we only know two types of accelerated motions, lineal acceleration (*a*) and vortices of cyclical acceleration (V × radius=k), masses should be curved, accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.

This was Einstein’s view. It led him to formulate with Riemannian tensors the four-dimensional space-time structures of gravitation and masses, measuring the structure of space under that principle in a simultaneous moment of time. Thus, he made still pictures in which we can gauge the curvature of the vortex to its finest detail, adding smaller corrections to the whole dynamic Newtonian view.

Thus, Einstein just made a more detailed analysis of Newton’s vortices of mass, turning around the sun, using Riemannian geometries and the concept of simultaneous present time. We could say in a way that he made a more precise picture, a still present photograph of the spatial form of those vortices, but the essential truth, the principle of equivalence between forces and acceleration remains the same from Newton to Einstein to fractal relativity. And so it is that principle and not the evolving mathematics of any of those three models what we have to consider in detail to fully grasp the essence of all the forces of the Universe. What fractal relativity does is to add the advances on theory of information, to go even further, respecting the work of those pioneers and founding fathers.

Now as we advance through different systems of physics we will realize that those 4 views are common to all of them, albeit, some have a better use than others. Of them the most all-encompassing one is the Lagrangian Hamiltonian as it is the vision of the whole time worldview of the entity (described with the peculiar concept of energy≈ time in physics, as it should distinguish ALWAYS potential, informative and kinetic energy momentum, as it does in the detailed analysis of its quanta, the scale angular and lineal momentum. So we shall before going into those studies make an analysis of the meaning of magnitudes and conservation laws to fully graph them in terms of T.Œ.

This of course does not mean the others do not work, but as a general rule, far away perception observes wholes (you do not see the hairs of your friend coming down the road but its head and before that its whole, so the Whole –energy worldview and the head – Tƒ element, in this case Newton and Hamilton – are by far the most widely used. And for that reason we have used the Newtonian easiest perspective that comes first – the head in motion that is talking so to speak – to unify forces. In 4th line we will make copious use of the other 3.

In that regard the power of T.Œ to classify and understand the why of all mathematical physics marvels the ‘rational, non-computerized still human thinker’ (-: As this is not the case of most experts, ts, ts, we are not writing so much for physicists, but about physics and for all humans with a minimal degree of knowledge of physics, to the level of any graduate of natural sciences, which is expected to know the basics of mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism, and some notions of relativity and quantum theory – this final discipline, made extremely detailed in its content for two reasons:

- Information travels upwards with no entropy so we do have a lot of information about quantum particles, and a lot of things to describe, billions of particles with relative freedom of motion, to explain together with enormous detail because…

- The electronic industry is creating sophisticated organisms of metal, chip-brains, robots, and nuclear weapons, which require precision calculus of the exchanges of energy and information of those particles in bundles of billions. So this is by far the most overgrown of all disciplines of technological science, while far more fundamental sciences for mankind such as history, social economics, human studies and medicine are under developed.

We thus will consider ONLY on this overgrown discipline the basic conceptual elements required to understand particles as all other planes of the Universe, through its organic, mental, topological and causal properties, to show they are NOT special. As in any case it would be a disrespect to the reader, to get into the parlance of modern Latin, as in any case its goals (to unify all forces etc. under wrong dogmas and postulates) is impossible.

**Masses Are Vortices of Physical Information. ****Dimensional Form Becomes Speed: Creation and Destruction in the Organic Universe**

*The Universe creates dimensional form by reducing the motion/speed of a physical system and vice versa: it creates motion/ speed by eliminating dimensions of form. So a 3 dimensional nebulae of matter collapses into an accelerated mass vortex, in which, according to the Equivalence between gravitational forces, masses and cyclical acceleration (Einstein’s relativity), is an attractive whirl of spacetime.*

*The equivalence principle establishes a Universe with two limits of eternal movement: a lineal speed of gravitational and electromagnetic forces and a cyclical speed of masses and charges, which are vortices of space-time. Energetic forces create space, and vortices are clocks of time that carry information, eternally transforming into each other in self-similar events:*

*Σ** spatial forces (lineal movements) ≤=≥Tƒ (cyclical clocks of information).*

*The sums of all those events maintain an eternal dynamic balance of cycles and lines.*

*Yet since lines have one dimension less than a clock cycle, the process can be also perceived as a game of creation and destruction of dimensions of form. In the graph, a three-dimensional slow nebulae accelerates its motion as it becomes a bidimensional vortex of faster, more attractive mass. Such transformation is common both in the cosmological world as stars become black holes and the quantum world in big crunches when electrons become quarks. r.*

The Galilean Paradox is essential to understand the Universe as fixed lines are also ‘—motions’ and bits of information are time clocks. And one can transform into the other: Se x =Tƒ. They do so through the 3 ages of life or energy’s standing points of a Hamiltonian:

Spe<ST<Tƒ= Youth: Max. Se/Tƒ > Maturity: Se x Tƒ (Se=Tƒ) >Old age: Tƒ/Se

But in physical systems they do so through external motions mostly by loosing or acquiring back and forth in space, dimensions of form or dimensions of speed.

There are two concepts that do not appear in classic physics but are essential in understanding how the universe converts energy into information (motion into form): the paradox of Galileo, which allow us to describe those processes as “frozen pictures,” which is the informative point of view, or as changes in the speed or motion of things.

The graph shows the tw