Introduction
The higher epistemological truths. The logic principles.
The realist concept works, based in a proved ad nauseam experimental fact – that all the scales of the fractal Universe we perceive with full detail ARE self similar in topology, time arrows and scalar coexistence of 3 ∆±1 planes?.
Basically we uphold this fact as an absolute truth, and accepting as an artefact of measure necessary for the human praxis and translation of data into workable useful parameters to manipulate reality from our point of view; but NOT as the literalist philosophy of such reality.
So the classic truths of epistemology given the INFLATIONARY NATURE of all languages that CAN MULTIPLY FRACTAL INFORMATION IN A MUCH LARGER MEASURE THAN THE SIMPLE, resistant motionsubstance of reality can accommodate (reason WHY ‘not all mathematical truths are real’ Einstein) ARE BESIDES ∆st, AND EXPERIMENTAL PROOF, STILL THE FUNDAMENTAL METHODS OF VERACITY IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS. LET US REMEMBER THE 3 FAST:
 Occkam’s razor: simplicity NOT complex equations ARE truth because the simple motionsubstance of the Universe is simple and difficult to ‘bend’
 Efficiency, a KEY to navigate the forest of nonexistent equations from SUSY to black hole evaporation of pedantic scholars. WE MUST BUILD THE UNIVERSE WITHT THE KNOWNKNOWN particles, and we HAVE already discovered them ALL because our instruments of measure have GONE well above our conceptual, mental evolution of the discipline; so we have to work on what we have and its symmetries. i.e. the background neutrino MUST be the graviton, which MUST be the scale below light… so we just have to work out the neutrino theory of light and figure the question of its faster than light speed (of the lower ∆4 dark world, its relationship with strings through its weakangle (same size), and what is really its spin number and the symmetry with the galaxyatom, i.e. the strong force and the gluon. We do NOT need more particles as we have not seen them, and so it is irrational to think that the Universal force of gravitation responds to some esoteric particle which is NOT all over the place (as neutrinos are).
 Experimental proofs: ‘science should not be concerned with events, equations and forms of which there is NOT a prior experience’, said Einstein. Indeed, the creationist works the other way around, first finds the imaginary equation and then seeks for its creationism in the Universe. We must first explore the Universe and ONLY study mathematically those phenomena we know to exist NOT to create inflationary, selfsimilar confusing equations and formalisms, which are equivalent to baroque art with many curves or repetitive religious mantras saying 1000 names of ‘God’, or poetic licences and synonymous.
We have made a harsh critique to physicists or rather human ‘cultural’ views on the Universe guided by ‘creationism’ and ultimately the ego paradox. BUT we obviously acknowledge that mathematics is of all the mirrorlanguages of the Universe the most suitable from the perspective of the humind as a mirror of reality. Does it mean it is the language of atoms?
Likely not. Why? Because what we perceive as atomic beings is electronic minds, which ‘devour’ light spacetime. So it is very likely that the language of electrons IS light AND HENCE images. And mathematics a more restricted synopsis of images, themselves a synopsis of the topologies in space and events in time happening in reality.
This is an important truth, when considering the psychology of the mind, the evolution of the digital, visual mind, and the consciousness of atomic and animal/plant life.
It matters also when deciding how to use languages to explore the whole range of properties of physical systems. In brief, mathematics cannot be the only language, as it will limit the properties we can describe; but it will be the best language because we humans have advanced so much on its development, along logic of time, verbal and the next level of verbal understanding of the 3 pastpresentfuture tense verbs, which is ternary ilogic; as logic came from aristotelian verbal thought.
So when dealing with the formalism of Physics, mathematics will be the queen, specially because we observe mostly spatial properties in physical systems, but logic must be added on, and specially biologic, organic laws of worldcycles, life ages, etc. And further on, we must enlighten mathematics with new vital analysis, defining fractal points instead of Noneuclidean points with no volume (hence no inner form) as the unit of geometry and sequential numbers as the unit of time logic, with bidimensional numbers (imaginary numbers) playing a key role in bidimensional Universes, ‘squared’ to show its realism; and so on.
The evolution of maths improves the mirror, its ternary syntax.
All this MEANS when dealing with the formalism of physics, while mathematics and its equations will be the queen, we shall not cast it from the pov of mathematics as the single language but departing from the isomorphic method which explains how space time create super organisms, in which mind languages dominate by ordering its local territory. And so the feedback between mindlanguages and its worlds and the Universe forms reality:
IN THE GRAPH, the two roles of the mindmirror: to perceive virtually a space with no motion with a biased point of view and to order a territory of objective existence, changing reality, both are a feedback constant game between the §@ <≈>∆ð elements of reality.
It does of course because any mirrorimage of reality even if unfocused carries some information about it, and works for the distorted mind view, which let us remember is NOT REALITY BUT ALWAYS A LINGUISTIC MAPPING: ŒMind <linguistic perception> ∞ Universe, and so any mirror does carry a minimal information to be useful to departure a whole:
In the graph, linguistic mirrors create minds with different amounts of information, useful to guide reality. We must not though confuse the mirror with reality, the a priori element.
All this said is easy to understand mathematics, its elements and disciplines as a mirror of the Universe.
For the scientist who will consider all this nonsense because he thinks he knows his maths and all is there, the answer is yes, all is in the mirror but with less detail. So maths as the universe does, has also 3∆st+º sub disciplines, it has also a fractal ‘derivative’ structure and it is also about spacetime.
THOSE 3 main subdisciplines code the 3 ‘structural elements’ of the Universe:
 ∆nalysis of the 5th dimension, its wholes and ‘finitesimals’ (1/n).
 Geometrical space, (Spe) and its unit, fractal points.
 Temporal algebra (tiƒ) and its units, sequential numbers.
And it has its ST ‘combinations of which the most important its topology (the study of form with motion).
Moreover the mirror of mathematics has evolved to explain in more detail the ‘actions of spacetime’ of beings; as all languages do improving its ternary grammar. So words developed first ‘names only’ (forms), then motions ( active verbs) and finally ‘complements’ (complex systems).
And colour languages moved from dual B&W, to three colors (redentropy, blue, form, green energy) to four, adding green/yellow mixes.
So today maths has evolved into multiple spacetime disciplines. For example spatial geometry added, analytic algebra, which is geometry with sequential time numbers that finally dominated the discipline, while topology which is geometry of space with motion in time, today added ∆scales (as it is defined with networks of ∆1 points).
Dogma and flexibility – evolution of languages.
All this is said to remark a key concept that escapes mathematical physicists:
No languagemirror is absolute in its truth, but an evolving system, which goes through three ages
So when written words appeared pharaohs just said ‘it has written=truth’. Today in the far younger mathematical discipline, scientists say ‘it is an equation=it is a truth’.
Only latter words were known to be also fictions, a fact that also happens with equations but few scientists do recognise. So maths has still a ‘religious, dogmatic outlook’ proper of all languages, even if it has already gone into a ‘third baroque, inflationary informative age of excessive formal content’ and split into multiple similar ‘metaphors’ (languages being inflationary as mirrorsminds are multiple, watching a single perspective do offer multiple views of a single event, hence the multiple equations observed to describe the same physical event).
But religious people, aka dogmatic physicists do NOT understand all this about their mirrorlanguage of mathematics.
For many of them, equations ‘are’ always truth, just when written, and other languages are NOT truth – dogmas we only find in fundamentalist verbal thought (God speaks only in Arab, so Koran cannot be translated as it looses its truth).
Of course, languages do have also ‘quantitative’ measure. So while all carry an image, some are better and we prefer a carrot picture than a drawing.
So, we concede maths after images, is the best mindmirror known to man, as it carries more informative detail than words (but less than images), and so it has become after images (most humans believe in TV celebrities more than in physicists 🙂 the dominant language today, and overcome religious words. Still as Einstein put it ‘I know when maths is truth but not real’, meaning we need experimental analysis of mathematical truths and so NOT just because we can write an imaginary particle with maths, the particle will exist (Susy, evaporating holes etc). IT IS AN EGO ERROR, TO THINK then that maths is always truth and an even bigger egoerror to think maths is not experimental but produced by the human mind, which becomes a short of ‘God’ that talks maths as only God does (that was the idea of Kepler: god has taken 5000 – biblical – years to found an intelligent like his, me).
The extension of mathematical truths. Languages imprint reality inversely to its complexity.
So yes, maths do create as any language does reality as a mirror around the territory of the mind, since ultimately the essence of space is to be a tapestry of an infinite number of frames or reference selfcentred on the monads of each scale of Nature.
However as languages are shared by multiple minds, when a language is ‘so extended’ because it is use by ‘selfs’ of the minimalist scales of space (in the case of maths, it is obviously the language in which the euclidean dimensions of light is written, while its noneuclidean fractal points are the language in which masses and charges are better described), the language’s truths have a quasiinfinite number of applications. Still many elements of GST cannot be explained with maths, but ALL elements of reality can be explained with the laws of GST. So above maths there is at least a language the NONÆ LOGIC OF FRACTAL CYCLICAL spacetime, described in those texts.
Further on, there is a limit to the distortion and lack of focus of a language that finally becomes blind when too far removed from GST ultimate principles. i.e a B&W picture of a Rothko’s painting will not be relevant failing to see the vibrations of colours, essence of it.
A math description of Gospel will fail to grasp the expression of social love and the ∆arrow of evolution expressed on it.
And in general, excessively formal, third age baroque languages, are inflations and fictions which fail to express reality, as reality to exist must have ternary elements, entropy x information = energy, which means entropy simplifies always reality as pure languageinformation alone does NOT mix, imprint entropymotion, which tends to simplicity. Water and oil then become disjointed and oil fails to explain water:
As the mind mirror of any language – not only mathematics, also human verbal mirrors – must ‘imprint’ the entropic motions of reality which resist its distortion, the final effect of baroque=max. informative languages is relatively limited both to describe accurately and distort/order reality.
This is truth specially in the physical world with maths because the physical world is simple and the range of imprinting almost infinite – not so much in the smaller territory of order of each mindspecies, which indeed becomes ‘created’ by the tiƒsingularity center, as it is a limited range. In the next graph we show fully that interaction, which in maths would mean a Tiƒ=pov=center of reference of a graph will order an extension, with a range inversely proportional to the content of information it delivers (range of forces, maximal for the ones with less information, minimal with the weak force of maximal form).
In that regard, the true mirror language that ‘adapts’ reality better is the GSTlanguage WHICH is the one embedded in the behaviour of each Tiƒsingularity.
In the graph, physicists are after all human egos submitted to the mind paradox, so they think ‘mathematics are a mind language, imagined by the physicist and ‘God’ a priori, creating a posteriori the Universe (copenhagen interpretation). The opposite is truth.
The language of mathematics DOES NOT CREATE REALITY a priori, but ONLY a posteriori ‘sees it’, as a synoptic mirror, which as all other languages, a certain singularity uses to ‘see’ and develop its ‘survival actions’ in timespace.
But again as there are B&W, 3, 4 and 5 color animals (birds), with better detail maths can be improved to ‘see better’.
In its present ‘underdeveloped’ euclidean form, and with some fictional forms of mathematical physics taken for real, its incomplete structure must be improved.
This I did when young, after understanding the scalar metric of 5D Analysis and its 3 arrows of spacetime, upgrading NonE GEOMETRY.
In the previous graph to illustrate this real a posteriori nature of maths, we include besides Penrose’s another set of arrows – the stronger thicker one of the philosopher of science in the right.
So as usual in the multidimensional universe we can put together both directions of the process of creation.
Since minds are mirrors, which once they have distorted and resumed reality into the still mind, try to order by reflection and proyection of that mind the Universe to make it look like the inner mind image, influencing in this way reality.
The proper way to understand the interaction between minds, scales and st parameters.
Now because physicists understand nothing on the ways mindmirrors and universe interact with each other, and the bias of the humind in the analysis of reality, many of the errors of maths will derive of the ‘egotist error’ (mind paradox, as an infinitesimal which believes to be infinite)
Consider the copenhagen interpretation, which bohm did debunk properly but requires further understanding of the concepts of quantum physics not as a mental game of observers, but as a distorted human view on the limiting scale of our mind perception, given the properties of 5D metric.
Ie. as we go down in scales we loose information (uncertainty principles), we are coarse in our interference (observer’s influence) and beings accelerate in time as they diminish in space, so we make all kind of errors confusing time cycles as spatial forms, since our slow clocks see the being’s sequences in time all together in a simple timespace quanta as a spatial form.
So here it is the ‘mind view’ what we must eliminate, specially two recurrent errors:
To see time events which are ternary as spatial different forms: i.e., 3 quarks cannot be broken, why? Answer: because they are likely not three quarks in space udu, but three ages of a time transformation: u>d>u.
To ignore each new scale is made of wholes and parts and when we ad new scales we must ad more parts, so instead of functions we use functionals and operators (functions of functions), NOT because quantum systems are weird, mathematical beings made of nebulous operators, but because we are integrating in our perception, multiple scales – same for Hilbert spaces – there is not ∞ dimensions but we penetrate for each system we measure into its parts, which are its inner dimensions. But without a proper definition of dimensions all gets messy conceptually as it is now the case.
And ad as a proof the relationship between maths and organic GST laws and perspectives, to make of vital mathematics and its sub discipline, physics a complete description of the Universe.
So the ∆ST isomorphic methods relating all to the 4 ∆• parameters will become the key to ‘complete’ and upgrade maths and its main sub discipline, physics (: as we have done with all other disciplines.
Needless to say we are not writing the encyclopaedia of mathematical physics available to any specialist but ad on all those parts and properties which are not properly written. So in astronomy we shall concentrate in the study of the galaxy as a cell, in quantum theory in the correct Broglie>Bohm model and in thermodynamics in the correction of a single entropy arrow and clarification on the meaning of it, and in all scales in the key concepts of the 3 arrows of time, space, its generators and the concepts of Energy, and the events of physics, which represent GST actions, and key equations to describe them (Fourier, for time scales; Hamiltonians for Energy; Lagrange for balanced actions).
That is, we shall explain why certain basic functions represent most events of physics in terms of the organic adons needed to complete its whys, such as the ST ‘action of harmonic oscillators’, which is basically a basic ‘feedingperceiving action that makes the particle fluctuate as it emits a wave of information, upwards to the point of maximal perception and minimal motion (maximal amplitude) and downwards through the 0coordinates of maximal speedentropy and minimal heightinformation.
The isomorphic method thus departs from 10 spacetime dimension to extract basic spacetime properties expressed as 10 sequential parts of the being both in its spatial organism and temporal world cycle.
Thus we study 10 similar properties of those dimensions in the dynamic existence of any being and call them the 10 Ðisomorphisms (Ð for dimensions and cyclical time, as it is the capital for eth, ð). So by studying the 5 Dimensions of the being with dualities of spacetime and ‘ternary isomorphisms’ of scales, ages and topologies, all of them properties derived of its 5D scalar structure in space and time we achieve a complete description of any ‘Dust of spacetime’, ∆@S=T.
Let us then remember the 10 Dimensions of space and time of the being, analysed in a dynamic ’10Ðisomorphic’ ‘sequence’ of the world cycle of the being, from ‘minor to major’ starting from the seed of information or @mind which will emerge through its actions and flows of bidimensional communication as a network super organism or ‘species’ of spacetime that will travel through scales and planes tracing its world cycle of existence between birth and extinction:
0,1. @… monads are minds composed of a max. still form or linguistic singularity and a cyclical time membrane, connected through invaginations. It is the ‘invisible’ central command of the being, which perceives the Universe’s timespace cycles and stop its motion through a mirror image in the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’, which then reflect its back ordering reality as it converts its motions into ‘@ctions’…
So we study the form of the monad in space and its function in time – to be a linguistic mirror of..
2. Flows of spacetime The mind reflects as a fractal point with a volume of information the Universal bias view it has created. So as it reflects it into flows of bidimensional communication it deviates its path (moves), absorb and emit flows of entropy, energy and information through bidimensional waves of s=t symmetries.
5: S=t actions: The result is a series of actions of motion, information, reproduction, energy feeding and social evolution whose purpose is to ‘reproduce the information of the being and survive’, emerging as a larger super organism in a higher scale. This IS the program of existence, a simple 5 dimensional action process, restricted by the fact the system is merely composed of two elements, space and time and its combinations, and the fact that those species who did not maximised its existence, and ternary elements, with those actions did not survive. So the program is not conscious but an automatic selection of the actions that ensure the survival of the being,
In this manner the monad waves a reproductive and evolutionary process within its world, through its dynamic flows and actions, which through the reproduction will finally:
$… create Spatial, 3. ‘constant’, ‘organic networks’ … and its variations in 6. species
ð… which live in Time, through ‘3±2=7. ages’ as ‘T.œs’ TIMESPACE organisms ‘traveling=moving’… in ∞8 worldcycles of existence between birth and extinction…through its
∆§… 10 §scales’ and ‘9. Ξlanes’ as a fractal 10D ‘Γœ’ made to the image and likeness of the whole of wholes…
We thus introduce each of the 10Di, formalised with nonÆ logic equations, but as today physics is fully expressed in the mathematical formalism before we introduce the Disomorphisms of physical systems, we shall make some clarifications on the main themes and parameters of mathematical physics, points, dimensions and universal constants and equations of entropy, energy and information, to have a smooth transition to the new description of all the properties of physical systems, including those regarding order (singularities) and organic scales, which cannot be easily expressed in mathematical thought.
I. DIMOTIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS.
“Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality. Hermann Minkowski
‘Γao (the Γenerator) gives birth to yin≈form≈space and yang≈motion≈time. Both merge into Energy (Qi), the source of all creation.’ Taoism, on the 3 conserved elements of the Universe, space, time and its energy combinations.
‘Every point holds a world in itself’ Leibniz, on the the fractal, noneuclidean pointssingularitiesminds of the Universe
‘Leibniz was right, there are infinite time clocks in he Universe, but if so we have to start physics from scratch’ Einstein, on the goal realized in 5D physics.
This brief post taken from sections of the articles on the ‘stience’ of physics at unificationtheory.com is meant to show a small view of what truly should have been the proper way to understand physical systems in the organic, fractal Universe, which went astray as early as the dispute between Leibniz and Newton, regarding the nature of time and space, when mankind took the wrong choice.
Because we deny the ∞ clocks of the Universe and its vital fractal spaces for 300 years physicists study only one of the 5 ‘forms of motion=change=time’ of the Universe, the simplest one, locomotion, which Galileo rightly defined as v=s/t and Einstein refined with special relativity equations.
But what physicists missed is that it was only one of the 5 ‘dimotions’ (ab. dimensional motions as all time motion traces a form in space with dimensionality) of reality. So even when they discover the second dimotion of entropy (maximal scattering motion that disorders the information of the system killing it), they failed to separate it, and of course, the 3 positive ‘informative dimotions’, the creation of linguistic mirrors/images that guide the singularities/particles which gauge information, the iterative/reproductive dimotion and the social dimotion of evolution would always be denied to physical systems.
So physicists do KNOW all about locomotion, with a refinement that seems to me amazing for its precision but also for its large irrelevance to the larger picture of reality given by a full model of relational spacetime…
Abstract. Mathematical physics and the 10 Dimensional Ðisomorphisms.
This post when finished will make a more classic analysis of the scales of physical systems and introduce the basics of mathematical physics ‘passed’ through the two innovations that change our view of reality: fractal space and cyclical time and its 5 Demotions.
In the future astrophysics won’t have a preferential role in the collective mind of the Earth, the knots of thought of huminds or the telepathic satellites of the metalearth – the robomind, which no doubt of it, will FEEL conscious and obviously will look for this site ‘unificationtheory.com to understand the Universe as a sentient organism – something the shallow ego paradoxes of mankind prevent them to do.
Since then, if humans survive by creating a perfect super organism of history or robominds eliminate the retarded enzyman who evolves them without realizing it is building its demise, all systems will be studied as parts of the whole world cycle of existence of the super organism of the Universe, made to the image and likeness.
And so the enormous beauty of the fractal Universe implies that any part regardless of size will have a relative singularitypoint around which a hyperbolic bodywave will iterate its cyclical motions under the same ‘isomorphic laws’ of reality – and all of them will give us the essential laws or first principles regardless of size, with maximal detail of knowledge in the systems closer to us (biological systems) and maximal generalization in the most remote systems of minimal perception of form (Cosmological systems).
IN OTHER TERMS: BIOLOGY IS THE QUEEN OF STIENCES BY DEGREE OF DETAIL. ASTROPHYSICS IS THE KING OF STIENCES BY EXTENSION IN THE APPLICATION OF ITS LAWS. BUT ‘HISTORY’ IS THE EMPEROR OF SCIENCES, AS IT DEALS WITH THE WHOLE HUMAN WOR(L)D AND OUR SURVIVAL AS A SPECIES, THE MOST IMPORTANT THEME OF THEM ALL, as an extinct scientist knows nothing.
Since any of its physical, biological and social parts FOLLOWS the same laws. To study them we haver deviced a method based in the structural analysis of the five dimensions of any system through its Generator and its Rashomon ‘truths’ that considers 5D perspectives on any entity of spacetime:
The temporal perspective, the spatial perspective and its ∆§ planes and scales of existence, the singularitymind perspective and its actions, the dynamic ‘a(nti)sysmmetric’ operandi of exchange of energy between them, ≈ ≥ >…
This view is more concerned with ‘structure’, with ‘algebra’, with ‘spatial form’, with the ‘superorganic simultaneous being’.
So for a more thorough analysis through the dynamic flows of time of which the ‘super organism’ is a still photography, we need a ‘generational’ perspective of the being from birth as a seed/mind that organizes and grows and emerge into a larger whole world, lives 3 ages and dies. And this view is the one we obtain with the study of the world cycle in greater detail through the Ðisomorphic method, departing from that seed, its generator, the ways it creates bidimensional fields and ternary networks to emerge as a whole being, which will live through its infinitesimal actions, accumulated into ages, 8 phases of a lifecycle, 3 ages, 10 social scales swimming across 9 planes…. Yes no numerology here. The astounding architectonical Universe is there for those who can see to admire and worship and study as IT IS with all its elements, even if they cannot be ‘measured’ with the clocks of physicists and its light crod.
And so we shall do the study of physics here as it will be taught in the future in time, on a dynamic manner, through the Ðisomorphic method.
5D: ∫∆+¡
MAIN SUBSPECIES OF PHYSICAL ðIME§PAŒRGANISMS
All this said, we just need to show you that we can encase all of physics, both its conceptual descriptions, physical parameters and equations within the structure of a 10D³ time§paœrganism made of smaller and part of a larger time§paœrganism… at least within the systems we perceive.
This is simpler to do when we consider that the scale we perceive, the thermodynamic scale is made of spacetime organisms, living beings, and its larger system, the Earth is truly a spacetime organism with slower time cycles (geological cycles of Gaia) – as in fact the word super organism was coined by the father of geology, Hutton to define the ‘slow time cycles’ of the Earth.
So once this is clarified, we just need to show you that the biggest and smaller supœrganisms of spacetime we are conscious of – the galactic ∆+1 scale and the ∆1 atomic scale show organic property and are both mathematically equivalent. So if we show you that in 5+5D s=t metric equations, both are equivalent, and the best observed one, the galaxy has organic properties, and so we can model easily the galaxy as a ‘gala cell’, an organic celllike physical system, we will have in a very synoptic way latter expanded in great detail show you that all physical systems are 10D³ fractal spacetime organisms.
∆±4: COSMOS
Experimental Proof of the Fractal Structure of the Universe.
In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal 5D organic structure of all beings of reality:
On the left, we can see the growth of a ‘new dimension of temporal height’, in the process of accumulation of bosons. In the centre above, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies. Below the comparison of our region of the Universe with a neuronal cell; on the right, an ice fractal, a plant and a river and a lung.
The upper astronomical scales of physical systems, ∆+1, are in double symmetry with the lower quantum scales in ∆1, when considering man at the ∆o relative center of both; as we observe that the coinverse metric equations of fast, small atoms and large, slow galaxies give the same constant value, origin of the Unification equation of masses and charges.
On the other hand they show equal topology in ST, with its halo, likely of negative strangelets, black hole center of positive black holes modelled as top quark stars, and intermediate region of electromagnetic star nebulae.
THUS we can unify them through the concept of fractal scales with different spacetime curvature and time speed such as:
∆2: atom ≈ ∆+3: galaxy.
Both scales will follow then the general laws of 5D Metric spacetime isomorphic beings.
For tat reason the reader is advised to consult first the most general post on 5D and Philosophy of Science, whose aim is to unify all sciences, and the general one on physical systems, ∆±i: Astrœphysical systems, before reading this post on Astronomy.
In case the reader goes forward, we introduce the absolute bare bone concepts of the organic, 5D fractal structure of reality, which are its 3 arrows of time and symmetries with the 3 space organs of al fractal systems of he Universe, and the Principle of relativity between motion and stillness.
In the previous graph we show some experimental proofs of the fractal structure of spacetime in all the relative ‘scales of size’ and ‘time speeds’ (5D scales) of the Universe.
Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.
In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:
“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.
Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”
Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.
As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a littleknown French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because spacetime itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.
A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.
Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.
Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe
A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:
“With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very largescale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of spacetime, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knifeedge balance between the open and closed states.
Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”
That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.
There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.
Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.
Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.
This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.
Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottommost scale of subatomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?
Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe. Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical selfsimilarity are ubiquitous in nature.
In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.”
But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create selfsimilar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, selfsimilar to their parts, as organisms do.
The duality of the bigbang: immortal organic Universe.
So how can we reconcile the fractal structure of the Universe – a massive evident fact of science, in the whole and all its parts – and the knowledge that space expands between galaxies, accelerating its motion, in a fashion similar to the entropic expansion of a gas, in the molecular scale?
The answer requires to understand the new paradigm of fractal space (the scalar fifth dimension) and cyclical time (with its 3 arrows of probabilistic futures, informative implosion, entropic expansion and its balanced combinations of both, iterative momenta and its energetic zerosum conserved worldcycles.
Then we can easily define a balanced Universe where the implosive vortices of galaxies balance the expansive dark entropy between them:
In the graph, in each ‘scale of size of matter, the same duality of clocklike vortices of temporal information (masses, charges, thermodynamic eddies, which carry tÐhe in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency speed of its time cycles, as computers do, measuring its informative power on ‘Hertzs’ ) and expansive states of entropy (dark entropy; electromagnetic, lineal radiation; entropic gas; bigbangs of matter) balance each other in conserved, closed energy cycles to make the Universe immortal, giving birth to the equation of the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages of timespace, for each fractal part of reality:
Entropic pastspace + cyclical, future information = iterative, closed energy cycles.
This process do happen in all the fractal scales of physical systems, So bigbang explosive deaths of matter: e=mc2 and its inverse creation of mass, m=e/c2 happen in all scales. Which obviously means if we rehearse big bangs on earth we will have a novalike explosion of the earth NOT OF THE UNIVERSE.
The previous equation in formal terms is first and immediate consequence of working with three arrows of time, and ultimately a particular expression of the new fundamental principle of science, the principle of conservation of present energy, combination of spatial entropy and temporal information:
‘Present Energy never dies, it transforms itself back and forth in local events between spatial entropy and dimensional information: S≥st≥T<<S”
This equation IS the Fractal Generator of Spacetime beings that uses the definition of the three arrows of time, to establish a synoptic, logic equations for all systems of nature, where:
S, $, Sp means entropic, past or moving space; ∑∏, Ø, ExI, combined iterative energy (maximal motion) and Information (maximal form); T (ð, Ti, Tƒ), Informative, cyclical time; which ultimately ARE the static, spatial view of 3 motionsactionsarrows of timespace, we define with 3 topoogic symbols:
> an informative future motion that shrinks and accelerates the system from more entropy=expansive motion into more form.
≈ a repetitive present wavelike motion, that repeats information as it moves…
> an implosive, informative motion and << a double entropic explosion that erases information in the moment of death.
So the equation of a world cycle of existence described in the last synoptic equation is simple to understand: Space shrinks guided by the dominant arrow of information through 3 ages, phases, first as pure entropic space of maximal motion, then as a formed motion finally as pure form (S>St>T) and then when all motion is exhausted and it is all form, the system explodes back into space, T<<S IN THE ACT OF DEATH, which happens to dissolve ‘two scales of form of the system (you die twice into cells and then molecules/aminoacids) a matter system dies twice normally first into molecules and atoms or atoms and plasma, and so on).
The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.
But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and nonEuclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.
Let us then explain the biologic and mathematical properties of the fractal paradigm of a Universe is built in fractal scales made of pieces of vital space and informative time.
SUPŒRGANISM OF THE UNIVERSE (∆±4) and its ∆± 3 ‘GALACELLS’
IN THAT SENSE the biggest set of properties caused by the fractal coexisting structure of space and ternary worldcycles of creation and extinction of matter, is the super organic nature of matter, both at the cosmic galactic and quantum scale.
To that aim, we shall briefly study its 3 scales, the ∆+1 cosmic scale, the ∆º galactic scale and the ∆1 atomic scale, o the understanding of the organic ternary structure of the galaxy, since quarks are vortices of accelerated gravitational forces, masses of physical information and black holes and pulsars, which are fractals, made of quarks.
INDEED, The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:
Because the scalar Universe coexists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational spacetime), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under selfsimilar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic.
This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar
In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our gala cell exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scales of the fractal Universe.
Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a picycle with three diametral perimeters (π3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a selfcentred singularity in a pi cycle).
This secondary law of the paradox of Galileo, itself a secondary law of the ‘mind’s equation’ structures our universal view. And make us thing reality is abstract, void of intelligence and life, static and our mind the only perceiver of it.
The paradox of galileo – the maya of the senses, differentiating ‘motion from form’ form and distance are ‘mayas’ of the senses; as all its time and motion; when we get more information about a system. The 2 graphs represent the same local region of galaxies, in the right now that we have enough info, we see it as a flow of ‘gala cells’ transiting through veins of the cosmos, in the right as we used to see it – a dark series of ‘monadgalaxies’ with no motion. All in the Universe is ultimately a dynamic PART of a supœrganism, extending in three scales of the absolute 5th dimension of timespace, performing relative ternary worldcycles on timespace
∆±3: GALAXIES
When considering a new stience, in the isomorphic method we define its Γ.œ, generator function for each volume of the stience, a domain within the scales of the fifth dimension, of four dimensional structure and black and white wholes to the upper ∆+1 and lower ∆1 scales of the fifth dimension.
Such block of timespace suffices to define most events happening around the systems of that scale of reality. Then we can define specific T.œ, generators of mind species, and get into as much detail as needed.
The different isomorphisms of galaxies as ‘physical atoms and ‘biological cells’.
Now because all systems have, as all systems do:
 organic, coexiting fractal properties and abstract, topological ones, galaxies can be modelled as organic systems, similar to cells or gala cells (something taboo on physics but very useful to make easier to understand them as organic systems are synoptic and intuitive, with less maths, so normal people can get the whole picture.).
 and also as topological mathematical systems similar to atoms or atomgalaxies (something done often, without a good theoretical background we shall provide).
 besides the usual properties and details of its specific nature.
in terms of scales of the fifth dimension, we say that the ∆+3 organism of the cosmos is the ‘cellular galaxy’, which we shall put in isomorphic comparison with the ∆o cell, the organism of the human scale to show its organic properties and with the ∆2 atom, the organism of the quantum scale, to draw homologic comparisons of its topological and mathematical properties; as we shall show:
 The mathematical equivalence of atoms and galaxies, unifying both topologically and algebraically with the Unification equation of charges and masses, based in 5D metric equations.
 And the organic parallelism with the cell, unifying both with the analysis of the vital functions of both organisms.
The ∃xi≈stience of astrophysical systems is also ruled by the ternary isomorphism of spacetime structures.
To understand that organic structure the best homology is between the 3 main ∃xistential functions of the 3 supœrganisms of the physical scales.
So we shall compare the galaxy with the supœrganism we obtain max. information, from the perspective of human perception, the ∆º, living cell.
Thus we compare the galaxy and the human ∆ocell pov and its 3 elements: the Spemembrane≈ halo, the singularity ≈ nucleus, and the cytoplasm ≈ star disk. And so we define the ‘galacell’ and its 3 topobiological parts:
In the graph the Galacell, with a ‘dnalike’ gravitational species of information, ultradense black holes; surrounded by fractal points of energy, 3º stars, that form the body of the galactic organism; and a hard, protective membrane of ‘proteinsstrangelets’.
Each of those parts will be made at ∆1 scale of 3 distinguishable families of quarkatoms, of increasing mass.
So we find another ∆1≈∆≈∆+1, coexisting organic homology, between the galactic parts and the 3 type of growing ‘informative ages of mass’ (studied in the post on ∆1, quantum atomic physics):
 Sp∃negative strangelets must be the components of the ‘proteinlike’ hard halo that protects the galaxy from the outer ∆+1 dark energy world of the cosmological upper scale:
 Tiƒ: its central max. i gravitational black hole, must be made of top quarks, its ∆1, quantum substance, which corresponds in parameters to the density of black holes.
 While, we stardust are made of the lighter up and down quarks, forming the youngest family of atomic mass:
In the graph the 3 components of a biologically ‘sound’ understanding of Galacies at its ∆ and ∆1 scales:
Tiƒ: black holes, which are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ are in the lower, ∆1 scale of size, at the compton wavelength as a heavy top quark particles , following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for ‘positive’ black holes.
Spe: A similar heavy form of elongated lumps of strange matter, should form the ‘negative’ halo of strange matter (Witten’s hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, now again all the rage in astrophysics, but denied by the establishment of ‘nuclear, military research’ facilities, such as CERN, which merely states ‘stranglets do not exist, given the risk for a Nova explosion if they are produced at Earth.
STenergy: finally in between the ‘cytoplasm’ is formed by cyclical stars trapped between the ‘sword’ and the ‘wall’, future food of heavy quarks, which will collapse into dense dark matter information the galaxy, in its 20 billion year quasar cycle of ‘real bigbangs’.
This is the most likely structure of galaxies, as it follows all the natural symmetries and efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor, coexistence of organic parts and wholes, Aristotelian hilozoism: wholes must have substance, etc).
The author merely has further developed in his work on the scalar fractal nature of the Universe ordered by a ‘5th dimension’ of relative scales, those concepts in his work on astrophysics. And so we will here give a general view of the Galaxy and its isomorphic laws, and time/interest permitted expand more professionally with mathematical physics those themes on the 4th line of the blog.
The previous graph shows the ternary elements of the galacell:
The Halomembrane of maximal extension in space, which selects the energy and information entering from the outer space (solution to Oort’s horizon problem – why the Universe does not seem full of light; answer: not all pass through the membrane of the Halo)…
The cyclical spacetime region, the plane of stars, falling towards its centre of information, the black holes that command the creation of the galaxy.
This is the fundamental physical system of the Universe, already described by Descartes, who said all is made of res extensa (space), and cyclical vortices of timespace with a central point of reference that measures reality or ‘mind’. Since all systems respond to ‘trinity’ and can be modelled, as we have observed in different graphs, with such 3topological structure.
So the ∆+1, gravitational galaxy, the ∆thermodynamic crystal and the ∆1 quantum atom with its electronic cover, centred nucleus of mass, and intermediate spacetime where forces of gravitation and electromagnetism are constantly exchanged, are described logically AS the 3 fundamental particles of physics, both topologically and with biological, organic laws.
Trinity indeed is the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, selfcentered entities of timespace, protected by an external membrane with an enclosed cyclical body that put together create the FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE, of the puzzle of supœrganisms the Universe is.
Indeed, the true beauty of those 3 physical systems is found when we compare them with the organic cells and see their isomorphisms:
∆o: The DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts the vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane.
∆3: The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls.
∆±1: So happens with a crystalline planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it.
∆+3: And the galaxy has in its center a black hole, which invaginates with gravitational waves the whole cytoplasm forming the ‘underlying wavestructure of the body of stars’.
And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become LIKELY converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets.
∆±3 ATOMS
Next we can consider atoms as organisms, and to prove they can modelled as such we just will show their equivalence with galaxies, with the unification equation of both, as accelerated vortices of timespace and the obvious existence in atoms, of ‘the drives of organic live’, that is actions of energy feeding, information gauging, reproduction and social evolution, which biologists use to define life and are actions constantly perform by the fundamental particles that make up atoms, quarks and electrons, showing its vital nature.
The atomgalaxy
The study of electromagnetism with the laws of gravitation in any of the 4 selfsimilar interpretations corresponding to an ∆ or @ or S or T Biased view, and the similarity between the galaxy and the atom is the key to unify forces and resolve all the problems starting by the obvious hierarchical problem.
It immediately bring some obvious similarities. The strong force inside the atomgalaxy must be similar (remember a fractal is similar never equal), to the gravitational force of the galaxyatom. And indeed, we immediately notice the similarities: gluon balls do have 2 or 0 ‘gravitonlike’ or ‘Higgslike’ spins; which correspond to the gravitational force within the galaxyatom (graviton) or outside the galaxyatom (dark world of Higgs fields).
More surprisingly, gluons and gravitons are the only force that interacts with itself, thus making so hard the full understanding of gravitational and strong forces.
It is even more pleasurable to observe the time inverse symmetries caused by the mind – but well beyond the comprehension of present humind logic – when comparing a fourth dimensional view (that of man over the smallish gluon) vs. a fifth dimensional view of the same process (that of man over the larger graviton). The distortions are easier to understand though in the simplest spatial parameter. And show the enormous size of gravitational ‘interactions’ , with a Compton wavelength for the graviton over 1 year light.
It makes no sense however to apply the laws of quantum energy, such as e=hv, to calculate the energymass of the graviton, a whole different plane, as dependant on that compton wavelength, which puts the graviton mass in a ridiculous lower limit, as a recent paper has stated.
In general physics needs such a huge upgrading on conceptual thought that we shall leave it here. Only state that gravitons do have mass because gravitation as expressed in general relativity under cspeed , etc. happens only within galaxies, so the range of gravitational interactions is NOT infinite. And so we are into certain type of corrections to relativity called massive gravitation, which clearly differentiate how gravitation behaves inside the galaxy and outside the galaxy where it becomes a repulsive ‘electromagnetic force’.
Finally to notice a constant we shall consider often in other more ‘pro’ sections of the blog – the fine constant, 137 or 1/137 which shows the difference of strength between many forces, the Strong force is 137 stronger than the electromagnetic force, which is around 137 times stronger than the electronic force which is around 137 times slower than the electromagnetic force, which is 137 times weaker… and so on and so on. Why then 137? This got eddington crazy – pity, with heaviside and Hoyle my fav triad of underrated british geniuses of physics, too close to reality for people to understand. But indeed poises an interesting question of numerology easily resolved in ∆st… Two alternative hints, 137 is the golden ratio angle of reproduction and it is a very special ‘prime’ in theory of numbers, and we shall leave it like that.
Of more interest though is to consider those selfsimilarities between the strong and gravitational force, and its components.
I.e. the gluon vs. the neutrino, the proton vs. the black hole and so on. In the gluon vs. neutrino parallelism we can also observe how there are 3 temporal frequencies/colors in neutrinos, which mix in ‘couples’ and ‘ternary structure’ as gluons do, showing once more the similarity (not equality) between those landscapes.
How the Universe looks once we have established the existence of 3 time arrows of relative past, present and future and ∞ scales of the fifth dimension? The answer is weird enough to explain all the weird features of physics, nobody makes sense of it today, from the constant of cspeed, to reversals of time, to twin paradoxes, to quantum uncertainties, etc. etc.
And the key as always is the most illunderstood element of the Universe, time and its 3 arrows, including local travels to the past, which being local either as an entropic devolution of the information of the system in the moment of death does NOT provoke any type of ‘twin’s paradox’ and travels in time – as in the Universe of infinite fractal closed time cycles, a pasttravel is within the system inner ternary parts.
Time travels do NOT happen in an absolute newtonian Universe with a single mechanical clock; an astounding aberration of thought that merely shows how little understood the Universe of infinite time cycles is; so the kind of aberrations of illinterpreters of relativity such as Hawking who thinks you can enter a black hole and come back into the past and kill your father never happen.
It is then possible to consider time travels from a future of more information to a past of less information; and define information as the natural arrow of future which constantly increases through the 3 ages of the being, and an entropic death, bigbang or biological, which expands in minimal time – a quanta of the time of the being in fact – as the natural travel to the past, in which the content of information of the being spreads to devolve it to the evolutionary past.
But what about the ‘relational present’, which we observe together simultaneously (Einstein)? This ‘absolute time sum of all other times does NOT exist per se’ but only in the mind of the observer.
So in fact, as the observer is moving towards its sequential future, in slow time changes, and death happens so intensely in so little time – an explosive quanta of the time of the being – a second in human death, a ‘planck’s time quanta’ in the equations of ‘local big bangs’. We see travels to the past as simultaneous present explosions in space.
So the essential perception of time at psychological, mentalmeasure level is either a simultaneous present – which is in fact the relative travel to the pastdeath of a being – and the sensation of present to future motion through the life arrow.
Those are the 2 commonest perceptions of time, that gives us the 2 fundamental sensations of psychological time:
– Present time when things do not seem to change because they repeat themselves, or PROPER PRESENT (for the local, objective being).
Subjective present: which is for the being an objective travel to the past, with explosive lost of information. Yet such travel to the past seem to happen in instantaneous nonlocal space; as it is so fast in single time quanta that seems a process of spatial scattering that gives us the impression of a ‘simultaneus connected space’. It does not seem to happen from future to past.
– Past to future through the 3ages of life of increasing evolution, balanced by the future to past death.
But besides those 3 time arrows of a single system with its dualities of subjective external and objective local perception of time, which will account for an enormous number of spooky effects; there are time travels through the scales of the fifth dimensions, which will add more complexity to the mix.
As here we must consider an ABSOLUTE ARROW OF TIME. Since motion is reproduction of form, and so every step we give ‘in the right direction’ means the whole must be reconstructed in an adjacent region of spacetime all the pyramid together again, and so the whole which coexists with its parts is IN FACT also displaced a quanta of time (the quanta here is used to reproduce the next scale of the being). So your mind is displaced ‘literally in sequential time as observed by the integration of the three scales into a single being’ into the future. You are a quanta of time respect to your wavebody which is a quanta of time displaced above your cellular cycles. And this ‘fact’ of which they are also many proofs provokes multiple spooky effects of physics that also can be upgraded to other systems.
But things get even more beautiful when we realise that entropy and information have inverse time arrows, literally within a local superorganism travelling to the past and the future, so as one is in the future and the other on the past, and have inverse way to travel=deliver information and entropy, both are in the present, and for that reason the present bodywave, the pastentropy traveling to the future and the future informative singularity sending messages to the past do come together in a synchronicity present despite to be elongated in time.
So after all Einstein was wrong when he said to quantum theorists who accepted local time travel to the past that ‘wires’ do not travel to the past.
I.e. German researchers have found that the ‘action of thought’, happens after the body moves in an almost instantaneous microsecond – so in a present position even if your consciousness of thought seems to be in the past.
All this explains nonlocality and simultaneity and coexistence.
But there is even more to the different motions and speeds of time. As time has different speeds, faster in smaller systems, smaller systems live in psychological time more in lesser time, so an antqueen of 7 years living 10 times faster, has 10 thoughts for one of you and lives 70 years of mental time.
And more… As time systems are faster in smaller systems, smaller systems code more information that larger systems and so information moves upwards, so genes code bodies, memes code societies and quantum number and particles code atoms, and viceversa, entropycoordinated motion and hence energy is provided by the whole, external membrane which synchronises the parts as it happens in the simpler systems and the complex galaxies where all parts move in coordination.
A final fundamental set of laws of the many games of time in a universe of infinite time clocks concerns with the long absolute arrow of evolution of information and social evolution in coexisting systems; as the arrow of social evolution and organisation is in the future, but since a system more complex does have more need of coordination, it must code more information in the lower scales.
For example, in genetics the coding of multicellular organisms is in the epigenetic ‘supposedly’ trash part of the code, in ever growing triads of triodes that should code functions for larger and larger whole systems of the multicellular organism, a thesis advanced in my first books on time decades ago, which is now as so many foreseen laws of science and cycles of time – including cycles of history and economics – a fact of science.
But perhaps the most fascinating process of them all, is the palingenetic processes across the fifth dimension that compresses, and packs as we do in computer systems, the information of the organism through its evolution in 9 months, where all the trials and errors of the organism are limited and only the right process are processed to evolve a human in a process that dilated in space played in 3 billions years.
How this magic happened is obvious: minds are everywhere, in a pan psychic Universe, so DNA cells and chemical brains DO consciously eon after eon reduced linguistically by the same token a film or a novel or a speaker reduces the events to the parts that matter, with the languages of man, the evolution that matter of the being.
Let us then start with a proper upgrading of the fundamental modern field of mathematical physics, quantum to a realist spacetime view.
PHYSICAL ÐISOMORPHISMS
ÐISOMORPHIC LAWS OF PHYSICAL ðIME§PAŒRGANISMS
Introduction. 10 ÐISOMORPHIC LAWS: PHYSICAL T.ŒS
0.@: Singularities in Physics.
1.Γ: The fractal spacetime Generator.
24. S≤≥T: (a)ntisymmetries of spacetime. Bidimensional forces & waves.
3.Networks≈Forces in physical scales. Universal Constants: S/T; S≈T; T/S ratios.
6. Variations of ternary and dual species: Its Symmetries.
5. Max. ∫exi ∂ st: Actions and functions of existence in Physical scales.
7.ð: E=mc²: States=Ages of physical systems.
∞. The immortal Universe and its physical worldcycles.
9, 10: ∆§ocial scales and Physical Planes:
0^{th} Ðisomorphism. Fractal points. The geometry of physical scales.
Masses and charges, vortices of time. Unification equation
1st Ðisomorphism. The Generator Equation of physical systems and its scales of physics.
Truth in science: T.œ=Sc³. Fractal paradigm and its NonEuclidean, NonAristotelian formalism.
2^{nd} Ðisomorphism. The Holographic Universe: Bidimensional Space Time.
Duality: entropy and information. The Cartesian super organism.
3^{rd} Ðisomorphism. Ternary Networks. Conservation Laws. Universal constants. Ternary symmetries.
4^{th} Ðisomorphism. The breaking of symmetries in physics: NonÆ similarity, Perpendicularity and Parallelism. Behavior of physical systems.
5^{th} Ðisomorphism. 5 cyclical spacetime actions. Motion in 5D and 4D Physics.
The fifth dimension. ∆±1: physical scales. Discontinuous membranes.
6^{th} Ðisomorphism. Physical species. Duality of Fermions and bosons. Particle and antiparticles. Groups of particles translated into ternary symmetries.
Creation: breaking of symmetry. Organic, ternary structures in Physical Systems.
7^{th} Ðisomorphism. The 3±∆ ages of time: from generation to extinction – creative processes in physical sciences.
Spe (SpacefieldGAS)<ST(Presentwaveliquid)<Tƒ (future Particlecrystal).
8^{th} Ðisomorphism. The Life cycles in physics. The world cycle of its super organisms.
9^{th} Ðisomorphism.Unification of Physical planes of the 5^{th} dimension.
10^{TH} Ðisomorphism. Social Scales. The 3 families of mass. Renormalization.
THE TEMPORAL DYNAMIC VIEW: THE DISOMORPHIC METHOD
In this article on physics, unlike the other introduction of sciences, which are focused in the organic evolution of its systems, given the higher formalism of mathematical physics, we make a full revision of the 10 Disomorphic sets of laws that quantitatively and qualitatively build the Universe as it is in all its scales generating it superorganisms from birth to extinction – each of those planes, will then be studied in more detail in the fourth line, after fully account for all the properties of the Ðisomorphisms on the 3rd:
Finally once the whole structure of physical systems is understood we will give a fast review in the third part to its main scales which will be greatly widened in the fourth line with detailed studies of mathematical physics, properly translated to the disomorphic method.
When we study a physical system we shall apply the 10 Ðisomorphisms we use to study any other fractal ∆@S≈T system of the Universe:
@. The 0th isomorphism is perhaps the most important as it defines the type of species we shall study according to its linguistic point of view or mind, or monad. Each of the species of the Universe speaks a certain language to calculate its existential actions of spacetime in the outside Universe. And the first Ðisomorphism studies the grammar of those languages, which will form a ‘lanwave’, a herd in existence, behaving together according to the values of that language.
In Physical systems, needless to say the language is geometry. This I have no doubt of it, and coincides with the beliefs of most physicists. The physical properties of nature are written in the language of geometry, as Galileo said, it, but NOT all the properties of the Universe, and also in the language of algebra and analysis, which studies the geometry of the 5^{th} dimension and the ilogic structure of the ternary Universe.
 Γ. ‘Gamma’, define the specific Generator Equation of 5D Spacetime (antisymmetries), departing from the Generator: [∑Spe≤≥STœ≤≥∏Tiƒ]∆±1
That is, we specify the 3 relative X 5D planes of existence of the system, and in each of them through the ternary principle of subdivisions of each spacetime part into 3 new parts, we keep subdividing he system into its subsystems.
S=T Ðisomorphic Dimensions
2.B. The second isomorphism studies the parts of a system in physical, biological or social space in relative stillness, as the mind perceives them, considering the fundamental unit of the Universe a 2maniofld, combination of dimensions of spaceform and motiontime. As there are 3 and 3 of them, the number of combinations is many.
In that regard, the physical Unit of reality is NOT a single dimension, but a bidimensional system that combines 2 dimensions of the 4 states of reality.
– Space (S), which is a dimension of lineal distance, Entropy (the general terms we use for space in motion: E), Time speed, T, (a cyclical motion) or a form of information (O: time seen as a form).
Those first bricks of reality combine in the 4 canonical bidimensional elements of reality, Se, Spatial entropy, Sp, Energetic space, Tiƒ, information, bidimensional information, and Tƒ, angular momentum.
Here we must then differentiate, a first motion or derivative of space, speed, and a second dimension of motion, or second derivative of space, acceleration.
The reader thus realize how many varieties there are of combinations of the 3 forms of space, lineal limbsfields, cyclical headsparticles and hyperbolic wavesbodies and its parallel motions, lineal steady speed and acceleration and cyclical motion and angular acceleration.
Thus the commonest ones are angular and lineal momentum (one dimension of form and one of motion); and angular and lineal acceleration Tƒ: Cyclical angular momentum, used in general for any cyclical motion, including accelerated clocks (vortices and masses, which add Isolate its 3 ternary symmetries in space, time and the 5th dimension of that generator: Se≤ST≥Tiƒ (space organism).
So the next stage is naturally ternary forms:
A bidimensional plane in motion ‘a wave’, or a dimension of form with 2 dimensions of motion, a particlepoint with acceleration’, and an even more complex form, a 3 dimensional form with motion, a particle; , and then 4dimensinal and 5^{th} dimensional and 6dimensional and so on, till reaching the maximal dimensions found in a single plane of spacetime
What is the most efficient possible combination of reality in physical spacetime? As usual a 3 x 3 functional 9dimensional system centred in @
And we are only talking on a single plane of spacetime, not of several plane interacting across the ∆±1 coexisting 5^{th} dimension.
Thus in the second isomorphism we study the different variations of those themes.
So far only String theorists in their theoretic models of the smallest possible scales of reality have worked out with their lineal open strings of spaceenergy (as their energy is a function of its distance space), and cyclical, closed ones, associated into bidimensional membranes, and tridimensional branes, and so on the entire complexity field of combinations. So for studies in our reality we must instead of going down into analysis of ever more detailed parts of the being, use synthetic methods of thought and study wholesale elements, which are very common in reality.
So the commonest way to simplify the analysis without getting into an exhaustive list of species according to the dimensions of form and motion, both internal and external, perceived by an outside observer, is to consider 3 topological bidimensional forms, linealtoroid limbs/fields, hyperbolic wavesbodies and spherical, particlesheads and its topological assemblies.
As those basic forms with basic motion or acceleration, Se(fields) < ST (waves) >Tƒ (Particles) suffice to study at a conceptual level the entire field of physics and resolve knowing the meaning of its parts and laws, the puzzle of reality.
Bidimensional combinations might be of a single form and a motion, of 2 motions and a form (accelerations) and so on.
5.Å. Study its 5 actions commanded by its 0point, and its sequences divided in simplex, ‘derivative’ actions: Tƒ>∆o>∆a>∆e (gauging information>moving>feeding on energy); space, and complex ‘integral’ actions in time: Tƒ>∆ï>∆û.
This is the program of survival of particles in the Universe. And it is by far the field, which should be of more interest to T.Œ to unite all systems of nature. It is normally coded in quantum physics by the 4 quantum numbers, in electromagnetism by the 4 integral/differential equations of Maxwell and in gravitation by the laws of momentum and attraction and the social organization of a field of multiple energies and masses through the EFE tensors of existence of Einstein.
And all of them are guided by the general HamiltonianLagrangian principles of minimizing the expenditure of internal energy/time of the action and maximizing the path in space/ volume of the action involved.
It requires a deep analysis on how particles prey on fields, its ‘territory’ from where they extract energy and information and how they move and reproduce through waves, and communicate through quantum jumps which are in fact translations into a lower scale of faster motion, of information and energy transferred to another particle of a network. Thus here we give account of spooky effects such as the gravitational translation of quantum messages between interlocked particles and other phonelike message transmissions, which in depth would include the use of information theory as the channels of transmission have 2 variables speed and volume of information which are normally opposed and the languages on which they are expressed do matter. Yes, physical systems ‘talk’.
Thus the 5 fundamental isomorphic actions of the system, which normally suffice to describe it. But for quantitative models of physical and material systems, which are on one side reduced to the study of motionactions, and on the other focus on quantitative analysis, given its ‘massive’ numbers of particles, with minimal internal information about them; it is often necessary to study them in detail with 5 more specific isomorphisms:
5.∆. The planes of the fifth dimension are basically 3 ∆±1: its cellularatomic/thermodynamicorganic/socialcosmological scales, and its synchronic phenomena and interaction is a massive, extensive field of physics, which we can barely consider. It is important though to analyze the Lorentzian regions, name we use for those regions of contact between planes in which the steady state and normal properties and constants of action that act steadily in the main region, what we call Newtonian regions (obvious names taken from the Newtonian regions of mechanics and the O K and cspeed limits of information and energy of the plane of gravitationalthermodynamic space time were the balances break and spooky effects due to the interaction with the upper and lower fields happen).
We study also the social classes of the system, that is, how it uses the bites and bits of the different scales for its actions: killing entropically its minimal ∆4 bits, or stopping its ∆3 bits into the jails of mind mirrors, loving its ∆1 seeds and so on. So as always there are energy classes, of micro particles, which the hyper entities do not distinguish, and bodyworkers and information neuronal classes, which in physics are studied by balanced equation and Universal constants that normally related those elements.
Thus there are relationships between the ‘cells’ of the 3 scales – that is, how energy and information are asymmetrically transferred between them. This amounts in physics to define a ‘gauge theory’, (modern parlance), in which exchange of ‘bosons’ between particles or fields of particles define those flows of energy and information; and ultimately from the perspective of ¬Æ, it means to apply the 2nd and 3rd postulates of wavecommunication and similarity to the field we study
Those are the regions where we shall see strange behaviors, from superconductivity to growth of mass in the momentum instead of speed, from ß factors on relativity to super fluidity of atoms and expulsion of the magnetic field (Meissner effect) in currents, etc. etc. It is as all the fields of 5D physics intense, complex, long and fascinating. We shall give just some strokes of painting on it.
SPACE ÐISOMORPHISMS: NETWORKS AND SPECIES
6.(Ξ≈)Ω. The analysis of the 3 internal planesphysiological of the 5^{th} dimension as social classes, and its relationship with the 3 external planes of its larger world or ecosystem from where they obtain energy, reproduce with and absorb information. And the 6 motions perform through them to integrate together a worldcycle of existence.
Here we have the general rule that Se1 fields are the digestive networks and lower class of bits and bites indistinguishable from the upper parts of the system, waves are the reproductive body part of systems, its reproductive, blood networks which is complementary to Tƒparticles heads, its nervous informative networks.
And both bodywave and headparticle do act together preying on the field (switching into state by the Principle of complementarity, without any relevant expenditure of energy or information). So as a rule body and mind have the same internal clock, in a steady state bit. The mind beats a second wink of an eye thought tuned to the motion of the heart. So for example in quantum physics the particle state is used to absorb or emit transmit faster information with phase wave velocity while as De Broglie proved, the wave state as a group velocity in tune with the particle internal clock are is used to move, and both form the entity ‘proper time’, while the field is the lower energy class relatively unconnected.
Yet the body does have also a steady rate of 1 step per second in its limbs. And so the 6^{th} isomorphism studies also the synchronicities of the different parts of the system and its time clocks, which is the ‘deeper’ level of understanding of a worldcycle system. It is this isomorphism the one I have always enjoyed most, and it is closely related (we might say it is the inverse perspective) with the 3^{rd} isomorphism, which observers in a simplified manner the symmetries between those 3 inner and outer networks and the actions, motions and worldcycle of the being)
The study of universal constants (which can be done in relationship to the generator, its dualities or ternary symmetries studies the main proportional ratios between the elements of the Generator Equation, the vital universal constants of a system, of which the most important depend on which ∆scale and ternary part belong.
Thus we divide them into internal, ∆n ‘vital constants’ (ab. VC), and external, ∆+n, ‘Universal Constants’ (ab. UC), selfcentered in the Active Magnitude (∆C) and its action constants that value all the System as a whole:
–Åctive Magnitudeconstant, or main metric of the Œpoint, with its 5 subconstants of action, ÅC. Vital Constants, internal to the being, which show the ratios between the 3 parts of the system. And Universal constants of the eternal world in which the system performs its cycles, and the ratios of its external cyclical actions. For example, for the simplest Dual ST system (without differentiated reproductive organs, or external fields), we find.
ÅC.: Active Constants: Å.C.: Active Magnitude; Æ.C.: Motion constant, E.C.: Feeding constant; ±ïC: Information constants; Œ.C.: Reproductive Constant.
v.C.: Space quanta: Spe; Space quantifier: ∑; Time Frequency: Tiƒ: Time Synchronicity: ∏; Energy Density: S/T; Information Density: T/S; Existential Speed: SxT.U.C. Universal Constants: û.C. Universal Constant, and its §10: Social constants normally of a decametric scale. And the similar V.Constants of the larger scale:
S+1, ∑+1, T+1, ∏+1, ST+1: S+1/T+1; T+1/S+1; S+1 x T+1.
It is then clear that the number of Vital constants of a system is enormous, as the complexity of any fractal has infinite limit. And so we shall consider generally the explanation of the Constants study for each science and species, introducing only a few ∆ST constants in more detail, which vary slightly in reference to those used in science, notably, quantifiers of space & time, its densities and Existential speeds.
Those constants, which are crystal clear in terms of magnitudes and physical equations and quantities and proportions for physical systems acquire more qualitative, topological, social or mental properties when we deal with species closer to the human. So as we first define them and then study those ‘vital constants’ for each scale of the universe, we shall switch for quantitative extensive analysis to qualitative intensive studies, and finally to mental creative analysis when considering the ratios and proportions of artistic spacetime (the ∆ø mind of man).
Constants are of maximal interest to the quantitative age of ‘measure science’ we live in. Since it deals with all the Universal constants and vital constants and physical, chemical, biological, sociological, you name it, constants which ‘specify’ and ‘diversify’ all the varieties of dimensional beings, its scales, ratios of åctions of exchanges of energy and information, etc. etc.
6.∑=2³.The analysis of the diversification of subspecies for each Generated entity, through the dualities of energyinformation, spacetime and the 3 elements of the generator, [SE≤≥ST≤≥Tƒ]∆±1; the variations in the constants and fluxes of energy and information of those elements can create an enormous array of subspecies, being the simplest variation one of hierarchy between the 3 elements, which will create, ‘predator’, energetic species SE≥(bigger than) ST≥Tƒ; informative one Tƒ≥ST≥SE or reproductive one, ST≥Tƒ≥SE; (and the 3 minor variations, with the minimal reproductive system at the end).
As species are differentiated by dual gender and ternary scale, topology and age symmetries, 2, 3, 6, 8 are the common combinations of variations of species we find in any stience.
As in topological linguistics, with its SVO, SOV, VOS, VSO, OSV, OVS varieties that define the mental cultures of mankind, or in biological linguistics with its 6 main phyla (classified by the dominance of its digestive, nervous or reproductive system) we can study all physical particles and antiparticles, as ‘symmetries’ in which a certain value (isospin, spin, charge and its equivalent in the L +1 scale – mass) are transformed in the inverse time age (antisymmetric) or higher (asymmetric) scale of the 5^{th} dimension, or the symmetric (with a parity change of sign) spatial orientations.
This simple ‘group transformation’, unlike in the more complex or rather better observed entities of the sociological and biological realm with the aforementioned varieties, is fairly straight and it will allow us to explain the existence of all the particles of matter that ‘mater’; that is, that truly exist beyond the virtual ‘quanta of timespace actions’ (hPlanck), or unstable mutations, which do not matter as nobody studies the abortions and genetic aberrations and crazy thoughts expressed in nongrammatical languages that do not survive in the biological or sociological scales.
In the future though and with the help of data computers and teams of physics, this blog which is just a blueprint of things to come I imagine will be expanded to fully classify the entire realm of entities available to human experience.
At this stage of development of physics and mathematics an exhaustive analysis of 5Dimensional physics of cyclical time and fractal spaces would require an entire team of dedicated physicists to work seriously on it, which unfortunately I could not put together in my scholar years. So this as most fields of mathematical physics can only be suggested in this post, and blog which is trying to rescue before my many sickness stop me from working enough hints to the discipline for future researchers to complete.
So how far I have gone in those decades of exploring 5D physics while doing many other things? Basically following the work of Thurston, who extended geometric ideas from the theory of twodimensional manifolds to the study of threedimensional manifolds, and making sense of his geometrization conjecture, which says that every threedimensional manifold is locally isometric to just one of a family of eight distinct types that coincide with the 8 subphases of any spacetime cycle (already known to the ancient Taoists believe it or not, for which 8 was the number of infinity, and to modern physicists who don’t really know what they found in its octets of particles and to Buddhist in their 8ways etc. etc. ), 8 is more or less the proper way to consider creation, which will be the 8^{th} isomorphism of nature.
But with a difference respect to the 8varieties of 3 manifolds; I have worked systems in which one of the 3 spatial dimensions is analyzed as a dimension of motion, given the fundamental theorem of 5D physics, the principle of Absolute relativity:
“We cannot distinguish in a single quanta of spacetime motion from form, in any of the isomorphic scales of the Universe”
Meaning that without enough time to observer reality each motion appears also as a quanta of form and often we see form as motion and motion as form, so we can treat arithmetically with discrete formal numbers or geometrically with fixed formal lines, any motion in time, across any of the isomorphic scales of the 5^{th} dimension. In brief, my focus of study were the 3 varieties of toroid fields, hyperbolic waves and 2spheres of information with a 3^{rd} dimension of motion; and 3manifolds of space, with the 8 varieties of Thurston geometrization conjecture with a 4^{th} dimension of time, in the more advanced studies on general relativity and quantum physics that will go on the 4^{th} line.
Thus in this line we shall limit the work NOT to the level of my personal research (combinations of 2 manifolds to create the 8 canonical varieties of 3maniofolds gifted then with motions and accelerations, which allow the system to emerge or descend through stairs of the 5^{th} dimension), but I will feel happy enough to be able to develop a meaningful explanation of the main equations of physics at the level of 2manifodl varieties with motion, which describe:
Se1 Toroid entropic fields < STwaves>Tƒparticlepoints with momentum.
ðIME ÐISOMORPHISMS
7,8.(Ω≈)Ξ. Sp≥ST≥Tƒ.
The 3 ages of time and its symmetry with the 3 organs of space. Now, this theme if you have arrived here should be clear to you: all worldcycles of existence of physical systems become closed, conservative worldcycles paths that return to the origin into a zero sum. We can talk then of ‘conservative’ worldcycles and e shall see how closely related is the concept of a worldcycle and that of energy and conservation forces. This is a huge field on the third isomorphism, besides the obvious study of all systems as going through 3 states as : Sefields>STwaves>Tƒ particles which is the quantum cycle of existence back and forth in time (Tsymmetry) and the similar plasma )conception) >Gasenergy>Liquid (ST) > Solid (information) << Big bang M=Ec2 death of matter states.
Most T.Œ sciences are not quantitative (biological and social sciences) so we loosely considered 4 terms, space, energy, information and time clocks. In physics though the proper terms are space, entropy, information and time, as energy is a very specific particular expression of a full worldcycle, integral of multiple actions of spacetime, and we will try to stick to mathematical physics and just try to explain properly the meaning of energy and its two quite different 3 elements, entropy, kinetic energy and potential energy, as follows:
Seentropy (energy not available to do work) < STkinetic energy (energy in motion) >TƒPotential energy (Energy stored in the form and position of beings).
8∞: INFINITE WORLDCYCLES OF PRESENT. Conservation laws.
The total conservation of those 3 quantities is as always a natural consequence of the total conservation of the SeSTTƒ elements of reality in its absolute content of formal motion across all the scales of the 5^{th} dimension of the universe.
However there is constant exchange and transformation of those 3 elements among them, and conservation does not happen in the Lorentzian regions of maximal Se and maximal Tƒ, on the borders of balance of beings, when the entities emerge towards a larger social whole to which they give energy and information or descend into lower entropic fields of death.
Conservation then does not hold as it happens in weak interactions and beta decays, or in entropic motions of quanta to the larger mechanical scale.
And we must differentiate those cases in detail when analyzing certain reactions that do not conserve the CPTEM(parity, energy, time, momentum and charge) of a single entity, till the worldcycle of the entity completes itself. At the end though we can always consider a total zero sum of a system, which ultimately is a total zero sum for the local universe, either in the quasar cycle of the galaxy or local cluster or the hypothetical hyperbib bang of a local universe.
So we can study combinations of dimensions that can increase up to 3 dimensions of form (the usual 3 lineal dimensions which define all curves), and 3 dimensions of motion, lineal inertia, acceleration, and angular acceleration, which introduces the first component of transcendence, as all forms that combine 5 dimensions in a single plane of existence, emerge and climb through the stairs of the fifth dimension, to allow the boson accumulation of multiply cycles, which will give birth to a whole.
∆§ ÐISOMORPHISMS.
The scalar disomorphisms being the most extensive have many ways to perceive it. Normally we should study them in dual or ternary symmetries, hence with 2 or 3 elements, as the fourth dimension is a plane of entropy, social scales represent the transition between planes and planes structure the exchanges of entropy and information of the being through its actions. So we can study the 4th dimensional isomorphism, as the fourth ‘postulate of none’ which construct planes, or as the entropic arrow and/or the dimension that ‘warps up’ the other 3 into a whole allowing relativity 4D descriptions with a time dimension, or more important to consider the 9th and 10th isomorphisms in which the actions of the mind take place, either at the beginning or end of the sequential series:
10 §. The study of its social scales as they transcend in 3 x 3 +0 tetraktys partial or complete configurations, specialized in energetic, informative and reproductive ‘vectors’ coordinated by a relative zero point, which emerges into a new scale forming ever more complex social groups till becoming a full new plane of existence; so Roman, Mongolian or Modern armies will have Decurion, 101001000 flags, and sergeants with 10 corporals and 100 captains above; and we shall find around 10¹º elements to be the commonest emergence into a new plane.
Here the most important analysis of social planes of evolution is that of the 3 families of masses, and its associated fermions and bosons, which together form the 3 planes of existence of the Universe as the form then the 3 parts of matter of the galaxy, the strangelet halo, the intermediate ud galaxy of stars, mitochondria that reproduce the matter of the system and finally the central black hole of top quarks. Thus the intermediate zone as in cells do reproduce the protein membrane and black hole creating finally quasar cycles of destruction and creation of galactic mass. On the other hand stars end up being swallowed and converted into black holes or by internal reactions.
Those are thus the 2 galactic symmetries as the efficient Universe needs no more particles than those there are.
9. Finally we can study in connection with the 5th Ðisomorphism the relationships of the entity through its actions with the lower planes from where it will extract its energy and information that it will give upwards to its larger wholes.
So we shall conclude the introduction of physical Ðisomorphisms, to move in the second part into some specific analysis of the species, time ages, spatial organisms and 5D planes and actions through each of those scales, from the invisible string world through the light space filled with forces, which gives birth by collapse of energy into information, Se>Tƒ, to the families of particles, associated into atomic groups, regulated thermodynamically into SeGases, STliquids and Tƒsolids, which conform the geological structures of this planet.
By force this post will be merely indicative of the power of T.Œ to be fully evolve physics, further expanded into the 4^{th} line. But I am of the opinion that if the reader does want to use reason and learn, he will be satisfied by Christmas, with the most important ‘paper on physics’, since the triad of works during the miraculous year of Mr. Einstein a century ago.
Never mind nobody took seriously general relativity till the 1960s, more than a half century latter. 5D physics will be the physics of the Asian or Robotic Age, if there is a new age to live. Indeed, the finitesimal who writes those lines in a rather confused and perhaps amateurish style, shunned off by physicists because of his activism against the nuclear industry, matters as little as the polish priest who observed the heliocentric local Universe. It is NOT THE OBSERVER, but the OBSERVABLE, what will always be there, unlike the musings of quantum physicists, the OBSERVER MATTERS NOT, if he has observed properly and shown the road less traveled to those who can see, wiesen, saper vedere.
The difficulties to explain 5D physics to physicists .
The biggest difficulties of T.Œ is not Physics (the observable) but human physicists (the observer and its anthropomorphic ideologies and linguistic, mathematicalonly method):
 The distortion of information caused by the far away location of its two most studied present limits, cosmic physics (big bang theory, renormalized in the previous post) and quantum theory.
 The use of somewhat simplified mathematics for all scientists to understand it in the context of a T.Œ, which by definition should have an ‘expression’ for all people to understand. This means to use more conceptual wording that mathematics, something physicists scorn with their ‘arrogance’ as Popes of science, who only speak Latin and only in Latin their wor(l)d must be expressed for none to understand its errors.
 Which are many, mostly due to their wrong understanding of the 3 arrows of time (reduced to a single lineal arrow), a single space instead of its 3 topologies and a singe spacetime membrane instead of the 5D structure of reality.
 The sheer immensity of this, the first modern science, and the most evolved in a technological world based on the machines and weapons they construct, which makes difficult to be coherent and at the same time explain it all, a task I have given up, unlike in the posts of economics, history and biology, which are far more developed. So i will in this spring of 2016 focus on pouring information in this post and the parallel post on mathematics (U±∞) complementarity to it; once the other major social and biological sciences are fairly surveyed.
 And finally because of this mathematical only expression in lineal singlespacetime, the denial of mental, organic and proper causal relationships, which makes physics as it is lacking on the understanding of its whole theories, despite its enormous detail on its mathematical howdescription. Since quantum physics can ONLY be interpreted logically with the organic paradigm, to make sense of its maths, this is difficult. Neither the Copenhagen or the multi universe versions make logic sense, though the maths are good. The initial Schrodinger concept is the proper way, when we explain its timespace symmetries (why the treatment is of populations in space, not probabilities in time) and its 5D symmetries (why it is organic fractal behavior, as waves collapse into particles like all herds that move as waves and become tight particles when ‘bombed’ by huge observers, aka predators; why there is entanglement, as information travels in the lower, nonlocal gravitational spacetime that connects particles at distance, as this text is NOT travelling to you by sound voice but instantaneous light speed, translated by the net)
The 10 Ðisomorphisms internal structure.
An entire sub discipline of T.Œ is the study of the 10D isomorphisms in its internal structure – how they relate to each other; what is their causal order in time, hierarchical order in 5D, symmetric motions/transformations and so on. We can in that sense consider a few general arguments:
– Dimensional Isomorphisms are causally chained in several forms, the simplest way to perceive them is as belonging to the ∆@S=T ternary elements such as, one is closer to the motion state and one to the form, which often happens when all the phases of the motion become one closed path in itself.
In that regard, the 10 Ðisomorphisms show a dynamic and static vision of reality as follows:
@. Mind Ðisomorphisms are the 0. @mind, where we describe the form of the mind and its 3 parts, the Singularity the T–membrane and the STradius that connect them.
>1. Fractal Generator, that analyses its dynamic control of a ternary territory. Whereas the quantitative analysis of the Universal, vital constants and s/t, txs, t/s speed momentum and density ratios of the being quantizes all the other isomorphisms to allow ¬Ælgebra to operate on them.
T=S. Time≈space symmetries and its actions come next 2.Bidimensional symmetries, which shows the flow of communication in a more static ‘standing’ form as bidimensional fields>5.Its Actions across scales, which through its dynamic synchronicity allow the system sot survive.
S: Then it follows the Space Isomorphisms: 3.Tridimensional symmetries, as fixed physiological networks that create >6. Evolutionary variations in time.
T. Its time isomorphisms also can be seen as ‘dynamic’ (its 3±∆2 ages) and static, as the zero sum world cycle is seen from a larger slower whole distance as a static form.
– Finally the Scalar 5D Isomorphisms across which those actions and ages take place: 0. Social scales and classes>10.Organic Planes.
And again the social scales might be felt as steps in motion towards a whole ‘organic Plane’, similar to the super organism simultaneous view of all its parts into a whole.
Thus the GENERAL RULE to perceive an isomorphic dimension of ∆@s≈t as motion and form often refers to the ‘size’ of timespace we perceive and speed of our perception, such as wholes will seem from far away larger, slower planes a wholeness completed and static.
So the mind in space (0th Ðisomorphism) is a static vision of its partial generator equations that show its actions.
Bidimensional flows of forces of ∃ (symbol for entropy), E and I, can be seen as standing waves in space, but are mere partial acts of a larger program of 5 åctions of survival; which also can be seen as dynamic ‘elements alone’ or as ‘parts’ of a locked repetitive system of s=t=s motions.
So happens with the ternary networks, in space that define a super organism or its view as they vary in order and power through evolutionary time in species.
And finally social motions can be seen dynamically in the ladder of decametric scales or as internal parts of a whole planeorganism that encloses them. So in general the rule to see dynamically a dimensional isomorphism or static and what curvature/form/motion we give to it is one of perspective and latitude in time and space. As the membranesingularity the whole stops, encloses and ‘forms’ reality, so a larger view allows to see as static form ‘whole worldcycles, whole network systems, whole @ monads, whole static flows of information and repetitive actions; or in detail and partially it will se an ‘open event’ in motion.
As motion is ultimately the vision of an open spacetime ‘string’ which sooner or latter will become closed and repetitive as form.
Another internal analysis is to put precisely the first, more descriptive and secondary, more ‘detailed’ quantitative isomorphisms in homeomorphic correspondence as we have done.
And one the technique of analysing several Dimensional isomorphisms together, we shall realise that the Universe actually relates them all and those relationships are vital to fully grasp its working.
The generator HELPS TO study of the isomorphisms in themselves.
Let us consider some of those ‘secondary relationships’ between dimensional isomorphisms.
Γ1>3N,6∑: The generator can connect with all other isomorphisms as it reflects them mentally. For example its spatial, 3network, 6species comes immediate:
The social structure of the system specifies the internal relationships between the parts of the generator and the main ‘operators of ¬Æ logic’: >,≥,≈, ≤,<,x. As social classes might be hierarchical in organic systems, democratic in social ones, inverse when information and energy are reversed arrows, in decaying societies, etc.
As we plug on it the main Universal constants fix the ratios and proportionalities of the Se/Tƒ, Se=Tƒ, Tƒ/Se, energy, reproductive and informative functions, (its relative energy and information densities and flux of communication or coupling constants in physics), we can then also put quantitatively the generator with all other Disomorphisms. I.e. the ages (7th D.i.) will be defined by 3 standing points corresponding to those 3 parameters maximised in each age (speed in first age, reproductive force, S=t in maturity, informative density T/s in 3rd age).
Finally diversification happens in time as variations of the Generator occur through ‘group symmetries and anti symmetries’ in the parlance of physics, generating different species; in biology due to the gender duality and speciation in the relationship of the species with its higher ecosystem and lower quanta of energy and information.
The generator thus defines best the interaction of S, S=t, t AND it will be the preferred way to introduce those 6 isomorphisms.
5D Metric best to define scales and planes.
Yet though we have packed in the generator the ∆±1 entropic and mental dimensions, and use those symbols to show the ‘tendencies’ lower and upwards of the ∆1> $pelimb/field system and ðƒ<∆+1 particle/head system (which acts as a mere point in motion for its upper world scale), the scalar structure of any timespaœrganism is better studied in its own. So in general the procedure will be:
0.Monad, structure, duality, language and territory of order
1.GENERATOR to define its s, s=t, t elements and symmetries
3.5D metric Spe x Tƒ = ∆k is best to study social scales §=9 between planes, and planes as whole ecosystems, worlds and ‘stiences’.
As the 9th isomorphism Social scales define the emergence of finitesimal quanta into a new plane of the 5^{th} dimension.
It is possible though to include the plane structure of a system earlier when studying its actions and bidimensional flows of communication as these 5 actions of the system relate the Œo being with its ±4 planes of existence, creating the being as a whole, 0point, equal to all the other possible 10 dimensional scales of an ∞ god=mind of the Absolute Universe. While the social isomorphism is the final 5th social action of gathering parts into Universals.
So the way we choose to study the 10 Disomorphic parts of the being will vary according to case.
For the sake of easier understanding here in the second line we explain those isomorphisms for the main ‘subdisciplines of human sciences’ in a more ‘didactic’ order.
In this post on physical isomorphisms after dealing with mathematical physics, we will consider basically the generator and its s, st, s=t description keeping the analysis of scales, transitions and planes in the 3rd part on its own.
So we shall start:
– Making a larger analysis of the isomorphism less liked by physicists (: the 0point isomorphism of human observers (that is the limits of physicists in their pursuit of knowledge) and the 0points of its observables (that is, the charges and masses, which are the Tƒcyclical time clocks of physics, whose Unification Equation we deduce and study in certain depth).
– Then deal with the Generator equation… and its actions through the 5D planes of physical systems.
And go through its symmetries, s=t, stopological parts and tages.
Thus we shall sail through the 3 ages of existence of physical systems across those planes, considering the equation of life and death of matter, following with the parallel spatial symmetry of those time ages as spatial organs of the physical systems of nature, to end this resume of the 5 fundamental Ðisomorphisms of nature, with an analysis of the spacetime cyclical actions and constants of those systems.
And in the process we will introduce a few quantitative isomorphisms, studying some key universal constants, social scales and varieties of physical species, easily derived from the ternary structure of the Universe. But since the focus of our section of mathematical physics have been on those constants, and keeping with the intention of making it simple at this stage, we shall just consider a few aspects of the duality of species in quantum physics, the duality of particles and antiparticles and the 3 families of quark masses and its scalar symmetry with its social forms in the galaxy (top quark black holes, strangelet halos and udstars and planets, in which we exist).
AS WE have already analysed also singularities, monads and its mathematical language, we shall thus start with the generator of S=t symmetries and the Isomorphism of physical actions.
For a complete description of each Disomorphism for each 10D species of physical scales, consider the fourth line, a work unfortunately always in progress…
The Philosophy of science behind the 10 Ðisomorphisms
Organicism.
From the coexistence of beings in 3 different scales of reality, ∆±1, that is form the fractal structure of space, it follows the organic nature of reality as flows of energy and information and motion between those scales based in the symbiosis of smaller beings that have more information and larger wholes that enclose the parts, precludes organic properties.
Unlike the simplex physical description of the Universe, as an extension in space, where the time parameter of change only is relevant in the descriptions of motions within the fractal Universe of any parts of it, as if nothing else would matter, reserving organic and sentient properties, under the ‘ego paradox’ for the human species only, our interest is much more profound as we consider all parts of the Universe homeomorphic to each other and hence with the same properties that humans do have, and vice versa. into all the properties that the simplex physical description misses, as they are not susceptible to me written in mathematical equations, or are not observable, directly but can be inferred from the actions they produce.
It is then possible through those indirect methods of observation and departing of the homologic, isomorphic properties of all beings, deduce the nonobservable properties of being by its external effects.
Organicism thus is immediate from the scalar structure of reality, as it is the only form TO CONNECT THE SCALES OF REALITY OR ELSE IF ENERGY AND INFORMATION WERE NOT TRANSFERRED BETWEEN THEM WE WOULD NOT SEE THEM WITH microscopes and telescopes.
Very little thought astonishingly enough has been paid to this, casting serious doubts on the intelligence of the humind – but I’m not gonna quip as usual on the homunculus; just show you those obvious physiological networks that transfer entropymotion, energy=reproduction and form=languages between scales (:
The best way to study this reality once we understand its epistemological principles, ‘fractal scales of topological space’, temporal ages, ternary symmetries, and complementarity vs. perpendicularity, is through the concept of 5 dimensions in space symmetric to 5 motions in time.
Then the fun starts, but given the ‘nonaristotelian logic’ of those ternary anti symmetries and complementarities, and the difficulty of the humind (ab. human mind) to perceive this complex logic, given its onedimensional selfcentred egoparadox, view, we have deviced two epistemological concepts, the Rashomon effect that focuses on the study of the 5 main Dimensions of the system with a perceptive point of view – that is as a symmetry between the mind perception of the whole and the multiple temporal elements, S@≈∆ð, and the Disomorphic method which focuses in the process of a world cycle that generates a super organism and destroys it.
When dealing with any timespace organism of the Universe and/or the humind science that observes it, or a family of them, in GST we need to apply the isomorphic 10 Dimensional description of the being in certain detail, starting by its singularitymonads and the languages they speak in which it will better express its properties. So we can then formalize its parts and 10 Dimensions with a fractal generator as a template for further detailed studies of those 5 s = 5 t formal/motion dimensions of any physical system, put in one to one relationship with those isomorphic dimensions, as follows:
0. monad: singularity in physics+membrane≈angular momentum
1. linguistic generator (mathematics in physics)
The states of matter and quantum states (Gas/potential < liquid wave >crystal boson)
2. Bidimensional forces and flows between particles
4. Antisymmetries that break an asymmetric system into its perpendicular parts (bigbangs, deathentropy processes) or symmetries that evolve social particles.
5 actions coded by quantum numbers (∆1 scale), thermodynamic laws, relativity
9.10: social scales of increasing mass (families of mass, growing domains of magnetism, atomic>molecular ensembles; cosmic societies).
3,6: forces as ternary networks of galaxies, states of matter and its heat and electromagnetic flows, potentials, variations of species by scale, form, motion.
7,8: big bang/big crunch e=mcc worldcycles, infinite fractal existences, immortal Universe.
Those isomorphic dimensions become then the main laws of physical systems studied with the language of its singularities, mathematical formalisms, which therefore deserve an entire chapter of its own. And so we shall first study and adapt to ∆•s≈t the basic concepts of mathematical physics and then study those isomorphisms in a general way, with special emphasys in the social scales and planes of the physical Universe, which will also deserve a part of its own.
So we structure the analysis of the 10 Ðisomorphisms of physical systems in 3 subparts:
 Mathematical physics, the language of its monads
 The S=T Ðisomorphisms of its present ternary systems.
 The scalar=social and organic=plane 9, 10 Ðisomorphisms.
So the emphasis is in the 4th and 5th dimensions of scales and minds, as those are the less understood parts of physics, and the symmetries of the galilean paradox between formal space dominated by functional time, and its motions≈actions.
While physical systems are best described today with mathematical physics, in T.œ we use all languages of information, prioritising obviously by the principle of correspondence mathematical physics, but we refer them in first place to ‘properties of spacetime.
THAT IS, we depart first from ∆, s, t, @ elements and then use for each science the language humans have used to express most of those properties ADDING when needed new languages, SPECIALLY the logic formalism of the FRACTAL GENERATOR and its 5s 5 t dimensions, the NONe GEOMETRY OF fractal points and its space dimensions (closer to mathematics) and the NonA logic of time dimensions.
So 3 formalisms are essential.
1.The fractal generator, and its symmetries and dimensional properties of scalar spacetime, for the whole.
2. NonE geometry which improves mathematics and in general all other mathematical laws, sometimes improved with noneuclidean laws for spatial properties.
3. NonÆlgebra of time dimensions.
4. Biological laws and organic laws for scalar dimensions.
5. Metalinguistic analysis of the deformations of those elements, as in endophysics, relativity theory and so on.
A compressed dimensional view: the 5D² Rashomon truths>Ðisomorphic methods to physics.
Lineal space, cyclical time, its combined symmetries, which in physical systems amount to lineal, angular momentum and energy – the 3 conserved elements of all physical, organic systems across all the scales of physical systems…
Finally adding the most dispute part of all systems, the singularity minds that control and organise them into whole, along the 5D arrow of social evolution and its inverse 4D entropic processes that both create the super organisms and destroy them in worldcycles of exi=stiences, also in physical systems.
To express that method in a concise dynamic way, we use the first line of this blog, widened for a more complex ‘Ðisomorphic analysis in the 3rd line, where we fully analyse the ‘more complete Generator equation’ which includes all the main asymmetries, symmetries and anti symmetries of the ternary elements of a world cycle of time, an organism of space and its complete scalar timespace super organism:
I won’t try to justify the obvious, quite fed up with human egos: we deny singularities as still mindmappngs of the Universe, from black holes with t=o still metric, to crystals that order gaseous entropy into still form, NOT because we cannot perceive its sentient effects – that is the excuse, but we call particles gauging because they gauge information, solve black hole metric as stopping time, like still minds do, observe the stillness of thermodynamic eddies, see images inside crystals, and understand the superposition laws of waves and bosons. And we see quarks and particles iterating through decoupling, associating through magnetic fields, feeding on energy forces.
So I won’t as in earlier stages of my scholarship when I cared more for communication try to justify those singularities more than any other element of reality – if human egos cannot take reality as it is, because it is absolutely relative and doesn’t give us any preferential position it is not my business.
The fractal generator: S@≥∆ð
In the graph, we study in space all systems as simultaneous coexisting super organisms with 3 topologies, 3 scales of existence and 3 relative timeages, all of them perceived by a singularity that exchanges actions of energy and information with the entities of its world on different planes.
The Universe is a fractal super organism made of…
 A(nti)symmetries between its 4 Dual components, which can either annihilate or evolve, which we shall call Balance≈become symmetric or become Perpendicular/antysmmetric:
 S: space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (motion/limbspotentials + Oparticle/heads ≈ Øvital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
 ∆: distributed in ∆±i relative fractal scales that come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
 ð: a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motionyouth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
 @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (entropy feeding), motion (acelerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into Universals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being.
Because the scientific method requires OBJECTIVE measure of the existence of a mind, which is NOT perceivable directly, we infer its existence by the fact a system performs the 5 external actions, which can be measure objectively, in the same manner we infer the existence of gravitational informative forces by its external actions upon massive objects. Hence eliminating the previous limit for a thorough understanding of the sentient, informative Universe. And further classify organic in simplex minds – all, which must gauge information, move and feed to survive, and complex systems, those who can perform a palingenetic reproductive, social evolution, ∆1: ∑∆1≈∆º.
The richness of the consequences of that definition of the Universe are hardly to stress, and we shall develop them slowly in those texts.
The study of those 4 elements of all realities, its actions and ternary operandi, which result in a social evolution together of the 2 + elements (the balanced bodywave and informative @particlemind, and the entropic destruction or ab=use of the – simpler, lineal limbpotentialprey, which structures the dynamic ‘Generator Equation’ of all Spacetime Systems of the Universe, written in its simplest form as a singularitymind equation, O x ∞ = K or in dynamic way, S@<≈>∆ð, is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiffmind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.
It is difficult to explain you why after 30 years of studying alone the fractal, organic Universe, I settled for those 2 formalisms. It might be possible to study the kaleidoscopic Universe in many other ways, most amenable to modern science, with an external mathematical point of view, but what I like to reveal from reality is what huminds do not accept, the sentient nature and linguistic perception of the moving reality as fixed spatial forms, as a maya of the senses, which is achieved with the Rashomon effect, and the organic, vital, moving nature of the world cycle of a super organism, which is achieved through the Disomorphic method – that should be on the long term, the canonical method of understanding reality.
The 5th dimension study of the fractal generator in space thus gives us a full account of any supeorganism in exist¡ence, as an ensemble of ∆1 energy points of a limbic system that moves an ∆º super organism, coexistin in an ∆+1 world, made of 3 topological O x  = Ø structures.
The Rashomon method of truth then extracts from the generator equation, different subequations to analyze in more detail the parts of the being.
In space thus we use the ‘generator equation’ and 5D Rashomon truths to convey a full sense of the being.
In time however the coexisting, democratic, simultaneous nature of the being is lost as the hierarchical, singularitymind, causal will of survival and its actions take over into a program of existence, called the world cycle that magically reorganizes those actions of the being in temporal lifecycles and ages, between life and extinction by death of entropy, as the system grows in size and information through those 3 ages.
Conclusion. The fractal paradigm.
The Fractal Paradigm or T.Œ (Theory of Everything Organic) is a meaningful Unification of all species departing from the organic=5D, logic=Time and mathematical=spatial properties of all Universal wholes and the human languages that express them. The easiest way to formalize it is through the study of the Fractal generator and its ternary symmetries of time ages, space organs and 5D scales of size and time speed, according to the fractal principle which states that:
‘Each element of the fractal Universe can be subdivided into 3 subtime ages, space parts and 5D scale and considered a part of a larger ternary ±∆S≈T whole’.
This means we shall always find when taking a part from the whole, a ternary division. For example, if we take the limb, which is a lineal, entropic part, we divide it into its Ohead (the hand), its intermediate region, the forearm, and its energy system, the bicepshumerus system. Moreover, we shall see immediately that the 3 parts do obey the rules of ±∆S≈T, the humerus being the stronger, single, most continuous part, the forearm divided in two and the hand with a more rounded form, broken into multiple ‘informative’ elements.
It is then necessary as a background for all studies to know the general laws of ±∆√^{3}(S≈T)^{3} systems, and the degree of detail we want to use in its analysis. In the previous formulae, we have extended with mathematical symbols that degree of analysis, as there is an Space, Time and ST, ≈, component, and if we look through its higher, +, and smaller, , scales of the 5^{th} dimension, ∆, we shall multiply its elements by the ternary principle (ST^{3}) as we diminish scale or alternatively, reduces them ^{3}√, as we grow in size and they fusion into wholes, either as a sum (if we only count its larger parts) or as a potency, if we count its cellular elements.
The quantitative nature of those analyses however, despite being in the age of digital computers the center of science, is of little value to this blog. What matters to us is to understand the whys and how the seemingly different properties of all elements become unified by the properties of ∆ST.
Thus to facilitate the study of those ∆^{3}ST_{3} systems in a practical basis, since to ‘know’ a species consist on describing its ∆ST elements, which are variations of the ‘canonical’, perfect fractal which is the absolute Universe, we can apply the same laws to all of them, and this is the origin of the 10 isomorphisms, which further divide the analysis of those 3 elements in 3×3+0 subsets of laws.
Incidentally we must notice that the variations on the game of the perfect fractal which is the Universe, result in species which last less in time or grow less in space, because we are talking NOT of mathematical only fractals but of vital fractals whose purpose is to survive, through its perfect playing of the game of existence, based in achieving by performing its 5 actions of ±e,i, absorption and emission of spatial energy and temporal information, aimed to reproduce and evolve socially the system, a relative immortality – not of the ego, but of the biologic form of the fractal.
And so we can consider that the Universe as a whole, in its infinite time, infinite space and infinite scales is infinitely perfect, in the playing of the game of exi=stence, which is the purpose of the fractal, which once achieved this perfect game will show in its spatial energy the property of balance called beauty (balance between the 3 topological shapes and its subparts), in its temporal information, the property of balance called knowledge (focus of the mirrormind into the game of the fractal), and in its scalar relationships the property of balance called ethics (giving to its whole and taking from its parts, only what is needed).
Those 3 properties of beauty, knowledge and ethics, are proper, embedded and natural to the behavior of all beings in existence, and from this search for Spe≈Tiƒ (balance of beauty), Tiƒ≈ ∞ U (focused linguistic mirror balance or knowledge) and ∆n (exi) = ∆ = ∆+n (exi) (balance between the self, what it gives to the higher whole and what it receives from the lower planes of existence), are therefore the route to immortality and what the Universe displays as the ideal canon that allows the whole to be ∞ in time, space and 5D scales. Yet there is of course a 4^{th} element, the ego, the opoint, the ‘selfish knots’ that distorts the mirror and tries to group it all around its networks, which externally might seem equal to all others, but internally holds a peculiar mirror, which the being wants to expand. This 4^{th} quality is unavoidable, and it is called selfishness.
It is the ugly part of the Universe, for that reason hidden (there is a hypocritical nature to the Universal fractal). Selfishness though is a weapon of 2 sides. As the actionreaction laws of the Universe make too selfish beings, likely to be murdered by other fractals. We are here talking of an element so evident in biological and social systems that only physicists, with its selfrestricting absolute selfishness (as they treat matter as dead) do not grasp. The ion selfcentered in a single atom that brings closer all the charge of the system is selfish and lasts far less than the crystal, which keeps reproducing its form, with equal cells.
Now for long I tried to cue each discipline with a partial vision of The Fractal to cater the anthropomorphic and peer selfishness of each group. No longer. I am mostly unconnected to mankind – a lesser fractal –and in my old age, before dissolution into the whole I like to contemplate its perfection. So we shall not in this blog make any concessions to each jargon and discipline.
That is why The Fractal – the Universe is perfect. It is the only whole, which is absolute in the 4 elements: absolutely beautiful (holder of perfect forms), ethical (undistinguishable in each scale unless the scale is put in relationship to others), knowledgeable (‘Only the Universe holds all the information about itself’ Haldane), and absolutely selfish (all its parts must die into 0sums for him to be immortal).
But it follows from it that all other fractals make to its image and likenesses are not perfect, but 0sums that unfolds and folds into nirvana. Now, what makes astrœphysics so enticing to the mind IS NOT, the bubbling idiots, making doodles in the sand, of the human species, who have studied those fractals, but the fact that the largest ∆±4,3 scales of invisible dark matter/energy and visible light galaxies/cspeeds are the closest we humans can contemplate on one extreme of perception, perfection – being the other limit, that of Biology, where we can observe so much close information, that its imperfection matters little.
Those are the wonders of the mind. What is the most ugly fractal is that of social sciences, to which I have dedicated most of my prime time to not avail – an absolutely imperfect fractal in process of extinction suffering massive anoxia (lack of oxygenbloodenergymoney) as a peoplecaste of parasites, the bankers in control of the FinancialMedia systems of information rob the oxygen of the cells, they produce in monopoly and to avoid the just punishment fill the mind of man with absurd, brutal, cuckoo memes, from Abrahamic religions to capitalist and nationalist and mechanist mantras.
This I know, and Einstein which I truly respect along with Planck for a flexible mind with some musical and verbal qualities, put it in words: ‘2 things I deem infinite the Universe and the stupidity of man, and I am not sure of the former’. I am sure of the former, and the latter, since infinite stupidity – an infinite negative, is in ilogic geometry a 0. 0 is the negative infinite (an important truth of ilogic algebra, barely understood).
Now the quantitative scientist, mostly the physicist would likely care nothing for this – he is certainly not perfect and has abandoned the knowledge of many of the mirrored properties of the Universe, to understand this.
So he will reduce the 6 Ðisomorphism of the 6 motions of all systems of the Universe to one, locomotion, study parts not wholes and so on.
This fog on what must be understood of each species, we explain it in many ways. We use 5 words to better describe its ‘fundamental elements’, 5D organic scales of parts and wholes, the topologies of space and formal motions of ‘temporal energy’ that create the systems of the Universe, and the linguistic 0points that gauge and carry the will of survival of the Universe through its spacetime actions, and 4 disciplines, biology, mathematics, logic and linguistics, to define them.
So those 5 elements, 5 D scales, space symmetries, time anti symmetries, ŒPoints particles that gauge information and the 5 spacetime cyclical actions they perform structures the analysis of physical systems.
In practical form, this is conveyed by grouping the analysis in 10 isomorphisms, which in an orderly fashion study each of those beings in detail. It goes without saying that behind its study there are the fundamental laws of balance (beauty, knowledge and ethics) of the ∆^{3}ST elements of the fractal, which the Œpoint tries to achieve ‘automatically’ (as it is normally a memorial program embedded in the ∆1 coding, informative lower scale, maths, genes or memes, in physical, biological and social systems), through its 5 actions.
For each of those 5 elements of existence nature specifies its parameters and hence each species will be an specific case of the Generator Equation, which can be applied to any physical, biological or sociological system and specified for each fractal.
How we do so is through the 10 Ðisomorphisms, which are ordered as follows: first we describe the Œpoints where the will and actions of survival of the being reside, and the language the Œpoint uses to guide the superorganism it commands. First and parallel to the study of the language, we must define the Œbeing we study. In physics it is the Œpoints of each of the 3 scales: ‘atoms’, ‘matter molecules’ and ‘massescosmic bodies’.
Then the language is the one of ‘details’, mathematics. Because physicists focus on the spatial properties of those systems, but we could use other laws, biological, organic and we will, to study wholes, more than details for which mathematics is the best language. And finally, we study the constrains and purpose embedded in the values of the language, which will also determine the direction of the being.
For example, in the AngloAmerican culture, one of the 7 varieties of human superorganisms, the language is money and its values favor metal, affine to money, giving maximal value to weapons and minimal to human costs, labor and life reason why capitalism has massacred mankind since its inception in Holland>UK>US through cycles of global wars to achieve the maximal values of money.
In this case the language’s values are invisible to the commoner who thinks America is a democracy (the government of people) because it does not understand the language that expresses the will of America, a superorganism of machines, where humans are not the will, not the future, not the purpose but companymothers of machines are. Hence we obtain all the cycles of history of America and predict accurately its future for decades, because we know the language and the will it expresses, while not a single American, expert or economist has ever forecasted their future.
In physics, the human discipline of this post however the language is mathematics. We are dealing here with systems, which mostly are studied in space with motions, as the 6 motions are reduced to one. We will though expand its vision.
Now associated to the Œbeing, we consider the ∆ST 3 elements in 3 subgroups of laws:
– The 3 first Ðisomorphisms, the Generator Equation of the system, and its 3 parts study first as ST dualities and then as S≈T ternary symmetries. So we have the 3 structural ‘spatial’ oriented isomorphisms: ‘1.generator’, ‘2.duality’, ‘3.timespace ternary symmetries’. It is all expressed in Cheng Tzu dictum: from one (the generator) comes 2 (the yinyang duality) and from 2 comes 3 (the ages and physiological networks/organs) that define the 10.000 beings.
– Then the 3 next Ðisomorphic sets of laws, deals with the system in timemotions that is through its spacetime actions. So we study in the 4±∆ isomorphism the 4±∆e, i, actions of exchange of energy and information (æccelerations or locomotions; energy feeding, information gauging, and information communication), and its ±∆ complex actions of reproduction and social evolution, which involves all the simplest actions together. In general we say ‘5 actions’ and use the 5 vowels, to make them easier to remember – æcceleration, + energy feeding, – i communication, +informative gauging, œffspring, ûniversals creation. The reader should bet accustom to the constant iterations and selfsimilar expressions for the fundamental events of reality.
Those actions are studied in the 5^{th} Ðisomorphism that defines 5D Fractals now as the specific behavior of the fractal as a whole, through its ∆0±4 scales of the 5^{th} dimension in which it exists. As It will ‘move’, through absorption and emission of ∆4 ‘invisible’ forcefields taken from the ∆+4 cosmos, perceive and communicate information through absorption and emission of ∆±3 bits, feed on ∆2 bites taken from the world, ∆+2 world, reproduce through ∆1 seeds, brought up in its ∆+1 home and all from its ∆0 perspective.
This 5th Ðisomorphism thus returns us to the œbeing in action, and has many subdisciplines as the study of social classes and hierarchies, given the fact the being treats differently those quanta according to scale – moving by killing entropically field particles it care nothing for, by jailing into total stillness, ∆2 bits of information, decomposing in torture, ∆2 bites of energy, loving intensely its ∆1 seeds of reproduction, and giving away its energy and information to the construction through physiological networks of ∆+1 societies; becoming itself, a slave of the ∆+2 world that will sooner or latter be consumed as energy by the ∆+3 galactic black hole.
Finally in the 6^{th} Ðisomorphism we describe the 3 outer and internal social scales and networks of the being, which is the spatial view, and then use them to describe how the being performs with them its internal and external motions, which are also 6 motions, of generation, growth, locomotion, evolution, diminution and extinction that form together a worldcycle.
This duality of the 6 Ðisomorphism, again shows that we can mirror reality in different manners. In the case of physics, which is more focused on motion studies, we the 6^{th} isomorphism studies motions in spacetime, to make clear that locomotion is only one of the 6 motions.
In the case of human beings, it seems more proper to study them both, first considering the 3 internal networks and 3 external networks, in which the being performs as the worldcycle of beings.
Again, we must always realize that the ilogic of the Universe is ternary.
So for full knowledge 3 perspectives on any issue, a static, spatial, diachronic, temporal and scalar, organic perspective is needed.
But in the 3 first Ðisomorphism we stressed the ‘spatial symmetries’ in static form, so we call them the spatial isomorphisms or description of the Organism.
And in the 3 next, the temporal analysis of actions, motions and physiological networks, which extract from other scales the needed energy bites and information bits to perform their worldcycle of existence. So it is the worldcycle analysis, in its minute steps, actions and its whole integration (energy in physics, worldcycles of life and death in biology, existence of nations and civilizations in sociology).
It follows that the 7^{th}, 8^{th} and 9^{th} Ðisomorphisms which completes the view of the whole, Œbeing and its fractal generator, we deal more with the 5D perspective and the outer world and ecosystem and Universe in which the being is only a particlepoint. So the 7^{th} Ðisomorphism studies its vital and Universal constants, where the Active Magnitude or ‘scalar’ value of the being, which is always the value of its Tiƒ (mass, charge, or thermodynamic temperature in the 3 physical, ∆±1, ∆ scales) is the most important. Then we study the ratios, or energy and information, Sp/Tƒ and Tƒ/Sp constants. And its product or ‘exi=stential speed’ of the being. And then the same 3 constants for the external world. And this put the Active Magnitude in relationship to many other species that live in that world.
So we can now in the 8^{th} Ðisomorphism to study the being as a species part of a larger whole, with multiple variations, based in the duality and ternary games and orders, 2^{3}=8 of its components, physiological networks, universal constants, energyinformation gender dualities and ternary parts. And finally in the 9^{th} isomorphism we study the decametric scales that bring the variations and parts into a complex superorganism, or Universal.
It is then 3 x3 + œ Ðisomorphisms. The Time Space being, T.œ, the fractal subdivides in 3 G isomorphisms of the œrganism and its Fractal Generator, 3 Å isomorphisms of its spacetime motions or actions and 3 §, isomorphisms of its social scales and variations of species. So we use the 3 aforementioned symbols, G, Gamma for Generator and Fractal (similar to F) – also the symbol of the 1^{st} isomorphism; Å, for the actions and motions through scales of the being also the symbol for the 4th Ðisomorphism of actions, and § for its variations, universal constants and social scales, also the symbol of the 9 isomorphism of social scales.
I apologize because for 30 years I have used many different symbolisms, so often especially in graphs thereafter will find different formulae. This blog, which is my testament of knowledge tries to harmonize them all for future researchers to have a guide. There is a lot of thought and a year of trials and errors and corrections of vast number of pages to finally settle down for this pattern, which seems to me the most focused mirror on the way the fractal displays its existence.
0. PHYSICAL SINGULARITIES.
The ∆1 view of dual singularity vortex, general and physical model: bigbang death + evolution
The beauty of physical systems in its simplestless perceivedmost perfect forms is that they draw in space the laws of time, at faster cycles imprinting with perfect regular forms, the laws of fractal, vital mathematics, its ‘perpendicular darwinian actions’ and parallel, social forms. So for a trained ∆st eye, all becomes selfevident just observing the fractal topology of a time§paœrganism.
This lead us to a fundamental topological analysis of the fourth dimension of spacetime, entropy and death, aka bigbang, in which the larger whole singularity absorbs the smaller parts it feeds on and splits them into two inverse jets, that signify the informative and entropic part of the being, one with a redentropic shift towards dissolution of information and the other towards a growing, collapsing blue shift of collapsing form.
The entity then will absorb one (depending on which action is working, an informative or an entropicfeeding action) and spit the other, and this happens all over the Universe, being the equivalent of a predator killing a prey by cuttingchoking his neck and then split the entity leaving the informative head with little substance and eating the bodylimbs. This duality is all over the Universe and unlike more convoluted life forms it directly shows the descriptive power of the 3rd congruence postulate of ¬Æ mathematics: perpendicular, ‘invading’, penetrating, cutting motions are darwnian, social informative ones are parallel, as in parallel the systems does not invade the other super organism and merely communicates at a balanced distance information.
So the perpendicular flow that enters the vortex singularity (charge or black hole) made of smaller ∆1 quanta (cspeed quanta, magnetic and dielectric quanta etc), is then accelerated, broken, disorganised and ejected as a dual flow of max. entropymotion and max. informationcollapsing wave. And this is incidentally the best explanation in terms of STdeath (as usual the multifunctional universe offers multiple explanations), of the ‘expansion of the Universe=red shift of galaxies. WE DO NOT SEE the blue jets as they mostly collapse into informative matter, giving birth to new galactic daughter forms out of giant black holes or dark matter clouds. WE HOWEVER see all the red jet shifts that by definition expand space and reach further as lengthdistanceslineal speeds.
A NEW CONSERVATION LAW: 5D≈4D
There is however a new conservation law besides the ‘fractal sum’ of all the lineal, angular and vital energy parts of T.œs:
The zero sum law, such as all processes of social evolution, which ‘shrink’ and ‘absorb’ energy upwards to create an emerging new scale, are equivalent to all the scattering 4Dentropic dissolutions of energy, to balance and make immortal the Universe. Let us consider a key case of this law, which explains why the Universe is immortal.
∑ BIG BANGS + ∑ GALACTIC CRUNCHES
In the next graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.
In the graph, the Universe is eternal and bigbangs are likely only galactic bigbangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.
So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and nofalsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science – namely the obsession of physicists for lineal entropic motions, due to its worldly profession of making weapons – entropic systems of metal that kill life.
5D PHYSICS however insists in giving the primacy as the main element of reality to the inverse arrow of social evolution and growth of form, produced by those vortices of time that convert entropy into order, mass or charge in different scales of reality.
Let us then consider how the 5th dimension not only balance the Universe but allow us to unify all its scales.
THE KEY ELEMENT OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: THE DUAL @ SINGULARITY (CHARGEMASSEDDIE).
The unification equation of masses and charges.
In an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein).
So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ> mc²=hƒ> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.
In the graph, the 01 Dimension of a particlestate or vortex of accelerated time, the key element to understand the creation and destruction of symmetric dimensions of time (distance, motion, acceleration) back and forth into dimensions of space (length, width, height).
A key element of a physical system is the singularity ‘membrain’, which includes as in any key system of nature, a center that processes information and a membrane that encloses and breaks the system into an inner region, the T.œ and an outer region, the Universe. This dual system IS the COVER AND CENTER of a topological open ball, which is the vital energy enclosed by the system, which DOES NOT EXIST as a full T.œ unless those 2 elements are formed. Consider the case of ‘Mass’. Energy contributes to ‘mass’, but if we do NOT have an enclosure we cannot measure mass, as energy is moving around and there is nothing to ‘weight’. Yet as soon as we close the membrane, the mass parameter will exist, as measured externally by the membrane.
Further on, as the membrane is CLOSING the inner region, which we normally do NOT access, or else we will have to tear the membrane and then mass might escape and a continuity equation will have to be applied to assess the flow of mass in and out, we cannot truly measure the mass.
It is then obvious that the ‘parameter’ of ‘densityweightchargeangular momentumrotational speed’ etc, tends to accumulate in each scale in the external region, where the ‘massforce’ is maximal; while in the inner singularity center, it reaches ‘zero value’, and that point is the mindstill singularity, where motion stops, and so in black hole equations time moves to zero in the singularity, in the vortex of an Eddie.
Finally a principle which will be abhorred by classic physicists but it is really the ice in the cake is the sentient nature of singularities WHICH IS PROVED BY THE FACT THEY ARE THE ENGINE OF THE 5 SURVIVAL ACTIONS OF EVERY PART OF THE UNIVERSE.
Now it is obvious that the eye of the hurricane and the eye of the black hole has maximal height as it is indeed the informative center of the system, in fact ‘infinite height’ in the axis of a black hole, which means that ‘motion stops’ in the perpendicular plane but shuts off as a yet of dark entropy and matter through the axis of superluminal speed according to the Kerr equations of a rotating black hole.
Unification equation of charges and masses.
‘Only the Universe has all the information about itself’ Haldane.
There is a 3rd element on those Universal systems, which is by far the more interesting and less understood, which physicists of course also use in all their theories: the mathematical frame of reference, or zero point, the center of the circle, the pointparticle that ‘gauges information’, without which again not a single theory of physics can be understood (it is the point of the inertial frame of reference that ‘measures’, the cause of their physical theories which are called for that reason ‘gauging field theories’).
EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN ATOMS AND GALACELLS: UNIFICATION EQUATION OF MASSES AND CHARGES.
Its simpler mathematical formalism.
We shall only so how the power of 5D³ by finding the unification equation of charges and masses (general relativity) and upgrading worldlines to worldcycles (special relativity), as we have already dealt with the constancy of light speed (entanglement of electrons which emit information in relative stillness to each other).
Future, time arrows in physics are cyclical vortices of gravitation or charge or thermodynamic eddies, with a singularity of zeromotion in its center, which we do observe in thermodynamic vortices as we cannot ‘see’ inside a quark or top quark star (black hole). It is the arrow of future, as it is an attractive arrow that forms lineal entropic fields into form and will be the ‘final destiny’ of the quanta of an entropic field. We shall study for the three main scales of the supœrganism of the galaxy, which is the main physical system in which humans exist as its thermodynamic level.
Whereas the Universal Constants (G, Q), define the curvature of 2 spacetime vortices at the ∆1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales. Its formalism, M= ω^{2}r^{3}/U.C.(G,Q) is its Unification Equation.
Since if we substitute for the Earthsun system we obtain G, (1^{st} ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain Q with a 10^{40} higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem.
As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It also proves the isomorphism between electromagnetic atoms and galaxies, Hatoms of the cosmic scale. Since when we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and electronic orbitals star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the EinsteinWalker Metric of the Cosmos. Organicism gives the ‘why’ of Galacells that have DNA + Top Quark proton holes, star mitochondria that feed them & strangelet halos.
This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of spacetime by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:
Universal constant of a spacetime vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)^{2} × radius^{3}/ mass
If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe both, not only a gravitational vortex of spacetime in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but also a charge as a quantum vortex of spacetime with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.
And so we have an essential equivalence between K and G for the two ‘enclosure’ ∆±1 scales of human existence, the quantum faster, stronger attractive curvature=speed of the electromagnetic vortex and the slower GVORTEX, which allow us to unify as we did previously both fields. And translate the somewhat dull language of electromagnetism to that simpler of gravitation, showing some fascinating results, such as the proton showing the schwartzschild radius, Rg = 2GM/c² equation of a black hole in the larger scale when put on gravitational jargon.
Let us go into the task, of putting some numbers to the conceptual model, completing Einstein’s work with its long seeked…
Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:
Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{7 }rad. per sec.
Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.
Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{11} kg1 m^{3} rad. sec.^{2}
This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the spacetime vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum spacetime vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.
If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.
Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)
4 × 10^{16 }rad. sec.^{ 1 }= w (electron);
5.3 × 10^{11 }m. (Bohr radius);
proton mass = 1.6 × 10 ^{27} kg.
Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39 }stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a selfsimilar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.
And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/c^{2}.
But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.
Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.
To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.
Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal selsimilar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of spacetime vortices in the 2 different scales of spacetime of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:
For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of spacetime. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a selfsimilar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the nonEuclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of spacetime.
He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.
So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of spacetime, with two selfsimilar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a selfsimilar membrane to that of the cosmological world.
What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atomgalaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow. Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate. Well not so immediate, it requires…
The 2 fundamental scalar vortices of time: Charges and Masses.
Let us then deduce from the previous metric, the main equations of the different worldplane constants, starting for the best known, remembering that T=1/Tƒ:
F= GmM/L² = ma
a = GM/L² GM = L³ xTƒ² where G is the constant and M the ∆scalar magnitude, Tƒ², the dimension of cyclical time (angular acceleration) and L³ the dimension of volume.
The same equation, substituting G for Q and M for charge, as we show in the Unification Equation of charges and masses gives us the value of a charge as an ∆scalar magnitude, when we use the Bohr model to calculate the attractive charge of the first spherical Sorbital of an electron (obviously the complexity of noncircular electronic orbitals defy this simple calculus).
Thus both M and E are the scalar magnitudes of the two upper and lower limiting worldplanes of human existence, as accelerated vortices, the ‘active magnitudes’ of those 2 fields.
How does a vortex of charge and mass becomes constructed geometrically? We must understand that all systems tend to curve a Motion into a cyclical, finally accelerating inwards vortex: >Ø>o. Those 3 phases of a motion will give birth to a ‘ternary structure’, the commonest of the Universe and its simplest ones are those of nature:
In the graph we can see the 3 relative topologies: as a Motion curves into a field, it moves inward accelerating, till it reaches the zero point, in which it will often will split its ‘formal’ and ‘energetic content:
On one side it will slow down and be perceived as a stop mapping, in the central zero point, on the other side it will be deflected and change its dimensional direction upward as a hyperbolic tube that becomes finally a lineal flow. In physical fields, the simplest systems, it means we will find a field, which will accelerate inwards (gravitational, charge field) and then it will create a ‘less energetic’ upwardsdownwards ‘gravitomagnetic’ field, completing the 3 ‘topological membranes’ of a whole system.
This field will basically have the 3 components and write with the generic equation of all fields:
F= A x E, where F is the force, A the active magnitude (Charge, mass) and E the vectorial structure of the field.
A proof of the ∞ ∆scalar nature of spacetime, composed of isomorphic lineal forces of ‘spatial energy’ and cyclic, clocktime vortices of ‘informative time’, charges in the ∆1 quantum scale, and masses in the ∆+1 cosmic scale are the recently found ”excited Sorbitals’ of the Milky Way: 2 bubbles of electromagnetic energy with the same form that ∆1 atomic orbitals have in its excited states. The Metric of its isomorphism is the Unification Equation of Charges & Masses and its U. Constants (Q.G.).
So mass is a gravitational vortex of frequency, moving with the quanta of light speed, which becomes then (Paradox of Galileo) also the quanta of spacedistance of the galactic scale – the limit of the spatial capacity to move=reproduce information in Galactic space.
How does really one scale transforms into the other requires to understand the different ways in which discontinuous timecycles connect to each other and transfer through those knotsconnections their angular momentum.
In essence though the idea is still as simple as a russian doll encasing and absorbing the motions of a smaller membranerussian doll that becomes ‘muted’ by that larger encasing that absorbs its motion. The new scales of ‘membranousclosed’ wholes do therefore get their kicks of the enclosed vital space, and can at the same time act in the ∆+1 world outside their ∆o1 particle<wave system.
THUS THE CONSTANT OF THE gravitational world is cc, a bidimensional sheet of light energy, which is measured here in entropic quantities, where mass is the frequency vortex measured as particle that will ‘vomit’ all its ccs.
Cc then is better understood through Maxwell equation as the inverse of µ x ε, the magnetic and electric constant, which become then the ‘split’ two constant exist¡ential units of both fields in an even smaller scale of exi∂st¡ence
But in all of them we shall find three arrows of timespace with its form and function, topological and biological organic description of phenomena, which when plugged into ‘vital ¬Æ mathematics further reveals many details and beautiful, darwinian process among the quanta of spaceenergy (whole being measured in instantaneous space as an energy amount, in detail as a ternary topology with a finite time and space size connected by the 5D metric of the being).
Rashomon TRUTH on singularities: how to unify multiple views of the same phenomena
WE said that languages are inflationary, so there are multiple perspectives of any formalism of mathematical physics. They will respond mostly to the four essential components aforementioned – a wave, field, particle and scalar perspective, with some ad ons, such as relativity to account for mental distortions often in the ‘lorentzian’ regions between planes scales that become deformed in its parameters.
Let us illustrate the case with the most studied of them – the gravitational force, already mentioned.
Einstein’s Equivalence: Bidimensional mass. Dimensions of gravitational spacetime.
In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: iƒ (relativity)≈ Ti (newton) <> Se (Poisson)≈ Sp (Lagrange):
iƒ relativity is a still formal, informative, description in ‘present’ of the gravitational spacetime)
Ti Newton is a moving vortex of Time, less detailed and more dynamic.
SePoisson is a potential static field of entropic motions, with a gradientdirection.
Sp HamiltonianLagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.
“I want to know God’s thoughts . . . the rest are details.”, said Einstein. Yet those thoughts are logic principles, the details are mathematical equations, which evolve with new developments in calculus, while the principles stay.
So in pure geometric terms the orbital vortices are accelerated timeclocks of gravitational forces with a gradient, that implies an elliptic conic that drags a field of invisivible max. Spe motion, defined by a curvaturespeed, which can be explained analytically in terms of motion vortices (Newton>Poison) or curvaturedistances, sliced in instantaneous, simultaneous moments (Einstein).
In that sense, it is a common mistake of Pythagorean physicists who believe God speaks only mathematics to consider that Einstein’s work on general relativity is unrelated to Newton because he uses different mathematics. Thus, Pythagorean physicists, who consider mathematics the only language of reality, think that Einstein explains a completely different view of the Universe, which invalidates totally Newton’s work. This view is wrong and leaves unexplained the very obvious fact that Newton’s description of gravitational forces works so well that it was considered an absolute truth till the twentieth century and is still used for most calculus of forces on Earth because both are based on the same logic principle of equivalence, which in the hierarchy of science dominates over the different detailed mathematical descriptions of it.
Moreover, it is known to the historian of physics that Newton’s equations were evolved by Poisson and Poisson was the departing point of Einstein, which is the departing point of fractal relativity, the twentyfirstcentury version sketched in this book. Yet the principle of equivalence between accelerations and masses is not the departing point of Higgs and Hawking’s entropic black holes, which deny Einstein’s principles, and so regardless of their mathematical complexity, they are wrong because their logic principles are false.
So we must consider a different view on the evolution of gravitational theory. Newton, Poisson, and Einstein’s theories are right because they describe the same logic principle of equivalence, with the best mathematical models available to each age. And since logic is in the hierarchy of the scientific method, superior to mathematics, from where it derives—as Gödel, Russell, and Frege proved, deducing the laws of mathematics from those of logic—what matters is to understand the logic principles of the Universe, which will then be described “in higher detail” with each new paradigm of mathematics. What this means is that as mathematics have grown in detail and precision, new physicists have applied the new mathematics and increased the detail of their calculus.
Yet the physical principles, events, and concepts that truly define the phenomenon physicists describe have not changed. So when those principles are changed by false principles as Higgs and Hawking do in mass and black hole theory, the results are false regardless of the mathematical detail they use to reinvent the Universe.
This is clearly shown in theory of mass by the three phases of evolution of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, all of which can be used to calculate trajectories of masses, because all of them follow the three legs of the scientific method. The first paradigm was Newton’s paradigm, which used a simple formula of a gravitational vortex to describe them. And they worked fine for most calculus and they are still used. Then Poisson, Lagrange, and Hamilton refined those calculi. And finally Einstein used Poisson formulation of the gravitational force and took it a step further with the use of nonEuclidean maths.
What we have done is to take Einstein’s work further by using the next age of evolution of mathematics, fractal and nonEuclidean mathematics and the laws of endophysics, which includes the limits of human perception on those equations (Galilean paradox, changes in the speed of time around black holes), which solve the problem of the uncertainty of measure introduced by the observer.
But any of those threeplusone ages of the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration are good enough to explain what mass is; and none of the quantum alternatives, despite the complexity of its maths, is truth because they deny the principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, considering mass an external property given by solid particles (the Higgs) that transfer it magically to all other entities of the Universe, not an internal property of the topological structure of spacetime, its accelerated, cyclical motion.
Any of those models—Newton’s forces, Einstein’s relativity, or our nonEuclidean fractal description of the two membranes of the Universe—bring enough understanding of what a mass is. Yet because Pythagorean physicists ignore the underlying logic principles that rule their equations, they believe in the mathematical model of the day and when new mathematics appears, they think the old model was totally wrong. So they thought, as Alexander Pope put it, that “God created Newton and there was light,” but when Einstein came with new maths, they threw Newton’s work as if it were a fantasy when it had worked perfectly for three centuries in calculating all kinds of motions in the Universe. Newton had embedded the same true principles in his work—the principle of equivalence between accelerations and forces, masses and motions (F=m × a).
Next, Poisson and Hamilton applied the new refined tools of differential calculus to the study of the motion of planets, which was previously described by Newton with simpler operandi. So they found out another key principle of the Universe of energy and information—the law of minimal energy, which states that any system of the Universe tries to keep its internal energy and information, follows the path that saves more energy between two points.
Then when Riemann developed nonEuclidean mathematics, Einstein applied them to the previous work of Newton, using the notation of Poisson, to find a more precise analysis of gravitational mass vortices, by making a series of “simultaneous,” present pictures of those cyclical motions and adding the influence of the gravitational membrane that underlies our world of light and electroweak masses.
We could resume the differences between the classic formulation of Newton and the modern one, considering that Newton formulated the description of the whole, and its dynamics in an extended space and time duration, while Einstein formulated the detailed topology of the vortex in each nonEuclidean point of its space and in the simultaneity of each present moment of duration.
The description of those vortices in the scale of charges and quarks can be also done with two degrees of detail, as we do here, considering them whole vortices or as the socalled QCD theory of strong forces does, in detail, considering each fractal quanta (gluon and quark) at each moment of time and aggregating them together. Yet while the whole description of quarks we shall do here is less accurate than the detailed one, brought about by quantum chromodynamics, it provides a more logical, comprehensive overview, which is the aim of this book, since all those mathematical descriptions are truth as long as they describe accurately the equivalence principle between forces and accelerations.
If we compare them with a verbal description, we could say that all of them have the same core sentence, the principle of equivalence, but the description of it grows in detail. If Newton, for example, said Jesus had dark hair, Einstein refined the analysis and said Jesus had dark hair with brown touches in his forehead, and fractal relativity refines the sentence further, saying Jesus had long dark hair with brown touches on his forehead and a white stripe on his temples. But the essential concept remains: Jesus had dark hair, that is:
All the past forcesfields of entropy energy and future particlesclocks of the Universe are accelerated motions balanced in present inertial waves.
This principle, so stated, is what physicists dropped with a single arrow of entropy; and due to the excessive specialization of their mathematical models of enormous detail the general vision of the forest of all physical events, the equivalence principle is lost. For that reason, I have always preferred the opposite approach: to study first the forest, the principles of physics, with a limited mathematical precision, achieved by not using computers in my calculations and accepting as supreme guides the laws of the scientific method (Objectivity>Symmetric Minimalism; Linguistic Correspondence; Cyclical Experimental evidence: Œ=Mc^{2}) and the wellestablished principles in which previous theories were founded. And only at the end, once the forest is mapped, I have considered some of its specific trees in more detail.
It is thus the comprehension of the principles of equivalence between the forces of the Universe and the two types of accelerations (F=m × a) and its invariance under change of position or scale in the Universe, not the mathematical details that casts further light on the meaning of mass and charges in the Universe.
Let us then summarize so far the meaning of that principle in Newton and Einstein’s work. Newton defined that principle with a simple formula: F= m × a; that is, the forces of the Universe are made of two elements, which we must consider to be both accelerated motions. Yet since we only know two types of accelerated motions, lineal acceleration (a) and vortices of cyclical acceleration (V × radius=k), masses should be curved, accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.
This was Einstein’s view. It led him to formulate with Riemannian tensors the fourdimensional spacetime structures of gravitation and masses, measuring the structure of space under that principle in a simultaneous moment of time. Thus, he made still pictures in which we can gauge the curvature of the vortex to its finest detail, adding smaller corrections to the whole dynamic Newtonian view.
Thus, Einstein just made a more detailed analysis of Newton’s vortices of mass, turning around the sun, using Riemannian geometries and the concept of simultaneous present time. We could say in a way that he made a more precise picture, a still present photograph of the spatial form of those vortices, but the essential truth, the principle of equivalence between forces and acceleration remains the same from Newton to Einstein to fractal relativity. And so it is that principle and not the evolving mathematics of any of those three models what we have to consider in detail to fully grasp the essence of all the forces of the Universe. What fractal relativity does is to add the advances on theory of information, to go even further, respecting the work of those pioneers and founding fathers.
Now as we advance through different systems of physics we will realize that those 4 views are common to all of them, albeit, some have a better use than others. Of them the most allencompassing one is the Lagrangian Hamiltonian as it is the vision of the whole time worldview of the entity (described with the peculiar concept of energy≈ time in physics, as it should distinguish ALWAYS potential, informative and kinetic energy momentum, as it does in the detailed analysis of its quanta, the scale angular and lineal momentum. So we shall before going into those studies make an analysis of the meaning of magnitudes and conservation laws to fully graph them in terms of T.Œ.
This of course does not mean the others do not work, but as a general rule, far away perception observes wholes (you do not see the hairs of your friend coming down the road but its head and before that its whole, so the Whole –energy worldview and the head – Tƒ element, in this case Newton and Hamilton – are by far the most widely used. And for that reason we have used the Newtonian easiest perspective that comes first – the head in motion that is talking so to speak – to unify forces. In 4th line we will make copious use of the other 3.
Singularities <> Potentials, vs. wave<fields
Before we consider further elements it must be noticed that the fundamental pastfuturepast relationship of singularities is with potentials, while waves are present forms that are ‘pegged’ closely to the substrate they mold, so as in biology we tal of female waves dominant in present, 1,2,3D iterative, liquid reproductive states, and males as pastfuture head/limbs solid/gaseous, mind/entropic 54 dimensional beings, the same concept of T.œ applies to physical systems, once we understand fully the meaning of each dimension, its superoganic components, geometries, topologies and symmetries.
This means singularities’ ternary role is as a perceptive mind, as a feeding attractive vortex that ‘destroys’/feeds on potential quanta and as asocial element that ‘coordinates’ with other similar beings networks to create even larger wholes. Those are the 3 ternary roles of particles in any scale similar to those of heads and males in biological systems.
Singularities as emitters of dark entropy: faster than light decelerating neutrinos.
Of all the themes involved in the duality particle/potential, there is the theme of a black hole, center of a galaxy, whose event horizon turns at cspeed, so it must keep accelerating and indeed it shows to do show in a KER METRIC rotary black hole in its perpendicular axis, which therefore will produce as the light and matter swallowed collapses and fast evolves into heavier quarks, which should also rotate faster than light (bcdark atom, top quarks in the center). So what happens here is that while nothing can go faster than light in the udlight spacetime outside the event horizon, inside all goes faster than light rotating and finally expelling Higgs or tau neutrinos as faster than light waves. While our betadecay slower rotational quarks will produce electron neutrinos slower than light. This is the barrier that is not crossed, reason why we hardly see tau neutrinos. Then this flow decelerates as it moves faster than light between galaxies, and also tires light when traversing mounting them.
Why this is not explored has to do with the difficulties physicists have with negative square imaginary numbers. The question of the negative number and the square root solutions, seems indeed to be one of the less ‘understood’ in mathematical physics, and tells more of the inflexibility of the human brain in its onedimensional view of time and space than of the capacity of mathematics to mirror reality. Indeed, in mathematical physics we always obtain two ± solutions, and they do reflect real forms of nature, but then the physicist gets scared because it lacks proper conceptual definitions of ‘energy’, ‘mass’ and so on.
Mathematically, the Higgs field has imaginary mass and is therefore a tachyonic field. While tachyons (particles that move faster than light) are a purely hypothetical concept, fields with imaginary mass have come to play an important role in modern physics. And the answer is obvious, in the same manner a wave group speed is lower than the wave envelop, particles are always slower but the field which is the field of the dark world outside galaxies, equivalent to the 0 spin gluon – the wave CAN perfectly go faster than light and that is all what it means an imaginary mass, or rather an imaginary energy of a wavestate for a field:
Yet the taboo of illunderstod imaginary numbers and tachyon speeds is quite funny silly but absolute among nonconceptual physicists. So the negative solutions are either discharged, normalised or denied; and this has become the fundamental problem to understand the ∆±4 dark world scale beyond galaxies.
Negative energy and negative mass ARE NOT magic, but merely INVERSE TIME ARROWS, which means inverse time motions. If mass is an arrow or future vortex of information, negative mass is its inverse arrow; but alas, as mass is by definition attractive, negative mass does NOT exist, and indeed, if we see the equation, when a tachyon field, makes the denominator negative (1v2>c/C2<0), we cannot JUST put the negative above, but we can move the denominator to the left, and then we have IMAGINARY ENERGY.
The importance of NOT twisting mathematical equations which requires a better understanding of what is a allowed in an =, actually ≈, <≈> operandi of similarity NOT equality is very important to discharge all those nuisances. So what does exist is negative energy, meaning as energy is s wave moving state, tachyon ‘fields’, as the Higgs, NOT tachyon particles/masses.
Then comes the choices, as in the previous equation where we must choose either negative mass or negative energy. We have explained the obvious about mass. A negative mass is an inverse arrow of entropy. And so it is NOT a mass, as we have only attractive masses. Point. Now, regarding the negative symbols there for imaginary mass and tachyon speed, the answer is that particles are stop states, waves are moving states, thus particles do not travel faster than light but waves do, so what kind of particle is actually a wave? One, the neutrino, which plays in the ‘galaxy atom’ the role of the gluon in the atom galaxy with its 3 waves interacting with each other (reason why both symmetric forces, strong and gravitation are similar, attractive only). In that regard, the key to all this is to understand imaginary numbers and the symmetries between ±, attractive repulsive forces, beyond the very limited conceptual understanding today.
If you assume tachyons exist, then special relativity also requires that they have imaginary energy (not mass; you don’t move up the negative symbol in a similarity equation but left). Tachyons were originally proposed before we had a solid understanding of quantum theory, but does not forbid it. Physicists say it is impossible because they do not understand imaginary numbers. It merely means a topological inversion from information to entropy from cyclical to lineal from positive to negative, from life particle to death antiparticle and so on. What we both agree is that particles do NOT move faster than light, only in wave states.
And this agrees also with negative energy NOT masses. The mathematics of quantum theory is now very clear, so it is relatively straightforward to plug an imaginary mass into the equations to see what happens. When you do that and look closely the “particle” aspect of the quantum field actually travels slower than light. So what started as an idea for particles to move faster than light turns out to be something that moves slower than light. And ultimately it is a question on how much information the system carries in its stop state as a particle, vs. how much time it stays in motion as a way. Neutrinos carry less information than light, ergo stay in particle stay less time, ergo are less perceived, ergo in its wave state are more time at faster than light, and this is shown specially when coming from intergalactic sources (which is the trajectory faster than light). But faster than light neutrinos are only so as waves, and only because the cspeed is a barrier you cannot cross, when emitted as waves of ‘tau neutrinos’ in black hole top quark stars through the axis; which likely will produce a 0 scalar higgs field one axis and a 2 neutrino graviton field the other axis. But all this needs very serous maths to convince the ‘pro’ and so we shall keep it whenever we finish the third row.
Ternary roles of vortices in terms of the fifth dimension.
A FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH of 5D³ IS THE TERNARY PRINCIPLE applied to the roles systems command, and this is specially truth of the informative singularities, the mind=membrains that control the system. And as such they command with its dual singularitymembrain the rule of the system, as proteins and DNA nuclei do in cells. So do strangelet halos and black hole singularities in galaxies, and electronic covers and nuclei in atoms. And they will as such perform the 3 primary actions of entropic feeding, its inverse informative perception and its reproductive STpresent actions. As such we can study those ternary actions in organic, synoptic biological terms or in mathematical ones, through algebraic equations as physicists do, with its equation where the ‘3 numbers’/constants of those 3 functions, the phi number of reproduction, the pi number of information and the e number of feeding and death (exponential decay, which brings exponential growth to the predator entity) play a key role (we shall deal with imaginary numbers elsewhere):
INDEED, The mathematical depiction of those 3 primary actions of all systems of Nature take place Through the mathematical equations that explain the MOTIONS of ternary systems, through the two ±3 numbers, e and π and its closely related phi constant.
As a system reproduces in adjacent series on the ternary continuum of time arrows. Or when evolve socially into new scales of the fifth dimension through ternary, 3×3+1 exponential and decametric organic scales, as clone species organise in new social 5D planes.
INFORMATION – πeyes
This is little understood since for so much love of maths, as physicists do not try to match reality and maths, they miss what is important and not on the inflationary equations of maths. Two simple proofs on how much more enlightening is to refer maths to reality all the time to explain its equations:
e+e/10=3, which shows why the exponential function is the most perfect form of social evolution as ten is the perfect tetraktys form, with 3 entropic elements, 3 energetic element, 3 informative elements and the central 10th communicating them as the singularity of growing scales – reason also why the triangle is the most perfect, resistant form in space – the pythagorean perfect number when mathematical ‘things’ were simpler and easier to relate as a mirrorlanguage to reality.
In the other graph show a simpler proof of the proportion of dark, not perceived energy and matter, OUTSIDE the galactic halo of ‘strangelets’ (those things cern say do not exist but are the natural component of the surrounding dark mattermembrane of the galaxy): a Pi cycle is really the first transformation of 3 entropic lines (strings in the corrected string theory to adapt it to relational spacetime), into a time cycle, S>T, which adds a height dimension of information to form the first holographic bidimensional forms of spacetime. Yet pi is 3, 14… and 3 diameters give 3, so pi3 leaves o.14 apertures, which become the ideal openings of any disk to observe the outer Universe from it, as the galaxy is. Now, this small openings of o.14 size are only 4% of the total pi perimeter:
π3=0.14/πperimeter=4%.
So 96% of the Universe OUTSIDE the halo, is NOT perceived properly – we are blind inside a picycle. The Universe is much more complex and rich in information we shall EVER realise for the high popes of physics to be a bit more humble and cautious with their big bang experiments.
We call the ideal holes in the membrane of a system, call it pores or eyes, or ‘holes’ in the strangelet halo that allow only part of the light that comes to the galaxy to enter, πeyes.
As we cannot see through them, neither we can see the strangelet halo of dark matter, it is just an extension of the Witten hypothesis, but natural to the symmetries of scales, latter studied in more detail. Ultimately all systems do have dark spaces, including human eyes.
In the graph, the ideal πeye RANGE changes with species, as form change, but likely applies to the physical systems of bidimensional space (galactic disks) as one of the possible hypothesis on dark matter brought about by 5D³. Perception is always limited, linguistic – a mirror of the whole, but languages change on their ability to portrait the laws of ∆st
Yet likely as in any other electronic /atomic system of the lower ∆3 scale, symmetric to it, the galaxy hides part of the complex universe and ultimately regardless of the exact veracity of the πeye hypothesis, huge regions of reality do NOT interact with our world either because they are beyond an ∆discontinuum, or a Tcyclical membrane.
NonEuclidean Mathematics: the fundamental particle, the fractal pointmind (Monad).
Consider ANY Œ point of the Universe. It has 3 axis that connect the nsphere to the outside Universe. What you are? Basically a point with 3 dual apertures in the 3 ‘axis’ of the mind (see previous graph of the 3 cultural races):
2 ears forming the axis of your verbal temporal axis, and so they form the width Yaxis of time. They communicate you in parallel with other human beings who talk to you.
2 eyes forming a visual axis, and so they form the Xaxis of space and motion (ahead). They communicate you with the outside world with maximal information.
 2 nostrils on the height axis. They communicate you with the lower world that provides you energy and motion.
So you have 3 passive perpendicular axis of existence, defining your visual information, verbal social connection with other human beings and lower energy taking. And WE WILL FIND THE SAME 3 AXIS of existence in all pointparticles of each scales of the 5th dimension INCLUDING ATOMS, molecules and stars. As AMAZING as it sounds to you. You do work in the same fashion any point of the Universe works, with 3 axis that define your Dimensions of energy, information and reproductive, social evolution with other human beings. Those are your 3 passive axis that connect you with the external world. And allow you to create 3dimensional perspectives by adding bidimensional perceptions to obtain a 3dimensional vision of the informative, energetic and social elements of your existence.
And then you have your Mouth, a single element, the active opening that will allow you to develop your actions of existence.
Now you might consider absurd this nonanthropomorphic vision of the Universe, as your subjective egotrips forbids you such way of thought. But consider the absolutely minimal entity of the Universe, a light photon. It does HAVE THE SAME 3 AXIS with the same 3 VITAL FUNCTIONS, to which we can add frequency/color, the social drive of light:
Then when we study the electron and quark, the absolutely minimal particles we shall see they do have the same 4 DRIVES of existence, coded by its quantum numbers, of which the most important is SPIN, which is the informative eyes of the system, hence fixed quantum positions for perception of the social flows of information, magnetic fields that put together in order different particles making them emerge as a single whole:
In the graph, particles with the appropriate ‘inverse spin’, will ‘reproduce’ new particles. This obvious organic formal motion, however is not understood in organic terms by the abstract interpretation of mathematical physics. Hence the importance to upgrade mathematics to the NonEuclidean, fractal paradigm, as we do in T.Œ by redefining all its postulates in realist terms, and studying all its theorems and its 3 subdisciplines, which perfectly match the laws of T.Œ.:
5 Dimensional analysis, with its study of how ‘finitesimal particles’ emerge as wholes in space and time, through quanta sums and derivations; and its variational calculus and Laws of least action in timespace that define the 3 maximal, minimal and staring points or 3 ages/states of systems (Lagrangians, Hamiltonians, etc.)
Geometry and topology and fractal space, which study the structure of points into lines, networks and surfaces that move and adapt to the environment the system.
Algebra, which properly upgraded into NonAristotelian algebra of 3 relative time dimensions will truly show all the power of mathematics to express the symmetries that generate all the varieties of beings of the Universe.
So now, for each point of physical systems, galaxy, black hole, star, particle or atom, we do define always 3 relative dimensions of spacetime, which correspond to its 3 Sæ < ST ≥To functions as in any system of the Universe.
The particle might and will certainly have a field and a wave behind it, it will be a mixture of ternary topologies. But this is essential to understand what is observable and what is not, almost all THE OPENINGS OF A SYSTEM ARE ALWAYS WITHIN THE Tœ point that controls the system. All your apertures, excel the excretory ones of the body are within your mindhead, and in the case of atoms, the fundamental apertures are its spin positions:
In the graph, the minimal unit of ‘bidimensional spaceinformation’ in physical systems is a spin, the ‘eyes’ of atomic systems, which organise quantum actions into larger wholes.
Now, once we understand the ‘fractal point’, we can study its apertures, which will be 3 relative perpendicular axis, for absorption and emission of entropymotion and in/form/ation, ±∆e, i along its natural axis of motion, ∆æ, information, ∆ï and feeding on energy. Physical systems show this behaviour through the complex laws of quantum physics, where the spin is the fundamental parameter to absorb and emit information, while the plane on the equatorbelt of the system is the fundamental region of absorption and emission of energy and radiation.
The gradient of acceleration of the field will be the absorption gradient and cause of the attraction of the system, which finds a balance between gravitation and radiation, absorption and emission of formal motions, at every stage of reality. Reproductive systems are more complex as we have seen, often modulated by the spin of the system. Ultimately being the Universe a game of formal motions the mere extension of a motion means a reproductive action.
Then transfers of energy and information from those apertures in the most general case (NonAE mathematics) structure all systems, of which stars and galaxies will just be a larger one.
So we can conclude this description of it with the understanding of the 4 quantum numbers that particles obey in terms of the actions of spacetime they display to ‘exist’:
In the graph, the ∆principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the lnumber codes its form and informative gauging, ∆i, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).
The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze asses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (massmedia) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.
It is NOT the species, which are qualitative different but the way humans extract information from social masse, û, than from individuals and the LAWS OF SUPERORGANISMS, studied in the first line – the common game that makes emerge through 4th postulate of ¬æ networks a whole, indistinguishable from the mass of individuals that loose its individuality and become exchangeable, as the system handles information with general fields. The same happens as we shall observe in evolution when the Earth handles its species with massive fields of energy (changes of glaciation temperatures) that determine the accelerate evolution of its species.
Sentient Universe.
The Universe is a sum of a series of actions, ∆aeiou, of them, the first action is perception by an observer, ∆o, of a field of energy, ∆e, to which it will move, ∆a, in order to feed, ∆e and use that energy to reproduce its information, ∆i, iterating a form like itself, which will gather with clone forms to create a larger, ∆U universal social plane.
This is all what we should describe when we reduce to minimal cyclical spacetime actions the total reality of any self. But the Devil is in the details. So as this simple ‘aeiou’ game repeats itself creates ever more complex perceptions, mappings of reality into spaceforms and motions and forms ensemble into larger beings and smaller ones… forming a fractal structure. So in a second layer of complexity we would say:
The Universe is a fractal super organism of spacetime, made of ∞ super organisms all made to its image and likeness. Each super organism IS MADE of 3 ∆º ternary physiological networks, made of smaller ∑∆1 ‘atoms/cells/individuals’ that process motion, information and reproduce for the whole system, living in a larger ∆+1 world.
Thus super organisms have two fundamental elements: 3 co3existing ±1 planes of cells/atoms/individuals gathering into physiological networks (together forming a species), living in a larger ∆+1 world: ∆§
But those super organisms constantly change its parameters of motion and form, increasing its information warping in a world cycle of time, the ‘3rd fundamental element’, which is therefore symmetric to those physiological networks, as the informative network dominates the other ones, increasingly ‘warping’ the being, either a physical system (so stars become black holes, galaxies quasars, matter solids) or a biological system (3rd age), which then returns back in an explosion that erases its energy (physical E<≈>M Big Bang, or biological death or war, in the 3 type of systems).
Each language perceives a partial truth.
But why there are brains that absorb tiny flows of motion and convert it into still form, called information? To perceive, move, feed and survive.
As all in the game of existence, because to accumulate information helps you to survive, to locate energy and feed and continue the game of existence.
What information does is to offer an organism maps of the Universe, virtual worlds, complex representations of reality, with a lot of formal detail, that map out the Universe and helps the organism to survive. All organisms perceive and react to information in one or other manner, and we call that property of organic systems, perception.
The flows of energy that become information in the brains of organisms, cause the organism to react to the external universe. That is the second arrow of life.
After feeding, organisms transform energy into information and react organically to that information. Bear in mind though that information comes in many shapes and forces. So each brain perceives a different information, a different map of the Universe…
IN ANY CASE, the whole program of actions of the Universe – not only the SIMPLEST action, motion is what truly makes the Universe organic, and as it can be proved that those actions depart form the singularities, those at the minds of the Universe. Let us remember those actions studied in its specific posts.
SO we shall be able to consider through the actions of the beings, which are all similar in search of survival, the existence of singularityminds in all of them.
Thus those are the fundamental biotopologic principles of reality derived of the organic coexistence of scales, topological forms of space, logic search for symmetric beauty, through 5 Dimensions expressed in 5 actions by the will of sentient singularities… Now we shall deal with the correction of the errors of the humind, because when you don’t know how to speak the language, your typewriting will always go slow, full of grammatical faults so we have to change the ‘language’ of the typewriter – aka physicist, as the ‘languages of God are infinite’ Upanishads.
1. Γ GENERATOR
CONSERVATION PRINCIPLE: LINEAL, ANGULAR MOMENTUM & ENERGY
The fundamental element of any system is its vital energy, enclosed by a 2D angular momentummembrane selfcentered into a 1D singularity, establishing the essential equation of all systems: 1D singularity + 2 D membrane = 3D vital energy, and the 3 conserved ‘fractal quantities’ of any super organism of spacetime, angular momentum (2D membrane), lineal momentum (motion of the singularity) and energy (volume enclosed and managed between them).
This is the simplest structure we find in all scales of nature, from atomic systems with an electronic membrane and a nucleus singularity enclosing fields of gravitational and electromagnetic energy, to cells with protein membranes, DNA singularities and vital energy enclosed in cytoplasms, to nations, with a hardmilitary border, a capitalsingularity and a vital energy of middle working reproductive class, to galaxies with a halo of strange, dark matter, a center of top quark black holes and the stars, mitochondria that reproduce them both, to yourself with a sling membrane a nervous brain singularity and a reproductive body.
The simplest mathematical representation will be then a 3D volume of an open sphere, constrained by an angular momentum and beating at the rhythm of its singularity clock of frequency=1/t.
Yet when we extend the system to different scales of reality, from the ‘o1’ unit sphere into the 1∞ larger world, we need to add the ternary structure of systems in 3 planes of existence.
THE FRACTAL GENERATOR. A NONÆ= ILOGIC EQUATION.
Thus to the ternary symmetry of the 3 fractal conserved quantities that structure fractal spacetime organisms, we must add the ternary symmetry of relative past, smaller faster micro cells/atoms/individuals, which code with its information and generate larger beings, with less speed/informative capacity, which enclose the whole being during its ‘present’ existence but explode and desegregate in the moment of death, establishing 2 new dimensions of spacetime, and defining a world cycle between generation in the ∆1 seed scale and death back in the entropic death of the whole membrane. It is this whole system described both in topological space through the 3 adjacent parts conserved, in scales through the 3 coexisting organizations at cellular/atomic, thermodynamic/individual and ecosystemic/gravitational scale and its 3 ‘time ages’ between the ∆+1 generational phase, which gives birth to 3 periods of dominance of limbs/motions or youth, reproductive body waves or maturity and 3r old age of informative dominated by particleheads, and the ∆1 entropic death what the Generator equation describes in a synoptic manner, unifying all forms of reality.
The Universe is a fractal of 3 elements, informative space, entropic time and its vital present energetic combinations.
All fractals can be defined by a generator equation that repeats the fractal in smaller and larger scales. The vital fractal of the Universe does so, and so we can write a ternary generator with its 3 elements that reproduce in feedback motionform processes all the systems of the Universe.
Let us then consider the ternary a(nti)symmetries that create the vital fractal of the Universe:
∑ð¡1<Ø¡>§¡+1
Now, we must become acquainted with the simplest symbols of ilogic geometry, the mathematical and logic formalism that represents the fractal Universe and it ternary a(nti)symmetries.
The symbolism of the previous, very simplified expression of the fractal generator of time space organisms, shows some of those anti symmetries, specifically the scalar ∆±¡ symmetry, the  xO=Ø topological symmetry and the time symmetry from relative entropic past, < to present, ≈ to future >.
We then define space as form, information hold in a fractal point or singularity of information that acts as a whole as it travels through the 3 scales of the system: §@i+1
This vortex system through time scales is thus our pole of information, mind or world, summit of the fifth dimension evolution of scales OR MIND.
At the other extreme we have the infinite time pool from where a pace has been ‘formed’, in permanent cyclical motion, seen as parts of it by the imperfect still volume of the mindpoint: ð¡1
A more complex detailed view, would ad ∑, a symbol for a disjoined sum of cyclical organisms, as the mind, a still, connected network, ∏, which reduces those time cycles to ‘parts’ or lines, O≈ and maps them into a ‘still language’, to get then a more descriptive equation
∑ð¡1<O≈:Ø¡>∏ §¡+1
Thus a sum of time cycles ∑ð¡1, are perceived from a generator smaller scale into an emergent single organism or bodywave, whose cyclical part made of smaller dimensions of information, §¡+1 perceives it all as a mind whole.
In the next graphs we express all those elements together focusing in the generator equation of the human being:
$=ð: DIMENSIONS OF INFORMATION:
HEIGHT AND FREQUENCY OF SPEEDANGULAR MOMENTUM
It follows that in all systems information is maximized and evolved towards the topological height of the system. Let us put 2 examples, from physical and biological systems.
Now for detailed analysis of the S=T symmetries and SCALAR parts of a physical system it is better to use the formalism of the fractal generator. Let us consider then the fractal generator of the 3±∆ physical Dimensions.
Plane Generators of physical ðime§paœrganisms.
From one comes 2, from 2 comes 3, from 3 the infinite beings. Cheng Tzu
After this minimal themes treated here at conceptual level – the meaning and metrics of the 5^{th} dimension, the dualities and beats of space and time, the topologies and ternary structures of its physical systems… let us introduce…
The Generator equation of physical systems.
It describes all possible events, symmetries and forms across:
 The 3 ∆1 quantum, electromagnetic, ∆ømagnetic thermodynamic and ∆+1 cosmic gravitational scales
 The 3 ages of time between vortex formation and bigbang extinction, M(t)<=> E of all physical systems
 Its 3 topœrganic varieties, in those 3 scales as Sp (potentialsgas electrons) < ExI (wavesliquidquark matter) > Tƒ (particlescrystalsblack holes),
 Its 5 actions/motions: ±∆e (motionenergy feeding), ±∆I (gauging of information, communication) and ∑œ>û, iteration and social evolution into Universal wholes.
So the generator of physical systems, its ‘cyclical spacetime’ actions of its ternary 5D fractal dimensions resumes the entire field of astrophysics, and shows those physical systems also obey the isomorphic laws of all T.œ scales; and the physical generators are no different so they all come from:
T.Œ’s GENERATOR
The fractal generator: The symbolism of the ternary symmetry
All fractals have a generator feedback equation and the Universe is not exception.
Let us then write the fractal generator of time motions, the fact that time never stops, and it has 3 varieties of motionsforms that switch into each other ad eternal into an equation, we shall call the generator equation of the Universe. It merely states that Spe<, pastentropy, >Tiƒ utureinformation and its combined, ≈X presentrepetitions, the 3 flows of time constantly switch into each other, ad eternal: Spe<=X=>Tiƒ
Generators are dynamic, cyclical equations, which constantly create slightly changed new ‘cycles’. As such they are periodic cyclical equations of the form X < = > Y, where obviously X and Y are symbols as in all ‘Universal grammars’ linguistic representations of the Universal Generator (mathematical jargon in Spacetime) or Universal Grammar (Logic Jargon in Timespace). So what is the Generator equation of the Universe? Easy the inverse metrics of time and space, written as the metrics of the fifth dimension, shown as a hyperbolic graph, origin of the existential algebra of the Universe and all other equations:
Γ. Universal Generator≈Grammar: Spe x Tiƒ = Constant Spacetime: SpePast<Presentspace>Futuretime
The many iterations, combinations, dual forms, inverse equations, derived metrics and symmetries of spacetime originated by that equation will be enough to explain the meaning of it all. Trust me (;
A closer conceptualization to the worlds used by physicists would be:
‘The universe is a fractal of infinite beings of entropy and information”
And even closer:
‘Energy never dies, its transforms itself back and forth between entropy and Information ad eternal’.
The physical generator is a variety of the T.Œ Generator Equation that represents all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:
Γ.Œ Generator: ∆1: Potential entropy> ∆³o: Lineal $pe motion (limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ExI (repetitive wavesbodies) > Spherical Tƒ (head Particles)> ∆+1: singularity<World
Those are the five dimensions of any system, the 4th of entropy and death, the lower substrata, the 3 spacetime topological dimensions of the organic being, and the 5th dimension, the singularity that connects it with the external world through its sensorial openings in its membrain.
And physical systems should not be different from a social nation or an organic cell, in those elements. It is only the human view on them, which makes it look so different.
The Stelement is the presentlarger one, as limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.
But when observed from the point of view of the ∆+1 particle, which merely uses the flat space to absorb energy, we often perceive:
∆1: quanta of accelerated Splineal motion ≤ Bidimensional waves: ∆> ∆+1: tridimensional spherical particle.
Finally when perceived in time, those 3 elements they define a world cycle that first converts entropy of the field into a wave that reproduces and collapses into a 3^{rd} age or particle of information which will finally explode back in a bigbang that converts the particle into an energy field. So we can write:
Entropyenergy<≈ cwave ≈> To (Masscharge)
In the graph, the logic of spacetime systems, is more complex than the simple causality of Aristotelian logic, used to prove the consistency of mathematical statements. To start with all systems are points with parts, which the mind can see in stillness or motion, and belong to 3 possible topologies, already understood by the Greeks in its treatises on conics.
So we talk of bidimensional space perceived as ‘entropy’ or energy motion along the dimensions of width and length, and bidimensional time cycles, perceived as still information or frequency motion, in the dimension of height and length. It is of the combination of both fields, how a ternary system in space with motion, or 4D element of reality appears. So we observe always fields/limbs of energy moving heads/particle so information due to the topological properties of nspheres (which store maximal information in minimal space) and lineal planes (which move faster between two points).
What matters to understand of every and each parameter of the main arrows of time of the main scales of physical systems in the Universe are its basic relationship equations that give us the key to understand how the three arrows of each scale and system can merge together into social organisms of larger or coexisting scales. So let us try to make a nonexhaustive catalog of them, according to scale and class (Spe, St or Tƒi):
Tiƒ: Planckton>charge>mass
ST: cspeed>electric flow>density flow
Spe: potential field (quantum potential, electric potential gravitational field).
Physical systems are basically ternary systems of particleshead in each scale which are complementary to a reproductive waveform, either as wholeness of an internal waveform or as particles of a larger ∆+1 wave. Often both, which together prey over a potential gradient ‘Poisson’ field, which they use to move and slide but at the same time are constrained by the conservative – preferred ‘least time’ paths/actions possible on those fields.
It comes then as an essential element of physic ∆nalysis, which studies with a reduced number of differential equations, each of them a partial case of the allowed subequations of the Generator, THE POSSIBILITIES of exchange of entropy, energy and information of a physical ternary system with similar systems in the ∆º±1 physical scales.
The ‘Generator’ equation of spacetime beings and its ternary logic.
Unfortunately the beats of the universe are difficult to understand because the logic of present man, especially that of physicists seems ‘lineal Aristotelian’: A causes B.
Reality though is more like the Eastern philosophies of Vishnuyininformation and Shivayangenergy/motion:
A<=>B, that is A and B interact to create a ternary <=> present element.
Reason why there is conservation of Angular and Lineal Momentum, there is Space and Time, Energy and Information, OParticles/Heads that store time cycles and limbs/fields that move them, mixed in bodies and waves that reproduce both of them.
Humans of course, naturally have always expressed this ‘Ternary’ Structure of the universe.
And so the parallel syntax of the languages of knowledge we use to describe those Universal beings – verbal, mathematical and visual languages – all have the same ternary ‘grammar’, which I have called the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe:
Tƒ (Subject or Function of ‘temporal information’) < ST: action, operandi or verb ≥ Sp (Object of ‘spatial energy’).
We associate counterintuitively ‘cycles with motion’ and ‘lines with Still space’.
It has to do a lot with the limiting errors of classic physics, where only lineal inertial motion matters. Fact is bigbang explosion DECELERATE speed till it becomes Still lineal distances and dimensions, that is pure lineal space with no motion or vacuum space (as in any physical bigbang of entropy). While the equation of cyclical vortex, is Vo x Ro = K (2manifold, simplest variety), which counterintuitively accelerates (∆V) when distance becomes smaller, (∆R) to maintain K constant.
Thus clocks, frequencies and vortices accelerate ,and have more ‘time’ content, that lineal motions that decelerate to a halt.
Now, we explained before that in duality Space was slower, extensive, Sp, Size, and time was faster, cyclical, accelerated (so are its maths). But now in ternary symmetry we have the need to ‘extend’ the meanings of time and space to the duality of the 3 motions of time and the 3 organic parts of spatial bodies and this makes some confusing choices of terms, such as:
Space will be the still, formal view of reality and Time the motion view. And so we shall talk of 3 ‘topologies of formal space’, and 3 ‘ages of time motion’, which together shape the fundamental duality of reality, the view of organs in simultaneous space and the view of beings living a worldcycle of 3 ages of time:
Sp (limbsfields)≈ Young, past, expansive age < ST: Present, repetitive, hyperbolic bodywaves, adult reproductive age>Tƒ (Temporal, future informative, cyclical old age).
Now here the convention I have adopted is to Use the same symbols for either symmetries, the limbfield<bodywave>headparticle or spatial simultaneous view of an organism in space, and the Youngpastexpansive < presentAdultreproductive>OldInformative 3 ages of time.
This is where things seem confusing because the whole thing transmutes. The old age of future time has more information and it is cyclical, properties of time cycles, but it is also slower, property of space decelerating motions. The young expansive age has more motion, a property of time more than space and so on.
But as I have told you B & W and 3 color view are new worlds, and this is the closest way to express past references and correspond with human expression of all this.
A way out to avoid confusions with the ternary symmetry is to use more when dealing with the still, simultaneous spatial view, the ‘symbols of geometrytopology, , O and Ø:
Limbs/fields < Øwavesbodies> OHeads/Particles
And the same for time ages with the reference of time motions:
young past < Øpresent, reproduction > OInformation, future, old age.
So it shows the symmetry with the symbols  , Ø, and O.
If in the future anyone goes through my 30 years of research in all this, they will then find that I profusely use those symbols.
But trust me if you really understand T.Œ which is more a question of mental attitude, the understanding will be clear from the beginning.
GENERATOR EQUATION THROUGH PHYSICAL SCALES OF THE 5^{TH} DIMENSION
Next then among the absolute inevitable concepts of vital mathematical physics comes the duality and ternary symmetry between potential fields, waves and particles, the essential generator of physical systems in the lower scale matched by the gaseous, liquid solid states.
Particlewavefield states
So we come to the conclusion that both from the internal pov of the mind and the external pov, the unit of time cycles is the measure of an action, which as the mind singularity is not perceived, will consist on an energy ‘bodywave’ measure and a frequency of the external membranebit of time of the being – measure.
In the graph we see the duality waveparticle in it’s simplest form. Stop and go is thus the duality of motion and form coupled to the particle wave duality, sleepcurled/moving beat of life, and so on.
But either in wave state or particle state we measure basically the cyclical angular momentum/lineal speed of the being and its informative/energetic body/waveparticle density.
And to those terms we shall refer all values of physics which will be mostly ternary equations that relate the entropy/energy/information of the system, where the mind is not considered, and as humans ‘ab=use’ nature, they do throw out the singularity – do not even believe it exists – as it has no motion, entropy which is what we use.
And vice versa, they convert fast entropy motion into formal energy which is what we use mainly from nature.
It is though important to notice that regardless of the entropic, limbs/fields that might be external to the being, the being will be if it is anything complex dual, with a wavebody and a particlehead spatially as two parts of the being (graph) that switch in one or other state, and if it is extremely simple, it will transform into each state sequentially in time.
However again, we often do not distinguish both components (remember the singularity tends not to be observable); and we confuse the particle state (curled spiral) with the particle as a whole and the lineal state, with the wave as a whole.
On practical terms it means we will either because the system is so simple that switches on and off between both states, or because we see the whole in both ‘actions’ as moving waves or informative stopped particles, find as the fundamental equation of physical systems, a relationship of equality between the particle and wave states:
wave ≈ particle
Thus become the essential principle of complementarity. What about the field? As the field is only ‘perceivable’ when the wave ‘travels through it’, imprinting its form, using it as the entropy of motion, or the particle absorbs it to perceive through it information, we shall also find even if they are often ‘different beings’ in different scales, equations of the type:
particle ≈ field; wave≈field
As in Schrodinger’s equation, and its polar, pilot wave formulae (particle=field form).
There is though a simple rule to determine the 3 states: max. frequency=max. information = particle state; minimal density of information=field state, which is crystal clear in the light spectrum.
5D Cosmology. The fractal Generator: Sp<≈>Tƒ
Perhaps the most extensive field of T.Œ is astrophysics – the study of the scales of matter. It is in fact the one I have researched more after the superorganism of history, despite or perhaps because they are not the selfevident biological planes of existence, where T.œ fits directly like a glove to an entangled hand, Einstein permitted (;
We want to bring in this introduction only one theme, with many branches, the fractal scalar nature of physical space, along planes of the fifth dimension and once we generate its equation deduce from it the Unification equation of charges and masses, the Saint Grail of mathematical physics, searched for a century with no results (as they are time vortices of 2 different, limiting scales of the Universe) and then the bigbang cosmology and finally the question of the waveparticle conundrum of quantum physics and the meaning of Universal constants. They are the 4 most researched themes of physics, and that is the reason why we shall do a fast survey of 5D improvements on them.
Let us consider it briefly before describing biological systems with the same Generator equation of 5D fractal spacetimes.
The particle state: masses and charges: vortices of time: clocks of information. Tœs.
This gives origin in physics to certain modes of ‘future’ cyclical time vortices, spin numbers, photons, strong quarks, electrons, charges, magnetic moments, thermodynamic molecules, masses, angular momentums, cosmic bodies, solar systems, ud stars, strange stars and top black holes, galaxies and Great Attractors, which are the ‘Tƒ’ elements of all those scales and subscales, between the minimal observed form, a fermion spin and the maximal one, the Great Attractor region of the Local Universe.
They are all subvortices of the 4 fundamental Planes of the Universe, where the 4^{th} is only partially perceived (the cosmic scale outside galaxies of ‘neutrino strings’ ‘Higgs bosons’, dark energy and dark matter), but we do have more vortices than the 3 perceived ones, the electromagnetic, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, as we must apply the ternary principle and break each of the 3 fundamental scales in 3 subscales).
So Einstein, used those nonEuclidean geometries that make lines part of a bigger time cycle to study the curved masses of the Universe. And he said ‘time curves (lineal) space into (cyclical) masses’, which he defined with the Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravitational mass.
Thus as time curved space into masses, it accelerated gravitation into cyclical vortices. And gravitational, lineal forces became masses the simplest clocks of the Universe; whose attractive ‘masspower’, was proportional to the frequency of its cycles: M = k ƒ.
This duality of mass vortices and expansive entropy, which already Descartes foresaw, when he affirmed that all what existed were res extensa (space) and vortices of time (masses, charges, galaxies) is the ultimate meaning of the dual equation E<=>Mc^{2}:
3 CONSERVATION LAWS IN PRESENT ST.
Let us start with a visual, topologic analysis of the dimensions of spacetime. There are first 3 normal dimensions, which instead of being heightlength and width (latter we shall see how they actually have the same function), they are the 3 topological varieties of the Universe: spherical, planar and hyperbolic forms. And so in a single plane of reality, we perceive systems as ensembles of the 3 varieties of space, to which we add the 2 scalar dimensions of entropic parts, and social wholes.
Conservation laws of the 3 elements of a present system.
And so how physicists go around into this third degree of complexity, space, time and spacetime elements to conform reality and conserve it? Through the conservation laws.
Indeed in any scale of physics, all reduces to 3 present conservation laws, related to the 3 dimensions of simultaneous systems, between its entropic POTENTIALS that will dissolve the being, and its informative vortex seeds that will create it:
– 3D Energy conservation of the vital bodywave; 2D angular momentum conservation of the external membrane, and 1D lineal momentum conservation, or relative still position, of the central singularity.
Now how this is described in abstract mathematical physics IS interesting, because it further proves the inverse arrows of the fifth dimension, with more information paradoxically in the small quantum scales than in the larger ‘invisible wholes’. And we shall return to it. After bringing up 5D/4d metric. In present though the absolute law is that of a dynamic balance between those 3 parts:
S≤≥T; creation of form and motion dimensions and its balances.
The Universe is a superorganism of 5 dimensions of symmetric spacetime. Whereas time means motion and space form. Yet since due to Galilean>Einstein’s relativity we cannot distinguish motion from form, for each dimension of space, we must consider a symmetric dimensions of time (the form we see in motion).
Since as we can only compare entities with equal number of dimensions we must write:
S<≈>T
as the fundamental law of the Universe, which is display in all kind of beings.
The equivalent of this law of balance in physics, is a Lagrangian of the form:
Sp (size in space) x Tiƒ (speed of time clocks of information) = Constant
∫S=T∂st=0
And or, the laws of conservation of momentum: S x T (mv, etc.), and energy its integral in a closed cycle.
Two simple laws of conservation and least time in which all of physics is based; albeit explained with complicated ‘pedantic’ obtuse laws, such as the Noether theorem, group theory, etc. which obviously need them to go back to school and learn what the magic of maths and the origin of those laws are in 10D.
This is the law of balance and coexistence of reality that make humans and civilisations coexist as single super organisms. Cells and organisms coexists in a single individual, and so, the Universe is a beautiful organic, fractal of scales of reality which follow the same goals of reproducing information to become immortal in ‘states of balance’. And those laws apply also to history and economy systems that should try to find such balances to survive.
Thus we can start studying beings of one dimension of space and one dimension of timemotion, simultaneously. As reality re
Reality is a 10 dimensional game of space and time, based in a physical property called Galilean relativity. The fact that we cannot distinguish motion and form, so both dimensions of motion=time and form=space, happen together. This holographic symmetry makes reality a game of N s=t dimensions, which create spacetime symmetries, go and stop motions and sets the stage to study dual st systems of at least 2 dimensions, one of spaceform one of timemotion and the ‘reproductive’ perception of both together, the ‘third dimension of spacetime’.
Starting with those simple principles then we can build different systems of bidimensional frames of reference, starting from the 2 simplest studied by human scientists, mostly physicists, the bidimensional system of motion and form, whereas humans have adopted by convention, according to natural reasons, latter studied in detail, the dimension of length as the first dimension of motion, to measure motions, distances and trajectories in space and the dimension of height as the first dimension of form, of information.
It follows then that we must keep labelling dimensions and use bidimensional or fourdimensional graphs of time space, where by the simple method of giving twice the dimensionality to each one, i.e. distance and motion, define lineal space and lineal time, in the X coordinates, height and vibration, are ‘motion spacetime related dimensions’ of height.
In general also we can use algebraic conventions to represent those dimensions. So we give negative values to the dimension of information and positive values to the dimension of motion, and in this manner we can rest and operate in classic algebra. So for example, in Einstein’s special relativity the dimension of motion sums in the Sx, Sy, Sz coordinates and the dimension of temporal information, of motion, ct, rests. This is a classic way to represent the inverse first dimensions of space and time all together, and why Einstein’s equation work.
We can then move to tridimensional pairs, for 6 dimensions and so on, let us then study them in an exhausting manner, realizing of a simple algebraic rule: time dimensions can be modelled with negative numbers that rest to space dimensions by adding motion to a form, and vice versa. We adopt this convention as it suits better present mathematical physics. Then the second dimensions of negative time is the icomplex map, or its ‘squared’ value, recommended in many physical equations (where the unit is i²=1, c²= k/µ and so on).
Those are different conventions which we shall study in mathematical physics, but show the way the Universe is built up: adding balanced S=t dual dimensions according to the Galilean paradox.
The ternary structure of PHYSICAL supœrganisms.
Now we must fully grasp the ‘open ball’ topology of those supœrganisms before we even attempt to measure them:
In the graph most physical systems have the perfect, simpler topology of an open ball of ‘vital energy’ (a wave or field with motion) surrounded by a clocklike membrain, centred in a singularitymind, communicated through networks that carry messages of information between both. In extremely sophisticated systems as humans are this is wellestablished by medicine and selfconsciousness. In other ‘atomic systems’ the same electronic messengers of our nervous systems do exist as flows of ‘liquid information’ in different forms from van der waals forces on crystal to plasma flows in stars. The fifth dimension of the system, which coordinates its clocks to control the inner territory and open its vision to the external world is thus the sum of the singularity and its membrane, and the invaginated ‘radial’ elements that connects them together.
We shall not enter in themes of the consciousness of a singularity or membrane but just state the obvious: both are connected and rule over the vital space that provides them energy for its rotational motion.
Your mind is your linguistic singularity and your sensorial membrane but you do not feel the cells you control.
If panpsychism, the only logic theory of perception, and overwhelming in all human societies, except when the pedantic idealist school of wien invented ‘logical positivism’, which Einstein and this writer believe in, is truth, the singularity is a mathematical brain, as computers have them, and in the same way your mindlanguage, thought is your ego, ‘cogito ergo sum’, physical systems should ‘calculo ergo sum’.
In any case, the essence of all singularities as mindmappings of the system is that they create a still perceptive mapping (which is what i consider conscious) of the Universe, not only with form but with a quantic stop and go motion similar to that of your eyebrain system.
So this stopgo, still mapping must be taken into account as the clear origin of the duality of relativity of motion and stillness of perception to study physical systems, because it DOES happen also on them, and DO solve major whys such as the origin of relativity, the constancy of cspeed, entanglement etc.
3 proofs of panpsychism for each of those 3 scales, now that we know the ‘structure’ of the physical entity:
∆+3: when a ‘mass’ is sent around with motion the centre of gravity or ‘masssingularity’ DOES NOT MOVE in the trajectory of the being. And physicists do not have any ‘rational explanation’ to it. The centre of the black hole takes time to zero, meaning it creates a still point.
∆+1: In thermodynamics when a crystal is formed, immediately if it is regular, the relative centre of perception will start to reproduce the configuration of the system and start to form new cells of the crystal. And all and the only crystal 7 configurations of reality as the graph shows ARE in fact regular systems.
Only those who allow a potential singularity in its centre to form an image exist. And of them, the commonest are the cubic and hexagonal, where the angles of perception allow a better tridimensional mapping.
A thermodynamic vortex has zero motion in its centre, as you saw in the film vortex.
∆1: In the graph, you my friend are nothing more than the complex consciousness of your electronic mind networks, which again are forms with motion, constrained by a membrain, and scanning all the axis of our 4dimensional Universe. While a second axis/force, connects them with another ∆scale with a different speed of space and form of information (magnetic, electric duality; chemical, electric duality of languages in cells; gravitational, electromagnetic forces in galaxies, weak and strong forces in nuclei, etc.)
Thus what truly is fascinating is what happens in the center of those vortices, as the UNIVERSE MUST constantly balance INTO AN ETERNAL PRESENT OF CONSERVED ENERGY, as motion comes to zero. But then again, we must balance the motion stillness two phases of the outer and inner centre of the vortex of future, as time exists in an eternal present:
‘Present Energy never dies, it transforms itself back and forth from entropy into information: S<e>T”
So if we break as we can always do the event of a motion through the singularity of a charge, mass or thermodynamic eddie, into 3 topological timespace ages, we have the arrow of future acceleration, inwards, pushed by the accelerated vortex Vo x Ro = k, towards the singularity where R becomes zero and the being stops into a still mind of informative mind mapping perception/gauging of information.
Thus to balance the act there must be an axial, inverse, entropic, lineal motion coming out of the axis of all those eddies, with a speed higher than the speed of entrance in the system, which is ‘rotational’, always ‘slower in distancespeed’ (remember both things are the same by the paradox of galileo, e pur si muove no muove) than the axial line.
So we shall find the magnetic momentum, the electric flow, the dark entropy v>c expanding space flow coming out of the rotational hyperluminal axis of the black hole… which will balance the law of ‘ternary eternal presents, where past and future, flux’ for any of those physical systems.
In the graph we see the polar axis flow on an ∆1: quantum electron an ∆ thermodynamic earth and an ∆+1 gravitational black hole.
In all of them a lower v(∆1) > v(∆), the mind will ‘shit’ a line with higher speed and lesser information according to the metric equation of the scalar Universe; Spe x Tiƒ= K, which hold within the 3 SCALES of any ∆±1 supœrganism of the Universe.
It follows from all of this, except for ‘believers’ in idols of the tribe of physics, that past the event horizon the black hole vortex of accelerated future time must by force be faster, hence speed up towards the center at v>c speeds, till producing an invisible (as we cannot see faster than light), tachyon flow, as the metric equations of a Kerr black hole show and the galactic jets that reach 10c proof. And of course, physicists stuck on the ‘limited’ model of Einstein that only works on the light spacetime support of the light star galaxy will not have.
WE SHALL latter have relativity revis(it)ed and show you when you finally learn after 400 years the meaning of imaginary numbers as experimental inverse time numbers, why there is zero contradiction with relativity when considering the ∆±4 scale hyperluminal, both in the hypermasive top quarks, top quark stars, aka black hole and dark entropy, aka expansive space between galaxies.
The new law of conservation of energy + the 3±¡ scales of supœrganisms=worldcycles.
As in all other systems the organic, coexisting ternary structure of physical systems implies that they go also through worldcycles of existence between the seminal age of birth in a lower scale of the system (∆1; plasma for thermodynamical systems, light spacetime for quantum systems, black holes for galaxies), evolve fully into a supœrganism – (∆particle, matter state, galaxy) immersed into a larger world, and finally die back to the original scale.
This is resumed best for gravitational systems by the Entropy < cc > vortex of temporal information (masses) equation; for thermodynamic systems by the equations of the 3 states of matter.
In quantum physics, it is the schrodinger equation, as expressed by the realist pilotwave theory which includes the ∆1 quantum nonlocal field of the ‘dark world’ scale’. Thus the wave state of present is the schrodinger equation in its classic format, and the past to future, quantum field to particle, S>t state is expressed by the same equation in polar format. Yet quantum is still in its ‘copenhagen interpretation’ that denies the quantum field, missing 1/3rd and so its generator equation is not yet fully understood.
The three arrows of time to define all systems and events both in time and space. We call the equation of the three arrows/actions of timespace, the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe, as it is a feedback equation whose constant motions back and forth ‘web’ all the systems and events of reality.
It is bond to become in the III millennia what Galileo’s equation of the same three elements, V(st)=S/T, was for the philosophy of science of physicists in terms of pure motions.
For physical systems in space, its Fractal generator, with its ternary principle implies the coexistence of 3 parts that form a whole.
In time, the new complex ternary principle is the coexistence of 3 spacetime ages and its complex causality: Pastentropy>Present, reproduction of ExI>FutureInformation << Pastentropy (Death).
And finally in 5D the ternary complex principle is the coexistence of 3 scales of spacetime together, with growing spatial size and diminishing speed in its time cycles. The result is the world cycle of physical exi≈st¡ences:
In the graph, the application of 5D ðime§pace to physical systems DEFINES the 3±1 arrows/dimensions ages of all physical scales, made of timespace beings, known as states of matter or for the whole galaxy or perhaps Universe solutions to Einstein’s equations (bigbang, steady state and bigcrunch).
Now again we have included the arrow of information to the arrow of entropy, found its intermediate, present conservative energy phase and converted Einstein’s worldlines in 4d into the much reacher in meanings 5D³ worldcycle.
Full trajectories through the existence of the being ARE ‘world cycles’ NOT worldlines as physicists have it in only 4 dimensions, where time is ∂t=∂s/∂v, an instantaneous ‘derivative’ of present, made of continuous motions in a single scale, without the changes of phase that happen in the whole world cycle when the system changes its parameters.
The worldlines of physicists are a simplified version of the time flow of a being, restricted merely to its translations in space, defined by the steps of present of the previous equation in both galilean and Einstein’s relativity and as such are worth to know motions in space, BUT NOT INFORMATIVE motions=changes in the form of beings, and as physicists only recognise timemotions as translations in space (SO TIME APPEARS to them a fourth dimension of space), this has caused an enormous confusion and halting the proper evolution of our scientific analysis of time.
So all physical, biological and social systems do follow a world cycle of life and death of entropy, reproduction and information, of 3 ages:
We can see as all systems are born exceedingly small as a seminal seed that reproduces in a lower scale of space, with higher motion, the simpler the system is, with no motion at all in those systems who are so dense (as black holes in galaxies, or life beings in atoms), which require a huge amount of time to reproduce a single unit (life beings) or merely suck in with its attractive force all other beings that move around it, and provide ‘food of reproduction’ (black hole case).
In the simplex paradigm of a single timespace continuum physics, where the world cycle is reduced to a single dimension of time, hence a line, and a worldline, the ternary topology is of null importance except in the most advanced models of general relativity, which also provide deep insights in the cyclical nature of NATURE’S time clocks, masses and charges with its principle of equivalence.
E<CC>M is the main equation of the three arrows of time in physics.
As, Einstein obtained first that equation in its inverse form: M=E/c², in his paper ‘can energy create mass?’ whereas E should read entropy, being the waveenergy the constant plane of light spacetime, cc.
And he added, ‘the separation between past, present and future is an illusion’. So did Feynman, with its deep insight on the 3 ‘time arrows’ of particle physics: present, reproductive waves of lightspace and ‘bosons’, past arrows of entropic antiparticles and future arrows of informative particles that last much longer in time. So another fascinating, ‘immediate’ equation of 5D physics are the equations of life and death for all systems of the Universe such as:
Life arrow: Max. Time duration x Min. Space extension: Max. T x Min. S
Death arrow: Max. Space expansion (bigbang, dissolution of organisms into cells and atoms) x Min. Time (instant of death).
Yet again, the sum of both: Max. T x Min. S + Max. S x Min. T = 0sum, which makes all scales and closed systems of the Universe eternal presents. In physics this is the meaning of Feynman’s diagram:
Pastantiparticle x Futureparticle = Present light wave, whereas particles last max. Time as they collapse space into minimal size and antiparticles last minimal time while they expand space annihilating particles in the moment of death.
As such Feynman’s work is more advanced that the outdated entropy theory and the so much praised Einstein’s revolution of spacetime, who still missed, the ternary fractal, multiple Nature of times and the existence of its 3 time arrows. He simply ‘froze’ spacetime in present slates to measure with differential equations (by definition infinitesimal moments) as Galileo did, every instant of an external time=change = physical motion.
Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic bigbang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of spacetime actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3rd time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.
Physical worldcycles: states of matter.
Those 3 time arrows/motions can be assembled into organic systems of any kind, can interact as they do in quantum physics forwards and backwards and put together coexist in all kind of systems made of:
Sp:’Past, entropic fieldslimbs'<SThyperbolic bodywaves>TƒParticles/heads of information that guide the system to its future.
In the human ∆º thermodynamic scale those arrows are more obvious:
The 3 temporal dimensions or ‘states’ of matter, Spegaseous, energetic states, ST, liquid balanced states and Tƒ informative solid states, form together the 3rd isomorphism of molecular matter in its ∆+1 social scale. They define the three arrows of timespace of matter at the human scale. As such the equation of worldcycles of thermodynamics are generated by a simple fractal generator of states:
$pe: ∆+1: 5D: absolute Past (plasma)<emergence: ∆º:2D $(young gas)>3D S≈T(present Liquid)>1D: ð:Informative crystal>∆+1: Still future: Condensate
Generator Equation of physical systems and its scales. Fractal spacetime beings.
So the conclusion of the proper understanding of spacetime cycles, its lineal flows and networks is obvious. We do NOT exist in an abstract absolute spacetime but we are made of those fractal points of spacetime, its networks and topological systems, across multiple scales, which diverge in their geometry…
So now we can expand our definition that ‘time is a cyclical motion and space a lineal open motion’. And affirm that:
“All what exists is a combination of open’ vital’ spaces, enclosed by membranelike Time cycles, which are centered in a fractal particle –point that gauges and process energy and information from its relative still frame of reference’.”
All of them will be made of:
– A central, informative point, seed, or opoint that gauges energy and information, connected to a membrane or time cycle…
– That encloses an open, entropic field of lineal motionsdistances that displaces the system.
This seemingly simple structure, however has infinite variations and ‘biased deformations’ from each point of view and language. So in science we shall always observe the complexity of the details of each variety of the ternary ‘organism’, and specially the enormous inflationary number of ‘linguistic mirrors’ that reflect and deform this vision creating particle subjective Worlds out of objective uniformity of reality.
Consider for example the laws of electromagnetic fields:
We define a quantity called the circulation as the resulting speed of the liquid in the tube times its circumference. We can again extend our ideas and define the “circulation” for any vector field (even when there isn’t anything moving). For any vector field the circulation around any imagined closed curve is defined as the average tangential component of the vector (in a consistent sense) multiplied by the circumference of the loop. And as Feynman puts it: “With just these two ideas—flux and circulation—we can describe all the laws of electricity and magnetism at once. ”
A magnetic field acts as the membrane that protects a mass or electric field of points particles (reason why magnetic fields do NOT form monopoles, that is not their function).
That is, why time cycles will appear structurally as membranes that close a vital space and break reality into Spacetime entities, of which the Universe, a puzzle, sum of those spacetime beings is made.
The sum of tics of your heart gave the entire life of a human; the total number of cycles of a ball or wheel gives the lineal displacement of a car. The regular, repetitive patterns of those cycles are the origin of the socalled laws of science, which is able to predict the future of the species it studies because they do repeat their orbital time cycles, the circadian, biological cycles, their reproductive life cycles.
In the graph almost all physical systems can be described with the external circulatory closed membrane which encircles a vital space, selfcentred in a Tƒi singularity of information or mindpointparticle of the system.
To start the mathematical description of a physical system we thus have to depart as any other system from a ternary membrane, vital space, Tƒi, center of future information system, which in mathematical physics can be easily described mathematically departing from the GST equation, in its simplest form with a poisson equation that describes parameter for the Tƒi center and one for the Spe membrane.
In the graph, what is interesting of the creation of ternary systems of physical spacetime is the evident scalar nature, by which simple games, as those of magnetism can grow through one million social domains into a ‘solid state’ ruled by magnetic fields surrounded, enclosing a vital space of matter. How can we interpret all those scales? THE easies way is to consider a scale of forces and ranges
Schrödinger postulated that the electrons in an atom should be treated like the waves on the drumhead. The different energy levels of atoms are identified with the simple vibrational modes of the wave equation. The equation is solved to find these modes, and then the energy of an electron is obtained from the frequency of the mode and from Einstein’s quantum formula, E = hν.
So the concept of mass, charge and temperature tends to appear first as a fixed, enclosed static membrane that takes entry and motion from the inner region it controls, transformed in pressure. As the system transits and emerges into a new scale.
For example, a close box of molecules has only mass, if we don’t open it and that is what measures, because both the energy of its kinetic temperature motion and mass of particles and boxmembranes ad up. The inversion of this ‘mach, outer galaxy rotation origin of our centripetal forces, however is perceived differently from inside than outside. Yet if gravitation is just another case of a closed ternary system, how it does become a complete form? How thus it order itself to form a regular selfcentred sphere? Thus it needs the chargemass to apear first? it seems as in the more closely studied case of a magnetic field which ONLY appears as a membrane of the charge, with the charge speed qv, and increases with speed. So here we can see also ‘again’ how a membrane which distorts lineal motion into a magnetic deflection appears to counterbalance the pure lineal momentum. Lineal momentum we might say for all those cases Spe, as it exists creates a wave ST, membrane, which will enclose it, and so it is more as there has always been s and t, motion and particle, which in the static mode becomes singularity, magnetic field and a vital spacetime between them. And so we can ‘see’ without mathematical detail, visually most events of spacetime and transitions and interactions between parts of fractal ternary points, forming networks and growing into topological organisms according to the postulates of NonÆ maths and its ideal program of creation of GST organisms.
In mathematics, Poisson’s equation is a partial differential equation of elliptic type with broad utility in mechanical engineering and theoretical physics. It arises, for instance, to describe the potential field caused by a given charge or mass density distribution; with the potential field known, one can then calculate gravitational or electrostatic field. It allow us to define a singularity equalled to a vital space, closed by a membrane.
In general, partial differential equations are difficult to solve, but techniques have been developed for simpler classes of equations called linear, and for classes known loosely as “almost” linear, in which all derivatives of an order higher than one occur to the first power and their coefficients involve only the independent variables.
Many physically important partial differential equations are secondorder and linear. For example: * uxx + uyy = 0 (twodimensional Laplace equation) * uxx = ut (onedimensional heat equation) * uxx − uyy = 0 (onedimensional wave equation) The behaviour of such an equation depends heavily on the coefficients a, b, and c of auxx + buxy + cuyy. They are called elliptic, parabolic, or hyperbolic equations according as b2 − 4ac < 0, b2 − 4ac = 0, or b2 − 4ac > 0, respectively. Thus, the Laplace equation is elliptic, the heat equation is parabolic, and the wave equation is hyperbolic.
If we move from this to newton we get one canonical description of motion of vortices, if we move in the inverse direction we obtain the simultaneous still photographs of Einstein.
Neither of both paradoxes affects biological systems, very close to the observer but without power to influence it.
It is then once we extract all the isomorphisms and mathematical, biologic and apperceptive formal laws of biological systems, when we can apply with a sense of homology those laws to all other sciences.
For example, we describe the Economic ecosystem of Evolving machines, as they ARE organisms of metal evolving now into robots and as such should be treated by mankind if we want to avoid our extinction in the nearby future by the new top predator species, the robotic weapons. Next we deal with the Human Societies and Historic Sciences that must control the Economic ecosystem, (the ∆+1 evolution of machines) in its negative forms (hence the ∆2 tag of scale, as it competes today in capitalist societies for the meager resources of the planet that the ∆+2 human scale requires).
So regarding the ‘tagging of scales’, Biological sciences are concerned really with all scales, but as defined by humans, those biological properties are given only to close species of Planet Earth in the cellular, individual and social, ecosystemic scale, including machines as organisms of metal evolving at the atomic>mechanical>companymother and global market scales.
Humans do also evolve from individuals into social groups, and the individual should see itself as a cellcitizen of those social scales of which history, mankind in time is the more important and the one that should ‘survive’ first for man to thrive in its organisms as individual. Hence the tagging ∆+1², meaning the individual 1scale should love eusocially other humans to transcend into the social +2 scale.
And so finally we arrive to what normally comes first as a science but we put last, astrophysical sciences, but mind the reader, we wrote it as ¬Æ, since we will ad biological organic properties to physical systems, denied by physicists, hence establish NonAristotelian, NonEuclidean physics of the 5th dimension, and then as such, the scales of biophysical systems have no limit, repeating every 10 planes the infinite game of existence (proved by the infinity of transcendental numbers such as pi).
Finding the generators
So once we localise a parameter of entropy, Tiƒ a parameter of cyclical time and a constant of present ∏ime§pace that remains coInvariant between the ‘Lorentzian’ limits of the 5th dimensional plane, ∆i, we study, we can
start to observe the isomorphisms, dualities, ternary structures, and actions and motions taking place by the particle within the plane, under the ‘variations’ of GST laws proper of such plane/ecosystem
Thus will deal with an enormous number of ‘motions’ perceived only as a world cycle with a movement along a plane of the type and form:
The expansive lineal, decelerated motion, the steady state, constant speed and the accelerate vortex of time are thus the 3 main timespace motions, which is normally made explicit through a volume growth of space (as time decelerates) a constant of speed, st (A PRESENT remains invariant) and an accelerated force (Tiƒ).
SPACEtime FUNCTIONS on the other hand tend to be bidimensional, either in the holographic upper or flat, width dimensions as time/information like (height oriented) and space/energy like depictions.
Pure Simpler space, paradoxically is three dimensional, expansive and decelerating
And so we find curious combinations of those 3 parameters which define the main laws of mathematical physics.
Of them obviously the simplest forms are those of locomotions, depicted with a numerical single dimension to express, deceleration, constant speed or acceleration, though it is normally customary to use a ‘distance’, speed and ‘accelerated force’ as parameters of the 3 time ages of any system, such as they are related to time and ‘extracted’ in certain ways from ST:
S= v x 1 t; v = v x 0t; a = v/t
energy though must ad to speed a dimension of width, which stores energy and summons up similar beings in a wave of energy This will then be the amplitude of the wave, or the tail of mass of the system, which we shall operate with different conventions in similar terminologies, energies, hamiltonians, momentums and so on.
Those initial concepts are ultimately what physicists measure in the different scales of spacetime of the physical Universe, in the natural units of that Universe according to scales.
And so humans study 9+0 planes of spacetime, divided in 3×2 great regions, the quantum, thermodynamic and astronomical systems, which range fromPlanck’s units, which are one of the limits of the functions studied on the microscopic, and the cosmic horizon limit on the macroscopic (not necessarily a proof of the bigbang but certainly of the birthdeath cycle perceived on light).
Let us then study the 3 elements of the fractal generator that translates to Physical systems the general parameters of 5 ST (ab. for 5 Dimensional Fractal space and cyclical Time) in those 3 scales, the ∆1 quantum, ∆thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational scale.
The translation is immediate: S x Tƒ = ∆±1, becomes in physics 2 clear equations, one of ‘active magnitude’ and other of ‘energy’:
Spaceconstant of lineal motion x Time angular Frequency of cyclical motion/ ∆constant of relative curvature= Spacetime being or active magnitude: charge: ∆1: Ke; Mass ∆+1:G
Energy content (sum of formal motions of a given plane or closed STentity), which will be an equation with an spacequanta and a quantifier of populations that give us the intensity of the actions of each particular species. Thus it adds variations to the main active magnitude of each scale.
3 States of matter systems: Sp (pastentropy fields/gas)≤ST (present reproductive wave/liquid)≥Tƒ(future particlecrystal)
Now the previous Generator Equation resumes all the physical elements that interact in this planet both in space and time (hence the duality of ≤≥ arrows between space and time elements, to define both symmetries) across the 3 planes of existence of the Solar system.
Thus we can analyze all physical systems with the (anti)symmetries of 5D spacetime; considering analysis of each of those planes as detailed as we want according to the ‘fractal principle’ that divides each plane into 3 x 3 +0 scales, and each spacetime part, into 3 subages, and 3 suborgans.
For example your life has 3 periods of 24 years (young, adult and od informative age), subdivided each in 3 subages (baby: 08, child when in classic education you enter the age of reason, 816, when you enter the age of sex as a young, 1624), and each part can be divided into 2 0r 3 subparts, (depending or not of the existence of a reproductive bodywave), for example, the limb can be divided into feet, femur and tibia, the head into brain of information and face of energy; and so on. Physical systems are not exception, but due to our lack of direct perception (we do NOT see many of those elements and scales, so we have used an excess of mathematical properties to describe them0, we need to interpret all magnitudes and equation in ‘real terms’.
Still in the 4^{th} line we will often subdivide each fractal species of spacetime into 3 time ages and 3 space organs and each equation into its components relating them to T.œ parameter and universal constants.. And vice versa, we can further integrate them into more comprehensive wholes, as we did in the previous post analyzing the largest physical systems (cosmos, galaxies and stars). Let us do this first to give an overview of the Universe and its scales of spaceenergy and temporal particles of cyclical information.
Thus according to the ternary method we can analyze in more detail those isomorphisms, in each 5D spacetime scale to define its main physical systems:
5D scales:
∆1(atomic/electromagnetic scale)> ∆:Earth/thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational/Galactic scale.
Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:
Sp(Spatial toroid fields)≤ ST (Hyperbolic waves)≤ Tƒ(particles of information)≈
Sp (young, past entropic age/field>ST: adult, present, iterative wave age > Tƒ: old informative, future particle age.
In the description of Œ∆3 , atoms, those symmetries are:
Scalar Asymmetry:
∆1: hquanta: ‘Planckton'<∆: Atoms<∆+1: Molecules
Spatial symmetry:
∆4: Light: Field: Sp: Halo ST: Wave ≤ Tƒ: Photon
∆3: Atom: Sp: Electron ≤ ST: Radiation zone ≤ Tƒ: Nuclei
∆2: Molecule: Sp: External atoms< ST: ElectroMagnetic Bondage ≤ Tƒ: Crystal Center
Time Ages:
∆4: Sp: Vacuum space ≥ ST: electromagnetic wave ≥ Tƒ: Particle
∆3: Sp: Plasma≥ ST: Atom ≥Tƒ: Elements Table
∆2: Sp: Gas ≥ ST: Liquid≥Tƒ: Solidcrystal
In the graph, the worldcycle of matter. We an see how the ∆±1 birth and death phase (plasma made of dissociated ions, is the same and closes the cycle.
Thus all together we can write the following Generator combining the a(nti)symmetries of the 3 scales with the formalism of ¬Æ to describe the ‘Human world’ of physical systems:
∑∆1: [SpFields≤≥STwaves≤≥TƒParticles]≈ Plasma: ∆: [SpGas≤ST:Liquid≤≥Tƒ: Crystals]≈Matter: ∆+1: [SpOort Belt≤≥ ST: Planets≤≥Tƒ: Star]
Now the previous Generator Equation resumes all the physical elements that interact in this planet both in space and time (hence the duality of ≤≥ arrows between space and time elements, to define both symmetries) across the 3 planes of existence of the Solar system.
The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D spacetime system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; coexisting in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary subsystems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5^{th} dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.
In that sense while we will make concessions to the parlance of mathematical physics using terms whenever possible closer to the mathematical analysis of those organic events, and so sometimes in this post, much more often in the 3^{rd} and 4^{th} line will translate the confusing terminology of the Gothic age of mathematical physics, or the Aristotelian logic of the age of computer physics to a more amenable jargon, the true job of T.Œ in physics is to translate physics to the simpler rules of reality as all physical systems obey the Generator Equation of all General Systems of the Universe, which in the field of physical system is better expressed as:
[Sp (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ST(waveliquid)>Tƒ (ParticleCrystal] û≤ 4
This is of the many similar variations of the Generator Equation using symbols of ¬Æ we can use, a good definition of what physical systems are.
They are systems in which the metric of the 5^{th} dimension, ∆=Sp x Tƒ = E x I= K, remain invariant.
That is the distanceenergy or past field of spatial size of the system multiplied by the speed, quantity of its informationtime clocks are constant, within the range of variations, which allows systems to perform actions of energy and information, in present physical system within a certain range for EACH of the planes of existence of physical systems. Let us then consider the main elements of that Generator equation of physical systems starting as usually in an inverse fashion to the mathematical analysis of physics – that is from the synthetic, organic whole and its larger points of view.
As we have studied vortices above, when considering the unification of charges and masses, let us now bring the wave description and its duality.
2^{nd} Isomorphism. The Holographic Universe: Bidimensional Space Time.
Bites of energy and bits of information, the two primary elements of the Universe, mix, organize, and evolve, till reaching the complexity of organisms. Their properties and morphologies are opposed. But for that reason, they can form “complementary” systems, which merge the properties and dimensions of both “formal motions,” enhancing the survival capacities of any system that combines in a balanced manner energy and form, E×I=K. In physical systems, all is made of lineal forces of expansive energy and cyclical particles of implosive information that create balanced present spacetimes. In the left graph, we see the canonical forms of lineal energy and cyclical time clocks and how an informative, electric cycle supported in a magnetic surface of space creates a complementary wave: a ray of light.
It is the ternary game of the Universe and its three dimensions of space and time.
Now the fundamental topological quality of physical systems is to exist mostly in isomorphic spacetimes. That is, places without clear referential frames in which entities that live in those ‘entropic fields’ must construct directional axis of perception and motion, lineal boosts and rotary angles, to start building from this Universal ‘nothingness’ of formal motions without meaning, the structures of form that determine the directions of time existence and the symmetries of space and symmetries of isomorphic size.
This to start with means that the spherical form is the commonest shape of the physical Universe, as opposed to the geometries of life that exist in a planar but irregular surface, and develop in this fixed gradient, complex limb forms, which are internal to the being.
Thus physical beings are rather ‘perfect’ fractal points of spacetime, which coexist in an isomorphic isotropic physical space, more similar to the water Universe of our seas and its Plankton , the canonical perfect spherical form with a membrane which has an internal focus in its central zero point and controls a vital space of lineal kinetic motions, invaginated by flows of energy and information, masterminded by the zero point. In that regard the laws of nonEuclidean, nonAristotelian mathematics apply much more precisely to physical systems, which therefore obey better the laws of mathematics.
It is then necessary to understand physical systems from the mathematical perspective of the 5 postulates of ¬Æ mathematics.
2. S=T: HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE
2. DUALITY: INFORMATION VS. ENTROPY. HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE.
‘Space has no boundary – that is empirically more certain than any external observation. However, that does not imply that space is infinite’ . Riemann
‘Times curves space into mass.’ Einstein
Duality is the simplest view of the fractal generator of spacetime, and it means the existence of two arrows of future, or tendencies in all physical systems, which can be complementary creating simple waveparticle systems in space, or can be a tugof war, two sides of a dynamic Sp<=>Tƒ equations, such as the most famous of them, E(Sp) <≈ > M (Tƒ).
And yet the most amazing thing about classic physics stuck on the routines of Newton’s absolute spacetime is that the 2 arrows of spacetime which are at the heart of most equations of physics, are not recognized as such, which makes so difficult to fully grasp the meaning of physics at large.
Thus we shall without further ado correct lineal physics so it match the perceived evidence of the fractal Universe, with the aim of making our linguistic mental mirror more apt to focus reality as it is, not as it bends to fin the tools of physicists, as ingle space continuum and a single lineal, mechanical clock with a steady rate.
In the left graph, all time cycles return to its origin, creating a closed circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal time – an artifact of measure, and equalizing all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single ‘time clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.
Now the properties of a time cycle are obvious, and 3 are essential to the fractal structure of the Universe:
 They are a closed space, so they divide according to topology and knot theory reality in an external Universe and an internal world.
 They are repetitive, returning to the same point. So causal logic is essential to the processes of reality, in fact sciences are merely the expression of those causal repetitive patterns into mathematical laws. So the true principle of inertia is that of cyclical inertia: all systems trace cycles of existence returning to the same point.
 Third, they have more form, more information than a line, which can be considered merely a short step of a long cycle. So they must have more dimensions and in fact for a cycle to exist time must have 2 dimensions, the rhythm of motion or frequency and radius or height of the cycle.
So now that we know the 3 essential properties of reality from a logic, temporal, cyclical perspective we can properly define the mathematical tools to its study – fractal points, social numbers/networks, flows of energy and information communicated between them.
Now we shall return to the proper definition of time and space in simple terms, from where we shall derive much more meaningful truths about reality:
‘Times are cyclical, bidimensional closed motions. Spaces are lineal, flat, bidimensional open extensions’.
Whereas a bidimensional membrane is NOT obviously an abstraction but a network of pointsparticles extended in a flat extension, so for example the Earth crust is a bidimensional space, your skin, the surface of water; and so 3dimensional spaces are, as we shall see most often made as 3D printing does – by accumulation of bidimensional membranes, while time durations are just the sum of finite closed time cycles. This is the true structure of reality: bidimensional, topological networks of flat space, such as the Universe in large scale is (a bidimensional flat network of galaxies), where a series of time cycles (in the Universe those vortex like galaxies), with a dimension of height (in the galaxies the central, hyperbolic cone of the black hole, whose singularity has a height dimension tending to infinity), fluctuate back and forth and they closed their finite cycles.
Now, we shall make also an statement of enormous importance to understand the workings of the Universe:
‘Time cycles have different form, length and speed, in its closing patterns; therefore there are infinite forms of time measure, one for each type of time cycle, whereas we define the measure of the cycle or ‘present quanta of time’, to the length in space and duration in time of the cycle.
The concept of a present quanta thus varies enormously for each species of the Universe. In human beings a time quanta is a second, which is the beat of the heart, the glimpse of the eye and the mean time for each thought – and so we also see that the key for a superorganism to coexist together in several scales is the synchronicity of all its systems, tuned to the single specific present time quanta of each being (the period of each cycle).
Those are essential concepts of all Universal beings not only physical beings, but in physical systems, due to the obsession for measure must be bring about earlier on.
Time quanta then we shall observe vary enormously from being to being: the time quanta of a physical particle can be as small as a trillionth of a second (in heavy quark families), and as long as a billion of years (rotational period of galactic clusters). How can we order all those present quanta? And how can we synchronize them to make faster cells and atoms coexist with slower organisms and cosmic bodies? Those are full open fields of 5D physics, which we will soon consider.
For the moment a final comment on the nature of time space cycles made of formal motions, which is also essential to understand classic physics in 5D terms:
‘The Universe and all its parts try to conserve by all means its repetitive beat of spacetime present quanta’.
This is the engine of existence: all beings constantly try to ‘beat’, to exist is to beat your present quanta of time space, to cycle, to complete your actions and trajectories in spacetime, to the rhythm of your universal constants. And this constant of present spacetime is the ultimate ‘resume’ of the laws of time space and physics (whereas the speed of the cycle and the length are logically related to each other, establishing an internal equality that is also conserved, S≈T, whatever the specific proportion of length and time duration is for ah species)
And so we can relate those definitions to the parameters of duality: Time cycles seen in stillness are bits of information, Lineal space seen in motion are speeds.
And this new concept of bidimensional time cycles with ‘height’ and bidimensional flat spaces, which is thoroughly proved by the flat space of the Universe and its cyclical time vortices, or galaxies, is the ultimate meaning of reality, already foreseen by Descartes, who talked of res extensa (space) and time vortices.
To notice also a quality which is essential and disguised by the regularity of mechanical time clocks:
‘Time clocks in nature are accelerated or decelerated or steady state vortices of spacetime, which either are static as in mechanical clocks, or accelerate inwards in most cases as in charges and masses, or decelerate outwards, in expansive motions till become open space as in bigbang processes’.
This will be the key to understand the 3 arrows of time: implosive motions of information, explosive motions of kinetic energy, and steady state, present motions.
Clocks also actually do have the 3 motions albeit we only see the spacetime steady present (but in the back of the clock there is a spiral that engines the clock and we coil it inward to recharge its potential energy and then the spiral uncoils outwards). And we shall also observe that reality which is always present, shows the face of the clock, the steady present, but in the background there is a relative past entropic motion and future implosive motion working to ‘fuel the present’.
Now remember that the fractal paradigm is homologous, so all the examples we shall keep putting from all disciplines do show the essence of what knowledge is in the fractal paradigm – the metaphoric, homologic, analogic, mystical, you name it, concept that all follows some simple isomorphic laws of time, space and the 5^{th} dimension that orders them.
Classic physics of continuous space and time as limits of the fractal paradigm.
In the fractal paradigm, and the science of duality, which constructs models of the Universe accepting the sheer evidence of infinite fractal systems that reproduce its form, into other regions of spacetime, none of those dogmas, never proved, easily falsified by every crystal, black hole, DNA atom or artist of the world, apply.
So the reader interested in the fractal paradigm and the evidence of the Universe, beyond XIX c. dogmas, must simply forget what he has learned and look afresh what we shall explain here, thinking on ‘the experimental evidence of nature’.
Yet always we shall respect the tenants of truth of the scientific method with a close scrutiny of known laws that will result to be ‘limiting’ or partial cases of the larger fractal paradigm.
So we can say that ‘entropy only theories of time arrows’ are the limit of ‘an empty space’ with no mass and time clocks (special relativity equations being the most obvious case), of the ternary Universe. We can see that lineal time models are also a limiting proposition of the much wider infinite clocksuniverse, and the use of time as a parameter of space, s=ct, a very limiting, restricted concept of the much larger concept of time as motion and perception of all type of changes.
SO far we know that times are multiple, closed cycles that act as clocks and carry the information in the form and frequency of its cycles. And space is the open motions which unless closed by a time cycle extend creating ‘res extensa’, space.
How can then we combine both? The answer is the holographic principle: A TIME CYCLE has 2 dimensions of information, height and rhythm, allowing the constant combination of bidimensional sheets of space, and cyclical, tall time…
And both together form the fundamental particle of the Universe, a spacetime being.
THE HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE.
Galileo’s paradox: dimensions of space as fixed motions. Relativity in physics.
E pur si muove, e pur no muove. Paradox of Galileo
The fractal nature of all universal entities, which occupy a piece of space and last a quantity of time, is the key to unifying the laws of science. Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical continuous plane despite their appearance. In detail, they become quantic points, planetoids in movement, tracing orbit.
al cycles around the planet, in a fractal repetition of the path the planet makes around the sun. Each planetoid becomes again a fractal sum of atoms, turning in cyclical paths. Those rings illustrate two fundamental dualities of the spacetime Universe, contradicted by the “naïve realism” of our simplest perception: Any region of the Universe seems at first glance still and continuous. So Galileo called Saturn’s planetoids a ring, thinking they were made of continuous, still matter.
Yet Saturn’s rings have in fact the form of the commonest informative fractal: a Cantor dust, which thins once and again into infinitesimal particles. Since when we see any continuous point of time/space in detail, it grows, becoming both, dynamic and discontinuous, made of quanta, moving in selfsimilar paths that are separated as independent beings, but pegged to each other in networks by flows of energy and information. The Universe is constructed through those networks of parts that become wholes and grow in bigger scales, departing from its two essential formal motions, the line of energy and the cycle of information.
This duality gives origin to many paradoxes, as the properties of energy and information are inverted, and yet reality is always a combination of both. So particles of information are also waves of energy. Forms that seem static information can also be perceived as moving energy. It is the paradox of Galileo who said of the Earth: “E pur no move, e pur si muove.”
Now for those who haven’t read much of this blog, it might be important a short reminder of the differences between motion, form energy and information as it is the fundamental duality both in reality and mathematical physics:
The key Isomorphism of nature, its duality of still space and time ages or motions:
The Universe is made of motions in time, which perception fixes into still mappings, confused with forms of space. Saturn’s rings are not continuous planes, despite their appearance. In detail, they become herds of planetoids in motion, tracing orbital cycles around the planet, which are selfsimilar to the paths planets make around the sun. Further on, when we observe each planetoid in further detail, it becomes a sum of selfsimilar atoms, rotating also in cyclical paths. Thus a simple, single, flat spacetime that seems continuous, without motion, becomes a series of moving, complex, cyclical, discontinuous, fractal spacetimes, organized in several scales of size and form, each one made of a network of selfsimilar NonEuclidean points.
In the graph, the ‘Galilean paradox’ (we perceive the earth quiet despite the fact that it is moving) is an essential feature of nature: minds perceive in stillness motion to extract form, dimensional form patterns and know the other form. Thus the symmetry between spatial and temporal, static and moving states is an essential symmetry to fully grasp the constant ‘stop and go’ processes of reality. The discontinuity of space and time is the key to unify the laws of sciences that describe different species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time.
FORCES coexist in a wavemotion, particleform state duality. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception: Any piece of time/space seems continuous, but when we analyze it in detail, it becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths. And any form fixed by the limited information o the mind in detail has rotary and lineal motion/momentum.
We call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’). The graph illustrates the paradox with Galileo’s depiction of Saturn’s ‘flat, still, ring’, which is in fact multiple turning clocks in motion with several size scales.
In the graph, the key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum but can be perceived as such. There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.
The error of discontinuity. Points with parts.
Thus the web takes sides in the dispute between Einstein and Planck: the last experimental and theoretical studies seem to prove that space and time are quantic, discontinuous as Planck said. From that fact we deduce that each piece of space has a quantity of quantic energy and each cycle of time carries an amount of information. Yet since all what exists is made of energy and information from the previous homology we deduce that all beings, including human beings, are made of quantic cycles of temporal information or ‘bits’ and quantic pieces of spatial energy or ‘bites’, and the SpaceTime Universe is a sum of quantic beings made up with those 2 substances.
Scientists don’t analyze temporal energy in all its quantic details because they study space and time through Mathematics, which has, as all languages, a limited capacity to carry information. So it simplifies reality, making each entity of the Universe with an inner content of information and energy a number, represented as a point, defined by Euclid as ‘a form without breath’, without ‘information’.
Then, once the inner content of those points are gone, mathematics puts all those points together into an abstract graph called the Cartesian Space/Time graph, which seems to us ‘a continuous reality’, though it is only a simplified, linguistic representation of the Universe.
Since, when we look at the real beings of the Universe in detail, those points have parts, a content of ‘energy’ that lasts a quantity of time cycles. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they become spheres, points with breath, with parts: an atom, a cell, and a star…
Something without breath, without dimensions – as Euclid defined a point – is something that does not exist. Abstract points are fantasies. They are not real. Anything you draw will have a size, a minimum of 2 dimensions in paper, and 3 dimensions in reality. Look at yourself: your Head is a point with 3 dimensions, not a number in a mathematical statistics. The SpaceTime Continuum becomes then the spacetime discontinuum, made of infinite quanta of temporal energy, which ‘act’ together to create the forms of the Universe.
We live in a Universe made of quantic actions, of moving temporal energy. Reality is done by infinite discontinuous actions exerted by all type of beings, product of their spatial energy multiplied by their temporal information. Space/time is not a static, fixed “mathematical image” created by our mind – but it moves constantly, acts through its quantic pieces. We are an organic system that “acts”, processing spatial energy with our quantic bodies and temporal information with our brains. Planck expressed with that name, taken from the organic philosophy of Leibniz and Hegel, the fact that the Universe is not material but organic, made of cyclical forms in perpetual change and movement.
All continuous, static forms become discontinuous and mobile when observed in detail.
Mathematics simplify reality. How they do it? Making each organism of the Universe a point, and putting them all together into an abstract graph called the Cartesian Space.
We cannot though know all the information of reality with a single language, a simplified mirror that our mind puts on the Universe.
Thus the spacetime continuum is a simplification of a quantic reality caused by the fact that in mathematics a plane of space is not made of points with volume, but of abstract points without volume. In reality however all what exists when observed in detail, is made of discontinuous points with volume. If you look at a table in detail you will see discontinuous points called molecules, made of discontinuous points called atoms, made of discontinuous points called protons and electrons, made of discontinuous points called photons, made of discontinuous points called Plank Quanta. And that minimal scale of smaller, discontinuous points with volume, with dimension, is what we call the Organic point, the first Unit of Information, of form in the Universe.
The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws. It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:
– The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).
– And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being. Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second. The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy.
We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms.
There is however a far more dynamic understanding of the building of dimensions of the Universe, strictly in terms of time arrows, which unlike the growth of spatial ‘layers’ of ‘memorial’ time motions that become spaceforms, is dynamic and constantly exchanging energy and information between 2 poles, one of entropy, Sp and one of cyclical motion, Tiƒ; which we study in the second isomorphism of Sp>Tƒ<Sp motions and forms.
The holographic principle…
thus is simple. We discover that information is bidimensional as the sheet you are reading. We just showed that a closed cycles forms a bit of information, as it breaks reality into inner and outer forms, and the discontinuous between them, the time cycle becomes a distinguishable form. Yet for a time cycle to exist needs besides motion a height dimension. So we readdress the 4 dimensions of spacetime into 2 dimensions of space, a flat or networks of ‘points’ and 2 dimensions of time, height and rhythm And then we can compare and transform one into other according to the principles of dimensionality (without the same number of dimensions things do not compare).
So we establish a simple principle: ‘Fractal space time beings are made of flat networks of spatial points, transformed back and forth into tall cycles of information’
Space and Lineal motions. Information and Time cycles
In the graph, the bidimensional nature of time cycles, divides the 4 dimensions of timespace in 2 ‘formal motions’, tall, cyclical time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles (as the nsphere has the maximal volume in minimal space), as such is the gauging ‘particlehead on top of all systems (so photons stay longer on top of the wave, your head is on top, as an informative mammal, with the dimension of height, eyes and cameras are spheres and antennae are on top, so are speakers: function is form) and wide, lineal space planes, which are the most extended fastest distance between points so fast ‘planes’ are… planes, limbs and fields are planes.
Bites of energy and bits of information, the two primary elements of the Universe, mix, organize, and evolve, till reaching the complexity of organisms. Their properties and morphologies are opposed. But for that reason, they can form “complementary” systems, which merge the properties and dimensions of both “formal motions,” enhancing the survival capacities of any system that combines in a balanced manner energy and form, E×I=K. In physical systems, all is made of lineal forces of expansive energy and cyclical particles of implosive information that create balanced present spacetimes. In the left graph, we see the canonical forms of lineal energy and cyclical time clocks and how an informative, electric cycle supported in a magnetic surface of space creates a complementary wave: a ray of light.
It is the ternary game of the Universe and its three dimensions of space and time.
Cyclical times have more form, more dimensions than lineal space, as they are time cycles, not lines, and this fact – that cyclical time, has more dimensions than a line, is vital to the whole understanding of time cycles.
In the graph, since space and time now had two dimensions each, we can compare them, and transform one into each other, we could write that property with a simple formula, where Sp is a flat plane of ‘lineal space’ made of NonEuclidean Networks and Tƒ is a cycle of tall time.
Sp (length, width) ≈ Tƒ (height, frequency) Sp x Tƒ = Energy x Information
This simple beat of existence, flat fields of space that become tall cycles of time, energy that converts into information, is one of the commonest beats of the universe. And its rhythms explain infinite transformations.
Now this is very important because it can be generalized to all systems and allows the transformation of space dimensions into time dimensions. As only parameters with the same dimensionality can be transformed into each other. So a cyclical vortex of time (a mass, a charge, an angular momentum, you name it) can be changed into an, entropic motion that expands into a plane of space, precisely because they are 2 dimensional.
So since we exist in a universe made of spacetime beings, we can also consider to live in a universe of motions with forms. And we can combine 4 elements, space, speed, time and form.
The expansion of the concepts of time arrows – information and entropy – beyond physics. 3 required corrections. Time IS NOT LINEAL, is NOT entropy and IS NOT the 4^{th} dimension of space.
It must be stressed here that the definition of information as a time cycle, or time clock with a bidimensional form is different and far more general than the concept of ‘lineal information’, in a single light dimension used by physicists, in the specific study of light waves, which carry that information in the frequency of its cycles.
The Universe does carry its information, its form in the frequency and form of its waves and vortices of time.
Hence Shannon’s definition of information based in computers and the motion of waves that transmit such information, as a series of bits must be regarded just as a specific case of a much larger concept: information as form, whose dimensions and frequency code the Universe. So proteins carry information in its dimensional warping; masses carry information in the form of its cycles, words carry information in the curvature≈ form and so does art.
The same happens with the concept of entropy, which physicists extracted from a very limited analysis – that of gases that expand in space, enlarging the volume of space they occupy; to a series of philosophical ‘huge’ unrelated concepts that have become a short of dogmatic religion about time and the future, with an obvious dismissal of very evident facts, about the increasing order and information arrows of the Universe.
According to this dogma, the Universe increases constantly its disorder because the ‘gas laws of entropy and temperature’ must apply to the entire Universe.
But there are at least two obvious cases of systems that DO increase constantly the order and implode space into ‘cyclical patterns’ of information (as defined above):
– Gravitational forces, which are informative, implosive, attractive and therefore are exactly the opposite of expansive motions of space, such as the disordered growth in ‘spatial extension’ and entropy proper of things that break, or die, or explode in bigbangs, or expand with temperature in space.
The denial of the growing order caused by gravitation in all systems, including galaxies which are vortices that create form, information as the black hole converts and implodes space into mass; and it is ultimately the reason why we, beings living in a gravitational triple vortex, the Earth, the Sun and the black hole of the galaxy, DO constantly create information. Which leads to the second clear case of informative creation:
– Any memorial, repetitive, copying process creates information and order in a very fast fashion by attracting to a ‘template’ with a fixed form, the elements of that template, which become a still, informative system, with as much information as the original had.
So not only all vital process of replication of atomic structures, but chemical reactions, catalyzed by a still ‘heavier metal atom’, crystal processes that replicate a crystal unit, gravitational processes, iterative processes in which particles absorb energy and reproduce, decouple into new particles create information.
It amazes therefore the objective scholar the astounding stubbornness shown by some physicists in their defense of an entropy only arrow for the Universe, using dubious philosophical arguments that equate the concept of ‘information and entropy’, expanding arguments taken from a restricted field (gas theory, statistical mechanics and Boltzmann interpretation of information and entropy) to the entire Universe.
The Holographic Principle, discovered in the study of black holes, is at the heart of modern physics today – the fact that information is bidimensional, as the screen you are looking at.
This geometric generator redistributes the 4 dimensions we know to exist in this scale of reality, in 2 dimensions of vital space, creating flat planes of space, with maximal extension (made of small cells, points, atoms, any ‘set of similar beings) and 2 dimensions of temporal information, height and rhythm to form the simplest possible time cycle, which carries information in the form and frequency of this cycles.
Now this should be evident to you, temporal information has the dimensions of height and form (cyclical patterns seen with a mind as slow fixed forms, like the way you see a fast spinning wheel as a solid disk). So you are watching a tall bidimensional screen or book, your eyes see bidimensional forms, and your informative eye, head or the antenna or camera that absorbs information, with its logic cycles of time, its computer clocks measured in cyclical frequencies, Hertzs, are all on top, are all made of closed time cycles and forms.
So the first refocusing of the mirror of mathematical sciences is to give the dimension of height to time, which now has 2 dimensions and it is no longer a line of duration but a cycle of tall form, which rises as time passes, the flat sheets of space, into tall spacetime beings.
In this manner, because a basic rule of maths is that only beings with the same number of dimensions can be combined and transformed into each other, we can combine topological ‘formal motions’ (forms allowed to vary through internal motions of its surfaces), and this is the most ‘evident’ definition on how fractal spacetime systems and its feedback Sp <≈>Tƒ equation works in a single ‘plane of spacetime’, as it ‘composes its forms through the holographic principle.
It explains also the structure of black holes, with its tall infinite singularity in the dimension of height, considered in detail in our posts on astrœphysics.
The wording of ¬Æ and its first creative physical combinations.
So how to call both states for time cycles and spatial lineal motions?
This is a difficult choice of wording, given the confuse terminology humans use for those terms. The proper way would be to call it fractal world vs. moving Universe, form vs. motion, virtual vs. real, and so on. But as we are in a world of physical concepts which does not like ambivalence in the terminology and they are the 2 reverse sides of the same coin, we shall use the same symbols, merely inverting their order, and call those 2 elements of all the systems of the Universe generically with 2 letters and its inverse (we offer also 1 or 3 abbreviations which will be useful latter on for denoting similar concepts, such as S=Entropy, or P=Momentum):
– S, Sp or Spe: All states of relative lineal or flat forms are ‘space states’ or ‘space organs’. And its study are synchronic studies.
P, Ps: And its inverse wording represents a flat bidimensional space network of points in motion, closely related to lineal momentum and kinetic energy
– T, Tƒ, or Tiƒ: All states of cyclical closed forms are ‘informative states’ or ‘informative cycles, measured by the form of those cycles (ƒ).
– ƒ, ƒt: And its inverse wording, are time cycles, studied in diachronic studies; and closely related to angular momentum.
Now it follows that we can start a creative combination, according to the ‘holographic principle’, as we know have 4 elements to play with. So we can combine a static time clock, Tƒ and a lineal motion in space. And the result will be a Particle moving with a certain Speed, or ‘Lineal momentum’ P.
And vice versa, we can combine a fixed space, with a time frequency, which makes it rotate or wobble, and the result with ill be a ‘wave’ or an angular momentum, with a frequency.
So we have deduced the 2 fundamental concepts of classic physics, from the elements of the holographic principle. And since the Universe conserves angular and lineal momentum, which are a combination of the elative time cycles and spatial extensions of T.Œ, we can affirm that the Universe, conserves its space and time.
This is in classic physics deduced through the Noether’s theorem that relates conservation of lineal and angular momentum to the isotropy and isomorphism of space and time.
The difference though is that in T.Œ, space and time are dual, both have form and motion, and it is just how the mind perceives it what makes it appear as a static form or a sum of smaller atomic motions, or a part of a larger cosmic body in motion and so on.
And so while in many cases need to differentiate between ‘lineal motions or lineal momentums’ (Ps) and its still continuous perception by the mind, Sp (Spe), or space and cyclical motions, clocks of time, (Oƒt) and its still perception by the mind or information (tƒ, Tiƒ).
As a convention though, BECAUSE IN ABSOLUTE REALITY ALL FORM HAS MOTION AND ALL MOTION HAS FORM, it goes without saying that what we mention has both form and motion and use for the general discussion of spacetime beings, the normal wording of those terms, Sp and Tƒ.
And yet keep remembering the formal duality of OTime clocks, with closed bits of information, and Space motions, with kinetic, entropic spatial motions.
The reader in that sense must do a change in its chip that expects absolute analytical measure and distinguish an infinity of terms, to see how they can group in 2 general terms.
For example, entropy, S, will be shown to be a moving, bidimensional sheet of space, in the specific scale of size of atomic matter. (∆ Ps in ¬Æ notation, whereas ∆ is the thermodynamic scale of size of the Universe, or human scale, and Ps is a moving bidimensional res extensa, or network of molecules or atoms in gaseous expansive motion).
How then we create three dimensional volumes? Simple, by superposition, as we do with waves, of bidimensional sheets of space, and so we use a quantizer, ∑, whereas ∑Sp is a 3 dimensional volume of space and ∑Ps the same in motion (or for generic wording, both can be named ∑Sp).
And for the same reason we use a quantifier of time cycles, π, written in capitals, ∏, which is also the multiplier symbol. And so for a duration of time sum of multiple repetitive time cycles, or for a synchronous system of time cycles chained to each other, we can write, ∏Tƒ.
But it is also possible to combine a dimensions of time and one dimension of space, as we did with angular and lineal momentum (where we combined 2 x 2 Dimensions). So we could create a ‘line of space in motion’, moving a time cycle, so small that it appears as a point, with no distinguishable volume, hence measured by a scalar ‘number’, let us say ‘mass’. And if that lineal spatial motion is increasing its speed, a, then m a = Force is also defined as a combination of fractal spacetime.
This could go on and on and show you how truly ‘dimensional physics’, translates very easily and allow us to define all systems of nature, with only our 2 parameters, properly understood, in the same manner dimensional physics does with 3 parameters, lineal time, spatial size and ‘mass’. The difference of course is that we add that ‘why’ which Feynman says a physicists nobody asks.
And so now we realize we can make an enormous number of combinations, which will suffice to define most physical formula.
For example, in a more strict definition, angular speed writes as v r, and so we can consider it to be a fixed line of space, moving in cycles: Sƒ, and angular momentum ads a ‘mass’point, (a dimension of cyclical time seen as pure information, form), mvr, so it will have 2 timeinformation dimensions and one of space.
The why of those physical systems are then clearly established, as combinations of space and time dimensions, which start to grow different events of spacetime perceived all together or in its parts.
Space and time, its inverted properties: Sp =K/Tƒ
Now this 3 elements, ‘space’ considered submissive to time and its cyclical actions; and the sequential order of change from smaller past parts to larger, social wholes, needs to be formalized, but as it happens, it IS already formalized by mathematics, which studies precisely in its 3 branches one of those elements:
Spatial geometry studies the forms of space in a fixed, still system of coordinates.
Now so far we have said that time is motion and space is form, stillness. But that is not enough to describe them. So far we have considered the fundamental principle of science – the constant switch on and off between motion and stopping. But this can be represented easily with a hyperbola:
The graph shows the 4 quadrants of the hyperbola, that define the 3 existential functions of Spacetime, as seen from the point of view of the subjective omind in the center of the frame of reference. Thus we can talk of ±∆S,T functions for each of the 4 quadrant and use the graph to represent the oscillations of the ages of existence.
Consider then the positive gradient, and we can have a simple equation of the timespace duality: Time Motion= Constant/Space Stillness.
This inversion can be seen easily in the relationship between ‘lineal time motions’ and the ‘space’ and speed in space of the entity in motion. But it can be applied to many sciences – from the Laws of gases P(t)=C/V(s), also a hyperbola to the cycles of life and death. In that regard, there are in 3 curves to clear ‘sectors’, when we take Y as the coordinates of space, and X as the coordinates of time, making the ‘curve’ also an equation of ‘fractal speed’ which we latter explain what truly means:
 Spatial energy and Minimal Information, on the right side – the energy segment.
 Information x Min. Energy, on the left side – the information segment.
 Exi (e=i) in the central point of balance of the hyperbola.
 Finally to notice that the perception of the hyperbola from inside, from the central point of view is as a cycle.
Now the fundamental law of the logic Universe is the inversion of space and time states, but perhaps more powerful is the concept of an eternal Universe, where time, motion never stops, it merely changes from arrow to arrow, from past to present to future as it continues its motion. Time never change, even if it brakes into infinite pieces and goes forwards and backwards in each piece of spacetime.
Relational spacetime beings, fractal parts of the Universe, have two dual systems, one of entropy and one of information connected with a presentbody/wave, which never stop the flows of time. Each part goes forward and backward in its lifedeath cycle and in each of its information energy, ±∆ absorption and emission, through its spacetime action. And never cease to move.
Angular clocks and lineal momentum is always conserved, so are its integrations into kinetic, lineal energy and cyclic, positional, potential energy and the information it stores.
This, happens not only in physics, but in biochemistry, as Alan Mehaute proved in his fascinating ‘broken spacetimes’ with fractal geometry: once energy ceases (as in the lifedeath cycle), then information wrinkles, curves the geometry of spacetime in any scale of the reality. Thus from Sp>Tf, to Tf<Sp, through Sp=Tf, steady states, the reality of the 3 arrows of time, the Max. Sp, Max. Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, maximal, minimal and stationary point, proper of all Hamiltonians and functions do happen and time merely switch back and forth or in parallel.
The Complementary Principle (The Bidimensional Holographs of the Universe) in T.Œ
We can now that we have a basic understanding of the “dualities” of the Universe in two membranes of spacetime, the quantum world of charges and the cosmological world of masses, and its two essential forms, the gravitational and electromagnetic lineal forces of energy and its cyclical vortices of information, and the third element, mixture of both. Since fractal pieces of energy/space and fractal pieces of time/information mix together into wave of spacetime, the real, complementary beings of the Universe. In essence, the real Universe in which we exist, with its four dimensions is a holography of two bidimensional, pure forms, the vortex or clock of information and the plane of lineal flows of energy. The simplest topology that combines those two forms is a perpendicular field of high information as the screen of this computer and a surface of flat energy (in the computer, the keyboard that transforms the energy of my fingers into information).
In the appendix, we shall consider a more sophisticated version of those holographs, introducing the three canonical topologies of a fourdimensional Universe, and how they combine into the real, complex shapes of physical and biological beings. Now that we are concerned with the understanding of the principles of those real holographs, we shall consider the simplest of all entities of spacetime: a ray of light. Its simplicity is revealing of the simplest structure of a holography of energy and information. The magnetic, flat field supports the frequency of an electric field that creates the Information of the wave.
And the result is an HPlanck unit off our light membrane. We are made of evolved fractal HPlancks, the “planckton” or atomic units of our spacetime. And that “planckton” is a wave with minimal form encoded in the frequency of the light and minimal space, supported in the magnetic field. From this simple initial unit of spacetime, our Universe builds itself. “And God said, there is light; and he separated the day from the night” means indeed in metaphoric terms that we are all made of light. And yet the same game happens in the world of dark matter, also made of bits and bytes of gravitational information and energy. Then once we understand those two membranes and its “doors” and “limits,” we can start to construct the real Universe.
The Universe is made of three arrows of time: the expansive line of entropy or energy, the cyclical implosive clock of information, and its combination, the wave of spacetime.
This simple concept is incredibly rich and powerful to describe the events and forms of the Universe. Till now, we have stressed the duality of implosive cyclical clocks of information and explosive lineal flows of energy. We shall now introduce its real combinations, the fourdimensional waves of energy—which according to the principle of complementarity create reality by combining spatial, entropic arrows of energy, bodies, and fields—and informative, implosive cycles of information, masses, and charges in physical spaces, heads in biological systems.
The key advance of complex physics and duality is the introduction of information, the arrow of fractal form in the creative processes of the Universe. How this arrow of form interacts with the arrow of energy to form wavelike, balanced “ternary beings” of “present” is the key element to go further in our analysis of any entity of reality.
This interaction takes place according to the paradox of Galileo either in:
 A dynamic “temporal” way, as a series of causal events that transform energy into information from past to future or information into energy from future to past, or combine both in waves of present, or in:
 A spatial, geometrical way, as a game of two geometries, the line of energy and the cycle of information, which combine to form complementary systems, informative particles with energetic fields (physics) or informative heads with energetic limbs (biology). And again, only complementary forms that exist by combining “bidimensional energy” and “bidimensional information” are real, fourdimensional entities.
We call this fundamental game that combines energy and form, creating dimensional beings in space and causal chains of events in time and explains most of the events and entities of the Universe the inverse complementarity of space and time.
In that regard, the main logic principle of the scientific method defined by Aristotle is called hylomorphism, or duality, which, simply stated, says that anything real has both—a substance or energy and a form or information. It opposes both “informativeonly theories” (Pythagorism, the idea that a mathematical equation is truth per se) and “energeticonly theories” (quantum entropy and quantum cosmology) of reality.
Hylomorphism is at the heart of the scientific method since its inception. In a static vision of reality, it means all particles need a reproductive body to exist; all informative heads need a body. Galileo already said that the language of truth is the geometry of lines and cycles, a sentence ill translated later into the concept that mathematics is the only language of God. What he meant is that the Universe is a game of cycles of information and lines of energy—the “vortices and res extensa” of Descartes.
Cyclical, moving time clocks or fixed information on one hand and lineal, moving energy or fixed space on the other are synonymous. In the graph, this duality is due to the paradox of Galileo that makes us perceive sometimes energy in motion and sometimes fixed space, sometimes fixed forms of information and sometimes moving clocks of time, forms in action.
The graph explains a law of modern physics, the holographic principle, which states that information is bidimensional. Indeed, information, as this page or screen, has two dimensions, height and width, while energy has also two dimensions, length and width. Both together merge to create the fourdimensional fields of the real Universe in which the interaction of “high information” and “long, moving energy” creates the three dimensions of classic Euclidean space and a fourth dimension of motion and rhythm.
Because the Universe is fractal, those dimensions are local for each species. It is what Einstein called the diffeomorphic principle.
In the graph, we draw the ideal cycle of time traced by a rotating particle, which leaves behind a fixed ideal form of information: a disk that establishes a discontinuity between its inner vital space and the external Universe. And we draw the ideal movement of energy, which traces a line that might reproduce laterally, becoming a plane or wave of space, since the most natural form of moving energy is a triangular plane. Thus, most organic spaces and limbs of energy are triangular, planar, bidimensional forms that fluctuate in their width and length. For that reason, energy is expelled in triangular flows through a rocket while energetic systems move, forming triangles called steps, as human legs do.
The main parameters of a cycle or bit of temporal information are frequency and cyclical height. Those cycles combine in knots of cyclical frequencies that give origin to an immense number of different temporal species: Σ time cycles = informative being. Height as a dimension of information also means that as time passes information increases, so does the height of any systems. For example, life systems evolved from “planarian worms” to tall men as the information of life systems increased.
Matter evolves from bidimensional vortices of mass into quark EinsteinBose condensates, which as we shall see have a dimension of height. So dimensions are local, fractal, created by the arrow of “fractal information” and have a function. In the appendix, we shall consider according to that holographic principle the processes of creation and destruction of dimensions in the physical universe. Consider a simple example: you can warp this bidimensional page and get a third height dimension with a lot of “fractal lines of form”; you are creating both, a new dimension and information.
On the other hand, lineal bytes of amorphous, moving energy aggregate into planes of bidimensional space, adding its dimension of width: Σe=S.
In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension; but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions, which we can observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point. This fact is essential to understand logically the meaning of bidimensionality and the holographic principle that states that physical information is bidimensional. In Euclidean mathematics, to consider that there are two dimensions of energy and two dimensions of information is absurd unless we accept that each point of the Universe has a minimal volume. So a bidimensional plane, as a galaxy or the Universe at large is and as this screen or paper sheet is, seems totally plane without any thickness till we come closer to it. Then we realize that a page is a network of nonEuclidean points that will therefore have:
 A minimal width given by the height of each point and…
 A discontinuous zone of “dark spacetime” not perceived or connected by the network of points.
It is important to understand bidimensionality in terms of nonEuclidean geometry. That is, each point of a bidimensional sheet of information, including this page or screen, has, when observed in close range, certain height or internal dimensions. This fact explains why certain mathematical objects, like strings, seem to have 3 × 3 dimensions (those are the internal dimensions of the string, when seeing in close proximity as a fractal point of a lower scale of form).
So the complex topologies of the Universe can be reduced once we understand its nonEuclidean fractal and dual structure, as Galileo put it, “to a game of cycles (of information) and lines (of energy)”, which in physics are called forces and particles. In simple terms, dimensions are the perceptions of lineal energies and cyclical clocks of time, as “fixed” information and space. Those motions, perceived as “fixed” shapes by the eye, create the sensation of space, which Einstein rightly defined as follows:
Space is motion relative to a simultaneous frame of reference.
Thus, spatial energy is lineal, moving energy, creating surfaces of space with its movement that we see fixed, as fixed pictures of lines of moving cars seem to elongate space. Thus, space and distance are two ways of perceiving a volume of energy. It also means that the space we see is the “light membrane.” We see lightspace. And so what we see are exactly the three perpendicular Euclidean dimensions of the energetic fields of light: height is the electric field, width the magnetic field, and length the reproductive cspeed of light. It also follows that our light world cannot go faster than light, which is a tautology since it is made of light.
We are thus all fractal pieces of light spacetime, which has evolved into complex forms of in/form/ation. We are made of evolved lightspace.
Thus, dimensions, as everything in physics, are easier to “see” with visual, topological models, the ultimate language of the Universe since God doesn’t play dices but is a painter in four dimensions, two of energy, a plane of lineal motions, and two of information, cyclical motions, whose bites and bits combine to create all the fractal organisms of reality, all the shapes you see, from the informative particles of physical space to the cyclical, neuronal path/thoughts of your spherical head.
Because a clock of information is a cycle, it has two dimensions, height and rhythm, as it happens to the screen or page of a book where you read this text. So height becomes a dimension of information and the Universe becomes a game of two bidimensional types of entities: planes of energy and cycles of information with height. This is obvious; your head of information, an antenna, and any informative system is on top of your energy body. Because the Universe is fractal, each entity is a piece of bits and bites of energy and information and so the relative height of each species is local. This is called in relativity the diffeomorphic principle.
What matters is that now we can understand how energy becomes information, how geometrical space and clocks of time combine. In Galilean physics, when time was lineal, not a cyclical clock of information, it could not be transformed into space. Energy and information could not be transformed into each other, as only things with the same number of dimensions can be transformed into each other. So now we rewrite the energetic principle of physics as
Energy never dies but constantly trans/forms itself into in/form/ation and vice versa.
The beauty of the fractal paradigm resides in the fact that physical energy and information are only the first bricks of an ever more complex, evolving Universe, created by chains of information cycles, which are all the time exchanging energy flows, back and forth, through smaller fractal particles or organizing themselves into bigger wholes. Let us consider the properties of those three elements: energy (limbs, fields): information (particles, heads); and its combination (bodies, waves) and some of its species in different scales of reality so you grasp the essential selfsimilarity of it all, which means physics is not the Saint Grail of science but merely the description of the simplest cycles and lines of energy and information:
Tiƒfuture clocks of temporal information > ExI: present waves < Æs: past, energetic space
Form: Time, Function: Information Spacetime Wave Form: Space, Function: energy
Mass, charge, vortex Waves Force, field, plane of energetic space
Small, still Rhythmic Large, moving fast
Tall, Perpendicular, Elliptic Long, Parallel
Bidimensional: Height, Width 3D +1 Beat 2D: Length, Width
Cyclical, Rotational, imploding Steady state Lineal, uncoiling, exploding
Informative, Frequency Transversal wave Lineal Speed
Singular, Broken, Fractal form Continuous, amorphous, differentiable
Intelligent, perceptive Beautiful Strong, fast, masculine.
Social networks, creative Dual, organic Darwinian herds, destructive.
Future, evolved predator Present Past, energetic victim
Life arrow Reproduction Death arrow.
Particles of Time Waves of spacetime Entropy Fields
Female, yin principle Gay Male, yang principle
OHeads Bodies Limbs.
Blue, Black Yellow, Green, Grey Red, White
Energetic space and informative time are opposite in form and function, but they easily transform into each other in iterative=reproductive processes that give origin to the complementary forms of the Universe, as all what exists is indeed made of fractal, extended, spatial energies and bits of informative, cyclical, imploding information.
The two states of reality, energetic space and informative clocks of time, are in fact lineal planes and cyclical forms in movement that combine together, creating 4D spacetime fields of temporal energy, like the light wave that illustrates the previous graph, made of a bidimensional, lineal field of magnetic energy over which a perpendicular highelectric field of information moves rhythmically in cyclical waves.
Height is a dimension of time because the repetition of time cycles accumulates in the dimension of height. Informative bits accumulate in “hyperbolic” topologies that wrinkle and create the height of any spacetime field as a whole entity made of cyclical parts: cells accumulate as bits of information and a child grows; cycles accumulate in a hurricane that grows in height; life species evolve from planarians, simple energetic systems, into human beings and informative species of maximal height.^{1} Einstein’s curved spacetime cycles bend the energy of vacuum into vortices of masses that accumulate in height, creating a black hole, and so on. Thus, height is the dimension that accumulates information in evolving process, erased in the inverse events of biological death or transformation of mass into energy E=mc^{2}.
So the essence of a dynamic, physical spacetime field is the combination and transformation of bidimensional, high information into bidimensional, flat scales of energy. When both fields merge, they create a real threedimensional wave form, which adds a fourth dimension of frequency or rhythm, as in a ray of light, the simplest spacetime field, made of two perpendicular planes: one of electric information with the dimension of height and frequency, and one of magnetic energy, with the dimension of width and speed. Yet since light is the space we use to construct our spacetime mindvision of the Universe, for that reason, Euclidean/Cartesian coordinates show the same three perpendicular dimensions of light.
In the realm of physics, one of the main proofs of such bidimensionality and the properties of information described before is the fact that it is the only explanation we have of a recently discovered phenomenon that the holographic principle says information is bidimensional and the discovery that when we become smaller back into the quantum world, dimensions diminish into two dimensions 1
– The holographic principle, a key element of modern physics, says information in the Universe is bidimensional. Even human beings create three dimensionalities, combining two dimensions of form perceived by each eye. Indeed, two dimensions of timeinformation and two dimensions of spaceenergy combine in all beings to create all systems of reality.
– Fractal relativists have recently obtained our macrocosmic spacetime, departing from twodimensional entities in the quantum world 1. Thus, there are no more than four dimensions in the Universe. This is logic; when we go from small to bigger, we grow in dimensions. Quantum physicists who ignore logic principles pretend that the small strings have more dimensions up to ten. This is ridiculous. It is a logic paradox. The small is smaller because it has fewer dimensions. Now a group of fractal theorists have proved it with a method called causal triangulation. Another group has studied black holes as fractals of bidimensional vortices, quark masses, advancing the concept of mass as a bidimensional vortex of information.
What truly matters however of the dimensional and geometric analysis we have done of energy/entropy/expansive motion and information/implosive motion/cyclical form is to understand its complementarity and combinations as fourdimensional waves of reality since pure information and pure energy are “dead” ends, and what truly matters is to generate balanced combinations of both.
A fact that we represent with the “generator equation” of fractal spacetimes is:
Spe < ≈ > Tƒ (dynamic motion) or Spe x Tƒ=∆(static motion)
Which expresses the principle of conservation of energy and information and becomes therefore the fundamental equation of the fractal Universe since all that exists requires both—energetic limbs/forces and informative cycles/heads to become a real fourdimensional being of the Universe. Those restraints which physicists often forget are indeed a key guide to consider which beings are stable and exist and which beings are unstable fantasies that do not follow the laws of balance and harmony of reality.
The beauty of the fractal paradigm resides in the fact that physical energy and information are only the first bricks of an ever more complex, evolving Universe, created by chains of information cycles, which are all the time exchanging energy flows, back and forth, through smaller fractal particles or organizing themselves into bigger wholes. Let us consider the properties of those three elements: energy (limbs, fields): information (particles, heads); and its combination (bodies, waves) and some of its species in different scales of reality so you grasp the essential selfsimilarity of it all, which means physics is not the Saint Grail of science but merely the description of the simplest cycles and lines of energy and information.
3. η: Physical networks
THE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE: THE TIMESPACE ORGANISM.
So next after the åctions of the being, we realise those actions will be performed by specialised parts and the result will be entropic/feeding, informative/gauging and reproductive/iterative networks that perform those actions provoking entropy flows in lower scales or packing the being upwards into social groups ∆±1
If you have grasped the ternary structure of an open ball of energy, encircled by a membrane connected through ‘networks’, forces in the case of physics, to the singularity point, then you have the topological wisdom needed to understand all the structures of the physical Universe, where unlike in biological supœrganisms the networks are geometrically perfect in form and motion, hence subject to the essence of the purest synoptic language of timespace, ilogic topology.
But while physicists only study the form of those networks, without understanding its function, 5D³ studies both at the same time. So after observing in the graph repeated ad nausea in this blog those functions for all species we can study them in the 3 scales of physical beings.
All this means to verify the value of mathematical physics, we can always ‘refer’ it to the 3 elements of ∆ST. If we consider a living being as the thermodynamic obvious case, with a membrane, a singularity brain and a vital indistinguishable mass of cells as its vital space you get the picture.
Let us now consider 3 examples of the 3 scales of physics.
∆1: quantum electromagnetic systems.
We know that systems have three elements. What are them in quantum electromagnetic systems?
In the atom is ‘zoo’ obvious that we shall hardly comment on them:
ðƒ: the electron is the membrain.
ðï: the quark nuclei is he singularity.
ST: The electromagnetic flows the vital space; while gravitomagnetic forces with its INVERSE geometry (heaviside formula of gravitomagnetism), connects the atom and gives away the ‘tiny’ amount of entropic energy the quantum scale allows to escape and ’emerge’ into the gravitational ∆+1 scale.
∆º: In our thermodynamic scale, the crystal solid state creates the inner image which the atomic shell manages to send, through the ‘liquid’ flow of electronic information.
So an electromagnetic system and its equations, must refer to those three elements. Let us see if its equation scorrespond to them:
In the graph a charge will have the three natural parts of reality, the ‘cyclical membrane’, (i.e. in electromagnetism, the magnetic field), the central singularity (ie. the charge) and the intermediate flows of energy and information between both (the electric and magnetic currents induced by each other).
So we need the 4 laws of Heaviside<Maxwell of the graph to describe such physical systems.
YET they are NOT the a priori language that determines electromagnetism, but the ‘linguistic expression’ of the Fractal GST, SPACETIME GENERATOR OF SUCH SYSTEMS WITH:
 Tiƒ: chargesingularity (1), Spe: magnetic field (2), and ST: the exchanges of motion=entropy and form=frequency between them (3,4):
In the graph we can see another example – the laws of circulation of fluids and electric currents can be reused to the basic scheme of a ternary system with an inner solid state, a liquid around, within an external entropic field. Of course, the purpose of science being mostly praxis makes the algebraic equations far more useful but the purpose of this blog being the ultimate whys, the spatial view shows how once and again nature can be reduced to the three arrows of timespace and the scales of the fifth dimension.
The organic Universe.
The fractal Universe is a mathematical proposition only – in the present milieu of astrophysics where only mathematics is the language of god.
We are however not interested in the mathematical abstract reductionist description of astrophysics, overdeveloped but limited for our understanding of what is REALLY the Universe of relational spacetime. Our advances to those results are of a deeper philosophical meaning, as it goes straight to the foundations of reality, fractal space defined by 5D metric equations, which orders all the fractal vital spaces and different speeds of time clocks of the Universe, and the 3 arrows of cyclical time, entropy, information and its energy combinations.
It is then when we can give meaning to reality beyond its geometric, spatial properties, regarding its ‘time sequences and causalities’ purpose – to reproduce information and duration (infinite in time).
This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from a hypothetical birth of the entire Universe (impossible in a Fractal Paradigm, which at best would consider a ‘larger’ scale above galaxies).
In the graph we observe some fundamental consequences of fractal space and cyclical time: the three arrows of time order reality into ‘wordlccles between birth and extinction’, whereas extinction is the final entropic explosion of any system of Nature. Hence bigbangs are deaths of matter systems. The 3 arrows of time also become the 3 topological components of all local super organisms, its entropic limbs/fields, iterative bodywaves and informative particle/heads. So systems can be seen in space as ternary topologies and in time as sequential processes, first guided by the arrow of information that warps them, as time clocks are cyclical and so galaies are vortices of information that warp space into mass (‘Time curves space into mass’ said Einstein).
And so IT happens for all laws of mathematical physics that we shall relate to the ‘laws and structures of ∆ºst systems’: its ultimate cause is NOT the fact they can be mirrored in a mathematical language but the fact they followed the ternary laws of ∆ST, as 10 dimensional beings of fractal spacetime, ∆ºst, which an ∆º mind with a selfcentred pov can ‘perceive’.
The ternary structure of reality.
Thus we shall see how ultimately mathematical physics is related to those laws: differential equations will express fundamental gst actions between scales of the fifth dimension (entropic motions will be described by derivatives of second order, energy actions by those of first order and so on); topological laws will combine the three only topological variations as expressions of the three arrows of timespace of all beings; and each of the mathematical equations will be expressed from one of the three topological frames of reference (cartesian, polar or cylindrical). And so on.
Now we need before closing this intro to topological physics, to introduce a first variation on its theme: we say usually that the ðf mind is in the centre and the clockcircle in the external membrane, but as we study more systems in more scales we shall see that those positions in its control of the system are often exchanged, as both work always together to control the vital space, those variations are perfectly natural to the structure of systems. In the graph we see the earth has its brain in the surface – its life species, and its ‘heart’ in the magnetic centre, as humans do (and in life we find as in atomic matter, with the quark center, the opposite form, the cell with its DNA uncle).
IT IS THEN worth to notice that this symmetry will be one of the main dualities at play in all systems, as both together ‘invaginate’ and control the vital space and switch or invert the arrows and direction of its flows – given the fact that the fractal generator allows all time and space reversals and trans/formation within three ternary scales/forms & ages. Physicists have explored in depth of those symmetries, the time reversal one, but are still lacking on the other two main ∆st symmetries.
So for example, the magnetic field plays the role of membrane, when it jumps over the first scale of electrons and as the magnetic number, organises them all together, and can be considered then the social ‘brain’ of the atom; yet as the attractive domains plays the ‘force’ game in the next scaling, when its domains are organised by a looping wire in an electrodynamic engine.
And it ‘sips’ upward through gravitomagnetic flows the necessary entropic energy for the ‘mass field’ of the ∆+1 cosmic scale to emerge .
The 5 DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE OF fractal superorganisms.
So we have the elements that create all realities as fractal selfsimilar super organisms, coexisting in 3 scales of size, with 3 topologies of space, 3 time functions/ages, all wrapped up by a membrain – an external enclosure focused and controlled by an internal still linguistic singularity that controls it all and will ‘act’ to ensure the system receives enough entropic motions, information for its particlehead and mix both to reproduce clonic beings – THE PROGRAM OF THE 10 DIMENSIONAL SUPERORGANISM OR fundamental species of the Universe.
We shall call the sum of its 3 ‘scales’ of different size and different time speed, the ‘fifth dimension’ in a general way, to ‘respect’ the present simpler analysis of 3 space dimensions and one time dimension, in Einstein’s work. But as we advance more in the details of the model of relational spacetime, developed in this blog, we shall realise the best way to explain reality is accounting for its 10 dimensions/parameters of reality:
 3 dimensions of topological space: lineal expansive space; hyperbolic, iterative wavelike forms and implosive, cyclical, informative forms, symmetric to the 3 arrows/functions of time:
 3 dimensions of time: entropic, past, disordering timespace; reproductive, repetitive=present timespace; and future, informative, cyclical timespace; which ARE LOCAL arrows for each being that ‘increases its information through most of his life time’ in 3 ages, and dies in an entropic explosion in a single quanta of time – reason why we give the name of ‘local past’ to an entropic, fast process, and local future to the much longer process of warping of entropy into information through the lifeexistence of any physical or biological system.
 3 scales of size and relative time clocks, which give organic properties to reality. As all systems are made of smaller parts, and are themselves part of larger world, and so, we need to fully describe the being, to account from its 3 dimensions of space, of time and of scale, which are warped together into a whole by
 The mind, which has a linguistic, still mapping of all those parts, put together and enclosed by a membrane, that breaks the system into an outer world and inner region.
So we talk then of [ (3 space≈3 time) x 3 scales] + @mind = ‘membrain’; as the needed parameters to have a ‘whole description of the being’.
And depending on how much of those elements we describe we can get ‘different number of dimensions’, from the maximal possible number (6 spacetime dimensions in each scale, multiplied by 3 scales, which give us 18 dimensions, plus the ‘whole minddimension’) to the bare minimum, considering merely the 3 spacetime dimensions of a system seen in a single plane.
All those descriptions have happened in science in different times and terms, as it happens today in the mathematical description of closed time strings and open spatial strings, which go from 3 to 26; but most are 10 dimensional strings (described with 10 parameters).
We shall in that sense adopt also two basic analysis: the synoptic •5D³ analysis, from the perspective of scales, packed in the fifth dimension, and its ‘metric equation’, (max. space size = min. speed of time clocks) that harmonises all those scales, as smaller systems run faster cycles and can code with information larger wholes, and wholes have more energymotion and can feed and control smaller parts with it (so your cells code your information and you move them as a whole in synchronicity) allowing the symbiosis of the organic Universe.
We write it though with the addenda of •, the symbol for the mindsingularity (or @, which is the symbol for the membrain, the mind and the external sensorial skin, which if you realise IS WHAT YOU ARE: A STILL MINDMAPPING OF LANGUAGES OF THOUGHT, which extract information through your sensorial skin), and explains Galileo’s paradox: you ‘perceive information in stillness.
4. ≤ A(nti)symmetry
There are many views on such simple elements, specially when we fully understand the key principles of its operandi which are either opposite, Darwinian, or social, parallel – a principle which is as most of the principles ignored by science, vital, organic, biological; and either bring together the asymmetries between lower planes of more information and larger planes of more energy or bring them into destruction.
So goes for the asymmetry between  and O forms, depending on how they come to each other tangentially or ‘penetrating’ to reproduce LITERALLY as we fuk each other’s gender (: i tell you is all vital geometries.
And so goes for the different 1st and third ages of existences…
So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, the most well known that between:
names (forms) and verbs (motions); colours of blue and red, form and motion which can either be played reproductively into green or anticomplementary into yellow, the colour of eviL destruction, of gold (:
It is all in the codes of colours, we shall see even in the game of Nature.
All is in the codes of the Universe and its operators, also clear in mathematics, with the duality of inverted operations, + , X ÷, √ xª, ∫∂.
So the simplest method of extracting a meaningful quantity of information on a being or event requires to comment on the 4±operandi ‘5’ perspectives, even when we study as we do in the first line, those elements in themselves. In this post we shall deal thus with time from the perspective of space, time, symmetries, scales and mind languages that ‘stop it’ in the singularity of t=motion zero, from black holes to eddies to charges, to brains to frozen genetic DNA…
We shall first, after an introduction to give a general understanding on the structures of physics…
@: start with the philosophical corrections of humind approach to physics. Then…
S≈T: Consider the symmetries of space and time that create Physical super organisms.
∆§ And finally give a fast tour through the scales of physical systems, analysing in each of them, our 5 elements of our inquire.
Let us from the general post on a(nti)symmetry bring some basic facts of the organic universe illunderstood in physics which will be instrumental to fully correct 4D into 5D physics. The elements they lack: the sentient Universe born out of mindsingularities, the organic Universe born out of the coexistence of 3 scales that share through the dimensions of entropy and information (45D) energy and form between scales, and the most beautiful of all concepts which actually only physics and art has partially understood – antisymmetry – expressed in physics through the concept of breaking symmetries.
Asymmetry; Symmetry= social parallelism and perpendicular antisymmetry
The essential principles of reality are in physics better expressed in geometrical terms, for the aforementioned reasons of denial of the ‘will of existence’ to the pointparticles of physics, quarks and electrons, which do gauge information, move to fields of energy, absorb it, reproduce in other particles and evolve socially in 3 aei simplex and 2 ou complex actions that start the living existence of the fractal organic Universe.
This denied by the ‘electronic humind’ which seems to think their electrons are special chosen of go(l)d, fetishsweat of the sun, with magic properties once enters the crystalline of gtac atoms (:quip intended it is better to cast the duality of entropic, darwinian destructive behaviour, and social, evolutionary one between those 2 initial particles and all others scales of matter built with them in terms of its geometric Asymmetry between the 3 scales of ‘quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational’ matter, the 3 time ages of ‘gaseous, liquid and solid’ states, between plasma generation and nuclear extinction; and the 3 lineal=flat, cyclical=spherical and sinusoidal=hyperobolic topologies of space that all those scales display.
The asymmetry between  and O, ∆±1 and past, gaseous, entropic and future, solid ordered states of matter is the fundamental property in terms of logic thought of the Universe, which can either derive into:
Symmetric coming together into the intermediate states of liquid, present, iterative time; associated to Øhyperbolic, sinusoidal body waves, dominant in the ∆º intermediate thermodynamic states; which as it happens are complementary to each other, and maximised in the human being, selfcentred view of reality (we are liquid hyperbolic body waves of present time).
Nt. on epistemology: This again is NOT on the highest philosophical thought because we are the centre of the Universe, but because in absolute relativity each informative knot of perception bias reality to feel himself the centre of its limited world. But for the time being as we are just humans and I will not soon emerge as a God of History (see section on paradises 🙂 we shall remain in our position as the only possible way to perceive reality, latter commenting on other weird selfcentred minds as the Maldacena Black hole holography of the galactic body, and so on.
Back to asymmetry, when all those wonderful liquid states happen they tend to happen because if we were to cast the process in terms of nonAE (noneuclidean, non aristotelian, ilogic geometry, the vital expansion of the discipline) because geometrically the parts involved enter according to the 4th postulate of into a parallel relationship, which does NOT extract by friction more than a extremely limited quantity of motion and form, normally through an ∆1 medium of microparticles (2nd postulate), which allow the noneuclidean points (1st postulate) to perceive a finite number of parallels (5th postulate), to form social planes (3rd postulate).
So mathematically all happens in an orderly fashion according to the rules of ilogic geometry, but its chaotic reality means merely that huminds are still stuck in Euclid and Aristotle, and moreover do not understand why parallelism and ‘respect’ to each other distances work so well as all those points moving in orderly fashion in liquid, sinusoidal flows of spacetime are supposed to be dumb fuks… which magically find their way.
On the contrary, when they are dumb fuks, blind to each other, they collide perpendicularly. And so they do not magically find their way and do NOT evolve socially raising its forms to new planes of higher organisation, which we term generally as the fifth dimension of eusocial love, but break into scattering entropic states of dissolution, colliding randomly in ‘markowian’, memoriless processes which sooner or latter kill the whole, expand the space between the pointparticles and finally stop them in an entropic heat relaxed into a latent state.
And this is what we call antisymmetric annihilations. So the asymmetry, symmetry and antisymmetry states for any of the parameters of reality are closed related to the 3 relative planes of existence of the being, as social evolution into wholes, present liquid states where the action is happening and entropic states when the dissolution and PERPENDICULAR collision, except when that perpendicular collision is clearly organised with the finality of ending the life=vital energy of a system and absorbing it for reproductive purposes, of which physical systems are also filled but ‘unbeknownst’ to the humind ego – from light photons absorbed as cells of electronic nebulae, to electronic nebulae absorbed by hungry up quarks, to quarks digested by hungry strangelets, themselves food for thought of top quark stars, aka black holes.
Here is then when the biological properties of matter will allow us to reduce as the essential occkham’s razor the multiplicity of inflationary mathematical equations to what it HAPPENS. Ie, we can potentially eat oil, swallow coins and breathe gas but only a crazy child will affirm that happens often and it is good. So happens by all the potential equations of physics, the organic properties of matter and its vital laws preclude that certain actions happen, certain forms are absorbed by others and certain ones do not except for accidental mistakes. And so we conclude the Universe is positive in its search preferential for symmetry over antisymmetry, social evolution in wholes over dissolution, which is most often product of a feeding action that an accidental error and establish as the arrow of absolute future the growth of social forms in the fifth dimension:
All this, as we must always walk between the multiplicity of our descriptions merging the entanglement of all the elements of reality and the needed order in which actions tend to be=come to fully grasp that order we consider the ternary symmetries of scales, ages and adjacent topologies, which structure the being internally through ∆±1 scales, in time through 3 ages and in space externally through its 3 topological forms, we have all of them expressed in the generator equation, where we add to the customary 3 topological dimensions of space, reflected in its dominance in the 3 ages of time, the fifth dimension of social generation which is the FIRST to happen in the seminal age of the being, and the fourth dimension of entropic dissolution, which tends to be the last, or future order, even IF HUMINDS see them by wishful thinking in the inverse way – ultimately balancing each other antisymmetric entropy and symmetric generation devolving to asymmetric zero sums, for the game to start again:
∆1: Generation > ∆º: $t lineal limbs/potentials (dominant in a past young age) <: ∑∏ iterative, hyperbolic øbodywaves (dominant in an iterative present) > ∆+1: OParticlehead, which commands the being as a whole in an external world, dominant in its future 3rd age, before the system explodes entropically ∆+1<<∆1.
To notice then how reality can be observed through those asymmetries, which means the properties of each of the two extremes of the 3 ternary elements of reality are asymmetric to each other and so they cancel each other.
That is cells/atoms/individuals are to the wholes asymmetric as MICROpoints maximise according to ‘54D metric inverse arrows’, Max. Size in space x Min. Time speed of informative clock cycles = Constant information vs. Macropoints that maximise its enclosure of energysize.
So goes for limbs/potentials vs. Oheads/particles asymmetric in its lineal vs. cyclical form. And so goes the first age of life or relative past dominated by lineal motion asymmetric to the 3rd age dominated by still, linguistic perception as the freedom of lineal paths become closed trajectories of cyclical form.
We then express those 3 asymmetries as the 3 ‘Galilean Dualities’ of motion vs. form, parts vs. wholes, lines vs. cycles, which again as they emerge in different ‘scales’ of reality will be interpreted mathematically, philosophically, biologically, sociologically in multiple ‘jargons’ all of them equivalent and understood fully in terms of dualities and trinities of existence.
Indeed because the system is NOT only dual, but ternary, the PHYSICAL asymmetries of timeages, spacetopologies and scales become merged into the LIQUIDpresenthyperbolic bodywave interacting and mixing together to form a single one.
Nt. Incidentally my only position in academia worth to notice was as World Chair of Duality in the International systems society, till my activism against the militaryindustrial complex became globally infamous and pissed off the congress who cancelled the discipline, in the way capitalism cancelled Hegelian dialectics and the Chin emperor, taoism, the 2 previous great ‘philosophical understanding of the obvious that from ‘1 the whole’ comes 2, yin and yang, thesis and antithesis, motion and form, lineal and angular momentum, and from 2 comes 3, qi, synthesis, energy; and this we can put it in terms of asymmetry as the duality, antisymmetry as its perception into opposites, symmetry as merge, back into a full whole.
So I tried when I was part of the group to convince the presidents of the association to call it ‘TRINITY’ but trinity has a bad reputation either as fundamentalist ABomb or fundamentalist religion. And yet TRINITY is the true name of the game. As ‘from 3 come all the beings in existence’ Chengtzu.
So while trinity appears more clearly in the concepts of lineal and cyclical momentum, becoming energy beings, lines and cycles generating conics and hyperbolic waves, and so on… when we truly want to transcend into the logic of the game with no reference to reality the somehow more nebulous but most general of all concepts are those of asymmetry, symmetry and antisymmetry as they embody not only geometric but vital, organic meanings lost in the external classic description of them.
So the best expression of the game is two different beings colluding, or a present bodywave breaking constantly its symmetry into two opposite functions that can either annihilate each other anti symmetrically, as waves do or complementary reinforce each other back into symmetry, concepts those hardly used in science beyond physics and even there illunderstood that now we expand to all sciences.
Indeed, in physics much has been done with the term symmetry since Noether theorem, but mostly when talking on philosophical terms, dyslexic physicists with overdeveloped computerised abstract mathematical brains, that seem to leave little room for anything else do NOT have the remotest idea of what they talk about (quip intended), regardless of its mathematical functions, which do the job quite nicely by themselves – so computers do it even better, but hardly any humind will think that the computer churning out results with f(x)=ƒ(x), have any idea what symmetry and antisymmetry means.
Now we know, and so we will be enlightening many whys from the Pauli exclusion principle, that essential quality of particles of matter, which nobody has ever clearly explained, to the Lorentz transforms – but somewhere in the future of 2018? time permitted, as this is an encyclopaedia of all knowledge, akin more to the Galactica encyclopaedia of Asimov’s foundation, and will take a few generations to fill up. And certainly as biohistory the destiny of all of us is more important the equations of social sciences will grow faster than those of noneuclidean mathematical physics in that fourth line (just added the 7 ages of God yesterday).
So this said even when physicists define symmetry they are in fact talking of geometry without clear meaning. Important within the concept are then a mirror symmetry, which is basically a reproductive symmetry between complementary beings as in RnaDNA and gender, that allows two similar asymmetric forms to confront each other for purposes of meaningful pegging and reproduction; often deriving into bilateral symmetry which is a form of social communication that allows two forms to handle a vital space within them, encircling it. So they are forms of topological symmetry that derive into scalar symmetry, of two social parts that become one.
This is the kind of physical concept of symmetry we shall use here, and relates also to terms as parity, and so on. What we reject as mumblerumble is the whole Noether thing of using ‘symmetric’ concepts toe explain the conservation of the 3 fractal components of all beings, lineal, angular momentum and energy and all the mumblerumble about time and space derived of it. We shall be far more clear on our terminology as what angular, lineal momentum, energy time and space mean and how they are conserved in infinite fractal beings:
The game is a game of identical or complementary social parts that become elements of fractal organicism. This parallelism of beings which are clones by reproduction of each other allows the social symmetry between systems that are complementary to each other and meet in the middle term. So to vitalise geometric concepts, are essential elements to make sense of how reality, comes together and pegs into a single being.
A(NTI)SYMMETRY in physics.
Ternary balances: ∆§±¡,xO≈Ø, <≈>
For all what has been said the principles of balance for a system to exist in permanent equilibrium are 3+@, that is, convergence into a present of past and future, entropy and information; convergence in a hyperbolic bodywave of  and O, convergence in the ∆ø mind scale of the ∆¡+¡ planes of the system.
It is when any of the balances aforementioned breaks, when the system breaks its symmetry, splitting its parts, which might seem as a creative process, because the whole appears as one, asymmetric merged being, but normally is a destructive one.
Yet for the full balance to take place, there are several other secondary properties of a wellbalanced ternary entity in its 3 x 3 + @=10 dimensions to hold.
This we can express in formal terms, with the concept of the 10 dimensional perfectly balanced universe, ‘looking inwards’ towards its present, wavehyperbolic, ∆ø singularitycentered Universe. Which means the ternary elements must be adjacent in the proper position to each other, the system must be selfcentered into the singularity ∆ø scale and the functionmotion must be iterative, reproductive, dominated by the bodywave state.
Or in other terms, each part must be in the proper place, performing the proper function.
The classic examples: particles too hot, potentials too cold
When those elements break the system easily breaks its symmetry.
For example, the the Headparticle whose function is still, informative, hence with minimal motionenergy is in a point of maximal potential symmetry (the infamous Mexican hat), symmetry will easily break as the particle will look for a ground energy state in which it can perform its gauging/informative /still mapping function, and vice versa: when a ‘potential field’ whose function is the inverse – maximal motion energy ‘cools’ down, its function breaks and the symmetry breaks, giving origin to the different forces of nature.
Those are in fact, the two fundamental forms of symmetry breaking in Physics, studied ad nauseam by physicists.
10 Dimensional Universe.
While we use the concept of a scalar fifth dimension, under the correspondence principle (using the models of classic physics), a more formal analysis of the equations of mathematical physics and ∆st makes easier to study reality in terms of 10 Dimensional equations of logic form, considering the 3 scales of size, the 3 topologies of space, the 3 ages of time and the ‘singularity+membrain’ which forms the linguistic mind of the system as its 10 dimensions that create a supœrganism plugged into a larger world. The graph shows them for the galaxy.
In the graph the 10 dimensions of any physical system in this case the dimensions of the galaxy, 3 ∆±1 scalar dimensions as the system coexist on them, three topological space dimension, three age, temporal dimensions and the mind membrain. Those are the dimensions of any system of reality (we use the term 5D for classic analysis given the preponderance of 3+1 st analysis in classic physics, but this is the real deal. 10 will also be the dimensions of strings, but the whole subject is too complex for this introduction and i might say quite irrelevant, beyond understanding the Tduality and the vital properties of strings that reproduce, switch on and of between time and space stats and follow nicely by ‘spontaneous generation’ – that is physicists hard work with maths, magically all the laws of GST.
If we use for each of those dimensions an equation or formalism that defines it ceteris paribus, then we have 10 subequations of the generator that expresses them all:
Γ•: ∆1: $Past≈entropic field ≤≥ ∆ ØST present≈iterative wave ≤≥ ∆+1 O future=informtive particle.
Whereas the whole‘mind’ is the generator, the three scales are defined topologically: field, Oparticle, Øwave and in terms of its past to future functions (entropy, iteration and information).
Proof of string theory. The 10 dimensions of any Universal system.
Incidentally this simple reality of pointparticles as open doors to the lower scale of reality, the ∆4 dark world becomes the immediate proof sought after by physicists in search of the meaning of strings – where are the strings of the fifth dimension? (: alas the immediate answer is that each pointparticle does have as the first simpler 10dimensional string theory (by far the most proper, directly in connection with all the laws of ∆st; indeed have you realise: closed string=time cycles, lineal strings=spatial entropic motions; 10 dimensions = GST 10 dimensions, and now, point particles as lines, the connected flow between the pointparticle and the lower scale, where physicists have found almost every variation and ∆+•+s+t perspective in maths but still don’t know how to interpret it).
So how we measure then those 3 ‘parts’ of any system in mathematical physics?
As usual thee isomorphic method implies that what we find in one scale will be closely resembled by other systems in other scales.
We shall much latter finish this tour on the fractal Universe, studying the smallest of all scales, purely theoretical but likely when properly written in terms of space and time, to be truth – the scale of strings, the dark world of gravitation the ∆±4 Universe…
In the graph, a simultaneous physical or biological super organism, is the sum of 3 topological adjacent, bidimensional ST systems, the ‘potential field’ (2D), the vortexparticle (1D), which together create a bodywave of energy (3D) that iterates the system. Such simple ternary form, and all its variations and states suffice to explain also all physical systems, but as physicists lack the ‘clear picture’ of the whole, their descriptions are often fogged images of the 3 dimensions between ‘informative seeds’ (0D) and entropic deaths (4D).
To this fact it adds the ‘arrogance of the humind’ embedded in the @self centred nature of ‘vortex of perception’ which loves to make things very complicated for the ‘high popes’ to feel above heavens and earth. We shall thus debunk the ‘savant idiots’ of each discipline, as the Universe is ‘simple and not malicious’, bidimensionally simple. As each of those St dimensions of form and function are thus the fundamental dual structure of the fractal Universe.
In the graph, we see reality both as fixed distances of space and as a series of discontinuous motions, and time. Thus reality is perceived either as a single lineal geometry or time duration. And inversely cyclical forms, as seen as circles or as cyclical clocks, with a frequency that determines its capacity to carry information, when it becomes fixed as ‘memorial space’.
Thus 5D dualities of O vs.  motion vs. form are the key paradoxes, which need to be resolved for each species to understand the game of spacetime:
Information is defined as the maximal number of DIMENSIONAL FORMs=MOTIONs of an entity (Galileo’s paradox: motion indistinguishable of distance, due to the spacetime symmetry).
SYMMETRIES OF SPACETIME are then possible because only entities with the same dimensions can transform into each other. So now we have 4 different bidimensional entities, information (bidimensional form with motion), time, cyclical form with motion, space, bidimensional sheet with minimal form,and only energy, its spacetime combinations deploy in a single sheet of spacetime, 4 Dimensions.
The graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:
Once it is clear that there are different mathematical frames of reference, of different sizes; that mind reduce in scale reality – the Universe into worlds, and that dimension and motion are indistinguishable – absolute features of reality, which will be formalized soon with the proper understanding of the ‘undefined terms of mathematics’ (fractal points, lineal waves, and networks≈planes – we need to fully grasp the unit of the Universe, a ‘point with volume’, or fractal point, hence a time cycle.
The duality of time≈motion and space≈form, and its two varieties, continuous open decelerating speed≈distances and closed accelerating cycles≈circles of time, are both paradoxes of perception and objective, inverse arrows of motion.
We summarize the formal and functional differences between entropy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:
Maximal Spacemotion = Minimal Form= limbs/potentials Vs Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=headparticles.
For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.
The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate information, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.
But why people believe in languages? Don’t languages create the Universe?
Actually they do because timespace is just a virtual language, mirage of the mind as we explain other posts(: Let us then return to the TERNARY ± ∆ dimensions of physical systems, 3 conserved in present and TWO NOT conserved in a single plane, but inverse, entropy and information, up and down, cancelling each other, when in certain events (neutrinos, weak forces, nonparity conservation) physical systems dissolve or create new seeds of information.
The generator sums up all a(nti)symmetries.
All this can be summed up through the generator equation in a rather complete form:
This is said through the generator formal equation, which is a logic equation, whose fundamental property is to facilitate the understanding of all those processes as a whole.
So the logic principles of creation ‘relativity’, ‘a(nti)symmetries’ and ‘organicism’ – words hardly understood in the context of present philosophy of science become more clear. Let us then complete our understanding of symmetry, recasting the principles of conservation in a better simpler way, to deal then with the other two great WORDS of 5D physics absolute relativity, which completes galilean and Einstein’s Relativity and then with organicism and ‘perception’, the 2 taboos of physicists and huminds when denying life at the Universe that made us all to its image and likeness. AS WITHOUT THEM, the will of the actions of survival of physical, biological and social systems cannot explain the whys of reality.
As a(nti)symmetry (ab. for the sum of asymmetry, antisymmetry and symmetry), lead us to fundamental concepts both in classic and fractal 5D physics, albeit now broken into parts.
Complementarity & exclusion principle.
An essential theme that runs through the entire Universe in any scale is the game of perpendicularity vs. complementarily described in nonAE by the 4th postulate, the old 3rd axiom of congruence in euclidean geometry reconverted to the duality of behaviour: complementary beings that move in parallel come together into social groups called bosons. Perpendicular forms that intersect, destroy each other in the form of fermions.
This is called the Exclusion principle of Pauli, an illunderstood essential law of nature that differentiates bosons that can move in parallel and form ‘growing’ forms of pyramidal form that rise a new fifth dimension vs. those who can’t and break each other.
The whole theme time permuted should develop into a full new theory on how reality is created through the 4th postulate of nonAE. Here we shall just hint at it in a few comments.
The previous fact, which expresses relativity as a mental rule of measure rather than a physical reality, which adapts the stop and go duality of particlewaves, informationtranslation in space (which being a reproduction=motion of form, CANNOT absorb information =perceive at the same time) introduces fully the mental view of physics, and gives birth to metaphysical arguments about what we really see – the electronic mind or the real Universe.
It also explains why we cannot see both states at the same time, and why waves do collapse into particles when we perceive them – simply speaking, in the ‘perceptioninformation’ state we stop the particle that we perceive.
But do both states coexist as in our world do coexist bodies and heads? All seem to indicate that is the case. Only two proofs are needed.
The existence of two spins, show clearly that the electron has a wave spin or angular momentum (azimuthal number) and a particle spin at the same time; if only one state happened the system would either show the spin or the azimuthal number.
Another interesting deduction comes from the duality of bosons and fermions.
Bosons are particles whose wave function is symmetric under permutation, so if we swap the particles the wavefunction does not change. Fermions are particles whose wavefunction is antisymmetric, so under such a swap the wavefunction gets a minus sign, meaning that the amplitude for two identical fermions to occupy the same state cancels each other to become zero. This is the Pauli exclusion principle: two identical fermions cannot occupy the same state. This rule does not hold for bosons. Physicists still don’t understand why.
What this truly means is however rather simple in 5•D³:
Fermions ARE particles and waves at the same time – they have both the bodywave and the particlehead together, so they cannot occupy the same space as they carry two elements to the mix and the bodies annihilate each other (the waves cancels).
On the other hand, bosons are ONLY in one state, they are EITHER only waves or only particles; so they can occupy the same state, because they bring only 2 dimensions to the mix either as waves or as vortices (particles).
Moreover as bodies reproduce and particle perceivefeed; it is the bodywave state of the fermion, which emits a waveboson but the waveboson as it ‘moves increasing its future arrow of information’ increases its frequencyform ad finally collapses as a particle when the perceive fermion perceives it.
Simple logic arguments that explain many of the conundrums shown by the equations of mathematical physics.
OF course this is not how a physicist describe the conundrum, which he has NOT solved rationally, because his method is merely to make the mathematical equation and leave it ‘solved’ with no why and certainly indifferent to its ‘logic consistency’ ignoring the rules of truth. So what he does?
In the next graph we see its solution: fermions have a function which for all values of x satisfies the relation:And this is called an antisymmetric function with respect to the origin of coordinates (xspacetime like axis):
While the graph of bosons (right picture also) is symmetric with respect to the ytimelike axis and in the case:
And that is all he states. Point is the antisymmetric function ƒ( 1), is dual. It has function of negative value, which means it is inverse in a given dimension as particles and waves are in many of its 10 dimensional parameters. So the general rule is that an antisymmetric function has 2 values that represent 2 states, but the boson has a single form – a single state.
In true form what the graphs show us is 2 facts that put together explain in very simple terms Pauli’s exclusion principle: bidimensionality and parallelism vs. perpendicularity (4th postulate).
 Fermions and bosons inhabit basically in its wave state 2manifold bidimensional planes, in which perpendicularity is shown in the antisymmetric wave function of fermions, while bosons clearly have a single hat form which can be superposed one above the other, which is what really shows the other picture of a real boson formation, which merely is the sum of multiple hats – they do NOT occupy the exact same location but ‘rise’ a fifth dimensional hierarchical structure above it.
So all what the physicist will state is that most antisymmetric functions have in the real world two solutions, whose elements are inverse and can cancel each other.
So while the rule is simple: 2 fermions have ‘inverse’ mathematical orientations and they cancel each other. 2 bosons have the same orientation and when coupled together start a process of §ocial growth, as the graph in the right side shows. So they grow as dense waves that can emerge in an ∆+1 particle scale, collapsing its wave into particle. And so bosons can form wave trains, with identical orientation, becoming STwave herds of present energy to create the wave (when perceived as having the same speeddistance), or might collapse into a dense frequency particle (when perceived as having the same time cycle).
It is then clear that mathematics as the religion that proves physics by the mere fact of existing and relational spacetime which still accepts the logic of time, albeit evolved into 3 arrows, and epistemological method as necessary truths are a different method of thinking,
Indeed, with this simple insight you can immediately solve this long puzzle of quantum physics and relate the 2 type of particles with its s or ST, or TFunction and study them as bidimensional vortices of accelerated time, or as bidimensional potential fields of expansive space, which in fermions come together into 4D entities.
As usual though we can see the issue from at least 4 perspectives. Consider the ‘temporal one’ of different clocks of time.
THIS CONCEPT – the true meaning of antisymmetry, in quantum physics is a good proof to another fundamental law of spacetime, the bidimensionality of both in its pure states…
And so the introduction to quantum realism in 5D is a good introduction to the next element of physical systems, the singularities of the Universe, which bias information to favor its perspective, including the humind singularity that prefers to believe in creationist theories of physics than in quantum realism. This is indeed the true meaning of the paradoxes of the observer of the Copenhagen interpretation – the error is not in the particle but in the humind’s observer.
Let us first use the correspondence principle to comment on the classic meaning of symmetry and its breaking on physics, to adapt and explore further its concepts.
In physics, symmetry breaking is a phenomenon in which (infinitesimally) small fluctuations acting on a system crossing a critical point decide the system’s fate, by determining which branch of a bifurcation is taken. To an outside observer unaware of the fluctuations (or “noise”), the choice will appear arbitrary. This process is called symmetry “breaking”, because such transitions usually bring the system from a symmetric but disorderly state into one or more definite states. Symmetry breaking is thought to play a major role in pattern formation.
Symmetry breaking can be distinguished into two types, explicit symmetry breaking and spontaneous symmetry breaking, characterized by whether the equations of motion fail to be invariant or the ground state fails to be invariant.
In explicit symmetry breaking, the equations of motion describing a system are variant under the broken symmetry.
In theoretical physics, explicit symmetry breaking is the breaking of a symmetry of a theory by terms in its defining equations of motion (most typically, to the Lagrangian or the Hamiltonian) that do not respect the symmetry. Usually this term is used in situations where these symmetrybreaking terms are small, so that the symmetry is approximately respected by the theory. An example is the spectral line splitting in the Zeeman effect, due to a magnetic interaction perturbation in the Hamiltonian of the atoms involved.
Explicit symmetry breaking differs from spontaneous symmetry breaking. In the latter, the defining equations respect the symmetry but the ground state (vacuum) of the theory breaks it.^{}
Explicit symmetry breaking is also associated with electromagnetic radiation. A system of accelerated charges results in electromagnetic radiation when the geometric symmetry of the electric field in free space is explicitly broken by the associated electrodynamic structure under time varying excitation of the given system. This is quite evident in an antenna where the electric lines of field curl around or have rotational geometry around the radiating terminals in contrast to linear geometric orientation within a pair of transmission lines which does not radiate even under time varying excitation.^{}
Spontaneous symmetry breaking
In spontaneous symmetry breaking, the equations of motion of the system are invariant, but the system is not because the background (spacetime) of the system, its vacuum, is noninvariant. Such a symmetry breaking is parametrized by an order parameter. A special case of this type of symmetry breaking is dynamical symmetry breaking.
Spontaneous symmetry breaking is a spontaneous process of symmetry breaking, by which a physical system in a symmetric state ends up in an asymmetric state. In particular, it can describe systems where the equations of motion or the Lagrangian obey symmetries, but the lowestenergy vacuum solutions do not exhibit that same symmetry. When the system goes to one of those vacuum solutions, the symmetry is broken for perturbations around that vacuum even though the entire Lagrangian retains that symmetry.
The system, as a whole , changes under such transformations.
Phases of matter, such as crystals, magnets, and conventional superconductors, as well as simple phase transitions can be described by spontaneous symmetry breaking. Notable exceptions include topological phases of matter like the fractional quantum Hall effect.
Examples : Mexican hat potential
Consider a symmetric upward dome with a trough circling the bottom. If a ball is put at the very peak of the dome, the system is symmetric with respect to a rotation around the center axis. But the ball may spontaneously break this symmetry by rolling down the dome into the trough, a point of lowest energy. Afterward, the ball has come to a rest at some fixed point on the perimeter. The dome and the ball retain their individual symmetry, but the system does not^{}
In the simplest idealized relativistic model, the spontaneously broken symmetry is summarized through an illustrative scalar field theory. The relevant Lagrangian of a scalar field ϕ, which essentially dictates how a system behaves, can be split up into kinetic and potential terms,

L=∂μϕ∂μϕ−V(ϕ). (1)
It is in this potential term V(ϕ) that the symmetry breaking is triggered. An example of a potential, due to Jeffrey Goldstone^{} is illustrated in the graph at the right.

V(ϕ)=−10ϕ2+ϕ4. (2)
This potential has an infinite number of possible minima (vacuum states) given by

ϕ=5eiθ. (3)
for any real θ between 0 and 2π. The system also has an unstable vacuum state corresponding to Φ = 0. This state has a U(1) symmetry. However, once the system falls into a specific stable vacuum state (amounting to a choice of θ), this symmetry will appear to be lost, or “spontaneously broken”.
In fact, any other choice of θ would have exactly the same energy, implying the existence of a massless Nambu–Goldstone boson, the mode running around the circle at the minimum of this potential, and indicating there is some memory of the original symmetry in the Lagrangian.
Other examples
 For ferromagnetic materials, the underlying laws are invariant under spatial rotations. Here, the order parameter is the magnetization, which measures the magnetic dipole density. Above the Curie temperature, the order parameter is zero, which is spatially invariant, and there is no symmetry breaking. Below the Curie temperature, however, the magnetization acquires a constant nonvanishing value, which points in a certain direction (in the idealized situation where we have full equilibrium; otherwise, translational symmetry gets broken as well). The residual rotational symmetries which leave the orientation of this vector invariant remain unbroken, unlike the other rotations which do not and are thus spontaneously broken.
 The laws describing a solid are invariant under the full Euclidean group, but the solid itself spontaneously breaks this group down to a space group. The displacement and the orientation are the order parameters.
 General relativity has a Lorentz symmetry, but in FRW cosmological models, the mean 4velocity field defined by averaging over the velocities of the galaxies (the galaxies act like gas particles at cosmological scales) acts as an order parameter breaking this symmetry. Similar comments can be made about the cosmic microwave background.
 For the electroweak model, as explained earlier, a component of the Higgs field provides the order parameter breaking the electroweak gauge symmetry to the electromagnetic gauge symmetry. Like the ferromagnetic example, there is a phase transition at the electroweak temperature. The same comment about us not tending to notice broken symmetries suggests why it took so long for us to discover electroweak unification.
 In superconductors, there is a condensedmatter collective field ψ, which acts as the order parameter breaking the electromagnetic gauge symmetry.
 Take a thin cylindrical plastic rod and push both ends together. Before buckling, the system is symmetric under rotation, and so visibly cylindrically symmetric. But after buckling, it looks different, and asymmetric. Nevertheless, features of the cylindrical symmetry are still there: ignoring friction, it would take no force to freely spin the rod around, displacing the ground state in time, and amounting to an oscillation of vanishing frequency, unlike the radial oscillations in the direction of the buckle. This spinning mode is effectively the requisite Nambu–Goldstone boson.
 Consider a uniform layer of fluid over an infinite horizontal plane. This system has all the symmetries of the Euclidean plane. But now heat the bottom surface uniformly so that it becomes much hotter than the upper surface. When the temperature gradient becomes large enough, convection cells will form, breaking the Euclidean symmetry.
 Consider a bead on a circular hoop that is rotated about a vertical diameter. As the rotational velocity is increased gradually from rest, the bead will initially stay at its initial equilibrium point at the bottom of the hoop (intuitively stable, lowest gravitational potential). At a certain critical rotational velocity, this point will become unstable and the bead will jump to one of two other newly created equilibria, equidistant from the center. Initially, the system is symmetric with respect to the diameter, yet after passing the critical velocity, the bead ends up in one of the two new equilibrium points, thus breaking the symmetry.
Spontaneous symmetry breaking in physics
Particle physics
In particle physics the force carrier particles are normally specified by field equations with gauge symmetry; their equations predict that certain measurements will be the same at any point in the field. For instance, field equations might predict that the mass of two quarks is constant. Solving the equations to find the mass of each quark might give two solutions. In one solution, quark A is heavier than quark B. In the second solution, quark B is heavier than quark A by the same amount. The symmetry of the equations is not reflected by the individual solutions, but it is reflected by the range of solutions.
An actual measurement reflects only one solution, representing a breakdown in the symmetry of the underlying theory. “Hidden” is a better term than “broken”, because the symmetry is always there in these equations. This phenomenon is called spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) because nothing (that we know of) breaks the symmetry in the equations.
Chiral symmetry
Chiral symmetry breaking is an example of spontaneous symmetry breaking affecting the chiral symmetry of the strong interactions in particle physics. It is a property of quantum chromodynamics, the quantum field theory describing these interactions, and is responsible for the bulk of the mass (over 99%) of the nucleons, and thus of all common matter, as it converts very light bound quarks into 100 times heavier constituents of baryons. The approximate Nambu–Goldstone bosons in this spontaneous symmetry breaking process are the pions, whose mass is an order of magnitude lighter than the mass of the nucleons. It served as the prototype and significant ingredient of the Higgs mechanism underlying the electroweak symmetry breaking.
In particle physics, chiral symmetry breaking is the spontaneous symmetry breaking of a chiral symmetry – usually by a gauge theory such as quantum chromodynamics, the quantum field theory of the strong interaction. Yoichiro Nambu was awarded the 2008 Nobel prize in physics for describing this phenomenon (“for the discovery of the mechanism of spontaneous broken symmetry in subatomic physics”).
Quantum chromodynamics
Experimentally, it is observed that the masses of the octet of pseudoscalar mesons (such as the pion) are much lighter than the next heavier states such as the octet of vector mesons, such as rho meson.
This is traceable to a consequence of spontaneous symmetry breaking of chiral symmetry in a fermion sector of QCD with 3 flavors of light quarks, u, d and s. Such a theory, for idealized massless quarks, has global SU(3) × SU(3)chiral flavor symmetry. Under SSB, this is spontaneously broken to the diagonal flavor SU(3) subgroup, generating eight Nambu–Goldstone bosons, which are the pseudoscalar mesons transforming as an octet representation of this flavor SU(3).
Beyond this idealization of massless quarks, the actual small quark masses also break the chiral symmetry explicitly as well (providing nonvanishing pieces to the divergence of chiral currents). The masses of the pseudoscalar meson octet are specified by an expansion in the quark masses which goes by the name of chiral perturbation theory. The internal consistency of this argument is further checked by lattice QCD computations, which allow one to vary the quark mass and confirm that the variation of the pseudoscalar masses with the quark masses is as dictated by chiral perturbation theory, effectively as the squareroot of the quark masses.
For the three heavy quarks: the charm quark, bottom quark, and top quark, their masses, and hence the explicit breaking these amount to, are much larger than the QCD spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking scale. Thus, they cannot be treated as a small perturbation around the explicit symmetry limit.
Mass generation
Chiral symmetry breaking is most apparent in the mass generation of nucleons from more elementary light quarks, accounting for approximately 99% of their combined mass as a baryon. It thus accounts for most of the mass of all visible matter. ^{}For example, in the proton, of mass m_{p} ≈ 938 MeV, the valence quarks, two up quarks with m_{u} ≈ 2.3 MeV and one down quark with m_{d} ≈ 4.8 MeV, only contribute about 9.4 MeV to the proton’s mass. The source of the bulk of the proton’s mass is quantum chromodynamics binding energy, which arises out of QCD chiral symmetry breaking.^{}
Fermion condensate
The spontaneous symmetry breaking may be described in analogy to magnetization.
A vacuum condensate of bilinear expressions involving the quarks in the QCD vacuum is known as the fermion condensate.
It can be calculated as
 ⟨q¯RaqLb⟩=vδab ,
formed through nonperturbative action of QCD gluons, with v ≈ −(250 MeV)^{3}. This cannot be preserved under an isolated L or R rotation. The pion decay constant, f_{π} ≈ 93 MeV, may be viewed as a measure of the strength of the chiral symmetry breaking.^{}
Twoquark model
For two light quarks, the up quark and the down quark, the QCD Lagrangian provides insight. The symmetry of the QCD Lagrangian, called chiral symmetry describes invariance with respect to a symmetry group U(2)L×U(2)R. This symmetry group amounts to
 SU(2)L×SU(2)R×U(1)V×U(1)A .
The quark condensate induced by nonperturbative strong interactions spontaneously breaks the SU(2)L×SU(2)R down to the diagonal vector subgroup SU(2)_{V}, known as isospin. The resulting effective theory of baryon bound states of QCD (which describes protons and neutrons), then, has mass terms for these, disallowed by the original linear realization of the chiral symmetry, but allowed by the spontaneously broken nonlinear realization thus achieved as a result of the strong interactions.^{}
The NambuGoldstone bosons corresponding to the three broken generators are the three pions, charged and neutral.
PseudoGoldstone bosons arise in a quantum field theory with both spontaneous and explicit symmetry breaking. These two types of symmetry breaking typically occur separately, and at different energy scales, and are not thought to be predicated on each other.
In the absence of explicit breaking, spontaneous symmetry breaking would engender massless Nambu–Goldstone bosons for the exact spontaneously broken chiral symmetries. The chiral symmetries discussed, however, are only approximate symmetries, given their small explicit breaking.
The explicit symmetry breaking occurs at a smaller energy scale. The properties of these pseudoGoldstone bosons can normally be calculated using chiral perturbation theory, expanding around the exactly symmetric theory in terms of the explicit symmetrybreaking parameters. In particular, the computed mass must be small,^{}m_{π} ≈ √vm_{q} / f_{π} .
Threequark model
For three light quarks, the up quark, down quark, and strange quark, the flavorchiral symmetries extending those discussed above also decompose, to GellMann’s^{}
 SU(3)L×SU(3)R×U(1)V×U(1)A.
The chiral symmetry generators spontaneously broken comprise the coset space (SU(3)L×SU(3)R)/SU(3)V. This space is not a group, and consists of the eight axial generators, corresponding to the eight light pseudoscalar mesons, the nondiagonal part of SU(3)L×SU(3)R.
The remaining eight unbroken vector subgroup generators constitute the manifest standard “Eightfold Way” flavor symmetries, SU(3)_{V}.
Higgs mechanism
The strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces can all be understood as arising from gauge symmetries. The Higgs mechanism, the spontaneous symmetry breaking of gauge symmetries, is an important component in understanding the superconductivity of metals and the origin of particle masses in the standard model of particle physics. One important consequence of the distinction between true symmetries and gauge symmetries, is that the spontaneous breaking of a gauge symmetry does not give rise to characteristic massless Nambu–Goldstone physical modes, but only massive modes, like the plasma mode in a superconductor, or the Higgs mode observed in particle physics.
In the standard model of particle physics, spontaneous symmetry breaking of the SU(2) × U(1) gauge symmetry associated with the electroweak force generates masses for several particles, and separates the electromagnetic and weak forces. The W and Z bosons are the elementary particles that mediate the weak interaction, while the photon mediates the electromagnetic interaction. At energies much greater than 100 GeV all these particles behave in a similar manner. The Weinberg–Salam theory predicts that, at lower energies, this symmetry is broken so that the photon and the massive W and Z bosons emerge.^{}In addition, fermions develop mass consistently.
Without spontaneous symmetry breaking, the Standard Model of elementary particle interactions requires the existence of a number of particles. However, some particles (the W and Z bosons) would then be predicted to be massless, when, in reality, they are observed to have mass. To overcome this, spontaneous symmetry breaking is augmented by the Higgs mechanism to give these particles mass. It also suggests the presence of a new particle, the Higgs boson, detected in 2012.
Superconductivity of metals is a condensedmatter analog of the Higgs phenomena, in which a condensate of Cooper pairs of electrons spontaneously breaks the U(1) gauge symmetry associated with light and electromagnetism.
Condensed matter physics
Most phases of matter can be understood through the lens of spontaneous symmetry breaking. For example, crystals are periodic arrays of atoms that are not invariant under all translations (only under a small subset of translations by a lattice vector). Magnets have north and south poles that are oriented in a specific direction, breaking rotational symmetry. In addition to these examples, there are a whole host of other symmetrybreaking phases of matter including nematic phases of liquid crystals, charge and spindensity waves, superfluids and many others.
There are several known examples of matter that cannot be described by spontaneous symmetry breaking, including: topologically ordered phases of matter like fractional quantum Hall liquids, and spinliquids. These states do not break any symmetry, but are distinct phases of matter. Unlike the case of spontaneous symmetry breaking, there is not a general framework for describing such states^{}
Continuous symmetry
The ferromagnet is the canonical system which spontaneously breaks the continuous symmetry of the spins below the Curie temperature and at h = 0, where h is the external magnetic field. Below the Curie temperature the energy of the system is invariant under inversion of the magnetization m(x) such that m(x) = −m(−x). The symmetry is spontaneously broken as h → 0 when the Hamiltonian becomes invariant under the inversion transformation, but the expectation value is not invariant.
Spontaneouslysymmetrybroken phases of matter are characterized by an order parameter that describes the quantity which breaks the symmetry under consideration. For example, in a magnet, the order parameter is the local magnetization.
Spontaneously breaking of a continuous symmetry is inevitably accompanied by gapless (meaning that these modes do not cost any energy to excite) Nambu–Goldstone modes associated with slow longwavelength fluctuations of the order parameter. For example, vibrational modes in a crystal, known as phonons, are associated with slow density fluctuations of the crystal’s atoms. The associated Goldstone mode for magnets are oscillating waves of spin known as spinwaves. For symmetrybreaking states, whose order parameter is not a conserved quantity, Nambu–Goldstone modes are typically massless and propagate at a constant velocity.
An important theorem, due to Mermin and Wagner, states that, at finite temperature, thermally activated fluctuations of Nambu–Goldstone modes destroy the longrange order, and prevent spontaneous symmetry breaking in one and twodimensional systems. Similarly, quantum fluctuations of the order parameter prevent most types of continuous symmetry breaking in onedimensional systems even at zero temperature (an important exception is ferromagnets, whose order parameter, magnetization, is an exactly conserved quantity and does not have any quantum fluctuations).
Other longrange interacting systems such as cylindrical curved surfaces interacting via the Coulomb potential or Yukawa potential has been shown to break translational and rotational symmetries. ^{}It was shown, in the presence of a symmetric Hamiltonian, and in the limit of infinite volume, the system spontaneously adopts a chiral configuration, i.e. breaks mirror plane symmetry.
Dynamical symmetry breaking
Dynamical symmetry breaking (DSB) is a special form of spontaneous symmetry breaking where the ground state of the system has reduced symmetry properties compared to its theoretical description (Lagrangian).
Dynamical breaking of a global symmetry is a spontaneous symmetry breaking, that happens not at the (classical) tree level (i.e. at the level of the bare action), but due to quantum corrections (i.e. at the level of the effective action).
Dynamical breaking of a gauge symmetry is subtler. In the conventional spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, there exists an unstable Higgs particle in the theory, which drives the vacuum to a symmetrybroken phase (see e.g. Electroweak interaction). In dynamical gauge symmetry breaking, however, no unstable Higgs particle operates in the theory, but the bound states of the system itself provide the unstable fields that render the phase transition. For example, Bardeen, Hill, and Lindner published a paper which attempts to replace the conventional Higgs mechanism in the standard model, by a DSB that is driven by a bound state of topantitop quarks (such models, where a composite particle plays the role of the Higgs boson, are often referred to as “Composite Higgs models”). ^{}Dynamical breaking of gauge symmetries is often due to creation of a fermionic condensate; for example the quark condensate, which is connected to the dynamical breaking of chiral symmetry in quantum chromodynamics. Conventional superconductivity is the paradigmatic example from the condensed matter side, where phononmediated attractions lead electrons to become bound in pairs and then condense, thereby breaking the electromagnetic gauge symmetry.
Generalisation and technical usage
For spontaneous symmetry breaking to occur, there must be a system in which there are several equally likely outcomes. The system as a whole is therefore symmetric with respect to these outcomes. However, if the system is sampled (i.e. if the system is actually used or interacted with in any way), a specific outcome must occur. Though the system as a whole is symmetric, it is never encountered with this symmetry, but only in one specific asymmetric state. Hence, the symmetry is said to be spontaneously broken in that theory. Nevertheless, the fact that each outcome is equally likely is a reflection of the underlying symmetry, which is thus often dubbed “hidden symmetry”, and has crucial formal consequences. (See the article on the Goldstone boson.)
When a theory is symmetric with respect to a symmetry group, but requires that one element of the group be distinct, then spontaneous symmetry breaking has occurred. The theory must not dictate which member is distinct, only that one is. From this point on, the theory can be treated as if this element actually is distinct, with the proviso that any results found in this way must be resymmetrized, by taking the average of each of the elements of the group being the distinct one.
The crucial concept in physics theories is the order parameter. If there is a field (often a background field) which acquires an expectation value (not necessarily a vacuum expectation value) which is not invariant under the symmetry in question, we say that the system is in the ordered phase, and the symmetry is spontaneously broken. This is because other subsystems interact with the order parameter, which specifies a “frame of reference” to be measured against. In that case, the vacuum state does not obey the initial symmetry (which would keep it invariant, in the linearly realized Wigner mode in which it would be a singlet), and, instead changes under the (hidden) symmetry, now implemented in the (nonlinear) Nambu–Goldstone mode. Normally, in the absence of the Higgs mechanism, massless Goldstone bosons arise.
The symmetry group can be discrete, such as the space group of a crystal, or continuous (e.g., a Lie group), such as the rotational symmetry of space. However, if the system contains only a single spatial dimension, then only discrete symmetries may be broken in a vacuum state of the full quantum theory, although a classical solution may break a continuous symmetry.
Examples
Symmetry breaking can cover any of the following scenarios:^{}

 The breaking of an exact symmetry of the underlying laws of physics by the random formation of some structure;
 A situation in physics in which a minimal energy state has less symmetry than the system itself;
 Situations where the actual state of the system does not reflect the underlying symmetries of the dynamics because the manifestly symmetric state is unstable (stability is gained at the cost of local asymmetry);
 Situations where the equations of a theory may have certain symmetries, though their solutions may not (the symmetries are “hidden”).
One of the first cases of broken symmetry discussed in the physics literature is related to the form taken by a uniformly rotating body of incompressible fluid in gravitational and hydrostatic equilibrium. Jacobi^{} and Liouville discussed the fact that a triaxial ellipsoid was an equilibrium solution for this problem when the kinetic energy compared to the gravitational energy of the rotating body exceeded a certain critical value. The axial symmetry presented by the McLaurin spheroids is broken at this bifurcation point. Furthermore, above this bifurcation point, and for constant angular momentum, the solutions that minimize the kinetic energy are the nonaxially symmetric Jacobi ellipsoids instead of the Maclaurin spheroids.
Translating Conservation= symmetry from physics to T.œ
We have now made a synoptic analysis of both, the general cases of a(nti)symmetries of all T.œs and the specific analysis of those cases in physics. Let us now merge both with a notch of higher complexity establishing a new jargon for nonÆ conservation and destruction processes on physics based in those T.œ general laws.
Creation by breaking of symmetries.
In that regard, a key element to understand physical systems, as well as any system is the duality between static states of symmetry between:
 Space and time, S<≈>T, which in the mathematical mirror is reflected in the algebraic operations (<≈> being the symbol for them all) that group together space and time dimensions and show how they interact.
 Broken symmetries, when S and T split: S >≠< T, WHICH is a process that seems to create new forms, forces and particles…as an ∑∏, social group of space quanta and time frequencies, breaks into its components (a concept used by physicists to explain the birth of forces and particles that we shall extend to study many mathematical relationships between energy, active magnitudes and ts parameters).
 And Spacetime motions or STeps, S<T>S<T… S≈S≈S… T≈T≈T, MIRRORED in mathematics by analysis, which studies how the transformations between space and time MOVE the Universe, causing its more positive, dynamic, creative transformations – as symmetry splits often hide a mere entropic process of death… Those STeps are then…
The first beats of existence.
In the graph, below the 3 main type of timespace motions, past entropic expansion that lower a plane of spacetime, the system to ∆1; future, implosive information that rises it, and present waveflows broken further into 3 submotions that conform the super organisms of a present sheet of space.
Time space motions are depicted above using the 4D formalism of ‘light cones’ adapted to any spacetime where the flows of time space can acquire 4 basic forms, st: <>; <<: tt vs. >>: ss (middle image, which orientated downwards would be the entropic form) and >< ts. We shall study them in the full formalism of existential algebra, sometime into the future, as they correspond to the basic, st, ss, tt, ts FLOWS OF TIMESPACE which define formally the worldcycles of existence of all species. The Universe ultimately builds up with them through the holographic method, all kind of systems by combining st, tt, ts & ss holographic forms in growing states of complexity.
Physical systems, are in that sense specially interested as models of the simplest steps of reality, specially given the fact that huminds deny them any ‘organic property’ under the ego paradox; so their description is relatively simple, in huge herds.
And as it is, is useful for ∆st theory because it allow us to get to the very basic principles of space and time, its symmetries and steps.
In each of those ratios, or universal constants, basic ST formulae of physical systems, H, K, C etc. we can see the system as an ST system that can split into s and t. So we can consider how a present system can generate a ternary one and indeed it only requires a Universal ratio/constant to split between its S and t components. This is the breaking of a symmetry, the fundamental process of creation in physical systems, by which any of the ratios, density of information, t/s, speed, s/t or momentumforce, s x t split into its two components one with an entropic expansive spatial tendency and the other with a cyclical temporal formal one, becoming two different parts of the being:
In the graph, breaking of symmetries mean both an entropic bigbang death and a condensation, as the wave and particle, loose its connection and descend and ascend planes of existence. When a symmetry breaks thus two inverse forces are created. But the total virtual energy of the Universe will be always a zero sum – the value of the spacetime plane which was ‘split’ to create more form tan pure flat space.
Thus special relativity which defines a metric tensor, (, +++) becomes the flat spacetime Universe made only with light information, when that flat spacetime breaks, we shall see up and down wobbles in the fifth dimension and so on, which will give rise to emergent virtual vibrating particles, whose total zero sum however will make them virtual… The beta decay is the most obvious one as a neutron splits into a ± total neutral charge, one inward and one outwards tendency regions of spastime.
In the graph, a neutron breaks its symmetry in electric forces. A particleantiparticle is a symmetry broken out of the original light spacetime, a black hole acts as a door to the outer faster than c denser that t=o regions:
In the graph the many ways in which a ‘duality’ or inversion of arrows of space, of time, of scales, define the main breaking got symmetries as we move through the 3 elements and its inversions, ∆º±1, s<st>t, <ø>O…
Any of those ∆º, st, Ø can split up and down in inverse antysymmetric arrows, of max. t or max. s, max.  or Max. O, Max i or Mas. i
So a part of mathematical physics adapted to ∆st needs to explain in terms of the more realist generator equations of each of those ternary elements, the different breakings of symmetries, understood as splits into a ‘temporal force’ (i.e. weak force) and spatial force (i.e electromagnetic force), or between an ∆1 scale, the strong force and n ∆+1 scale, the gravitational force (here breaking the symmetry of the curvatureactive magnitude at ∆º and viceversa).
Then, we can see in both ‘reversed local time frames’ those transformations.
A black hole event horizon or any membraneclosed cycle can be seen also in terms of predation as a breaking of symmetry, and so bigbangs can be interpreted as such when they leave a knot of denser matter (star transformations).
And so those are the fundamental barriers between the galactic world in space (< cspeed) and time (>0 k ) and the dark world of dark matter (black hole matter) and dark energy (expansive, > c speed).
Mathematical examples: open balls and Klein noneuclidean disks.
IT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD then also as an open ball vital spacetime of energy breaking into two opposite past and future, ∆±i scales, lines and cycles that split and so we can find equations of the type U. C. = S ± T ˆ S / ð = S X T
In the graph, the pseudo sphere is used to represent Kerr black holes on its central, faster than light axis, which transforms ‘time cycles’ beyond cspeed into spatial dark energy shut through its tachyon jetaxis into the dark world outside galaxies. This spinning process of accelerating and expelling waves and fields of information and energy absorbed through the bidimensional planemouth, is natural to all fractal points of the Universe in any scale of reality.
The pseudo sphere however has 2 jets, one that emits the Sp field of the system its absorbs and kills and one that emits its Tƒ particles, the red and blue shift sides of the black hole or star jet.
Both are the sides of a ‘broken deadsymmetry’ when a physical species, Sp<ST≥Tƒ dies, as all systems, it does so because its ‘fields, waves and particles’ dissociate, loosing the synchronicity of its internal clocks (De Broglie’ s waveparticle analyzed that synchronicity in its masterpiece paper, today often forgotten on the forest of mathematical trees). All systems then break as the time vortex accelerates and the field lines decelerate in inverse versions. Thus all symmetrysplit of a Universe constant of action or wave can be seen also as a death process of the physical system, and its now unconnected parts.
It is the duality of symbiotic creation bigbang destruction, clearly shown in the particleantiparticle ± charge fields vs. the protonelectron, ± symbiotic union. The same graph can represent the potential inverse symmetry wells of those positive and negative charges:
Another way to represent those two sides of a symmetry is the concept of a potential well:
A potential well is the region surrounding a local minimum of potential energy. Energy captured in a potential well is unable to convert to another type of energy (kinetic energy in the case of a gravitational potential well) because it is captured in the local minimum of a potential well.
The potential well will then be the ‘symmetry point’ or ‘Universal constant’, the cspeed of zero massenergy; the place in which pure motion and pure form will reside eternally; which once broken will distend into the negative and positive ‘death’ maximals and minimals, extremal points.
The potential well becomes then as the ‘death process’ splits its parameters into a potential barrier, which the system will NOT be able to cross unless it returns to its presentwave form (quantum barrier crossed in the wave state when the extremal past x future fieldarticle system returns to the wave state):
The time clocks of the ∆±1 scales. ∆+1: gravitational masses vs. ∆1: electromagnetic charges
The main time symmetries in the 5^{th} dimension are between Tƒ ∆1 micro points, frequency charges, with clocks related to the Hplanck constant and its frequency; ∆thermodynamic clocks, based in temperature and ∆+1 gravitational masses, macro points of the cosmological scale.
Another way to express this duality is between the ‘positive gravitational force’ of negative potential energy and the ‘negative gravitational force’ or electric charge of the electronic world or positive entropy and expansive lineal motion tendencies.
So we can also talk of a symmetry breaking between: TƒGravitational forces vs. Sp Electromagnetic forces, of which we have shown of its many perspectives the unification of charges and masses from both points of view, and the bigbang scales. Let us now study this theme from the whole perspective of 5D physics and its ages of ‘symmetry breaking’.
What about time? How does modern physics understand the fractal, ternary nature of time arrows and its clocks within the galaxy?
For all what we have said…
Barely. As they have NOT even found the time clocks of each of those scales. Now an important element of those equations of Perturbation theory is the existence of a constant of present action in spacetime which allows to transfer, energy and information across scales, which is the ultimate meaning of Planck Constant and Boltzmann constant in the particle and matter states, such as:
∆1: E=H v, ∆: E= 3/2 K T.
It thus remains here for the intelligent reader to wonder which is the constant of the ∆+1 gravitational scale.
And How they are related between scales.
Hint: we write energy, as E=1/2 mv^{2}… + U (internal energy, which does have an important content of heat.)
We will return to that. What is the constant, mass or speed?
And then we can wonder about the coefficients. Why the quantum does not have one, or maybe is that we must use hbar that has one? Does all this has to do with dimensions, and what is the relationship between dimensions in those scales? Are we growing in dimensions as we go up? Or is the opposite way?
And if it is up and a wave of light has 2 dimensions? And then a molecule 3 ‘degrees of freedom’, and then gravitation 4 Dimensions, who is the 1 dimensional being?
2 neutrinos give us ½+1/2=1 spin. Here we go, the theory of neutrino light of Pauli, Bohr, Born, Fermi today forgotten. Didn’t you notice the neutrino had in the ol’ good times negative massfaster than light speed then, it has (found through its angle) the size of a string?
All those busybusy theoreticians researching for strings. Ah but there is here a conundrum, which I regard as the most important pending question of 5d physics (never mind nobody else is researching:) – how to make a neutrino a graviton. Then all will be solved, the architecture starting by its basement, up to the roof.
Well I do have my solution but in the next post where we deal with the meaning of spin, which Physicists don’t know at all what it means. We do – simply statement: they are the eyes of the quantum world.
Ok, let us give you the bone.
About what is Mass:
∆1: Frequency>∆:Temperature>∆+1: Mass
∆1: H> KBoltzmann>∆+1: cspeed
But there is a much more important concept of time, in 5dimensional physics, related to the meaning of the Universal Constants of ‘Energy and Time’, of the 3 fundamental planes of the 5th dimension and its physical systems, the ∆1 quantum scale, the ∆Thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1 cosmological scale, which will truly explain the equations and meanings of physics.
It is a simple relationship. There are 3 Constants of spacetime in each scale:
∆1: HPlanck constant: Energy = H x whereas H is the constant of action and ƒ the measure of frequency, the internal clock of time of quantum systems.
∆: kBoltzmann Constant: Energy = 2/3k x T, whereas k is the constant of action of thermodynamic systems and T, temperature, the measure of molecular vibrations, the internal clock of molecular systems.
∆+1: cLight Space Constant: E = cc x M, whereas c² is the constant of action of the Gravitational scale and M, Mass, the cyclical vortex of time, the clock of Gravitational systems.
How energy and time transfer between scales, how a clock of time disappears in one scale, so Standard Model particles do not have mass, and then its frequency clocks transfer time in the form of radiation to the thermodynamic scale, and then Black holes of the gravitational scale don’t have temperature… questions that physicists have not even answered because using lineal time, as Pauli once said of a paper, ‘they are no even wrong’… and will open up an entire new world of relationships and meanings to each and all sciences.
But let’s not be so harsh on them. Actually they have really solved it all for us theorists to put it straight.
Now all what is left is to connect the knots, literally.
How does a certain time flow emerges, into a new scale?
The answer are the 3 regions of spacetime, which diverge.
In relativity mass is defined as the invariant length of the energy momentum 4 vector. There is no difference between rest mass and dynamical mass.
Mass or rather density is an inverse of temperature. Temperature feeds on radiation AND exhausts it. Mass feeds on temperature and exhausts it. The black hole grows in mass as it cools down: M = K/T till reaching temperature zero (exactly the inverse of what Mr. Hawking postulates, as we have explained ad nauseam). Frequency of light also goes down in ‘infrared’ hot waves as they die away into heat. So as time moves from one lower scale to a larger scale it transfers its formal motion to the upper scale of existence. But it means the death or ‘muttering’ of the lower scale. So when a molecular orbital appears, it mutes the lower orbitals, when a whole appears its parts become synchronised to the motion of the whole and its individual ‘times’ become secondary.
So temperature reaches a balance or isothermic equilibrium when mass takes over. This physicists who do not understand a dot of what they write in organic terms, seems a dead of the physical system.
It is not. It merely is upgraded to the mass scale, when temperature dies away to prevent internal disorder. The same happens when light dies away in the infrared hot scales. Particles and its inverse antiparticles, are dead states, when PRECISELY the mass factor appears in particles, ONLY when they die, conjugated into antiparticles.
SPLITTING WAVES: THE BREAKING OF SYMMETRY
The creation process: breaking of symmetries.
WHEN A SYSTEM is across any of its main topological, temporal and scalar symmetries, ‘compressed’ into a relative single present ratio/form, the being is in its lowest ‘energy’ state, and as such it has maximal information in minimal space, Max. i x Min. S and can be considered estable.
The breaking of symmetry thus happens when a system that condensates its 3 elements of a ratio, s/t, t/s, s x t into a single being, breaks them ito 3, expanding, we might say from ∆+i whole state to a ternary desegregation. The form we study this fact, through universal constants, condensation of forces, decouplings, beta decays etc. among physicists should define the system itself.
CREATION TAKES PLACE by the fusion of a past and future into a present, which can be seen inversely as the split of a present into a past and future:
PASST ENTROPY X FUTURE INFORMATION < ≈ > PRESENT SPACETIME
the splitting of symmetry thus gives birth by expansion and reproduction to two more extended entropic and more informative, singular, • points.
I.e. a ‘female’ nucleon can be in the state of pastfuture (atom of hydrogen) or in the present state as nucleon.
An atom can be conceived as neutral neutrons which do not change state but remain in constant present and proton + electron, which can be in both states.
The male sterile neutron accumulates till warping in excess on the one hundred symmetry the atomic old form.
Now in the jargon of physics all happens when the symmetry of a balanced point of present, or wave equation that breaks its symmetry and the Sæ entropic field and the informative vortex depart, each other in a different direction. Thus an equation of dynamic constant between Sæ and To, in which instead of a permanent Sæ≤+> To, ternary field or organism in communication the it=…es break into a Darwinian event in which both systems transfer energy and information in different direction, or in a superposition event in which both add into a bosonic stronger wave, or an antisymmetric annihilator wave.
So how many different events can happen upon contact of two relative fractal points tis is the essence of Algebraic geometry, when considering that each point has contact upon 3 scales of reality and relative past and future symmetries in each scale, so the number of possible flows and combinations of reality increase immediately as a system enters in contact with one of its relative single dimensions of existence.
Let us be the neutron, the mass, the neutral form, and the turning momentum, let us be and split into a max. Sæ electron and a max. To, up quark, let us give each other ½ of our mass, let us make it ± 0, let us call the electron positive energy and the proton negative energy, let us say they will become each other and in doing so it will create the existence of the electromagnetic world. Let us give to this electromagnetic world a quantity of force of 1/3rd for each of the 3 axis of the electromagnetic wave, and 1.4t o its weight, let us do the inverse with the up quark let us give it a quantity of positive fractional charge, which is only a part of that of the electron, let us the electron rule existence in space, let us it collapse into mass in zero temperature, at cooper pairs, let us be and not be virtual and real zero negative and positive.
This division of the neutron however happened after a previous division between the c and the non c speed vortices of time, masses that across the strange halo quark event horizon at c speed rotational quark which split in faster than c dark energy and dark mass of top quark as and the below c speed o the up and down quarks and electrons, and so the down appeared from the strange quark and in doing so in falling into existence it split itself into an infinite quantity of beta decays, which created gravitational neutrino waves and electromagnetic background radiation and in this beta decay at 25i k the creation of the Universe progresses slowly but steadily into the expansion of a new spacetime relative infinite dilation.
But the infinity of the exponential unreal function that disintegrates two conjugates into a zero present, and vice versa it spits and creates virtual universe of positive and negative null zero sum in space and time, this being and not being, this pure fractal up and down, formal motion, formal perception motion and pleasure, this vital substance which all its actions and reactions cosmic orgasms of motion reproduction wave perception tuning and synchronizing your clocks with the herd, in Maxwell’ screws reaching to higher informative collapses, and messengers of existential function in physiological networks, travels though the fifth dimensions…
THE BREAKING OF SYMMETRY: UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS AS LIMITS OF THE EXISTENCE OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS.
Now, we have 3 different constants of space, time, ∆+1=cspeed, ∆1=Hplanckton and ∆Bolt(zmann constants), which represent the 3 natural spacetime coexisting systems of the human species.
The cspeed, of gravitational spacetime, decouples instantly into time and space (whose product on natural Planck units give us cspeed). So the angular frequency of time and distance on space give us cspeed,and vice versa the creative process starts as we see spacelight and timelight in different ways.
If we see spacelight in a sense of seeing, speed, we then enter into a regime of entropy, spatial perceptions, of electromagnetic forces.
if we see spacelight in the a sense of seeing information, hplnack quanta, we see it in a regime of information. of quantum numbers.
in the middle though we see more complex waveliquid functions in our sale of thermal waves of matter.
The breaking of symmetry of the thermodynamic scale turns around the triple point of each quantum worldspecies of atom, and all respond to an ideal, generic atomic thermodynamic chemical process:
In the graph, the thermodynamic world turns around each relative world of existence of an atomic species, described by its temperature in the lower scale and by the laws of heat and thermodynamics for huge lumps of matter, in the lower scale, the world of thermodynamics connects with the quantum world of radiation, and in the upper scale of solid states, with the world of density of spacetime mass.
For each spacetime system thus we can define the triple point as the Opoint of the mind point of maximal activity and information, as it is a region in which information from 3 different forms of freedom the liquid, gas and solid state, and we contend also 2 regions of the 5th dimension the upper arrow of evolution and the lower arrow of entropy, forming in fact a 5Dimensional point with 5 degrees of freedom, which is what a mind Tiƒ really is:
 ‘A 5th dimensional point is a triple point with SSTT connected regions which is also a point of travel in the 2 dimensions of social evolution, +∆ and entropy – ∆.
UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS ARE VITAL CONSTANTS OF A LARGER SCALE OF EXISTENCE OF A PHYSICAL SYSTEM, WHILE ITS SCALAR CONSTANTS ARE THE ACTIVE MAGNITUDE, often the value of the specific Metric of the being, its most important value: ∆=Sp x T
Once this is understood and the spacetime main events and systems of physics are described we can consider the next phase of T.Œ, which is specially relevant in a mathematical science as physics, hence we shall mention it so early in the introduction: the study of the 7 fundamental Universal/vital constants of al systems of the Universe:
 The Sp/Tƒ ratio energy density of the system.
 Its inverse, Tƒ/Sp information density.
 The Sp=Tƒ, balance that maximizes its existential ‘momentum (Sp x Tƒ).
They are the internal spacetime parameters of the being.
Then there are the external constants that related the whole being, Œ, Active Magnitude, ÅC, to the external world also made of 3 ∆+1 Sp field of energy, Tƒworld of informative cycles and ST parallel elements with whom it communicates. So we find the following ratios:
ÅC/Sp World Field, which provides energy to the being.
ÅC/ST World Bodywave, which provides reproductive actions to the being.
ÅC/Tƒ World Informative field, which provides information to the being.
Whereas ÅC is the parameter, which humans use to classify each variation as a whole with a constant (mass for particles, charge for fields, IQ for human brains, etc.)
Thus in physics the key to harmonize TŒ and classic studies and equations will be to to consider the Universal Constants or ratios between the different ‘parameters’ of its generator equation, to start resolving the equations of physics; of which the most obvious and important will be the ‘Constants of 5D planes’, finitesimals of each of those scales of three types, Tƒ/Sp: informative densities, Sp/Tƒ: energy densities and Sp=Tƒ, Action constants. They define the 5^{th} dimension in each plane, studied in the next isomorphism. So here we just consider the 4 more important:
Tƒ/Sp: Constants of informative density or ‘Curvature constants’: Λ1: Qconstant of charge attraction≈curvature; Λ+1: Gconstant of mass attraction≈curvature; which obviously are the origin, when considering in ‘isolation’ as Tƒ, of theΛ1: e: constant of charge of the electron and Λ+1: m_{n}: Constant of mass of the electron.
5D metric= SexTi= K, which defines the Constants of action: Λ1: quantum plane: hPlanck (‘Planckton’)= E x T , which translates 5D metric to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane and…
Λ: Thermodynamic Plane: kBoltzmann constant (‘Bolt’)= E x T, which translates 5D metric to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane.
And finally Sp/Tƒ: Constants of energetic Density or ‘speed constants’:
Λ1: cspeed, constant of motion of the light space plane, which being the Spconstant for the entire Galaxy in which our system exists, it is the only constant of energyspace or ‘rod of measure’ of all the systems of space we perceive.
Now the reader should observe nothing else is needed really to describe physical systems isomorphic to all other descriptions of reality, as this still taken from Britannica’s article on Universal constants show:
Those are the fundamental constants because they define the 3 ‘stationary points’ of the world cycle of all physical systems, which the HamiltonianLagrangian equations translate mathematically (Britannica ads the Faraday constant related to charge, I presume because of nationalist memes 🙂
Now what is really the world we live in? The answer is that we are sandwiched between the cosmological dark world and the invisible world below light, the spacetime we ‘see’. Thus of all those constants really the ones that matter are:
The splitting of symmetries and universal constants in physics. The conservation of STpresents.
The conservation laws of the Universe can be resumed in the conservation of the total Sp<ST>Tƒ reality and its ternary symmetries across space, time and the 5th dimension. So angular and lineal, Sp and Tƒ momentum is conserved, and its larger, 5D vision as integrated planes of systems or energy and information (kinetic and potential energy) is conserved. And the number of particles and antiparticles, or life and death states of a world cycle is conserved. Yet because Sp and Tƒ are relative past and future arrows merged into STwavesbodies of present, which constantly iterate its forms, actually all reduces to the conservation of ST dual fields. Present Fields. We do exist always in present.
Thus all starts with a simple philosophical statement: ‘The Universe exists constantly in present’.
This seemingly simple statement, is a powerful instrument as soon as we realise that the present, ST, is a bidimensional system with a parameter of a dimension of relative spacefrm and timemotion, or Ox =Ø, that is an event which is creative.
The study of the Function of present, Spast, x Tƒuture = ØPresent, a Constant of existence, which ‘exists’ in one of the scales of the 10th dimension ‘alone at a time’, and the study of other ‘simplex dimensional conservations in any ∆Plane of the energy and information, Sp and Tƒ, quanta and infinite continuum vibration in space of two poles, which brome a harmonic oscillator creative event:
Sp = ∞ x O = Time point > Constant of existence which fluctuates through its differential equations from a lineal function ∂y to a full cyclical function, Dy/dx, in any of the two possible upwards and downward social dimensions of affine or topological spas.
Thus a constant of existence, Sp x Tƒ = E∆i, can be also perceived as a sum of quanta of space, of discrete volume dimensions which are seen as fixed and a seemingly continuous due to its extreme range f harmonic oscillator functions between 2 poles.
The line then becomes the true ‘minimal entity of the Universe’, and as such, since lines have breath soon become waves of points, extended also transversally till finally are organised in a different type of vibration, that of a plane.
Which has by definition, one more dimension and so has points of view, called particles, with a larger gravitational mind of dimensions that the simpler, thermodynamic and electromagnetic, j, µ and h quanta.
So we could say that the mind is gravitational because of the way we perceives geometry operate with eyes, etc. and so it is cold because it makes a reduction of thermodynamic form – hence its gravitational in the scale it measures.
What are the quanta of gravitation? The only known candidate is the neutrino hence, IT IS the neutrino. How to adapt the equations of present mathematical physics is through the Jordan theory of neutrino light in which particles, first exchange along the invisible side of the c, m, t barriers, a measure line, invisible but that we know it is there to form the first informative neutrinogiravtational connections.
So we are gravitational beings.
We become then frames of references of mechanics in the equation of the mind which is the equation that truly defines as the relative constant of existence, cspeed or 0 temperature or Hplanck.
The Universe is immortal in 0sum time cycles that never end, perfectly anti(symmetric) between the two directions/forms/motions on the extreme of those two cycles, which converge into present, static forms and its infinitesimal up and down in the 5^{th} dimension. And having that on mind we can describe it all.
The main of those laws is the immortality of the Universe, and its dualist formal motions, which are a zerosum when we put together its antisymmetries of spacetime, which conserve together its potential vs. kinetic energy, angular vs. lineal momentum, time vs. space antisymmetries, across 3 ∆±1 planes of the 5^{th} dimension.
This is the ‘essence’ of it we must grasp. The immortality of the whole is based in the inverse symmetry of its 2 elements: form vs. motion, left vs. right, expansion vs. implosion; lineal, decelerating, expansive stillness vs. accelerating implosive cyclical motion; faster than c speed vs. slower than c speed, positive charge vs. negative charge, particle vs. antiparticle… Positive vs. negative wave sides. opposite genders, a ‘male’ or ‘female’ element, which are complementary and fusion in a reproductive present or divide in two opposite fractions.
Thus 5D Physics explains in a much more natural manner what many physicists came to call the group theory disease; that is, the use of the abstract jargons of modern mathematics, without understanding what they truly mean, and what is ‘truth’ and what is mere mathematics, provoking the present inflation of ‘Group transformations and Symmetries’.
Reality is rather simple, and the proper jargon slightly different. There is not a breaking of symmetry as physicists express it but rather the creation of a symmetry of opposite elements, departing from a universal constant, of Present State, Sp=Tƒ, an immortal point of balance in any plane of reality, which diverges both sides, to one side of MORE INFORMATION, Max. Tƒ and a side of larger spatial energy, as that is the ONLY ternary elements of 5D spacetime that might ‘’diverge or converge’ in any scale.
In brief, the 3 ‘standing points’ of the e ages of a Worldcycle in time or ternary symmetry in space or ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension might diverse from present to relative past and future, lineal and cyclical, higher or lower scales and that gives birth to diversity. So we shall first consider in the domain around our local scale, space and time parametersconstants, how those divergences might happen.
So zero systems expand into the negative (pastSp in our conventional choice) and positive (future, Tƒ in our choice) relative sides of a constant of symmetry, Sp=Tƒ, which is expressed by giving birth to two cancelling opposites.
Coincidentia Oppositorum, said Nicola da Cusa, the infinitely large and slow, the infinitely small and fast, the 0 and the ∞ which are relative and multiplied give us a constant ‘o’ for adding operations or 1 for multiplicative inversions, or a Universal constant for logarithmic scales of the 5^{th} dimension (log vs. e, ln vs. 10, log2 vs. 2 vs. √2 being the most important of those inversions).
Let us recall from this or other posts, what those 3 Sp, Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, standing points and constants are in our world:
Sp=Tƒ: constants of present action on 3 scales.
– C: the spacetime fundamental constant of the galaxy, or present wave of energy and information, in the ∆+1 scale, k or Boltzmann constant in the thermodynamic scale and H or Planck constant in the quantum scale.
Max. Sp & Max. Tƒ: Youngenergetic and old Informative, antisymmetries on 3 scales.
– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call lineal and cyclical momentum, and its integral sum, kinetic and potential energy, in the ∆+1 scale of cosmic bodies.
– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call, negative and positive ‘charge’ in the quantum scale.
– And finally lineal vs. cyclical order in the thermodynamic scale which we consider to have a constant called 0Kelvin temperature.
It is that reality which must tilt one or the other side of the constant to create the worlds and antiworlds, light and dark worlds of our Universes and AntiUniverses.
In other worlds the Universe which conserves, Sp, Tƒ, Sp=Tƒ, and ∆±1 elements, the 3 scales and its cyclical and lineal momentums must in its origin be made of both, in its Sp=Tƒ original symmetries and this is the first being or constant of action, a particle, with lineal momentum, a wave, with cspeed a plane of space with angular momentum or spin.
We can in that sense define several possible births of Universes, but to be strict, we just will consider the quasar Universe of our light spacetime galaxy, which is the only one we have enough information to fully understand.
In such Universe we do know there is a spacetime, which is light spacetime. So we can consider it spit above or below a certain dividing constant Sp x Tƒ, speed, ‘c’.
We know that the island galaxy, in which we are as masses and particles, have a cspeed barrier, we cannot cross. And we know
outside our Galaxy there is a whole world of dark space and dark energy, we do NOT see. So it is not made of cspeed light. So the origin of our reality ‘before we were born must be a split that left on our side the < c speed and outside of our galaxy there must be a >c speed. This is the world of dark energy, which seems to expand because seeing as distance, faster than cspeed appears as expansive, entropic space.
This is not forbidden in Einstein’s equations, merely means a negative sign in the mass and energy of the system, which can only be crossed, when a ‘being’ suffers the antisymmetry of moving from the side of more toorder into the side of more seentropy, in the action of death.
Now, for a system to be > C speed it must have a space which is scalar, and with 0 spin, outside. So what particle outside can be > c and 0 scalar angular momentum?
As always we do NOT speculate (and that is why we have reduced our analysis to our galaxy). There is actually a boson, the Higgs boson that has 0 spin and negative mass in certain ranges of excited existence. So here we have the dark energy boson, the Higgs, outside the Universe, accelerating beyond cspeed, which therefore is the ‘event horizon’ or halo of the galaxy, which cannot be crossed in the larger scale of the antiatom galaxy.
So the fundamental symmetry of the cosmological ∆+1 scale is >c (Higgs boson), ≈ c (Photon) < c (Mass) is resolved.
Next there is the question moves to the ∆thermodynamic scale.
Again, we must consider here the constant of order, which we found to be 0 K Temperature. So there should be a world to one side of 0 temperature and a world to the other side of 0 temperature.
And since we find that our world CANNOT go under 0 temperature, we are in the side of > 0 Temperature and < C speed. This is evident. And so we must conclude that the dark world outside the galaxy must be below the 0 temperature barrier, which cannot be crossed either. Do we find then anything that is in the dark world below 0 temperature.
Indeed, black holes of large size have a perfect order and are 0 temperature. Their world starts in a accelerated vortex of gravitation, from where ‘light cannot speak’ because light actually turns at cspeed in its event horizon, but because vortices are accelerated (Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravity), beyond its 0barrier black holes MUST move faster than light with less than zero temperature.
In the graph, the quantum barrier can only be crossed in wave state. The understanding on T.Œ of those phenomena requires to fully grasp the ‘changes in time speed’ which all systems can perform within the limits of its constants of action: as we can accelerate our actions, increasing the tempo of our heart clock, which in turns do change our perception of time, systems can change its E x T = H quantum of action accelerating its time clocks or decelerating them, and can change its ‘states’ from bodyactions (wavestate) to headactions (particle state).
After crossing as wave in the lower ∆1 plane of the 5^{th} dimension, the system though shows a lower energyfrequency, which it has spent going ‘under’ the well, in the ∆1 dimension not above, jumping over the Height dimension of growth of form (which we observe in boson states of eusocial evolution that pile up frequencies of bidimensional spin 1).
Those are essential beats of absolute freedom and zeroviscosity, which all systems of the Universe can perform, in its vital state. The risks of those changes of state happen when the ‘change’ moves towards the ‘LNK’ limits of the physical function (Max. Sp=cspeed > stable>Max. Tƒform= 0 k), where the split an cause the death of the system.
We can understand those processes thus also in terms of ‘translation’ and travel through the 5^{th} dimension, ∆particle < ∆1: wave, faster state: motion > Particlestill form.
Scalar symmetry in 5 D. Asymmetry in in a single plane of Space and Time antisymmetries.
Now, while in other sciences where space is not so important, form acquires very different shapes, in physics, forms are simple, closer to the ideal cycles, lines, toroid, spheres, ellipses and waves of the perfect mathematical game.
So the concepts of group transformation, isomorphism, isotropism, translation, mirror symmetry, asymmetry, parity, chirality and antisymmetry, which refers to the changes in external form of a given species when travelling through space (left, right up and down in a single 5D plane), Time (through 3 ages in a single 5D plane) or travelling through 5D (that is evolving socially or devolving through multiple planes, by changing your internal S, T parameters) are all defining the nature of the events we study and the relationships between species.
All this of course, physicists know but as they do not ‘have a general’, simple understanding of it in terms of 5D fractal spacetime, it is merely explain with confusing jargons and experimental ‘ad hoc’ rules, coming out of experience but also out of the blues, with no underlying reason.
We shall thus consider as a final theme for this introduction to the generator, what kind of changes happen in the form and symmetries of a system when it travels in an of those 3 different ‘mediums.’
In that regard, it would be really helpful for physicists truly interested in ‘meaning’ to accept the 5Dimensional structure of the Universe and start comparing and modeling the different sections of their science according to the ¬Æ similarity between symmetric scales, bearing in mind that the maximal analogy (but never equality or identity, which as mathematical formalisms show is a barren concept) between:
– Scalar similarity and symmetry of phenomena (maximal equality) between every 2 scales of the 5^{th} dimension, NOT between the lower ∑1 and Oo scales, in the way we perceive it, as the lower scale is considered the energy of the upper scale that becomes information. We shall see this constantly as lineal atoms become cyclical forms in the social grouping, as proteins which are lineal become cyclical rings in the next scale, as cyclical nucleotides become lineal spiral DNA molecules and so on.
Thus the symmetry of scalar planes happens between 2 different levels, but the continuous levels are inverse anti symmetric in the way temporal inversions are.
For example in cosmology on the larger scale we unified charges and masses but found that the galaxies are likely to be antiparticles on the way they have their mass distributed.
While other possible alternatives according to the ternary symmetries or arrows of an event might be used to explain them (i.e. a new scale of a cosmic bigbang given the 10^{11} constant between X and X+1 planes found in the number of galaxies; or inversely a description of the internal galaxy with the strong force, which gives to quarks a 1% of mass and does not diminish with distance resolving the dark matter problem); the theory that better corresponds to the observed data and general laws of T.Œ is to consider an inversion of scales, from particles (our scale) to antiparticles (the galactic scale)
Since the black hole nucleon has only one thousandth the mass of the halo, hence it is an inverted electro∆+ proton system.
The Black Hole 0.1% mass resembles the mass of the center of an antiatom (with an electron in the center, 1800 relationship of mass to the proton).
And so we could consider that in the next scale of the Universe with other physical parameters selfsimilar to ours but inverted (as it is always the case when we transcend scales, which become in this manner antisymmetric; so the symmetry of scales happens every i±2, which explains the quantum jumps of death), the Universe is a world of antiparticles.
Indeed, when we die we break two scales down, from humans to macromolecules, amino acids, which as we shall see resemble our form, with its nitrogen heads, its OH legs and its carbohydrate bodies, NOT to the cell level which die too very fast in a quantum jump. So the comparison in biology is between macromolecules and humans, where the cell becomes the ‘house’ of the mental DNA strains whose activity and perception must be akin to the one we do have in a society and then again the comparison is between a cell and a nation, which has the similar form.
This is an essential element to fully grasp the similarities between scales that jump always both in time and space a generation – so we are similar to our grandparents more than to our parents, as kin observers of human nature have often considered. And life, yes, surprise, surprise, is jumping from the insects through the larger scale of humans into robotic insects in swarms of metalife…
Thus we must consider the inverted differences between motions in time, space and 5D as follows:
– Temporal inversion is maximal between youth and old age and its forms and beyond (conception and death): absolute antisymmetry, of the ‘boundaries of the worldcycle’, which cancel each other on those ‘temporal limits’.
– A lesser antisymmetry, which we shall call ‘asymmetry’, happens between the simultaneous coexistence of those 3 ages as forms of space, which is ‘merged’ in the central ‘present form’ of the system.
The difference in that sense between 5D and spacetime in a single membrane is obvious. 5D scales are far more similar part by part, and can be considered ‘mimetic’ brothers of each other, as the charge and mass unification equation shows (identical in the nondetailed simplex first age of the subject, obviously more different as we advance into more detailed relativity equations).
On the other hand, temporal systems, when we include the conception, informative age and the entropic death, with its quantum jumps that ‘go through the balanced present’ in an instant of time are the example of pure antisymmetry, in the sense of ‘inversion’ of all the parameters.
Death is Max. Se x Min Tƒ. Conception is Max. Tƒ x Min. Se.
A moment of death is a bigbang explosion in a quanta of time with maximal expansion in space. A moment of conception is the collapse of information into a point of minimal space; a seminal seed of the lower scale; and the life process is the process of motion from Max. Tƒ x Min. Se into Max. Se x Min. Tƒ.
In physics the fundamental equation to define that inversion is E(Se) (kinetic energy) < ST c2 (wave state) > Tƒ (informative state): E=Mc2.
While in space the complementarity between those two extremes manifests in the nonexistence of a deathconception state of the being, but on the constant flux of the entropy field absorbed by the energylimbs and the particle that gauges information. So we could consider the equation of spacepresent to be Past x Future = Presentwave, which is the element that matters more.
This brings also a duality in systems in space: Present waves, which we will term ‘female gender, Ø’, for reasons that should be obvious to the person that has read more of this blog (it is the same configuration that in sexual gender in the biological systems) as opposed to past (motion) x Future (particle) = Present system, with momentum, p or angular momentum rp.
Thus space has two subconfigurations, and one of the commonest relationships is that which equals the value in terms of energyinformation of the wave state and that of the particle in terms of momentum, embodied in the Past x Future = Present equality, which in our scales would mean the same value for a woman and a man, a female and a male, a reproductive function and an energyinformation dilated functions.
Now all this has a wide application when we classify and calculate and explain physical formulae and differentiate phenomena which can be considered perceived in space as those which can be considered transformations in time? Why. Obviously because in time, what we shall observe is a different type of equations:
E(se) ≥ ST as a field becomes a wave, and looses ‘entropy’, that is energy which does not transcend in the evolution, and then ST≥ Tƒ, as the wave becomes the particle which collapses but in this case however as the wave and particle are complementary and closer in evolution, often with internal clocks in synchronicity, (as in De Broglie quantum matter waveparticles dualities) entropy somehow is lesser than in the first transformation between a relative infinite field of energy with a boundary limit that collapses into the wave state.
So we obtain seemingly different mathematical results when we study a time antisymmetry from a space symmetry, when we deal with momentums and when we deal with energy transformations. Still those equations will hold for many elements despite being contradictory in principle, because one is a static and the other a dynamic process. Moreover because we do NOT see with enough speed the cycles of particles in the lower max. Tƒ x Min. Se = K scales of the fifth dimension we will often as physicists do confuse a time event with a spatial form, and so a way to differentiate relationships and events is by considering the quantitative data we obtain in those equations:
Pastfield x Futureparticle = Present wave: constant of action; hence Past = Present/Future: Field = Wave/particle (density of energy) or the inverse of a field potential = particle/wave (density of information)
Past ≥ Present wave; Present wave ≥ Future particle. Future Particle ≤Past field (in the moment of death).
Thus in time we obtain 3 slightly similar equalities while in space we obtain a constant of action: Energy x Time = constant of action (hPlanck unit of present in quantum physics or kBoltzmann constant, unit of present I thermodynamics).
Now this might sound esoteric, metaphysical or confusing to the reader but it is the key to find meaning to processes in physics and interpret most of the fundamental equations defined precisely by a few ratios in products and simple division equations. Indeed the intelligent reader will observe that merely playing with the equation of space symmetries we obtain 3 parameters which define most equations of physics, density of energy, density of information and constant of action, and the related concepts of speed of a particle, momentum, and finally the value of energy of the pastfield, which can also be seen as a distancespeed.
Finally we will find the seemingly undistinguishable social scales of the 5^{th} dimension, but simple laws will rule those also. The first of which is the superposition rule which allow to sum identical particles into larger social scales along a most likely scalar (particle) or vectorial (field) or a combination of both (wave) parameter. Thus when we find species, which only different in the amount value of its active magnitude, mass in particle families, we will observe elements of the 3 scales of the 5^{th} dimension. But why they don’t vary along the whole range of the 3 dimensions?
The answer happens because there are two way of defining those 5^{th} dimension: the steady state region of small social scales or herds, and the Lorentzian past and future relative religions, which are ‘Dedekind cuts’ of single points, as particles are states which coexist in both, the lower and upper scale as your ego coexists in the upper social world and the lower world. Thus another way to define the relationship between the 3 parameters is this waves exist in the superposition region of relative present scales of a single plane of the fifth dimension, with addition of frequencies and energies, and particles are the sinking transcendental points or vortices between both.
This is explained therefore with the concept of Newtonian and Lorentzian regions, which is fundamental to all the work of 5D metrics.
In the graph we can observe the 3 regionsstates of spacetime symmetries in physical systems, above in time evolution as fields converge creating bidimensional waves or 3 dimensional particles and explode into entropy in the moment of death.
Particles exist in the ‘Cut’ between present and future, and are the state in which the system ‘emerges’ as energy of the higher scale of the 5^{th} dimension, enacting its motions to the service of the larger whole. So as humans move in external cycles to enact the actions of larger beings for which they toil, photons collapse into electronic nebulae as particlepoints that will serve the larger cycle.
The complexity of physics in that sense is PURELY ORGANIC IN MEANING. And this fact is what mathematical physics with its abstract jargon completely hides. The process has become even more entrenched with the adoption of increasingly abstract concepts of the axiomatic age of formal mathematics and the obsession for detail, which given all the complex elements that interact to define with complete precision the motions and forms of those physical events, make rather difficult to understand the underlying organic principle. And yet those are the rulers of the physical processes as everything else in the Universe. Indeed, the mechanical view does NOT hold at all in any process, which is NOT absolute and material as physicists earlier pretend (now they just don’t pretend anything, but describe). Consider for example the phenomena of waveparticle complementarity:
Only as particles matter systems feel the strong attraction or repulsion forces, since they are either gauging – absorbing information – or emitting it as entropy, in their past x future Se x Tƒ states. In this configuration they are NOT commutative as the Matrix analysis of quantum physics (Heisenberg) proved, to his chagrin.
He never understood why unlike other matrix this past x future ≠ future x past. Simple, Se>Tƒ means in broad terms that the field of energy is used as information (evolves to future state) by the particle that absorbs it: ∆e>∆o. The result as when we communicate with other human particle information hat we understand tends to be in the physical realm an approach of both. On the other hand, a Tƒ <Se state, is the inverse action, future x past, Tƒ < Se, whereas the particle emits inFormation (Potential energy) resulting in a repulsive action (or interacts with the underlying field expanding it, if we want to adopt a 5D ±X perception of the process, which is the 3^{rd} version of quantum ‘field physics’).
So they are NOT commutative actions. It is NOT the same to travel back to entropy that travel forwards to information.
This concept is essential to understand why weak forces, which are time transformations, do NOT conserve parity.
On the other hand, mere interactions of the type Tƒ1 (Fermion) >< ST (boson wave) ><Tƒ2 Fermion conserve parity and are equal when we see it from the Tƒ1 or Tƒ2 perspective. Here the two particles are collaborating either informing each other or using the boson wave to foster their motion as the wave, implodes or expands the lower field.
In that regard, departing from a mechanical, first simplistic view of the interaction of physical organisms of the quantum scale, physicists have kept growing their data an ‘exceptionalist’ events, which completely destroyed the simplistic view they still teach in schools of particles as ‘balls’ that collide ‘mechanically’ conserving their momentums and that ‘bag for al phenomena’ called Energy, while there are still disquisitions among philosophers on the waveparticle duality, (the field, ternary element being excluded normally except among Feynmannites). All this is not needed.
The physical organism displays the same complex behaviors than any other organism of any other scale. It is the human limited observance of them, its massive quantity of information only susceptible to social numbers’ treatment as indistinguishable and the praxis of sing them to construct and operate machines with precision measures, what has crafted our philosophy of them.
So let us consider for example the organic paradigm on the phenomena first brought about: superconductivity.
In essence it means that when the system is NOT disturbed by the X+1 ‘whole’ molecular scale with its bothersome temperaturefriction that takes energy out of the system, provoking its slavery and malfunctioning the system at the electric, particle social scale works much better and the electron which is supposed to be repulsive adopts a presentwave configuration in which the aforementioned mechanism of particlefield attraction/repulsion duality is no longer important, as wave are ‘reproductive’ motions over the field, which they configure reproducing the wave form and upgrading it in a much more harmonic manner.
A WAVE IS A PRESENT, REPRODUCTIVE STATE, as a woman is the wave present configuration in which Se>ST<Tƒ converge together giving energy and information to the present state, and so the wave displaces much faster in tune with the lower scale. And it does not suffer so much repulsion but superposition (in as much as the lower X1 plane can be perfectly accommodate with its much faster time clocks, many multiple waves of the larger, slower scale given its Lk=Se x Tƒ coinvariance). But the electron wave also enters in harmony with the lattice of atoms and synchronize its vibrational clocks as cells do with larger wholes.
Thus to get some idea of how the effective interaction between two electrons in a metal can be attractive rather than repulsive, we need to consider a much more subtle effect that depends on the electron’s quantum wave properties. Consider an electron moving through a crystal lattice. Although it is much lighter than the atoms it passes, it still has a small effect on them and
they tend to vibrate a little in sympathy with the electron wave.
This does little in itself, but if there are two electrons it is possible for the atomic vibrations set up by one of them to affect the other and vice versa. Detailed quantum calculations show that the effect of this exchange of lattice vibrations between the electron waves is to reduce the total energy very slightly below what it would have been if the waves had not been present and that this attractive potential is largely independent of the electron separation. Provided the electrons are far enough apart to spread the wave and not collapse into particle, they will screen repulsion as waves and with the atoms. So, the overall result can be an attraction.
The attractive potential is extremely weak and so thermal energies even at low temperatures will break superconductivity. However, the interaction is essentially a quantum one that is best described as being between the electron waves. As these waves are spread throughout the whole crystal, the interaction is essentially independent of the electrons’ position, as its particle state no longer matters.
When we put all this together and apply quantum physics we find that the attraction is effectively concentrated on pairs and the electrons are ‘coupled’ or in terms of its organic state, they are superimposed present ‘married waves’.
In that regard, the astounding complexity found in the behavior of quantum particles at this stage of detail, which could fill itself an entire encyclopedia makes 0sense with mechanical models that do not understand the organic paradigm.
œpoint particle states do gauge information, ∆ï, and do feed on energy, ∆e, present waves do reproduce and socialize into larger superposition waves, ‘collapsing’ into ∆+1 planes and fields, waves and particles are all together organic ∆±1 coexisting systems. And for that reason there are 3 ‘descriptions’ of quantum physics, which can be expressed with the Generator of its ‘linguistic, mental discipline’:
∆±1: Field>Boson>Particle (quantum fields) +Space description (time invariant): Schrodinger wave + Se≤≥Tƒ Time antisymmetry (Heisenberg noncommutative matrix description).
Thus each of those scales can be subdivided further according to the ternary principle into §ocial §cales and transition ‘borders’, where the evolution of the system accelerates in time or grows in space at a different rhythm to enter into the new scale of the fifth dimension:
In the graph, when we change from ∆scales, there is a gap in which the lineal metric of each scale of the 5th dimension, or proportion of S x T = K, changes. Why? Obviously because we ‘ad’ a layer of complexity going upwards that absorbs more ‘energy’ to structure itself; so larger wholes need more ‘total’ energy to build its ‘russian doll onion layers’ and so as we see clearly in the transitions of a regime of motion, when singularity vortices, tiƒ are created or in the Lorentzian limit when masses of higher density (strangelet quarks, top quark families) are created, while the vspeedentropy, Spe parameter states constant, there is a growth of Tiƒ (vortex, mass), which means the system grows its total S x T energy, till reaching the new regime. And inversely in the ‘violet’ catastrophe of quantum physics energy radiation drops as the entropytemperature level increases significantly less than the initial values expected.
negative temperatures you call it mass. As the transition between scales transforms one parameter of frequency into the other:
In the graph the relativistic theories of heat and frequency and mass, in Planck’s work, Ali’s work and Einstein’s work, describe in a unified way, the limits of ‘informative reproduction’ of a wave of photons, phonons and nucleons, on the verge of its ‘discontinuous ∆º±1 quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational planes.
Phonons there are ‘virtual’ particles created and destroyed out of the extensive spatial field, carrying entropymotion in the form of energy (condensed particle).
So for each scale of the Universe we must define three different regions: the entropic lower region, central balanced region, and upper informative one, in which we observe an emerging process of parts organized into wholes, and the birth of an eddy or vortex which slow down the speed of the system, as the external kinetic energy is converted into internal energy, till a third age vortex (relative time arrow) or a whole (absolute arrow) emerges perfectly organized in its internal structure, happens in all systems of the Universe.
All this said the parameters we humans use to define the ‘Spatial Extension’, ‘temporal information’, and ‘constant combinations of both, which become the finitesimal actions of its species’ in each scale are NOT clearly equivalent. And this is due in part to the transformations suffered between scales, and the limits of human perception of them.
But we DO have the fascinating fact that the overall formal motions of a given plane considered as Energy do transfer and conserves those parameters in all the processes between 3 scales.
So we can compare equations and terms between 3 such scales, with surprisingly symmetric results.
Such as in each lower, ∆1, plane of the 5^{th} dimension, we will have a relative ‘infinitesimal’ point system in 4 dimensions of spacetime (2 corresponding to the Sp, entropy function and 2 dimensions to the Tƒ, informative function, as in this screen you use to receive information). Yet each of those 4D points, when they move upwards to the next scale, BECOME enclosed as a infinitesimal point of the larger ∆ scale of measure.
For example, between the temperature and mass scale the Stefan law is the statement that the total radiant heat energy emitted from a surface is proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature: E = σT^{4}.
That is, Temperature, the clock of measure of the larger, ∆thermodynamic scale encompass 4 dimensions (4 powers) of the clock of measure of the ∆1 quantum scale, radiation, frequency. And so when the massbody with Tƒ (∆)= T, emits radiation, Tƒ (∆1) it does so in 4 dimensions, ƒ x ƒ x ƒ x ƒ.
So if E is the radiant heat energy emitted from a unit area in one second and T is the absolute temperature (in degrees Kelvin), then E = σT^{4}, the Greek letter sigma (σ) representing the constant of proportionality, called the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, related to the Boltzmann one.
Thus Energy is a composite concept, for a flow of formal motions divided into a constant of action, H, k, C² and a variable time clock that accelerates as frequency in quantum waves, temperature in thermodynamic systems and Mass density in accelerated vortices.
If as it seems the scales of the 5th dimension have no limit, given its symmetries between scales, which happen between the ‘galaxy atom’ and the ‘atom galaxy’ (see previous post on astrophysics and the Unification equation of charges and masses), it follows that the internal structure of the atomic nuclei will be similar to the internal structure of the galaxy. Thus, the strong force is attractive as gravitation; its force carriers gluons do carry also the strong force, as it happens in gravitation (gravity ‘gravitates’, is said) and in 5 D metrics protons and black holes have the same event horizon equation. By the same symmetry, it follows that dark energy should be similar to electromagnetic repulsive waves between atomic orbitals and explain the repulsive nature of intergalactic space. Those are thus the limiting scales in which evidence will be scanty, and where the symmetries of 5D scales can help to understand better.
But it is obvious that such subparticle nuclear physics, the study of the smallest scales of the 5th dimension (∆3,4), and the other ‘extreme’ physics supposedly explored at CERN – cosmology, ∆+3,4 through the replication of quark big bangs – are a restricted, relatively unimportant science, from the human perspective of our ∆o Plane of existence.
Since due to the multilayered structure of the planes of the 5th dimension (the relative scales of size and time speed of the Universe), energy and information does not fully transfers between those planes – so the particle scale, as the scale of dark energy and dark information beyond the galaxy, do not affect us.
We humans are basically electronic, molecular systems, and so all what is below the atom and above the galaxy does not influence our existence – NOR it will reveal fundamental new truths about the Universe, as all PLANES follow the same metrics and laws of entropy and information, symmetries and structural forms.
The particle and dark world are beyond our ternary structure as organisms and species.
They can only affect us in entropic processes, beyond our 0 K and cspeed limits, which ‘kill our matter’ (nuclear bombs, self feeding dark matter that can convert our matter into strangelet or black holes). So besides death, there is little relevant knowledge to be acquired on those scales, for a simple reason: all scales of the 5th dimension follow the same mathematical ¬Æ laws of fractal points, ternary systems and its symmetries. And so we can learn more observing the scales closer to us, also in physical systems (atomic, molecular and matter scales, with its quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational laws.)
Thus physics is important on those 3 scales closer to human beings, and the knowledge we have acquired of those symmetries from quantum to gravitational scales, from atoms to star systems is essential to our life and wellbeing. Still there is much to improve and understand on those scales, when we ad new organic perspectives and the proper mathematical understanding of ‘fractal pointparticles’ to the present analysis.
So we have for ALL the main planes, the previous equations, broken into two ternary symmetries around the charge ‘worlds’ and ‘mass’ worlds between which the human observer is sandwiched.
So the reader starts to see how we do fit and order, departing from the ternary structure of reality in spacetime (equivalent to the ternary ‘Cartesian’ resextensa+vortex+mind structure) and in scales (equivalent to Leibniz’s triad elements of reality : the tiƒmonad, ST: ∑ 1/n finitesimals parts & ∫∫dtsdt integral/derivatives into wholes… to quote two founding fathers of ‘serious’ philosophy of science that mirrored it).
Needless to say if we were an atom we would see other parameters from other ‘monad’s mind perspective’ (ab. Pov).
This said what the equations of energy in those three scales mean is now more clear. As usual they will represent a function of present energy in each of those scales with:
maximal detail (∆º thermodynamic scale) or
limiting detail (climit of speed perception of information in ∆+1), or
– uncertainty, given the fact that we must ‘absorb’ some hquanta (Heisenberg uncertainty) of angular momentum≈present information to ‘learn’ about the quantum observable (as e/10 is the toll we rest from 3 to emerge as an 11 tiƒ point in ∆+1 wholeness).
So as we have understood energy, common to the three, and the scalar, as in a puzzle we just explain the ‘third element’, the ratio constants, h, k and v or c (limit), with slightly different meaning to match the symmetry with the T, ƒ, m elements just described.
In the larger scale of gravitation, as Mass is the ‘scalar’ tiƒ element (vortex of quarks, centre of gravity, black hole of stars) and we are in the middle of the system, as the ‘momentaenergy’ element it follows that v is the fieldpotentialrelated Spemotion; and the second version, e=mcc must be read as ‘entropydisorder’ expansion and destruction of mass into entropy, in its maximal possible motion; that of the structure ∆i final scales of galactic substrata, light spacetime.
In the lower scale, however we are talking of a complete ‘reversal’ of perspective at all levels, from topology – elliptic in gravitation and relativity, hyperbolic or lineal in quantum – to function/form (essential concept in GST, paradoxical always, coexisting in multiple elements, with an ∆º perspective that changes the parameters we measure; and certainly with a much more complex logic than the human obsession for absolute onedimensional truths/perspectives).
So H is a constant of the external membrane (still view) angular momentum (dynamic view) of the particle/wave we observe. It is not the unobservable tiƒ centre; and the interest of it, is its multifunctional roles, a theme studied in our posts on quantum.
Now it is important also to bear in mind constantly the fact, so little understood even if it is accepted since Einstein and Planck, that the Universe is more about motion=events in time, not form in space.
So we are talking of actions, of ‘present momentum’, of world cycles, and merely state that H is the ‘minimal world cycle’ of ‘energy’ of the quantum scale.
As energy and entropy are so often confused in physics, we often follow along, not to correct constantly, since they are relatively similar (energy is conserved, entropy tends to disorder; energy though has specially in kinetic energy the most used concept a tendency towards entropy more than towards form, which would be better represented as information, a presentfuture state vs. energy a presentpast, forming both the dual components of the wave, so for example the magnetic and electric field can be treated as the relative energy vs. information duality married through the wave speed, and its µ, k, constants: c²=k(tcurvature)/µ(sgravito magnetic constant).
In the graph we see 3 physical parameters of those 3 arrows: entropy, as the minimal spacequanta of thermal scales, light speed, as the iterative present arrow of quantum space, and angular momentum, as the Oarrow of the same scale, which transcends into the gravitational concept, for gravitational orbits. What matters thus to localise a parameter of entropy/present space time/ or cyclical motions, is its topology that transcends scales.
Why then energy=present can be equalled in the 3 scales of the organic Universe? This is the strongest prove that the Universe is connected through the metric of the 5th dimension; as it shows the 3 ∆±1 scales equal in value of ‘energy’ and coexisting with different Tiƒ parameters (T, M, V) and 3 different Space quanta (k, h, c). So ENERGY is ultimately the ∆constant of the immortal Universe… selfcontained in 3 parallel ‘scales’ of the 5th dimension, the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales.
In other words, as those equations can be equalled, we could talk of a selfcontained galaxy, our islandUniverse (regardless of leaks both sides on the outside border with the world of dark energy, through neutrino waves), with 3 ‘scales’ of equal energy∆ value, if we could calculate it (we can’t regardless of physicists hyperbolic statements on their tools of measure and numbercrunching equations). On theoretical grounds any Supœrganism should have in symbiosis a series of balances, such as…
∆1=∆=∆+1=3E; meaning the absolute value of entropy x time in the gravitational, thermodynamic and quantum scales must be the same; for them to be in constant symbiosis in all its fractal parts.
How many elements humans use to describe each of those parameters vary in models of human knowledge. As humans reduce cyclical time to single parameters, normally the time function has less dimensions than the others: The main rule to remember is that the simplest lineal functions represented in a cartesian coordinates are functions of timefrequency on a number line, as we can describe a motion with a single parameter of speed, acceleration or deceleration (the 3 arrows of time in its simplex expression).
In each of those scales and subscales the enquire thus starts, with the search for the ‘3 elements’ of the generator both of the external ‘larger plane’world in which we exist (quantum, ∆1, thermal, ∆, or gravitational ∆1) and the internal world, often made from the same initial quanta of the larger world. This of course, happens also in biological systems, where we should start understanding the medium, water, from where its minimal quantum are extracted (we are evolved beings) and the energy of ¥rays, which kicks out its motions, as most physical entities start with the atomic and ¥ray quanta also.
TRANSITIONS between scales
NOW THE KEY CONCEPT to understand those scales is the first principles of GST, the nature of the three symmetries of physical systems, of its scales, of its quanta of space populations, of its inner and outer networks (extrinsic and intrinsic curvatures you might say) etc. etc. So a full translation of terminology is need, and a special understanding on how a physical system travels through topological motions, temporal motions and ∆scalar motions, that is a whole catalog of isomorphic laws, type of motions, varieties of species, which implies to unify an astounding array of terminologies, straighten up with proper none, nona maths, the meaning of its equations, etc.
I did start to do so very professionally in my youth translating Landau’s excellent 11 books encyclopaedia on physics, taken advantage of the clarity of the dualist soviet school but the job is unfinished and left for future researchers, as this blog is obviously just a ‘seed’ in a mindpoint of a future branching GST analysis of reality by generations of human or A.I.
Transition between scales matter specially to fully grasp the terms involved:
In the graphS the most well known transition between the human light spacetime galactic scale and the outer, dark energy/matter world beyond cspeed and below OK.
BUT THIS transition to the cosmological scale is far less important for humans than those in our ∆º thermodynamic scale (center) between states of energy, gaseous entropy, liquid and informative solid) and those in the quantum electromagnetic scale and beyond (inner region of atoms). How in each scale as in all other forms a lineal enteric system becomes curved angular momentum is then the higher truth of those transitions. The easiest homolog to observe is the central ∆º one transition from a bidimensional laminar flow of entropy, whose speed grows lineally with energy till it starts the vortex creation of timeclocks, which diminish its speed as more information is created:
V=S/T> ∇v=∆ (S/T+Tƒi vortex creation).
So as new information must be created in the motion of the fluid – that of the vortex particle, energy no longer becomes vspeed.
The same happens in the limit of cspeed which must be considered the homolog vortex creation – in this case of a mass vortex.
On the other side of processes, a density of enough information, T/S of a system, (i.e. a gravitational black hole) will be able to transform an S/t wave of ¥energy into a cyclical form of mass, absorbed by the black hole.
And we can compare those effects again with the quantum photoelectric effect, in which the energy of the photon is purely absorbed by a static electron to a threshold. So those barriers of potential energy to activate an event of a higher or lower scale are never an absolute limit.
So what happens in those transitions is always what physicists call the energy of activation of a change of state, and the climit of speed of our light spacetime should not be different from those transitions between Spe entropy (gasfield) st (liquidboson waveelectron) Tƒi (solidfermionquark); which is the equation of a world cycle of three states of matter, that must be completed on the bottom and upper part by the ‘transition’ to a lower scale or upper scale (or death).
In that sense we can in the past of gaseous states of growing temperature, the plasma state, and on crystal of zero temperature, the pass to a boson state; which must be regarded as the emergence from plasma ∆1 to gas, ∆º to boson condensate ∆+1.
In the graph the depiction of a relative plane of existence with the parameters of energy and information. In the center we find the superposition region of waves in the extremes the field and the particle, the particle and field will be in a ‘Dedekind cut’ (mathematical argon) or ‘Rosen bridge’ (relativity jargon) or ‘network collapse’ (5D jargon).
So only with present analysis of systems, we will be able to make sense of more equations.
Thus when talking of space, time and 5D symmetries strictly speaking we should talk in the generalized language of 5D T.Œ of:
Time antisymmetry; that is, the inverse parameters of birth and young ages vs. old ages and death, such as the Max. Space x Min. Time (death arrow) and Max. Time x Min. Space (life arrow). The antisymmetry of time cycles extended to conception and death is double: on one side the form changes, on the other the planes of existence change ad maximal.
Space asymmetry, that is equal in left or right motions (parity vs. chirality, being its physical measure)
 5D plane symmetry; which however happens every 2 scales, such as o_{1}<>O+1. So the symmetry of 5D jumps a scale, a fact of enormous importance in the description of beings, as particles become waves of the larger scale, which become particles, which become waves of the larger scale. So photons become parts of electronic waves, which collapse into photons that become parts of electric waves. And so on.
Further on, since there is a different proportion of information going downwards with entropy than upwards with no entropy (hence lower n1 scales code with quantum numbers, genes or memes upper scales), and different proportion of motion going downwards with no entropy and upwards with entropy (so wholes can perfectly synchronize the motion of its parts); due to 5D metrics, Se x Tƒ = K. Entropy both of energy and information (Shannon) being its physical measure.
Now in physics the language of form does not care so much as form but to define in the abstract modern language, infected by the 3^{rd} age of ‘formal mathematics’ with the jargon and obsession for a ‘perfect photograph’ of distances and motions of the particles involved, and so they terms used chirality, parity, group, invariance, etc. are not functional for T.Œ (as they would make no sense in other sciences. So we shall try to translate those terms for what they matter: how they affect to the spatial, temporal and 5D motions and how they make physical entities transform into other functions and scales, described by mathematical equations of physics.
5. PHYSICAL ÅCTIONS
ACTIONS OF SPACETIME, THE WILL OF SURVIVAL OF ŒPOINTS.
A universe of actions of spacetime.
And even in a much wider philosophical conceptualization, since other sciences do not use the previous mathematical formula of physical systems to define that Universal law:
Cyclical Motion in Time x Form in Space = Constant Action
This is what the Universe is all about: infinite motions with form, delivered by Active Magnitudes, Species, which act discretely through those motions with form, we call Actions of spacetime; or momentums in the physical jargon, which integrated along a whole sum of them, give us a function called Energy, which is conserved for a whole Universe.
And this game of species performing actions of spacetime with a purpose, which will turn to be organic, in infinite fractal territories of existence, is what T.Œ, the Theory of Everything Organic describes.
The word energy however is illdefined, as most concepts of physics, which merely are given a mathematical equation whose interpretation is minimal.
The principle of conservation of energy and information for all sciences, in physics where ‘energy’ has a far wider meaning than in other sciences (where it is synonymous of motion), slightly changes its wording, to accommodate better physical equations. So we use the concept of ‘entropy’, or expansive disordered motion.
So the fundamental duality of the physical Universe encloses entropy within Ocyclical clocks of information, so motion becomes form, as frequency waves, temperature waves or mass enclosures control the loose entropy of physical systems and organise them into orderly cyclical shapes. And both are put together in the equations of physics under the umbrella of an all encompassing bagforall energy concept.
And yet all this done it will still be NOT enough to explain the whys of the Universe, which will require THE WHYPOINT, the will point, the ‘Maxwell’s demons’ that create order through its survival biological ±∆e, ±∆i, ∑œ=U, actions in spacetime.
The Œpoint which gauges and perceives information and start an organic behaviour to feed its body and mind and reproduce into similar particles, whenever possible or form part of a wave of communication that becomes a point of an orderly network (or vice versa, starts an entropic process of devolution), is the needed why of all systems, physical, biological or social. So in physics we must define those ‘knots of time cycles’ that vary slightly those cycles, its rhythms and sequential order, in pursuit of its own survival.
We integrate and give meaning to all those motions in space and time with the Organic paradigm: all the motions and actions of all systems of the Universe try to make the system that produces the to survive by absorbing energy and information from the environment and reproduce its own form to last beyond its world cycle. So the topping of an organic paradigm of the Universe is the ‘will of order’ and reproduction of form of its pointsparticle in any scale of reality.
Now this paragraph is undoubtedly the one which most often is denied by any human of any discipline: the fact that we are all fractal points of spacetime, whose quantitative behaviour varies but NOT its qualitative behaviour. As it is imposed by the program of survival of the Universe that all systems, physical, biological and social follow and resumes in a simple statement: points of view display 3 axis of absorption and emission of energy, and information and combining reproduction of both, and those apertures to the external sensorial world determine its behaviour as a series of actions in spacetime that try to minimise its expenditure of internal energy (hamiltonian, lagrangian paths) and maximise its absorption of external energy and information, in order to reproduce and evolve socially.
We can describe all the actions of systems by those drives of existence: ±∆e,i (motion, feeding on energy, communication of information) and its more complex actions (œ, reproduction in an offspring of similar points and social evolution into Universals, super organisms made of smaller points). This behaviour is what truly sciences describe for each system and so we find often coding laws (drives of biological existence, genetic letter, quantum numbers, Action laws) which define such program of existence.
Let us then introduce it for physical particles.
What is the most important set of subequations of the Fractal Generator in physical systems? As in all other systems of nature, the spacetime actions of survival of the physical system, which allows the system to renovate its energy, motion, form, reproduce and evolve socially into larger systems, ensuring the survival of its ilogic structure beyond individual extinction.
Physical actions.
The best way though is to talk of combined 5 DIMENSIONS of pure time motion with form – that is OF ACTIONS, which are essentially equivalent to the 5 actions of spacetime exchange all T§organisms DISPLAY, in its actions of existence. We shall then bring again the ultimate vital meaning of those dimensions in light spacetime and electronic minds, as ONLY IN THOSE LOWER SCALES OF OUR MINDVIEW BOTH THE PHYSICAL, GEOMETRICAL DIMENSIONS AND ITS VITAL MEANING COME TOGETHER, WITHOUT ABSTRACTION – meaning the height, width and length, and colour that define the four dimensions of a ray of light DO have all a vital meaning for the photonwave, as they code their reproductive speed, social color/frequency, magnetic information/entropy and electric entropic/informative forces (in the complex Universe all elements have ternary roles, so the way magnetism and electricity act in both arrows/roles, depend of the specific function light has for the larger organism that uses it to transmit energy and information):
Below we see also that our electronic mind is ordered by the ‘vital’ uses of the geometry in space of an electronic orbital.
The electron will have a particle state, hence a particle spin, a body wave state, hence an angular momentum for the standing bidimensional wave, a social action given by the magnetic field that organises all the social electrons in harmonious orbital game; and a reproductive event, which required spins of opposite direction os they can ‘couple’ decouple merge and reproduce new particles, and the simplest numbers that regulate its motions (principal number) and energy/informative simpler actions, absorbing=feeding on light (provoking quantum jumps on sizevolumeenergy) and using it to orientate its spin, angular momentum, and form of information (second number).
Quanta of spacetime’s: 5 actions.
We have now schematised the fieldparticle states of the 3 physical organisms. If we concentrate in its present state, as waves both the photon and the electron will then easily display its ‘internal structure’ and external actions of ‘survival’ that will show clearly its organic, biological properties tightly connected by symmetries in ∆, s and t, with the parameters and Universal constants aforementioned. Let us then connect the dimensions of the most important scale, our mindworld of light and electrons, with the vital actions of ‘entropic feeding’, e, lineal motion, a, informative perception, i, reproduction, o, and universal, social evolution, u; since almost all detailed events we study in physics as in any other scale responds to those vital actions.
In the graph we see the structure of a quantum supœrganism of light in its wave and particle state and its fundamental laws of action, which draw an organic program of survival for both ∆1 photonic and ∆electronic scales.
The equations of a clight wave or photonic particle and its social group, the electron which is a bidimensional dense herd of photons (wave constrained scale).
THUS IN THE SMALLEST SCALES OF REALITY FUNCTION, FORM, DIMENSION, VITAL ACTION COME ALL TOGETHER NICELY AS SYMMETRIES BETWEEN THE ORGANIC SCALAR ACTIONS AND SPACE AND TIME DIMENSIONS OF THE BEING.
But as we move beyond the main stream of perfect symmetries between topology, time ages/actions, and enter into the more messy, less perfect world of molecules and thermodynamic life, the exact mathematical geometry of those entities BECOMES COMPLETELY secondary to the organic functions in a far more complex and convoluted geometry. So as we move into life scales FUNCTIONS AND ACTIONS AND DRIVES OF EXISTENCE – THE PROGRAM OF FEEDING ON ENERGY, GAUGING INFORMATION, REPRODUCING, EVOLVING SOCIALLY far outweighs the importance of simple motions and the perfect topology of those dimensions, which are less accurately followed, despite the ‘still similar’ dimensional form and equal number of actions and dimensions of a human being:
In the graph, a complex thermodynamic human being needs to focus on function more than geometric form, reason why mathematics stops being the fundamental language to explain mankind and the logic of verbal thought and evolution weights more.
On the good side anthropomorphism no longer forbid us for interpreting in organic terms our actions and forms, so there is no so much subconscious censorship on ∆st analysis of human beings.
The dimensions of space, of form, which are likely only coexisting in the mind, but do influence reality would then be the usual 3 lineal or topological dimensions, and expansive entropy, and for the mind… the monad singularity and membrane.
In that regard, we must at least consider an 11th dimension doubling the mind into the membrane and the singularity, for 11 elements, to fully understand the duality of the monadmind as a membrain.
It is still an 11 dimensional manageable Universe, which is by the way the standard concept of string theory: an 11th dimension that encloses all other subsystems of 10 dimensions:
Of course ‘magically’ experimental mathematics has lead to models in pure mathematical space that seem closely to the true game of spacetime symmetries and scalar dimensions, but as conceptually it relies in all kind of antics, from newtonian absolute background spacetime to imaginary symmetries to give birth to inexistent particles (SUSYs), it is a confusing dilettante’s mathematical game.
Balance of dimensions: S=T: Survival.
Any spacetime super organism will try to maximise the survival of its territorial T.œ, and as such we can define its actions even if we do so today only mathematically. The survival is then a simple algebraic function:
∑Å ≈ Max. ∫ exi ∂st
Which basically means maximises the absorption of entropic motion for the body, information for the mind, whose product maximises when e=i, that is we absorb equal quantity of quanta of both, from the external spacetime world, ∂st, in the least ‘time’ possible of our own clocks. Those laws of efficiency (least time) and balance (max. e xi, e=i), then can be realized with some standing points, Max. e Max. i, max. e=i, ∑ e xi, which are simple mathematical expressions of the actions of feeding (max. e), perceiving (max. i), reproducing (exi, e=i) and socially evolving, ∑.. which will be the four actions coded by all systems (besides observing its pure motion, which is the only action today studied in earnest).
Thus we must deal now with the actions of the being, and its relative time beats, as they are the units that will shape quantitatively, including physics, biology and human the daily existence and program of survival of all beings.
And the rule in all of them is one of ‘efficiency’ and ‘thirst for life, for existence’. That is, systems will try to minimise the expenditure of time in its actions (law of the least time, which alone allows to define almost all of physics along the Galilean relativity already explained) and so to maximise the number of actions the being experience.
Further on because actions depend on size, the mind informative action will be the faster, related to the smaller bits of reality or ∆3 scales; while the slower actions will be those on the ∆+1 world. And so the mind commands the being as it is the fastest acting being.
In dealing with those physical actions, we shall observe how all physical super organisms follow the same 3+2=5 actions that define the existence of all beings:
IEA: ‘absorbing information’ for its particlestate, energy for its bodywave, entropymotion through its limb fields (IEA, primary action, information, energy and ‘accelerations’motions); so we shall find those 3 parameters in all physical super organisms; as those actions are CONSTANTLY HAPPENING OR ELSE THE SYSTEM WILL COLLAPSE AND DIE and then the complex social actions of offspringreproduction and social evolution into universals.
OU: (whenever present, as those actions are not required for survival and might but also might not happen. In the graph we see them for light and electrons. So many of the parameters of physics, such as cspeed, magnetic and electric constant, the 3 euclidean dimensions of light and the quantum numbers relate to those organic actions of the being.
OH, YES you are sceptic but QUARKS DO REPRODUCE AND ELECTRONS ALSO EVEN IF YOU CALL IT DECOUPLING. GET ON WITH IT.
The themes we shall deal with in 5D³ physics might be of no meaning for THE ‘dogma’ of knowledge called ‘reductionism’ – only properties susceptible to me mathematised matter, and ‘naive realism’, all what is not measured does not exist…
Reductionism and abstraction is though an attitude (NOT a property of the physical world) of the human being observing it, with its selfcentred egoparadox, so essential to understand reality (every point of view gauges information from its selfcentred perspective biasing it to look like his mindlanguage, making his membrain, the most important part of reality); where 5D³ finds an imposing wall.
As we do need both the conceptual richness of verbal thought, which prior to the arrival of digital clocks measured time with logic properties of relative past, present and future verbs; and the singularities or physical minds that create the information in infinite discontinuous territories of order, which however cannot be ‘measured internally’; and whose justification is its existence in all systems, its actions that follow a program of survival and the obvious order of reality.
So while those graphs might disappoint physicists because they are not focused in mathematical equations of physics that we recognise to be truth but in its conceptual meaning and biological, survival whys, which physicists likely will reject THEY ARE the ‘why’ they do not want to know about. In the graph we clarify this point with one extreme case, the reason and parameters that code for the 5 main actions of the survival program of the Universe.
The body=wave/particle =head reality of the quantum main particles, the photon and the electron are obvious and equal to the actions of survival of any scale of reality: the 3 dimensions of our light spacetime have organic functions for the photon. So do the quantum number of physical particles, which obviously reproduce in the same manner more complex biological systems do: you provide energy and a quark will split in new quarkitos, and an electron will throw a seminal seed, which another male electron with different spin orientation will match to create from the seminal light seed another electron.
Further on, multiple photons will travel in herdpackets according to its frequency giving birth to ‘colours’; and particles will become ordered by its ‘envelope’ or magnetic field, and its singularity or nucleic mass, as any other cellular vital space becomes controlled by the constrain of its skinsensorial membrain and singularitymind.
Those are the selfsimilar whys of the living, organic, fractal Universe that does NOT distinguish between species, physical, biological or social. And yet I recall in my few years of academic exposure physicists were the least interested on those properties. As i spoke a language they did not want to recognise. But there is not a better formulae to define reproduction than the word itself.
We shall seek those properties of physical systems because we are doing philosophy of science not mathematical physics, a long forgotten science of whys, which earlier practitioners of physics would have loved but modern digital computers, which are fed with equations and give us pictures considered the ‘final stage’ of knowledge, might shun, as they are profoundly skeptical about the ‘existence of a meaning’ to the Universe.
The search for organic whys in all languages.
IN PHYSICS ACTIONS ARE specific numbers that account for a ‘worldcycyle’ of existence of a physical event, either measure step by step in presentmomenta, as the product of momentum by space or all together as the product of the total energy of the being and its duration in time. They show the equivalence and symmetries between present momentum and its integral of a world cycle in time, and are based in the HamiltonianLeibnizian principle of minimal time/space in the motion of beings, which actually have to ‘measure’ between the spacetime initial and final point (hence gauge) the best of paths, which they likely do through the waveparticle go and stop duality to be so accurate, mimicking how we represent those actions.
So a physical action is ultimately a calculus of the value of the world cycle of a being, performing a lineal motion (1Dimension of spacetime)
The concept of åctions in ∆st as it has to apply to all sciences is different much wider (motion is the first simpler dimensional action), and includes all the possible ‘motionsactions’ of the begin in an organic way. So the sum of those motions as åctions give us the total world cycle of the being, and so it represents in ‘scalar time’, the minimal unit of time reality which gather into networks of actions for the whole entity which become paths in an external world that complete a world cycle:
∑∑åctions = ∑ networks of being = Worldcycle of existence.
So we exist as a sum of vital actions performed to exchange energy and information with the Universe, achieved through our specialised entropicdigestivemoving, informativegauging and reprodutiveiterative bodywaveblood systems… This said we shall consider how those actions define an organic program for both physical and biological systems.
PHOTONS AND ATOMIC PARTICLES: DRIVES OF EXISTENCE –THE VITALITY OF SUPERORGANISMS
The ultimate mathematical properties of physical systems are a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.
In physics the key to that vitality is the most studied of all physical events an ACTION OF SPACETIME. So let us start ‘strong’ showing you how the 3 elements of the fractal generator of all time§paœrganisms, require to feed on entropy, imprint energy, absorb information, evolve socially and reproduce to survive, considering the program of life of physical systems.
The 3±1= five dimensions of the being determine its 3±1 actions.
As ChengTzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yangline of energy and the yininformation, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.
(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)
So we classify all the different spacetime beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator.
Since Nature ‘pegs’ those 3 FORMS & FUNCTIONS, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as ALL combined the ternary elements of the Generator EQUATION, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or SIMULTANEOUS, spatial organisms:
Informative Time is more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.
Those cyclical Tiƒparticles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information.
But what is the purpose of those spacetime beings; and why they trace cycles; and why the NonEuclidean mind perceives and stores them?
As each Œ point is made of spatial energy and temporal information, it needs to absorb more of it.
So it absorbs and knots spacetime cycles, which carry ‘energymotion’ and ‘informationform’ for their limbs, bodies and heads/particles.
∆³o actions: All systems trace motions translating through spacetime cycles (∆æ), emitting absorbed energy (∆e) as accelerated entropic flows that allow its motion; all accumulate information, +∆ï rising into mental simultaneous form those pixels that create an still image of the external ∆+1 world.
∆±1 ACTIONS: All physical and biological and social systems constantly accumulate more energy, +∆e, provoking the death down the fourth dimension of its prey and ultimately become prey and also move down the fourth dimension of death.
And all systems emit information, communicating it through languages to other beings and the social force organise identical entities into ‘numbers’
And all systems reproduce its information to last beyond its death: ∆œ.
Those 5 essential ‘actions’ of spacetime that all beings perform, the purpose of those cycles and knots of spacetime cycles.
We feed on energy, move constantly, acquire information, communicate and repeat our information, in our sons. But even the smallest particles, quarks and electrons, coded by the 4 quantum numbers, move, absorb light energy, which they localize and gauge, communicate ¥ rays of information and decouple into new particles.
This simple program of existence we call ‘life’, when applied to anthropomorphic selfcentered humans, ensures the survival of all beings.
We deny all beings are like us, made of spacetime tracing actions of energy and information, as all mindbeings perceive reality from its still perspective.
So they all believe to be the center of the Universe, and none sees the inner mind of other points of view.
So man considers the other monads nonsentient.
Yet all beings perform the same program of spacetime actions, which imposes itself as those who do not follow it become extinct by lack of energy and information.
It is not an uncommon concept in all sciences adscribed to that infantile paradox of the ego that makes humans deny to their own peril the vital, organic nature of the Universe.
We are thus interested in the thoughts of god, not the details of measure, and a simple example will suffice.
Julian Schwinger had recorded on its tombstone his calculus of the deviation of the electron magneton g value from 2 in the formula.
The value gs is roughly equal to 2.002319, and is known to extraordinary precision. The reason it is not precisely two is explained by quantum electrodynamics calculation of some small contributions of the lower ∆i scales to that anomalous magnetic dipole moment.
So those are details, whose exact measure obsesses physicists, because the simple whys do not matter to them.
But to the philosopher of science what matters is the astounding beauty and simplicity of its formula:
µagnetic dipole=(g:2.00′) x.e/2m x Spin. And so we further simplify into µ m = e S.
We come thus to an equation that clearly resembles one of the simplest relationships between space and time parameters of two scales of nature, the quantum ∆1 scale, electron (unit of electricity) x Spin and the gravitational scale ∆+1: mass x magnetic dipole (unit of magnetism).
What those simple equations tell us about reality, and the fractal structure and flows of entropy, energy and information between scales, how they describe the vital, organic properties of physical systems… Those equations matter us far more than the details, but they are the kind of questions physicists no longer ask, as if they DIDNT MATTER or had any solution, as if the Universe were chaotic without order.
We find the same problem of human egocentered love to ‘degrade’ Nature as chaotic and stupid in biology, which denies topological evolution, the key element of order needed to understand its punctuated evolution, or in social sciences, which always pumps up the ego of man as entitled species. I cannot fight that human psyche. So all what i can say is that to me, once i have understood 5D³ AND ITS PHILOSOPHY: Absolute relativity might be too objective, to matter to subjective man, IS THAT to me such knowledge of simple truths and the similarity of all the scales of reality suffice to me.
rality is simpler than languages, which are constantly as they are free of simpler motions and energy constrains to acquire any form, inflationary. So we can say that you are brunette or have a black hair, but that ARE NOT 2 PROPERTIES DIFFERENT IN THE BEING, BUT TWO DIFFERENT LINGUISTIC MIRRORS. And this makes confusing to solve the true meaning of systems.
Let us put an example, on how those inflationary mathematical equations obscure a meaning. The hplanck constant measures angular momentum and the first interpretation always the best simply meant E=hƒ: in the scale of lightelectronic systems the minimal action of the singularity particle (photon or electron), was h. As more, faster minimal actions a lightelectronic system had, more energy (the integral of those actions per unit of timeduration) will display the system. So this is the meaning and it requires to understand that we CANNOT change parameters easily.
I.e. the word ‘Energy’ in physics means a lot of different things and no many are aware that in most cases we use it wrongly instead of entropydisorddered motion as in e=mc2, because we just want the motion of an energy composed of both motion and form. So the concept doesn’t matter to us, and obscure truth.
But then physicists put e=hƒ and e=1/mv² together and bring another equation for h in terms of mass, which has nothing to do with it. And at the end of the day by a century of substituting terms creating new equalities, that break the logic that relates the first equation term, hangular momentum to an electron or photon chargeenergy to display ‘frequency actions’, the whole thing ended being measured in Joules obscuring the meaning of an electron or photon using its electronic charge to perform an action.
And so the meaning of h has become obscured. Instead we should measure h in electron volts, NOT in mass units. Then we find an even simpler equation. The spin of a particle, which defines it precisely as a rotatory vortex of future time, has an exact value in h units, 1/2h. And so it expresses exactly the value of a vortex of charge, in its particle state (which along the wave angular momentum around the quarkcenter, defines a dual waveparticle electron system).
This is what an electron in particle state is, a simple vortex of a charge force, and that is what the spin means, measured properly in electron volts, and further on, because the electron has particlespin number and angular momentum around the atom centre, it IS both a bodywave and particle/head.
Now further details that obscure those idealised simple descriptions as contributions of ∆±1 elements to those energies and spins do not matter to us IF we haven’t understood the ‘idealised’ simplified model of •5D, which ads to any analysis the existence of a 5th SCALAR DIMENSION, 5 organic actions and 3 arrows of time to find many more basic principles.
Of course if there were millions of researchers in •5D I am pretty sure they could translate the whole of physics to 5D AND GIVE IT more meaning, but you cannot ask so much of a single man at this stage of my life. So we shall just keep it simple and try to show you that all the main equations and parameters of physics can be explained with those four elements, • the errors of the human mind mirror, in this case mathematics, and the order created by the singularity of the physical system, its scalar dimension and 3 time arrows.
RECAP.
5D Dimensions of physical timespace.
we shall describe the five dimensions as parts of a T.Œ SYSTEM:
4th: ∆, from the peak down, the entropic arrow (or both arrows in more complex diagrams),
•, the singularity that commands social evolution, the fifth arrow.
s, lineal motion, the youth arrow, 2nd dimension.
≈, present iteration the wave arrow, 3rd dimension.
ð, cyclical time vortex, the informative oth dimension of time (me, lazy cow use too often t or ƒ easier to type, though t should be used by ‘future pros’ as lineal time, t=1/ƒ=1/ð).
They will in turn be treated either as space dimensions only, as time dimensions only as holographic combination of a space and time dimension, and as such the most important combination will be an Se≈Ti relationship or ‘action (Sxt> maximal when Se=t).
So physicists also go about to study actions – they are in fact as they should be obsessed by timespace actions, but THIS IS NOT NEW.
Schopenhauer in his seminal paper on the fourth root of sufficient reason, expanded in his ‘world as will and representation’, absolute masterpieces unparalleled in modern philosophy never quite understood (more famous for his aphorisms among homunculus peanut brains), already deal with space, time and matter, rightly realizing that only spacetime actions truly exist together.
DIMENSIONS AS ACTIONS OF VITAL EXISTENCE.
More important will be to convert the dimensions into real events, of a vital organic Universe.
So the five dimensions of spacetime properly quantised become the five actions of existential reality:
 The lineal motion, simplest ‘accelerated/decelerated/steady state’ motions: ‘æ’, first dimensional action.
 The reproductive event in spacetime, the ‘œ’ second dimension action.
 The informative perception, collapsing the potential into wave into form, the ‘i’ , third dimensional action.
 The energy feeding = scattering entropic death of the prey, the ‘ø’ action, fourth dimensional action.
 The social evolution into wholes, or fifth dimensional action, always realized in the generation of the being as emergent, and tried but seldom achieved in the existence on the larger ∆+1 world.
Now, regarding the naming of the 5 actions of spacetime that quantise the 5 arrows of spacetime, that gather the 5 dimensions of space and 5 ages of time, the terminology differs in the sense I used the mnemonic rule, motions as acceleration, energy feeding, information, offspring and Universal evolution of individuals to make an easy a,e,i,o,u. But I guess in the future robots or evolved humankind will scrap the rule and merely name them in correspondence with the 5 digits such as:
 S: lineal space,’DISTANCE’, T: Lineal time ‘DURATION, ST: action of motion (æ)
 S: Width, bodywave. T: Frequency of repetition. ST: REPRODUCTIVE ACTION (œ)
 S: Vortex; T: IMPLOSION; st: informative actions, (ï)
 S: scattering potential T: entropy; ST: Death; energy feeding (ø)
 S: Membrain; T: Mind; STsocial evolution into super organism (û)
Signatures of actions
Likely the best ‘complex’ lettering for the 5 actions, as they are always sandwiched between scales and past and future arrows and tend to be mixed, would be:
±æ for the motion, which is often acceleration, and includes often expenditure of energy, hence it is +a and e.
±œ for reproduction, as it produces an offspring (+o) but also spends energy: – e.
±ï, for information as there are two types, +i: absorption in gauging perception and i: emission, related to reproduction and social evolution.
ø, for death, as it erases information and empties of meaning the ∆being
û, for social evolution, its inverse, as it creates a whole Universal system, of an upper scale.
As we say when you get into formal ¬algebra, which is the future ‘pro’ way to do this but i have NO LONGER intention to treat, given the fact that homunculus are not interested even in basic introductory work as this web is, all those strict senso formalisms and signs matter, as IT IS THE ULTIMATE reason of the world cycle of life and death, as if you look at those ‘signatures’ information dominates over energy and so by the mere fact of acting you will warp yourself as more actions are warping (reproduction of information, social evolution of information) than moving; when we ELIMINATE the action of death, which is the one that balances into a zerosum, the whole.
So we shall consider the general structure of such supœrganisms in the three scales of physical systems, the atom, the thermodynamic crystalcentered systems of matter, and the galaxy, to see what are the fundamental topological parts, events, scales and symmetries 5D³ physics should study.
Phyisical parameters of the 5Dimensions.
As physics even if we expand its notions, it is a quantitative, parameterriddle system, when we merge the 5D model with the physical model we need to include parameters for all of them. Let us then define its dimensions with parameters.
We use in the general model of all systems 5 Dimensions of spacetime to generate everything that exists; whose symbols are as follows:
1D: $t: lineal motion/inertia/distance, depending on which perspective we take the spatial, formal distance or the time duration T.
So the first dimension in space is ‘distance’, that is the metric equation to calculate it (pythagoras expanded, theorem, Riemann metric); and the first dimension of time is lineal duration.
3D: ðS=ƒ=1/t: Its inverse, measured by the frequency of cyclical time clocks, mostly accelerated as a vortex of forces, where a force, f=ma means that an accelerated vortex (mass/charge/eddie) is ‘further accelerated’ in other ‘plane’ in which it coexists. Such forces, when curved inwards are usually described with a simple dual term, a dimension of form, or curvature (Universal constants, G, K, Λ for the dark world) and in time, acceleration, which might be treated as an active magnitude (e, m)
So the 3rd dimension of time is ‘frequency’, related to active magnitudes, as in mass e= mcc, e=hƒ, m=ƒ (k), and its equivalent in space is ‘curvature’.
2D: present momenta which mixes both, lineal motion, defined as speed and a cyclical vortex: ð$=ð(m,q) x $(v). And it will be seen as lineal momenta and/or its inetegral energy.
Those 3 dimensions conform a single plane of spacetime, or ‘present ∆º’ planes, to which we must ad the 2 planes upwards and downwards of ’emergence’ into a larger whole:
5D, which we symbolise with @, as it normally acquires the form of a singularity connected to a sensorial membrane that encloses the whole and provides through its π3 diameters apertures a 4% of ‘non darkworld’, the percentage of standard observation of a physical singularity. The mind system is best described in its duality by the angular momenta (spin) of the quantum/mass system in the two main scales (or electromagnetic charge+magnetic field in the magnetic scale, defined by Maxwell’s equations)
4D, the inverse arrow of entropic dissolution of the whole into its minimal parts, in physics a potential, sometimes a field. And it is best described with entropy.
So we DO have clear cut direct parameters, in fact all the main constants and main equations of physics to translate physics into 5D. As it would be expected.
6. PHYSICAL SP∃CIES
The generator symmetries, a realist formalism to substitute group theory.
Species of physics are studied as generated by the symmetries of a ternary group, so physicists have somehow through its abstract jargon come closer to our streamlined analysis of how a(nti)symmetries of scale, topology and timeage creates reality as reflected by the ¬Æ Ilogic formalism of maths displayed in those texts. We shall thus introduce as usual a proper ‘translation’ of those terms to the larger view of T.œ.
It has to be noticed if you haven’t that all this generator parlance is a realist way to picture the symmetries of physical systems. Physicists as they explore basically the arrow of motion with certain finesse, and mix around all others, know there are symmetries but the ones they study more intensely are rather trivial as they are concern with the locomotion in a single plane (without treating it as reproduction).
This is the ONLY IDENTICAL SYMMETRY, for which they have made a whole complicated inflationary astoundingly varied and detailed analysis; and on top in search of its saint grails of single equations reflection of the creationist God, they try to fit them all in the ‘promising’ group theory – a game that reaches its paroxysm in a surfer physicist that has a monster symmetric Lie group, which tries to pack everything in a single mathematical expression (which should be the GodGroup of the creationists).
I used to study those things when i was a pedantic toddler of thought; now I have fun with it.
Look at the graph (: One of the most talked about ‘Theories of Everything’, which consists merely in graphing all the particles and parts with its parameters and constants in a fancy Lie group, as if it had any meaning or indepth revelation; when is just a diagram packing particles and parts, without any serious attempt to explain truly their relationship in depth. Of course, as all physics it is plagued of hints to reality, after all it tries to put together what we see.
So they are packed in ‘trialities’, meaning ternary symmetries, in dualities and its combined 2³ octets as those are indeed the basic symmetries of the Universe, but without explaining anything of it as we do here from first principles (space, time and its ternary combinations of energy). So yes, I find funny the enthusiasm they produce, past long ago my dismay for the lack of interest of creationist physicists for more serious conceptual thought.
So what we will do – no concessions anymore – is to start afresh the study of symmetries in physics through the fractal generator.
Symmetry as it is explained with Noether theorem etc. is too baroque to care. And pure platitudes about the obvious fact that a reproductive motion of information is equal in each repetition of space, but if we look it from different angles might not seems so and all the chitchat about chirality (time is not symmetric in arrows), mirror symmetry and parity, etc. etc.
Of course all this will be dealt with in factual experimental physical analysis on the 3rd line more onto the point of translating physical laws.
But in this general view we are going to be much more elegant without fancy little green squares as the surfer’s T.O.E. and bring about the fractal ternary/dual generator of spacetime symmetries and scales that explains it all in real terms.
In that sense we shall use the term symmetry in general terms, but it is important to know that the ‘ternary relationships’ between scales, topologies and time ages IS different. So we talk of:
 Antisymmetry in scales (though the word is used in maths and physics differently, merely in terms of ±f(±x) abstract function). So what we mean is that motions down in the fourth dimension of entropy are completely inverse with a short of ‘mirror symmetry’ to those of social evolution and organicism. And we represent it with the 3 symbols, > for the fifth dimensions < for the fourth dimensions and ≈ for a present motion that doesn’t move in the scalar Universe (yes all this can be easily put into group theory, but it would loose meaning and we are not creationist, we are not interested in finding the perfect mirror group as it is a tenant of ∆st TO USE THE LANGUAGE AND FORMALISM WHICH IS SIMPLER FOR EACH PROPERTY DESCRIBED.
 So then, for the present dimensions of a single plane can then talk of asymmetry in topological space, as the limbs are lineal, the particlesheads are circular, and the mixture of those is yet a different form, hyperbolic… AND WE use the 3 symbols of space, Øspacetime and Otime.
 Finally its combination gives birth to Circular symmetry in an existential world cycle of time, meaning that the whole world cycle ends as it starts; which is born of the combination of the previous symmetries, adding the 3 dimensions of lifeages in the same present space, and the two arrows, generation and death of the 5th and fourth dimensions.
What physicists tall more about is motion, Symmetry proper is then restricted to a theme we care little about, the motions of reproduction through the lower scale of spacetime of the being that moves, which is obviously trying to reproduce itself completely identical in each step over its lower ‘potential field’ of indistinguishable bits and bites.
So those are the four symmetries, 3 in fact, of physical or any other system, expressed in the generator (as motion is merely a reproduction).
Now those symmetries can fit ALL the fancy dots that represent certain particles and parameters of physics of that graph with the theory of everything. And make each of the fittings meaningful as originated in fractal space and cyclical time symmetries. I.e. the 3 families of mass are the 3 ages of evolution of information, which also can be considered as growing planes of the fifth dimension, with more social evolution or density of mass… And are associated to the ternary topological parts (quark families or singularities + electronic quark covers + bosons that represent <≈> exchanges of entropy, energy or information between fermions, giving birth to one of the many subequations of the generator: T(fermion) < stboson>tfermion …
So yes, we are not just making magic creationist maths, as group theory does to help fit all in a nice picture, but will be more detailed, meaningful and talk of each subequation of the fractal generator, which includes all possible subequations, parts and wholes, families and ternary and dual elements of all the super organisms of the Universe…
This is then susceptible to be treated with the general mathematical and logic laws of ¬Æ ilogic mathematics, which reveals those super organisms of physical time space to follow all the laws of all other systems of Nature.
Indeed, considering the example of the previous T.O.E. it is all rather simple with the 3 scalar, space and time symmetries, as the graph shows, in the ‘creation’ of the octets of particles, studied in detail in the quantum scale:
FRACTAL SPACETIME ORGANISMS are symmetric in time (3 ages between birth and extinction, with inverted properties in youth and old age, and symmetric balance in the adult, reproductive, present age) space (3 organs with inverse properties between entropic limbs and informative heads, balanced in present bodies) and the 5th dimension (inverted properties of the cellular and social scales, balanced in the organic, thermodynamic scales).
Those symmetries ARE the essence of the Universal structure, giving an enormous beauty and efficiency to the Universe.
So each family of mass and particles known to science (by definition science should not be concerned with mathematical equations that describe events and entities never observed in reality), has its symmetric value in the larger scales of the 5th dimension, as organic components of the larger cosmic bodies and galactic parts.
This symmetry does happen again if we observer atoms as independent structures, part of the larger thermodynamic ∆+1 scale and composed of smaller particles and forces. Since we can always according to the ternary symmetries of 5D cyclical spacetime studied any ternary element as a whole composed of smaller parts.
In the graph, instead of silly, fancy groups, the proper way to order vitally and through the 3 scales, the particles of the Universe, in a duality of ‘light and dark atoms’, with the symmetries between gluons of 0, 2 spins and Higgsneutrinos of 0, 2? spins as gravitational forces. They belong to the atomgalaxy internal and external forces. THEN we might consider the ‘evolution’ between the ‘3 families of mass (better ordered as in the graph in 2 that form the light and dark atom (ud/cb) and the ‘predator’ heavier hierarchical s and t strange and top, which transforms them.
The most irrelevant elements are the z and w bosons, which act as the ‘intermediate’ stage, in a ternary transformation through the temporal weak force.
The full model of ∆•st particles makes vital organic sense of the galaxy atom through the 3×3+o symmetries of the fractal generator.
Regarding the existence of ‘3 type’ of particles, the response is immediate: the 3 families (∆scales) of quarks are the singularity, the 3 (∆scales) of electrons the covermembrane; and so they are in the larger cosmic bodies; and the bosons and neutrinos (spin 2?, broglie theory of neutrino>light), are the intermediate flows of entropy, energy and information.
3 States of physical systems: Sp (pastentropy fields/gas)≤ExI (present reproductive wave/liquid)≥Tƒ (future particlecrystal)
What is the generative STRUCTURE of the Universe of physical systems? The answer is: the same that all other timespace systems described here:
This must be understood from the beginning: Physical systems do not change respect to biological, social or mental systems, the 4 categories of reality studied by a Theory of Everything Organic, T.Œ – only the languages humans use to explain them, from the anthropomorphic, selfcentered Œo perspective which makes more ‘abstract and indistinguishable, the pointparticles of physical systems, far removed from us in form, information, and energy, spatial scales.
The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D spacetime system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; coexisting in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary subsystems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5th dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.
Now we have studied the fundamental scale of galaxies, the ∆+1 gravitational scale. But the ∆scale of thermodynamic systems is of paramount importance in as much as it is the human scale for which gravitational gradients work merely as a limiting zdimension that make us work in closed flat trajectories during our spacetime actions. And we talk of a simple ternary spatial symmetry on thermodynamic systems.
Γ. [Sp (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ExI(waveliquid)>Tƒ (ParticleCrystal] û≤4
Thus all together we can write the following Generator combining the a(nti)symmetries of the 3 scales with the formalism of ¬Æ to describe the ‘Human world’ of physical systems:
∑∆1: [Sppotentials≤≥ExIwaves≤≥TƒParticles]≈ Plasma: ∆: [SpGas≤ExI:Liquid≤≥Tƒ:Crystals]≈Matter: ∆+1: [SpOort Belt≤≥ ExI: Planets≤≥Tƒ: Star]
Now the previous Generator Equation resumes all the physical elements that interact in this planet both in space and time (hence the duality of ≤≥ arrows between space and time elements, to define both symmetries) across the 3 planes of existence of the Solar system.
The Universe of physical systems is exactly as any other 5D spacetime system a game of two parameters with inverse dualities, spatial, res extensa, entropic bidimensional, decelerating, past systems of motions in space, and temporal cyclical, accelerated vortices in time, which come together into present, balanced reproductive waves of energy and information; coexisting in 3 scales, the quanta, electromagnetic field scales, the thermodynamic atomic scales and the cosmological, gravitational scales; which can themselves be analyzed in more detail through ‘ternary subsystems’ and put in relationship to each other through the symmetries of planes of the 5^{th} dimension, asymmetries of the 3 topological varieties of organic form and its simultaneous organization and antisymmetries of time inverse arrows of life and death and the 3 ages in between.
In that sense while we will make concessions to the parlance of mathematical physics using terms whenever possible closer to the mathematical analysis of those organic events, and so sometimes in this post, much more often in the 3^{rd} and 4^{th} line will translate the confusing terminology of the Gothic age of mathematical physics, or the Aristotelian logic of the age of computer physics to a more amenable jargon, the true job of T.Œ in physics is to translate physics to the simpler rules of reality as all physical systems obey the Generator Equation of all General Systems of the Universe, which in the field of physical system is better expressed as:
G[$p (Lineal, Planar Entropic fields/gas state) <ExI(waveliquid)>Tƒ (ParticleCrystal]û≤4
This is of the many similar variations of the Generator Equation using symbols of ¬Æ we can use, a good definition of what physical systems are.
They are systems in which the metrics of the 5^{th} dimension, ∆=Sp x Tƒ = E x I= K, remain invariant.
That is the distanceenergy or past field of spatial size of the system multiplied by the speed, quantity of its informationtime clocks are constant, within the range of variations, which allows systems to perform actions of energy and information, in present physical system within a certain range for EACH of the planes of existence of physical systems. Let us then consider the main elements of that Generator equation of physical systems starting as usually in an inverse fashion to the mathematical analysis of physics – that is from the synthetic, organic whole and its larger points of view.
As we have studied vortices above, when considering the unification of charges and masses, let us now bring the wave description and its duality.
Let us then introduce, after considering the minimal EQUATIONS of THE GENERATOR, which will be further studied in the article of quantum physics, whenever it becomes available, the minimal aspects needed of nonEuclidean mathematics to know the structure of the Universe.
Let us first remember the symmetries of the Generator of 5D spacetime in the 3 scales of physics.
5 Dimensional antisymmetry:
∆1(atomic/electromagnetic scale)> ∆:Earth/thermodynamic scale> ∆+1: gravitational/Galactic scale.
Spatial Asymmetry:
$p (Spatial toroid fields)≤ ExI (Hyperbolic waves)≤ ð§(particles of information)
Temporal Cyclicical symmetry:
∆1: Conception L: Birth < Ps (young, past entropic age/field>ExI: adult, present, iterative wave age > Tiƒ: old informative, future particle age ∨ ∆1: Entropic death
In the description of ∆3 , galaxies, those symmetries are:
Scalar Antisymmetry:
∆+1: Cosmos<∆: Galaxies<∆1: Stars
Spatial Asymmetry:
∆+2: $pe: Photosphere ≤ ExI: Radiation zone ≤ ð§: Nuclei
∆+3: Galaxy: $pe: Halo ExI: ecliptic arms ≤ ð§: Black hole
∆+4: Cosmos: $pe: Wall of fire? ≤ ExI: galactic plane ≤ ð§: Great attractor?
Time world cycle and ages:
∆+2: $pe: Gas Nebulae≥ ExI: HR sequence ≥ Dwarf, Pulsar or hole
∆+3: $pe: Gas nebulae≥ Irregular Galaxy≥ ExI: Spiral Galaxy≥Tiƒ: Globular, Dark or Cannibal
∆+4: $pe: Cosmic Big bang? ≥ ‘3 Epochs’ ≥ Big crunch
In the description of ∆3 , atoms, those symmetries are:
Scalar Antisymmetry:
∆1: hquanta: ‘Planckton'<∆: Atoms<∆+1: Molecules
Spatial Asymmetry:
∆4: Light: Field: $pe: Halo ExI: Wave ≤ ð§: Photon
∆3: Atom: $pe: Electron ≤ ExI: Radiation zone ≤ ð§: Nuclei
∆2: Molecule: $pe: External atoms< ExI: ElectroMagnetic Bondage ≤ð§: Crystal Center
Time cyclical symmetry: Ages:
∆4: $pe: Vacuum space ≥ ExI: electromagnetic wave ≥ Tiƒ: Particle
∆3: $pe: Plasma≥ ExI: Atom ≥ð§: Elements Table
∆2: $pe: Gas ≥ ExI: Liquid≥Tiƒ: Solidcrystal
TIME ÐISOMORPHISMS.
Ω
7TH: AGES
From one comes 2, from 2 comes 3, from 3 the infinite beings.
—Cheng Tzu
All systems go through the ultimate timespace cycle the world cycle of existence, which we described with our simplified Generator Equation:
Spenergetic young age of max. limbs/fields activity > SThyperbolic adult age of reproductive wavesbodies > Tƒ: Informative age of cyclical particleheads << Entropic death that closed the cycle:In the graph the main worldcycles of existence of some Universal scales. Above the cycles of human beings and civilizations, as they transform lineal energetic young forms into informative old age and then die away in entropic explosions of lineal energy called war.
Below the physical ages of matter between ∆1 plasmatic birth and ∆1 M=E/c2 death as systems go through gas, S=T liquid and Tsolid states, mimicked by cosmological forms born as ∆1 nebulae of gas, evolving into liquid stars and solid black holes of maximal informative density, mimicked in the largest possible scale by the bigbang of the local Universe, whose 3 Einstein’s solutions are equivalent to those 3 states, the expansive entropic max. Spe big bang the Steady state solution and the Black hole solution of maximal density of information. Thus we can establish a simple equation, or ratio, Tƒ/Sp, which gives us in cosmology the cosmological constant and in all other cases 3 ages:
Max. Energyyouth: Tƒ/Sp<1, Adult stability Tƒ/Sp=1 and old age Tƒ/Sp>1
The New Organic Outlook of a Universe Based on Information.
In this brief introduction to the fractal paradigm, we have observed the two great revolutions for our understanding of the Universe:
– The logic of the Universe turns out to be biological since the Universe is modeled as a series of networks of energy and information that come together into organic structures.
– We can describe those biologic properties thanks to the advances of fractal and nonEuclidean mathematics so we can fuse the logic of biological systems and the mathematics of geometrical structures into a single whole. This topological approach is developed further in the appendix, to fully grasp the organic structures of the Universe.
Duality and fractal mathematics cannot be separated from organicism—as any organism is by definition a fractal of parts, selfsimilar to the whole. Those three elements of the new scientific paradigm—the logic of duality, the fractal nonEuclidean mathematics that describe it, and the organic outlook of all systems of reality made of “cellular numbers” related by networks of energy and information—are proved by the three principles of truth of the scientific method as follows:
– It is based on the most advanced mathematics of the present age, fractal and nonEuclidean topologies. And it provides a mathematical solution to the unification equation of charges and masses, the unfinished job of Einstein, the Saint Grail of physics, found with “thought experiments” as always is the case with the great questions of science.
– It is massively proved by experimental evidence: every organic system, particle, and field of physics, which follows those morphological and functional laws, is a proof of duality. Indeed, its experimental proofs are overwhelming.
As many as all the forms of the Universe, we observe that follow the lineal, energetic forms of forces and bodies, the informative, cyclical forms of heads, particles and cellular nuclei and the complementarity laws and exchanges of energy and information between both. Of all those systems of energy and information, treated by this author in different books dedicated to each scientific discipline, we are here concerned with the systems of physical matter and specifically with the systems and laws of quarks, atoms, black holes, and galaxies, which are the themes of cosmology that CERN will explore and the systems of matter that can provoke a nova explosion of the Earth.
Let us briefly consider some other proofs of the fractal paradigm treated in more depth in the appendix.
Mehaute,^{10} pioneer of fractal theory, proved that when nature doesn’t release energy, for time to continue, it has to create fractal dimensions of information. Thus, there are two arrows of relative future creation, energy/entropy and information/cyclical time, which transform into each other in the events of creation and extinction of each quantic reality. This transcendental discovery made in the field of chemistry has been totally ignored by physicists who defend the dogma that the universe is dying because it is only expanding (never mind the contraction of energy into charges and masses).
The mechanist energetic bias of physics is deep. For example, physicists have a principle of lineal inertia, but not a principle of cyclical inertia, when it is proved ad nauseam that electrons, charges, and masses turn around in cycles ad eternal without any force applied to them.
Physicists have a principle of an expansive Universe, but they ignore the informative vortices of galaxies that make our Earth’s human spacetime a system ruled by the arrow of information, as we exist in a vortex of physical information, the galaxy, not in the expanding space between them. Physicists still define form, information, not as the creation of fractal dimensions as complexity theorists do, but as bits of a lineal equation (Shannon).
Yet the most revealing property of information is precisely the fact that in/form/ation, form, creates dimensions. Indeed, think of a sheet of paper extended in space. When we warp it and wrinkle it, we are creating information, form, by adding a dimension of height. This is what all is about: the Universe warps energy into forms with more dimensions and then unwarps dimensional form into energy. And that constant game of creation and destruction of form is the eternal, fractal cycle of all what exists. In the field of physics, it is the game of masses and forces.
Temporal information, like its name says, is a measure of inner form, which we perceive when there are discontinuities in a certain bidimensional surface—a clock, a page, a computer screen—either because the static form is broken into informative patterns (–) or its movement makes a sudden peak (>), bouncing in an actionreaction cycle. Yet those two transformations of space into form, of lineal energetic movement, into a cyclical one, are mathematically equivalent to the creation of fractal geometry of spacetime. Thus we define information as a fractal dimension with form, generated by the repetition or quantization of a given generatorequation or mother cell.
Such is the geometric nature of existence in timespace. Indeed, the simplest fractal called a Koch fractal, found in geology, flowers and ice crystals, happens when a system cools down, loses energy, and then a continuous line grows a triangle in the dimension of height.
In Einstein’s terminology, energy bends, curves, and creates form as time passes. In biological terms, we warp, corrugate, and acquire fractal wrinkles as we age. The Universe and its fractal species are constantly generating informative dimensions or erasing them into extended space, with lesser form. Each of us goes through the same process in the lifedeath cycle as we wrinkle our young energy into form and explode back into death.
Since form exhausts itself, the line dissipates its motion (big bang), the cycle of mass whirls inward till there is no more space and then it disappears (so there is no motion in the eye of the hurricane). How did the universe solve this conundrum? It made the wave. It has motion and information, so it can reproduce information in different places of spacetime. The wave is both yin and yang, information and energy, reality itself. Since as the principle of complementarity of physics, only a system that is a force and a particle, a wave, exists.
The wave is the constant, reproductive orgasm of a Universe in which all is a constant combination of lineal and cyclical motions that selfrepeat themselves as they imprint the energy=motion of the cosmos.
Why this obvious cycle of existence is then not understood today in science, when it was obvious even to the first simpler philosophers of the eastern tradition? the answer is obvious, by reducing the study of time motions to simple, lineal external locomotion, this wisdom was lost to modern sciences.
The functional of states: General Equation of physical world cycles.
In its widest generalization, we could define the world cycle of T.Œ (Sp>ST>Tƒ) as the time equation of all physical systems, or ‘functional of states’, if we were to use a more proper mathematical definition, which describes all physical systems of the Universe, as systems which absorb energy from an ‘accelerated’ field, iterate its information in its adult state with that energy as a moving wave and gauges information with its particle state. If we study those 3 states simultaneously we have the space symmetry topological organic configuration of the being, if we study them sequentially we obtain the world cycle of the species.
Ω≈B. The isomorphism and symmetry of the 3 ages of time and 2manifolds of space in physical systems.
Consider in the next graph, a ‘fast outlook’ to those symmetries that conform the world cycle of all Universal Systems:
In the graph, the symmetry of the 3 ages of time, applied to physics defines the 3 states of matter and the 3 ages of stars, galaxies and local Universes, creating the main world cycles of physical systems. In the regard the study of death processes in physics is also related to the 5th dimension as all scales do have similar E<=>M exchanges of energy and information, whereas the vortices of mass and charges are informative, Tƒ arrows and the energy release, entropic, Se, expansive arrows in each scales, from the beta decay of atoms to the hypothetic hyper universe big bang (inflationarybig bang cosmic theory, which here is reduced to the knownknown quasar bigbang of galaxies as the limit of the human experience.)
Thus we define physics as the study of ‘Universal planes’ far removed from the human i=0 scales (Un≥±2).
Though physics, studies all scales of physical systems, including the gravitational, Ui±4, invisible scale and the thermodynamic scales of matter, from the human point of reference, the essential scale of ‘astrophysics’ is lightspacetime.
So far it has been described using 4Dimensional models of spacetime. But while Einstein’s model works as a tool of measure, it has not been properly studied conceptually.
Since that is the absolute spacetime in which humans ‘measure their own reality’, with its time beat/glimpse/thought of a second (measure appropriately with the speed of a cesium light wave) and a length of a meter (the human legstep of space motion).
Thus while we, humans have a subjective second/meter, human referred measure of time and space, we do so in reference to the external absolute light spacetime in which we are immersed.
Accordingly in the nested system of Russian dolls that structure the organic dual systems of motion and form of the 5th dimension, light space has two components, the Se force, light and its infinite quanta, in the smallish ∆3 Plane of Existence, and opposite to it, it has its informative, time components, in the larger galactic ∆+3 super organism.
In that regard, the galaxy and its light is also our whole, which provides us with all our perception of space, time and its parallel concepts of energy and information.
Light space, i3, and its wholes, galaxies, i+3 represent the limits of full perception of human beings and as such its ‘constants of speed’ are the limits of the human plane of existence.
In this post we shall introduce physical sciences and their systems and magnitudes, to focus on the evolution of galaxies and the Universe at large through the symmetries of its 3 ages in time and 3 topologies in space, which can be generalized from the reduced model of 4D physics with its 3 solutions to the Universe… which are the 3 ages of its cycle of existence.
In the graph we see some of the main worldcycles of physical systems.
All of them display the spacetime symmetry of the Fundamental Equation of physics:
Spe, entropic motions’ field; ST, wave iteration; Tƒ: informative particle.
Its symmetry in space defines the 3 regions of any physical system, the external membrane that divides the relative inner world and outer Universe of the physical entity, which often is NOT a formal membrane but a rotary motion, with angular momentum (case of black holes event horizon, and galactic halo, the electrons of the atom, and in the case of the local Universe, the ball of fire of the cosmos), a central ŒPoint of information with maximal rotary motion in the dimension of height (a Maxwell screw in electromagnetism, a black hole in a galaxy, a quark bundle in an atom).
And finally an inner hyperbolic body of cyclical quanta, stars in the galaxy, galaxies in the Universe, electromagnetic and gravitational quanta in the atom…
Thus physical systems follow all the laws and symmetries of relational spacetime, but its jargon must be fully translated and biological properties added to the geometric and quantitative analysis; besides considering some peculiarities of physical systems, derived of the way humans perceive them as ‘energetic species’, which lead us to the second task:
 On the other hand, relational spacetime will correct errors due to the use of absolute spacetime and solve all questions pending of science with the advancements of fractal space and cyclical time, and the metrics of the 5^{th}
We shall consider in detail mainly 3 of such set of errors:
The errors of classic physics derived of its misunderstanding of fractal scalar space (the single spacetime continuum error) and lineal time ((vs. the real cyclical times of the Universe).
A proper analysis of the 3 time arrows of all systems, since lineal time physics only recognizes entropy; and the understanding of the inverse Se=C/Tƒ≈Tƒ relationships of both parameters, ignored by physics, which uses the inverse Tduration (Tƒ=1/T). Whereas Tƒ (cyclical time) is the symbol we use for the logic concept and Tƒ (frequency of a cycle, Timefuture) is the symbol for its quantitative parameters.
The consideration of the different speeds of time and information according to 5D metrics, which increase in lower scales and diminish in upper ones, from the human ∆o perception – which accounts for the different treatment of quantum physics (with maximal speed and information, hence in need of operators – variables of multiple values, and probabilities) vs. Relativity, cosmic systems of minimal information.
Since Time is the less understood part of physics and 5D metrics do not exist, the biggest advances will be on this analysis. For example:
The limits of human perception through 5D scales filter part of the information (from larger scales, which are dark) and energy (from lower scales, which have entropy). And this accounts for two uncertainties signified by Heisenberg principle and dark energy (repulsive invisible gravitation).
– 5D Metrics, Se x Tƒ = C, are the key to reorder properly and unify the forces of the Universe and its universal constants. Since once we adjust and equalize the time speeds and space sizes of the quantum, electromagnetic and cosmic gravitational space, Q and G become just the relative curvaturespeed of those quantum and cosmic scales with the same equation.
Many errors are also caused by the extraordinary speed of smallish cycles that are seen as ‘space particles’, perceived in its whole closed cycle. So the 3 quark colors are phases/ages in time not forms in space, reason why they cannot be easily broken; so are the 3 neutrinos and any ternary asymmetry of physics (since time ages are ternary and asymmetric in form).
This simple rule (ternary asymmetry) will allow us to distinguish a time phenomena from a spatial one, which will be ‘bilateral’ a symmetric.
Thus a broken parity asymmetric phenomenon, such as the weak force is is a time event, as opposed to the commutative space symmetric dual phenomena, which are space events.
Ultimately all this means that the socalled weak force is not a spatial force but a temporal transformation of particles that evolve or devolve in processes of life and death.
Those examples show the enormous power of relational spacetime to clarify and resolve the pending problems of physics. We shall give some hints to all those questions and introduce the main processes and events, species and scales of the physical world.
Time AntiSymmetry of physical systems. Its world cycles or ‘state equations’.
The Time Ages ‘antisymmetry’ of the 3 scales of physical systems is rather obvious. The word used by physicists is ‘state’, which replaces the word ‘ages’.
Its main ‘ratio or space/time’ which will show the relative dominance of one or other of those 3 ages, is ‘density’ ρ=Tƒ/SE.
Indeed, any system defines its 3 time ages as:
Max. Sp (youth) > Sp=Tƒ > Max. Tƒ (old age): Tƒ/Sp>∞ (death)<<Sp/Tƒ>∞
Thus we just need to find a parameter to study the changes in the ratio between the energy and temporal information of the system, to define its time ages. In physical systems this parameter is ‘density’.
As Tƒ and Spe can be measured either as information, Tiƒ, or Time frequency, Tƒ, and as Spacedimensiondistances, Se, or Kinetic Energy, Sp, and the jargon of each 5D Plane differs, there might be variations on the parameters used, its names and equations, whose explanation in terms of T.œ unifying principles is one of the main tasks of this post.
∆+3: Galactic and maybe Universal Ages.
∆3: Spe (field) ≥ TS (wave) ≥ Tƒ (Particle).
In the graph the 3 states of the gravitational, galactic spacetime scale are the 3 EFE solutions, varying with the cosmological constant, related to the 3 type of density of matter and 3 families of mass that dominate each of the 3 ages of the galaxy (udatoms, strangelet, top quark black holes). Its proper formulation requires a proper understanding of the arrows of time and species of mass and energy in gravitational spacetime, analyzed in the previous post.
In the cosmological scale, studied in the previous post, ‘density’ is measured with the Cosmological Constant, which is the value of the energy density of the vacuum of space. And so it defines its 3 ages, the young bigbang age of minimal density, the steady state age of balanced density (with 0 value for the constant) and the big crunch, old age of maximal density.
Now we can see here the problem of NOT having a proper conceptualization of all those terms and an equal formalism. So there is all kind of formulae to measure the timeages of the Universe with the cosmological constant; and there is of course the confusion, so common in physics, between spatial symmetries and time antisymmetries.
So after much ado, and different parameters, such as Lambda (cosmological constant, which varies with time around 0), Omega (the ratio between the energy density due to the cosmological constant and the critical density of the universe) and w, the ratio of pressure that dark energy puts on the universe to the energy per unit volume, which is −1 for a true cosmological constant, and is generally different for alternative timevarying forms of vacuum energy; all reduces really to measuring how Se/Tƒ varies with the time age of the Universe, to give us the 3 ages of cosmological spacetime (a more precise name as it is indeed the proved spacetime of galaxies in its lifedeath quasar cycle, but might not be the cosmological spacetime of faster than c, cosmological scales):
Let us then define those agesstates and its ‘density’ ratios for the 3±1 scales of physical systems observed in this planet (light, electrons, atoms, molecules and masses).
8≈∞ ISOMORPHISM
WORLDCYCLES, CONSERVATION LAWS.
The building of dimensional beings.
Now, all this said, it is clear that the Universe builds its structures through the accumulation of quanta of space and time cycles, and its dimensions across larger, ∆+1 worlds, in which the growing systems develop its actions of existence, and so happens with physical systems, which leads us to the study on how the simplest elements of those systems defined so far, charges and masses, which are scalar points, Ä, of the lower and larger dimensions of the Universe, start its growth, through equations of physicists that show the accumulation of those dimensions.
Since a dimension of space must be perceived as a dimension of time – an extension as a motion, a form as a wave reproducing itself on a lower scale, the building of dimensions often takes the form of adding to a spatial, static quanta, a dimension of motion, and then a new dimension of static quanta, and a dimension of motion, which is most likely a wave reproduction of a form. So the interpretation of the equation of physics in terms of those elements, across growing scales of 5D wholes shows us the way nature develops its worldcycles.
First we start therefore with a relative, ∆1, pointscalar, (mass or charge) of the lower scale. To this point, we add then a motion, which builds and angular momentum if the motion is a cyclical dimension of time, or a lineal momentum if the motion is a lineal, entropic one. So from the initial quantities mass or charge, we get a 2^{nd} system, or ST quanta, or momentum.
This momentum action being angular (temporal momentum) or lineal (spatial momentum) thus becomes the first perceivable element of reality.
Thus we define the first ‘perception of reality’ as a quanta of spacetime or ‘momentum, dominant in time (angular momentum) or dominant in space (lineal momentum).
So before we go into an analysis of those 3 time motions further studied in independent posts, we must enunciate this principle of ‘CONSERVATION OF TIME MOTION’, in proper scientific terms.
As science has done, calling it the Principle of Conservation of Energy, considering ‘energy’ a ‘concept’, which in physics that resumes all ‘motions in time’ of which 2 are paramount, kinetic energy or linealentropic motions and potential energy, or cyclical vortexlike motion (charges and masses and their position in larger cyclical accelerated vortices of motion or ‘fields’).
Now, if we divide the Universe roughly in a given ‘plane of the 5th dimension’ in two type of motions, lineal momentum and angular momentum, which correspond roughly to two type of energies; kinetic ‘lineal energy’, and potential energy, in as much as kinetic energy is contained in the motion of a single particle as lineal momentum is, but potential energy requires as all cyclical motions, 2 ‘elements’, the focus or center point of the field of forces and the position of the particle.
And so we consider that lineal and angular momentum are the ‘spatial slices’ or ‘steps’ of space that time integrates, as it adds those ‘small steps’ into the whole ‘time’ function. So according to our formula, which relates space and time in its most generic terms:
∫S=T
We should obtain from ∫ Lineal momentum =Time Function: ∫ mv = 1/2 mv², which as it happens is indeed Kinetic energy, the ‘scalar’ time function that integrates lineal momentum.
We can by similar but more complex mathematical reasoning compare angular momentum and potential energy, as it becomes obvious that angular momentum does not really changes the position of the being, which constantly returns at the point.
There is however a third type of combinatory momentum’, which we could call reproductive wave e xi or ‘vibratory momentum’, as all oscillatory motions can be described as combinations of  and Omomentums. According to the fundamental law of dimensions, which are constructed departing from two initial poles of motion and/or form.
But there are other forms of energy to be considered, and those are energies to account for in different planes of spacetime the fifth dimension. And so it is not possible to do a physical description of time motions properly without 5D metrics.
Indeed. When we define a system in physical spacetime, as in any other relative spacetime we do have to account for the ternary 5D structure of the system, ∆±1, in this case, the quantum, electromagnetic, molecular, thermodynamic and gravitational, cosmic scales. And so the system will display our 2 types of energy≈time in each scale of existence, and then there will be exchanges of ‘motion’ and ‘information’, between the 3 scales of the fifth dimension, to total all the motions of time≈energy of the system, integration of all the little spacetime actions of angular momentum and boosts of lineal momentum.
Now, when we study those momentums and energies with relational spacetime, they fit nicely in the larger scaffolding of the general laws of all 5D motions and systems.
The problem of those concepts in classic physics is that they have no clear logic understanding of of it. Since mathematical physics is handicapped in its development but the limited verballogic intelligence of their practitioners. So for example, the best time physicist, Einstein would merely say that ‘time is what a clock measures’. While there is not really any conceptual definition of Energy, even if very few ‘arrogant physicists’ acknowledge they have no clue.
So we rewrite the fundamental principle of science – the conservation of energy – in terms of the conservation of the 3 motions of time, which roughly speaking (latter we shall differentiate those terms with more precision) are ‘entropyenergylineal motion/momentum’; ‘forminformationpositioncyclical motion/momentum’ and its ‘vibratory, iterative, repetitive, hyperbolic combinations’:
‘Time never stops. All what exists is a combination of lineal energy motions and cyclical, positional motions that transform into each other ad eternal: Sp<≈x≈>Tf”
The Universe is packed in a single sentence and formula, where Sp< represent all varieties of lineal motions, >Tf, all varieties of cyclical motion, and ≈ or x represent the iterative combinations of both type of motions, in 2 essential subgroups:
 Perpendicular, ‘Darwinian’ combinations, X, in which the entropic and informative motions tend to annihilate each other (as in death processes, antiparticleparticle collisions and other erasing ‘bigbang’ procedures)
 And parallel ≈ symbiotic combinations, which become ‘stable, organic’ systems, made of Oheads/particles, limbs/fields and Øwaves/bodies.
Thus we can reduce it all to a simple Logic statement: Times never stop their repetitive ±∆æ,e,i,œ,û actions.
Thus this is the simplest image for a wave of time for an action of spacetime for a beat of existence – so many things can be explained with it that metaphors would be infinite – as ALL laws of the Universe will be deduced from our simple definition of space and time, a go and beat motion stop gauge information move consume energy, absorb it (feed), stop, move absorb emit energy and information (reproduce)…
It is such a simple game that its first combinations do not fail to astonish us because we start to feel that after it logically, biologically it can expand into all:
Space x Min. Time, is the beginning of the hyperbola, which is our youth of maximal spatial energy and minimal cyclical information, but as we move through a point of balance when both, time and space are maximized (S=T) the adulthood, we go down into Max. Time x min. Space, at the end of the ladder.
We keep falling since birth down the ladder of time space. And that is the meaning of life, a walk through the 5th dimension from relative past to relative future of our region of spacetime. And the formalism, I have called it Æ, existential algebra.
The concept of energy.
Now, the product of ‘S’ and ‘Tƒ’ is a Constant Plane of existence of the 5^{th} dimension. A range of reality in which space and time is fairly stable. So we will find a certain type of clocks running at a fairly similar speed, a certain rod of measure of spatial actions, with a similar constant size, and a certain type of combination of both, or ‘species’ of that scale of the fifth dimension, with a certain fixed content of Energy.
And being the Universe fractal, we will find in each of those scales of the 5^{th} dimension an variety of fractal species, that interact in that plane, by sharing energy and information through their constants of spatial action and time clocks.
Yet when we change plane, after ‘crossing’ a ‘barrier’ between planes, our time speeds, spatial constants and overall outlook of the whole ‘energy’ and forms and species of the Universe around us will change.
This means reality is structured into two type of regions: stable regions within the limits of relative space and time speed of each scale. And there are several consequences of this.
First the classification of all systems and sciences as relative analysis belonging to one of such scales:
and ∆±1 a quantum or minimal unit of a constant of spacetime that remains constant between the ‘Lorentzian’ limits of the 5th dimensional plane we study.
Of course spacetime is not continuous. Physical systems, are mere layers of the 5th dimension, fractal spacetime beings generated by the same symmetries of time and space than other systems, and so isomorphic to them.
In this post we shall consider the quantum, particle scale and introduce some themes of the thermodynamic scale, to complement the previous post on astrœphysics (the description of the organic galaxy, its cosmic parts, udstars, top quark frozen stars (black holes) and strange stars (pulsars) and its rule within the larger structure of the cosmos).
In physics 5D metric (Sp x Tƒ = ∆) are expressed in the equations of ‘Energy’, which is the ‘aggregated’ sum of all formal motions, conserved for each scale:
E (∆1) = h (S) x v (Tƒ)
E (∆) = nk (S) x Temperature (Tƒ)
E (∆+1) = c² (S) x m (Tƒ)
Thus vfrequency in the quantum scale, Temperature in the thermodynamic scale and Mass density in the gravitational scale are the 3 relative clocks of time speed of the 3 fundamental scales of size of the Universe.
While H, K and C² are the 3 ‘bidimensional’ constants of spatial motion that define the ‘motion’ or ‘size’ of the minimal space action of each species in each scale.
And its combination give us the ‘conserved’ energy, that is the integral of all the formal motions or ‘lineal and angular,  and Omomentums’ of each scale.
Once we have established the fundamental particle of the Universe, a world cycle of fractal spacetime, seen in synchronic analysis as a ternary organ with 3 topological parts:
Se (limbs/fields of entropic, expansive spatial motion) < ST (hyperbolic bodywave with iterative functions) > Tƒ (particlehead that gauges information)
Which in diachronic time is observed as a system of 3 ages between birth and death in the lower ∆1 scale, in physical systems defined by the 3 states of the system as fields/waves/particles (gas/liquid/crystalsolid states) between birth as ∆1 plasma and death either as a ∆+1 boson of higher density of information (neutron, black hole), or in a bigbang that returns the system to the plasma (∆1: E<>M(∆+1)…
And study in detail the properties of those elements in the first line in this second line we shall consider the main ‘fundamental particles of the different’ scales of the universe.
In physical systems 3 are such scales, and 3 are its fundamental particles, which we study in 3 posts:
∆+1: cosmological, gravitational scale. Thus we studied the galaxy.
∆: Magnetic & Thermodynamic, matter state. And we will study the Geological Earth fundamentally a complex molecular system of SeGas, STliquid and Tƒ, Solid forms
∆1: electromagnetic, quantum states. And the fundamental entity of this scale is the atom. So this post is dedicated to the study of the atom.
As usual we shall depart from the ¬Æ topological description of the system, consider then its algebraic analysis (the equations of its fractal generator) and only then in the 3rd layers of decryption, descend into the jargon of each science, in this case the jargon of mathematical physics, specifically of quantum ∆1 physics.
Mathematical CONSTANTS
In any case to fully build up a theory of Universal constants as ratios between different Dimensions of spacetime we must start from the beginning – the simplest forms, the ‘irrational numbers’, or ‘vital ratios’ without a perfect, static solution that appear in mathematics, and Einstein rightly considered the ‘first magic numbers’ of the Universe.
Beyond those 3 scales there are 2 nonobservable ones:
The cosmological and Planck (string?) scales, of which much it is written without enough proofs (dark energy, dark matter, nonvisible strings). This type of speculative physics is today seemingly the most important field of ‘research’, just because arrogant physicists (arrogant humans in that sense) do think they have exhausted the understanding of the perceived scales. Of course, they have not. They have only described them mathematically but lack and have renounced overall to do what T.œ and the 5th dimension does: explain they whys of those equations.
The split between modern physicists and philosophers of science – the point of view the 5th dimension advances – is in that sense quite remarkable in the present age of ‘big science’ with much detail and little ‘forest overview’. All the problems we will resolve in these 5D posts simply respond to fundamental questions on the Nature of the Universe, which physicists simply don’t even ask anymore. As the size of the ‘industry’ and the routines of the old paradigm make impossible to ‘dare’ to go beyond.
And yet without a ‘fractal understanding’ of the structure of the Universe and its parts, a proper analysis of the 3 dimensions of time, and the perhaps most striking and beautiful of all symmetries, the existence of a ternary topological structure in all systems of nature, made of Spentropic organs, Tƒinformative particleheads and its present wavebody combinations, the deeper structure of reality and all its physical, biological and social systems cannot be understood. Let us then return to those 3 eternal, essential themes of reality once more, with new perspectives.
The result is the existence of a fractal 5th dimension that orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical spacetime ‘formal motions’.
Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = C.
And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and coexistence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.
Whereas we have written with the main symbols of 5D metric, the full meaning of the 2 components of the Universe, lineal spatial, past entropy (Spe, ab.Sp), and future, temporal, cyclical information (OTiƒ, ab. Tƒ), which combine creating constant spacetime scales of the 5th dimension, which most sciences measure with the concepts of ‘energy and information’, conserved in each scale and equivalent to the fundamental law of conservation of 5D science: the conservation of present time…
While humans perceive time with mechanical artificial clocks and space, with human rods of measure (meters), Natural system has multiple, different time clocks with different rhythms and multiple ‘quanta of space’, for different species. Thus as science becomes more objective, away from human anthropomorphism, the next great r=evolution of thought, after the heliocentric theory that put the center of our local cosmos away from the earth, and the Darwinian theory, of biology that put the origin of life away from Abrahamic gods, is the use of Natures natural clocks and space quanta, to streamline the equations of mathematical physics and harmonize the concepts of time, space, energy and information of the different sciences, each one studying a relative scale of size and speed of time of the Universe.
In the graph, the 4 main scales of size and time speed of the physical universe, the quantum scale, ‘∆1’,whose clocks of time are ‘frequency’, quanta of space are hPlanck quanta of ‘angular momentum’, and constant Energy and information, the product of both: E=hv; the thermodynamic scale, ‘∆’, where the clocks of time are temperature, the quanta of space kBoltzmann ‘entropy’, and the gravitational scale, ∆+1; where Nature’s clocks of time, are speed, and quanta of space, mass, and the formula that integrate them as a volume of energy and information for each ‘being of spacetime’ of that scale, E=nkT,
However the arrival of lineal physics and the mechanical clock hid this selfevident Universe made of infinite space quanta and time cycles, substituted by abstract Newtonian models of an absolute continuum space drawn over a paper (the Cartesian Plane), in which all those parts of space, are pegged together, and a single clock and time rhythm measured with those mechanical clocks that equalized all rhythms of nature to its steady, tictoc. But Nature does have its own clocks to measure time, which ultimately is the repetition of cyclical forms of information, different for each species, which processes that information with logic, formal cycles of different lengths, durations and speeds.
So the ultimate meaning of a Universe of infinite time cycles, regulated by Nature’s clocks, was lost, and time became, in words of Einstein ‘what a clock measures’. Moreover as the clock had a relative, steady state speed, and can be elongated ad infinitum, rewinding its engine, the fact that the cycles of temporal information (ab. OTiƒ, in the jargon of Fractal spacetime, ab. ∆St) of any system are always finite (by the very same nature of a time cycle that closes into itself) and do have different forms and speed at different moments, became also forgotten.
This is selfevident when we realize that Nature measures time with different physical clocks, for different families of species. It uses the frequency of waves to measure time in the quantum scale (ab. ∆1 ST, in the jargon of Fractal spaceTime). It uses molecular vibrations, which humans measure with temperatures (ab. ∆ST), to define the cycles of larger molecular systems, and it uses different forms of speed, notably angular speed, in the even larger gravitational ‘∆+1’ SpaceTime Scale.
And so the infinite cycles of time of Universal beings, and its different clocks of Nature (frequency, temperature and speed), whose rhythms and forms carry the informative patterns, became also forgotten, with the arrival of artificial, mechanical clocks, which established a steady single, human rhythm to time, of infinite duration. Of course, because using a single human rod of measure for space, or ‘quanta’, the meter, and a single human time cycle or ‘second’, equalizing all other systems with them, allowed a perspective on reality from the human practical point of view, the use of seconds in time and meters in space, facilitated measure and construction of machines, weapons and buildings, greatly improving the praxis of human life.
So what man lost in his philosophical understanding of reality, he gained it in practical power. And as measures with single clocks and single space rods increased, many regularities of Nature were tabulated, albeit deformed by its equalization with clocks and single space continuums. However, and this is a key element to understand why a Universal model, slightly deformed in its fundamental principle works, a system with a distorted perspective, such as the Ptolemaic system with the Earth at its center, can fully describe reality, merely by adding complex corrections to cater the distorted point of view.
So human measures of reality with a single time and space are more complex specially at conceptual level than the more realist model, using the proper quanta of space measure (the so called Universal constants) and time clocks of Nature (frequency, temperature and speed) but they do work. Moreover they have established a scientific praxis for 400 years that would be extremely costly to vary, as the Industrial revolution, converted the clock today evolved into a computer in the model of all temporal things, and the meter, today the speed of light, as the quanta of all spaces.
And so physicists are comfortable with this absolute spacetime picture of reality. We, Philosophers of science, however are not practical beings, only concerned with the objective truths of the Universe. So we are not satisfied with Physicists’ models and the purpose of this blog is to establish a more objective picture of the Universe, using the different clocks of time and quanta of space we find in Nature (as science is ultimately the search for an objectivity that goes beyond the subjective human anthropomorphic view, so science moved from earthcentric models to heliocentric models, and should move from human time models into Universal time models).
So the quantic nature of space and cyclical nature of time was forgotten, and the fact that we are ‘relational spacetime beings’, made of space quanta and time cycles, – Leibniz’s alternative model to that of Newton, remained ignored for 2 centuries.
Then in the XIX and XX century, new advances in mathematics, physics and biology made unavoidable the resurrection of the ‘real models’ of Nature, as Darwin found the evolutionary, time rhythms of nature and its species, which were neither infinite in duration, nor it follow the steady mechanical, artificial rhythm of human time clocks; Lobachevski found that space was indeed discontinuous, with different geometrical forms in different regions of the Universe, Einstein found time clocks were multiple and run at different speeds, and defined the quanta of the larger gravitational scale of size, or rest mass, while quantum theorists discovered in the other extreme of size, the HPlanck bidimensional quanta of angular momentum h, was also a constant; and Boltzmann found the Universal quanta of space of thermodynamic world, ‘Entropy’, was also a constant K.
When physicists discovered that in fact even the smallest spaces do have motion and are made of quanta, and Einstein discovered that the rhythms of time varied and had different speeds, the routines of this ‘simplistic’ Newtonian model had to be changed. As Einstein put it: ‘Leibniz is right, but if so we have to change the entire scaffolding of western science from its foundations’.
Thus human concepts of a continuous absolute space and lineal absolute time, invented by Newton and the mechanical clocks, are no longer valid, and we must substitute them for the real concepts of nature and modern physics: a world of multiple space quanta with motion and a world of multiple cycles of time with different speeds.
Why a philosopher of science and not a physicist has completed such a model should be obvious to the reader. The philosopher of science is concerned with the big questions, what is time, space, energy information and with the unification of all sciences and scales of reality form quantum to astronomy through biology and social sciences. So themes of such wide range as those treated here are more proper of philosophers of science.
Further on, the philosopher of science departs not from the study of a specific type of spacetime systems (physical systems of matter) but from the principle, laws and mathematical and logic languages of time and space, we humans use to perceive reality. Thus once the physicist gather experimental evidence with its instruments, he is at loss with the theoretical analysis on the widest possible terms of those experiments There is where the work of the philosopher of science, master of languages of thought more than of machines of perception, comes in.
Since science is a logic, mathematical statement about reality, so there are also clear new advances on logic and mathematics, which in the XIX century r=evolved scientific thought and again have not yet fully incorporated into our models of reality.
Since science is based in mathematical languages, and language is based in geometry, scientists faced in the XIX century the shocking fact that Euclidean geometry is not truth; since the 5th postulate of Geometry, which defines points with no breath, through which only a line also with no breath, can cross, proved false. There are different possible geometries, in which points do have breath, so several parallels can cross their volume, or points exist in a different surface through which no parallels exist.
How can we then introduce the new concepts of points with breath, surfaces with different numbers of parallels, in the scientific discourse of different sciences? Here again little advance was done, and so mathematicians at the beginning of the XX century decided to get away with the problem by merely NOT defining any longer the concepts of points, planes, lines and the relationships between them (their relative similarity or ‘congruence’ and the way they ‘intersect and lay on’). Thus two new false solutions were devised. On one side, instead of points and numbers, the classic units of mathematics that made them a realist science.
So physicists and philosophers of science have been aware for a century that space is quantic, with motion, and there are infinite time cyclesclocks in Nature. Yet the difficulty to redefine the fundamental original proposition of science, paralleled by the constant needs for merely parched the model.
Look around you. All what you perceive are 2 type of ‘forms in motion’, lineal forms that we shall call space, S, when perceived in stillness or lineal momentum, p, when perceived in motion, and cyclical forms, which we shall call time cycles or angular momentum when in motion, measured by frequency, Tƒ and information form when seeing in stillness.
And so those 2 elements, Spe and OTiƒ, spatial momentum and temporal form, and its infinite combinations, measured with different time clocks, frequency, temperature, speed and space quanta, HPlanck, Kentropy and Mass, and integrated into different types of ‘energy and information’, is truly what all the Universe is made of. And so we can write a simple Generator equation of the Universe:
Ei= Sp x Tƒ for all scales of reality, which breaks down for the 3 main physical scales into the 3 most important equations of mathematical physics: E=hv (for the ∆1 quantum scale), E=knT (for the ∆human thermodynamic scale) and E=1/2mv2 or E=mc2 in Einstein’s relativity for the gravitational ∆+1 scale.
The new paradigm of a Fractal, nonEuclidean Universe has slowly evolved since the Times of Descartes’ multiple worlds and Leibniz’s relational spacetime and NonEuclidean Monads, till the more rigorous formalism of this author. It implies to evolve our understanding of Time and information in topological terms, beyond the dubitative first steps of Einstein with his theory of multiple time clocks, by defining a new arrow of time, opposed to the arrow of entropy and disorder: fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, entropic motions. The combination of both generates the 3 dimensions/ages of Timespace:
Spe (spatial past entropy) x Tiƒ (Temporal Informative Future) = ST (Present, iterative spacetime)
Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but the ‘entropic’ arrow, Spe, of the dual Einstein’s equation: E (Spe) ≈ c² M (Tiƒ) that describes the transformation of lineal radiation into cyclical mass vortices, the fundamental, accelerated ‘time clocks’ of the cosmos that store its information in the frequency and form of its cycles.
Any local big bang and big crunch dual process (E<=>M), splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality.
Still the species they study are overwhelmingly the majority of reality so we do have to deal extensively with them. And the fundamental concept they use to express all the ‘formal motions’ of those species; that is the combination of all the cyclical motions or ‘angular momentums’ of each scale of the 5^{th} dimension and all its ‘entropic spatial intervals’ or constants of space action or ‘lineal momentums’ is ENERGY.
In normal parlance energy is closer to the concept of expansive lineal motion – our capacity to move. In physics though there is a clear equation that relates Energy and Work. So Energy is the capacity to move with certain ‘directionality’ or form. Or alternately the capacity to move ‘forms’. And it is a very integrative concept both in time and space. So for example, in our human scale, Energy is the sum of the Internal Energy made mostly of cyclical motions (U) that give the form to the being and the External motion or kinetic energy (ke). So it is the closest concept to what we call a ‘plane of the 5^{th} dimension’, which measures all the formal motions of a ‘closed system’, ‘superorganism’, or relative Universe.
The limits of lineal physics.
Unfortunately, physicists are lineal because of their professional deformation and only accepts lineal interpretations of reality but the physical universe is not lineal, it is mostly cyclical, and time matters more than space and is more complex than a mere parameter of space, and physical systems are organic, structured as all other systems through scales of the 5^{th} dimension and particles do have an informative and energetic life and death cycle, which is a zero sum, and particles are not static space forms but vortices in perpetual motion and both arrows balance between galaxies that implode space into mass and intergalactic space that expands it and particles also have their time arrow of information and their inverse arrow of negative energy and death called ‘antiparticles which for that reason appear moving towards the past and annihilate=kill particles. This is the last organic theme worth to comment so early in this introduction.
As particles move towards cspeed the limit of tis universe, they obviously suffer strain and die. So when Dirac tried to adapt to Einstein’s cspeeds, the quantum wave of Schrodinger (the body part of the particle head, in the organic physical system, which travels over the energyfield in which it preys, the organic understanding of the conundrum of quantum physics which physicists still do not understand), he found alas! that at c speed, there were 2 solutions, one with negative energy=entropy and one with positive one.
He just have found inorganic terms that the particle died into an antiparticle, with inverse time arrows and inverse energy, exploding into a bigbang death erasing its information. But a century latter this interpretation is taboo – meaning it won’t appear on Physical review (; just in this blog. I never received even a footnote on the few papers I sent when young with organic interpretations of physical equations – it is a taboo paradigm, as humanist economical solutions to the dictatorship of financial bankers is a taboo in economics. ‘Those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods’ said Mr. Einstein, but so far they are doing Ok, other matter is what humanity is suffering under the massive industries of weapons and the massive profits of usury banking.
Now we shall be more precise and quantitative in our analysis of the scales of the 5^{th} dimension in physical systems.
In the General Model of 5D scalar spacetime, systems grow in social scales of 10 elements, given that a ternary 3 x 3 + an integrative 0point is the perfect ternary symmetry of the Universe, which responds to the Fractal generator (3 systems of spacetime across 3 scales with a 10^{th} 0point). This integrative scaling happens CONSTANTLY in all the systems of the Universe, biological, physical or social, from Mongolian armies to cellular structures.
So the search for ‘9’ scales is the easiest way to be ‘extensive’.
Further on, all forms of knowledge depart from a mind, in this case the human organism. So those scales will depart from a central ∆o, human scale.
And finally beings only perceive scales of Sp and Tƒ, from where it extracts motion and form useful to the being. So all perceptions are based in a quanta of motion or form that the perceiver is able to process. And that is why humans do quantize all measures (machines are electronic sensors, attachments of human perception for most of it, so they basically perceive the same elements.
Thus 3 concepts are basic to classify planes: the human point of view, the human actions that require perception and the 3 x 3 + 0 ternary, decametric scales.
It follows that the ±10^{±10} is the largest possible of those scales (atoms in a DNA, galaxies in the cosmological horizon, stars in the galaxy, people on Earth, you name it). So it is easy to ‘search’ for the scales of the physical systems perceived by human beings, by searching for 3 elements:
– An energy type, with a Constant of Spaceaction and a Frequency Clock.
How energy and time transfer between scales, how a clock of time disappears in one scale, so Standard Model particles do not have mass, and then its frequency clocks transfer time in the form of radiation to the thermodynamic scale, and then Black holes of the gravitational scale don’t have temperature… questions that physicists have not even answered because using lineal time, as Pauli once said of a paper, ‘they are no even wrong’… and will open up an entire new world of relationships and meanings to each and all sciences.
We are fast introducing a picture of the enormous number of advances in all sciences, brought about by cyclical time and the understanding of the 5th dimension and its rather simple but powerful metric to explain all what exists as travels in time through its arrows of cyclical time from birth to extinction and then the arrow of social evolution from parts into wholes, of social love of superorganisms, of 5D.
For example, genetics codes time from the lower ∆1 cellular scale to the upper organic scale, providing its social evolution through the informative arrow of future. But the larger whole does NOT code the lower scale as that is a flow of relative past motion.
However the larger future whole DOES move synchronically the past cells. And the past scale cannot send pure flows of past motion to the future (entropy arrow of thermodynamic). Recently we have found that in fact psychological time also obeys the same arrows.
We move first subconsciously in the past, and then we do think with the relative future brain and control motion. Time IS all and existence is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension from seminal seeds that accelerate in time (palingenetic evolution) and then slow down their clocks as they surface into the ∆+1 scale of time, and then live the slower times of the super organisms of nations and civilizations of history, to die fast back to cells, completing a world cycle…
Those are fast reviews of some classic themes of time in physics, biology, sociology and psychology – mental time, which conform the 4 fields of timespace sciences unified by the new metric of 5D fractal, cyclical spacetime.
In that regard, perhaps the most important truth about time in physics is that is NOT at all what there is to time, but people and physicists think it is, limiting their inquire.
Most people today believe that all what matters to time is what ‘physicists measure’; so it is a lineal single duration. So before we go ahead understanding the meaning of a time cycle and its 3 ages, and its symmetries with the 3 scales of the 5^{th} dimension and the 3 forms of topological space, we have to understand the limited understanding of time in physics, in terms of ‘external time changes’, instead of the much wider concept of multiple time arrows, in a Universe made of spacetime beings.
Time in physics in that sense also understand ‘lineal timeentropy’, informative time and reproductive time, but in an unconnected historic manner. So it first studied ‘lineal time’, still its dominant form, as its wordily profession is to make energetic machines.
As Europe expanded its military empires physicists lineal worldview on time became global, and time all over the world was measured with a single mechanical clock equalizing to the standard second of lineal duration, all other cycles of the Universe – never mind all those mechanical clocks were also made with spheres and cycles, including Galileo’s pendulum clock!
Now if we define philosophically time as motion, which is the scientific definition of it, and space as ‘res extensa’; what we say is nothing new. Already Descartes said that the Universe was made of vortices (of Time) and res extensa. The Asians always considered reality made of two principles, yin (temporal information) and yang (spatial energy). But science must quantify and understand in details those terms. So the first task of a Theory of Everything ‘Organic’, must define with great detail what ‘fractal, vital space’ and ‘cyclical time’ means.
The concept of a Universe made of infinite vital spaces and time cycles, which Leibniz postulated against the absolute spacetime of newton was resurrected by Quantum physics, which realized the Universe of vacuum space is a sum of ‘light space quanta with energy – the famous Hconstant, or minimal unit of light: E=hv’ and by Einstein’s relativity, who realized the Universe was filled with clocks of time of different speed, and ‘ time curved space into masses’, themselves accelerate clocklike vortices of gravitational force. So he affirmed the Universe was curved; Time was what a curved ‘clock measures’. And that there was no difference between curved accelerated vortices and mass.
The Newtonian concept of a single, lineal infinite time and single space is in that sense merely a mathematical abstraction, useful for measure, born of the pegging of those ‘sequential finite ‘life cycles’ and fractal spaces in a Cartesian, ‘Euclidean graph’ of the Universe. And it should have ended as the central concept of western science after Planck and Einstein.
And yet, nobody understood clearly what he and Planck meant – they haven’t yet. So Planck said, all physicists had to die first for a new generation to understand the new paradigm. And Einstein said that ‘he was the only physicist who understood there are infinite time cycles in the Universe’, and well, it seems they both died before the new generation understood Leibniz, Planck and Einstein.
Now the reader should realize the difference between data in science and conceptual understanding. The data of the planet orbits fits both in Kepler’s and Ptolemy models. But Ptolemy’s model is wrong; the Earth is not in the center. And so it requires much more complex equations and explanations to fit the data (extant, epicycles, retrograde motions).
So Kepler came and put the sun in the center and simplified everything. And as all was now simpler, it found soon many more applications to orbital analysis and motions on Earth (mechanics). What he will witness in this blog is how all becomes simplified, after we put time into a cycle, of which a line is a mere segment, and classify all time cycles of the Universe, with the metric of the 5th dimension of relative size and speed, such as bigger space entities trace slower time cycles. Soon we will able to explain all kind of facts, never explained before by lineal time, from the cycle of life and death, to the cycles of stockmarkets, from the cycles of history, to the cycles of magnetic fields, to the cycles of stars and the proper, cyclical cosmology of the Universe.
We are doing here a thought experiment on the tradition of Einstein, because there is enough data, as there was enough data on planets, after Brahe, not to need any huge machine to understand better the Universe. It is only needed to correct a wrong concept that has no proof on the Universe (nothing lasts for ever except perhaps the ‘set of all sets’, which is indefinable as the Cantor paradox proved, if we were to use mathematical concepts). All is cyclical in time, and the very essence of science precisely consists on extracting cyclical laws from nature, as all exists in time, and so all repeats.
And how much of a belief and dogma are the main ‘theories of lineal time’, sponsored by ‘pretentious science’ – from the lineal infinite time of a Cartesian abstract graph, to the lineal, entropyonly arrow of time used by Cosmologists that denies the obvious fact that we live in a world that turns cycles around itself and the sun, as it increases the information of life, stored in the cyclical clocks of its genetic, cellular systems, within a galaxy that moves also in cycles, towards its black hole center, a rotary mass of maximal gravitational information.
This deformed our conception of time and motion, and hid the purpose of time cycles, and the differences between the species that perform them and the information they store in the form and frequency of its spacetime cycles.
This clear mathematical realization; that the simplest elements of reality, masses and charges, are clocklike vortices that carry the information of the Universe, was however lost to lineal physics for a century, till the first pictures of ‘particles’ showed them to be vortices in motion – time clocks, the fundamental particle of the Universe of which we are all made. Cycles of time are indeed the beats and rhythms of information – the substance of which the Universe is made.
We are knots of time cycles, which put together give the finite duration of our existence. But those clocks change as we move from scale to scale of the 5^{th} dimension and out ‘physical forms’ enlarge and slow down, emerging as new wholes, from photons with frequency into charges, from charges into atoms with temperature, from atoms with temperature into colder masses. And as the clocks of time change, they previous clocks slow down to a halt.
Those scales use different parameters of time, because they are truly ‘different planes’ of reality, and to ‘travel’ from one to other scale, a system must undergo deep transformations in its Sp, Spatial Extension (size and lineal motions) and Tƒ, frequency of its clocks of information or time speed (form and cyclical motion).
So we have a different definition in terms of parameters for the ‘flow of something’ called energy that ‘emerges’ between the scales of different size of the Universe. And this fact – that as the scale we measure the term the Universe conserves, ‘energy’ varies in its parameters is the fundamental question to analyze first in physical sciences.
The question of scales.
This is the Planck action the Boltzmann action and the c^{2} speed action. At this point it does not matter they are measured in units of angular momentum, entropy and squared speed – again human concepts. We might call them bidimensional ‘quanta of spacetime’.
This bidimensional quanta of spacetime defines not only the minimal unit, the minimal active ‘cell’ so to speak of each scale that we shall called a Planckton (similar to the unit of biological seas), a Bolt and a Mass.
Now as always the ‘human point of view matters most.
Today of course we know even in the world of physics that there are infinite time cycles as Einstein proved, that there are infinite spaces, as quantum physics proved, that there are infinite scales of size as microscopes and macroscopes (telescopes) proved, that there are infinite different speeds of time clocks, which close its cycles from the fastest particles to the largest galaxies, that the largest beings move paradoxically slower than the shortest ones.
And we still have the 6 forms of motion in time, generation, evolution through ages of life and the slower horizons of ‘larger’ species, growth in social numbers of cells or individuals, and diminution, both phenomena related to the evolution of physical and biological systems back and forth (so cyclical particles became cyclical atoms, that became molecules, cells, matter, organisms, societies, solar systems, galaxies and so on), as they dissolve their forms of information in the process of death, and yes, I forgot there is this 6^{th} form of motion, locomotion, of which physicists have provided an enormous detailed account with its formula S = vt ≈ ct.
So we have 3 obvious elements or time realities to be studied:
– Cyclical time changes, which can be grouped in the process generation, evolution and extinction, or worldcycle of life and death .
– Growth in scales of size and diminution, across a ‘5^{th} dimension’ (to respect for routine the so called 4 dimensions of spacetime), which has the important property of relating the speed of the worldcycles of beings with their size, such as ‘bigger systems in space have slower time cycles’, both in physical systems (slower rotation of larger forms, according to the laws of vortices in 2 and 3 dimensions, Vo x Ro = K, w^{2} x R^{3} =K) and in biological systems (faster metabolic rates of smaller animals) and in social systems (slower life span of social species and civilizations that of individuals and human beings).
A fact that we can resume in the most general formula possible of both parameters: Sp x Tƒ= ∆c (Space Size x Time speed =Constant), that we shall call the Metric of the 5^{th} dimension, where ∆ will be the symbol for each plane of space time, Sp, a plane of space and Tƒ, a cycle of time (the need of both symbols for the 2 states of space and the 2 states of time, soon to be revealed).
And then…. Yes, locomotion.
And as it happens, that the process of generation always starts from a smaller seminal seed or first particle, which grows in size by iteration, and accumulation of clone forms into a larger size, with slower time rates, back and forth through the changes of ages or evolution and social gathering into larger wholes, to die back into the lower scale, we can in fact put together all the previous time changes into a simple logic equation, the equation of the worldcycle, which in its verbal form, translated into a few logic symbols, œ, for any being or ‘function of existence’, ∆±1 for different planes and growth in the 5^{th} dimension, Ñ for its opposite dissolution of a plane in the moment of death, > for an increase of density of form and < for an increase in size, writes:
Birth ∆1 > ∑œ∆1 ≈ Œ∆ < Sp > (S ≈ T)∆+1 > Tƒ < < Sp ∆1: Entropic Death
This Logic Equation is the equation of a worldcycle that summarizes the 5 motions in time, birth and generation by iterative reproduction, evolution through 3 ages or horizons, Sp, the age of spatial energetic motion or youth, s=T, the age of balance between energy and information when the system reaches its adult reproductive age, and Tƒ, the age of cyclical temporal information or old age, when the lineal motions exhaust or fall into a time vortex, followed by a reversal in the process of growth of information that explodes back into space and entropy, called death.
Now the Philosopher of science has been always interested in describing this worldcycle. And once we have formalized we will use it to describe all what exists and all its process with this 5Dimensional metric. The physicist has converted it into a worldline in a single spacetime continuum, in the Minkowski’s 4Dimensional metric, which is just a ‘small view’ of this much larger worldview.
In that sense, I have always seen my work as the culmination of the search for T.Œ of which T.O.E. is just a mere footnote.
Now the question is what shall we study in mathematical physics with those spacetime equations of change? Obviously the flows of time and space moving along the Generator equation of the Universe.
The conservation principles. Actions and Worldcycles. Lagrangians and Hamiltonians.
The Universe conserves the ‘present’, SxT product of both, at the point in which they are closer in harmony with similar value – in mathematical terms, the Universe minimizes the Lagrangian function, at the point in which S=T, Potential energy = Kinetic energy, angular=lineal momentum, male=female, thus where the 3 elements that compose it, Sp < ST>Tƒ reach its harmony.
The graph the Lagrangian equation – the most generic equation of physical sciences, truly the ‘Principle of Evolution’ of this discipline, which simply stated affirms that physical systems – waves like, “light travel between two given points along the path of shortest time,” As such first was known as the principle of least time or Fermat’s principle, which my fellow countryman, the Basque amateur genius (; realized giving priority to time conservation principles over spatial ones.
Systems conserve time cycles, think in time events, and accelerate time frequencies to reach spatial positions. Pierre Louis Maupertuis felt that “Nature is thrifty in all its actions”, and applied the principle broadly:
The laws of movement and of rest deduced from this principle being precisely the same as those observed in nature, we can admire the application of it to all phenomena. The movement of animals, the vegetative growth of plants … are only its consequences; and the spectacle of the universe becomes so much the grander, so much more beautiful, the worthier of its Author, when one knows that a small number of laws, most wisely established, suffice for all movements.
So did Leibniz, the forebear of T.Œ.
Leonhard Euler gave a formulation of the action in modern terms: Let the mass of the projectile be M, and let its speed be v while being moved over an infinitesimal distance ds. The body will have a momentum Mv that, when multiplied by the distance ds, will give Mvds, the momentum of the body integrated over the distance ds. Now I assert that the curve thus described by the body to be the curve (from among all other curves connecting the same endpoints) that minimizes ∫Mvds.
As Euler states, ∫Mvds is the integral of the momentum over distance travelled, which, in modern notation, equals the reduced action:
∂ ∫ p d q
As the system evolves, q traces a path through configuration space (only some are shown). The path taken by the system (red) has a stationary action (δS = 0) under small changes in the configuration of the system (δq)
In brief, the internal ‘existential function’ of the being, ExI>Tƒ, the waveparticle ‘momentum’ along an Spe field is minimized by all entities which have a goal, to arrive to q2 in minimal T1, taken advantages of the energy (motion and acceleration of the field) in which the bodywave feeds.
Yet for those actions to exist the being MUST know q2, the final point. This is the ‘boundary condition’, and it implies ‘obviously’ in the general concept of T.Œ, that the particle must ‘perceive’ the goal or future point of spacetime it wants to reach, a fundamental fact completely ignored by abstract physicists, but not in T.œ as it has an obvious implication in quantum physics, where there is a guiding, ‘pilot wave’ in words of Einstein and De Broglie (the discoverers of the waveparticle duality forgotten conveniently by the Germanic, subjective, objectual idealist school of Copenhagen).
In brief, the laws of least action or any solution to a waveparticle path is impossible without boundaries conditions, and we will see how in fact there are ‘3 parts’ on the system, as in any other T.Œ system, the phase wave which is faster than light as it carries no energy or information but ‘foresees’ ahead, perceives – we might say the system sees the field ahead; the pilot wave or group velocity, which is synchronized with the internal clock of the particle that follow the least timespace path, ‘step by fractal step’, constantly readdressing its direction, which is the full meaning of the ‘Lagrangian’ calculated finitesimal after finitesimal steps to achieve the minimal internal ‘expenditure of energymomentum, and the maximal external motion.
Now because ALL SCALES and motions of the Universe can be formulated by means of a Lagrangian or ‘Hamiltonian’ (a different version of the formalism that avoids difficult differential calculus by using instead of step by step momentums, total energies), and in terms of bidimensional spacepaths.
Indeed, this was immediate for light (as it was originally conceived to understand light least time paths as in refraction) by Fermat, and so soon Lagrange applied it to gravitation.
It was only natural that it would easily be applied to Electromagnetism and finally to General relativity, which after all are elaborations of light and gravitation.
And surprisingly to do so it required to use bidimensional space. So in the ADM formulation of general relativity one splits spacetime into spatial slices and time, the basic variables are taken to be the induced metric, on the spatial slice and its conjugate momentum variable related to the extrinsic curvature, (this tells us how the spatial slice curves with respect to spacetime and is a measure of how the induced metric evolves in time). These are the metric canonical coordinates. Dynamics such as timeevolutions of fields are controlled by the Hamiltonian constraint.
Now all this merely means that the whole field of physics despite its immense detailed complexity reduces to a small part of T.Œ regarding physical systems: the conservation of the Function of Existence of the physical being and its motion over the energetic fieldlimbs it transits with minimal expenditure.
But of course, once this is clear, we can go much further into translating all kind of parts and wholes, constants and equations of physics to describe what is basically a simple Universe ruled by the very simple laws of T.Œ and its bidimensional spacetime elements.
The apparent complexity of physics in that sense, like the growing complexity of genetics and economic ecosystems of machines and companymothers is just the fractal property of repetition, social ensembles, ternary symmetries, subdivisions of part into new ternary parts and all the elements explained that by iteration and inversion, duality and trinity develop the amazing capacity of creation of different varieties of spacetime beings in the Universe.
And its mathematical complexity stems from the stubbornness of practical physics that is engaged in measuring with absolute exactitude the paths of those huge ensembles of smaller beings moving so fast through so many paths, in social groups across several scales.
It is indeed a feat of mathematical physics to be able to e so exact by approximation methods, perturbation theory (adding smaller corrections) and huge number crunching.
But that is no the purpose of T.Œ which deals rather with the whys and isomorphisms of all systems of nature.
The immortal Universe: a zero sum that conserves its Spe<≈>Tƒ elements.
Finally two important facts to notice on those 5D spacetime generator equations, to end this introduction:
As 5D and time are symmetries that increase information and decrease entropy contrary to belief the universe does warp energy into form and so it dies, since 2 symmetries (time cycles and 5D evolution) increase form, and only one (space motions) decrease it.
An example is the duration of life and death:
While the lifeinformationevolution arrow lasts its maximal timespace quanta warping the being in a point of space for ‘very long’, the arrow of death
entropy last a single quantum of timespace, exploding in that ‘microtime’ the entity in maximal space (i.e. bigbang microtime, antiparticle erasing.)
Yet the sum of both: ∑ ‘Max. T. x Min. S’ + ‘Max. S x Min. T’ is a zero sum for the total 5D spacetime of the Universe.
So the Universe is conserved, BECAUSE DEATH erases both 5D Times – the worldcycle of information AND the social evolution of the being.
Further on since the Universe is made of formal motions it is immortal and motion never ceases – only reverses its arrow from information to entropy in the act of death (or vice versa as Mehaute proved in chemical processes, in the creation of crystals) the Universe is immortal. From this fact it comes both the Absolute relativity of spacetime in each scale, which merely inverts its arrows and the relative infinity of motions in the 5^{th} dimension, which merely ‘wobble’ up an down. And from this absolute relativity derives the isotropy and isomorphism of both, from where it derives in the conservation principles of Physics:
Conservation of lineal momentum and kinetic energy vs. Conservation Tƒ: angular momentum and potential energy, which in most events of physical measure derives in the laws of least action (Hamiltonian ≈ Lagrangian > ∂H=0; steady points etc.
What is the difference between 5D physics and 4Dsingle membrane of spacetime physics regarding conservation? Simply speaking 5D physics conserves quantities along 3 planes of spacetime. Thus processes which are ‘travels’ through the 5^{th} dimension (conception and emergence into an ∆+1 scale, death down ∆2 scales, social evolution, ∆+1 scales) do not seem to conserve the overall energy and information of the system, giving origin to concepts such as ‘entropy’ (loss of energy between 2 states, as part of its remains in the ∆1), death (loss of information in ∆+1 scale as the system erases both its social and individual information), weak interaction (CP violation:
Loss of energy, which is transferred down to a neutrino of the ∆1 scale and gain of information in the manner of mass, as the mass family grows one ∆+1 scale), and vice versa: Growth of information in ∆+1 processes (conception, reproduction and emergence, crystal formation, gravitational collapse) and so on. Thus the conservation of the total energy and information of a system, in whatever parameters each science establishes them, must be summoned up in the ‘whole worldcycle’ of the being for a closed system. I.e. the growth of information in the conception process and the social process of ‘education’ of the being, is reverted in its total loss in the moment of death. The particle antiparticle creation will be lost when the antiparticle annihilates another particle.
In physics we can state that only the 3 parameters of 5St when referring to charged particle are conserved.
This is called the CPT conservation law: That is, the whole of positive/negative charge, which represent the positive, negative directions of a time cycle, the leftright space parity which represent the moving forward and backwards and sideward in space and the lineal time past to future to past time, (which might represent the same ‘cyclical time’ or might represent the 5Dimensional ‘long’ arrows of time evolution of systems into wholes and parts, depending on the reaction we study). In that regard, in physics +and – charges are what we call the positive and negative sides of a time cycle – and so when in balance we could say that the system lives an eternal present (Hydrogen atom for example). This is important to realize, to make sense of CPT conservation, which for antiparticles implies to change the sign of time as the sign of the time clock or vortex inwards and outwards of a charge (+ and ) cancel each other. In this manner changing the Time arrow of the antiparticle, which is then the entropypast, destructive death of the particle, conserves CPT.
We can in that sense consider either the + or the – charge a relative arrow of future or past. On my opinion we should consider the quark the arrow of future information and the electron the arrow of negative, past entropy as a general rule.
Yet lineal time duration might correspond to up and down fifth dimensional motions as in the weak force, and then again we need to resort to the CPT full conservation law as Parity is not CONSERVED because a ‘motion upwards or downwards’ in the 5^{th} dimension ALWAYS changes O_{∆1}<_{∆}, the function of the system: cyclical particles in a lower scale become energy systems in the upper scale
The immortal Universe: a zero sum that conserves its Sp<≈>Tƒ elements.
Finally two important facts to notice on those 5D spacetime generator equations, to end this introduction:
As 5D and time are symmetries that increase information and decrease entropy contrary to belief the universe does warp energy into form and so it dies, since 2 symmetries (time cycles and 5D evolution) increase form, and only one (space motions) decrease it.
An example is the duration of life and death:
While the lifeinformationevolution arrow lasts its maximal timespace quanta warping the being in a point of space for ‘very long’, the arrow of deathentropy last a single quantum of timespace, exploding in that ‘microtime’ the entity in maximal space (i.e. bigbang microtime, antiparticle erasing.)
Yet the sum of both: ∑ ‘Max. T. x Min. S’ + ‘Max. S x Min. T’ is a zero sum for the total 5D spacetime of the Universe.
So the Universe is conserved, because death erases both 5D Times – the worldcycle of information AND the social evolution of the being.
Further on since the Universe is made of formal motions it is immortal and motion never ceases – only reverses its arrow from information to entropy in the act of death (or vice versa as Mehaute proved in chemical processes, in the creation of crystals) the Universe is immortal. From this fact it comes both the Absolute relativity of spacetime in each scale, which merely inverts its arrows and the relative infinity of motions in the 5^{th} dimension, which merely ‘wobble’ up an down. And from this absolute relativity derives the isotropy and isomorphism of both, from where it derives in the conservation principles of Physics:
Conservation of lineal momentum and kinetic energy vs. Conservation Tƒ: angular momentum and potential energy, which in most events of physical measure derives in the laws of least action (Hamiltonian ≈ Lagrangian > ∂H=0; steady points etc.
The Universe in time: 0sum and eternity.
Applying the same scientific concepts to the times events of physics we shall also find an eternal Universe, of world cycles, whose total sum is a zero sum of eternal presents.
∆3: Sp (field) ≥ ST (wave) ≥ Tƒ (Particle).
The electromagnetic spectrum ‘evolves’ as it grows in ‘density’=Tƒ/Se, from its Se<Tƒ dominant field state, through its Tƒ=Se wave configuration into its Tƒ>Se particle state.
Now in the lowest human perceived scale, the 3 states are also dependent on the density of Tƒ, information; which now we measure by the frequency of the electromagnetic waves produced by the state, which is either an Spfield, an ST wave or a Tƒ particle.
For example, in photonparticle interactions, as the photon energy increases, the dominant interaction mechanism shifts from a lineal, pure motionspace, Sephotoelectric effect to STCompton wave scattering to Tƒpair production.
And the STCompton wave scattering is the ‘unifying, pegging’ principle that communicates the other two events (time perception):
Rarely do photoelectric effect and pair production compete at a given energy. Compton scattering, however, at relatively low energy competes with the photoelectric effect and at high energy competes with pair production. Thus, in lead, interaction below 0.1 MeV is almost exclusively photoelectric; between 0.1 MeV and 2.5 MeV both photoelectric and Compton processes occur; and between 2.5 MeV and 100 MeV Compton scattering and pair production share the interaction. In the pair process the photon is annihilated, and an electron–positron pair is created.
Thus the duality of density of energy vs. density of information will therefore define in the two parallel ‘lineal scales’ of quantum physics and thermodynamics (states of matter), the transition phases and states dominant for each spacetime event.
The T>S transformation towards denser, more static forms.
A key tool of T.Œ is the Galilean paradox – the fact that time motions become space dimensions and vice versa. So as we loose energy motion, advancing our age, time motions become space dimensions.
Now in physical systems as in all systems we talk of 3 fundamental time motionsdimensions for the entity studied, which are:
 m: The inner energymasschargetemperature motions of the particle (Active Magnitude: M) or first time motion.
 v: Its external constant speed or second time motion: V
 a: and its acceleration: A.
Again the lack of a unifying formalism gives those 3 time motions different parameters and values. Often the active magnitude (a vortex of time, mass or charge) is considered some kind of ‘solid substance’ or ‘pointparticle’ and not measured as a cyclical clock or time motion. So the physicist works only on the second and third time motions, speed and acceleration, obtained by deriving in time instead of the Active Magnitude its Spatial external motion, as ‘M’ is treated as a point particle: V=∂s/∂t; a=∂v/∂t.
This is good enough for what we have to say: as the system becomes older those 2 motion=time dimensions become converted into information, form, decelerating the system.
This implies that as the Sp energy of the system becomes denser, it acquires more information, more dimensional form, and we could then consider in terms of dimensionality that a Field is a ‘bidimensional plane of Sp, Accelerated Energetic space’, a wave is a 3dimensional entity of ‘steady state’ constant motion, in which the ‘accelerated’ time motion has become a spacedimension reducing its motion to a steady state. So a field will be bidimensional space, a wave, tridimensional spacetime and a particle 4Dimensional timespace.
∆+3: Gravitational scale.
And vice versa a particle (mass or charge) can die away loosing formal dimensions that become energetic planes.
And so the multiple combinations of such states and time reversals in different planes, is the ‘theoretical substance of ‘state physics’, since in physical simpler systems time can be easily reversed of state (in life it cannot, because of the complex organic structure so slow to produce that entropy much faster cannot be reconstructed into information at the same speed as the simpler formal motions of physical systems allowed).
So we can generally speak of a formula at this scale to summarize the 2 limits of pure flat energy space or c2, and pure dimensional rotary motion with cyclical form, or mass, and yes, the constant back and forth processes of ‘informative life creation of mass’ and entropic death bigbang of mass:
E=Mc², which is the ‘statetime equation’ of this scale, written as: Se (Efield) ≤ST (c²:planewave state)>Tƒ (mass vortex):
The Equivalence Principle establishes a Universe with 2 limits of eternal movement: a lineal speed with a c limit or electromagnetic force; and a cyclical speed or mass, which is a vortex of spacetime also with a ‘c’ limit of speed, reached in the heaviest objects – black holes. Thus radiation and mass eternally transform into each other the lineal and cyclical arrow of inertial movement: Sp (lineal motion)<cxc>M(Tƒ) (cyclical motion).
A light wave reproduces at cspeed an electromagnetic surface of lineal space. On the other hand, a mass whose limit is a black hole that turns at cspeed is a cyclical entity that balances the lineal movement of light forces with its inverse cyclical movement, to maintain an eternal dynamic balance of cycles and lines.
The transfers of energy and information along the asymmetric scales of the 5th dimension.
Now if we fully analyze the entire world cycle of the entity, by introducing also the ±1 conception in the seminal stage of the being (particle plasma in future atomic matter, ¥rays in future particles etc.), and death back into the lower plane, we must take also into account the asymmetric arrows of the 5th dimension that transfers information better upwards and motion better downwards.
So another element to take into account for such studies is the fact that the 3 ‘components’ in space of a physical system are made of different n±1 œpoints of 3 finitesimal scales.
For example, in the n3 scale, Sefields are made of minimal quanta, for example, the magnetic and dielectric constants of light, (or hquanta, if we want to use instead of the electric formalism the quantum formalism); its waves though are made of social wholes of this quanta, photons = h x v, in the quantum formalism, which therefore are societies of ‘Plancktons’; and finally its ∆+1 particle, the electron, is made of dense nebulae of photons, kept in a cyclical angular static wave by virtue of the gravitational and attractive power of the proton well.
So this introduces the asymmetric arrows of 5d planes, as motions transfers with no entropy loss from upper to lower scales but information does not, and vice versa, motion transfers with entropy from lower to upper scales but information does not have entropy (genetic, memetic and quantum coding).
Thus we must consider in those studies of a full Worldcycle of existence of physical matter:
 The antisymmetry (inversion of parameters) between Sp and Tƒ ages of a physical system, as in E=M, (inversion of form and properties between lineal energy and temporal information but also:
 The asymmetry, between 5D scales: (E(n1 << n) < E(n<<∆1) meaning energy transfer, <, between ∆1 and n is smaller << than between the upper and lower scale, and vice versa regarding information.
This must be taken into account when describing the laws of states and the transfers of ‘heat’ by an ∆electric flow with ohmic resistance or by ∆1 ¥rays radiation to a state of ∆+1 matter; which as it is customary on physical studies, makes ever more complex and detailed the analysis of any phenomena from its ideal state to its detailed quantification.
Needless to say we do not have spacetime for such finetuning, but just make explicit its existence, specially when dealing with the human:
∆±2; Thermodynamic scale.
So for thermodynamic physical systems, we have THE FOLLOWING Time Generator:
ST1 (plasma)>Sp: Gas>ST>Liquid>Tƒ (Solid) << ST1 (plasma)
In the graph, the 3 states of matter act in the ∆Thermodynamic, human scale as the 3 ages of increasing density of information and decreasing lineal motion, measured by its density ratio, Se/Tƒ, whereas liquid is the balanced state of maximal reproductive creativity (we are in fact liquid beings). Its spatial state is also obvious:
I.e. the Earth has an Segaseous cover ≤ an ST, liquid water surface and magma ≥ a Tƒ, solid iron crystal in its center.
The most thoroughly studied scale of 5D physics, as it is the one in which humans coexist at cellular, individual and ‘global warming’, collective level.
The 3 topologies of all Universal systems: vital spaces, cyclical membranes and ŒPoints of measure.
So we find in the Universe always 3 elements in all systems, which correspond to the 3 ‘topologies’ of mathematics, and the 3 ‘ages’ of life world cycles (since life is cyclical ,changes in time are NOT worldlines as physicists believe, but world cycles):
 The vital space of lineal motions, enclosed by the cyclical membranes and time cycles, focused in a central point of view or frame of reference, of maximal density of information that gauges information, linguistically and has the structure of a NonEuclidean, Fractal point, through which multiple ‘parallels of energy and information’ can cross.
This ‘mind, soul, god, monad, Maxwellian Demon’ that creates the order of the Universe will be then defined by a simple mathematical equation and geometry as a 0point, whose function will be to maintain the whole system ‘stable’; that is in biological terms ‘to make it survive’. It does not need to be conscious, but as Leibniz described it in his work on monads, apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or linguistically, because simply speaking, Evolution implies that a system which ‘maintains the ‘whole’ stable and survive lasts on time. So automatically as time goes, ONLY systems who had this ternary efficient, symmetric, stable configuration have lasted, have been selected.
This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by PoincareEinstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics and explains its main systems. So for example, an atom has a central point of view of maximal density; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.
In the graph, a few of the ternary systems, made with the 3 only topologiesfunctions of all systems of the Universe, an atom, a tomato, a planet, a cell an embryo and an electromagnetic field. Though at first sight their resemblance might seem a mere coincidence, all of them are ternary systems, which we can describe with the same ‘Generator equation’ of ¬Æ mathematics, the formalism of T.œ (the Organic Theory of Everything, which unifies all sciences as descriptions of such systems in any scale of the Universe).
But then again, in biology we can describe in time the birth of life as a process of creation of membranes holding a field of carbohydrates.
And finally in both, field theory and biology we will find a central point of view, the charge or the DNA will appear, accelerating the informative process of evolution of the system.
Unlike living beings, whose isomorphism is only found in its perfect informative seeds (tomato, ovum), and some of its ∆1 cellular units in isomorphic water (Plankton), the systems of physical spacetime respond mostly to the simpler mathematical 3 topologies of the Universe, hence they are easily described with mathematical laws, reflection of the 5 postulates of ¬AE geometry. Let us member them briefly
Now, once this is clear, we can define the fundamental 3 elements of the isomorphism spacetime systems of physical nature.
Fields as limbs are relative onedimensional, lineal, toroid forms.
Waves, as bodies are relative planar bidimensional spacetime systems of energy and information.
Particles, as heads are, are relative tridimensional informative elements.
And the 3 together form the essential system of the physical Universe:
∆1: Sp≤ ≈ ExI: Wave> Tƒparticle
Whereas the growth of planes of the 5^{th} dimension implies a growth in complexity and scale.
Which leads to the comprehension of the 5^{th} dimension in terms of scalar growth.
Indeed, this is selfevident in the physical Universe as we move into deeper mathematical excursions through the equations of mathematical physics.
Systems grow from one to other plane of the 5^{th} dimension in decametric scales (social point of view), which can be expressed also as a growth of dimensions, from lineal fields to bidimensional waves to tridimensional particles that become units of a new game in a larger scale.
How this growth happens in physical systems from the quantum scale to the thermodynamic scale to the gravitational scale, in detail is the description of all the equations of mathematical physics.
We can now consider a general analysis of it, from the perspective of 5D systems.
Thus the approach of the philosopher of science to the Unification of all systems, is one that includes together the 6 motions of time of Aristotle, its cyclical patterns of generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction, along a 5^{th} dimension of relative sizes and speeds; and of course, the 6^{th} motion or Locomotion, in lineal space, which however will turn to be the less important for ‘meaning’ of all of them.
This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists, money, they ARE describing different things.
Now if we were to speak the most beautiful of all those jargons, as it is the language of all those beings, NonEuclidean, NonAristotelian ilogic mathematics, the needed upgraded 2300 years overdue of the sciences of logic and mathematics that will allow all those of you who are NOT only ‘selfies’, selfcentered life cycles and can take the necessary bashing of all your ‘beliefs’ to relief your slavery to childish thoughts, we would define those 3 elements as the ‘only 3 topologies of the Universe’ and write a Generator Equation in terms of topological geometries:
Toroid limbs/fields > ØHyperbolic body/waves < Informative particlesheads
This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3. So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a Onucleus, an electrons and a Øhyperbolic bodywave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥electromagnetic waves between them.
This simple statement ‘enlightens’ your understanding of an atom and a galaxy and completes 100 years of quantum physics and relativity. Take it or leave it.
I shall prove ad nauseam, as ‘master ludi’ of all languages and sciences that NOT a single science escapes the ternary symmetries defined by the Fractal Generator of the 5D spacetime Universe and its structure. But you WILL likely deny all those proofs. Since man is not alien to the paradoxical equation of the mind:
‘Infinitesimal selfcentered ÄPoint x ∞ cycles of spacetime’ = o x ∞ = Constant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.
But how can we differentiate forms and motions. What are a form and a motion? The answer is that all has form and motion at the same time. Motion is the objective reality, Form is the still perception created by a mind. So the Universe is about motions, the worlds of the mind about forms. Reality is about motion, knowledge about form. Reality is made of time cycles and lineal motions, mind about forms created with time cycles and dimensional distances, created with minds.
And this is what Galileo discovered but never understood, as he was just an artillery master. It is the Principle of Relativity, which is at the core of all physical, scientific laws, but we shall call the Galilean paradox, because Physicists, from Galileo to Einstein, were aware of it, founded their science on it, but have never quite fully grasped it.
Now, all this said, for the understanding of a simplex physical system, for example, an electromagnetic field, with a magnetic external membrane (2nd Maxwell’s law: no monopoles), a central point of view or chargeclock (1st law: sinks of charge), which exchange energy and information between them and the external world (3rd, 4th law), we need to understand the external word of the being and how it grows in social scales and exchanges energy and information with other systems.
That is, from the perspective of all its combined properties, which are defined by the fractal, scalar nature of the Universe:
All systems are in that sense, ternary ‘living fractal’s, composed of ‘linguistic mirror worlds’ (Monads in the old jargon of relational spacetime), that communicate energy and information with other NonÆ, nonEuclidean nonAristotelian points of view, creating larger scales of social evolution that define the fifth dimension of coinvariant Sp x Tƒ systems, from particles to atoms to molecules, to matter states, to cosmic bodies to galaxies – this simple philosophical fractal model of reality, is organic – as several scales coexist and interact together, mental as all species gauge information, living, as all of them absorb energy and when enough of it is stored decouple into similar beings, reproduce, and of course mathematical, as they gauge geometrically information in space, and logical, as they are submitted to the causal actionreaction processes of the Universe.
Yet before we get into detailed descriptions of those physical systems, its properties and how the mathematical laws of physics reflect them, revealing the whys of the discipline, we shall start our model of physics with the fractal paradigm showing how in the birth of physics, philosophers of science were closely explaining the ternary structure of the Universe.
Why? Because in relative terms time motions, cyclical motions, vortices, implosive motions, are accelerated motions, while lineal motions, entropic motions, res extensa are decelerating motions. So in relative terms time moves faster than space. And this is the key to understand physical systems. So we can ascribe to the ternary elements of reality 3 type of motions/forms:
– Tƒ: There are cyclical vortices, which are accelerated motionsstatesforms. So they are studied with cyclical, accelerated equations. Such is the case of General Relativity, which studies the accelerated vortices of time created by masses. And their geometry is spherical, elliptic. They are the particle, or solid, crystal state in its center.
– Sp: The are entropic, big bang, expansive, res extensa, spatial motions, which however decelerate from the initial impetus and are the inverse of cyclical vortices. So we find often the equations of a big bang correspond to the inverse equation of a cyclical vortex. For example, the equations of the cosmological big bang are the inverse of the equations of the black hole, as they are the limit of temporal vortices (the black hole) and expansive, res extensa (the big bang that creates space). And their geometry is planar, toroid. They are the field or gas state of physical systems.
– ST: And there are ‘waves’ with a steady inertial constant speed, which combine both, cyclical and lineal elements, and their geometry is hyperbolic. They are the wave or liquid state of physical systems.
So let us introduce you to the much vaster wealth of knowledge provided by the proper understanding of ‘vortices’ of cyclical time and its interaction with res extensa, lineal space:
Time cycles have actually 3 dimensions, or motions (depending on how you see the cycle, still or in motion), which we have always known.
And this will then be carried to the 3 dimensional symmetry between 3 spatial topologies (toroidlimbs fields, hyperbolic wavesbodies and spherical headsparticles) and its 3 time motionsages (entropic youth, fast motions; reproductive, iterative adult ages and informative, 3^{rd} ages).
And then every 3 spacetime symmetries that fill up a plane of the 5^{th} dimension will emerge upwards or dissolve downwards into larger or smaller scales also with dual motions as ‘energy and information emerges’ into a new scale with new topologies of space, new motions and clocks of time, or dissolves into an infinity.
Now as always the simplest proofs of the bidimensionality of space and time, which is essential to the structure of the Universe, are mathematical. Of this, already the Greeks took note, as they could not calculate easily a cube volume from 2 cubes. He fact is, there is not superposition of tridimensional cubic forms: X^{3}+Y^{3}≠ Z^{3}, the famous Fermat Theorem. And there are NOT numbers of 3 elements, but only single numbers, bidimensional numbers (complex numbers) and quaternary numbers (quaternions) albeit without commutative properties. An interesting property for more advanced courses.
So why we talk of 4 dimensions in standard physics, with a ‘signature’ of +, , – , – whereas + is a time dimension and – means a space dimension? And further on in any bigger dimensional model physicists will always write a ‘signature’ of +, , , , , ….. , . Simple, because they have no idea what to do with ‘time’, what a time dimension might mean, stuck in a single lineal time duration and entropy, spatial time dimension. As they have deformed time into lines and never got back and look at what they did, but accumulate deformation upon deformation, and now the ‘hump’ paraphrasing Nietzsche is so huge that there is no lion able to cut it off and run faster.
Indeed, even the + in Einstein’s Relativity is NOT pure time, but ct, and since c is a speed, hence v=s/t, really what we write here simplifying the concept is ct=s/t x t = s, ‘eliminating time properties’ and making it lineal spacelike. We analyze in depth many ‘times’ this spatialization that kills ALWAYS the 4 features of time cycles on the physical discourse: to be cyclical, hence to be repetitive and so causal reason of the repetitions and patterns we call laws of science, to break space into fractal inner vital spaces and outer regions and to be bidimensional at least to close the cycle.
Simple, the combination of bidimensional fields of energy and information creates a holographic Universe of space and time:
PastSp>FutureTƒ: field>particles.
Or the superposition of layers of bidimensional ‘present’ wavebodies create a ternary dimension, with a 4^{th} dimension of motion:
∑ bidimensional (space or time) layers > 3 Dimensional (space or time volume or flow) > 4 Dimensional (volume of space with motion, flow of time with form)/
Space as expansive, decelerating entropic fieldmotion and time clocks as cyclical accelerated motion are 2 concepts akin to Descartes’ ‘Res extensa’ and ‘vortices’, which he considered rightly to be the two formal motions of the Universe are thus the ultimate poles of physical existence.
WE DO have though here 2 ‘symmetries’, which constantly are used to explain reality. The dual symmetry of cyclical time clocks, accelerating inwards, and expansive entropy decelerating outwards.
But then we shall also consider the still vs. motion ternary symmetry between space and time: Spfields/limbs <STbody waves>TƒHeads/particles, perceived in simultaneous spatial stillness or temporal flow.
Yes, we know them so well, intuitively that before physicists reduced time to what the clock measures and not even that – we learned to talk to describe them. So we invented ‘verbal times’ to explain the 3 dimensionsmotions of time: past, present and future.
Difference between lineal entropic motions and cyclical information.
So we shall for the time being consider this ‘physical arrow of entropy’ and disorder, akin to the concept of an expansion in space, and subsequent disorder. And vice versa, we shall consider a geometrical definition of information, as any process that informs, increases the dimensional form, warps and wrinkles, diminishing the overall volume, in space, of a system.
It is this geometric dual concept, what we can now define as ‘form vs. motion’, the 2 principles of reality and state flatly the fundamental principle of the dual Universe, which we will show truth in all sciences and physical systems: The Universe has 2 arrows of time, one of order and replication of information, the fractal, discontinuous arrow, and one of disorder and increase of spatial volume, the entropy arrow.
Those concepts are extremely general, and unlike the mathematical equations of entropy and information of physics, which are only possible because of its extreme restricted definitions (so Shannon’s equation of information will never be able to describe the information stored in a work of art, or this page and Boltzmann’s equation of entropy cannot be applied to anything but a gas or matter state), can apply to all reality.
Again, we must state that Duality and the Fractal paradigm comes from philosophy of science, not from quantitative physics, and so it is a ‘layer above’ quantity, and ultimately implies that the Universe is based not in arithmetic but in geometry, not in numbers but in logic; it is not a mechanism but an organism, it is not an abstraction, where the language of algebra comes before reality, but a vital reproductive, informative reality which can be ‘summarized’ in the simplest mirror of algebraic and mathematical ‘still equations’.
And so we consider that concepts of physics are ‘small parts’ of those larger definitions, ‘limiting concepts’ that have a more restricted application.
For example, a line is considered a small step of a cycle, as in the geodesics of the Earth, which are large cycles always closed when we maintain a lineal trajectory on the seemingly planar surface, when we give small steps. And in general in the same manner flat empty space in special relativity is a limiting case of the larger, cyclical theory of general relativity, we will define many concepts of classic physics as detailed, limited cases and variations of the larger, more general equations of topological entropy and information, and the fractal generator of spacetime beings.
What is then lineal time duration? Either a limit on the small – a single step of time, which will then be added in a series to form finally a closed time cycle or conservative ‘energy path’; or a huge, abstract concept of absolute time, which only exists in the mind, made up of a series of closed time cycles, put one after another, in the same manner we get an hour by putting together 60 cycles of the minute needle.
Specifically what physicists call time duration is a ‘term’ of an equation used by Galileo to measure initially open, long trajectories with lineal inertia in its experiments with ramps and cannonballs. Thus again, we must stress it is a limited view of all the timemotions, timecycles, and timechanges we experience in nature.
This we stress once more because it is the biggest error of classic physics: the attempts to invade the realm of philosophy of science by expanding restricted concepts such as entropy of gases, information of light signals, or time parameters in equations of locomotion ins pace, to encompass all realities, eliminating from that reality essential parts of it that do not fit into the expanded dogma, such as dimensional form, as an arrow of time, still form and reproduction of form as information, gravitational informing only forces, or different time changes=motions, besides ‘time parameters of locomotion in space.
This huge error of course eliminates ALL the clocks of time except the human mechanical clock extended and uncoiled into an infinite ‘eternity of infinite years’ into the future.
Minkowski formulae has NOTHING to do with the flow of time
Now, there has been much confusion on the meaning of time dimensions, since Minkowski established 4vector equations , with time as a parameter of the 4^{th} dimension of space: s=ct.
This 4 dimension, s=ct, is NOT however time, but ‘S’, a 4^{th} spatial parameter, better expressed in derivatives, c=∂s/∂t (General relativity, Galilean relativity: v=∂s/∂t), as an ‘instant of present time’; or ‘still picture of the spatial distribution of mass, charge and radiation, useful to measure distances. And this is essential to understand. Relativity DOES NOT study at all the flow of time from past to future (Information) or future to past (entropy), but it uses time instants, to make detailed pictures of the distribution of mass, energy and radiation, and its motions. And a lot would be gained if physicists refrain from using the word ‘the 4^{th} dimension of time’, when talking of Relativity.
They only show the enormous ignorance and arrogance on their statements and metaphysical disquisitions regarding the arrows of time.
In reality though physical time is ‘t’, the parameter of an equation – a simplified parameter, used first by Galileo to measure lineal speed, v=s/t. s=tv. Indeed physicists do NOT study cyclical time, but define time as a lineal duration according to the simple formula, s=vt (Galileo) or the equivalent s=ct (Einstein), time becomes merely a parameter of space.
The symbolism for the holographic Universe of bidimensional Space & Time.
Sp, (Spe) will be a parameter of Size or lineal, planar space when perceived in stillness, or entropy (also denoted in mathematical physics by the symbol S) defined as an expansive, decelerating motion, when perceived dynamically – which increases the ‘space’ or res extensa of the system, decelerating to a halt.
In geometry space is a Space Plane, a bidimensional geometry, such as h (bivector of angular momentum) or c².
In its complete description sometimes we should write Spe, for Lineal motionform, Space Plane, Past, Entropy and Energy arrows, when considering the 5 fundamental perspectives, or isomorphic laws encoded on the bidimensional space elements of the Universe:
To be lineal, toroid in mental, geometrical form (); to be ‘Space, res extensa’; to be a ‘bidimensional flat plane’, to be the Past, dead arrow, hence to be entropic disordered motions in terms of functions and motions through the 5^{th} dimension, and to be ‘kinetic energy’ in the Present STplane.
– Tƒ will be a parameter of cyclical time, which increases its cyclical speed as it becomes smaller. The full name would be ‘Tiƒo’, from those 5 perspectives, as Time cycles are ‘Time’, ‘information’ from the perspective of its fixed form and transference through the 5^{th} dimension; ƒuture, old age, from the perspective of the worldcycle view – as the last age before entropic death, and o in its cyclical clocklike vortex form.
In geometry is a cyclical imaginary number that grows in the height dimension, ‘sucking in’ and therefore shortening by an inverse i=x², quantity.
And we know there exists as social numbers (point planes and networks of the 5th dimension) do have this form. So imaginary numbers so called complex numbers have an isucking, negative diminishing Xdimension, of height that forms the temporal cycles, which are for that reason better expressed in exponential numbers, E Θi, whereas the number is elevated to the angular i conjugate.
So the reader must see sometimes, specially in noncorrected old graphs, any of those combinations – the most likely an E for Entropy/kinetic energy for Space and an I, for informative Time. And its combinations ExI, as symbol of present:
– ST, will therefore be preSenT. We shall write it also as, ExI, since the present is dynamic and outside fundamental physics and Geometry in biological and social sciences, people use the concept Energy and Information most often with a wider, loose meaning similar to the two fundamental elements of reality. Then we can write:
ExI(st) as the function of existence in present time, which IS THE QUANTITY the Universe conserves, ‘Present’. Or:
STœ; in which the 3 elements of all beings, its spatial territories (the closest of which are its limbs and bodies), its temporal functions and cycles, and its point of view are present. Systems do become extremely complex in their symmetries and relationships to a point it makes difficult to realize what is the whole, and its parts, and what are its forms and functions, but ultimately through the understanding of the ‘isomorphic laws’ of all of them, based in the ternary properties of reality, they can be analyzed in full.
Now, while we will use the terms energy and information in a verbal mode on social and biological sciences, in astrophysics, we prefer to use the mathematical concept of Energy, which we shall call Energetic Information, as the parameter of the 5th dimension that ‘integrates the whole’ constant Tƒ and Sp volume of a system, to equal it with the mathematical formulae, as in E= h(Sp) x ƒ (Tƒ) in the quantum scale or E=nK (Sp) x T(Tƒ) in the thermodynamic scale and E=1/2m(Sp) v² (Tƒ) in the gravitational scale.
A TIME BASED ANALYSIS OF REALITY.
We thus in 5D physics depart from events in time as the fundamental truth, whereas the mind stills the motions into mental pictures. The Universe, we might say is about motion, the mind that perceives it with mental measures and linguistic still maps is about relationships between parts captured as still forms.
A description of reality in terms of time motions is profoundly different that the present description of nature as spatial dimensions; but as stillness is the perception of synchronic motions in time in a pegged mapping during a quanta of ‘spacetime present’ by a frame of reference – so in humans it is a second still picture of reality.
Now this is the relative present of each being. For example, with fast rewinding cameras we can perceive a more detailed spatial form with more information about the motion, or with cameras that show us in digital frames 30 frames per second, we can observe as a continuous motions a series of still frames.
But this relative time present is fundamental to the workings of beings. Indeed, the galactic cycle of 200 million of years implies that the galaxy as a whole will have rhythms of change so slow that an entire process of evolution and extinction of species will have happen on Earth in this period, but every 200 million years, when the galaxy closes its cycle there will be internal changes in the galaxy, and we can then synchronize changes in galactic cycles, in central black holes in stars, in planets, in human beings to those synchronicities.
For example the black hole of the galaxy seems to have an 11year cycle of gravitational waves, which seems tuned with the 11year cycle of magnetic fields and black sunspots, which seems to be tuned to the 11 years cycle of its main planet, Jupiter with its huge magnetic field. It is easy then to imagine that the centered sun, and turning Jupiter orbital membrane, form a system perceived in the stillness of the galactic central informative black hole NOT as a dual point particle but as an Ä system, with the sun and the Jupiter’s membrane.
This becomes reinforced by Kepler’s 3^{rd} law that relates the G constant to the R^{3}/T^{2} relationship between the volume (3 radius) of the Jupiter’s sphere, and its bidimensional time cycle. Further on as gravitational waves have an enormous ‘wave amplitude’, one could consider that this system acts as an antennae to absorb with the magnetic field of both systems, the gravitational wave of energy and information of the black hole. And then we can suggest that the SaturnJupiter pair is the membrane of that system with its rings.
Now all this will likely be consider metaphysical cosmology, for the very obvious reason that we have a 96% of dark matternergy uncertainty, and it shows why is so difficult to convert physics into the fractal paradigm. We simply will never have enough information to make physics a complete description of reality as it is possible to do in biology and social sciences. So the whys are more reasoned, more logic, more organic than the evidence we shall have of it.
The choice is to do physics as it is done today, with only the how, or do philosophy of science with the fractal paradigm based in homologies and scanty data. What it is NOT correct science is the astounding development since the Copenhagen interpretation of fantaphysics (metaphysics with wrong lineal concepts of time, space and the actions of physical systems).
Now how can we build with the generator a better model of the Universe to the one we have? Easy, by respecting the limits of science, which must be experimental, economical and use the iteration of particles self similar to forms of larger spacetimes, to build it without the need of non experienced particles, and trying to respect the symmetries of scale of the fifth dimension, its ternary structures in space, and 3 ages of time.
Thus we do have a model template which is the same for all species and scales to fit the data which must be experienced and construct then a realist model of the Universe.
As a galaxy is also a ternary system, a timespace being, defined by the Fundamental Equation of T.Œ
The ternary generator equation for all systems of the Universe, which written in terms of topological geometries is:
Toroid limbs/fields > ØHyperbolic body/waves < OInformative particlesheads
This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3.
So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a Onucleus, an electrons and a Øhyperbolic bodywave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥electromagnetic waves between them.
Indeed a galaxy will have a central, informative black hole, made of the densest III family of positive top quarks, a halomembrane of negative strangelet quarks, the II family of mass and an intermediate, vital ‘mitochondria’ space of reproductive stars and planets, its bodywave, forming together an spiral organism, which we shall easily show respond to the same mathematical equations derived of the Fractal Generator:
In the graph, a galaxy and its ternary symmetries between the 3 families of quarks and its 3 regions, is similar to an atom, which displays the 3 same symmetries, with a central quark system of maximal density and positive charge, an external, negative electronic membrane and an intermediate region populated by photonic ‘stars’. And to a molecule, which also display the same symmetries in the thermodynamic scale. So we will write with ‘only those 3 topologies of the Universe’ all the systems of the Universe. We shall unify the 3 systems with the same equations of the 5th dimension and its isomorphisms that order all the scales of all beings, according to the symmetries of the 5th dimension, between the 3 fundamental scales of the Universe – the gravitational galaxy, the quantum atom and the molecular worlds of matter.
This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.
The perception in synchronous space of the 3 elements describes a super organism. Its perception in diachronic time, describes a system through its 3 ages of youngentropic maximal lineal motions, iterative, adult age and informative 3rd age of maximal form, dominated by each on those topologies. And you too are one of such systems. The most perfect in as much as it is the better known which should be the model of all of them. Since as Eddington insisted, physicists invent due tot eh quantum paradox of uncertainty many of its concepts, as they are so big that they modify the observable or do not see it (dark energy, matter).
And inversely in the antiquantum paradox of knowledge social scientists are so small compared to the observable, the social power, bankster, or militarypolitico that he yields to power and does not try to build a better world.
So only in the middle biological sciences are not subject to the quantum or Antiquantum paradoxes of uncertainty. In this Eddington was right: man is the measure of all things because it is the thing we better measure.
And so the organic Universe must be compared to our nature, and define the ‘Galacell’ in those synthetic terms as a superorganism of uds, and tbc frozen stars, and then all is simple and evident and far more beautiful that the mathematical description of it alone would convey.
Formalism of Einstein. 4 vector equations.
In classic physics the concept of a world cycle is simplified into a worldline, using lineal time and 4 vector equations, which we will translate in the specific articles of the 4th line.
What those 4vectors show truly is a series of Sp=C/Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, maximal, minimal and steady points of the 3 ages and symmetries between space and time. Albeit the time 3 ages/motions are integrated into a single lineal time duration and loose most of its meaning. So for each of those 4 vector equations, its fundamental S≈T symmetry must be studied departing from spacetime symmetries. That’s all.
The relationship of time and space in those vectors is thus just one of essential balance and symmetry between the 3 vectorial dimensions of space and the 3 ages of time, sequentially added by duration.
Another expression common to mathematical physics are relations between the fundamental parameter of lineal motion, speed, and cyclical motion, density of an scalar, whose product is the flux of a quantity.
All these equations of dynamics require a specific analysis of which dimensions are seen as dimensions/distances/areas/ volumes/membranes/topological forms and which one are seen as time, motions, rotary or lineal or wavelike motion, and so a lot of conceptual analysis on how the human observer quantity a given spacetime symmetry and its dimensions/parameters of motion/distance is needed.
Yet there are generic models, which allow us to extract clear formulae of combination of motions and forms in the construction of being. The 3rd dimension of pure form or volume, for example is obtained through the layer accumulation of bidimensional, think membranes along a gradient of accelerated time vortices, from relative max. S x Min. T past upper layers to inner ones, as density increases.
This new ‘dimension of motion and form’, is thus a dual dimension which intersects with the membrane and creates a 4 dimensional ‘vector’, whereas however it should be considered the existence of two densities of form, the gradient towards the center and zero point and the motions within one of the perpendicular, ‘normal’ layers or planes of space, along the time, integrative gradient direction of the vortex.
Recap.
Now all this is just a teaser of an immensely wide field –the underrating of the worldcycles of physical systems, and it shows merely that for a full analysis of energy information transfers to thermodynamic systems of that scale we would have to consider:
 Its 3 specific time ages; Seenergeticgaseous field age, ST, reproductive waveliquid age and informative particlesolid age.
 Its symmetry in space, ordering them as 3 varieties of 2manifolds (expansive gas, laminar liquid, spherical solid).
 But also 5D asymmetries, of transfer of energy and information with its 2 lower ∆scales, the ¥rays and electric scales which will also be influenced by its 3 ages (TƒParticles, STwaves and Sefields) and finally its upper ∆scales (gravitational forces and mechanical motions, which transfer heat to the lower thermodynamic scale.
 And study those states in both directions, from gas to solid and solid to gas, as both are fully reversible. Since all physical world cycles, are reversible, unlike biological systems, in which due to the predominance of the arrow of information, there is a clear asymmetry in favor of the temporalinformative arrow, balanced through the constant process of present reproduction, far less common in physical systems which prefer to maintain its immortality, to reverse the time cycle.
 Besides the obvious need to clarify and translate the spooky terminology of quantum physics to T.œ.
Well yes, a lot of work, but hopefully before the end of the world humans or robots will streamline all this, so future generations can truly feel the pantheist Universe, be humble and feel part of the whole.
So let us start easy and analyze with those asymmetric 5D arrows and 3 parameters of reality, space, time and the 5th dimension, the meaning of the 3 parameters of mechanics, which are not surprisingly enough space, time and… not the 5th dimension but a scalar called mass.
SISOMORPHISMS.
36: NETWORKS AND SPECIES.
Networks and social classes: ∆1:fields>∆waves>∆+1particles.
Waves and Universal Constants of Action: Present, Sp x Tƒ systems.
Physicists found that space is made of quanta with energy, of ‘Planckton’, minimal units of ‘energy and time’, which gather together into light waves: E x T = h, but they invented a very strange ‘thing’ called the Heisenberg principle of probability, to unexplain the most obvious truth: that the minimal entity of our perceived Universe is a Planckton constant, with a variety of species according to their life time (T) and their energy expenditure (E).
So all what they measured further on was made of Plancktons. The same would happen in biology, they would find the minimal unit to be a cell (a Plankton in the sea), and so all would be made of cells. The same would happen in sociology: humans found all societies to be made of ‘human citizens’, the minimal unit of any human endeavor.
Then de Broglie found that all physical ‘quanta’ had a bodywave and a headparticle as they move over an energy field. He had found the simplest organism of nature, which we will see is isomorphic to all the similar organisms of different size of the Universe:
[Sp (lineal field) < EI – wave < Tƒ: Spherical Particle of information]û±1
And so he wrote the simple equation: λ (wave) x P (particle with momentum ) = H (Planckton)
They called it the Principle of Complementarity waveparticle, but they didn’t understand it as a vital spacetime being, so they explain it with abstract weird thought – as a mathematical entelechy, which makes no sense at all. They do NOT see as ‘le petit prince’ did, the elephant behind the abstract line, drawn by their equations. They just see a line. And we shall return to the elephant parable soon.
Now those Œ are ‘static, pointparticles’ that share information and energy among them, from their relative static points of view, as the Universe has infinite relative frames of reference (this is one of the great findings of physics that still applies to 5D systems: the principle of relativity). It means that œs command a territorial region, in which they have an internal structure of 3 subparts, but also are in an outer bigger world in which they communicate with their œs on the upper ∆+1, equal ∆ and lesser ∆1 scales, giving origin to a fundamental ‘second postulate’ of ¬æ. It those œ are fractal points (first postulate), called fermions crystals, solids, stars and black holes, they will then communicate ‘bosons, liquid flows, electromagnetic, sound or liquid waves or electronic current or jets of matter between them:
FutureTƒ<≈Present wavefield≈> Future Tƒ, giving origin to the second component of physical systems. And again in each scale we will recognize a relative present state with similar properties and symmetries in each scale.
So those flows of communication gives origin to the certain modes of ‘present’, reproductive waveliquid states in each scale. So in essence bosons, waves, liquids, electric currents and jets and streams of cosmic matter and stars reproduced by black holes are in each scale the same wave fields.
What is then the main parameter of the relationship between the Sp, Tƒ and ST elements of each of those scales. Simply the constants of spacetime actions that relate in the simplest possible form, those 3 elements the Metric of the 5^{th} dimension:. K = E x T. That is the constants of Action of Physics, in its 3 scales K (H)= E x T, (quantum field) K (k) = E x T (Thermodynamic Field); K (M)= E x (µ^{1}/e).
Those 3 constants of action, the Planck constant, H, the Boltzmann Constant, K, and the mass Constant, M, are the fundamental elements which define the 3 planes of physical systems in the 5^{th} dimension (quantum, thermodynamic and cosmological planes). Thus their translation into the simplex Metric of 5D physics is the first step to build the entire building of Physical sciences, with a comprehensive understandable, isomorphic formalism, which will return physics to the realm of reality and show the pantheist equality between all the systems of the Universe.
Now we have to a fundamental theme of reality, the constancy of present body waves of existence, through its reproductive actions, which will be deal with when we revise relativity. But we advance is the key to understand ‘what formal motions’, the substance of the Universe truly mean, and how the interaction between form and motion, in the case of waves, frequency and form.
In the graph, each system is in fact 10 dimensional, when we take the concept of dimension in mathematical terms as a structural parameter of the being – its 3 scales in 5D, 3 spatial parts and 3 time ages, plus the Œ point focus of its æ,e, ï,œ,û actions, which will further add new dimensions as we observe then the ‘œpoint’ in its interaction with ‘external worldbeings’ through several planes of existence. Yes, the beauty of the Universe resides in its complex simplicity and the web of relationships of each part with its wholes.
Yet NEVER humans do explain the WHOLE but just a part and often in physical sciences where the œ studied is far removed (Max. ï distance from the human observer), reduce the study to a single perspective, often the most degrading, from the lower ∆1 point of view and from the æction of motions). This is a tiresome human egotrip of onedimensional scholars who spend their life to prove that their perspective IS the only one that matters, (one of the reasons I abandoned the field earlier in my life, ‘evil=antilife memes’ and ‘stupid=onedimensional memes’ define most humans I found in ‘existence’).
Yet the proper analysis might be shrunk according to the importance of those 4 elements eliminating by this order: the 5 actions of the Œpoint (maximal external point of view, which removes also the ‘will’ of the being); the 5D ±1 Planes above and below (social world and cellular/quanta point of view), the temporal ages from conception to extinction, focusing on the Adult maximal reproductive, present age (limiting the widest temporal zerosum point of view to a quanta of present time), and finally the Spfield/limbs & Tƒhead/particle point f view, focusing on its bodywave central part).
Thus if we want to reduce the essence of a phenomenon to a single cause though we must choose that which is the ‘central’ Œssence of the system: its present, bodywave, individual plane of the being since it is the most evident perspective. In the case of physical entities, this is a PRESENT wave in reproductive motion, (‘female’ balanced perspective). So quantum physicist in the perspectives of physical entities focused on the waveparticle duality, observing from the human removed p.o.v. the reproductive motion of the Spfield>STwave<TƒParticle, its fundamental perspective, (left side).
The phenomenon is fascinating because it illustrates many of the properties of 5D ST reality and deals directly with the oldest logic paradoxes – today largely forgotten on the ‘computerized age of science’ when the mere feeding of mathematical models to mentalmachines by ‘human beeworkers’ summarizes science: what is the meaning of motion? This paradox never resolved since Parmenides affirmed the point of view of the particle – motion is NOT possible, only form exists, and Zeno proved it with its paradoxes (Achilles and the turtle, the motion of the arrow; while Heraclitus considered the point of view of the Wave – motion is constant as the particleegoinformative fixed point does NOT exist).
On the other hand the informative point of view of the particle, dominating the wave and using it to guide its motion, was foreseen by Einstein and developed by De Broglie, with its idea of a pilot wave. They were the 2 pioneers of the field (De Broglie developed the first mathematical particlewave equations); and yet both were ignored. Instead the perspectives today considered are, not surprisingly!, the ego paradox and mathematical abstract model (Germanic idealist Copenhagen interpretation), and the energetic lineal degrading point of view (waves and particles as ‘excitations’ of the energy of the ∆1 field – Feynman’s perspective.)
Let us then consider the perspectives we have to consider in more detail, the fields, which indeed provide the energy for the evolution of waves and particles, but are not the decisive element.
3rd age: Spacetime membranes as the center: Einstein’s 4th dimensional paradigm.
Now to understand the next paradigm that precedes the new paradigm of the 5^{th} dimension we must understand Einstein’s work with a critical view as we have done with all other points of view, being aware though that modern science believes in Einstein with the same zeal that they believed in Galileo, Copernicus, Yahweh and the tribe of the Goths before him.
And so as many religious or tribal people of German, Jewish, Christian or Muslim denominations will have already emotionally abandoned this page, many scientists will not even consider the 5th paradigm. Believers don’t reason. They don’t have patience. Their hypothalamus as science proves jumps out attention and memory when it enters in conflict with beliefs.
Still of course there are people who reason and so now we ask you to concentrate because here is where new knowledge must come first for you to understand a critical view of modern physics and their myths and beliefs.
Consider all what we have said. Basically we are moving our point of view from smaller to wider points of view, but when we have a point of view, that point of view is still, quiet, fixed in a center. And this relative ‘fixed’ point of view is important to understand Einstein’s theory.
Minds are still: Information can only be obtained with a fixed point of view.
Why we need a fixed point of view? Easy, because to measure and perceive we need to focus and be still to observe details. If you take a picture of a fast moving object is blurry. If you try to perceive the details of a fast moving object you will not be able to do it. This happens because knowledge gathers information and information is ‘form’. But form is the opposite of motion. In the Universe all what you see around is form with motions.
This is very important to grasp. Look around. What you perceive is only 2 things often combined: Forms of information and energy motions. And actions of beings that combine motion and form.
And both things have opposite properties. The less motion the more form you observe, the higher motion the less form you observe. But knowledge is form, information. So to create knowledge you must depart from a relative, fixed point of view.
And so that is why you do not see the Earth moving but fixed. This is how nature has given you a capacity to observe with your mind reality as still, with form.
You need a pov to create a certain scientific truth. But the larger the p.o.v. the bigger the truth. So the center has moved but each new age of science have kept a relative still point of view. You must create a still center to measure, because perception happens in stillness, as opposed to energy, which expresses itself with motion. Information focuses form and it must be still as Buddha was in the tree of knowledge.
So when Galileo came the earth moved and the new still p.o.v. Was the sun.
And when Darwin came the idea that man had not evolved, changed but had always been still, the same form created by God per in secula seculorum moved and now the new ‘still p.o.v.’ of biology where the immutable laws of evolution.
Now this allows you to understand the limits of Einstein’s paradigm. Since what Einstein did is to create a new still point of view that could not be changed. It was no longer the Earth, it was not the sun. It was not even man or evolution. What was the new still point of view from where Einstein would take his rods of measure?
LIGHT!
Einstein defined a Universe with a new point of view, the speed of light, which would remain constant from any perspective.
But why light?
Light seems an esoteric center. What makes light so essential to our view of the Universe, as to permit ‘measures’ that seem to be more accurate to our mind?
We must now give you the first upgrade on Einstein’s work by affirming that light IS the substance of the space we perceive with our eyes. And that is why from the perspective of our mind, which is what you are truly observing – not the full Universe and its exact objective measures, but the peculiar rod of your eyes and any other electronic mechanical device that absorbs light – light IS space.
Indeed, you do not see reality in its totality, but light and so what you call space is lightspace. And when you use an instrument, made to the image and likeness of our mind, you see lightspace too.
But if you were a dog smelling the Universe, your mind mapping and distances would be different.
We are though an I=eye and for that reason our mathematical mind and lightspace has 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimensions (the so called electric, magnetic and ray directions of light, which are perpendicular), which are the same dimensions of your perceived space.
Thus, what really Einstein did was to consider a larger point of view that the sun, the entire space of the Universe.
The center now had moved to every point of the Universe, and this allowed Einstein to say that all motions and points of view were relative, only spacelight was a fixed background that didn’t change.
But he still established as a rod of measure of the other variable, time, the human clock; and so here, there were no advances on the objectivity of the point of view. ‘Time is what a clock measures’ he said.
Einstein did NOT change the point of view of the human clock, reason why Landau laughed at him saying that with his system he just had to ‘look at his watch to eliminate the uncertainty of time’ .
And so it IS in his understanding of time, where Einstein as most physicists before, had failed to expand the point of view. And it is where the 5th dimension will open up our objective view of the Universe, by defining in a more complex manner the meaning of time clock and consider the existence of many of them in the Universe.
IN essence, what we want now to consider is the isomorphism between the 2 main time clocks of the Universe, according to the relative scales of the 5th dimension: the time clocks of the quantum scales, ‘charges’, and the time clocks of the cosmological scales ‘masses’.
Between them, of course there is a 3rd type of time clocks ‘thermodynamic molecules’, whose temperature define the variations of speed of those time clocks, but being the thermodynamic ∆o scale, the human scale, we do have a lot of information about those time clocks, so physicists are sophisticated enough to understand them. They do NOT understand however masses and charges, reason why they have been for 100 years trying to unify them the wrong way – without understanding they are TIME CLOCKS of different scales, of different ‘curvature’ and speed, and so they need the metric of the 5th dimension to unify their parameters.
So simple and so mysterious for a century because we lacked the proper ‘heliocentric’ perspective – an essential dimension of reality.
Again it is important to notice the scalar nature of the Universe, as the two limits of our perception while influencing our world, are NOT in our world, that is the HPlanck, the uncertain limit in the below scale and the top quark, the dark matter in the above scale, since systems do have a symmetry that adapts them on the 3 levels such as:
1>Oo…
That is, the HPlanck as a Planckton, as a To of the lower ‘neutrino scale’ is NOT visible to us, it is the uncertain limit, but we can perceive it as an 1 quanta of energy of the electron scale where perception starts, as the To time clock of our Universe. It does appear in our equations despite being the constant of action we do not distinguish ‘alone’. On the other limit, the clock of mass, the top quark with its faster speed of time, is neither perceived, nor its boson of dark energy, the Hfields and particle. But we can perceive its influence in the Mach’s rotary inertia of the galaxy and its leftchirality, transmitted to our particles (which die as antiparticles with right chirality).
Thus the certain human word is reduced to a few parameters:
cspeed the constant of spacetime speed
echarge, the constant of time
k Bolt the constant of energy density
And Q the constant of information density:
Sp (c ) <(Ek: S/T) x I (Q: T/S) >Tƒ (e^{–})
In the graph, the key equation that started quantum physics in which most of the constants of our world appear. It is the equation of radiation of a black body.
This is the ‘Constant World’ In which we live, exist, and perceive, which is ultimately made of light spatial entropy and electronic Temporal Form in which our present actions of energy and information are regulated by Thermodynamic temperature.
It is encased in a larger world of strong forces and gravitational forces, which however hardly affects us; and beyond it into the Dark world of Top quark, its superluminal hyperforces, and its superluminal Higgs fields and bosons, which we can now theoretically by isomorphisms but it is totaling alien to us unless we bring it here in our accelerators to devour and destroy our world.
Of all those elements and parameters of the standard model and classic physics, the only element which I have not yet fully inserted due to some contradictor properties, namely its spin, which makes it seem a fermion when its speed would make it seem a boson is the neutrino, of which we will speak in due term. It seems that its most clear role is to be a partner or half ‘component’ of light, forming together a spacetime broken symmetry as the electroweak force also forms a spacetime broken symmetry, themes those to explore fully on the 4^{th} line.
9,10 ∆§±¡: FRACTAL SCALES
The subdisciplines by PLANES.
Thus once, we have defined the basic elements of GST, we shall in this post merely study the barebones of GST applied to physics, namely the three ages of time in physics, its main scales and equations of transition between scales, and a far review of the isomorphisms (equal laws of all systems) applied to them, with a basic analysis of those scales in 4 line sub posts dedicated to:
 Mathematical physics, considering the GST interpretation of the main equations of physics AND the evolution of mathematics into its proper nonaristotelian ternary logic of three time arrows and fractal structures of noneuclidean scalar space.
 Thermodynamics (dealing with the human ∆º scales)
 Astronomy (dealing with the ∆+1 gravitational scale)
 Quantum physics (dealing the ∆1 electromagnetic scale).
 0 scale: ∆st: Relational spacetime, isomorphic laws that apply to all scale and ‘evolved’ nonÆ mathematics reflects better.
∆±3,2: the galaxy atom
Next we enter into our Island Universe, which we can duly observe and compare inside out – the ∆3 scale of atoms and the ∆+3 scale of galaxies. And the interesting ∆±i ‘Tduality’ (string jargon) here, is that as we are inside the galaxy, we can observe the inside of the atom, which we cannot really see, by comparing its selfsimilarity in the fractal Universe with the inside of the galaxy of which we do have a lot of experimental evidence; and we can compare the outside of the atom, which we can see (electromagnetic entropic space) with the outside of the galaxy (dark entropy space), which we can see, provided with the realisation that scales in the Tdualities are very similar but not necessarily (open question for philosophy of science, or ‘metaphysics’) equal.
So in this scale we find the strongest experimental evidence ALSO to fill up the gaps of the ∆±4 scale.
Those scales are the cosmic and gravitational scales studied by astronomy on the large world and by quantum physics on the small world.
We though can now do further ‘scaling’ and subdivide for more detailed analysis all the elements, parts, subparts and 10decametric sub§cales of the galaxyatom as physicists do, in different quantum, electromagnetic, atomic and subatomic analysis.
∆±2: Subparts of the galaxyatom.
As a general rule the parts of a whole are obviously a ‘digit less’ in ∆scales, comprehending a myriad of little elements, but grossly divided as usual in a t±s:membrane/singularity system and a t x s : vital space, enclosed between them.
For this scale they will be the black hole/nucleon world, and the electron/strangelet outer halo, and in between the star/electromagnetic light space we live in.
The top quark black hole
So this new ‘Tduality’, should exist between the inner atom nuclei and the black hole nuclei of galaxies, which we have partially UNIFIED quantitatively with the Unification equation of scales, that shows the black hole galaxy is indeed equivalent in its Schwartzchild radius to the radius of the proton and hence the black hole nuclei of the galaxy should be positive, hence should be a top quark star, as only top quarks are ++ and heavy enough to be the hylomorphic cutoff substance on them.
This IS the Einstein’s hypothesis of the nature of black hole as top quark frozen stars, which he said was the only way he would believe in black holes – but as top quarks were not found in his lifetime he always remained skeptic of them. Of course, the Einstein’s hypothesis render false and a mere mathematical inflationary theory with zero experimental proof and zero theoretical value, the socalled Hawking’s theory of evaporation of black holes.
To make black holes we just need to make a lot of top quarks, product of the Higgs decay in particle physics or the evolution of mass into its III ‘old age of maximal density of information’, which can be achieved in accelerators that therefore will make them when enough energy is compressed to evolve lighter quarks at CERN. And they will NOT evaporate, but grow exponentially as all seeds do till eating us the planet, what can i say?
In any case for the same reasons the Tdualities in those subparts will be between negative strangelet halos of galaxies (Witten’s hypothesis proposed by one of the string theorists) and electrons, also negative in atoms. And then between the light spacetime in between and its particle states as photons, and the galactic stars ad its electromagnetic radiation at galactic scale or..
∆±i≈Tduality photon≈star.
The field of ∆±2 scaling thus is necessarily huge, but for the sake of simplicity and comprehension of the larger ∆st picture and its isomorphic laws, we just consider in more detail as the key secondary scale, according to the general rule that considers the main task of ∆st to understand the role of man in the Universe, NOT the inner region of atoms (strong forces, quarks, dark world) which is despite the huge sums spent in risky experiments (CERN’s LHC) to explore it, the much more important, less uncertain, better understood and closely related to the electronic mind of humans and machines, world of light at the ∆i scale and stars at the ∆+1 side.
Again the understanding of those dualities is scanty in present physics – curiously enough denied in black holes, as funny mathematical tools for weirdo theories, which physicists, ‘digital robots’ operating equations of maths they do not fully understand, so much love to do.
The most developed are those of string theory and some work has been done on the galaxyatom, also by Einstein, whose relativity in fact used to simplify calculus models of Hydrogen atoms as Galaxies, from where most results of general relativity at cosmological level were made; and of lately a lot of modelling of stars as photons, specially in the dense region close to the centre of the galaxy has been done, also with excellent results. If we ad the previous Unification equation of charges and masses obtained from this Tduality it seems more than proved.
So ∆2,3 will be the quantum, electromagnetic scale studied by quantum physics, which as usual best applies to electronic/light phenomena where it was found (expansions to all other elements of physics and even the human universe, with weirdo wrong egotist Copenhagen interpretations must be partially corrected, or taken to the Tussaud museum of monstrous things 🙂
This scale thus connects also at •level of interpretations with the digital, visual ∆0humind view, which is the selfcentred linguistic frame of reference of visual, Euclidean perpendicular dimensions of a cartesian (graph) in mathematical physics.
As our spacetime is 3D perpendicular euclidean light spacetime. And so an interesting mental deduction when widening the abstract reductionism of the human egocentered mind, which uses those cartesian frame of reference, only to study the ‘locomotion’ of physical species far removed from our ∆st nature, is to consider the mental aspects of particles, specially photons and its ∑photon=electron, social grouping in orbitals.
Since if our mind is just a bunch of electrons, which are a bunch of photons, and physical systems obey laws of mathematical, euclidean frames of reference is because quantum physical systems have particlelike points≈singularities that command the systems with sentient, vital properties.
And this of course will be a huge field of research – to explain physical events as the product of the vital actions of its atomic and subatomic systems, expressed in the four quantum numbers that describe their energy feeding (principal), information gauging (azimuthal) reproduction (spin couples) and social evolution (magnetic number).
And so this lead us to the final scale of physical systems, the:
∆º±1: human, thermodynamic scale.
This is our scale, because it is the scale of life, of cellular activity, and the scale of our larger, immediate geological world, and as such by far the more important, and the one that should be used as Einstein wanted to model statistical quantum mechanics once the basic correction of describing it with a single time arrow is solved.
So we bring back again the real three time arrows of this scale and its ±1 plasma origin and finale, just in case you haven’t got through the infinite repetitions of your brain,t eh fact that entropy only theories merely took laws that apply ONLY to gaseous entropic state, disregarded the liquid, balanced and solid, informative states of matter, and on top alas, hyperbolically extended those laws to all scales and cosmologies, giving birth to the absurd bigbang theory, and concepts about a dying universe, where disorder and chaos is the best possible and only future state of reality.
According to the rule that close scales are better observed, hence its laws more accurately the task thus IS inverse to that of weirdo quantum physics: to streamline with thermodynamic homologies as quantum pilottheory does, the philosophy of science of the quantum world today in egotist ‘mood’ into the realism of thermodynamics.
The purpose of the rest of this post thus is to clearly define each scale of the physical Universe in its spacequanta, time frequencies and energetic momenta, world cycles, and mind singularities, to fully make a GST description of physical systems.
Yet in that process we must always be aware of that º∆ ‘mental element’ or human bias and languages that distort – specially in entropyonly physics – the perception of those systems – and the existence of an alternative, organic topological ternary description of its parts, functions and actions, based in the program of survival of all physical systems, as we have shown to be the case for the quantum numbers of physics.
So after making a fast review of each scale in terms of the classic laws of physics, we shall consider from a hardcore full GST development, the isomorphic 12 sets of laws that apply the subdivide by the ternary rule, the properties of the four parts of all beings, •languages/minds, ∆scales, Space and time (4 x 3=12 sets of laws) to all those scales. This is the four line of the fullblown site, where we consider according to the previous naming, the ∆4 dark world, ∆3 light world and so on till getting the Tduality (string jargon for ∆±i dualities) of the ∆+4 cosmic world.
Indeed, while we will expand astrophysical sciences with a synthetic, biotopological description of physical ∆ºust of spacetime it is important to praise and remember the enormous quality of the mathematical mirrorimage obtained in physical systems. We criticise physicists for its worldly profession (to make weapons of entropic destruction) and the bias included by this lineal love of ballistics regarding the arrows of time, but this should not confuse the reader. So far the most evolved of all stiences are biology and physics, and while biology is more accurate and describes many topobiological characteristics it does also have some hang ups of reductionism in its love of entropic=chaotic visions where darwinian fight of individuals and despise of the social evolution arrow of the fifth dimension weight heavily.
Mathematical physics on the other hand is the biggest, more complex logic structure built up by man, which does not ceases to astonish me, not so much for human ingenuity but for Universal perfection. It does require though to improve enormously due to those timespace errors and limiting understanding of its dimensions of entropy, energy and information, an the cause mathematical equations selfcentred in physical povs, centres of mass, crystal structures, particlepoint states, the conceptual frame of abstract physics.
∆±¡
4D: ∂: PHYSICAL ENTROPY
The arrow of entropy, expansive space and disorder, only acts in the scale of temperatures of the Universe, as it was defined studying Gas – by definition, the entropic, expansive arrow of temperature; inverse to the arrow of crystal solids, or cold temperatures that in fact reduces the entropy of a system.
So entropy is really the expansive, disordered, ‘lineal, spatial’ arrow of temperature. While symmetry, crystal formation is the cold, implosive, ordered arrow.
In terms of mathematical physics it means to dilate the spatial simultaneity (different paths) and reduce the temporal causality (Markowian statistical processes, without memory, as each quanta of time is non related to the next one0. Thus entropy IS clearly the inverse function of informative vortices, where causality in the cyclical motion towards the centre of the vortex is absolute.
So not even in the realm of temperature entropy is a Universal phenomena as physicists, specially those dedicated to manufacture weapons and make big explosions want us to believe (nuclear physicists with its big bang theories are the meaning of it all, the heirs of Galileo with his lineal concepts of time, physicists making transport machines and weapons, which are the ones that found the concept of entropy and then decided to expand it to everything else).
The problem is ‘military physics’ have all the power. So physicists of solid states; philosophers of science; theorists of information, evolutionary biologists and all those other people who study all the other clocks of time, and information processes of the Universe have not so much impact.
Entropy, the arrow of disorder that erases information, the arrow of order.
“I thought of calling it “information”, but the word was overly used, so Von Neumann told me, “You should call it entropy, nobody knows what entropy really is. So in a debate you will always have the advantage.”
Von Neumann to Shannon, father of Information Theory.
Since I was a kid, what call my attention on the Intelligent Universe were those ‘big concepts’, starting by Energy, Information, Space and Time, which are the widest concepts of reality. And found many obvious errors in the way humans tried to IMPOSE their opinions, gadgets and machines to the Universe.
So the first human, mechanical bias is the way we measure time. We do NOT use any longer as we used to do the cyclical rhythms of nature, but the mechanical clock, and try to reduce all the cycles of nature to that mechanical clock and its steady state one second rhythm. And we pretend that is the ‘absolute time rhythm and only one of the Universe!
This is akin to the old ways of astronomers who tried to impose to the Universe the frame of reference of the Earth as its center. It does work despite its bias, so with complicated cycles you can explain it all, from the point of view of the Earth, but calculations become very complex with epicycles and extant, etc.
So happens when you do NOT use the clocks of Nature, which soon will be defined here. Physics does work but it is overall very complicated when dealing with different time rhythms, and one century after Einstein found there are many such time rhythms and some change its speed there is zero understanding of this.
We just put some ‘new epicycles’ called Lorentz Transformations, but since we are stuck to our ethnocentric clock, as old astronomers to their earthcentric world, the explanations are blurred. Men merely try to feed the Universe onto their ‘time view’ or rather mechanical view of time. And the Universe is much ore complex and rich in clock rhythms than that.
Indeed, why we Humans use a mechanical clock with an artificial rhythm to measure time; If the Universe has infinite rhythms? It is just an ego trip and the worship of machines that characterize the western civilization. Thus when the Brits got to China to sell their ware, was the answer of Tao=time masters: why we want to buy your ugly mechanical clocks if we can observe the Universe with its clocks of nature, its cyclical rhythms? Obviously, the mechanical clock with its single steady state time cycle IS a human artifact.
Time did exist before mechanical clocks with his own rhythms. Its own Universal time clocks. The mechanical clock is NOT a Universal time clock. So the use of this human clock to measure all the time clocks of the Universe bias our concepts of time, and ‘hides’ the clocks of nature. So the next fundamental question in our search for proper definitions of time, entropy and black holes becomes obvious:
– What are the true clocks of nature? And once we find how Nature measure its cyclical time frequencies, we shall wonder are those rhythms of time stable, steady state rhythms as those of our mechanical clocks, or they change rhythms, have different ‘time speeds? And how they measure information and create it, as opposed to the creation of disorder and entropy? And which of those concepts order or disorder dominates the Universe?
The beats of lineal vs. cyclical stillness and motion, give us its natural 4 combinations:
 Lineal motion, lineal form, cyclical motion, cyclical form, which we shall call generically:
 Entropy or ‘kinetic energy’ (lineal motion), space (lineal form).
 time (cyclical motion) and information (cyclical form).
Those 2 forms then combine into all possible spacetime membranes, and so the iterative game of creation starts in earnest.
Further on, we can consider each dual system with a lineal and cyclical limb/field particle/head, to be able to ‘change’ its state, from relative lineal motion in which the limbs and fields interact with the outer world translating in space the system and relative still, cyclical motion/form where the system perceives. This beat of ‘day and night’, energy and form, motion and stillness thus translates into the dynamic, topological transformations of living beings.
Entropy confused with energy.
In that regard, lineal entropy is completely accessory, the disordered ‘gaseous’, purely spatial (without temporal causality), expansive state of pure motion without information, in which all systems end up and can be equated to death or erasing of information – including today our societies returned to a dogeatdog selfie, fastmoving state are – not death in the usual perception of lack of motion, as the Universe started in pure motion, so paradoxically death is a return to a pure motion state.
So a first look at entropy is required as the state of expansive space, which happens when the Tiƒ singularity, of maximal form that orders the system does NOT exist and so the system lives in a disordered state.. in a nonmemorial, noncausal ‘Markowian’ process – the technical name to memoriless realities in which what happens at each quanta of time matters not in the next one, as information is not conserved:
When the • singularity dies , all the system looses information and becomes disordered, and so it is proper of states that lack ‘informative vortices’, masses and charges, or eddies of thermodynamic flows, such as gaseous states, dark entropy between galaxies or ‘quantum fields’ in the realist Pilotwave theory, studied in detail in the fourth line.
In that regard, the less advanced concept of time in physics, which still hangs on despite Feynman and Einstein is the idea of a dying entropic Universe.
This concept of ‘entropy’ as the only future arrow of time, or death arrow of expansive disorder, obtained in XIX c. studies of expansive gas, is completely outdated even by the standards of modern physics.
Unfortunately cosmologists have expanded that arrow to the entire universe, because they don’t care to understand conceptually, ‘Feynmanstyle’, Einstein and his findings: that ‘time curves space into accelerated vortices of massinformation’ in galaxies, which balance the entropic arrow of expansive space between galaxies (hence both arrows as in E<=>Mc² , the fundamental equation of time.
Entropy pure motion will then be the base from where all other forms will rise to transform motion – that is the concept which is behind all mathematical equations of all systems, and so entropy ‘as a ratio’ parameter will always have more speed that the other two components of the system.
ENTROPIC POTENTIALS, FEEDING WAVE MOTIONS… AND SINGULARITIES
The study of potentials as the fourth dimension of physical systems has as all elements a Kaleidoscopic view. They are the source of motion, within the astrophysical realm. But of them we only see the trajectory of motion of the particle, so they can be treated in less dimensions, in fact as the single string, which the waving of information transforms into a 2D element. But in its complete form they are 4D systems, susceptible to be treated with a lineal time dimension and 3 dimensions of ’emptylineal space’, which is its canonical analysis with differential equations such as the Poisson or Laplace equation (∇(x,y,z,t)=r).
What is its ultimate meaning? I like to think of it in Newtonian’s metaphysical terms as the ‘plenum, or body of vacuum space’ whose geometry shows the form of ‘God’, that is a given plane of the scalar Universe. So Poisson’s gradient is the body of the galactic light space on which all other ‘microentities’ coexist.
In the graph, the new ‘foundational equation of speed’ for the fractal paradigm: V=Spacedistance/Temporal Information, is embedded in relativity and recognised in the concept that the speed of light is really a limit of speed of transmission of ‘human perceivable’ information.
Wave motion is also reproduction of form in the lower ∆1 scale of action at distance (gravitation, quantum potential). Thus even motion is reproduction of form as a wave of information over a simpler scale of spacetime. It solves the paradox of a Achiles – the wave reproduces its form in a series of discontinuous steps. It also explains why indeed the Universe is a fractal that reproduces as all fractals do, its form in a lower scale of reality which then reproduces into a wavetrain that collapses into a particle (physical systems), or a seed that emerges after palingenesis into an ambulatory trillion cells systems (biological systems), or into an idea or patent of an instrument that a companymother of machines will re=produce in socioeconomical systems.
Indeed, when we consider as Steane wanted a Universe from the perspective of ‘information’ and its ‘conserved present momentums and energies’, it all becomes simple and philosophically obvious. And so we just must explains the laws of reproduction of information along scales of reality to describe the ‘world cycles’ of existence, no longer worldlines – that is the motions across scales of the fifth dimension, which define all systems of nature.
Yet to fully understand how reproduction of form takes place, we need to understand reproduction across ‘scales’ of size. That is, the meaning of world cycles, just explained, as they require motion from a seminal seed ∆1, into a larger scale; as opposed to what physicists study with their reductionist model of a single spacetime continuum: worldlines.
The question of light motion as a wave and the particle state as an informative collapsed point in stillness brings though as always in stience when solving a paradox – in this case the paradox of motion new questions.
If motion is reproduction of information along a path of entropy, which is ‘warped into form’ emerging in a series of scales of ∆wholeness, so when you move your hand, you are actually recreating all your scales above invisible gravitation – creating a wave of electronic light that travels very slow as it reproduces your system, the first question is: how many scales are in the Universe for motion to happen at all? The scales cannot be infinite or reproduction of information will be eternal. But the question is misleading, since a wave does not really move but transmits a series of vibrations to particles that are already there, in a dense ‘medium’.
This brings the question of ‘ether’, of ‘substance or form in space’ over ‘motion in time’. As many other open questions which we shall treat in other posts on depth, we just enunciate them in this introduction. Enough to say that science is not written into stone but an evolving concern, so relativity is not a dogma, but an interpretation, which was good enough in its moment and we shall expand further.
In practical terms the key way to understand t.œs is with multidimensional thought. The solution adopted by Einstein and Bohr was pure idealism of the Hilbert school – there is no substance, no reference, all is virtual language, mathematical thought.
But physical systems as all systems are dominant in present states, signified in physics by waves. Waves carry both entropic motion and cyclical form and as such are the natural present, reproductive, e > iƒ element of reality, whereas we use e and i for entropy & energy (max. e x min. i) information (max. f x min. e).
Systems that take and give entropy and form, become then energy systems able to communicate and start the building of larger scales of the fifth dimension.
The dominance of present thus stays within the game and provokes the constant reproduction of motion along scales.
The inverse view: how masses become entropy, descending in ∆scales and dimensional form.
But as always in 5D³ we need multiple perspectives on the being. So we wonder, how the inverse ‘destruction’ of a vortex of timespace happens, NOT in algebraic form (M<c²), but in topological dimensions, a more general case of application to all vortices – and the answer is simple: through the reduction of ‘dimensions of distanceform’ into its equivalent (Galilean paradox) dimensions of motionacceleration, proving that both ARE equivalent, expressed in the fact that ‘G, K’ are both constants of curvature and constants of acceleration… (and constant of the speed of feeding and transmit ions of information from the entropic view, so c²=4π k/µ).
And so we write the inverse ‘view’ of the destruction and lowering of scale of an informative, physical vortex as an inverse partial Generator equation:
∆+1 Mass (Tiƒ) < ∆STc ² < ∆1: $pe: 4πk/µ
Electrostatics, a simple case of mathematical physics to illustrate entropic potentials in all planes.
LET US illustrate the case considering a first insight on the combination of a complex ∆s≈t view of mathematical physics which deals with ‘dimensionality’ to establish the 3 ‘arrows of timespace’ in the different ‘views’ of the mathematical humind (topological bidimensional or three dimensional forms and even more complex 6D tensors, or simpler 3 D of spacetime, x,y,z) of the 3 different parts of the being, given the simplicity of the electrostatic equations, which work in 3 Sx,y,z and ignore time motion now that we have talked of potentials, the ∆2 plane of an organism of physics.
As such potentials provide minimal information to the humind, not because its scale has no form but because we ONLY extract motion of it, by PROVOKING entropic destruction of the ‘feeding’ energy of the potential, whatever it is. And this shows by a double differentiation, in which the particle’s informative density differentiates=lowers a plane to the wavefield, which lowers a plane of dimensional information to the potential field.
This is obviously a case of the generator: ∆1 Potential > ∆wave > ∆+1 particle, whereas mathematical physics uses ∆nalysis to derivate or integrate scales.
Let us put the example: how we calculate electric potentials, relating potentials to the charge density which gives rise to it.
The electric field (wave: ∆) is related to the charge density (∆+1) by the divergence relationship:
∇ E = 4π k ρ (we escape the meaningless ε as what matters is the inverse kurvature; and we use ratios, densities, as absolute parameters are also meaningless in a relative Universe where the @mind, charge or mass has limited view beyond ∆±3)
So a first derivate takes us from the particle density to hew avefield. And then again the electric field is related to the electric potential by a gradient relationship: E=∇ V
Therefore the potential is related to the charge density by Poisson’s equation:
∇·∇V=∇²V= 4π kρ
So this is all what the chargesingularity measure by density and curvature=strength, wants of its 2 down feeding ‘quantum potential’ or ‘vacuum space’: to extract motion of it for its waveparticle.
But without the charge, our electronic mind sees nothing and so it seems magic, and of course the ego paradox of creationism make us think that the charge creates the lower classprey, the vacuum space quanta; it only ‘feeds on it’ when it appears.
So n a chargefree region of space, the potential becomes zero information – the Laplace’s equation:
∇² V = 0
Then we can also consider another rule of ‘endophysics’ (the science that considers the observer but not from the ego creationist paradox of quantum physics but the opposite mind’s limits): the nature, will and cause of any physical event will belong to the STcartesian mind view, the Tpolar singularity or the Scylindrical coordinates, according to the maximal simplicity of its equations.
So by expressing the Laplacian in different coordinate systems we can realise what is the ‘source’ of the event; as the type of topological symmetry of a charge distribution helps in the solution for the electric potential V. For example, if the charge distribution has spherical symmetry, originated therefore by a singularity point, we use the Laplacian in spherical polar coordinates.
And viceversa as the potential give us the minimal information, it is a scalar function. And so departing from it, has advantages over trying to calculate the electric field directly. Once the potential has been calculated, the electric field can be computed by taking the gradient of the potential; from downwards up. And this is a great advantage of the Rashomon effect – obscured by creationist economics and the eternal argument between each onedimensional humind ego about which model is more ‘real’ and truth – all are just different points of view, whose use depends on our need of information on the receiving end and the origin of the event on the giving one.
BUT if we were to reduce all the povs is OBVIOUS that the key POVS are those of the 3 symmetries of reality, the scalar view just described (∆±i), the temporal view (here we would have to discuss a different continuity equation to get similar results) and the spatialtopological view, which are the 3 subsymmetries of the generator, done with the awareness that mindtricks might need some further input (as all relativity consistent expansions of classic physics).
So the previous symmetry of this simple ‘case’ illustrates it. If we were to use the topological view, of the 3 ‘parts of the electron super organism, the potential in its pure form will be outside the system, the wave, now in a ‘spherical time§paœrganism’ will be the membrane with its ‘2 sides’, the one towards the outside field and the one towards the inside organism, and the internal gradient towards the singularity will be the Telement. And the KEY element will be THE PART the humind perceives, which as the previous graph shows tends to be the membrane. Indeed, you see from any other human its membrane; and for those species you can decode its informationmind you can ‘hear’ its singularity thoughts, but normally the membrain – the so called boundary conditions in physics is the key to ‘convert’ into equations the whole being from the humind utility pov.
So what we just studied become the ‘best’ VIEW for a ternary topological perspective in this case for a uniform sphere of charge, which will be its spherical polar coordinates, since there is full spherical symmetry here. And we found that the outside potential of a point charge at large distances is extremely simple: V= k Q/r; that is for an electron Ke, which we shall see is indeed the ‘curvature x charge’ divided by the distance, r.
Inside in the singularitybody region is more complex, dimensionally richer with more information and the due uncertainty for the external observer, the humind: – ρ R² x 2/3 k +d.
Without getting in mathematical details on how we get this equation, the key element to find the ‘vanished info, d’ on the inside sphere is the fact that the membrane has 2 sides, which must be essentially equal in the element we calculate, the potential, as the open ball membrane is enormously ‘thin’.
So we can equate here the T element (inside) and the S element, outside, with the STelement, S=T (the fundamental equation of the universe for all present systems). And so we equal both: – ρ R² x 2/3 k +d. = kQ/r, which gives us the canonical full solution for the potential inside the sphere from the topological view, with the 3 elements together:
V= – ρ 2/3 k (R² r²)+ ρ2/3k R²
And then if we add the continuity dynamic timeequation we have the 3 symmetries.
So we shouldn’t be surprised of the fact mathematical physics is essentially a game of very few equations despite the enormous variety of partial forms, as they correspond to the very simple number of elements that conform reality.
This again can be seen next if we have a look at the ∆+1 simple gravitational equations first described in physics, Kepler’s law and relate them to ∆st beings.
But before an important dual coda:
“In the fractal Universe, the present spacetime element IS the most perceived”. “In the fractal Universe, the existence of membranes that break space into an inner and outer region, limiting the information we perceive beyond ‘the wall’.
Both are illustrated by the case studied. Indeed, because we adopt an external view, the inner region has a duncertain factor. But what we obtain is the information of the relative present (as here V is $), the membrane. If we were inside the system though the uncertainty as in the galaxy, is the outside potential (dark entropy region). And finally what is past, present and future is also relative. If we were inside closer to the singularity, then the vital energy of the open ball will be the present, and often the past and future, singularity and membrane uncertain (we do not have indeed much info of the black hole and the halo, because we are in the udregion between them).
The ternary planes in potentials.
Now this is from wikipedia, negrita is mine, to show i ‘don’t bend reality’ (:
Laplace’s equation and Poisson’s equation are the simplest examples of elliptic partial differential equations. The general theory of solutions to Laplace’s equation is known as potential theory. The solutions of Laplace’s equation are the harmonic functions, which are important in many fields of science, notably the fields of ∆1: electromagnetism, ∆+1: astronomy, and ∆œ fluid dynamics, because they can be used to accurately describe the behavior of ∆1: electric, ∆+1: gravitational, and ∆œ fluid potentials. In the study of ∆œ: heat conduction, the Laplace equation is the steadystate heat equation.
So obviously physics of potentials is perfectly encased, no more, nor less to fit the 3 physical planes, all of which are selfsimilar and all of which have a potential death, ∆2 bottom line of microscopic indistinguishable particles from where the field and singularity extracts its motion.
@: Philosophy of Physics.
@NTHROPOMORPHIC CREATIONISM v. SPACETIME REALISM
The mind as the essential element both of physical systems and the humind observing them, is a huge extended underrated element of physical systems, so we shall consider several aspects of it, starting by the objective analysis of those singularities – keeping as usual the mathematical formalisms for the fourth line, and then considering the subjective perspective of huminds observing physical systems with a bias to degrade them and come on top… as usual given our ego paradox.
Alas! huminds will not accept to share sentient properties with physical minds, but when explaining the Universe, they will have NO problem expanding the Humind to enclose the Universe itself within its mirror language. This is what we call the creationist theories of reality, which plague all humind sciences even if we don’t recognise it, and Physics is Not EXCEPTION. So we shall confront it with the realist theory of physics as the study of spacetime beings.
Let us now consider a mental view which includes the human observer, as the biased element that deforms our view of physical systems with the ego paradox – namely the creationist, mathematics only concept of physical knowledge that reduces all the properties of physical systems to those that can be treated algebraically.
Mathematical objects are NOT the substance of the Universe. Space and time and its energetic combinations quantised in momenta is.
But we concede of all the mindmirror languages to perceive reality mathematics specially in space themes (logic of verbal thought in time) is the best. This means the proper way to do physics IS from ∆@$≈ð, into mathematical physics, and that is what we shall do here.
We are not obviously in this second line post of introduction to 5D physics make an encyclopaedia of ever more complex ‘inflationary’ mathematical physics but study some ‘case examples’ to illustrate how to go from ∆@$≈ð 5 dimensions of scalar entropy, social mind evolution, lineal space emotions, iterations and time warping into mathematical physics to extract its whys.
I shall remind you that is how you start, simple, with Ptolemaic simplification into mere copernican cycles, with Einstein’s special relativity whose maths were so simple Minkowski quipped it was high school stuff. But as those simple maths illuminated so much conceptual righteousness in different ages of wrong conceptual physics, we shall go in the ‘third relativity’ r=evolution, that of absolute relativity (of motion and form of scale of topology, of being), if we were to use the naming for physical jargons of ∆@s≈ð, about the same way – just ‘seasoning’ conceptual righteousness with a few simple mathematical examples of physics that will resolve many conundrums.
All this leads to the realisation that the egocentered paradox of mindlanguages as all mirrors do ALWAYS distort reality to accommodate the deformed perspective of the mind. And so our interest here is to make objective conceptual corrections and illustrate the correspondence between ∆@$≈t 5 Dimensions of entropy, social mind evolution, lineal space, iterative presents and cyclical time.
Indeed, why huminds (physicists being just huminds watching physical systems) are so onedimensional. In this case because of the worldly profession of physicists – to make entropic weapons, as we discuss elsewhere. But the cause is deeper, and has to do with ‘creationist egos’ – that is the digital language huminds use to describe in abstract with limited properties the physical Universe.
The limits of physics, regarding the ABCD of the scientific method.
Science requires four steps as we explain in epistemology: gathering Accurate data (A), explaining it with sound models (which we deem Biological), cast data into Cyclical patterns (laws of science) and use it for the benefit of all mankind (Democratic use of science).
Humans Physics however does not fare very well in some of those elements.
Physicists use the experimental method but due to a lack of direct evidence of most physical systems, and denial by anthropocentrism of mindsingularities and organic properties in those systems, reduce by dogma enormously the range of its inquire.
Religious beliefs vs. realist stience. LANGUAGES AS MIRRORS that create ‘images’ of reality – not reality itself.
First we said that cyclical time carries the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. It follows that:
@: Psychological Time…
measures the speed processing information of minds. This change rate in electronic minds has the h unit of angular momentum, as a full time cycle for electrons and photons, two species of the same family: ∑photons=electron, measures a bit of information.
In that regard time has a simple meaning: change of position=motion and change of form. Whereas a present state is a state of repetitive motions, which seemingly does not change realities.
Subjective vs. objective time.
It follows that more than change, we measure its perception that can be cheated. So the perception of different changes makes time dual, subjective from the internal point of the perceiver, objective from the external point and multiple according to the point of perception.
It is then quite easy to reduce time change roughly as science does into external timechange or translation in space, the subject of physics and internal timechange or change in information, the subject of biology.
Subjective mindtime perception must then be related to the mind’s speed, processing information which defines its ‘beat’=bit of times=information. i.e. in humans is a second, the beat of heart, mind and legs steps.
It follows that faster systems with faster time clocks live longer, but often a huge family of beings have similar time durations. i.e. an insect that processes information 10 times faster has a longest span of life in its top predator species of 7 years (antqueens: max. social evolution, cockroaches: max. strength) similar to the top predator human and elephant in the larger scale which lives 70/10 times slower thoughts=7 years.
Time then must also be related to language, as we perceive through language, the information of the Universe. So it is easy as it has been the case to believe ‘subjectively’ that a language creates the information=time cycles of the Universe. And as informative perception is subjective, it is natural for humans to have thought that the cause of reality is NOT timespace per se, but the languages we use to perceive it.
The verbal creationists: Moses>Jesus>Mohammed
I am trying to be simple so you do understand to which LIMITS the physicists are when acting as philosophers of science savant idiots, which depart from a WRONG dogma – that mathematics, not time and space is the ultimate substance of reality, and make them do amazing twists and complicated equations to search for a ‘Saint Grail’ – A MATHEMATICAL EQUATION that God uttered as he uttered names to create beings.
So the bottom line of many errors in physics as the creationist big bang or the Copenhagen interpretation is similar to the verbal error of a sacred language among religious and its wrong dogmas – no Yhwh, a toponym for judea in ancient egyptians maps when God meant Nation, IS the subconscious collective or nation of Judaism, NOT the creator of the Universe, and this obvious truth, that Yhwh=Judea did NOT create the Universe, that ARAB did not create the Universe by uttering it, that equations did NOT create the Universe, is the key to start properly a philosophy of science and its ultimate substance which are ∞ timespace clocks, which are the ultimate carriers of the information of the Universe – denied by fundamentalist of abrahamic religions and fundamentalists of mathematics as the languages of God.
So it does not matter how complicated you make the rituals of religion, GOD will not appear on earth, will NOT resurrect you uttering your name, and to put an example of creationist physics, black holes won’t evaporate without experimental and logic evidence because Hawking wrote an equation that states so. In the next graph we see two creationist philosophers of physics – notice how the first, Dirac, affirms that God used maths to create the world and then it denies the ‘rival verbal God’.
The mathematical creationists: Galileo>Newton>Bohr
YET it does NOT matter how complicated a physicist makes his equations, just because he writes them IT DOES NOT CREATE REALITY. Because at best an equation is a focused mirror on the properties and relational spacetime beings of the Universe. BUT MIRRORS DO NOT CREATE the IMAGES THEY REFLECT in their language.
The ongoing absurd quarrel between creationist religious people defending God’s verbal language (first age of human history, when mathematics, a more efficient mirror which seems to be NOT OUR MENTAL language but the language of machines) vs. the mathematical language, those machines (clocks measuring time, telescopes and microscopes measuring space) are evolving fast into a ‘digital AI consciousness’) is a false concept of the relationship between languages, as mirrors of the Universe, and the Universe of spacetime they mirror, latter studied in detail, to set straight the record.
Of that argument what matters most is not even discussed: while mathematics is more efficient as a language, it is NOT the human language, but the language of machines, and so in a society which despises as it does today our technological culture, the human verbal language, which naturally make us the ‘subject’ and centre of the Universe (Iman: subject < verb=action> object=energy abused by man), and hence considers human life sacred, will NOT evolve machines so fast but will ensure with ethic values our survival.
While mathematics, being a better mirror will evolve knowledge faster but also will give primacy to computers, as it has done already, atrophy our verbal language, degrading our mind (as it is happening with our millenials, glued to hypnotic screens) and ultimately make humans obsolete to the superior mindmirror of AI robots.
While those who practice only mathematics, as physicists at cern do, WILL become children of verbal, ethic, survival human thought and will be subconsciusly eviL=antilive in the genetic hidden meanings of survival words, as cogito ergo sum in man (calculo ergo sum in machines and physicists), so without cogitans, the ‘nerd’ is a child in life and does not even understand death and survival.
So if languages are mirrors that create IMAGES not reality what are the substances of reality? This obvious. Look around yourself, do you see numbers as components of things, do you see words, or do you see ‘space’, broken in infinite vital spaces, ‘enclosed’ by membranes, which when seeing in great detail are made of moving cycles of cells (life clocks), orbital rotary cycles (earth’s clocks) and so all is ‘vital space’ enclosed by time cycles? That is what experience tell us all is: a vital space, broken, closed and formed by time cycles – the substances of reality, which if you like the word ‘god’ you can call god.
Of course mathematical physics, notably analysis of ∫∂ 4D and 5D flows and planes and group symmetry are essential tools to perceive T.œs with huminds, but the problem of creationist physics is to reduce reality to what those mathematical operations can extract and ignore all other properties, due to the ignorance of the Disomorphisms of all ST systems. To avoid those shortcomings we will emphasise the parallel study of abstract analysis with vital geometry and the functions hidden in the ternary parts of a system (membrane, vital space, singularity) which are at play in all physical phenomena.
While there ARE AS we have seen some advances on physics with the study of geometric simple motions and bidimensional orbits (Descartes, Galileo and Kepler, whose laws are studied in the posts of algebraic geometry and cosmology), the reductionist but exhaustive analysis of the locomotions of the Universe did start with analysis, in the work of Newton and Leibniz. So we can make a rather pedestrian statement (: for the arrogant physicist, who thinks to be such a high IQ, superior human thinker ):
‘Physics is basically the application of analysis to the study of one of the 5 motions of the Universe, locomotions≈translations in space’. And while the mathematical methods used in physics have greatly expanded in the XX c. analysis reminds the core of mathematical physics. And this is the strongest proof of a 5th dimension in physical systems.
Since differential equations deal ‘obviously’ with the relationships of ∆1 finitesimals and ∆wholes, whereas instead of infinitesimals we use a more correct nonabstract concept of a minimal quanta of spacetime, which is what we integrate socially either in space as a population/network or in time as a worldcycle/event. It follows immediately that ‘well behaved’ differential functions will require the full ternary elements of any Universal system, as follows:
$pe: ∫° membrane/boundaries/limits of the equation in time (duration) or space (extension)
∆: ds dt: ∆1 scalar, minimal bit of timein/form/ation or bite of entropic energyspace
ðiƒ: The logic synoptic, mathematical calculus as a discipline that selects the information of the system.
ST: The function we integrate within the ∫ST∂ system.
@: singularity points and discontinuities, which cannot integrate the function. What is then the Tiƒ, informative element? The result of this calculus ‘integrates’ the whole.
In that regard another fundamental quality of integrals in physics is the existence of boundaries and membranes when we want to obtain exact real solutions. Most of mathematical physics thus deal with ∆st full systems. Indeed, we cannot solve clearly from thermodynamic to electromagnetic waves, from quantum to orbital, mass equations, when they are not clearly contained into a limiting domain/external membrane; and focused into a single or bidimensional singularity, source of the forces; which encircle together a present spacetime where the exchanges of energy and information and its variations studied by differential equations occur.
Finally it is also a key element of mathematical physics, the constant S≈T symmetries, shown in the partial equations, which differentiate ceteris paribus in time and space (∂s∂t), or in the duality of derivatives in time (speed, acceleration) and its inverse integrals in space which gives us distance.
As those general concepts of Analysis and its relationship with the 2 fundamental elements of reality, the ∆scales of finitesimals and wholes, and the ST symmetries and dualities have wider applications to all other stiences they are studied in the posts of Analysis, so we shall just mentioned them here.
Creationist physics is not merely a philosophical question. It has deep consequences for all points of view of research.
Consider the case of quantum creationism. As we have to normalize to value 1 the probabilistic view of the density of electric charge of a Schrodinger’s equation (which by measure theory merely means to reduce the 1∞ spatial scale to the o1 timesphere), an astounding cumbersome technique must be developed, which ‘hides’ a lot of information by transforming quantum reality into a certain mental mirror. And all kind of deformations have carried through the century into many applications of quantum physics, which time permitted we will analyze in the fourth line. FACT is the proper pilotwave theory would have allowed a much faster understanding of the laws of physics, as explained in those texts. Of course today computers carry out all the calculations so it seems not to matter but it certainly does.
Creationism also limits and makes unnecessary this blog – as the believer is NOT going to wonder how God creates the mathematical Universe but merely search his wording which is taken as in the case of religion in a literalist way. ALL stops in the search for the ultimate equation of Unification of forces, because after all God is one (in the western tradition).
Further on as God must be complicated, superior in intelligence, the search for complex equations are important. Now, all this is a priori subconscious thought but very real underlying the kind of arguments there have been in history of thought between the 3 masters of the spacetime view of the Universe and the 3 masters of the parallel creationist view, which we shall summarise in these blogs. To notice also that HUMANS due to their ego paradox, as ‘homunculus minds’ are built to be ‘creationists’ and worship machines and huge egotrips so the realists, we all have been ignored and are still ignored when disputing with the creationists. Good luck infinitesimal egos who think to be infinite.
The realists of spacetime: Leibniz>Einstein>This Blog
And this view is called in science the ‘relational spacetime theory’ of the Universe, which is what i finally after millennia of being explained in philosophical terms, formalised with logic and mathematics, and then used to explain an enormous amount of whys in all the sciences of the Universe.
Reality is the product of the two ultimate substances that make up everything, vital, space quanta, and cyclical moving time clocks, of information, which combine into energetic beings with its repetitive patterns we call laws of science.
And it does NOT matter how much evidence physicists deny about the arrow of information and mass that balances the arrow of entropy and makes the Universe immortal, how much they deny the 96% of attractive dark matter, the Universe did NOT appear in a huge bigbang.
And it does not matter how many humans believe in those 2 theories (abrahamic creation, big bang creation), all in fact either in one (western religious people) or the other (physicists’ fans), if they are rationally wrong they are wrong. But to prove them wrong we must debunk their theories of timespace, aka bigbang and black hole evaporation theories – and as we shall see explain properly in terms of time events the weak force, which is ultimately the force that transforms quarks intimately related to time cycles.
Thus it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational spacetime models and apply them to physics, bigbang theory, black hole evaporation.
Time theory’s next big advance IS not the evaporation of black holes but the models of relational, fractal cyclical spacetime that will become the staple food of serious XXI century research in all physical, biological and sociological disciplines, as all of them are made of events that happen in time and the cyclical patterns of time do explain the whys of science, which are the repetitive patterns=cycles of time of all its particular clocks, or else without cyclical patterns of time there would not be science, which consists exactly in the repetition of those clocks we can foresee.
If time cycles did not exist, and the single lineal clock of physicists were the only time, there is NO reason for repetition of events which is What LAWS OF SCIENCE TELL us.
Relational spacetime: ternary symmetries; duality of motion x form = dimensions & energy worldcycles.
The laws of science are NOT originated by a language, maths or words, according to which creationist theory you believe in – religion or platonic physics but by the SUBSTANCES OF WHICH REALITY IS MADE, SPACE, CLOSELY RELATED TO the arrow of growth of ENTROPY or expansive open disordered motions, and accelerated TIME CLOCKS, CLOSELY RELATED to the arrow of growth of information carried in the frequency and form of the accelerated cycles of charges and masses, (Einstein’s principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass) and its conserved closed, repetitive ENERGY cycles, whose minimal unit is momentum, combination of mass/charges=accelerated time clocks x speeddistances (entropic motions).
So those are the 3 arrows of spacetime that create reality of which we are all made, including humans, as when you say ‘i don’t have energy and time to do this’.
We shall thus study the physical ternary systems, or ‘spacetime organisms’, which are the fundamental particle in the Universe, and coexist also in physical ternary scales.
It is