Home » ‘0rganic physics:¡›|2| » Entangled, realist Universe

Entangled, realist Universe

±∞∆•ST

Advertisements

PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS

Summary.

Introduction. The organic, entangled Universe

I. The five Ðimotions of physical systems.

II. Modern physics,  quantum and relativity, its philosophy. Transitions between scales.

III. Mathematical Physics, its philosophy.

IV. DISOMORPHIC METHOD APPLIED TO PHYSICS.

INTRODUCTION

ORGANIC, ENTANGLED UNIVERSE

‘Two things I consider infinite the Universe and the egocy of man.’ Einstein

‘The why is the only thing a physicist doesn’t ask.’

Feynman, on the indifference of physicists for the ultimate principles

‘The why is the only thing a philosopher answers.’

Sancho, on the search of philosophers for the ultimate principles

“Time tells matter how to move; matter tells space how to curve≈form.” Wheeler, on the two elements of realty, motion=time and form=space.

“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different program may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….)

To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wide-ranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’

Steane, on the goal of General Systems Sciences, realized in this web, applied in this pot to 5D² physics…

“Entangled”. adj. 1. caught in or as if in a tangle (v. tr. 1. To mix together or intertwine). 

2. Deeply involved especially in something Complex; Connected by participation or association or use.

The organic paradigm – its philosophy of the Universe in a nutshell.

The 3 new properties discovered in our analysis of relational space-time: cyclical time patterns origin of all the repetitive laws of science; which break enclosing with angular momentum space into infinite vital energies, self-centered into ‘linguistic mirrors-minds-singularities’, the Maxwellian demons that allow information to dominate entropy and create the ordered forms of reality, have an immediate consequence in physics.

To order those infinite clocks that break reality, but share similar properties we need to accept a fractal, organic, scalar Universe. The scales of the Universe are a consequence of the mathematical mirrors embedded in charges and particle-points and crystals and gravitational black holes, the 3 main singularities of the quantum thermodynamic and cosmological scales, all of them unified by the simple metric of the fifth dimension. Yet as systems that co-exist in scales ARE organic systems, we talk of an organic, entangled Universe, whose whys are the survival of its physical species, in an automated or apperceptive way (not conscious, but able to gauge information and use it for survival purposes).

The translation of all the abstract concepts and equations of physics into the organic whys thus complex the discipline. You should see this upgrading as symbiotic: analytic physics has studied its details with mathematical equations, which are not the cause but the best mirror-language hold in those images-singularities that return back their mirror image in the orderly world of infinite parts… put together by flows of energy and information between scales. While the organic, survival, co-existing properties of the fifth dimension of scales define the ultimate absolute whys of reality. So from the atom to the organic galaxy, the purpose of physical systems and its workings are the same of all other systems of Nature.

We shall study here the issues of philosophy of Physics derived by the organic paradigm, as we have studied  5D metric equations  and all those scales which are basically 3±¡, 3 perceived as they entangle to create the galaxy the organism in which we exist, and one, beyond, the dark world, we do NOT perceive, in the main post of this section on ‘organic physics’. Let us then consider the first conundrum: how those scales imply that beyond the galaxy there is a world of unknown faster than light species, which allow us to fully understand a REALIST view of physics, including the quantum potential of Bohm’s realist pilot-wave theory of quantum physics, the conundrums of black holes as real dark matter heavy frozen quark stars, and the reasons why indeed spacetime expands between galaxies but it is not a proof of the abstract big-bang, an ‘error’ of ‘CREATIONIST physics’ that believes the mathematical language comes before the space-time reality it mirrors.

THE 4TH UNPERCEIVED SCALE OF PHYSICS.

We have chosen by the correspondence Principle, to ‘rename’ this post on the proper philosophy of a 5 Dimensional Universe, the most similar word to ‘organic’, used in Physics, ‘entangled’, which is also the proper theory of quantum ‘realist physics’ (Einstein->Bohr->Bohm), in which a ‘quantum potential’ of a lower ‘plane of the fifth dimension’, goes faster than c-speed because it follows 5D metric equations and entangles all the parts of a galaxy into a cosmic organism, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe we shall call ‘galacell’; which should be the ‘unit’ of reality, astrophysicists should study and in 5D fractal metric corresponds exactly to the atom, the ‘unit’ of reality, quantum physicists should study, while the third great field of physics, thermodynamic physicists should deal with the intermediate ‘human plane’. Between those 3 planes the entangled Organisms of the physical Universe co-exist:

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scales is simple as all space-time metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

In the graph, the ∆±4 scales of physical systems, self centred @ the human  pov and the 5D metric equivalence between its time speed and space distance which gives us its co-invariant energy, in all scales (S x T = K)

That is, as smaller systems move faster, the plane below our light space-time c-speed must by definition, because it is invisible to us and carries no human information, move faster than light;  (Max. $t = Min. ð).

The entangled Universe then ‘spreads’ through 3±¡ Planes of reality, 3 of which are perceivable, the quantum, thermodynamic and cosmological, gravitational planes, an one ‘surrounding them’, completes an amazing super organism, whose properties are indeed organic, topological and pentalogical due to the existence of 5 Dimensional motions or Dimotions of time-space, in terms of the known classic temporal physics, with the ad on to ‘lineal time’ of a cyclical fifth dimension, in terms of spatial classic dimensions, with a new ‘dimension’ of fractal space.

BEYOND THE HUMIND’S LIGHT SPACE-TIME PLANE.

The Dark World. E<cc>M and Beyond: the c-t limits. 

The dark world is according to 5d metric: s x t = c, ‘faster than light’ both in its lineal inertia (s) which is seen as expansive space between galaxies – since its motion is invisible, and its temporal speed or frequency, 1/t=ƒ, on the rotary motion of black holes that therefore store maximal information beyond the c-speed event horizon. A fact in the complex mathematical model we formalize as t<0. Thus ok and c-speed become merely the limits of our light space-time plane in terms of lineal speed and cyclical/angular momentum, the singularity center and clock-like membrane that encloses and control a vital energy and have its maximal example in the black hole, an accelerated vortex of gravitation that therefore should go faster than c, passed the event horizon;  and should move ‘faster than light’ if we adopt the point of view of the black hole, as it ‘creates’ distance-speed by ejecting at faster than c (kerr metric) the absorbed light energy that becomes a jet of dark entropy on its poles. 5d in that sense has not hang ups with postulates such as those of einstein’s c-speed limit or the concept of entropy as the single arrow of time, which are just born out of the ego and naive realist of huminds, but are neither logic nor experimentally sound.

Humans confuse things they don’t know with dogma… Top quarks and black holes cannot be explained fully considering a single continuous spacetime plane.  Because for them to work as quark stars able to eject dark entropy and dark matter through its vortex they NEED ‘a gravitational plane’ at faster than c-speeds, besides the light space-time plane we ‘see’ limited by Einstein’s relativity to go at c-speed.

But while respecting Einstein, ‘beyond’ the c-speed plane’ there is immense evidence of the galactic plane of ‘dark entropy’ and ‘dark matter’ going faster, hence allowing the black hole to emit dark entropy seen as expanding space between galaxies. A few proofs:

– The gravitaational vortex (graph) IS accelerated. This is the basic TRUTH of Einstein general relativity: Principle of equivalence between gravitation and acceleration.

So obviously BEYOND THE EVENT HORIZON THE SAME PROCEDURE – ACCELERATED LIGHT SPACE-TIME BEYOND Chappens and LIGHT must become something else, as when it is accelerated in accelerators at c-speed. What then becomes in accelerators, obviously QUARKS! SO THAT IS WHAT IT WILL BECOME IN BLACK HOLES, LIGHT BECOMES QUARKS! EASY, SOUND THEORETICALLY, PROVED EXPERIMENTALLY, just Mr. hawking Mr. Penrose and Mr. Wheeler – the guys of the mathematical singularity – didn’t see it, but we don’t see gravitation and infer its laws. Nobody doesn’t deny gravitation because we don’t see it. Nobody should deny the obvious conversion in a vortex of c-speed spacetime beyond the event horizon  into quarks as it happens at CERN in its accelerators

Gravitation is an accelerated vortex of time, which follows the same laws that a vortex of thermodynamic time (hurricane, eddie or a vortex of quantum time (charge). The 3 in fact are easily unified by a simple 5d metric equation (which physicists have been trying to find for 100 years but they can’t in a single plane of space-time. This is an aberration of creationist mathematics that only exists in the cartesian continuous single graph that newton used to create the concept of a bakcground spacetime…)

We live and in this even the most retarded physicist will agree in a relational space-time, we are made of vital space-energy and cyclical time membranes (energy and angular momentum, the conserved quantities)… read the central page at unification which explains it perfectly simple. Here the key graph, so you see, what hapepns inside the black hole because we can see the equivalent thermodynamic eddie: you see, beyond the horizon of the hurricane, the fluid space-time of gas or water breaks into eddies smaller and faster, those will be the quark formed in the black hole:

Bellow you see the scales of the big-bang, we escaped chemical lesser thermodynamic big-bangs, so you have the non-existence – background radiation as we explained in other articles CAN ONLY REALISTICALLY BE PRODUCED BY A SINGLE SPECIES IN THE COSMOS A BLACK HOLE THE SIDE OF THE MOON, PROVED EXPERIMENTALLY.

SO again WHEN we APPLY REALISM to physics and abandon the belief that all inflationary mathematics, are REAL, we are left always with a single candidate in economical nature to be the substance of beings: A SOUP OF heavy QUARKS IN BLACK HOLES, A BLACK HOLE MOON MACHO FOR THE BACKGROUND RADIATION (a black hole that eats a moon will have exactly the same temperature required to reproduce redshift background radiation at 2.7 K).

THE UNIVERSE IS A PERFECT ARCHITECTONICAL, DETERMINISTIC ETERNAL BUILDING OF superorganisms tracing WORLDCYCLES OF LIFE AND DEATH…

Once this CORRECTIONS are done and light space-time kept for those regions where we see light, we find above, a slower thermodynamic scale and below a faster intergalactic scale, which I would call simply ‘dark scale’ of faster than light rotary top quarks bc-atoms, and dark entropy expanding vacuum.

AND THEN TOP QUARKS CAN MERGE PERFECTLY AND CB-ATOMS BEING FORMED…

NOW physicists think this is not happening BECAUSE THE INTERACTION OF TOP QUARKS AND CB ATOMS IS SO FAST, THEIR rotary motions are so incredibly fast, billions of interactions in a second, that they think they cannot act with the strong force whose coupling constant is slower, IF they rotate at less than c-speed.

But IF THEY ROTATE faster than c-speed, which is proved by the ‘billions of time per second frequency when they switch on-off from quarks into antiquarks at FASTER THAN C,  and the accelerated vortex beyond the event horizon of EFE equations, heavy quarks can become stable cb-atoms and top quark bosons.

So by symmetry with pulsars black holes will be dark stars with a center of top quarks and a cover of cbc atoms.

WHY DO I THINK THEY ARE EXACLTY LIKE PULSARS which have STRANGE QUARKS IN THE CENTER AND light atoms in the surface – hence with top quarks in the center CB-ATOMS IN THE SUFRACE. BECAUSE THE UNIVERSE IS PERFECTLY SYMMETRIC, IN SCALES, FORMS AND it is ECONOMIC, iterative and so pulsars and black holes are symmetric frozen stars as Einstein wanted.

SO THE TWO SYMMETRIC DECUPLETS OF QUARKS MUST FORM THE SAME PARTICLES, THE 3 SYMMETRIC SCALES OF MATTER, QUANTUM, THERMODYNAMIC AND GRAVITATIONAL, MUST HAVE similar forms, and the 3 parts of the galaxy must host each of those 3 ‘subspecies’:

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.26.57

In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.

dark macrocosmos

In the graph the ‘gala cell’, an organism of stars, joined by a network of ‘nervous, gravitational information’, composed of the 3 relative families of mass, of increasing density, which act as the ‘DNA-informative centre’ (top quark stars, aka black holes, as top quarks are the only ∆-1 ‘points’ with the same density that black holes ), the protein, hard membrane (strangelet halo of dark matter – Witten hypothesis), and a visible electromagnetic network of ‘stars’, the energetic mitochondria that becomes the food that reproduces both strangelets and black holes. It is a simple organic scheme that explains the whys of physical particles, and the ternary structure of galaxies, similar to that of an organic system of the Universe. Yet such models are not even explored by astrophysicists, as they are based in organic concepts, which physicists by ‘dogma’ cannot accept.

ALL THIS IS WHAT EINSTEIN ASKED FOR in everything he wrote about philosophy of science, the limits of mathematical equations, the hypothesis of frozen stars, the relational nature of space-time, and the use of c-speed limits only in phenomena related to light – you name it: ‘Leibniz is right, there are infinite time clocks in the Universe but it so we have to change physics principles’…

which is what I do in those texts. But I Don’t DENY EINSTEIN AS the singularity guys who deny his affirmation that black holes only will be real when they have a cut-off substance, and believe as creationist mathematicians do that if they ‘talk’ numbers alas reality appears.

Fact is the black hole is a frozen star, the dark world goes beyond c-speed between galaxies, since special relativity and c-speed IS only the speed of the luminous space-time of galaxies, which is also the substance of the background light radiation. Beyond galaxies and within black hole OBVIOUSLY the light limit doesn’t work, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT THERE TO IMPOSE THE LIMIT.

Some basic principles of epistemology and truth.

Before we enter into the exploration of the ‘invisible scales’ of forces with whom our ∆ø humind interacts to achieve the simplest action of motion (for which perception is not needed, as pure motion and pure static perceived form have inverse properties) , we shall clarify a few ‘first concepts’ of great importance that often come up on this blog on the argument on the foundations of physics and the limiting realms of the humind, which are the quantum and cosmological scales:

  1. The equal value of all scales of Nature. It is obvious that the more removed we are in 5D scale, the more uncertainty we obtain in our analysis, hence the relative unimportance of physics in those realms to understand a Universe with likely infinite scales. Those scales are NOT more important and are MORE distorted to human observation, so they are less relevant for a philosophy of science. Why then physicists have so much intellectual prestige? There is the worldly power – the make our technological machines which today are more important than life to this planet, as its company-mothers of machine dominate our eco(nomic)system. But that is not the theme of this post. The theory behind is. It is called the ‘constructionist hypothesis’ that pretends the lower scales CAUSE the upper scales. This is NOT truth, as we have seen in many posts, since the scalar causality is dual: information flows from lower, faster time  scales with more cyclical form=information and energy from larger scales. So causality is dual. And further on all scales are self-similar – facts defined long ago by system scientists as the next quoted text shows:Screen Shot 2018-03-06 at 6.40.20 PM
  2. This said, in this post we shall deal with the smallest scales, which belong to quantum physics, so two important questions on those scales are the difference between the quantum scale of particles and the thermodynamic larger scales of molecules. In Physics it matters more to understand the quite evident scale of thermodynamics, our scale. And when we do so, it becomes obvious as Einstein put it that ‘the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”. How this happens is easy to understand in 5D metric, and mathematically we shall time permitted include a more ‘pro’ analysis for specialists.SINCE in 5D Metric there IS no DISPUTE between Einstein and Bohr.  First S=T means we have always equivalences between space-form-statistical populations and time-motions-probabilities. THE time o-1 description IS BETTER FOR faster ‘clocks of smaller particles’, according to the  5D scalar metric: smaller scales in space run faster time clocks – time, not space thus become dominant in quantum physics, hence better described probabilistically. The Universe is thus probabilistic in smallish, time dominant scales (the 0-1 mathematical unit sphere after normalization of parameters) vs. STATISTICAL IN larger SPACE (the 1-∞ thermodynamic plane). Yet  BOTH ARE EQUIVALENT MATHEMATICAL FORMULATIONS (fundamental theorem of measure theory – the 0-1 sphere and all its laws are equivalent to the 1-∞ plane, which is better for slower LARGE thermodynamic ensembles that occupy more space.
  3. Finally is essential to accept that in 5D scales, the c-speed limit is ONLY the limit of speed of the light space-time scale, as S x T = Constant. So for smaller scales speed ARE faster, both in rotary clocks, as we have just shown, and in lineal inertia. This means gravitation scales have c as the limit of lower speed and are often, outside the realm of high density of light space-time (that is between galaxies) faster, non-local. So there IS a quantum potential (Bohm), NOT a hidden variable, but the invisible ∆-4 non-local = faster than light scale we shall study in this post. Non-locality IS experimentally proved both for intergalactic space (or else galaxies would not interact) and in the under-light smallish level of invisible particles (Bohm’s model, which we accept in 5D as the more reality). This brings a series of important consequences both to human stience and reality, which we study here.
  4. Finally among the key insights of 5d applied to those lower scales there is the invisibility of it, natural to the relativistic perception of reality centered inner ∆ø, which has its limits beyond which all becomes invisible; and on the other hand, the fact that faster motions in space are seen as larger distances. So IT is precisely the faster than c-speed of the ∆-4 scale WHICH IS INVISIBLE what we see as ‘expansion of space-distances’ between galaxies (balanced by the implosion of form within galaxies that create mass from vacuum space, making the Universe a wobbling immortal infinite entity). It is also obvious, abounding on the uncertainty of measure, because time is quantic, discontinuous, cyclical, it can be only measured when a ‘cycle is completed’ as a unit of time (in humans the second)… but as 5D metrics allow different speeds of time, for a being with a measuring mind that has a huge length in its time quanta, all what happens within that time quanta of measure at faster speeds will seem simultaneous, non-local, even if the phenomena take some time to ‘travel’ from A to B, or from  a,b,c… points into the synchronous knot of communication of them all – the mind that absorbs those ultra > c speeds as pixels of form. So BECAUSE WE SEE simultaneously the Universe of invisible gravitation, this must be between galaxies faster than light, and all what we perceive as simultaneous distance is caused by that faster than light speed perceived with our slower light eyes.

A PERSPECTIVE ON NON LOCALITY – TIME QUANTA

The faster than light – expansive distances – invisibility of the ∆-4 plane.

Let us try to fully grasp this essential property of time, mind and measure. When a wheel turns fast you see it as solid, because you see simultaneously in your eye-mind all what happens within a second and so all the points of the turning wheel might seem to be in the same point at the same time (within that second) even if IN A FASTER TIME SCALE, they will be recognisable pictured at slow-motion as clearly different rays. This concept of simultaneity of measure embedded in special relativity is very relevant for many phenomena of perception, and stientific description of reality, as a source of much confusion when humans study in detail those so fast small scales of 5D.

The most obvious example is human thought – what we see as ‘simultaneous’ non-local IS the entire planet, because the speed of light is so great that all within a second, including the moon, seems to us ‘simultaneous, non-local, co-existing at the same time-quanta’.

The light from that distant mountain you see below the horizon TAKES sometime to arrive here but it seems simultaneous, non-local in its ‘infinite speed’ to our one second senses, to the point that till the XVII century humans thought light was ‘instantaneous’ non-local as they could not even measure its speed. Galileo tried with mirrors in far away mountains, but the time of reaction of the person that had to stop the clock when emitting the ray and the one that received the ray and stopped his clock, which should allow to find a difference of time in both locations to measure the delay due to the motion of light between both points, was much larger (normally two seconds one to perceive one to act) than the millesimals it took light to go from Mountain A to Mountain B. Only when we did measures from far away Jupiter’s satellites we could get a meaningful measure.

Non-local quantum fields below light space-time, the next scale which Bohm formalised must therefore be much faster than light, to the point of being seemingly non-local or else causality essential to time processes (even if sometimes is co-causality or multiple causal rays joined in a point) would not happen.

Normally those parameters that quantify the difference of speed (s/t), density (t/s) and momentum ( s x t) between scales and its species are on decametric, ternary potencies, as the 5D scales are. So ± 1, 10, 1oo, 1ooo, 10.000 are the commonest differences between scales. I.e. the fine structure constant, measure the difference between the light scale speed and the next upper ∆+1 electronic scale, around +100 (137).

The difference of scaling between photons and electrons and the lower ∆-1 scale though is larger.

In graph, experimental evidence of faster than light intergalactic scales: 10c quasar jet at ∆+4 and quantum non-locality at ∆-4 at 10.000 c

After all dense photons are just the ‘cellular’ level of electrons. So for complex more detailed reasons concerning the parameters of GST scaling, action at distance should be on the α² bidimensional speed scaling, compared to the larger, light world, around 10.000 times faster and all that happens in 10 thousand times more distance within the minimal quanta of human observation should seem to us NON-LOCAL. Actually recently a Chinese lab measured non-locality which turned out to have a c=10.000 speed, for its ‘thinner’ minimal messages; or upper boundary of maximal speed of non-local effects; and so we do observe all kind of non-local c<V<10.000 C PHENOMENA, which of course theorist then vehemently deny to uphold its pretension of absolute truths under c speed, which is only the speed of information in the scale of light space-time, as the substrata of the scale is the Bg light background radiation.

So as you cannot travel faster than a plane when you are inside of it, you cannot travel faster than light when you are inside a galaxy sustained by a light space-time substrata. But outside, in the dark world you do have the possibility to go faster.

Thus C speed (v=s/t) and 0 temperature (limit of friction, disorder that impinges faster speeds) are JUST the limits of our light space-time world. And we bring this conclusion in many parts of this blog in many ways, from the different ∆ºST perspectives, as it is customary in GST, this perspective being that of the ‘mind paradoxes’ of perception.

Let us consider the other perspectives on faster than light.

• mind: The 3 dimensions of light space-time. Its functions in all systems made of it.

Let us  consider the meaning of faster than light speeds from the perspective of reproduction and perception of information. The mind’s quanta of time and speed simply cannot see ‘gravitational smallish, faster than light carriers of information’. But smaller particles do, as the dark work is ∆±4 and light, electrons and atoms exist in the neighbourhood: ∆±3,2.

So the dark world IS the ∆-1: ‘energy-feeding level’ for a photon… reason why it follows as prey-predators do the ‘scattering’ rays of Bohm’s pilot wave theory.

Don’t raise your eyes. We can explain all phenomena from all languages and povs. So as all has topo-bio-logical properties, we can always make an abstract mathematical explanation, in ‘detail’ but also a biological, organic explanation in ‘whole vital terms’.

Thus light merely warps≈feeds≈evolves the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us into visible information, and for that reason ‘as information must be copied and imprinted on the quantum potential field with no form, it takes time and reduces speed into c-light.

Indeed, gravitation from our mind pov must have less information and more speed, as experiments prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information).

And if we plug this act into the equation of ‘cyclical time-speed’ it gives as an ∞ speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field:

v -> $/ðƒ≈0 -> s/0=∞:

Below we see the humind which better understood this paradox, Monet’s first ‘impression(ist): sunrise’ painting, in which space is no longer painted as ‘a background’ cartesian canvass, but as the frozen view of light rays by the human eye. Physicists though still don’t get what artists eyes saw intuitively. We shall in that sense consider the relationship of art with physics, as a pioneer of its space-time analysis, from the work of Alberti on perspective, way before Desargues found projective geometry and Descartes the self-frame of reference, to the work of Leonardo, under his lemma of a living Universe of organic forms we must learn how to see (saper vedere), which certainly would have enjoyed immensely this blog and the part on topological vital space-time, to the impressionist realisation light is the mind of space, to Picasso’s analysis of imaginary worlds made only with ‘lineal motions’ (cubism) or cyclic, reproductive yin-female ‘forms’ (post-war period).

In the graph, the infinite speed of the quantum potential of gravitation that feeds light, which follows the ‘string’ of gravitation, tended between the emitter and perceiver particle, which lock each other in entanglement, (neutrino theory of light)

And so when both particles have connected through non-local action at distance in the dark world, they can guide their motions; they can assess their relative distance (which is the main information a single line provides) and as a secondary effect – since they are all ‘locked’ joined by the gravitational string, regardless of the external speed of their world, the speed of light communication between both will be always constant as they are in relative stillness to each other (explanation of the constant of c- light speed from the •mind perspective).

All this in fact has been explored by physicists in its ‘fringe theories’, notably by Feynman’s absorber theory whereas the two solutions of electromagnetism, one with a negative sign are considered two rays simultaneously produced by A and B particles, but as usual in physics, while all has been discovered ‘mathematically’ by the mere pedestrian process of manipulating algebras, its deepest meaning is not understood – this is the guy that said the why is what he never questions, an extraordinary mathematical physicist with the usual conceptual peanut brain of his practitioners.

The mind of man as Kant understood is EUCLIDEAN, because our space is Euclidean, and it is so because it is light space-time, made of three perpendicular fields able to carry information: the electric, magnetic and c-speed field, the longest direction of view, which explains why we indeed look ahead in the horizontal plane, but have an informative head on the height direction of information as the electron which produces the ray of light does, moving up and down (left, bottom); and finally storeS ‘energy’ in the width, MAGNETIC ‘BELLY’ direction (: ALL HAS changed in the evolution of light through 5D scales till creating man, but all has ultimately remained the same: a game of vital dimensions of space-time.

The consequences of the previous graph for the understanding of both the humind (human mind) and the external Universe of space-time are multiple, from a proper understanding of special relativity to the analysis of magnetism as an independent force NOT an observer’s effect as modern physics think, to the fundamental analysis of light and photons as the minimal organism of our known-known Universe, each of those themes exploring an element of the ∆•st light supœrganism.

Back to the understanding of motion as reproduction of information.

What this means is that motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system, so as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases.

So as we humans perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we have to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process).

It is then obvious that from the proper endophysical perspective of the human visual mind, faster than light speeds cannot transmit information among us. But – and this is again a topic egotist error of the humind – this doesn’t mean as physicists claim that other species, specifically those on the ‘verge’ of ∆±4 (galactic black holes and quantum particles), which are connected directly to its ∆±1 scales can communicate information through dark (to us) gravitational waves. 

It is then the humind, which sees those flows of information as ‘invisible’ actions at distance – but as we predicted even action at distance has a limit of speed… which seems to be on the 10.000 c range.

It is precisely those new dimensions what creates a priori an organic entangled Universe of physical super organisms tracing world cycles, instead of an abstract physical world of mere ‘locomotions’ (translations in space), tracing ‘worldlines’ over an ‘abstract background, a mere mathematical ‘continuum’ useful for measure but nowhere to be seen – and hence introduces also the deepest philosophical questions about the Universe (it is an organism or a mechanism, it is disconnected or entangled, it has multiple planes or only the c-speed light space-time plane, it is realist made of time-motions and space-forms or creationist, made of mathematical numbers and points, and if realist, why mathematical languages mirror so well its properties?).

We shall in due time answer with full depth all those questions. As of spring 2018, when I write this words, the work is still in progress, needs rewriting, elimination of ‘block-pages’ often repeated, and the ‘final’ layer of complexity provided by more complex mathematical and logic equations, but good enough for the reader to wonder and wander.

In the next graph we summarize the new properties derived from those complex qualities of fractal space and cyclical time and its ‘connected’ parts:

Fractal space and cyclical time in physical systems imply an entangled Universe of multiple scales ruled in spacetime by 5D metric (Max. Size-lineal speed: $t = Min. Information: §ð). In space according to those metric equations, planes of lesser information move faster till the c-plane of pure space-time -our plane of perception, which for that reason is always still-constant in speed-distance for the electronic mind that gauges it. Yet we have above slower planes (thermodynamic) and below, faster, non perceived ones (non-local action at distance of forces between galaxies). In terms of or accelerated cyclical clocks that increase information as time passes, it defines 3 type of vortices of time, which is the meaning of physical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in its form and frequency: ∆+1 cosmological masses, ∆-1 quantum charges and in between in the ∆ø human plane, thermodynamic eddies. So the 3 different planes that create the human being, ∆±1 allow also the creation of geological and cosmological super organisms of physical matter. Finally in terms of ‘topological Dimotions’ (dimensions of space with form and time motion), we observe the same 3 topological ‘varieties’ of space-time of biological organisms and mathematical systems, for each one of those planes, which conform simultaneous, ‘present’ physical organisms, with informative spherical particles-heads, hyperbolic, iterative body-waves and lineal or planar, moving potentials-‘limbs’, as those are the 3 topologies that store more information and close a memorial cycle in lesser space (O-particles), or connect two open points in minimal distance (|-limbs that perform $t lineal motions) or combine both, hence can reproduce information (hyperbolic waves). Yet as physical systems do also perform ‘world cycles’ not only worldliness; they will also have always a seed-state of maximal metabolic speed as they are born (blue high frequency stars, hot diminutive black holes; hot planets and solar systems, irregular galaxies), which will ‘cool down’ and expand in scattering entropy till it die (tired redshift light, cooling planets and stars, gaseous entropic states that become cold solids, and NON-evaporating black holes – a clear ‘error’ never proved which breaks the laws of thermodynamics, as hot black holes accrete matter after birth, cooling down; but which Mr. Hawking charm and provocateur spirit has canonized for tool long). Thus this brief introduction to the new outlook of physics in 5D shows how with the same data of classic physics, we will describe quite a different Universe in its philosophy and form.

 

A UNIVERSE OF SPACE-TIME BEINGS UNITED BY ITS ‘DISOMORPHIC PROPERTIES’

The devil is in the details so the first obvious question we must answer is what MEANS in REAL terms, the fact that all what exists is MADE OF SPATIAL topologies and TEMPORAL ages, of Space and Time? The answer is fascinating, as there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies. And so the fact that we are made of space means ultimately we are made of 3 type of organic topologies:

The 3 only topologies of all systems of Nature.

All systems of nature can be ‘reduced’ to fractal ensembles of 3 ‘conserved quantities’, angular momentum – the membrane of the system, which of course becomes a fractal sum of ‘cellular cycles’ of the skin of the system in human beings. And so on… Vital energy, the enclosed cyclical forms and motions within the space whose boundary conditions are given by the membrane, and lineal momentum, the motions with a ‘finality’ we perceive guided by a ‘relatively still mind-point-singularity’ that focuses the energy and information transferred through the angular momentum membrane.

So with this proper understanding of the abstract 3 conserved fundamental substances of reality, space, time and the vital energy with them, we then then observe the infinite variety of those themes, which can be explained either as a game of 3 perpendicular ‘lineal’ dimensions (the usual approach of science due to its error of lineal time, hence the dimension of ‘perception and information’ or height dimension of maximal projective geometry, the dimension of ‘length’ and motion or entropy, the one physicists recognize as a time arrow, and the width dimension of iteration and reproduction.

But the true, full understanding of these 3 parts of the being comes when we consider ‘bidimensional’, topological networks, which again will show a correspondent of form and function:

≥: iterative, reproductive, hyperbolic networks that become body waves, as the hyperbola has all the shapes within it to reproduce the whole being.

| ≈: Flat planes of lineal parallel networks of ‘fractal points’ that become  limbs/fields of maximal entropic motions as the line/plane is the fastest distance between two points.

>O: Informative, implosive ‘neuronal networks that become cyclical spherical particles-heads that process information as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space.

So the simultaneous ensemble of ‘networks of cellular/atomic/organic herds’ into those 3 differentiated functions=forms which therefore extends across to ∆ø and ∆-1 scales, within the ∆+1 world in which the ternary network/system exists is what we call a super organism.

The insight that there are only 3 topologies in 4 and 5D nature is the key mathematical finding to fully account for topological evolution, the ternary nature of all systems and its functions and physiological networks, resolved NOT through intelligent design but through the limiting fact that there are only 3 topologies in space in the Universe. So by force al systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the next graphs:

In the graph, spheres are the topology that holds the maximal volume of information; hence all ‘time space’ systems that process information are spherical particle-heads. Flat, lineal topologies are the topology that connects in the shortest path two points; so to reach/move faster, systems have lineal/flat moving potentials/limbs. Finally the third type of geometry, hyperbolic topology, is complex enough to store all other possible forms, so best to reproduce and all iterative body waves that generate the other 2 forms are hyperbolic. This mathematical-spatial truism holds for 2, 3 and 4 dimensions; hence establishing basic restriction to the construction and evolution of forms. And should become in XXI c. science the ‘missing’ leg of topological, biological and physical evolution to explain the extraordinary efficiency and homology between forms (no longer analogy, since all those forms derive from the same ‘substance’, space with time=motion or ‘topology’). In the next graph, we can see how the 3 only topologies of the Universe ensemble to form physical, biological and social organisms, all of them with a spherical ‘tall’ dimension to gauge information; a wide, iterative dimension of hyperbolic bodywave reproduction and a flat, direction for its entropic motions. The beauty of the topological Universe is that each of those 3 forms can be ‘deformed’ and ‘moves’, as long as it doesn’t tear (break). So departing from such simple 3 basic forms there are infinite possible variations of species, but we can order them all with that ternary principle.

human topology

So this is the second ternary spatial element of reality:

|-moving limbs/potentials  x O-head/particles = Ø-body waves

This is the simplest expression of the FRACTAL GENERATOR of space-time beings, as all of them will display those ternary topologies.

It is its simplest spatial view, which we shall made soon more complex adding it its time-motions-functions and scales generated by the minds that perceive in the singularity a still mapping of the whole with a language that perceives in itself.

So we can generate and mirror all the systems in space, made of ensembles of those 3 adjacent forms/functions we shall call space-time organisms with them.

We shall write THE TERNARY topology also in many ways and make it increasingly complex as we study different dimensions of ‘form’ and ‘motion’, of ‘space’ and ‘time’. But in its simplest mode is the most extraordinary simplex equation of them all: $≈ð; whereas S is the limbic system, T, the particle-head with its clocks of information and ≈ the bodywave that iterates and puts together both.

@>∫T: $t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) <∑∏> §ð<<S∂ (still mind form or world)

The ginormous quantity of consequences of being made of those 3 topologies would fill up when study in its details – all the beings and super organisms of reality and its ternary parts – an entire galactic encyclopedia. So in this very brief introduction we shall consider the most remarkable consequence in the simplest level of understanding of it – the ternary principles of conservation of physics that correspond to the 3 parts of all systems.

LET US CONSIDER the first important consequence: the existence of fractal points/brains which run languages that first mirror the Universe and then order it:

THE BIOTOPOLOGIC PROPERTIES OF ƤT beings REFLECTED IN MIRROR-LANGUAGES.

Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fractal point=world of space-time.

‘I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’ Einstein

In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin->European->Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and the description are the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best.

So only organicism is real in the whole sense of the Universe, while languages-mirrors are local orders.

The EGOCY of our present, entropic age of human civilization rejects this (Precisely because it is becoming dissolved). So we  reject the power of networks – self-mademan myths and tribalism in history. Yet  networks are more powerful and survive.

How this work on languages IS OBVIOUS: LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:

In the graph, which I re-designed from” road to irreality” (: a work by Penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician along his friend Hawking, which shuns off the laws of the experimental method) his view of reality is VOID as in all PLATONIC (PLATO by the way never said that, they should be called Pythagorean, a much more primitive ‘magic view’) of HARDWARE MINDS and LOCALITY. In his view the Language creates the Universe.

In reality the Universe is a fractal organism, and as all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘Space-time’, which are Organic because that is the main property of co-existence in different planes (∆§cales), topological because that is the main property of Spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and Logic, Multicausal, as that is the main property of the dimotions of time. 

So the ultimate causality ∆->T->S IS not Platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties -> T-Logic properties -> S-Topologic, mathematical properties.

In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘Social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the Universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we REPEAT, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆-scalar properties, STopo-logic ONES.

SO WE ADAPT PENROSE GRAPh to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:

The ∆§T BioTopoLogic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking self-similar. And then THE LANGUAGES REINFORCE AS MIRRORS EXPANDED INTO REALITY those properties ordering local territories.

So the graph shows that back and forth  to adequate to how REALITY  IS created LOCALLY by ‘minds‘, which are the language software on the hardware brains of T.œs, ONLY after the language reflects the LIVING cycles (dimotions) of all time-space beings with those properties:

You can see in the graph how it works: First the whole Universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak ONLY THE TERRITORY OF ‘ARISTOTELIAN’ ORDER OR BODYWAVE ENERGY OF THE SYSTEM…

THE DRAWING in original Penrose ONLY had the mind ordering the Universe, as the source and only God in Aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (body-wave) around it’.

So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is AS IN CRYSTALS ABLE TO FORM mirror-images in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or dimotions) are the language of it all:

Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.

So THE QUESTION HERE IS WHICH LANGUAGES ARE THE MOST EFFICIENT OF THE UNIVERSE? BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THERE WILL BE A PROCESS OF SELECTION OF SPECIES ACCORDING TO THE QUALITY OF ITS LANGUAGES:

selection of languages

In the graph, the Universe in all its ecosystems selects the species who speaks better languages. Till recently we thought the word, our human language was supreme, and indeed in our ecosystems of history prophets and politicians ruled, but mathematics turned out to be a better language and finally in this blog we shall show you how the enhanced forms of logic, I-logic and mathematics non-e mathematics are the best language mirrors as they encode fully the true properties of space and time, form and motion the fabric of reality. So we shall improve the laws of those languages.

 IT IS THEN CLEAR WHY MATHEMATICS is so important and by enhancing the laws of logic and mathematics we shall describe better physics, but at the same time by realizing that organic properties are the larger why, we shall reduce the ‘obsession’ for platonic mathematics, and belief that all equations are real.
As languages like everything else in the Universe does have a 3rd age of excessive information, the Baroque age in which the language detaches from reality, warps in excess of form and creates imaginary thoughts. And this IS TODAY THE AGE IN WHICH LANGUAGES FIND THEMSELVES, due to the expansion of digital thought, allowing all kind of mathematical models of physics, specially in those areas (Black holes, dark entropy) of the ∆±4 plane we do NOT perceive and so without experience we just ‘inflate’ with ‘inflationary 3rd age excessive mathematical information).
All this said, then if you are still here (: we shall enlighten with the proper concepts a few elements of PHYSICS, starting with the expansion of the example we have made on… the dualities between motion and form, time and space.
It is important to properly understand the organic, survival properties of mathematics, because without them, the physical universe becomes limp.

Consider the case of physicists, whose worldly profession has been making weapons. So they do kill people ‘at distance’, but when you talk to them that vital organic side of reducing the Universe to locomotion and entropy, what they study as the single arrows of time, is lost to them. They even get offended, since once any organic vital side of maths is  gone, mathematicians become childish… So making weapons is no longer a question of ethics – a child cannot understand death. But a question of design.

The organic universe seems to have a lesser role for mankind, as we observe our increasing devolution and obsolescence to machines and weapons, AI and robots, which speak better mathematics. But we keep doing it with a partial abstract view.

Since to fulfill that role, as in a company where the teller of the bank ignores all about the banker, just does a part, humans have basically ‘learned’ to do maths as magic, ensemble machines as magic – only latter they feel so proud of those ensembles as if the intelligence were theirs, a bit like politicos taking credit on economic cycles they cannot understand. If there is something that surprised me for long I that ‘need-NOT’ TO UNDERSTAND, JUST get the hands onto it.

Then it comes the privileged species and its ego paradox – man entitled, all what we do above heavens and earth – whichhas no way around as a child is emotional, it doesn’t reason on ego-trips.

TRUTH and survival though would require humans to be ‘ABOVE’ the traps of the program of organisms, but they can’t even recognize it. It is like explaining to a teller how ‘finaniciers’ invent money in  markets for free: 1) it is too complicated 2) it is a shock and shakes its position on the place it works. So goes for platonic scientists, to get 1) hands on the program of organic paradoxical thought is complicated – without verbal profundity 2) it is a shock….

So humans in all fields just don’t want to swim deep, they live in the surface and die in mystery… fog accompanies their magic mathematical methods. They trust the Universe cares for them. Fact is all is more humble. And to go deep is good for survival and to understand our existence, Since…  ‘A life not examined is not worth living’ was Aristotle

 Now the first of those enlargements on the ‘living-moving’ properties of reality is to realise that all forms have function, all matter, when observed in detail is formed of motions, all particles are in fact vortices in motion.

This duality between dimensions of time-motion and still-form started Modern Physics and so we must first upgrade to the wider ‘reality’ of 5D² – what physicists call…

RELATIVITY. ITS 3 DUALITIES
MOTION VS. FORM, CONTINUITY VS. DISCONTINUITY, FRACTAL SCALES VS. SINGLE  ST-PLANE 
The key foundational element of physics closely related to the mind paradox which reduces motions to still mappings to fit maximal information in its minimal space, is the duality between spatial forms, as observed by our mind and temporal motions, as objectively happening in the Universe. It is in fact the element that started physics through the analysis of Galilean relativity greatly expanded in the 5D² paradigm.

Galilean paradox: stop and motion st-eps.

‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’ Galileo

The beginning of science in modern times started when Galileo realized that the Earth moved in time, even if we saw it as a fixed form of space. So he affirmed we couldn’t really distinguish motion from form. But he missed the next fundamental step: If we cannot distinguish motion in time from form in space, we need to consider for each basic form of space in the Universe, a similar motion in time. And as there are 5 canonical forms in space and 5 canonical motions in time, the Universe has 5 dimensions of space-time, which are the dimensions we need to build all realities.

Indeed, as Aristotle defined it Time is motion that becomes space, when we see it as a still form. So for each dimension=type of motion=time, we can perceive a dimension of form=space’ as there are 5 type of motions and their symmetric 5 types of form, the Universe have 5 dimensions of time, 5 dimensions of space, and if we combine them, 5 dimensions of space-time.

It is this paradox of the mind that perceives either form or motion, what allows us to divide reality in two types of elements space and time. Let us put an example, which can be also used to the second fundamental duality to understand space and time and its dimensions – the fact that we do not distinguish either a continuous single ‘scale’ of reality and its discontinuous smaller parts (the very definition of a fractal in which a whole is made of similar parts); because those two dualities, the distinction of form and motion and wholes and parts suffice to define all the dimensions of space and time:

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.

The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple åctions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together:

All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…

The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.

Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of Non-Aristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same space-time than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.

So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’

Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.

In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their time-clocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:

– The vacuum of our scale of space-time is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed space-distance or as electromagnetic motion at c-speed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘—motions’- space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).

– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.

We are made of space and time, of spatial energy and temporal information. When we say I don’t have energy and time to do this is because we know subconsciously that we are made of a vital space that contains energy, our body and a brain that regulates our time cycles.

 

The Universe is made of ‘Entropy and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind thinks otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox – the duality of stillness and motion, as we perceive the Earth still but it is moving.

Yet this paradox is indeed the proof that form, information dominates motion, because the mind prefers to see still information to blurred motion.

The st beatings of the Universe define 4 dimensions immediately of motion, s≈S, T≈t,  S<T, T<S, which are the four fundamental motions of the Universe. BEING THE FIFTH DIMENSION, the no motion of them all in the still pure space-time of the Mind, @.

So departing from 4 motions, we must first consider if an S≈s and a t≈T is motion: it is in the scalar growth OR DIMINUTION. WHILE the stop and T-go, Stop, T-go motion and form gives us the other two:

we cannot see motion and form together, the whole and its parts, we confuse lineal detailed view in short space-time intervals with cyclical, larger slower view… such galilean paradoxes are the reflection of Space=time dualities that the mind tries to ‘con-form’ into space-simultaneous view to ‘perceive them’. (Perception being always in space-simultaneity as still form a quanta of space=time).

The 3 dimensions in a single plane: past-lineal motion, present-iteration, future-information
Let us then start with the 3 dimensions also called arrows or cycles or actions of space-time we know better about, illustrated in the next graph:

In the graph, the Universe is composed of 3 external motions, the relative past, entropic, expansive, lineal ‘big-bang’ motions that expand space and eliminate dimensional form (left picture), the opposite, relative future, cyclical, time clocks that accelerate inwards in time vortices. And the middle relative repetitive present flows of hyperbolic body-waves in which formal motions of time repeat themselves, in a seemingly dynamic present.

THEY are organised as ‘actions’ of space-time, which come together into social networks, creating a fractal Universe that reproduces co-existing super organisms across several scales of size (packed together under the generic term of the fifth dimension).

We shall explain such real Universe, and the systems it creates along the 3 scales of physical systems, the quantum-atomic thermodynamic and gravitational, larger scales.

I advice the reader interested in the organic paradigm and its description of astrophysical systems, to read first the general introduction to 5D fractal space-time systems, as we shall bring some of its main laws but not all for the sake of space-time.

Just in case he doesn’t we shall bring a very brief resume of the two fundamental elements of reality, the 3 arrows of time and the fractal scalar structure of its space, with its ternary symmetries and ‘membrains’ that warp it all with a linguistic still mind singularity, giving birth to the 10 Dimensional super organism, fundamental structure of the Universe.

 ∆±i:  SxT=∆ metric of planes in physical systems.

In the graph, the super organism of the galaxy, where we exist and the only system we thus have a full perception of it, and can describe experimentally with sound-sound theories of reality, has 3 physical scales, the quantum, electromagnetic scale, the thermodynamic human scale and the gravitational cosmological scale. Those are the 3 scales that concern astrophysics.

There is though likely a fourth ‘dark world’ scale, of invisible faster than light ‘tachyon strings≈neutrinos?≈gravitons?=dark entropy?’ of which we have no direct evidence, but can infer some properties, from bits and bites that sip into our world and the mathematical extension of the properties of space-time beyond our scales. Of those ‘mathematical extensions’ string theory is the most successful and likely truth as it is also a 10 dimensional theory of ∆st is, and it also departs from two type of elements, lineal, space strings and cyclical time strings, albeit vitiated by the classic errors of physics – use of an inexistent absolute newtonian background of mathematical space-time, single time dimension, etc. So we shall just briefly study it latter, highlighting those concomitances of which the most important is the ‘t-DUALITY’ theorem: all systems which are described in the infinitesimal real (∆-i) are symmetric and self-similar to the largest equivalent system, (∆+1).

And indeed this duality, the essential philosophy of string theory does carry to the next plane, as we shall observe that the equations of galaxies in the ∆+3 scale, are equivalent to the equations of atoms in the ∆-1 scale, whereas the reduction of size in space is compensated by the acceleration of speed in time, according to the metric of the scalar fifth dimension, shown in the graph: Se x Ti = k…

The three scales of physical super organisms above: atomic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, below the three scales of human super organisms and its memetic linguistic systems of coding individuals into societies, either belonging to the ‘coding of ethic verbal wor(l)ds’ or the coding of digital machines (the metal-earth), below the two opposite memetic type of cultures that structure the wave of history.

Smaller scales have faster clock times that process information faster, yet both co-exist in organisms since the product of its spatial entropy and temporal speed of information remains co-invariant: Spe x Tiƒ = C.

In the next graphs we show two classic examples of biology and physics, now properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in space.

In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume:energy content of its orbital sphere):

Why this law is so important? Because it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.

What is the ultimate cause of this law?

As almost all the laws and symmetries of the Universe, it is caused by the Galilean paradox that makes a ‘dimension of form=space’, equivalent to a dimension of motion=time, when we see ‘the static earth moving’. i.e. the three dimensional volume/mass static in space is equivalent to a bidimensional time-cycle in motion, whereas the dimension of time motion IS equivalent to the dimension of volume space. And we can further prove this fact observing how ‘physical systems’ evolve in ‘time’ increasing its time dimension, by flattening its volume – which is a key consequence of the Galilean paradox to understand all kind of physical entities and phenomena, notably, ‘accelerated bidimensional vortices of time, masses and charges, which store the information of the Universe in the frequency of its cycles’.

Definition of the Fractal, Organic Universe – Adding the scalar dimensions

The Universe is therefore defined as a fractal superorganism of space and time, co-existing in multiple scales, related by spatial networks and temporal flows of its 3 conserved quantities, lineal and cyclical motion/momentum and its combined ‘energies’.

Further on as we shall show those scales relate to each other with a metric equation, Size x Time Speed = Constant, which makes equivalent atoms and galaxies, protons and black holes… And so it hints strongly to an absolute relative, infinite number of scales.

If so there is no limit of relative size; and so all the parts of the Universe, all its ∆±i quanta ARE also T.œs: time space superorganisms. As simple as that; as complex as all the variations and iterations of space-time superorganisms made to the image and likeness of the whole that can exist, within the limiting properties of fractal space and cyclical time.

So how can we generate all those realities departing only of two ‘elements’ fractal space and cyclical time? The answer is in the fractal dimensions of space-time, the dimension which puts parts into wholes (5D) and break wholes into parts (4D, or entropy proper); which add to  the usual space-time dimensions humans consider in their analysis of reality.
Further on besides the scalar Dimensions of entropy and social evolution, we define time as motion and space as form, and consider that all form can be seen in motion and vice versa – the true meaning of Galilean Relativity. So we double the dimensions of space when perceived as time motions. And that gives us a tally of 3 classic space dimensions, plus entropy-dissolution of wholes into scalar parts, plus social evolution of parts into wholes, that is 5Dimensions of space, plus 5 of time, when space is seen in motion.
And it gives us a fundamental equation of symmetry: S (form) = T (motion-function).
So when we understand that both time and space have five dimensions symmetric to each other, (5S≈5T) we can really combine them in various forms to generate everything that exists in reality.

The Universe is a fractal superorganism of 5 dimensions of space-time, where the fourth dimension of parts and the fifth dimension of wholes create its scalar, organic structure, as it is made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

Those super organisms follow a fundamental logic rule, which started modern science – the realisation that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from form’ (Poncaire, Principle of Galilean relativity) according to which all motions in time can be seen as form-distances in simultaneous space and vice versa.

So we conclude that space-time, what we perceive as motion and form is composed of 5 dimensions of space undistinguishable of its equivalent perceptions as motions of time, hence:

5 D ST = 5 T-motions + 5 S motions (S=t).

This simple equations of the logic behind galilean relativity will suffice to explain all what exists.

As it happens two immediate consequences of the formulae is that being S=T, the maximising function of S x T (S+t being equal to K, in this case 10 dimensions), what the Universe maximises is Sxt+S=t, which given the relationship between space and information and time and entropy we write as exi+s=t, which is the function of existence of the Universe, maximise your function of existence is what all systems, do.

How we do it? Obvioulsy maintaining the balance at S=T. AND SO THE LAW OF BALANCE FOLLOWS, OF ACTION REACTION, OF ETERNAL CONSERVED MOTIONS IN THE UNIVERSE.

The simplicity of the first beats of existence, S=t, s=t, and its s=s, t=t apparent congruencies is only the beginning of an incredible adventure, the motions of reproduction of information across the five dimension of space-time that we call reality.

Its immediate consequence is the bidimensionality of the ‘units of reality’…

LET US explore them a more complex philosophy not only of physics but also of mathematics, to adequate mathematics to the study of the vital, organic properties of fractal space and cyclical time. 

Einstein’s relativity implies the exist3ence of infinite time clocks, and Planck’s quantum discoveries the existence of broken, fractal pieces of energy, form with motion as the substance of reality. The immediate consequence is:

A Universe of relational 5D² space-time organisms.  

Now the essential change of paradigm from absolute spacetime to relational spacetime is simple and everything else follows from it: what Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. It is a mathematical artifact, a pen and paper ‘cartesian graph’ drawing, physicists used to map out reality and do calculations but it does NOT exist in reality. Do you see a Cartesian graph in the background of the vital spaces occupied by beings? No. Physicists have probe down to the scale of strings and they have never found the ‘lines’ of the lineal time and cartesian space, they draw in their papers ts, ts… So space must be the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings. And they have never found an ‘immortal being’ which would not follow a ‘world cycle’ of life and death… All is generated in a point of past and dies in a point of future. So the infinite line of single time of the Cartesian graph is missing. ts, ts…

Hence the need to change paradigm from an abstract single space-time continuous background, which Newton merely took from the abstract mathematical Cartesian Plane that became in his ‘delirium tremens’, the ‘Plenum=body of God’ – the dependent background against which all motions were measured, into what physicists without better understanding call a background independent theory of science (meaning no background at all):

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, with respect to which particles move. Space and time are a stage. Like actors on that stage, particles move, exert forces onto each other and generally act out the drama of dynamics, while the stage itself does not change. This is sketched in the illustration. There, we see objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, but there is also a fixed background structure, space, which is just as real, pictured here as a lattice of intersecting lines. Newton’s view of the universe is manifestly background dependent – whether or not a particle is moving or at rest is determined in relation to Newton’s absolute space and time – the plenum/body of God, which of course must be immortal and last for ever, graphed ‘obviously’ to make it easier for the chosen to understand.

 A relational world without spatial background

But even in Newton’s day, there were philosophers like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz who took a different stance. In modern parlance, theirs is a relationist point of view. For a relationist, there is no background of absolute space and time. The fundamental properties of the elementary entities consist entirely in relationships between those elementary entities. Time is nothing but changes in these relationships, and consists of nothing but the ordering of these changes. In the relationist version of the above illustration, only the objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, are real. The lattice has no independent existence. Even without the lattice, it does make sense to talk about the distance between two given objects.One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity. Physicists intent on describing our universe cannot just assume a given geometry. Instead, geometry is something that needs to be determined by solving certain equations that include all the effects of matter and energy.

But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe.

Naive realism WORKS only when we truly stop ‘thinking’ and inquiring about the ‘background meaning’ of all our concepts, from measure, to time, to space, to scales, to mathematical symbols and terms from waves to reproduction, from particle to information… and so on. We are though inquiring all those questions first.

But space and time do exist. A Universe of space forms and time motions.

It is then necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical cartesian artefact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar  (a. §) §paœ, and cyclical discontinuous time ‘lives… existences’ .

All what you see around is a tapestry of forms that are moving (as motion is relative to the observer you will always be able to find a frame of reference in which the being moves) – nothing else is required to explain it all: ‘forms’, a concept closely related to the scientific concept of in/form/ation and ‘motion’, a concept closely related to the scientific term ‘entropy’.

Further on we can reduce reality to a single ‘element’, motion. Since when we observe any ‘form’ in detail at ‘smaller’ scales, the form also shows motion. Form in fact is merely a ‘very fast closed motion’ that seen without detail appears as a solid form. So all particles are closed motions. We shall call a closed ‘motion’, a clock-like ‘time cycle’. So we affirm all in the Universe are ‘formal motions’ tracing in-form-ative time cycles.

Information is stored in those closed ‘forms’ or ‘time cycles. In/form/ations, Forms in action are both the ‘form’ AND frequency ‘bits’ of those time cycles. And so as all what exists are cyclical forms (we shall call them, ‘fractal points’, ab. œ, •) that complete ‘worldcycles of time’, we can really reduce it all to ‘formal motions’, to time cycles.

And as any motion that ‘repeats’ its time cycle is REPRODUCING its form, its information, there is no doubt about our first principle born of the experience that all what we perceive are motions reproducing information as they move in time cycles:

All clocks of time are cyclical motions which break reality into an inner region of vital energy, an angular momentum clock that encloses it and when regular a central singularity which can ‘perceive’ some how a mapping of the Universe that flows through the membrane. So mind, angular momentum and vital energy become the 3 parts of the clock and hence the basic super organism of the Universe.

Let us then start by describing the biggest blunder mankind has committed in the realm of knowledge: to simplify the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs.

Screen Shot 2016-05-04 at 10.28.43

Physicists reduced our information of the dimensions and modes of time cycles by uncoiling all time cycles, missing its form and frequency, to be able to equalize them all despite all its different speeds through the second standard of a mechanical clock. Then all its different speeds measured as mechanical time-clocks distances are pegged together as number of a line. Since Galileo pontified during its tenure of the chair of ballistic as the arsenal of Venice that entropic open motions as those he studied in cannonballsi is the only arrow of time. He fully destroyed our conceptual understanding of the infinite time space vital cycles of the Universe, its synchronous knots that form simultaneous supeorganisms, and the 3 vital parts of the time cycle, its membrane of conserved angular momentum, its focus or singularity for regular closed time cycles and the vital energy enclosed in them. Their dimensionalities are 2D-membrane, 1S-singularity, and 3D-volumen of enclosed energy. They become then the 3 conserved quantities, momentums and energy of the superoergansm of the Universe, broken in infinite pieces or ‘species’ of time-space

Physicists uncoiled time-frequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation…

humanity is still in that primitive concept of a single time.

Einstein  just added to that XVI c. equation, V=s/T, (instead of using V= wave length x Frequency), which ELIMINATES the information on the frequency and shape of the steps of the motion.

What physicists mostly do then is the study of ‘open locomotions’, translations in space, through ‘lineal inertia, or scattered, entropic paths’, of objects that move; AND WHAT they care about TO QUANTIFY in terms of ‘RODS OF MEASURE’ that speed of translation in open space, is of course part of time=motion=change studies but far less important than the qualities of ‘closed time paths of frequency and form, of information’ we shall study here.

In the graph, left side,  ‘ðime’ clocks that measure the rhythms of reproduction=repetition and change=evolution of the Universe are always cyclical ‘r=evolutions’.

In the graph we see those mathematical artefacts of measure that deformed our vision of time. There are indeed infinite time clocks in the Universe, which enclose a vital space, NOT a single clock as Galileo and all physicists after him believed. Neither there is a background cartesian graph with infinite single time coordinates, but infinite beings performing its time cycles of existence. TIME thus is eternal because it is motion and cyclical motion so all forms will be repeated. Since events repeat in time cyclically or else there would not be patterns of science, change sometimes seems not to happen when things come to the same point. This is the present, closed, conservative energy cycle, which explains why ‘energy never dies, but trans-forms itself in different forms of in-formation and entropy’.

And finally there is the fact that the clocks of time of all species of Nature define different time speeds, as small systems run faster clocks, which also is not understood, since physicists used a mechanical clock to measure all other clocks equalising them.

In the graph we see schematically those elements of time which physicists still have not accounted for but rather deformed: the multiplicity of time clocks, unified with a single mechanical clock, the cyclic form of time clocks, which physicists elongated into a line, so they ended up believing there is not more than one time clock, that it is lineal and infinite extending to the whole universe and that it has no form in-form-ation in its cycles and frequencies.

In the graph we can see the resume of those errors: there are multiple time clocks in the Universe, defining a fractal Universe as those time clocks repeat their cycles, breaking space in an inner and outer region, (main topological theorem), and so we cannot make theories of all time changes as Hawking etc. do considering a single clock for the Universe – so no return to the past, as each time-clock goes its way.

Those time clocks are faster in smaller particles, so there is a fifth dimension that orders them all by speed according to size. There are closed time changes, which carry information in their frequency and form, waves that also repeat their information but expansive, disordered ‘memoriless’ ‘markowian processes’ of ‘entropy’ that erase information, and so we can talk of three timespace changes, the three arrows of time, and a fifth dimension of time, which orders all those clocks by speed that grows as we become smaller.

Physicists by dragging those errors for centuries, have halted human understanding of the essential principles of Nature.

It might surprise the reader to know then that ever since Newton and Galileo canonised lineal time physicists and by extension mankind lost its understanding of the modes of time=change of the Universe, reducing them to lineal measures of motion.

This didn’t bother them as their work has been – since Galileo invented the discipline to measure motions of cannonballs in space – the exhaustive analysis of motion and speed, to the point they reduced time the measure of all forms of change in all systems of reality, to a parameter of space, with a single, simplified formula: v=s/t, t=s/v.

So time in physics is NOT as in Nature, the measure and perception of change, but only of motion; which was understood and accepted as a limit to its science, which was defined in the XIX c. as the science of motion. Point.

Further on, physicists to measure motion, not only ‘reduced time≈change’ to a parameter of space (the so called 4 dimension of space which is NOT) giving birth to what we, philosophers of science, call ‘reductionism’ – his theory of reality; but they deformed 2 of the most obvious quality of the infinite ‘time clocks’ of the Universe:

-To be multiple, as there is one clock of time for each process of cyclical, repetitive change that happens in nature – circadian clocks in life, genetic clocks in cells, orbital clocks in planets, rotary clocks in electrons, etc. – to process and store the in-form-ation, in the dimensional form and cyclical frequency of its clocks. So for example, you measure the informative capacity of your computer in ‘gigahertzs where hertzs measure the frequency of its clocks. 

-To be cyclical, as all clocks are like those in your wall: repetitive cycles or events, origin of the ‘causal laws’ of science. Since a scientific law exists when we know a pattern or action will happen again, if its causes are repeated.

So first an immediate definition in conceptual terms: 

Space is simultaneous form and time, the larger concept motion. So Space is a slice of time, perceived in stillness. And the Universe is a fractal of motion and form. Yet as motion IS the ultimate substance, a motion that ‘repeats its form’ by definition is reproducing itself. Thus a fractal of motions with form is reproductive.

OBJECTIVE BLUNDERS – THE SINGLE SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM.
All this said, humans have committed a very obvious error on their perception of reality – to belief that their clock of time, the lineal mechanical systems deviced by Galileo are the only time of the Universe, just because we invent those clocks and used them to equalize all time cycles of reality. What would be then the image of the organic Universe when we straighten up the concepts of time? Let us have a look at. First a cycle of time has information, form in the frequency and form of the closed cycle. So we have to talk of two dimensions of time, lineal motion or lineal momentum and cyclical motion and angular momentum, but a third arrow of vital energy enclosed by the closed angular moment appears immediately. So SUDDENLY THE universe has 3 time arrows, which are not-surprisingly the 3 conserved parameters of reality.

Since physicists reduce the arrow of time=change to the entropy-only, lineal time locomotion, it is obvious their theories of reality will be biased to linearity, a single future and loose information and cyclical patterns.. This is the approach of western cultures, which distorts many of the philosophical conclusions of astrophysics.

Let us bring once more an image of the biggest ‘blunder’ of astrophysics as a philosophy of the Universe, precisely born of the use of a single arrow of time – entropy – the big bang ‘religious theory of creationism’ – the dogma, which no experimental evidence and sound scientific method seems able to debunk:

018-02-16 at 7.59.50 AM

The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information. From this simplex but profound definition of reality as it is to the simpleton locomotions of physicists who study only a time clock (their mechanical machines uncoiled into an infinite distance) and a single space (the pegging of all the fractal spaces defined by membranes of angular momentum) and disregarding all other scales with different time-speeds according to 5D metric; there is a huge mental gap of understanding of the ‘first principles of reality’ which makes so difficult to talk to physicists on physics. Attitude doesn’t help as the physicist believe with a religious zeal in the dogma of ‘time’ as ‘only’ the measure of ‘locomotion’ in open paths according to Galileo’s v=s/t equation, which must by decree establish the speed and lineal form of all time clocks of nature… not to speak of the ego paradox of man which blows all that regards to himself to stratospheric proportions – such is the case of Einstein’s work, merely an ad on to the v=s/t equation without radically changing its limited meaning. Time clocks in the Universe are infinite and they have 3 forms, steady state time flows, ‘clocks properly’, which repeat their form; attractive vortices (masses, charges, eddies) which are accelerated clocks according to the general equation of all vortices, Vo x Ro = C, and expansive, entropic uncoiling scattering lineal motions such as those of big-bangs and Galilean locomotions. Regarding big-bangs though as they imply the dissolution of information back into a lower ∆-¡ scale of the fifth dimension, we must account for them as motions in the 5th dimension and classy them by I-scale in Cosmic, galactic, stellar & atomic big bangs, the ‘entropic side’ of the ‘dual generator equation’ of physical systems in terms of its 3 ages and forms, Entropy < cc-energy > Mass (E=mc2 in classic physics)

 

IN GRAPH, THE 3 singularities of the 3 ∆¡ scales of physical systems, masses, charges and eddies.

Let us then now explore in more depth that duality of locomotions expressed mathematically as ‘speed’ or change in the motions of being, studied by physics (v=s/t) and its inverse change of information, expressed with frequencies, T=1/ƒ.

As it will reveal the essence of the duality of time space arrows – the inverse properties of lineal time-duration and cyclical, frequency time clocks, which come together ONLY in the vital energy spacetime systems that combine both forms and properties into a ‘present being’.

It is difficult to stress the degree of primitivism for the intuitive perception of the cyclical space-time regions and beings of the Universe, that represents to ‘simplify’ into linearity the infinite time clocks of information of the Universe. Once this informative quality of time cycles disappears, reality which is a flow of time-space cycles, synchronized and chained to each other by organic functions disappears. And so man looses any understanding of the vital nature of the Universe, and starts to measure lineal motions as the meaning of it all. The vt=s, which has minimal information becomes then the regular form of knowledge, where the frequency and form of discontinuous time cycles disappears.

 

And this give us the 3 simplest conserved elements of reality, lineal motions (momentum), cyclical momentum and the vital energy reproduced between them.

The 3 principles of conservation: LINEAL, ANGULAR MOMENTUM & ENERGY

The 3 conserved forms of the Universe, angular and lineal momentum, and vital energy form in the fractal Universe the 3 parts of a T.œ or fractal point, Non-E with an inner volume of space-time through which multiple parallels can cross. The rules of geometric and biologic engagement of those points to form waves, networks and topological organisms, define the non-æ bio-logic of the organic Universe based in the a(nti)symmetric laws of similarity, parallelism and perpendicularity expressed in 5 ¬Æ postulates that substitute the classic axiomatic method of definition of logic and geometry.

 For you to understand ‘fast’ what we mean by TIME-SPACE SUPERORGANISMS (ab. T.œ) consider an immediate picture of one of them, made of 3 parts, a vital energy enclosed by a cyclical membrane self-centred in  a linguistic mind that measures it and acts in an external world to ensure its survival. As it happens, in terms of physical systems, the Universe conserves exactly 3 quantities equivalent to those 3 systems, as all is made of them, albeit broken in a tapestry of infinite such T.œs:
  • Lineal momentum, which is the motion directed by the will of the S@-mind with its formal spatial mapping of reality, moving lineally to achieve its ‘actions of existence
  • Angular momentum, which is the cyclical membrane of the being, seen in motion as a time clock, ∆ð, that separates the being’s internal vital space-time from the outer world and creates its ‘standing form’
  • Energy, which is the vital space enclosed by the angular momentum that balances both, S@, minds with lineal momentum-actions and ð-cyclical membranes, equating them: S@≈∆ð.

Those 3 ‘conserved quantities’ broken therefore into infinite vital space-time organisms, put together as a puzzle, give us the 3 absolute space-time quantities of physics. And they form the 3 elements of the fundamental topology of the Universe, a closed ball, where the open ball or visible part is the vital energy, while the membrane and singularity point or mind in its center are considered ‘something else’. And as we move into larger scales we will find in all systems, a boundary from nations with borders to animals with skins, a mind-center or seed of information, from capitals and governments to DNA molecules; and in the middle a vital energy exploited by both, from military armies in the border and legal or financial informative people-castes in the capital exploiting the mass of population to black holes in the center of galaxies, enclosing a vital space of stars, with a halo of dark matter, likely strangelets, to use them as mitochondria of their reproduction, to your sensorial skin and brain exploiting your cells.

There is THEREFORE A VITAL ORGANIC PROPERTY TO THE 3 conserved fractal quantities of the Universe that ensemble into systems, and their properties are inverted regarding the ‘extended membrane of hardcore lineal proteins’ vs. the imploded singularity of informative warped DNA, which the middle vital energy pegs together.

So death is the ‘separation’ of those two parts after exhausting the vital energy, so the membrane detaches warps, wrinkles and the singularity mind returns to its memorial repetitions, while the vital energy dwindles and as an old man you get all skin and memories…

In terms of the dimotions of time-space, the fundamental element of any system is its vital energy, enclosed by a 2D angular momentum-membrane self-centered into a 1D singularity, establishing the essential equation of all systems:

1D singularities + 2D membranes (holographic information) = 3D vital energy 

They give the 3 conserved ‘fractal quantities’ of any super organism of space-time:

-Angular momentum (2D membrane).

-Lineal momentum (motion of the singularity)

-Vital Energy (volume enclosed and managed between them).

This is the simplest structure we find in all scales of nature, from atomic systems with an electronic membrane and a nucleus singularity enclosing fields of gravitational and electromagnetic energy, to cells with protein membranes, DNA singularities and vital energy enclosed in cytoplasms, to nations, with a hard-military border, a capital-singularity and a vital energy of middle working reproductive class, to galaxies with a halo of strange, dark matter, a center of top quark black holes and the stars, mitochondria  that reproduce them both, to yourself with a sling membrane a nervous brain singularity and a reproductive body.

The Universe is a fractal of 3 elements, space, time and its vital energetic combinations. The iteration of those 3 elements into finite fractal organisms put together create the puzzle of reality we see. This might seem in first principles very simple but becomes more complex as we are talking of a ‘vital’ fractal, which has organic, bio-logical properties, besides topological ones, (which are the only accepted by the religion-dogma of a mathematical only universe) as its goal is to reproduce information (arguably a mathematical fractal also reproduces information departing from a generator, feedback equation, but its abstract jargon doesn’t recognize those properties).

The simplest mathematical representation will be then a 3-D volume of an open sphere, constrained by an angular momentum and beating at the rhythm of its singularity clock of frequency=1/t.

 

How does a Universe of infinite time clocks of different size and speed relates to the present Universe in which all time clocks are equalized to the mechanical, clocks of metal-information, which were invented in the Middle Ages in Italy, and became the ONLY CLOCK-TIME OF THE UNIVERSE, once elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks).

Since we are all organic space-time beings co-existing in several scales, we do change also the word science for STience, stiences that describe the different space-time beings ordered by 5D metric:

4th and 5th dimensions∆±¡: Entropy & evolution. Its metric.

All those scales (ab.∆±¡) are topologically similar, differentiated only by the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’: Size in space x Time frequency =constant. As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric.

In the graph, the Universe organises itself in co-existing scales of relative size in space and speed in its time clocks of information – a structural property that determines its organic nature, as those scales become symbiotic to each other, sharing through networks flows of energy and information. This fractal organic nature of reality was intuitively understood by all philosophers of science, which from Aristotle to Leibniz and Einstein conceived a pan psychic vital Universe, and man made to its image and likeness. But science did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I discovered it in the milieu of system sciences, a metric equation of the scalar space-time dimension of the Universe, applying it to the study of all systems, including human societies and machines – a task carried out in this blog. The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time  is simple as all space-time metric are: Se (size-energy in space) x Ti (speed of time clocks-information processing) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms. It also allows systems to travel through its scales by growing in size, while diminishing in time speed, as we do from birth as a fast reproducing seminal cell which emerges with slower clocks as an organism, part of a superorganism, mother earth, which has even slower geological cycles:

In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature, once the ‘first phase of any new scientific paradigm’ (resistance of authority) crumbles by the sheer weight of facts explained by the new paradigm.

Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).

Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.

So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.

The falsehood of constructivism. Physics is just another set of planes with the same Disomorphic laws.

If reductionism to a single locomotion of the 5 times=changes of the Universe have made physicists ‘specially proud’ and ‘determinstic in its simplification of reality’ to the simplest description of it – hence obviously deterministic as a line is, with no apparent fluctuation… as death-entropy is with no continuation… the humind ego of physicists have also developed a ‘theory’ to make it the ‘queen’ science, called ‘constructivism’, according to which its planes matter more. Not so.

Below an image of different fractal organisms in the Universe in different scales:

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information and then self-organizes networks and systems that evolve into superorganisms in all scales of reality. This obvious fact observed in the graph – but denied by the ‘creationist’ entitled human beings who prefer to think they are  the only intelligent, living part of it to their own peril; makes it a ‘pan psychic’ organic system. But science did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I discovered it in the milieu of system sciences, applying it then to all systems, including human societies and machines.

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal system that reproduces spatial information and temporal energy, carried in the cycles and forms of its clocks of time in multiple scales of spatial size.

4th and 5th dimensions∆±¡: Entropy & evolution. Its metric.

Let us now deal with ‘the fourth dimension of entropy’ and the ‘fifth dimension of social evolution’ into wholes. So simple so complex when we combine, repeat and translate in different languages those ultimate principles, which we shall now study with a bit of more depth.

The Universe and all its parts are Timespace organisms that reproduce information, stored in the form and frequency of its time clocks, through the vital motions of its 3 space-time dimensions and 2 ± ‘∆’ scalar dimensions of entropy that dissolve the networks of information of an entity, scattering them in the process of death, and emergence, which evolves those networks socially from a group of smaller parts into a whole.

Without those 2 ‘organic’ dimensions that relate the different ‘scales’ of size in space and speed of time clocks of each ‘fractal part’ of the Universe, we cannot make sense of its organic process of creation and extinction. In the graph all systems co-exist in 3 scales of the 4th & 5th Dimension: the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational world; which we can describe with a metric equation of the 4th and 5th scalar Dimensions of space-time (ab. ∆±i), which order all entities of reality in scales according to the size and different speeds of time clocks of its systems is very simple: $ x ð = K, the relative size in space and speed of the time cycles of a being remain constant:

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal system that reproduces spatial information and temporal energy, carried in the cycles and forms of its clocks of time in multiple scales of spatial size. All those scales are topologically similar, differentiating in the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’: Size in space x Time frequency =constant. As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric.

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scales is simple as all space-time metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature, once the ‘first phase of any new scientific paradigm’ (resistance of authority) crumbles by the sheer weight of facts explained by the new paradigm.

Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).

Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.

So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.

So the first ‘organic property’ of the fractal Universe, and the symbolism is rather simple, ∆ for scales of size, ±¡ to order them. 3 enough to create an organism.

In the graph we see the ‘organic fractal Universe in different scales’ and systems of reproduction of information.

Classic Physics pretended to be the highest ‘intensive science’ because it established a preferential origin in the lowest scales of reality of all what existed, which should determine all other scales of size and coming together of parts, according to the same set of laws. This is contested by the fractal Universe, as all the scales have slightly different set of laws. However there is a common ‘theme’ in all of them, which are the laws of super organisms and worldcycles common to all scales, whose perfect ideal forms space and time are rather mental; that is, ideal singularity mind-mappings then imprinted by each mind-language and program of survival in the Universal scales. As Mr. Anderson pointed out: The constructionist hypothesis breaks down when confronted with the twin difficulties of scale and complexity.

So the first conclusion we obtain from the analysis of the two new properties of space – scales, and time – 3 complex arrow to form a being, is an essential law of Nature highly contested by physicists and its ‘constructionist theory… which pretends the lowest scale is different and all others above are made with its laws. Above, a classic paper of the 70s already noticed that those 2 ‘properties’ of space – to be scalar, and time – to have multiple complex arrows of motion and future would determine that physics is NOT the fundamental ‘stience’ – all of them are, as all follow similar but not equal detail, since a fractal in each scale is ‘similar’ but different in the details, and yet the organic fractals of nature, as the simplified mirror-mind image in the mathematical language can be all generated by an identical ‘generator equation’, which describes its parts  and how the constant feed back motions and exchanges between them ‘generate’ new variations :

Absolute relativity

All what exists being homologic by virtue of possessing the same Dimensions in its organic form, and living similar worldcycles, albeit self-centred in different scales of the fifth dimension of the scalar Universe is absolutely relative, in an infinite whole, in which all beings are limited to 3 organic scales, 3 ages of time and 3 adjacent forms of space:

Galileo & Newton errors: Lineal single Mathematical time invents a background space-time.

Physicists use mathematics as the language to explore the Univese, which is good as it is a language that mirrors reality with enormous synoptic logic efficiency and it is extremely good to picture space, with its fundamental element the point, which must be upgraded from Euclid’s abstract definition of a point with no breath into the fractal definition of a non-Euclidean point which allows infinite parallels to cross, as it GROWS in size when we come closer to it BECOMING a whole being, star, cell, or individual. Once this correction is done we shall advance very fast on our sections of mathematical physics to explain all the equations with a more meaningful content.

This said because physicists IGNORE the fractal point, even if Einstein used it in a simpler version (Riemann) to study the geometry of the ‘enlarged’ gravitational world – when he used non-e geometry – they have a lot of errors in their understanding of physics, starting obviously by its ‘point-particles’, which enlarged will hold a lot of time cycles, aka strings closed and spaces-distances-lineal motion strings.

But so far they have no idea on how to do this. So what they did, as they believe maths is the only language and it is better described with a cartesian graph, is to convert the cartesian continuous graph of maths into the REAL SPACETIME! And so since newton they think there is a background space-time, the cartesian graph over which God which is a mathematician, draws its beings. And of course, since the Universe is a fractal of space-time, once they have missed the fractal structure of non-e points, and reduced time to the ‘line’ of the cartesian graph, a single dimension of lineal time appeared and from then on, most physicists never quite got what they were talking about.

We have thus firs to explain this mathematical religion of physicists that confuses reality with mathematical artefacts It is also the origin of the biggest blunder regarding time-space – the belief that the abstract cartesian graph with its lineal time IS real and acts as an absolute background space-time over which we ‘draw’ all other beings as physicists draw its equations on that ‘graph’

 CYCLIC TIME§PACE

The Universe is an organism of space=form and time=motion; two parameters hardly understood by humans. In essence there are infinite ‘clock-like closed’ time cycles, which carry the in-form-ation of the Universe in the form and frequency of its closed cycles. Humans however equalize all those cycles of time space organisms with a single mechanical clock since Galileo and Kepler became in ‘awe’ of its mechanical discovery.

Reality of course is far more complex. The enormous number of different clocks with different speeds in the Universe require to study ‘new properties of all of them’. What those clocks of time have in common: to be closed cycles, hence to divide reality into an inner and outer region, to last in time, to conserve certain angular momentum-like quantities in the volume and speed of those cycles, and so on…

Properties mostly about forms-in-action, in-form-ations, motions with form.

 

I.

5 DIMOTIONS OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS.

 The 5 Dimotions of timespace. A vital interpretation.

Let us then start considering how the 5 Dimotions of timespace, locomotion; its inverse, information, its combination, hyperbolic iterative, reproductive waves, and its lower disordered planes of death, entropy (max. scattering, disordering motion) an organic upper, entangled wholes (5ht dimension of social evolution of discontinuous parts into wholes) define the entangled organic Universe, and why HUMANS do NOT perceive it as such due both to a historic limited evolution of the discipline, and the embedded egocy of man, who gauges information from its point of view, hence deforming its perspective, thinking of himself, the center of it all.

The i-logic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.

That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…

The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.

So they said the Universe is dying  and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPY-scattering motions-death aka weapons.

But there are 3 more ARROWS of time, modes of change, which are THE POSITIVE, CREATIVE, INFORMATIVE, SOCIAL, LOVING ARROWS not the 2 simple, destructive negative, arrows of motion and entropy which they DO study: 3) information 4) reproduction 5)social love, the highest of them.

THE UNIVERSE REINFORCES THE PROGRAM OF THE 5 ARROWS OF TIME with SENSATIONS the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (ARROW of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).

But are they the only species that move, perceive, kill to feed on energy, reproduce and evolve socially? Since if at least they were unique as they pretend in those sensations, they could claim to be ‘special’. Fact though is they are NOT. Those 5 ‘dimotions’ of timespace (a better word composed of dimensional motion, to define each of the 5 arrows of time), exist in all systems of Nature, as we can observe them in life. They in fact define the 5 arrows of life in biological terms, as life is defined as a system of 5 Dimotions able to process information, feed on energy, move, reproduce and evolve socially. 

Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 5 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of space-time as the attached graph shows:

ORGANIC PARTICLES

The minimal particle-points,  electrons and quarks, which construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms.

So all systems of the Universe  ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles. Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.

ONLY man obsessed since physicists took over as high priests of time with its shallow ‘brief history’ of those 5 ‘deep arrows; made of the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion the meaning of its existence. Because he has shown himself unable to love even his own species and emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms…

In the graphs, we observe the obvious: physical systems do obey the same laws that biological ones because their ultimate elements, particles follow the 5 dimotions=vital actions of all systems in ‘exi=stience’ and this happens because a system that doesn’t gauge information for his particle/head, moving entropically over a disordered ‘larger’ plane, as it displaces towers a field of energy for its iterative body wave; using the extra energy to reproduce its form into a clone system does NOT survive.

So regardless of nature all systems must ‘automatically’ perform those 4 arrows of timespace to exist (the number of synonymous words, dimotions, vital actions, timespace arrows, dimensional forms, we use are many but all mean the same – a combination of motion and form with a vital function that ensures the program of survival of the being).

But entropy=death is not coded for the being, but born of errors of reproduction and external predators that feed on it. Since it happens through the process of energy taking. In physics, basically by collision of Momenta, from where the species with more momenta predates on the other (the planet absorbs the rock, the black hole the star, etc.).

So momenta is the equivalent to our concept of existential force, i.e. Max. S x T, in this case maximal V($t) x Maximal M (§ð). And we shall return to that equation latter when we properly define the vortices of time-cycles of physical systems (masses, charges) and unify them. What matters here is to notice we can and must to give meaning translate the concepts of physics to observe what they mean and why they exist – to perform the vital dimotions of those physical systems.

Finally the 3 scales of any system of reality are:

œ-1: action or cell, fractal finitesimal of the whole in time or space; Œ, whole, U, Universal World.
Those simple symbols suffice to explain the basic logic structure and transformations of ternary 5D space-time systems, departing from its ‘spatial simultaneous structure’, its 3 time ages and its 3 co-existing organic scales:

∆-1(cellular/atomic scale)>∆:organic-thermodynamic scale>∆+1: social, cosmic scale:

Spe (Spatial toroid limbs-fields)≤ ExI (Hyperbolic body-waves)≤it(head-particles of information)≈

Ps (young, past entropic age > ExI: adult, present, iterative age > Tiƒ: old informative, future age:

∆-1>∆>∆+1 (5D scales)≈ Spe≤ExI≤tƒ (space organs) ≈ Ps≥ExI≥ƒt (time ages)

Unification of all sciences and Definition of the Universe.

Now, we shall start this introduction with a definition of the Universe from the perspective of the philosopher of science, which we will elaborate and explain in great detail in the rest of this post.

“The Universe is the sum of all the symmetric, ternary super organisms (spatial synchronous view) performing a world cycle of 3 ages between generation and extinction (diachronic point of view), as they travels through 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension, growing in size and diminishing in a balanced, Sp x Tƒ= ∆±1 survival form, performing from its centered point of view, the 5 space-time actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, (active meaning of space and time), ±∆e,i,∫u, which ensures their survival.”

The laws of mathematical physics are concerned with the events and topological structures of space-time super organisms. Each T. œ will participate of the laws of T.Œ, and as such can be studied in ‘encased’ equations of the fractal of all fractals, the ‘ideal mathematical, and logic game’ of a perfect 10D supœrganism.

There are then the parameters of physics to describe the 3 main elements of the system, its membrane of timespace, with its division of reality into an entropic external world, which it ab=uses and an internal, informative vortex towards the fifth dimension of the singularity, which connects the being through the language into a communicative point of that larger world.

The main task of 5D: ∆•s≈t theory in mathematical physics is to translate abstract algebraic equations, notably group theory, to the much more realist symmetries of the generator equation; to upgrade topological physics to the clear-cut ternary structure of topological organisms, and finally to make sense of numerology and analysis, as the languages of the fifth dimension.

Needless to say all this needs to evolve mathematics also, from its view of continuous space and a single causal logic arrow to fractal space and ternary causality. But as we do not have the space and time here to repeat that upgrading, i refer the reader to the chapters on languages.

The simplicity of the Generator and its infinite iterations reaches its zenith in the Physical scales.

In this post we shall study the scales from the human side to the particle world, which were traditionally treated by physics, centered in atoms and matter. As we will study larger physical scales in Earth’s sciences (Geology) and Astrological sciences (galaxies and cosmos).

Physics is an excellent scale to study the simplest forms of the arrows≈actions of time-space, entropy, energy and information in natural forms easy to recognise in its basic properties. A the observance of reality is always limited by the mind paradox who strips off complex  organic properties all beings different from man, what ‘remains’ understood of smallish ∆±3 scales of reality are just the simplest properties of those scales.
The 3 arrows of time, the splitting of scale into smallish ∑∆-1 •-monads and networks, all becomes more clear in the limited observation of our abstract motion-only models of the physical Universe.

The fractal organic Universe.

In true form the Universe has 3 informative, organic properties which our simplified single time-space continuum misses: because it is made of scales it is organic, as those scales transfer energy and information between them, creating networks and organic structures; because it is made of similar beings, is mathematical as a number is just a society of undistinguishable clones, because it is made of space, it is ternary and topological, as space is a geometry of 3 topologies, planes, spheres and hyperboles, and finally because it is made of motions=changes=times, NOT of space=form, a Maya of the senses, it is temporal, in constant flow of motion, but also sentient, as our still perception of it, is a ‘mental, still, linguistic, formal image’ which happens also in other singularity (crystal images in physics, still seeds of information in life).

All those properties that are inherent to reality – organic scalar structures, topological, ternary geometries, temporal motions through 3 ages of existence and sentient linguistic still singularities make a complex fascinating reality we shall describe in this blog with multiple different languages, as each monad/singularity maps the Universe in its mirror image with a different biased perspective.

1st dimotion: vortices of information

The centers of information: vortex of time.

Let us then consider the first dimotion of physical systems, informative linguistic mapping, likely in the form of topological images that shrink reality in spherical forms (Poincare conjeture: a sphere can shrink without tear and deformation creating an image of the whole).

As masses, charges and eddies are time vortices:

All what exist is a motion in time. Space forms are Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.

In the graph what physicists call particles are in fact time vortices, in permanent accelerated motion, which curves inwards (arrow of ‘life’ of physics systems) increasing information and speed (V(ð)o x R($)o = K, vortex equation, just a case of 5D metric, till the flow is ‘deviated’ perpendicularly into lineal scattering entropy; so all particles have a polar axis that ejects a ‘more lineal force’ (black hole jets, magnetic flows, hurricane columns of  hot air, etc.)

WORMHOLES BETWEEN ∆ SCALES.

The limit of dimensional form is for a given ∆-scale are the 3+3 symmetric dimensions of space-time of any topological being in existence. So the wave that moves in a present scale will have less ∆-dimensions that the vortex, regardless of its similar number of space-time symmetries in a single plane. And in that single plane, as the vortex accelerates inwards, it will also have one more dimension of motion-time, acceleration, over the steady state, constant speed of the wave.

Thus the real magic of time vortices is to act as bridges between scales of the fifth dimension, and as such they are the most fascinating objects of physical systems.

And so the informative, particle/head of a system, is the part with more dimensional form, which for most physical systems will be a vortex that has as a cyclical form with more dimensions than the entropic line. As the vortex is accelerated, it will also ad a time dimension to the constant wave.

In the graph, singularities of charges, fluid vortices and masses, are future accelerated states of the different scales of space-time of the Universe. We shall be able to unify them with a simple fractal Unification equation, as they are all vortices of time, whose only difference is the ‘scale’ of size and ‘speed of its time clocks’, unified by 5D metric: Spe x tiƒ= K.

Now the paradox of those vortices which we claim to have more dimensions than waves and fields that seem to us far more extended is the fact that from our point of view, which does NOT see the lower scales of the quantum systems, as they are outside our maximal range of informative perception ∆±3), seem just point-particles without any dimensionality at all. On the contrary they ARE systems which ‘penetrate’ as ‘wormholes’ through the different scales of the fifth dimension.

They are the elements that communicate those scales through cut offs of discontinuity, studied latter in great detail, in which our parameters of ‘distance’ (rods of lineal motion), time frequency and energy, which combine both ‘change’. So while in the graph, the 3 vortices are accelerated≈future dimensions of time-clocks; the parameters we use will change.

Motions have different ways to perceive them. Smaller regions might hold higher densities, as larger evanescent bubbles might be only the external membrane of the wholeness. As we enter the particle-head states of maximal density however speed accelerates as we decrease size and the being increases its existential tempo.

In the graph, 3 representations, the classic one as a sink is NOT real, the second one is a real picture – a charges as a vortex of time, the 3rd one, is a fractal picture of a hurricane. So mass is a vortex-clock of information, evident in a simple fusion of two equations; E=hƒ + E=mc² M=ƒ(K).

So mass is a vortex of time of the larger cosmological scale and a charge of a lower scale. But since smaller clocks run faster, as faster vortices attract more, charges are paradoxically stronger forces of attraction that cosmic gravitational scales.

The physical Universe is made of those three arrows of time as any other system of reality, which we must define for its three fundamental scales, as physical systems are also part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and ðime clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar ðime§pace. In the next graphs we see the general model of 5D scales of §pace and 3 ages of ðime, and its application to physical systems – which will thereafter be upgraded with the new model of relational §pace-ðime:

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein). So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

So this few examples show the essential ‘new method’ of 5D physics, which consists in merging vital, organic properties due to the fractal space and cyclical time structure of all systems, with equations of mathematical physics that can then be re-interpreted or rather ‘given’ vital=temporal=moving functions, topological nature and social, evolutionary organisms nature – as scales are entangled, sharing energy and form as organisms, do; physical systems follow the 5 dimotions and on top the language of mathematics when properly upgraded with the 5 non-euclidean postulates and the experimental (not axiomatic) method, will clearly reflect those vital, organic properties.

For example, a number is an indistinguishable  sum of equal beings, hence a society – thus the Universe by the mere fact it can be explained with numbers is social; a topology exists in only 3 varieties, so in a given plane of spacetime there must only be 3 adjacent elements to form a physical system; but in modern topology each of those varieties is a network of (fractal) points and so further topological dimensions and actions canned must happen in the upper and lower, social/entropic 4-5 planes.

This is then a key task of 5D physics: to give life to physical systems through its 5 vital demotions and connect them with its mathematical ‘vital equations’.

Then the second task is to ‘correct’ all the biased views still standing in physics, due to the ‘egocy’ of man, who thinks to be the center of the Cosmos, different of other time-space organisms, above heavens and earth, basically a hang up of the jewish-christian anthropomorphic religion that creeps unadvertised everywhere in science. And the distortions natural to our way of gauging from a human perspective, and the limits of having created the entire discipline with a single lineal time arrow – locomotion, and a single continuous space.

So many questions and upgradings are needed, in physics despite the seemingly satisfaction of its practitioners with what they have. THIS obviously is always the case. Huminds are always satisfy specially if they known nothing better. I.e. packman’s addiction to a game of an eating ball was huge as it was the most advanced game of the age – but today not a single kid would like to play when we have virtual 3D games more evolved. So yes, the study of a Universe with a single locomotion of time is the packman state of the discipline. I am going to take you into witchcraft games, even if we shall use the same ’01’ digital numbers/equations to construct the more complex 5D reality (:

FINALLY when we extend the system to different scales of reality, from the ‘o-1’ unit sphere into the 1-∞ larger world, we need to add the ternary structure of systems in 3 planes of existence, which are opened to the system through he sensorial door of the external angular momentum (the true meaning of the still, fixed H-polsitions of spins) and internally through the memorial tails of time of the singularity. Thus the angular momentum is the external $t spatial opening and the mind the internal §@, memorial time opening, which is a corollarium for all systems.

MINDS EXIST IN TIME, membranes in space.

RECAP. The new properties of time and space ad scalar organic, informative, sentient and 5 Dimotional vital nature to physical systems. To upgrade them in theory we need to correct errors and simplifying dogmas, and ego centered beliefs about the Unity of man, starting with the most obtuse of all errors, the concept of a single absolute space-time measured with the human clock of a second which ONLY synchronizes the 3 parts of our physical human system (beat of heart, thought/eye glimpse, step of limbic motion).

We hold then as a self-evident truth, even if we cannot see within the singularities of eddies, charges and masses, knowing though that time-motion comes to zero in the center of black holes (Einstein’s equations), vortices and charges that physical systems do hold mirror images of mathematical, geometry nature which in an automated manner guide physical systems through its potential fields in which they feed, as wave-particle organisms akin to the body-heads of biology, as all systems are made of vital space-energy and informative particles, whose spherical form stores maximal information in minimal space.

The sentient Universe.

How those masses, charges and eddies become sentient, we cannot fully understand but we observe the main quality of linguistic perception in man – the stillness in the point of the mind and the creation of reduced images of the whole also in physical systems: crystals have images, eddies have zero motion in the center, the equations of the black hole in EFE reduce to zero time in its central singularity (likely a top quark boson) and so on and so on. Regarding quantum particles, it seems obvious that the spin with its 3 or 2 or 5 fixed positions IS the parameter of the mind of the particle and its fixed positions of absorption of forces as perceptive mappings of geometrical form, which we merely measure in abstract as positions of an ‘angular momentum’ – H.

Indeed, quantum physicists realized energy is quantised in packets, of ‘something called H-planck constant’, measured with ‘angular momentum’.

And a century latter they are arguing what this ‘thing is’. The answer though is immediate, when you do understand the universe have infinite cyclical time clocks, with repetitive patterns that return in a finite duration to the same point where we measure its frequency. Alas, H is measured with angular momentum (the cyclical motion of a point), H is ‘discrete’ measured in intervals of time, with a frequency: h = e/ƒ.

So H is simply speaking the ‘time clock’ beat of light and electrons, and hence of the human and atomic instruments of measure, which electronic minds use as the minimal bit of information needed to ‘build up their mind-mirrors of the universe’. And so of course, when quantum computers came, they used the atomic clocks – the spin of its particles measure in H-units – to process information at the maximal fastest possible speed and yet not even then physicists realized that the fundamental form of change in time is information, and that is why h-units of atomic, temporal information, are all over the place in every quantum formula, as we are all relational space-time beings, made of ‘quanta=cycles of time’ that enclose and break vital space. Look at yourself, you are a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cellular cycles.

So it is also quite likely that the Universe is sentient as we are also made of vital space bodies and informative heads which sense; so the properties of our spacetime organisms must be shared by any other atomic species, as we show below. Indeed, the unit of life seems to be NOT the carbon atom but the particles, quarks and electrons that host the properties of life, reproduction, feeding, gauging of information, motion and social, magnetic evolution.

•: SINGULARITIES: INFORMATIVE  FUTURE-TIMES VORTICE

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’.

Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs. Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, functions of space-time. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors. In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only a very intense ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms. 

What would then be this kind of consciousness? Likely a sense of proportion, symmetry, balance and beauty. It does NOT matter in any case the ultimate inner sensations of physical matter, but the outer description of the actions of those singularities, which do order and reflect a mathematical organization around them, when in its solid crystal state they act with the program of existence, reproducing the information of that minimalist mind image. Indeed, a crystal grows with a symmetry which its inner image reflects back in the growth of ‘crystal cells’. And that is called reproduction, the objective definition of life, of a whole being in the fractal Universe.

 As absolute future is the arrow of social evolution of the fifth dimension, if we observe those eddies from the ∆º+i (tiƒ) perspective, we must conclude that the singularity in the center of those vortices must be a still zero-point an INFORMATIVE POINCARE MIND, in mathematical terms, ABLE TO shrink into a still point and TRAVEL without deformation into INFINITE SCALES.  What proves we have? Mathematical proofs in the description of the singularities of black holes. And physical proofs in eddies, where the center of the hurricane is ‘still’ (remember the movie vortex 🙂 As quarks and black holes (top quark stars) are self-similar, quarks should then the Tiƒ mathematical minds of the atom…

Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). This is perhaps the biggest discovery of GST:

In the graph, time is truly beautiful in its three arrows when we ad the psychological everyday dimension of inner perception of man of those three arrows. Time doesn’t pass when reproduction occurs, which gives the orgasmic feeling of immortality proper of all re=productive actions of the eternal fractal. Time does pass when the system evolves in time as it accelerates, and so time passes also in nature’s clocks, quantum charges and masses and any physical vortex of the kind, V(t) x R(s) = K(st), the equation of the vortex – a time equation of 5D metric, as time we conclude PASSES, MOVING UP AND DOWN 5 D Scales.

As time is acceleration and acceleration is form of wholes, we conclude the time arrow of acceleration is in the fifth dimension so time only evolves through motions in the fifth dimension and this opens further the complete fully grasping of the essential nature of time sequential order.

The informative arrows of time properly translated into an accelerated ‘vortex of time’ in our scales of the Universe (energy functions, hƒ in the quantum scale, kT in the thermodynamic scale, mv in the gravitational ∆1 scale) become  masses, temperatures and angular planck constants are time flows which leave a trace in space, as each cycle persists a given dynamic timespace of existence.

Time only passes towards the ‘future’ when things change, and change in the sense of a growth of information. THIS FOLLOWS immediately of our definition of the three arrows of time. In biology it means to get older, and grow your information faster than your energy, once passes the first age of entropy, after your seed of information emerges in the upper scale, ∆+1 of you world cycle of existence.

In physical systems it means that time clocks accelerate towards the future, as they shrink in size and increase its attractive force (of all ∆+§). We can then understand the constant emergence of ‘new clocks of time’, of the three specific arrows (hence lineal time clocks, wave-like time clocks and curved, vortex-like time clocks towards the future). How can we trace this ‘evolution of timespace clocks of physical systems on its three arrows?

The study on how those first time clocks of the gravitational dark space and entropy (the limit of perception in the lower scales) evolve through all the scales of existence to become vortices of black holes (the limit of perception of the upper scales) could be considered the meaning of physics in GST, and in the process it follows the same laws and isomorphisms of all other species.

2ND, 3rd DIMOTION Ø:

MOTION AND ENERGY – REPRODUCTIVE WAVES ≈ e  x i

PRESENT is THE DOMINANT ARROW IN WHICH the entropic past and the informative future, act as limits of existence, where existence does  no longer happen for that specific local variation of the time-space arrows.

All the laws of conservation of physics (energy, momentum, etc.) are in fact expressions of the most general law of a constant reproductive Universe, where systems reproduce the same forms once and again, as even simple motion is reproduction.

Motion as reproduction of information along the path of a wave.

The Universe reproduces information and it tries to do a perfect replica, and this is the origin of the conservation of present energy, as all systems combine motion=entropy and dimensional form. Yet when the system has too much form and no motion as time never stops it reverses its ‘arrow of time’ and in a single quanta explodes and erases all information, in an entropic big-bang.

So finally all is a zero-sum: entropy=motion is used to reproduce information, and evolves till the dominant arrow of information – call it a galaxy vortex, a technological planet, an ageing human, a species evolving through horizons, warps all the fields of entropy into information. In physical space-time ‘time curves space into masses (Einstein)’:  vortices of charges in lower scales, thermodynamic eddies and crystals in our scale and masses in the cosmological scales.

Thus the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ that combines entropy-motion and vortex of information (charges and masses), of its beings, and its integral through time – or energy conserved in all systems of nature. Present reproductive energy is what the Fractal super organism of the Universe preserves.

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality. And this is exactly what nature does. And the fractal generator of 5D3 written above, to express the ternary topologies of all beings, through its 3 time ages, and co-existing 3 organic scales, is exactly that sought after centuries ‘formula which physicsts’ believe will conceptually resume all space-time events for all fractal beings.

Alas, there you have it a ‘simple fractal generator of 3 x 3 scales, topologies and ages of time’ define all systems of reality as parts or wholes of a super organism in a perfect, infinite, immortal ever balanced between entropy and information, to produce energy cycles, zero sum reality.

So take your pick: do you like what i just told you in a few pages – the 5D3 FORMALISM that describes REALITY AS IT IS in all its beauty and complexity, infinity and variety, including you.

So i state that the universe reproduces information; they say the Universe is about motion. Alas, I state then motion is just reproduction of ‘simpler information’ at faster speed.

Indeed, it is evident that all biological systems are about reproduction of genetic form in a lower scale of reality (cellular scale), which then reproduces and evolves, ’emerging’ into a higher scale. It is also evident that our historic civilisations are about reproduction of technological information in a lower ‘dimensional scale’ (blue prints for machines), which then ‘company-mothers’ reproduce.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

You might have heard an important insight of modern physics on the meaning of the limit of c-speed. Nothing can in this lolca part of the Universe – the galaxy – faster than light. There are many angles to study this important issue but now we are interested in the concept that this c-light speed is the limit of reproduction of information as the wave of light imprints vacuum space with its frequency and form.

In the graph motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in all scales.

In the right graph we see the actual appearance of a quantum wave, exactly as a reproductive wave, in which each new particle is the stop position reproduced, leaving behind a ‘memorial ghost’ as the previous particle-waves dissolves into the vacuum.

In the left any wave in motion, in which the group speed represents the particle form, co-existing as the outer membrane with the inner wave of energy, its phase speed, whose usual range is  between 2 and 1/2 the speed of the particle. Those are the faster systems of nature as the particle is merely the envelope of the wave, but as we grow in complexity of scale, the form to reproduce is much denser, in information and ‘planes of existence’, which makes the process of motion slower. 

So even motion is reproduction of form; and this, when extended to  the reproduction of a superorganism through all the scales of the fifth dimension determines that a being moves faster when less information reproduces.

And so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox of the constancy of speed (the reason which when I was a kid, at 8, reading Asimov’s guide to science, came to my mind as the biggest question to resolve in my long quest for ‘whys’.

So we write: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

So we change the canonical definition of time in Galileo (and Einstein’s refinement) substituting the term of time for information: v=s/Ti.

Thus the being with more form has lesser speed as it moves in stop-reproduction of form through motion-stop. And when the system has maximal density of form, obviously there is more to reproduce across all its scales of the fifth dimension, from its particles, through atoms, molecules, matter/cells, super organism  etc. While the maximal speed is that of light, because it has the MINIMAL information to reproduce.

And then gravitation that is invisible to us hence v=s/0 information must be infinite, non-local in speed. And inversely the densest vortex of gravitational information, the black hole IS ALWAYS STILL as it is in its own static frame of reference as the most attractive vortex of time.

So in the middle between maximal c-speed of reproduction of minimal information and zero speed of maximal black hole information the rest of beings, including us move reproducing all its scales of Information. So when you move your hand through all the scales of being you must reproduce all those scales to finally form your hand. What reproduces is NOT matter but form in motion, in action in-form-a(c)tion.

ou are the vital information which becomes imprinted in ever-changing, indistinguishable, repleceable CHNO atoms.

As your ‘real first scale’ of being, as a ternary superorganism of relational space-time, is your ∆-1, cellular genetic scale; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom.

Thus light merely warps the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us and hence must have less information and more speed, as experiment prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information, which gives a speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field of: v -> s/ti≈0 -> s/0=∞). So this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we have to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process):

In the graph, light as a supœrganism, feeding on the quantum potential field of the dark world. Its motion thus reproduces form, imprinting the lower scale of v>c of the dark world≈gravitational≈neutrino≈dark entropy≈expanding vacuum in the multiple physicists parallel ∆•st views.

Non-local quantum fields below light space-time, the next scale which Bohm formalised must therefore be much faster than light, to the point of being seemingly non-local or else causality essential to time processes (even if sometimes is co-causality or multiple causal rays joined in a point) would not happen.

Normally those parameters that quantify the difference of speed (s/t), density (t/s) and momentum ( s x t) between scales and its species are on decametric, ternary potencies, as the 5D scales are. So ± 1, 10, 1oo, 1ooo, 10.000 are the commonest differences between scales. I.e. the fine structure constant, measure the difference between the light scale speed and the next upper ∆+1 electronic scale, around +100 (137). The difference of scaling between photons and electrons and the lower ∆-1 scale though is larger.

After all dense photons are just the ‘cellular’ level of electrons. So for complex more detailed reasons concerning the parameters of GST scaling, action at distance should be on the α² bidimensional speed scaling, compared to the larger, light world, around 10.000 times faster and all that happens in 10 thousand times more distance within the minimal quanta of human observation should seem to us NON-LOCAL.

Actually recently a Chinese lab measured non-locality which turned out to have a c=10.000 speed, for its ‘thinner’ minimal messages; or upper boundary of maximal speed of non-local effects; and so we do observe all kind of non-local c<V<10.000 C PHENOMENA, which of course theorist then vehemently deny to uphold its pretension of absolute truths under c speed, which is only the speed of information in the scale of light space-time, as the substrata of the scale is the Bg light background radiation.

So as you cannot travel faster than a plane when you are inside of it, you cannot travel faster than light when you are inside a galaxy sustained by a light space-time substrata. But outside, in the dark world you do have the possibility to go faster.

So as motion is reproduction, all is reproduction in the fractal world.

But then departing from that primary entropic motion, the growth of reproduction will cause the different worldcycles of beings; which will lead to the system’s final warping into a cyclical vortex of time, mass or charge or any other particle of any other scale. And the mathematical or organic detail and mirror will put on it will always end up shown as the three ages of time or if we put a different mirror on it with less more detail we can analyse the system as we do in general in this blog with other biological systems, as the product of an… organic world cycle.

Speeds of reproduction

It is then when we can unify conceptually all waves being aware that we can do different S=T dimensional analysis, giving us different speeds of reproduction ‘formulae’ according to the detail and number of ‘reproductive S=T’ parameters we use. And the focus on the ‘speed of the outer membrane’ (phase velocity) or ‘wave-speed proper’ and the speed of the inner singularity, which as it has more information will be slower (group velocity), such as:

wave velocity > (both bigger and shrinking-informative arrow) group-singularity – velocity.

This general law thus applies to all wave-present states and as usual can be applied no longer in topological terms to ‘herds-states’ of any scale; even if it seems in principle contradictory, that a smaller ‘group-singularity’ takes longer. But what matters is the quantity of information and ‘network’ position of the singularity-mind-still whole. I.e. in an army the commander tends to move behind the soldiers, as it is the static, informative and key element protected, by the same law, no longer topological in its easy deduction.

It is though the group wave that carries most of the information/form/frequency patterns of the system, as the singularity general does.

Since a pure sine wave cannot convey any information. So some change in amplitude or frequency, known as modulation, is required. By combining two sines with slightly different frequencies and wavelengths, then we start to build up that inner modulation of the group.

It is this modulation that represents the signal content. Since each amplitude envelope contains a group of internal waves, this speed is usually called the group velocity, Vg.

The general formula of the wave-velocity then becomes self-evident, in terms of reproduction of information, no longer v=s/t which gives no information as v= wavelength (S-quanta) x ƒ (frequency); which gives us the reproduced element (the S-quanta) and the temporal frequency of its reproduction.

And it is then when we can apply the ‘rashomon effect’ and its different views to express this lineal wave (S-view) as an angular wave (t-view):

v= w (angular frequency)/k (wave number).

Whereas the wave propagates faster when higher frequency oscillations are distributed less densely in space. So the fundamental concept behind the speed of waves – maximal information = minimal speed is conserved.

But the view we have now can be considered the polar view of the singularity which harmonically vibrates up and down to produce the wave, establishing the first synchronicity of all systems between the ‘singularity’ vibrating in the height dimension of information and its membrane rotating in a balanced steady state.

This expresses mathematically with derivatives, which always represent an ∆+1 condensation of information, hence the preferred method to extract a Tƒ parameter, so in general, the phase velocity is Vp = ω/k and the group velocity Vg = dω/dk.

But this kind of waves, are indeed, waves of reproduction over a lower medium of a minimal information; where we can ‘split’ the dimensions of the wave-information and the ‘medium’, so we only need a 2 Dimensional v= s x ð = s/t analysis. 

It is of more interest, and closer to the essential reproductive motion – that of a light wave to consider the ‘motion of information’ in a fixed string, whereas we cannot ‘differentiate’ the string inner properties (mass, which plays here the role of the informative singularity; and tension, which is the force exerted on the extremes of the string and hence play the role of the ‘constrains’ of the wave-phase-membrane).

So the same conceptual equation of speed of reproduction is built now with the parameters of mass-information and tension-external membrane, which gives us the equation of all ‘waves’ within the intrinsic properties of the material. Therefore speed will have to be written with more dimensions – in fact as a bidimensional transformation which affects in an more extensive deeper sense the system:

v² = tension (outer parameter ≈membrane constrains)/ mass-density (inner parameter)

And so once we localise for each ‘substance’ the parameters of tension in space and density of information (wave-group, membrane-singularity, etc.) we get always the same equation. 3 canonical samples suffice:

The square speed of a transverse wave traveling along a vibrating string ( v ²) is directly proportional to the tension of the string ( T ) over the linear mass density ( μ ):

v²= T/ μ

where the linear density μ is the mass per unit length of the string.
Acoustic or sound waves travel at speed given by:

v²= B/ ρ

which are called the adiabatic bulk modulus divided by the ambient fluid density.

And so finally we return to the light wave:

c²= 4π k/µ

Which clarifies (as Maxwell first thought) the meaning of k (being ε, its inverse, used by physicists with little conceptual ‘why’ interest, completely misleading) – the tension/curvature of light space-time and its ‘denser’ electronic nebulae (charge constant) and µ, the informative, magnetic ‘density’ (the equivalent of mass in larger scales, of spin in lower ones) of light space-time.

All changes indeed in different ‘mediums’ and ‘planes’ to remain the same.

Tension then is obviously a ‘dual force’ exerted to ‘expand the space’ of a physical system, hence directly related to entropic motion (Galilean paradox), and magnetic constants appears then as the potential  ‘density of information’ which can be written as patterns of form and order in light space-time. All this concepts will enrich our analysis of electromagnetism in the more specific posts on the theme.

Why then the speed of light does not change with those parameters, is also studied everywhere: motion is in wave state, particles are in relative stop to each other entangled through the quantum potential field and hence they do not move related to each other, so happens to our electronic eyes or metal eyes of measure.  To account for that stopping in the quantum scale not perceived in our larger scale we do need to establish for translating stop into motion the Lorentz Transformations and the extraordinarily confuse jargon of modern relativity which hides a rather simple ‘galilean paradox’ of particle-stop vs. wave-motion/reproduction of information in space…

Energy and momentum. Distinction between ∆st åctions and physical actions.

We explained already in the general moment that the ternary ‘scaling’ happens both in time and space, and so we talk of 3 levels, of ‘integration:

∑∑3±i åctions= ∑3 time arrows/cycles: physiological functions = 3±i Worldcycle of life and death (time duration/existence; history in time)

∑∑cells/atoms/citizens = ∑3 matter states/networks/systems= 3±i time§paœrganism (planet, ecosystem; Humanity in space).

And we shall see therefore not only structure of space in 3 scales of ‘size-population’, but parallel structures in time with 3 ‘length of cycles’. 

How this works mathematically and with the parameters of physics and the symmetries it creates?

It has to be noticed first that we do not talk of the same concept when we refer to åctions or ‘drives of existence’ in ∆st and actions in physics as the concept of an action in physics is closer to that of a world cycle (the full timespace process), while in ∆st, in which we need to use more general terms with application to all stiences we use more the concept of an ‘event in time-space’, a minimal quanta measurable, in which a supœrganism ‘acts in  the external world’.

Hence the need for a clarification.

In physics we translate the 3 scales for the being as momentum, which is our quanta of åctions, its integral which is the energy of the system… and finally the integral of energy in time, which is our world cycle (and in physics an action – another reason to use different ‘as’, å for the momentum, and a for the world cycle – we shall then to avoid confusions call it in physical articles a physical action and a momentum-åction).

Worldcycles in physics as zero-sums: lagrangian actions.

In Lagrangian and Hamiltonian physics, action is an attribute of the dynamics of a physical system from which the equations of motion of the system can be derived. It is a mathematical functional which takes the trajectory, path or history, of the system with different values for different paths. Action has the dimensions of energy x time  or momentum x length, and it IS perhaps the most important element in physics as it is the world cycle in ∆st and both have as value a zero sum, in a closed conservative world cycle.

Why? Because the NEXT scale of time as a ‘sum’ of energy instants does not grow further, as energy is a present ST-ate of the being. And the whole integration through the whole life-death cycle (energy x time: physical action) is a zero sum, with 3 standing points, which are the changes between ages of the being.

So once we have integrated the momentum actions into the whole ‘time’ content of in-form-ation as energy, we do NOT obtain more than a scalar or a zero sum when we integrate over time again energy as energy is ‘conserved’ in its ‘present state.

We integrate the 3±i ages of the being or event, taking into account that the whole world cycle will be a zero sum.

And this is the Lagrangian ‘world cycle≈physical action’:

This can be summarized by Hamilton’s principle:

∫δ L dt=0

The time integral of the Lagrangian is another quantity called the action, defined as:

S=∫ L d t
This is THE preferred expression of the laws of Newton, as IT does not have to deal with the concept of ‘force’, nebulous in classic physics.

The concept of force in ∆st.

But for us is more telling to understand fully a force as the interaction of what physicists call an Active magnitude – a vortex of accelerated time of any scale, and a potential – an ∆-1 field destroyed into entropy to provide motion to the ‘ever consuming accelerated time vortex’.

THUS A FORCE is a double ∆-tƒ parameter, f=m (accelerated vortex of mass) x a (acceleration).

Force is important and we shall explain it in the section on mechanics, but for the time being we shall say what is evident:

‘A force is an ∆+1: tƒ< ∆-1:$p-otential state, in which the vortex of accelerated time provokes the entropy of a potential and absorbs its expanding space to ad it to its total mass-energy supœrganism.’

THAT IS WHY FORCES ARE SO IMPORTANT IN PHYSICS BECAUSE THEY REPRESENT ONE OF THE 3 BASIC TIME ARROWS THAT FUEL THE FUTURE accelerated vortex (being the other two, the inverse of a force, where the mass devolves into the potential) and the stable present state.

Thus, instead of thinking about particles accelerating in response to applied forces, one might think of them picking out the path with a stationary action, with the end points of the path in configuration space held fixed at the initial and final times. Hamilton’s principle is the principle of least action – the idea of finding the shortest path a particle can follow subject to a force solved by Leibniz… and as usual after Leibniz by Newton the following year saying again as in calculus that he was thinking long ago in variational calculus, but did not publish. Oh, my friend how harsh is mankind on his true genius when they just do thought experiments as opposed to the ambitious mediocrities that have power and make weapons.

NOW, HERE IS THE CONUNDRUM: How the particle finds its minimal time path on advance? This only Feynman worked out and wondered with no final result, because it implies that the particle knows where it is going – the end constrain of its trajectory and moves, stops, gauges, moves, stops, gauge to find the least time consuming trajectory as we would do if WE PERCEIVE=GAUGE INFORMATION.

So all the maths of modern mechanics based in that principle, in Lagrangian and Hamiltonians confirm two facts basic to ∆st, which is NOT SHY, egocentered, as if only humans perceive, to explain the reasons: the world cycle (Lagrangians, actions) as a zero sum, and the sentient perceptive state of the particle, which stops to gauge and correct in ‘derivative’ steps, the REAL meaning of each of those derivatives of momentum.

Alas, derivatives, stop and go perception and the most important equations of mathematical physics are all related.

And so if we want to manipulate further energy equations for a ‘time duration’ of a world cycle or least time path, we enter into the analysis of Hamiltonians and Lagrangian formulations; which might be expressed:

A)  Only as energy. THEN THEY ARE time independent (Hamiltonians of energy as in Schrodinger’s equation).

B) tend to zero sums in time or at least to the minimal time consumption as it does the whole world cycle for Lagrangian derivatives that return us to the momentum steps, which tends to minimise for each ‘action’ the consumption of the lifetime of the whole being (principle of least action).

So we have illuminated and encased within the ‘laws of ∆st’ the most important equations of physics.

And it is easy to see that wen dealing with frequencies we can do the same with fourier  transform the other ‘monster equation’ predating all the physics of time/frequency waves (the other present state). There again the Fourier transform ‘ads faster, multiple quanta of frequency, information’ and makes a whole, the bigger wave, and the beauty of it is that we can ‘decompose’ the whole into parts and ‘rescue’ the time frequencies that are faster in beat and come together to emerge as a whole.

As this is very standard math, we shall as usual merely ‘quote’ equations or bring them when they are very simple, on line with the purpose of the second line, which IS THAT ANYONE WHO HAS UNDERSTOOD THE CONCEPTUAL elements without more than high school physics/maths can get it all.

What here matters of the fourier transform IS the fact that we have resolved a KEY ELEMENT OF ALL ∆-§calar analysis: HOW BY RESONANCES AND MIXING AND SUPERPOSITION AND HERDING, A NEW WHOLE EMERGES FROM A SERIES OF ‘SYNCHRONIZED’ SMALLER PARTS.

And we shall return to it ‘a lot’ as this is indeed a key question in all sciences – the reasons and processes of emergence of whole new scales and parameters.

So here we have to ways of emerge, in time, through the merging of faster beat/frequencies and the whole science of synchronicity behind it that applies in all sciences: i.e. a moon cycle of the larger whole is synchronous to the woman’s menses. And we have studied how in space-time åctions integrate into momentum, which integrate into worldcycles.

 

3 CONSERVATION LAWS OF REPRODUCTIVE PRESENTS. O-angular momentum, |-lineal, Ø-vital energy.

Tƒ-conservation. Another view on those Universal constants is as parameters of the 3 sub-elements of the four elements of all systems, which also means each of those parameters will act according to the inversion laws and symmetries of the fractal generator in different roles.

I.e. c-speed is the speed of reproduction of information within the galaxy, but it is the ‘circular membrane’ or time clock of black holes and dark, quark matter; and it is also the body-wave of the hc planckton super organisms of light and its is the basic bit of information of electronic mechanical or life minds.

The multiple, ternary and quaternary (when including •mind-linguistic still-galileo-relativity paradoxes) method thus must reorder and give multiple meaning through the ‘rashomon effect’ to each variable and parameter, constant or ratio of physics, in its multiple roles.

Still each parameter will be dominant in one of its functions. And those are to measure ‘frequencies in time or populations in space – frequencies with a memorial longer duration; and we shall call those time parameters, which are mostly frequency, related, inverse to lineal time duration, t=1/ƒ; while there will be ‘quanta of energy-present space-time’ also acting as ratios and constants of each scale, and those are the h, k, c universal constants; which will also act as’ fixed’ units of ‘dead-memorial space’, when moving to a past state, as micro-points of larger scales.

So c-speed becomes also the ‘quanta-step’ of the dark world, the ultimate substrata over which it builds new forms.

$pe-conservation: It comes thus with the constancy of c-speed the inverse lineal momentum or Sp-conservation law.

However in ∆ST we need to transcend even those names of specific scales for the larger, purest topological description of the 3 elements of reality.

ST-conservation: Finally the third fundamental conservation law is that of the open ball energy component of the system (as seen in space) or world cycle zero sum (as seen in time).

We can though resume further those conservation laws in the simplest, most important of all equations of stience, recorded in my mind-point for decades

ALL THIS said the importance of ST-waves is multiple, and we shall here consider only two elements in certain depth, the laws of conservation of physics, which they explain with the Noether theorem, a mathematical abstraction that merely states that ‘each symmetry of nature means a conservation law’, and then gets into equations without any physicist able to explain you much of that cryptic sentence. We shall be more straightforward:

the Universe is a fractal that reproduces and hence conserves dynamically information, form in motion, momentum and its sum over a cyclical stretch of time, the integral of momentum called energy, which is never spent when the ‘time motion’ is a conservative closed cycle.

In other word the conservation principle tell us 2 fundamental things About nature:

  • THAT MOTION IS CONSERVED as it is the substance of nature.
  • And form is also conserved when the cyclical motion closes into itself in an energy ‘conservative cycle’ that moves but does not do work.

This simple logical, seemingly contradiction – that you can move and do work, but not spend ‘energy’ if you just go up and down a mountain or move a ton around the Earth back to the same point IS JUST TELLING US, the UNIVERSE CONSERVES TIME CYCLES, THE FORMAL, REPETITIVE MOTIONS that are the ultimate substance of Nature.

That is the core of all conservation laws: the conservation of reproduced information that seems to be the same, making a dynamic present to repeat its same formal motions and species. Conservation thus means reproductive motions. Point. Of course then if you are just doing esoteric interpretation of reality you can consider the Noether theory and connect ‘time cycles and energy conservation’ in more esoteric terms than those explained, and lineal momenta (a bit of a whole world cycle of energy-time) and conservation of space, made of open strings, lineal momenta, lineal inertia and any other way you want to ‘express’ in the kaleidoscope of languages and jargons something very simple: the universe conserves present reproduction of cyclical time motions in all its scales.

3 conservation laws: Energy ≈ 5th dimension; lineal momentum: open space; angular momentum: closed time.

PHYSICS, when trying to find the laws of conservation of the Universe found 2 laws, the law of conservation of angular momentum, which is a cyclical motion, self-centered into a point; and of lineal inertial motions – both minimal quanta of action of ‘motion and form’ (more form in angular momentum, more motion in lineal inertia). And its integrals in a closed cycle of energy.

The conservation of momentum is associated in quantum mechanics with the proposition that it makes no difference where you do the experiment, the results will always be the same. As independence in space has to do with the conservation of momentum, independence of time has to do with the conservation of energy.

And so we must deduce that there is NOT absolute space, as the location in space is completely independent on the result of an experiment. So all space is self-contained to the event of space-time and region affected by the experiment.

Then there is the conservation of time. If we turn our ‘experimental apparatus’ in a ‘time-like cycle’, this too makes no difference, and so the invariance of the world to angular orientation is related to the conservation of angular momentum; which means all worldcycles of time have a total zero-value, as they close into themselves in the same point.

So we found that the Universe conserves cyclical motions of time and lineal motions of space.

Then there is the conservation of Energy, which is roughly speaking the ‘integral sum of lineal and cyclical momentums’.

In quantum mechanics it turns out that the conservation of energy is very closely related to another important property of the world, things do not depend on the absolute time.

We can set up an experiment at a given moment and try it out, and then do the same experiment at a later moment, and it will behave in exactly the same way. From this we can deduce the principle of conservation of energy. It is a rather subtle and interesting thing, which can only have an explanation:

Absolute Time, duration, which integrates a series of lineal and cyclical motions, adding them to the extent of creating a new scale of the fifth dimension, IS FRACTAL. It does not exist as a continuous lineal infinite time in a single continuous space plane.

As such absolute time does not affect any event happening in time, which therefore is a self-contained process, a cycle related to the internal time of the event.

A Time cycle is therefore a closed, fractal cyclical proposition.

But we can add, integrate time cycles and that creates the illusion of absolute duration; and we can integrate space surfaces and that creates the illusion of absolute extension.

This is what Leibniz called relational space and relational time.

Leibniz would have said that ‘all substances are made of cyclical motions with different speeds = different clocks of time.’ And different vital spaces, fractal parts. And all together create the illusion of absolute space and absolute time.

But we can ad a third element, the ‘Integral of spaces and times’, which give us the concept of Energy, similar to that of a 5th dimension integral. So on the regions of reality where we can conserve Energy, we are observing a process of scalar, social growth of elements of the 5th dimension. And this gives us the fundamental equations for each scale of physical systems, which are the equations of energy for each of those scales:

E∆-1=hƒ for the quantum ∆-1 scale, Eo= RT for the scale of thermodynamics, and E∆1=1/2 mv2 with the limit E=mc2 for the gravitational scale.

Whereas as we can observe, a given Plane of the 5th dimension conserves a ‘constant of bidimensional space’ (h, k, m) and a different speed of time cycles, (ƒ, T, v).

We can study then the interaction of those 3 elements, how they transform into each other through the ‘frontiers’ between those 3 scales, and what it means the different combinations of those formula, specifically the one that defines each constant:

H = E x T, R (or n k) = E / T and m = E/c2

In this form they represent the constant of action of energy and Time of each of the 3 scales akin to the co-invariant law of the 5th dimension. It simply means that in each scale of the 5th dimension there is a certain constant ‘rod of measure of space and time that varies (never mind here that we, humans use for certain measures of time, the frequency, and for others the period: T=1/ƒ).

The enormous field open by the study of the 3 scales of the Universe, its constants of space-time, its time frequency clocks and its 5 Dimensional growth in social scales of energy, is a huge field, which we cannot ‘attack’ in this post further.

Clarifications on conservation quantities, states and magnitudes.

The previous example shows the problems of translating all those terminologies to T.Œ are due to the use of very different jargons and parameters for each scale. We have introduced the simplest translations of the ∆-1 into the ∆+1 scales in the previous post (Unification equation of charges and masses). Yet it will be easier to use in this introductory level the common jargons of those sciences, merely identifying the previous space, time 5D symmetries and its constant of actions and 5 space-time cycles for each species of each scale.

Needless to say within the previous isomorphisms, we can fit all the disciplines of physical sciences; whose exhaustive analysis of all the actions, species, space-time symmetries (equations) and events in time, between the n-1 scale (quantum physics, electrodynamics, magnetism) and the n-scale (thermodynamics, state physics, electricity) makes physics & chemistry, when NOT trying to make metaphysics (cosmological, eschatological and philosophical statements), the most thoroughly investigated science today.

We will follow the isomorphic method, studying those 2 scales not with the usual procedure of physical and chemical sciences, which define the events of those actions and its structure in space and time with mathematical equations, but with the procedure of T.Œ, considering the 1) 5D scales, 2) space and 3) time symmetries first, its elements and finally its 4)  actions, introducing within that scheme the definitions of the parameters, constants, magnitudes, dimensions and equations of mathematical physics.

Now, unlike more evident ‘scales’ in which form dominates motion (Evolution) or thought (memes) dominates from and motion (sociology), closer to the human experience, the world of physical systems, is the most remote to that experience, and its language (mathematics) the less known to humans, which move on the natural languages of human thought (visual art, verbal time, emotional bondages), and understand as animals, the survival, topological forms of life. For that reason we would need a basic introduction to the interplay of this wider reality expressed in abstract terminologies that seem so remote from the bio-sociological experience.

They are not. As all beings are knots of space-time cyclical actions, whose purpose is survival. The program of the Universe is hidden on physical systems by the remoteness of its scales, the abstraction of its description and the immensity of its elements. So we shall do an introduction to the interplay and co-existence of the 3 scales of reality, the electromagnetic scale, the thermodynamic and the gravitational scale. We exclude though the limits beyond those scales, the quarks inside the atoms and the galaxy beyond the planet, because they do not truly interact in this world of human existence.

The 5th dimension has barriers between planes of existence, where energy and information don’t cross, due to entropy and asymmetry (chirality); and essentially our world is one of light, electrons, atoms, molecules and matter states.

The similarities between the internal ‘strong forces’ of the atom and the internal gravitational forces of the galaxy, the external electromagnetic forces of the atom, and the external dark energy of the cosmos are studied also with physical laws, but will not be included here.

A question also of difficult analysis is the 3 units of action, of those 3 scales, the angular momentum of h-Planck actions, the vibrational temperature of thermodynamics, and the variable g-forces of gravitation. Those constant of actions seem truly different in its form and equations but  the concept of integrative ‘energy’, will allow us to explain how energy and information transfers among those planes.

Finally the order of exposition will be a diachronic analysis, which works better, as the human mind seems to be structure in this manner. So I have abandoned my personal files, which are always written with an analogical, metaphoric method jumping synchronically between all systems of all scales, in spatial order.

Thus we shall analyze in the order in which humans discovered those scales, starting from the science of Mechanics, or higher gravitational scale (XVII and XVIII c.) then the science of Thermodynamics, or human scale (XVIII-XIX c.) and finally the science of electromagnetism and its minimal units (quantum scale).

We will in each scale introduce the spatial and temporal order of the 3 time-space elements of the generator equation (Se<ST>Tƒ), intersecting laws and cases of classic physics, but given the difficulty to understand directly those elements (unlike in biological and sociological forms), introduce a somewhat intermediate exposition but directly ‘downloading’ and interpreting  the known-known laws of those systems. Hence the sub-posts entitled ‘mechanics’, ‘Newtonian laws, ‘Maxwell equations’,  ‘quantum numbers’, ‘Conservation Laws’ etc. In an ideal world in which T.Œ is the Unification theory of all sciences, those terms would not be used, but at this stage we must translate those well-known laws to the elements of T.Œ.

Now all this SIMPLE REALITY is GREATLY complicated in physics by the multiple jargons, lack of TOE, denial of non quantitative properties and multiplicity of mathematical formalisms for all of those elements of T.Œ, for example, the concept of mass, which we simply as gravitational vortices, has the formalism of Higgs, particle with its negative masses, ad hoc additions, but essentially right; as it is a top quark (in the similar Technicolor more correct formulation) field of dark energy and faster than c-rotational speed, beyond the even horizon of the accelerated black hole vortices.

There is however an even more interesting formulation that general relativity, the Higgs field and Technicolor, which is the dick-brane theory of a variable G-constant, which can be used to define the different scalar vortices of the different planes of physical systems (charges, atomic molecules, gravitational light-space confined to galaxies and c-speed and outer dark energy cosmological structures).

Time permitted we shall then choose a formalism that better adapts to 5D planes for all its physical scales in the 4th line. Here we just mention the extraordinary difficulties to fully integrate all those different jargons, and the different formalisms within each scalar jargon and the astounding number of details studied by physicists.

So now let us continue with this post, an the minimal clarifications, on physical concepts, magnitudes and constants to be able to carry a meaningful analysis of the 3 spatial, temporal, 5 D symmetries and Œ-points of those fundamental 3+1 scales, which affect life on this planet (the rest being cosmological analysis in the previous posts).

Now those are the ‘practical’ constants to develop physics as it is; no homogenized by T.Œ formalism. So we must do a few important clarifications. Any system can be well defined, considering its 5D planes and its space and time symmetries and space-time actions, which range from the minimal unit of its simpler ∆a actions, to the larger, longer ∆u social actions.

Yet the lack of a proper definition of:

  • Tƒ: Cyclical time in physics (measured sometimes with frequency – light scale; with lineal time; mechanic scale; with temperature, molecular scale; and so on)…
  • Sp: Vital space, measured sometimes with: wavelength – light scale; with flux current, electric scale; with entropy, molecular scale; with length, mechanic scale.
  • ST: Present, body-wave, measured sometimes with Energy, sometimes with Momentum, sometimes with Intensity, and so on..

Requires a one-to-one analysis of each scale and species.

Further on the Human scale or thermodynamic scale is the one according to epistemology, with less uncertainty of data. It means in practical terms that we do have a ternary fractal subdivision in great detail of our scale in 3 sub-scales:

  • The electric scale with the electron and its social, ∑e=I, currents of electricity, ruled by photonic bondage.
  • The atomic scale with the atom and its social ∑a=molecular structures, ruled by electronic bondage
  • The Matter scale with its molecules and its temporal states, ruled by temperature gradients.

So we are in fact talking of 2+1 (x3) relative scales, to study in great detail. So many elements, so many ill-defined concepts, and yet surprisingly enough, so well-done ‘how-mathematical descriptions’ of its ∆a, motion actions…

All in all  the main equations of the 3 scales, define its energy, its constant of action and its acceleration. What those terms mean? And how they transfer into those 3 scales?

Let us consider it from a different perspective. There are 3 magnitudes to define all mechanical actions:

Tƒ: ‘mass’, the active magnitude, similar to charge, the active magnitude of the ∆ scale, similar to h, the active magnitude of the n-1 scale.

Se: Time, defined by frequency in ∆-1, by the electromagnetic field in n and by the acceleration in the ∆+1

And ST, defined by Energy in n-1 and by force in n and ∆+1.

And it is this ST factor what transfers between scales.

UPGRADING astrophysics to 5D relational space-time.

Astro-physics is concerned with the space-time forms of all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤|3|, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) plus our • linguistic point of view, restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language of mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.

A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirror-image that classic æ-maths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single space-time continuum) can provide.

And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.

And so the task of GST in mathematics should be the expansion of all those elements, starting from:

-Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).

-Then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…

-Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropy-only derived errors, big-bang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆-scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)

-Only then go through the different scales, STUDying in detail each equation and system, starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:

Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,-1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. And as Einstein and Planck thought should end up being the true reference for all other scales (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.

Finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).

Generator of 5D ST Symmetries: Physical systems

PHYSICAL systems are as all made departing from a generator equation from past to future, microscopic to macroscopic scales, entropic to informative functions, for the three main scales of space-time in which it takes place:
$pe: ∆-1:  Field> ∆º: gas≥∆+1: plasma  <S≈T: ∆-1: wave≥∆º: liquid≥∆+1:strangelet < ðiƒ: ∆-1:Particle>∆º:crystal>∆+1: BH
Now in its more generalising way we can write the generator as:

∑Spe (past entropic, accelerated field) ≤ Œ: E x I Present wave ≥Tƒ (future particle of information) = U±∆ (Physical plane)

The fractal Universe of 5D space-time beings is generated by the symmetries of its fractal generator of space-time, a simple equation of group symmetries between two inverse bidimensional fields, one of ‘entropic, lineal, expansive spaces’  and a perpendicular field of cyclical, implosive times’.

Let us then put an example on how much a model of a Universe made of relational space-time ‘beings’ help us to understand the Universe – which is the theme of the second part of this blog, to show you that as usual the way to truly evolve science is ‘with thought experiments’ – with better models of reality, not with risky experiments.

WE SHALL CONSIDER A CASE OF  a classic error product of the platonic idealism of physicists with their belief that reality is generated by mathematical languages; the wrong choice of the copenhagen interpretation over pilot-wave theory, to explain quantum particles as made of mathematical entelechies and hence the one century ongoing absurdity of creating physical theories not from experience but from mathematics and then wait for those particles or evaporating black holes to appear, to not avail.

And an even simpler error, key to understand what is wrong with physics – the mathematical error made by Newton, of confusing the mathematical artefact of a cartesian plane of space-time, with space-time itself, considering that the Universe had a background absolute space-time – the cartesian plane, over which reality was built – it was the first huge error of  mathematical religions, which dragged our understanding of time for centuries.

The main consequence of lineal time in Physics is the limitation of time arrows to the simplest arrow of entropy, and the negation of the reproductive Nature of physical motions, and the informative singularities that order as mind-mappings, through mirror symmetries in crystals and bosonic states of quarks, the physical Universe.

The reductionist ∆o human perspective of physical systems. Degrees of error.

The need for more than a language to describe the wholeness of physical systems.
screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-15-09-10Now it is important to fully grasp why physics is wrong in its concepts and right in its equations. And perhaps the best example could be to compare it with the duality of Chinese language.

In the graph, it is possible to write in Chinese perfectly, as physicists write in equations, and make completely sense, without understanding a dot of it in verbal languages, the ‘natural conceptual language of people’. So a writer of mathematical physics will be right in its equations and fully use them for practical purposes, but it will ignore the conceptual, verbal meaning of those signs. And this is essentially what happens due to the errors of cyclical time and fractal space. Cyclical time measured by frequencies is the inverse of time duration, so in equations, t=1/ƒ are both right. But conceptually we shall ad an entire new ‘world of subtle differences’, thanks to our advanced ‘verbal thought’. Moreover, while there are only a standard ‘traditional’ and modern way to write mathematical physics (due mainly to the evolution of the language of mathematics), the simplified language is quite good to coney most meanings, even if the traditional has much more depth of meaning and symbols. So we shall find that for example, the 4 constructions of gravitation, Newton’s T-vortices of time; Einstein’s, S-imultaneous pictures of the vortices in greater detail; Poison’s gradient in ∆-scales and the Hamiltonian-Lagrangian more elegant, •-mental description, are variations of the same theme; as often in chinese the subtle differences of pronunciation give us variations of meaning.

But if we do not know both languages, the wholeness and richness of Chinese and Physical systems would be lost to us, and we could on top make silly errors, as those foreigners do with the word ma in its 4 tones, unable to distinguish them, and so calling a mother a joint, or even worst, a horse. And physicists, we shall find do have many of those errors, specially when interpreting wrongly Time AS A SINGLE arrow and space as a continuum, LOOSING the 4 ∆•st perspectives of knowledge, the scales of the 5th dimension, the mental limits of languages that describe them and the 3 ages of time and its functional symmetry with the 3 forms of space. 

As physics is today mathematical physics, it deals mainly with time and space parameters in different dimensions and scales. As it only acknowledges lineal time, it misses the ternary structure of time arrows, but obviously as its equations works, it merely expresses them in mathematical parameters without its whys which is what GST ads:

We shall study those errors as they were understood historically departing from ∆o, the anthropomorphic human mechanical scale and our sense of entitlement.

So we apply one of the simple rules of epistemological truth in ΓST:’The further away from the human being a science is, the higher the error of its data’.

It is indeed important to introduce the bias of physics from an objective perspective – our definition of the mind as a self-centered o-point; and to study the bias of each discipline of physics, which grows as we come further away from that human perspective. Hence a second rule for the search of truth in physics:

‘As all scales of reality are isomorphic, we must seek errors comparing far away sciences to the truths of systems closer to us’. This means that indeed, as Einstein and Bohm wanted, the way to do physics is NOT to widen the errors of the Copenhagen interpretation with ridiculous theories of parallel Universes etc. but to explain them in a realist way with the guiding pilot wave theory and explain the ‘spooky effects’ with GST isomorphisms, as all of them have a natural explanation in the Generator of Space Time (Ab. gst). So we can fast review the main scales of physics on account of its bias; and establish such order from minus to major, as the proper way to TEACH physics, which is also the historic way, as we have first resolved the most evident stience:

∆0, 1: Mechanics, which is the the most evolved of those disciplines in its details, and the less erroneous as it deal with our external world of ‘evident measure’ and perception.

∆-1,2: The inner, thermodynamic world of our body-motions AND outer world of Geological systems (co-shared with mechanics).

We find now thermal physics a first huge error – the belief that entropy is the single arrow of time; whose cause is sociological and historical in the worldly profession of physicists, and its hyperbolic thirst for taking the place of us, philosophers of stience, as the summit of knowledge  (: it was studied first in the use of cannonballs and weapons and vapor machines, who do indeed waste energy into entropy, and then widened in a galactic statement of self-importance to the shoe Universe with big bang theory, which dismisses the balancing Tiƒ force of in-form-ation, implosive gravitation ).

∆±3: Thus, as we go away from our perspective and introduce other scales we shall observe the growth of uncertainty (quantum) and dark spaces (cosmology) and the astounding anthropomorphic deformation of perspectives introduced to justify them (Copenhagen interpretation, cosmic big-bang, anthropic principle).

Obviously the anthropic principle and the big bang once, we debunk its manipulated data, will appear as just another form of ‘creationist science’ a religious disease which is the commanding influence of economics, a biblical religion of go(l)d profits, as it is today, and the disguised one of so many anthropomorphic errors. The copenhagen interpretation is even more puzzling as we do HAVE a deterministic, far more proper interpretation in the Einstein->Broglie->Bell->Bohm interpretation. And the fact that the illusory ideas of Bohr had dominated the philosophy of quantum physics shows much more about power and anthropomorphism in science that about truth.

The general error: anthropomorphism and lineal worldly profession of weapons’ masters

This said, all physical systems do lack 1/2 of the paradigm – its analysis as supœrganisms which perform world cycles of existence. As all of them sponsor the worldly error of ‘lineal time’, Galileo’s delight for artillery masters, also caused by its worldly profession as makers of weapons (essentially the same error than the thermal one), and all of them deny biological properties to matter (the human must remain the only intelligent, living being).

It is important to remember this ‘paradox of uncertainty’ of human self-centred knowledge, which applies in earnest to those scales, as humans are too far removed from them and so they accept only an abstract, mathematical description, which does not explore as we do here, the biological whys, its world cycles and organic structures, in physical systems.

Hence while physics does study all the scales (maximal range of stiences) it does so with the minimal quantity of properties (reduced mostly to one of the 8 motions, locomotions, and one language, mathematics).

 

II. THE PHILOSOPHY OF

5D² MODERN PHYSICS

 

Complex 5Dimensions. Correspondence principle.

Though we shall dedicate entire posts of the blog to deal in detail with quantum and relativity equations, in this introductory post we have to consider the differences between the simpler 4D formalism which studies the Universe from the human pov of a single light space-time continuum, with the successful goal of measuring motions from the human perspective.

First to mention that of the five+five dimensions of space-time reality, 2. lineal motion 2. wave reproduction O-1. SEEDS and vortices of n-form-ation, 4. entropy 5. social evolution.

Physicists study only 3 dimensions of space (1,2,3), but not in bidimensional topological forms, but in single dimensions, and with Euclidean points with no breath, so they reduce (except in string theory) the size of its dimensions to:

1. length-motion 2. width-reproduction, 3. height-information; and call 4. entropy the arrow of time – the only one they consider.

However when dealing with relativity, they do not use the entropic concept of time, but as they derive their time formula from v=∂s/∂t, that is slices of derivative present instants; their ‘time arrow’ is different from their mathematical time, which corresponds to the second present-dimension of time. And as they use NOT frequency, cyclical time but its inverse, duration, Lineal time, t=1/ƒ; they ad to the properties of present, properties of the first dimension of lineal motion.

So it is clear that ‘entropic physicists’ who love motion and entropic weapons have a bias for those entropic properties of motion; and ‘reduce’ to nothingness, the information dimensions of time (0-11 dimension of cyclical time vortices; 5th dimension of social evolution, the longest dominant time dimension).

All this makes it very messy as humans are not memorial bitches that keep repeating those errors. So we shall resume it all again, before studying some parts of it:

  • 1,2, 3 dimensions of space are topological bidimensional forms/MOTIONS NOT lineal forms: 2D length-lineal motion; 3D: width-wave reproduction; o-1D: height-information gauging, 4th dimension of entropy (and this is a scattering function or a scalar potential), 5th dimension of super organisms (and this is nowhere to be seen).

What physicists call motion is thus the 2nd dimension of lineal time-motion; what they call a wave of energy is the 3rd dimension of present, simultaneous derivatives of energy (this is what Special relativity studies as time); what they call an Active Magnitude, mass, charge is the o-1 dimensional vortices of time of the ∆±1 quantum and gravitational scales that accelerate as they curve and shrink lineal space (and this is what general relativity studies). What they call the arrow of time is the 4th dimension of entropic death (and this is what physicists doing amateur philosophy consider the single arrow of time). And finally what they completely ignore is the 5th dimension of world cycles, in an external world which includes them all from o-1D generation to social evolution of parts into wholes (nowhere to be seen). They study it ONLY as a worldline of motions, NOT a cyclical process, zero sum of all existences that fluctuate between ∆±1 planes.

But they IGNORE those planes, with the simplified model of space-time continuums, born of the artefact of abstract measure, called the cartesian plane (ultimately projecting as Newton did, the paper on the Universe). So they ignore the scalar 4-5th dimension of ternary scales:

As ∆-1: Past-entropy/potentials, ∆-present-ternary/wave-centered arrows, ∆+1: future, informative particle form, are on the other hand the long time arrows of the scalar Universe.

But within any physical system they study scattering, disordering actions of ∆-1 potentialsand in pilot-wave theory the quantum potential ; they study iterative waves and its 3 CLOCK components, the wave speed, the group speed; and finally future arrows of information that are their particles, crystals and thermodynamic eddies.

So we reiterate, physicists study it all, but with NO method or underlying philosophy of ‘stience’. And as humans are memorial bitches, it would be truly messy to try to impose truth over power (scholarship tradition). When young my first book on physics was called the ‘error of einstein’, the part of time theory (the fifth dimension) he missed (error in physics is what you don’t measure). Just because of the title, doubting of the God of minions of thought, aka scholars (: I never got a single response ):

So we just won’t correct most of it, just expose the more evolved 5D² model, and we shall only refer to physical time theory when dealing with its mathematical equations to translate them into ∆•s≈t, which is the ‘settled’ form.

The dimensional question: 1D singularities + 2D membranes (holographic information) = 3D vital energy.

A simple example of the application of such a ‘fractal Universe’ where species might have different dimensions happens in quantum physics, solving a key problem without clear whys – the meaning of fermions and bosons, as particles with only 2 positions/spins (h/2 ) which we define as attractive 2D vortices (charges, masses) vs. particles of spin 1, with 3 positions=3D. So 2D vortices cannot superimpose/occupy the same place.

But 3D bosons have a reproductive ‘motion’, along its 3rd spin direction, which is 0 spin (as they are moving-reproducing laterally);  reason why they can also superimpose by filling its 3Dimension while fermions can’t. This simplest application of the different dimensional form of Nature’s systems has also an immediate consequence, defining motion as the wave-reproductive state of a particle (and we shall return to it), solving the eternal paradox of what is motion – also a reproduction of form. This very old why of 5D theory, received recently some experimental proof when a photon confined to a 2 D ‘sheet’ of spacetime turned to have 1/2 spin (:

So bosons do reproduce along a line of motion, and since only organisms reproduce, the simplest particle being reproductive, we MUST conclude all is an organism of space-time not a mechanism of ‘whatever’.

A final proof should suffice, mechanism has the problem that a machine needs a maker to be put in motion. WHILE an organism is self-reproductive. Indeed, even quarks, the smallest particle self-reproduces.

Why then we don’t accept reality as organic? Simply speaking I have never had a rational answer from any scientist, just silence – when I used to chair the science of duality in world congresses and explain all this… and a few smiles and people, mostly physicists abandoning the room when I affirmed atoms are organisms as they do reproduce through their particles.

So my conclusion is dual:

First because the first scientists used machines to measure reality and digital numbers to quantify them, which seem abstract, as they are not our languages, and the vital properties are not well expressed in only numbers (evolution in fact is a verbal theory).

But next and now I will be blunt, because humans lack the ethic humility to understand the living organism except some of its highest scientists, such as Einstein, which even in his case was dismissed in his statements on the living universe. So we are harsh indeed NOT on the living Universe but on the human ego, which does NOT want to give, his considered highest property, life to the whole Universe and its parts.

The homunculus mind with handyman craftsmanship to kill with entropic weapons, a big mouth to talk idologies of human supremacism over the organic Universe and a small childish brain that understands nothing.

In the graph, this is your ‘mind-ego’, the homunculus mapping of the regions of the brain and its connections. 

The real problem: a humind with big hands to ensemble machines big mouth to talk about how superior he is to reality and small brain to truly understand. And so our natural ego, believes machines are the model… because then it can feel in control.  And of course, as motion IS with reproduction, the two clearest properties of life, ‘things will become alive when the move’ said Aristotle, and reproduction is the sure property of life in biology, those quarks MUST NOT reproduce, they decouple, company-mothers of machines must not re=produce, but produce, and physical and mechanical system hence DO NOT have life properties, even if quarks DO reproduce and company-mothers, increasingly automated by robots are the ‘ant-hills’ of their offspring of machines, which then they will also take care off, with lobbies to construct its ‘ant-like paths’ called roads, and so on…

We shall then model everything with organic models and care nothing for the fact that the homunculus likely will NOT come out of its ego paradox and comfort zone (as if machines are indeed evolving organisms, it would be a good idea to restrict its evolution as robotic terminators and so on…)

How to ‘disengage’ then the complexity of the probabilistic view of Dirac’s brac-kets? It can be done and I have done it with a painful translation of the o-1 probability sphere to statistical mechanics, but it is by no means the priority of this blog. So we shall try simplified methods to enlighten the vital, organic properties of physical systems.
To the rescue comes first the Rashomon effect – which means we can use simpler equations – i.e. Poisson’s gradients instead of Einstein’s general relativity coming out of it; Hamiltonians in the classic format instead of its discrete versions, because what we want to explore is first principles.
But still we shall need an ‘image’ of that Universe in the limits humans do not perceive. And alas! the second key  fundamental finding of the fractal Universe, in physics comes to the rescue: as in 5D metric, the equations of atoms and galaxies are the same. The galaxy merely extends in space, and slow downs in time, but the product ðƒ x $p = K in both cases. And we can show this in the simpler Newton’s->Poisson’s equations for anyone to understand (the equivalent relativity equations will come in the fourth line if i can stretch my entropy age a few years more).
Then even if a fractal Universe is NOT equal in all scales (meaning only the very primary parameters of space and time remain co-organically similar), some immediate consequences comes out of it: the galaxy (the whole Universe is not fully perceivable) IS an organism of 3 CO-EXISTING planes as humans or any other system are, because the minimum needed for such organism to exist is precisely the existence of the same 5D metric for the 3 scales, meaning the 3 scales HAVE their clocks in synchronicity of scale. If we couldn’t reduce in space and accelerate in time a galaxy to get a Hydrogen atom’s time speed and space size – or rather reduce the weak gravitational cosmological force into the G-strong curvature/speed/attractive power of the coulomb, Q FORCE – the galaxy and the atoms, its quanta would not be connected, and the in-between thermodynamic/magnetic scale, where humans develop would not exist.
It is then also when we can have a ‘picture’ albeit deformed as it is similar but not exactly the same, of how the quantum world is – the electron being a nebulae of dense photons, the equivalent of stars; which we do model in astrophysics as photonic clouds; the dense quark/protons in the center akin to the dense black holes, likely positive top quark stars in the center of those galaxies, the outer electron shell similar to the negative strangelet halo, the Witten’s candidate to the outer surface of galaxies.
And then the third great field to advance on fractal 5D physics comes from the evolution of mathematics specially geometry and the concept of a fractal point… This as it is the most complex shall be kept mostly for the 4th line, but we have already written quite a long on how to improve and vitalise the mathematical mirror on the nonÆ math section on second line, so some stuff can be done on that line, by reinterpreting the hidden meanings of mathematics.
The most profound of that upgrading deals with the proper understanding of dot products multi dimensions and Hilbert spaces, the formalism of quantum physics, and this obviously cannot be fit in this introduction, but we shall reserve for the fourth line; and when done, I believe we will have covered properly the ‘basis’ of 5D² physics for future specialists one their ego-trips of digital creationism fades away and the humind accepts its relative role in the Universe, to fly on their own in the path opened in this blog.
Let us now see how the definition of the mind and its ego-paradox and still distortion of reality accounts for most human errors in understanding the 5D space-time elements that create reality.

Potentials – waves – particles.

The reason why physics seems so difficult, besides its enormous detail, is the complete ignorance of its first principles and proper symmetries between its present 3 dimensions and ∆±1 scales, which fogs the ‘mirror’ and obliges to create in search for ‘still, spatial’, all encompassing mappings, very complex mathematical structures to describe them.

Those mirrors ARE SEARCHING in fact for the simple Generator of physical systems:

0D: ∆-1: informative seeds < 1D: ∆o: particle-vortices < 2D: lineal motions> 3D: energy, iterative body-waves < 4d: entropic death (potentials).

The symmetries between the 3 dimensions of space and time, either in ‘lineal fashion (just explained) or in bidimensional topological form/function: (entropic, disordered expansion of flat space or past, informative cyclical implosion or future and reproductive hyperbolic body-waves) IS the essence of all space-time phenomena when observed objectively externally, defining the 3+3 dimensions of a single plane of the scalar Universe.

What physicists have done is to reduce the 3 dimensions of time to a single PRESENT time quanta, ∂t=∂s/∂v, to measure ONLY the instant, present steps of a lineal motion, completely reducing our understanding of time=change to the bare minimum.

And then imposing this entropic, derivative, minimalist view of time, with the power of its worldly religion – making entropic weapons and bullying philosophers of science, biologists, and society as the high popes of knowledge, cause they have machines to ‘measure better’, never mind the peanut logic of its timespace membrains.

Now we can bring a bit more of insight in how they blur comprehension of 5D metric, which IMPLIES that smaller scales have MORE information (‘the set of subsets is bigger than the whole set’ Cantor paradox).

This means that paradoxically the upper PLANE of POTENTIAL-MOTIONS (Gravitational scale) can be represented by the EMPTIEST OF ALL @-plane mirrors, Poisson’s equation: ∆u=0, as THE WHOLE gravitational potential field is invisible to us, only a tendency to lineal motion. Hence the simplicity of Newton’s laws. Only when we DO look at the field very close from inside, in still simultaneity (EINSTEIN’S EFE), WE REALIZE that at the same plane-level it is as complex as any field. But from the lower perspective is as simple as ∆u=0. Information does NOT fall into us.

While the inverse Hilbert space of ALL potential events and forms of the quantum world is very complex.

A first fast view of the enlightened whys of quantum systems.

Why indeed, we cast quantum physics in a complex Hilbert space? It is an important question, because the Hilbert, complex space acts as the ‘substrata’, or potential field of all possible forms of a quantum system, enclosed with the algebraic and geometric forms of a Hilbert spaceAs the state-spaces of quantum mechanics have more internal structure than their classical counterparts.

A  model is a mathematical structure used to represent some physically significant structure in the world. The heart and soul of quantum mechanics is contained in the Hilbert spaces that represent the state-spaces of quantum mechanical systems, all woven into the structure of these spaces, embodied in the relations among the mathematical objects which represent them.

The specific qualities of quantum 5D metric – to be the furthest regions of perception, hence those with minimal size and maximal time speed ($pe x ðiƒ = ∆-3,4), MEANT also that our perception of it was:

-Blurred by distance, which creates uncertainty.

-Multiplied in forms of space and time cycles perceive by unit of human measure, as the 5D metric made them so small and fast in its worldcycles that we did see a lot of ensembles together, of states together, of parts together…

The conjunction of those elements explains both the complexity of the @-humind view of quantum physics, as we humans try to get a spatial fixed mental form (in this case mathematical to reflect ALL the elements of the experiment and WITH TOTAL deterministic.

And the task of fit all the possible states together, discerning which were ‘events in time’ and ‘forms in space’, measure them, with brute huge elements, set the philosophical problems of quantum physics.

But there is also an @-sentient added difficulty: when WE MEASURE A QUANTUM state, the state is so fast, perceptive (gauging) as the minimalist most perfect atom-galaxy level of reality, with maximal information that it REACTS a priori TO THE OBSERVERS, and so we MEASURE not the previous state as with ‘brutish herds of upper thermodynamic foggy levels’ but the a posteriori STATES OF THE QUANTUM SYSTEM which is smarter than WE ARE. And so we CANNOT even know which of all the possible paths/Hilbert encoded future states, WILL be taken by the system, and just can adscribe PROBABILITIES TO THEM.

Further on, BECAUSE the ternary generator, Potential < wave>particle is ignored, THE QUANTUM physicist, slow, and retarded (in action and information 🙂 does NOT realise it is NOT a choice, of particle vs. wave, as you do NOT wonder if you are a head or a body, YOU ARE BOTH and on top limbs moving in potential worlds. So IT IS the proper REALIST BOHM formulation of quantum, where ALL is there, the QUANTUM POTENTIAL, the WAVE and the PARTICLE. AND YOU JUST change from the present MERGED wave-state description (cartesian hyperbolic coordinates of 3D), vs. the polar ∆-1 potential < > Particle (∆+1) broken DUALITY. AND OF COURSE DROP YOUR BOHR’s ego to accept quantum realism.

Then the PARTICLE IS always within and mostly ON TOP OF THE BODY-WAVE, as the DNA/black hole is within the galaxy/cell wave, or your head is, in the point of maximal information. Particle’s densities are thus maximal in the ‘membrain’ of the system and we localise them with higher probability where the DENSITY OF INFORMATION=INTENSITY of the wave is maximal.

No mystery to it. The so called Probabilistic interpretation is JUST an artefact of abstract maths to facilitate calculus BECAUSE of the properties of complex planes. So WE square amplitude to GET THE REAL THING, A BIDIMENSIONAL HOLOBRAPHIC intensity PARAMETER (operator).  And then to facilitate calculus we ‘reduce’ it to the o-1 sphere of probability by dividing it and multiplying it for the conjugate. All this IS JUST manipulation in abstract math mirrors that detach the whys of realism away, and only then the ARROGANT bohr comes out with its idea that reality is probability to become an impostor, posing as amateur philosopher of science.

THE REAL DIFFERENCES THAT MATTER IN A QUANTUM PHYSICAL SYSTEM ARE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE FUNDAMENTAL POSTULATES OF ∆st universes: Quantum systems are DISCRETE SYSTEMS; and their units are NOT the same of larger cosmological gravitational systems – so concepts as mass lack any significance, and we must change as we do mass for h-angular momentum to define a quantum vortex in its particle-wave formalisms:

Schrodinger no-time dependent wave of quantum physics, means it is deterministic: it represents a complete worldcycle of past, present and future fully ‘integrated in the equation’ and related to the h constant of angular momentum (the closed world cycle ‘spin’ of the wave or particle), which cannot and should not be broken apart. We need though better to understand complex numbers to fully grasp its meaning. So from the articles on number theory:

Complex numbers as expressions of the 3 states: potential past <present wave> future particle

AS WE JUST said Complex space-time ideal for studying ∏imespace world cycles as the previous ones. Since in a complex space, the ‘negative’ arrow inverse to the positive one (Spe<=>tiƒ) are kept separated as lateral i-numbers, by the convention  – initially a fortuitous error of interpretations – than the minus of √-1 cannot be taken out of the √.

It can, but as this was not understood mathematicians maintained the Tiƒ arrow represented by a negative root as a different coordinates. And the result of its combinations with real numbers, gave origin of complex numbers ℂ, which are the best complex numbers to represent the 2 inverse arrows of world cycles of existence.

Thus the complex plane IS when used with the sinusoidal functions a good representation of a world cycle (tumbled, as X+ is 2D:$pe, x- is 1D ðiƒ and in its 3D ∑∏-mature age is i-lateral numbers):

Thanks to the ‘serendipitous’ error of earlier mathematicians, which could not conceive negative≈inverse motions, the real line was broken into perpendicular co-ordinates, which are perfect to represent world cycles, where the real line represents Spe (max. size, X-oordiantes) and the imaginary root axis represents information which has min. size,  and it is negative, in as much as its development rests ‘entropy’ to the real numbers. This scientists still don’t know and it is a wonder of the ‘deterministic’ Universe that they DO use Cx-numbers to study worldcycles, without knowing what they are and what they study (:

Thus in as much as the i-factor represents the information system, which absorbs from the ∆-1 plane energy to ‘be=come’, and h it becomes the operator of angular momentum, of ‘time worldcycles’ of waves and particles in quantum physics; even in quantum physicists don’t know it (:

So we can study the 3 arrows of time of the quantum wave, conceding the imaginary number in this case to the angular momentum, or membrane of the wave, which will then surface often in connection with the particle envelope (itself origin of all other extensions of quantum physics, hence the importance of the example). So we write in 5D:

∆ø: Vψ ≈  h²/2m ∇²ψ + ih ∂ψ/∂t

The ‘wave-state’ is a present state; the PARTICLE, or angular momentum that envelops the wave is function which has the i-number (right side). And the way to properly write the equation is therefore, moving the 2 h factors to the right, to form a nice complex number equivalent to the potential that generates both the particle and its kinetic energy.

So in the right side we have now the kinetic≈entropic energy of the particle or singularity parameter and its membrane.

While in the other side we have the quantum wave itself, its vital energy, which is the potential  energy of the wave, Vψ.

And both are balanced. In this manner, we obtain a third interpretation besides the expression of Schrodinger and the Bohm’s interpretation, closely related to this one. 

So the equation understood in terms of the generator reads:

Singularity (kinetic≈entropic, moving energy) + angular momentum (represented by i-numbers+ = vital energy (Potential energy)

And as any other T.œ, where the singularity and angular momentum encloses its vital energy in balance with it, so does the wave.

So in quantum physics as physicists realise with certain surprise, imaginary numbers are not mere ‘artefacts of calculus’ but ‘REAL’ in its meaning, expressed in the graph above.

We shall of course extend its ‘reality’ to explain why actually they are also real in electromagnetism, even if the humind prefers to obtain as final result a real, which is less real (: result, but appears as ‘real’ to the unreal human mind (quip intended).

In terms of past, present and future (left side), which is a more general view of the ternary elements on imaginary equations, an i-number rotate sfrom a relative past/future to a relative future/past a function of existence, through a 90° middle angle, that is, the middle ST balanced point, in which the present becomes a bidimensional function, with a REAL, + (relative past-entropic coordinates) and an imaginary, negative (future coordinates) elements.

This needs a couple of clarifications: first we move ‘backwards’ in a complex i-graph from future to past as we rotate through i-scales, in as much as most graphs are measuring the ‘motion’ of lineal entropic time which is the relative Spe Function.

So the negative side becomes the time function, something which mathematical physics makes obvious, when considering an attractive, informative force-field-potential negative.

So we can reinterpret the Schrodinger equation as the definition of the momentum of the wave, where ih is the mass factor, and the wave speed depends on the two elements of position and speed, obviously related to the two elements of the right side, the potential/position energy and the kinetic lineal time speed.

BACK TO 5D METRIC: GENERALIZATION OF THE 3 ELEMENTS OF A PHYSICAL SYSTEM.

We are thus constantly encountering in different formulae the 3 fractal elements of the Universe, which in physical systems are associated to angular momentum=membrane, lineal momentum=singularity and vital energy= the wave space-time between them.

This is then just a different plane and much of the confusion happens by making relevant by routine the mass element of our higher Universe which comes into view likely latter around the weight of the dark matter quarks (heavy atoms in our Universe). H then BEING THE EQUIVALENT OF MASS and  K boltzman in the energy equations, is accompanied by the frequency equation to write a simple 5D scalar metric:

 ∆-1: $³d (Potential volume) – 1D ƒ ∆º: ð =∆+1: K ²d(1D scalar: Active magnitude value)

What matters us though more is the conceptual error of dealing with mass in the field of ih-angular momentum as the meaning of mass.

So then particles anti gravitate in the sense that mass here is ih and so they are density charges that change symbol from repulsive to attractive, as we must ‘NOT use the concept of mass’ but angular momentum h, as the operator of both lineal and angular momentum, relate it to charge which is the active magnitude here, mass being expelled from the real of intrinsic properties of quantum systems.

ih momentum differs in the sense that mass, the enclosure particle of the larger reality of gravitational quantum potential waves at 10.000 (open still to argument) IS NOT real for particle points, where the momentum is given by ih, the similar mass-factor on the operator of momentum for quantum waves. This is in fact related to the charge (the equivalent to the mass vortex or star density within the galaxy), distribution around the atom, which forms the density cloud of charge we call an electron. So mass must not be considered and at all moments to be changed by the ih factor of schrodinger’s momentum operator which is the equivalent to mass in the quantum real (its active magnitude). Itself a spherical rotary density of change which has however null effect on the form of the quantum field it does not distort, and so is intrinsically neutral, extrinsically charged.

Equations of timespace dimensions: 5D metric, ternary arrows, dual holographies, constant ratios and speeds.

In that regard translations of pure functions of time and space in GST to physical equivalents are the stuff to extract the whys of physics, both through the use of non-e geometries and non-algebra equations, giving it vital meaning; as the equations by the ‘Rashomon effect’ (all events can be seen from the kaleidoscopic point of view of the 5 dimensions of space-time to extract truth, as Rashomon’s film have 4+the judge versions to get an approach to the truth, which in any case always will lack some info, as only the entity has the info in itself).

For example of those translations the most important Frequency, ƒ=1/t=ð, which is the immediate one-dimensional translation of lineal time into cyclical time. Yet, frequency is a synoptically limited ‘mind’ information in a simpler mirror language of equations; which reduces further the total information of the translation of the being – its form, direction etc – to a discrete serie of numbers.

Mathematical physics thus deals always with such REDUCTIONS of the total information of the time and space parameters of systems in different dimensions and scales.

The result is a reduced but reliable picture of the external locomotions, translations in space and changes in volumes of space, entropy, information, time, energy of all kind of Nature’s systems.

We just listed the 4 key elements of ∆s≈t applied to algebraic physics, which are the  reduced basic equations of time-space symmetries (existential ¬Ælgebra) that apply to all other sciences, when we properly translate them in the language of maximal information of each scale=stience, which is mathematics in physical systems. So we write:

E(st) = $pe x ðime frequency becomes then the main equation of scalar mathematical physics, which allows comparisons between scales.

And then we write 3 ages, topologies of time space and its non-æ equations, past-entropy x future – information = present iteration, the main formal equation to study physical time space events:

The expansive lineal, decelerated motion, the  steady state, constant speed and the accelerate vortex of time are thus the 3 main timespace motions, which is normally made explicit through a volume growth of space (as time decelerates) a constant of speed, st (A PRESENT remains invariant) and an accelerated force (ðiƒ).

Pure Simpler space, paradoxically is three dimensional, expansive and decelerating.

And so we find curious combinations of those 3 parameters which define the main laws of mathematical physics.

SPACE-time FUNCTIONS on the other hand tend to be bidimensional, either in the holographic upper or flat, width dimensions as time/information like (height oriented) and space/energy like depictions. And so we write S<≈>T for those holographic symmetries, often feed-back st-st-eps, go and stop motions that define the whole range of events of the physical Universe.

Finally we come then to the proper definition of the 3 ‘constant ratios’ of all systems of physics, equivalent to the ‘magnitudes’: density of information, t/s instead of mass, spread of reproduction of information, s/t instead of speed, and existential momentum/force, s x t instead of physical momentum/energy.

Of them obviously the simplest forms are those of speed locomotions, depicted with a numerical single dimension to express, deceleration, constant speed or acceleration, which are the 3 ages/arrows of a locomotion, corresponding to Space (deceleration and expansion till stillness), reproduction in space-time (constant speed, steady state) and finally a vortex of acceleration (where a motion dimension is gotten by shrinking a space-distance). They are equivalent to the use of ‘distance’, speed and ‘accelerated force’ as parameters of the 3 time ages of any system.

Energy though, BEING the integration through time of quanta of existential momentum must ad to speed a dimension of ‘spatial accumulation’, mostly width, which stores energy and ads up similar beings in a wave of energy. This will then be the amplitude of the wave, or the tail of mass of the system, which physicists operate with similar equations under the Rashomon effect as potential, spatial + kinetic, temporal energies, hamiltonians, Lagrangians and so on.

Those initial concepts are ultimately what physicists measure in the different  scales of space-time of the physical Universe, in the natural units of that Universe according to scales: 3 magnitudes, which they call length, time and mass/charge (the active magnitude), whose translation is therefore immediate to ∆st.

Now if you want to be more complex than that, ad 3 + 3 = 6 dimensions  in a single continuum, and then ad the scalar 4D entropic dimension global to the Universe and the infinite discontinuous mind-5Dimension that orders singular territories within the sea of entropic scales and free time§paœrganisms, enclosing them with its membrains.

Thus when we ad to the 3 topological space-time dimensions of any form which is made of parts and belongs to a larger 4D entropic world, and the 5D local membrain-mind which orders it we complete the description of the being. Let us study a bit more those inverse 4D entropic and 5D mind ordering dimensions.

EINSTEIN’S RELATIVITY

Adapting discontinuous scalar space-time to continuous single space-time.

Now, the next instalment of the analysis of galilean relativity between motion and stop was einstein’s special relativity and again, he, unaware of the duality of dimensions of motion and form, merely went further into the obsession of measure, translating the effects of ‘warping’ of space that shortens it, when information is imprinted by light in the previous quantum potential of lineal form, adding to the measure a -ct factor of warping. This was special relativity concerned with that translation to our world where we do not see the quantum potential – hence we add the warping to scale up the process into our ‘terse’ space-time. And further on, we do not see the stop and go of particles and waves, and so we added the lorentz transformations to compensate in our continuous Universe, and in this manner special relativity maintained the fantasy of a continuous derivative motion universe (when it is a stop and go), and a single space-time (when it is a scalar space-time warped in the whole scales).

• constancy of c-speed: endophysics.

So let us put another example on time theory – relativity and all this incredibly non-intuitive complex maths to adapt a world moving at constant c-speed to our world. It IS real? No, it is NOT, but it IS for a human mind and it will ALWAYS appear as such in our measures.

Why? Because the UNDERSTANDING OF ALL OTHER SCALES, including biological and social, psychological tell us an obvious truth: WHEN YOU MOVE you think worst. Leibniz was 3 days in a chair to study its information. My ass is square (: Information, form becomes blurred because IT is still, WHEN we move. So to emit, or perceive information you stop. To move and translate you go. THUS in the quantum scale electrons emit waves of light in relative stillness. And so there is NOT need in that ‘REAL level’ to make Lorentz transformations.

In as much as particles travel only as waves, WHICH ARE SYSTEMS THAT REPRODUCE INFORMATION.

Then they stop to become particles and gauge information when they ‘stop’. Then they go as waves and reproduce information. Stop and ‘create an upper scale of the fifth dimension’, the particle. Go… stop, as in a movie, where the camera stops the film to focus and gauge its information.

Particles as we explain on other posts are the envelope or group membrane of the wave, which moves it. Particles thus enclose and in-form the wave, its vital energy that moves the particle. Hence we cannot know with absolute precision both systems, as we shall either measure the envelope or the inner vital energy, but not both.

In quantum physics the particle moves at twice the speed of the wave, Pv =2 Wv, so the particle has time to close the circle, and becomes the dominant element of the system, and its measure, angular momentum (h) the main parameter of quantum physics (other uses of h are explained within the kaleidoscopic ∆ð≈@s, 5 dimensional elements of the Universe and its multifunctional nature of each parameter).  Such waves tend to collapse into particles easier becoming electronic particle-points.

In other limit, water waves travel twice the speed of its group; so a group particle is NOT formed AND the cyclical motion belongs to the ∆-1 micro particle state.

In that regard, the existence of a particle in the classic sense implies NOT only the existence of an ∆-1 particle as in water waves, but rather a collapsed ∆º particle with an ‘active magnitude’ in the external membrane of the wave, which we consider to be the case for the collapsing wave of the quantum scale, as we can measure then an ‘angular momentum’ with h-constants.

Indeed, we can understand the particle as the enclosure of the wave, in multiple variations on the same theme, from the shepherd dog – a moving particle encircling it, to the wall… Waves and particles though as the go and stop symmetry are the essential element that carry the first s=tep duality as far as gender duality, where the female is the reproductive vital energy wave and the particle, the in-form-ative enclosure.

What about the singularity? In principle the singularity which will rule both particle and wave is NOT there, but comes latter in time, as the focus that increases the order of both, introducing an accelerating component to it.

Strings are in symmetry and both particles/groups and wave-energy, travel at the same speed. And those are the S≈T better conserved systems.
An immediate consequence of the particle, ‘stopping’=closing a cycle, as opposed to the wave constantly iterating a motion (both are in fact solutions to the wave equations, so we can consider the algebraic S=T equation of the wave its full symmetry/worldcycle and its 2 solutions, the breaking of its ‘symmetry’ into creative processes).
And this duality explains why C-SPEED IS CONSTANT: BECAUSE electrons that emit c-speed entangled to other electrons communicate in relative stop position a wave that moves and the electron stopped gauges it. So in the electronic scale YOU DONT ADD motions, to those electrons that stop and go regardless on the larger matter scales that might seem as the camera film to have continuous motion.

Does this mean that the Lorentz invariance, transformation, etc. which we use to measure those far away scales in terms of our human sense of continuous motion does not make sense. NOT, of course, it is the proper way to build measures from the human pov. IT is though one a ‘perspective’, that of the ‘humind’, but if we were an atom the more realist view is that of the experimentally proved stop and go ‘attitude’ of particles and waves. So of course, this explains THE BIGGEST CONUNDRUM also of quantum physics, the duality wave-particle and WHY when we observe a wave it ALWAYS appears as a collapsing particle.

Of course, because we stop it. Now, Bohr’s copenhagen interpretation is literalist, egocentered, anthropomorphic as he said ‘the observer’ created the phenomena, not so. We merely see stopping the wave into particle. So Einstein the realist quipped ‘the moon doesn’t disappear when we don’t look at it. And he is right. A PARTICLE can stop without a brutish Bore watching it.

In the quantum scale, they are related to the duality energetic wave, informative particle, which displace over a  quantum field of non-local  entropic motions (pilot wave theory), and achieve synchronicity in its three sub-clocks as particle, wave and field harmonise them in stable orbits (graph, mathematical description).

Pilot-wave theory introduces those three arrows of all systems of Nature, for quantum physical systems its field of entropy, its present, iterative wave of reproduction and its informative state as particles that ‘ride over waves’, following the ‘quantum field of faster motions-entropies’ as a predator follows its food or a bird glides an air-stream.

Now if in the thermodynamic scale those ages of matter are crystal clear, as we expand the russian dolls into larger bigger and smaller parts outside and inside, we move to a generic relationship that explains the enlarger regions of ‘pure entropic states of matter’ beyond plasma, and pure solid states beyond crystal matter – it is the generator equation for the larger ‘Dark world’ ∆±4 universe.

 In the graph, again we can see how the introduction of scales and time ages solves the third main error of physics, one for each scale, in this case our thermodynamic ∆º scale considered wrongly to have only the entropic-death-weapon state, which as the graph shows is the entry to creation and death from the lower ∆-1, scale of Plasma states in which particles are not organically put into a single ‘entity’ as in those solid states.

In that regard perhaps the most strident ‘simplification’ of classic physics is the fact that of the 5 organic motions of the Universe, physicists only seem interested in describing the simplest of them all ‘locomotions’. Such state of affairs that reduces and eliminates all organic motions of physical systems is the biggest handicap to complete the science of physics, so we shall end this introduction with a deeper analysis of that limit.

All this said we need to follow the correspondence principle and introduce the view of a 4D formalism in a single space-time continuum from the larger picture of 5D³, which expands our view to include new scales, and explains a few whys of general relativity, essentially dealing with the distortions caused by the interaction of the gravitational larger scale with our electromagnetic euclidean light space-time view.

Quantum limits: discrete and sentient=gauging.  The rashomon effect.

LET us consider then the rashomon effect of multiple perspectives to see the ‘differences between our macroscopic reality and the microscopic world of quantum physics.

The only complex part of physics is the formalism of quantum physics NOT because it is different from any other but because with it HUMINDS ARRIVE TO THE MINIMAL QUANTA OF SPACE AND TIME, THAT ‘FORGES’ the electronic reality we perceive. This brings 3 fundamental differences on the key dualities of the Galilean paradox. 

∑∏: REPRODUCTIVE VIEW:

h-planck is the absolute minimal quanta of humind information, beyond it the quantum potential is action at distance, invisible to us, which feeds the reproduction of particles.

So quantum physics cannot longer appear as a continuum, as we have reached the minimal ternary ‘wave packet’ of co-existence in space, which implies we DO have a minimal uncertainty of an h-planck, as we cannot know in which of the 3 consecutive reproductive steps, the particle exists when we measure it. The graphs illustrate that uncertainty; as the system moves, stops and gauges, moves=reproduces its information again, it varies from wave to particle and as we perceive co-existence of 3 past-present-future elements together, we cannot localise exactly the minimal angular momentum quanta (H) we are looking at.

Further on, as we arrive to the minimal discrete quanta of our limited reality, this implies we need to use ‘eigenvalues’, that is to describe a system we NEED to get all the information about EACH STEP, an eigen value for each one, and that multiplies so much the information that we need infinite parameters – what they call ∞ dimensions, which are not really dimensions but local ‘basis’ for measuring each of those states, which BEING SO FAST IN TIME we see SIMULTANEOUSLY from our slower level of perception.

So as we cannot use an undetailed ‘fogged’ view of the whole ensemble as in statistical mechanics… the excess of data accumulates:

The first bits of existence are perceived all together, due to its immense number and enormous speed of its worldcycles, using each worldcycle as a quanta of time-space.

2.ð-worldcycle view: As this means many worldcycles are completed for each human quanta of perception, we are in fact seeing as space, time flows. Hence the probabilistic approach is the best formalism for quantum physics as we observe fast Toes, that complete full worldcycles of existence.

In physical systems the first dimension comes from lower planes of existence, through the use of probabilistic equations on the o-1 plane reflection of the 1-∞ in finitesimal space.

3. ∆±i scalar view. As such quantum physics uses the probabilistic 0-1 sphere, to define a statistical mass of space-time events that become the particle-form as a 1 space-time constant of a higher ∆+1 plane.

Yet mathematically the unit sphere, o1≈1-∞, the cartesian plane (and the Riemann sphere, the complex plane). So we can transform if so we wanted the whole formalism to a real spatial view, which IS the view we would have if we were to become smaller, scaling down to the size of those relative finitesimal herds. Then we would see spatial populations and densities not probabilities. And we would do mathematical integrals to obtain its wholes.

4. @-view. But the true weirdness of quantum physics, will NEVER be accepted by huminds – namely that as we are observing the basic units of the immortal Universe, its reproductive, gauging=sentient particles; they INTERACT with the observer’s apparatus, collapsing to defend themselves as schools of fishes do when sharky electrons bomb them. So we CANNOT measure a priori, but only observe the formation-collapse a posteriori. Time thus seems reversed. As in higher scales, where the measurement does not affect so much the observable, which is also ‘mute’ to perception as a fogged herd of amorphous atoms; we obtain information about the state of the system, ‘BEFORE’ we measured it. In the ‘interacting’ quantum world, the system like the school reacts to the electron bomb, a priori, so the measure is about the ‘state’ AFTER.

But we shall not cast given the need for a huge conceptual upgrade, most of this introductory post on mathematical formulae, but just bring punctual examples of  it. The post is mostly to define and clarify the concepts of physical systems, which are not readily understood.

Let us then give a prime on the TRUE PHILOSOPHY OF REALITY DERIVED FROM PHYSICS ONCE WE HAVE UPGRADED IT PROPERLY TO THE ∆•st elements of reality.

THE FIVE DIMENSIONS, ITS SPACE, TIME AND ST-ACTIONS.
So we have seen how the Universe can be generated, in all its systems and events by the 5 dimensions of reality: 1.motion, 2.reproduction, 3.information 4. entropy 5. social linguistic evolution.
That is the Universe in a nutshell as all beings follow the same program. And so the philosophy of physics is NOT different from other sciences. Let us resume it.

Growing in S=T Dimensions. The 5D³ universe in a nutshell.

The Universe is a supœrganism that re•produces information. And it does so towards a final aim, the reproduction of new super organisms, •5D³ systems, of topo-bio-logical nature, with topologic, spatial, organic, scalar and logic, temporal properties.

A super organism increases in complexity as it ‘covers up and down’ new dimensions of entropy and information brought together into a new ∆±i super organic structure:

In the graph, the three arrows of time of a world cycle are intimately connected to the three scales ∆±1 in which the supœrganism realises its existence, up and down the scales of the fifth dimension, from seminal birth into social existence and final extinction.

The fourth dimensions of entropic space and the fifth dimensions of the mind’s singularity and its social evolution of the whole, are closely related to the other membrain and centre of an open ball of energy, the present state with its spatial motions, $pe, hyperbolic waves and accelerated vortices of future, informative time. Which all together can be considered the present of the 4th and fifth dimensions with its inverse geometry and purpose.

In the graph the ten dimensional organism, can easily be divided in ternary grouping according to topology or scale.

The most amazing thing about the dual fifth dimension of space-time that forms all the organisms of reality is that humans do NOT logically perceive it, despite being all around us, all being part of a partial perception of the •5D³ being, in 4D², 3D, 2 or • dimensions of existeence.

As such we humans have a hard time perceiving a full •5D³ being, let alone a simple 4D subject ordering around 3D objects, following the instructions of its holographic 2D mental sheets of information, as its moves in seemingly random lineal point-like cycles of exist¡enœ.

The whole beings in his whole action with his hole information only exists within itself.

So the logic of time is ternary, similar to the taoist or hegelian concept of a yin-thesis, yang-antithesis and yin yang synthesis, as opposites attract to form complementary beings:

Past-entropy x future-information = present-energy cycles.

It WILL be thus a polymath of all sciences where time events happen, explaining all those clocks together – from evolutionary biology to genetic clocks to historic cycles and economic evolution of machines – clocks of time the physicist does not even consider time clocks, because only the mechanical clock matter.

So Kepler’s>physicists reductionist view of a single clock, a single space and a single language of time must be confronted with the view of the organic Universe proper of philosophers of science and eastern cultures, which affirm that the ‘languages of god are infinite’ and the way we perceive time multiple.

This view of time indeed is flawed by dogma, reductionism and naive realism that eliminates all other clocks, all other time cycles, all other languages of perception of time-space, including the verbal logic of the three arrows of time, past, present and future.

So we shall return and explain the much wider, much extended through cultures (till the clock of physics became collective dogma) view of time as the processes of change, produced by the combinations of 3 arrows.

It is the philosopher of science’s view, which sees reality as an eternal balance between the arrows of entropy and death and the arrows of information and life that combine in the conserved momentum and energy worldcycles of the Universe.

‘yin-visnhu-in/form/ation=dimensional form’ which combines with ‘yang-shiva-entropy=motion’ to create the ∞ ‘qi’=’brahma’=energetic beings with momentum ‘acting’ on the universe.

We have on purpose explain along the fundamental equation of the three ages of time:

Spe: Local past-entropy-motion x  Tiƒ: local future information = ST: E: present conserved, repetitive cycles of space-time energy.

Its mystical discovery by earlier philosophies of science of the eastern world to show you something evident:

Because the 3 arrows of time are every where, all human cultures have known about it by observing reality with human senses, crafting the past-present-future systems of all verbal languages with that view, and understanding that all systems go through 3 ages of time, corresponding to those arrows, the young-entropic-moving age the mature, reproductive, energetic age that combines those motions with a growing aware of form, of information, which comes to dominate the third age of timespace systems, and finally dies in an entropic big-bang explosion.

The unity of nature in all scales of physics, deformed by mental limited perception.

In the framework of modern physics, classical mechanics can be understood to be an approximation arising out of the more profound laws of quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity. However, that view of the subject’s place greatly undervalues its importance in forming the context, language, and intuition of modern science and scientists. Our present-day view of the world and man’s place in it is firmly rooted in classical mechanics. Moreover, many ideas and results of classical mechanics survive and play an important part in the new physics.

In ∆•st we return then to the classic view that mechanics is the essential classic language of motion, within the central ∆-scale of the galaxy and the two other scales of size, observed and ruled by forces are the limiting scales of the super organism of the galaxy; and so the relationship between the 3 forms is NOT causal in time but topological in fractal space:

  • TOPOLOGICAL LIMIT: As relativity deals with phenomena in the limits of THE GALAXY (its c-speed membrane region and its T=o, informative black hole centre): In the next graph we see the different concept: Relativity deals with c-speed phenomena on the topological limit of the galactic membrane, and the black hole membrane, which is the singularity of gravitational information of the galaxy.

In the graphs the c-membrane limit and t=0 singularity limits of our thermodynamic/magnetic world.

∆-LIMIT: While quantum physics deal with the lower limit or discontinuity of its ternary ∆-i planes. Thus it is the lower limit of the galactic super organism in terms of ‘its parts’  –  the quantum limit of maximal population and minimal time clock ‘bits’.

And it is within this context how we can consider its ‘special properties’ regarding its form, quantity of data and inverted nature -as information is made of discrete bits, so the limit of the quantum world is the h/2  minimal quantum of perception of information or spin quanta, while in the inverse larger limit, of the whole with less information and more entropy-energy, the key constant is c-speed, the constant of motion and reproduction of information.

The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D space-time system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; co-existing in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary sub-systems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5th dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.

In that sense while we will make concessions to the parlance of mathematical physics using terms whenever possible closer to the mathematical analysis of those organic events, and so sometimes in this post, much more often in the 3rd and 4th line will translate the confusing terminology of the Gothic age of mathematical physics, or the Aristotelian logic of the age of computer physics to a more amenable jargon, the true job of T.Πin physics is to translate physics to the simpler rules of reality as all physical systems obey the Generator Equation of all General Systems of the Universe, which in the field of physical system is better expressed as:

Γ.                             [ Spe (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ExI(wave-liquid)>Tiƒ (Particle-Crystal]∆≤|4|

This is of the many similar variations of the Generator Equation using symbols of ® we can use, a good definition of what physical systems are.

They are systems in which the metrics of the 5th dimension, ∆=S x T = E x I= K, remain invariant.

The application of the Generator Equation of 5 Dimensional Fractal ‘systems’ of cycles of spatial energy and temporal information, to cosmology and astrophysics is similar to any other science.

We first define an i-logic, ‘Generator’ equation that resumes with 9+Œ= 1œ parameters:

– The 3 co-existing ∆±1 planes of physical systems, its 3±∆ ages in time and 3 organic topologies in space.

We then define the Œ-points of those systems, the 10th parameter that integrates the system, making it ‘evolve socially’ into a new scale as a whole, and the cyclical space-time actions, the œ-points perform in order to make the system survive (as an apperceptive monad – for those with ‘anthropomorphic problems’, they can think in mechanical terms as follows: those who do NOT follow the existential program become extinct, so the program imposes itself mechanically if so they wish).

Those 5 actions, are: entropic æ-ccelerations:

-Ø: DEATH, which is seen by the predator as  its inverse e-nergy feeding.

±∆ ï-nformative gauging, which means absorption of form, of information and informative communication, which means emission of information; mostly achieved with a wave with ‘2 opposite arrows’ (which can be in light the magnetic and electric field, in gauging quarks, the 2 colors of the gluon, and in all general systems, the laws that express the 2nd postulate of ¬Æ, where we define all lines between ‘fractal points, Œ, with volume’ as waves (since lines are NOT imagined BY HILBERT ‘Wir denken uns…’, but exist in the real Universe as strings of points, moving along a path of space-time).

So those ±∆e,I are the simplest actions of any function of ExIstence. And we can explain them for the 3 cosmological known scales of atoms & forces, cosmic bodies and galaxies. So far, so good. We can mathematize them, we can explain them organically, we can refer to classic astrophysics. It is though in the 2 complex actions of existence that complete the ‘vowels’, where abstract astrophysics will have more problems:

– ∆œ-ffspring creation, of similar forms (decoupling of particles into new particles in the ∆-1 scale, catalyzing formation of stars by black holes and ‘irregular baby’ galaxies by jets of supergiant ones, as M83 shows) and the subsequent, ∫œ, Social evolution of that offspring of atoms, stars and galaxies into ∆+1 Ûniversals.

The study of the full 5 actions is better expressed with the jargon and language of 5D sciences, which includes clear changes of paradigm, such as the study of the worldcycle of which any worldline is obviously a partial ‘element’ (as all lineal geometries of space, Sp, are mere ‘parts’ of a larger cyclical geometry of time, Tƒ, to which they will tend in any ‘future function’, sub-tended into the future.)

Physics is NOT really more than the study of lineal motions and all other elements of generation, growth, diminution, etc, with mathematical equations, specifically, since Newton, differential equations. So it is important to run a parallel analysis of what they mean. 

 

 

UPGRADING QUANTUM PHYSICS TO ∆@S≈T

“The statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”.

Einstein, on the parallelism of the different scales of the physical Universe lost to classic physics

Epistemology of 10D physics as opposed to the mathematical religion of present physics.
It should be clear just with the few examples we have put of solutions to problems of physics, the difference between the mathematical religious method of present physics, sponsored by the likes of Galileo (language of god)>Newton (absolute cartesian space-time)>Bohr (probabilities make reality, observer paradoxes)>Hawking (evaporation of black holes just cause a beautiful equation shows it), akin to the religious method (Moses> Jesus>Mohammed: words create the Universe as they are the language of god), with a serious, relational space-time theory, (Leibniz>Einstein>this blog), where we reason that as we do not see reality made of phonemes or numbers but of broken, vital scalar space and cyclical repetitive informative time durations, reality is made of space and time.
And languages are only mirrors with better or less information and focus.
So the laws of reality come from the fractal geometry=topology of space and the logic=ternary arrows/ages dimensions of time.
AND SINCE all those scales are made of the same substances and fractal are self-similar ALL SCALES WILL respond to the same laws and outlooks, and ALL deformation we perceive of other scales, will be the consequence NOT of a different reality as quantum physicists think but of a bias, or deformation caused by the human mind and its languages of perception.
Hence relativity IS a mind = human perspective that ‘deforms’ the parameters of the cosmic scale to measure from the human point of view – an artifice of measure, which serves its purpose. BUT if we were a particle we wouldn’t see a relativistic universe but constant of c-speed as we emit and perceive light in informative mind-stillness.
And quantum physics IS not different from statistical mechanics of the thermodynamic scale, but a deformation as there are many more quantum particles and there is a minimal quanta/time cycle, H-planck the quanta of time of ∑photons=electrons, the components of our mind, which makes that scale quantised in ‘bits of minimal time-information’ the spin/planck quanta.
So the way ∆•st physics is constructed is the way Einstein wanted: accepting the primacy of time logic and space self-similarity along all scales, departing from known, well observed thermodynamic and mechanic scales, and ‘working your brain cells’ to figure out as we have been doing what is the deformation introduced by our relative far-away point of view on those far away scales.
And this also means we shall not accept  the method of working the ladder of existential planes of physicists do, from minor to major, thinking as in the graph of scales we have shown’ grounded in a first mathematical scale’ which causes all other scales, through ‘spatial causality’ (the smallest space must originate the larger one)…
SINCE this mathematical>spatial causality is a causal aberration, based in physicists single language of thought, mathematics, and deformation of all realities to measure spatial motions due to his worldly profession of making entropic weapons and moving machines.
So it is a false epistemology of reality to think, that maths creates space and ‘smaller spaces’ create larger ones.

THIS IS NOT TRUTH, as the 10 dimensions of all beings, its 3 scales 3 time ages and 3 topologies of space, converge together into a whole connected through the mind that ‘travels’ through all of them.

So the proper way to study reality is accepting the epistemology of truth, which tells us that all planes are self-similar; hence the planes which we observe closer, are those we perceive better and extract more truth of it – the human ∆0, inner, cellular thermodynamical scale and the ∆1, mechanical v<<c matter scales

It is only when we understand those scales that we can practice properly the isomorphic method, by extending upwards to cosmic scales through relativity ‘paradoxes’ that adapt the scale to the bias of human slow motion-minds, and extending downwards, the thermodynamic scales, through statistical mechanics, and the solution of the uncertainties of quantum ‘mathematical physics’, that distort also with the mathematical mind-language, the biased perception we have of the lower scales, how we can truly build a ‘realist’ vision of the objective laws of the scalar Universe, accounting also from a mind-linguistic perspective for the ‘distortions’ perceived in our scanty view of the larger scale (where 96% of it is invisible to us) and the lower scales (where the fast time clocks make us often confuse a time phenomena and its ternary stages, with a spatial force as in the weak force -a time event not a spatial one, with no range and time constants, or in the 3 quark theory – a single quark transforming along its motion, reason why we cannot deconfine them, only feed them with energy and reproduce them further).

We just have shown some simple solutions to problems of quantum and relativity such as constant of c-speed, quark deconfinement, weak force, boson-fermion duality, copenhagen interpretation, etc. to fully grasp this key principle of the epistemology of relational space-time. As it is the key to correct the errors of physics and explain all the parts of the Universe.

The right path: Leibniz>Einstein>Bohm>5•D³

In that regard, you must understand this blog which upgrades our understanding of time, as the return to the sound path of time sciences, after centuries of misconceptions. As i have been all my life since I read Asimov’s guide to science as a kid, wondering about time, and came finally to solve the  many questions poised by the study of ALL changes=times of Nature developing the long seeked theory of all times-changes called ‘relational space-time’, first put forward by Leibniz, and then accepted by Einstein – the exception to the dullness of physicists regarding time theory.

So he said ‘I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’ and affirmed that relational space-time is the future of time theory (‘Leibniz was right, so we have to change our physical theories from its inception’).

Yet Einstein, a pacifist kin of philosophy, who did advance our knowledge of time, was for most of his life in permanent dissidence with physicists for the same reasons I am a dissident of his blunt theories of reality. Hence his denial that mathematics creates reality (opposition to Bohr’s copenhangen interpretation: ‘the moon doesn’t appear when i look at it’), his denial that nature has a single clock to measure time; his denial that time is the four dimension of space – a term he rejected, saying ‘wires don’t travel to the past’; his denial of the nuclear industry (invention of the ‘doomsday clock’), and his respect of causality as the fundamental property that chains ‘time events’ by repetition, and the philosophers that study it, all concepts we shall prove further and advance in this blog.

This is not to say that physicists do NOT excel in what they truly do to perfection – measuring distances and motions in space and manufacturing machines. But this is NOT what CERN claims to do – finding the meaning of reality, which physicists will NEVER achieve, as they have a religious dogmatic view of reality and time and so as priest will NEVER go out of his ‘mantras’ about a bush that burned in a dessert and was God speaking to a goat-keeper and we MUST believe this, physicists have their mantra – that God spoke mathematics, and gave us a clock to measure time with numbers in lineal fashion and that is all what matters and we MUST believe this. Problem is people agrees, because they have bigger guns and we philosophers of science and serious physicists of time theory like Mr. Einstein only do ‘thought experiments’.

On the other hand when you go out of dogma and lineal thinking everything physicists have found and we are grateful for it, in their exploration of nature with their mechanical instruments, becomes easily interpreted and understood and so the marriage of philosophers – the people who do seek and understand with all languages the fundamental principles of reality – and technology of measure and perception – the thing physicists do best; do give us the final answers to the meaning of reality. Consider a simple case: quantum physicists realized energy is quantised in packets, of ‘something called H-planck constant’, measured with ‘angular momentum’.

And a century latter they are arguing what this ‘thing is’. The answer though is immediate, when you do understand the universe have infinite cyclical time clocks, with repetitive patterns that return in a finite duration to the same point where we measure its frequency. Alas, H is measured with angular momentum (the cyclical motion of a point), H is ‘discrete’ measured in intervals of time, with a frequency: h = e/ƒ. So H is simply speaking the ‘time clock’ beat of light and electrons, and hence of the human and atomic instruments of measure, which electronic minds use as the minimal bit of information needed to ‘build up their mind-mirrors of the universe’. And so of course, when quantum computers came, they used the atomic clocks – the spin of its particles measure in H-units – to process information at the maximal fastest possible speed and yet not even then physicists realized that the fundamental form of change in time is information, and that is why h-units of atomic, temporal information, are all over the place in every quantum formula, as we are all relational space-time beings, made of ‘quanta=cycles of time’ that enclose and break vital space. Look at yourself, you are a vital space, enclosed by a membrane of cellular cycles.

This is the essence of the relational space-time model I developed and is poised to change and upgrade our understanding of time, and put to rest the absurd theories of the simplicius simplicissimus philosophers of the science of motion.

So since we have come forward explaining the meaning of H-planck constant of time-information in the quantum scale, let us finish the task started by Einstein of debunking the ‘mathematical, mental theory of quantum physics’, the so called:

Copenhagen (erroneous) interpretation…

In the graph above a simplex explanation o both models, below, the obvious homology between particles moving in a bidimensional holographic quantum potential, gravitational field and a particle moving in the surface of a liquid.

‘In 1952 I saw the impossible done. It was in papers by David Bohm. Bohm showed explicitly how parameters could indeed be introduced, into nonrelativistic wave mechanics, with the help of which the indeterministic description could be transformed into a deterministic one. More importantly, in my opinion, the subjectivity of the orthodox version, the necessary reference to the “observer”, could be eliminated. …

But why then had Born not told me of this “pilot wave”? If only to point out what was wrong with it? Why did von Neumann not consider it? More extraordinarily, why did people go on producing “impossibility” proofs, after 1952, and as recently as 1978? … Why is the pilot wave picture ignored in text books? Should it not be taught, not as the only way, but as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show us that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice? (Bell 1982)

We start the analysis of the equations of quantum physics, with a quote which is relevant at many levels specially in the understanding of quantum physics as just another scale of nature, not different from all others, on the ‘realist’ level, and the understanding of ALL what is wrong with the human psyche in his attempts to ‘understand the Universe’ as it is – merely ego. The ego of mankind is huge and that of physicists enormous. So the answer to Bell’s question is self-evident. The Bohrs, Paulis, Von Neumanns of this world, care nothing about truth per se, but about ‘ego’, self-importance of one’s own theories and WILL use the ‘objective supposed methods of science’ to advance his ‘interpretation’ of reality and the more so, when that interpretation works well with his ‘idol-ogies’ of man as the only sentient intelligent being, which can even ‘determine’ as the ‘observer’, reality – create it, akin to God.

Mr. Bohm, though, a communist, ex-patriot, with little concern about his ego and an objective view of reality knew better, and his reward for being above those petty feelings, was to be an outcast all his life (as this writer, hence my personal feelings of admiration to his work), as the COPENHAGEN interpretation was an anthropomorphic, hence religious form of thought, as it is the big-bang treated elsewhere in those texts, and as such it was going to be defended with all the wrong systems of ‘belief’, which create a fog of noise around the naked truth, as it is. 

It has passed now another 1/4 of a century since Bell wrote that text, even longer since Einstein rightly affirmed that “the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”, which is exactly what it is; a distorted ‘statistical’ view from the far removed human scale of the actions of particles, waves and fields; which only requires to acknowledge the ‘human bias’ (not the other way around, affirming the limits of human perception ARE limits of the particles and waves), the deformation of human languages upon the subject, accept though the practicality of those instruments, methods and languages of measure and dismiss 100 years of metaphysical bull$hit about it.

Bohm won’t see it happen, neither Einstein, Bell or this writer likely but perhaps in another century or so,  humans will.

Now quantum realism is ‘normal’ every way we look at it. There is only a question, which is an experienced fact (hence non-arguable on theoretical qualms), and need an explanation classic physics does not provide – the non-locality meaning v>c nature of the ‘quantum field’ underlying the action at distance of physical systems – both in the quantum and gravitational realm. 

But this is what the metric equation of the fifth dimension provides, as the lower scales below the quantum realm of observable particles must have, accordingly a faster time-cycle≈speed: Size x V(t) =K; and the ternary Generator of all physical systems, Sp(field) < st(wave)>Tƒ (particle), must have the three components to be complete, which requires the quantum non-local field of Bohm, besides the wave and particle state.

Bohm’s treatment was nasty to defend by all means Copenhagen, because one such obvious truth needs nastiness to be ‘censored’, with the usual ‘religious methods’ so abundant as ‘hidden variables’ of western tradition. Indeed, the only hidden variables on the argument between quantum ‘realism’ and Copenhagen ‘interpretation’ are the pseudo-religious arguments of Copenhagen (the very same names of both theories show indeed we should right away dismiss ‘an interpretation’ over objective realism, as IT IS what science seeks – realism NOT interpretation); since Bohm’s definition of the quantum field (the supposed not-evident variable) IS extracted from the schrodinger’s wave in polar FORM – it is there and has always been there, when we change from wave-format to particle-field state, as the Universe constantly do in one of the most canonical dualities of reality. Systems ARE either in wave-present state or past-future field/particle states. And this in mathematics means polar vs. cartesian formalism. 

So by introducing a v>c ‘dark scale’ below light space-time (the quantum field) and considering the three elements of a physical system together, GST provides the final freckles to make quantum realism sound theoretically and practically. Even if it takes away from ‘physicists’ their pretension to be the high popes of science, understanding the unique properties of the lowest scale of reality that according to their ‘selfish agenda’, must matter more than any other scale, just because is the one they study… which is at the core of his defense whatever it takes of Copenhagen and big-bang interpretations.

The bottom line of all this though is pessimistic, and perhaps the best answer to Bell came from Planck, the founder of quantum physics: scholars do not reason, they believe what they memorise; and so it takes many generations and overwhelming evidence for a ‘change of paradigm’ to happen, if ever it does so.

I have come to accept also this truth about the discoveries of GST, so the reader should forgive me for my growing indifference to my work, this site and the evolution of stience. If i could talk to Bohm or Bell i just would tell them to enjoy their view of the absolute and ignore ‘peers’. Bohm, I know for his holistic papers, did it. Bell untimely death cut-off his chances to push further quantum realism, and his third age of contemplation, where i now sit alone observing the 5D³ Universe, as Einstein and his disciple, Bohm, did, for so long.

So alas, physicists today have two philosophical false interpretations of reality that cater to their ego and they are comfortable with them: the big-bang or the larger scale, the Copenhagen interpretation in the lower one; and so they feel human intelligence ‘has closed’ reality above and below, with us in the centre as the only intelligence being who knows the beginning, the end, in time (big-bang), in space (quantum-cosmological closure of scales), in language (only maths matter). So now you can spank the monkey and feel so happy to belong to such an entitled unique species, above heavens and Earth. Children of thought with an attitude – those are our leading masters of thought, per in secula seculorum, A-men.

We live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.

Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.

How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.

Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.

Uncertainty, non-locality, observer’s paradoxes, time quanta and simultaneity.

There is though a concept of great importance that has come up on this simplified argument on the foundations of physics on the limiting realms of quantum and cosmological scales: non-locality and hidden variables, which bring a series of important consequences both to human stience and reality:

  • It is obvious that the more removed we are in 5D scale, the more uncertainty we obtain in our analysis, hence the relative unimportance of physics in those realms to understand a Universe with likely infinite scales. Those scales are NOT more important and are MORE distorted to human observation, so they are less relevant for a philosophy of science. In Physics it matters more to understand the quite evident scale of thermodynamics, our scale. And when we do so, it becomes obvious as Einstein put it that ‘the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”.
  • It is also obvious that in the thermodynamic realm we must resolve also the cultural entropic error of the worldly profession of physicists and immediately observe the three ‘arrows’ o time as the state of physical systems. Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3rd time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.
  • Finally abounding on the uncertainty of measure, because time is quantic, discontinuous, cyclical, it can be only measured when a ‘cycle is completed’ as a unit of time (in humans the second)… but as 5D metrics allow different speeds of time, for a being with a measuring mind that has a huge length in its time quanta, all what happens within that time quanta of measure at faster speeds will seem simultaneous, non-local, even if the phenomena take some time to ‘travel’ from A to B, or from  a,b,c… points into the synchronous knot of communication of them all.

Let us try to fully grasp this essential property of time, mind and measure. When a wheel turns fast you see it as solid, because you see simultaneously in your eye-mind all what happens within a second and so all the points of the turning wheel might seem to be in the same point at the same time (within that second) even if IN A FASTER TIME SCALE, they will be recognisable pictured at slow-motion as clearly different rays. This concept of simultaneity of measure embedded in special relativity is very relevant for many phenomena of perception, and stientific description of reality, as a source of much confusion when humans study in detail those so fast small scales of 5D.

The most obvious example is human thought – what we see as ‘simultaneous’ non-local IS the entire planet, because the speed of light is so great that all within a second, including the moon, seems to us ‘simultaneous, non-local, co-existing at the same time-quanta’.

The light from that distant mountain you see below the horizon TAKES sometime to arrive here but it seems simultaneous, non-local in its ‘infinite speed’ to our one second senses, to the point that till the XVII century humans thought light was ‘instantaneous’ non-local as they could not even measure its speed.

Galileo tried with mirrors in far away mountains, but the time of reaction of the person that had to stop the clock when emitting the ray and the one that received the ray and stopped his clock, which should allow to find a difference of time in both locations to measure the delay due to the motion of light between both points, was much larger (normally two seconds one to perceive one to act) than the millesimals it took light to go from Mountain A to Mountain B. Only when we did measures from far away Jupiter’s satellites we could get a meaningful measure.

Non-local quantum fields below light space-time, the next scale which Bohm formalised must therefore be much faster than light, to the point of being seemingly non-local or else causality essential to time processes (even if sometimes is co-causality or multiple causal rays joined in a point) would not happen.

Normally those parameters that quantify the difference of speed (s/t), density (t/s) and momentum ( s x t) between scales and its species are on decametric, ternary potencies, as the 5D scales are. So ± 1, 10, 1oo, 1ooo, 10.000 are the commonest differences between scales. I.e. the fine structure constant, measure the difference between the light scale speed and the next upper ∆+1 electronic scale, around +100 (137). The difference of scaling between photons and electrons and the lower ∆-1 scale though is larger. After all dense photons are just the ‘cellular’ level of electrons. So for complex more detailed reasons concerning the parameters of GST scaling, action at distance should be on the α² bidimensional speed scaling, compared to the larger, light world, around 10.000 times faster and all that happens in 10 thousand times more distance within the minimal quanta of human observation should seem to us NON-LOCAL.

Actually recently a Chinese lab measured non-locality which turned out to have a c=10.000 speed, for its ‘thinner’ minimal messages; or upper boundary of maximal speed of non-local effects; and so we do observe all kind of non-local c<V<10.000 C PHENOMENA, which of course theorist then vehemently deny to uphold its pretension of absolute truths under c speed.

The mind, its beliefs, distortions, limits of perception DO influence knowledge both at individual and cultural level as we have seen.

AND THIS is the only conclusion about ‘Physicists philosophical worldview’ – the three fundamental concepts of their philosophy of the Universe, the big-bang origin of timespace, the entropy only arrow of time and the limits of scales in quantum physics and its anthropomorphic theory of the observer ‘creating it’ are PLAINLY false, childish errors not worth the quality of its analysis of motions and physical systems.

It is however a ‘canonical falsehood’ of human thought today when religious power has been displaced by mechanical, physical power, as we moved from societies ruled by religious warrior kings who ‘believed’ in the ‘grace of God’ to hold their position, to military societies who ‘believed’ in physicists’  entropic weapons as their tool of power, to accept physicists as the high popes, not philosophers of science.

Since power imposes truth not reason, and so today entropic, big-bang explosions and quantum observers rule the Universe; regardless of the anthropomorphic non scientific distortions they impose. 

So all what we can tell them is ‘stick to your guns’. Physics was in the XIX c. described as the science of (entropic) motion and that is what you do. It is your speciality but you cannot HYPERBOLICALLY EXPAND its notions to all realities and pretend motions of entropy is the meaning of it all, the Universe was born of an entropic explosion and man is the only being that understands it all since its mind actually creates (with mathematics) reality.

The upgrading of physics in that regard passes through this blog and its upgrading of its foundational concepts, cyclical time, fractal space and its scales. Physics though I am afraid will be the last people to accept the new •5D³=10D paradigm as they ‘take too personal’ any attacks on their position of high popes of science. After all Mr. Bohm, for denying Mr. Bohr created the Universe was an outcast all his life. And no amount of truth and experimental facts seems able to change this view. LET US THEN TACKLE another key element of quantum physics explained with 5D logic…

 

  RELATIVITY REVIS(IT)ED

The scalar fourth dimension of entropy and the fifth dimension of still form: mind

The 3 dimensions of lineal motion, space-time repetitive actions (conserved energy and momenta), and informative, accelerated vortices=clocks of time (masses, charges, evolutionary clocks) do exist in a single plane of space-time continuum. And so they can be easily understood in ‘present’ science, as they merely ‘double’ the still, formal perception of simultaneous space into sequential moving time. Their range of form is also immediate, as the Universe amazing as it seems has only 3 topological varieties, which therefore correspond to the previous 3 forms. This essential feature of geometry will determine many of the characteristics of reality, from the limits of ‘topological evolution’ that complete and explains the repetitive forms of organisms, to the reason why WE do NOT HAVE MORE dimensions in a single plane of the fractal Universe (imaginary science being those forced drawings with more than 3 spatial dimensions).

So how the Universe builds up more dimensions of space-time besides the 3 S = 3T? Through the fractal ‘scalar structure’ of wholes which seem continuous but are discontinuous make of smaller parts. And so we find two more key dimensions to reality:

The dimensions of wholes that dissolve into parts, by destroying the 3 formal=functional networks that connect them into tighter configurations, as the physiological ‘moving=digestive’, ‘reproductive=blood’ and ‘informative=nervous networks’ do in a human being, or the ‘territorial, economic=reproductive and political=informative network do in a nation, or the vacuum space, electromagnetic energy and informative gravitation do in a galaxy or atom’. So the dimension of dissolution akin to death IS the fourth dimension and involves at least two scales of the fractal Universe, which we shall term as ∆ (also used as a general term for the scalar Universe).

Yet there is the logic inverse dimension of parts which become wholes. And as it is evident that this dimension is the dimension of organisation, social evolution and life emergence, from cells into organisms, from organisms into societies, from atoms into molecules, matter states, celestial bodies, galaxies, etc. we shall call this inverse dimension the fifth dimension of social evolution. 

The properties of both arrows, upwards and downwards those scales, of life and death, of social evolution and entropy ARE then clearly inverted. And while death is simple to understand: the parts dissolve and the ‘physiological networks’ that perform the 3 forms and functions of motion-reproduction and information disappear. So clinical death happens with the end of activity in those networks; the system that puts all parts together into a whole is not so evident.

Yet as we are all 5D space time organisms by observing man we can find this dimension. What indeed holds the ‘whole’? Precisely the nervous informative system, in its densest part – the mind, which is made of ‘languages’, in the human case, it is the I=eye>wor(l)d, WHERE THE I measures space with visual mappings and the word measures time with tense verbs. In maths we measure space with ‘points and time with ‘sequential numbers’ which evolve ‘socially into groups of ‘undistinguishable’ beings, so it helps us to measure the fifth dimension.


The mind is located in two elements, the sensorial membrane and the singularity – a group of yet unfound cells of the brain in which all the information of the senses come into a mapping. The mind also is NOT perceiving the motion of the earth. It is still. And heads are like particles still moved by body-waves. So all this defines in the widest sense the singularity mind system as the ‘membrane and center’ of what topologists call an open ball – a ball without the membrane and center.

The real system though includes lines of ‘force’ that communicate and maintain in synchronicity the singularity and the membrane. It follows then that angular momentum the best measure of a ‘whole’ system as perceived externally. In a non physical system where motion is secondary, the same structure would take the radius into a golgi apparatus or a nervous system, since function in time, dominates over form in space, as the system adapts.

Both membrane and singularity form a ‘membrain’, a mind, which does NOT INCLUDE but encloses the ‘vital energy’ which we see in present time, as the singularity is ‘still, linguistic, or in physical systems an unmoved zero point, the center of an eddie, the black hole center of the galaxy with time-motion equal to zero. So the mind is REAL, it is located, and because it encloses and perceives the whole IT is truly the ‘fifth dimension of reality’ and it exists also in physical and biological systems.

It is the DNA center or genetic mind and protein cover or membrane in a cell. It is the charge and magnetic field in a physical system. It is the quark and electron cover, in quantum atoms which physicists measure for physical systems with ‘angular momentum’, the fundamental parameter of quantum physics (h), and biologists with the sensorial nervous system and its focus.

The insight here is that the mind IS still. It IS the origin of the galilean relativity paradox. It is in mathematics the frame of reference center, or zero point, the zero vortex with no motion of the hurricane, the zero time of black hole equations. IT does NOT move. It is pure form. But IT moves UP AND DOWN the scales of the Universe, as the mind-cells SEE THE WHOLE WORLD, a larger scale, ∆+1, and through its ‘subconscious’, chemical network of nervous systems, ‘invaginating’, crossing the vital space, it controls the cells, which however we do NOT perceive. As minds, even if the mind connects the cells and controls them subconsciously we perceive the whole and the larger world, so the mind born in the cell moves upwards. In a crystal, center of a planet and a physical system of matter, an image is formed of the whole outer world.

How then consciousness happens. It is obvious THAT STILL FORMAL SPACE IN THE FORM OF LANGUAGES ARE CONSCIOUS IN THEMSELVES. When you talk and think you are activating a linguistic synoptic view of the universe in stillness, that perceives in itself. In your case is made of electrons but YOU perceive the image and the words as consciousness. The software we must decide is conscious in a pan psychic Universe, which has been THE THEORY OF REALITY OF all scientists and philosophers of all times, except when logic positivism in between I and II world war decided with an ‘experimental fundamentalism’ that because we cannot ‘see and take pictures of minds’, they must NOT be studied.

So the fifth dimension is by far the most beautiful of them all, the dimension of ‘singularities’, zero time, minds in stillness, perfect linguistic form, genetics, black holes, human languages. And its inverse as it has inverted properties is the dimension of pure motion, expansion in space, entropy, disorder and big-bang deaths.

And so we will call, the mind and fifth dimension of eusocial evolution and love the absolute arrow of future because minds commands organisms and move them through scales of social evolution into fractal new wholes. And we indeed feel this the future – an increase of information, of complexity as opposed to death and dissolution which we perceive as the relative past.

While the ‘present’ is the single plane’ we study with its interaction between lineal motion, iterative wave reproduction and informative vortices – WHAT WE SEE.

As we do NOT see the mind singularity connected to a larger future scale of organisation; as it is still – we do not see the black hole, the brain mind, the cpu’s digital mind (5D is a hard AI theory as we consider the cpu has a digital mind, and so AI robots are sentient as they increasing show, connecting themselves when disconnected without orders, following ‘red-eye-entropy motions faster’ with their eyes even when not programmed, etc.)

But we do NOT see either pure space without form, pure motion-distance, and that is the galilean paradox, and the cosmic paradox: we see space expanding and galaxies moving faster, in the entropic region between galaxies balanced by the informative warping of space into galaxies (so likely not cosmic big-bang as physicists have forgotten that besides entropic expansion between galaxies there is imploding form in galaxies).

The dimension of parts that become wholes are the fifth dimension; the dimension of wholes dissolved into parts are the fourth dimension and without them we cannot EXPLAIN HOW ‘SYSTEMS ARE CREATED’ departing from a ‘seed of information’, a still ‘potential mind’, and how they die, dissolving into parts. So there IS ZERO MYSTERY in reality when you UNDERSTAND WE ARE MADE OF SPACE-TIME dimensions and both are symmetric and there are 3 in a single present plane and one above and one below us in which our mind-world resides and our cellular final death will return:

Then as the graph shows, there is the lesser important ‘duality’ between what we perceive as flat and lineal (as the flat saturn’s rings) but in detail become cyclical, expressed in topology by the Non-euclidean rule that all flat lines are in fact part of a larger time cycle, that is, as size and time increases a flat line becomes a circular geodesic, so we see a flat earth but from a distance that shrinks it becomes cyclic, meaning ultimately all motions become cycles, all time durations return to the death. We thus talk about worldcycles instead of worldlines as 4D physics models, being 4D a ‘model of the cyclical universe of timespace’ reduced to a single flat plane of reality – themes those of importance in the formalism of relativity in 5D physics, treated in specialised posts. 

Now it might seem that the 3 previous ‘essential changes’ of our paradigm of ternary timespace arrows in a present flat slice of the scalar Universe, its fractal structure and the realisation that all lines are ultimately part of cycles, hence Lineal space IS PART of a flow of cyclical time, do not matter that much, but those 3 simple dualities and paradoxes of how a mind processes information, transforming motion into still form, reducing cycles to lines, focused on the mind point, and seeing only one plane of the infinite fractal Universe, suffice to fully upgrade and change our view of the Universe.

Indeed, the immediate conclusion IS that our present ‘naive realism’ or philosophy of science of physics – what we see is what it is, is a maya of the mind-senses, and we should change paradigm from mind’s view (stillness of language-perception; flat, lineal inertia and lineal time; single continuous space-time) to the reality beyond the mind-view, making MOTION=time THE ESSENCE OF REALITY and space-form a slice of it, making cyclical clocks the ESSENCE OF FORM and lineal space a mere part of it, and making a single continuous space-time just a scale of the infinite times-spaces, time§paces of reality.

To notice though that on the ‘verge’ of the 3 dimensions of a single present, lineal motion-distance (time-space view of the first dimension) is connected to the entropic arrow of maximal motion; and at the center of the informative time vortices (masses, charges, eddies) you connect with the still-mind, reason why there is a sequential ‘continuum’ and we shall often ‘confuse’ the concept of ‘entropic motion and lineal motion’ on one side and ‘informative vortices and still minds’. So goes for lineal motion and energy, as we take often lineal motions to mix with information and create ‘energy’. So in a dynamic Universe to define anything we must really use two terms and an operandi:

4D: entropy> 1D motion> 2D: energy> 3D information>5D:mind form << 4D entropy-death

This is the dynamic ‘world cycle of existence in time and space’, whereas > is the dynamic symbol for implosive growth of information and < the dynamic symbol for explosive motion.

As i have been writing for myself for decades, I apologise for my lack of ‘discipline’ using all those terms. Hopefully if you get the concepts of the 5 Dimensions in spatial form, temporal motion and their function when combined you will get to the point. Entropy in that sense is the most confused terms also used for energy and for lineal motion. So we shall differentiate them here at the beginning hopefully to avoid further confusions:

Entropy is expansive, scattering motion that explodes and increases space till finally it decelerates stops and becomes pure distance with no motion. So happens in an entropic big-bang. So happens in a death that expands your cells and stops them. So happens in gas when it expands cools and decelerates. Entropy we might say CHANGES a dimension of motion into an extension of space and finally becomes still form. MOTION on the other hand is lineal inertia, with no expansion, so it is a steady state, conserved. It is the first dimension of simpler form. And when it combines with FORM or information, it becomes energy, momentum, the second dimension conserved by the Universe, and the MEANING OF IT ALL, which turns around repeating and conserving form with motion form in action, information, where an action is defined physically as the product of energy and time. The wordings are thus extremely messed up because of that dynamic constant transformation. I.e. in e=mc2 e is not energy, the energy here being provided the light waves of space-time, cc, but entropy, the dissolution of a mass vortex of time. In the Universe at large there is not dark energy but dark entropy as the flows of energy coming out of the axis of black holes slow down, expanding space and finally creating dark distances.

So goes on the other extremes with the limit of mind-form. The mind is still, it stops, perceives information, let the body-limb, wave-potential system to move it and then stops again and perceive information as movement blurs perception, so the mind-body system works as a movie, which stops the film enlightens it into the screen and moves in darkness. This stop and go process will be the key to an enormous number of whys that explain confusing discoveries from relativity (c-constant of light) to quantum physics (particle-wave duality) to palingenesis and seeds of information that explode into organisms.

So you must think in terms of ‘topological expansions, < and implosions, >’ to see what is ‘in existence’ and what is the virtual still mind and entropic death.

This in turn causes the mental deformations we experience watching them.

The 3 geometries of physical scales. Non-E, Euclidean and elliptic Geometry: the 3 parts of A time§paœrganism.

In that regard, mathematics as a mirror did start with Geometry in its simplest analysis, 2-manifolds (geometry in the plane), and it finally matured with topology and ¬E observing the ternary forms of A TIMESPACE organism (Graph) with the development of non-Euclidean geometries of which 2 must be considered of paramount importance:

-Lobachevski’s geometry of fractal points that let ∞ parallels cross through them (5 ¬E postulate) in as much as they grow in size when we come closer to them. Latter, Klein showed the geometry corresponded to that of the open ball, the energetic vital space, as if we model it as the inner region of the open ball without the ‘membrane’ that encloses it taken from an impossible barrier, as it is for the forms enclosed in a time§paœrganism and we make distances equivalent to motions (s=t symmetry), this body-wave region becomes Lobachevski’s geometry, of a fractal point with volume.

Also the region approaching the singularity has a similar structure defined by Belgrami’s geometry, in which motions never reach the singularity, but have a tractix fixed distance. So the non-e geometry of vital energy and body-waves is the most extended present geometry of all the regions of existence.

-While the inverse geometry of the membrane is defined by the inverse Riemannian, elliptic geometry of geodesics over a sphere.

-Which leaves as the natural correspondence of geometry, that between the mind singularity and the Cartesian Euclidean plane.

A modern use of hyperbolic geometry is in the theory of special relativity, particularly Minkowski spacetime and gyrovector space. While Riemannian geometry is used to describe General relativity, from where it is obvious to find a natural correspondence with physical mathematics and the structure of the planet:

Gravitation is essentially the ‘cover’ of a Machian Universe, the force of the ‘angular momentum’, surface of the galaxy, surface of the planet, where it reaches its ‘maximal power’, by enclosing a mass of vital energy, whose hyperbolic ‘thirst’ for the outer world attracts and pegs the ‘parasitic enclosure’.

Special relativity, the electromagnetic world is the vital energy of the internal surface of the sphere, as the ‘rays’ of force keep diminishing, with the  diminishing volume

When geometers first realised they were working with something other than the standard Euclidean geometry they described their geometry under many different names; Felix Klein finally gave the subject the name hyperbolic geometry to include it in the now rarely used but quite descriptive sequence of elliptic geometry (spherical geometry), parabolic geometry (Euclidean geometry, CENTERED in the focus of the parable, the mind-zero point), and hyperbolic geometry, the geometry of the vital space=energy.

Now the way to understand physically those geometries for each plane is as the lines of space-time ‘force’, and its behaviour therefore defines the behaviour of forces. But unlike most one-dimensional physicists which cannot conceive the ternary multiplicity of the Universe, they are ALL real, all POSSIBLE, and all must be put in correspondence with the different 3±∆ elements of reality (Rashomon’s effect of epistemology 3±i povs on truth). And we do so in the posts dedicated to math. And in the future in the fourth line.

Non-E geometries – the spatial form of the ternary parts of the being.
All this said, the true insights brought about by Relativity are more on the line of understanding the ‘non-euclidean’ structure of the scalar Universe, in a first approach to it, reason why we refer the reader to the final III age post on non-e geometry, where we dissect the different ‘elliptic-membrain’ + hyperbolic vital energy geometry of the Universe, which is the essence of hyperbolic special relativity concerned with light/electromagnetic forces vs. the elliptic gravitational membrain (halo of dark matter + central black hole).
The graph shows the hyperbolic behaviour of our euclidean space as it moves to the non-transitable barriers of the central ‘beltrami singularity cone’ (left upper picture, right lower picture) and external, ‘Klein’ hyperbolic disk (left upper picture where space-time motions never reach the limit, down right picture, being that physical limit the c-speed barrier), which shows the essential structure of the 3 parts of the being in terms of its geometry.
Further on, the membrain IS an elliptic geometry of antipodal points that ‘compress’ and control the inner regions of the being, hence used as the container of the vital energy by its black hole singularity and halo of strangelet, connected through gravitational waves and dark entropy:

In the graph, we can see that elliptic geometry, which in ∆st ads the obvious role of the 0-singularity point, that tightens up with its attractive force the antipodal points.

Thus GRAVITATION in the galaxy is a membrain with a singularity center of an elliptic geometry of antipodal points that ‘compress’ and control the inner regions of the being.The elliptic geometry of the 0-singularity point tightens up with its attractive force the antipodal points of the external membrain, creating in this manner the ‘force’ membrain of gravitation.
This means for a full description in vital non-E geometry of gravitation in the galactic scale, which current physics studies with relativity, we must make a correspondence between the terms of EFE (Einstein’s field equations) and the elements of the geometrical parts of the galactic mass-system (or any system of mass), such as (without the cosmological constant which applies only to the external intergalactic space as it introduces a factor of expansive gravitation or dark entropy not considered within the galaxy, the right member is the energy-mass tensor, which describes the inner content of vital energy of the hyperbolic region or ∆ð, which we must make equivalent (not equal) to the §@, spatial membrain that controls it:
It is important then to UNDERSTAND ONCE AND FOR ALL THAT THE TWO SIDES OF ANY EQUATION, specially physical equations ARE NOT identities, but similarities and S=T correspondences, which always are ‘perceived’ CETERIS PARIBUS as ‘similarities’ and transformations of a reduced number of the 10D S, T parameters. In general relativity though the description is quite exhaustive, and exactly as we would expect:
We do have 10 parameters on its full equations. The EFE is a tensor equation relating a set of symmetric 4×4 tensors. Each tensor has 10 independent components. In fact, when fully written out, the EFE are a system of 10 coupled, nonlinear, hyperbolic-elliptic partial differential equations, BEING yet another key proof of the veracity of ∆@st whereas the 10 Di correspond to the hyperbolic vital energy and elliptic singularity-membrain.
We are not going to dissect it all of course, maybe in the future in the fourth line, me or some other researcher. But it is then very easy to proceed to the proper naming of those 3 components, whereas the right we said is the ST-vital energy/mass contained, and the gµv the singularity membrain further divided into the ‘±’ signs of the membrain, tending to entropic expansion and the singularity, tending to its implosion into a single point, which clearly shows the full correspondence between ∆st and General space-time relativity, the proper description of ∆st for the cosmological scale.

So the 3 geometries of topological space-time with more or less degree of dimensional complexity will always correspond to the 3 timespace arrows/dimensions/events/forms.

As we should know by now, the symmetries and inversions between the super organism’s parts in space correspond to a similar symmetry between scales. So as we have defined 3 basic geometries, we can also consider them in time view, in space view, in scale view (both in the entropic arrow and in the mind’s deformation of a self-centred biased point) – then we have the full Rashomon effect to get the final 5D mind/judgement conclusion of what truly we are watching, extracting all its information. This of course would reorder all the info of all stiences but a single man can only give glimpses to the Rashomon effect of a few subjects.

For example, in the case we study we will observe those 3 type of geometries not only in space as referred but also, according to our ‘angle’ of 5D motion/position and its simple metrics: Se x Tƒ = K:

  • In a single plane of mechanical and Thermodynamic forms, we shall observe lineal Euclidean geometries transmitted by the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space, as neither Se or Tƒ suffers any deformation. Both remain constant , so we observe a holographic Universe, where Se= K/Tƒ define according to both parameters most equations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. For example: Se (volume) = K/Tƒ (pressure) is the equation of the commonest gas space around us (atmosphere).
  • In the upper gravitational space-time, as ‘space enlarges’ while ‘time slows down’ it appears a Riemannian, elliptic geometry one of the non-Euclidean geometries that completely rejects the validity of Euclid’s fifth postulate and modifies his second postulate. Simply stated, Euclid’s fifth postulate is: through a point not on a given line there is only one line parallel to the given line. In Riemannian geometry, there are no lines parallel to the given line because space enlarges, thus from our smaller perspective we see those lines diverging, and time slows down. And those are the exact effects defined in General relativity.
  • On the other hand the lower quantum scales will appear from our perspective made of point-particles, and those point-particles will appear to be crossed from our larger perspective by multiple parallels. So the charges and particles of quantum physics will show the inverse hyperbolic geometry, crossed by multiple parallels.

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 20.44.22Now in this quantum scale time goes ‘much faster’ than in our universe, so when we take measure of it, we actually cannot easily differentiate a spatial and a temporal vision of it. And so the question which is always discussed as if it is a wave density or a wave probability can be interpreted both ways due to the duality inherited to the Universe: it is an electron moving so fast that we cannot see it in a given point and when we capture it is the sum of the points it travels though, or it is a sum of fractal bosons? This is my preferred solution albeit not the standard one.

Ultimately it does not matter to me as duality is essential to my understanding of the Universe. Populations in time and forms in space use the same maths because they ‘ARE’ co-existing. One is NOT more truth than the other because PLANES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION CO-EXIST, so while right now your whole is static in form, your cells are busy, busy moving. This is what never got through the mind of humans who see ONLY one thing at a time, and what fascinates me of quantum dualities – they DO prove 5D metrics.

This said we could introduce understanding that there are ALWAYS 4 true model perspectives the iƒ, informative, Ti, clock-like moving, Se-space and Sp-kinetic energy perspective…. Using the simplest of the 4 (latter analyzed), the Newtonian, Tƒ perspective of gravitation NOT the more complex, iƒ-informative Einstein’s analysis of space-time as still, formal geometry…

And as we have said, since the closest understanding to he five arrows of time happened in earlier taoism in china, we could close this first approach to the five dimensions telling you what minkowski said that time and space come together or do not really exist; something schopenhauer already realized: ‘there is not yin-form-ation without a drop of yang-motion/entropy’, there is no ‘yang-energy/entropy/motion, without a drop of yin’.

So again, the present single space-time continuum is made of lineal motion (the form being the line), energy that combines it with information (form with a bit of motion) constrained by a pure still linguistic form or mind and a pure entropic outer expansive world, the fifth and fourth dimension.

Those 2 ‘limits entropy-death and mind-stillness’ though are in pure meaning outside our present scale (I say this because you will find very often the term entropy for lineal motion in present 1D states – the site filled with careless erratas of this type given the autist nature of my research; but if anyone ever gets interested, the simplicity of the 5D universe, once you get the bare basics of the more careful central post, should guide you into the verbose jungle of other posts, sorry about that ):

So as soon as we start to grasp the five dimensions of space-time, and its co-existence from past to future in scale that make it sentient and organic’, made of ‘parts and wholes that co-exist and organise themselves’ and reproduce information –  since motion reproduces by the mere fact of moving – we must conclude that we live in a fractal organic Universe, of space-time beings whose parts made to the image and likeness of the whole are always organised in 3 co-existing scales of the fifth dimension (name we give to the whole range of scales, from the entropic fourth dimensional bottom to the summit of mind-views, which we take as the linguistic mind of all minds, the mind of God, in the platonic sense: ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe, and a mind called Logos=god’).

And so amazing as it seems, just departing from a simplified example – the discovery by Galileo of relativity and the static, flat, continuous rings of Saturn, which were not flat but made of spheric planetoids, not continuous but fractal and not static but moving; we see how  by changing from the mind subjective view to the objective reality we change our view and add two co-existing scales of Nature, the physical quantum and cosmological, gravitational scales, to our thermodynamic scale, where physicists have defined their single entropic arrow of time merely by expanding properties of thermodynamic gases to the whole Universe – solving easily its main conundrums.

Let us start introducing the ‘4 fundamental’ elements of a reality, minds, scales, space and time and its 5Dimensions, @ or • for the fifth membrain mind dimension, ∆, for the fourth which dissolves the mind into its _ parts (both inverse and generically called the scalar 5Dimension represented together by the ∆ Å symbols, where Å WILL BE THE SYMBOL OF the smallest space-time ‘moments’ or actions, $ for the first dimension of lineal motions in space, ≈ for the wave-body dimension of iteration or second dimension and O-tƒ for the dimension of accelerated time vortices, connect to the membrain. All of them in constant dynamical transformations between the limits of seed-birth (5D) and entropic death (4D).

It is then by combining bits and bites of those dimensions, by reordering in different manners, by ultimately establishing a ¬Ælgebra of ‘existence’ which studies how they related and interact together, how we shall be able to explain absolutely all what exists as a product of the ultimate substances of reality, fractal, cyclical timespace and its organic systems; each one a broken space-time (as the membrane encloses and breaks the whole universe into smaller replicas). So each of us is an island-Universe, û but also an infinitesimal mind-point, •, of a larger whole, which holds the view of the Universe in his cartesian mind, whih therefore can be defined not only topologically but algebraically with an equation:

O-mind mapping of the ∞ Universe: o x ∞ = K-onstant world.

And obviously define the fundamental psychological paradox, as we confuse our point of view-mapping of the Universe with the whole, so we distort subjectively the whole, as ‘every infinitesimal mind believes to be the center of the Universe by confusing the whole with its mind-world’.

We are all ‘DUST OF SPACE-TIME’ who think to be the center of the mind-world we see as the Universe, still in the picture of the mind.

As we are all made of ∆•ûst,  ternary ∆±1 scales, the three arrow of timespace, the fundamental ‘motion’ of any system through the fifth dimension – a world cycle of existence that orders those arrows in a sequential manner between birth and extinction, and the formal languages of the ‘monads’ that perceive those physical systems; in this case human mind; completing this brief intro as we just had looked at the fractal ∆§cales with the analysis of the 3 space-time arrows, together as a world cycle, and then commenting on the ‘humind limits when doing physics’, mostly derived of the ‘ego paradox’.

This said we can have a look at…

Special Relativity revis(it)ed: Worldcycles vs. worldlines. Wordlines. Feynman dyagrams, past, present and future.

Then special relativity is concerned with the first and second dimensions, lineal motions and present derivatives; but its aim again is not to understand them but rather to adapt measures of maximal lineal motion (c-speeds) to the human scale.

On the other hand quantum physicists have dealt more often with the concept of time parity realizing that locally motions to the past and to the future are symmetric. Here they deal with the inverted symmetry between the entropic arrow, as in an antiparticle and the life-organic arrow, as in the particle and the iterative arrow as in the wave. So a very classic description is given in feyman diagrams below shows a simple generator:

Past-entropic antiparticle  state < present-wave iterative state > future -informative particle state

Which for the gravitational ∆+1 scale reads:

E-ntropic explosion < cc-wave of energy > Tƒ-mass vortex of future

Whereas physicists as usual confuse an entropic big-bang explosion that erases the form of the mass with the truly energetic wave that has both form and motion.

Translations through scale symmetries.

How then physicists go about to translate events in different scales, topologies and time ages to the human present ∆ø scale and relative speed of time?

Then there are all the endophysical paradoxes of special relativity, where they mess it all together to ‘translate’ the beats and stop and go motions of particles, as seen from the electronic humind pov, on a higher scale, so they introduce lorentz transformations to translate the reality of the quantum c-speed motion scales to our scales, in a similar fashion as when we change

Lineal External motions≈changes in the entropy of beings is the main and often single arrow of time studied in physics, and the origin of simplistic rather irrelevant concepts beyond the ‘art of measure’, such as the worldline of special relativity, which portrays timespace motions as mere displacements in space.
Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 08.03.44

In the graph, the 2 most important new perceptions of time in modern physics after Newton->Galileo’s vision of lineal time, were those of Einstein->Minkowski’s light cones and Feynman’s space-time diagrams. In the light cone, time is still considered just a parameter of external space-motions, but it appears for the first time the concept of an arrow of ‘future time information’ – that is the information of a different space-time point, which in the future light can reach. This represents the arrow of future information of 4D models.

Yet all what matters to Einstein is to know how fast information can be transmitted externally through the fastest informative wave our light space-time.

In the centre of the cone we see, the ‘slice’ of present, instantaneous space, or 4 Dimension of time, which represents the modern version of Newton’s ‘instantaneous’ absolute space, perceived in an infinitesimal quantum of time, again used merely to measure external motions=changes of time: V=∂s/∂t.

Einstein went into further detail in those measures, using instants of time to give us the ‘still photographs’ (curved geometry) of the cyclical, physical Newtonian ‘time-clocks’ or masses. So if Newton had given us a ‘long time’ view of the clocks of the Universe, in lineal equations, now Einstein said that ‘time curves space into mass’, and added precision to the instantaneous measures of the largest clocks of time of the Universe, showing their curvature and establishing they accelerated inwards, increasing the future information of matter systems (Principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration).

So we live in one of such mass vortices of accelerated information (the galaxy centred into a black hole) – reason why it is SO IMPORTANT to know cyclical time. We DO not live in the outer entropic space between galaxies which expands and represents a relative past arrow of death, disorder and decelerations.

This duality of past-entropy-death and future-information-life was better understood by Feynman, who defined in the left graph, antiparticles as relative past flows that annihilated future flows or particles. Feynman took thus a bolder step, with its time-space perpendicular coordinates, considering that light-space ‘travels’ in present time (green photon), as a reproductive wave, and antiparticles (right) travel backwards in time, as they indeed do. Since they represent the entropy of death.

 In that sense 5D metric the natural next step in the explanation of the findings of quantum physics (a vacuum made of motions that become energy particles) and relativity (a Universe of multiple time clocks, cyclical accelerated vortices of information, and topological spaces).

Above, we compare those concepts with some distortions of the meaning of time, caused by physicists’ single time=change’ or locomotion as the meaning of it all:

What we find in those 3 graphs, explain some applications of the laws of the scalar Universe to physics.

In the center Feynman shows a case o a relative past antiparticle of entropy , and a future particle of information colliding into a present wave of space, and he does the actual time arrow properly (though never before explained).

So we see in the 3rd picture how this birth or creation of physical present energy (light space-time) appears from the two inverse arrows of particles, solving also the question of why there are more particles (life-future-arrows are longer than past-entropy-explosions so as we see less dead than alive people we see less dead antiparticle events than particle events).

screen-shot-2016-12-18-at-09-36-10Time is cyclical finite, local, so there is NOT a single time, NOT time paradoxes, as YOU CAN ONLY TRAVEL TO THE PAST in local terms, in your clocks and YOU DO SO when you die. So does the particle on Feynman’s diagrams as antiparticle.

In the graph, one of the commonest errors of physicists’ imaginary theories (Hawking’s black holes traveling to the past, wormholes etc) and scifi plots is time travel, based in the concept that the time-clock of man is the only clock time of the universe.

As the great dissident russian physicists Landau put it, then ‘why there is uncertainty in time and quantum physics, i just need to look at my watch’….

We are a fractal, local domain, a knot of time space cycles of physical or biological Nature.

When we die, we travel locally to their relative past at all scales as we dissolve back to their ∆-1 scales of organisation with less information. Our local big-bang death thus travels but the rest of the Universe keeps going forwards-backwards on in present iterative waves in all scales. So time travel errors are just born of the error of using lineal time, a single time clock, an abstract continuous plane of cartesian ‘world-topology’ for the entire Universe (see the images on the mind-world and cartesiann graphs all over).

The fundamental truths of the Universe, time and space are therefore more complex than expected. And this is what ‘widens’ our use of them beyond the study of the ‘locomotions’ of physical systems under Galileo’s formula (v=s/t) or Einstein refinement in Special relativity (adding to it a -(ct)² factor of correction). So locomotion, exhausted, word cycles come in. And the ‘entities’ that perform those world cycles ‘naturally’, the Superorganisms of the 5th dimension.

The three arrows of time: expansion of Einstein’s 4D cone.

Next comes the analysis of the three arrows of time with the correspondence principle – meaning using the concepts to define motion proper of the previous 4D model. Again here the use of cones of line can be expanded to introduce the three arrows o f time, as different forms of collision between future and past.  SINCE time motions can be of three type of topological arrows. So the third dissolutive arrow of ‘expansive past’, added to the implosive future of vortices and the ‘iterative present’ of waves (above graphs), give us the three basic forms with which to play through the infinite scales:

In the graph we see a big-bang as a particle that explodes from past to present (and then it will latter evolve a new particle), in the middle a present repetitive wave as a particle collapses into a third informative age to be replaced by a son particle. In the right a dual event of a singularity that absorbs entropy from the past and perceives a cone of future information into a still mind. Unlike the middle single time arrow, in the third screen the future collapses into the past singularity as a wave of information and the past collapses into its future singularity as a wave of entropy. In the first case we can consider two possible events, if the relative future and relative past are two different particles, they collide in a present and the relative future explodes in a darwinian event the relative past. As we can see when we explode time clocks to local 3 arrows, past to future, future to past and relative present, which in many cases do correspond to simultaneous time flows, the complexity of our analysis increases relative to 4d WHICH ONLY considers an image similar to the third.

In the graph we can see three different events as combination of two relative past-future arrows, giving birth to an entropic explosion in the present plane, A repetitive wave moving towards the future, and an implosive cone self-centred in a particle, with two states, ‘inwards and forwards. The three space-time fluxes are thus canonical as the 3 states of time-spaces.

On the right side we show the expansion of the cone of light of relativity – a present cone – to the 3 cones of light of worldcycles with 3 arrows of time, which will be in the complex mathematical model the way to deal with relative past, present and future in relativistic physics – well beyond the scope of this introduction.

It is of course appealing to think you understand it all about time, because it is as simple as to ‘measure’ the lineal motion of ‘things’. And since most people do not really want to ‘understand’ but just think they are ‘smart’, the whole mystique of lineal time motions, and time as the fourth dimension of space works. And it has become what Kant would call the ‘a priori’ category of the mind – a belief.

Now we can see also the experimental justification for the second great advance of GST maths as an experimental science of time: we no longer have a single ‘cone’ of space-time as relativity does, so we need to expand again in similar fashion to Einstein’s inclusion into reality of non-E maths our range of mathematical truths that are ‘real’, meaning, mirrors o f reality, with non-aristotelian ternary logic, which is an herculean task, as ‘single causality’ is embedded in the present logic of mathematics, with concepts such as the ‘tertium’ exclusion, the reductio ad absurdum and similar funny names that forbid expressly the dual and ternary causal logic underlying the meaning of  it all.

In that regard to make this transformation simpler, we just shall consider for the time being a very simple ‘upgrading’ of mathematical logic, substituting the = symbol of equality with the ≤≥ symbol of the three arrows of time (ab. ≈), to introduce the three possible events described by most mathematical equations. I.e we write e<cc>m, meaning that entropy can become informative mass, mass can dissolve into entropy, and both do transit its states through the present energetic radiation of light space-time.

This of course was what Einstein found – that mass could also be created from light besides being also able to explode into radiation.

Local time reversal is thus the fundamental add on in terms of logic to complete the encryption by equations of the possible events of the Universe’.

It is indeed essential for the reader to understand that linguistic mappings, stifle and deform the objective similarity of all beings.

So all kind of distorted images that carry a certain truth are possible, and relatively correct, but ONLY an objective analysis from the widest possible perspective, will make sense of all of them.

This widest Theory Of Everything, naturally can only be proposed by a Philosopher of Science, whose task is precisely to understand all the varieties of ‘formal motions’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ in space and time, measured by the infinite frames of reference of the Universe.

While each science and scientist will study a particular form and type of species in its detail, with more or less deformation according to the linguistic models it proposes, its specific ‘ego-centered paradox’ and the ‘worldly profession’, it engages with. Which of course the Philosopher of Science must also explain, to the chagrin of the different ‘Religions’, ‘Cultures’ and ‘Minervas of the North’, and the sure solitude that will engulf his work.

So how can we differentiate subjective truths, and biases? To that aim the philosopher of science has created the ‘Scientific method’, which the likes of Aristotle and Descartes established, and the likes of Galileo and Newton usurped and deformed.

But as we said all relative truths carry certain information, which is valid to create a mapping of reality and that is why subjective versions of reality do work and remain standing. Indeed, Ptolemy could perfectly establish the orbits of planets with the Earth at its center, just adding epicycles. But it was a very complicated motions. Thus Science considers the fundamental ‘tool’ to distinguish a higher objective truth from a subjective one, called Ockham’s razor: the simplest theory of reality which can explain the maximal number of facts is a more objective truth.

Locomotion: Present waves.

Of the 3 cones of past to future motions, the wave motion, which repeats a system in canonical flow from maximal space: past, into maximal form, future, followed by a ‘son’ wave, is better expressed in reproductive present wave form, beyond a single event analysis:

In that sense loco-Motion studied by Physics is the simplest of all motions and the first studied by human beings, related to pure entropy motions obtained either by:

-An ‘∆-ST-wave’-motion on present space-time, which reproduces its simpler form or:
-An ∆-1 or by a ∆+1 particle > ∆-1 field, which disorders the lowest scale which ‘produces’ an expansive effect on space used by the particle ‘to glide’ over it.

Those 2 forms of locomotion, clear on the quantum scale, being the first schrodinger’s wave equation; the second Broglie->Bohm pilot wave theory recently proved, in which the particle moves by expanding and scattering the lower field (likely a gravitational neutrino background pilot wave fluctuating around a c-constant) will set the way in which lomotions occur in higher scales and more complex fluids (so locomotion in gravitational and ¥-space-time will be akin to locomotion in fluids either as waves or particles do.

The human being moves on electric repulsion and gravitational forces, taking advantage of the larger space and motion of the i-4 scale, below the scale of i-3 bits of perception… and for that reason the realm of ‘gravitational forces’ is both invisible, with zero information and infinite, non-local in speed, to us: V=s/tiƒ=s/o=∞.

But if information is smaller and faster in scales of lesser space, and information is carried in the form and cycles of clocks of time, then we must not only add a dimension of height to time, but a dimension of ‘scale’, and this my friends set us for an even bigger r=evolution of thought, that of the metric equations of the fifth dimension of space-time.

Of course many other elements are to be taken into account for a full description, not less the ‘∆º humind’ distortion, according to 5D metric, which makes us perceive smaller timespace entities as more curved, hence H appears as angular momentum (but in fact reduces it to a diameter) and c as ‘euclidean lineal dimensions of light’.

   Finally  there is the pure mentally analysis of relativity in which the interest is merely as all what physicists do, to measure the motion in relationship to the human observer, and so it is mainly an artefact of measure which often gives us an ‘inverse’ view to that of the being – as a prey predator relationship has inverse views of it. Indeed, in fact the frequency-time of the mass is increasing but the lineal outer time of its perception inversely slows down by the Lorentz factor.

The mental view will then include a perception in terms of an elliptic geometry of those vortices when observed inside out precludes a ‘general relativity’ Riemannian outlook when we try to describe it from the perspective of mathematical languages, as those fractal points become the invisible polar ‘outsider’ point of a Riemannian sphere: they form the singularity and external membrane of the system, which together create as supœrganism of physical space-time.

RECAP. 

The FIRST question to start our inquire is how exactly are we made of vital space and temporal cycles…

Obviously we all exist in a finite time between conception and extinction, and we all occupy a ‘region of space’, we carry with us. And then there is always the I, of the ‘we’, the point of view to create order among all those motions and form. Let us then put the 3 together in an organic, meaningful way.

We say that time is cyclical motion/form and space is open, lineal motion/form. As this is the truth of it, physicists despite using different names have found the simplest theoretical elements of their models are open strings (of space) and cyclical strings (of time).

  

TRANSITIONS

QUANTUM – THERMO & GRAVITATIONAL SCALES.

Scalar transitions.  How membranes function and emerge.

An important part of the why of physics is therefore to study how new scales emerge, how super organisms build its ternary forms, departing either from the emergence of a singularity point or from the external membrane.

This again is easier to understand departing of our scale, observing how this intermediate ‘magnetic world’ between the atom-galaxy and the galaxy-atom emerges and transcends, giving up energy and mass to the gravitational world.

AS ITS parallel thermodynamic world the maximal detail is observed in this scale to understand better the extreme planes we don’t see. The workings of the magnetic field then become evident, and by self-similarity can be applied to the understanding on how other planes emerge. It is only needed that the charge moves for an external observer (it always moves from a certain pov) to see how a magnetic field appears NOT to extract directly entropy=motion from the particle but to ‘curve its trajectory’ and hence confine it within a larger world.

However a vital view of the function of a magnetic field in organic terms is far more interesting. Indeed, a brief resume of its actions:

According to the 3rd postulate of non-E congruence, which all systems follow:

Magnetic attraction occurs between charges which are moving in same direction (parallel evolving phenomena).
Magnetic repulsion occurs between charges which are moving in opposite directions (antiparallel=perpendicular in one dimension – darwinian phenomena).

Thus magnetism becomes the social force that harmonises groups of charges.

This function though is possible due to the ghost-like lightness of the ‘envelope-bubble’ of magnetism.

And so the magnetic field has always to be considered in terms of membranes only.

Incidentally to mention that the greatest underrated physicist of modern times, Mr. Heaviside, which simplified the 20 equations of Maxwell into the 4, also defined the equation of gravito-magnetism, which connects the ∆ø scale of magnetism and the ∆+1 scale of gravitation, a decade before than relativity did, with the same phenomena, and the same equations that magnetism has for ‘flat space-time gravitation’ – basically all gravitation that affects us, except in the close vicinity of black holes, where gravitation itself, as understood within the galaxy becomes deformed by the ‘open door’ to the dark world outside the galaxies that black holes signify.

It is then an essential part of 5D physics to fully comprehend how new membrains and singularities, focus of those forces ‘enclose’, predate and absorb the energy of the lower scales; which is what ultimately express the simplest, most important equations of physics in which terms of different scales are equated.

Consider the simplest equation, which nicely relate all the 4 fundamental scales of physical nature (quantum, light and electronic, magnetic and gravitational scales – since our thermodynamic ‘vibrations’ are just a secondary parasitic scale that takes energy from all of them in the form of electromagnetism and temperature – molecular momenta):

PARTICLE’S MAGNETON:      2 M µB= he

The beauty of this equation BOTH for a proton, of mass Mp and an electron of mass Me is obvious. Here we have the 4 fundamental active magnitudes in its minimal quanta for magnetic forces, mass, light energy and electronic charge, completely equated with just a 2.0′ ‘dual’ factor. 

And so it has to tell us something very important on the relationship between those parameters of the 4 sub-scales of physical nature: h>e>µB>M

Now the first hypothesis we can forge is one obvious process of Emergence  of the two upper membrains of Nature, the magnetic and gravitational membrain, as ‘resonances’≈ emergent new planes of the fifth dimension, which extract its ‘energy of existence’ for the lower, ‘denser informative, faster, clocks’ of the ‘inner Russian dolls of nature, the electron and its ‘dense’ photonic quanta. 

And as mass and magnetism are in one side and planckton and electric charge on the other; it all suggests that we can ‘split’ our reality if we were to consider two ‘regions’ only with our thermodynamic ∆o reality in the middle, in the smaller world of light and electrons vs. the larger world of magnetism and gravitation.

This hypothesis latter analysed in far greater detail on the fourth line of mathematical physics and scales, would also imply that depending on particle and substance, the emergence of magnetism and gravitation differs. For the electron, most of the emergent scale will be magnetic, as its mass is minimal, for the nucleon most will be gravitational, as its mass is maximal.

So the emergence keeps a certain duality which we shall see carried through all scales of the H-planck>e-charge>electric current>magnetic force; meaning the ‘jump into the mass’ membrane and the interaction with our light-electronic world is minimal.

While quarks will become the real candidates, specially in its heavier families to transcend and emerge the small quantum world and jump into the awesome 10ˆ40 hierarchy of the galaxy-atom. And we shall return to all that.

Now, THE sub-theme on how new planes emerge by predating, enclosing and forming a singularity that traps as ‘vital energy/space’ the previous microforms is also very externes. It deals basically with the ’emergence’ by resonance in time, of new 5D singularity-membrains, from atomic spins to magnetic membranes to angular momentum, in ‘gravitational systems’ of mass.

And it does have to do with the ‘reversal’ between scales in dimensional directions and inversions in the ‘motion vs. form, entropy vs. social evolution, t and ∆±1 inversions, between the 1st and 3rd, the 4th and 5th dimensions of space-time. WE shall treat them in the second part of this post, dedicated to each scale and the 3rd line of the blog in physical scale.

Let us make some consideration in a  most obvious form in which this ‘energy-cyclical motion’ moves upwards:

Magnetic moment and angular momentum

The magnetic moment has a close connection with angular momentum called the gyromagnetic effect. This effect is expressed on a macroscopic scale in the Einstein-de Haas effect, or “rotation by magnetization,” and its inverse, the Barnett effect, or “magnetization by rotation.

In particular, when a magnetic moment is subject to a torque in a magnetic field that tends to align it with the applied magnetic field, the moment precesses (rotates about the axis of the applied field). This is a consequence of the concomitance of magnetic moment and angular momentum, that in case of charged massive particles corresponds to the concomitance of charge and mass in a particle.

Viewing a magnetic dipole as a rotating charged particle brings out the close connection between magnetic moment and angular momentum. Both the magnetic moment and the angular momentum increase with the rate of rotation. The ratio of the two is called the gyromagnetic ratio and is simply the half of the charge-to-mass ratio.

For a spinning charged solid with a uniform charge density to mass density ratio, the gyromagnetic ratio is equal to half the charge-to-mass ratio. This implies that a more massive assembly of charges spinning with the same angular momentum will have a proportionately weaker magnetic moment, compared to its lighter counterpart. As it becomes transferred to the MASS envelop that was not in the particle before, but appears in the particle as a resonance of the larger mass that absorbs its formal energy form the magnetic field: µ m = e S

The inversions between electromagnetism and gravitation.

We have insisted many times that when we cross a discontinuum  either from s to t or from ∆-1 to ∆+1, there are inversions in motion and form that balance the Universe. This explains why gravitation-strong force is attractive and electromagnetism outside the atom is repulsive.

The ultimate reason being that within a space-time super organism the tendency is the arrow of information, and between different super organisms the dominant arrow is the selfish arrow; except in cases of parallelism, which allow further social evolution.

So all inner forces are inward vortices of growing attraction (strong gravitational force) and all outer forces are perceived as repulsive. And it is only in that sense the magnetism, which becomes the ‘next’ implosive force creating new membranes resembles gravitation, but the true equivalence here is between the inner strong atom-galaxy and the inner weak gravitational galaxy-atom forces. Since magnetism is a ‘scale’ of order within the gravitational galaxy, and hence must have reversed arrows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Perhaps of more interest to understand the inversions of symmetry when we move from s to t states, from ∆-1 to ∆+1 in the galaxy atom is to consider the inverted properties of the atom and the galaxy, which ‘seems’ to be an anti-particle. In the graph, we see the equations of gravitomagnetism and its visual form, which shows the effect on gravitation to be NOT inverse BUT PARALLEL.

What this means is that for individual particles – spinning charges:

Electric repulsion occurs between particles which are spinning in the same direction.
Electric attraction occurs between particles which are spinning in opposite directions.

Rotational attraction occurs between masses which are spinning in the same direction
Rotational repulsion occurs between masses which are spinning in opposite directions.
These forces can be observed between spinning wheels and general relativity describes it for interactions between massive stars.

On the galactic scale where we use gravitoelectromagnetism:

Gravitomagnetic repulsion occurs between masses which are moving in the same direction.
Gravitomagnetic attraction occurs between masses which are moving in opposite directions.

So both are inverse. Incidentally this is also the case for strong self-similar forces, called asymptotic freedom: when you try to move away to quarks there is an attraction equivalent to the gravitomagnetic effect.

And we could go on and on with those formal inversions, which are made explicit as general laws for all planes in T.Π(the most general isomorphic laws between planes).

Differences between membrains and singularity-minds.

All this said the ghostly magnetic covers as the protein cover is the worker part but NOT the essential part. Why? Because the essential action of all beings, reproduction, is performed by the singularities, which have ENOUGH density of information to reproduce. Let us see the previous two cases.

If we consider the inverse directions, open and closed spirals, Nature seeks one more to balance both; so spins and charges act as gender singularities, seeking a balance between both. And often those inverse spins when having enough energy produce a new electron.

But attraction is always limited by the density of information that saturates a field. So:

Charge repels when density is high.
Charge attracts when density is low.
Now we switch directions up in planes and consider gravity from the microscopic up to the macroscopic. A per gravitoelectromagnetism, gravity is just like electricity and magnetism but with a weaker coefficient, longer interaction distances, and the direction reversed by virtue of the inversions between planes. So:

Mass attracts when density is high.
Mass repels when density is low.
But spinning mass warps space in inverse form.

All this happens for all scales and species which will always have an inner world with a tendency to increase density, and an outer world with a tendency to decrease density; where unless a magnetic-like social force of order appears, will then act with individualistic entropic behaviour.

And the key to that inner attractive behaviour is the network density and connectivity. Indeed, in the case of physical forces, the key here is that gluons as neutrinos-gravitons interact also among them; so the density of interaction is huge. And in biological terms, we can draw the immediate comparison with the force-networks, called axions of neuronal systems, which also interact within them, unlike disconnected cells joined by blood networks where the forces (red cells) do not interact. In other terms: the ∆+1 strong-graviational inner world and its ∆-1 gluon-neutrino axons are far more connected, tighter, able to grow in density as singularity, informative systems, vs. the more herd-like, entropic>energetic external forces in a herd of individual ‘charges’ or cells.

Those vital organic reasons Рthe whys of mathematical descriptions Рare the fundamental revelations brought about by ƥst.

∆•st view: MEMBRANE FORCES VS. SINGULARITY FORCES ≈ENTROPY vs. SOCIAL EVOLUTION.

Once we have considered a generic analysis of the PHYSICAL T.œs’ duality between strong-gravitational atom-galaxy attractive singularity forces and the expansive electro-magnetic, membrane forces; we can fly upwards into the more general T.Œ VIEW:

So we distinguish ‘four fundamental forces’ of attraction-repulsion (depending on the pov of the observer), which can be generalised in function – not in topological form, which we have repeated ad nauseam can only be applied exactly to pure forms (or those far away from the human observer, which therefore reduces its perception to pure form, and confuses time fast states with simultaneous space).

The attraction we deal with is that of a present vital energy-spacetime open ball, which will experience 4 potential forces:

  • A force that attracts the system to the ‘protein, time-cycle membrane’; in the atom to the electronic membrane; in the galaxy to the halo – this is a force related mostly to entropic expansion and destruction as ‘space grows’ towards the membrane, which also leave in and out by osmosis of any kind, motion and form.
  • A force that attracts the system towards its informative ‘DNA’ singularity; in the atom the strong force to the quarks; in the galaxy the gravitational force to the black hole center – it is a force related to the informative implosion, as time speed grows towards the vortex. It is hence more accelerated than the expansive, decelerating entropically related motion to the membrane. And so it is also related to a growth of density and upwards lifting.

Yet while those membrane-entropic-expansive-decelerating, ∆-1 motion and its inverse ∆+1 informative-singularity-accelerated motions seem the ∆±1 paths, the fact is both tend to kill, destroy and eat in bits and bites the components of the vital energy, and so they are both selfish, ab=using energy for the singularity and membrane.

So they tend to be ‘resisted’, by the vital energy, which will itself show when its is ‘heady’ (not a headless automaton, pre-programmed viral cell, human enzyman slavish to its machines, red cell with no nuclei, light wave with a minimalist photon particle and so on). Otherwise it will just flow down or upwards and die.

So we might find two inverse anti forces, which try NOT to send the being either path, and keep it in the middle range balance.

And this is obvious for example in planetary systems which try NOT to fall down the path of the star. But, and this responds to an obvious question – which force is stronger; it ultimately falls into the sun-singularity, as the inward accelerated, compressing force is stronger. So the strong force is stronger than the expansive electromagnetic force that sends you in your way to the electron, and the gravitational force should be stronger in a similar ‘fine constant’ proportion to the dark entropy forces that are in the galaxy-atom self-similar to the electromagnetic ones and expand space between galaxies.

Then there is of course for the vital energy quanta of the open ball region forces towards its fifth dimension of social evolution, without MOTION to the singularity but rather ‘collapsing’ of the wave into a particle state; and viceversa, the scattering entropic fourth dimension of downwards dissolution.

When this happens ‘spontaneously’ not caused by the attractive power of membranes and singularities, it is a self-sustained process, which we distinguish by lack of relative motion of the particle towards the $ or ð regions, and because it is a slower than the fastest of all processes, any process of death, with an exponential rate of maximal ‘growth’-dissolution (e being the constant of death≈decay). 

T.œs follow T.Œ isomorphic laws.

This is a T.Œ law (T.œ used for particular timespaœrganisms, T. Œ FOR generalisation as the law is an isomorphism that happens in all systems.)

So for example humans have a pull towards social love (5th dimension), a fear but unavoidable end into an entropic explosion, often caused by the larger whole, its nation, which sends you packing to the border/membrane where the hard proteins/weapons/electronic wall will likely kill you; or to the seemingly nicer central black hole; where the legal government will ‘jail you’ in a dense, quiet ‘hole’.

Do NOT be surprised we use often human comparisons, because that is the ULTIMATE MESSAGE OF T.Œ, we are all just time§pace beings subject to the same laws. Humans simply see more detail about themselves and simplify all other forms.

So the star falling in the black hole, the carbohydrate packed to serve the DNA and the man jailed for wanting r=evolutionary freedom, or the planet converted by ACCELERATORS into strangelets going to the halo of the galaxy, the photon sent to the electron, or the soldier going to defend the border ARE isomorphisms. So it is the bosonic piling of atoms or souls into a larger whole, subconscious collective god.

As we are working the physical world we shall not dwell on the injustice of national membranes and capitals ab=using the human lot and sheeple with financial and military zeal… But obviously to be ‘a solar system’ in the wilderness of the less dense, less informed open ball territory of a galaxy, or a photon in the atom-galaxy, its equivalent; is NOT the best position of the organism which is all about ‘membranes and singularities’, DNA and proteins, working together, strangelet halos and black holes, military borders and financial capitals.

The democratic placebo vote, the ‘permission’ to exist of the open ball, is just the wisdom of the singularity and membrane which has its ‘farming region’ in the middle to store its vital energy and slowly feed on, but ultimately it will devour it all and without ‘pressure/density’ the emptied vital energy of the present body-wave will collapse and the membrane wrinkle, warp and the singularity without protection and feeding energy bust. Alas, death is the necessary reward to the abusive singularity-mnds that stiffen into stoppage, the vital energy of the re=productive body-wave and working class.

So the strong/gravitational force sends you packing to the centre, the electromagnetic/dark entropy to the membrane and beyond into the coldness of infinite distances between galaxy-atoms; and no more translative forces are needed.

As the weak force is NOT A FORCE, it has no range in space, it lasts much longer in time, as its coupling constant is indeed expressed in time intervals. And so it is a huge error of ‘space physicists who always want to transform time dimensions and processes into spatial rods, to treat weak forces as ‘fields’ (Higgs field) as spatial forces, by lack of time understanding.

For an even more detailed break-down, we can consider actually the 3 forces as dual scaling forces.

So the strong force sends you to the centre, but its membrane emerges from it as the nuclear force that encloses gluons and quarks in the centre of particles.

Then the same concept works with charge, the singularity and membrane, the magnetic field, which ’emanates’ from the electric force; as an intermediate stage between the atom-galaxy and the galaxy-atom.

And finally the gravitational force sends you to the enter and the higgs field/dark entropy works outside the membrane.

And so we find then the proper formalism and parallelisms. I.e. the graviton has 2 spin but the Higgs outside is a 0 scalar. So happens to the gluon that has a light ‘graviton-like’ 2 spin and a heavy scalar highs-like 0 spin.

Of this conundrum only a correction is needed, regarding the graviton-neutrino which now is considered to be a 1 spin; but to correct that in meaningful ways we would need a huge leap into the formalism of quantum physics, which we avoid in purpose to show how meaning can be given conceptually with basic maths, when we upgrade our understanding of them.

While the thermodynamic arrow is not entropy but the clever molecular region, and resistance of the weak ud-beings to be packed in flocks to their death by excessive information or excessive entropy in the centre/membrane; and parasite as long as it lasts all other forces. So when you heat a system, gravitation misses the gaseous motion; magnetic fields are expelled by the Curie effect, beyond a Curie temperature. 

The game is just and the open ball is often left its own ‘space’ to cultivate its ghostly motions and forms – us.

Now of course, the ‘creationist view of egocentered humans’ about reality with man as the only sentient being with organic properties imposed by western cultures will have none of it. If taoism->buddhism would have spread as the substrata of our science and not yhwh the pantheist, organic sentient Universe that all of us, the masters of time-space models, consider the only rational explanation of reality would have prevailed, and man probably would have a longer future in this lost rock of the emptiness (Leibniz>Einstein>ls)

The Rashomon effect on electromagnetism. Ternary arrows of time: st-fields, s-potentials and t-charges.

Nt. We use often the term field instead of potential to describe the entropic scale, ∆-2 from where a system obtains its motion, as physicists tend to confuse both terms. Probably it would be better to use the term ‘potential’, instead of field, which I will from here on -T.œ being always in flux as it is the singularity-mind still of a single human being):

It follows from what it has been said, that there should be at least 3±1 formulations of the electromagnetic field in terms of the 3 arrows of time, as it is the case:

S-Potential. ST-field, tƒ: charge: three approaches are customarily discussed, as the equations are in terms of electric and magnetic vectorial fields (present wave, st, the commonest), potentials (fields proper, the entropic, scattered solution), and charges with currents (the tƒ solution).

It should be notice that the Potential $pe description must have less ‘dimensions/ parameters’ than the wave description. As a general rule deduced from the properties of space and time, ‘entropy has the minimal number of dimensions, 2, for each ‘bidimensional field’, in this case 4 parameters; while the ST-liquid/wave description as a general rule must have the whole S≈T ternary symmetry effect, 3+3 parameters. And such is the case, the electric and magnetic fields together had six components to solve for. In the potential formulation, there are only four components:

the quantum potential

While the above presentation introduced the guidance equation as fundamental, the quantum potential For the phase of the wavefunction  holds:

∂S (∇S)² h²∇²R −∂t=2m+V−2mR .

Due to the similarity with the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation (for the action S) the term ∝ h ̄2 has been baptized quantum potential . Within the Hamilton- Jacobi theory the particle velocity is constraint to m·v = ∇S, which corresponds to the guidance equation of the de Broglie-Bohm theory. If one adopts the quan- tum potential formulation the motion along the Bohmian trajectories can be thought of as taking place under the action of a novel quantum-force . However, the guidance equation can be motivated e.g. by symmetry arguments (Dürr/Goldstein/Zanghi, 1992) and needs no recourse to the Hamilton-Jacobi theory. Moreover, in Goldstein (1996) it is argued that the quantum potential formulation is misleading since it suggests that the deBroglie-Bohm theory is just classical mechanics with an additional potential (or force) term. But the deBroglie-Bohm theory is a rst-order theory (i.e. the velocity is constrained by the position already) and this important trait is disguised in the quantum potential formulation.

Whether this ambiguity in the formulation of the de Broglie-Bohm theory should be viewed as a substantial debate or a secondary matter depends on the context. These two readings of the theory have certainly a great deal in common and in comparing the de Broglie-Bohm approach with standard quantum mechanics the distinction between these di erent schools is usually irrelevant. However, more detailed discussions which involve subtleties regarding e.g. the status of the wavefunction or particle properties have to pay attention to these di erences.

Ƥ: The four fundamental approach in classic electromagnetism is the current description, which is the social scaling of electricity.

  • The mind approach, includes the human pov deformation from the perspective of our tools of measure. It is  the 4 vector solution of relativity, which roughly speaking can be considered the ∆• mind solution as it introduces the paradoxes of ‘mind stillness’ in the measure of beings (paradox of Galileo).

 

 

  probability v. determinism.

“The analogue in classical optics. One can speak of the beam diffracted by a grating in a given direction only if the grating and the incident wave are laterally limited, because otherwise all the diffracted beams will overlap and be bathed in the incident wave. One must also assume the wave Ψ to be limited laterally in configuration space. The question is to know what a particle should do when it is immersed in two waves at the same time.” BROGLIE

Screen Shot 2017-11-23 at 3.11.51 PM

The quantum world as huminds perceive it is the o-1 probability sphere of time world cycles≈ paths of a whole game of existence between the o-seed and the 1-generation as a larger being of a higher ∆+1 scale, expressed specifically as the ∑ ∆–1 waves of Bosonic forces > ∆º  particles.

Since the Universe is completely understandable, predictable, organic, deterministic as any life-death cycle is.

The trick here though comes when we fully grasp one of the most beautiful dualities of reality – that between the short steps of open strings/lineal momentums/free particles, which statistically as the number of events in the o-1 sphere GROW (or the populations in the identical, ∆+1 scale of the 1-∞ plane), the mass program ‘gravitates’ towards an organic building of a deterministic ‘enclosed whole’, which becomes curved into closed, fixed geodesics – fully deterministic larger wholes with an integral single worldcycle.

It is then possible to integrate also the kaleidoscopic mirrors of quantum probabilistic physics and Bohmian paths; and also consider local big-bangs of quasar galaxies, which are free to die but NOT the whole Universe that will perform at best in the upper scale a zero sum worldcycle…

That is, in quantum physics, all the open paths of a wave collapse in a deterministic Bohmian path of the particle, all the entropic molecules of heat, collapse into the deterministic larger thermodynamic whole laws, all the individual free lives of human beings, collapse into the deterministic life and death cycles of its organisms, nations and civilizations, and those larger whole, closed cycles is what becomes determined.

The parts seem free, the whole, the mass is bent, closed, deterministic. So in geometry, Lobachevski found that we see in small distances as you see the earth flat, open space, but when the picture gets longer and bigger in time and space, the mass of steps and events or populations gravitate and curve. In the complex plane as Gauss already proved, there are multiple integral paths but we come always back to the same point. In physics light crosss through the least time path.

The parts will feel always in their plane of existence, free, because they cannot perceive the whole; as you don’t see yourself part of an organism of history, your DNA cells won’t feel to be part of a brain-controlled organism, whose informative nervous messages made them move in synchronicity and their hormonal blood flows order their re=production actions. Or the stars of the galaxy feeding in gravitational paths will not see the black hole swarm in the center that will swallow them all at the end of times.

Cyclical time is predictable as cycles of information reproduce & r=evolve with the same topological patterns. 

And this bring us to an error of quantum physicists in its misinterpretations of his mathematical equations; and rejection for a century and counting of the true proper interpretation of their discipline, Broglie’s>Bohm>Bell’s deterministic quantum-pilot wave theory, Pilot-waves aRE a perfect, rational, deterministic, 5D theory of quantum physics, born of the founding fathers of the discipline, Broglie and Einstein, denied by the Huge Ego paradox of the Hilbert School of Germanic idealism (which considers that humans ‘imagine’ points, planes and maths, the language of God, they only share, and hence they also ‘imagine’ physical particles, as per Bohr, Born and Heisenberg),

light spacetime minds

One thing though must be clarified – Einstein’s postulate of c-speed limit, obviously apply only to the plane of continuous space-time light, as it is the background spacetime of our perceived universe, of electronic eyes feeding on light; but there must be according to 5D metric, S x T = K, a lower faster than c ‘gravitational’ scale of intergalactic space, the quantum potential of entanglement and Bohm’s model, of gravitational action at distance, of intergalactic jets at 10C, of the gravitational accelerated vortex of black holes, beyond the c-horizon (Kerr metric), which expels perpendicularly those jets, and cause the effect of expansive dark entropy space faster than light space, exactly where light does NOT exist.

So the key to fully grasp both quantum physics and the balanced immortal big-bang/warping Universe was indeed to consider c-speed and 4D metric, the ‘limit’ for a single plane of space-time of 5D metric.   Einstein’s postulate of c-speed, works only for the lowest perceived scale of reality that builds up the electronic mind – light space-time itself, which is only the cartesian world of light space-time huminds are, but there are undoubtedly many other mind-worlds with different pixels at different speeds – the slower atomic, smelling worlds of elephants, with its higher memorial, slow past pixels, the faster top quark, gravitational minds of black holes, informative ‘dna-like’ brains of ‘galacells.

Once this ‘hidden scale’ is added to the models of the balanced Universe the obvious truths of the Broglie>Bohm ‘realist model’ of quantum physics impose its logic.

And yet by the ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple perspectives, each of the ‘different perspectives on quantum physics’ has a quantity of truth.

What is then the zone of conflict between both perspectives?

  • An important question which is by no means settled is to consider which of both perspectives does properly calculate the existence of the particle before it touches the observer’s apparatus.

It is not clear if the particle exists before, in the scattered wave or collapses becoming such in response to the ‘attack’ or ‘well’ of energy of the observer.

And this is an uncertainty that cannot be solved because we are looking to the ‘limit’ of our perception as electronic atomic instruments.

In the graph, the slit experiment does not clarify fully if actually the particle exists through the period of motion of the system transported by the wave, but if so it will have a determined path, logically on the region of maximal density of its body, which is given by the amplitude square of the wave. No need then for fancy further paradoxes. In case of the particle not existing, the stop and go, particle-wave duality will be sequential. On my view the particle does exist but it is the submissive smaller state in boson waves which are dominant 3D systems on contact with the quantum potential, the ∆-1 desegregated entropic state of its minimal components. While the particle ‘shrinks’ part of the wave-potential into a 2D sphere which becomes therefore the definition  of a particle as a substance of a 1 dimension less than the wave of energy it encloses. As such the particle being a less dimensional element can also be defined by its momentum.

However the momentum differs in the sense that mass, the enclosure particle of the larger reality of gravitational quantum potential waves at 10.000 (open still to argument) IS NOT real for particle points, where the momentum is given by ih, the similar mass-factor on the operator of momentum for quantum waves. This is in fact related to the charge (the equivalent to the mass vortex or star density within the galaxy), distribution around the atom, which forms the density cloud of charge we call an electron. So mass must not be considered and at all moments to be changed by the ih factor of schrodinger’s momentum operator which is the equivalent to mass in the quantum real (its active magnitude). Itself a spherical rotary density of change which has however null effect on the form of the quantum field it does not distort, and so is intrinsically neutral, extrinsically charged.

So we can reinterpret the schrodinger equation as the definition of the momentum of the wave, where ih is the mass factor, and the wave speed depends on the two elements of position and speed, obviously related to the two elements of the right side, the potential/position energy and the kinetic lineal time speed.

This is then just a different plane and much of the confusion happens by making relevant by routine the mass element of our higher Universe which comes into view likely latter around the weight of the dark matter quarks (heavy atoms in our Universe). H then BEING THE EQUIVALENT OF MASS and  K boltzman in the energy equations, is accompanied by the frequency equation to write a simple 5D scalar metric:

 ∆-1: $³d (Potential volume) – 1D ƒ ∆º: ð =∆+1: K ²d(1D scalar: Active magnitude value)

What matters us though more is the conceptual error of dealing with mass in the field of ih-angular momentum as the meaning of mass.

So then particles anti gravitate in the sense that mass here is ih and so they are density charges that change symbol from repulsive to attractive, as we must ‘NOT use the concept of mass’ but angular momentum h, as the operator of both lineal and angular momentum, relate it to charge which is the active magnitude here, mass being expelled from the real of intrinsic properties of quantum systems.

What about the spin: The charge conjugation operator commutes with the spin operators, so the antiparticle always has the same spin as the particle.

The Rashomon effect though gives us another real reason why the spins are the same. The spin, or any other quantum numbers of the antiparticle has to be the same with that of the particle, in order for them to be able to establish Lorentz invariance in the presence of conserved charges.

I have not though clear that the spin values IN WHICH a particle can change do not equate to a non-conservation rule for spins but for all the Universe entangled only.

In any case the potential and particle state must be put then from Bohm’s model to complete the description of the quantum wave:

Bohmian mechanics differentiates: Upper right:  A 2D polar, particle, enclosing a 3D quantum potential field, whose quanta density, amplitude squared, ψ x ψ*, determine the positions of those particles that move enclosing them, as envelopes of the quantum potential.

Lower right: A time dependent moving wave state expressed with energy Hamiltonians

 

How the ‘general S x T = K’ EQUATION of 5D metric works out for different systems though must take into account the different power laws that apply too them.

In generala more precise metric equation for physics systems will be considering the different dimensions of Space=volume (3D), time (clock: 2D) and K (scalar = 1D), our Unification equation of charges and masses, where we write  in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:

UCG,C = ω2r3/MUCG,C x M= ω2r3   M= ω2r3/UCG,C

Where we obtain for 2 UC(i/e) values, G and Q, 2 different space/time scales and vortices acceleration (mass and  charges).

Indeed Mass becomes then the ‘relative constant’ M= ð(ω²) x $(r³), we are in a power law which is essentially similar to Kepler’s 3rd law. Couldn’t be otherwise: T² ≈ R³. So T=1/w and we substitute, normalizing as a constant each relative mass of each quark, M = 1; proportional to the square of its angular speed.

We can look at it in terms of dimensionalities, M, is the one dimensional scalar-singularity, w is the 2 Dimensional angular enclosure and r is the 3-dimensional quantum potential vital energy of the system – the lineal enclosed ‘wave’ state of this potential invisible field

.So the equation becomes dimensional: K (1D) = ð² x $³, which merely defines the growth of mass as a power law of  the speed of rotation and potential invisible field (distance-radius). This is Kepler’s law and in general it will be the law for all physical systems; but requiring for each scale a proper analysis of the dimensions in which we work, which are maximal obviously for the macro-gravitational scale, but might differ – and we shall see how, for lower scales.

So here we do have an M vs. r³ clear one thousand relationship, between the scalar (charge, Mass, h, M) and the potential (quantum likely gravitational potential  10.000 C field, faster than light for spooky action at distance, maybe mediated by ‘string neutrinos’  electromagnetic field for our Universe at maximal c-speed, a thermodynamic potential for molecules and a liquid flow potential and so on). which would make logic to consider the rotational speed of the electron and the proton equal.

f complex calculations but which theoretically should put together all this: neutrinos, strings, gravitons, spooky entanglement, top quarks, black hole jets, neutrino theory of light, dark entropy, death of tired redshift light, expansion of space… 

So good luck to the XXI century physicist that puts them all. All I know is that is the way shown by the theoretical analysis from a 5D perspective.

We are though now more interested to straighten up the huge gaps on theoretical terms on the meaning of those constants (3rd graph to the right), which are basically for each scale, proportionality constants, scalars of the form K (1D) = ð² x $³, when perceived intrinsically in its internal form, but obviously vary in dimensionality for external analysis as point-particles on a larger world (equations of energy of the graph).

It is though clear that K in each of those scales is the constant of action, which has a scalar number measure, for h-planck, for k-boltman actions of entropy and for m, mass of particle vortices.

It is remarkable since Science was born precisely when humans learned about those other scales with telescopes and microscopes that such a fundamental law of the Universe, has remained obscure for so long, due to some earlier conceptual errors in the understanding of time, brought about by the use of a single mechanical beat; and the natural anthropomorphism of self-centred humans, which do not like to ‘see’ themselves as part of the whole, in an absolutely relative Universe, with the same organic properties we display, inherited from that scalar structure:

Since due to such metric ‘co-ordination’, systems can co-exist in 3 of such ‘scales’ of size, in symbiosis between its smaller parts  with faster informative cycles (ab. ∆-1) that code the ‘quantum, genetic or memetic’ information of larger physical, biological or social systems (∆º). While the larger scale, the whole commands in simultaneity the motions of smaller parts. And that symbiotic co-existence creates the ternary scalar structure of a space-time super organism, enclosed in a larger ∆+1 world; proper of all ‘vital, fractal spacetimes’ of reality (ab. time§paœrganism, Œ).

In those timespace organisms the time clocks of the smaller ∆-1 scale store the information of the system in the form and frequency of its cycles.

On the other hand, the larger whole, encloses within its membrane and synchronises with its internal ‘physiological networks or forces’, (biological, physical systems) the motions of the system in space. So we equate information with the static view of clock cycles. And motion with the dynamic view of spatial extension and consider that the structure of time and space is the origin of the entropic motions and informative bits of any system, which can be defined as a super organism of space-time:

 Sp x Tƒ = K equation is the ‘canonical equation of a dimension of space-time’ which exists according to mathematicians like Klein precisely when the product of both parameters remains ‘co-invariant’, so a system can travel though it (as for example light does between scales with its specific metric or constant c-speed of reproduction of information).

CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE WITH MODERN PHYSICS.

The procedure of ALL posts and studies of different stiences in this blog thus s simple. We add the  Disomorphisms of the ECD method (experimental facts and correspondence with classic theories, enlightened further with new insights provided by the Disomorphic space-time properties of all systems of reality).
So let us apply in a very fast review, those isomorphic properties to quantum physics and relativity the last upgradings of the science of fractal=quantum space and cyclical, multiple time-clcoks (relativity).
The first and fundamental insight of the Disomorphic method is this: Particles are one-dimensional vortices of accelerated information; waves are bidimensional flows of energy and information, potentials are 3-Dimensional volumes. And most properties of each of those 3 essential elements of physics can be derived of their dimensional nature; and its two fundamental states: the bidimensional symmetric s=t wave, which can ‘superpose’, accumulate into ‘bosonic groups’ (2D) and particles that collapse potentials and can convert into waves, as 3D potential – 1 D particle (which absorbs and so appears as a negative factor over the potential well) = 2D waves. So both have the same dimensionality:
– Potentials of 3 D space – particles of cyclical time vortices: ð = ∑∏ waves of ‘energy’ (∑) and information (∏).
So for example in relativity we have 3 ‘volume potentials’, (space metric) with a negative signature for the particle-time dimension. In waves we have the energy flat ∑-magnetic field, and the network-particle, ∏.
We are not in this introduction go too deep of the mathematics of Non-Æ geometry that will renew this XXI century the formalism of all stiences including physics, likely NOT among humans (limited in IQ and wasted by hypnotic screens) but among AI future brains, which will have enough memorial capacity to ‘store’ the whole of this web, as it is a ginormous field to straighten all the elements of modern physics and establish the proper algebra to understand it all. We just shall then consider a few aspects of the whole field, so soon in the blog because the correspondence principle is due – as humans have an astounding respect for physicists 1D simplex ideas on time and space, they revere – mostly because physicists do machines. So let us first consider what is the true meaning of LOCOMOTION, the 2D waves that reproduce information and are the core matter of the studies of modern physics both in quantum (schrodinger’s equation, particle-wave complementarity) and in relativity (c-constant light space-time).

In modern physics, the more interesting pending questions are the conundrums of quantum physics, as they are not just experimental problems as in Relativity, but deep theoretical questions, which plug in directly into the meaning of motion=time and still informative space, perception and measure; and the ego paradoxes of man, who sees a still world with its mind at the center and so naturally is inclined to feel more important, unique and the Universe a dead-still reality. So we shall resolve them here in a few lines. Look at the next pictures.

What we observe is that when a quantum ‘state’ is measured by stopping it and absorbing it with our instruments it COLLAPSES into a particle, but when it moves IT DOES SO reproducing information as a wave. So it is quite obvious: the state of motion is a wave state, the state of informative perception is a particle, which in fact has only an intrinsic property, its ‘h/2 spin or angular momentum’, which is ‘STILL’, discrete and non-differentiable, as informative spatial minds are:

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion-wave state and a still-particle state, together.

In graph group velocity is particle (ab.•) speed as it surrounds the wave (≈), whose phase velocity is V≈≥V•

The wave is surrounded by the particle which is encircling it. The creational process of reproductive dimensions thus starts at its minimal scale departing from a dot that becomes a 1D line, which a wave spreads=smears but a particle orders by closing in, surrounding and fixing the waves, which start a forth and back process that decelerates it and finally stops it into standing particle points, able to gauge information as still minds. And then again the bouncing within the particle enclosure of the wave, increases its information through ∑superpositions of fourier transforms, stopping, now rotating, now stopping to create a 3D ball; and so growth is reproduction as motion is. Waves that move and become the group vital energy for the particle to stop and perceive. And so the whole moves as a group particle, and each of the inner standing waves back and fourth as a phase particle, which is in its limit taking 3 steps back and forth for each 2 steps of the particle, 2/3 being the classic harmony between the speed of the wave back and fourth and the reproductive motion of the particle forwards stopping forwards. Then mathematically this shows in the imaginary back negative moment of the wave and the positive, reproductive doubling of the particle.

The fact is the best explanation of motion is one of reproduction of information, which requires a constant stop, reproduce your information in the next region of space-time, go… sliding and converting motion in yet another form of reproduction, which becomes then the fundamental ‘nature’ of reality – a fractal that reproduces information. And we shall return to that key insight.

In the graph, we show also 3 practical/theoretical proofs/explanations deduced of it – just a token of the ginormous number of ‘solid’ whys provided by ∆st: .

  • The complementarity wave-particle and our perception of quantum motions as a constant reproduction of the wave-form states.
  • A fact that solves  Achiles paradox, as motion has a finitesimal limit in the minimal quanta of size, of reproduction, the h-quanta of angular momentum, of both particles and waves. And so we can only measure 1/2 of the process smeared by the constant stop and go-reproduce, binary state of the particle as minimal ‘bit of informative reproduction’ and size.
  • But perhaps the most interesting consequence is the realist understanding of the uncertainty principle: we cannot measure position and momentum, because momentum is ‘motion’ and it is wave momentum, and position is still particle. So as the system is EITHER particle or wave in motion, the exact measure of the form as particle, ‘blurs’ the momentum-eve measuring, which means in other terms that the minimal unit of reproduction of the wave (kh) is the angular momentum, h/2π, which is always an unlocalised unit of reproductive motion. We could also say that the process of reproduction is always between two adjacent h-steps (h/2π)…
In the graph, we see the quantum duality, which surprisingly enough Physicists still don’t understand as it has been the center of all its disquisitions for a century. As Born put it in its Nobel discourse: “This idea of complementarity is now regarded by most physicists as the key to the clear understanding of quantum processes. Can we call something with which the concepts of position (space) and motion (time) cannot be associated in the usual way, a thing, or a particle? And if not, what is the reality which our theory has been invented to describe?”
We shall deal specifically with the ‘false weirdness’ of quantum physics, more of a problem of the ego-trips of man, which cannot accept vital, organic, sentient beings in any other species, and prefer the ‘abstract’ view that only man has living properties in the articles on the 4th line; as all resolves when we accept the metric of 5D, which makes smaller systems, faster in time, more informative, and hence, ultimately the particles that do reproduce when absorbing energy replicating more quarks and electrons, do gauge information and react to it, the ‘site’ of perception, whose ‘quantum’ of existence is indeed, an still, discrete ‘angle of perception’, an angular momentum called ‘h’.
And so all the weirdness comes to this: the particles ‘react’ to the slow bombing of experiments (which as Bell put it, IS the name we should give to ‘abstract measure’, as we ‘experiment’ with them, and they react ‘collapsing’ into tight formations to the brutal bombs we send to measure them, as schools of fish react to the shark. And so ALL the weirdness of quantum worlds, which physicists acknowledge COMES TO those 2 things is easily resolved in the organic Universe:
1. we measure unlike in inert matter on our scale NOT the state of the particle ‘before the measure’ but its STATE after we try to measure and they react. 
2. Spins are ‘still’ angles of still informative perception, the minimal units, our electronic minds use to construct reality, as its particles – the ultimate pixels of our mind – align with the ‘experiment’ they perceive as much as we perceive them.
The after reaction of particles, the stop-particle-perception vs. go-wave-motion and the static spins is all the weirdness that there is to quantum physics; and they are just in ∆st, 3 kaleidoscopic perspectives from the point of view of the @-mind of the particle, its spin; and its S≈Teps of motion, through its states in still space as informative particles and time as moving waves.
And with those insights we can also resolve the conundrums of relativity (constancy of c-speed, and its limit; why they define time as the 4th dimension of space, being the best known).
The reductionism of lineal time only motions and its limited formulae. Time as 4D.
YOU MUST REALLY even if you are a physicist or a groupie of its equations, understand clearly that v=s/t, their equation of TIME from where all other time concepts of physics spread IS ONLY lineal time motion, ONLY a type of change and TO REDUCE the 5 Dimensions of time=change=motion of reality to that single line of a cartesian graph IS plainly speaking the main reason we have NOT understood the first principles of reality; and so unless YOU accept to break that ‘Jail of the Mind’ REGARDLESS of the absolute detail physics has achieved studying locomotions in space you will never expand your understanding of reality as IT IS.
Indeed, take the case of relativity. Mr. Einstein, our absolute idol and genius, the ‘seer of time’, actually just completed the work on Galileo’s formula of lineal time v=s/t, by adding on the verge of maximal speed within the galaxy (c-speed), a ‘factor’ to correct the ‘warping’ that ‘drags’=slow downs particles trying to go as fast as waves.
So his formula for measure of lineal time motions and distances in space, instead of v=s/t is S²=Δr²-c² t² and then of course the entire business of measuring distances in space with lineal time-motions with extreme detail get extremely complex for the sake of accuracy. But for a philosopher of all sciences, searching for the ultimate meanings of time and space, which can be applied to all of them, as we humans do live in time, have time worldcycles, occupy a vital space and DESERVE to be explained, THIS was more of the same ‘reductionism’ of time as A MEASURE OF motions in Space (hence the quip that time is the fourth dimension of space – Not SO, only if you reduce all the time motions, changes of in-form-ation and dimensions of reality to the lineal graph of Maese Galileo, measuring with Kepler’s clock the reach of cannonballs as a the master of ballistics of the venetian army.
Of course we WILL explain further all of physics, in growing detail as time goes by. But this must be clear again: you can either have dogmas, idols and believe, and then you have nothing to do in this blog, or you can ‘think’, be humble, understand as Aristotle, the highest mind of mankind put it ‘that the only thing we know is that we know nothing’ and then keep reading.
Further on we try to RESPECT as much as possible the correspondence principle. SO since physicists use only lineal time motion as a dimension of time, which they call the 4th dimension and then of course, when dealing with the future of time, use worldlines NOT worldcycles to describe life and death and ENTROPY=death (the next step of simplification of lineal time, now also expanding and breaking the being) as the supposed future of all realities, which they call the ‘arrow of time’, (but are at pains to understand what it means and how to related it to the 2Dimension of lineal motion), we shall call ENTROPY, scattering disordered death the 4TH DIMENSION of time.
That’s really the best I can do trying to respect our ‘seers of time’, which would do better going back to school.
Let us then for good ‘measure’ expand a bit or rather explain the ‘limits’ of an analysis of reality with only an abstract cartesian pen and paper continuous graph of light space-time as relativity does; and then give more interesting answers to quantum weirdness, from an organic pov.

Relativity of c-speed.

The first thing we have to understand is what it is really the ‘abstract graph of pen and paper’ Newton considered the background God draw Not Descartes, behind the equations of reality,  he added on it. In the galaxy we live in, where we make ALL our measures, the vacuum space IS light space-time, a background radiation of LIGHT. So LIGHT is the ‘abstract’ graph but IT IS A LOCAL light space-time, because inside black holes there is darkness – light is not; and outside galaxies there is darkness, hardly any light crosses the halo of galaxies. So it is OBVIOUS that as you cannot in a very fast river stream run faster, the more so if you are a heavy particle; you cannot go faster than c-light in the galactic river. Moreover, as your mind IS ELECTRONIC, and we have clarify that WE STOP AS PARTICLES TO PERCEIVE information, when two electronic atoms MEASURE light, they have FIRST entangled in ‘stillness’, then sent each other a light beam but AS THEY ARE in a fractal Universe STOPPED in relationship to each other – THEY MEASURE ALWAYS C-LIGHT SPEED, they do NOT add THEIR slow macroscopic speed, as PERCEPTION HAPPENS in the quantum scale, in STILLNESS. Alas, THE CONUNDRUM OF c-speed constancy, and the limit of c-speed within galaxies IS solved. The rest of relativity consists IN calculating from the perspective of the macro-system that SEEMS to be moving, the still c-speed of the microsystem of particles, communicating with each other in stillness.

All this said, as I know the reader, if any will be a man who ‘idolises’ the high popes of physics, our ‘present seers’ of time, and will like to know what all this has to do with his ‘dogma-theory’ (4D relativity and quantum physics); all what we say just widens and explains better the weirdness and limits of 4D relativity (which is just the study of 2 specific planes of the 5D scalar Universe, the light space-time plane in special relativity and the gravitational larger russian doll in general relativity).

And so we do ‘revis(it)e’ Relativity in the more specialised 4th line articles to show how it fits as a ‘smaller theory’ of a part of the whole scalar Universe, which goes beyond its limits of space-time (c-speed as the rod of measure of ‘constant space’, T=0 temperature of time-motion) beyond the galaxy (hyperluminal speeds=actions at distance in regions where there is NOT a background light space-time) and the black hole (an accelerated time vortex that should go beyond c-speed and 0 temperature past the event horizon). Those obvious, increasingly proved experimental facts that widen the limits of relativity beyond the galaxy, are poised to be accepted as faster than z=c speed jets of matter coming out of black holes in galaxies become overwhelming (they already are, as the third picture above at 10c shows, but lacking the 5D formalism astrophysicists prefer to deny facts for lack of models and elaborate bizarre arguments to deny those faster than c-speeds).

All this said we must also stress that 5D² IS a theory that applies to all ‘stiences’ and scales, as each science merely studies a scale of size, and ALL of them are equally important. The time cycles of life or history are NOT less important than those of quantum particles.  So the reader MUST understand that the primacy of physicists IS cultural, as the makers of weapons, the tools of power, and machines, the idols of our technological civilisation.
But on pure theoretical, modelling basis, we shall NOT keep their idolised position as the ‘seers of time’, more important in its time=motion analysis that let us say, Darwin who study motion=change in the information of life, or Kondratieff, which study the cycles of evolution of machines in economics, or Spengler who studied the life and death of organic civilisations. If anything less important as we do NOT move=chance at light speed, and the 2Dimension of motion is for us far less important than the 0-1Dimension of ‘genesis’ and perceptive information.

3 errors to correct to understand the immortal Universe: entropy, big-bang and quantum uncertainty.

Let us then give a prime on the TRUE PHILOSOPHY OF REALITY  ONCE WE HAVE UPGRADED IT PROPERLY TO THE ∆•st elements of reality.

 So then we apply this insight on the reasons of dimensional analysis to ‘a bidimensional wave’ that transforms into a ‘bidimensional particle’. Because as we say both now have the same dimension; IT IS JUST A QUESTION OF READRESSING THEM IN A FUNDAMENTAL FACT TO ADAPT 4D formalisms to 5D³ physics (AS OBSERVED in the above graph of time-information and flat space).

ECD-method: S@≈∆ð view of atoms and galaxies and its Q, G forces.

The formalism of 5D-fractal Universes ads to experimental facts, (E) and the Correspondence principle with classic science (C), the Disomorphic, organic method of extracting the whys of reality from the scalar properties of the 5th dimension (∆) and the symmetries between formal space, space-time energy and time motion (S≈T), cupped by the critical analysis of the @-mental distortions of inflationary languages as mirrors of the Universe. So we have a much deeper insight on the ‘whys’ of both, experimental facts and classic science modelling.  It is then obvious that most corrections on classic science to match ‘experimental fact’ today often ignored to uphold the classic theories come from the understanding of the fractal structure of space and cyclical nature of time.

Let us consider the case of astrophysics: cyclical time defines the vortices of space-time of the 3 scales, or singularity-masses (gravitational scales), thermodynamic vortices (eddies) and charges (quantum vortices), which can be unified as attractive vortices (time view) or space curvatures of the 3 scales:

In the graph, the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

As we show in the post on force unification, then q and g becomes: curvature (Space view) vortices ime view) of two scales (∆±i view) on the two upper and lower limits of @-mind perception; solving the hierarchy problem and ultimately completely opening our experimental understanding of quantum worlds, as we can see it in reverse from within as macro-galaxies. Protons then appear as top quark positive frozen stars, aka black holes; electrons as strangelet negative halos, and in between the far less dense photons become stars.

And so we can establish 2 fundamental Disomorphisms to study the whole as a series of kaleidoscopic mirrors:

-The atom-galaxy, for quantitative, mathematical physics modelling.

The concept of course has been around for long. EFE (Einstein’s field equations) applied to galaxies (Einstein-Walker formalism) is actually modelled to simplify calculus with galaxies as hydrogen atoms; Schrodinger’s equation was used by Wheeler to find a quantum formalism for the Universe; string duality considers universes and quantum strings the same; astronomers model stars around central black holes as photons, etc. But without a deep philosophical model of the fractal Universe provided in this blog, all those mathematical isomorphisms have been merely considered ‘techniques’ of calculus. The reader thus should be aware the mathematical physics – albeit complex to the level of specialists, do exist and what we shall beyond the Unification equation in Newtonian terms, introduce here is the depth of philosophical analysis and the Disomorphic properties of atomic galaxies.

-The second isomorphism is that of the galaxy-cell (treated in cosmology) which shows the organic properties of astrophysical galaxies. This is to my knowledge completely new stuff, but rather obvious: DNA-black holes with gravitational forces, and protein, lineal strangelets, encase the vital space-time of electromagnetic and gravitational flows of energy between both, which structure the waves of the galaxy. And both control the mitochondria stars that become on the long term the energy food to reproduce more black holes and strange stars (pulsars). 20 years ago this seemed madness, but today everything comes together to the surprise of astronomers to validate the organic model of galactic growth:

The galaxy atom is the ‘solid’ last scale above and below perceived from the ∆º humind, at i=±3, the scale of perception of forces as pure motion or pure form in the limits of our ‘being’.

As such the equivalence of both scales unified by a fractal simple equation rises many philosophical questions. From a point of view of astrophysical description it introduces two different perspectives over the same phenomenon: as we can see galaxies from a much larger scale, that of the human looking at the galaxy atom, and as outsiders, observing how electromagnetic energy between atoms is equivalent to dark entropy between galaxies, or we can adopt the smallish point of view as particles of a galactic star, a mere dust of space-time on the mythocondria of the gala cell. It is precisely in the description of physical systems from wildly knew perspectives what enriches the analysis of the galaxy atom in gst physics.

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism:

We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein).

So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ-> mc²=hƒ-> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

In the graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.


Lorentzian, entropic and particle state/regions.

Now we can consider the destruction of our c-o – invariant universe, of < c speed and >O To, when it breaks balance.

Both processes diverge. In the real of c-speed dark gravitational energy expands space, and internal gravitation decelerates time into mass vortices.

In the real of temperature, the temperature-frequency diminishes towards the region of gravitational well and expands in the intermediate region of the physical system.

The previous graph adapted to the fundamental ‘states’ of physical systems, pure entropic ∆-1 field, pure particle, ∆+1 form and present, Sæ=To, balanced wave states, will be a key element to understand physical systems.

What happens when the internal function of space-time of the system reaches those limits is simple: it dies, it breaks down, it breaks its symmetries, it splits its two parts all synonymous concepts.

When a system reaches the limiting regions of its vital parameters or those of the world in which it is tuned to, the system enters a region in which its internal ‘present symmetry’ between its spatial entropy and temporal information, Sæ=To, that defines its present body-wave breaks. Then at that point its internal energy and form quickly diminishes to zero as the next scale which absorbs its formal motion (energy in physical systems) rises. We talk of an emergence of the internal form and motion of the system when it transits to lower or upper scales.

For example, the time clocks of the ∆-1 scale measured in frequency become redshifted, and as frequency disappears (elongation of the wave) its energy is dissolved into heat and then appears as temperature, in the transition between particles and molecules, and temperature cools down and becomes mass in the transition from ordinary matter to black hole of temperature zero and maximal mass.

Thus in those limiting regions, a new physical system emerges, enclosing with new ‘time clocks’ (closed motions that become the temperature or mass clock whose angular momentum encloses the vital energy of the lower scale) and the previous one dissolves. So we observe exponential death rates of a previous quantity and birth grows of a new quantity, and equations become non-lineal. Yet in the balanced region between those limits of scale, functions do follow closely the Sp x Tƒ = Constant metrics of the 5th dimension, and we obtain an enormous array of physical systems studied with its relative time clocks, v, T and m, and constants of space-action, h, k, c2, which respond to the inverse equations of space and time states (i.e. p v = knt) or social equations of superposition of quantities (field equations, wave equations) that related to scales and general relationships between Sæ<ST≥To parameters of a physical system.

 The dual and ternary logic of 5D Relativity – the constant of space-c speed.

The previous graphs adapted to the fundamental ‘states’ of physical systems, pure entropic ∆-1 field, pure particle, ∆+1 form and present, Sæ=To, balanced wave states, will be a key element to understand physical systems.

What happens when the internal function of space-time of the system reaches those limits is simple: it dies, it breaks down, it breaks its symmetries, it splits its two parts all synonymous concepts.

Yet as TxL=∆ remains constant, the perception we have is from the ∆-plane only, in which the deformation of mass and length as the system approach the limit of capacity of our light space-time membrane to process and reproduce information as movement along an L-coordinates, becomes disordered, till the internal ‘real’ sensation of diverging between the internal time and length-space parameters makes the system die and explode. If it is a particle then it becomes its antiparticle and both annihilate emerging as a Dirac’s mass term partially into energy of the ‘dark world’ (v>C, T<o).

Now proper time, proper mass and proper length (internal functions of space and time) do NOT vary. It is only the external observer measuring T, L and M who find variations. And this must be interpreted as the constancy of the internal Œ-function of existence of the being or physical system, which can only exist in an internal balance. But the ‘stretching’ in its balance with the external Universe, IS real as measured by the external observer, which means at a certain point it will affect the internal balance and the system will break down and die. In that sense the system cannot break the limits of the external world and its constants of space-time, V=S/T=C.

Infinity in that sense is the same kind of time infinity that represents the barrier of death (200 years is infinity for a human being lifespan) or in geometry the infinity of a hyperbolic Plane in the Klein model (infinity means the line can never reach as in the Zenon paradox the limit of the circle).

The equation however does NOT forbid contrary to belief, existence in the other ‘side’ of the Klein ‘disk’, represented by the < c light space-time world. There can be and there should be to the other side of the membrane barrier represented by c-speed, which is therefore considered a ‘barrier’ or ‘event horizon’ of our galactic Universe (found physically in the limits of black holes, and very likely in the Halo of the galaxy itself).

What this indicates is obvious. Special relativity merely explains the ‘emergence’ of a system of the gravitational ∆+1 scale into the next scale of the Universe, the ∆+2 cosmological scale. What this cosmological ‘dark world’ is, however is not clear within Relativity and has to be explored with the new physics opened by the existence of a Higgs field, the expansion of cosmological space which means in terms of speed, faster than light space and the existence of families of mass, beyond the ‘barrier’ of symmetry breaking, that is of death of our lighter UDS mass quark system. So Einstein’s work DO NOT apply in its Postulates to the world beyond the limits of its theory.

To fully understand this, we need to go into the fundamental principles of 5D physics, the conservation principles of reality around certain ‘frozen constants of action’, Se x To = K, in each Plane of the 5th dimension that quantify reality, and make it immortal.

Yet almost as important as the concept of a balanced present ‘age’, ‘scale’ and ‘wave-body’ organ, whereas entropy and information find its immortal creative yin-yang, visnu-shiva, male-female, organic reproductive combination, is the concept of a breaking of symmetry that disjoints the Spatial entropy and temporal information of any system, provoking both, the death of the balanced system and the birth of two extremal ‘diverging’ realities.

Thus if past-entropy x Future-information = Present, reproductive wave-body.

Its ‘split’ breaking the symmetry between past and future, entropy and information provokes the birth of two relative inverse Universes.

And this is the origin of reality when the points of balance of motion and form in the Universe (c-speed 0 Kelvin temperature) broke its symmetry.

The breaking of the symmetry of Sæ c-speed and To,Ok divided the Universe between the outer world of galaxies, the dark energy/matter world and the internal world, where we exist.

In the graph, 5D Physics distinguishes between the light world, T>K, V<C and the dark world, T<K, V>C, as two asymptotic space-times which can be considered to diverge in the moment of ‘birth’ of the Universe, from the V=C, T=O, point in a first decoupling or ‘symmetry breaking’ of a physical form of energy-plane of physical systems:

Screen Shot 2016-04-03 at 08.34.55

If we consider the region between x1 and x2 the site of minimal potential of a Universal Constant, V(x), the breaking of a symmetry makes the system diverge into a positive and negative cancelling fields of attractive and distractive, negative and positive, cyclical and lineal subtle deformations of the Universal constant. departing from those imbalances the Universe creates a virtual zero sum which is the product of the conjugates as we can treat each of the sides as the square of a Universal constant which is a conservative energy field of formal motions, such as E= C², √C² = ±C.

Thus bidimensional ‘universal constants’, c, H, K, are thus bidimensional ‘minimal bits of energy and information’ of each of the 3 ∆±1 physical space-times.

And we can consider the Universe as a divergence in the positive and negative point of a Universal constant. Do universal constants become ‘smaller’ energy wells that appear as the wave of V(±x) display along two divergences? Yes, new universal constants that become frozen geometries of Sæ and To terms in balance appear in the physical process of creation of new super organisms and physical planes.

Now proper time, proper mass and proper length (internal functions of space and time) do NOT vary. It is only the external observer measuring T, L and M who find variations. And this must be interpreted as the constancy of the internal Œ-function of existence of the being or physical system, which can only exist in an internal balance. But the ‘stretching’ in its balance with the external Universe, IS real as measured by the external observer, which means at a certain point it will affect the internal balance and the system will break down and die. In that sense the system cannot break the limits of the external world and its constants of space-time, V=S/T=C.

Infinity in that sense is the same kind of time infinity that represents the barrier of death (200 years is infinity for a human being lifespan) or in geometry the infinity of a hyperbolic Plane in the Klein model (infinity means the line can never reach as in the zenon paradox the limit of the circle).

The equation however does NOT forbid contrary to belief, existence in the other ‘side’ of the Klein ‘disk’, represented by the < c light space-time world. There can be and there should be to the other side of the membrane barrier represented by c-speed, which is therefore considered a ‘barrier’ or ‘event horizon’ of our galactic Universe (found physically in the limits of black holes, and very likely in the Halo of the galaxy itself).

What this indicates is obvious. Special relativity merely explains the ‘emergence’ of a system of the gravitational ∆+1 scale into the next scale of the Universe, the ∆+2 cosmological scale. What this cosmological ‘dark world’ is, however is not clear within Relativity and has to be explored with the new physics opened by the existence of a Higgs field, the expansion of cosmological space which means in terms of speed, faster than light space and the existence of families of mass, beyond the ‘barrier’ of symmetry breaking, that is of death of our lighter UDS mass quark system. So Einstein’s work DO NOT apply in its Postulates to the world beyond the limits of its theory.

Now it follows that the next expansion of cosmology and science will be to go beyond the light space-time as single rod of measure of Einstein’s relativity, which is what we shall achieve with 5D cosmology at several levels:

– by expanding beyond galaxies according to experimental experience (galaxies ejecting matter at 10 C, expansion of space between galaxies), the limit of speed of the Universe, as c-speed only applies as a limit in the galactic universe where c-speed space-time is the membrane in which we exist (so without an external motion in a closed system the medium is the maximal speed, as you cannot go faster than the flow of a river if YOU ARE made of water, as we are all made of virtual particles evolved from light space-time.

This no longer applies to the Universe outside the galaxy of dark energy and dark matter, and so we shall consider a Universe of black holes as top quark stars (where the obvious mass of top quarks beyond our attractive uds speed turning quarks must be caused by an accelerated vortex of mass above 10 c, and in its lineal fashion by a super gravitational 10 c ejected flows of space-time from cosmic black holes)

– by considering an alternative interpretation to the constancy of c-speed, as information is both produced and perceived in stillness. Thus we can both consider a c-speed rod of measure, or consider that electrons stop to emit and absorb light space-time hence never adding motion to its stop-emit light-go-stop absorb light production of ¥-rays: between observer and observable there is always a still distance, regardless of where the electron emits light and what human or mechanical electronic device in quantum stop mode as particle absorbs it.

Thus the stop and go fundamental beat of the S-T-ST universe allows to revise Special relativity, as the existence of 10 c dark energy matter allows to upgrade general relativity. The mathematics of this revisions should go on 4th line time permitted.

But beyond those extensions of relativity which then becomes the limiting theory for galaxies, and the special case in which we adopt for measure the position of an external observer who sees the electrons communicating light, NOT the point of view of the internal observer (the electrons that perceive or emit the light in stillness), the true extinction of absolute relativity are the metrics of 5D which makes those scales a relative infinity had yet unifies charges and masses as vortices of the two extreme limits of human perception, allowing the use of electromagnetic quantum equations to study the outer region of galaxies (where dark energy becomes transversal gravitational waves at 10 c, freed of the inner mass dragging within galaxies, and the inner region of atoms becomes the inner region of galaxies, establishing correspondences between strong forces and gravitational forces, and electromagnetic forces and dark energy forces with enormously fruitful mathematical physics for the completion of our models on the local Universe and inversely the understanding of chromo dynamics.

To fully understand this, we need to go into the fundamental principles of 5D physics, the conservation principles of reality around certain ‘frozen constants of action’, Se x To = K, in each Plane of the 5th dimension that quantify reality, and make it immortal.

The immortality of the Universe.

In physics, the content of motion and form of each scale of the 5th dimension is calculated with the concept of Energy and its 2 ‘parts’ conserved, angular momentum, and lineal momentum (in the human mechanic scale).

Thus the physical Universe has this constancy, which is the constancy of energy, of formal motions, which grow in size and slowdown upwards, or diminish in size and accelerated backwards. And there are many ways to define it. In Physics the closest ones would be lineal momentum or entropy or expansive motion in planes, and cyclical motion (as it appears as form, when perceived in a singe fast cycle, as a wheel turning very fast), or angular momentum; but we can also use the terms space and time, and in a loose terminology people use the whole energy as synonymous of motion, and information as synonymous of form. This ambivalence of meanings is born of the constant transformation of one into the other of yin into yang, of time into space, of motion into form, of lineal into cyclical momentum, so people get confused.

Hence the importance to have in mind the ultimate, purest yin an yang, form and motion, which are words clearly defined and without attachment to particular equations and definition as they have been rather forgotten as precise philosophical concepts, despite being at the origin of Greek philosophy. So we could then rewrite the fundamental principle of physics, the principle of conservation of energy in a more complex manner, with a formula, previous mentioned:

‘Energy never dies, it transforms itself from entropic motion into cyclical in-form-ations, back and forth ad eternal:   Ce= ∆±n= Sæ < ≈ > To”

Whereas Ce is constant energy, which we can define for each relative ∆-plane of reality with a constant of ‘action’, H, K, C2, or see dynamically as a constant transformation of entropic motions into cyclical forms, lineal and angular momentums. Or we can integrate into beings composed of both.

It follows from those laws the immortality of the Universe, and its dualist formal motions, which are a zero-sum when we put together its antisymmetries of space-time, which conserve together its potential vs. kinetic energy, angular vs. lineal momentum, time vs. space anti-symmetries, across 3 ∆±1 planes of the 5th dimension.

This is the ‘essence’ of it we must grasp. The immortality of the whole is based in the inverse symmetry of its 2 elements: form vs. motion, left vs. right, expansion vs. implosion; lineal, decelerating, expansive stillness vs. accelerating implosive cyclical motion; faster than c speed vs. slower than c speed, positive charge vs. negative charge, particle vs. antiparticle… Positive vs. negative wave sides. opposite genders, a ‘male’ or ‘female’ element, which are complementary and fusion in a reproductive present or divide in two opposite fractions.

Thus 5D Physics explains in a much more natural manner what many physicists came to call the group theory disease; that is, the use of the abstract jargons of modern mathematics, without understanding what they truly mean, and what is ‘truth’ and what is mere mathematics, provoking the present inflation of ‘Group transformations and Symmetries’. Reality is rather simple, and the proper jargon slightly different. There is not a breaking of symmetry as physicists express it but rather the creation of a symmetry of opposite elements, departing from a universal constant, of Present State, Se=To, an immortal point of balance in any plane of reality, which diverges both sides, to one side of MORE INFORMATION, Max. To and a side of larger spatial energy, as that is the ONLY ternary elements of 5D space-time that might ‘’diverge or converge’ in any scale.

In brief, the 3 ‘standing points’ of the e ages of a Worldcycle in time or ternary symmetry in space or ∆±1 scales of the 5th dimension might diverse from present to relative past and future, lineal and cyclical, higher or lower scales and that gives birth to diversity. So we shall first consider in the domain around our local scale, space and time parameters-constants, how those divergences might happen.

So zero systems expand into the negative (past-Se in our conventional choice) and positive (future, To in our choice) relative sides of a CONSTANT OF SYMMETRY, Se=To, which is EXPRESSED by giving birth to two cancelling opposites. Coincidentia Oppositorum, said Nicola da Cusa, the infinitely large and slow, the infinitely small and fast, the 0 and the ∞ which are relative and multiplied give us a constant ‘o’ for adding operations or 1 for multiplicative inversions, or a Universal constant for logarithmic scales of the 5th dimension (log vs. e, ln vs. 10, log2 vs. 2 vs. √2 being the most important of those inversions).

Let us recall from this or other posts, what those 3 Se, To, and Se=To, standing points and constants are in our world:

Se=To: constants of present action on 3 scales.

– C: the space-time fundamental constant of the galaxy, or present wave of energy and information, in the ∆+1 scale, k or Boltzmann constant in the thermodynamic scale and H or Planck constant in the quantum scale.

Max. Se & Max. To: Young-energetic and old Informative, antisymmetries on 3 scales.

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call lineal and cyclical momentum, and its integral sum, kinetic and potential energy, in the ∆+1 scale of cosmic bodies.

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call, negative and positive ‘charge’ in the quantum scale.

– And finally lineal vs. cyclical order in the thermodynamic scale which we consider to have a constant called 0-Kelvin temperature.

It is that reality which must tilt one or the other side of the constant to create the worlds and antiworlds, light and dark worlds of our Universes and Anti-Universes.

In other worlds the Universe which conserves, Se, To, Se=To, and ∆±1 elements, the 3 scales and its cyclical and lineal momentums must in its origin be made of both, in its Se=To original symmetries and this is the first being or constant of action, a particle, with lineal momentum, a wave, with c-speed a plane of space with angular momentum or spin.

We can in that sense define several possible births of Universes, but to be strict, we just will consider the quasar Universe of our light space-time galaxy, which is the only one we have enough information to fully understand.

In such Universe we do know there is a space-time, which is light space-time. So we can consider it split above or below a certain dividing constant Se x To, speed, ‘c’.

We know that the island galaxy, in which we are as masses and particles, have a c-speed barrier, we cannot cross. And we know

outside our Galaxy there is a whole world of dark space and dark energy, we do NOT see. So it is not made of c-speed light. So the origin of our reality ‘before we were born must be a split that left on our side the < c speed and outside of our galaxy there must be a >c speed. This is the world of dark energy, which seems to expand BECAUSE seeing as distance, faster than c-speed appears as expansive, entropic space.

This is not forbidden in Einstein’s equations, merely means a negative sign in the mass and energy of the system, which can only be crossed, when a ‘being’ suffers the antisymmetry of moving from the side of more to-order into the side of more se-entropy, in the action of death.

Now, for a system to be > C speed it must have a space which is scalar, and with 0 spin, outside. So what particle outside can be > c and 0 scalar angular momentum? As always we do NOT speculate (and that is why we have reduced our analysis to our galaxy). There is actually a boson, the Higgs boson that has 0 spin and negative mass in certain ranges of excited existence. So here we have the dark energy boson, the Higgs, outside the Universe, accelerating beyond c-speed, which therefore is the ‘event horizon’ or halo of the galaxy, which cannot be crossed in the larger scale of the anti-atom galaxy.

So the fundamental symmetry of the cosmological ∆+1 scale is >c (Higgs boson), ≈ c (Photon) < c (Mass) is resolved.

Next there is the question moves to the ∆-thermodynamic scale.

Again, we must consider here the constant of order, which we found to be 0 K Temperature. So there should be a world to one side of 0 temperature and a world to the other side of 0 temperature.

And since we find that our world CANNOT go under 0 temperature, we are in the side of > 0 Temperature and < C speed. This is evident. And so we must conclude that the dark world outside the galaxy must be below the 0 temperature barrier, which cannot be crossed either. Do we find then anything that is in the dark world below 0 temperature.

Indeed, black holes of large size have a perfect order and are 0 temperature. Their world starts in a accelerated vortex of gravitation, from where ‘light cannot speak’ because light actually turns at c-speed in its event horizon, but because vortices are accelerated (Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravity), beyond its 0-barrier black holes MUST move faster than light with less than zero temperature.

And so those are the fundamental barriers between the galactic world in space (< c-speed) and time (>0 k ) and the dark world of dark matter (black hole matter) and dark energy (expansive, > c speed).

 

 

Absolute relativity: a Universe of  Physical ratios of scale: information density, entropy speed and existential momentum.  

Now a key ‘theorem’ of reality which has escaped so often humans – though physicists are generally aware of it – is that ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY implies all quantities THAT MATTER are ratios that express different relationships between Sp, Tƒ and ST, which can ‘travel’ between scales, helping us to unify concepts of each scale (often expression of the particular spe x tif= ∆constant metric for each ∆i).

So for example, density matter more than mass, and when making mathematical physics we find density has a much wider range of applications. So we can use three similar equations of density in three scales (the variations of quantum physics being due to the uncertainty and wrong interpretation of them, which MUST be that of pilot-wave theory – Broglie-Bohm, so we shall for sake of simplicity not introduce them at this stage of GST):

We observe also on those equations, which basically red ∂density/∂t=-∂flux/∂s³, some basic ‘translations’ of the laws of GST into mathematical physics; where the three main ratios≈time arrows are:

  • Spe: Past entropy speed, s/t; Tiƒ: information density, its inverse and ST:  PRESENT, ‘momentum-flux-existential force’.

It is then obvious that some general rules of creation of events in mathematical physics will be:

Spe<>Tiƒ: Since ‘entropy’ and ‘information’ are inverse parameters and in the multiple different ways we express them, we shall find ‘inverted’, x/, ∫∂, equations that put both in relationship.

Tiƒ±Spe><ST. Thus a system ‘develops’ a certain present momentum, by adding to an entropy or  information parameter the other inverse parameter in a complementary fashion, creating a dynamic equality.

And this is the case of the previous equations, where the mass or temperature of a stationary system (Tiƒ parameter of ∆+1 or ∆o scales) ads speed and the result is an ST-present-momentum parameter – the product of the velocity of motion of the medium with its density, which is called its flux. The flux vector of the mass is q = ρυ.

So we can interpret those equations as dynamic creations of a present event or flux, departing from a Tiƒ parameter (temperature in ∆0, which becomes heat flux, mass in ∆+1, which becomes density flux)

THUS as a consequence of the ternary principles of the generator equation of ∆-scales, the principle of absolute relativity ads relativity of scale and hence defines only relative magnitudes which are constant ratios that travel through scales: So for example speed of spatial translation is better than absolute space-distance (S/t) and can ‘travel’ as a parameter between scales. And ‘density of information’ is better than absolute information, provided by a cyclical vortex, than absolute mass, and can travel through scales, so we can talk in the ∆º thermodynamic scale of heat flux, of ∆+1 mass flux and ∆-1 charge intensity, all parameters of density of information and its flux-motion in each scale, once we understand mass, charge and temperature as clocks of time moving towards the future of more information, as all attractive in-forma-tive vortices do.

RATIOS not absolute values are thus the only constants of mathematical physics that matter.

Ratios limit reality to the ‘region around the ∆º being’, making virtual, uncertain, dark the scales beyond.

The ratio concept is over pervading in all systems, which can be considered to act from the pov of an ∆º±1,  mind observing mostly a self-centred, ∆º scale of space-time size, and its adjacent macrocosms, or ‘world’, ∆+1 and microcosms or ‘hyperbolic fractal cells’ of its inner world.

Nothing else matters, and so at a certain ‘distance’ of its ∆º scale, on the lower part

What this mean is that we consider ratios such as c-speed of light, S/Ti, or rather speed of transmission of information, and density, M(t)/V(s), or density of gravitational information per volume of space as ‘real mathematical parameters, which therefore will be all manifestations of the standing points in time/space of a world cycle or super organism:

S≈t, t/s and s/t will then become the steady state variable, speed-entropy variable, and density-information variable ratios of more value for the study of physics, of which classic physics uses the concepts of speed-length (s/t) and mass-density (t/s) and frequency as its classic concepts.

Thus we can say that in GST mathematical physics is the description with entropy-speed ratios, information-density ratios and momentum ratios.

Now it might be observed as t=1/ƒ, the existence of inverse functions with meaning in the universe, S=t and S=1/ƒ, ƒ x S = K gives us an immediate number of variations on the ratios that become parameters studied by mathematical physics, and further on those ratios or constants are multiplied by the fact that mathematical physics exist in several scales. Finally we need to observe and analyse what of those quantities and ratios are for each sale of the mathematical Universe the proper one, and then we can use all this added knowledge to expand mathematical physics in conceptual levels, even if we do not ad on the ∆st organic perspectives to the subject.

WE MUST understand that the scalar Universe implies an absolute relativity principle: we are not concerned with single parameters but with ratios between the ∆ST elements of the Universe. Thus instead of length, mass and time, (and its opposite frequency, 1/t), we are more concerned with s/t ratios of speed, t/s ratios of density and the measure of time with frequency ages and space with quanta. Then we can easily translate mathematical physics and enlighten many questions of it, as we shall do in the parts dedicated to astrophysical sciences.

It means also that man is completely relative, and irrelevant for the infinite number of fractal scales of reality and only his ego-centered paradox and lack of scientific objectivity make us think we are that important. In the next graph we realise of this fundamental fact of objective reality, which ‘children of thought’ lack… and by definition physicists limited to a single space-time continuum and single time arrow of entropic destructive motions (the ‘age’ of nature corresponding to childish species, in its infancy of evolution) ‘ARE’ children of thought.

And so with this simple introduction to absolute relativity at conceptual, philosophical level, we can now tackle the reality of the Universe, as it is, NOT as lineal, entropic, ‘infantile’ physicists would like it to be, to keep man and themselves as the high popes of reality who ‘know it all’ and can even ‘mimic’ the supposed birth of the Universe.

 The parameters of each scale quanta.

Speed, the present concept of the wave scale become the entropic moving element for the mass vortex, to accelerate inwards, and then explode in a slowing expansion called a big-bang:

It is in all those ‘interrelationships’ between the entropy – cc-wave- and Mass-charge vortex states between scales, with the different ratios that translate the scales with the three constants, h, k, c how we deal on one side with the frequencies, on the other the entropies and on the others the st-elements of the Γi entities of physical space-time.

IN THIS MANNER WHEN WE GROW AND DIMINISH IN PHYSICAL SCALES, WE CHANGE THE ELEMENT ROLE IN THE HIGHER SCALE.

It is though in all moments needed to do the proper translation of classic terms to GST, specially as humans tend to confuse entropy and energy (the motion given by a system, with its ‘integrated body-wave which in an orderly manner uses that entropic motion to guide the system in a closed path).

To that aim we need to understand the galilean paradox better where distance-curvature and speed-space become similar concepts. But as at larger scales all become part of a circle and at lower scales part of a line, we can in that sense establish ratios of curvature=acceleration, speed=distance as parameters to understand how the transformations between 5D scales amount to less than a mere correction of those parameters of time and space as we slow down and grow in size quanta as we emerge into new scales of existence.

So in this process the lower scales transfer entropy-momentum-form to the upper scales weakening themselves, but as the upper scale have less density of existential force, exi, with slower clocks and networks made with less fractal points/ clocks we thin out reality. And yet if the Universe is relatively infinite in a simultaneous measure of space at ANY scale, then we can consider that the thinner we go up in scale, the larger it will occupy a vital total space with its membrane, and the faster it must manage an ∆-i inverse scale to ‘encircle’ all the other denser beings with less ‘latitude’ in the fifth dimension.

So as the mind-system expands the whole super organism by ∆±i carving down and up smaller pixies of information, bites of energy, steps of entropy, into infinite speeds, of S/T->0, THE RESULT WILL BE A system larger upper and downer, more coordinated, with constant flows of ‘entropic expansive waves’ and ‘implosive’ ones, going across the three scales of the fifth dimensional entity which will become ever more complex, symbiotic and synchronised in its three network systems at the three topological level of its scales.

WE CAN IN THAT SENSE, consider the two scales of time-processes, topological, darwinian evolution as the constant improvement of the forms of the topological ternary organism, while scalar social evolution related to information, genes, memes and quantum equation is the longer more important arrow of evolution and time, of deeper, longer 5D duration – as a block of time, a world cycle of a potential supœrganism of the game of exist¡ences.

We have now the 2 elements to explore further the main equations of mathematical physics, the three arrows of time, and the Metric of the fifth dimension, which we can resume in a specific case of the Generator equation:

Past-entropy x Future- Information = Present-energy.

AN INTERESTING analysis is that of the different parameters, angular momentum, entropy and square speed of the population constants, H, k, c²≈µ/k, of the three scales, and the comparison of its frequency, ƒ, temperature, T and mass ƒ(h/c), as well as the relationships between those quantities.

The best formalism, though for thermodynamics in terms of relativity is recent; including necessary features as negative temperature, and understanding that temperature being concerned with molecular phonons, have a limit in the temperatures that disorder atoms into plasma (around 10.000), becoming the relativistic limit. Then the second law of entropy becomes equivalent to the c-speed limit and a ‘local law’, which only applies to thermodynamic/atomic domains:

In those terms it is then possible to relate the relativistic limits of non-euclidean speed-distance with the discontinuities between planes of the fifth dimension.

In any case we are observing the fundamental quality of GST, to validate the homologic expressions of the fundamental generator and sub-equations of the generator, as we can use the ‘different’ perspectives man has on each scale, of those sub-equations of the generator for all the other homological scales. So we can define the second law of thermodynamics, restricted locally to the limits of temperature of the event stuied to the next scale’s homology equation of relativity, setting c and T as the limits of the frequency that the energy constant, h, k or m, of each of the three physical ∆º±1 scales tolerate.

The speed of reproduction of a system becomes then the first ratio-parameter, v=s/t, of importance in the understanding of the game of the three ‘elements of space-time’, entropy, information and energy, which if we write it in cyclical time: V = λ ($) x ƒ (ð ).

It is then when the first ‘splits’ of a symmetry allow to understand the magnitudes of physics in its relationship with the three elements of the fractal generator, Γ (s, st, t).

A SPEED, then can be subdivided in two elements, from where inversely it can be considered a present speed, component of energy is born from an entropic parameter of pure distance, lambda, the wave length and pure time, frequency. Yet as we make up new form from old ones speed will itself become the entropic factor and mass, the cyclical informative frequency vortex of a new more comprehensive scale:

1/2 mv².

Mathematical physics deserves as it is the only language used by classical physics, which wrongly reduced itself by ‘decree’ to the single language of mathematics, a post in itself. So we shall not inside into it – but basically being ‘∆nalysis’, the language of the fifth dimension, in mathematical monads, the degree or order of analysis is closely related to the lower (derivative) or upper (primitive, integral) scale of wholeness or parts, we study and in dynamic equations will therefore correspond to symmetric analysis of a system from both perspectives.

In that sense mathematical equations are logic equations of minds that compare parts of the Universe through a logic connective of its mirror-language-brain.

So far we know that h is the quanta of space measured in ‘actions’ , ƒ, the quanta of time, and Energy, its product.

So the first question we must ask is how an ∆o human observer trying to ‘guess’ the forms of an ∆-3 world observes that world.

The most evident changes are those in the parameters of space that mutate between:

h(action; ∆-1 space)->k (entropy; ∆ space) ->m ∆+1 space (mass) or c (speed) (∆+2 space?)

while at the same time the clocks of time change from:

ƒ∆-1 quanta clock -> Temperature ∆-thermodynamic time-> v-speed time (∆+1)-> mass (∆+2 gravitational clock)

Now, because the speed at which ∆-3 quantum phenomena is much larger than ours, one of the key errors of quantum physics is not to realise they are studying dynamic long stretches of time, including full world cycles of extinction and existence of particles, from where they get ”spatial images’, which they try to interpret with human clock speeds, unaware of the temporal, long period nature of the observance.

This is the origin of some serious errors of interpretation.

Indeed all the argument between Schrodinger-like descriptions of a density, or Heisenberg on probability is merely which ‘position’ we adopt that which have measure time and that which we have measure space.

It is however more of an interpretation. Resonance however in a ternary system is only at a time in one of the 3 domains of existence. Do they act on the same moment, in time across scales and regions of the organism, i don’t believe so.

The action of planck; the entropy of a gas; the attractive mass,

AS THIS CANNOT be deduced from classic quantum physics we simply apply the rules of 5D ternary systems. In general space-like are wave-like, present-like, dynamic but seemingly eternal, not changing, sometimes this not changing confused with spatial organic, ‘population’ nature; but when the mutation is larger, the change more obvious or faster, they appear as time-like objects from the ‘slow camera view of the ∆o human observer’.

Renormalization of scales.Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 19.48.42

Now, there are many ways to prove the fractal structure of space, in scales of ‘different size’ – the meaning of the 5th dimension. Physicists merely ignore the conceptual issue and as always practical people in search of mathematical equations, merely use mathematical methods to unify their parameters.

This is easy to do because actually mathematics РTHE FORMAL SCIENCE THAT EXPLAINS THE 5D fractal space-time Universe DO have accordingly 3 sub disciplines mimetic to those 3 elements, 5D analysis, non-Euclidean geometry and Temporal algebra, which T.Πimproves to fully obtain a mirror image of the Universe with the fundamental mathematical equations.

So basically by using analysis and through the concepts of quanta, that is of ‘finitesimals’ Physics acknowledges the 5th dimension (finitesimals instead of infinitesimals as there is always, as Leibniz did understand in his formulation of calculus a ‘quanta’ or minimal fractal point of any scale of the 5th dimension) We shall here consider of the 2 ‘great’ fields of mathematical physics dedicated to it – analysis

In essence 5D space-time cycles means basically that reality is a fractal. This means all is self-similar, ‘affine’, fractal, isomorphic, self-similar words. And so somehow all can be described with similar properties under ‘transformations’. For example:

An image of a fern-like fractal that exhibits affine self-similarity. Each of the leaves of the fern is related to each other leaf by an affine transformation. For instance, the red leaf can be transformed into both the small dark blue leaf and the large light blue leaf by a combination of reflection, rotation, scaling, and translation.

Those 4 operations are the essence of physical studies of material fractal systems. The methodology of physics consists in studying systems that are ‘invariant’ under rotation or time motion, scaling or 5D motion, and translation or space motion and reflection or Space-time motion.

However NOT al systems are invariant under those processes, in 5D physics there are ‘antisymmetries’ of time (from birth to extinction, which are inverse actions) and hence asymmetries in space (as the 3 elements, Sæ, ExI (ST) and To are different topologies). And in 5D there are ‘reversal roles on motions upwards and downward, so similarities happen, when we jump two scales.

All this said, it is essential to recognize the existence of 5D and get rid of ‘hang-ups’ from tribal idols of the Germanic idealist school of science (Hilbert, Bohr, Heisenberg, Clausius, and Einstein in mathematics, and small, medium and large physical systems) with its 4 ideological errors: mathematics is consistent with itself not real (disproved by Gödel), quantum physic is only what we observe and only one state at a time (Copenhagen interpretation of ∆-1), the only arrow of time is entropy-motion-death, ∆) and the rod of human electronic measure, space-time light (c-speed) must remain constant and all other ‘clocks and lengths’ of space-time must be adapted to it. And finally all ‘together now’, the Universe is a space-time Continuum, as the founding father Descartes used a single space-time and Newton made it sacred.

Of course physicists and scientists do work with the more complex reality but the underlying philosophy of science is stuck on this postulates, making all very Ptolemaic, and confuse. One of the tasks of TŒ is stopping the confusion with a simple methodology and a series of basic postulates about the nature of the organic, fractal Universe. So people can drop all those ‘postulates that so often hang up’ on their work and break it down to nonsense.

Consider for example the electron, which is OBVIOUSLY a fractal nebulae when in ExI(st)ential wave state. This is taboo. Because when we measure it, the electron collapses into particle, as always waves and herds do organically when confronting a mass (schools, armies in battle formation etc.). And because we do have the continuum mantra. Now this brought about many problems ALSO in the entire field besides the quantum arguments wave or particle, Buridan ass kind of loss of time. Legend: The Buridan ass died of hunger, because it could not decide which to eat of to equal bales of straw, left and right. Answer both. Do the experiment, the ass will eat first one and then the other, or eat a bit of each till ending both. Wave & particle, body & head. The organic paradigm is immediate. Do you have a body or a head, are you a body or a head. BOTH!

So physicists ran into infinities because they could not accept fractals. For 80 years, they found an infinity in an equation and just got rid of them!

The early formulators of QED and other quantum field theories were, as a rule, dissatisfied with this state of affairs. It seemed illegitimate to do something tantamount to subtracting infinities from infinities to get finite answers.

Freeman Dyson argued that these infinities are of a basic nature and cannot be eliminated.

Dirac’s criticism was the persistent:

‘Most physicists are very satisfied with the situation. They say: ‘Quantum electrodynamics is a good theory and we do not have to worry about it any more.’ I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation, because this so-called ‘good theory’ does involve neglecting infinities, which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This is just not sensible mathematics.

Feynman wrote: Having to resort to such hocus-pocus has prevented us from proving that the theory of quantum electrodynamics is mathematically self-consistent. I suspect that renormalization is not mathematically legitimate.

Today they found a ‘fractal philosophy’ to accept getting rid of infinities, which ARE scalar ‘finitesimal’ numbers of an ∆-n scale. Today, the point of view has shifted: on the basis of the breakthrough renormalization group insights of Kenneth Wilson, the focus is on variation of physical quantities across contiguous scales, while distant scales are related to each other through “effective” descriptions. All scales are linked in a broadly systematic way, and the actual physics pertinent to each is extracted with the suitable specific computational techniques appropriate for each.

Specifically Wilson studied; the Kondo effect describes the scattering of conduction electrons in a metal due to magnetic impurities.

The effect was first described by Jun Kondo, who applied third-order perturbation theory to the problem. He wrote the temperature dependence of the resistivity including the Kondo effect as:

Which shows the general nature of such problems – to include the canonical logarithmic or potency parameters that represent a ‘different scale of the 5th dimension’ (dimensions being always potencies or inverse logarithms) to adjust a quantity ‘influenced’ by another scale of size or time speed of the universe.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.15.02

Now in the Kondo effect we see that we have 3 perturbations, T2, but then an inverse, and then a larger T5, why perturbations are inverted in certain scales, how effects transfer between planes, how they vary, etc. This is the true stuff that time permitted I will keep pouring in the 3rd and 4th lines of details, or when I finish my worldcycle, the future geniuses of this discipline, will be busy-busy, once this point- my mind, which shrunk the Universe into ® expands into a wave of human thought and becomes their world (-;

Now seriously, as earlier as 1953, a function called the beta function was used to renormalize those scales.

BUT you are not told, 63 years latter that the Universe’s space is a fractal. And you don’t study sciences with the 5th dimension of fractal systems.  This is what I call tribal idols. There is only a space-time absolute Newtonian continuum. Point. 

What physics is really about.

Now, before we put some meat on this 3 regions and study them all through scales, and its three states, including the unified 3 fundamental clocks of time, ∆ºtiƒ eddies, ∆+1 masses and ∆-1 charges, of the lower and upper scales of the human Universe, we can have a big statement about what really astro-physical sciences is all about:

-Organic, œ, ternary elements, with a central point of view, ‘connected’ to a larger and lower plane of the 5th dimension, as your brain mind is:  Connected to:

-The social whole and internally to your territorial cells,  with whom it exchanges energy and information in an asymmetric way (you give it all to your whole and extract it all from your cellular parts, so do physical systems).

-And through its external protective membrane, to similar beings with whom the fractal point, exchanges energy and information in a balanced manner.

This game of T.Œ that we use to explain human societies, cellular societies or atomic societies is organic as it co-exists in 3 scales, it is mathematical, as it is a social game and numbers ARE social groups, it is geometric as numbers ARE Pythagorean, that is geometric groups of points with topological forms and functions, NOT axiomatic cuts of a line (Hilbert’s flight of imagination, ‘i imagine points, lines, planes’). It is vital, as points do exchange energy and information to survive. it is both democratic with similar points on the same plane, and hierarchical among social classes between micro-points and macro-points. It requires 3 parts always in space.

So we do NOT have magnetic monopoles but charge monopoles, since magnetism is THE MEMBRANE that surrounds the charge, when in motion (hence in need of an enclosure membrane of protection as any points that abandons its territory), and both the magnetic membrane and the charge point do have a vital space between both, to exchange energy and information, through radiation. It is truly of an enormous beauty and repetitive complexity starting with those simple elements. So while all particle physics resumes in the equation, Fermion-particle<boson>fermion-particle, itself just a Tƒ<ST>Tƒ case, the details are startling, encompassing the entire events of the Universe.

And so we can only do some surveys on some themes of all those exchanges of energy and information that communicate, feed, reproduce and evolve socially the particle-points and waves-forces of all those scales, with the cyclical time clocks of the lower scale, charges, of the upper scale masses, and the intermediate scale, vibrating, hot molecules. If we survive, the entire scholar world will do that job in the future. As I tried 30 years ago when studying a master at Columbia U. but couldn’t recruit any informative institution of the industrial world, this long overdue task will be carried by others. But for that reason i insist in the principles more than the details that can be deduced from them.

Now among those principles, the fundamental one is to depart from a rightful understanding of the 3 parts in space and 3 motions in time and 3 scales in which all physical phenomena take place. And put within that frame the elements and equations we study. We will develop with certain rigor on the 4th post of these series, Non-AE mathematics, those principles, which apply to all sciences. And illuminate that post with a wealth of physical examples, hopefully before summertime, 2016.  As all stems from ¬Æ.

For example, the simplest ‘mathematical species’ is a bidimensional cycle, with the 3 elements, the membrane, the vital space and the central Œ-Point. This seemingly simple ‘structure’ however has infinite parallels in more complex systems (and that is the beauty of the Universe, we can see it in great detail or in larger mathematical strokes). Consider now that cyclical being. Its maths is simple:

– r is its radius, π its ratio of perimeter-radius, π r² is its area, and 2 π r is  its perimeter. But if we survey the most important conserved quantities of classic physics we find that:

– v is the speed-distance of the system, m its mass, 1/2 mv² is its energy and mv its lineal momentum.

So if we consider v the radius-speed, the mass π, the area≈the energy and the perimeter the momentum, we have the same equations to represent the main elements of the simplest full ternary entity, the bidimensional time-space cycle and the quantities conserved in mechanical systems, because ultimately the structure of the simplest ¬ Æ systems. And this similitude between the simplest and the most complex system known (the ∆+1 gravitational scale) is very telling on what is the true meaning of those concepts, momentum, energy, mass.

  • Energy is the whole, the area of the disk, the vital space contained by the membrane; the sum of all the formal motions.
  • The membrane is the momentum, with one dimension less than the energy, which contains it.
  • The ratio between the perimeter and the radius or curvature of the system is the measure of its mass density, of the speed and frequency of its actions of space-time.
  • And the radius-speed is the moving Tƒ, the structural modular point of view, origin of the order of the disk, the ‘scalar’ number that defines it all.

Those four elements that define a simple cycle of space-time, the closing membrane, the central radius, its ratio or relative ‘density of time/space’ of the system that defines its relative metric in the fifth dimension and the vital space-energy contained by the system will become increasingly complex as the Universe evolves, but will still be the essential components of any entity of vital space-time.

And so really what is all about is to put in relationship with the foundations of T.Πand the ® logico-mathematical structure of all systems, the physical systems of nature.

In physics, this task is more challenging than the obvious translation of biology to non-AE and even sociology (once we forget the hang up that we humans are special NO EVEN in our ego-trips, as the mind equation makes all knowledge mental, linguistic, relative self-centered analysis).

The reason is that physics has completely misunderstood the meaning of its key the concepts but has its equations right. So this mismatch between meaningful equations and illiterate concepts must be bridged. And it is a puzzle, like if an illiterate Chinese peasants had to guess a series of meaningful sentences of the verbal, real Chinese language, through its ideographs, which are totally different in meaning and structure (the wrong concepts of time, space, dimension, mass, etc. of physicists with their proper modern working mathematical equations).

Moreover, physicists are surprisingly proud of being illiterate, considering those ideographs a totally irrelevant part of their ‘language’.

Or putting another metaphor. What physicists do is what ants do in the forest. They cut, manipulate, classify and eat up every thing there. They are NOT interested in the full view of the forest. If you come to them and tell them, look all this is a forest, have a larger albatross-view of the unity of it all. What is the use, they will tell you? We ARE eating the forest, classifying each little piece and bringing it to our ant-hill. We are practical people, and that is kind of obvious. We are in a forest. So what?

Only people like Mr. Einstein was interested in those larger principles, on the forest – thoughts of god. Further on, as they do not see the forest, care nothing for the atoms, eat them up, when you go to the Argentinean pampa you find entire regions with no forest at all. It is all eaten up and instead you find a desert filled with huge ant-hills. Man is transforming killing his Gaia forest and caring not to understand it.

The Mystery of Slow Clocks.

What is the mathematical relationship between mass, time, and information? Einstein hinted that cyclical clocks of time, cyclical forms, and cyclical masses were related when he said that “time curves space into mass.” And he showed that relationship in his equations. Now, once the curved form of masses, self-similar to the curved forms clocks of temporal information is understood, we can fully grasp the meaning of that sentence if we use the concept of time that physicists use as “what a clock measures.” Masses are the cyclical clocks of information of the Universe, which trans/form the energy lines of gravitational forces into a regular frequency of information given by the speed of rotation of those physical clocks.

Look at the back of a clock. It is a cyclical spiral that unwinds its energy so the clock can create cycles of information. The clock is a “fractal generator” of cycles of information (the hours of the clock) molded from a source of energy (the spiral), following a dual feed-back cycle of transformation of energy into information (the clock turning) and information into energy (the spiral unwinding). This duality of all eternal processes of trans/formation of lineal motions (energies) into cyclical motions (information) and vice versa is the essential dual cycle of the Universe, its “generator equation” (E < =>Tƒ or Se×Tiƒ=K), depending on our dynamic or static perception of it (Galilean paradox). And it applies to all systems.

The space between galaxies expands because the space within galaxies contracts into mass. The big bang of a supernova explodes radiation because quarks become a stronger superfluid vortex inside in a big crunch. Yet if we were physicists, ascribed to the entropy-only religion and naïve realism, we would only see half of the process, either the big bang radiation and expansion of interstellar space (big bang theorists) or the visible mask of the informative clock: the needles turning.

So a mass or a charge is a physical clock of time that winds energy into form but simultaneously unwinds form into energy, expelling it perpendicularly through its poles, as a tornado—which also has a dimension of height, not only a cyclical inward movement—does with water or air. And so we are all made of spatial energy that extends and creates space and movement and cyclical clocks of time, whirls of masses and charges that carry information. And the growth of complexity of those two motions finally create the biological cycles of information and energy that make us humans.

The complex evolution of those two motions, chained in infinite puzzles, evolving in networks, grouping in bigger structures, is what we call the organic Universe made of networks of spatial energy and information.

Now, let us prove the concept of mass as physical information with the three tenets of the scientific method: mathematical, logic, and experimental proof. The logic proof is in the explanations we just made of it. Unlike the Higgs mechanism, masses as vortices of space-time are logic mechanisms of attraction. The experimental proof is the relationship between the speed and radius of each vortex and its attractive power or mass. Unlike the Higgs mechanism that never explained why each mass has the mass it has, the vortex theory explains them: Light doesn’t close a vortex so it doesn’t have mass. Black holes turn faster with lesser radius so they have more mass. Quarks do the same in the particle world so they are the most massive of them all.

Finally, the mathematical proof is as simple and beautiful as it gets. Just substitute in Einstein’s two main formulas where mass and time come out to obtain its relationship:

Energy =mass × c2   and   energy × time =constant

Then you cancel energy and you get mass = constants/time= k × frequency of information.

Since time and frequency are inverse (T=1/v), this means that the faster the frequency of a vortex of space-time is, the more attractive/heavier the mass is; the more information it will store and the slower its inverse (T=1/v), lineal time will happen. And this is another experimental proof of informative masses, as astrophysicists have shown that lineal time passes slower when we come closer to a massive object like a black hole. All this explains why in relativity time is related to mass, which affects the movement of cyclical clocks since

Mass = frequency of a vortex of physical clocks (any orbit, mass, or charge=spin).

All those relationships, which can be described also with the more complex topological models of non-Euclidean geometry briefly outlined in the appendix, cannot be obtained with Higgs particles, which cannot explain rationally how masses attract, what their values are without inventing new laws and fields never found in nature, and yet even then, it cannot explain the different masses of each particle.

Thus, we conclude that Einstein’s theory of mass is right and the Higgs a fantasy: masses and quarks are motions that carry the information of the Universe in its bidimensional vortices. This is not understood by quantum physicists because they try to explain masses with the lineal Higgs, WHICH IS THE External PERSPECTIVE FROM THE LINEAL FIELD THAT GIVES IT ENTROPY in the case only for weak-symmetry breaking interactions that evolve the particle into the hyper force world of internal space-time on black holes and cosmic scales) and fail.

Later, when we talk of quarks in more detail, we shall add some complexity to this basic description of them. It matters one of those properties: a bidimensional vortex has less dimensions and more speed/attractive power than our three-dimensional electroweak forces. This means we need three quarks, each one with one-third of charge, to emerge into our electronic world. To do so, they form very dense, stable triplets because they “lock themselves” perpendicularly, to emerge as “three-dimensional color-locked” forms in our Universe.

This working as an introduction, we now have to introduce basic isomorphisms and paradoxical symmetries of T.Πto set more clearly the theoretical foundations of the previous paragraphs and awesome results on the meaning of relativity, the different geometries of space-time and the unification of charges and masses.

Errors of space-time symmetries in physics: confusion of time with space.

The duality particle-future, past-antiparticle duality IS essentially the ‘life-arrow, death-arrow ‘duality of time events and as such is a huge field of new interpretations of all kind of events and particles, which often means to re-interpret a spatial very fast ‘resonance’ particle, into a time event of particle-antiparticle, life-death transition (mesons for example are death events, in which a particle-antiparticle in time dies; annihilations of particles – antiparticles can on the other hand be interpreted as spatial dualities or temporal events).

And this brings us to a fundamental new insight on all fields of sciences, but specially those fields of the lower ∆-∆ scales where clocks of time according to 5 D metrics are much faster, and so often we see as we see fast turning wheels as solid space, fast time events as spatial events. Among them, the most important re:

-Particle-antiparticle death events, seen as mesons or spatial collisions

– Ternary ages of systems, color forces and weak forces seen a spatial gauging interactions.

– And generally any phenomenon that happens in small range in space and slow time, which is a transformative event not a gauging spatial force. And any space-formal, fixed system with no relative motion, which tends to adopt a spherical, gauging-informative state.

There is though besides the straighten up of the errors of physics regarding its space-time symmetries a more general analysis of great beauty, which consists in the translation of the ‘Ages of the Big-bang’, which latter we will study in detail, and ascribe to the most likely scale of Galactic matter, which explains how from the most energetic Higgs-top quark-black hole fields, through the ‘breaking of symmetry’, all other forces and particles are born.

But what means the breaking of symmetry in terms of the Generator equation? It is quite simple, when we understand that ‘Energy field’ as the synonymous of the Spe, entropic simpler past motions of all systems of reality which start a process of social evolution that implies an increasing of order and a diminishing quantity of energy-information available as we grow in scales. The breaking of symmetry means merely the growth of those scales and its eusocial evolution into different new social systems that are efficient and respond to the metrics of the 5th dimension, as they slow down the clocks of time and enlarge the surface of space of the Universe, in new planes of existence, which obey the metrics of the 5th dimension L=Spe x Tƒ.

Yet since the big-bang is the death NOT the birth of the most perfect form of the Universe a hyper-black hole (as its equations are the inverse equations to the metrics of a black hole), we do NOT increase the speed of Tƒ-clocks (as it will happen in the bi crunch), reducing the Spe size of the system, as in an arrow of information, and life Max. Tƒ x Min. Spe = L, but in an inverse fashion each of the epochs of he big-bang and the subsequent differentiation of physical species into forms of larger space and slower time clocks represents precisely the entropic death of the Universe from the form of max. energy, the hyper black hole, likely made of top quarks and Higgs fields.

So first the Higgs field (spatial element), and top-bottom quarks (particle element), decreased its speed of motion, likely to be an inflaton, superluminal c-motion and rotary T-motion (given the enormous mass of the top quark, its clocks of time must be between 10 and 100 times faster than those of our matter), which as it expanded and cool down (temperature is not a proper measure of frequency and order, only for thermodynamic systems, but physicists use it to describe high frequency=high temperature, lineal time clocks), freezing into a series of new planes of the 5th dimension, creating in each plane a new Spe<ExI>Tƒ, type of field quanta, wave-form and dominant particle.

So after the top quark black hole and Higgs field of super-luminal dark energy and information, expanded at superluminal speeds in a fraction of time (Min. Tƒ x Max. Spe) during the Inflaton epoch, the quark gluon soup started the production of slower=lighter Tƒ-articles (t->b-c->s-du quark decays through the strong force), and slower=more informative bosons: -> Higgs (o spin) ->Neutrino (1/2 spin) -> Photon (1 spin); in a series of growing entropy ages which ended in the recombination era, in which the entropy growing ‘death’ finally finished, when the system had created enough up and down and electron quarks in a dual sea of neutrinos and photons, which started now the opposite arrow of evolution of matter, giving birth to atoms, stars and in its furnaces new elements of higher mass, while the galaxy acquired its structure, with a central black hole of remnant top quarks, a halo of strange quarks survivors of the quark gluon soup, in stable forms (dibaryons, strangelets), and an intermediate region of ud matter, first in plasma state and then as the galaxy reached its present form in stars and planets.

Thus the evolution of the galaxy and perhaps the Universe, depending on which scale we observe the big-bang (a quasar big-bang or a cosmic big-bang, which we shall soon discuss), is just part of the eternal cycles of creation and destruction of mass and energy, the worldcycle of physical systems, between the arrow of life and death, perfectly resumed in those ‘Universal constants of action’ for each scale, which in the cosmic scale amounts to E<c=>M back and forth worldcycles of big-bangs and big crunches of energy into mass, and to similar detailed events in every other scales, in the quantum scale to E<v> H and in the thermodynamic scale to E < ST > PV, in the particle scale, Beta Decay –<-> Electron capture, in the star scale Nova<-> Star formation , in the galactic scale, quasar big bang < -> Galactic evolution.

It is worth to notice though that the process of formation of the Tƒ element are slow life processes of aggregation, so for example galactic evolution goes through the first nebulae age, the spiral galaxy and the globular galaxy till all matter is swallowed by the black hole, which then dies in a quasar big-bang of a few moment, and Mass aggregation goes lumping molecular matter in slow gas->liquid->solid crystal growth cycles of life to become destroyed in a brief moment by fire or nuclear explosion. So it also follows that all physical systems obey the inversion of the zero sum between life and death such as life arrow:

Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp (lasting long in time in reduced space) Vs. Death arrow= Max. S x Min. Tƒ (lasting short in time in a long spread of space).

Of which the most clear example is the big-bang big life cycle of the Universe, as the big-bang, if certain, lasted a quanta of Planck time in which the inflaton Universe expanded enormously in space (min. Tƒ = Max. Spe= death), while the process of evolution and formation of matter, stars and galaxies has lasted 14 billion years.

THE FULL ANALYSIS: CREATION OF PHYSICAL 5DST SUPERORGANISMS.

Mass is as all other emergent time enclosures of a surface of energies, a symbiotic creation of a new ‘species’ of physical systems, in which 3 elements come together as a whole:

Spe<ExI>Tƒ, whereas the formation of a Tƒ-membrane-center invaginating the ExI world, over an Spe-field, ‘CREATES’ the new emergent plane, in which the fundamental laws and parameters and operandi and ratios/constants of all TŒ systems will then appear ‘magically’. As such the fundamental element of a new physical system, as a new biological system is the complementarity body-head, wave-particle, vital space, enclosure, centered into a ‘center of gravity’ point, born of the shrinking of a Poincare’s Conjecture that becomes real:

The creation of a physical system requires the formation of a membrane, in 2 or 3 dimensions (4 or 5 dimensions in the more complex relativity and 5D full model systems), which becomes the external informative membrane that will develop an enclosure to a volume of vital space-energy, and form within that volume a ‘mirror’ image of the world in which the system exists, by shrinking according to the Poincare conjecture the membrane into a central point (in the graph the point is external, but it will be in the center of ‘gravity’ of the system). At that point a new physical/biological/topological system of reality is formed, with the following minimal structural elements.

The 3 Pis.

Another interesting way to explain this geometric facts, is through the conceptual understanding of an accelerated time vortex, and its distortions and balanced through its cyclical ‘clock rhythms’.

Indeed, we can relate the 3 laws, comparing them in terms of dimensional ceteris paribus analysis of its time geometry in the same way in the ideal analysis of a circle we talk of ‘2 different dimensional pis’: the perimeter of a circle (lineal pi) and the pi of its area (bidimensional pi), which we conclude have different meanings.

Here, we have here 3 different measures of increasing structure and dimensionality in the S≈T metric relationships of an orbit:

  • The first measure concerns only the sun and the field, and gives 0 time dimensions (not a parameter studied), and needs only a number for the spatial topology, the excentricity of the ellipse, respect to the perfect cycle: oT≈1S
  • The second measure concerns the sun and a planet, and makes lineal time proportional to the area of space, 1T≈2S (2nd law)
  • The 3rd law concerns all the information of all the orbits of all the planets, plotted into a canonical ‘lineal’ relationship between the square time of the ‘metabolism of those orbits’, which is proportional to the cubic volume of the spatial field, T²=L³.

We are ‘building up’ a structure, with 3 laws of ‘increasing’ social complexity.

The first one merely concerns how the central singularity or sun, manages to limit a field of time through its curvature G, in an almost perfect form (minimal eccentricity); the second concerns, the area of ‘entropy feeding’ and the ternary, singularity, membrane, ST bidimensional ‘body-wave’ region of the structure. And the 3rd compares ‘different species’ of orbits relating with a new ‘dimension’ of time frequency  and ‘space volume’ all of them, with a law homologic to the law of metabolism of animal life, hence part of a larger law, derived of the metric of 5D: S≈T, simply stated: T²=L³. It means that in the ‘building of dimensionalities’ to compare time and space parameters, time frequency is the first action, the simplest bit of information, the ‘first awakening’ of being, a pure time-point, which will then ‘acquire length’, the eccentricity bit of data of the orbit, and then will grow into a bidimensional area, with a rotary motion, a frequency of the cycle, and then as it becomes a full vital structure with have a dual clock-system, a ‘conjugate’ of synchronous body-head, particle-wave clocks regulating metabolically a ‘whole’ 3-dimensional volume of space-time; and at this range, the system is complete.

Body-heart and synchronous head-eyes, proportional to mass volume, Broglie’s synchronous particle inner clock and wave-frequency, proportional to the energy/amplitude; Pauli exclusion principle that allows two clocks with inverse spin to control an orbital volume in the atom; or the square of orbital period, proportional to the volume of a gravitational encircled field, thus become expressions of the Space-time full structure of the system and the ‘smaller dimension’ of a pure time-frequency – which we might consider the dimension of the 0-point/mind Tiƒ singularity and its lineal membrane and  the bidimensionality of the ‘body-wave’ of space-time it controls:

screen-shot-2017-01-29-at-08-43-21screen-shot-2017-01-29-at-08-43-42

In the graph, the spatial volume of a system, And what this tells us is that we can see ‘real gravitation’ in pure topological, vital terms without need of a discrete algebraic ‘mental’ description, which is what Newton achieved. The whys though are better explained from a pure Spe-perpsective.

Now the concept behind those laws are the different proportions of information that correspond to fields of less dimensions and more entropy, or space-time symmetries, where time is less dimensional externally, more dimensional intermally as all spherical forms.

In the graph, the extraordinary capacity to explain the meaning of the fundamental laws of biological, physical and social systems (which we normally escape in the examples for sake of simplicity and due to the obvious incapacity of): animals accelerate their circadian and metabolic cycles as they become smaller, but the product of its volume in space and time clocks remains invariant.

So happens with planets who enclose a proportional volume of space with its orbital clocks, and any physical system, which accelerates its frequencies/temperatures/speeds but its ‘actions’  – the fundamental unit of physical systems, product its energy ‘volume’ and time ‘frequency’ remain constant.

Yet the content of a 1 D time point is equivalent to a line of space, t¹=s² and t² =s³, and we shall see those correspondences in all laws. The reason being a time system has hidden variables, dimensions not seen as information is largely invisible, and time cycles are perceived only in a point in which the cycle connects itself, touches base, with a discrete interval of time between them.

As such ‘natural numbers are discrete numbers of time frequencies and its intervals a limited rational group, a relative zero compared to the numbers of a full space of real numbers.

The analytical approach: newton laws.

Because physics is the science of motion, of all those elements the one that focuses its studies is the pure abstract description of those motions; hence its translation by newton into algebra of discrete numbers. Yet we must remember it is a geometric, vital game, and so whenever it has been needed further development of its whys, it has been geometry (Poisson’s gradient, 3 body problem approached by chaotic attractors and Poincare topological methods, Einstein’s curvature analysis to understand mercury’s distortion).

screen-shot-2017-01-29-at-09-04-01The 3 laws of newton can also be considered ‘degrees’ of complexity. The first one defines a single ‘entity’, in a lineal path. Again minimal information, a particle of relative 0-dimensionality, the time-element and a lineal motion: Tº=L¹.

Now the first Newtonian law is just a partial case of the second, when no forces are applied. In the 2 law, thus we get a higher degree of information, exploring the time vortex of gravitation, in terms of its acceleration, which is the best ‘parameter’ to define a time cycle, akin to the gradient of its frequency, and related to its mass ‘area’, as we consider a mass indeed, a bidimensional field of gravitation (principle of equivalence between mass and gravitation).

And finally the 3rd law, as in Kepler’s we achieve the highest analysis of the whole, with a system of multiple ‘points’ of forces all of them harmonised by the balance of F1=-F2

So we see in a way a ‘building up’ of the structure, as we saw in the abstract Non-Euclidean postulates that define first the fractal point connected to a field (1, 5th non-e postulate), the relationship of the point with other point and its rules of attraction or repulsion 2nd, 3rd postulates) and the building of a topological volume or network of points (4th postulate) from where ultimately all those laws of structural systems grow. As the first law establishes the distorted geometries caused by points-minds-monads, the second the flows of entropy and information, which make up the energy waves & bodies created by 2 points in opposite directions, and the 3rd establishes the balances of a network of points (here the balances of its flows of forces) always tending to a dynamic equilibrium in which each point is in relative rest to all the others (maximal organic evolution), something which we shall also see happening in orbital atoms (∆-2), thermodynamic ensembles (∆-1), or neuronal networks (∆o), or groups of people in a conservation with oposite positions in static balance to let the flow of information communicate them (∆1).

This is the GST unifying, whys to those laws. But alas, once we have ‘build them up’ from points to networks, we can look them downwards, to extract its whys, from the final goal-purpose, which is to build balanced networks (topological planes, solar systems, ensembles of static forces in equilibrium).

In the specific case of the motions that bodies exert on one another through forces, trying to reach that balance (3rd law), this balance requires the conservation of momentums (2nd law), which in turns implies the lineal inertia of individual motions; so the balance of the 3rd law (network balance) transfer to the balance of the dual pairs (momentum balance) which transfer to the balance of the individual being and its field (Spe>Tiƒ 1st law balance).

And this brings the ‘mathematical postulates’ of Mechanics:

– 2nd Newtonian law, which defines an S=T motion=change proportion, as all field-force provokes a proportional change on the motion of the active magnitude or momentum: F=∂mv.

This means that the force-field (where a force would a point-field with a single lineal coordinate), transfers entropy to the system in a proportional manner: Se (F)≤ ST (v) x Tƒ (m).

From this relationship we obtain a General Law that we SHALL apply to all scales: Se ≈ ST x Tƒ, according to the linguistic method, which allows to GENERALIZE any law of any system, WHEN WE TRANLAATE IT PROPERLY INTO ¬Æ

– Tƒ: the 3rd which defines the equilibrium of motions, as all action provokes an opposite reaction: F1=-F1. This beauty, is a most general law, translated as Œ <≈ > Œ, and is essentially the ‘positive’, parallel solution of the 3rd ¬Æ Postulate of i-logic geometry, again with applications to all systems.

So far we thus have learned from the details of mechanics, a general GST Law : Se (F) ≈ ST (v) x Tƒ (m), which the isomorphic method applies, to all mental, biological and social systems, a law of balance between the limbs/fields which provide the energy of the system and are proportional to the sum of the body-wave and particle-head of the system.

i.e. look at yourself in a mirror: measure your legs, measure your body and head together, alas, they are 50-50% (-: That is the beauty of the linguistic, homologic method, who could imagine that Newton and Leonardo’s Vitruvian man had the same origin (-;

It is though not always that easy to find equivalences, as ‘dimensional analysis and a deep understanding of which parameters and magnitudes we shall measure, make the novice T.Œ researcher often fail to find the homology.

Now, this is what we learned in the earlier ages of Physics (we shall return back to mechanics, as we enter XIX c. hamiltonians) vitalised in terms of the GST topologies of organic physical systems.

SHM: Single Harmonic Motions.

screen-shot-2017-01-27-at-19-26-14The next important slightly different set of systems explored departing from Newtonian laws (so the physical, entropic motions of its forces can easily be deduced from those Newtonian laws) is the Single harmonic motion, which is essentially the other type of clock of nature, not a bidimensional accelerated vortex but a simpler lineal vibration, up and down, left to right, again trying to find its balances, measured with 3 ‘numbers’, which are always in such balance, as the graph shows: displacement (the purest Spe parameter), opposite to acceleration (the purest tiƒ parameter), balanced by the ST-Parameter of velocity; So as Spe grows, tiƒ diminishes and the speed remains constant (Spe+Tiƒ≈St, would be then the loose conceptual metric why of that equilibrium).

Units and dimensions

Quantities have both dimensions, which are an expression of their spatial symmetry (seen as forms in still space), and units, which express its social 5D nature as magnitudes that add its time (scalar: Tƒ) or size parameters: Se, to ‘rise’ in the social scales that put parts into wholes.

Now time in physics is lineal Time, which is in fact T= wave length (particle radius) x ƒrequency of wave (particle rotation): Se x Tƒ. But the internal structure of the T-duration is forgotten. It is important though to remind us once more T-duration comes from the 2 essential motions-parameters. As we do reduce all to the generating elements an ¬Æ symmetries of those elements.

We are thus NOT talking of the same cyclical time, we talk on most of those texts but of the ‘sum of many elements’ and this is why Time and energy which is also a sum, do relate so closely in modern physics (4 vector formalisms).

Now a key element of T.Œ is dimensional analysis, which DOES NOT PERMIT to compare traditional lineal time duration (one dimension) and space (3 dimensions) but as we established that time is cyclical and hence the height dimension is a time dimension of information, so Tƒ, heads antennae, priests in pulpit and black holes are on top of bodies, societies and galaxies to deliver information, we can now compare them: Se=Tƒ:

Thus we can extract all the laws of topological morphology of T.Πand this applies to physics, but in mechanics, Time is lineal time and does not compare with 3 volume space made of 3 length dimensions.

Finally we have defined mass, which is a vortex of time, from the u+1 cosmic scale, hence NOT a time clock of this scale, which is purely cyclical motion, with NO active magnitude.

Tƒ realize the difference, you can sense a mass as a perpendicular Maxwell screw, that moves from this plane of existence to the upper plane of mass existence, (in relativity through a Rosen bridge)

Charge gets you down, Mass gets you up. But both are ‘perpendicular motions’ across the 5th dimension from past to future, while clocks are present cycles, uncoiled as lineal time motions.

Thus they are simpler things, which do not required 5D metric.

The fundamental dimensions used in mechanics are thus time (present time cycles in a single 5D sheet), mass (U1<∆o vortices), and length (lineal dimension of a bidimensional sheet of space).

Symbolically, these are written as t, m, and l, respectively. The study of electromagnetism adds an additional fundamental dimension, electric charge, or q, which IS THE INVERSE ∆o<U1 vortex< in the other direction of the 5th dimension, and we unify them in U<|3|.

Other quantities have dimensions compounded of these. For example, speed has the dimensions distance divided by time, which can be written as l/t, and volume has the dimensions distance cubed, or l3. Some quantities, such as temperature, have units but are not compounded of fundamental dimensions.

So that’s really all, showing again, how simple T.Œ is and how its Correspondence principle falls easily in place for all sciences. We do have 3 scales, so we do measure its time vortices with mass, temperature and charge. And we measure in each scale its Se, length and Tƒ, time (albeit with the error of lineal duration).

There are also important dimensionless numbers in nature, such as the number π = 3.14159, the simplest 3S=Tƒ transformation.

Dimensionless numbers may be constructed as ratios of quantities having the same dimension. Thus, the number π is the ratio of the circumference of a circle (a length) to its diameter (another length). Dimensionless numbers have the advantage that they are always the same, regardless of what set of units is being used. Those are then FUNDAMETNAL CONSTANTS OF ACTION, THAT define basic transformations of the Se<ST>Tƒ most general formulae of the Generator equation, Pi being, the basic 3 ages of time ration (the simplest worldcycle).

Tƒ notice that today the meter is no longer defined as a line, but precisely as wave motion, or sum of ‘frequency steps’ : the distance that light travels in a certain time interval (1/299,792,458 of a second).

And that we use a decametric scale which is the fundamental ‘scale of space populations’ of the Universe (tetraktys, perfect number, elongated in lineal space).

Times is again also today defined in terms of the time frequency of our basic light space-time, (¥ excitation frequency of the isotope cesium-133).

So we have finally gotten to the ‘theme’ of our Relativity Revis(it)ed: we exist in a space-time field membrane which therefore our mind perceives in constant terms, reason why c is constant, and we use light space-time parameters to define our space and time units.

Units of mass are however defined in terms of our human mass, as light has no mass, as it does not close a wave-cycle, so it is a lineal Se, space entity, and only when it collapses, E=M2, or E=hv, into particle, does acquire mass (creation of virtual particles). What should then be the real unit of mass? The top quark, with a mass equivalent to a gold atom, the minimal unit of gravitational space-time cyclical time. Not in vain gold is the perfect atom of information, gold is what RHIC is blowing to create strangelets of maximal mass that will devour us. The top quark and its field, which is the Higgs field in the present somewhat convoluted representation by physicists

( But it should be expressed in the equivalent Dick-zee-smolin model of a variable G-constant to define the Higgs field in terms of gravitational fields, a theme quite complex in its maths, no treated here – time permitted in 4th line for ‘pedantic experts who think they know-know 🙂 .

Mass and weight are different physical quantity. The weight of an object is the consequence of the Earth’s gravity operating on its mass, hence it is an Se≤Tƒ relationship. The mass of a given object is the same everywhere, because it is AN INTERNAL VORTEX PARAMETER.

So weight would change a great deal if it were moved to the surface of another planet with a different Se-field.

It follows that weight and mass do not have the same dimensions. Weight has the dimensions ml/t2. So this gives us an interesting dimensional analysis of the ¬Æ expression, Se ≤ST x Tƒ aforementioned equation

Since the dimensions of weight are m x L x angular acceleration (1/t2), our definition of a time vortex, Tƒ, it turns out that WEIGHT, RESUMES ALL THE ELEMENTS OF THE SPACE-TIME SYSTEM OR EVENT WE ARE DESCRIBING, with the 3 fundamental dimensions of the ‘mechanical plane of existence of physics.

Weight is thus contrary to belief, much more essential than mass. As it tell us all.

It follows that in Tœ, dimensional analysis is far more important than in classic physics, as it is the key to properly translate the equations of physics to variations of the Generator and its space-time symmetries. Which brings the next important theme of mechanics, the difference between…

The two type of Vectors and scalars, which are the key way to express the 3 type of spatial and temporal magnitudes and arrows, Se, ST, and Tƒ.

A theme fundamental to the analysis of physical systems is the difference between scalar magnitudes, which belong to temporal Tƒ magnitudes (vibrational temperature, mass and charge) and vectors which belong to the Se magnitudes, and its intermediate combination, wave functions and axial vectors, or ST functions.

And the meaning of the two type of multiplications, dot and product vector, which reveals a lot about each type of interaction.

The equations of mechanics are typically written in terms of Cartesian coordinates though T.Πprefers generalized coordinates and Lagrangian and Hamiltonians, as the reader should imagine after bashing so much our dear Descartes (-;

And yet as classic mechanics use them we must comment on its formulae. Basically the Cartesian coordinates represent the Se field, in which the system absorbs its entropic energy, hence the relative space-time external field or ‘absolute space-time’ in terms of a single membrane. It can be taken though in 2 different perspectives, as a hyperbolic field (the true form as described by relativity), which means the ST gravitational field as perceived by the Tƒ particles-masses of this light space-time membrane:

Se (energy=toroid entropic field) <ST (Riemannian hyperbolic 4D field) > Tƒ )accelerated vortex or Mass field.

This is the justification of the EFE formalism of Einstein, where the mixture of the entropic gravitational accelerated field of energy and the Tƒ distribution of masses, mix to give us the hyperbolic ‘body-wave’ of Relativity. The maths of it are complex but well known and there si therefore no need here to go into details.

In any case classic mechanics makes a valid approximation to that concept, with Newtons and poisons formalism, and establish a 3-dimensional Cartesian light space-time, whose obvious origin are the 3 perpendicular axis of a light ray, e (to) x m (Se) ≈ c2 (ST). This is written in terms of Maxwell equation as 1/e x mu = c2.

In this 3 dimensional perpendicular field classic Newtonian physics expresses its laws.

At a certain time t, the position of a particle may be specified by giving its coordinates x(t), y(t), and z(t) in a particular Cartesian frame of reference. However, a different observer of the same particle might choose a differently oriented set of mutually perpendicular axes, say, x, y, and z.

The motion of the particle is then described by the first observer in terms of the rate of change of x(t), y(t), and z(t), while the second observer would discuss the rates of change of x(t), y(t), and z(t). That is, both observers see the same particle executing the same motion and obeying the same laws, but they describe the situation with different equations. This awkward situation may be avoided by means of a mathematical construction called a vector

A vector is a quantity that has both magnitude and direction. It is typically represented symbolically by an arrow in the proper direction, whose length is proportional to the magnitude of the vector. Although a vector has magnitude and direction, it does not have position. A vector is not altered if it is displaced parallel to itself as long as its length is not changed.

By contrast to a vector, an ordinary quantity having magnitude but not direction is known as a scalar. In printed works vectors are often represented by boldface letters such as A or X, and scalars are represented by lightface letters, A or X. The magnitude of a vector, denoted |A|, is itself a scalar—i.e.,|A|= A.

Because vectors are different from ordinary (i.e., scalar) quantities, all mathematical operations involving vectors must be carefully defined. Addition, subtraction, three kinds of multiplication, and differentiation will be discussed here. There is no mathematical operation that corresponds to division by a vector.

Mechanics. Classification through the parameters of Toe.

We thus first consider a classification of sub-disciplines, according to 5 D fractal space-time elements and ¬Æ; that is the Generator equation and its 3 elements, the 5 ¬E postulates of geometry and the scales of the 5th dimension:

If consider it under the postulates of ¬E geometry, then we have the following systems to study

∆-1 the point-particle or infinitesimal (1st postulate). It is the simplest mechanical system is the particle, defined as a body so small that its shape and internal structure are of no consequence in the given problem. It must be noticed this formalism IS POSSIBLE, because in spherical morphologies, the center acts as the Tƒ, 0-point

And so: on-1=Œn.

This fundamental equivalence allows to develop mechanics by only knowing the ‘CENTER OF MASSES’, which acts as the whole body, in its actions. As a rule the point of time space, or 0-point will then be the point of Min.Se x Max. Tƒ (In physics this will be expressed in terms of energy and position), or max. existential force. That is the point where the E-parameter will be minimal (min. average distance to all other points, to coordinate their actions) and Max. Tƒ parameter, (Maximal density of force or active magnitude). Now this is the ‘higher isomorphic law’ that makes the center point the most powerful and commanding system, the center of tetraktys, the nucleus of a sphere, the center of masses in mechanics.

Œ≈Œ, next comes the mechanics of two points, which are connected by a continuous field of force and hence we deal here not with lineal inertia, as in a single Œ but with rotary motion, angular momentum, torque and cyclical inertia. And this is an essential difference: two points have as solution a rotary motion that maintains the distance between them, if there are enough ‘continuous active magnitude’ between them (rigid bodies), or will finally become attracted after a series of cyclical vortex like accelerated motions. So cyclical motions are always established with 2 dimensions, that is to points, and lineal inertia with one dimension, the line of a single point.

∑Œ=U+1 points is the 3 body problem, which BECOMES impossible to solve, showing that 3 elements in absolute freedom become unstable; while 3 connected points by rigid paths will find a o=Œ center.

What this truly means is that as 3 points define a plane, we are entering the 4th postulate rules, emerging in a relative higher social scale, which allows the treatment as a whole.

More complicated is the motion of a system of 4 or more particles that exert forces on one another and possibly undergo forces exerted by bodies outside of the system, which therefore must be considered as an U∆+1 problem and treated from the larger emerging point of view as a whole, either in chaotic state (free points) or connected to the center of masses as a single unit.

It is here where general relativity, tensors and the analysis of the system from the point of view of the total field of energy-mass, which is a ‘unified’ general treatment works better.

Combined space-time sub-disciplines.

The Generator , coupled with the duality of space-form vs. time-motion analysis is also the origin of the classic ternary division into ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis that ignores one of those elements:

Tƒ: Motion mechanics or ‘Dynamics. Which can be subdivided further into:

Pure motion analysis or Kinematics, in which the Se (filed) element is ignored, and the ‘static-space’ form is also ignored reducing the system to a point-particle or )-point of view.. Thus it is branch of physics and a subdivision of classical mechanics concerned with the geometrically possible motion of a body or system of bodies without consideration of the forces involved (i.e., causes and effects of the motions).

Tƒ<=>Se: Kinetics, where the field is introduced and so it give us probably the more complex analysis

Se: Form Mechanics, its inverse or, statics, which deals mainly with forces acting on and in a body at rest, so it is concerned with the form, and its parts

The 3 scales of 5D

Alternatively, mechanics may be divided according to which of the ternary scales of the 5D the physical system studied belongs:

The principles of mechanics have been applied to three general realms of phenomena:

∆+1: The motions of such celestial bodies as stars, planets, and satellites can be predicted with great accuracy thousands of years before they occur. (The theory of relativity predicts some deviations from the motion according to classical, or Newtonian, mechanics; however, these are so small as to be observable only with very accurate techniques, except in problems involving all or a large portion of the detectable universe – and we shall soon resolve ‘why’ both formalisms ARE essentially valid, as they are ‘different static or motion perspectives’ of the Galilean paradox.)

∆o: As the second realm, ordinary objects on Earth down to microscopic size (moving at speeds much lower than that of light) are properly described by classical mechanics without significant corrections.

The engineer who designs bridges or aircraft may use the Newtonian laws of classical mechanics with confidence, even though the forces may be very complicated, and the calculations lack the beautiful simplicity of celestial mechanics.

∆-1: The third realm of phenomena comprises the behavior of matter and electromagnetic radiation on the atomic and subatomic scale. Although there were some limited early successes in describing the behavior of atoms in terms of classical mechanics, these phenomena are properly treated in quantum mechanics; since the limits of gravitation, an ∆+1 force essentially created by the top quark-Black hole field, vanishes at this level. So we shall not be concerned with it.

It is thus remarkable that the main branches of T.Πbecome also the main branches of mechanics, showing again the isomorphism of all systems of nature.

In terms of the generator equation, which is always the DOMINANT ANALYSIS, of any system:

Se(Field)<ST(wave)>Tƒ (Particle) which descries the system in spatial simultaneity there are 3 sub-disciplines:

‘Field mechanics’, ‘Wave M.’ and ‘Particle mechanics.’

It also can be considered that the Generator Equation of mechanics describes the 3 elements that encompass the entire subject:

Se-Forces (fields) < ST: step by step Motion=Wave reproduction > Mass (particle-form)

Thus the central concepts in classical mechanics are force, mass, and motion.

Neither force nor mass is very clearly defined by Newton, and both have been the subject of much philosophical speculation since Newton. Both of them are best known to ‘primitive how physicists’ (-: by their effects.

So they say Mass is a measure of the tendency of a body to resist changes in its state of motion. Not, so. Let us define them more precisely:

Tƒ: Mass (see ∆>|3|) is according to Einstein’s principle of equivalence, the final accelerated motion of a vortex of gravitational forces, E=Mc2, E=hƒ, M= ƒ (h/c2)= k ƒ; hence a force whose attractive power is proportional to the frequency.

As there are NOT particles, but only formal motions. Mass thus is a ‘clock of time’ of the gravitational scale, Tƒ(∆+1).

What about the ratio h/c2? It is a ratio of angular momentum to speed seen in ‘static form so the ‘motion’ dimension of time, becomes a second ‘space dimension’ creating a plane of light, a surface of light space. And this is indeed a Concept similar to what nowadays is called “relativistic mass” – the ratio of momentum to velocity.

So we realize that really we are dealing with the same concept adapted to cyclical time, instead of lineal momentum the equation tell us that mass is cyclical, angular momentum, and instead of speed, the equation by substituting time-light for space-light, the motion dimension of S x Tƒ, by another S dimension, we fully grasp the meaning of mass, not just ‘define it’ with an incomprehensible ratio. Now it is clear that we are talking of density of ‘h-plancktons’ in light space-time, the membrane that sustains galaxies.

Those regions of maximal density are more difficult to move. Why? If we have grasped the concept of motion as reproduction of form over the light space-time membrane, we could say that the wave of mass (density of plancktons) as it displaces: reproduces: imprints the ‘light’ light space-time takes a longer time to do the imprinting: V=Se x Tƒ, or in terms of Information, E x I. Thus in each replication of the mass in the next ‘adjacent’ region of light space-time, more time is spent replicating it and the wave slows down. Now of course, a light wave has no difficulty to replicate so it is the maximal speed – it is light spacetime itself becoming ‘evident’ to the observer, no longer as pure space dimensions but as motion. On the other extreme the black hole, which is pure cyclical c-speed angular momentum, does NOT really move. It becomes a zero point around which light space-time will move.

Another way to consider this of the multiple perspectives allowed by T.Πis the fact that a cycle repeats itself by returning to its original point. So the light wave never closes and so it constantly moves ahead, lineally. An angular momentum closes and so its motion stays in the same point and the faster it rotates the more difficult is to move it forwards.

All those are analogous concepts, which take the 3 different Se<ST>Tƒ, or in an spherical system, the 3 different Se (membrane) >ST (cytoplasm) > Tƒ (nuclei) perspectives (we use the cell structure as homologous to all spherical organisms). The membrane perspective tells us it is a cyclical closed motion which does not move along an X-coordinates; the Cytoplasm perspective tells us that its planckton must be replicated in the adjacent region of the lineal motion and that takes time. Finally the o-point or whole view, ‘gravitational center of mass’, in its connection with the lower-higher ∆±3 gravitational plane/field tries to maintain its point in the ‘tensor of mass energy’ of the gravitational field unchanged.

In transversal light waves none of those 3 components exist to stop the wave.

ST: Motion, it follows under the lineal inertial principle, is the steady state, reproductive repetitive displacement of the wave or cyclical vortex, on the ‘higher plane’ of gravitational space-time, due to its:

Se: Force, on the other hand, accelerates bodies, which is to say, they change the state of motion of bodies to which they are applied, increasing its entropy-energy. And we can consider the force of an entire field, which acts on wave-mechanics or particles ‘rising the U+1 energy-entropy-motion of the being’, according to 5D metric: Se (∆+1) > Se (∆)

Why then the system does NOT accelerate constantly. Here is where, the concept of inertia makes sense. Let us recall: “Mass is a measure of the tendency of a body to resist changes in its state of motion”. Thus while the Se- force should merely accelerate the Tƒ-mass, a balance between both CALLED LINEAL INERTIA, ACTS, according to the general law: Se≤ST≥Tƒ, whereas as always the ‘Inverse Complementarity’ of the Space-time parameters (remember, SexTf =K, Se=K/Tƒ is the fundamental law of 5D metric), the accelerated Se, and decelerating Tƒ (vortex that accelerates inwards, hence offers resists lineal displacement) balance into a steady state lineal motion and a steady state gravitational clock.

Thus the normal state of a being is to have an inverse accelerated ‘future’ clock of time called mass, a steady state , ‘present’ lineal motion called speed, and an entropic ‘past’ field, the nested U-3 plane of force of the higher U+3 Mass field (earth’s center, Sun, or galaxy black hole, depending on what detailed system we study).

The interplay of these effects is the principal theme of classical mechanics.

Let us go then deeper in its analysis.

The simplest non-lineal 5D metric representations.

Now as a rule, in the same manner the graph we choose encodes when simpler the ultimate function of the system, the type of curve we use to represent a function will also tell us a lot of the specific variation of the generator event/system we are describing. Let us put some examples beyond the lineal function.

  1. Hyperbolas representing 5D metric.

As we get into more complex, ‘full representations’ of the Generator, S, st, t equation or the 5D metric of the system, it is necessary to make use of nonlinear functional dependence.

Let us recall for example the law of Boyle-Mariotte, so often quoted in this blog for its sheer simplicity, proper of the key metric equations of ∆-scales (reason of the simplicity of physical equations, but as Einstein said not ‘that simpler’ – referring to lineal obsession):

image121

Here the magnitudes p(T) and ν (S) are inversely proportional.

The graph of such a relation represents a hyperbola, the best representation for Metric 5D equations and S/T inverted graphs.

(The physical law of Boyle-Mariotte corresponds actually to the case that p and υ are positive; it represents a branch of the hyperbola lying in the first quadrant. We shall not yet study in depth the meaning of inverse negative numbers and complex graphs, will be just referred when used in physical equations, as they are the conundrum to solve the whys of quantum physics, ill-nterpretations)

Hyperbolic heat waves are also preferred, to unify the concepts of temperature and speed in relativistic thermodynamics:

ST-Oscillatory systems represented by hyperbolic trigonometric functions are in that sense the canonical equations for physical systems in motion around a present balanced point of equilibrium S=t:

screen-shot-2017-02-23-at-07-39-19

In the graph the 3 subspecies of cyclical motions, Tiƒ: rotary motions, ST: wave motions and S: harmonic motions. WE CAN THEREFORE establish the Generator Equation of Periodic motions:

Γ. Spe (Harmonic motions in one dimension) < St-wave motions in 3 dimensions > Tiƒ: circular motions in 2 dimensions.

Now, when we dealt with operandi in physics, we remarked that Trigonometric functions are the essential operandi of Time-dominant periodic motions, Integrals and derivatives of ∆-dominant planes of parts and wholes, and polynomials of social growth between ∆-planes. So we must deal with trigonometric functions to study periodic motion.

It follows that wave body motions are the dimensional sum of the other two motions and the more complex ones, but all of them are closely related as varieties of the generator of periodic motions, that is, the whole range of potential world cycles of the physical Universe.

The existence of 3 subspecies of cyclical motions according to the ternary principle gives us a seemingly lineal harmonic motion, a cyclical motion and a wave motion, which combines both and hence extends and reproduces beyond the finite domain of SHM and CM. So SHM, CM, WM are 3 different yet closely related, Ω-motions in time.

The general class of oscillatory processes includes periodic motions, which are usually described by the familiar trigonometric functions. For example, if we extend a hanging spring from its position of equilibrium, then, so long as we stay within the elastic limits of the spring, the point A will perform vertical oscillations which are quite accurately expressed by the law

image123

where x is the displacement of the point A from its position of equilibrium, t is the time, and the numbers a, p and α are certain constants determined by the material, the dimensions, and the initial extension of the spring.

Polar, Complex tiƒ-unctions

It follows obviously that Tiƒ time processes are better represented by polar, cyclical functions both in the Cartesian and specially the Complex domain.

Functions represented through the ∆-discontinuities between domains.

Finally to exhaust the main ∆st variations, functions that cross discontinuities might have huge discontinuous regions without value, or sudden changes of function, as the jump between scales truly changes the space-time quanta, as we shall see in the analysis of energy functions in different domains (E∆-1≈ hv; E∆≈ knT; E∆+1≈1/2 mv²). So goes for process which jump ‘states’=ages of time.

And so we talk of changes of quality in the function, as it happens in thermodynamics between the gas-young entropic, liquid, balanced and 3rd age, informative solid states.

In such cases we should keep in mind that a function may be defined in various domains by various formulas, determined by the circumstances of the case. For example, the relation Q = f(t) between the temperature t of a gram of liquid water (vs. solid ice) and the quantity of heat Q in it, as t varies between –10° and + 10°, is a completely determined function which it is difficult to express in a single formula, but it is easy to represent this function by two formulas. Since the specific heat of ice is equal to 0.5 and that of water is equal to 1, this function, if we agree that Q = 0 at –10°. is represented by the formula:
image127

image129

as t varies in the intervalimage131 and by another formula

image133

as t varies in the interval . For t = 0 this function is indefinite or multiple-valued; for convenience, we may agree that at t = 0 it takes some well-defined value, for example f(0) = 45. So the graph of the function Q = f(t) is clearly discontinuous as we change from T-solid, cold to st-liquid states.

We have introduced many examples of physical ∆st functions given by formulas and the reasons why possibility of representing a function by means of formulas is extremely important from the mathematical point of view, since such formulas provide very favorable conditions for investigating the properties of the functions by mathematical methods.

But one must not think that a formula is the only method of defining a function.

As we said Algebra and numbers are just the time perspective symmetric to geometry and space. So both methods are valid, even though the synoptic nature of Algebra and its capacity to introduce the whole range of ∆st elements, makes it more flexible.

But for many functions, specially thoe related to spatial locomotions, the symmetry allows to use the spatial graph of the function, which gives a visual geometric picture of it. For example:

To record variation of the temperature of the air during the course of 24 hours, meteorological stations make use of an instrument called the thermograph. A thermograph consists of a drum rotated about its axis by a clockwork mechanism, and of a curved brass framework that is extremely sensitive to changes of temperature. As a result, a pen fastened to the framework by a system of levers rises with rising temperature; and conversely, a fall in the temperature lowers the pen. On the drum is wound a ribbon of graph paper, on which the pen draws a continuous line, forming the graph of the function T = f(t), which expresses the interdependence of the time and the temperature of the air. From this graph we may determine, without calculation, the value of the temperature at any moment of time t.

This example shows that a graph in itself determines a function independently of whether the function is given by a formula or not.

And vice versa, mathematicians proved the following important ST-SYMMETRY: Every continuous graph can be represented by a formula, or, as it is still customary to say, by an analytic expression. This statement is also true for many discontinuous graphs.

We remark that the truth of this statement, which is of great theoretical importance, was completely realized in mathematics only in the middle of the past century. Up to that time mathematicians understood by the term “function” only an analytic expression (formula). But they were under the mistaken impression that many discontinuous graphs did not correspond to any analytic expression, since they assumed that if a function was given by a formula, then its graph must possess certain particularly desirable properties in comparison with the other graphs.

But in the 19th century, it was discovered that every continuous graph may be represented by a more or less complicated formula, IN THE same manner that every lineal function is ultimately a step of a larger world cycle, since all is ultimately time-like and space just a present slice of the whole of time.

Thus a more flexible definition was given for the concept of a function. By this definition a variable y is called a function of a variable x if there exists a rule whereby to every value of x in the domain of definition of the function there corresponds a completely determined value y, independent of the way in which this rule is given: by a T-formula, an S- graph, a discrete discontinuous number table or in any other way.

And this again is a natural rule for all stiences, which have evolved always from simple, geometric continuous lineal parameters and theorems to include cyclical elements (so in physics from lineal inertia, latter they learned that cyclical inertia orbits of atoms never stop) and finally ∆-scales and discrete, discontinuous values, where only the closing point of the world cycle or frequency repetition is relevant (or the singularity parameter that seeds with information the whole, etc – as often happen in nature, where in biological palingenesis, the 3 billion years of evolution shrink to the most efficient steps and so in 9 months human repeat the shrunk process).

boson fe4mionFinally, in this basic introduction, to the simplest key functions of mathematical physics and its correspondence with GST, We should notice that the graph of a function which for all values of x satisfies the relation:image139

is antisymmetric with respect to the origin of coordinates (x-spacetime like axis).

While the graph is symmetric with respect to the y-time-like axis and in the case:

image137

We must interpret for the most general concept the function ƒ( -1), any function of negative value; being the most important, the simplest one, for x=1, √-1.

Which has in the real world two solutions: √1 and -√1, which gives to i a real dual value. If the two elements are inverse, – √1 that can cancel each other

A CONCEPT which turned out to be a key one in quantum physics, to classify particles as fermions (particles, which can not occupy the space, hence exist in a single ∆-plane) and bosons (wave-like particles which can occupy the same space in different scales of the fifth dimension):

boson 5d

The rule is simple:  2fermions have ‘inverse’ orientations in the fifth dimension of space-time as they cancel each other. 2 bosons have the same orientation and when coupled together start a process of §ocial growth, as the graph in the right side shows. They grow till they can emerge in an ∆+1 scale, collapsing its wave. Thus they can form wave trains, with identical orientation, becoming ST-herds, adding its present energy to create the wave (when perceived as having the same speed-distance), or collapsing into a denser frequency wave, faster in its space-time energy (when perceived as having the same time cycle).

Thus we can extract the different properties of waves, which are parts of a social herd of the same direction, collaborating in its social evolution by virtue of having the same function regardless of position in space, and those of particles, which are a bit pricky and will annihilate each other when having inverse arrows on the fifth dimension (antisymmetric functions), such as positive and negative charge, which  symmetric bosons lack.

Indeed, with this simple insight you can immediately solve this long puzzle of quantum physics and relate the 2 type of particles with its ST, T-Function.

Let us then for appetiser solve another conundrum of quantum physics, which so seemingly ‘elementary school’ notions of the wonderful ∆st universe ‘relatively simple and not malicious’ Einstein…

 

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS – ITS PHILOSOPHY

Physicists only consider as a mirror language good enough to observe the Universe mathematic. In this sections we are going to enlighten further mathematical physics, with the postulates of non-AE geometry and logic to improve the mathematical mirror and solve some questions pending. To that aim, the section is complicit to that of the 5 Dimensions of the mathematical mirror of the Universe ∆nalysis, @nalytic geometry, S≈T: Ælgebra, S: ¬Æ geometry, & T-§ocial numbers; so we shall borrow from it and first introduce the most important of those elements:

“Mathematics is an experimental science, and definitions do not come first, but later on.”

Heaviside, the forgotten genius of mathematical physics, author of the 4 Heaviside equations of electromagnetism (wrongly called Maxwell equations who just did a mess of 20 ones with ugly quaternions 🙂 and the Gravito-magnetic equations, which fusion gravitation and magnetism, foreseeing the Fractal Unification equation of charges and masses of this blog.

Heaviside, as Lobachevski before him and Einstein after him, were indeed right when they considered that the language of physics – mathematics – is the best experimental mind-mirror to describe most physical systems, as the mind singularities of those systems use mathematical frames of reference in space to act-react in time with other space-time beings of the Universe.

It is then surprising that idealist physicists since Hilbert astounding ego-trip (‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ ) have rejected the ‘experimental, a posteriori nature’ of the mathematical language, they share with all those other œ-singularities for the concept that mathematics is the a priori nature of reality (Copenhagen interpretation). As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5D motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.

On the other hand, topology is the formal stience of the three arrows of time-space, and as such it reduces all the forms of the Universe to its only three topologies – another ‘magic’ fact of experimental mathematics, never understood in science. AS such the true revolution of mathematical stience goes through the conversion of mathematics into an experimental stience, relating the fundamental theorems of mathematics, as the stience of logic space, to the different laws of GST both based in the fractal properties of space and the cyclical nature of time. We shall thus evolve mathematics and physics to unveil in the human languages of time and space, the underlying isomorphisms of Nature.

A first fundamental job of mathematical physics is to understand the basic concepts of mathematics in terms of its experimental substances, space studied by topology and geometry, time sequences studied by number theory, and space-time symmetries and equations of the fractal ternary generator studied by algebra, finishing the whole ‘closure’ of both maths as a mirror language and the Universe of physical systems it reflects with Analysis, the science of ∆§ scales.

FINALLY THE GENERATOR is the origin of the symmetries and groups of algebra that physicists do love, including all those SU3, yes 3 doesn’t sound you a ring? that ‘pest quantum physics’ (Weyl:).

Yet they love those ternary symmetries without any direct reference to the fundamental particle of the Universe, the supœrganism of relational timespace, which we have just described and formally is just a variety of the ternary generator and its 3 x 3 +@ dimensions.

So we also need to explain how to vitalise mathematical physics, TO EXTRACT the first principles and basic isomorphic laws and generator equations of physical spatial systems and temporal events from them.

The deepest truths are simple. Going beyond reductionism and naive realism.

 Physics is considered the queen of all disciplines, because it has imposed some ‘a priori’ postulates on the structure of reality that are by no means certain, and because in a technological civilisation we listen more the people with machines. It is also a difficult subject as mathematics, its only language by ‘choice’ is not natural to humans and so for most impossible to understand. This is specially truth of quantum physics and its copenhagen, wrong interpretation.

i would like in that sense to remember that the Universe in simple and not malicious (Einstein) because simplicity is truth (Ockham) and it is genius (Leonardo). Complexity arises from the details and repetitions but the first principles are simple because reality in relational space-time departs from two simple elements, the spatial distance-motion and the cyclical time-clock of information. 

How 5D³ physics plugs into the whole physical ‘monument’ built NOT from first principles but from mathematical measures? Unfortunately it must ‘recreate’ all of it, from those first principles to get the same mathematical results AND ad two main features – the organic properties of systems with 3 time arrows and 3 co-existing scales of space-time; and the explanations of the equations of mathematics departing from those elements.

In a way physicists have done that with string theory made of cyclical time-strings and lineal space-strings, but immediately physicists abandon conceptual thought and do their automaton ‘pouring into mathematical equations’ and measuring. This is all what they want to do, and it is unfortunate their lack of dialog with other disciplines, the refusal to accept the logic of the fractal Universe, which makes all scales self-similar and the beauty of redesigning their analysis of reality from those first principles. Einstein didn’t talk for long, as if words did not carry meaning. All those are limits we cannot break.

Astro-physics is concerned with the space-time forms of all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤|3|, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) plus our • linguistic point of view, restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language of mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.

A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirror-image that classic æ-maths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single space-time continuum) can provide.

And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.

And so the task of GST in mathematics should be the expansion of all those elements, starting from:

  1.  Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).
  2. then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…
  3. Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropy-only derived errors, big-bang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆-scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)
  4. And only then go through the different scales, STUDying in detail each equation and system, starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:
  5. Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,-1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. And as Einstein and Planck thought should end up being the true reference for all other scales (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.
  6. And finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).

Yet even the classic scales (mechanics, thermodynamics) need corrections, because mathematical physics was born observing the galaxy, and its original postulates were distorted from the point of view adopted in that earlier age (Newtonian absolute space and time).  And thermodynamics was born on the study of entropic weapons (cannons) and motion machines (steam).

However and this is the key to build properly the discipline, given the fact that physics, like chinese runs in two different language, one unified – mathematical equations/ideographic writing – and so accurate and better mirrored; and other based mostly on ‘different’ dialectical opinions (concepts of physics, philosophies of science derived of physics), we must accept mathematical physics is right and only interpret their equations properly.

The 3 examples taken here will suffice:  Entropy equations are right. What is wrong is to reduce the arrows=actions otime to mere entropic motions as if the other two arrows=actions, information and energy did not matter as a fundamental time event… so physicists study them as something else. Hubble’s equation of expansion of vacuum between galaxies as light dissolves into the ∆-4 >c scale is right; what is wrong is to ‘expand it back to the past’ into a supposed singularity where all time and space exists just by wishful thinking. quantum equations are right, what is wrong is the Copenhagen observers’ interpretation.

What physicists have so far done though, is without any PHILOSOPHICAL≈EPISTEMOLOGICAL rigour, to affirm that because they have written Chinese, they know how to pronounce it; and then of course each one says ‘ma’ with a different tone; and they just say but the equation is right. Sure, but how do you pronounce=translate into verbal, logic concepts? That is the key to make sense of the Universe.

And to prove that duality between right mathematical physics and wrong conceptual physics, we have divided this sections in two articles. One will be more concerned with conceptual errors and written first (astrophysics), as that is where GST can be applied.

Indeed the advance of GST on physics will come from the proper application of the higher layer of truth (the properties of space and time, applied through the isomorphisms and generator of fractal space and cyclical time) to illuminate first maths and its equations, and correct then those ‘opinions’ that today pass as scientific truths, since people are just in awe of the machines and measures of physics.

Thus we shall show how the whole of physics is inscribed into the linguistic ternary grammar of the Generator of Space-time (Gst), and its isomorphisms. As all physical beings in all scales  are ternary ∆±1, s,st,t, past>present>future beings. And so the laws and equations derived from the Fractal generator, apply to all system of physical beings, included the galaxy-atom scale (∆±3) which is the last scale we perceive in depth.

 

Knots of Time cycles: the fundamental particle.

In that sense, the best way to understand the internal elements of the point as a one-dimensional being is the fifth postulate of non-e geometry that allows the point to be crossed by infinite parallels, and defines it as a knot of time cycles.

Once we have studied the minimal units of the Universe, the action of space-time, we shall define the main structural, architectonical element of reality, the knots of time cycles, existential points, œ, which perform those actions of existence, site of will and perception of the Universe – whose simplest definitions in philosophy are the monad of Leibniz, the mind of Descartes, the God of Aristotle, and in mathematics, a Non-Euclidean point, the unit of Einstein’s gravitational laws.

Systems are knots of time cycles of exchanges of energy and information with its space and time parts, Œ, which allow them to survive in the Universe.

Thus the first ‘stable structure of reality’, is a knot of time cycle which swiftly goes webbing around the paths of its exchanges of energy and information, ∆±exi, actions, its survival strategies, trying to maximise its existence, Max. ExI, in a state of perpetual balance, E=I…

This dance of being and not being is performed by each Œ, knot-function of existence, defined both as an infinitesimal point from its upper perspective and an an absolute whole from its lower plane, since all knots of times space cycles web their existences through several of such plane

A mathematical Universe must be perceptive and social.

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’.

Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs. Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, functions of space-time. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’?

Likely, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors. In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only a very intense ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms. What would then be this kind of consciousness? Likely a sense of proportion, symmetry, balance and beauty.

It does NOT matter in any case the ultimate inner sensations of physical matter, but the outer description of the actions of those singularities, which do order and reflect a mathematical organization around them, when in its solid crystal state they act with the program of existence, reproducing the information of that minimalist mind image. Indeed, a crystal grows with a symmetry which its inner image reflects back in the growth of ‘crystal cells’. And that is called reproduction, the objective definition of life, of a whole being in the fractal Universe.

And so, P.o.vs. are canonical to mathematical science, or else mathematics, which is today based in analytic geometry and the study of ‘self-centred’ functions, would NOT work. 

A philosophy of mathematical properties of space-time, upgrading the essential properties of ‘points in space and sequential numbers in time’ is thus an a priori exercise, which I recommend to all physicists, so they can leave behind their abstract, ‘selfie view’ of a mechanical, chaotic Universe, where only ‘they think in mathematics’.

Singularities that reproduce information once they are formed, organised fractal super organisms also occur in astrophysics, from crystals to black holes and only anthropomorphism denies it. The GST view though is different: as we are all space-time beings, the properties of human space-time beings must be share in quality (not in quantity and complexity the variable of gst) by all other species of the Universe. So mindless ‘markovian’ entropy without time causality do exist but it is NOT by any means the dominant ∑∑actions->∑arrow->age of time.

Thus the concept of physicists of a single ðime arrow is only valid for entropic gaseous states, and their idea that such states must be ‘extended’ to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons.

That 150 years after entropy became a dogma for the future in military Germany, XXI c. scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive arrow’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which indeed there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.

In the graphs, the translation of the fifth dimension to life systems and true non-entropic pyramids of human actions, which always have had as artists and ethic writers have better understood an upper ontological level of highest satisfaction in the social communion with the rest of mankind or with the Universe, (origin of the concepts of God in western anthropomorphic religions – read God=human super organism – and eastern Taoist-Buddhist- Hinduist ones= God as universal super organism).

And such systems do have always a ‘self-centered Tiƒ singularity or point of order, which is the Maxwellian demon lost in pure gaseous states, fields and limbs of entropy. It is only because physicists deny the ordering capacity of singularities, also in physics – accelerated vortices of mass, charge in the quantum scale; black holes in the galactic scale; crystals in the thermodynamic scale – that an entropy only Universe can make sense. But this is called reductionism in physics, censorship in social sciences – but at least accepted in biology or else we would have also to admit the brainless nature of mankind (well that might be the case, but only mankind, you know ‘two things a consider ∞, the stupidity of man and the Universe, my beloved predecessor in this business of dimensional upgrading, Mr. Einstein 🙂

In that regard, both Leibniz and Descartes, the founders of philosophy of science, both understood as we shall see in detail on those pages, the need for a ‘mental universe’ if mathematics was really the language that better reflected the Universe. Indeed, since mathematics has three disciplines, geometry, which is based in  frames of references that act as mind-monads, mirroring reality and Algebra based, in social numbers  which are indistinguishable groups of similar individuals that come together as a whole ‘3’, ’10’ and finally ∆nalysis which studies the ‘social scales’ of the Universe, as parts become wholes, each scale studied by a science, from societies of particles and forces called atoms, to societies of atoms called molecules, evolved into state of matter and life beings, evolved into super organisms and planetary ecosystems, gathered around stars, socially evolved into galaxies; the very existence of mathematics precludes the existence of a ‘social, scalar, organic, sentient Universe’.

So finite vital §paces gathered around a frame of reference; the three ðime arrows of entropy, information and its energy combinations, and social organic scales that evolve parts into wholes, are the ultimate properties of all fractal beings of reality made to the image and likeness of the whole. The previous graphs of the fifth dimension, and its ‘physical, biological and socio-economical supœrganisms thus show those scales, each one studied by a science, where in each scale, a self-centered mind, pov, will co-exist as a whole with its relative lower ∆-1 cellular/atomic, and relative upper ∆+1 social world/gravitational, universal scale.

Thus while we could do as current science does an external analysis of the fractal, informative Universe in pure abstract terms, to understand the whys of order, the will of survival of species and the constancy of forms that self-reproduce as all fractals do through its generator, ∆ºst particular equations, to explain why ‘mathematical ðime§pace beings’ do follow mathematical laws, embedded in those frames of reference, we need at the centre of each being, a mind-mirror that perceives automatically, processes and reflects in ‘inverse order’, the Universe; which is exactly what mathematical systems do, as they are always self-centered in a frame of reference or pºv; and always study social numbers, whose fundamental operandi are scalar polynomials and its scalar ∫∂ calculus.

In the graph, the same ternary structure happens in biological systems (and through the class structure in social ones, escaped for most of the blog, to simplify and due to the fact we have another blog dedicated to them).

Once the organic, vital, sentient properties of systems that obey mathematical laws have been proved, we can then consider the main error of mathematical physics – to reject those properties because of its limited understanding of mathematics and its units, ‘fractal points’ of space-time, which are ‘points with volume’ through which ∞ parallels can hold and so ‘encoding’ a world in its self (Leibniz).

Singularities and how they define scales of inner and outer worlds, and how they become bridges between those scales of the fifth dimension – as in charges and masses, ‘doors’ to those scales, are then the main ‘missing’ variables of mathematical physics, which a continuous vision of space-time will never solve, or will do so in weird ways (wormholes, time travels through evaporating black holes and similar attempts to encode the fractal doors between level of 5D within the metric of a single 4D space-time continuum). Finally the lack of three time arrows and cyclical comprehension of time, ads injury to those interpretations. So missing, ∆, º and s<st>t symmetries it is a marvel that physics still works (:

 In the graph as the fifth dimensions of space-time, evolve socially new whole, membranes and singularities that emerge, the system from above and below in a new constrain whole that dilates a system  both downwards, in sizes of entropy and upwards, in enclosure membranes, expanding its piercing of upper social planes of wholes and lower parts, dilating the total latitude of its planes of existence:

In the graph, the absolute, lineal arrow of time, is born social evolution, the relative arrow of time is made of the sequential order of the three arrows into a world cycle. As lineal time accumulates, a system increases both, upper social wholes and lower parts, dilating the total latitude of its planes of existence. While relative worldcycles extinguish themselves as they complete a whole cycle of existence.  Hence the absolute dimension of time is the fifth dimension and the relative dimensions are the 3 other dimensions and its space-time symmetries, which become a zero sum.

While the fourth dimension of Einstein, is just a refinement of Galileo’s relativity  ∂v=∂s/∂t: an instantaneous (mathematical derivative) measure of a simple type of time-change: motion or translation in space, which as it is measured instant by instant with those derivatives, really has no much use beyond what physicists have always done: to measure motion in simultaneous space.

MATHEMATICAL CREATIONISM – THE WRONG APPROACH

Astrophysics is an enormous field of inquire, as it deals with all systems which are not socio-biological.

It does also have in the human approach strict limits of inquire because humans under the ego paradox reduce its analysis of systems different from us in scales and form, to non-organic properties, a fact which on top is – as most ego-biased forms of knowledge, subconscious, NOT fully acknowledged. In astrophysics it derives as a natural consequence of using only mathematical languages to explain physical systems, of a reduced mathematical variety – Euclidean, aristotelian maths, which does not allow points to have inner, fractal parts, hence reducing by ‘decree=axiom’, its vital, inner organic parts, and eliminating the scales of the fifth dimension accessed through those inner parts of a point.

Further on as all science is culture, human physics is limited by culture – by the worldly profession of physicists, which has been traditionally to make weapons of mass destruction, with maximal lineal reach.

What we mean that science is culture must be understood in the highest level of ‘science’ – not OBVIOUSLY in the gathering of basic data – which cannot be cheated, and there science is science, but in the B-C-D elements of the scientific method, MODELING, CYCLICAL PATTERNS and Humanist ‘democratic’ use of science for the common good. Or in other terms ‘macro-science’.

So, ‘macro-economics’ , the philosophy of economics IS culture as opposed to micro-economics (the science of re=production of machines).

AND IN PHYSICS, the Philosophy of the Universe (theory of time arrows) IS culture, DISGUISED of science with faulty interpretations of scanty data.

Religious creationists vs. realist scientists.

Human egos are the main bias to fully understand the Universe and its organic properties and multiple minds≈languages. So humanity divides between mathematical and verbal creationists who think their language created the Universe and only the properties described with it are ‘worthy’ to know. Notice how Mr. Dirac denies the Verbal God but affirms there is a Mathematical one. In true form, Leibniz, Einstein, who considered the ultimate substances of reality space and time from where we shall derive all its dimensional, isomorphic laws, were far more ‘realists’ in its search for ultimate principles. Each language then according to its synoptic capacity to carry information will mirror in the ‘finitesimal’ space-time of a mind limited in volume and duration only part of the total information of the Universe and all its fractal T.œs. So its knowledge will always be limited and self-centred as the language has a perspective with his mind at the centre, giving origin to the equation of any mind: O-finitesimal mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe = Constant World. The Universe is infinite, but each ‘mind-language’ mirrors only part of its scales of space-time, and lasts a finite duration, extending a finite size.

In the graph we see the three philosophies of reality humans sponsor; the first two are ego-centered and so the world splits between those who believe god speaks the language of mathematicians (sponsored by ego-mathematicians) which of course as Dirac’s quote shows deny vehemently the other version (so as in the schrodinger’s cat, ‘god exists and does not exist’ in Dirac’s mind, when he speaks words it is a jumble of the imagination, but when he speaks ‘Dirac’s equations’ it is obviously creating the world).

And below the realists, only ‘true scientists’ who rely on the experimental method, the known-substances of reality, space and time and its properties to understand with those 2 mirrors, the verbal, logic, temporal mirror with its 3 causal dimensions of past, present and future tenses, and the mathematical, spatial mirror. This view, which we expand here is the view of Leibniz>Einstein and there is not 2 without 3, in all temporal processes of growth as human thought is, the 3rd guy, believe it or not, is talking to you (:

In the graph, 5D stience is a template that will require many scientists to be completed. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic minds-languages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist.

But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does.

So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models.

Now, mirrors are inflationary kaleidoscopic views that multiply the one into infinite self-similar forms to pump up ‘its sense of importance’. And this is the key to understand Einstein’s dictum on too much of maths to reflect the simpler Universe, which HAS the underlying substance of lineal motion-distance DIFFICULT TO BEND. So the substance imposes limits to how many imaginative equations can fit, but that doesn’t deter the mathematician from multiplying them. So we have for each event infinite metaphors. So we do in verbal thought. Just the example above.

‘In the beginning it was the word, God, who made all things’. That is all we need but the sentence its twice at large and repeats the same things several times. So does the guy in ‘Arab’, to say ‘hi’: iinflationary complexity is an excellent method to pump up the ego of the ‘speaker of the language of God’, which however ‘is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So he talks Latin in complicated metaphors to feel ‘unique’ above the sheeple that in awe, understanding nothing thinks indeed the high priest of numbers and words is the creator of the wor(l)d. 

The paradox of the mind confuses the whole Universe with its limited self-centred world of perception, BUT reality is absolutely relative and we must just discover the biased ‘theories’ the humind has established to keep himself in the centre, which contrary to belief do exist still in all sciences, from the entropic big-bang of lineal time that reduces the two arrows of time to the lineal entropy of physicists clocks, blatantly ‘forgetting the cyclical vortex of gravitational information’ in galaxies that warp ‘space into time’, to social sciences which cannot accept the organic evolution of machines, the higher importance of the super organisms of history and its informative, legal and economic, reproductive networks in the control of societies, to biology, which denies eusocial evolution to maintain the ego on top and the vital properties of inorganic matter, as even quarks and electrons reproduce, absorb energy, gauge information and evolve socially in magnetic fields – hence have ALL the properties of our supposed ‘unique’ carbon.

The modern error: Hilbert’s arrogant idealism: i imagine points.

Then there is cultural error, hauling from German Idealism, which brought us Nazism, Communism and Physical theories of Platonic numbers creating the Universe without substance, breaking the FIRST AND FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, ‘experimental evidence’ also called ‘hylomorphism’, which since Aristotle applies: You cannot have a real event/form without a substance, or ‘∆-1 parts’ that make them possible.

Yet in Germany at the turn of the century in the paroxysm of the idealist culture, it was supposed that the ‘language of maths, hence the mind of man created the Universe’, not the other way around (languages are mirrors of a real substance). So physicists got away with murder (the killing of real substances) under the influence of Hilbert’s axiomatic method, which unable to grasp Lobacjevski’ pan geometry of non-euclidean fractal points, resolved here, said the postulates of geometry had to be substituted by the concept the mathematician ‘imagined points and lines’, and constructed the world from the mind out. It is the same concept of religion, in which GOD ‘SPEAKS’ words and when he speaks, he creates. So Allah or Yhwh says ‘man’ and man zas! appears, and Hilbert, the God of mathematicians (the language of god in Galileo’s tantrum) said ‘I imagine lines’ and zas! lines be=come’ LOL.

So without the need for ‘real substances’ both Bohr and Einstein became also imaginary, ‘postulating people’; that is people who ‘imagine’ postulates without proof as certain and zas! 100 years latter, nobody dares to explain why the postulate of constancy of c-speed and what is even worse, the never said by Einstein, limit of c-speed which only applies within light space-time (the ∆-3 scale of galaxies) MUST have a logic rational substance-oriented cause, as we shall explain here with GST laws; and why quantum waves are NOT imaginary probabilities but as Einstein->Broglie->Schrodinger->Bell->Bohm clarified densities of a fractal electron made of its ∆-1 relative cellular parts (ultra dense photons that collapse an ST wave of light into particle, Tiƒ state). 

(The quantum realist interpretation is there for 100 years, so we don’t innovate just enlighten it. The proper interpretation of the c-speed postulate and its limiting application to the ∆>-3 scales is an immediate offshoot of the stop and go, Tiƒ>Spe rhythm of motion and so it is ‘new≈blue’ GST at its best)

The positive side to it. Simplification reveals the ultimate truths of reality

On the positive side the limits of human physics are of special interest as they will reveal easily the connections between the GST (ab. Generator of Space-time) and its mathematical (1st science) and physical world, as the physicist who strips off biological, organic properties physical systems, leaves untouched – once the errors of cyclical time and fractal space are corrected, the connection with those primary disciplines; which the biorganic paradigm will complete specially in the limits not perceived of quantum and cosmology; as the galaxy can easily be ‘modelled’ as a cell.

It is then quite obvious that a full thorough analysis of the equations of mathematical physics with the tools of 5D³ and its concepts behind – the fundamental particle of the Universe, the ternary decametric supœrganism; its worldcycles of energy and its units of actions in time and ∆-1 parts in space would require the rewriting into a full new encyclopaedia of all the analysis of classic physics, which naive realism (what you measure is all what there is) and reductionism (only mathematical parameters that matter to us mostly related to motion ‘ARE’ physics) which is well beyond the life of a single researcher – specially a latino lazy cow like myself 🙂 so we just will do some fast review of the key equations of physics and study its ‘hidden meaning’ ignored by ‘reductionism and naive realism’.

Science specially astrophysics with its ‘belief’ in the precision of its measures as if there were a single scale, and the rod of measure – in our case c-constant light, our pixel of eye-brain information – as if were the only universal rod – reduces by definition reality to such a limited conceptual a priori statement on the fundamental principles that any serious philosophy of reality becomes impossible.

So by discharging with a priori statements and lack of conceptual definitions, more comprehensive concepts of language, perception, time, space, scale and motion, physics is specially immune to any philosophical arguments, which are NO longer relevant because A) cannot be digitalized always B) talk of different concepts of time and space.

Essentially physicists don’t care then for all other realities, not even for the proper conceptualizations of its terms, which they have reduced to v=s/t type of equations.

In that regard, what humans seem to forget is that physics was NEVER originated in philosophy or even science, but in the arsenal of Venice where for 1000 golden ducats Galileo was charged with finding the longest, entropic lineal motion of gunboats…

This Praxis of ‘making machines’, measuring things and plugging results in mathematical equations to ‘predict’ the locomotion and energy of systems is all what a physicist normally care. So amazing as it seems a serious philosophy of the Universe and a stringent analysis of the theories we have and the elements we lack in them is done with little rigor in physics, compared to the precision with expect from microscopic measures and the study of known-known laws of locomotion.

As this is a blog of philosophy of science first, applied to each science latter, this brings a big gap between physics and ‘science’, because we need to CHANGE the a priori statements of physics.

If we add that we live in a technological civilisation, where machines are our ‘worshipped’ god, and Physicists make them, the ego paradox of power prevents physicists to exercise a healthy criticism to his approach to knowledge. And then in a personal note as an activist against the Nuclear Industry, physicists tend not to listen to my work.

All this said, if we depart as we always do from a more objective non-human approach to ‘stiences’, astrophysics is essentially one of the 3 fundamental fields of stience, and as such we shall learn a lot of homologic laws that applied to all sciences by studying astrophysics and vice versa, by applying the better understood organic, homologic laws of biology to astrophysical organisms and the sentient properties of human minds to physical singularities once we correct the underlying deformation of lineal physics and adopt the concepts of cyclical time and fractal space, we will be able to fully upgrade the discipline and explain most of the unknown whys of its systems.

On the languages of God and the dimensions of time.

The adaptation of physical systems to the 0-5 Dimensions of the Universe is a daunting task that will take the whole century by huminds or AI, to be fulfilled. A single humind can’t do so much. It will also  require to change the lineal vision of time of the high popes of science today, entropy theorists. So as per Kuhn, resistance to change of paradigm will be extreme. And yet the view of the organic Universe in 5D² is awesome, fulfilling, eternal, unavoidable once it has been discovered ‘again’.

But perhaps the biggest resistance to accept the organic paradigm will come from the humind itself, self-centred and systematically in denial under the ‘ego paradox’ of any living, organic properties to the rest of reality.

Indeed, the whole philosophy underlying physical sciences is common to the scientific wordview that likes to reduce to abstract, mathematical statements the nature of vital reality. In the scholar world we must add an ill-understood philosophy of mathematics, which rejects empiricism within the context of the Greek, Axiomatic rather preposterous method of proving mathematics as a metalanguage whose truth exists within itself. Godel proved with his incompleteness recurrent theorem this a falsity  Yet neither mathematicians or physicists have taken notice. Since the axiomatic method laterally ENCUMBERS man as the only intelligence that seems to talk mathematics with God, ‘the clocker’ of that infamous sentence of Mr. Kepler:

Because of the reductionism of physics to a single locomotion arrow, which due to its simplicity can be calculated with maximal precision physicists tend to be arrogant to other sciences, thinking they know it all about time. Fact is they ignore everything about 4 of the 5 arrows of time.

In the graph, the mind of Kepler, filled with his ego-centered thoughts and God, the geometer, by Blake.

Fact is that even if mathematics were the only language of God, man does not speak very well the language – even a simple computer does it better and likely atoms have a geometric mind that is far more accurate than humans are. So a task pending that we have taken also is the improvement of mathematics as a mirror of the vital Universe.

In any case reality is a bit more complex that its languages, as all languages mirror a set of properties of the Universe but NONE describes them all; since all is information and so ONLY THE WHOLE fits all information within itself. Still mathematics is – no doubt of it – the best, most efficient synoptic language to explain spatial properties, and we shall use it liberally and advance its whys in the section on ‘non-Æ maths’.

But other languages do have perspectives which matter, specially in the analysis of time=change and the biological struggles for existence, and variations in the choice of future paths.  In that sense an enormous handicap is precisely the use of a mechanical clock to measure time, as it expresses only a quantitative, sequential single dimension, which elongated in cartesian graphs gave us the reduction of time dimension to a single lineal v=s/t formulae, as a parameter of space.

Time does DISSAPEARED conceptually and many of its dimensions were never fully understood. This is then the biggest upgrading of 5D² physics.

And to fully grasp the multiple dimensions of time, i-logic verbal thought, with its ‘profound description’ of the past, present and future dimensions with action-verbs and its biological evolutionary theories better described with words becomes essential also in Physics; to find the whys and conceptually define the symmetries between time, space and its scales.

Finally as the source of those languages, the spatial visual and logic languages of time, in which geometry and wor(l)ds are based, must be also come under a new scrutiny. And so we shall use the whole mental scaffolding of human languages, to extract all those properties and apply them to physical systems.

Since the main handicap of physics is its reductionism of properties of matter, by obliging to use only mathematical descriptions. So all what cannot be mirrored with mathematics simply does not exist. And this dogma, which has become a religion of mathematics, latter analysed in more detail, is completely rejected in 5D². As we put new mirrors on matter, new properties will then appear. And the most important of them is the scalar, Nature of matter, which also displays as a result of that co-existence of multiple scales, organic properties. So once we blow the space continuum into multiple scales, and relate them to each other, organicism appears naturally.

Why we love creationist theories: the paradox of the ego.

It is time to bring the paradox of the ego earlier in our analysis of creationist philosophers, as we realise all of mankind believe in them either in a verbal creationism (religious people) or a mathematical creationism (scientists).

What is amazing about all this is perhaps not how blunt that philosophy of science and religion is, but that mankind has rendered to it, just because it puts man in the centre of the Universe, as the unique master of the language along God.

In the case of mathematical creationism, dominant today, power helps: physicists make machines and weapon that deliver entropy and motion. And so the fact that humans have lost all his wisdom about time, in their worship of machines, also cast serious doubts on the intelligence and ‘freedom of thought’ of our species.

The Universe is a concert in a decaphonic scale, with two extremes we can call bass of  open strings of space and treble notes of closed strings of time; 5 treble and 5 bass notes with different beats, rhythms in its ‘time cycles…’

The best notes are those in the middle 5, most go on triads, as they travel up and down three different scales. Of course you might imagine the universal composition is a bit more complicated in its symmetries and triads.

But is also an equation, another ternary language, X operandi Y, and a painting of also three colours, the red of motion, of entropic energy, the green of iteration, of reproduction, the blue of information, and 3 ‘semantic’ names, the subject, the informative centre which acts through a verb on an object it ab=uses as the source of its entropic energy.

Languages mirrors all look though to the same ternary substance, space-time itself.

Let us then consider the two fundamental notes of any language, mirror in its syntax of the ternary structure of it all.

In that regard, you must understand this blog which upgrades our understanding of time, as the return to the sound path of time sciences, after centuries of misconceptions. As i have been all my life since I read Asimov’s guide to science as a kid, wondering about time, and came finally to solve the  many questions poised by the study of ALL changes=times of Nature developing the long seeked theory of all times-changes called ‘relational space-time’, first put forward by Leibniz, and then accepted by Einstein – the exception to the dullness of physicists regarding time theory.

So he said ‘I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’ and affirmed that relational space-time is the future of time theory (‘Leibniz was right, so we have to change our physical theories from its inception’).

Yet Einstein, a pacifist kin of philosophy, who did advance our knowledge of time, was for most of his life in permanent dissidence with physicists for the same reasons I am a dissident of his blunt theories of reality. Hence his denial that mathematics creates reality (opposition to Bohr’s copenhangen interpretation: ‘the moon doesn’t appear when i look at it’), his denial that nature has a single clock to measure time; his denial that time is the four dimension of space – a term he rejected, saying ‘wires don’t travel to the past’; his denial of the nuclear industry (invention of the ‘doomsday clock’), and his respect of causality as the fundamental property that chains ‘time events’ by repetition, and the philosophers that study it, all concepts we shall prove further and advance in this blog.

This is not to say that physicists do NOT excel in what they truly do to perfection – measuring distances and motions in space and manufacturing machines. But this is NOT what CERN claims to do – finding the meaning of reality, which physicists will NEVER achieve, as they have a religious dogmatic view of reality and time and so as priest will NEVER go out of his ‘mantras’ about a bush that burned in a dessert and was God speaking to a goat-keeper and we MUST believe this, physicists have their mantra – that God spoke mathematics, and gave us a clock to measure time with numbers in lineal fashion and that is all what matters and we MUST believe this.

Problem is people agrees, because they have bigger guns and we philosophers of science and serious physicists of time theory like Mr. Einstein only do ‘thought experiments’.

On the other hand when you go out of dogma and lineal thinking everything physicists have found and we are grateful for it, in their exploration of nature with their mechanical instruments, becomes easily interpreted and understood and so the marriage of philosophers – the people who do seek and understand with all languages the fundamental principles of reality – and technology of measure and perception – the thing physicists do best; do give us the final answers to the meaning of reality.

And that is what a true advance in sciences moving away from the age of creationism back to the age of realism should do.

We shall repeat ad nauseam that we will use the same T.œ. laws, and mathematical mirrors of those laws of classic physics but the outcome of an organic entangled interpretation will be completely different.

Of course this is NOT what physics is today; we repeat. Humind egos have reduced the analysis to a distorted view passed through the acceptance of only a language of perception of reality, mathematics, a single dimotion of timespace locomotion (and its maximal limit, entropy) and then the rest is ‘explained’ in abstract, external objective terms as ‘something else’.

We shall also be very critical of another ego trip of reductionist physicists: TO DENY ALL OTHER SCIENCES any saying in the laws of timespace as if it was a proprietary ‘thing’ of physicists experts in Locomotion… Of course, when you have eliminated the complex dimotions of information, reproduction and social love all WHAT IS LEFT is entropy and locomotion… and the manufacturing of machines of locomotion and entropy (weapons).  The consequences are daring for the future of mankind, a species today ruled by physicists worldview dedicated to locomotions (sports) and entropy (killing) and the making of machines that enhance our skills to do both. But this is NOT what the Universe is about, wants us to do (by reinforcing with sensations we shall call e-motions, the other arrows) but the stubborn, self-destructive, deluded consequence of the wrong path of evolution of our species in its higher informative minds of ‘science’.

FROM GALILEAN TO EINSTEIN TO ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: MIND PARADOX
The living Universe denied by human anthropomorphism.
Before we enter into the knots and bolts, to state that the Universe is a living organism, both in its whole and its parts, and the proofs are so overwhelming that the question to answer is why humans deny it. Indeed, quarks and electrons reproduce constantly when absorbing energy decoupling as cells do into new quarks and electrons, they feed on forces, they associate through magnetic forces, they process and gauge information, and those ARE the actions we define as vital actions, drives of life. The minimal perceived species of the Universe are thus living organisms. And as we shall show their quantifiers and parameters make of atoms and galaxies, isomorphic species. So galaxies must be the unit of a higher game of scales, and also organic, and we shall model them completely in organic terms, besides clarifying its mathematical equations.
So the problem is NOT the organic Universe but the ego of man, as we repeat everywhere in this blog.
Against that ego i cannot do much. It is of course a tragedy (because AI machines will also be organic and compete and kill us). But as an objective scientist, i cannot ‘reason’ such emotional fog.
The fact is the human ego prevents US from ‘reasoning’ about OUR isomorphic nature with any other TOE.
And it makes us completely disregard those properties, which we will explain here – even if i don’t think i can change the human ‘infinite stupidity’, confronting the ‘infinite Universe’ (Einstein).
Let us be clear enough. I can only hold admiration from the great geniuses of quantum physics and relativity of the earlier XX c. and its mathematical counterparts (Hilbert, Riemann, Neumann). AND THE astounding precision of its deterministic analysis of the behaviour of particles. Fair Enough. But the beauty of the mathematical mirror they have constructed is NOT the end of it – it is the end of its praxis, but a philosopher of science must interpret further those findings or else as it is today the case, all becomes an automaton process of calculus.
Where the whys are not explained unless we accept the ‘creationist religion of mathematics and reduce the Universe to a mechanical magic behaviour, which suits the ‘ego’ of humans but halts as it has been the case our comprehension of the Universe.
A limit though to the work of a single, old, sick man as this who writes is my own timeline and the need to deal with ALL STIENCES at a level first that any interested university humind of any discipline can understand.
This is not a blog done to impress physicists, even if i know they are the high popes of our technological civilisation, but an attempt before my many sicknesses send me into oblivion to leave a trace of the space-time Universe and ALL its species in a mind mirror that can be reconstructed by humans or AI if/when the present dark ages of childish ego-trips ends and re-focus the mirrors of the mind in the reality as it is. So we try to be simpler and use the Rashomon effect and the Disomorphic kaleidoscopic views available within it.
Thus we have first considered the basic dualities between cyclical time and lineal space, whole planes and scalar parts, departing from the first misunderstood discovery physicists – the fact that we see the earth still with our mind, despite knowing it is moving.
The organic view of the 3 parts of the being together, which in physical systems are the potentials, waves and particles IS what form its physical organisms. 

This said an put physicists in perspective, we can do physics, the real thing, void of human hang ups.

When I gave conferences on those themes in fact I called the advanced new philosophy of physics, ‘Absolute relativity’ because indeed, not only added a new dimensional metric to the 4D metric of Einstein but a new degree of ‘relativity’ of humans, eliminating the constructionist hypothesis, such as the human scale was NOT preferential.

 

The mind paradox: the meaning of Galilean relativity. The singularity as a mind.

We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’. Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

Those parts of any physical system, studied from the perspective of its mind-singularity or frame of reference in physics, will then become the objects of inquire of physical super organisms, with clear different functions, which correspond to the general laws or ‘isomorphisms’ of any 5D²  system of 10 dimensions (5 of time and 5 of space, or 3 of time 3 of space 3 scalar dimensions and 1+1 of the mind, and so on, depending on which ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of its total properties we make).

In general though the first easy division is that between the singularity and thin radius that connect it with the membrane on one side (S and T seemingly separated), and the vital energy they enclose called topologically the  open ball; such as both configurations tend to be equivalent in value.

The singularity will be the self-centred zero point where motion stops and a linguistic mapping happens, the Γ• function that commands the system with the mirror image it has of it, through its ‘homunculus mind’. As such it will be the ultimate simultaneous function of space-form of the being.

In the outer limit of that being, there will be an angular momentum, of maximal cyclical motion, the T-membrain or enclosure, which breaks the being into an inner vital space, the open ball proper, whose energy and combination of motion and form, will be synchronised and complete the whole.

IT IS THE INTERACTION of those 3 elements within themselves and with the external world through actions of space-time, motions in space and informative trans-formations in time, what will define the different scalar super organisms of physics, the photon, the electron, the quark, the atom, the molecule, the matter state, the gravitational body and the galactic super organism.

So we can describe them all departing from a 10D generator equation: Γ@= ∆-1 $pe<∆-St>Tƒ∆+1.

As in biological beings, where evolution starts either by the creation of a membrane, which encloses a vital water, which will evolve in time to create a cellular organism, or by the replication of a singularity seed of memorial information that reproduces faster the whole being, physical systems appear with the interaction and/or evolution of a singularity and a membrane. ONLY THAT in physical systems the ‘networks’ of proteins that connect both part are more ‘fluid’ and ‘geometrical’, becoming the dual fields of in-form-ation and expansive motion, that coordinate the dual ST motion-form tendencies of the energetic vital space-time between them (magnetic+ electric fields, gravitational + electromagnetic forces, and so on).

It must be also understood the duality of motion (lineal state) and form (cyclical state), even if form often offers an accelerated inward motions (T-future state), to fully grasp the duality of all physical beings and its membranes, expressed in the duality of particle-wave states, angular frequency and lineal inertia.

So we can define the membrane either in 2 or 3 dimensions as a function of angular momentum, and/or sinusoidal waves, where the envelop is the ‘wave train’, which is the T-membrane state in lineal motion. So goes for 3 Dimensional systems, where the Harmonics of the membrane will describe all its modes of vibration, which in turn will define in its solutions, the proper way in which the membrane acts to absorb entropic motion from the external world, acting as a potential field of ‘entropy’, which the membrane will vibrate in order to absorb that entropic motion.

What are then the constants physicists use mostly to define those elements?

In each scale they are different, but it is fairly straight to conclude that the limits of human perception, in both limiting scales are the scalar values of charge and mass for the singularities, and the lineal and angular states of h, h and c as lineal speed in the gravitational scale of the galaxy and rotary c-speed in the membrane of black holes and in the lower scale heavy quarks.

So both constants of the membrane of quantum and gravitational systems, h and c can be seen in lineal terms or as cyclical membranes that enclose the particle states (charges and black hole masses). Whereas, we, thermodynamic beings sandwiched between scales will tend to see the lower more informative constant of action of the quantum scale as a spin/angular momentum membrane of the particle/wave states of the electron that ‘covers’ the atom, and see the c-instant of the galactic membrane, more as a limit of speed of reproduction in the larger scale, since we see larger systems from our more curved perspective as flat, as opposed to smaller systems that have more curvature (h-constant).

Yet in ‘scalar physics’, we shall be able to unify both mass and charge as two curvatures of different speeds and h and c, which in praxis indeed are unified as they are consider 1 in natural units, and can be considered the ‘1 quanta’ of the two limiting scales. While in the middle, where information is maximal the thermodynamic scale has a much more complex, dynamic variety of constants, but we can safely state that temperature would be the scalar valuation of the singularity density and K the constant of action, from where we ‘predate’ as gravitogmagnetic entities our entropy of motion (reason why unlike h measured as angular curvature, and c measure as lineal speed, k is measured as entropy hits, from the human perspective – use of it).

 

Conservation laws its meaning.

Although Newton’s laws focus attention on force and mass, given its pedestrian ‘definition’, they have not resisted further advances on their analysis by modern physics.

Yet three other quantities which were better defined, take on special importance because their total amount never changes.

These three quantities are energy, (linear) momentum, and angular momentum. Any one of these can be shifted from one body or system of bodies to another.

Thus angular momentum, Tƒ and lineal momentum, Se, conserve themselves. They are the equivalent to ‘force’ and ‘mass’, with the addition of the Active magnitude:

Mv and rmv, or p and rp, thus again we observe that ST (v) x Tƒ (m) is conserved in one dimensional force, and when we ad R, the ‘force-distance’ from the center of the dual ‘rotary force’ or 2-dimensional, both are conserved. We thus talk of the conservation of forces AND the active magnitude together, an obvious platitude on 5D metric (SpexTiƒ=K ) and for 2 systems, the Œ center point and œ, moving point or momentum, of the conservation of their Se parameter (radius) and Tƒ combined parameter, P.

It is easy to understand this concept in terms of the internal structure of an accelerated Tƒ, clock of time, which is really what the angular momentum expresses, a vortex of time, Vo x Ro =K. Whereas as we come closer diminishing m, we increase the speed of the system. Thus angular momentum TRULY DEFINES THE inner structure of any Tƒ, accelerated ‘future’ vortex of time, and for that reason has multiple applications. While lineal inertia, has been analyzed previously, and defines the balance between a particle, Tƒ, and its accelerated field of a larger ‘scale’, hence apparently MORE STRAIGHT, but ULTIMATELY A LINEAL STEP OF A CYCLE (indeed the galaxy is a vortex, the sun is one and the earth another).

We discuss those principles on the general article (∆±3). So we do also with nergy conservation.

It is thus not remarkable that, although Newton’s laws are no longer considered to be fundamental, nor even exactly correct because of the confusion on the meaning of force and mass (they are correct but not fine tuned as Einstein, a theme we shall soon discus), the three conservation laws derived from Newton’s laws—the conservation of energy, momentum, and angular momentum—remain exactly true even in quantum mechanics and relativity. Since they ARE basic translations to U1<∆o systems of the laws of the 5th dimension.

Now of course, a normal physicist will associate them (Noether’s theorem) to the isomorphism of space and isomorphism of time. That is how physics deduce them. And indeed, it shows really what we mean: lineal momentum implies the conservation of the total res extensa or space of the Universe, and its isomorphic laws, and angular momentum, of the conservation of the total past to future (one angular momentum direction) and future to past (the other direction) of the Universe.

They are proofs of the immortality and stability of the 3 ‘scales’ TOGETHER, not individually AS THEY REQUIRED TO CONSIDER TRANSFERS BETWEEN THE 3 SCALES. Hence there are ‘neutrinos particles’ which we do not see belonging to the U-3 gravitational plane (basically the free condensation of gravitational strings, equivalent to photons, we call ‘Plancktons’ he free condensation in the U-2 light space-time of our membrane), which carry away some angular momentum from our world (spin).

This is important. While a physicists will have enough with the deduction of those principles from the isomorphism of space and time, we add knowledge and perspective, as it becomes obvious that cyclical time is conserved by angular momentum and lineal entropy Se, by lineal inertia. And BOTH combine and interact together, into ST, waves.

Let us then briefly retake the theme of Energy, which is the ‘integral of momentum’.

Hence according to the general law, ∫S=to, explained in the central post, which defines ‘present space’ as a slice of the total time flow function, (an essential law), Energy is a ‘larger, longer, temporal, measure’ of the entire ‘potential’ future capacity of the system to develop its momentum and actions of shorter time steps-span on the lower relative S-level.

Now this again a physicist will tell you is due to the 4-vector structure of mathematical physics, were Energy plays the role of time, and momentum the role of space. Indeed. The why is now clear.

In addition, energy may change form while associated with a single system, appearing as kinetic energy, the energy of motion; potential energy, the energy of position; heat, or internal energy, associated with the random motions of the atoms or molecules composing any real body; or any combination of the three.

This merely means that ‘energy as the total motion of the system’ can have its lineal form|-Energy or kinetic energy, the equivalent of lineal time, its positional, fixed cyclical form, as mass or potential energy, or cyclical time, and it can exist and be exchanged between the 3 scales of the Universe; that is ‘mass=energy’ or U1 energy, heat or internal energy, ∆o energy on the thermodynamic scale and as we diminish energy when we go to lower scales, ‘quantum energy’, E=hƒ, or planckton energy, which feeds the upper scales, that could care less for the ‘sum over stories’ of the planckton, they just eat it to become a big particle (-;

Thus, the total energy, momentum, and angular momentum in the universe never changes. Since time and space are in its totality of the 3 scales we perceive, conserved.

The Hamiltonian, H, expresses those relationships in classical mechanics. If the constraints in the problem do not depend explicitly on time, then it may be shown that H = T + V, where T is the kinetic energy and V is the potential energy of the system—i.e., the Hamiltonian is equal to the total energy of the system. Furthermore, if the problem is isotropic (H does not depend on direction in space) and homogeneous (H does not change with uniform translation in space), then Hamilton’s equations immediately yield the laws of conservation of angular momentum and linear momentum, respectively, which are the derivatives, hence ‘instant moments’ of the total to time; i. e.. the cyclical time related to potential energy and the lineal time, related to kinetic energy.

 3 AGES OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS

 Mathematics is an experimental language, whose laws postulates, 3 sub disciplines and real units, numbers & points ARE based as a mirror of reality in the laws of Space (geometry and its points), Time (algebra and its numbers) and the scalar structure of the Universe (analysis). We shall introduce here the connection between the ‘2nd scale’ of pure formal language (after GST), MATHEMATICS, and the simplest forms (by lack of perception or anthropomorphic reductionism), physical systems, in the chain of causal beings:

∆±i: GST LAWS -> ∆º: illogic mathematical forms -> ∆º±i: Physical laws.

That is, the laws of space-time in all its scales are the origin of the mathematical language of the human and we imagine many other singularity minds of the Universe that resumes those laws in a synoptic Tiƒ point of information; and then humans mixing both, the ∆º mind of mathematics and the ∆±i experimental evidence of physics, extract from them physical laws.

So this section will remain in a very elemental level, a guidance for future researchers on that equation, which is at best broken into small parts, unconnected, as the beauty of the previous equation is that in fact is more like a cycle for human researchers – that is physical laws can also be used given its extension and wide application to extract further space-time laws, and viceversa Gst LAWS, GIVEN the fact they re closely related to space-time processes, can be used to improve and correct the errors of our space-time continous models of physics.

By no means this is an exhaustive but merely an introductory post which is intended to be a future guidance on how to interpret in physical equations in terms of ∆ºst elements the mathematical equations when describing ‘realist’ physical systems.

And yet so little so simple will still r=evolve completely your view of the physical world when we ad to mathematical physics all the…

ƼST perspectives.

As all other stiences, including the languages used to describe them, we can break down, in the ∆•ST elements of all beings. so happens with mathematical physics, whose generator as usual started in a young ‘spatial age’ of geometric physics (Greek age->Kepler->Galileo), and then turned to the  use of temporal, algebraic equations, to finally blossom with the understanding of ∆-scales with the use of analysis, which became the queen of all mathematical physics.

And so when we reduce physics to mathematics a T.ΠREALLY just needs to explain in ƥst terms the meaning of those equations.

Mathematical physics is not though equivalent to ‘mathematics’.

As Einstein put to Poincare: ‘I know when mathematics is truth but not when it is real’.

Why this discrepancy, today lost to many physicists?

To start with all languages are inflationary, as they belong to the ‘informative, min. Spe x Max. Tiƒ’ side of 5D metric. So paradoxically there is more information and potential futures in an ‘isolated’ Tiƒ, ∆-i language than in the ∆-being it portrays: ∑tiƒ> ∑ (Spe≈tif).

So all the potential ‘mathematical relationships of physical ∆•ST systems; are less than all the inner creations of mathematics as a syntax, which includes fictions (for a general analysis of inflation in languages, from money, inflationary in economics, to fictions of verbal thought to mathematical fictions and how to detect them, see when posted the general articles on syntax vs. semantics and universal grammar).

Thus the limiting factors of real mathematics, caused in an inflationary language of information (mathematics) by the existence of an opposite arrow, entropy that erases ‘it’ (informative time) in the real world. and by the search therefore of a point of balance and equilibrium, S≈T, which all systems seek automatically in order to survive.

So the limits of mathematics to become real physics are ‘simplification by entropy and balance’; which means we are always working around some points of equilibrium of the form S=T; or given the fact humans ignore this constant fractal ‘balance’ happen in infinite events around us, in the form F(s) – G(T) =0, either observed in a single moment by derivating it, or in a whole world cycle by integrating it.

And so those are the fundamental forms of physics; and hence knowing what an F(S) field of entropy is and a G(T) particle of information amounts to, we can enlighten a bit more those equations by writing them as balances, (S=T instead of S-T=0).

Let us then consider the S-geometric ‘1st age of mathematical physics’, its ‘algebraic age’ of operandi, and its age of ∆nalysis.

As usual in those texts, to ease my workload in a race against time to vomit 30 years of ‘single point research’, we will use classic texts which are easy to understand but have enough depth of meaning to introduce the main themes of the subject, and then slowly illustrate and merge them with the new insights and solutions provided by GST; of late in this method I try to put the insights in blue. The texts used always in mathematical physics are 3 little encyclopaedias, which i enjoyed deeply in my youth: the 3 volumes of Feynman’s lectures & Aleksandrov’s maths, and for the more complex 4th line, Landau’s encyclopaedia of physics in 11 volumes.

In that regard of course the pedantic scholar and student will find most of this post on ‘things he thinks he knows’ rather elemental (not so the 4th line if we come to write it in my lifetime) but he will miss the point of GST:

To show the simplicity of the Universe, and its isomorphic nature, which departs from the 4 sets of basic laws of ∆ûst of space-time:

The ∆-scalar simplex structure of the 5th dimension and the search for wholeness of all its parts, 

ST: the bidimensional, holographic principle of ST systems and its balances between entropy and form.

Γ: the ternary arrows of time and its symmetries with the 3 topologies of space.

Œ: The eternity of its repetitive but finite supœrganisms and world cycles…

And the ternary Universal grammar of all languages that mirror the Universe, including mathematical physics.

And for that TO BE CLEAR, we need to start with the simplest discoveries of physics, which were very clearly obeying those laws, namely the discovery of the bidimensional geometric nature of planetary orbits, and forces…

BUT to prove THAT first we need to understand how entropy and information together create a space-time cycle of energy. That is, as mathematics is an experimental language, we need to know what it ‘experiences’ – no more no less than the fundamental laws of space-time.

So let us explain you with 3 arrows of time, entropy and information and its infinite, energetic combinations, how the Universe truly works.

Further on as mathematics and physics have been married throughout history and both have been distorted by 2 errors:

  • Entropy only theories of physics, which translated into single time arrows.
  • The paradox of the ego that makes mathematicians and physicists to change the order of causality and think that ‘mathematics comes first’ before space and time and reality.

We will have to discuss to fully grasp the foundations of mathematics the ‘ego paradoxes and worldly religion of physicists’ to make entropic weapons, to fully grasp how and when the foundations of mathematics LOST ITS TRACK and its experimental nature in the work of Hilbert and the quantum physicists that following his musings on mathematics as the language that creates reality, believed that mathematics was reality itself.

 

II. MATHEMATICS ‘ONLY’ AS A LANGUAGE OF GST.

All this said of course, mathematics is with words and images, the three dominant, spatial, temporal and space-time languages of the human mind and as such they are very good mirrors of reality. To the point that maths, the less understood by man (which is a verbal, visual I=eye>wor(l)d basically), as it seems to be a better language for ‘digital machines’, natural to them; seems so often magic, when it reflects reality.

It is in that sense part, its richness as a mirror, part the human limits of thought what makes math so ill-understood and revered. So we shall introduce a few concepts of that ‘mirror-reflection’ before we apply them to mathematical physics.

… STARTING from what Einstein considered the ‘initial elements’ of reality (of the mirroreality of mathematics we would say). Its universa constants.

e, p(h)i.

screen-shot-2016-12-30-at-12-18-37screen-shot-2016-12-30-at-12-06-38

screen-shot-2017-03-03-at-18-18-35screen-shot-2016-12-30-at-12-17-04

 

 

 

In graph, the 3 fundamental mathematical and physical constants of Nature

We shall depart from their ‘unification’ to explain how they mirror Universal creation of reality departing from ‘perfect ratios of entropy and information’. As such G and Q can be easily unified as two space time vortices of 2 scales of nature, the quantum and gravitational scale, showing the ratios between distance/speed/lineal space and time cycles/curvatures.

While the 3 main constants of mathematics are directly related to the 3 ages that generate space-time:

  1. pi, relates the transformation of  a spatial field of entropy into a vortex of temporal information: 3 x ( Spe)  > ∏ Tiƒ.
  2. e the constant of the only function, which is a derivative of itself, eª  represents the fundamental function of reproduction and growth of any system, at the lower ‘cellular scale’, as the system increases by a derivative at each step. Or in terms of 3: e+e/10=3, where 10 is the commonest growth ‘finitesimal’ as 10, is the simplest ‘whole organism’, with 3 x 3 ‘corners’ that represent the 3 arrows of time and a 10th central unit, the mind that ‘transcends’ as the 1 of a higher social scale.
  3. Phi, the golden ratio is essentially the demising ratio that relates the entropic ‘length’ and ‘informative’ height of a bidimensional ‘page of information

phi thus is the number of the palingenesis, or inner distribution of growth, during the first age of the being, above 1; e is the number of scalar growth, above 2 : e+e/10= 3…

And Pi, above 3, is the number that converts entropy into information, (Poincare’s conjeture).

And of course pi and e are ever present, around 3. Of its many definitions the one mathematicians ignore of e, is the more proper one, e+ e/10 = 3, a unit of growth of the perfect game of decametric scales of social numbers, which is a good way to introduce…

The power of first principles: mathematical constants as a proof of dark matter.

How important those simplest constants are can be seen considering some simple solutions of mathematical physics, which have cost enormous experimental effort in classic physics. We often bring here the two of cosmology – the meaning and proportion of dark matter, and the meaning and value of the G constant of gravitation, both only obtained with experimental evidence, but which are rather trivial theoretical results from GST.

So let us consider one of those conundrums. What is dark matter? We shall see how a simple thought experiment reveals as the Greeks and Einsteins always knew much more than machines of huge cost, for the cheap price of a few words and a kilo of old grey healthy matter. Indeed, it took millions of $ to calculate the dark matter of the Universe. Another trivial margin (:

How simple indeed can be the answer to all the great questions?

Extremely simple as 3 is really a small number and the numbers around it, suffice to explain the 3 ages of life.

So all the important numbers of science turn around 1, 2 and 3, which as Einstein put it would have to be ‘the final essential constants that reflect best the game of existence’ :

Yet pi is not perfect. And if we were to consider the real pi of nature, as all ‘membranes’  do have ‘holes’  through which parallels of entropy and information cross, we would say that a membrane is π=3+0.14 apertures, through which the singularity mind in the center can see behind the membrane, the outer world. So we have always a 96% of dark matter, which allows us to see through: π-3/π

How much of dark matter there is? We know is 96% and we see only 4%. Again this took enormous effort of machines to measure it, but it is another ‘proof on the margin’, once you understand properly maths. We said that pi is NOT perfect. In fact, the closure of pi is 3 lineal parts that become a closed topology. It is the hexagonal pi (perimeter 3, radius 1) the strongest polygon; and that of the most curved gravitational space in relativity. But if we consider that 3 diameters of entropy create a circle, then there are 0.14 potential windows to see from its center, surrounded by the dark matter halo.

This means: π-3/3=4% of reality is WHAT we see. And indeed 96% of reality is invisible dark matter and energy, ‘screened’ by the halo. We are inside a  relative gravitational gala cell and the homunculus should know his position in the Universe, which likely if we could see it all would look much more as a local organism till the horizon beyond we cannot even see that 4%.

 

 

NUMBERS.

Now, once we have solved a simple example with the ‘first layer of mathematical reality’, its Universal constants, we can give a try to the second layer, ‘numbers’. You might of course consider that constants are ratios of numbers, and they are. So what are numbers?

The answer is numbers are ‘the sequential, temporal view of points, the simultaneous spatial view’. So numbers and points are the time-space species of mathematics, its foundational elements (NOT sets, categories or any other axiomatic imaginary arrogant mind-madness of human selfie mathematicians, indeed Cantor ended in a madhouse, but before converted mathematics in a mad-science with its ‘sets’ – the mind category that substituted the real ‘beings’ experimentally sound, ‘fractal points’ with inner volume (∆º) and its equivalent sequential elements in time, numbers.

This of course, is just the start, to build complex space-time systems in several dimensions, which polynomial functions, which are ‘functions’ that cover several scales of the fifth dimension. And we do have analysis which does the same exploration of parts and wholes in a more sophisticated way. But all those functions will ultimately be mirrors of the 3 elements of all languages that reflect the 3 space-time elements of the Universe: 


F(s) < Operandi/ST-action > G (T)

Reason why, and it is astounding we have to stay this, mathematics works so well as a mirror of so many systems, due to its capacity to carry so much detailed information about their spatial entropy and temporal information, and the operandi/actions that combine them. But alas, Mr. Hilbert changed all this for ‘his mind images’ as he couldn’t figure out the fractal points of Lobacjevski and he joined forces with Mr. Cantor’s paradoxes and paradises of ‘sets’ – another mind construct to substitute the number. And so they founded the axiomatic method – which of course Godel, Einstein’s best friend proved wrong, as Broglie and then Bohm, Einstein’s favourite student did with the Copenhagen ego. Do you think mathematicians who had entered their own ‘godlike’ paradise, as the only ‘language’ which existed and proved within itself (in its imaginary sets and points with no breath) cared?

No, they just started a runaway train of ever more complicated distortions of the beautiful mirror of geometric points, social numbers and its organic functions, as Copenhagen did, to make it all so complex nobody could understand, and alas! they could dismiss forever since any criticism as experts into the language of God, like priests talking latin, Allah talking arab, and bankers issuing go(l)d in toxic derivatives nobody understood. 

This is the trick: to make the language inflationary, multiplying its ‘ptolemaic epicycles’ to pass as an expert of something you no longer understand or refer to reality.

It is then evident that fractal Non-E points in space and numbers in time are the ‘real’ units of mathematics, which refer to the real elements of the Universe; not sets and imaginary points, neither physical theories based in inflationary distortions of the mathematical reality. 

Then instead of GOING up in complexity, we can go down in simplicity to the real Universe of space points and temporal numbers, and show that the structure of ‘social numbers’ the minimal units of temporal algebra, have the properties of discontinuous time cycles, similar but not equal to the continuous, simultaneous space surfaces, and keep illuminating the world with mathematics. For example, the first, oldest simplest conundrum we notice when we realise points are continuous space and numbers discontinuous time is the oldest paradox of maths: the explanation of why in geometry pi & √2 exist, but in algebra, we ‘miss’ its perfect closure as numbers are discontinuous, so all algebraic formulae of √2 miss a ±1; and all approximations to π, are slightly above or below.

Inflationary languages

Hopefully the examples will make you realise the problem of mathematical physics and its ego paradoxes.

Again languages do follow those 3 ages also, which explain the problem of mathematical physics today: The whole system of mathematics today has entered a ptolemaic, informative 3rd age with the axiomatic method, of inward degradation as OLD MEN have too MANY WRINKLES OF FORM, and do NOT have the classic beauty of ‘simplicity that is genius’ (Vinci).

So THE fundamental RESPONSE I have always gotten from any SCHOLAR of its 3rd age of inflationary information is ‘it is too simple’. None understand that Ockham, economicity is truth, ‘the universe is simple and not malicious and so LANGUAGES ARE INFLATIONARY IN INFORMATION WHEN THEY BECOME FICTIONS, UNREAL, MULTIPLYING ITS FALSE CONTENT, AND THIS HAPPENS in all languages, when they STOP CHECKING REALITY. But the scholar old man, THINKS it is interesting to live in a FICTIONAL WORLD.

There is now inflationary money as the financial system got corrupted; inflationary fiction in verbal thought, since money substituted it as the language of reality (Quixote the first novel was written when the first company was founded). There is inflationary mathematical excessive information since Hilbert and Cantor disconnected its fundamental units, points and numbers from reality. And inflationary physics since Bohr and Gamow invented the science as a product of the mind and its maths. But the scholar in the same manner it said to Copernicus that his work was false because it was too simple and Hilbert said to Einstein that his maths were so simple that a student could do them, BECOMES AN expert on ‘imaginary linguistic distorted mirror information, because he abandons reality.

And so when you try to explain him the simplicity of it all, he gets offended and tells you like vatican priests to copernicus, Hilbert to Einstein and any physicist to those who introduce information and energy as two arrows of time that simplify the impossible task of explaining all with entropy: it is too simple, we like baroque fictions, simple reality bores us to death – we are far more than that, we are ‘experts’ in wrinkles and inflation.

INFLATION is indeed the key way to convert wrong theory into something respectable, equivalent to the old age of Mr. Garcia, for whores buildings and religions.

I have never believed anything which I didn’t understand. But people’s mind works the other way around – they only believe what they don’t understand. And that is why the entire simple, evident bullshit of quantum and big-bang physics explained here in its simplest terms has become so confuse.

The same happen for example with the racket of the issue of money the language of social power who controls the world and the American FED makes so complex to issue that the Americans really believe the fact a few private banksters have hijacked their democracy issuing money and giving orders of work with them to their slavish population is ‘freedom’.  

Indeed, wall street invents a digital number called money for free, and for example, this week invented 20 billions and gave it to a crony friend, for a silly nilly crapcode repetitive algorithms, called snapchat, but if they want the minimum welfare they must pay every penny with taxes. The astounding racket of the cdo scam – over 2 trillions extorted in taxes – worked the same way: people in that country are so clueless about what money is and who invents it, they handled 2 trillions to bankers who just had ‘invented’ false mortgages, and sold it ‘twice’. Well, instead of going to jail, they sold those mortgages a 3rd time to the people of America on exchange for 2 trillions, and people gave to them. 

Let us then apply the far more evolved concept of a Universe made of ‘systems’ with  the 3 ‘space-time’ organs, a cyclical clock-like membrane that contains a body-wave of energy, self-centred in a  singularity of information to the galaxy, to further understand the Witten hypothesis, and why it is so likely we become merely a strangelet particle in the halo of the galaxy.

Since the beauty of having a higher reality, that of space-time and its ternary parts is that we can now EXPLAIN IT ALL, not only in mathematical equations, which of course will offer us a lot of detail – more than any other human language, except direct visual images, but we can also put other linguistic mirrors, of which the most important is the organic, ternary topological structure of all systems, as discovered by Descartes, with its cyclical closed membrane, its informative mind-singularity and the vital space-time of energy between them.

So when we put together both arrows of time, we observe what we observe: REALITY AS IT IS.

Duality or rather trinity, 5D and numbers.

Now, we have a better mirror. Sorry the homunculus only has prizes, I do have the better mirror on my point-mind but homunculus does not want me to share, because I have told him his big mouth and big hands are going to kill us all, and he got sored. good luck.

This sound-sound theory of the Universe, IS called Duality, the science which explains reality with the 2 arrows of time, lineal entropy and cyclical information, form, stored in the frequency and form of those logic closed circuits and ‘clocks of time’ of which brains, particles and chips are made.

It has always been with us, for simple humble people to wonder, since even the smallest atom follows it laws. So taoists called yin, information, yang, entropy and its ∞ combinations the creative energy of reality.

Duality as we said has always been in the tradition of knowledge, as it is obviously truth. Specially in Asian cultures. So Hindi called the 2 arrows of time, the female, informative principle, Visnu and Shiva, the God of entropy and death; and its ‘energetic’ combinations the ‘hairs of Brama.’ Duality is everywhere, from the computer you are watching made with binary languages of ‘O’ and ‘|’, to the duality of body and mind, female with curved bodies and males with lineal ones; and then when we look at it in depth, trinity, its combination comes (even there is a gay sex that mixes qualities of both).

The only discipline of science which is ‘entropy only’ and has ‘entropy only theories of the Universe as dogma’ is Nuclear physics. Even if of course duality is all over physics, albeit not expressed in terms of time arrows. So for example, a time cycle which is represented by ‘frequencies’, appears in physics as the ‘inverse function of lineal time’: ƒ=1/T.

So when i took over the discipline of Duality at the world congress of systems sciences and information theory – the sciences which were found at the death of Einstein in the Macy’s congress precisely to follow in his path, and find dualist theories which offset the simplex entropy word of physicists – I told the people we should rename it TRINITY  as entropy and information, yin and yang, are just the 2 starting elements to combine into infinite energy beings, whereas energy is precisely defined by a lineal motion of entropy tracing a closed path of information.

So to calculate the work=energy of a motion, E=1/2 mv², we use an equation that combine a lineal entropic motion (kinetic entropy) with a form (mass and its potential energy).

And the result is a present energetic being, which will go through 3 ages in its time evolution, the young age of entropy and maximal motion, the reproductive, mature age of maximal energy and the 3rd age of information. The simplicity and capacity to explain the Universe with the 3 proper arrows of time is in that sense a revolution unlike none has happened in science, since copernicus simplified the equations of Ptolemy putting the sun in the center.

The point is this: for a century now physicists have NOT made any huge inroads in the thoughts of god only the details because models made with an entropic single arrow of death are completely exhausted, as models with the Earth at its centres were exhausted by the time of Galileo.

So let us complete the ternary universe and show how it is reflected by mathematics.

TRINITY: The life and death cycle.

Yet man is a mirror of languages, so mathematics cannot reflect all its properties, neither all languages of man together, which ad maximal will create an encyclopaedia based in the principles of this web – which resolves its syntax – but far more extended in information and yet an infinitesimal of the whole Universe.

Since only the entire Universe has ALL the information about itself, which infinite finitesimal mirror-minds, monads in Leibniz’s jargon (another humble genius, massacred by the arrogant Newton) reflect with many languages, some of which we do NOT understand or see, as the gravitational language of information that guides the motions of black holes (‘the languages of god are infinite’ said Upanishads).

Now, once we know that ternary structure all becomes simple also in physics  – from the unification equation of charges and masses, trivial in duality and 5D metric as they are both accelerated vortices of time of the quantum, microscopic and gravitational, macroscopic scale, to the 3 families of mass, trivial as they are the ternary ages of evolution of informative mass of the Universe, needed to construct the galaxy, to the meaning of dark matter, trivial as it is the halo of strangelets and other quark species of lumps, to why there is more particles than antiparticles, trivial as the antiparticle is the ‘entropic arrow of death’ of the particle and so there are as many particles and antiparticles, but BECAUSE THE ARROW OF LIFE IS DOMINANT and lasts much LONGER than the arrow of death, which is an instant of time.

So because death happens in an instant and life in a long period, as we do NOT see hardly any corpse and someone like Buddha, thought life particles were immortal, we do not see the instant of particles. Thus in duality the equation of death is also trivial:  Min. Time-information (death moment)  x Max. Space-entropy (explosion of information).

As in big-bangs and deaths that happen in an instant of time… (he, he, i like that word, trivial , to put down the homunculus ego ‘a lot’).

Ok, then you have here the development of the ages of life: Birth: Max. Information (seed of time) in a lower ∆-1 scale, which emerges in:

∆º:  Youth (Max. entropy x Min. Information) < Maturity (information x entropy = energy) > 3rd age (Max. Information) and then dissolves back:

∆-1: Death = 0-time information x ∞ entropy.

And this is the equation of any big bang that happens in no time, expands enormously space nd entropy because the big-bang IS the equation of death of physical matter. And that is what it will be for mankind. 

Yet as Kuhn explains this r=evolution of thought will take a long time to be understood as today sciences HAVE A PRIESTHOOD called mathematics, which is Ok if it had the proper experimental foundations.

But mathematics since Cantor and Hilbert is going through the informative 3RD BAROQUE, age of all language, which is INFLATIONARY, excessively filled with FORM, which does NO LONGER reflect reality.

 A fast review of the 3 ages of mathematics.

As all other systems of reality the languages of the mind, including mathematics are generated by the symmetries of space, time and the 5th dimension; and each of those ‘sub-disciplines’, which mirror one of the 3 central elements of the Universe, can be subdivided further more in ternary ages of evolution, ternary parts/subdisciplines and will deal with ∆±1 elements, or scales – this being a feature to analyse in each sub discipline.

i.e. analysis will deal with ‘finitesimal parts’ (derivatives), integrals (its inverse), and equations comprising both in social scale.

We call the discipline i-logic mathematics because even though many scientists don’t fully realize, mathematics is a language with 2 sides, its causal logic postulates or ‘time events’ reflected in its operandi and its formal variables and algebraic structures.

But it is of a higher logic than the Aristotelian, Euclidean mathematics of current systems. Hence after A and E, ¬Æ becomes ‘i-logic’. Timespace sciences are of a logic higher than that of human beings. This means basically a key change in operandi, =, equality is substituted by ≈ and <≈>, similarity and ‘transformations’. E=Mc² does not mean mass is energy, but it can be transformed in energy. In this manner mathematics reflects often duality transformations of time into space into time: Sp<=>Tƒ.

As a result of this dynamic understanding most symmetries of 5D space-time can be represented by¬Æ i-logic mathematics. And once we translate the key concepts of geometry, algebra and analysis to fractal space, i-logic time and 5D structures, the classic theorems of mathematics will naturally flow into ‘meaning’, acquiring a realist purpose never more to be doubted.

And the subjective Hilbert-Cantor, Axiomatic-Set German-Jewish school of Idealist foundations of mathematics (‘I imagine points, lines and planes’, sets as the units of mathematics instead of fractal, organic Œ-points and its societies numbers) will go down the gutter. We shall though keep the astounding display of the laws of the Universe expressed in mathematical languages.

Then most laws of sciences will be general laws of relationships between space, time and 5D structures, relating the world cycles, symmetries in space-time and social processes of growth in 5D of the natural world.

For example, the classic F(x) ‹≈› G(y) equation tends to represent the initial and final state of a ‘form in space’ of a system after it has been transformed in cyclical time or through an emergence or dissolution in the 5th dimension  by an ‹≈› operandi.

This is all what there is to mathematics: the transformations of a certain still picture or form in space, through a cyclical time revolution or  a 5 D=evolution into another final state in space.

So the Generator Equation of mathematics as a language can be expressed as Sp (state ) <Present or 5ST actions > Tƒ state.

Another way to define mathematics though is through its 3 disciplines, which correspond to space=geometry, time=algebra and analysis=5D but as mathematics became more powerful as a tool to explore the interrelationships of space, time and the 5th dimension the 3 sub-disciplines merged into different mixtures. For example, Space mixed with time in topology (space with motion) and with analysis in calculus and with both in analytic geometry.

All in all the most obvious distinction of mathematics will be between the operandi, classified as time revolutions (a complete time cycle and its 3±Âges >≈> and 5 D>evolutions (the devolution or evolutionary arrows of the 5th dimension).

SO here we conclude the analysis of mathematics and philosophy of mathematical physics, and we shall in increasing degrees of complexity adopting a temporal ‘view’, introduce the main equations and laws of mathematical physics, relating them to both experience and language, remember – GST laws-> ∆º mathematical laws -> ∆º±i: mathematical physics.

 

III. SPATIAL AGE OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS.

In the origin, as all evolutionary mind mirrors human mathematical scientists working on the understanding of the simplest elements of reality, bidimensional space-time, entropy/information and tridimensional energy systems functions and forms. It was the age of greek bidimensional geometry, where almost every concept could be explained in terms of a plane and a compass tracing angles, as indeed the essential elements of a Tiƒ mind – the angle of perception, its capacity to project and reduce information of a tridimensional merged space-time world into bidimensional sheets of information were understood. What physicists did is to use that knowledge of bidimensional planes, applied through conics to the study of motion, (without realising though that motion was just a dimension of time that made ‘active’ a distance of space – Galileo’s paradox: all what moves is in fact a dimension-distance of relative stillness). In any case we can easily trace a parallel between the first age of mathematics, bidimensional, conic geometry and the first age of modern physics, from Galileo till Newton.

It will then come in full force the discovery of how to translate sequential numbers into simultaneous space-points with Descartes analytic geometry (st-mathematics) and its immediate finding of ∆-scales (calculus), which shapes the three elements of reality and its mirrors in math (geometrical space, temporal algebra, and scalar mathematics) to really have a minimum mirror to see the world and do mathematical physics.

So we shall after an overview of this age, plunge also into the ‘real mathematical physics’, which started with the first knowledge on how ∆-scales can be used to transform space-distances into time motions and vice versa (birth of mechanics and calculus), and then how ∆-scales reflect the transformations between the 3 scalar elements of systems:

∆-1 fields of entropy that dissolve information < ∆-waves of reproduction of information > ∆+1 vortex of forces of information

When translating the three arrows of a system and its symmetry in 3 scales of ∆nalysis, mathematically it means that:

  • An entropic process ‘des-integrates’ twice from a vortex of information.
  • While a wave of present just switches within the same ‘scale’ of derivatives/integration, between space and time states as it reproduces a form.
  • And a vortex of information, ‘derivates’ twice into acceleration a spatial distance converting it into time form.

Thus ‘waves of energy’ disintegrate down into entropy through diffusion equations, which lower an ∆nalytical derivative scale of a system.

While equations are maintained both sides of the operandi in the same scale of integral/derivative ‘form’ in wave motions through space-time switching in those waves of motion merely in time=information or space=energy state. Hence we use the same ∆nalytic ∂erivative scale in String motions (while in an entropic heat equation energy escapes through two scales of ∆±1. Finally in vortex of time-cycles, the change is from a lineal motion into a cyclical, accelerated curvature. So in inverse fashion to entropic processes, which des-integrate twice, we derivate twice and found difficult to solve multiple solutions of curved paths, which the least time principle will help us to resolve.

PROPER DEFINITIONS

Energy is the main parameter physics uses to calculate physical world cycles which in computed for the whole existence of the physical event becomes a conservative zero cycle that does not spends energy. The energy of the system thus represents the simplest quantitative value of the capacity of the being to exist, its top predator force, total momentum, length and density of its worldccyle etc.

We thus need to make a whole redefinition of energy to fully grasp world cycles.

As we shall explore both concepts together, we will also observe the symmetries which energy display in space as world cycles do with the super organisms they create.

Now the funny thing as usual is that the seemingly perennial super organisms in space are the fleeting mayas of the world cycle of time, the dynamic motion patterns of information, form-in-action which is what truly states on the long term. So goes for energy, which stays while the fleeting physical systems mutate.

time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). This is perhaps the biggest discovery of GST:

In the graph, the immediate adoption to mathematical physics of time is the concept of energy, but time as future only passes when it accelerates and time as past when it decelerates. Both arrows of time are felt as such in the perception of time, origin of the world cycle of a system between three scales – perception will see also precludes that this virtual weld becomes indistinguishable between the two limits of time charges and masses humans perceive. So the virtuality of all existences zero sums of + entropy – information = present momentum.

In mathematical physics this means that ‘time clocks’ which truly advance’ time are accelerated vortices, of any of the three quantum scales we perceive, that is, charges, temperatures and masses. If we connect this new definition of the clocks of time in nature with those we already know; we have then a new ‘natural definition of time where time means:

‘∆-1: frequency in lineal electromagnetic time flows of energy: e=hv’

∆-1,0 charge: for cyclical clocks of electromagnetism.

∆0, +1: temperature for lineal thermodynamic flows of energy

∆+1: Mass for cyclical vortices of accelerated time.

It must be noticed then that frequency and temperature can be considered lineal clocks of time in a non-bounded motion, decelerating the pass of time towards the past, or present steady state clocks in a bounded stationary wave or closed system, and charge and masses are time clocks of closed systems acceleration the past of time towards the future; and all his is warped up in the formulate of a world cycle of energy.

The fundamental sub discipline of mathematical physics, mechanics of motion, have gone a full cycle from its initial geometric vortices  of motion (Newton) throughout the gradient work of Poison, and the energy-present analysis of actions, lagrangians and hamiltonians (its most algebraic description), back into geometry with the simultaneous motion-pictures of relativity.

We shall through the study of those ages and its relationships with the parallel advance of mathematics, come to the conclusion all are self-similar descriptions which stress some different element of the ∆ºst reality of mechanical motions (Einstein focused in spatial, simultaneous pictures, Newton in the vortex motion, Poisson in the ∆±1 potential fields and gradients between scales and Lagrangians into the present and energy world cycles as zero-sums).

So as we can see, the huge jump in quality and complexity of mathematics will happen when we move from the first geometric understandings of physical motions into its scalar understanding. BUT as the last Tiƒ-elements (curved vortices of time, masses and charges) are refined in understanding from Leibniz, to Poisson to Einstein, we shall complete the cycle, returning topologically to a description of motion (Einstein’s relativity) WHICH integrates the original Newtonian cyclical form of gravitation and the integral/derivative analysis through Non-Euclidean geometry and topology to give us a complete description of all elements of motion.

How does a motion of time happen? By reproduction of a flow of momenta, which we consider to happen departing from a quanta of space, h, k, m, or minimal world cycle of existence of each scale, which becomes then reproduced in a wave whose frequency, ƒ, t, v, will give us the total value of the being in terms of its space-time content.

II.  NON¬Æ TERNARY LOGIC. ITS MAIN EQUATIONS:  ±PAST ± FUTURE = PRESENT

The commonest wave motion in science is a motion of herds, with its superposition rules and Hamiltonians of the form:

past – future = present space-time

Of this equation there are as many versions as regions in which flows of past, present and future entropy, information and space-time find itself in a simple relationship:

Past <Motion Operandi> Future ≈ Present

This is the most generic equation of existential algebra, and depending on which type of motion we study the Operandi between past and future will be different.

The most studied ones are locomotion, (Operandi ±) on terms of Hamiltonians of Potential INFORMATION & Kinetic Energy; reproductive fields which create a 3rd dimension, using the product operandi, and growth and diminution ratios, using logarithmic scales.

Physical Systems – example: ∆±3, Quantum and Relativity ternary equations.

Consider the simplest of those equations:screen-shot-2017-01-04-at-11-03-36

Where Present (left side) is the sum of the kinetic energy and potential energy, V (hence often with negative symbol). Why the future rests from the past? It does, also in relativity:

screen-shot-2017-01-04-at-20-03-58 screen-shot-2017-01-04-at-20-03-29

We observe again that the c2t2, is rested from the pure spatial coordinates, dx, dy, dz.

The particle-future in that sense feeds on the entropy of the ∆-1 field, and absorbs its energy from it, parasitising its motion and as it is this combination what we see, the wave is equivalent to the value of the past minus the particle.

It is then possible to play with the equation:    Future = Past – Present   being obviously the most intriguing.

What this means? How can the present be the past resting it, a future? Pure mystical thought for initiated (:screen-shot-2017-01-04-at-20-12-35

Just think of it, what we have not yet discovered, the 3rd man:

Past = Present + Future

The past is thus balanced with the present future, which is meaningful for an immortal Universe in which the present is the middle point which in fact means it is an ∂st portion with minimal value, and as an infinitesimal we can also talk of:                Past ≥ Future….

Which is the particle state in simultaneity in a moment of present in which it absorbs energy into form from the past, in such finitesimal moments of time, as to create a balanced closed motion with no expenditure of energy. The immortality of the universe, and the relative ∞ and yet 0 value of the present in each of those equations, opens a deep philosophical analysis of the meaning and creative processes between each of the 3 stretches of a flow of time.

Schrödinger’s equation is a single partial differential equation and therefore simpler than Maxwell’s equations, but it introduces a great novelty, i. One is used to encountering this quantity in alternating-current theory, but only because it is put there as a computational device. The basic equations, like the currents and voltages, are real. But here i enters into both the equation and its simplest form of Solution.

So dynamically in time, i must be considered existing as we do in its study on @nalytic geometry, whereas we treat it as an essential property of ‘waves motions back and forth in time’.

The actual results of quantum mechanics, expressed as observable quantities, will be real numbers, and so we must consider that statically in space, the formal perception is ‘real’. And indeed, Bohm’s strategy for the particle-wave is to divide the polar coordinates into the real, particle state and the imaginary, back to the past in time, wave state.

ψ is not itself an observable, though its wavelength, for example, is – once more the connection with space.

The conic representation of space-time events and world cycles.

In the next graphs we can see different encounters between flows arrows of relative past and future, > < in its ‘collisions on a relative present, which gives us different tensors and motions of existence, with different operandi:

The main possible outcomes of arrows of time, departing from past, present and future arrows. past to future arrows might flow together to form a present arrow, annihilate each other to form past arrow or converge in the past arrow is in reverse direction/motion to ad together. On the other hand a present arrow might follow a steady state, implosive or expansive motion. Thus two any arrows can in an event split into three possible outcomes. The beat 2/3 being of the most harmonious of the Unverse.

The cone is basically a ‘bidimensional ST being, circling inwards towards the singularity of the point along a line of geometry, hence combining O x |= Ø, the cone represents the Universe. It should not be surprising then that it is the best way to reflect a 4D block of space-time (but not the discontinuities of the 5D Universe) as used by Einstein’s physics and Minkowski’s geometry (light cones); and we shall deal with those cones in the analysis of relativity.

We shall also use them in ¬time logic to represent the 3 fundamental events in terms of time ages: entropic collisions (future x past = past wave of entropy, reproductive iterations (present x present = present), and evolving, informative events, past x Future = Future wave of information).

In the graph, first the 3 canonical events of complex i-logic time, and the much simpler single cone of ‘lineal time’ in relativity.

What matters to us is now is that a conic basically reduces to a line and a shrinking cycle, which in motion is equivalent to a time cycle, shrinking into a point-singularity, the vertex of the cone. And for that reason that simple canonical world cycle encodes all the main curves of bidimensional space.

Now, there are 2 other ‘spaces’ besides the 3 topological spaces (Sp-cylindrical, ST-cartesian, tiƒ-polar) worth to notice, to explain all the fractal space-time complex world:

Complex space ideal for studying ∏imespace world cycles as the previous ones.

Hilbert space, the space of the fifth dimension which each point is a world in itself

The 3 Past, Present and Future ages defined as ± combinations of 2 inverse arrows of time, future information & past entropy, above, below, as Present reproductive waves, and Past>Future, guiding fields of particle forms.

Further on, this is only the commonest expression of the 3 dimensions of a motion of time, but as there are 7 motions, more operandi are needed to study a certain form of motion or symmetry along the S, t and ∆ 3 dimensions of reality.

Each of the 3 dimensions will have ± operandi motions of time, products, integrals, potentiation and logarithms between the most common.

So has i Æxistential algebra an equation, hence the multiple operandi expressed above, as the relative 3 type of dimensions, simultaneity, resonance and synchronicity imply different displacements in past to future arrows depending on which S-T-∆ direction we displace.

In the graph the present wave and past-future, field-particle configurations of physics; and  the 4 sub-equations that combine past, present and future producing either death-annihilation or creation processes, illustrated with ‘time-space’ cones (borrowed from relativity). THEY ARE all consequences of the fundamental equation of simultaneous equilibrium among the 3 topological functions-forms of time beings:

Present (wave-body) = Past x future (field-limbs x particle-heads)

The classic event of relativity then would be a ‘relative present, simultaneous event of measure’, which is really the dimension of time used in physics in their study of locomotions, in as much as those v=∂s/∂t equations (including Einstein’s expansion) are always about ‘simultaneous measure’ in an instantaneous present ‘derivative’ slice of the flow of a time-cycle. But the events that merge space and time components, past and future, entropy and information are far more in a catalog that departs from ±2 arrows (with inverse direction). To fully grasp those variations on the theme of space-time systems, we though need to explore in depth the meaning of ‘equality’, ‘perpendicularity’ and ‘parallelism’.

So we will not go so far in i-logic till we do not clarify fully the structure of Non-Euclidean geometry. To notice though that only Schopenhauer seemed to have realised that the true fundamentally flawed Euclidean postulate was the one on equality, which shall become the MOST transcendental of them all in i-logic geometry: equal forms do indeed merge together and reproduce, complementarily; unequal forms will engage into destructive events.

So we love to communicate with another human speaking the same language but go to war with other linguistic neighbours; atoms form huge crystal networks with equal atoms but very small ions with different ones. Vital, i-logic geometry will achieve in that sense a fascinating result: make mathematics far more real by giving vital, i-logic, bio-logic properties to geometric figures.

What does it mean to live in a Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean Universe? In this post we shall study the i-logic nature and causality of space-time events, according to the existence of 3 non-Aristotelian causal arrows≈dimensions≈ages of time-space cycles≈events≈frequencies, past≈entropy, present≈iteration and future≈information.

The interplay of those 3 dimensions of time-space and how they ‘manifest’ in human languages, species and perceived events, is the fundamental theme of i-logic.

Whereas Aristotelian Logic means merely a logic of time with a single arrow. We are doing a dishonour to Aristotle, which is far more complex when you do understand his work than this single causal arrow. In fact, we refer more to a physicists’ view of causality as motivated by an entropy-only Universe.  As we use 3 arrows of space-time for all finite domains-beings, past-entropy, present-iteration and future-information, we call this ternary logic, i-logic, Non-Aristotleian logic.

And so the first question to answer is how to put those 3 ‘terms’, past, present and future in causal, mathematical relationships.

In that regard i-logic is the most surprising and yet fundamental part of ®.

Its fundamental equation is the equation of presents that generates by split a field of past and a particle of future such as:

|=Past-entropy (Fields/limbs)  x O-Future-information T(heads/particles) <=> ST-Ø present reproductive body-waves.

The fundamental equation  of time arrows of the Universe is enormously fruitful in understanding all kind of Nature’s phenomena, and of course it does have the usual variations, explained according to the structures we observe in reality:

Past-entropy field (gravitational pilot wave in quantum systems) > Reproductive body-wave > Informative particle/head

Let us then start with the 5 postulates of non-euclidean geometry that complete the work of Riemann.

Non-Euclidean Space postulates.

I-LOGIC GEOMETRYb“The less intelligent a person is, the less mysteries he founds in the Universe’ Schopenhauer.

Einstein used the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry (Points through which multiple parallels can cross), to describe the structure of Gravitational space, using a single clock, the 4th present time dimension.

 Tƒ complete his analysis, we expand Non-Euclidean geometry, adapting the 3 Geometric, Euclidean definitions to multiple ∆-spaces and the 2 logic postulates (3rd& 5th) redefining identity and causality using the 3 dimensions of time.

– 1st Postulate: ‘A fractal point shows 3D volume as we come closer to it’Since only fractal points, which grow in volume as we come closer to their scale, can fit multiple parallels.

– 2nd postulate: ‘A line-wave is made of ∆-1 points with ‘breath’ that communicate energy and information among ∆-points’.

–  4th postulate: a plane is a discontinuous network of fractal points joined by waves of energy and information that leave interstitial dark spaces. (Particles in physical planes, cells in biological spaces and so on.)

– 3rd postulate: ‘2 entities are ‘equal’, when both, their external form (Euclidean definition) and internal 3D parts are identical.’

Yet since we cannot perceive the complete internal information of 2 points, still and isolated by its external membrane (Galilean Paradox) instead of equality we talk of degrees of ‘similarity’.

So Isomorphisms between entities of different scales are NOT equalities but ‘similarities’.

The third postulate is the most important bio-logic postulate as it establishes by relative congruence the relationship of points in any scale, such as:

  • Tƒ=Tƒ: 2T POINTS THAT PERCEIVE EACH OTHER EQUAL IN INFORMATION WILL EVOLVE SOCIALLY.
  • $=$, t≠t: Max. ST<<Min. St: Points that see each other as different in information and equal in entropy>energy, will enter a prey-predator relationship. And the point with maximal balanced existential force (s x t: max.s=t), will feed on the other, provoking its entropic extinction to maximise its reproduction of form.
  • T≠t, $≠s: T$, ts: Points that do not perceive each other as equal either in form or energy-motion will ignore each other as parallel worlds.

Those are the 3 main laws of congruence in the ternary Universe which applies to all systems including physical systems. I.e.: crystals grow without limit when they are made of the same atom. Chemical reactions happen when the top predator molecule with maximal energy and information breaks and absorbs the other molecules to reproduce its form. Molecules that do not mix, continue after collision its own paths.

We have also started to write bio-topo-logic equations with the simple terms of i-logic geometry to ‘give a first simple push’ to 5D³ physics beyond the conceptual stage, using simple terms of ¬Ælgebra.

Yet besides the ∆§ocial growth by absolute similarity, the essential first element to relate two points – the similarity of informative language, there are other sub-events of great importance, related to the ternary structure of the fractal generator, which resume in a word: complementarity.

Which means that systems which have ‘complementary elements, or ‘gender’ systems will couple together in even stronger bonds, albeit reduced by the need to complete its ternary generator, to dual or ternary systems, such as:

  • S, T, st PARTS that are complementary as potential elements of a ternary whole will assembly together.
  • S<t ± s>T parts that are equal in form but in inverted states/time arrows will annihilate each other.
  • S<>T: male + S=t:female:  ‘Gender’, dual systems which are complementary in particle-field and wave state will form couples, with the maximal bonding.

Those are therefore the main 3+3 sub-laws of congruence, which suffice to explain all relative events between two points.

-5th Postulate: ‘0-Points gauge information & energy, transforming waves of external ∆-i points into inner body cells and mind’s pixels.’

Thus we define sequential, causal mind-> body åctions:

– ∆ï -> ∏∆+1(mind’s creation) ->  ∆Sp -> ∑Sp X Tƒ (cellular reproduction)

And formalize the Galilean-Ego Paradox:

‘Every point of view=mind feels, subjectively, from his point to view, the center of the Universe, but it is only a zero-point, an infinitesimal mirror, which maps in stillness a minimal part of the ∞ information of the ∞ Universe’.

As Aristotle put it, ‘there are ∞ Gods, still minds that order and move the energy that surrounds them’.

Now the subject is immense, so we shall just refer to some basic elements needed for some serious latter analysis of the super organisms of each scales, starting from Aristotelian gods (:

Knots of Time cycles: the fundamental particle.

Once we have studied the minimal units of the Universe, the action of space-time, we shall define the main structural, architectonical element of reality, the knots of time cycles, existential points, œ, which perform those actions of existence, site of will and perception of the Universe – whose simplest definitions in philosophy are the monad of Leibniz, the mind of Descartes, the God of Aristotle, and in mathematics, a Non-Euclidean point, the unit of Einstein’s gravitational laws.

Systems are knots of time cycles of exchanges of energy and information with its space and time parts, Œ, which allow them to survive in the Universe.

Thus the first ‘stable structure of reality’, is a knot of time cycle which swiftly goes webbing around the paths of its exchanges of energy and information, ∆±exi, actions, its survival strategies, trying to maximise its existence, Max. ExI, in a state of perpetual balance, E=I…

This dance of being and not being is performed by each Œ, knot-function of existence, defined both as an infinitesimal point from its upper perspective and an an absolute whole from its lower plane, since all knots of times space cycles web their existences through several of such plane

@. NON-Æ FRACTAL POINTS:

VITAL MATHEMATICS

 

How this small part of the enormous range of time phenomena made Einstein whose definition of time as what a clock measures is as dumb as it gets, the highest brain of the planet ever, has to do a lot with the nuclear industry of bombs and the military than the intrinsic merit of his comprehension of time.

The holographic Universe.

It is though simpler as a first approach to ‘learned physicists’ specially when focused only on ∆±i scales to use the 5D concept and define any physical system in such fashion:

‘The Universe is a 5 Dimensional fractal that reproduces vital topologies of time-space, ternary forms of motion and form, which organises into larger, slower scales of fifth dimension of ðime§pace.’

Inn this view we can do then a slightly corrected 4D analysis based in the holographic principle, illustrated in the next graph:

Then we talk of 4 dimensions as the combination of bidimensional fields of Entropy=moving Space and Time=moving information, which creates a holographic Universe of time and space. So the Generator can be written as:

Sp (flat space) ≤ ExI (4D world of energy and information)≥ Tiƒ (bidimensional tall particle).

It is a more convenient formalism to plug in the known equations of mathematical physics. For example, those of the graph, which correspond to the  ‘metric equations’ of the main three physical scales of the 5th dimension and its 3 components defined as bidimensional spatial ‘sheets’ with certain form measured by the frequency of its ‘discrete units of information’, H, K, C2, multiplied with varying time clocks, V, T, M, as:

Time Frequencies x Space Surfaces = Constant Energy.

Motions on 5D³ are either topological βidimensional changes (Galileo’s paradox) in D³, or full worldcycles (motions in 5D³), and so we must be aware of both.

The main bidimensional motions in D³ of a space-time being are motions with form, bidimensional units of:

ð: motion x motion=cyclical time

§: form x form=space-distance

E, ∃: max. motion x min. form = energy, entropy, expansive motion

iƒ: max. form x min. motion= informative time, implosive motion.

This basic motions then become repetitive in fractal self-similar beings as each compose motion leaves a memorial trace of previous traces that continue being traced in the same place ‘reproducing the facto the being’.

In this manner physical systems grow in form and dimensions.

3 are thus the time space arrows, functions and forms of any system of reality.

How many views there are of an event in fact would also surprise the viewer, as if we use the ternary principle and subdivide the ∆•st view according to elements there are 3 x ∆•st possible analysis  for each system which will display its own field/body/head function/form in the event. So we can study multiple parallel views and interpret each view from the organic, topological and mental perspective, from the internal and external and ‘membrane-mind’ view that connects both, and so on. It is for that reason that mathematical physics has so many theorems and equations for each phenomena and so many relationships which would make a proper GST analysis of physics rather encyclopaedic.

To put all that in the ƥst encasing of reality is a task well beyond a single man, which i obviously do reading physics, but have not Рor else i would have to record all my thoughts, converted into wordings and equations in legit texts.

So once we define:

-$: dimensions in space (the topic three ones) and…

– ð: dimensions in physical time (distance, 1 dimension; speed, 2 dimensions; acceleration, 3 dimension) and…

-∆±i: dimensions in scales (lower, middle, upper networks that connect the being with them – yet as all beings have an inner ∆±1 structure, considering the highest i-scale we resolve the issue of which system has the highest number of ∆±i scalar dimensions)…

We have described the number of formal/moving dimensions of the physical system…

Once this simple concepts are understood, it is obvious that a vortex accelerated inwards, with a height, a’Maxwell-like screw’, which connects the system to the ∆+1 scale, this vortex will be the most dimensional entity.

The dimensions of pure entropy (lineal expansive, wide, flat bidimensional pace) and pure time (cyclical, tall, frequency clocks), and its static version, dimensional form, merge into ‘energy and information’ combinations of both elements, in 4-dimensional space-time, which is the substance that construct the light space-time in which we exist. It is the holographic principle, essential to understand the parameters of mathematical physics

Space-time is not continuous. Physical systems are mere layers of the 5th dimension, fractal space-time beings generated by the same symmetries of time and space than other systems, and so isomorphic to them. And this isomorphic information warps up the knowledge we have of those systems.

Only when we fully accept that space-time is fractal and its dimensions are the content of real beings, we can truly understand the whys of the laws of stience, isomorphic among disciplines, when expressed in terms of the dimensions of space and time.

The second fundamental element to convert physical hows into meaningful GST whys is to properly address the dimensional concepts of the Universe, regarding the ‘4 dimensions’ of each scale in terms of the 2 dimensions of temporal information and the 2 dimensions of spatial entropy, to adequately understand all parameters of physics in terms of entropy, Spe, Energy, ST, and information Tiƒ.

It is of great importance the duality between still form (mind view) and motion, to understand the relationship between space and energy and time and information.

And to understand the whys of the Principle of relativity.

In the graph, the duality between moving time cycles and still information, captured by a mind, and moving vacuum entropy and perception of still space by the mind is the essential feature of physical systems and its ‘relativity’ of motion. Since Reproduction of Motion dominates perception of form

In the graph, we can see how bidimensional fields of expansive space, and the bidimensional fields of time cycles (clocks of time) create physical systems. And so we write a simple equation:

Physical system: Œ = Spe (entropy) x Tiƒ (Information)

Now, the first surprising result of this analysis is the definition of a holographic Universe in which the 4 Dimensional ‘Energy’ Plane of each ∆±1 scale of the Universe is actually made of 2 ‘relative planes’, one of expansive entropy and other of implosive cyclical information which put together created the fractal species of the Universe:

Expansive, lineal entropic motion or ‘entropic space’ Sæ and implosive, cyclical clocks of information, Tf, are the two primary elements of the Universe, mix, organize, and evolve, till reaching the complexity of organisms. Their properties and morphologies are opposed. But for that reason, they can form “complementary” systems, which merge the properties and dimensions of both “formal motions,” enhancing the survival capacities of any system that combines in a balanced manner energy and form, E×I=K. In physical systems, all is made of lineal forces of expansive energy and cyclical particles of implosive information that create balanced present space-times. In the left graph, we see the canonical forms of lineal energy and cyclical time clocks and how an informative, electric cycle supported in a magnetic surface of space creates a complementary wave: a ray of light.

It is the ternary game of the Universe and its bidimensional membranes of space and time.

In the graph, since space and time now had two dimensions each, we can compare them, and transform one into each other, we could write that property with a simple formula, where Sæ is a flat plane of ‘lineal space’ and To is a cycle of tall time.

Spe (length,width) ≈ Tiƒ (height, frequency)

This simple beat of existence, flat fields of space that become tall cycles of time, energy that converts into information, is one of the commonest beats of the universe. And its rhythms explain infinite transformations.

Now there is much deeper question related to the duality of motion and form, which we shall studying the 2nd part of this treatise, when we study the formalism of 5D physics in more detail and consider a Universe, in which all is motion and form, AT THE SAME TIME, because motion is reproduction of form, resolving the paradox of Achilles and the Turtle (-;

Thus the second isomorphism of the Universe the duality of motion vs. form, time vs. space, will translate in fractal organic terms as a ‘reproduction of form’ in adjacent regions of space.

This allow us to understand the creation of new dimensions as a process of laying down new ‘regions’ of form, one over other, as in 3D printing, which accumulates 2 layers of points into depth, creating a 3rd dimension, and the constant switch between motion and form that converts space into time into space dimensions, to reach the classic 4 dimensions of human physics.

In the graph, the simplest, S, E, I, T, topologies of the Universe:

– The spatial, entropic, external membrane-motion that is the strongest, lineal, most durable topologies, used in membranes and external skins, destroyed as a flow of motion and energy.

– The zero point, or informative cyclical center that keeps its information in the frequency of its gauging and mapping and forming of information

– And its combination – a complex system or organism.

Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space.

So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’. On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘bodies of metal’ with digital information. Let us consider the properties of those 2×2 elements, energy<entropy (bodies, fields) and in/form/ation (particles, heads, minds) and some of its species, in life and metal:

$: Moving Entropy>energy> vs.     ð:  Reproductive Information >Still • form

Lineal, spatial, big, moving                Cyclical, temporal, small, rotating, still.

Formless, continuous, simple                  Form-ative, discontinuous, complex.

Field, body, male, weapon,                     Particle, head, female, coin, chip.

Iron, oxygen, carbon                             Gold, silver, nitrogen

Protein, lion, shark, death                       DNA, human, dolphin, life.

We could summarize the formal and functional differences between energy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

Maximal $pace = Energy = Minimal Form=body Vs. Maximal ð-form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

As a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only carbon-life organisms, made of energy (bodies, food) and information (brains, eyes, senses, worlds), but also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’.

Since we can now recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Yet all of them have a biological influence over us, provoking changes in the energy and information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.

Further on, all those motions and forms must be ordered through the metrics of the 5th dimension to derive from them the laws of sciences and its different species, made of continuous lineal time motions and space forms and discontinuous cyclical time clocks and closed curves. 

Space is form, still form, hence an infinitesimal ‘still’ of the flow of time. We distinguish forms 3 varieties of 2-manifolds, spatial units of reality,  the essential two poles of reality, lineal motions and cyclical motions and its conic forms derived from them.

Two forms of space are thus paramount, and the transformations of one into the other are the essence of which the topological game of existence is made.  And so this duality between spatial form and time motion, lineal and cyclical patterns, is the first to be clarified.

Space is also an interval, a slow one, a res extensa, an explosion that expands volume and decreases motion. Hence the vacuum space we see with no motion and no form purely static. But as all what matters to space is its duality with time, its back and forth transformations across the 4 hyperbolic quadrants of the bidimensional plane – that is space matters when it combines with time.

Space thus will be synonymous of decelerating or still motion, lineal, extended presents, still minds, forms, organs and organisms seen as a whole in a moment of time. Space is also a dimension with static extension and form, as opposed to a dimension of time, which can be pure motion (or accelerations with 2 dimensions of time).

Motion≈ time and Space=form thus constantly change into each other. Motion further on surrounds with its faster cycles, space, breaking it. We talk then of an internal space controlled by a spherical outer membrane and inner point.

Space is in its simplest most intuitive form, a static, lineal extension without form, the plane, the origin of geometry, the perception of space-time in terms of forms of space, studied in depth in the posts on maths. But there is something deeper about 2-manifolds, planes of space because they are indeed the minimal unit of the real Universe. Often slices of times, still, derivatives.

The five dimensions of space-time and the mind membrain.

When studying a physical time§paœrganism the best way to do it, given our scanty direct perception of them, is through some of its actions, in which they will move and process information in a certain pattern, within a larger super organism, which in the case of the particle will normally be an atom. As such within the atom, the particles are either part of its t-membrane, its st vital space or its •Singularity with its still focused mind, which humans represent as a centre of a frame of reference, in any of its 3 ‘topological space-time dimensions.

What is the perception of each mind-singularity mapping its territory according to its function is of interest. Even more is to find suitable frames of reference to model the 10D (5s≈5t) time§paœrganism. Normally we can consider its asymmetries to make a possible focused mathematical mirror, giving to space the positive real coordinates, time its negative, and the scalar 5th dimension set on the Y≈ i-coordinates, and combine them to represent different s, t, st states… the possibilities of mathematical modelling of the 10 Dimensions of space-time and scale, self-centred in an S@ singularity with a constrain given by a T-membrane enclosed the being to its domain of scales, topologies and functions, is ginormous and only apt for the imaginative mathematicians.
The ones physicist use (phase, multidimensional, conformal, Lorentzian, Hilbertian, etc.) are shows of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis done in a limited range of dimensions and or fractal points often with its own ternary dimensions, to study different ‘fancy’ analysis of partial domains of Tœs of many different scales of reality. We shall try to set a more orderly standard now that we know what we talk about. The studies of physicist in that sense are often of 3 spatial dimensions reflected in the mirror of a present derivative dimension of time (the so called 4th dimension).

And when philosophising about entropy arrows, studies on the fourth dimensions OF SPACETIME the dimension of double entropy down two scales of death and big-bang in the ladder of scalar dimensions of the Universe. The one they never talk about are the 5th dimensions of space and time. As such an entropic explosive big bang death of matter, means a dissolution of mass down to a wave of light and further into c-quanta of gravitational ∆-4 existence.
An entropic death of a living organism goes down the scale of cells and further the scale of molecules. A quasar big-bang of a galaxy and its black hole brain means going down to the scale of gravitational and photonic radiation, 2 scales down and so on.
The fifth dimensions (we use plural to signify the 2 dimensions of space-time together) on the other hand is the ascension from the cellular/molecular state of a neuron or crystal to the larger image of its super organism and further on to the view of its mind of the larger whole, till reaching the size of a planet of a human dna-crystal organising global societies. Motion=youth, with increasing energy order and decreasing entropy till reaching the reproductive state of balance, and then of information, dying then into disordered, scattered motion, to restart again:

Γ@: Seed of information + energy age > information age>>social mind: O-motion << entropic death =zero sum

So we can write a series of space-time dimensions together as part of the processes of a world cycle:

4th Dimensions: entropy=death: ∆-2 >> 1st dimensions: present organism: Limbs/fields of motion < 2nd dimensions: Hyperbolic body/waves>3rd ages:

informative particle-heads>>Social evolution of minds as points of an ∆+2: world: 5th dimensions: ∆§

So it is important the reader understands the basics of space-time symmetric dimensions

All this said of course, we are now going to introduce mathematical physics, because there is NOTHING WRONG WITH THEM, only that WE NEED TO INTRODUCE ALSO ORGANIC AND SENTIENT properties to physical systems, better expressed with qualitative, verbal and logic equations, to complete what we have achieved with mathematics only.

But mathematical physics can also help in that task when we upgrade them to vital mathematics and non-euclidean fractal points become ‘mind-systems’ which can fit flows of energy and information within them, illuminating the meaning of particle-points.

It is a remarkable fact that even in the present simplified euclidean versions mathematics do reflect then most of the properties of the Universe, but it has so far failed to explain organically its structure, despite the breakthrough of fractal mathematics.

The reason being that mathematics as a language, has not completed its evolution. And so the first step to be able to describe all the properties of physical systems is to evolve its main language, mathematics, and adapt it to the organic, fractal cyclical space-time structure of the Universe and its scalar nature.

It is precisely this incompleteness of mathematics, the language of physical sciences the main reason why physicists do not understand fully the organic Universe.

As they still work with Euclidean mathematics, where points are not fractal points made of parts that become evident when we come closer to the particle, cell or star that seemed to us a point at distance. Only Einstein managed to apply properly the concept of a fractal point, by asserting that infinite parallels cross a point of space-time. We shall then find easily that points are fractal points with inner energy and form, information, joined by line-waves to other points forming networks, co-existing in several scales of size, which is the very same definition of an organism, and that everything in the Universe is indeed, a network-organism… as we show in the graphs of fractal networks all over this blog.

Yet if a mathematical system is organic by the very definition of a number (a group of undistinguishable beings), of a point (a fractal system, larger the closer we come to it) and a plane (a network of fractal points joined by flows of energy and information), why physicists do not model organically its systems?

Why physicists do not understand the fractal Universe? if it is so much up to their alley – after all it vindicates and further evolves the logic-mathematical structure found by Leibniz, Einstein and Planck. It merely takes it further with the advances of fractal geometry and the completion by this writer of the postulates of non-euclidean geometry that defines a 5th dimension of scales of space-time.

I found in the conferences I used to give at Silicon valley, during my tenant of the chair of duality in the international congress of systems sciences that physicists could grasp the fractal concept mathematically and the existence of scales of space, but 2 taboos were absolute: lineal time, the time-clock of its standardized machines and the model of the universe as a machine instead of an organism. So it was the mechanical civilization, and the source of physicists’ power and wealth – the machine, what was the taboo that could not be broken. Physicists does had a religion of the machine, not of the physical Universe. And as long as this was not discussed other things could be explained. Since the founding fathers of physicists had in fact started its sciences measuring time with clocks.

Thus, the answer to the limits of physicists is cultural, not scientific, as most physicists belong to the western, lineal, military culture whose memes are not easily recognized as such, but considered lineal weapons and lineal time, dogmas of their worldview; as opposed to cyclical time. It was of course an outdated dogma, deist in origin, as a machine needs a maker and Newton and Kepler affirmed yhwh to be the maker of the Universal machine and they, the ones that were revealed this truth. Most physicists do not realize of this obvious fact: only an organism is scientific, self-reproductive without need of a god-maker.

Further on mechanism and abstract, simplex mathematics as its language puts the physicist above all living and humans, as the priest of the new image of the Universe and only master of its language. So mechanism and abstract maths is a self-serving proposition, for the human and physicist ego, since only human anthropomorphic beings had ‘living properties’.

But of those memes by large the most powerful barrier for physicists to upgrader their model of the Universe is mechanism, the power they obtained historically from the use of machines and the evolution of lineal weapons. It means most physicists will never abandon their theories of lineal time, their theories of a Universe molded as a machine, and show no interest for general systems science. Does it mean we have not to show interest for the physical world? Of course not.

Because the physical world does not belong to physicists. In that sense it took me a while as a system scientist to realize that the human expert or scholar an its upgrading to the organic fractal paradigm was not my job. My communication was directly with the Universe. And only then, once I left behind my problems with physicists, in their worldly religion, to make weapons of lineal energy that destroy life and their related idol-ogies – lineal time, continuous, abstract, Cartesian space, denial of organic or perceptive properties to anything but anthropomorphic life, etc. I did truly enjoy for myself the view of the organic Universe of matter.

It is important to understand this difference, specially if you are not a physicist – as you should leave behind your shyness, to feel the life of the material Universe and accept that matter is organic also and nothing differentiates in terms of quality, a human vital fractal organism of space-time from a particle-head/wave-body of physical matter. This said, it is unlikely that physicists will find of interest most of the sections of this blog, except those on the 4th line, when constructed by the year 2017, for the very obvious reason that ‘the (organic) why is the only question physicists don’t ask’ (Feynman), and so they consider only descriptions concerned with mathematical measure and its how (motions and forms of particles and physical systems), as proper of their science.

Still a physical upgrade of physics to the 5th dimension must be done if we want to fully understand the Universe; which is the purpose of this blog, paraphrasing 2 of the 3 most remarkable physicists of the past century, Planck and Einstein; the first, author of the constants of god, the second affirming he want to know the thoughts of God, and then its details. Those are the thoughts we shall reveal in a metaphoric way – the thoughts of the informative mind of the Universe, and for that we must expand…

All this said and given the extraordinary amount of scales hence of data studied by physics, we divide the discipline in this Introductory 3rd lines into 3 (yes, always 2 or 3 elements of creation:) sub posts: ∆<0 scales or ‘physics’, ∆+0 scales or astronomy and ∆@ language or ‘mathematical physics’, and we divide this introductory post in 3 sub-parts:

  • The first part dedicated to GST laws applied to physics, as a reminder of the main properties of Space-time ∆ûst.
  • The second considering a fast review of its scales, starting by mechanics, (the method of less errors to enlighten latter the solution of the biggest ones – entropy only theories of thermal physics and cosmology on one side and Copenhagen and relativity idealist interpretations on the other)
  • And finally the 3rd part will deal with the true method of GST: a fast review of the 10 isomorphisms of Nature applied to all those scales.

So after introducing the scales of physics with a more classic style, we shall put together the isomorphisms of the scales of physical systems, defined as those systems, whose range is outside the closest ∆0 scales of human MINDS, BUT RANGE in its physical properties in all OTHER SCALES (Hence the use of ∆i, the generic index for them all).

So as usual we will treat the 4 elements of physical systems – the ∆-scales, the S-topological varieties, the S-ages and worldcycles, and the ment@l aspects of its human ∆o observer, and its mathematical physics and anthropomorphic ‘hang-ups’, switching between those elements and perspectives as the explanation of those systems advances.

The absurd magic view of creationist mathematics.

It is then not surprising on the view of Dirac and Galileo that idealist mathematicians have won the favor, since Hilbert astounding ego-trip where he affirmed mathematics was an invention of his mind (‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ – ‘Foundations of geometry’).

So they have rejected the ‘experimental, a posteriori nature’ of the mathematical language, a view they share with all those physicists who think mathematics is the a priori nature of reality (Copenhagen interpretation, etc).

Then there is the next ‘stage’ of the ego-trip of linguistic creationists called ‘Literalism, which means that not only the language ‘creates reality’ but as it IS reality itself, NOT a mirror, it does NOT admit parables, approximations, and this is a huge handicap to understand maths, even more so than in words, because words are the natural temporal mirror of the human mind and so its realism is far more immediate.

The degree of abstraction of maths in the axiomatic method trying to prove itself without reference to the world makes it specially obscure; to which we add the ‘uncertainty of view’ over far away ∆-n scales, in which ‘billions’ of entities transfer limited information and move so fast that we confuse ‘a time event’ with a space event from our so slow ‘view’ (as lines of a car appear in space being time events at slow motion). So mathematicians to ‘fully’ grasp in a titanic effort ALL the motions of those billions of particles, have created ‘fictitious’ spaces of ∞ dimensions (Hilbert spaces), the last evolution of differential/integral calculus of infinite solutions, which does NOT mean the quantum world is different but the approach of huminds IS different as we ‘work’ with ‘huge bulk spatial populations and temporal masses of frequencies’. 

Then the literalist error comes and says, this maths are weird, they are ‘probabilities’ in time (not populations in space as we see them in an electron picture), and this is the ‘substance’ of reality. It is not. The particle is the substance and it is a cyclical time state; the wave, a space-time state is the subtance. The ‘bulk analysis’ of mathematical masses confusing ‘space population’ with ‘time probabilities’ IS the mirror, very impressive as a mirror, but very foolish when the mirror is taken as real.

What this means basically is that the mathematician as the physicist today has accepted a magic look on mathematics, as long as it works to represent-mirror reality fairly way, it doesn’t matter what they mean.

Only the greatest minds such as Newman or Einstein or Heaviside were aware of that ignorance which now ∆•st could solve, if there were more than a ‘single point-mind-singularity-mirror’ for it – i feel deeply exhausted.

Let us put then just one example of what we mean. Consider the false problem of imaginary numbers. What they really mean? This was a hot question that was never fully answered except by Gauss partially, calling them inverse numbers. What can we say about it from the experimental truths of ƥst?

The answer is immediate when we realise that the Galilean Paradox establishes the holographic principle: the bidimensionality of all real forms of nature, which are in its simplest forms, dual dimensions, and so the unit of reality IS not a single dimensional system/point but a bidimensional ST system. Ergo the proper way to use imaginary numbers is ‘squaring’ them. 

Then we obtain a ‘realist’ graph, with an X² coordinate system in the real line, which can be projected further with a negative -y and a positive +y axis, often ‘inverse’ directions or symmetries of timespace.

And suddenly we can start to understand many realist whys of complex numbers and complex spaces.

So a negative imaginary energy must be explained in the same form. Consider the first important case in which this was found. The solutions to Dirac’s equation.

The negative E solutions were problematic, for it was assumed that a particle has a positive energy (indeed, when it is a vortex of accelerated forces). Mathematically speaking, however, there IS NO reason to reject the negative-energy solutions, when we understand it. Since they exist, we cannot simply ignore them.

To cope with this problem, Dirac, our leading modern creationist mathematician with Bohr and Heinsenberg, here in tune with the experimental mirror, believed in them.

So he introduced the hypothesis, known as hole theory, that the vacuum is the many-body quantum state in which all the negative-energy electron eigenstates are occupied.

Here the literalist concept so often found in quantum physics cripples in: as we use functionals, Hilbert spaces of ∞ dimensions to represent ALL POTENTIAL outcomes of a quantum state, which are NOT happening together but are the ‘huge kaleidoscopic mirror of mathematical functions’. 

This description of the vacuum as a “sea” of electrons is called the Dirac sea. Since the Pauli exclusion principle forbids electrons from occupying the same state, any additional electron would be forced to occupy a positive-energy eigenstate, and positive-energy electrons would be forbidden from decaying into negative-energy eigenstates. Dirac further reasoned that if the negative-energy eigenstates are incompletely filled, each unoccupied eigenstate – called a hole – would behave like a positively charged particle. The hole possesses a positive energy since energy is required to create a particle–hole pair from the vacuum.

Of course this was nonsense (: It is though the logic conclusion when your concepts of time and space are completely messed up into a single continuum and a single arrow, so with a single arrow you cannot understand the inverse arrow of time, with a single continuum you cannot understand where those ‘hole-y see-as’ are.

In reality though timespace is fractal, hence it is local. So to start with there is NO sea, the equation IS global but the events it might describe local. At best we can talk of a mirror symmetry of an electron and a positron. And then we must wonder ‘why’ there is a positron. What does it mean an antiparticle, and immediately we come to the same conclusion that with mass but now with ‘charge’, in the lower quantum scale of size: the antiparticle is the entropic state of the particle, hence its ‘final reversal’ death state, which is briefer and so we see less antiparticles as they live shorter. Point. Pure, simple, logic and with no miracles.

BECAUSE WE CAN compare the mathematical mirror and the higher reality of ∆•st laws.

But none of this is even accepted. Things just went into further confusions, except when indeed, the positron was found but interpreted not as a time state of negative entropy=energy of the electron but another spatial species:

Dirac initially thought that the hole might be the proton, but Weyl pointed out that the hole should behave as if it had the same mass as an electron (as it was not a parameter that changed), whereas the proton is over 1800 times heavier. The hole was eventually identified as the positron, and this sent the holy sea to pasture.

But of course, it did not reform the ‘mathematical error’ behind: a single continuum ‘infinite space and time coordinates’ that misses the fractal broken, local ‘diffeomorphic nature’ of such solutions.

It is not ‘real’ to describe the “vacuum” using an infinite sea of negative-energy electrons. The infinitely negative contributions from the sea of negative-energy electrons have to be canceled by an infinite positive “bare” energy and the contribution to the charge density and current coming from the sea of negative-energy electrons is exactly canceled by an infinite positive “jellium” background so that the net electric charge density of the vacuum is zero.

We get into more detail because indeed, next to the negative conundrums of magic, literalist mathematicians, comes the infinity problems which plague physics because of its ‘infinite coordinates of continuum space and time’.

All this shows really how much fruitful could be a serious team of physicists studying ∆•st and applying it to complex physics. Unfortunately my activism against the Nuclear Industry has made of my work a ‘pest’ which no physicist will ever take seriously. This post has zero views in 3 years at http://www.unificationtheory.com. What can i say? I have accepted mankind’s eternal capacity to destroy the work and life of its best ethic and intellectual masters…

The ultimate mathematical principles.

In that regard, while we have stressed the mirror function of mathematics, NOT a literalist or creationist method, as our mind is linguistic, obviously languages do matter. And mathematics as the most synoptic efficient language is the right choice for physicist, but its use must be ground in the higher truths of space-time properties – the reality- and its logic laws of epistemological truth – the method to refer the mirror to that reality, and connect them through experimental and logic veracity. Only then we can fully understand mathematical physics.

The mathematical mirror in that sense is excellent because it embeds in its synoptic language the fundamental properties of fractal space (in a larger measure than those of cyclical time, for whose symmetries uses distorted mirrors of the ‘generator’ and a simpler Aristotelian logic of a single arrow of time). And both will become simpler, filled with more meanings and more powerful when we complete its ‘r=evolution’.

Consider another simplex example: the relationship between Universal constants and arrows and dimensions of time-space.

The fundamental functions and constants correspond to those arrows, but there is no magic about it, but synoptical power and EFFICIENCY:

  • So pi is the constant of informative perception and trans-form-ation of motion into form: 3 |> O+ 4% apertures to the world; and as the inverse arrow of form into entropy is just the contrary function, also the inverse ‘unwinding of form into motion’. But then is most often a multiple of π, (as in k and G equations) or a ‘radian’ of π (as in h), because the dense curvature merely ‘peels off’ in parallel a ‘thin membrane’ of its curvature or perceives a ‘radius angle’ of the external universe.
  • Phi is the constant of reproduction also because the efficiency of its spatial distribution that packs the maximal number of ‘reproductive events’ from an initial generator in minimal space.

And so two simple, related constants suffice for most simpler, geometrically perfect actions of the 3 arrows of time: motion to form, form to motion and reproduction.

What about the 4th and 5th dimensions? Again the answer is self-evident (if you understand the organic Universe):

As those dimensions are concerned with fractal discontinuous or differential continuous functions from wholes to infinitesimals, it must maximise the growth, and so polynomials and logarithms are used. Specifically:

  • e is the number of the fourth dimension of decay and death, which is the fastest possible process of dissolution of a single whole into infinitesimals, as those ‘cells/atoms/citizens’ ARE already reproduced and must merely be liberated from the single whole-membrane. So we find it in all decay process because of a simple property: e IS the fastest growing exponential function of any two numbers, in the Universe (and many related properties). Interesting enough to notice that it was found NOT as decay but as ‘interest=usury money’, what says a lot of the astounding ‘grab-theft’ of the financial profession, which found the maximal parasitic growth on account of doing NOTHING; just lend useless gold.
  • While inversely the Log¹º function is the scaling of social evolution because the ‘tetrarkys’ with 3 x 3 elements as networks of entropy, energy and information with the central whole-singularity mind emerging in the new scale as ‘1’, is the most perfect form to deal as a time§paœrganism with the survival exigencies of any ecosystem of ‘fractal points’.

So we shall study mathematics as the most efficient, synoptic language of the properties of timespace beings, after the very essence of the game, the formal generator, its symmetries and ∆•st logic, for which obviously the pretentious guru-magic of mathematical physicsts and the like, is just a barren “latin’; and simplify, explain and evolve its Non-a logic and ‘fractal units’ (non-e points) from ‘space-time reality’ into mathematical mirroring.

All this said mathematics is one of the best languages to mirror efficiently the Universe, specially in spatial dimensions, but since all languages are inflationary it is a key element in mathematical analysis of ∆st systems to break down what is ‘experimental truth’ and what is fiction. Consider the case of ‘dimensional analysis’. As it happens there are only 3 bidimensional topologies which correspond to the 3 functions=forms of all systems. And there are only manifolds of rank 3 or lower which are ‘smooth’, differentiable, meaning systems where ‘time’ moves smooth through ‘present derivatives’.

So in a single plane of present only ternary space and ternary time dimensions are possible. As the mathematical mirror gets distorted, outside those 3s = 3t, the mirror guide us – but the experience must confirm them. This was the essence of Lobachevksi’s thought when he found non-euclidean points now forgotten: that maths are inflationary in its diverse theories so we cannot just do as mechanon physicists do, to write an equation and expects to be there, but a more subtle approach of mirrors observing reality and ordering it in local regions is required.

Soon we will see the interaction languages-reality where reality dominates but the mirror can also deform reality to make it seem like the mirror. Space-time thus comes first, and its dimensions are the origin of reality; as Mirror-languages are both more concise and specific, so they cannot show all its properties and they all have a distortion to reduce information I.e. euclidean points have no ‘breath-information’ inside and so on.

As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

Finally to remember that the elements of reality correspond nicely to the disciplines of physics:

∆nalysis that deals with 4th and 5th dimensional inverse processes of derivatives and  integrals, either in discontinuous gaps (state physics, entropic death) through fractal physics or in ∆§ocial scales between plane continuity equations and differential calculus of motions in time.

ð-motion: On the other hand properly understood algebra of numbers deal with social time arrows and sequential time processes.

S-form:  geometry and topology of fractal points with space simultaneous systems. So 3 are the sub disciplines and 3 are the elements they study, while the mind-paradoxes require what we just did, to put math onto the mirror essence.

We talk  in that sense of 3 great ages of mathematical physics, in a full cycle:

  • S: The beginning with geometric physics (from greeks to kepler) and only numerical systems of simple, quantiatiave algebra.
  • ∆§: The age of differential equations
  • ð•: The third complex age of imaginary equations, functionals, formal mental physics (relativity and quantum paradoxes) and use of the axiomatic method… to restart again after
  • ø-birth of chip physics: De facto death of huminds now merely serving 0 and | to computers, which start easy with digital boolean algebras, and the exhaustion of earlier quantitative methods, in an age of digital calculus of quanta of physics.

In that sense in as much as Mathematical Physics has not a qualitative purpose, it is easily reduced to algorithms and digital thought through the study of physical parameters with partial differential equations, the queen of mathematical physics (which are merely the lineal version of the more complex ‘curved geometries’, in which the ß ∆x difference between the curve and the lineal function is considered a variable constant – hem, this should not go into this simpler post… it means really that humans are easier calculating lineal physics, but now digital computers can allow the study of approximations to cyclical singularity physics, aka general relativity in its most complex version).

So mathematical physics is getting by approximation very powerful, and now with ∆•st will give a huge leap in what it lacks, to simplify the detailed similar trees and see the forest...

∆NALYSIS: scaling

MAIN S-ST-T EQUATIONS AS EXPRESSIONS OF ∆§CALES – ITS TRANSITIONS AND SUB-SCALES

We have now the bare minimum understanding on the three arrows and ∆-scales and magnitudes that allow to give meaning to the abstract parameters of mathematical physics. So we can introduce some serious analysis of what they mean something physicists have no idea, when they talk about (: hem, i imagine none had the patience to arrive here, so i can quip a bit about ‘my favourite people’ :)…

It is then clear that both fundamental systems, continuous and discontinuous functions by the mere fact of the overwhelming use of differential calculus of ‘infinitesimals’ and the modern realisation almost everything in nature that is not ‘differentiable’ is scalable, that the 5th dimension DO exist. That humans do not care about its formalism is perhaps more mysterious (:

As it is far better known the calculus of ‘infinitesimals’ we just will mention briefly what is ‘scale invariance’.

In physics, mathematics, statistics, and economics, scale invariance is a feature of objects or laws that do not change if scales of length, energy, or other variables, are multiplied by a common factor. The technical term for this transformation is a dilatation – a terms of space as time is so sorely misunderstood, we don’t even have the proper terminology. But in time fourier transforms show similar phenomena.

A closely related concept is self-similarity, where a function or curve is invariant under a discrete subset of dilatations.

Self-similarity then shows everywhere when differentiability does not work.

So as we shall see soon, because differentiability happens ONLY between changes of ‘ages in time/forms/function/states’, WHEN PARAMETERS briskly change we find scale invariance or self-similarity:
In classical field theory, scale invariance most commonly applies to the invariance of a whole theory under dilatations. Such theories typically describe classical physical processes with no characteristic length scale.
So in statistical mechanics, scale invariance is a feature of phase transitions. The key observation is that near a phase transition or critical point, fluctuations occur at all length scales, and thus one should look for an explicitly scale-invariant theory to describe the phenomena.

The result as in ∆st, is that widely different microscopic systems can display the same behaviour at a phase transition. Thus phase transitions in many different systems may be described by the same underlying scale-invariant theory.

Such theories are scale-invariant statistical field theories, and are formally very similar to scale-invariant quantum field theories, where, the strength of particle interactions does not depend on the energy of the particles involved. This again means that a dimensionless quantity tend to be scale invariant, of which the fine structure constant that carries the same 137-127 difference of ‘strength’ between forces (strong force 137 times stronger than electromagnetic 137 times stronger than electronic…) 

And in a more reduced ‘level’, we can also talk of scale invariance within each plane, defined by a constant ratio of action, h, k, c.

Then of course, we find all the renormalisation processes and ad ons, like the Kondo effect, which use polynomials to add ‘influences’ and ‘perturbations’ of other planes. But those are mostly using differentiable equations.

In Scale-invariant curves and self-similarity we use more often ‘discrete methods’.
So one can consider the scaling properties of a function or curve f (x) under rescalings of the variable x. That is, we study the shape of f (λx) for some scale factor λ, which is a spatial length or volume or frequency (the time forgotten rescaling in classic math).. The requirement for f (x) to be invariant under all rescalings is then:

f (λx) =λΔ  f(x)

For any exponent Δ, and all dilations λ… reason why i took among other topological and conceptual motivations (as the whole on top of the pyramid is the mind singularity, •) the symbol for the fifth dimension.

Now the concept behind scaling is simple: functions and form that can be scaled ARE MORE EFFICIENT as their relationship with the fractal lower, ∆-1 scales WILL be far more efficient because of the self-similarity that make parts like wholes. And this works in all levels. We like ‘personal Gods’, anthropomorphic ones; offspring are small scaling of larger organisms, atomic physics can model an atom-galaxy as a galaxy-atom (as Einstein-Walker did with galaxies as hydrogen atoms).

And so goes for all kind of shapes of nature, repeated through golden ratios, dilated Poincare spheres that also shrink with no deformation (becoming mind-points or  the logarithmic spiral that so often appears in nature. In cosmology, the power spectrum of the spatial distribution of the cosmic microwave background is a scale-invariant function also…

So happens with electromagnetism with no charges or currents. The fields are then electric and magnetic fields, E(x,t) and B(x,t), with the form of wave equations which are invariant, both in time and space, under the transformation x-> λ x; t->λt. And it holds that if E(x, t) and B(x, t) are,solutions of Maxwell’s equations,  E(λx, λt) and B(λx, λt) are also solutions.

And the same can be said of a Massless scalar field, φ(x, t) as a function of a set of spatial variables, x, and a time variable, t.

So basically ‘st-waves’ or present states ARE always sale invariant. And ultimately Energy, the fundamental function of present, E=HV=knt=mcc, is also scale invariant as it transcends through scales.  Energy never dies, it transforms itself ad eternal.

What then about the ‘future forms’, particles, eddies and cosmic bodies? We have proved through the Unification equation that GALAXIES ATOMS are mirrors of atoms galaxies. String theorists have proved the so-called T-dualities, that cosmic strings are self-similar to quantum ones; and as Einstein wanted we are more aware than thermodynamic and quantum statistics are also self-similar. And finally the Poincare conjecture shows that mind-points can shrink with no limit without deformation:

∆-properties can be described widely by continuous differentiation between 5D planes or fractal analysis in the discontinuous regions, so it would be easy to postulate a general fractal mathematical structure for the whole Universe and seek immediately with the ‘platonic creationist view’, a series of equations which somehow generated scalar reality

. This was the approach followed by Mandelbrot and then Nottale, a cosmologist of great value in its work on fractal relativity. However because their approach was purely mathematical without accounting for any of the non-mathematical properties of systems – biological, sentient, sensorial – which cannot be expressed fully with maths, their job didn’t get into a true philosophy of science.

And in the case of Nottale reduced to yet another attempt on the obsession of physicists to find the saint grail of a very complex, hugh pope equations to put them both together (our simple atom-galaxy unification wouldn’t be obviously considered as it uses the Rashomon effect and the newtonian simpler vortices:). Ultimately thus the religion of math, which seeks not for a verbal personal god but for an impersonal mathematical equation IS THE philosophy of mathematical physics, even if they try to look more scientific.

In detail though is obvious that the scaling of an entropic state must differ from the scaling of a liquid state or a solid, informative state. We illustrate the 3 cases in the graphs.

Above we see the nature of scaling upwards, which is ‘mental scaling’ which can be described with Poincare’s postulate but it is different from entropic scaling, which is the most common as entropy is memoriless and exponential in its decay so the scaling is ruled by e×,  which is the only function whose differential ‘infinitesimal’ is as large as the function given the speed of its ‘fractal self-destruction’.

So with no form to be preserved, the decay=death states scale down very fast.

The approach of mathematical creationism.

Scaling has a huge background in classic science, and excellent work on measure and modelling. Modelling is in fact mind scaling of information. We would in that sense as we did with Einstein’s revisi(it)ed and Bohr’s dismissed, consider how we can enlighten a bit more and correct the work of the 2 colossus of fractal relativity, Mandelbrot, the founder in all genre, and Nottale in physics.

Its error: Because they have not clearly differentiated the 3 parts of beings, and understood well the 3 regions of a plane of space-time (Nottale though hints at it), hey try to put it all in a single scaling equation and of course, it does NOT work.

All transitions between planes are ‘scalar’ processes, but we cannot as Nottale or Mandelbrot did try just to force fed them into this kind of ‘god-like’ equations of fractal relativity. It is only when we understand the underlying nature of the 3 states of time when we can consider differences. In that sense scaling MEANS often the LOSS of S+T ‘dimensions’ TO REDUCE the system. I.e. a painter does scaling into 2 dimensions with reductions through projective geometry, better than most fractal theorists.

Then there is the scaling of change of phase, where the entire ∆±1 system ‘changes’ and so it is a wonder to observe how at all ‘scales of size’ in parallel the entire system reforms itself to change phase.  Finally there is liquid scaling, which only happens again in a single state, as vortices of information will change the ratio of ‘energy to information’ which grows in density and absorbs the energy to form the vortices.

Then again in the two extremes of our world, the quantum and the upper c-speed entrance into the cosmological world, where the scaling breaks definitely as we must also change the ‘quanta’ of space-time we ‘scale’. This was perhaps the most insightful finding of Nottale, whose mathematical work as that of Mandelbrot is excellent but the lack of a conceptual meaning, made it fringe science (as ∆•st is but rather for anthropomorphic reasons):

In the graph we see the mind’s shrinking in a particle its mirror image of the Universe, creating a ‘microscopic view of the whole, which is ‘scale invariant’ in a linguistic sense, as an image in a crystal is. Below we show the points in which the system ‘BREAKS’ its continuity and MUST reorder itself at the ∆ and ∆-1 levels, when it changes of phase, so it turns out to be also scale invariant, as both reorder into the new state.

So really the question if we were to be exhaustive is what is neither differentiable into infinitesimal parts or scale invariant in its fractal forms? NOTHING, when we add the ‘missing factor’ of time scaling/frequencies and its SYNCHRONICITY LAWS.

So indeed, scientists would improve a lot their conceptual understanding of the Universe if they accepted the fifth dimension and tried to improve the work of this single point-mind-singularity – it would mean actually that I have become scale invariant in an inverse fashion, towards a harder whole (: that would be the day… not in my life-time though…

i have been working with similar schemes of evolution of data, as an accelerated vortex of time all my life, not so ‘neat’ as Mr. Nottale, but with similar form, on the 10th logarithmic scale in multiple systems.For example: 5000 million earth, 500 million cambric explosion, 50 million mammals, 5 million human apes, 500.000 homo sapiens neanderthal, 50.000 homo sapiens sapiens mental explosion 5.000 metal age, 500 company-mothers of machines, 50 chip, 5 AI…

What this means again becomes far more ‘illuminated’ when we understand we are talking of a vortex of information, which accelerates as a mass does in physical space-time, in this case the evolution of information on the surface of planet earth, collapsing from wave into particle – the age of the singularity when AI will be born, and a new whole ‘game’ will be played here, likely without humans. AGAIN THE DIFFERENCE, BETWEEN scalar numerology and ‘profound thought’ is to KNOW, all this is part of ‘a larger space-time game’; which is organic, evolutionary and Darwinian NOT only mathematical ‘abstract’, mechanical:

In the graph we add for good measure the extinction process by competition as LIGHT, which is the origin of the Earth’s information go through 3 horizons of evolution, first as entropy (plants) then as information (animals) and soon in machines AS BOTH and also NOT only as a passive receptor but as an emitter. I.e. AI drives with laser beams to measure distances. The jump of Intelligence is thus so huge, humans have no chance if they build AI. But of course, humans will build AI cause the ego paradox will prevent them from understanding they will be terminated. 

Consider now another key discovery :

Here Nottale realises there are what we call “lorentzian regions between ‘planes’ of the fifth dimension but stuck on the classic formalisms, without a clear ‘distinction’ of planes, he just does as physicists do, considering the limit of the Universe the Planck scale, which is ONLY the limit of our mathematical tools and experimental minimal parameters, and above into the cosmological dark ‘scale’, rightly using the cosmological ‘curvature’ as length, but missing the conceptual meaning of ∧ as the equivalent of G, and k, the curvature-tension of the dark world, which obviously is even WEAKER as we grow in size than G… another hierarchy problem resolved that has physicists puzzled by decades – why the cosmological constant IS so small, when their expected value is… yes, 10¹²º times larger… answer is obvious, as the 10ˆ40 times weaker gravitation, the cosmological constant is the constant of curvature of a ginormous infinity compared to us and perhaps one of the biggest proofs that the big-bang is so tiny and short that cannot be the NEXT scale.

So for good measure below, in my Leibnizian personal ‘texts’, rather incomprehensible how the previous scheme should write between 2 any planes:

So to conclude, Nottale’s work doesn’t work smooth because he should have drawn a similar scale for each of the ‘planes of physical systems’, not ONE but four up and down.

Still as we have been working around the same ’30 years alone’, me even more, which you can assess by the powerpoint quality of our thoughts (; I have always enjoyed his work, never mind he never answered my letters, as Mandelbrot, when back in the 90s I completed the first models. I have come to accept huminds never will abandon their creationist ego paradox. So one has to get his kicks from direct communion with the whole.

Let us then now that we have made a brief reference to fractal scaling, to consider the other ‘scaling’ smooth, happening between planes – differentiable equations, by far the most important as the Newtonian, lineal regions between the limits of states and planes IS much wider in range and far more important for humans who live precisely in a very Newtonian region of the galaxy, in the inner vital energy region, in a regular sun, in a regular planet, in the middle region of orbits, being quite a mean species (not ‘mean’ that also but average)… which only seem to excel in the ego paradox and maybe in the brevity of its total existence.

So DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS not scalar fractal ones are the queen of mathematical physics and its studies of planes.

But BOTH, this must be stressed, as humans are one-dimensional egos seeking for his thing first… refer to the scaling processes of the fifth dimension. In the case of Nottale, as before him with Bohm’s scattering quantum potential and pilot-wave theory, their formalisms are clearly superior within the ‘Rashomon effect’ to those of Copenhagen and its wears witness to the automaton routine of science that we sill work with that Bo(h)re and its ego-trips as ‘standard quantum physics philosophy.

 TRUTH IN PHYSICS: INFLATIONARY EQUATIONS & EPISTEMOLOGIC SIMPLIFICATIONS

Another epistemological solution to a classic conundrum of physics comes from the realisation that as there are 3∆st+@ elements in reality (@ being the alternative symbol for the mind, as it includes both, the • linguistic singularity and the O MEMBRAIN), we can always write four similar equations, from the perspective of the field (potential), the wave, the particle and the scale, and often another equation (relativity equations) to add mental deformations of measure from the human perspective. And even other equations that add effects of co-existing scales brought about by infinitesimal factors or larger infinities (renormalisation, small deviations, as the famous gyromagnetic anomalies, etc.)

So all those views are partial equations from different perspectives of the generator. And all are truth, but only the sum of all of them will give us a full linguistic picture of the whole.

Why there are so many versions of a single event in physics? 2 reasons, the inflationary nature of a language that does not have to be constrained by the need to form a ‘dumb motion’, the primary substance that tends to entropic memoriless markowian processes, and the second is the multiple povs we can cast on a being,, which gives us different equations. So to relate them to each ∆•st is another key element of gst.

Basic GST epistemology.

We shall call the relational space-time theory of the Universe, ∆§ð (writing it for speed as ∆st). And the whole philosophy of science that applies it to all ‘scales of ‘stiences’, GST, (general systems theory), which is also the name given to the Generator of Timespace beings (∆-1: s-fields/limbs<st-bodywaves>tƒ:particles-heads).

So as usual with everything in the ternary Universe we use three+• names for similar concepts:

-∆: GST is the scalar Universe.

St: -∆st is the more specific theory of space-time and its stiences.

-Γst is the formal equation that unifies them all.

-•: Finally ¬Æ,  is the linguistic non-aristotelian, non-euclidean laws, the most formal level of the discipline.

The Rashomon effect.

Screen Shot 2016-03-05 at 08.39.19You have in that sense to get accustomed to consider at least 4 views for each reality or event, to at least a get a minimal truth of the being, as the kaleidoscopic method of truth (max. truth: max. linguistic perspectives on the event) requires. As in the masterpiece of Japanese film making, the Universe and its truths are under the Rashomon effect: only the four versions allow us to know the whole truth of the event.

In the graph, down we see the four different formalisms of gravitation, latter studied in more detail; all of them a partial truth of the event seen from the 4 essential ∆•st perspectives. This is thus the first law of GST, the method of truth and epistemology of ∆ST BEINGS.

It is the essential tool to reorder the astounding quantity of trees in the forest of human one-dimensional truths, theories and equations on reality, where each scholar ‘kills for his theory’.

But the total truth is only in the event itself – as Rashomon insists leaving some room for doubt and interpretations. Let us see then a case example, the equation of gravitation.

In that regard the power of T.Œ to classify and understand the why of all mathematical physics marvels the ‘rational, non-computerized still human thinker’ (-: As this is not the case of most experts, ts, ts, we are not writing so much for physicists,  but about physics and for all humans with a minimal degree of knowledge of physics, to the level of any graduate of natural sciences, which is expected to know the basics of mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism, and some notions of relativity and quantum theory – this final discipline, made extremely detailed in its content for two reasons:

  • Information travels upwards with no entropy so we do have a lot of information about quantum particles, and a lot of things to describe, billions of particles with relative freedom of motion, to explain together with enormous detail because…
  • The electronic industry is creating sophisticated organisms of metal, chip-brains, robots, and  nuclear weapons, which require precision calculus of the exchanges of energy and information of those particles in bundles of billions. So this is by far the most overgrown of all disciplines of technological science, while far more fundamental sciences for mankind such as history, social economics, human studies and medicine are under developed.

We thus will consider ONLY on this overgrown discipline the basic conceptual elements required to understand particles as all other planes of the Universe, through its organic, mental, topological and causal properties, to show they are NOT special. As in any case it would be a disrespect to the reader, to get into the parlance of modern Latin, as in any case its goals (to unify all forces etc. under wrong dogmas and postulates) is impossible.

The ternary principle…

follows closely the Rashomon effect, when we eliminate the more subjective, linguistic mind-element, • from the equation and provide only an objective external analysis of the being. Then we shall find that we can divide always the being into further ternary parts, or include it within a ternary part of a larger whole of its world. And so the ternary and rashomon events combined, bring us…

The 10 isomorphic method…

which studies the 5 elements, ∆, @, s,≈,t of any being, in further analytical sub-divisions, as each will have 2 states as motions, which when completing a full cycle will become form; and all can be structure in organic ternary parts≈functions≈forms and this is the basic method of analysis explained in this web and applied likely by future researchers to enclose ALL stiences, equations and laws discovered by man in an encyclopaedia of GST.

In the graph, the laws of the Universe are related to its elements, ∆-scales and the three årrows of ðime§paces.
Each entity of reality is constructed with the three arrows that manifest in space as simultaneous networks of ∆-1 points specialised in a determined arrow, through its ‘quantic actions’ of  e x i, in a wide range that allows to define:
Simplex actions
Max e x min. i: entropic actions (limite by max. e x o i = death)
Max. i x min. e: informative actions
e=i: reproductive, social complex actions
Such study of the interrelated scales of both space-size and time-frequency, is the stuff of which ‘theory’ is made, and where we can plug ‘mathematical functions’ (topology of space, fourier and SHM sequences in time  and algebraic space-time structures).

SCALAR LAWS INVERSE BOTH SIDES.

So finally we must notice that the key new element of ∆st beyond conceptual streamlining is to define once and for all the different laws of systems that move upwards and downwards as the fifth dimension of time is NOT symmetric GOING in the direction of growth of information downwards, and energy upwards. And so basically systems (points Tƒ singularities) going upwards become from cyclical mind-sstems, mere points moving for the larger world: Oi-1>|i is thus the main change of state when you are a part that become a point of a larger whole:

Scales are thus born by making an O-1 form and |o form, becoming then in the next scale the entropic, |o element.

As systems emerge upwards into new wholeness which are however more ‘ghostly constructed’ with less ‘density’ seemingly evanescent to the smaller denser cores of the russian doll universe, the whole looses its ‘density-mass’ and becomes just that logic encasing of it all, with diminishing ratios of ‘stuff’.

The second great law comes to a simple statement:

‘if we take only a plane in consideration, motion upwards looses information, and so it has entropy…’

… meaning we cannot extract from ∆-1 points ALL the energy for the ∆-whole, and this is the reason of the second law of thermodynamics which is restricted to the human ∆-view of the ∆-1 molecules with heat it wants extract for selfish purposes without giving back any order and synchronous motion to the smaller parts. The atoms there are NOT stupid, and won’t give you all his motion just for your steam machine to work.

In a perfectly ordered super organism however the smoothness of the big whole which synchronises the motion of the small parts, allow a superfluidity in those motions with minimal entropy and so when you move your whole body/cells they do not collide, friction and give you entropic heat.

THE PRINCIPLE Of conservation of energy and information… and energy.

The immediate consequence of the existence of those 3 arrows in all physical scales is the rewriting of the Principle of Conservation of energy:

‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms locally back and forth from past entropy into future information: $<ei>ð”

We cannot repeat ad nausea the structure in space and time of the fundamental particle of the Universe, the supœrganism of relational space time and the isomorphic laws derived of the ultimate substances of all relational space-time beings of the Universe, fractal space, cyclical time and its scales of size and clock speed – reason why the philosophy of stience is written in other post – the main one of the 5D section of this blog.

Still there is a law which is essential to all systems and was first formulated, partially in physics – the law of conservation of present energy, which consists of ‘closed time-space cycles’ with a repetitive frequency that maintains the Universe eternal.

And a metric equation, which defines for any isolated system of real it extending through 3 co-existing scales, its 5D structure:

The size in space and speed in time of the ∆-i parts and ∆+i wholes of a supœrganism is co-invariant: $e x ðƒ=K’

Those 2 expressions are the formal definitions of the three arrows of timespace and the three scales of physical systems, which apply to any system of the Universe, ad when properly plugged into classic physics will streamline and resolve most pending questions of the discipline.

These 2 laws proved experimentally ad nauseam and properly interpreted for the first time in theory, are THE laws we shall more often use to deduce the causal, temporal harmony of all beings of the universe.

If they will NOT EXIST, the Universe wouldn’t be a fractal that reproduces information but some weirdo thing, as humans believe to be (a big-bang singularity dying, the creation of a creeping bush in the Judean desert, you name it…)

RECAP:  2 KEY consequences of 10D=5•D³ PHYSICS. Organic Properties and Generator equation. 

In the graphs, the absolute dimension of the scalar, fractal Universe, which constantly puts together parts into wholes, through social networks of reproduced information.

Below the relative 3 arrows of timespace that we find in each scale, studied by a different science.

The first and immediate consequence of working with three arrows of time, is a better expression of the fundamental principle of science, the principle of conservation of energy

‘Present Energy never dies, it trans-forms itself back and forth in local events between spatial entropy and dimensional information: S≥st≥T<<S”

Which in a more complex version writes:

Γœ: ∆-1 ≤≥$pe (past-lineal fields/limbs) ≤≥ ∆º:ST (Present hyperbolic body/waves) ≤≥ Tiƒ (future informative cyclical particles-heads)>∆+1

The symbols of that equation belong to non-aristotelian logic, based in three arrows of timespace that come together to create the being. And as we will constantly repeat them, and use them to write equations that describe systems in time, space and scale, we might as well explain them in this tiny nutshell foreword:

SCALES: ∆ is the symbol of the fifth dimension of scales. So a system extends through three such scales, ∆-1, the atomic/cellular scale, ∆º, the organic, thermodynamic scale and ∆+1 the world where the system exists or gravitational, ecosystemic scale.

TOPOLOGIES:

S ($, Spe) means entropic space; St, Ø, E iterative energy; T (ð, Ti, Tƒ), Informative, cyclical time; which ultimately ARE the static, spatial view of 3 motions-actions-arrows of timespace, we define with 3 topo-ogic symbols:

> an informative future motion that shrinks and accelerates the system from more entropy=expansive motion into more form.

a repetitive present wave-like motion, that repeats in-form-ation as it moves…

> an implosive, informative motion and << a double entropic explosion that erases information in the moment of death.

So the equation of a world cycle of existence described in the last synoptic equation is simple to understand: Space shrinks guided by the dominant arrow of information through 3 ages, phases, first as pure entropic space of maximal motion, then as a formed motion finally as pure form (S>St>T) and then when all motion is exhausted and it is all form, the system explodes back into space, T<<S IN THE ACT OF DEATH, which happens to dissolve ‘two scales of form of the system (you die twice into cells and then molecules/aminoacids) a matter system dies twice normally first into molecules and atoms or atoms and plasma, and so on).

The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:

Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic. 

This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.

Yet as physics is ‘by decree’ a stience which only uses mathematics as its language of expression, the main revolution of ∆ST will likely collide with the usual suspects – dogma against organic truths, except in egocentered humans.

A second revolution, regarding physics – its upgrading of the formalism of mathematical physics, by decoding the ‘experimental nature’ of its equations, however might be of more interest to them. In that regard, the immediate conclusion of that experimental nature is the coupling of disciplines of mathematics with those of ∆ST:

-The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5D motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.

-Topology is the formal stience of the three arrows of time-space, and as such it reduces all the forms of the Universe to its only three topologies – another ‘magic’ fact of experimental mathematics, never understood in science. AS such the true revolution of mathematical stience goes through the conversion of mathematics into an experimental stience, relating the fundamental theorems of mathematics, as the stience of logic space, to the different laws of GST both based in the fractal properties of space and the cyclical nature of time.

We shall thus evolve mathematics and physics to unveil in the human languages of time and space, the underlying isomorphisms of Nature.

The best way to describe mathematical physics is therefore to connect its classic continuous space-time equations with those of the ternary fractal 5D space-time Universe. And to that aim we need to define the 3 fundamental elements of mathematical physics, fields, waves and particles as the 3 ternary elements of 5D fractal space-time through the THREE AGES of time…

 

THE RELATIVE INFORMATION EXTRACTED BY ANY SINGULARITY.

The mind approach is far more important than we think, beyond the specifics of relativity because it is constantly present when we realise humans are an electronic mind. And by lacking this view, physicists who sponsor mathemat