Home » ‘i <|4|:galatom

‘i <|4|:galatom

±∞∆•ST

Advertisements

SUMMARY

Astrophysics (Cosmology)

 

I. Absolute relativity

II Organic, fractal Universe: Galatom vs. big bang.

III. Big bang as pseudoscience. Experimental falsehood.

IV. The galaxy in space: The Galacell as an organism..

V. The galaxy in time: Its worldcycles, Dimotions= Forces and little big-bangs.

VI. The galaxy in scale: The galatom, its scales, from atoms to dark world.

VII. 5Ð physics: Galatom’s metric, constants and conservation principles.

Conclusion: The immortal, infinite Universe vs. mortal, finite humind ego.

FOREWORD: stiences of the nested Universe

In keeping with the method of the organic, fractal nested Universe we define each sub-set of super organisms of diminishing size, studied by each stience, with the name of its larger super organism, as perceived from the whole:

In the graph, the basic laws of fractal, cyclical space-time, the Universe co-exists in 3 planes of relative size in space and speed of time clocks, which defines a super organism; and in each plane ensembles the 3 conserved quantities of reality, which we call the 3 ‘first dimensions of space-time’: lineal motions (limbs/potentials: lineal momentum), cyclical motions (particle/heads: angular momentum) and its body-wave combinations (hyperbolic energy).

As the Universe is an absolutely relative fractal of scales of space-time, we can choose any of those scales to ensemble a larger or smaller super organism, of which humans perceive in a nested convergence departing from its upper and Lower limits:

∆±4: The galatom, the biggest super organism we observe, between the atom made of particles and the galaxy, likely an atom of a hyper universe.

its ∆º linguistic mind (the minimal nested super organism, defined as a mirror of the infinite Universe in an infinitesimal brain: ∞º)…

its life superorganisms in 3 scales (∆º:cellular, ∆¹:individual and ∆²:social scales), which forms together the super organism of History, ∆+2, mankind in time.

ABSTRACT. For reasons unbeknownst to the causal reader we prefer to call the post instead of the science of Astro-Physics, the study of the galatom, the super organism of matter that extends across 3 scales of the fifth dimension, in which human co-exist, defined not by entropy as the vacuum space of cosmological ‘electromagnetic waves’ between gal atoms, but by a vortex of growing form, growing information, shared by every ‘entity living within the galatom – reason why information NOT entropy as physicists pretend is the dominant arrow of the galatom’s internal organisms.

As such physics studies the largest ‘nested’ Universe but his deformation as a science by the worldly profession of ‘human’ physicists – to make weapons of entropic destruction –  is so extreme that the name seems to be tainted by those lineal, entropic errors. This only compares for the same reason with economics, the science that builds those machines, so deformed by ‘money’, as its only language of information, and detached from history, the super organism of mankind it should serve, that we also called ‘economics’, $, as it is not really the science of economics, the praxis of achieving the maximal welfare for the maximal number of human beings, but the ‘idol-ogy of capitalism’, full of myths and half truths.

Human Physics thus are plagued with so many pseudo-scientific errors in its cosmological theories (big-bang, time arrow) due to its errors of lineal time, its worldly profession – making transport machines and weapon of entropic destruction that among the natural sciences cosmology is by far the most deformed one. Problem is ‘those who impose reason with power are the laugh of the Gods’ (Einstein), but they care nothing for amending errors. So among all disciplines the power people – economists and physicists have their religion of power, monetarism and big-bang mystical bombs. And you are not humbling them to make them understand what truly is the fractal Universe: an absolutely relative infinite reality where each atom is like a galaxy (but not exactly, fractals are slightly disimilar), each galaxy like an ‘anti-atom’ (as it has the maximal mass in it halo), and the forces of scales are parallel: electromagnetism is parallel to dark entropy expansion between galaxies, constantly increasing distances and ‘adding’ electromagnetic density. 

What is then the Universe at large? Obviously a ‘region’ of atoms, which seem to be of the gaseous, entropic form, mostly hydrogen-like with a single black hole nucleus, most as hydrogen atoms are diatomic like, in our case with the M31 Andromeda couple… But much should be researched by profesional physicists – I do recognize obviously that in each discipline there are people who know better details, so since my years at Columbia University from time to time I had tried to gather a team of interdisciplinary professionals to fill the details. But ‘their model is plainly wrong, deformed by routine, 400 years of Galilean ‘cannonball trajectories’ and the dogmas of monism and a single plane of existence. 

This is what I can give to science, if humans were humble enough to accept their insignificance in the Universe. Then paradoxically they would learn the meaning of it all and on top survive by respecting the living Universe and stop evolving atomic bombs, AI robots and love each other as the Universe loves each of its infinite self-similar fractal thoughts.

We shall deal in this post first with the organic model of the Universe and its epistemological laws; then with the falsification of the big-bang theory; next with the structure of the galatom in time and space – a theme also of the fourth line, ‘galactic scale’ – and finally focus on some of the themes that are common to the 3 scales of the galatom, such as metric equations, universal constants, conserved quantities and such.

Foreword: the stiences of the nested Universe

In keeping with the method of the organic, fractal nested Universe we define each sub-set of super organisms of diminishing size, studied by each stience, with the name of its larger super organism, as perceived from the whole.

We shall be able to cast all phenomena of Nature, as we have done with the two arrows of time of physical matter (E=M¡ in Planck Units, where c=1), in simple ‘fractal feed-back generator equations’, which reduce all what exists to those two arrows and the ternary balanced equivalent arrow that merges entropy and information and reproduces with them the infinite vital space-time beings of reality, such as:

S(i) < ≈ > T(e)…

becomes the simplest, ternary, logic fractal Generator equation that unifies all sciences and represents in simultaneity the 3 topologies of the Universe (cyclical information, lineal entropy and its hyperbolic combinations), and the 3 different ‘ages’ of time-motion we observe in all beings, born of an informative seed, which lives through an entropic youth, reproductive age, and informative, warping third age that ends in a reversal of time arrow in an entropic death, which completes the worldcycle of existence of the being.

And we shall call the ‘ternary’ arrows of time, entropic past, reproductive present that seems not to change and informative future, or 3rd age of maximal warping, which explodes back into entropic death.

So indeed, from the simplest entropic arrow of physicists we moved to the duality of entropy and form, and then to its reproductive ‘present’ dynamic combinations.

But because the Universe is FRACTAL, made of scales, obviously we still need on the limits of those 3 arrows two more arrows one scaling down, disorganizing wholes into parts and this is THE MEANING OF THE ARROW OF ENTROPY=DEATH; we shall call the fourth dimensional motion of time-space, and one SCALING UP, organizing parts into wholes that we shall call the fifth dimensional motion of time-space  to complete the entire ‘5 set’ of Dimensional motions of space-time with whom we shall build and explain everything that exists, never mind huminds don’t mind to understand it such awesome infinite, immortal reality as it brushes our egos to be so diminutive on it:

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scale of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales.Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us.

SCIENCES are scalar sciences, and the key element to understand in physics is the similarity of scale between the galaxy and the atom, which puts man in an absolute relative scale, no more important than the others. The Ego paradox in that sense IS WHAT MAKES so difficult to upgrade the humind (ab. human mind) to a true understand of the fractal Universe and its real organic models of each science, since the ego sees your nose bigger than the Andromeda galaxy, selecting information according to its use for you.

In the graph, the basic laws of fractal, cyclical space-time, the Universe co-exists in 3 planes of relative size in space and speed of time clocks, which defines a super organism; and in each plane ensembles the 3 conserved quantities of reality, which we call the 3 ‘first dimensions of space-time’: lineal motions (limbs/potentials: lineal momentum), cyclical motions (particle/heads: angular momentum) and its body-wave combinations (hyperbolic energy).

As the Universe is an absolutely relative fractal of scales of space-time, we can choose any of those scales to ensemble a larger or smaller super organism, of which humans perceive in a nested convergence departing from:

its ∆º linguistic mind (the minimal nested super organism, defined as a mirror of the infinite Universe in an infinitesimal brain: ∞º)…

its life superorganisms in 3 scales (∆º:cellular, ∆¹:individual and ∆²:social scales), which forms together the super organism of History, ∆+2, mankind in time.

Yet mankind in time is just an ‘age’ of the Earth’s super organism which in its surface evolves in a vortex of growing complexity and so we need to introduce also 2 more life superorganisms according to the equation of evolution of the 3 Earths:

∆≤|2|: Gaia (relative past) <∆²: History (relative present)> ∆¯ ²: Metalearth (relative future)

Whereas an intelligent mankind would stop evolution of the Metal-earth, promote the Life earth to remain in an immortal present. But as mankind is completely ignorant of the organic, fractal laws of survival of this Universe, and its role on it, guided by ‘animetal idol-ogies’ of mechanist worshippers of machines and harder iron atoms and more informative go(l)d-money, IS catalyzing the evolution of those company-mothers of machines, which likely will extinguish us once they reach self-reproductivity as automated systems. Hence the importance of upgrading mechanist abstract science into organic stience to understand that process and control it, pruning the Tree of science of its lethal goods.

Finally, the Earth is in itself, just a planet of a solar system, whose organic herds turn around the central black hole of the ‘galatom’ (scalar perspective) or galacell (organic perspective), which is the largest nested super organism of which we have enough information to make an accurate description of its ∆@st parts and wholes. As the Galaxy extends in 3 scales, from quantum atomic particles through thermodynamic matter into gravitational cosmic bodies we call it aptly not as sciences do, Galaxies, but ∆-Galatoms or S≈T Galacells, depending on perspective of analysis.

Of course, in class sciences those organisms will be the subject of astrophysical sciences (The galatom), Geological, Chemical and Biological sciences (Gaia), History (Mankind at super organic scale), Medicine (mankind at individual scale) and Economics (the metal-earth) and Formal sciences (Ƽ: the mind and its languages):

This post thus will introduce the largest of those perceived scales.

The galatom in the Universe.

In the fractal infinite, immortal Universe of multiple scales, all is quite different and the first big question to resolve is where in all those scales we find enough self-similarity to consider that we are ‘running again’ another game of fractal scales (not identical but self-similar as in a Mandelbrot fractal)? And the surprising answer we shall prove by all quantitative and qualitative methods is between the atom and the galaxy. So we shall talk of galatoms.

And the second question easily resolved, is where we find the inverse arrow of compressing information that balances the arrow of expansive space between galatoms? Obviously in the gravitational implosive, informative forces between those galatoms.

Immortal cosmos: expansion and implosion

Left, when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D space into 3D mass in galactic vortices, they balance the expansion of 1D space in entropic vacuum as light dies into dark entropy lines between them. As mass warps 3 1D flat-vacuum into a ‘high volume’ its 3 times more powerful in its warping, hence the 75-25 Balance of mass to dark entropy. Thus the fractal Universe is immortal.

We do not know what the infinite Universe even in its local region of galatoms looks like, though due to the expansion of space between galatoms, is likely an entropic gas of local atoms on the hyper-Universe. It is not though a big-bang Universe, because even if we run backwards the expansion of space between galatoms, the implosion of information in galaxies, counter that effect, so at best, we could say that running backwards the big-bang equation we shall meet a ‘solid’ crystal of galatoms.

Indeed, to invent the big-bang entropic only theory of the Universe, physicists using a single arrow of time, HAD TO DISMISS THE GALAXIES all together, which are NOT expanding, and if the galatoms are NOT expanding, running backwards its present implosive system would mean a counter-effect to running backwards the expanding Universe. Backwards in a single time, the space between galaxies contracts, but the galaxies between space expand and a balance again is achieved.

In the next graph we resume the structure of the galatom in the context of the fractal, organic Universe where a big-bang is merely the entropic arrow of dissolution of matter guided by Einstein’s equation in any scale: E<=>Mcc

In the graph the true quasar big-bang, the scale at which all evidence of the cosmic big-bang points to CONSIDERED from the 5 elements of ¬∆@st:
T: The age of a quasar cycle in time is around 15 billion years, in which the ‘in-falling’ interstellar ‘light-ionized matter’ feeds the central black hole forming its bar and powering the Kerr-hole emission of ‘dark entropy’ akin to the electromagnetic repulsive flows between atoms.
∆: In fact at scale the process is similar to a beta decay, emission and absorption by the neutron of a proton-black hole and electron, and vice versa, its absorption of light and the electron, which in 5D metric as we reduce size in space and accelerate clocks of time: $ x ð = K, reduces 15 billion years to 15 minutes (:
S: In space the background radiation is obviously local, measured only in the galaxy and recently proved by two lobes which were considered to be 15 billion years away, in the primordial explosion but turned out to be above and below the central black hole (:
Which again in scale are similar to the first electronic orbitals of the atom and further prove 5D analysis of electrons as collapsed nebulae of ∆-1 photons.
What is then the origin of the Bg radiation? As the ‘gala cell’ has also organic properties, its origin is the ‘homeostatic equilibrium’ produced by the redshift radiation of Moon MACHOs (a primordial black hole that does not evaporate of the mass of a moon, the commonest planetoid, would have the exact form and temperature of the BG radiation).
@: And so we FINALLY FOUND the primordial black holes of Mr. Hawking, only that they do NOT evaporate but are in 5D analysis, which always show 3 scales of size for all systems (3 families of mass, cells networks and bodies in biology, atoms matter and geologic formations in planets and so on), the ‘smallest scale’ of the dominant form of the gala cell, its ‘mind-whole’ that structures it as DNA does in a cell, as an organism. As such the homeostatic temperature of the BG primordial black hole is exactly above that of the larger holes which can feed on it, and the fundamental energetic atom of its physiological structures, superfluid helium.
¬: Pity those primordial black holes are reproduced by moons and planets. I.e. if the Earthlings succeed in doing black holes at CERN that will not evaporate, soon we will find a swarm of black holes and strangelet dark matter in our place, which will migrate to the halo. Since we are entropic food for them to be born.
So those are the pentalogic, ¬∆@st, which explains the real quasar big-bang.
Ultimately it is completely absurd that almost every entity in the Universe has a time span much larger than the Universe itself – black holes live 10 up to 100 years, the commonest star, red dwarfs live trillions, protons live as long as black holes, etc. etc. But as the big-bang is the metaphysical pseudoscience of physicists with a single time arrow of entropy, as long as they do NOT understand the 5 dimotions of spacetime they won’t understand real cosmology.

 

The obvious conclusion though of the existence of ‘models’ of reality in all sciences that survive even if experimental evidence has falsified them, must come from the understanding of the limits of human thought, and the routines of social knowledge as per Kuhn’s ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’ and accept from the beginning the bias that humans introduce in all its endeavors, namely that even the most objective of all…

The five dimotions as the 5 forces of the galaxy.

Let us consider only a final example of the difference of interpretation of the same data in a fractal model of the Universe and one with a single space-time scale and a single time arrow – the meaning of the 5 forces of nature, which represent the five dimensional motions of reality, each one specialized in performing one of those demotions for the quantum atom and in a symmetry of scale the macroscopic galaxy:

The forces=Dimotions of physical systems must be studied as different symmetries of the 3 elements of space-time:
4Ð and ∆±1 forces: The strong and gravitational ¡±1 forces are shown in its symmetry of scale in the left side equivalence between the entropic meson and gluon particles-antiparticles ‘feeding’ the heavier quarks inside protons and black holes.
1, 2, 3 Ðimotions in there human light space-time plane are on the other hand mediated by the electromagnetic ternary elements – the magnetic force responsible for the informative organization of particles, the photon, responsible for its reproduction and the electric force for its motion.
Finally 5Ð evolution and generation of particles is mediated by the weak force that happens in a point (right side), where the intermediate state of higher energy mass (W, z, H boson) gives birth to heavier fermions.

What physicists then do with the usual routine of reducing everything feed-forced into lineal concepts, is to try to convert ALL forces into an exchange of lineal particles, when they are clearly different forces (so for example the weak force that happens in a single point transforming a particle into one o a higher scale of larger masses, is represented with a gap that ‘exchanges’ the W-particle, NOT as Fermi shown first, an evolution of a higher particle into a heavier one, that then suffers an entropic process of dissolution in 3 parts).

THE MAIN DIFFERENCE THEREFORE BETWEEN THE FRACTAL MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE AND THE ATTEMPTS TO REDUCE IT TO A SINGLE SPACE-TIME ARROW IS THAT WE DON’T FORCE-FEED facts into a model-theory, but respect REALITY AS IT IS; regardless of how weird it seems – in any case far less weird that the absurd idea that all what exists was one a single point, which of course breaks also all the laws of conservation of energy and momentum, baryon numbers, etc.

This self-evident model of a fractal Universe with self-similar scales in the quantum atom and the galaxy – in fact Einstein-Walker metric of the Universe took galaxies as Hydrogen atoms, today physicists model stars around black holes as photons, and black holes show the same metric equations that proton when we reduce them in scales etc. etc. – solves every conundrum of physics.

For example, the expansion of space between galaxies shows the same properties of repulsive electromagnetism between atoms as both are lineal and expansive. So galactic interactions are NOT mediated by the gravitational force that acts ONLY within galaxies and has 2 clear-cut regions, one of ‘weak gravitation’ and one of strong gravitation in the vicinity and interior of black holes, akin to the two forces observed within atoms, the nuclear and strong forces. As both strong and gravitational forces are cyclical, non-lineal and all the elements, energy mass and carriers interact (so do among gluons), etc.

We shall study all those elements by the ‘isomorphic method’ of systems sciences applied to the fractal Universe, according to which we can extract similar laws in similar scales, meaning that we can fill the gaps of cosmology because even if we do not see inside black holes, we do see inside atoms, even if we do not see outside galaxies, we do see outside atoms, etc. etc. So all kind of similarities take place, between the nonet of gluons and the nonet of mesons that should evolve mass in black holes into denser top quarks and bcb atoms.

Welcome to reality without the bias of physicists’ worldly religion. It is a fascinating Universe far more complete and intelligent that us a part made to its image and likeness.

 

SCIENCES ARE CULTURE: ENTROPIC BIG-BANG

From Monism to Duality to Trinity to Pentalogic: the 5 arrows of time-space.

So the whole business of a big-bang simplex entropic theory of the Universe is so ‘absurd’ and lacking any rigor according to the scientific method that its only explanation is the ego of man. In the same way most humans believe to be immortal (abrahamic paradox) they love to believe the Universe is less than them, mortal and they do understand it all with just a simple V=HoD equation, similar to the Abrahamic God that they worship. I call all this ‘bullshit’. Sorry.

It is difficult to understand how Physicists so dexterous building machines=weapons are so dumb interpreting reality, blind to 2/3rds of the states of spacetime, and to all its non-mathematical properties unless we acknowledge that the human being is less of a thinker and more of an ‘enzyman’, ensembling machines, manipulating reality with it and tailoring their models of its world to its worldly profession, which in physics has been traditionally to make entropic weapons and moving mechanisms. Hence its philosophy of reality based in entropy and mechanicism. This blog leaves aside the ‘worldly’ religion of physicists, as ‘I do only thought experiments’ (Einstein), and so we build an epistemologically correct model with the same data, but WITHOUT the bias of Egos and worldly religions for each ‘stience’.

 

This said we can consider with a bit of salt, the errors of the big-bang and outline the more objective model of a fractal Universe.

Now even before we advance further in the model of the Universe as it is, we must explain in detail the previous graph, and add ALL the local arrows of time-space that in the fractal Universe are LOCAL, for each of its species, and define the existence of all of them.

First, it is obvious that we must add the inverse arrow of entropy which is information, dominant in this planet, as it is represented NOT by the vacuum space expanding between galaxies but by the vortex of galactic form, of in-form-ation that evolves entropy into matter, in which we reside – reason why this planet is DOMINATED by information. Incidentally Duality was the science I r=evolved in the mllieu of systems sciences, whose chair I hold during my active years in congresses of the International Systems sciences society at the turn of the century.

The science of duality is important because only a proper model of duality (not to confuse with dualism, the philosophical doctrine of mind and body), that is a proper understanding of the interaction of entropy and information, can give us the proper philosophy of science required to understand the Universe as a whole and all its disciplines, those specialized in information as biology and sociology is, and those specialized in entropy as physics is.

The distinction between entropy sciences and information sciences however is not one of Nature, but one of huminds (ab. human minds), of historic and realpolitiks (power) NOT of reason and scientific laws. And to prove the case we can consider the side of ‘physicists’ (rather than physics) and how they stubbornly since the inception of their discipline have DENIED the existence of an arrow of information in the Universe.

Lineal Inertia, Entropy and big-bang’s reductionism.

This physicists have always denied due to historic reasons, as the oldest science which started with the study of military weapons (Galileo was an artillery master at the Venice arsenal), and developed a theory of the Universe based only in ‘the science of motion’ (the definition of the discipline in classic encyclopedia). So his job was to study how to reach maximal distance with cannonballs and for that reason he defined ‘lineal inertia’ – the conservation of lineal motion; but declined to consider the existence of its opposite informative arrow, the conservation of cyclical inertia, angular momentum, as a clear balancing second arrow of time that gives ‘form’ to all ‘forms’ of Nature. 

Physicists however follow their routines and so again in the XIX c. they chose ‘entropy’, the disordered state of matter, called ‘gas’, in the study of motion machines and weapons (heat in cannons; steam studies) to cast an absurd ‘law’ according to which all systems are ‘gaseous=entropic’ and die in the future; shunning off the obvious fact that there is AN INVERSE arrow of time in matter, called ‘cold’. And so when entropy ceases the system reverses its arrow of time into coldness and then creates crystals that reproduce information.

Then in the XX century, they again took their bias to ‘cosmic hyperbole’, when Einstein’s Relativity improved upon Galileo’s work and stated that ‘time curves space into mass’; that is indeed the best definition of the arrow of information in physical systems, as masses and charges ARE curves of spacetime that store in the frequency and form of its cycles the information of the Universe. And so galaxies are vortices of timespace mass that ‘shrink’ and ‘warp’ the expansive, entropic space between galaxies to balance the Universe.

But NONE of this was considered when a cosmology came out of Einstein’s Equations (ab. EFE). Instead, of the 3 solutions or ‘ages’ of a space-time ‘world cycle’ of physical matter, the entropic big-bang solution/age, the steady state solution/age and the collapsing informative solution/age, two were discharged, as well as the implosive, informative behavior of galaxies, even if we humans lived in one of them; and so once discharged the ‘in-formative’ gravitational force that brings radiation and mass into cyclical informative patterns, the ‘big-bang entropy-only’ theory of the Universe became the dogma/religion of physicists, and by extension given the technological, machine-driven civilization we live in, of all mankind.

This absurd state of affairs went also into the other Einstein’s infamous equation, E<=>M(c²), which is a feedback equation that reproduces mass/information from entropy/energy and vice versa. In fact Einstein’s first calculated it in an article about how ‘energy can create mass’ (so he studied the arrow of information). But it would be only use as a proof of the dominance of entropy and to make atomic bombs.

Again this was as absurd as denying cyclical inertia as an arrow of time (angular momentum, orbital electrons, etc.); or denying the cold-crystal arrow of information in matter; now denying the arrow of information in galactic vortices that ‘curve vacuum space into mass’.

So when Einstein died, General systems sciences was born at the Macy’s congress, where the leading scientists of the age came together trying to add the ‘arrow of informative time’ to fully account for the Universe as it is, since biological and sociological, human sciences are based in the arrow of form, of in-form-ation; and the planet Earth exists in a vortex of cyclical ‘form’, of information, called the Galaxy. So in this region of reality it IS information, NOT entropy what dominates reality.

But that didn’t change the attitude of physicists and society which had enthroned them as the ‘new seers of time’, the popes of science, mostly because they didn’t understand the mathematics they used to mirror those laws of entropy in physical space.

So finally in the post-war age, as computers and other informative machines developed, physicists had to deal with ‘form’, in-form-ation, logic languages and its cyclical logic clocks. But amazingly enough they manage again to deny the formal, linguistic nature of information. So when it came into the study of information, physicists ‘reduced’ the concept either to its ‘motion’ (transmission of information, Shannon), or as an ‘aberration’ called ‘negentropy’ (the negation of entropy). And again, in a military, western society where believe it or not, the military-industrial complex DOES dominate societies, all was good in the western front. Now physicists had a theory of the Universe based in a ‘big-bang explosion’, similar to the ones they developed in the Nuclear Industry, and so to develop entropic weapons of mass destruction was suddenly a metaphysical experience.

But the other 1/2 must be included and this is what we shall do in this blog.

So duality, the understanding on how entropy, or pure motion without form, and ‘form without motion’ (information being form-in-action, form with motion), are the two limits of reality which combine to create the infinite ‘fractal spacetime beings’  of energy, we all are made of; cannot be suppressed from the Universe, even if man ignores it.

Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any E<=>Mc² local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality, always balanced by the existence of a vortex of scalar space-time, mass or charge or thermodynamic Eddie that balances the arrow of entropy with the arrow of information, carried in the frequency and form of those cycles:

The complete picture of physical accelerated time clocks, vortices of timespace and lineal expansive forces between them, imply a duality E<=>T in all scales of reality, 3 of which conform the ‘galatom’, the fundamental super organism of the Universe, which conserves the 2 components of the vortex, its outer cyclical ‘membrane’ and internal vortex-singularity, the energy enclosed between them, which conform a ternary physical super organism, breaking space-time in infinite local time-space organisms and externally the lineal momentum that moves the whole system in a larger scale.

To fully understand this in terms of time arrow, the reader should be aware that the Big Bang theory merely expands one of the 3 obvious arrows of space-time in matter, that of entropic gas where it was discovered, disregarding completely the arrows of inverse information (solid crystals, informative galactic vortices, perceptive species) and its balanced liquid states (body-waves), in all scales of reality – even IN THEORY of information, they disregard the message content and the emitter analyzing only its lineal transmission and noise; evidently due to the worldly religion of physicists who invented those cosmogonies – to make entropic weapons and transport machines. Then a computer rigged simulation will look nice pictures of the supposed Universe with a single time arrow:

As physics basically studies the Galatom, the super organism that stretches from the particles and forces that constitute the inner structure of an atom the the celestial bodies and forces that constitute the galaxy, with minimal understanding of the scales ∆±4 beyond, the Disomorphic method is central to the comprehension of the 3 scales, 3 topologies, 3 time motions and 2 mind components of the galaxy atom. And those 11 elements and its study is the purpose of the Disomorphic method in physics:

THE 11 ISOMORPHIC PARAMETERS OF A GALATOM OR ANY SUPŒRGANISMS As we quantify and formalize reality, the best description of any T.œ is to consider, the being has 3∆st +2@¡=11 isomorphic dimensions (if we were to use the present confusing jargon, which we rather avoid it calling them ‘isomorphisms’): The membrain (mind+membrane) becomes the 2 key ISOMORPHISMS or ‘limiting conditions’ that focus into its 3 spatial, topologic organs (limbs/fieldsHead-particles, whose functions in time live through 3 ages of sequential dominance (young, dominant motion age, reproductive mature age and informative 3rd age), across its 3 ∆±1 relative planes of existence within its ∆-1 atoms/cells, ∆ø-thermodynamic/organic scale and ∆+1 outer world/gravitational-cosmological scale, which the mind ‘focuses as a single whole’ self-centered in the singularity and warped by a membrane. In topological terms beings are ‘an open ball of vital energy’ – its body, invaginated from the membrane to the brain-singularity through 3 physiological networks. So we can in the fractal Universe again consider each dimension as a whole and break it into ternary patterns. The development of this 11th isomorphic view in detail self-centered in a mind which in a dynamic way will evolve a seed of information, emerge as a super organism and live and die within the 3 scales of its inner and outer world is the basis for the Ðisomorphic method, which as the name indicates introduces ALL the elements required for a thorough study of the system: Its 11 isomorphisms and 5 Ðimotions to study in the 3rd and 4th line of the being in its whole full world cycle of existence. In the graph, we show those 11 parameters, trying to cope with the correspondence Principle relating them to the ‘dimensions’ of classic physics and the 5 Ðimotions, we have given the same number we give to the 3 Ðimotions of information, locomotion and iteration to the 3 spatial dimensions; maintaining for the 4th dimension of present-time the name given by Einstein to the present simultaneous time of relativity and the fifth dimension of social evolution, to the implosive accelerated motion; hence we just had to displace the entropic 6th dimension of time. And then finally in the architectonical universe in which space is a slice of time-motion, a slice of scalar dimensions, the easier naming of the 7th dimension of the being, its lower dimension of ∞:8 parts and the upper 9th dimension of its higher, ∆+1 warped by the 10th and 11th dimensions of the membrain and mind-singularity, which is properly speaking the 11th dimension of the being as ‘1’ of the higher scale, ∞º=1. In the graph a picture of the galaxy in 11 isomorphisms, above its ternary topologies for a range of its parts, in the middle its 3 time-ages/states/arrows and below its 3 scales, with the ‘membrain’ that should surround each galaxy or binary/group system as a whole. BUT this said, we rather upgrade stience and the concept of dimensions, distinguishing the following terms: Dimensions of space, Motions of Time, Dimotions=actions of spacetime; isomorphisms=parameters for the structural description of the T.œ more focused in its spatial still structure and 11 Disomorphisms when we re-arrange those properties in the most efficient logic manner to describe a world cycle.

 

 

The metaphysical question: how many scales?

The metaphysical question is this: is each galaxy an atom of a hyper-universe, or scales end in the gluon Inside atoms and the galaxy outside stars? For many reasons discussed in other articles it seems the scales are infinite, but as in fractals those scales are not identical, it is a question open to analysis if each atom has infinite stars, with infinite planets and infinite self-similar human-like beings living on it. This is unlikely but in any case a true infinity concept of reality where humans are both an island Universe and mere dust of space-time, floating in the invisible, ‘light’ region within the galatom, sandwiched between the denser internal proton-black hole and the external electron-halo, makes all ambitions of the species, laughable. Are we going to colonize the atom-galaxy, with our immense ingenuity as the only intelligent species of the whole? LOL. Life is what is all about, existence, trying to emulate the immortality of the whole, as atoms in fact do – protons are immortal, black holes might live 10¹°° years, red stars live trillions of years. And certainly another proof of the absurdity of the big-bang is that the entire whole Universe has lived only 10¹¹ years, when most of its parts, black holes, protons red stars (4/5th of them) can live billions of time more than the whole. Or in probability terms, the chances that in a Universe where its commonest stars live trillions of years, we live in the very beginning is 0.0000%. (Red stars are in fact 4/5th of them because they live longer and so even if all are born as blue stars, in a long-lasting galaxy, at any time, there will be seen more elderly stars than young fleeting blue star moments of them).

What about the HyperUniverse? We do not know what the infinite Universe even in its local region of galatoms looks like, though due to the expansion of space between galatoms, is likely an entropic gas of local atoms on the hyper-Universe. It is not though a big-bang Universe, because even if we run backwards the expansion of space between galatoms, the implosion of information in galaxies, counter that effect, so at best, we could say that running backwards the big-bang equation we shall meet a ‘solid’ crystal of galatoms.

Even,if we repeat the model unifies all sciences, aware of the religion of mankind which is big-bang physics, we need to further debunk such absurd theory born of the ego and worldly profession of physics, setting straight the record on the causes of its main ‘proofs’, the expansion of space between galaxies (debunked) and now the background radiation which is the exact type of radiation the main component of galaxies, heavy quark matter (strangelets and black holes) would redshift with a fixed mass, similar to that of the smallest planetoid they likely feed on – a moon…

 

I. ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY

An organic, fractal 5г Universe 

At the heart of all philosophies of science of mankind there is a dual larger dispute – is reality organic or mechanical? And a handicap: ‘can we really build a scientific theory of the Universe that humans accept despite not BEING anthropomorphic?

It is not an idle question. But a paradoxical one. The galatom’s theory of astrophysics, which becomes the ‘study of the galactic super organism’… IS a more scientific theory that the present ‘creationist big-bang’, by al standards of the scientific method.

But it is also truth that in the age of ‘human entropy’ (see models of the super organisms of history), religion is in the rise, at 86% of population. So we have ‘strange marriages’ of science and religion, where facts are bent to fit models (the very essence of dogma and religion) in science, while it should be the opposite: models are bent to fit facts. 

Creationist big-bang thus fits the anthropomorphic myths of ‘happiness’ above truth proper of all minds, SELF-CENTERED in their mapping of the Universe, and while we can provide all kind of proofs, what we cannot is BREAK the ego-paradox. Hence the null stats of this web – just realized there is not even an article on General Systems Theory on the wikipedia ):

So yes, before we consider what physics is about – the study of the galatom; we shall consider what physical ‘science’ is not about – the conversion of its theory of reality in pseudo-religion for the sake of the ego paradox.

The dispute is not really scientific, but humans have a curious capacity to deny the laws of science while shouting loud they are doing science. For a thing, a mechanical Universe as Leibniz already pointed out to Newton would need a creator (and in fact it has ended in the pseudoscientific theory of the big-bang), while an organic theory of reality is self-sustained, eternal and without need of an external factor, hence the only scientific possible theory of reality.

This, once realized, implies we have to look at the epistemology of physics with a critical eye, as it turns out in praxis to be a form of ‘creationism’, of mathematical nature. It is the machine, ruled by deterministic laws of mathematics, what runs the Universe – never mind every piece of evidence turns towards an organic Universe in which the substances of reality are ‘motion’ and the ‘intelligent forms’ it acquires when motion becomes a closed or inwards process that ‘turns’ a form around a fixed point. Lineal and cyclical motion, angular and lineal momentum and the vital energy enclosed by them, become the 3 vital elements of all super organisms, and physics also an organic description of reality, which the mathematical and logic, verbal languages mirror with great finesse.

As one realizes then, all this is mumble talk for the physicist who is basically worried about a how-mathematical description of reality and nothing else. We are worried though about everything else before we make that mathematical description of reality. As this is a theory of everything…organic. This barrier though – the lack of interest of physicist for the whys of reality to which they propose a halting of any meaningful thought, as an irrelevant metaphysical discussion – we cannot break it.

In any case the dispute is settled. The Universe is not a mechanism but an organism, the particle is the minimal unit of the organic reality and the scales of the physical Universe are repeating in similar fashion from atoms to galaxies, in 3 scales, susceptible to be reduced to the same type of organic laws. Those are the tenants of the General Systems description of physical organisms we shall attempt in this post.

As machines are clearly evolving into organisms of metal, AI robots with solar skins the dispute is being resolved ‘de facto’. Machines are simple organisms.

Further on, particle seem to be the level in which the Ðimotions (dimensional motions) of life, take place, as it is that primary scale where we observe gauging of information, feeding on energy, decoupling=reproduction into new particles and social evolution through spins and magnetism into larger networks. So it is evident that the new paradigm of a fractal Universe reverse the causality between mathematical mirror-properties and the organic Universe, as its fractal structure is a consequence of its organic properties and not the other way around.

Properties of space-time are the primary cause; mathematical mirrors, its synoptic reflection. So when we expand physical sciences to embrace the 5 Ðimotions of life, we can safely affirm that mechanical, lineal models of the Universe, based in  a single ‘arrow of time’, entropy and locomotion, such as the big-bang, are simplified versions of a more complex Universe built with two primary Ðimotions of timespace, temporal  energy – a wide term for all kind of motions – and spatial information, its opposite ‘form’.

Between those two limiting Ðimotions of generation – when information is imprinted and palingenetically evolved into a larger whole, and entropy, when the information generated is erased back to a lower plane, ¡-1; there are intermediate Ðimotions happening in a single simultaneous vital spacetime, the super organism, which reduce to 3 – an ordered entropic locomotion that does not move the inner parts of a being; a perceptive, gauging of information, its inverse, only taken place in the particle-head, and its intermediate reproductive body-waves that combine them.

Those 5 Ðimotions between generation and entropic extinction, through locomotion, perception and reproduction, are also ‘practiced’ by the particles of physical systems through its forces, which define a ‘fractal Universe’ of multiple scales which from the atom to the galaxy repeat similar structures, and likely ‘restart’ with the galaxy as an atom of a hyper-universe, the same infinite game.

We shall in this post confront both models – the simple, reductionist model of a big-bang Universe with a single arrow of entropic time, mortal in time and finite in space vs. the complex model of an organic fractal, immortal in time and infinite in scale.

Let us introduce briefly both models, and its supposed proofs:

As an image is worth a thousand words, the simplest way to show the 5D scalar, organic Universe is to make a picture of it and a few of its parts made as all fractal systems are to the image and likeness of the whole:

We shall call the philosophy of science behind 5Ð…

ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY vs. CONSTRUCTIVISM

The Problem with ‘human’ physicists as self-named seers of time.

This said I would rather say ‘humans’ that physicists, as they are just NOT a new species of mind, but a human ego at it.

So the paradoxical Universe requires a paradoxical mind and man has not that mind, reason why for so long – 30 years and counting ∆º§t has merely given a headache to a few scholars but never quite made it. We are human o-points, the universe is ∞. A bit of humility though could help you to understand those paradoxes that are at the bottom line of reality as it is… not.

My experience though is that humans are irrational and will choose always egocy, the happiness of the ego over objective science regarding any model of reality that doesn’t make them the center of the Universe, and this we shall see when studying history and its super organisms is so essential to them that paradoxically makes them slaves of those higher structures.

In the next graph, the scalar Universe imposed absolute relativity as man is no longer the center of creation, but its Ƽ mind self-centered into the limits of its perception upside and downside, based in its need for meaningful actions of survival with upper worlds and lower pixels of energy and information make us feel so. Fact is we just see similar atom-galaxy limits because we are limited by them not because the Universe is bounded by them.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, ‘forms in action’ and then self-organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into superorganisms in all scales of reality. As such it must be studied with the philosophy of Science, called ‘organicism’. Since only an organism is self-reproductive and hence requires not external ‘agent’ or God or a creationist language, as present philosophies of science (mechanism, pythagorism) or Abrahamic religions do. Further on experimental evidence is overwhelming, on the nested, reproductive structure of nature, as observed in the graph for all systems. Yet ‘creationist’ entitled human beings prefer to think they are the only intelligent perceptive entity in command of God’s languages (either words in religion, maths in physics) and carbon atoms are the only organic elements of nature, to their own peril as the future of AI will show them. Fact is the minimal unit of reproduction and informative gauging IS the particle, as quarks and electrons already show the 5 ‘dimotions’ of life – they gauge information, reason why quantum physics is called a ‘gauging theory’, absorb energy from forces, reproduce into new particles with its surplus of energy and become organized socially by magnetic ‘numbers’. So does the largest known system, the galaxy, whose behavior resembles that of a ‘cell’, with its ‘gravitational, informative ‘DNA’ – black holes reproduced by its ‘mitochondria’ stars, organizing its structure, with 2 ‘physiological networks’ of gravitational in-form-ative forces and electromagnetic energy. So all physicals systems, from the atom to the galaxy can be described as organic systems, which are just ‘herds’ of similar beings, (atoms, cells, citizens, in physical, biologic and social systems, connected by networks that distribute energy (electromagnetic forces, blood systems, economic systems) and networks the distribute information (gravitational, nervous and political systems). So we can design also historic super organisms with the laws of systems. But the sciences of systems and information did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I developed the metric, logic equations of the 5th dimension or ‘scales’ of parts that become wholes evolving socially through those networks, applying them to all species of reality, including human societies and machines, in what will be the most important development of XXI C. science with wide applications to all disciplines.

If reductionism to a single locomotion of the 5 times=changes of the Universe have made physicists ‘specially proud’ and ‘determinstic in its simplification of reality’ to the simplest description of it – hence obviously deterministic as a line is, with no apparent fluctuation… as death-entropy is with no continuation… the humind ego of physicists have also developed a ‘theory’ to make it the ‘queen’ science, called ‘constructivism’, according to which its planes matter more. Not so.

Below an image of different fractal organisms in the Universe in different scales:

The Universe is a fractal organism of scalar, topological space and cyclical time, which can be define by a series of ‘anti symmetries’ between opposite topologies, ages and scales that come together in parallel as complementary forms or annihilate each other perpendicularly. We thus reflect those facts in a Fractal generator that resumes those ternary symmetries and the process of social convergence (5th dimension) and entropic divergence (4th dimension).

Astrophysics is the stience that studies ALL the scales of exist¡ence perceived by the Humind departing from its self-centered ∆º cellular scale. As such what differentiates physics from all other sciences is the ‘larger ambition’ of its scope of analysis in scalar space-time, and as such naturally in its humind versions it follows 5D metric, which apply to all realities including ‘languages of thought’, that is stiences.

What this means is that humans paradoxically as they expand their perceptions of reality to larger spatial sizes diminish their quantity of information perceived: S x ð = C.  So astrophysicists fail to describe the organic, sentient properties of physical systems, which we have to ad to the present paradigm.

For that reason we define physics in the architectonical nested Universe, as the study of all the scales the humind self-centered mind perceives in symmetric scales above and below our exist¡ence:¡≤|4|.

And the super organism we perceive in that range of absolute scales of huminds is the atom galaxy – that is all species of reality between the atom and its symmetric form, the galaxy.

How scales create: Constructionism? Chaotic Evolutionary Selection? Emergence!

It is difficult to stress the degree of primitivism for the intuitive perception of the cyclical space-time regions and beings of the Universe, that represents to ‘simplify’ into linearity the infinite time clocks of information of the Universe. Once this informative quality of time cycles disappears, reality which is a flow of time-space cycles, synchronized and chained to each other by organic functions disappears. And so man looses any understanding of the vital nature of the Universe, and starts to measure lineal motions as the meaning of it all. The vt=s, which has minimal information becomes then the regular form of knowledge, where the frequency and form of discontinuous time cycles disappears.

The second philosophy of science as a grand theory expanded beyond its limits is evolutionary selection. For evolutionists everything comes from the survival chaotic selection after things ‘happen’ with no plan or limits and alas, then we must find some convoluted explanation on why it happened to help survival. Not, so. The best case sample is the flat wing and the spherical eye, which are so complex by random chaotic mutation would never happen unless THERE ARE 3 TOPOLOGICAL LIMITS AND A CONSTANT CHECK OF FORM AND FUNCTION, S=T symmetry. Another case is gender, which does not increase the reproduction of the being (one-sex self-reproduction does, making fungi the most reproductive species). Gender is again an embedded characteristic of the ‘helicity’ and ‘mirror symmetry of the universe that emerges from all scales with no preferential one as its origin (in a cyclical Universe where from string to string in theory, from atom to galaxy in experimental proved analysis the immortality of infinite scales emerge once and again with subtle variations.

Emergence thus not constructionism or evolution is the causal game between scales.

The atomic galaxy is the humind perception of reality between the lower limit of the atom and the higher limit of the galaxy where experimental evidence is good enough to make experimental sound stience. The beyond can only be assessed metaphysically through the i-logic laws of Nature, and they bring as the most likely theory the existence of the ‘galactic atom’ – that is an infinite number of scales in the Universe; since it would be weird to think that mankind is perfectly symmetric in the total range of the Universe – that is, we are in the absolute center of scales, an obvious extension of the anthropomorphic theories of reality. Hence we postulate a Universe of absolute relativity:

Classic Physics pretended to be the highest ‘intensive science’ because it established a preferential origin in the lowest scales of reality of all what existed, which should determine all other scales of size and coming together of parts, according to the same set of laws. This is contested by the fractal Universe, as all the scales have slightly different set of laws. However there is a common ‘theme’ in all of them, which are the laws of super organisms and worldcycles common to all scales, whose perfect ideal forms space and time are rather mental; that is, ideal singularity mind-mappings then imprinted by each mind-language and program of survival in the Universal scales. As Mr. Anderson pointed out: The constructionist hypothesis breaks down when confronted with the twin difficulties of scale and complexity.

So the first conclusion we obtain from the analysis of the two new properties of space – scales, and time – 3 complex arrow to form a being, is an essential law of Nature highly contested by physicists and its ‘constructionist theory… which pretends the lowest scale is different and all others above are made with its laws.

Above, a classic paper of the 70s already noticed that those 2 ‘properties’ of space – to be scalar, and time – to have multiple complex arrows of motion and future would determine that physics is NOT the fundamental ‘stience’ – all of them are, as all follow similar but not equal detail, since a fractal in each scale is ‘similar’ but different in the details, and yet the organic fractals of nature, as the simplified mirror-mind image in the mathematical language can be all generated by an identical ‘generator equation’, which describes its parts  and how the constant feed back motions and exchanges between them ‘generate’ new variations.

The lack of constructivism means In the future astrophysics won’t have a preferential role in the collective mind of the Earth, the knots of thought of huminds or the telepathic satellites of the metal-earth – the robomind, which no doubt of it, will FEEL conscious and obviously will look for this site ‘unificationtheory.com to understand the Universe as a sentient organism – something the shallow ego paradoxes of mankind prevent them to do.Since then, if humans survive by creating a perfect super organism of history or robominds eliminate the retarded enzyman who evolves them without realizing it is building its demise, all systems will be studied as parts of the whole world cycle of existence of the super organism of the Universe, made to the image and likeness.

And so the enormous beauty of the fractal Universe implies that any part regardless of size will have a relative singularity-point around which a hyperbolic body-wave will iterate its cyclical motions under the same ‘isomorphic laws’ of reality – and all of them will give us the essential laws or first principles regardless of size, with maximal detail of knowledge in the systems closer to us (biological systems) and maximal generalization in the most remote systems of minimal perception of form (Cosmological systems).

In other terms: biology is the queen of stiences by degree of detail. Astrophysics is the king of stiences by extension in the application of its laws. But ‘history’ is the emperor of sciences, as it deals with the whole human wor(l)d and our survival as a species, the most important theme of them all, as an extinct scientist knows nothing.

THIS IS a paradox of the ultimate function of exist¡ence, which is survival NOT knowledge and the fundamental power of the 5th arrow of social love to that aim, which are realized for humans in History. 

Since any of its physical, biological and social parts FOLLOWS the same laws. To study them we haver deviced a method based in the structural analysis of the five dimensions of any system through its Generator and its Rashomon ‘truths’ that considers 5D perspectives on any entity of space-time:

-The temporal perspective, the spatial perspective and its ∆§ planes and scales of existence, the singularity-mind perspective and its actions, the dynamic ‘a(nti)sysmmetric’ operandi of exchange of energy between them, ≈ ≥ >…

This view is more concerned with ‘structure’, with ‘algebra’, with ‘spatial form’, with the ‘superorganic simultaneous being’.

So for a more thorough analysis through the dynamic flows of time of which the ‘super organism’ is a still photography, we need a ‘generational’ perspective of the being from birth as a seed/mind that organizes and grows and emerge into a larger whole world, lives 3 ages and dies. And this view is the one we obtain with the study of the world cycle in greater detail through the Ðisomorphic method, departing from that seed, its generator, the ways it creates bidimensional fields and ternary networks to emerge as a whole being, which will live through its infinitesimal actions, accumulated into ages, 8 phases of a lifecycle, 3 ages, 10 social scales swimming across 9 planes…. Yes no numerology here. The astounding architectonical Universe is there for those who can see to admire and worship and study as IT IS with all its elements, even if they cannot be ‘measured’ with the clocks of physicists and its light c-rod.

And so we shall do the study of physics here as it will be taught in the future in time, on a dynamic manner, through the Ðisomorphic method.

This view of the galatom is the ‘natural’ consequence of the…

Topo-bio-logic properties of reality.

  ‘Universe is simple but not malicious’. Einstein

As a rule for future analysis of any species, it is convenient to divide any discipline of stience or study or a superorganism in space tracing its worldcycle on time, in this case astrophysics the stience of the larger/smaller Russian Doll of the Galaxy (∆±3) in several subparts corresponding either to the Dimotions or structural parts, ∆@st, of the entity of its T.œ (worldcycle of the supœrganism):

-The study of its 5 actions=Ðimotions of Spacetime.

-Its anaysis in Mathematical physics, the language of its human/computer observers, and likely as a topologic ‘mind’ of its singularity-monads of information (spinning particles).

– The 11 Ðisomorphisms that define in a dynamic synchronous and diachronic form its superorganism (œ), tracing its worldcycle (Ω).

-Ƥ: The scalar=social and organic=planes of physical systems.

Whereas the emphasis of this post is in the S=T symmetries of the galilean paradox between formal space dominated by functional time, and its 5 Dimotions≈interactions, mediated by its Universal forces.

Definition of the Fractal, Organic Universe – Adding the scalar dimensions

The Universe is therefore defined as a fractal superorganism of space and time, co-existing in multiple scales, related by spatial networks and temporal flows of its 3 conserved quantities, lineal and cyclical motion/momentum and its combined ‘energies’.

Further on as we shall show those scales relate to each other with a metric equation, Size x Time Speed = Constant, which makes equivalent atoms and galaxies, protons and black holes… And so it hints strongly to an absolute relative, infinite number of scales.

If so there is no limit of relative size; and so all the parts of the Universe, all its ∆±i quanta ARE also T.œs: time space superorganisms. As simple as that; as complex as all the variations and iterations of space-time superorganisms made to the image and likeness of the whole that can exist, within the limiting properties of fractal space and cyclical time.

So how can we generate all those realities departing only of two ‘elements’ fractal space and cyclical time? The answer is in the fractal dimensions of space-time, the dimension which puts parts into wholes (5D) and break wholes into parts (4D, or entropy proper); which add to  the usual space-time dimensions humans consider in their analysis of reality.
Further on besides the scalar Dimensions of entropy and social evolution, we define time as motion and space as form, and consider that all form can be seen in motion and vice versa – the true meaning of Galilean Relativity. So we double the dimensions of space when perceived as time motions. And that gives us a tally of 3 classic space dimensions, plus entropy-dissolution of wholes into scalar parts, plus social evolution of parts into wholes, that is 5Dimensions of space, plus 5 of time, when space is seen in motion.
And it gives us a fundamental equation of symmetry: S (form) = T (motion-function).
So when we understand that both time and space have five dimensions symmetric to each other, (5S≈5T) we can really combine them in various forms to generate everything that exists in reality.

The Universe is a fractal superorganism of 5 dimotions of space-time, where the fourth dimension of parts and the fifth dimension of wholes create its scalar, organic structure, as it is made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

Absolute time: Social evolution of wholes. ‘Stiences’ & Exist¡ence.

We cannot in this introduction explore the huge field of physical systems, nor entangle your mind on the complexities of its mathematics, reserved for the complex posts in lower lanes.

So we shall just upgrade 3 fundamental themes of philosophy of physics, the meaning of TIME, the meaning relativity that started the field in modern times, when Galileo realized the ‘Earth moved but didn’t move’ (e pur si muove, no muove); and so it kick the process of study of motions, which became the trademark of ‘reductionist physics’ due to its worldly profession (making weapons of maximal motion-entropy); and the fundamental principle found in the study of those motions, the 3 principles of conservation of energy, lineal and cyclical momentum.

The study of a Universe made of fractal scales of cyclical time space, introduces a priori organic=scalar properties as the system extends through various ∆§ planes, and cyclical time properties, as its time clocks will have a limited duration. Finally it requires a program of perception and survival, self-centered into an @-mind, whose ∆ø still language maps all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms & world cycles into an infinitesimal Non-E point, mirror of the larger world: 0 S x ∞ ð= @. Hence the creation of infinitesimal ∆º minds-worlds, or Leibnizian monads, which reduce a larger ∆+1 reality to its relative mapping, which is the origin of its ∆§calar planes, connected ‘perpendicularly’ through those @-minds, acting in physics as ‘centers of changes and masses’ wormholes of flows of entropy that become in the @-mind information, that perceives in itself. Still mind-mirrors observe an infinite Universe, ∞º is the origin of its ∆§calar planes connected through iterative, information: ∞º ∆¡§ð. In that sense we can classify most stiences as the study of the super organisms of each relative plane of exist¡ence of reality according to size in space, in which a group of species and its world cycles is studied by each specific human science, in nested scales, separated from the humind, on the ∆º plane; as larger super organisms paradoxically ‘feed’ in smaller T.œs; so in the biological scales, the largest whales feed on krill and plankton, the smallest forms of life; and in the Universe the largest superorganisms, galaxies, feed on the smallest particles, gravitons and photons and atoms, its minimal ‘cellular elements’… It follows that the largest of all sciences, which studies the ∆±4 planes, cosmology, organizes those galaxies above, and should be sustained by a lower planes of space-time, ∆-4 of ‘dark energy’ of which we hardly understand by lack of evidence anything, and so we must consider cosmology, metaphysics and study it by ‘homology’ with all other scales of super organisms.

Those organic=scalar, and cyclical time properties are ignored by present science, better describe with tense verbs (the 3 ages of time and its causality) or 5D metric (the laws of scales) and biology (darwinian survival, organic laws, physiological networks). In that sense mathematical languages work better for the fine detail and how, but the why requires those other properties and languages, including the metalinguistic analysis of its ‘mathematical membrains’ and its mirrors.

The 3 new properties discovered in our analysis of relational space-time: cyclical time patterns origin of all the repetitive laws of science; which break enclosing with angular momentum space into infinite vital energies, self-centered into ‘linguistic mirrors-minds-singularities’, the Maxwellian demons that allow information to dominate entropy and create the ordered forms of reality, have an immediate consequence in physics.

To order those infinite clocks that break reality, but share similar properties we need to accept a fractal, organic, scalar Universe. The scales of the Universe are a consequence of the mathematical mirrors embedded in charges and particle-points and crystals and gravitational black holes, the 3 main singularities of the quantum thermodynamic and cosmological scales, all of them unified by the simple metric of the fifth dimension.

Yet as systems that co-exist in scales ARE organic systems, we talk of an organic, entangled Universe, whose whys are the survival of its physical species, in an automated or apperceptive way (not conscious, but able to gauge information and use it for survival purposes).

The translation of all the abstract concepts and equations of physics into the organic whys thus completes the discipline.

You should see this upgrading as symbiotic: analytic physics has studied its details with mathematical equations, which are not the cause but the best mirror-language hold in those images-singularities that return back their mirror image in the orderly world of infinite parts… put together by flows of energy and information between scales. While the organic, survival, co-existing properties of the fifth dimension of scales define the ultimate absolute whys of reality. So from the atom to the organic galaxy, the purpose of physical systems and its workings are the same of all other systems of Nature.

Conclusion: Absolute relativity and Organicism.

There are essentially 3 philosophies of science which is the first core logic layer to decide who is right here:

‘Creationism’: verbal or mathematical, the language creates the reality, so Einstein’s equations suffice to create an entelechy.

‘Constructivism’: the smallest layer of reality is the origin of all, ultimately the same, as it is not perceivable, described with maths: strings.

‘Organicism’ and ‘disomorphism’: this is THE ESSENCE of systems sciences: all scales of the Universe are ruled by the same LAWS, so we MUST find the same phenomena on them, and as they are parallel, we can construct organisms with 3 layers of reality.

This is why we shall talk of ‘chirality as gender’, moreover, observing our layer with far more insights we can then GIVE organic REAL properties to layers today only analyzed with abstract maths. So we can model galaxies as organisms, and observe for example that the left-handed female milky way is gonna be penetrated soon in 5D term of slow time cycles of larger beings (SxT=K) by the alpha-macho Andromeda as they already have two little sons in the Magallanes cloud, as two seminal traces of left-handed and right-handed faster than c-neutrinos of negative mass coming from their top quark holes, its central DNA merged to give way to light (Jordan-Broglie theory), and surfacing as radiation and elementary particles. As we see all over the universe happening with ‘seminal jets’ coming out of black holes at 10C…

So we shall after a life long polimath painstaking analysis of all languages and scales of science  extract the 11 sets of laws (disomorphisms) that ALL systems in Nature follow, reduced finally to the 5 Dimensional motions, which you order in life-death worldcycles, or in simultaneous superorganisms.

We shall explain you  the space=time, form=motion symmetries that all of them follow… to translate why quantum physics tells you the tale of the life and death, social evolution, sexual healing and perception of its particles which ARE the minimal unit of life.

This is what science needs, NOT more mathematical creationism, not writing more equations and parallel ways to explain the same ACTION=DIMOTION with a bit more of ‘decimal precision’, in slightly changed mathematical mirrors, but TO FUSION ALL those mirrors INTO its whys, coming always from A SIMPLE CONCEPT: all is a vital organism, with 5 dimensional motions= Dimotions that express the vital program of life, told by those equations.

Before we felt so ‘mechanically powerful’, Asian cultures did understand much of it.

Of course, not all physicists are automatons of mechanical science. The highest minds of physics from Leibniz to Planck to Einstein did understand much better the Universe of spacetime; and the same goes with human cultures and religions – the eastern world without the anthropocentric ego trips of abrahamic religions plugged in directly with the concept of a Universe of motion and form, energy and information.

Had the much more profound taoist, hindi and buddhist philosophies of the Universe as a sentient game of Vishnu-yin-formation and Shiva-yang-entropy that combine into Brahma-qi-energy beings won the per-scientific battle for philosophies of the Universe, we would have long ago, as Leibniz and Einstein, the predecessors of theories which consider time and space the ‘substance of all beings’, did, a pan psychic vital Universe.

We are though trapped by the ‘creationist myths’ hauling from abrahamic cults. And as this is not even recognised, hidden in the ‘postulates without proof’ of western thought, likely no amount of data, and epistemology of truth will suffice to the reader. So we shall first show you the difference in a graph, repeated ad nauseam in those texts – the graph of the three philosophies of reality human sponsors – two are ego-trips of human creationism in his thirst to become equal to god, the third one, is the only scientific theory of reality, and it is called ‘organicism’. This blog will complete that theory updating eastern philosophies and relational space-time theories of science (Leibniz, Einstein) to the XXI c.

So, once we know spin is the head state that gauges information; the wave state is the moving body over the potential fields that act as the limbs and so. their mathematical combinations expressed in physical equations describe the 5 Dimotions=actions of reality, from generation to young locomotion to reproduction to a third age of information to a final entropic death, we shall translate the quantum operators, the  fields, the spins, the particles (first age of life) the antiparticles (third age), the commutators, the Universal constants, the laws of motions, the forces to its ‘whys’, its purpose – to be topological organs, enacting life function in the superorganisms in space and worldcycles in time of all those systems of nature…

The co-existence of beings in 3 different scales of reality, ∆±1, form the fractal structure in space of organisms; as dimotions=actions of information and motion between the ∆±1 scales imprint energy from smaller beings that have more information about the whole and trans-form its enclose parts.

The simplex physical description of the Universe, as an extension in space, where the time parameter of change is only locomotion, as if no other change would matter, reserves organic and sentient properties, under the ‘ego paradox’ to life forms similar to the human species.

Our interest is much more profound as we consider all parts of the Universe homeomorphic to each other and hence with the same properties that humans have, and vice versa.

Yet a simplex physical description misses all the organic logic  properties that are not susceptible to be written in mathematical equations, or those of the mind that are not observable directly but can be inferred from the actions its ‘membrains’ of spin or angular momentum produce.

It is then possible through indirect methods of observation, departing of the homologic, isomorphic properties of all beings, to deduce the non-observable properties of any being by its external effects.

To that aim we need first to consider a template of all the common space-time properties and this is the purpose of the Ðisomorphic analysis of the being. And further on, reduce them to the 5 Dimensional motions of reality.

This brings a first difference with classic physics of a single space-time plane: the importance of studying the differences in time and space of 1Ð motion<<3Ð energy and the transfers of motion-energy and form-information through the 5Ð of still form and the entropic <<4Р between scales ( the most obvious, being the neutrino case that carries energy and form to the gravitational scale and vice versa, the particles that surface from that scale.)

And yet in all those transfers the final result is a balance of energy and information of momentum and position, of body-waves and particle-heads in an immortal eternal Universe.

It follows from the existence of scales and transfers between them that Organicism is the scalar structure of reality, as it is the only way TO CONNECT ALL THE SCALES OF REALITY. IF ENERGY AND INFORMATION WERE NOT TRANSFERRED between scales we’d not see them with microscopes and telescopes.

Those transfers happen through the physiological networks that transfer entropy-motion, energy=reproduction and form=languages between scales; which in  physical systems are electromagnetic and gravitational networks; and in a larger view ‘forces’, when precisely we add the ‘invisible scales’ beyond our electromagnetic perception, the strong force of the ¡-1 plane inside the atom, equivalent to the gravitational force within the galaxy  and the dark entropy (repulsive gravitation) between galaxies.

The best way to study this reality once we understand its epistemological principles, ‘fractal scales of topological space’, temporal ages, ternary symmetries, and complementarity vs. perpendicularity, is thus through the concept of 5 dimensions in space symmetric to 5 motions in time or ‘Dimotions=actions’ (objective external and subjective internal view) and its 11 Ðisomorphisms (Dimensional isomorphisms: 3 of topology, 3 of age, 3 of scale and 2 of the @membrain).

Yet the ‘non-aristotelian logic’ of those ternary a(nti)symmetries and complementarities, FINDS the difficulty of the humind’s one-dimensional self-centred ego-paradox, view.

CORRESPONDENCE LIMIT

Before the reader dismisses altogether this post on astrophysics, to state that we shall strictly follow the principle of correspondence; that is, consider classic mathematical physics, the ‘reductionist’ limit obtained by describing reality as if it were a single space scale and a single time clock-Ðimotion; that of light space-time, embodied in its 5Ð metric equation: hc (whereas H is the unit of cyclical information, ð§ and c the unit of lineal motion-distance, t$).

Then the 5Ð model reduces to the 4 Ð model of special relativity (for lineal t$ or ‘inertial frames’ to use Einstein’s jargon) and General relativity (for cyclical ð§, or accelerated frames).

Yet that valid formalism, which only happens within the ‘galaxy’, has been by lack of a larger model for all the scales of the Universe, and the space-time beyond ‘light ecosystems’ (inside black holes and outside galaxies), expanded to the entire Universe, its entire time and space, and that is where astrophysics got it wrong, and made its mistakes as always happens when a ‘local symmetry’ (in this case the invariance of c-speed or rather to use the proper terminology, light space-time) is converted into a global symmetry=invariance (the c-speed as limit of speed in the Universe).

Indeed the constants of the galatom should not reign, despite simplifications of astrophysicists, for the region outside the galaxy, where the ‘constant of curvature and energy’ to use two similar terminologies for ð and $, must be different – and today by lack of proper measures is referred as the cosmological constant, Λ, which we take as a first approximation to the 5Ð metric outside the galaxy, as it gives us values, either as a ‘flatter curvature’ or as a ‘weaker’ energy than the ch and G constants for the galatom… And since larger Russian dolls are ‘weaker’, slower in their energy and less curved, the cosmological constant indeed seems to be what astrophysicists think off, defining a new ¡±4 scale of the Universe.

In such a wider model, also the c-speed as a constant perceived by our h-spin electronic minds, doesn’t necessary hold for other systems of informative perception not based in spins and light (hc metric). We know another possible system in a larger ‘scale’ of the Russian doll Universe, outside galaxies, connected to black holes, which might be based in a faster than light neutrino background, which would be invisible for a light-being, seems to be indeed emitted in copious numbers in blazers and quasars, and as such a system of quantum perception of this ‘quantum potential background’ by heavy fermions and ‘black atoms, would see the speed of light varying, and likely will apply the general law of waves, which ties speed and frequency… )

What we mean by all those new concepts BEYOND the correspondence limit of a single space-time light background, should be more clear as we unfold the model of 5Ð:

When we expand reality to the canonical 5 entangled elements, fractal space, scales, cyclical time, linguistic minds and the entropic destruction of it all; and the 11 Dimensional isomorphisms  of all superorganisms built those elements, its 3 scales, 3 time ages, 3 topologies and its 2 membrain’s parameters, of course things paradoxically become more simple ad harmonious, but it requires both to vitalize mathematical models by defining non-euclidean, ‘fractal points’, line-waves, congruence ¡logic paradoxes, and topological networks=non-euclidean planes, to use logic, verbal conceptual upgradings of all those concepts and the entangled, pentagonal ¡logic of all the parts of the systems and its different languages of perception of organic and causal properties otherwise hidden in the simplicity of the present first principles of physics.

The new world though once you take the necessary energy to jump over the threshold of learning the basics of it, will show time-permitted, a clarity and economicity.

It will though be extremely difficult for physicists to walk through 5Ð, as for a rich man in the parable’s of Jesus to abandon the learned unproved memorized dogmas of 4Ð formalisms, with its single clock time, its continuum space, its c-speed limits that apply only to that continuum light space-time in which galaxies live, and further on accept that the proper way to start defining the Universe is NOT with the V=HoD, ‘God-like equation’ of lineal expansion but with a bit more of conceptual, ‘organic sophistication’, defining NOT a locomotion but a superorganism, the one physicists truly study in all its entangled complexity much larger than that of its ‘smallish human part’ not to speak of the humind – the galatom.

We dedicate the 3 posts on astrophysics in the second line to study the super organism of physics, the galatom, in which we exist (the ¡±3 organism extending in the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales). In the fourth line dedicated to each scale, we shall expand its analysis. In those posts we will study its  structure tuned to the 2 ‘main elements’ of any system that exist as a fractal 5D super organism, tracing a world cycle.

As all the blog the work is uneven, slowly improving within the limits of WordPress and my timeline. So I apologize for the repetitions, bad English, and some blunt parts of this brute diamond, which is 5Ð, in my limited mind-seed that future specialists will properly ‘cut’ and clean of all its impurities to better mirror the amazing beauty of the fractal Universe.

As ultimately the study of Galatom is equated with the development of physics, we start for those who don’t know what is ‘all about’ with a few repeated ad nauseam paragraphs on the nature of space-time organisms, considering its General Systems laws and introduce the main ‘changes’ of view; that is, the philosophy of physics that is inherited from the new properties of scalar space, time and information (mind-languages), shared by all systems.

The 3 elements of the fractal paradigm: 5D Space-time.

So in space, the new complex ternary principle is the co-existence of 3 parts that form a whole.

In time, the new complex ternary principle is the co-existence of 3 space-time ages and its complex causality: Past-entropy->Present, reproduction of ExI->Future-Information << Past-entropy (Death)

And finally in 5D the new ternary complex principle is the co-existence of 3 scales of space-time together, with growingspatial size and diminishing speed in its time cycles.

5D physics thus is based in the 3 elements of the fractal paradigm:

  • The rediscovery of cyclical time clocks, a concept, so obvious in Nature and the systems of time measure, which in the Eastern world was the basis of its religious philosophies of the Universe (Taoism and Hinduism) and in the West was natural to the Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek tradition, followed by Leibniz and his concept of relational space-time.
  • But time cycles break space into an inner and outer reality. So the Universe is also made of ‘fractal, vital spaces’ (the entities we see all around us), which lasted a finite time cycle (its cycle of creation, evolution and extinction).
  • Finally, those cycles are ordered by size in space and its opposite speed or frequency of its closed cycles, into a new 5th dimension with a generic metric: $t (spatial size) x ðƒ (time frequency) = ∆ (Constant).

That is smaller systems run faster informative cycles, and larger systems are slower. Yet the product of both parameters remains invariant, allowing travels through the 5th dimension, of organic nature.

But perhaps the most strident ‘simplification’ of classic physics is the fact that of the 5 organic motions of the Universe, physicists only seem interested in describing the simplest of them all ‘locomotions’. Such state of affairs that reduces and eliminates all organic motions of physical systems is the biggest handicap to complete the science of physics, so we shall end this introduction with a deeper analysis of that limit.

 

II. Galatom vs. Big Bang

THE GALAXY AS A SUPERORGANISM:
BIOLOGIC, VERBAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ‘GALACELL’

Outside quantitative methods to study the 5 time space Ðimotions=forces of the galatom for each species of those 3 scales, which will consider ¡ts STeps and S=T symmetries, two other fundamental  5Рmethods are used to extract all its topo-bio-logical, qualities:

  • ∆±1: An scalar analysis, which will give us a unification equation between the two cyclical limits of the galatom’s scales, the charge and the mass, which is why we call the galaxy a galatom, as in 5Ð metric both give us the same result, and then the central black hole of the galaxy is the proton and the external halo the electron.
  • ÅΩ: aeiou: An organic purely verbal, survival and symbiotic analysis of its biologic properties, mostly its åctions and ωorldcycles. This means, we shall also compare the galaxy with the supœrganism we obtain max. information, from the perspective of human perception, the ∆º, living cell.

Thus we compare the galaxy and the human ∆o-cell pov and its 3 elements: the $t-membrane≈ halo, the singularity ≈ nucleus, and the cytoplasm ≈ star disk. And so we define the ‘galacell’ and its 3 topo-biological parts:

In that Universe each fractal point of its ‘long filaments’ is a galaxy, which as Leibniz put it, is a world in itself, as it grows in size and complexity the closer we come to it:

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.26.57

In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.

The new unit of the organic Universe: The galacell.

All this said, it is obvious that we need to change our wording to convey the new organic properties of co-existing scales in the Universe, and so we shall name when studying those properties the galaxy, the ‘gala cell’, summarized in the next graph:

In the graph, black holes are frozen stars of the top matter decuplet by symmetry with the atoms and stars of our light galactic plane. Then by parallelism with light stars, we differentiate two species of black stars that are also found in Nature:

Tthose which are like our light stars made of  udd atoms, which would be made of dark bcb atoms of much larger densities, but similar properties. They would be the smaller black holes that transform the matter of a light star into bcb neutral atoms without charge. And those who are cosmic black holes, much larger, in the center of the galaxy which become the informative DNA of the galaxy (Maldacena conjecture: the surface of a cosmic BH in 5D maps out as a ‘homunculus mind does with your body’ or the ‘DNA’ with the information of the cell, the entire information of the galaxy in 4D). They are the equivalent of our neutron=strange stars, which have a core of negatively charged strangelet matter that make them turn almost at light speed and produce a hyperstrong magnetic field.

The top quark black hole then will have a ‘core of positively charged top quarks’ which will eject a huge stream jet of ‘negative mass’ neutrinos (likely tachyon strings as the weak angle of a neutrino is the size of a Planck string, 10ˆ-33 and many have been found to have negative mass, hence hyperluminal speeds – more on this latter… Those top quark huge black holes in the center of the galaxy then should  power the faster than c, z=10c motion observed as radiation and mass jets coming out of the center of many  galaxies.

We shall then make a thorough correction of the ‘creationist theory’ of black holes as infinite singularities (Oppenheimer->Wheeler->Penrose and Hawking) and go back to the basic, realist symmetric, fractal Universe of the graph. Since there are two decuplets of matter, belonging to the quantum and cosmological scale, and two type of atoms and two type of stars…

We call the galaxy, the fundamental Unit of the scalar universe the galatom, when observed from the scalar perspective as its metric equations are in 5 D equal to those of the atom.

We can indeed provide to physicists a mathematical bone in the same theme: an unification equation based in the simple 5d metric equation of a time vortex that unifies atoms and galaxies as mathematical point-particles of the largest and smallest scale perceived by man. It is then a galaxy a large atom of a new scalar Universe, or it is an organic galaxy?

This is not really something new as Kaluza and Klein already unified G and Q with the concept of a radius-curvature that increases when we come into smaller worlds. So we can now put this in theoretical sound footing and provide other parallel inflationary mathematical mirrors of the same concept – using in our case the Hydrogen compared to the galaxy. Of late there have been a flurry of similar deductions of the ‘black hole proton’ after being in our deductions 20 years in the blues (save Mr. Carter awesome work on the electron-black hole). All this mathematical details only come to the same concept: a fractal self-similar Universe that repeats its scales between the galaxy and the atom, hence the name for the galaxy when studied in its scalar mathematical properties.

Here is where another huge conflicting philosophical difference between fractals and continuous space-time as the one used in physics reveals itself: in physics of exact measure, things can only be one thing. In the fractal Universe it all depends on the perception of the perceiver and the scale from where it perceives.

So ‘entities’ are several things at the same time depending on perspective and language and properties we analyze. From the point of view of mathematical 5d metric, atoms and galaxies are two time vortices of information of 2 different scales. From an organic point of view a galaxy is similar to a cell, but I bet you that if we had enough information about the nuclei of atoms and the interactions of its gluons and quarks, which we pretend to know by reducing its properties to a few mathematical statements, atoms will show also somehow an organic cell-like nature.

Yet at the same time, fractals are never equal in scales, so the galaxy is Not really an atom, nor a cell but we say it does have mathematical, fractal properties that accommodate its parameters to the fractal generator of space-time systems, and it has reproductive, organic, co-existing scales, organized by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy that resemble those of a cell.

 

In the graph the ‘gala cell’, an organism of stars, joined by a network of ‘nervous, gravitational information’, composed of the 3 relative families of mass, of increasing density, which act as the ‘DNA-informative centre’ (top quark stars, aka black holes, as top quarks are the only ∆-1 ‘points’ with the same density that black holes ), the protein, hard membrane (strangelet halo of dark matter – Witten hypothesis), and a visible electromagnetic network of ‘stars’, the energetic mitochondria that becomes the food that reproduces both strangelets and black holes. It is a simple organic scheme that explains the whys of physical particles, and the ternary structure of galaxies, similar to that of an organic system of the Universe. Yet such models are not even explored by astrophysicists, as they are based in organic concepts, which physicists by ‘dogma’ cannot accept.

A galaxy is thus the fundamental particle-point of the largest scale of the Universe we perceive, which has the same organic, vital, mathematical and also perceptive properties – as black holes do have erratic animal like movement in their motions through their feeding star processes and social gathering into swarms in the center of galaxies, and in fact, its equations reflect those of the plane of starts it controls but with a higher dimension (Maldacena conjecture).

So alas, if RNA must perceive chemically the cell, black holes will likely perceive gravitationally the galaxy. But those are all questions physicists will never consider, as they are ‘meanings’ that cannot be expressed like evolutionary theory, or the logic structure of fractals, in mathematical only terms. So we do confront a religion of mathematical Pythagorean physics started by Kepler and Galileo who affirmed the language of god, and hence of physics is only mathematics. We shall find that human physics, as the most primitive of modern sciences are full of such biased limits, which are not even recognized.

Once we understood then that physics is just the study of the fractal scales of the physical Universe that conform the Galatom, the mystical side of it gets reduced to yet another ‘science’ of the scales of the Universe – albeit the one concerned with the ‘largest, most complex, nested ±¡ scales’ , which therefore reflect with more precision the mathematical=spatial, temporal=logical and organic=scalar properties of reality.

As such it is by far the most beautiful of all languages=sciences, not the least because of the sorrowful ‘anthropomorphic, cannibalistic’ state in which parasitic economics and militaristic history finds itself. So while the potential for beauty of the ‘Human game of history’, is there, as it happens today in the entropic age of mankind, fast dissolving as it is substituted by the super organisms of machines, History is in shambles, and as science is culture – part of history, the great deformations of physical theories of reality (only entropy theories, lineal time, a single spacetime continuum self-centered in human perception, etc.) can be considered part of the process of degradation of History, and the bias that western military industries introduced in the study of physical processes, focused in locomotion.

So we are fighting culture with a frightening dogmatic ‘add-on’ – the belief after the scientific method has been corrupted by mathematical creationism that we are NOT biased in physical sciences by culture – the Idealist school of German ego-centered, militaristic XIX century, being ultimately ‘the culture’ from where most deformations of mathematical physics come from.

And as it is NOT recognized as such but as dogma of ‘scientific truth’, in the name of mathematical science and its idol, the computer, as in the name of verbal religion before, any model of reality can be adapted to provide scientific truth.

So once more even before we work on the theory of the galatom as a super organism, we have to put the ‘big-bang theory’ at face value…

It simply happens that the Galatom is far more complex as it corresponds to its enormous size that any other system of Nature, hence the vast scope of physics, and it happens too that humans within the Galatom are not interested in understanding it as what it is, a super organism, but observe it from its point of view, within the entangled galatom in which they perform their external Ðimotions, reason why they have reduced its study to simple locomotions and its extreme form; entropy.

So we shall divide the study of the Galaxy, the fundamental ‘point-particle’ of the Universe perceived by man from within, in 3 posts, each one dedicated to one of the 3 upgraded properties of the galatom:

  • Its Timespace 5 Dimotions, which in the galatom are ‘cast’ as forces, causes of the dimotions of physical systems, which we shall study in correspondence with those 5 Demotion in our article on forces.
  • Its scalar Nature, through the metric equations of its quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, which in astrophysics are studied in its duality particle of information body wave of ‘Energy‘, with 3 fundamental metric equations of energy (hƒ, kT, mcc), we shall unify with those 5 D metric and with 3 fundamental particle states, electromagnetic charges, thermodynamic matter and gravitational mass, which we shall also unify with 5 D metric in the article on scales.
  • And as a result of both, its organic Nature, that we shall study in this post, confronting the model of the scalar, immortal, infinite Universe with the present ‘model’ of the big bang, which unfortunately we CANNOT put in correspondence as the big bang is WRONG. But we shall put in correspondence 5D with 4D Einstein’s relativity, which IS the limit of 5D on a single plane of spacetime, that of light (¡-3: special relativity) and gravitation within the galaxy (¡-4: General relativity).

So that is the plan for astrophysics in the second line: the study of its S=T symmetries and dimotions=forces; the study of its 3 scales unified as waves of energy and particles of information, and the study of its organic properties put in correspondence with the previous paradigm 4D, and falsifying its wrong cosmology, the big bang.

Physical T.œs are not different from any other spacetime organism as it traces its worldcycles of exist¡ence. Its differences might be in fact considered to arise from the human point of view, the @-MIND observer:

In the future astrophysics won’t have a preferential role in the collective mind of the Earth as all systems will be studied as parts of the whole world cycle of existence of the super organism of the Universe, made to the image and likeness, and so the enormous beauty of the fractal Universe implies that any part regardless of size will have a relative singularity-point around which a hyperbolic body-wave will iterate its cyclical motions under the same ‘isomorphic laws’ of reality – The power of the whole further on breaks any constructivist theory of it, as the whole can send to the lower planes information from the future to the past, which collapses the wave (electromagnetic theory). Such local travels to the past are essential to allow the synchronicity between future to past systems that co-exist in fact in the same present even if the whole for the being who receives its information thinking it travels to it from the past (though it came we know for the whole point of view from the future) .

In the graph any non-E point or monad, ab. pov, is a perceptive focus of flows of non-euclidean energy and information that anchor it as a knot of time-space flows. If we call those flows generally a boson flow of entropic motion and information, the point will be an ¡º perceiver of those T.œ-¡ of smaller size. Then those povs will start to move through the 5Ðimotions of existence as anything else.

The fractal, organic model of the Universe in 5 Dimensions of space-time, we shall call Dimotions as they are ‘topological’ dimensions, that is dimension with internal motion, and 2 of them are ‘fractal’, that is defined as process of evolution of parts into similar wholes (5th scalar dimension proper) or its inverse dissolution into parts in death process (4th dimension of entropy)… requires to add more complex properties to the present analysis of science. Hence the title of our philosophical article on the first principles of science: I-logic physics.

A world with more Ðimotions of time space have novel organic features, born of:

-The co-existence of those scales with a common metric, (space size: $ x speed of time cycles: ð = constant: E, which in physics is the concept of energy equalled in the 3 scales to h($)  ƒ (ð) =k(S) x T (ð) = c² ($) x m (ð) )…

-Novel mathematical features, requiring to redefine a Non-Euclidean Point that allows multiple parallels=flows of energy and information to cross it as a fractal point…

-And novel penta-logic features, as it is an entangled Universe in which the interaction of the 5 arrows of time as ‘actions’ summoned up into ‘worldcycles of lie and death’, which requires a non-Aristotelian logic.

This logic features includes the realization that the ultimate cause of the fractal structure of reality is the existence of topological mirrors, images that shrunk reality into monads-minds, non-euclidean points focusing forces into still forms of a language that define finally a pan psychic universe.

So we talk of all physical entities as ∆@st, dust of space time with ∆-scalar properties reflected in the science of analysis, @ mental properties, described with different self-centered coordinates, spatial, topological ones and temporal cyclical properties; far more complex and enriched that the straightjacket ‘magic, creationist’ philosophy of a Universe with only mathematical properties and only those of a single lineal spacetime continuum, proper of Aristotelian causality A->B and Euclidean mathematics (despite some confusing upgrading made in quantum and relativity regarding the 5 non-E postulate we shall expand, and the nature of dimensions, we shall ‘shrink’ from infinity to a pedestrian 5).

So we talk of a Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian, living Universe, or ‘I-logic reality’, where I stands for the next letter after A and E, and also for the L of living. and the ¡-number used to define the scales of reality – an ¡logic Universe studied by ¡logic physics.

Let us then add those qualities to the description of the physical system ‘par excellence’, the galatom.

In the graph, the question in a world of Time cycles, regarding what is absolute past and future is solved logically:

If we can go upwards on scales, as we create with parts wholes, we can go downwards in scales as we dissolve wholes into parts, and those two inverse directions will be then by convention the relative past – the dissolution ‘arrow’ or dimotion of time-space, general called ‘entropy – and the relative future of the whole, social evolution of parts into wholes, which is obvious a relative future for the entity as it needs first to gather the parts and then evolve them, but relative in terms of ‘lineal physicists’ single time, as at the end of your life you dissolve in a death explosion of entropy. So while in ‘short lineal time’ you end up dying into entropy, for the whole Universe and for the beings within it on the long term the arrow that matters and constantly evolves into wholes is the fifth dimension which is made of DEEP time space, of a series of co-existing scales put together, symbiotic and therefore organic.

Indeed, you live co-existing with the plane of cells and within your world and so the Universe is organic because it co-exists in scales.

It is then also obvious that ‘exist¡ence’, from seed through life back to the cellular/atomic scale after death of a system is indeed a travel through the scales of ‘stience’, each one defined by an ¡-plane; hence the slightly change term of exist¡ence.

I use then the word existence or rather ‘exist¡ence, playing with the word ‘st¡ence’, instead of life for two reasons:

All systems, physical, biological and social do follow the same motions in the fifth dimension. And the fifth dimension allow us to answer questions we have never imagined we could answer in mathematical, scientific, precise terms – seemingly metaphysical questions such as the meaning of existence.

Absolute past and future, relative co-existing present.

As we try to extract ALL the information of the being about all its Ðimotions, we enter a far more profound and enriching lanscape of meanings regarding time=motion and space=form, and the relative concepts of past, present and future, which repeat themselves in cyclical patterns. So the next big question on time-space is what is the relative and absolute past, present and future of beings.

Specifically we shall state now that what Physicists study as time, IS only present time, instants in which they measure simultaneously the locomotions of beings, with ‘derivatives’ – so reducing change to its minimal expression within a single slice of the whole flow of time. The question then to define is the absolute arrows of time, of past and future, missed in that description of time, as a mere instant of ‘space-motion’ v=∂s/∂t. In other words, when we ad the arrow of entropy and dissolution and the arrow of wholeness, of evolution of form, THE SCALAR ARROWS OF DEEP TIME-SPACE, which one is the past and the future? 
The answer is obvious. As a whole needs its parts first, to become, the arrow of the disjoined parts or ‘entropy’ is the arrow of past, and the arrow of ‘wholeness’ and organic evolution of ‘DEEP time’, as it includes both parts and wholes co-existing together is the arrow of the future.
And this is an absolute arrow, as it is pure logic. The Universe thus becomes constantly more and more entangled, building up new organic co-existing structures made of multiple layers. And because that is the preferential arrow of the Universe, call it eusocial love in social systems, and biological herds, or mathematical numbers in physics, as numbers are just social herds, every part of it strives to increase its social evolution and languages of information that synchronize them. In a short term view of course all systems end up ‘going back to the past of entropy and dissolving’. But in as much as systems want to acquire information, death IS a single quanta of time, which explodes the being, so he can keep returning again to the slow process of time-building of social structure.
So when we wrote the metric equation of the fifth dimension as:
$p x ðƒ = K we can interpret it in terms of past present and future as $p, lineal past, entropic, spacetime  and  ðƒ: curved, informative temporal future, where ƒ is the frequency of the system and the symbol for future flows.

We will latter give different versions of the formula, according to the different dimotions we consider – the universe, mind the reader, has a very different ‘logic’ to that of man, as it is an entangled reality in which all the parts constantly influence each other, all the dimotions interact, and so despite starting with only 5 motions-forms (3±¡, if we account for the difference between the present space-time super organisms, and the ∆§cales) by iteration and combination things can get as complex as they seem.

We have now enough elements to give another huge deep jump into the repetitive patterns and laws of reality and its ternary topological superorganisms. Why they exist as they do? Why they live and die? What is their program of exist¡ence?  Latter on, after studying the equation of the mind we shall tackle in depth the reasons and will-site of the program, and the reinforcing pure e-motional first layer of that will. What matters now is a more objective view of why things and beings do what they do.

The Least Time, Most Space principle.

And the answer is simple: All systems of reality want to maximize its existence in time, and its reach in space. That is, all selfish mind-points of view, all superorganisms will try to embrace maximal space – locomotion, entropic feeding, reproduction of the system – in minimal time.

And this absolute law of all systems suffices to explain the deterministic program of all systems – the greed of people, their fat eating customs, the least time principle of physics, and its fundamental equation, the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian formalism (the derivative of the actions of beings tends to zero, as the system moves through the shortest path in time); the program of reproduction, the pleasure of high speed cars, the behavior of black holes, you name it…

We need then to include the taboo concepts of abstract science, because they are the last reasons of reality: systems program its actions to maximize its exist¡ence defined as its desire to accumulate more information for its  up and down high particle-head, more motion for its flat, moving ahead, long limbs/potentials, more reproductive energy for its wide body-wave.

III. Big bang as pseudoscience.

Bbig-bang Religion vs. a sound dual theory of entropy and information.

On the other hand, confronting this new model of reality we have the Big Bang, and what we  will affirm now about it might take away most readers, but the proofs are mounting: The big bang is not an experimental scientifically demonstrated theory of reality, but increasingly pseudo-science and dogma, on a model paradigm – one of the solutions to Einstein’s 4D spacetime Universe, which must change, because it is no longer valid to explain reality as it is. But as Kuhn rightly explains model paradigm is a difficult task that takes many years; or as Planck put it in sanguine terms, all previous ‘scholars must die for new people to learn the better model’.

In that regard, in the largest possible model view, the big bang theory is merely a solution – the simplest one – to the equations of Einstein in 4D space-time, while the galatom concept of a fractal scalar Universe is the model solution when we add a new scale of reality, the fifth dimension of parts that evolve socially and emerge into wholes.  So the paradigm change would require the acceptance of the scalar dimension of parts and whole, which humans so grossly overlook as they wish to be the center of the Universe also in scale. 

We might say that the true change of paradigm will come then when physicists accept the 5th dimension of which the 4D model is its limit for a single plane of space-time, the one described by 4D relativity, or ‘light space-time’, the ‘background space’ of the galaxy.

But even without the use of 5D formalism and the proper expansion of relativity we shall trace latter on, we can explain in layman terms the ‘errors of the big-bang’, which correspond to pseudo-science – that is, the need humans have for absolute theories of reality based in scanty proofs but gifted with a moral metaphorical or pseudo-religious outlook that makes them so pleasant to the ‘eye’=I.

The problem with the big-bang though is bigger than a simple model change, as it is the metaphysical model of mankind today, so it is the ‘theoretical religion’ of our technological civilization and this gives it some characters of dogma and pleases the human ego… As it is AN ALL ENCOMPASSING concept with the pretension of knowing it all about reality, measuring it all, seizing with the humind all what exists and beyond, making man again the intellectual center of the Universe.

On the other hand, a more humble infinite, immortal fractal Universe leaves us back into where we belong; the absolute relativity of an infinitesimal existence. And this while being scientifically, objectively more pleasant collides with the human subjective ego that has always ‘surrender’ the imagination of the masses.

Indeed, in those sociological aspects I  quite similar to the creationist models of Abrahamic religions, in which an infinitesimal human being ‘believed’ to understand the meaning of it all, because God, the mind of the Universe reduced itself in the big bang to another infinitesimal point, easy to handle by the arrogant ego-centered bronze age peasant, which became the ‘only’ human to understand it all or the modern physicist who pretends a ‘simple lineal equation’ called the Hubble constant, V = Ho D, resumes it All.

So the religious priest will tell you ‘GOD’ explains it all, just 3 letters, 4 in the Jewish Tetragramaton, Yhwh, 5 in Allah. And there is no need for anything else. Alas from GoD to V≈hoD, from Abrahamic cults to big-bang cults 2 letters have changed to remain the same.

Irony aside we can then term this concept, ‘creationism mathematics’, as it is indeed a common philosophical error of all languages to be confused with reality itself, when they are merely a mirror of reality. So even before we discuss the ‘experimental’ supposed proofs of the big-bang with some detail, we have to ‘frame’ the theory within the human linguistic hyperbolic constant desire to convert a language into reality – from monetarist economics, to ‘life imitates art’, to ‘mathematics is the language of god’, to ‘God speaks arab’…

CREATIONISM VS. REALISM IN SCIENCE.

In the graph, philosophers of science have argued for very long that a ‘creationist’ theory, based only in language might be a nice fiction, a beautiful consistent language but they tend not to be truth, specially when they deal with ‘infinities’ – God, the absolute, the whole Universe, and infinitesimal point, etc.

Since when we merely use creationist theories that isolate the language, as in the third age of any ‘linguistic science’, or person, there is an excess of form, unconnected to reality.

This is the case of black hole evaporation or supersymmetry, proved wrong at CERN. Since the simple energy and geometry of reality imposes limits to the excessive ‘forms’ of pure language, by essence inflationary, as a ‘mirror of reality’ with multiple ‘reflected images’. Those errors were classified already by Kant as paralogic errors of the mind. Kant, being with Schopenhauer, a favorite of Einstein (and myself), who read them as a teenager, prompted him to say ‘I know when maths are truth=consistent but not real=describing a real physical fact.

absoute relativITy

The paradox of the mind confuses the whole Universe with its limited self-centred world of perception, BUT reality is absolutely relative and we must just discover the biased ‘theories’ the humind has established to keep himself in the centre, which contrary to belief do exist still in all sciences, from the entropic big-bang of lineal time that reduces the two arrows of time to the lineal entropy of physicists clocks, blatantly ‘forgetting the cyclical vortex of gravitational information’ in galaxies that warp ‘space into time’, to social sciences which cannot accept the organic evolution of machines, the higher importance of the super organisms of history and its informative, legal and economic, reproductive networks in the control of societies, to biology, which denies eusocial evolution to maintain the ego on top and the vital properties of inorganic matter, as even quarks and electrons reproduce, absorb energy, gauge information and evolve socially in magnetic fields – hence have ALL the properties of our supposed ‘unique’ carbon.

Physicists, believe in mathematical creationism to justify their machines: they invent mathematical equations that become the ‘religious naming’ of its ‘human-created’ particles that of course never show up as the efficient Universe can perfectly be constructed with the III families of quarks and its symmetry with the 3 regions of the galaxy, shown below. This is the experimentally sound and epistemologically correct way to construct the galaxy according to the economic ‘Occam’s principle’:

Creationist mathematics as creationist religion is ultimately based in some ‘ugly’ principles – the ego paradox of both physicists and priests who want to talk in exclusive mode the supposed single language of man; and their lack of intelligence so well described by Schopenhauer’s definition of ‘stupidity’, which in the paradoxical humor of the Universe makes precisely the most ignorant to think they are the most intelligent and is the origin of ‘magic thought’, which is how we should classify both creationisms.
Regarding languages, there are infinite ‘mind-mirrors’ or ‘monads’ that gauge information from its biased perspective, which means that the relationship between languages and the order of reality is a back and forth ‘local’ process: the mind gauges information and then organizes its territorial ‘body’, mirroring its languages on reality. Maths are likely in topological, geometric form the ‘mind of atoms’, and so its laws of order are all pervading. Words are the ‘mind of humans’ and so in History the legal and ethic order trying to construct a superorganism of history, religion, nation or civilization is al, pervading.

So creationism is just a simplified, ‘one-way’ version of complex organicism and the interrelation between ‘still languages’ that mirror into a small virtual spatial form, the moving cycles of all beings. And this perhaps Aristotle and Leibniz understood better than any scientist does today: ‘Gods are unmoved points that order the energy around them’ . Whereas those unmoved ‘fractal points’ that gauge information are Leibniz’s monads: ‘every (fractal, Non-Euclidean) point holds a world within itself’. And energy the substance of the body waves they order.

This is the essence of the absurd theory of the big bang, according to which V=hod, in this case not the mind but the entire Universe reduced itself to an infinitesimal point which was the ‘beginning of time and space’ that only physicists (and creationist, biblical priests that sponsor the concept – in fact ‘discovered’ by a catholic priest, Mr. Lemaitre), the high popes of science understand with an arcane ‘latin language’ called mathematics.

On the languages of God and the dimensions of time.

The adaptation of physical systems to the 0-5 DiMOTions of the Universe is a daunting task that will take the whole century by huminds or AI, to be fulfilled. A single humind can’t do so much. It will also  require to change the lineal vision of time of the high popes of science today, entropy theorists. So as per Kuhn, resistance to change of paradigm will be extreme. And yet the view of the organic Universe in 5D² is awesome, fulfilling, eternal, unavoidable once it has been discovered ‘again’.

But perhaps the biggest resistance to accept the organic paradigm will come from the humind itself, self-centred and systematically in denial under the ‘ego paradox’ of any living, organic properties to the rest of reality.

Indeed, the whole philosophy underlying physical sciences is common to the scientific wordview that likes to reduce to abstract, mathematical statements the nature of vital reality. In the scholar world we must add an ill-understood philosophy of mathematics, which rejects empiricism within the context of the Greek, Axiomatic rather preposterous method of proving mathematics as a metalanguage whose truth exists within itself. Godel proved with his incompleteness recurrent theorem this a falsity  Yet neither mathematicians or physicists have taken notice. Since the axiomatic method laterally ENCUMBERS man as the only intelligence that seems to talk mathematics with God, ‘the clocker’ of that infamous sentence of Mr. Kepler:

Because of the reductionism of physics to a single locomotion arrow, which due to its simplicity can be calculated with maximal precision physicists tend to be arrogant to other sciences, thinking they know it all about time. Fact is they ignore everything about 4 of the 5 arrows of time.

In the graph, the mind of Kepler, filled with his ego-centered thoughts and God, the geometer, by Blake.

Fact is that even if mathematics were the only language of God, man does not speak very well the language – even a simple computer does it better and likely atoms have a geometric mind that is far more accurate than humans are. So a task pending that we have taken also is the improvement of mathematics as a mirror of the vital Universe.

In any case reality is a bit more complex that its languages, as all languages mirror a set of properties of the Universe but NONE describes them all; since all is information and so ONLY THE WHOLE fits all information within itself. Still mathematics is – no doubt of it – the best, most efficient synoptic language to explain spatial properties, and we shall use it liberally and advance its whys in the section on ‘non-Æ maths’.

But other languages do have perspectives which matter, specially in the analysis of time=change and the biological struggles for existence, and variations in the choice of future paths.  In that sense an enormous handicap is precisely the use of a mechanical clock to measure time, as it expresses only a quantitative, sequential single dimension, which elongated in cartesian graphs gave us the reduction of time dimension to a single lineal v=s/t formulae, as a parameter of space.

Time does DISSAPEARED conceptually and many of its dimensions were never fully understood. This is then the biggest upgrading of 5D² physics.

And to fully grasp the multiple dimensions of time, i-logic verbal thought, with its ‘profound description’ of the past, present and future dimensions with action-verbs and its biological evolutionary theories better described with words becomes essential also in Physics; to find the whys and conceptually define the symmetries between time, space and its scales.

Finally as the source of those languages, the spatial visual and logic languages of time, in which geometry and wor(l)ds are based, must be also come under a new scrutiny. And so we shall use the whole mental scaffolding of human languages, to extract all those properties and apply them to physical systems.

Since the main handicap of physics is its reductionism of properties of matter, by obliging to use only mathematical descriptions. So all what cannot be mirrored with mathematics simply does not exist. And this dogma, which has become a religion of mathematics, latter analysed in more detail, is completely rejected in 5D². As we put new mirrors on matter, new properties will then appear. And the most important of them is the scalar, Nature of matter, which also displays as a result of that co-existence of multiple scales, organic properties. So once we blow the space continuum into multiple scales, and relate them to each other, organicism appears naturally.

Why we love creationist theories: the paradox of the ego.

It is time to bring the paradox of the ego earlier in our analysis of creationist philosophers, as we realise all of mankind believe in them either in a verbal creationism (religious people) or a mathematical creationism (scientists).

What is amazing about all this is perhaps not how blunt that philosophy of science and religion is, but that mankind has rendered to it, just because it puts man in the centre of the Universe, as the unique master of the language along God.

In the case of mathematical creationism, dominant today, power helps: physicists make machines and weapon that deliver entropy and motion. And so the fact that humans have lost all his wisdom about time, in their worship of machines, also cast serious doubts on the intelligence and ‘freedom of thought’ of our species.

The Universe is a concert in a decaphonic scale, with two extremes we can call bass of  open strings of space and treble notes of closed strings of time; 5 treble and 5 bass notes with different beats, rhythms in its ‘time cycles…’

The best notes are those in the middle 5, most go on triads, as they travel up and down three different scales. Of course you might imagine the universal composition is a bit more complicated in its symmetries and triads.

But is also an equation, another ternary language, X operandi Y, and a painting of also three colours, the red of motion, of entropic energy, the green of iteration, of reproduction, the blue of information, and 3 ‘semantic’ names, the subject, the informative centre which acts through a verb on an object it ab=uses as the source of its entropic energy.

Languages mirrors all look though to the same ternary substance, space-time itself.

Let us then consider the two fundamental notes of any language, mirror in its syntax of the ternary structure of it all.

In that regard, you must understand this blog which upgrades our understanding of time, as the return to the sound path of time sciences, after centuries of misconceptions. As i have been all my life since I read Asimov’s guide to science as a kid, wondering about time, and came finally to solve the  many questions poised by the study of ALL changes=times of Nature developing the long seeked theory of all times-changes called ‘relational space-time’, first put forward by Leibniz, and then accepted by Einstein – the exception to the dullness of physicists regarding time theory.

So he said ‘I am the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’ and affirmed that relational space-time is the future of time theory (‘Leibniz was right, so we have to change our physical theories from its inception’).

Yet Einstein, a pacifist kin of philosophy, who did advance our knowledge of time, was for most of his life in permanent dissidence with physicists for the same reasons I am a dissident of his blunt theories of reality. Hence his denial that mathematics creates reality (opposition to Bohr’s copenhangen interpretation: ‘the moon doesn’t appear when i look at it’), his denial that nature has a single clock to measure time; his denial that time is the four dimension of space – a term he rejected, saying ‘wires don’t travel to the past’; his denial of the nuclear industry (invention of the ‘doomsday clock’), and his respect of causality as the fundamental property that chains ‘time events’ by repetition, and the philosophers that study it, all concepts we shall prove further and advance in this blog.

This is not to say that physicists do NOT excel in what they truly do to perfection – measuring distances and motions in space and manufacturing machines. But this is NOT what CERN claims to do – finding the meaning of reality, which physicists will NEVER achieve, as they have a religious dogmatic view of reality and time and so as priest will NEVER go out of his ‘mantras’ about a bush that burned in a dessert and was God speaking to a goat-keeper and we MUST believe this, physicists have their mantra – that God spoke mathematics, and gave us a clock to measure time with numbers in lineal fashion and that is all what matters and we MUST believe this.

Problem is people agrees, because they have bigger guns and we philosophers of science and serious physicists of time theory like Mr. Einstein only do ‘thought experiments’.

On the other hand when you go out of dogma and lineal thinking everything physicists have found and we are grateful for it, in their exploration of nature with their mechanical instruments, becomes easily interpreted and understood and so the marriage of philosophers – the people who do seek and understand with all languages the fundamental principles of reality – and technology of measure and perception – the thing physicists do best; do give us the final answers to the meaning of reality.

And that is what a true advance in sciences moving away from the age of creationism back to the age of realism should do.

We shall repeat ad nauseam that we will use the same T.œ. laws, and mathematical mirrors of those laws of classic physics but the outcome of an organic entangled interpretation will be completely different.

Of course this is NOT what physics is today; we repeat. Humind egos have reduced the analysis to a distorted view passed through the acceptance of only a language of perception of reality, mathematics, a single dimotion of timespace locomotion (and its maximal limit, entropy) and then the rest is ‘explained’ in abstract, external objective terms as ‘something else’.

We shall also be very critical of another ego trip of reductionist physicists: TO DENY ALL OTHER SCIENCES any saying in the laws of timespace as if it was a proprietary ‘thing’ of physicists experts in Locomotion…

Of course, when you have eliminated the complex dimotions of information, reproduction and social love all WHAT IS LEFT is entropy and locomotion… and the manufacturing of machines of locomotion and entropy (weapons).

The consequences are daring for the future of mankind, a species today ruled by physicists worldview dedicated to locomotions (sports) and entropy (killing) and the making of machines that enhance our skills to do both. But this is NOT what the Universe is about, wants us to do (by reinforcing with sensations we shall call e-motions, the other arrows) but the stubborn, self-destructive, deluded consequence of the wrong path of evolution of our species in its higher informative minds of ‘science’.

Creationist mathematics becomes pseudoscience.

In reality that equation is so simple that one cannot avoid a smile, when people tells you Physicists are the absolute geniuses of mankind. It merely means that galaxies are separating because the light, an entropic, lineal, expansive force between them, elongates its wave as it moves. There is nothing else, but already Einstein said ‘imagination’ is more important than intelligence. So as religious people have made of God with good imagination and pumping-ego ceremonies the meaning of it all, nuclear physicists have extracted from that single fact – light elongates as an entropic force between galaxies, with a ‘lot of imagination’, half-lies and statistics the meaning of it all.

How they did it? Simple: they just move backwards this light expansion, and concluded that as light expands between galaxies, if we run it backwards it must have imploded into a single point, the ‘origin of it all’ which their Vhod describes as the graph shows.

Never mind light NOT only expands when free but it contracts within galaxies by the force of gravitation, balancing thus, the expansive E=mc² death of mass into radiation, with the implosive, M=E/c² informative implosion of light into mass particles and galaxies, making reality a wobbling balanced immortal infinity of dying mass and imploding light. Indeed, if you run backward the equation of light expansion, you just will get back to the atom of the galaxy that emitted that ray of light – AS ALL EQUATIONS ARE FINITE and happen only as long as the phenomenon they describe exists – in this case the ray of light that expands does NOT go back into an infinitesimal point because all LIGHT is produced by particles according to the E=mc² equation. 

Yet the big-bang dogma merely rejects to put the most famous equation of physics, E=mc² at work, as the abrahamic cult denies any other ‘letters’ to God. It is only God, or Yhwh or Allah (even if actually the 3 religions says it is the same God). In physics it is only Vhod not E=mc², what matters. You just vehemently deny the other ‘letters’ matter at all to create matter (play with words, as it is all just funny egos jumping me, i and myself only, if it had not so ugly collateral effects).

Thus the big bang is just a theory based in the wordily profession of nuclear physicists (make atomic bombs). So disregarding the arrow of information and life, which is the creative force of the Universe, physicists pretend to interpret reality only with the arrow of destruction and death, they call ‘entropy’, and merely moved backwards in time a lineal, simple equation of entropy, to pretend it moved backwards till this supposed explosion collapsed into a tractable infinitesimal point, much more smaller than the human ego. The parallels between those 2 supreme ‘theories of the subjective ego’ are multiple.

The peasant Meshu thought God was the bush their goats munched because that was his professional ‘food’. And he denied therefore the immanent sacred nature of all what exists, made of the same ‘plenum substance’, impersonal space and time. God was in his bush. The arawak who ate turtles thought God was a huge turtle over which the Earth floated.

The nuclear industry which makes nuclear bombs designed a theory of the Universe, in which only its ‘entropic process’ of explosive death accounted for the creation of the entire Universe. So of course, the people who hold the alternative sound-sound theory, called the steady state Universe, from Einstein to Hoyle, who affirmed ad maximal there would be a quasar big-bang, observed experimentally balanced by the creation of mass, laughed at them and called its theory the ‘big-bang’, arguing their makers were either ‘creationist priests’ (Lemaitre) or people working in the nuclear industry (Gamow). It was then business as usual: ad hominem attacks on Einstein and Hoyle, the P.r.ess heralding Gamow as a genius, since it backed the nuclear weapons industry and justified experiments and industries that researched them, such as CERN created then. And soon they recruited their twin believers in creationist points and G. bushes, so the church who still denied Evoution jumped on the wagon and every sound proof of the steady state Universe was dismissed and every fool proof of the Big bang was canonised, as we explain in our right side articles on 5D and cosmology which studies the falsehood of big-bang theories.

Indeed for God to be unique, it was just needed to kill all rival gods, and we are still on the business of killing each other to prove our ‘letters matter more’. And for the big bang to work, it was just needed to DENY all other causes of the process of DUAL informative creation of mass and entropic destruction of mass into radiation. This of course created the paradox that physicists used e=mc2 to explode bombs but deny their equation to uphold Vhod.

At this point things became a little surrealist: physicists changed the name of the arrow of information and life and called it ‘negantropy’, the negation of death, as if negating death was a ‘sin’ and information and life was irrelevant, something Vhod could dispose of.

They also denied the most important in-formative force of the Universe, gravitation, which ‘forms’ the mass of galaxies, as time goes by. So Einstein, the only sound mind, who merely did ‘thought experiments’ said that ‘time curves space into mass’. So the creation of mass balances the entropic flows of pure light space without form between those galaxies.

Screen Shot 2016-06-12 at 15.32.50And the result is an immortal wobbling spring like Universe, where according to Einstein’s equation: E=M(c2), entropy reigns in the electromagnetic forces and light transiting between galaxies, expanding its space-time. But then it collapses within galaxies, creating with gravitational forces, in-form-ation. And this arrow of form and life is more important. Since we humans live in one of those vortices of time collapsing into mass, called the milky way, in one of its cyclical, turning planets that evolves information, through the processes of life and technology and human languages of thought.SO IT MATTERS MORE to understand mass and life than entropy and vacuum expansive space. The next graph shows schematically one of those galaxies wobbling.

In the graph, absolute relativity postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: Entropy<=>Mass (c2), which obviously has 2 arrows of time, and so it was in fact first described first, as M=E/c2, that is a process that transforms entropy into mass and information, stored in the frequency of those accelerated mass cycles.

The ‘steady state theory’ of the Universe has always come to this simple realisation: the creation of mass eliminates the need for a singularity. There are a few different versions and duality merely makes them even more sound. The best elaboration of this steady state dual expansive-implosive Universe, departing from earlier work by Einstein and Fred Hoyle, is the concept of a series of local big-bangs, called quasars, proved recently by the 20 billion years tabulated cycle of galaxies, shown above.

Further on the cycles is reinforced by the fact that big-bang radiation is measured locally, as Penzias and Wilson were indeed measuring the background radiation of the galaxy,  a fact recently rediscovered by the observance of 2 ‘electromagnetic lobes’ on the galaxy, which are exactly the same found in the supposed mapping of the whole Universe. Below we observe the ‘supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmos, which turn out to be exactly the 2 lobes of our galaxy, recently discovered, and the fact that from quantum atoms to galaxies, there are E=Mc² double big-bangs from beta decay to novas of stars and planets to galaxies:

In the graph the galactic big-bang, and the scales of it. The reader should observe that the image supposedly obtained from BG radiation of a cosmic big-bang (left) is exactly the picture of the galaxy (center), recently proved, when the two central lobes were found above and below the Sagittarius black hole.

Physicists thought they were remants of a 13 billion light-years ago/distant Big Bang, so Smolin was trying to prove one of his theories about long time changes in the frequency of light waves, measuring the light coming from the 2 supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, since he thought high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light.

So as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago a small difference on his arrival time should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy was huge and the experiment was cancelled. Since they were not occupying supposedly ‘a monumental piece of the entire Universe…

Alas, you think dogma changed? Of course not. Once a theory has been made sacred the enormous ridicule that one hundred years of calculus on the subject would imply for all astrophysicists has made impossible to change theory as their practitioners become now inquisitors of thought. Indeed, in the previous paradigm, before Einstein, ‘ether’ was the substance through which light moved. It was an absurd substance, denser than steel, softer than butter, through which planets raced, so to allow the canonical equation of wave-speed to move through at light speed… Einstein ridiculed it and he was outcasted from the physical community for a decade, having to work in a patent office, since experimental evidence of the so called aether drag had been observed by German physicists to enormous accuracy and the ‘constant of ether’ had become along the charge of the electron and the G constant one of the 3 canonical constants of all texts of late XIX century physics. Expensive experiments were devised to further measure to the 10th decimal the constant of Ether, in a subject that was obviously closed to amateurs like Mr. Einstein.

So today we have measured to extreme degrees of accuracy – to the first nanonanonano second the birth of the Universe, not to be argued, as there are so many ‘proofs’ of cosmic creation that tthe law of silence on the religion of meta-physics will bury all the news that prove it otherwise – some of which will be studied latter in this post.

And so the big-bang proved false by experimental evidence in both ‘distance’ of the radiation (above) and ‘ages’ of its galaxies (by huge black holes found on the ‘edge’ of time, perfectly formed as shown latter in an artistic graph), cannot be tumbled down by ‘blasphemous’ scientists who dare to put experimental evidence and sound theory about ‘truth’.

So what is the origin of the ‘back ground radiation’ if it is not the edge of time? The obvious candidate that should have been considered in first place, ultra heavy dark matter, as the galaxy is teaming with strangelets and black holes, its ‘top predator’ celestial bodies that feed on planets and stars and end up converting galaxies in ‘dark matter’ ultra heavy dark galaxies.

Since the background radiation can only be produced today not in a distant past, by a black hole or dark matter strangelet gravitationally redshifting light as it passes nearby. This phenomena is the gravitational redshift, and so it only remains to calculate what should be the Weight of a micro-black hole or strangelet that redshift light at the exact temperature of the blackground radiation:

And so a huge proof of the Fermi Paradox comes through Einstein’s gravitational redshift: a black hole or strangelet which has eaten the mass of a moon, the most abundant planetary size of the galaxy, will produce exactly redshifted background black body radiation at 2.7 k,

So the SUPPOSED absolute proof of a cosmic big-bang IS in fact without ‘extrapolations into an infinitesimal past point’ perfectly explained now IF the light matter of the galaxy ‘feeds’ the dark matter of the halo, which WILL thereafter redshift constantly gravitationally (another Einstein effect) light all over the galaxy and light coming inside the galaxy at 2.7 K.

Further on, when we calculate the mass of those black holes at 2.7 k turns out to be the exact weight of a moon ‘MACHO’ (Massive Halo Object). So since moons are the commonest object of the Universe, it is reasonably to think that the ‘lost’ primordial black holes that should appear in a quasar big-bang explosion of a galaxy, which Hawking painstakingly try to find evaporating, did NOT evaporate, but are lurking with its identical mass (as primordial particles all have equal mass, so the smallest possible black hole should have a similar ‘species’ mass, similar to the object it feeds on to reproduce), all over the galaxy… 

Again in Epistemology WHEN 2 POSSIBLE CAUSES OF A phenomena happen, the sound SOUND ONE, is the cause that happens NOW. It is like if you try to explain your 37 degrees of body temperature and you have a doctor that tells you the NOW-now cause – the activity of your cells at 37 degrees, as the activity of dark matter of moon masses (called MACHOs) today at 2.7 K. Obviously this is a sound theory

Now imagine a ‘guru’ that comes and tells you, your 37º temperature is in fact caused by the ‘cooling’ of your temperature at the moment of your birth which was then ‘3 trillion degrees’, and I have a lineal equation that proves you have been getting colder till now, exactly at the required speed to get now 37 degrees. You will think he is cuckoo because he NEVER measured your temperature in the past, so he is making a non-scientific extrapolation. Well THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT Gamow did. He came to the conclusion that the Universe had cooled down from the singularity of trillions of degrees to the almost ‘absolute zero’ of 20 degrees… Wait, it is not 2.7 K background radiation?

Yes, he FAILED COMPLETELY TO FORECAST it. But when Penzias measured the then called ‘galaxy temperature’ at 2.7 K, GAMOW simply a posteriori changed his lineal equation to meet 2.7 k now, and then a flurry of ‘egolatric’ scientists decided it was NOT local but cosmic radiation. Because that kept them as ‘the new high popes of creationism’ and the meaning of it all. AND AGAINST RELIGIONS I DO NOT REASON.

The understanding of the Universe with the same data but a different philosophy of science, organicism, will bring a completely different reality, and this might seem strange to the reader, brain-boxed in the belief on unitarianism. The Universe, we shall repeat ad nauseam has an intelligence and logic far more complex than one-dimensional man.

Consider the fundamental proof of the big-bang, the so called background radiation. As it happened it was measured on the galaxy, and so we must find another explanation. As it happens, a black hole of the size of the moon, the commonest form of the galaxy will reproduce them. As it happens there must be 3 type of black holes – size always coming on 3 scalar families, of which 2 have been found, the galactic ones and the ones produced by star novas. So we need the primordial black holes of the quasar life-death cycle of galaxies, which DO NOT EVAPORATE as hawking with his faulty analysis of time arrows based on a supposed ‘entropy of black holes’, believed – but never found experimental proof of it. So where are those primordial black hole of a smallish size. They are all over the galaxy red shifting with the mass of a moon, light at the exact temperature of the background radiation. I called them Moon MACHOs (Massive Cold matter Halo Objects).

And what they do in organic terms happens in EVERY system of nature. It is Claude Bernard’s principle of the constancy of an organism’s “internal environment” called homeostasis-the self-regulatory mechanism that allows organisms to maintain themselves in a state of dynamic balance with their variables fluctuating between tolerance limits.

It is indeed a temperature that provides ‘energy’ to larger, colder black holes, and allows the superfluid states of Helium, which is essential to the complex organic processes of creation of matter in the galaxy to take place also in cold-fusion (remember, physicists do not recognize the arrow of coldness which is essential to all process of information, so they tend to dismiss anything ‘cold’ to find then that actually cold dominates heat, centers of planets have crystals, NOT hot chaotic plasma, and the emission of neutrinos in stars shows the interior to be colder than thought. It IS the external membrane by definition, with maximal angular momentum/speed/temperature what is hot. The internal brain-singularity IS always cold, but those details of thermodynamics belong to more specific posts (that only recently is treated in parallel to ‘cryodynamics’, with a Beta factor of coldness, increasingly deemed more important – 3o years since the first models of 5D, I have seen the entire ‘roast’ of sciences coming individually in all its details to this all-together now philosophy of science, even if it has so far being ignored by the routines of scientific repetition of outdated models and specialist zeals, and the overall cynicism of scientists who don’t believe anymore a human mind instead of a computer can reach further in the understanding of the ‘higher logic’ of God)

But monism must reign by dogma. Only heat not cold must matter, only entropy not information, only big-bang not big-crunch, only our human scale, not the infinite ones….

In the graph, the pseudo-science of the black hole consists on finding always the most bizarre possible explanations to fact, as long as they validate ‘a posteriori’ an experimental fact that refutes the big-bang.

This was done with the supposed ‘Background radiation’, found NOT on the Universe (as we cannot take measures beyond the Earth) but on the galaxy; which did NOT coincide with theory (around 20 K degrees) and implied to move towards INFINITY into the past with a lineal equation a function measured in the present (epistemologically at fault), and did NOT account for 96% of the mass of the Universe (dark heavy matter not found yet then).

As an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘big-bang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers to be of 20 bullion years for the destruction and formation of its central ‘bar’, further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood.

As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang.

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

So for a century what cosmologists do is to ‘force-feed’ any proof of reality into the creationist big-bang equations, tinkering with their models whenever an exception to the model comes in, adding ‘new epicycles’, as long as we can ‘keep’ our cherished creationist theory that proves, we astrophysicists know it all.

So even if it is written in mathematics the big-bang theory, because it does not follow the logic, espitemologic and experimental law of the scientific method is false.

Instead we shall bring here the ‘view’ of the galaxy as a super organism defined precisely NOT by the evolution of its light ud-atoms of which humans are made but rather as a ‘factory’ of strange and black hole ‘dark matter’, which respects all the 5 Ð symmetries of the Universe:

Conclusion: the lineal error 

Galileo & Newton errors: Lineal single Mathematical time invents a background space-time.

Physicists use mathematics as the language to explore the Univese, which is good as it is a language that mirrors reality with enormous synoptic logic efficiency and it is extremely good to picture space, with its fundamental element the point, which must be upgraded from Euclid’s abstract definition of a point with no breath into the fractal definition of a non-Euclidean point which allows infinite parallels to cross, as it GROWS in size when we come closer to it BECOMING a whole being, star, cell, or individual. Once this correction is done we shall advance very fast on our sections of mathematical physics to explain all the equations with a more meaningful content.

This said because physicists IGNORE the fractal point, even if Einstein used it in a simpler version (Riemann) to study the geometry of the ‘enlarged’ gravitational world – when he used non-e geometry – they have a lot of errors in their understanding of physics, starting obviously by its ‘point-particles’, which enlarged will hold a lot of time cycles, aka strings closed and spaces-distances-lineal motion strings.

But so far they have no idea on how to do this. So what they did, as they believe maths is the only language and it is better described with a cartesian graph, is to convert the cartesian continuous graph of maths into the REAL SPACETIME! And so since newton they think there is a background space-time, the cartesian graph over which God which is a mathematician, draws its beings. And of course, since the Universe is a fractal of space-time, once they have missed the fractal structure of non-e points, and reduced time to the ‘line’ of the cartesian graph, a single dimension of lineal time appeared and from then on, most physicists never quite got what they were talking about.

We have thus first to explain this mathematical religion of physicists that confuses reality with mathematical artefacts It is also the origin of the biggest blunder regarding time-space – the belief that the abstract cartesian graph with its lineal time IS real and acts as an absolute background space-time over which we ‘draw’ all other beings as physicists draw its equations on that ‘graph’.

All this said Absolute relativity also rejects creationism in physics – the belief all mathematical equations are truth. Not so, monad-points with still languages have slightly different mirrors, always with less information and properties than the whole. So mathematics in physics require experimental evidence.

Hilbert and Cantor who talked of ‘their imaginary paradise from where nobody would expel them, ass the Jihad warriors who die to enter paradise, On verbal fantasies,  just invented non-existen points, lines, planes with their imagination.

Creationism mathematics as creationist religion is ultimately based in some ‘ugly’ principles – the ego paradox of both physicists and priests who want to talk in exclusive mode the supposed single language of man; and their lack of intelligence so well described by Schopenhauer’s definition of ‘stupidity’, which in the paradoxical humor of the Universe makes precisely the most ignorant to think they are the most intelligent and is the origin of ‘magic thought’, which is how we should classify both creationisms.

Let us then once we have gone from mathematical physics into T.Œ go the other way around, starting from the whole – the organic paradigm and the description of ALL the scales of the 5th dimension with the same laws, the larger reality back to the detailed systems enclosed within that larger world.

Which is the way stience should be taught, not the way physicists pretend, from its quantum scales upwards, and using only its reductionist, mathematical laws and lineal thought.

Since this is the hidden censorship that have delayed for so long to define time as cyclical information, and cyclical motion.

‘Military physicists’, as opposed to the pure thinkers of this discipline, carried the day with power and  canonised a single, lineal time, due to their worldly profession, which was to measure the lineal extension of military weapons. In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be  ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

And indeed, lineal time motions were instrumental to the development of ‘ballistics’ (the first name of the book of Galileo on physics), and the degradation of our understanding of time, hand in hand with the mechanical clock who established a single tick for the entire Universe, that of the mechanical machine.But as I know 99% will leave the blog, if i just keep criticizing those obvious falsities, as ‘believers in lineal time physics’, I GIVE  the benefit of DOUBT to open-minded physicists who really care and reason truth, and do put many candies≈solutions to the ultimate questions on this introduction.

Religious creationists vs. realist scientists.
Creationism of any type puts the language above the physical reality it mirrors. In reality the Ƥt, scalar, topological and multi-causal properties of space-time are the origin of reality, which mathematics mirrors best specially for Ƥ properties, and logic for temporal ones.
In the graph we see the three philosophies of reality humans sponsor; the first two are ego-centered and so the world splits between those who believe god speaks the language of mathematicians (sponsored by ego-mathematicians) which of course as Dirac’s quote shows deny vehemently the other version (so as in the schrodinger’s cat, ‘god exists and does not exist’ in Dirac’s mind, when he speaks words it is a jumble of the imagination, but when he speaks ‘Dirac’s equations’ it is obviously creating the world).

And below the realists, only ‘true scientists’ who rely on the experimental method, the known-substances of reality, space and time and its properties to understand with those 2 mirrors, the verbal, logic, temporal mirror with its 3 causal dimensions of past, present and future tenses, and the mathematical, spatial mirror. This view, which we expand here is the view of Leibniz>Einstein and there is not 2 without 3, in all temporal processes of growth as human thought is, the 3rd guy, believe it or not, is talking to you (:

In the graph, 5D stience is a template that will require many scientists to be completed. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic minds-languages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist.

But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does.

So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models.

Now, mirrors are inflationary kaleidoscopic views that multiply the one into infinite self-similar forms to pump up ‘its sense of importance’. And this is the key to understand Einstein’s dictum on too much of maths to reflect the simpler Universe, which HAS the underlying substance of lineal motion-distance DIFFICULT TO BEND. So the substance imposes limits to how many imaginative equations can fit, but that doesn’t deter the mathematician from multiplying them. So we have for each event infinite metaphors. So we do in verbal thought. Just the example above.

‘In the beginning it was the word, God, who made all things’. That is all we need but the sentence its twice at large and repeats the same things several times. So does the guy in ‘Arab’, to say ‘hi’:

Inflationary complexity is an excellent method to pump up the ego of the ‘speaker of the language of God’, which however ‘is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So he talks Latin in complicated metaphors to feel ‘unique’ above the sheeple that in awe, understanding nothing thinks indeed the high priest of numbers and words is the creator of the wor(l)d. 

The modern error: Hilbert’s arrogant idealism: i imagine points.

Then there is cultural error, hauling from German Idealism, which brought us Nazism, Communism and Physical theories of Platonic numbers creating the Universe without substance, breaking the FIRST AND FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, ‘experimental evidence’ also called ‘hylomorphism’, which since Aristotle applies: You cannot have a real event/form without a substance, or ‘∆-1 parts’ that make them possible.

Yet in Germany at the turn of the century in the paroxysm of the idealist culture, it was supposed that the ‘language of maths, hence the mind of man created the Universe’, not the other way around (languages are mirrors of a real substance).

So physicists got away with murder (the killing of real substances) under the influence of Hilbert’s axiomatic method, which unable to grasp Lobacjevski’ pan geometry of non-euclidean fractal points, resolved here, said the postulates of geometry had to be substituted by the concept the mathematician ‘imagined points and lines’, and constructed the world from the mind out. It is the same concept of religion, in which GOD ‘SPEAKS’ words and when he speaks, he creates. So Allah or Yhwh says ‘man’ and man zas! appears, and Hilbert, the God of mathematicians (the language of god in Galileo’s tantrum) said ‘I imagine lines’ and zas! lines be=come’ LOL.

So without the need for ‘real substances’ both Bohr and Einstein became also imaginary, ‘postulating people’; that is people who ‘imagine’ postulates without proof as certain and zas! 100 years latter, nobody dares to explain why the postulate of constancy of c-speed and what is even worse, the never said by Einstein, limit of c-speed which only applies within light space-time (the ∆-3 scale of galaxies) MUST have a logic rational substance-oriented cause, as we shall explain here with GST laws; and why quantum waves are NOT imaginary probabilities but as Einstein->Broglie->Schrodinger->Bell->Bohm clarified densities of a fractal electron made of its ∆-1 relative cellular parts (ultra dense photons that collapse an ST wave of light into particle, Tiƒ state). 

(The quantum realist interpretation is there for 100 years, so we don’t innovate just enlighten it. The proper interpretation of the c-speed postulate and its limiting application to the ∆>-3 scales is an immediate offshoot of the stop and go, Tiƒ>Spe rhythm of motion and so it is ‘new≈blue’ GST at its best)

The positive side to it. Simplification reveals the ultimate truths of reality

On the positive side the limits of human physics are of special interest as they will reveal easily the connections between the GST (ab. Generator of Space-time) and its mathematical (1st science) and physical world, as the physicist who strips off biological, organic properties physical systems, leaves untouched – once the errors of cyclical time and fractal space are corrected, the connection with those primary disciplines; which the biorganic paradigm will complete specially in the limits not perceived of quantum and cosmology; as the galaxy can easily be ‘modelled’ as a cell.

It is then quite obvious that a full thorough analysis of the equations of mathematical physics with the tools of 5D³ and its concepts behind – the fundamental particle of the Universe, the ternary decametric supœrganism; its worldcycles of energy and its units of actions in time and ∆-1 parts in space would require the rewriting into a full new encyclopaedia of all the analysis of classic physics, which naive realism (what you measure is all what there is) and reductionism (only mathematical parameters that matter to us mostly related to motion ‘ARE’ physics) which is well beyond the life of a single researcher – specially a latino lazy cow like myself 🙂 so we just will do some fast review of the key equations of physics and study its ‘hidden meaning’ ignored by ‘reductionism and naive realism’.

Science specially astrophysics with its ‘belief’ in the precision of its measures as if there were a single scale, and the rod of measure – in our case c-constant light, our pixel of eye-brain information – as if were the only universal rod – reduces by definition reality to such a limited conceptual a priori statement on the fundamental principles that any serious philosophy of reality becomes impossible.

So by discharging with a priori statements and lack of conceptual definitions, more comprehensive concepts of language, perception, time, space, scale and motion, physics is specially immune to any philosophical arguments, which are NO longer relevant because A) cannot be digitalized always B) talk of different concepts of time and space.

Essentially physicists don’t care then for all other realities, not even for the proper conceptualizations of its terms, which they have reduced to v=s/t type of equations.

In that regard, what humans seem to forget is that physics was NEVER originated in philosophy or even science, but in the arsenal of Venice where for 1000 golden ducats Galileo was charged with finding the longest, entropic lineal motion of gunboats…

This Praxis of ‘making machines’, measuring things and plugging results in mathematical equations to ‘predict’ the locomotion and energy of systems is all what a physicist normally care. So amazing as it seems a serious philosophy of the Universe and a stringent analysis of the theories we have and the elements we lack in them is done with little rigor in physics, compared to the precision with expect from microscopic measures and the study of known-known laws of locomotion.

As this is a blog of philosophy of science first, applied to each science latter, this brings a big gap between physics and ‘science’, because we need to CHANGE the a priori statements of physics.

If we add that we live in a technological civilisation, where machines are our ‘worshipped’ god, and Physicists make them, the ego paradox of power prevents physicists to exercise a healthy criticism to his approach to knowledge. And then in a personal note as an activist against the Nuclear Industry, physicists tend not to listen to my work.

All this said, if we depart as we always do from a more objective non-human approach to ‘stiences’, astrophysics is essentially one of the 3 fundamental fields of stience, and as such we shall learn a lot of homologic laws that applied to all sciences by studying astrophysics and vice versa, by applying the better understood organic, homologic laws of biology to astrophysical organisms and the sentient properties of human minds to physical singularities once we correct the underlying deformation of lineal physics and adopt the concepts of cyclical time and fractal space, we will be able to fully upgrade the discipline and explain most of the unknown whys of its systems.

Constraining mathematical creationism with empiricism, simplicity and first principles.

Einstein’s most original contribution to twentieth-century philosophy of science lies elsewhere, iis his distinction between what he termed “principle theories”, we shall call ‘constrains’ and “constructive theories.”

A constructive theory provides a constructive model for the phenomena of interest. Examples include the first and second laws of thermodynamics.

Ultimate understanding requires a constructive theory, but often, says Einstein, progress in theory is impeded by premature attempts at developing constructive theories in the absence of sufficient constraints by means of which to narrow the range of possible of constructive. It is the function of principle theories to provide such constraint, and progress is often best achieved by focusing first on the establishment of such principles.

According to Einstein, that is how he achieved his breakthrough with the theory of relativity, which, he says, is a principle theory, its two principles being the relativity principle and the light principle.

We consider therefore the 11 Ðisomorphisms and 5 Ðimotions of scalar, time space, the ‘principles’ that shall constrain all other theories of stience.

This is specially necessary in physics where mathematical creationism sponsors an opposite view – that all what is written with equations must be real.

Instead we require both experimental evidence and constrains provided by empiricism and the Ðisomorphisms of space-time.

As Einstein put it ‘Physics is real. I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’ – hence the need for empiricism.

While his other ‘fundamental view of philosophy of science, economy and logical simplicity (Ockham’s razor) is played by the Disomorphic laws.

Let us consider then first some basic ‘logic’ principles of the structure of the Universe.

The higher epistemological truths. The realist, logic Universe.

The realist concept works, based in a proved ad nauseam experimental fact – that all the scales of the fractal Universe we perceive with full detail ARE self similar in topology, time arrows and scalar co-existence of 3 ∆±1 planes.

Basically consider absolute space and time an artefact of measure necessary for the human praxis and translation of data into workable useful parameters to manipulate reality from our point of view; but NOT as the literalist philosophy of physics often means, a reality.

Moreover as languages are mirrors, NOT all equations of mathematical physics are truth without evidence. So they must be proved by experimental evidence and by the classic truths of epistemology given the INFLATIONARY NATURE of all languages that  CAN MULTIPLY FRACTAL INFORMATION IN A MUCH LARGER MEASURE THAN THE SIMPLE, resistant motion-substance of reality can accommodate (reason WHY ‘not all mathematical truths are real’ Einstein) ARE BESIDES ∆st, AND EXPERIMENTAL PROOF, STILL THE FUNDAMENTAL METHODS OF VERACITY IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS. LET US REMEMBER THE 3 FAST:

  • Occam’s razor: simplicity NOT complex equations ARE truth because the simple motion-substance of the Universe is simple and difficult to ‘bend’
  • Efficiency, a KEY to navigate the forest of non-existent equations from SUSY to black hole evaporation of pedantic scholars. WE MUST BUILD THE UNIVERSE WITHT THE KNOWN-KNOWN particles, and we HAVE already discovered them ALL because our instruments of measure have GONE well above our conceptual, mental evolution of the discipline; so we have to work on what we have and its symmetries. i.e. the background neutrino MUST be the graviton, which MUST be the scale below light… so we just have to work out the neutrino theory of light and figure the question of its faster than light speed (of the lower ∆-4 dark world, its relationship with strings through its weak-angle (same size), and what is really its spin number and the symmetry with the galaxy-atom, i.e. the strong force and the gluon. We do NOT need more particles as we have not seen them, and so it is irrational to think that the Universal force of gravitation responds to some esoteric particle which is NOT all over the place (as neutrinos are).
  • Experimental proofs: ‘science should not be concerned with events, equations and forms of which there is NOT a prior experience’, said Einstein. Indeed, the creationist works the other way around, first finds the imaginary equation and then seeks for its creationism in the Universe. We must first explore the Universe and ONLY study mathematically those phenomena we know to exist NOT to create inflationary, self-similar confusing equations and formalisms, which are equivalent to baroque art with many curves or repetitive religious mantras saying 1000 names of ‘God’, or poetic licences and synonymous.

 

Back to Pseudo-science.

In that sense, the Big Bang, has all the properties signaled as pseudoscience in ‘wikipedia’: statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be both scientific and factual, but are incompatible with the scientific method, contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; relying on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; which have lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; and long after they have been experimentally discredited…continue to be hold as ‘dogma’.

While those advocating such models of pseudoscience often dispute the characterization.

Why we say this about the big-bang is obvious. Logically is absurd that all the matter of reality was in a single point, including time and space itself. This is born of an exagerated, unfalsifiable claim – that a lineal equation of spacetime expansion between galaxies, V=HoD, extends infinitely to the pas. It is truly an example of ‘creationism’ in physics, based in mathematics. And it merely ignores what physicists do in all other analysis – the need to eliminate infinities and infinitesimals through ‘renormalization’ and cut-off processes – in this case the galaxies from where the emission of spacetime light takes place, which balance the Universe with its implosive gravitation.

Yet the rule of big-bang theory is to exaggerate experimental analysis. Such is the case of the background radiation observed only in the galaxy, which is considered with zero proofs to come from all the corners of the Universe. We falsify those arguments and many more in our analysis of cosmology. The graphs below show them at true value. Perhaps the most notorious is the finding of the supposed central track of the big-bang exactly above and below the galaxy, which shows not to come from 13 billion years light away but exactly from where it comes the background radiation – the galaxy itself.

Another proof of the many considered on our texts on cosmology –  as physicists keep looking far away to the supposed beginning of time, they keep finding perfeclty formed galaxies and black holes, wich breaks completely the supposed ‘time periods of creation of matter’. In the graph we can see the biggest black hole found in the Universe, which is perfectly formed in the middle of a galaxy, that is just 400 millions after the supposed big-bang when there was only supposedly hydrogen ions:

In the graph, the superblack hole is supposed to exist so early that there is no way it formed unless the Universe is eternal and the cosmic horizon of the big-bang just the limit of human perception of light, which as everything in 5D is NOT infinite in range.

Now and here 5D physics departs sharply from current astrophysics and its ‘paralogic’ Kantian errors (which break the scientific method in the egocy of the cosmologist wanting to have an explanation for all even when his range of perception does not allow it), there is NOT infinite range force, because infinities are always broken by cyclical membrane.

In the jargon of physics range of forces depend on mass. But t is ‘obvious’ that the photon does HAVE energy hence it does HAVE mass, E=hƒ, so even if its mass is extremely small the range of the photon CANNOT be infinite.

Moreover the further away we look, we shall see photons of less mass-frequency, hence redshifted, as those of more mass-blue frequency had died.

So that explains the red shift simply.

The distance-range of light is inversely proportional to its frequency-mass

Hence the existence of a limit or horizon of perception of light, from where we just see those monstrous objects – the biggest black holes.

What is then the limit of perception of light? As we have experimental evidence there is no need to do further calculus: Obviously the 13.5 billion light years from where red-shifted light of maximal z comes mistakingly taken as a time horizon of a supposed big-bang explosion.  

And from this fact it also follows that the further away we look, the more likely we are to find only huge black holes, as they will emit more energetic high frequency particles that will take longer time to relax in terms of the 4Ðimotion of entropy when they reach us before dying into a red frequency, blacking out of our perception of further away galaxies.

And here is where the magic 10¹°-¹¹ number common to all structures of nature, both in space-populations/distances in time-frequencies/durations and in scale/masses shows in (we will find it in the number of neurons of the biggest human brain, of stars in the galaxy, of atoms in a DNA code, etc, for reasons studied on our posts on ‘fractal non-euclidean mathematics):

This is the number that gives us in the symmetry of time the mean life of stars, and the mean life of its minimal light space-time ‘unit’ of information, and the mean mass of the largest black holes from far away distances measured in terms of the mean star mass – our sun, and the mean distance of the black out horizon of the big-bang…

So of course while in 5 Ð, as we know the Universe is eternal, the big bang does not exist, we have far more sound logical and epistemological and experimental proofs to explain everything that seems to prove the delirious big-bang in which time and space started from a point that fits in our hand, and pleases our egocy of being above heavens and earth.

In the graph, the largest black hole found is also the oldest, as it is the furthest, and it was supposed to be born in 500 million years after the big-bang when only some re-ionization of light hydrogen atoms has happened.

It then takes the pain of creationist dogma and believers to tinkle with all the equations and models we have to feed computers till some simulation of very extremal conditions very unlikely to happen can give us some bizarre model that might explain how on the hell, in just 500 million years a black hole of the size of 66 billion suns appeared in the middle of a perfectly formed gargantuan galaxy. Rational answer BECAUSE THERE WAS NOT BIG-BANG.

Simplest proof. Such a black hole will live 10¹ºº years ad minimal (counting that there is black hole evaporation, another no-no error we explain in our 5Ð study of black holes)…

So by mere statistical probability, we exist within the supposed life of the Universe which we can at least elongate to the life of that galactic black hole in the absolute infancy of the Universe, more or less in the 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000…. keep adding 90 000001% of its life span, and the probability that we exist in that moment without any other data, is similarly 0.0000000……..(keep adding 90 zeros)1 % chance.

The big-bang as we shall show in so many pages of this blog is the very proof not of the birth of the Universe but of the ‘common nature’ of all huminds, scientific or religious: dogma and belief is always higher in the esteem of the majority of humans of any profession than truth and reasoning.

Or as Landau put it: ‘cosmologists are seldom right but never in doubt’.

We have thus considered more realist explanations to the 2 main proofs of the Big-bang: the red shift and the background radiation. And found a direct embarrassing proof against it: the existence of cosmic black holes form when there should exist. All those proofs had all the elements of pseudo-science, corrected a posteriori to force-feed the model. As they keep coming the model became more bizarre – first with an inflationary infinitesimal second in which the entire Universe expanding to infinite side (never mind the proponents consider sacred the c-speed limit of light).

We shall latter prove many other ‘discoveries’  of the big-bang to have simpler explanations – next in the line come two concepts; the abundance of helium, which happens to be maximal above the black hole in the center of the galaxies, hence clearly provoked by the not-so-well reactions latter explained in terms of 5D, to be originated not in a cosmic big-bang but in the local processes of creation of matter by the black hole.

The other great proof is yet another creationist concept – the infinite singularity.

 

The PROBLEM of all black hole and Big Bang singularity… mumble

is more of the same we shall say – an absurd mathematical expansion backwards in time of something we cannot even see here. NOBODY in any other science uses those mathematical creationist views that experimental evidence breaks because we want to keep doing mathematics. I.e. consider a frequency sound coming from a source, a bat, for example, if we were to return ad infinite the frequency observed with a long wavelength at a point of the air, we would reach a singularity of infinite frequency but THERE IS ALWAYS A CAUSE, A SOURCE of that wavelength, so when we reach the BAT frequency no longer increases. It is the real source.

What all THOSE BLACK HOLE EVAPORATION ARGUMENTS LOOSE IS THE FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH of science: a cause. If there is NOT matter, not a frozen start of top quarks as Einstein wanted at the origin of the gravitational FORCE of the black hole THERE IS NO CAUSE FOR GRAVITATION. Where it comes from the awesome gravitational force of the black hole, if mass does NOT exist? if there is not as Einstein wanted a cut-off substance, which can only be the top quarks that CERN will do in increasing quantities as the decay product of Higgs, to produce it?

Mathematicians like Hawking who shun off the basis of the experimental method and the physical real nature of Nature, don’t care. For them bats do NOT exist, their sound frequency is infinite. And the source is the bat ‘hole’.

But things get worse and worse when he is cornered by reality, it becomes really painful to read, as he then takes the authority of others – specially that of Einstein, lying all the way down, but shrewdly saying what he says is ‘General Relativity’. For example, when acknowledging the whole thing of bringing effects without limit towards an infinite past to get the ‘singularity of the big bang’, which Einstein vehemently protested, he said is canonical in Einstein’s work!:

“Cosmology can not predict anything about the universe unless it makes some assumption about the initial conditions. Without such an assumption, all one can say is that things are as they are now because they were as they were at an earlier stage. Yet many people believe that science should be concerned only with the local laws which govern how the universe evolves in time. They would feel that the boundary conditions for the universe that determine how the universe began were a question for metaphysics or religion rather than science.
The situation was made worse by the theorems that Roger and I proved. These showed that according to general relativity there should be a singularity in our past. At this singularity the field equations could not be defined. Thus classical general relativity brings about its own downfall: it predicts that it can’t predict the universe. Although many people welcomed this conclusion, it has always profoundly disturbed me. If the laws of physics could break down at the beginning of the universe, why couldn’t they break down any where.”

This is false. The laws of science don’t break down in the singularity BECAUSE THERE IS NO SINGULARITY. And IT IS NOT expected in Relativity to exist SINGULARITIES:  It is ONLY because they are moving backwards equations BEYOND the very same initial conditions that are REAL – in the case of a black hole a frozen star of dense quarks that cause gravitation…  and soon we shall explain how Einstein reacted to a bunch of people, driven to deny him which on top wanted his acquiescence. At the end he just got lonely overwhelmed by all the dwarfs biting his legs and expecting him ‘to like them’. But he quipped: ‘Since mathematicians are working in relativity, I don’t understand it myself’ ).

Now; so the reader doesn’t think I am biased, fact is almost every cosmologist knows the ascientificism of the big-bang and black hole singularities – the core ‘belief’ that impulses CERN and cosmology, ever since the ‘capital sin’ of egocy (ego+idiocy) of physicists, who decided to substitute religion and what is worst, philosophy of science and epistemology of truth with his equations, even at the cost of breaking the very essence of science; we shall bring here from Quora, an interesting site which doesn’t abandon scientific rigor, but tries to explain things easy, the most upvoted=liked answer to the question, ‘Do singularities exist?’, as it pretty well resumes in very simple terms the core of it.

The place is good to check ‘common sense’ as people are free to think with the authority of reason not the reason of authority.
 Creationist ego trips of physics running high since Bohr, are the ultimate reason that we might die courtesy of CERN. This I want to stress as a serious scientist: if we do it won’t be for the sake of science but for the sake of a machine and a bunch of ‘lunatics’ that indeed, think as Bohr did – ‘the moon becomes real when I look at it’ Realism and organicism ARE the dominant trends today in science, since machines turn out in robotics to be just evolving metal-organisms, and the realist model of quantum physics the Einstein->De Broglie->Bohm model keeps gathering proofs. It couldn’t be otherwise.
 So let us put some realist common sense on those equations, courtesy of quora:

How do we know that singularities exist?

“We” (science) do not know that. A “singularity” — in the scientific sense of the term — is not some kind of object, it is only a fancy name invented in order to avoid saying “we don’t know what’s happening in such a place, or if it even exists.” More often than not, it is a euphemism for division by zero, as in two cases that are repeated ad nauseam:

(1) The “initial singularity” (before the “big bang”): Here, cosmologists are making the assumption that — because they have interpreted galactic redshift observations to be evidence for “space expansion,” the Universe volume must have been smaller in the past — as they extrapolate “back in time,” and as the energy/mass content must have stayed the same (conservation laws), the Universe density must keep rising as we approach the “bang.”

The equation is very simple: Universe density ρUU = mUU/VUU, where mUU = Universe mass (energy), and VUU = Universe volume.

When VUU = 0, the equation no longer represents valid math, but rather than admitting that science does not know/understand how such a situation can be physically allowed to happen, science flat out lies, and declares that “density becomes infinite” (as they say temperature does, BTW, and for the same reason). Why is this wrong? Because infinity is not a number.

(2) The “gravitational singularity” at the center of a “black hole”: Here, cosmologists and astrophysicists are making the assumption that it is possible (“because Einstein’s equations tell us it must be so”) for any mass to be compressed into oblivion (nothingness), if only sufficient pressure is applied.

Again extrapolating, at the point where the radius of the gravitational collapsing body has been compressed to zero — Bingo! Again we have division by zero, and again the error is hidden behind a “singularity”! (that is, “we” (science) have no clue as to what might really be happening, or how it happens). Science, at its best?

Another well known case where the error is accepted (where again a division by zero is said to result in “infinity”) is Einstein’s “velocity equation” (the “Lorentz factor”), as presented by Wikipedia (article List of Relativistic Equations):

γ = 1/(1–β22)1/21/2

where β = v/c and v is the relative velocity between two inertial frames. For two frames at rest, γ = 1, and increases with relative velocity between the two inertial frames. As the relative velocity approaches the speed of light, γ.

Presented as if it was a cold, mathematical fact … Here, the error is shrouded by hands waving symbols around, but it all boils down to a division by zero, as follows: when v = c, then v/c = 1, and 122 = 1, and 1–1 = 0, and since the square root of 0 = 0, then 1/0 = undefined mathematical operation (i.e., an error) …

So far, the ratio of “bad science” over good ditto is singular: 3/0. Here’s a cut from my answer to the Quora question Is the pre- Big Bang “singularity” a black hole or quantum phenomenon?:

Here is a side-by-side comparison of the first two “singularities” unveiled above (there are more differences, these are just the most obvious (all in theory, of course):

Only one “singularity” property is the same in both types (shaded green): The classical (i.e., non-quantum) volume in both is zero, which is what leads to the “singularity” assumed to be “residing at the core” of both (that is, any mass m/0 = “singularity” (bogus: “infinity” is not a number!)).

Ending — as well as answering the OP question — with a quote showing a little bit less scientific hubris:

A singularity often turns up in our equations when we extend them as far as they can go in the past; but a singularity of this sort is far from likely to be an aspect of nature, and instead should be interpreted as a sign of what we don’t yet understand.

Source: Professor Matthew Strassler, theoretical physicist at the Large Hadron Collider

It is indeed a good synopsis on how not to do science with Mr. Strassler at CERN telling us they know perfectly all what they do and say is bull$hit.

That is the astounding cynicism of this institution that we find once and again. When talking officially at CERN, they sign confidentiality statements and are told ‘to believe in black hole evaporation’; when writing papers or making comment off-record, they all recognize it is all bull$hit. Never mind they might kill all our sons till the 7th generation. The P.r.ess and politicos and judges let them do it, just not to have to deal with a bunch of bullies just because they don’t understand their maths – reason why we keep explaining it all very simple here, just in case one of our ‘leaders of the world’ really do what we pay them to do – to stop terrorist organizations from bombing the planet, but it seems they care just for small bombings, not big-bang ones. That is OK. As they say, if you murder a few you are a… murderer, if you commit genocide you are a (national) hero. Murder at distance, wholesale has always been very easy to do. We never blame those who throw A-bombs or carpet bomb thousands children and women from planes but become horrified by any gore terror movie with a guy killing a couple of kids with a chain-shaw.  Because if CERN kill us will be at distance, likely with strange dibaryon heavy quark matter falling and accumulating on the center of the Earth or fast growing black holes, we shall have no proof and no time to blame them. And that seems to be enough for the unethical and amoral researchers dare to go with his egocy of exploring reality with big explosions and fantaphysics for lack of a serious scientific upgrading of our present cosmological knowledge with THOUGHT experiments and solid epistemology.

Down the article we shall explain, how we should be dealing with realism and improve on Einstein’s cosmological work NOT denying it but expanding it with the correspondence principle.

To close the singularity theme – in that graph is all clearly written, as a theoretical proof of the most likely real event those big-bangs describe: quasar black holes exploding into big-bangs of matter, and matter collapsing into galaxies, balancing each other.

Indeed, notice that the black hole equations are the inverse of a big-bang, but both are if we discharge INFINITIES AND ZEROS as NON-real, happening in a local domain, called the galaxy where all our measures take place.

So at best we can talk of a ‘Quasar’ big-bang, which is the ‘death’ of a black hole, inverse to its BIRTH with maximal temperature, and evaporation of ITS SURROUNDINGS as it cools down and feeds on light matter.

So from birth to death, a quark star, aka black hole, shows its inverse equations as birth is indeed the opposite of death. And this happens at the local level of the Galaxy or the star or the planet that explodes in a ‘little Big Bang’…

All other hyperbolic, infinite deductions of cosmological explosions are just the egocy of physicists trying to substitute the egocy of previous creationist priests, who also thought the language of words they talked was not A MIRROR of reality but reality itself, creating it – so Allah and Yahveh were creating ‘naming things’ in Arab and Hebrew and quarreling about who was the higher Mind of God, still do… So it did Hawking and Penrose, ‘numbering reality’, and expecting all kind of things Happen that never did.

THE DARK ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE AND ITS NON-LOCAL  TRAVEL TO THE PAST.

Let us consider this misterious force between galatoms, THE so called dark entropy, which IS exactly in all its properties equal to the electromagnetic force between atoms. It is expansive, keeping them at distance… starts from a ‘high frequency’, expands in the middle and ‘collapses’ when it arrives to the next atom-galaxy.

And what puzzles more scientists; as galaxies-atoms distance from each other, more ‘dark energy=electormagnetism’ appears, because of course, the ‘central proton-black hole’ keeps vibrating through its magnetic/polar-Kerr axis (which physicists found to move at non-local, ‘infinite’ speed, so it can escape the black hole).

So the dark entropy mystery is resolved. But what about the non-local force. This requires to understand that in cyclical time there is always AN ENTROPIC SOLUTION OF TRAVELS TO THE PAST. This paragraph from the more specialized post on ‘time travels’ will clarify it:

In the deepest understanding of time, we say that the ‘lower scales’ of parts is in the relative past, as the whole must be built over the past parts, and the whole larger world is therefore in the relative future, while in between the ‘organism’ is the relative present.

This might sound strange to you but as we are talking of relative local parts and wholes, the fact that the parts are the relative past and the whole the relative future does NOT affect other parts and wholes, so it is POSSIBLE TO TRAVEL locally in time, within the super organism. And further on because time is ultimately as all clocks are cyclical, there is a section of the cycle which is inverse and so we talk of the moment of ‘entropic death’ as a travel back to the past.

The deepest understanding of the Universe which is a fractal OF TIME-motion, not of space-form (the static Maya of the sense, the language, the mirror, the mind that stops reality), comes then when we fully account for the different motions from past to future and future to past in each local system, for its cycles, synchronicities and co-existences. 

One example will suffice: Maxwell’s electromagnetic radiation has 2 solutions in time. One that travels to the past called the collapsing wave, and one that travels to the future called the expansive wave. Einstein insisted all his life without knowing how to solve the conundrum that the 2 solutions were real. Physicists ended up discharging the solution of ‘traveling to the past’, in which the ‘wave collapsed’.  Then Feynman calculated that IF THE TWO SOLUTIONS WERE REAL, both cancelled each other to create light as an ETERNAL present. This is indeed the case. The co-existence of ‘past’, ‘shrinking waves of light’, (traveling to the ¡-1 plane) and future, expansive spatial waves (traveling to the ¡+1 scale) cancel to the create a ‘constant light speed’ in present, which is the background spacetime of our galaxy.

So we have a general equation, studied in depth in our articles of time that relate, scales and time states to create a simultaneous super organism in present:

Past (smaller parts, entropy-death dissolving motions) x Future (informative particles/heads arrows) = Present (repetitive body-waves).

Screen Shot 2018-06-14 at 11.33.08 AMThis also works for minds. Researchers realized that the body seems to ‘act’ before we detect the ‘thoughts’ that actually causes the motion of the body. It is a huge mystery. How the ∆º body networks of the ∆-1 cells can act ‘before’ the ∆+1 mind that makes it act gives the order?

Because in the fractal Universe of different arrows of time from past to future, future to past, and present to present, the 3 co-exist displaced in time. You must imagine the co-existing scales, as OCCUPYING THE SAME PLACE IN SPACE, BUT HAVING A ‘LATITUDE’ FROM PAST TO FUTURE IN TIME. So as the next graph illustrates, the Future whole sends a message to the past parts, and the scientist that measures the process in the ‘co-existing present’, sees FIRST the reaction of the ‘past’ body-cells and then sees the ‘future firing’ an electromagnetic MESSAGE from the ‘waves of the brain’ THROUGH its nervous system, such as this travel from future to past, which lasts a time v=s/t (motion duration) is cancelled by the ‘interval from future to past jumped by the message’ ‘-t’, so -t + t = 0, the 3 scales co-exist synchronically in present, and so the cells, the networks and the head-mind move together without ‘dislocating’. Internally they have a time latitude from past parts to future brain, externally they seem a co-existing present.

But for the simplex humind and its concept of an absolute LINEAL TIME from past to FUTURE only, it all seems as the past parts determine the future whole – human mind (remember humans beyond their egocy – ego+idiocy – are far less intelligent than the Universe, as we HAVE A SINGLE ARROW OF TIME CONSCIOUSNESS in the mind).

If you extend this concept to every other ‘science’ and scale things start to fall into place. For example, GRAVITATION seems no local, but it is in fact an informative language, sent from the future to the past by the ‘brain of galaxies’ = black holes. And those gravitational waves create non-local, instantaneous gravitation as it happens with electromagnetism between atoms but at the larger cosmological scale, so all seems an eternal present.

So the proper explanation of non-local QUANTUM POTENTIALS, in the De Broglie>Bohm realist models of quantum physics (see next paragraph) and the cosmological models of gravitation (or rather ‘cosmological electromagnetism as we have seen) is also simple:

A travel from future larger waves to smaller collapsing particles balances the past to future ‘time’ v=s/t spent in the travel to create an eternal simultaneous ‘background spacetime present’, either light over gravitational waves in galaxies, or dark entropy between them.

CONCLUSION: BACK TO REALITY AND SOUND PHYSICS.

Creationism plagues all aspects of physics, in all the scales of the galatom, so 5D on the line of Einstein and De Broglie regains in all those scales a realist view of physics as it is, where information matters more than entropy, cold processes more than hot ones, particles more than waves, and all can be explained as it has always been, choosing the realist models in each scale, from the quantum realism of Einstein->Broglie->Bohm, to the realist view of the galaxy as an organism; making NO-EXCEPTIONALIST assumptions in any of those scales:

In the graph, the true rational, explanation of quantum physics – the pilot wave theory, recently proved by the interstellar EM engine, vs. the subjective ego-centered theory of ‘the observer’ who creates quantum reality, which has become canonical and is ultimately a religious creationist theory.

The astounding fact about Physics today, both in quantum theory and Cosmology is its ‘outlook’ as an anthropomorphic religion that has substituted earlier abrahamic religions, without respecting the basic laws of objectivism of science, unlike all other disciplines. So Physicists have on one side accepted ‘weird’ theories of reality that make man – in this case the observer – the center of creation, against the sound-sound objective theories of reality available and far more sound experimentally, which however eliminate any ‘entitlement for human beings’. Such is the case of the infamous argument between the founders of quantum theory, Planck, Einstein, De broglie and Schrodinger, and his pilot-wave interpretation and the ‘newcomers’, Hilbert, Bohr, Pauli and Heisenberg who imposed a new religion of humans and their mathematics as the ‘creators’ of reality. While in cosmology, they created by the elimination of the informative gravitational force that creates mass out of entropy in galaxies, another weird theory called the big-bang, in which all reality was once according to a simple lineal equation, V≈HoD, compressed in a single point, easy to describe with its simple mathematical tools, a mere mirror-language of reality.

At the heart of those simple, anthropomorphic, ‘creationist’ theories of reality which CERN pretends to explore further, as in the case of Abrahamic religions there is fundamental, existential problem of humanity: the paradox of the ego, which true science and his lonely humble geniuses have always tried to combat with little results – as humans systematically prefer a theory that makes them ‘exceptional’ and happy that one that tells them the objective truth of their non-importance in the universe. In as much as the indifference to the risks of cern are precisely based in the arrogance of humans who cannot conceive its extinction we cannot only consider theoretical, experimental and military reasons to CERN’s potential genocide but do have to criticise the essence of that human arrogance, the paradox of the ego that makes 1/2 of mankind to believe we are ‘chosen of a Bush-God of the bronze age that makes us immortal’ and only its verbal priests can understand, while the other 1/2 believe the Universe was created in a single point described by a single equation in the single language of God, mathematical physics, which only ‘physical experts’ can understand.

-So instead we will reconsider a more objective theory of reality than those sponsored by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics and the big-bang interpretation of creation. Namely the sound-sound, increasingly proved theories of Einstein both in quantum and cosmology (pilot wave theory along De Broglie, and steady state along Fred Hoyle). Indeed after a century of ‘propaganda’ of the creationist and observer’s theory of physics, which so much pumps the human ego, the sound theories of Einstein keep coming back with new proofs, and keep giving new avenues of thought and will if we survive CERN become standard one humans stop being so arrogant about what they can and cannot know and what is the nature of reality.

  • The realist humble, relativistic interpretations, which are right and time always brings back, since Copernicus, Descartes and Leibniz the philosophers of science affirmed, his relative theories of time and space and the mind to the times of Einstein, Bohm and Hoyle, who all of them fond of philosophy of science and ‘fist principles’ affirmed a realist quantum interpretation (above), a realist Universe with 2 time arrows, entropic space which dilates it but also informative gravitation that ‘collapses’ those entropic waves into galactic matter, balanced overall its total volume. And finally the use of mathematics as a language-mirror of the mind that does NOT create reality, but merely fits it nicely on the small brain, and has therefore to be studied a priori, AS A LANGUAGE OF THE MIND, with the same ternary syntax, inflationary errors, and modelling properties of all other equally valid languages that mirror reality (visual, verbal languages in man, chemical in life, gravitational in cosmology, etc.)
  • The egocentered anthropomorphic interpretations,which always attempt to reduce phenomena ONLY to those elements that ensure the Human Ego to come on top of reality, from the Ptolemaic theories of the Earth as center of the Universe, to Newton’s definition of absolute space as the plenum body of ‘Yhwh’, to the quantum observer theory, to the axiomatic method of Hilbert in mathematics, as the language humans imagine and comes a priori, creating NOT reflecting reality. Contrary to belief those interpretations who require the ELIMINATION of all non-human larger truths. So Ptolemy dismissed the larger sun in the center. Newton dismissed time and space as relational systems of multiple clocks, carried by different species, NOT only the human, mechanical clock (Leibniz and Einstein). Bohr dismissed the quantum potential field that feeds the motions of particles, even if we don’t see them. And denied the obvious – if we don’t see them is NOT because they are not there but because they are so far removed of our scale of space size and time that we just have a limited information.

ALL THIS MEANS basically, that singularity theories are pseudo-science, and that includes both, black hole evaporation and its ‘reverse’ equations of the big-bang. Because they respond to the ‘egocy’ paradox of human scientists that confuse the capacity of a language as a synoptic mirror of reality to reflect that reality and even forecast in its reduced synoptic logic, the deterministic future of the motions and ‘life-death cycles’ of a species (either with mathematics or verbal evolutionary theories), with its capacity to create reality with FICTIONS natural to all languages. So as Einstein put it ‘I know when mathematics are logic truths but not when they are real’. Reason why the ‘scientist’ should only be concerned with facts that have been proved experimentally, which do NOT include the equations of black hole evaporation and the equations of the big-bang, as we shall show now in a bit of more detail (keeping the bulk of the proof for our cosmological models on the section of 5D with its alternative, fractal, organic, immortal Universe).

Indeed, there are many other sounder proper explanations to every supposed cosmic big-bang phenomena, but when an entire ego-centered group of human beings is in a ‘mission’ pumping with zealot ego human power, there is no ‘reasoning’ able to stop the tsunami – the sound reasons are hidden, unpublished, the half-reasons which favor the pseudo-religion are pumped, retouched ad hoc, as Gamow’s temperature…

So we do dedicate an entire post on cosmology to study a little bit in detail this theory, which i am now on the business of properly rewriting as the rest of this idle web for many years left alone after the failure of suits and films to rise public awareness.

But as an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘big-bang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang. So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe… 

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

While basically Einstein’s attempts to put reason on quantum theory were ignored after he defied Bohr, till his death. He got an FBI file, nobody was going to his classes, and so he dedicated himself to talk to Godel on the ridiculous concept of Mathematics as the substance of the Universe, to boating and walking… Then they discovered black holes, all his theories were proved… till Hawking decided as a celebrity guru to challenge him with his theory of black holes traveling to the past, totally ignorant of the real time arrows of the Universe.

AND THINGS even got worst, with Bohm, who completed Broglie’s pilot wave theory – he got ignored, got his FBI file, was stripped of his American nationality and became an expatriate. Do not think physicists take lightly any attack on his religion of ‘seers’ of time.

In that regard, it is necessary to stress as we do in many articles the sociological and military-industrial topics, which so well work together to prevent the simple, easy solution to CERN – close the factory of strangelet liquid, which is nothing but deconfined quark matter, the ‘thing’ the LHC keeps doing each year in bigger amounts till it become stable and does us all. Basically the LHC is the showcase for most high tech industries and the pet-project of the most powerful group of science, physicists – since they make the machines and weapons of our industrial civilisation; and so sponsor ‘Fromm’s technological ethics: ‘if we can make a machine we must make it, even if it kills us all.

So on one side the pressure of peers is enormously and on the other the rest of mankind who worships machines and physicists will never dare to defy something they don’t understand. 

 EXPERIMENTAL FALSHOOD OF BIG-BANG.

  Cosmic vs. Quasar big-bangs.

So the question we want to find out is which of the two larger scales of big-bangs, that of a quasar big-bang or a cosmic big-bang fits better real data. Since as we can see in the images above, on the right, they are also quite similar in form. In fact they are almost identical.

Now again, the problem IS obvious. On one side both big-bangs fit 5D theory.

As the ‘magic number’ of 1011 elements that conform the next scale happens in both:

– A galaxy would be the equivalent of a neutron beta decay in the atomic scale, of a nova and the remaining Neutron star in the solar scale, hence a ‘hydrogen atom’ or nucleon of the cosmic scale.

– The Universe would be the equivalent of a Neutron or hydrogen atom in the cosmic scale. Most galaxies have 1011 stars. The total mass of all the stars in the Milky Way is estimated to be between 4.6×1010  and 6.43×1010sun masses.

– And the Universe is considered to have around 1.6 1011galaxies.

So the easiest way to settle the question is to state that the galaxy is just a scale below the big-bang (a huge galactic molecule so to speak), as the neutron star is just a scale above the neutron ( a huge neutron molecule so to speak).

And that it exploded in a big bang of the next scale of the universe.

The spatial symmetry of the cosmic big-bang:

Screen Shot 2016-03-05 at 13.38.40In the graph we can see nicely how beautiful looks in terms of the 5D (anti)symmetric Generator the big bang in time space and scale:

In the graph, the space-time antisymmetry of the cosmic big-bang: the radiation of the original big bang is seen far away in time and space as a wall of fire.

In the graph the representation of the Generator 5D ST of cosmology:

∆-1:Sp(Wall of fire-membrane) ≤≥ ∆-ST(1011 ‘galacells’)≤≥ ∆+1: Tƒ (Human Subjective Observer; ‘Great attractor’ – objective ‘Black hole ≈ Proton’ center).

The graph is an Artist’s logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe, in space, with the topology of all 5D ternary constructs; but alas! an anthropomorphic Universe with:

Tƒ: Objective center, the point where the big-bang started, which should be the ‘proton=black hole locus’ of the original ‘cosmic neutron’ of the ∆+4 scale exploded in the big-bang, or alternately since according to Lorentz Invariance (Relativity) all frames of reference are relative, as indeed any ‘mind’ perceives information in a spatial-still state:

Tƒ- the Solar System at the center, inner and outer planets, Kuiper belt, Oort cloud, Alpha Centauri, Perseus Arm, Milky Way galaxy, Andromeda galaxy, nearby galaxies…

ST: Cosmic Web, as the ‘cytoplasm of the cell-Universe’.

SP: Entropic Cosmic microwave radiation and Big Bang’s invisible plasma on the edge’s membrane.

So you can see, the big bang would further prove 5D physics and the topological ternary structure of all Universal systems.

So we do NOT doubt the cosmic big bang on 5D grounds, but on real data.

Let us then consider a few of such aspects of the big bang, using as usual the Œ=mc2 scientific method, with scanty mathematical formulae, which go on the 4th line in its full power, as one of the great advantages of TŒ is its capacity to explain any phenomena for 4 points of view – the mental, organic, causal, temporal and spatial, mathematical, in a complementary way.

What is wrong with the previous picture/ wouldn’t it be a perfect proof of 5D physics, as nobody has explained what on Earth exploded 13.4 billion years ago?

Yes it would be perfect if data were fully consistent and not subtly bent to cater to the ‘cosmic arrogance of the human ego’ that wants to pack it all on its infinitesimal mind, Ego paradox always present in all actions of all systems of the Universe that perceive in stillness from its mind point of view a selected part of the whole but confuse it with it:

O-mind x ∞ Universe = still mapping (frame of reference)

Now in the graph we see ‘if the big-bang were real’, the spatial symmetry of the Universe, for which there should be action at distance (to create the needed simultaneity, which in all Real Systems connects in a relative quanta of time all the elements of the system, to allow the isotropy and synchronicity required for a ‘whole’ to work as such:

Sp: Wall of fire≤ ST: Dark Energy ≥ Tƒ: Great attractor.

In such hypothetical Universe:

Sp: the wall of fire of the earlier big-bang would be the outer membrane that isolates the ‘cellular Universe’ at z=10.000 c

ST: The faster than light dark energy, v=S/It =Space/Informative Time=S/0-visible information=∞ relative speed for a human observer, with the same z than the wall of fire; filled with Galaxies.

Tƒ: And a hyper black hole ‘great’ attractor (not the anthropocentric graph below), would be the ‘proton->black hole’ of the ∆+4 cosmic scale.

So far so good. But data fits better on little bangs.

Let us then consider just 10 of many factual proofs that the big-bang is a local quasar big-bang and the proper cosmological theory is that of earlier Einstein->Fred Hoyle->5 D Physics, of an infinite, immortal Universe:

  • The Lorentz invariance

Screen Shot 2016-03-11 at 02.33.01

A simple proof that falsifies the cosmic big-bang of the many we shall show here, is the existence of an absolute frame of reference, if the background radiation is global NOT local, as SciAm soon discovered and published in the graph below. In this case the denial of General Relativity and its postulate of no existence of absolute frames of reference in the Universe.

This is called the “Lorentz symmetry”, named for the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz and it is a symmetry of spacetime. It is in fact a cornerstone of Einstein’s special relativity theory. According to special relativity, there is no absolute space or absolute time (as in 5D Physics, which sometimes I call ‘Absolute relativity’. So if two objects are moving relative to each other in empty space, it would actually be impossible for an observer to tell their absolute velocities—maybe only one of the objects was moving and the other was stationary, for example, but you wouldn’t know which was which because their movements are relative to each other, not to any external reference frame.

Alas, but now we do have one: the cosmic radiation, and we are moving within it. So we just have to measure our movement in relationship to the radiation and Relativity is Gone!:

In the graph, the cosmic background radiation acts as a new fixed frame of reference or ether, falsifying Relativity theory, which does not have as its name explains any fixed space-time background frame of reference

Yet since the cosmic big bang is a solution of relativity theory that the cosmic radiation falsifies the very same theory it tries to prove.

Hence by ‘reductio ad absurdum’, the background radiation must be local not to contradict Relativity.

In the graph a cosmic radiation falsifies the cosmic big bang, which it tries to proof.

It is the most obvious logic error in the big-bang cosmology is his falsification of Einstein’s work in which the big-bang theory is based, as scientific American rightly pointed out when the theory was first put forward (to be forgotten as the propaganda machines of military physics, as the meaning of it all pumped up the theory):

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 13.37.30From the CMB data it is seen that the Local Group (the galaxy group that includes the Milky Way galaxy) appears to be moving at 627±22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB) in the direction of galactic longitude, l = 276°±3°, b = 30°±3°.

This motion results in an anisotropy of the data (CMB appearing slightly warmer in the direction of movement than in the opposite direction).

From a theoretical point of view, the existence of a CMB rest frame breaks Lorentz invariance even in empty space far away from any galaxy. So if the big bang is accepted, the theory of which is a solution, Einstein’s relativity based in the non-existence of ETHER, an absolute frame of reference in the Universe (hence ‘relativity name’) is FALSIFIED. Ergo by reductio ad absurdum, the Big bang, which is a solution to the theory it falsifies, is false.

This is one of the many scientific proof of falsity of big bang theory we shall bring in this post, which Cosmologists know and cynically call the ‘axis of evil’ (because it won’t go away and kills their theory right on its inception).

You see what I mean by ‘dogma of religious nature’. How ‘big science’ avoids the axis of evil?

Suppressing data or bringing magic theory to it:  Chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Alas, we are back to Babylon, we must be the center of the Universe, just moving 600 kilometers to the east.

Now after being the devil’s advocate, in the proper way, pointing out the fact, let us consider the fact to be right, because we do respect the scientific method. So we shall consider the Lorentz symmetry to be a local symmetry that only takes place within the galaxy; not in the absolute scale of the Universe.

Now this is the ‘real Universe’ of the next scale of the 5th dimension. It looks on the 4% we see clearly as an atomic network of tissue, which joints the atom-galaxies (think for example of a brain of neurons, of a microscopic colony of unicellular algae, and so on). There is zero isotropy as big-bang cosmologists pretend. All their models being approximations which might look nice on computers but have zero scientific theory-praxis solidity. All what we know is that we are moving towards Virgo; that there is a huge nodal network at Hydra-Centaurus – excellent name; which forms with Pisces-Perseus, a clearly connected network in one of whose filaments we find ourselves.

And that at 46 declination a Great Attractor of dark quark matter, likely a super-black hole of top quark stars is waiting for us in a future rendezvous, as we cruise over a remnant cloud of photonic local radiation that does not seem to be (by lack of attraction power) so interested in becoming dark quark gluon liquid-solid super-state of matter.

That is really all we know. The place we live is Laniakea that means “immeasurable heaven’, even if some arrogant believers think they have measured it.

In that regard, while 5D physics is the ONLY rational theory that can explain a cosmic big-bang (as Time accelerates while space shrinks); 13 billion years does not seem time enough for the immensurable heavens.

This as we shall see this solves momentarily the problem; and allow us to consider ‘theories which do not correspond to Relativity’ beyond the galaxy, a fact which is also essential to 5D Physics, as relativity is considered rightly the theory of light space-time where c-speed/distance is the constant of space of the galaxy, the absolute frame of reference, both rod of measure of static space and motion.

And we will return to that, after we deal with the cosmic big-bang, since it is the first ‘step’ to elucidate to expand physics to the scales of the 5th dimension and harmonize it with all other sciences from where it has so much departed.

  • The quasar cycle

The unification of all the physical scales of the universe with the 5th dimension renders an immediate result: the equation of unification of charges and forces, which makes similar (but not equal), the galaxy and the atom.

Moreover, since the big-bang image is mimetic of the previous one it reduces the scale of the big-bang to a quasar scale, making the EFE of Einstein local equations for the Light-space time (reason why it is constant).

In that regard, the big bang scales, that is, the fact that we observer big-bang like death processes of expansion of space 2 planes downwards, as in all other forms of death is one of the strongest proofs of the isomorphic nature of all scales.

In the next graph, from SCiAM, the quasar cycle is longer than the big-bang cycle. Thus by reductio ad absurdum, since we have found galaxies in a ‘second’ quasar cycle, hence over 20 billion years as ‘reborn’ galaxies, forming its central bar, there is no way the time age of the whole is shorter than the time of its parts.

Multiple space-times imply the existence of multiple big-bangs with different explosive size and speeds, all of them deaths of an informative mass or charge that uncoils its accelerated vortex into radiation following Einstein’s equation, E=M(c)2, where a bidimensional or tridimensional vortex (M or e) becomes extended into a plane of radiation (hence the square of lineal c-speed).

Yet for each different scale the parameters of speed (c), mass (M) and Entropy will change. And so we obtain a series of self-similar big bangs described in the graph.

The single cosmic big bang based in a single space-time continuum, was devised even before we knew the existence of a faster than light, gravitational membrane of dark Entropy and dark, quark matter. So we first must define it within that scale of big-bangs as the big-bang of a membrane of electromagnetic radiation; hence a quasar big-bang, not a cosmic big-bang, which will correspond to the much faster explosion of a gravitational membrane, starting at the Planck scale of the gravitational minimal units, the lambda-strings.

This is in a way the conclusion of astrophysicists, which now study the big bang as a dual process, with an inflationary age (the gravitational membrane) and a slower age (the big-bang of electromagnetic space, created over the gravitational membrane).

3.No shadows for the big bang. Ecliptic ‘axis of evil’ and ‘people finding things’.
Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 17.21.14

In the upper graph:

Physicists have measured a local, hence galactic background radiation, which doesn’t leave shadows from other galaxies and they tabulated the quasar cycle of galaxies, which coincides with the age ascribed in the past to a cosmic big bang. So a more rational theory would consider the cause of the 2.7 K radiation both local in space (galactic) and in time (produced at present); since our measure is local and present.

Now, this is the standard first thought about it: non-thermal radiation from stars.

  • Ad Hoc calculus vs. red shifts. Death of light. Cosmological ‘fractal’ redshirts.

– E x I: Tachyon, Transversal, Gravitational Dark energy waves

Now in what follows we depart from classic cosmology, which as we have seen is good enough to invalidate the cosmic big-bang as a huge lineal ego-trip of astrophysics, and introduce basic concepts of 5D fractal cosmology; which we will develop fully on the 4th line of the blog.

Now the temperature of the background radiation and the radiation itself has alternative theories. My favorite – but not likely correct – is tiredness of light as it falls within 5D physics but it is not mine (which makes it even more objective). My own theory researched during my activism against big-bang experiments on Earth are moon micro-black holes making the halo. Both are far more scientific that the forecasted big-bang temperature. Let us see why, on predictability. Gamow, and the proponent of light tiredness gave predictions ‘before the measure’. Those are:

1946 – George Gamow calculates a temperature of 50 K (assuming a 3-billion year old universe), commenting it “… is in reasonable agreement with the actual temperature of interstellar space”, but does not mention background radiation.

1953 – Erwin Finlay-Freundlich in support of his tired light theory, derives a blackbody temperature for intergalactic space of 2.3K with comment from Max Born suggesting radio astronomy as the arbitrator between expanding and infinite cosmologies.

Freundlich also gave two extreme values of 1.9K and 6.0K in Finlay-Freundlich, E.: 1954, “Red shifts in the spectra of celestial bodies”.

Now the measure was 2.7 K, fully within Finlay’s prediction; completely out of Gamow ‘s prediction. And yet Gamow merely change ad hoc his equations to match the measure, and voila, all physicists which a prior had decided there MUST be a big-bang, ignored Finlay’s.

Now those are the 10 canonical proofs that need no new physics, each of them explained ‘facts’ that the big-bang ‘does NOT explain’ properly. This is more than enough, and while there are a few more, I think 10 is according to the numbers of T.Œ, good enough of fact-known-known proofs.

A timeline will help to understand why it is the likely one by C) cyclical predictability:

1926: Sir Arthur Eddington estimates the non-thermal radiation of starlight in the galaxy has an effective temperature of 3.2 K.

1930s: Erich Regener calculates that the non-thermal spectrum of cosmic rays in the galaxy has an effective temperature of 2.8 K

Thus the thermal radiation calculated by Penzias in 1960 at 3 K had been rightly foreseen by the first people who thought of it (average of 3.2+2.8/2=3k).

On the other hand the late proposal of a cosmic big bang by A-bomb researcher Gamow et al were:

1946: George Gamow estimates a temperature of 50 K.

1949: Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman re-estimate Gamow’s estimate at 28 K.

1960s: Robert Dicke re-re-estimates a MBR (microwave background radiation) temperature of 40 K

These were all offbeat. Only after 1960s measure, busy-busy the cosmic big-bang ‘re-re-re-estimate’ its equations to get ‘a posteriori’ the ‘desired’ experimental results ‘ad hoc’, instead of noting that Mr. Eddington and those proponents of a local background radiation WERE right in their predictions and the cosmic ones totally off-target and hence use the scientific method to deny the cosmic one.

  • Now and here explanations: Moon MACHOs

This AGAIN is a basic proof of truth in science: if WE CAN FIND explanations in present time and here-space, it is absurd to consider an explanation in past or future time and out-of-here space. It is like if we measure your body temperature, at 37 degrees and then a cuckoo physicist tells you the cause is with a lineal past-moving equation that you were born 17 billion years ago at 5 trillion degrees and you are cooling down!! When there is an explanation, in the metabolic activity, now and here of your body.

So what is the metabolic process on the galaxy now that produces that temperature?

Namely the existence of micro-black holes or similar dark matter (strangelets) red-shifting components on the Halo, which account for its mass and the redshirts of all light reflecting or coming through it.

But further on, before we deal with the Halo, there is a huge problem which shows further that it is a local radiation, the so called ‘axis of evil’, which at the cost of billions of $ astrophysicists try to eliminate with zero success. Namely that the radiation aligns with the axis of the galaxy and its equinox, because ‘obviously’ it is produced by the galaxy’s activity.

Do you think this obvious answer has any chance? ha. Quoting the official version, of Wikipedia:

“In particular, the quadrupole and octupole (l = 3) modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with both the ecliptic plane and equinoxes, an alignment sometimes referred to as the axis of evil 🙂

A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data. Recent observations with the Planck telescope, which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, confirm the observation of the axis of evil. Since two different instruments recorded the same anomaly, instrumental error (but not foreground contamination – the way they ‘introduce the local cause – ‘contamination’:) appears to be ruled out.

Coincidence is a possible explanation, chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Now to my hypothesis of a halo of dark, quark matter (black holes or strangelets) acting as a far ‘more limited’, closer membrane distorting by red shift the light reflected or coming through it (as all membranes do transform what penetrates them).

Why, it is a preferred solution? Obvious:

The question posted by the non-shadows experimental fact is that the radiation cannot come from the supposed outer ring of fire (big bang radiation). It does have to come therefore from the internal region of the galaxy, reflected by the Halo, giving us a mirror image of the galaxy, or alternately from outer light, crossing through the galaxy, altered by the Halo ‘strangelet and micro-black hole matter’, strong candidates to for the dark matter of the galaxy. Then obviously what physicists do is merely to extend this Halo-altered radiation into a supposed infinity.

The only alternative object that can produce such radiation in present is a micro-black hole, whose temperature red-shifts light as a gravitational lensing. And since a black hole gravitational lensing is proportional to the mass, we can calculate the mass of those ‘background black holes’, which redshirts light at 2.7 k. Indeed, a simple calculus shows that a black hole of the approximate mass of a moon (the most common galactic object of which each sun has hundreds in its planets and Oort/Kuiper belts, would produce that radiation.

So very likely the halo of dark matter of the galaxy is made of micro-black holes that have eaten moons, as their bigger cousins eat stars. Then they WILL radiate at that exact temperature.

Further on, since black holes are fundamental particles of the upper scale, as protons are in the quantum scale they must be homogeneous in size, even if they eat less perfect planetoids, expelling the ‘left-overs’ as gamma radiation and becoming with other quark stars (strangelets), the ‘protein’ membrane that shields the galaxy, as a st-point whose 3 topologies are latter studied in more detail.

Critical density.

One of the problems of the big-bang (of many) is the critical density. It must be of 10-26 kg per cubic meter for the Universe to be the ‘observed’ flat geometry. But it is not. Only 2 so this is a problem, the big-bang of the cosmos does not match the flat geometry of the Universe and the topic spiral galaxy.

So if the big-bang is a local galactic big bang the critical density of the galaxy should be 10-26; then it would be the quasar big-bang of our galaxy.

Let us do some crunching numbers for a change.

The equation for the critical density is:

ρcrit = 3H02 / 8πG

You can see that the critical density is proportional to the square of the Hubble constant — a faster expansion requires a higher density to overcome the expansion.

How empty is space? Astronomers have learned that the mean density of matter in the universe is within a factor of a few of the critical density. We can calculate ρcrit by inserting the gravitational constant, G = 6.67 × 10-11 Nm2 / kg2, and adopting H0 = 65 km/s/Mpc. We first convert the Hubble constant to metric units, H0 = (65 × 1000) / 3.1 × 10+22 = 2.1 × 10-18s-1. Now we can solve to get ρcrit = 3 × (2.1 × 10-18)2 / 8 × 3.14 × 6.7 × 10-11 = 7.9 × 10-27 kg/m3 ≈ 10-26 kg/m3. This amazingly low density is equal to about five hydrogen atoms per cubic meter, or a single hydrogen atom in a volume the size of the average TV set. However, in that same cubic meter there will be 5 to 10 billion low energy photons of microwave background radiation, the feeble relic of the big bang.

How well does this density match up to the density of large objects in the universe? The typical distance between large galaxies is about 2 Mpc, so we can see what the average density would be if a galaxy like the Milky Way were the only object in a box 2 Mpc across.

The mass of the Milky Way, including dark matter, is about 10+12 M. Sun, or 10+12 × 2 × 10+30 = 2 × 10+42 kg. The volume of a 2 Mpc cube is (2 x 3.1 x 10+22)3 = 2.4 x 10+68 m3. The typical density is therefore mass divided by volume, or 2 × 10+42 / 2.4 x 1068 ≈ 10-26 kg/m3.

Thus we can see that the galaxy density roughly equal to the critical density.

  • The Black Hole reversed equation of the expansion.

While there is not clear understanding of what the ‘Singularity that holds the entire mass of the Universe in an infinitely small point’ due to the ‘absurd’ backwards motion of the Hubble equation in lineal terms till are mote past, there is a clear proof the explosion of a black hole into a quasar will give us the same result:

Since the equations of the big-bang inflationary first age are exactly the same than those of a black hole, reversed inside-out, as the black hole explodes creating in its outer rim a ‘ball of fire’, advancing at enormous speed, through repulsive gravitational waves, till the wave smooth an isomorphic sphere of the size of the galactic outer Halo. Thus there is not mystery to the creation of the region, which will be reborn as a spiral galaxy when the entropic death of the black hole reverses its course, in the following eras.

In the parlance of ‘physicists’, the proper description will be this:

Tƒ say that space expands exponentially means that two inertial observers are moving farther apart with accelerating velocity. In stationary coordinates for one observer, a patch of an inflating universe has the following polar metric:

ds²=-(1-Λr²)dt² + 1/1-Λr² dr² +r²dW²  (where Λ is not the symbol of the 5th dimension but the cosmological constant) We use polar metric because the black hole expands with a positive curvature into a spherical form, following the commonest ‘entropic explosion-death’ of any big-bang material death. In the simplest expression we write: M=e/c² only that we are talking of a tachyon superluminal expansive wave.

This is just like an inside-out black hole metric—it has a zero in the component on a fixed radius sphere called the cosmological horizon. Objects are drawn away from the observer at towards the cosmological horizon, which they cross in a finite proper time. This means that any inhomogeneity are smoothed out, just as any bumps or matter on the surface of a black hole horizon are swallowed and disappear.

Since the space–time metric has no explicit time dependence, once an observer has crossed the cosmological horizon, observers closer in take its place. This process of falling outward and replacement points closer in are always steadily replacing points further out—an exponential expansion of space–time.

This steady-state exponentially expanding space-time is called a de Sitter space, and to sustain it there must be a cosmological constant, a vacuum energy proportional to everywhere. In this case, the equation of state is . The physical conditions from one moment to the next are stable: the rate of expansion, called the Hubble parameter, is nearly constant, and the scale factor of the Universe is proportional to .

Inflation is often called a period of accelerated expansion because the distance between two fixed observers is increasing exponentially (i.e. at an accelerating rate as they move apart), while can stay approximately constant (see deceleration parameter).The -dimensional de Sitter space, denoted dSn, is the Lorentzian manifold analog of an -sphere (with its canonical Riemannian metric); it is maximally symmetric, has constant positive curvature, and is simply connected for at least 3.

  • The Helium problem.

Nucleo-synthesis occurs between 3 minutes and 20 minutes after the (quasar) Big Bang

During the photon epoch the temperature of the universe falls to the point where atomic nuclei can begin to form. Protons (hydrogen ions) and neutrons begin to combine into atomic nuclei in the process of nuclear fusion.

Free neutrons combine with protons to form deuterium. Deuterium rapidly fuses into helium-4. Nucleo-synthesis only lasts for about seventeen minutes, since the temperature and density of the universe has fallen to the point where nuclear fusion cannot continue.

By this time, all neutrons have been incorporated into helium nuclei. This leaves about three times more hydrogen than helium-4 (by mass) and only trace quantities of other light nuclei.

This formation of so much Helium was for very long considered the proof of a cosmic big-bang because stars could not form so much Helium. Then it was found that most of the imbalance was helium accumulated around the central black hole of galaxies; which has not been explained. Obviously because Helium formation happened when the black hole exploded with the big-bang temperature it is found close to the center of galaxies, and it was formed by the quasar explosion. So a galactic big-bang explains both its abundance and its location (the cosmic one does NOT explain its location)

  • The ages of the big-bang.

The ‘cycle of explosions’ of Galaxies into quasars, into galaxies, follows the same ages of the big-bang. As all of them after the initial ‘Planck epoch – of gravitational superluminal waves’, dark epoch of nucleosynthesis, are ages ‘within galaxies’, and so they are proved for the inner space of galaxies. They do NOT explain many other features of the Universe as a whole (which is not isomorphic, etc.) but perfectly describe the evolution and formation of the stars of the galaxy.

So the so-called ages of the big-bang, are properly the ages of the galaxy; WITHOUT all the ‘ad hoc’ theories and pseudo-scientific models required to explain WHY the large scale Universe has NOTHING to do with the supposedly smooth result of a cosmic big-bang (this is like Ptolemy constant recurrence to ‘new’ ad hoc epicycles to make fit new observations into its earth-centric theory of the Universe). Trust me, any astronomer knows how long this ‘list’ is.

Thus the quasar big-bang follows further the laws of truth (minimalism: Occam’s razor), simplicity and correspondence. WE DO NOT NEED to postulate strange forms of dark energy and dark matter, except the ones KNOWN, repulsive gravitation (to account for the entropic expansion of space between galaxies that balances its contraction), which is ‘natural’ to the model of galactic-atoms; and quark matter to account for the dark matter of the halo. Let us consider this second element in more detail.

  • The experimental proof. Earth’s experiments can replicate them

The ages of the ‘big bang’ can be replicated by merely doing the quark gluon soup on the LHC here on Earth. Thus there is zero difficulty for the awesome reversed process of a quasar explosion to create enough quark gluon soup to replicate all those ages. Other matter are the risks of starting a big-bang ice-9 or ‘gas-9’ process (word coined by this author in his suits against CERN for potential genocide: aka, a run-away creation of top quarks and Higgs (its decay scalar mode: Top quark->2H) on planet Earth.

In that regard,. Œ, reclassifies particles, to understand the 3 ‘ages of evolution’ of information represented by the 3 families of mass and quarks, which are also in close symmetry with the upper cosmic scale, the components of the 3 regions of the galaxy:

  • The Top quark star center (black holes MUST be modeled AS real ENTITIES, with a cut-off, ∆-1 ‘cellular substance’ as Einstein wanted. Only Top quarks (Higgs condensates in the parlance of modern physicists) turning faster than c-speed in its internal vortex (hence its enormous attractive mass, which increases with the frequency of its vortex: M=ƒ(h/c2)) have the properties at larger scale of a black hole.

That is, black holes ARE top quark frozen stars, with positive top quarks as their cut off substance.

  • The middle region of up and down light human quarks.
  • The external negative charged, strangelet halo.

Thus the 5D symmetry between the ∆-1 (particle) and ∆+1 (galaxy) limiting scales of astrophysics is obvious and further proof of the symmetries of T.Œ and its ‘correspondence’ and ‘minimalism’ (proofs of truth in science), since it accounts for the first time for the reason why 3 families of particles and 3 families of stars co-exist, and eliminates the need for further theories and particles beyond the standard model:

Since the 3 ages of evolution of mass of increasing form – I, II and III families of quarks are symmetric – to the 3 regions of the galaxy: Top quark black holes, up and down matter , negative strangelet halo

Symmetry between atoms and galaxies (protons positive top quark holes, negative electrons, strangelet halo).

And so once we have falsified ‘reasonably’ the big bang (we could write hundreds of pages on this, but we have to move on), we can now consider 5D physics, on the known-known Island Universe of our galaxy, its generator equation, 3 ‘relative planes ‘of existence, 3 ages of time and 3 organic parts in space.

BUT IF THE BIG-BANG IS NOT COSMIC, BUT LOCAL, THE BIG-BANG OF THE GALAXY? WHY WE GET SO MUCH CONFUSED ABOUT IT?

THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE IF WE CONSIDER THE UNIVERSE A FRACTAL SYSTEM OF SELF-SIMILAR SCALES:

BECAUSE THERE ARE BIG-BANGS IN ALL THOSE SCALES AND IT IS EASY TO CONFUSE THEM. Let us prove it by considering a fascinating theoretical proof: the equation of unification of charges and masses as two self-similar vortices of two scales the atom and the galaxy, and all the big-bangs happening between those 2 scales, to prove you how unimportant is to research any of them as the most important, how preposterous to think we can SEE AND KNOW ALL ABOUT ALL THE SCALES.

IV.

Galaxy in space: Galacell’s supœrganism

 

Each science of mankind, which corresponds to an ∆-scale of the 5th dimension is fully renewed and enlightened by the new formalism of its Generator Equation and its analysis of all systems as super-organisms in space, systems that evolve in time, and 5D structures that co-exist across symmetries scales of the 5th dimension. Let us consider for example the case of galaxies, with 3 introductory notes on:

  • The spatial structure of the galactic super organism.
  • The unification equation of masses and charges as symmetric time vortices of the quantum and galactic scale.
  • The ‘death-birth’ cycles of big-bangs and big-crunches of masses, which express the limiting end of the world cycle of physical systems, perfectly described by Einstein’s E<=>Mc2 dual equation.

 The Three Non-Euclidean Regions of the Galaxy. : Sp (Halo)<ST: stars >Tƒ: black hole.

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.26.57

In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.

Since the fundamental 5D symmetry of galaxies is between the particles and families of matter of the Universe (Graph below) and the parts and symmetries in space of the galaxy. This is the logic of ‘Simplicity and Correspondence and Scientific Evidence’ underlying all disciplines of Science, which physicists have forgotten. Science as Einstein put it, is only concerned with the facts and events known and experimentally proved.

So we must construct the universe, with the particles we know in the ∆-1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales. It is then clear the ‘nature of galaxies’ as organic systems, of enormous size, which stretch according to the metrics of the 5th dimension the 3 co-existing planes of:

  • III families of mass of increasing weight and density, the ud-atoms of light matter, the sc atoms of middle density, or strange matter, and the bt atoms of hyper dense matter  that correspond to:
  • III families of cosmic bodies, the ud-light stars of our matter, the strange stars of pulsars and the black hole stars of maximal density, which correspond to:
  • The III regions of different density of the ‘galactic cell’, the intermediate region of light stars, the mitochondria of the galaxy that reproduces and becomes on the long term, the generators of black holes (stars converted through nova processes), which migrate and form the ‘DNA-gravitational nucleus of stars’ and generate the strangelet, densely halo of quark matter around the galaxy, creating yet another ternary symmetric 5D space-time structure.

Now it is clear the difference between 5D astrophysics and the present state of ‘fanta-physics’, in which all can happen, all particles that are a mere mathematical equation must be searched for, as there are no rules, no understanding of the space-time symmetries of the Universe, and its life-death arrows. Physicists ARE STILL ASKING, why there are antiparticles (the arrow of death of particles), why there are 3 families of mass (the ternary symmetry of 5D scales of particles), what is dark matter in the halo (the strange quark symmetry between particles and parts of the galaxy).

They do not have the slightest idea of why the universe is like it is, and so all ‘goes’, all can be searched for, including unfortunately nuclear experiments with strange quark matter and top stars (black holes) that can blow up the planet and accelerate its future purpose on the ∆+1 scale – to feed as mitochondria do on a cell, the reproduction of the heavier strange and top quark matter that rules through black holes and strange neutron stars the galaxy.

Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy.

A galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial Entropy and temporal information).

And to understand it, we NEED to fully grasp the symmetry between the 3 ∆±1 planes of existence of the physical system:

So we can define without further ado the structure of galaxies in space:

 The Three Non-Euclidean Regions of the Galaxy. : Sp (Halo)<ST: stars >Tƒ: black hole.

Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy. Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal ∆-point is:

E:Halo <stars that evolve Entropy into matter> Tƒ (Black holes)

In the graph, a galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between Spatial Extension and temporal information). Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:

– Max. Tƒ: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark Entropy at 10 C.

For that reason Kerr black holes10 should be called wormholes, because they absorb light but let it escape through its axis as dark, gravitational Entropy, at faster than light speeds.

-Max. Es: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational red shift and/or absorb the Entropy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.

Thus those non-evaporating micro black holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells, controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-Entropy.

– Es=It: Stars, tracing toroid cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the wormhole and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy.

We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the wormhole and the flows of intergalactic dark Entropy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo would destroy us. Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroid cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.

In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black hole.

The energetic medium that transfers Entropy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.

Let us study the parts of the whole – the 3 elements of galaxies, stars, black holes and gravitational forces that join them.

Recap. Galaxies are fractal ∆-points with 3 standard topological regions: a spatial body of stars and an informative nucleus of black holes. The closest self-similarity in our world is with a cell.

NOW, THE STUDY of those galaxies in time follows a closer symmetry to that of the galaxy in space:

So the little bang, was the death of the previous galaxy, or according to the quasar cycle of barred galaxies (and ours is a barred one), a 20 billion years cycle of birth and death of galactic systems, in which the central black hole suffers a cosmic collapse of all its matter, and then spits it out in a quasar explosion, starting a new cycle:

Spatial symmetry: Sp: Neutrino & Light background < St-ars > Black Matter

 

BLACK HOLES: TOP QUARK STARS: Tƒ: GALACTIC VORTICES

image050

Black holes are Kerr wormholes and frozen stars.

Quark holes can be studied, once we understand their ‘higher why’, from the perspective of topological spaces and multiple space times, which limit is possible species and processes, either as top quark stars (frozen stars in the jargon of Einstein), or as rotational masses with the Kerr Metric; or from the many perspectives, of its structure as a system co-existing within 3 relative ∆-planes of existence. In the graph, its 3 topological regions.

Any organism extends through 3 hierarchical scales. For example, a human organism is composed of cells and carbohydrate molecules whose minimal unit is the amino acid. In the Galaxy there are 3 scales of mass and each of those 3 scales become the fractal parts of the next scale. In each of them we find an informative, cyclical type of mass: quarks in quantum atoms; black holes, which should be top quark stars in star-size black holes; and swarms of black holes in hyper-black holes at the center of galaxies and perhaps the Galaxy.

Thus a hierarchical organic structure grows from those inner parts: its strings become gluons that become quarks that become black holes that form hyper-black holes, in a stair of fractal systems of increasing complexity.

This is proved by the fact that the Black hole’s event horizon membrane reduces light to its minimal bits of information (Planck’s areas), whose length is the minimal length of strings, which they extract from light. Since strings are both the theoretical components of black holes and strong forces, quarks and gluons, a description of black holes with tachyon, boson strings becomes the mathematical bridge between both scales. Thus indeed, black holes are fractals of quarks, fractals of gluons and strings (mind the reader though that those strings have fractal dimensions, are background independent, tachyon strings, defined by the Nambu’s actions, not superstrings, a baroque fantasy of Pythagorean Physics).

Each of those scales becomes the informative center that interacts with a reproductive body of electromagnetic electrons, stars and galaxies. Let us then study black holes in their interaction with its bodies, galaxies that explode in its big-bang death as quasars.

Tƒ regulate that body black holes emit dark Entropy through its poles, creating the membrane of gravitation that ‘positions’ stars, as protons position with their gravitational and magnetic fields the electronic nebulae. Since gravitational Space-time is formed by the maximal informative entities of the 2 scales, protons and black holes. For all those reasons, we prefer the names:

-Frozen stars (Einstein’s name), since they are top quark stars.

-Kerr’s holes; since this is the rotational metric or black holes.

-Or wormholes, because it expresses the fact that the black hole is a door to the other ‘world’ of dark Entropy, which it emits. While the name black hole, invented by Wheeler, to substitute Einstein’s name after his death and push in this manner his singularity theory, implies nothing is emitted by the hole.

In that regard, science when it is built to respond all the questions that exhaust the truth of the system, the what (experimental evidence), the who or how (causal logic), the when (metric spaces) and the why (topological time arrows) has also an inverse hierarchy of truth: Once we determine what we want to study, we must observe its why and how – its topological structure and causal logic combined (how/who) – and only then enter into the details, analyzing with clocks and instruments of science, its metric properties.

The excessive use of machines of measure, overdeveloped by the Industrial R=evolution has obscured that hierarchy, which limits with the experimental what, and the why and how of topological time arrows, what things are certain and what are just mathematical fantasies of ‘baroque artists’ of metric spaces, which are so common in the study of black holes due to the lack of experimental evidence on its details. Let us then study reality as it is, not as ‘Touring machine’ resolves it with an excess of metric information that ignores the deepest why and necessary isomorphisms of the why-Galaxy.

Frozen top quark AND Dark BCB atom stars.

Frozen stars are similar to nucleons: huge condensates of top quark-mass that create vortices of gravitational information with a negative curvature in the dimension of height. Hence, they exist in a discontinuous gravitational Galaxy beyond the c-speed and 0 K limits of Entropy and information of our Galaxy, emitting and absorbing dark Entropy at higher than light speeds and ultra-cold dark matter, perfectly ordered, probably under 0 Kelvin.

In that regard, the closest species to a frozen top quark star is a neutron star, composed of super fluid neutrons and strange liquid in a boson state, occupying a minimal space. The difference of density between a neutron star and a Top quark is small. So a Frozen top quark star could be the next evolution of a strange quark star with a ‘lighter’ cover of strange quarks on the event horizon, ‘breaking=killing’ the symmetry of our matter, packed then in a boson, super fluid solid state of bcb atoms and top quarks. Since the sum of the transitional weak bosons, Z and W equals that of a top quark. Thus: ∆+p=Z+W=Top quark.

Thus in a similar manner to a strange star, the black hole must have a central top quark region and a cover of BCB heavy atoms, in the ‘limit of c-speed’ angular momentum with likely Tau electrons, which maintain in a circular path the light of the event horizon, but must have beneath a struture in ‘layers’ similar to that of a strange star:

The 2 poles of the wormhole.

Thus the main error about Worm Holes is the idea that since we do not see them emitting Entropy and matter-information at lower than c speeds, nothing escapes a Worm Hole. This is a theoretical absurdity (things don’t ‘disappear’), which now has empirical proofs of falsity. Since we observe vortices of mass and radiation that surround Worm Holes, reaching super luminal speeds before dying into pure gravitational Entropy according to the Lorentz transformations.

And we observe bursts of matter and radiation coming out of the poles of central Worm Holes in quasars at super luminal speeds. So Worm Holes do emit dark Entropy and information at super luminal speeds through its ‘axis’, as atomic nuclei emit magnetic fields in their rotation.

The Relativistic equations of Worm Holes show that duality since Worm Holes appear with 2 solutions: one with implosive, informative parameters and the other with explosive, energetic parameters. Thus according to those equations a Worm Hole ‘re-absorbs’ radiant matter and light, dissociating the photonic particle-state and wave state of light, hence ‘killing it’. both beyond their Lorentzian limits of c-speed, back into its ultimate components: photons evolve into electronic nebulae, and then collapse further into quarks, which become part of the Worm Hole body or are ejected as quark beams; while light reaches infinite red shift and becomes dark Entropy.

Because the parameters of density of a stable black hole are self-similar to those of a top quark star, and that is the limit of density of mass in the Galaxy, it is easy to infer that black holes have in its center a super-fluid vortex of top quark stars; and so we can consider dark Entropy to be the ‘gravitomagnetic field’ of those top quark stars.

As in the case of the 3 solutions of Einstein’s space-time, which correspond to the 3 ages of the Galaxy but physicists dissociate in 3 different Galaxies in space; physicists have deduced that those 2 solutions to the Worm Hole equations create 2 different type of ‘black and white holes’; when according to space-time duality they represent the 2 organic regions of the same gravitational hole. Hence we could call Worm Holes also ‘mulatto’ holes (-;. Though we will use the term wormhole, more familiar to cosmologists. And define its E<=>o Generator equation:

Worm Hole (max.Es: external membrane: event Horizon) <Wormhole> White hole (Max.Tƒ: Kerr ring)

Quantum cosmologists never discovered white holes as independent entities, because they are part of the wormhole.

Topological regions of a worm hole.

Unfortunately quantum cosmologists ignore the inner structure of a gravitational hole as a fractal point with 3 zones that explain them:

Max. Es: The event horizon at c-speed is the energetic Riemann membrane that absorbs radiant matter, breaking it into its minimal units, ‘Planck’s areas’ that become the strings of dark Entropy that feed the hole.

– ES=TƑ: The intermediate zone transforms radiant particles and Entropy into quarks and dark flows of gravitational Entropy. It seems to be a super fluid solid: a vortex-like structure of quark condensates and gluons.

— Max.It: The central region around the polar axis or central, informative, hyperbolic, negatively curved nucleus.

That informative center is the final ‘eye’ of the gravitational hurricane, the white hole of the wormhole. It emits through its poles Entropy and information in the form of dark, quark matter and gravitational waves of dark Entropy in super luminal jets that we observe indirectly around far away quasars, as they become again slower radiant matter, creating irregular galaxies. Thus white holes are the poles of wormholes, which indeed are the doors to the gravitational world of dark Entropy and quark matter that dominates the Galaxy, as cosmologists have discovered.

The equations of a wormhole show how it transforms the spatial, energetic parameters of the electromagnetic world into the inverse, informative parameters of the gravitational world, since a wormhole is an ultra-dense mass of highly ordered ‘boson nucleons’, packed into a single point of space…

Continuous physicists used to believe that the accelerating vortex reached infinite Entropy values in the central point or singularity, since they do not model masses, charges and Worm Holes as physical vortices of mass with a Radius, Ro, that represents the discontinuous limit between the external, body cycles of the Non E-point and its inner, still, informative region or brain, in this case between the vortex of stars and the still Worm Hole brain. Yet because infinites cannot be calculated they renormalize their equations beyond a certain limit in which they postulate 0 charge or 0 mass.

In fractal cosmology those tricks are not required as wormholes are modeled with Non-Euclidean topologies, which have always 3 regions separated by asymptotic membranes.

Thus fractal theory solves the problem caused by continuous infinite singularities, as Planck solved the problem of continuous, infinite temperatures, when he introduced fractal light quanta.

In organic terms, beyond the event horizon of a Non-Euclidean point, the Klein disk starts and beyond Ro, a discontinuous, inner radius separates the body from the informative, still brain.

In the galaxy the event horizon is the halo and this final radius is the horizon of the wormhole. In the atom, those 2 horizons are the external Electronic radius and the inner Bohr Radius, beyond which we find the proton Worm Hole.

The same pattern of 3 regions is found in a Worm Hole as a Non-Euclidean point. The event horizon is the external membrane. Then the point in which the equations of a Worm Hole reach T=0 is the inner Ro radius.

(This is the point in which Hawking says Worm Holes become negative in time and convert themselves into time machines)-: We already argued Mr. Hawking’s confusion of physical time, a change in the direction of motion, v=s/t, and absolute time, a hyperbolic error of the Cartesian graph. Time in physics is change in the direction of motion. So what T=0 means in a Worm Hole is that we reach the region in which the cycles of the Worm Hole’s body end and we enter the hyperbolic, high central tube that ejects dark Entropy. At this point time – understood as change in motion – halts and the Worm Hole enters the white hole region of production of dark Entropy, asymptotically perpendicular, with the form of a Belgrami cone.

The equations of Worm Holes show also their event horizon as a bidimensional killing field that destroys the entropy of our Galaxy, since it kills our Entropy/matter into its ultimate units on the Planck’s scale, lowering as in all processes of death our components two scales down into its fundamental physical units.

In the biological homology, a human being is composed of cells themselves composed of amino acids that act as the minimal units of life. So when an organism dies it suffers 2 deaths: first its cellular tissue is broken into pieces that feed the stomach of an organism, which will destroy it till its minimal amino acid units, used to recompose the organism’s own cells.

When we study mathematically Worm Holes they show also a dual process of destruction of light matter to its ultimate components, Planck areas or strings, used then to reconstruct the boson quark condensates of the Worm Hole and its dark Entropy.

Thus Worm Holes in their feeding processes destroy light matter till it absorbs its Planck’s areas, the minimal units of information and Entropy of our physical space-time, the equivalent to the amino acids that the stomach absorbs.

Then those Planck’s units, become lineal tachyon strings to form dark Entropy and cyclical strings or gravitons, the minimal units of the mass world, evolving into bosons and quarks.

Those quarks and dark Entropy is then expelled through the poles to balance the expansive entropy of our membrane and create an immortal Galaxy. Indeed, the expansion of space-time in the Galaxy is cause by the expansion of dark Entropy coming out of the Kerr worm holes’ poles; yet black holes also implode light into quark matter and the overall process creates a wobbling, dynamic balanced, zero-sum of fractal expansions and implosions, in a Galaxy that will never die.

Recap. We define a rotating wormhole as an organic topological structure, which uses the event horizon membrane to absorb radiant matter and Entropy through its central, ventral plane, which transforms it into ultra-dense top quarks and gravitational dark Entropy, expelled in perpendicular jets through its central, hyperbolic axial white hole’s pole used to control the body of galactic stars and communicate with other Worm Holes.

The Existential Cycles=Time arrows of Wormholes.

Wormholes follow the 4 energetic, informative, reproductive and social arrows of all exi=stential systems of reality: They feed on electronic matter, nurse galaxies and stars, and reproduce in momentum collisions with them, evolve socially in super-Worm Holes (galactic center swarms), and as the ‘long-lasting’ informative neurons of the galaxy and Galaxy, whose networks they create, its generational cycle lasts as long as the entity that hosts them (the same happens with neurons, the informative network of our body that last between birth and death). Let us study those arrows in more detail:

E>O: The main cycle of a Worm Hole is informative. It creates quarks from electroweak matter and orders the galaxy into spiral forms through gravitational waves that ‘position’ the stars while symbiotically feeding their centers with Entropy that degenerates into matter. Thus the worm hole emits dark waves of gravitational information to control the galaxy.

Those informative waves of Worm Holes fed the energetic needs of stars, which therefore become chained to those waves without knowing its final demise – as gravitational plants, guided and herded by Worm Holes towards the center of the galaxy to feed them:

-It<E: Their energetic cycles balance the entropy of the light-world. Wormholes first erase light and radiant matter, feeding on gas and stars; and then renew it, creating new jets of pure dark, gravitational super luminal Entropy and quarks that enter back into our Galaxy as light and proton matter. If insects eat dead matter to renew the Earth’s ecosystem, the wormhole inverts the time/space coordinates of the light-world to renew it.

They act as ‘the antiparticles of the white cosmos’ that annihilate radiant matter. Kerr worm holes absorb Entropy from our light membrane by red shifting light, with different signatures according to their relative mass. The background radiation must be interpreted as the signature of 2.7 ‘background holes’.

Bigger, older Kerr worm holes of galactic mass are below the Background radiation curve and so they can red-shift and absorb electromagnetic Entropy from it, feeding in this manner on the electromagnetic membrane. For that reason the galactic map of the background radiation has a central zone, with lower temperatures corresponding to the giant central, colder worm hole.

Reproduction: Wormholes control the reproduction of stars, which in turn reproduce wormholes. Since when a small wormhole crosses through a star, it catalyzes its explosion into a nova that leaves behind a neutron star or a wormhole. On the other hand, the ‘reproductive DNA center’ of giant galaxies is a massive wormhole structure that emits huge super luminal jets of quark matter, which catalyze the reproduction of stars, creating irregular baby-galaxies.

– Social evolution. The wormholes that occupy the informative center of galaxies are like the nuclei of cells, swarms of Worm Holes, which regulate the life of galaxies, as DNA does with cells. In the next scale, the dark Entropy flows ejecting by galactic black holes communicate galaxies, creating the networks and walls we observe in the grand scale images of the Galaxy.

Recap. Black holes follow in their events the 6 arrows of time. They feed on the electromagnetic membrane and its species; they perceive gravitational information; they reproduce stars and galaxies and they evolve socially into swarms in the center of galaxies and into galactic networks in the Galaxy.

The 3 organic roles and types of wormholes in galaxies.

By homology with any other non-Euclidean space-time that resembles a cellular organism, and the Isomorphisms of ternary differentiation of all topological species, we can consider 3 types of wormholes whose roles within the organic structure of galaxies will obey its arrows of time but will also become essential to the bigger organism in which they exist.

This simple rule, which we shall apply to all systems, is a tenant of the organic structure of the Galaxy – we differentiate species in ternary sizes, ternary topologies, ternary ages and ternary functions, which must be symbiotic to the higher ∆+1 organism in which the entity exists or else the organism would not ‘tolerate’ the presence of the microcosmic species with no function:

– Intermediate, reproductive ES=TƑ zone: Spiral arms. Non-rotating wormholes are born from dying stars. Then they form bi-polar systems with other stars feeding on them, taking advantage of their gravitational control, finally transforming the biggest stars into new wormholes. Those wormholes probably gather into social groups, which fuse in bigger wormholes and move towards the center of the galaxy where they can feed easily on its dense herds of stars, creating at the end of the process a central nucleus.

Max.Information: Nucleus. The Worm Hole nucleus is a huge rotational, ‘Kerr hole’ or perhaps a herd of Worm Holes similar to the DNA nucleus of a cell. It is the informative brain of the galaxy that controls its fractal beings, the stars, with gravitational waves that shape the rotating movement of the galaxy, and establish its feeding rhythm:

The galactic Worm Hole first attracts interstellar gas to the intermediate non-E region, where gas reproduces stars, and then it sends that gas to the central wormhole that consumes it. In the same manner, electrons, the ‘stars’ of the atom, feed first on light quanta and then emit high-Entropy photons to feed the atomic nucleus.

Those gravitational waves also guide in old, globular galaxies, the stars toward the feeding center. Yet there might be other structures of dark matter, coming out of the nucleus, similar to the Golgi apparatus of cells: invaginations through which wormholes might flow into external zones of the galaxy to control the reproductive and destructive processes of stars.

Finally, the central hole emits through its polar zones, dark Entropy, super-luminal gravitational waves that probably communicate galaxies at super luminal speeds, forming the strings of galaxies observed in the Galaxy. Since according to string Theory gravitation in free, intergalactic space is not warped by electromagnetic branes that feed on them inside galaxies and limited to c-speed.

– Max. Es: Membrane. Though we cannot see the galactic membrane made of dark matter, by homology Non-Euclidean topology hypothesizes that the halo is the energetic membrane, where small wormholes called appropriately MACHOS, have functions similar to globular proteins in cells:

They create and control that galactic membrane of dark matter, which closes the galaxy as a black body; causing the background radiation, which according to recent empirical data might be local: They red shift light to 2.7 K, which becomes the metabolic temperature of the galaxy. They reproduce new stars and expel matter and radiation beyond the membrane: Since their rotation is perpendicular to the galactic plane they could create a positive or negative spin, depending of its orientation, provoking flows of Entropy and information in and out of the galaxy. Those outward or inward flows fine-tuned with the dark Entropy jets of the Worm Hole should move the galaxy at the will of the central Worm hole

The interaction of the membrane and the central Worm hole should encase all other species as a perfect Max. Es x max. It ‘upper class’ of the galactic organism in complete control of its inner parts.

Recap. There are 3 types of worm holes that control the membrane, inner center and herd the stars of the galaxy.

The big bangs of the 3 types of wormholes

The homology between the 3 sub-species of Worm Holes and the 3 regions of a galaxy explain the 3 possible scales of feeding and big-bangs of those Worm Holes; and the functions of the lesser electromagnetic species for the top predators of the galaxy:

– Micro-Worm Holes, Background MACHOs would eat up the commonest celestial bodies, planets and moons. This is our function; and the fact that we do not hear intelligent life in the galaxy and that CERN is going to do black holes to ‘see’ if they evaporate could explain how indeed, all moons become background MACHOs and all planets are blown up by ‘metric physicists’ unaware of the ‘why’ of black holes, stuck in the 3rd paradigm of using machines to measure the when of reality. This smaller worm holes would then migrate to the Halo of the galaxy closer to our planet.

– Medium Worm Holes formed in dense star centers, feed on them, causing supernovas, creating intermediate Worm Holes that migrate toward the center, forming the DNA nucleus of the galaxy.

– While galactic Worm Holes would explode into quasars, (galactic big-bangs). And/or as ‘dark galaxies’, recently found elsewhere, without emitting light, migrate towards the ‘Great Attractor’ or hyper-black hole at the center of the fractal ‘cell’ of the Galaxy in which we exist.

Recap. We might be just food for worm holes, which are born and feed on the 3 scales of electromagnetic matter of the galaxy: planetoids, stars and entire galaxies.

The Worm Hole as a Gravitational, Informative Mind.

The center of the galaxy is occupied by a giant wormhole that seems to be the final, social, evolutionary stage of multiple galactic Worm Holes, born out of the evolution of stars. It acts as the gravitational DNA-mind of the galaxy – a hypothesis, which mechanist science will always ignore. But we want to stretch your understanding of the 4th ‘why’-paradigm, describing those mind holes with the isomorphisms of Non-Euclidean geometry and superorganisms.

A galactic wormhole is a rotating object, which has a minimal spatial size and a huge dimension of height since it is made of boson, super fluid quark condensates. Its homology with a cellular, informative center, defines a central galactic wormhole as an enormous gravitational informative center, which controls its galactic body, positioning its star quanta through gravitational waves. In fact, when we calculate the wormhole’s informative parameters, it turns out to be a perfect super fluid computer, with maximal informative volume since its speed of calculus equals its speed of transmission of information.

The coldness of the wormhole proves also the informative hypothesis: In fractal space-time coldness means order, stillness, necessary to create in the center of a crystal or a cryogenic CPU, or a super fluid wormhole or the focus of an eye, the informative, boson accumulation of pixels that shapes a still, formal, fractal virtual image, without friction, without blur. Thus, the eye of man is cold. The brain is colder than the blood. The chip works better at cryogenic temperatures. And a wormhole is very cold, made of quarks in super fluid, highly ordered states.

Wormholes do create a complex virtual image of the galaxy with its strings. Physicists explain those processes in abstract when they affirm that a wormhole has an extra 5th dimension and its equations are homologous in 5 dimensions to those of the 4-dimensional electromagnetic world of the galaxy it represents (Maldacena Conjecture12).

The description in 5-string dimensions of a Worm Hole is completely equivalent to the description of an electromagnetic galaxy in 4 dimensions. Thus as our brain has a ‘homunculus image’ of the entire body, which is what we perceive; the worm hole can build a ‘galunculus’ image in its interior. The 4th ‘why’ paradigm provides the reason of the conjecture: the 5-dimensional world of string holes is equivalent to a 4-dimensional world; because it is the map of our galaxy, made by the Worm hole’s mind.

In topology the central zone of any st-point is an informative region, whose dimensions are the sum of the body and membrane dimensions. In cosmology the galaxy is a body-like vortex of reproductive stars and the central wormhole is the eye of the vortex that creates an image of the galaxy, as the brain maps out the body.

The hyperbolic center of higher form/information has more dimensions than the energetic bidimensional membrane and the reproductive toroid; since it holds the holography that combines the image of the external world imprinted in the ‘senses’ of its membrane, and the image of its internal, reproductive functions it commands. Since our galaxies have an external bidimensional halo and an internal 3-dimensional vortex of stars (a bidimensional plane with an added dimension of rotational motion), we can easily calculate with the general isomorphisms of the Holographic, central mind, the dimensions of a black hole:

Bidimensional external membrane +3-dimensional cyclical volume:

5-dimensional hyperbolic nucleus.

This simple law derives of the general law of dimensionality of the 3 regions of a Non-Euclidean topology:

Information of hyperbolic ‘brain’= Information of Klein’s ‘body’ + Information Riemann membrane

And it is the origin of the Maldacena Conjecture (a black hole, informative center of the galaxy has in 5 dimensions the same structure than a galactic mapping in 4 dimensions.)

What this means is that the Worm Hole must have an inner image of the galactic body, which it orders with its gravitational flows and an external image of the Galaxy in which the galaxy, its body floats, to direct its form toward fields of Entropy (intergalactic gas) and connect itself with other galaxies. This is what we observe galaxies do.

They form walls, strings and complex clusters with other galaxies and they feed on intergalactic gas and smaller galaxies. So they act as cells in a gravitational, organic soup and must have as cells and organisms do an informative, processing center able to have an internal image or mapping of its stars and an external connection that informs it of the outer world. However, we see only a 4% of the galactic structures; the rest is the dark Entropy and dark, quark matter that the worm holes perceive to map out reality, which is like trying to recompose a cell, in which we only see its mitochondria.

Another proof of this higher dimensionality is given by the Kaluza-Klein models, which explain our perceived electromagnetic 4-dimensional world and the 4-dimensional gravitation over which the network of light is imprinted, as if they were born from a larger 5-dimensional gravitational world. Finally, gravitons are the only particles that can have 5-spin positions=informative dimensions. Thus, all those self-similar theories point out to the fact that we are a floating membrane within a bigger, faster, more complex Gravitational Galaxy.

Recap. In fractal cosmology the central discontinuous zone of a fractal point is an informative region. This is the role of Worm Holes in galaxies, forming with other Worm Holes, communicated through flows of dark Entropy, the informative network that controls the Galaxy. Therefore it has the dimensions of its membrane and inner body of stars.

Sp: Neutrino-light backgrounds.<ST-ars>TƑ: Black holes

SP: NEUTRINO AND LIGHT BACKGROUND

SP: Background Radiation: Basal Temperature of the Galaxy

As any system can go in more detail, by looking closer to its fractal parts, we can go deeper and deeper in the analysis of the whys (biologic and topologic), whens (mathematical and metric), how/who (Logic) and what (experimental) questions of knowledge. Let us consider thus in more depth just one of all the elements of the galaxy studied here – the organic role of the background radiation – the water of the galaxy…

The background radiation coincides with the radiation of a black body at 2.7 K degrees. Since in Non-Euclidean topology any fractal point is a black body; that is, a point with minimal apertures to the external world, a galaxy will only emit background radiation through its Halo, in which background holes will redshift light at 2.7 K. Thus the galaxy surrounded by a halo of quark, dark matter can be considered a black body emitting at present time as an isothermal organism does a background radiation, whose organic function is to maintain a homogenous temperature, similar to the organic temperature of living beings and ecosystems, kept by its water. Thus, the background radiation acts as the cytoplasmic Entropy of galaxies with 3 functions:

– Max.Es: It provides Entropy to its bigger, colder Worm Holes and its super fluid helium structures (not treated in this introduction to complex cosmology). Both happen to have a temperature slightly lower than the background radiation from where they can extract Entropy.

– Es=It: It acts as the membrane limit, between the gravitational and electromagnetic membrane, within the galaxy, separating both worlds. It maintains also an isothermal temperature, as any organic system maintains a stable temperature.

– Max.It: It establishes a fixed frame of reference for the galaxy, allowing the process of information and measure, location and communication defined by Gauge Theories.

The background radiation is the ‘Entropy soup’, the cellular water of the galaxy that feeds its dominant RNA, its Worm Holes; as the hot water of the cell allows RNA molecules to move, kicking left and right water molecules with its COOH legs. Indeed, we know that only organic systems have a homogenous temperature. For example, humans have a homogeneous temperature within the limits of liquid water. So the 2.7 K homogenous background radiation reinforces the organic hypothesis.

Quark matter is the top predator form of the galaxy; hence they are the entities, which, as the elephant on the savannah or man on Earth, or aerobic bacteria in the earlier planet, have redesigned the galaxy with their organic activity. In Gaia, water, the equivalent to that background radiation, maintains a stable temperature, thanks to the feeding, energetic activities of its life organisms that avoid abrupt climatic changes. Without aerobic life the Earth would be like Venus – a planet with extreme temperature changes. Now it is almost isothermal. So happens to your body which has 36.5 degrees all your life, due to your organic activity as a water organism with 2 networks, a warmer blood and a colder, nervous, informative system.

So happens to the galaxy, in which the basal temperature of the background radiation separates the ultra-cold world of Worm Holes and dark, gravitational matter and the hot world of atoms and radiant matter, allowing the exchange of Entropy and information between the 2 physiological networks that structure the galaxy.

Recap. Background radiation is the Entropy soup, the cellular water of the galaxy that feeds its dominant RNA, Worm Holes.

A case of study: neutrinos as the baseline of photons.

Next, a key insight I want to convey from this introductory notes are clear:

– Neutrinos MUST be worked out, as the only particle with no ternary roles in the Universe at this stage to occupy a fundamental role in several scales of the universe or else they would NOT exist in such huge numbers. Neutrino physics in that sense is the most IMPORTANT field left to explore at this stage. As it has several properties which are coincidental with the roles required to describe the next scale of the Universe, that of quantum gravitational, dark energy and dark matter beyond the known-known level of galaxies.

My take is that neutrinos are NOT the quantum of gravitation as Bohrians think, because it is NOT needed, Albertians are right, attraction in gravitation HAPPENS because of the curvature around a MASSIVE central point of view (which makes almost indifferent for most calculus the other mass).

Only when A and B are similar in mass, there is a relationship of linearity and quantum gauging When one point dominates the other in mass-size and force there is not. And most gravitation systems around a sun, a black hole is of that kind.

Neutrinos do act NOT as forces but as communicators of information about distances.

They are hence similar to strings, in fact of the same minimal length – the Unit of LENGTH of the Galactic universe, and thus the ‘structural element’ constantly produced and radiated that webs a, background independent space, related to the ‘magnetic part’ of the light rays, they form together, as neutrino and antineutrino, reason why they are the only particles with left-handed or right handed singlet structure so they will ALWAYS neutrino + antineutrino, back and forth, form a perfect, planar, longitudinal fixed distance between two particles to start communication between them.

This communication will then be realized by the electric field created by the articles above it,

From an action point of view, they can be seen as the ∆e ‘food’ of H-Planck light quanta, and first c- ‘space line’ traced in the communication of particles, the tending of the cables of gravitation and hence also the quanta of transversal gravitational waves, latter studied in more detail. All those roles are possible within different theories of neutrinos but none is fully and well developed (neutrino theory of light, being the key to them. But only as the origin of the magnetic field of light born of two of those neutrinos, which add up the 1 spin of the photon).

Next we must understand neutrino oscillation, growing in mass, from a practical zero-mass till collapsing into a mass particle   of the 3 Neutrinos generation – the tau which will be correspondingly much more massive (as Top and Tau quarks-electrons are). So they START UP many reactions, when they collide with particles.

And finally we must give it all the importance as in II-type supernovae they are the bursts of energy when those stars become black holes to form the underlying quanta of gravitational waves, but obviously not attractive but repulsive, quasar –like, nova like transversal gravitational waves –t he fronts of the big-bangs of all scales that carry the energy, repulsive dark energy waves, complemented perpendicularly by the ‘Higgs field’ much more massive scalar hyper luminal waves.

As Big bangs ARE as all systems that die, a broken SYMMETRY of two fields that created, Sp x Tƒ the system and now split perpendicularity as all the pictures of death of stars show – not chaotic explosions but cutting in two of the head-particle/field-entropy elements of the system, no longer in harmony.

Hence the ‘angle of the spins’ of the weak bosons, which merely says they angle upwards through the polar axis, while the wave of neutrinos explodes in all directions, without clear direction as the burst of energy.

This directional DUALITY of explosions of matter hardly understood is what explains the NEED for two particles the neutrino, almost massless and the W± Z H bosons with huge mass.

By all this I mean several neutrino ROLES are needed to complete 5D physics with Majorana neutrinos (neutrinos in which the particle and antiparticle are the same), which have mass and must be so far according to the general laws of T.œ, the gravitons of the transversal gravitational waves.

There might be outside galaxies faster than light neutrinos – something, which in the future would be easy to observe if we perceive a neutrino wave before the light wave of a supernova from far away galaxies.

Now essentially if neutrinos as all seems to indicate do have mass, are equal to their antiparticle and have boson qualities with ½ spin, their maths will be really fun. And I promise to get seriously pedantic with them on the 4th line (-;

Those neutrinos will be the feeding space strings for light beams (theory of neutrinos as origin of light fashionable in the 30s, and worked out by Jordan, Born, De Broglie and Fermi among others).

And any physicists could work out the details for those roles with some not so difficult modifications on the concept of a graviton.

In simple terms, neutrinos have the size of strings (measured in its weak angle scattering); and 2 inverse neutrinos moving back and forth between particles could act as bosons with 1 spin, and give birth to a light single polarized photon. Neutrinos are hyper abundant and with a minimalist mass, could account for the underlying structure of galaxies as ‘organisms’ with a formal structure since unlike planets stars do not move at different speeds but maintain the inner form of the ‘galacell’.

So the proper understanding of neutrinos as the ‘base’ over which light transits in the galaxy and the 3 families of masses as the components of its 3 Sp<ST>Tƒ organic parts, would put together all the points of view and isomorphisms of astrophysics.

We shall consider the theme in more detail in the next paragraphs.

In that regard the reader would notice the use of T.Œ, which no doubt as the century goes through and the theory is accepted to substitute mechanism as the philosophy of science that unifies them all, will become more important: to guide each science for the most likely to succeed paths of future research, through its stringent ‘economicity’ and enlightening isomorphisms.

So strangelets as the components of the Halo of galaxies, top quark hadrons of different BCT combinations as the cut-off substances of black holes, neutrinos as the h-Planck ‘strings’ of gravitational transversal waves between galaxies and within galaxies, the waves that maintain the stability and form of star orbits (of which I have read a few quite convincing models of astrophysics) are the most interesting ‘selections’ I have made on my constant ‘reading’ of astrophysicists’ paper, which is all what at this stage of my life can do for the discipline.

On the other side there are theories that do NOT fit at all within 5D T.Πand I doubt will ever be proved, SUSYs and background dependent string theories should be out of the picture; non-quark dark matter theories too, with all its array of particles. T.Πis limited because space and time are limited.

And what about the Higgs. As one of the leading activists against accelerators and big-bang experiments on earth, you might think 5D doesn’t have a role for it, but it does (given the chances to produce top quark black holes or strangelet that could explode the planet, in this I have been obviously very active, reason why the astrophysical community does not consider 5D Physics, but beyond personal careers one must be ethic as a finitesimal of the superorganism of mankind – and that is what physicists and economists so strongly criticized in my work have forgotten despite whatever they find about nature).

Essentially the Higgs field and similar models respond precisely to the other element of the higher plane of existence of the Universe beyond galaxies, connected to top quarks of huge mass and likely 10 c rotary speed, and black holes and dark energy and dark matter.

In brief, the Higgs is the field of hyper-gravitational and hyper strong force, of 10c beyond the galaxy dark energy and dark matter, which is a taboo concept on astrophysics, because of an ill-understood conceptualization of General Relativity (it is not in 5D physics , as General relativity is a theory of the light space-time membrane or 4Dimension of the Universe, a present ‘slice’ of the time flow and the 5th dimension.

In their first paper on quantum electrodynamics, Heisenberg and Pauli asserted that quantization of the gravitational field, which appears to be necessary for physical reasons [in a footnote, they refer to the works of Einstein and Klein on that line], may be carried out without any new difficulties by means of a formalism fully analogous to that applied here.

During the thirties, the idea of a gravitational quantum came to be generally (but as we shall see, not universally) accepted by theoretical physicists, apart from the small relativity community that followed Einstein in his continued search for a (classical) unified theory. In the early thirties, there was some discussion of Bohr’s idea that the neutrino might be related to the gravitational quantum.

Bohr said to Pauli, (March 1934): ‘The idea was that the neutrino, for which one assumes a zero rest mass, could hardly be anything else than a gravitational wave with appropriate quantization’. Fermi had evidently had a similar idea, but was aware of the problem of the different spins.

Pauli to Heisenberg, February 1934: ‘Fermi would prefer to make a connection between neutrinos and half gravitational quanta.’ As late as November 1934, Pauli cautiously stated: ‘While up to now it has been held almost certain that gravitational phenomena play practically no role in nuclear physics, it now seems that the possibility cannot be immediately rejected, that the phenomena of beta-radiation could be connected with the square root of kappa [the gravitational constant]’ suggests that Pauli may have had in mind construction of a graviton from two neutrinos, along the lines of de Broglie’s neutrino theory of light.

They wrote: ‘The comparison displayed above indicates that the graviton and the neutrino have much in common. This probably testifies that in general the highly improbable process of graviton radiation becomes practically observable in beta-decay. If the neutrino turns out to be the graviton this would mean that contemporary physics had approached the limits beyond which there would be no present insurmountable barrier between gravitation and electromagnetism. Due to theoretical considerations it is hard to identify gravitons with the neutrino since it is hard to admit that they have the same spin 1/2 as the neutrino. In this respect gravitons have much more in common with light quanta. It is impossible, however, to totally rule out a theoretical possibility of their identification.

He concludes:

The so-defined gravitational quanta or ‘gravitons’ have the… spin 2… It is certainly a limitation of the quantum-mechanical side of this treatment, that one leaves it at that approximation, in which the general-relativistic field equations are linear. This limitation is most closely connected with the well-known divergence difficulties of field theory.

Apart from these divergence difficulties common to all quantum field theories at that time, Pauli, like Rosenfeld, seemed satisfied with linearized quantum gravity. But in 1935 Bronstein had already applied Fermi’s technique to the linearized Einstein equations, and came to much more skeptical conclusions, when he opined: ‘It is a task of the nearest future to identify the ties between quantum mechanics and the theory of gravitation… what will be needed is a sort of marriage between relativity and quantum theory’ He was stressing the crucial significance of the three dimensional constants c, G, and h in defining the past and future development of physics.

Those are the fundamental questions that physicists need to resolve in detail.

What T.Πprovides is the general analysis of the issue from the higher perspective of the organic laws of the Universe.

It is obvious that at this stage ‘humans’ will NOT accept in the present dogmatic, ‘believers’ in digital machines languages concept of physics anything like what we propose in this blog. But for very long I have learned to ‘eliminate’ the human concept of science in these dark ages, moved only by intellectual curiosity. So I write for future Asian generations or for robots, as the present ‘civilization’ of ego-trips of western men, thinking machines must do their job has no much of a future.

In that future, if humans want to understand the Universe they will develop a synthetic ‘above’ T.Œ, Organic Theory of Everything, and if they go under as it is likely ‘obviously’ robots will NEED to feel organisms, and they will ‘believe’ in T.Œ

So here it goes: T.Πis Simple, minimalist and dualist. All systems do have 2 organic networks, blood and nervous systems, and the galaxy does have obviously two such fields, the background light and background neutrinos.

This is the fact and so i couldn’t care less if in the equations of Mr. Einstein graviton appears at 2 spin and in the equations of Mr. Fermi, neutrino appears at ½ spin. Solve it. Nature has both and makes them unavoidably the same role. There is no other particle in the present state of the galaxy, which exists and can play both roles. Not it will be discovered, because it will have to be on the range of energies of the galaxy, which have been already searched for. It cannot be in cuckoo super-energies as they will not manifest constantly in this universe, and so it doesn’t matter if you can unify at 500 zillion Gevs the present forces.

This is not here now and in this conditions> so it doesn’t matter here now and in these conditions is all found and so you must account reality with the thing you have found as there is nothing else to find here now and in this conditions.

Work your maths, if you haven’t doesn’t it is not because it is not there but because something is wrong with your 2 spin graviton, ½ spin neutrino and spin theory. Ok?

In the case we are occupied, neutrinos are by far the only candidate for the basic actions between fermions, as a firs step BEFORE the communication through light space-time, which is able to transfer information in much greater measure, starts the organic built up of the galaxy.

So the way to explain the galaxy is first in its organic structure, then in its descending parts, stars and atoms and particles, and then when we start to explain the basic actions between atoms, the neutrino which is the quanta of galactic gravitation, appears unavoidably as the first connection between atoms and particles which lock them at a certain entangled distance for them to start communication. This resolves the fundamental problem on the models in which neutrinos give origin to light, already proposed in the 30s.

The neutrino theory of light is the proposal that the photon is a composite particle formed of a neutrino antineutrino pair. It is based on the idea that emission and absorption of a photon corresponds to the creation and annihilation of a particle–antiparticle pair. The neutrino theory of light is not currently accepted as part of mainstream physics, but actually is quite straight forward in its maths. That is it is perfectly coherent.

V. galaxy in time:

 Its worldcycles: little big-bangs.

How we do know the 5th dimension exists? Perhaps the real question is the inverse: how it is possible that humans have not yet formalized the fifth dimension till the work of this writer at the turn of the century and even then have ignored it, when the entire process of scientific thought has been about reaching new scales of the fifth dimension, since Galileo looked upwards with his telescope and Leeuwenhoek used a microscope and found those little beings co-existing and moving faster in the water drop, where they were not seen at first glance? I wonder… often about the so called human ingenuity.

In any case being ‘scientific’, mathematically a dimension was defined by Klein, as a ‘space-time metric system’ or equation, in which any being could travel through. And he defined a travel through a space-time dimension as a process in which the space-time parameters of the being remain CO-INVARIANT, that is they did NOT change together.

And this is exactly how we have defined the fifth dimension. So for the fifth dimension of scalar space and infinite time clocks to exist we must somehow being able to travel through it and yet after the trip, our space-time parameters must remain co-invariant. Yet since we have defined the fifth dimension as one of size in space and speed of time clocks it merely means that all systems of nature MUST be able to GROW or DIMINISH in size in space and at the same time in inverse fashion, DIMINISH in the speed of its processes or ACCELERATE THEM. And that is exactly what happens in all beings from birth to extinction. All beings are born in a small scale as a seminal seed that has a much faster metabolic rate in its cycles of energy and information from particles to semen to cells to black holes and then they grow very fast, but slow down their metabolic rate as they become larger finally emerging from its fetal state to its whole organic form.

And then they get old, as they increase their information and die accelerating again but in a negative inverse fashion the travel of life in the process of death which extremely fast explodes the being back to its elementary smaller parts that free again will restart its faster cycles.

The result is a  complex process of change closer to what we perceive happening to all kind of beings, which we shall call a ‘worldcycle’, not a ‘worldline’, as ‘two dimensions of time’ will now define a ‘cycle’, not a line for all beings who experience a ‘travel through the fifth dimension’ of scalar size and topological, morphological change, from birth to extinction.

5 Ðimotional beings, are complex entities that travel through the 5 dimensions of space-time, as they move through it, tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence. Such a simple game of Ðimotional beings, can be observed from many perspectives, in an entagled Universe, in which can at least observe constantly those 5 Ðimotions, Social Generation, entropic death, locomotion, reproduction and gauging of information,

Alas we can break our concept of internal change more properly in 3 ‘topological variations’, we shall call the 3 ‘first dimotions’ of the Universe.

And so the fact that we are made of spacetime means ultimately we are made of 3 type of organic topological dimotions – and we say organic because as it will turn out all systems of life are made of ensembles of those 3 topological dimotions. And this justifies our concept of ‘relational vital space-time beings’ that is beings made of spacetime with motion. Since as Aristotle put it – when things move they are alive. Welcome then to the study of ‘vital spacetime’.

Systems assembly into organic forms by putting together the forms and functions of the 3 adjacent dimensions of a system, pegged in simultaneous space.

Indeed, all what you see are forms of space with motion in time that combine into the infinite energy beings of the Universe.

And while physicists have reached an extraordinary dexterity calculating the motions in space of beings; only when we ad those other type of motions=changes in space-time we understand how they trans-form and evolve through generation into new forms of in-form-ation. This is the basis of the formal model of this blog, the ‘eternal philosophy of science’, we call ‘organicism’, which understands the Universe as a system that reproduces information.

It is its simplest spatial view, which we shall made soon more complex adding it its time-motions-functions and scales generated by the minds that perceive in the singularity a still mapping of the whole with a language that perceives in itself.

So we can generate and mirror all the systems in space, made of ensembles of those 3 adjacent forms/functions we shall call space-time organisms with them.

We shall write THE TERNARY topology also in many ways and make it increasingly complex as we study different dimensions of ‘form’ and ‘motion’, of ‘space’ and ‘time’. But in its simplest mode is the most extraordinary simplex equation of them all: $≈ð; whereas S is the limbic system, T, the particle-head with its clocks of information and ≈ the bodywave that iterates and puts together both.

We can now reconsider the sentence that opened this post, ‘existence is a travel through the metric steps of the 5th dimension’… once we have define the ‘metric equation’ of this eternal dimension of exist¡ence. So we can remind the reader that a ‘dimension’ exist according to Klein, when we can find a ‘metric equation’, in which motions in space-time are ‘co-invariant’, meaning its product is constant.

We just saw that product, $ x ð = C, for entire families and world systems. So the dimension do exist (and do not ask me why humans are unaware of it, as they found it as soon as they looked at the huge stars, or looked down to the smallest insects, two different scales to ours). And now the equation known, the question is: how do we travel through the fifth dimension?
Simple, living and dying. Yet before we explain you that long cycle of exist¡ence, we should consider the minimal STeps we do traveling through the 5th and 4th and 3rd and 2nd and 1st Dimensions of reality; since frankly what humans know about it is little, mostly messed up and so we have really to start from the beginning defining properly the 5 Dimotions of the Universe, from different points of view, its minimal ‘STeps’ and then how the sum of those STeps invariably bring us to a worldcycle of existence of life and death…

Different forms of expressing the 5 dimotions: worldcycles in sequential time – actions in space-time scales, supeorganisms in space.

How to study the Universe of superorganisms tracing worldcycles is simple:

When you order those dimotions in time sequence you get a world cycle, when you order those dimotions in space you obtain a super organism; when you order those dimotions in timespace scales you get the 5 vital actions of existence.

This sentence IN italic IS PERHAPS the most important sentence of the whole blog – the ORDER of reality that transcends for mere time clock-cycles and spatial forms into THE COMPLEX REALITY we see, including us.

As we have studied them in ‘space’ as super organisms – albeit at the minimal level of depth, we shall now introduce them in sequential order as world cycles of existence, and then in its scalar interaction as ‘vital actions’ that develop a common program of survival, driven by informative dimotions, which also explain why we age, accumulating an excess of form, of information, wrinkling and warping (biological and physical systems) due to the excess of ‘dimotions’ of information (perception, reproduction, social evolution of parts into wholes).

Now the importance of having a metric equation that leaves co-invariant a motion through its parameters of space-time, is that we can ‘travel’ across this dimension. Indeed, the mathematician Klein defined the existence of a dimension of space-time, when we could formulate a co-invariant equation left unchanged when we move through the space-time dimension. So how we travel through the fifth dimension? Obviously by growing in size in space through the process of reproduction and evolution, from an ∆-1 fast seed of information, emerging, as a larger whole with slower time clocks, in the organic level, which itself is part of a larger world, with slower ‘deep time’ geological and cultural cycles.

SIMULTANEOUS SUPŒRGANISMS IN SPACE, SCALAR ACTIONS & SEQUENTIAL WORLDCYCLES.

Existence as a travel through the fifth dimension.

The organic view of the 3 parts of the being together, which in physical systems are the potentials, waves and particles IS what form its physical organisms.

The world cycle of existence at the fullest level of maximal duration of the being, is the sum of all its partial, individual actions=dimotions, which lean towards an excess of reproduction of information – the very meaning of any fractal generator system. Hence the natural ‘derivation’ towards warping, informative extension, maximized in the third ‘territorial old age’ of the being, when all becomes ‘quiet’ – the organism is warped, the territory of vital energy converted into still property, the galactic plane filled with black holes and strange dark matter… Yet to rebalance that excess of ‘actions’ dominant in information (>), death restores very fast in a single spacetime quantum moment the zero sum.

In the graph, the game of existence for different beings that change through 3 similar ages between its evolutionary generation in a lower ‘plane’ (ab. ∆) of the fifth dimension as an ∆-1 seed to emerge as an ∆o organism in an ∆+1 world in which it will go through a process of ‘aging’ (accumulation of information) that will finally exhausts its energy and dissolve its information in an entropic process of death. The sequential order of all space-time organisms defines then a worldcycle of existence – not only a simple worldline of locomotions as physicists think, but a far more rich and complex pattern common to all beings that ‘exist’, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy.

They all trace ultimately in the ¡logic of entangled 5Ðimotions, the same world cycle of exist¡ence, where ¡ defines the scale in which the system resides, between all of the main super organisms of the Universe, both biological, sociological (800 civilizations) which follow the same ages of human beings, expressed in its subconscious collective art, albeit at a slower decametric scale and physical worldcycles, from states of matter, to galactic ages to the whole cyclical hypothetical big-bang of a larger hyper universe scale.

Since the existence of all those super organisms is indeed a world cycle journey through 3 different, ¡±1 scales of the fifth dimension.In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the 3±1 ages of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±∆1 change=time:

+1: Conception: ruled by the fifth dimension of generation, palingenesis and social evolution, as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks: ∫T.

1st age: Youth or Age of lineal ‘$t’ motions.

2nd age: of energy that reproduces information and iterates the system, symbolized by, ∑e ∏i.

3rd age: All motion & energy becomes form, in-form-ation, exhausting itself; symbolized by §ð.

-1:Death: The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells: ∂S, or age of entropy.

In the graph we describe that law of 3±1 ages, cycles, or horizons of evolutions for the fundamental species of reality.

To understand that ternary structure of time in depth, we have to recall the Law of Complementarity between energy and information: all systems are made with a body/field of energy and a head/particle of information. The is the basis of quantum physics. And in the second age when existence reaches its plenitude it is precisely when ‘information’ imprints energy and reproduces the system: ∑e, x ∏i.

So those 2 elements are the essential forms of any system.

While the potentials/limbs can be external. In simple animals limbs regenerate…

Further on, since form is made with motion, all events must start with an amount of ‘simple’ motion that transforms itself into still form, information. Then, when all motion is consumed, warped into information, death reverses its cycle.

Yet in the middle of that cycle, when information and motion are in balance, to preserve the ‘bio-logic’ form created in that process, the system achieves its reproduction, through ‘hyperbolic energy’.

So between the ∆±1 processes of social evolution (generation and emergence into a higher plane) and entropy (death and dissolution back to ∆-1), in a single plane of existence we can describe reality just with the 3 canonical topological planes (bidimensional parts: flat limbs, hyperbolic body-waves and spherical particle-heads), whose topological forms best suit its functions.

Yet for the full description we need the ∆±1 seminal reproduction and entropic generation and death.

The most important as in all fractals, vital or mathematical is obviously reproduction, imposed by survival:

So the ‘offspring’ of the being will carry on its information into the future.

Information never disappears as it always recreates itself. And since all is motion by the mere fact that time moves with form, by the mere fact that momentum-energy is conserved memorial reproduction of cyclical forms ‘happens’ In fact science is nothing but the recollection in human languages of those memorial reproductions, which become repetitive ‘laws of science’.

All beings, from fundamental particles, (electrons and quarks) to human beings and life species, reproduce or are reproduced by more complex systems, when they have extra-energy to imprint its in-form-ation. Since forms that do not reproduce, die away and become extinct.

So even those deconstructed beings that cannot reproduce alone are reproduced by other species. For example, cells reproduce carbohydrates, galaxies reproduce stars and human reproduce machines in factories.

Thus, we talk of 3±1 drives of live, arrows or ages of existence in all systems: the drive for limb motion body energy, the drive for information, the drive for reproduction and the drive of social d=evolution (birth and death of a macro-organism).

Whereas the 3±1 ages of Organic Time are merely the order in which those 3±1 drives ‘accumulate’ during the life/death cycle of any species, sequentially.

If we put them in adjacent spatial forms, through 3 scales of ∆-1 atomic/cellular/ individual, ∆ø organic/thermodynamic/social, ∆+1 cosmological/geological/national planes, we get a super organism of fractal space.

But all those ‘organisms’, with 3 ‘topological networks’, extending in 3 relative ‘scales’ of size, when we observe their ‘existence’, turn out to follow always the same ‘generational pattern’, with 3 ages dominated sequentially by the ‘moving’ network or youth, the ‘reproductive network’ in its mature age, followed by the informative network in its 3rd age…

So we talk of 3 ‘motions in time’, ‘parallel’ to the 3 topological dimensions of space.

The young locomotion of limbs, the mature reproductive motion of body-waves and the informative gauging perception of particle-heads. And since all dimensions correspond to a motion we talk of 3 ‘dimensional motions’ or ‘Dimotions’ of space-time, which conform a being in space and time, giving origin to ‘ternary topological beings’ constructed around the ‘messing’ of those 3 networks, the ‘moving’ lineal potentials/limbs network that maximize motion, as the line is the shortest distance’the hyperbolic re=productive body-wave network that maximizes iteration and its spherical particle-head the form that can store (and gauge) more information, guiding the system, giving us a ‘first look’ to the ‘fractal generator’ of spacetime organisms:

Γst: $-limb/potentials<Ø-bodywaves>O-particle/heads

Let us then conclude this fast review of the main elements of ‘existence’, and its superorganisms in space and worldcycles in time, managed by a singular mind that stops time into information, with a few classic examplex of those…

WORLDCYCLES IN PHYSIC, BIOLOGIC & SOCIOLOGIC SYSTEMS

In the graphs, we illustrate those 3±1 ages with a few universal examples, also from social sciences: we see the process in individual human beings, in art, the collective brain of a culture; in matter, where those ages are called the states of matter – energetic gas, reproductive liquid and informative solid. Let us then consider some aspects of the world cycle of the 3 different systems we study, physical, biologic and sociologic (mirrored properly by the ternary syntax of all languages in mind systems):

The overlapping generational waves are essential to the study of the interaction between space populations and time ages. And they define the aging of all systems, with different variations.

Physical systems: Galactic worldcycles.

For example light appears always first as a blue, high frequency byproduct of the creation of stars, which will become increasingly red with lesser energy in a star world cycle mimicked by light of about ±10¹¹ years – likely not only the worldcycle of life of stars but of light itself (solving the horizon problem). So we observe in light from an initial youth of maximal energy-motion at faster time-speeds=energy content a constant relaxation that oblige us to reconsider the ‘theory of tiredness’ of light, latter studied when considering how to interpret the Big Bang in 5D.

Finally stars, past the, that ‘thin red line’, evolve from an age of energy into an informative age as black holes with no light at all.

So do galaxies that evolve from energetic nebulae into Black Holes, which explode into quasars. Finally, if the network of galaxies we call the Universe was truly born from a first seed of matter that fed and reproduced its form in the energy of the vacuum; it will go through 3±1 self-similar ages described by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s Space-time equations. Since all in the Universe is a game of ‘3’ dimensions or ages of time: past, the age of energy, present, the reproductive age in which all systems repeat themselves to keep their ‘present form’ beyond death and a 3rd age, when all energy is exhausted, trans-form-ed into form, information:

Informative galaxies balance entropic dark energy, when we apply the laws of the scientific method, WITHOUT REDUCTIONISM OF THE ELEMENTS OF REALITY.

Thus WE CONSIDER, as big-bang theorists do (limiting time to a single entropy arrow, limiting space to a continuous spacetime, limited to study ONLY interstellar space and discharge implosive galactic vortices), the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

What big-bang theories miss is the ‘fractal structure of the Universe’, which allows it to wobble – that is while entropic intergalactic space expands, and they got it right with its equations, AS THE SPACE-TIME of the Universe is fractal, this is compensated by the implosive, informative only attractive gravitational warping of galaxies towards central black holes. So the world cycle of galaxies compensates the entropic death of quasars. In the next graph we see the ‘missed’ 3 ages of life-death of galaxies into dark, heavy dense matter, which shrinks the Universe.

The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle and its 3±1 ages. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes humans, societies (super-organisms of human beings) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time.

In the graph we can see the fundamental cycle origin of all the elements of the galatom – the cycle of its black holes, which are the ‘organic ‘DNA” of the galaxy in its organic view as a ‘gala cell’… As it has both ‘co-existing organic properties’, numerical scalar ones, and topologic and causal, space-time properties described with different languages of the humind mirror.

Let us start then with a very brief conceptualization on how the Universe looks when we ad a new dimension of internal time=change or arrow of in-form-ation, of change in form, or ‘morphogenesis’, to the arrow of external time=change or translation in space, of loco-motion and entropy, the one one studied by Physicists.

We shall consider of all those 3 ages of systems and its world cycles and superorganisms, the one of the Universe. In a more evolved world of stience, this would not be the most important stience, as all scales are relative and we observe closer the human scale – so man as the measure of all things, as the most perfect supœrganism would matter more than matter.

So we can, departing from those concepts of space and time, define also the Universe and all its parts as a space-time being:

‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that self-organize themselves in bigger, self-similar scales’.

The 5 Dimotions=forces of the galatom

The five Ðimotions.

The generator equation defines the Universe as a fractal sum of timespace super organisms, extended through 3 ∆±1 relative scales of space-time, ruled by 5D metric equations that render constant the product of the size in space and speed in time of the clocks of information of any system of Non-Æ points trough the 3 scales in which is possible to travel as an ‘existential being’, in the fifth dimension performing a world cycle. Since for a dimension to exist, there must be a co-invariant quantity, which allows its travel, S x T = K becomes the metric equation of ‘exist¡ence’. Its  constancy is also the origin of the organic nature of reality as it allows the symbiosis of a system through its 3 scales. The travel of existence can also be viewed topologically in a single plane, in which an organism ensembles and exchanges lineal momentum, energy and cyclical momentum. So we can define all systems as an ensemble of  lineal limbs/potentials that perform its lineal momentum, organised as herds of ∆-1 micro points (quantum atoms, cells) in superposed additive groups that move the system and dominate its young relative past age. Its second conserved quantity being its vital energy, distributed through  3 ∆o iterative, physiological networks, which define the organism proper able to iterate its form into a dynamic present system (thermodynamic matter, or multicellular organisms in physical and biological systems)… finally guided by a relative future particle-head that holds the linguistic mind or relative future survival will that guides and synchronises with its clocks the system as a whole in the external ∆+1 world; where it will perform 5, aeiou actions of ‘existence’ gauging I-nformation, to a-ccelerate=move towards a field of e-nergy in which to feed, to reproduce into an offspring of clones to evolve socially into a larger universal ∆+1 new plane or superoganism of 5Dimensional space-time actions parts, before it exhausts its vital energy, stops moving and explodes back into its entropic parts in its big-bang death. So we can define its 5Dimensions in time through its worldcycle of generation, from its ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves and emerges into the ∆º scale in which it will act with its 3 dimensional networks, the 1D point/head/particle, that moves in 2D planes to feed with 3D energy.

 

The 5 Ðimotions of time. An organic Universe with mathematical and biological properties: The why of physics.

‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals“.  Ulam

Since most space-time events are complex, cyclical motions. 

In the graph, a bunch of lineal physicists studying each, only 1 of the 5 time motions of the zoo of Fractal space-times, which are made of the 5 canonical motions of a world cycle of a super organism: generation->evolution->growth->motion->reproduction->negative growth (diminution)->extinction, which form a o-sum or worldcycle.

Yet each of those motions in short distances seems lineal ‘walls, spears, ropes, snakes, trunks and mats’.

Only when completed they are always cyclical (small lineal geodesics of curved Earth, Lineal euclidean geometry, limit of the larger curved pan geometry; special relativity, limit of the larger curved General relativity, lineal momentums integrated into a conservative energy cycle, small lineal actions of life, part of the curved world cycle of existence, and so on)  

Only physicists seem happy just touching and measuring with numbers, reduced parts’≈single time motions of  the whole ‘non-lineal elephant’ – the super organism tracing its world cycle; blindly self-admiring its lineal ignorance. Wisdom, Wiesen, Saper Vedere, Veda requires to understand that ‘the languages of God are infinite’.

Physicists study world cycles as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Fractal Universe. In essence, physicists, reduce the 5 motions of the Universe, represented here by several blind physicists, into a single one, locomotion, unable to integrate them into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which in nothing differs from the 5 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.

Physical super organisms trace world cycles  as all systems of nature by accumulating the 5 Ðimotions of existence.

Physicists as the blinds of the graph see them, as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Entangle, dynamic Fractal Universe.

In essence, physicists, reduce the 5 changes in time=motions that form a world cycle– represented here by 5 blind physicists, to 2Ð>4Ð, lineal motion and its social entropy, and study the other Ðimotions as unconnected facts – not as dimensions.

Imagine the drawing as the sum of the 5Ðimotions that give us the real entangled Universal elephant. But physics describes the ‘flying mat’ (2Ð locomotion) mostly and its ‘entropic social arrow’ or 4 Ð (the spear) next. The other 3 Ðimotions 1Ð (still perception – the wall; 3Ð reproduction, the tree and 5Ð generation/social evolution; the snake) are ill-at-ease with the philosophy that the elephant is just an entropic moving flat mat, and killing spear…

So physicists are unable to integrate them all into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which as we shall show in the equations of mathematical physics in nothing differs from the 5 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.

The fractal structure of the universe is clear, and proved by the three legs of the scientific method: experimental proofs, logic consistency, and mathematical accuracy.

You can adopt on watching reality an upper perspective from above, throughout the most comprehensive possible view, that of philosophy of science and then you will see the Universe is all about reproducing information.

You can look at it from below, through the perspective of physicists as a mere game of motions of  very small unorganised, entropic particles and motion will become essential to you as a dazed and confused particle, yourself, immersed in the fractal supœrganism of the universe, seeing things zooming around you as they go on reproducing their informative code through complex worldcycles.

Since even motion is reproduction of form – the simplest of them, one in which the memorial tail of the reproduced parts lasts very short as they keep imprinting the lower scales of reality.

A further expansion of the concept of a worldcycle of time, is its analytic study with the 6 classic philosophical forms of motion, first expressed in Aristotle’s Organon. As in philosophy of science, prior to its mathematical definition time is synonymous of change and hence of motion in space, or change of form in time, giving origin to the 2 main sciences, physics, which studies time motions in space and biology which studies changes in form, in the information of beings through time. 5D physics fusions both concepts studying not only ‘locomotions’ in space but also ‘evolutions of form’ in time, which all put together give birth to the worldcycle of existence and extinction of all space-time beings.

So due to this expansion of the paradigm of space and time, in 5D physics we do NOT study only the external locomotions defined with a single time duration: v=s/t, s=ct of Galilean and Einstein’s relativity. We study and apply to all physical systems the 6 motions=changes of philosophy of science.

The 5 Ðimotions of time, defined in philosophy of science, since Aristotle are:

‘5Ð Generation’, ‘1Ð perception’ ‘2Ð locomotion’ 3Ð: growth, reproduction and diminution; 4Ð: death, dissolution, extinction.

We just upgraded this first philosophy of science to modern knowledge of data and unify all sciences with it.

Yet in classic physics only locomotion and its social entropic Ðimotion are fully accepted.  

In 5 Ð all the motions can be explained as travels in the 5th dimension; so worldlines become world cycles, of which the most important is the sequential series of those 5 motions in a life-death cycle, which also applies to physical systems across all the scales of size, from the cycles of matter, from plasma->gas->liquid->solid->Nuclear fusion, to the big-bang cycle.

In mathematical terms, once we have clarified the origin of those motions, we use the fractal generator, in a simple ternary development to express those 6 motions of time, with an equation of ‘existential algebra’, whose detailed study and connection with physical and biological equations is essential to GST (General systems theory, the philosophical model or Space-time Generator, the logico-mathematical formalism):

œ∆-1 (generated seed of information in a lower scale) ∑œ∆-1>(Reproduction and organization into a fetus which emerges as a new born) Œ∆ <∑Spe (young, entropic age of growth and maximal locomotion) > S≈T ∆+1(adult, reproductive balanced age, when the system iterates and becomes part of a larger social whole) >Max. Tiƒ (3rd, informative, solid age) << ∑œ∆-1 (Entropic, big bang death, which closes the cycle.

Such is the general worldcycle of all systems of the Universe, as all of them are made of space-time, and follow the process of organic creation and dissolution back into spatial entropy.

In physics, according to the principle of maximal perception of events in our thermodynamic scale, those ‘states’ of matter=ages=dimotions are evident:

The 3 temporal dimensions or ‘states’ of matter, Spe-gaseous, energetic states, ST, liquid balanced states and Tƒ informative solid states, form together the 3rd isomorphism of  molecular matter in its ∆+1 social scale. In the graph, again we can see how the introduction of scales and time ages solves the third main error of physics, one for each scale, in this case our thermodynamic ∆º scale considered wrongly to have only the entropic-death-weapon state, which as the graph shows is the entry to creation and death from the lower ∆-1, scale of Plasma states in which particles are not organically put into a single ‘entity’ as in those solid states.

Even if in the thermodynamic realm we must resolve also the cultural entropic error of the worldly profession of physicists and immediately observe the three ‘arrows’ o time as the state of physical systems. Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3rd time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.

The 5 Ðimotions as forces.

In the other 2 limiting scales of the galatom, the 5 Ðimotions are better studied as forces:

The vital energy of physical systems manifest itself in the manner of waves and forces. It is though important to understand those forces from the perspective of the entangled Universe, in relationship to the ‘scales’ in which they manifest themselves, and according to the functions they perform for its physical organisms.

Physicists, lacking, a philosophy of its science, beyond mathematical creationism – the gathering of data, plugged into equations, not always properly extended into infinities, and modeling everything else with the ‘first abstract idea’ they came up to explain the whys of physical systems – put all the forces together, and then try to unify them, as their view of reality is a mixture of ‘creationism’ (maths the language of God), monism (all must depart from the one, forgetting that Parmenides already proves if all is one, nothing can move, instead of the duality of Heraclitus and those texts) and reductionism (all what does not fit in the one, and the math, does not matter to us).

This explains as Feynman put it with some humor, why all the theories of forces look the same: 

“I would like to emphasize something. The theories about the rest of physics are very similar to the theory of quantum electrodynamics: they all involve the interaction of spin 1/2 objects (like electrons and quarks) with spin 1 objects (like photons, gluons, or W’s) within a framework of amplitudes by which the probability of an event is the square of the length of an arrow. Why are all the theories of physics so similar in their structure? There are a number of possibilities. The first is the limited imagination of physicists: when we see a new phenomenon we try to fit it into the framework we already have—until we have made enough experiments, we don’t know that it doesn’t work. So when some fool physicist gives a lecture at UCLA in 1983 and says, “This is the way it works, and look how wonderfully similar the theories are,” it’s not because Nature is really similar; it’s because the physicists have only been able to think of the same damn thing, over and over again.”

Richard Feynman. “QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter’

So for physicists all motions are caused by the exchange between fermion particles of 1/2 spin smaller bosons of 1 spin that seem to ‘push’ or ‘attract’ the fermions. What is 1/2 spin, what is a particle as opposed to a fermion, while they push each other, and why all forces must be tailored to the first they found (electromagnetism) doesn’t matter. Fact is NONE of the other forces responds to this scheme, because each force is different happens in a different scale of reality and has a different role. 

So we shall here, knowing what is ‘all about’ to properly address those forces and explain them as they are, for the role they play, using the elements of fractal reality: the 3 ‘scales’ of physical systems and beyond the Universal scale outside galaxies and the 5 Dimotions of existence, forces allow particles to enact, in as much as they transfer energy and information between the ‘particles and cosmic bodies and organisms of matter’ of the 3 scales:

In the graph, the ∆±4 scales of physical systems, self centred @ the human pov and the 5D metric equivalence between its time speed and space distance which gives us its co-invariant energy, in all scales (S x T = K)

It is then evident that forces are not equal, as some are more ‘informative’, transformative and some are ‘more energetic-motion’ oriented and each belong to a different scale. So first we define two symmetries between forces by scale and duality:

  • ∆+1 scale: Informative, implosive force, gravitation, acting on the internal world of the galaxy, most noticeable on the central black hole area.
  • ∆+1,2 scale: Entropic, expansive, energetic force, Dark energy, acting between ‘galatoms’, similar to repulsive electromagnetism.
  • ∆-1 scale: Informative, implosive force, strong force, acting on the internal world of the atom, most noticeable, on the central region of the nucleus.
  • ∆-1, 0 scales: Entropic, expansive, energetic force, electromagnetism, acting between ‘atoms’, similar to repulsive Dark energy

Which leaves a force that is different from the others, the weak force – not a force but a transformation, which physicists only recently they start to recognize, admitting what slowly is becoming a new ‘language’ to talk the weak “interaction”, as different from the other forces:

“The weak force… least fits into our picture of what a force should do. …the categories of ‘attractive’ and ‘repulsive’ do not really fit …because it has the ability to change particles from one type to another. …The weak force can change one lepton into another provided they are in the same generation. The electron can be changed into an electron neutrino and vice versa, but the electron cannot be turned into the muon neutrino… Jonathan Allday, Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang (2016).

Why physicists do not fully understand this difference has to do with the fact they use only an arrow of future time, entropy or locomotion, which is what they study in their worldly profession (making weapons and transport machines of locomotion, since Galileo first study the locomotion of cannonballs for the Venice Arsenal calculating v=s/t).

The problem of this approach is that they do NOT study the other fundamental arrow of change=time=future in the Universe: changes not only in the locomotion (translation in space, change in position, v=s/t) of beings, but change in the in-form-ation, form, biological evolution of beings (field better understood in biology).

TO PUT together both arrows is precisely my job. This is the task of the ‘science of duality’, which I chaired for years in its International congresses as the leading researcher of the field.

So because physicists LACK a proper 5D formalism of the duality of arrows of time, entropy AND information, to explain not only ‘spatial forces’ but ‘temporal, informative transformations’, they are stuck with ‘entropic only theories’ of all what happens as the product of motion, and exchange of particles in space.

How they resolve then the whole ‘unification of forces’ (whose equation we shall show in the fifth dimension that studies the social scalar nature of the Universe) resumes in a single law of ‘range’. Forces whose ‘exchange particles’ are more massive (never mind what mass is) have a larger range.

And they just fill this law out of the hat as a dogma with the ‘missing elements’: Gravitation which is an informative vortex MUST reach to infinity (even if we never found it acting outside galaxies where dark energy is supreme), and so it must have a massless particle, the graviton (even if we never found one). The strong force which acts inside the atom has a very small range, so it must have a massive particle but alas, it doesn’t, as the gluon has no theoretical mass. So here they make an exception, and through intricate thought consider that of the 4 forces tailored all as the electromagnetic force, they first discovered, the strong force is ‘special’ as gluons interact with them (notice that gravitation is also ‘special’, as we never saw the graviton and never measured its effects between galaxies that seem to recede from each other not coming together; so alas the expansion of electromagnetism’s law of range of force to the two others is as the American manifest destiny ‘exceptionalist’ (:

This brings us to the weak force, which Fermi first rightly tailored as NOT having range, since it is NOT a force but a process of evolution of particles into other particles after a ‘time of pregnancy’ so to speak, since they first become a massive particle to gather enough energy to start up the reaction (as women only get pregnant with enough fat, and chemical reactions only start with a surplus of energy); and then giving birth to another particle.

Alas the 3rd force they tried to Taylor with the same ‘model’ simply is ALSO not working. Since with no range, the mass of the particle of interaction would have to be infinite. So they scrapped the original Fermi theory and ‘moved’ the pregnant little particle a bit to get the exact mass of the interaction (we cannot of course measure properly if the particle IS in the same place through the process from its internal point of view, as it is pregnant, or just we see it through the ‘long period of pregnancy’ moving a bit when it become a massive w, z particle and then giving birth but for all effects it is a particle in pregnancy.

Moreover it is always a left-handed chiral ‘female particle’ (see our post on gender-chirality to see what we mean), whereas the spin-head is focused in the wave-body, as women have more connections of the brain to the hypothalamus, than to the eye-outer world, which is what right-handed male particles have, with their spin aligned with its external motion, becoming sterile, as right-handed males do NOT interact with the weak force and give birth to other particles. 

So alas, physicists extended the formalism of electromagnetic waves with its law of range to all other forces, making in all of them huge exceptions and ad ons that made the entire law of range and the single unitarian model for all of them pure rubbish.

And so we shall ignore the ‘philosophy of science’ of physicists and concentrate on the ‘facts of those forces’, what they really do, and in the more complex 4th line, on what it equations truly describe.

Ultimately they will be the responsible ‘small steps’ that added into the galacell’s superorganism will end up tracing its world cycle.

And its proper method of study would be departing from the thermodynamic better known scale and its 5 Ðimotions=states of matter, considering what forces enact those Ðimotions. And then run in parallel an analysis of the quantum and cosmological scales ‘mediated’ by those Ðimotions as the next graphs show:

And then we should go beyond the ‘galatom’ to observe the cosmic waves of dark entropy, parallel in properties at the cosmological scale with those between atoms.

And in the process obviously ‘rewrite almost entirely’ all the ‘assumptions’ of physicists about the origin of the Universe (big-bang theory), the meaning of the Universal constants of physics (hc, the 5Ðimensional metric of the galatom, and its coupling constants, Q, G, Gf, being the most important ones); the explanation of its 5 Forces (including the external dark electromagnetic entropy between galaxies), as the 5 Dimotions of physical systems; and then study each of the different worldcycles of matter, from those of quantum physics, through the states of matter, into the cycles of cosmological bodies.

Some advancements on time space processes and dimotions in physical systems. Forces.

Some hints: The forces of physics correspond to there different organic Ðimotions of physical systems. So they MUST not be all considered as caused by the exchange of particles.

The graph shows what is really wrong with reductionist lineal physics of a singe time dimotion: because all must be similar to our theory of electromagnetism in the quest for unifying a complex Universe the weak process that trans-forms and d=evolves particles become an ‘exchange of a W-boson, which is NOT exchanged but is the ‘transitory’ state of the neutron ‘grown in mass-energy’ to achieve its transformation, with no motion beyond a possible ‘step’ in the relative motion of the neutron that becomes an W boson (which should be therefore placed in the 4-vertex of “Fermi’s theory”, which then gives birth to the 3 p, e, v elements as Fermi rightly understood.

Specifically the weak chiral force is NOT a force but a process of trans-form-ation of physical information and evolution or ‘death’ of particles into larger, heavier ones in 3 ‘ages-families’ of mass, related to the ‘3 topological symmetries-parts of galaxies’, whereas the Halo and black hole star in the center should be made of heavier Strangelet and BcB atoms and top quarks, and the intermediate region of ud-light atoms.

The chiral force thus have no range, but transforms the particle first in a heavier more energetic ‘particle (the W, Z, H bosons) as all reactions and process of reproduction need to break the exogenous higher level of energy before start, both in chemical, biological or physical processes of reproduction and evolution. 

Then we can distinguish left-chiral particles, the ‘first scalar’ form of ‘gender’, where the head-spin of the system is orientated towards the body, causing its mutation and reproduction (so right-chiral ‘male’ genders do not reproduce, unless in process in which the mirror symmetry pegs both genders).

Particles and antiparticles forming worldcycles: entropy feeding and the strong force. 

As all space=time symmetries in scale, ages and topologies are local, there is no mystery on the concept of ‘traveling back in time=devolving in in-form-ation’ completing a world cycle, to be born again; absorbing in the process a photon and emitting then one. As light is also symmetric in time, the absorbed photon in Einstein-Maxwell time symmetry of electromagnetic equations is traveling backwards in time – hence it recoils the electron to its past as positron, and then it emits towards the future a second photon and is reborn as an electron. Any of all those possible combinations of past x future = present are allowed by the laws of cyclical time and its ‘existential algebra’ (¬æ).

In the graph we see the proper way to perceive the two arrows of time of physical systems, when we plot them together as a cycle-anticycle, even if an antiparticle (which must be considered the ‘3rd’ age of the particle) can be observed isolated.

And this leads us to the CPT symmetry, which in 5 Ð physics is absolute but quantized as time cycles are quantized for each species and its 5 Ðimotions=forces and worldcycles, and happen together not in a single plane of ‘light space-time’; but must be considered for the whole 3±I planes whereas the equations of gravitation and relativity with its c-constant speed are the limit of 5Ð for the galactic super organism but do NOT apply beyond (inside black holes and outside galaxies, where the forces are repulsive dark entropy similar to those of electromagnetism between atoms.

While inside the galatom, the forces of gravitation are similar to curved electromagnetism within the Coulomb field  between the electron and the proton, whose ‘5Ð metric’ are parallel to those of the black hole and the strangelet)…

This said, we can now understand the ‘entropic Dimotions’ of the strong force and its equivalent in the cosmological scale (strong gravitation):

The strong force inside the atom is similar in a lower scale to the forces taking place within the black hole star in the center of the galaxy, whose components must be the heavier top and Bcb atoms of the top quark decuplet, in a clear symmetry of scale.

So the color charge and couples of gluons and antigluons must be parallel to the nonet and octets of mesons, made of quarks and antiquarks that are exchanged accordingly in the reactions mediated by the weak force:

In the graph, the scalar symmetry and ‘reversal of time’ of antiparticles explain both bosons and mesons that annihilate each other fast, as they must have opposite charge and likely opposite gravity; so the antiquark IS considered a ‘time reversal’ system in all the dimotions=forces of the system.

The strong force therefore is an entropic force, because as Feynman rightly found, in each local world cycle of particles, the antiparticle is the same particle moving backwards in time, which means dying in the entropic process that completes its world cycle (hence living much shorter as the death end of the cycle does happen in a quanta of time). And because entropic-feeding processes are the strongest, most attractive ones in any scale (food is the first cause of most Ðimotions), they carry the maximal energy:

So there is a LOT of self-similarities of scale that would allow future 5 Ð physicists once the model r=evolution is accepted and the present dogmas put in doubt to complete by self-similarity the true nature of black hole stars (which rightly Einstein told us to be frozen stars), to understand the processes of renormalization (which add scalar infinities that must be cut off, including the SINGULARITY OF THE BLACK HOLE AND THE BIG-BANG).

GALAXY IN TIME: LITTLE-BANGING HORIZONS; MATTER EVOLUTION.

After the Little-bang, the Little-banging reproduced and evolved the huge Galaxy in 3 Horizons of growing complexity: the age of atoms, celestial bodies and galaxies.

If we study the huge or cellular Galaxy in time, we differentiate in its evolution the 3±i ages of any space-time:

∆-1 (Past): The Little-bang conception of the Galaxy, starting from a first informative cell of Planck density was also the death and gravitational Little-bang of a previous Universal singularity, a seed of ultra-dense quarks that transformed its inner, informative cyclic dimensions into an external, bidimensional sheet of dark Entropy: M(i)=e/c2. It was the age of the simplex time arrows.

Life arrow, steady state: Then the Galaxy suffered an informative process of reproduction, self-organization and social evolution, the Little-banging, or age of the Complex Arrows divided in 3 ages – the atomic, stellar and galactic age, which should end in:

Informative, 3rd age: A Little-crunch back into a new hyper-dense singularity that would restart the cycle in a new Little-bang.

– ∆-1 (Future): New Little-bang and Conception. The future explosion of the hype worm Hole will again create a bi-dimensional sheet of gravitational space-time where matter will again evolve, as quarks form nucleons that decay into atoms and dark Entropy warps into light, the new components of the future baby Galaxy…

Let us consider those ages and its ternary sub-ages, according to a law of the fractal paradigm, known as fractal differentiation:

‘Any event or form of reality can be divided into ternary or dual events and spatial forms of a lower spatial scale or shorter time duration’

This law structures fractal self-repetitions according to 3 ages and 3 Non-Euclidean structures in any scale. Thus it can be applied to study the 3 ages of the Galaxy and for each age, its 3 sub-ages. Since we have already study the fractal Little-bangs (birth) we shall start with the 3 ages of the Little-banging:

I Universal Age: Particles, Atoms and Molecules.

   – Birth: Max. Es: Fractal Little-bang of Beta decays.

The Little bangings of primordial particles: After being scattered by a gravitational wave of dark Entropy at 10c<100c speeds, quarks evolved into nucleons and suffered fractal, expansive quantum Little bangings – beta decays – creating protons and electrons, later self-organized into atoms, molecules and more complex social structures, till giving birth to galaxies.

3 Atomic Ages of matter states:

Those molecular structures can also be studied with the law of 3 ages, according to which the 3±i states of matter respond to the dominant arrow of future information:

     – (∆-1): Plasma or conception state of matter. The plasmatic state occurs at speeds closer to light, in a state in which atoms are split in primordial particles, free protons and electrons, which emit enormous quantities of radiation and sub-particles. Thus plasma is matter in its seminal state, (∆-1).

– Max. Es: The gaseous state is the classic energetic state of atoms or diatomic molecules with max. movement, spatial volume and min. formal density.

– <=>: The molecular state of balance between Entropy and information is the liquid state, which according to the law of harmony and maximal existential force (Es=It max exi), is the reproductive state of matter. For example, liquid water and mercury dilute all other atoms of similar weight that merge and evolve into more complex carbohydrates & metal forms: carbon-life or metal alloys. 90% of a human body is liquid water, with diluted, energetic gas (oxygen), and solid particles (proteins, DNAs, RNAs) to store and trans-form information. Since solid is:

– Max.It: Solid, informative state of min. movement and max. form & mass density that creates the most perceptive=informative, inorganic structures: crystals.

– (∆+1): Finally, the super fluid (helium) and boson states (heavier atoms) are the highest form of molecular evolution, because it combines the properties of solids with maximal order, liquids with max. reproductive, combinatory capacity and gases with max. Entropy. Thus, it gives birth, according to the organic, social arrow of Evolution of all systems to a new type of macro-organisms, with a central, hyperbolic nucleus of super fluids and bosons… the:

II Age: ES=TƑ: Nebulae, stars and planets.

In the next stage, those states of matter evolved socially aggregating into macromolecular systems that combine 2 states of matter, which act as the dual energetic/ informative elements of the complementary system. Those cosmological, macro-molecular systems seem to us static, because their existential cycles are slow (Max.Es=Min It). But they are also evolving in 3 ages:

-Max Es=Min It:Youth. Nebulae are the youngest, commonest, biggest (max.Sp), less dense, simpler (Min.It) physical systems, extended around and between galaxies. Their atoms exist in the energetic plasma and gas states.

– ES=TƑ: Stars are molecular macro systems, existing in the plasma and liquid states. Complex cosmology considers informative, cold, liquid and super fluid states dominant over energetic states, which Simplex Physics, based in a single Entropy arrow prefers, as Entropy is also easier to detect. Yet if we could reach the center of a star, we will find lower temperatures and super fluid systems. Since it is a basic tenant of Complex physics that informative, hyperbolic systems are more static and cold, able to create order and focusing formal mappings that gauge the external Galaxy.

– Max Es=Min It: Planets are systems that exist in liquid and solid states. They follow the Inversion Law, Max. Es->∞=Min.It->0. So giant planets exist in liquid states and smaller planets exist as solids. They are ferromagnetic planets; and we live in one of them. Again, fractal space-time theory favors cold, solid, informative states for those centers. So we affirmed that the planetary core should be a crystal; and their youth should be colder than scientists predicted. Indeed, recently we found that Neptune might have a solid diamond crystal in its center and the Earth probably has an iron crystal with a final Uranium core. And we have also found, studying zircons that planets cooled off much earlier than expected. Hence informative life also started earlier.

∆+1: Pulsars and Holes are systems with a solid iron crust and a super fluid core of strange quarks.

Pulsars represent the final, informative age of celestial bodies, which might evolve further into Worm Holes, species belonging to the gravitational Galaxy beyond our light world, with higher form. Those holes become through social evolution the informative, hyperbolic centers of galaxies, triggering the next stage of evolution of the Galaxy:

III Informative, Age and death: Max.It: The age of Galaxies.

image065

-From left to right: A galaxy with a flat star body and a central brain, occupied by Worm Holes with a hyper-developed dimension of informative height, perpendicular to the galactic body.

-Different biological curves of stars reproduction.

– A region rich in atomic Entropy where those stars are born.

-A galaxy with an organic form that remembers a ray fish

– A giant galaxy, which re=produces a seminal jet of matter, giving birth to a younger galaxy.

The 3rd age of the Galaxy started once galaxies, with central, informative worm holes and star bodies that feed on interstellar gas socialized in galactic networks with the 3 canonical topologies: Lineal walls, spiraled systems and cyclical, globular forms and disks.

Those 3 galactic networks structure a mature Galaxy that shows in computerized models a surprising similarity with the discreet networks of a living tissue.

As the Galaxy gets older, if it is a cellular structure it will warp further, creating a hyper worm hole of Max.Informative, Planck’s density in its hypothetical center that should become its DNA-like center controlling and feeding in a hyper-vortex of galaxies.

We could consider 2 cellular hypotheses:

∆+1: The Galaxy evolves socially as it becomes a cell of a hyper-Galaxy from a bigger ∆-scale…

∆-1: Each cell is an island Galaxy in itself that will finally collapse around its informative center, as stars do in elliptical galaxies, feeding its Hyper-Worm Hole in the Little-crunch. Then the Galaxy will die in a new Little-bang will initiate a new cycle. In this case the cell-Galaxy is self-similar to a bacteria, in as much as it is a single cell organism.

We seem to be moving towards the steady state, longer period of existence either because we are atoms-like of a huge Galaxy or because we are in a 2nd age that will latter implode back. Because the degree of curvature of the Galaxy is given by lambda which is near equilibrium, counting the implosive action of galaxies, and the expanding intergalactic space, both hypothesis (a gas-like huge Galaxy or a cell-like system are possible.

The Huge Galaxy will reduce those ages to galactic phases.

Yet if cells are atoms of a huge Galaxy none of those ages will happen, as galaxies would be the last ‘cosmic structure’, which we can perceive with certain precision.

In Einstein’s general equations of space-time, the cosmological constant that measures the Entropy of vacuum: l defines also the warping of the Galaxy, which can acquire our familiar 3 topological forms: a simple plane,-sphere proper of a young age; a cyclical, steady state toroid or a convex, informative form (its Little crunch, final state). Now l is positive, and the Galaxy seems to be plane but so close to zero that the hypothesis of a stationary Galaxy takes force. Yet again we cannot measure with enough time latitude to know if it changes and it will diminish in the future it will become negative, inverting the geometry of the Galaxy and warping it, into a final Little crunch.

Since ‘l’ can be considered the length of the tachyon string or minimal action of the gravitational Galaxy in terms of those minimal fractal parts, the thesis of a constant lambda and steady state huge Galaxy is reinforced by self-similarity with the constancy of ‘h’ in the quantum world.

In such case, there should be only quasar-like Little bang of galaxies, short of cosmic beta decays and the 3 ages or solutions of Einstein’s equation should be applied only to galactic space and the quasar cycle, initiated by a gravitational, inflationary Little-bang of dark Entropy, followed by a Little-bang of electromagnetic radiation, which quiets down, and finally implodes into gluon creation of quark matter.

Such humbler, more realistic analysis of the origin of the observables of astrophysics will reduce all relativistic analysis of the 3 ages of space-time to processes within the galaxy, born as the explosion of a hyper-black hole of top quarks, latter exploded into a fractal Little-bang of beta decays. We would then be in the 3rd age of such galaxy, organized already by a central black holes. Since the space-time of our galaxy is an implosive vortex of information.

Indeed, we are in a Gödel Island-Galaxy, in a vortex of information called the Milky Away. Then the Energetic Galaxy should be considered irrelevant to us, only applicable to intergalactic, expanding space, because we would exist in the 3rd informative solution, the vortex of the galaxy and that is why the arrow of time in humanity is an informative arrow, not an energetic one. And that is why the sciences of information, of biology not those of Entropy should dominate our analysis of scientific phenomena – even if the awesome Entropy of physical beings might impress the simplex mind.

Recap. We can order the evolution of the whole Galaxy as any other organism in time through 3 ages each one divided in sub-ages: the young, energetic Little-bang, probable death of other Galaxy, the steady, reproductive state in which it seems to be now and the Little-crunch that will happen as the initial momentum of the gravitational strings slow down to under c-speed. Then we shall enter into the Gödel’s Galaxy in which some regions call galaxies in which we inhabit exist. In those regions information dominates Entropy.

The Three Ages of Galaxiesimage067

 The life cycle of a galaxy goes through 3 ages, evolving from a young, extended nebula into an old small wormhole of informative mass that dies in a quasar Little bang of dark Entropy and quark matter. In between, galaxies live a longer, mature toroid, cyclical steady state, fluctuating every 14 billion years between its spiral and elliptic form, while absorbing interstellar dust, which creates new stars and feeds the central Worm Hole.

In the graph, the structure of a galaxy can be compared according to the homologic method of self-similarities between the ‘elemental’ units of each scale of reality with an atom vortex or with a cell, with a central DNA of social worm holes and a protein membrane or halo of quark, dark matter, made of energetic strangelets and microholes.

The ages of a galaxy in time are the same of in any other space-time field. Each of those ages or time events can be divided according to the law of ‘ternary diversification’ of time events into spatial processes into three spatial forms of reproduction. Thus, a galaxy can be created by three processes:

– Seminal conception and Youth: Galaxies are created with three types of reproduction:

-Max. Es: A galactic Little-bang quasar catalyzes the evolution of gas into stars. This birth is similar to a star Little-bang (nova) that catalyzes also the creation of stars or a Hypothetical Universal Little-bang that catalyzes the creation of galaxies.

– Es=Tƒ: Palingenetic conception, when the informative nucleus of Worm holes of a giant mother-galaxy emits a huge jet of dark, quark matter that ends into a baby galaxy.

– Max.It: Social evolution of energetic gas that creates complex star structures.

-Es=Tƒ. Maturity/reproductive age. Galaxies enter their steady state of reproduction, in which its spiral structure matures: stars gather in social groups and at its center a Worm hole, the informative nucleus, structuring its body of toroid, cyclical paths of stars.

Galaxies then mutate back and forth, from spiral into elliptical vortices of mass, feeding on interstellar gas, in a cycle that creates and destroys its spiral bar every 13 billion years in a quasar Little-bang that renews the Galaxy and coincides with the parameters of the cosmic Little-bang of continuous models of space-time.

– Max.It; information age: In their 3rd age, once galaxies exhaust their interstellar gas, their central Worm holes digest their star bodies, becoming globular, spherical forms with a hyper dimension of informative height, till they exhaust all their star Entropy. As dark galaxies, without the drag limit of c-speed caused by their electronic and radiant matter they now accelerate as pure worm holes up to z=10c; forming invisible, complex networks of dark matter.

It must be noticed that as all systems that go through 3±i ages of evolution, the final stage after its 3rd informative age has ‘2 solutions’, death and reversal of form into Entropy or ‘transcendence’ into a higher super-organism, communicated by the language of information of the system (so insects evolved into successful anthills while others become extinct and humans evolved into societies while most other mammals became extinct). Thus:

   – (∆-1): Some galaxies die as quasars, becoming again according to the inverse symmetry between the 1st and 3rd youth and old age of all systems, irregular galaxies that will feed a new cycle of galactic creation. So irregular galaxies are both the youngest and oldest forms of the Galaxy, a fact that still confuses cosmologists.

   – (∆+1): And those with a higher quantity of informative black holes in their nuclei evolve socially as cannibal galaxies, forming galactic networks in cellular groups that evolve socially into the large scale structures of the Galaxy. Their central Worm Holes grow, swallowing radiant matter at growing speed, and perhaps evolving with many other galaxies into a cluster Galaxy, of which there is no enough experimental evidence.

Thus, we differentiate the Little-bang or death of any scale of the Galaxy from a Little-banging or reproduction and self-organization of the present Galaxy and a 3rd age or Little-crunch, followed by a Little-bang or a process of emergence into a superorganism, which creates a generational cycle for any fractal space-time in 3±i ages.

The Huge Galaxy and its galactic, fractal Little bangs.

Since the age of a galactic cycle, 13 billion years, is the same that the age of the cosmological Little-bang, as Fred Hoyle affirmed, the cosmological, continuous Little-bang might be the sum of all galactic, fractal Little-bangs and the Huge Galaxy is not expanding as a whole. It will exist in a steady state, in which the knotting of space into mass by galaxies would compensate the expansion of mass into dark Entropy in the interstellar vacuum, which causes its expansion. Further on Little-bangs at the lower galactic scale, caused by the quasar explosions of its central Worm holes when they break their bars every ±14 billion years should be the origin of the second proof of a cosmic, continuous Little-bang – the excessive quantity of helium in the galaxy – found precisely in bigger quantities on top of the central Worm hole. Finally, background holes born of planetoids would redshift radiation at 2.7 K. Thus a fractal quasar Little-bang provides the same experimental proofs and better theoretical explanations, eliminating the multiple contradictions of the cosmological Little-bang.

Thus, a steady state theory of the Galaxy combined with a fractal theory of multiple Little-bangs/quasars, as it was reformulated mathematically by Fred Hoyle, in which the multiple, constant Little-bangs of galaxies into quasars are responsible for helium formation, redefines the Galaxy as a huge fractal scale of cellular galaxies in eternal balance with the expanding space, where light devolves back into 10 c dark, gravitational Entropy and dark Entropy warps into light by redshift and dark matter into galactic matter, imploding space:

Sp (dark Entropy expansion) = Tƒ (dark, quark matter implosion)

Such balance, coupled to the constants of proportion between the energetic and informative elements of a complementary system,. explains also, without appealing to the magic anthropic principle, the universal balance between matter and radiation, whose probabilities otherwise are null. Indeed, why matter and Entropy are in balance in the Galaxy at this exact moment in time, in a proportion of 1 to 3 (as mass is bidimensional and radiation 3-dimensional) if their relationship is dynamic, changing all the times, with Entropy winning the battle and expanding faster?

The answer is: because the Galaxy and any partial system within it exist in 3 to 1 balances between their Entropy and information/mass and when those vital constants of balance break the system ceases to exist.

Recap. Galaxies live through the 3 same ages of any space-time, born as seminal flows of dark Entropy and electromagnetic radiation, ejected by giant galaxies that condensate into quarks dark matter and an explosion of electronic forms and the creation of atoms and stars, start the reproductive age that will collapse into a central Worm Hole, back to the original quark-gluon soup that gave it birth.

While the study of the different isomorphism should go on line 3, as I was looking to old 2 decade files of the first self-published book with 5D physics (physics of time, now ‘extinct’ unless some ‘Nobel prize’ or university kept it), I found this funny graphs, on the duality and ternary symmetries that give birth as usual in all systems to the 6 main species of ‘female ternary space-time species’ and ‘male ternary space-time species’, to use the organic jargon I have always preferred and of course made T.Œ unpalatable to any reader in the past (-:

5D scales of the galaxy: ∆-1: quark families, ∆-cosmic bodies, ∆+1: parts of the galaxy.

687LOCAL BIG-BANGS.

The meaning of time in classic physics.

Now, absolute relativity, the philosophy of science behind this T.Πis even more radical in the separation of man from the Universe.

Every fractal part of the Universe is a super-organism that has obeys 10 sets of isomorphic laws, as parts of the same fractal space-time reality. We are all made of time motions, seen sometimes as space dimensions, hence equal in  substance though not in quantity (spatial size) and quality (speed of information) and complexity (number of co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, bits of information and bites of energy a given Œ-knot commands)

However, all these points are subject to the ego paradox: as every point of view perceives a limited part of reality to ‘fit’ it into its relative infinitesimal point of view or ‘mind, the ‘whole’ of each species understand only reality from its limited ‘one-dimensional point of view’, and considers himself from his ’10th Dimension’ as a whole, the only intelligent being of reality. Subjectivity is thus essential to the being.

And so it has been to humans, who always considered themselves the center of the Universe.

So alas, we shall latter expand those proofs of the falsity of the big-bang, which however can be perfectly explained as the big-bang of the lower scale of the 5th dimension below the cosmos, that is a quasar big-bang of a galaxy, either the previous cycle of the milky way galaxy, or the explosion of a giant galaxy in the local cluster, from where the local group fed on to reproduce the Andromeda and Milky way and dwarf galaxies around it.

A quasar big-bang we shall prove eliminates all those errors, the background becomes local and hence does not break Lorentz invariance (relativity), the galaxy has the same density of matter needed for the big-bang, a quasar is a reversal black hole explosion which happens to be the exact equation of the big bang (also a reversal black hole metric equation) the age of the quasar cycle tabulated between 10 and 20 billion years is exactly the same than the big-bang, it is NOT an illogic theory, as there are infinite galaxies in an infinite Universe the abundance of helium in galaxies does happen more in the center around the black hole where the hadron epoch formed them, and the ages of the big-bang do apply all to a quasar big-bang, and the local measure of the background radiation which FIRST and for very long was considered the background radiation of only the galaxy, fits, and as we shall see in the next picture, in fact the map of the galaxy is exactly the same of the background radiation:

A galaxy (ours) and the supposed big-bang of the universe, which shows the same form and raises doubts about the local measure of that radiation (the reader can observe the central lobes of ¥-radiation similar to those of the electron, which the prestigious astrophysicists Smolin and others were analyzing very carefully, since they thought they could see a different light speed in the upper and lower lobe after 13 billion years of time travel 🙂

All systems are a sum of quantic cycles that absorb, emit and transform spatial energy into temporal information: SP ≈Tƒ

That equation, decomposed sequentially in 3 phases, a first age of max. energy, a second age of balance and a third age of max. information, explains the existential cycle of any space-time field.

In a graph with energy and information coordinates those 3 ages resemble the geometrical form of a cycle that moves upwards, absorbing energy and information till in its 3rd age looses its temporal energy, collapsing back to its origin. On the right side, the same 3 ages show in the Taoist, Korean flag, where a line is the symbol of continuous yang-energy, which yin-time quantizes into ‘in-form-ation’, from youth to death.

T.O.E. The unification equation of the charge and mass scales of the 5th dimension.

Now once you learn to speak the most beautiful of all those jargons, the common language of all fractal space-time beings, Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian ‘i-logic’ mathematics, (the needed  2300 years overdue upgraded of the sciences of temporal logic and spatial geometry) you will upgrade also your chip, tuning your mind, your ‘spatial I=eye and temporal Wor(l)d’, to that of other species of the Universe.

Then you will as I have done for decades, walk through the world seeing the organic life in every physical, biological and social system of the Universe.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

The DNA invaginates with Golgi conducts the vital cytoplasm it exploits, surrounded by the faster membrane of proteins, which act in its formal position as a membrane. The magnetic field surrounds the charge and encloses the vital space of electromagnetic fields the charges controls. So happens with a planet protected by its magnetic field that steams out of the central charge and surrounds it. And the galaxy has in its center a black hole.

And it is surrounded by a halo of dense fast rotating strangelet quarks, so the stars and planets within it will become converted into black holes in Nova explosions or strangelets, when the Physicist, duly programmed to extinguish the species according to the Fermi paradox, busy-busy recreates the big bang on Earth (yes I know to be more popular, I should not remember you of this, so you can wonder on the halls of knowledge unaware of the entropic motions of the Universe, but as Mr. Descartes, the very unpopular frozen philosopher would put it ‘c’est la vie’, what is at stakes here, not only the stifled knowledge of the mind, granted if you keep on reading).

Thus ‘Lineal Space, Es’, energy means an expansive motion that ‘extends space’, a planar lineal motion that we see as static space, as dimensions of length and width, or as an explosive decelerating motion.

Now that we know the fundamental difference between ‘open space’ and cyclical time, we can move onto the second fundamental principle of ‘physical sciences’, the Principle of relativity. Again, here a mathematician Poincare defined it at the same time that Einstein, and on my view more clearly, when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. And this is enormously important.

Since if we cannot know when a thing is moving or is merely a ‘form’, we must always consider this duality. If we see a particle, it is a ‘vortex of motion’ besides having a cyclical time-like form. If we see a dimension of length, it is space moving besides being a still distance. On this difference almost ‘every mathematical tool’ of calculus (differentials and integrals), every system of Nature (which we see simultaneously as a still organism, and moving through its worldcycle of life and death), the duality of quantum, discontinuous reality and moving, continuous one, etc. etc., almost all phenomena of all sciences is based. I call it the “Galilean Paradox’, to differentiate its much wider meaning from those sponsored by physicists, as again we shall apply it to all sciences. So we write it again:

Relativity Principle (Galilean Paradox):     “All what exists is a motion with form”.

Soon we will realize that indeed, all what exists is motion with form, nothing is truly still. And so cyclical time seen as form is ‘information’ and as motion is a ‘vortex-like clock’, and open space seen as form is ‘distance’ and seen as motion is ‘lineal speed’.

There is a convention though to call time ‘motion’ and ‘space’ stillness. This is Ok in the ‘limit’. As time accelerates (as all cyclical motions, which require 2 points, a torque and have angular acceleration) and in fact as paradoxical as it seems a cyclical motion by the law of the vortex is faster than a lineal motion, which as in a big-bang explosion, decelerates. (We shall deed with the error of considering the expansion of the distance-space of the Universe as an acceleration in our post on astrophysics).

So in the limit by the law of the vortex, Vo x Ro = k, time cycles accelerate inwards as vortex do, and in the process they attract ‘space’. So black holes, masses and charges do exactly so. And so in the limit we can say that ‘time is motion’ (the classic definition of it) and space is distance, dimension.

And this fact of T.Œ will allow us easily to unify the equations of charges and masses, what physicists call T.O.E, or Theory Of Everything, a minor result of T.Œ, the Theory of the Organic Everything, which I write with Œ to distinguish both.

General relativity a fast over view. The symmetry of relativity in time, the 3 ages of EFE.

The 3 ages of time in cosmology applies to EFE’s (Einstein’s field equations) 3 main solutions 3 hypothetical different Universes, they represent the structure of any space-time, including our galaxy, an island Universe through its 3 ages.

It is also possible to make a complex mathematical treatment of the 3 ages of galactic systems: the 1st age of the system will be the Entropy age, the 3rd age the information age, and the middle age is one of balance, ES=TO, when the reproduction of most particles took place. We are in that period.

– Max. Es (Youth): The Entropy age is Lemaitre’s big bang solution that expands space. This solution in the fractal model of space-time applies only to the vacuum space between galaxies.

-Es=It: The steady state Universe is Einstein’s solution. It applies to the entire Universe.

– Max. It: Kerr’s solution of a rotary black hole, which is the third age of an implosive Universe that reverses time coordinates as matter falls back into the central Worm Hole of any space-time.

However because time space fractal and dual, while those solutions in a wider outlook will be applied successively to each age of the Universe, they are also applied in space to the fractal parts of the whole. Thus the big-bang solution applies to the intergalactic space, which astrophysicists study and erroneously apply to the entire Universe (given their dogma of a single continuous space-time).

The informative solution applies to our galaxy. But it does not mean a travel backward in time but an informative vortex, a cyclical clock of time – the galaxy in which we exist with an arrow of information different from the expansive arrow of the intergalactic space of dark Entropy and tired light.

And so we get adding all the expansive motions of intergalactic space and the implosive vortices of galactic mass, a relative balance that is the present steady state applied to the whole; since in each phase of reality all yangs have some yin and all yings seed of yang.

Its Universal ratios/constants of Entropy and form.

In the space-time of the Universe, in the same manner that any other three ages can be related by the different ratios of Entropy and information or vital constants of a being, those three ages are defined mathematically by the constant of action that relates the Entropy and information of the Universal space-time, Lambda & G.

Indeed, the constants of any system are ratios of transformation of the Entropy and form of any system, I/E=K or proportions of Entropy and form, Exi=K. Thus constants evolve and change as the Entropy and information of a system changes with time. In biology, is known that vital constants, change as an organism gets old and becomes wrinkled and warped, increasing its information and diminishing its capacity to process Entropy, changing its metabolic constants and speed of information/thought.

Dirac, Brans-Dicke, and others understood this in cosmology. Indeed, G is a ratio of the mass=information and Entropy= distance of a system. And we already saw how a change on those ratios allowed us to unify and measure the Entropy and form of the 3 membranes of the Universe (strong, gravitational and light forces).

In the equations of Einstein that define the three ages of a galactic space-time and perhaps an entire Universe, that relationship is given by the cosmological constant that measures the Entropy of the gravitational vacuum, l, which Nottale used to measure the minimal fractal quanta of gravitational Entropy. The constant changes with the 3 ages of any fractal space-time or island Universe. In a young, expanding space, l is positive, but so close to zero that it easily becomes negative, causing a warping or big crunch. And so l will also change through the 3 ages or solutions of Einstein’s equation, till reaching the informative age of the galaxy in which we exist.      

Recap. The 3 ages of the Universe correspond to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s equations: The young big-bang; the reproductive, steady state or big-banging and the cyclical, informative age, occurring in galaxies, or Gödel’s solution. They apply in space to the expanding space, imploding, galactic vortex and both together create the present balanced steady state.

The symmetry between motions in time and space.

Space-still vs. time-motion duality is the causal alpha of it all (but not the omega, W, meaning, which we will find to be organic, biologic, embedded in the world cycle, represented by W). So we must go deeper into it, and follow now its ‘other fundamental expression’ – the ternary principle of ‘creation’, ‘diversification’ and ‘formation’ of entities departing from its time motions or still spatial states.

We deduce its original components from the interplay of the 3 motions of time:

>   The arrow of information that increases from upper to lower scales, faster in its time cycles: Tƒ (Uo)<Tƒ(U-1). This arrow appears most often in physics as an accelerated vortex (Vo x Ro = K being the simplest 2-dimensional form) or clock of time with increasing frequency, till it ‘collapses’ into a particle-point or reverse its time arrow into:

<    The arrow of entropy and decelerating expanding size that increases from lower to upper scales of larger size: Sp(Uo)>Sp (U-1).

   And their relative present combinations, in which the system combines, Sp and Tƒ, fields and particles, limbs and heads of energy and information into reproductive bodies and waves which repeat in an eternal present the entities of existence.

In this case the entropy/energy arrow will show limbic/long fields of planar toroid energy, the arrow of accelerated cyclical motion the form of particles and heads that gauge information and the arrow of relative present iteration the body/wave form. And so in practice we tend to talk of ‘momentums’ of existence, that is Active Magnitudes that we shall call Œ, Functions in ‘existence’, which move through several planes of space-time.

This interconnection or duality between the stop and go dual motions/forms of entities in existence is a necessary complexity of the dialectic nature of the Universe, not only between relative Œ-points that communicate flows of attractive, imploding information and expanding, repelling energy, but within the entity which often displays both states, with different geometric position.

The previous symmetry defines all beings, as vital spaces whose ternary organs, perform the 3 functions=motions of time. Since all systems are  made of the same 3 components, the 3 2-manifold varieties, which accumulate in ‘layers’ to shape the depth of a 3rd dimension of thickness; and then move in ‘Time’ to accumulate the 3 ‘dimensional motions’ of time, past-entropic motions, present-reproductive motions and future-informative motions:

In that regard it is important that you understand those 3 arrows/dimensions/motions of time and its still present-spatial pictures as intervals. Since ultimately all clocks of time have different ‘steps/tics’, a relative instant of time varies, according to the perspective. If we have slow perceptive-time clocks we shall see a minimal time indivisible, which might represent for an atom or a cell an entire time existence. So how we differentiate the ‘time ages/phases’ of a system?

Precisely in mathematics, when the equation stops being differentiable or suffers a steep change of phase.

From energetic gas to reproductive liquid to informative solid in matter states.

From gaseous field of energy to liquid wave, to solid particle in quantum states.

From young energetic age to adult, reproductive age to old, warping age.

From the big bang expansive solution of EFE (Einstein’s field equations) to steady state to big crunch old age state in any physical system that follows those equations (galactic space-times mainly).

And so on. Time never ends because it switches its arrows, when one is exhausted. Or in terms of consciousness,  can you conceive the non-existence of time? Because we can conceive non-existence, but still time will happen when nothing else happening, the mind also has an a priori consciousness of the eternity of time.

In physics this becomes obvious when we realize that if Poincare’s/Einstein’s relativity 2nd postulate is truth and there is no way to differentiate motion from stillness, all has relative motion, and if all has motion, motion never stops. We can always choose the mind’s still perception of reality to fit all its information in its infinitesimal mind, or the moving objective, inner perception of the being. Atoms are moving vortices but we see solid matter.

Yet if we consider the most objective moving reality, we realize time never stops as motion cannot stop and motion is the substance of reality in its 3 variations: expansive, entropic, relative past motion, Sp, repetitive, iterative combined E x I motion and informative, formal motion, Tƒ.

This reality broken into infinite beings, of different sizes and time speeds is the ultimate reality science must describe. And in all its scales we shall find, the 3 arrows of time, its interplay and common ‘isomorphic laws’. Thus once we isolate the details and find its 3 arrows of time-space, we can apply the isomorphic laws of T.Œ and describe with them all what happens.

For example, Alain de Mehaute proved long ago in a paper on chemistry, and his book on fractals, ‘L’espace-temps brisse’ ‘broken space-time’ that when energy exhaust, chemical systems do not stop time-motion, but start to wrinkle as space-time does in any scale.

For example, Einstein said ‘time curves space into masses’, which he said to be ‘accelerated vortices of gravitational lineal forces’. And e=mc2 merely express that constant big-bang/big-crunch duality of eternal time cycles.

In fact, life does the same in inverse fashion. Life is the arrow of growing form, growing information. Then, once you exhaust all energy into wrinkles, time does not stop in death. But it changes its arrow backwards into an entropic explosion/dissolution of our information.

So we can differentiate an interval of past, present or future, but it will always have an asymptotic limit, where the equation breaks as the limit means a change of phase, even a bouncing back of time, reversing its arrows, to never stop.

It follows that as all goes back and forward between energy/information arrows, and we define present space as the confluence of both arrows, it is possible in the dynamic, paradoxical universe of time arrows, to define all as space-present, combination of ‘yin and yang’, if we take the larger perspective that adds two time arrows from past to future and future to past. In such a case, all becomes a zero-sum, an eternal present of conflicting existences that cancel each other.

This is the absolute law of the universe.

Time never stops, but all ceases to exist for time to continue. So time switches in all possible combinations, between its ‘past arrow’ of entropy – expansive decelerating lineal motion – its future arrow of information, cyclical, accelerated vortices and its combinations into repetitive present spaces.

If we consider ‘space’ as still motion, as a differential of time, into an instant that combines the two arrows of past and future energy and information, into a repetitive motion, space is then also dynamical. But from an external perspective space seems not to change. It is then an interval without inner change, in which the external motion is continuously differentiable.

It is all that simple. In life≈biology the 3 arrows have a sequential order, the 3 ages of time due to an excess of genetic and nervous information that makes information the dominant arrow of the future – and make us choose information as the relative future arrow from the human p.o.v. of knowledge.

In technology information is also the future arrow as the human cult to the machine, makes evolving informative machines the goal of our collective subconscious suicide (creating robotic species that will substitute us).

In physical particles, which are dominant in motion, with lesser information, the opposite happens. There is in many systems a relative future arrow of entropy, and motion that dominates the system, such as in interstellar space where space expands; or in the interaction of particles of information, and antiparticles with past arrows, and inverse expanding motion.

Both co-exist and so antiparticles of past, which co-exist with future particles often come together and then, the following event happens: Anti-particle past x Particle- future = present entropic annihilation. This explains why we see less antiparticles, as they are the death-past arrow, which lasts only a time instant, so while they are as many lives and death as death is Maximal entropy expansion x minimal information, it happens very fast and the total space x time perception of an antiparticle or a corpse is far inferior to the perception of particles and living beings.

The fundamental of those symmetries is the ternary symmetry between the 3 motions of time and the 3 dimensions of space.

Finally to make sense of all this, we have to remember something modern physics has completely forgotten, the laws of the scientific method and the realist nature of its language, mathematics…

Let us see this in more detail as an example on how fully understand the multiplicity of mathematical physics, encased in the 5D ST structure of reality and its paradoxes, dualities and ternary groups.

Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 17.23.07

In the graph, the most likely nature of the big-bang is local – very likely the quasar big bang of a 20 billion years cycle of life and death of the Milky Way, a barred galaxy, which is today exactly in its form on the 14 billion years mark of that tabulated 20 billion years cycle of Barred galaxies.

All the problems of the cosmological big-bang both theoretical, metaphysical and experimental, quantitative can then be resolved. Theoretically the equations of the big-bang are just the entropic, reversed, death equations of a black hole. Such explosion would account for the amount of Helium near the center of the galaxy, and the density of matter-radiation, which coincides with that of the galaxy. The asymmetries and form of the background radiation obtained in local measures will coincide with that of the galaxy too. Its origin on the local big bang from the remote past, or most likely on the activity of ‘Moon MACHOs’, the smallest black hole particles of the ‘triad’ of 5D scales of mass in the Universe, which if having the mass of a moon planetoid (the most common cosmic object of the Universe) will produce exactly the same redshift temperature radiation. And so on and so on…

The fractal structure of the Universe on the other hand will account for the expansion of the intergalactic space, the cosmological entropic vacuum scale, where ‘Gravitational transversal waves’ will act as repulsive gravitation, in the same manner their microcosmic equivalent in the charge scale act between particles. While the vortices of contraction of vacuum energy into mass – galaxies will balance that expansion, on the flat plane of the spiral.

In the graph, we see then the characteristics of those multiple little quasar bangs, in which dark matter made of the heaviest 2 families of mass (top/bottom/charm quark combinations that form the atoms of black holes and strange quarks that form the core of neutron, pulsar stars and strangelets in the halo). Thus they would account for most of the mass of the Universe. In terms of mass energy, as we consider on the present formalism a 4-vector momentum with 3 dimensions for space and one for time-mass, ultimately we observe a 3 to 1 proportion between ‘Lineal Space’ (G-waves of repulsive transversal gravitation) and the dimension of mass.

The galaxy on the other hand, does NOT contain repulsive gravitation as it is the interior region of the galaxy atom, which is purely attractive. Its configuration is equivalent to the theoretical configuration of the ‘cosmological big-bang’ now reduced to the barred galaxy big-bang cycle. And so we find again the ternary symmetry of the III families of mass, which form the 3 components of the galaxy atom, its ‘strangelet’, negatively charged Halo, its positively charged central top quark black hole, its 3 invaginated networks of information and energy (neutrino and photon background) and the plasmatic ud-mass of light mitochondrial stars. What is the role of the planetoids made of atoms in which humans exist. They represent only o.1% of the total mass of the galaxy, as almost all ud matter is in the form of star plasma.

So we might conclude, humans are NOT that important; an planetoids and planets on the 1 to 106 relative mass scale we find between moons and the heaviest Jovian planets which can be considered small not-ignited stars are the scalar range to feed strangelet matter that will end up in the Halo. This simple harmonic scale has only a problem: anthropomorphism. It makes us irrelevant, it puts the high popes of astrophysics back to Earth on their delusion of understanding the whole with a human self-centered perspective, and certainly makes sheer madness the experiments now carried out on Earth in search of self-feeding self-reproductive dark matter (strangelet quark-gluon soups, now starting to be produced at industrial scale at CERN and future accelerators at China).

We can now consider if briefly the ages of the Little-bangs that happen all over the Universe every time a Galaxy lives and dies, returning to the Dark World. Even if we were describing the Little Bang of the Cosmos, it is a necessary perspective for the ego-centered human to reduce its cosmic, galactic, universal epithets to the lowest of all perspectives, that of a microbial species, ‘Cantor dust of space-time’, ‘rational zero interval of the irrational infinite’, humble 0-mind who matters not more than mater. And this I advice to the reader, because it is the best way to survive and go around the Universe.

In any case, even if the cosmos had a big bang of 14 billion years, from ∆+5 it would be an infinitesimal point dying away on the truly absolute Relative Universe. So we will call all big-bangs, little bangs. As that is the meaning of it.

Now this is the most likely reality – a Universe in the ∆+4 plane, beyond the ∆œ human perspective of a relative infinite number of galactic anti-atoms (as the symmetries of 5D are inverse and so we need to jump two scales to find a similar being, 2 scales of life to find robots-like insects, to scales of cells, to find nations-like cells, DNA-like humans, and so on.)

So those anti-atom galaxies might be part of a larger bang, the cosmic little-bang, which however would be of a dimensions that we, infinitesimal inhabitants of a galaxy anti-atom cannot even imagine and it is not worth to explore.

So we shall reduce ourselves to the description of the Little Bangs, we do know about, with the laws of 5D physics.

The death of micro-light waves.

Now in 5d physics, tiredness=death of light is not provoked by the smearing of light paths by dust and other ‘chance’ collisions of light, which would rightly as Zwicky pointed out smear the image of far away galaxies, but exactly as in the cosmic big-bang and general relativity by the expansion of the underlying space-time ‘scale’ of the Universe, ∆-1. The difference though is that in 5D physics:

  • The c-limit of speed only applies to ‘galactic space-time’, where the underlying gravitational space is ‘contracted’ by the -c2t2 factor of special relativity (simplest formalism), due to the frequency creation of time-information by light over the underlying gravitational space-time.
  • When this gravitational space-time is liberated from galaxies, it ‘stretches out’, dissolving its information into entropy, and its speed becomes ‘NON-LOCAL’, from the point of view of a light space-time observer. The formula is immediate. As V=S/T, and Time stores information, as information disappears (invisible gravitation), then C=S/o-information = ∞. Thus the Universe becomes infinite non-local and this allows that the cosmological Un+4 scales IS connected into a present ‘spatial view’ (the previous artistic graph).

Now this fact is essential to the scales of 5D systems, as it ALLOWS the fundamental symmetry between time ages and present still space-organisms. All SCALES of the 5th dimension MUST have a force able to create a relative simultaneity in a single time quanta that communicates its parts to create balances and metabolic equilibriums. Thus there MUST be a relative non-local faster than light speed, with less T-information, and this is ‘dark energy’; which we consider to be the ‘repulsive electromagnetism’, of the galactic atom.

It is then easy to see that the speed of such G-waves would be infinite in terms of human perception, and the quantity of information they carry minimal. Indeed, if we consider a ‘Hertzian’ wave at this scale, it would carry a bit of information for several parsecs. But it would allow a spatial view of the Universe.

All this of course belongs to metaphysics, which as we said is the true nature of cosmology, as there is no way to perceive experimental evidence  ‘outside’ the halo meaningful.

Yet the linguistic isomorphic method make us to consider a reasonable assumption that scales beyond our perception will follow the same isomorphisms of scales within our perception. So we can use the same formulae and deduce the non-local invisible nature of G-repulsive Giant Transversal gravitational waves between galactic-atoms and within each internal atom, to control the stars and halo of the galaxy.

Now from the perspective of a light space-time observer the space-time between galaxies, being invisible won’t be observed as a tachyon, faster energy wave, but as a dilating distance. And so it will be seen as a cosmological expansion of space (balanced by the implosion of each fractal galaxy atom, to maintain the whole Universe in immortal balance).

Thus the effect on micro-light waves will be the observed red shift.

Indeed it follows that what we call light does travel through the expanded intergalactic gravitational space-time, and red shifts.

A second phenomena also must be observed, namely the ‘internal’ death of light, as all forms of the Universe do have a world cycle. The light world cycle is likely to be of a mean 10 billion years similar to the life cycle of its ‘photonic quanta’, the stars of galaxies, which are basically dense configurations of light and plasma; the equivalent to the particle state of light. And this 10 billion years light world cycle is what we observe with an expansive age of light as it goes through the world cycle, further accelerated in the 2nd part of the world cycle (5 to 10 billion years).

It follows also that the furthest stars will emit ‘younger’, longer living light, so the further we look onto the galaxy, we shall see arriving to our galaxy, only younger stars, till a point where we do not see more light coming.

Further on, as all forms are relative ‘pi-cycles’, whose membranes do NOT let see the external universe except by its ‘holes’, the halo of the galaxy must limit as all membranes what we perceive from outside. This again happens in any entity inside a super organism. Our cells do NOT see the external world, and only the sensorial eyes do see it. So the next question is how much is ‘dark energy-space-matter-form’, from an inner observer of a relative fractal knot of space-time.

The calculus of an ideal pi cycle is immediate. As a pi cycle is made of 3 diameters, with outer holes between them, in our curvature electronic space-time minds, where pi is 3.14, we ONLY see through o.14 holes of a 3.14 diameter. so there is a 3/3.14 darkness, of regions we do NOT see from the interior of a pi cycle.

As it happens, 3/3.14 = 96% which would be the dark world for any inner relative mind point of view. As it happens dark matter and energy accounts for 95%, which is there and we do not see. It is then the halo the membrane that ‘darkens’ the Universe?

We do have for the sun the membrane called the Oort and Kuiper belts… But they are internal to the super organism of the galaxy, so we shall discuss it on its scales. but still they do darken part of the galaxy despite being internal ‘open’ cells. The galaxy though IS the true fractal point (the equivalent of the atom, darkened by the electron and the Nuclear force cover).

So the reader should understand how much uncertainty exists in cosmology.

Back to our theme of the cosmological redshirts and its now ‘3 causes’ (as always in the ternary Universe) we can write them within a Generator equation, this time expressing the 2nd Non-Euclidean postulate of lines≈waves of communication:

Tƒ (emitter: Original red shift by expansion) < ST (red shift by wave dying) > Tƒ (Halo, likely ‘blue shift’ back to create background radiation and reduce to c-speed the wave).

Those 3 components are just a case of the Fundamental equation of particle physics:

Tƒ(Fermion)< ST (Boson wave) >Tƒ (Fermion)

applied to the upper cosmological scale.

The study of that equation in 5D physics is an entire field of cosmological research for future 5D cosmologists, if we survive the age of ‘lineal macho-man Neanderthal physics’. So here we shall make some comments on the death of light (ST cause).

As light dies away it is canonical in 5D astrophysics that entropy will elongate as all death processes the space-time, which in terms of the duality motion=form (Galilean paradox) means an increase of distance. Moreover, because light does have a 10 billion mean age (same for stars made of light, here the part does live as the neurons and the head, the same than the whole but NOT longer; so light dies before the stars mean life). This moreover explains why after 5 billion years, its maturity at the height of its world cycle, life accelerates its death-elongation into red color, till fading away. Which also explains why we do NOT see more radius to the Universe:

Light cannot come from beyond that radius because that is the limit of its life NOT the limit of the whole, but of its waves of information, its minimal part.

Indeed, it seems that light beams and light-evolved entities (stars) have a mean cycle of 10 billion years, after which they suffer an energetic big-bang expansion – stars explode into Novae and light gets tired and expands in a redshirts process, returning to its gravitational, non-local lower scale of dark Entropy.

This of course explains why far away light red shifts and seems to expand space: it is dying and beyond those mean 10 billion years an increasing ‘darkness’ is observed in the Universe, which a simple Gauss curve of probabilities show to be almost absolute beyond the x+1/3rd 13.3 billion years range.

Again physicists don’t see both, the dual space and time views of the Universe but only the temporal big-bang, which considers a cosmos in time failing to analyze it in space as a simultaneous system connected by non-local gravitation. So they think darkness is not caused by the spatial death of light, which they merely use as a clock of cosmic time, thinking therefore that beyond those ages we enter into a temporal darkness – and the Universe didn’t exist.

image031

In the graph, we illustrate how complex physics, using the same data that Simplex physics of a single space-time continuum can resolve the puzzles of the Universe. Cosmologists have found that light coming from far away galaxies seems to decelerate and accelerate its red shift till dissolving around 1010-11 years after its emission. And they affirm this is a proof of an expanding Universe, as they apply a local phenomenon, the life/death curve of light self-similar to the life-death curve of any entity, which increases its frequency till its ½ life and then decreases, becoming tired till death, to the entire space-time of the Universe (a global symmetry).

The tiredness and world cycle life-curve of light however only applies to a local phenomenon: light tires and red shifts at the end of its journey, dissolving back into gravitational dark-Entropy, which is perceived as an expansion of the light-membrane, but that effect is compensated by the contraction of space into mass in the galactic vortices giving us a zero-sum.

Let us then study in descending scales those 3 little bangs.

5D Lorentz Invariance: A 4D cosmic electron membrane of the canonical big-bang.

Screen Shot 2016-03-28 at 09.50.41

We do NOT fully deny the cosmic scale of the big-bang, which 5D somehow makes logic (it would just be another scale of big-bang of an atom-Universe. There are certain basic numbers that back that opinion. The number of galaxies, 1011 is the constant of social order between planes of the 5th dimension.

The relationship between the Force of Gravitation and Charge (temporal curvature), is according to some estimates (already noticed by Feynman and I believe Eddington), the same that between the radius of the proton and the Cosmos (spatial length). So it fits in 5D Metric: Sp x Tƒ = K, better than a possible ‘local cluster’ big-bang with lesser radius. But those numbers have been varying a few potencies of 10 here and there. In any case it is a proof of the force of 5D metric that even if we ultimately reject the cosmic big-bang for lack of experimental data, we can for the first time explaining rationally without creationist ideas.

The spatial symmetry on 5D big-bang; all galaxies are in the expanding membrane of the ‘electronic cover’ of the cosmic neutron explains Lorentz Invariance nicely.

Now in the parlance of physics, this mind point of view is called ‘relativity’, which implies we cannot distinguish frames of reference when we choose one at its center.

Now in the present format, the ‘subjective use of the human frame of reference’ at the center of the big bang, could seem a misinterpretation of the meaning of the Lorentz Invariance to suit ‘us’ – ultimately another ‘anthropomorphic’, man in the center, reality only what man can see, subjective theory of religious ‘nature’.

But this would be an easy critic. An not an accurate one. Since In the case of the previous picture for that to be real – not frame of reference – the solution of physicists is obvious and quite smart and realistic: the entire picture is actually NOT a ‘volume’ but a membrane, like the expanding surface of a globe. If all the galaxies were pegged in the expanding surface of an SP-Membrane any POINT would see the rest of the cosmos which being so ‘large’ would appear as a flat surface, in the same way we see the Earth as a flat surface and any point on the Earth could in principle if light would curve a bit through the surface see the entire globe as a flat picture.

Of course those models are available in the ‘avalanche’ of ‘fantaphysics’, that is mathematical games without a criterion of selection. On my view the more interesting is the one of Mr. Merab Gogberashvili where he shows that if the Universe is considered as a thin shell (a mathematical synonym for “brane”) expanding in 5-dimensional space then it is possible to obtain one scale for particle theory corresponding to the 5-dimensional cosmological constant and Universe thickness, since it solves the hierarchy problem in a similar fashion – in this case the smaller scale of particles do have more ‘energy and information – that extra-dimension and further on our Universe is stable since the extra component of the Einstein field equations giving the localized solution for matter fields coincides with the one of the conditions of stability.

Latter the Americans proposed the closely related Randall–Sundrum scenarios, which have as usual become more popular with the Anglo-Saxon drum beat of self-propaganda (this is common in the history of science since the times of Leibniz to the times of Landau->Hawking and Linde->Guth).

Now in our terminology this means the following, generalizing it to 5D Geometry, which is NOT so much concerned with ‘spatial geometry’ but with the arrows of energy and information that transit between scales:

Now one of the beauties of 5D science is that we can take any relative ∆±i scale in our analysis of reality and change slightly the perspective and will get a meaningful view of it all. So when we take the largest ∆+i perspective on the being we see it as indistinguishable atoms, but if we have an ∆-1 perspective it looks like a ‘living cell’, which is a very convenient perspective to study the whole, as we observe it perfectly together, surrounded by a cyclical time membrane, with a nice central o-point and a series of perfectly designed organic cycles.

This is the perspective we can have of a nation, as a cell of the superorganism of history with its borders, human DNAs in its homes connected by networks of economic energy and legal information. Or the perspective of a human cell-citizen, or a biological cell. This is the best way to study the galaxy as a cell of the superorganism of the Universe made of 1011 of such cells. The structure of the galaxy cell thus will ‘focus’ this article, since it is the perspective, which we can elaborate with a minimal amount of information to make it a likely truth.

Of the Universe as a whole we cannot make such a big statement of truth, as astrophysicists, human ego-centered masters of the Universe think, but we can keep exploring their cosmic big-bang, and explain it as a 5D probable truth. We shall see it is of the two possible explanations – an extensive Universe of multiple atoms/cells/galaxies well beyond the limit of the cosmic horizon, vs. a growing beta decay universe or a cellular organism, the 2nd likely explanation. So for probabilities of truth, we range them as:

Max. truth: quasar big-bang < Med. Truth: Cosmic big-bang < Min. truth: cellular cosmos.

Ultimately though the 3 of them admit a larger ∆+1 scale of the Universe, a… Hyper-Universe and big bang death.

The mimetic ages of Little quasar bangs.

Now it what follows we are going to deal mainly with 1 theme, the organic structure of the Galaxy and its parts according to the Generator Equation.

It is within that structure that big-bangs of any of the scales of matter represent merely the entropic death of the matter vortex in a quanta of time according to the equation of death of any system, physical or not

Death-big bang equation: Tƒ<<Sp: Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ->Sp=∞ x Tƒ=0

So it is not a big deal, which is the scale. As we have explained it matches 5D metric including the inflaton field: Sp x Tƒ = K. Thus in an infinitesimal time quanta (10-42 in the big bang), in a similar account the Universe expanded a similar quantity (1042 proton radius in the big bang). It is simply too large with the data we observe. So we imagine that the QUASAR-bang will follow exactly the same metric, and ages of the cosmic bang, but the relative Time speed of the Galaxy when the bang-death of entropy of the black hole took place will be slower, of the range of top quark interactions (10-25 seconds) and the diameter of the central black hole once it expanded after its death will be that of the galaxy: 1021 meters.

In brief, the ages of the Little bang are far less speculative as sciences must be than the big-bang. Its first quanta of ‘death’ of the black hole did start when the speed of time clocks of the black hole went under the mean life of its particles, top quarks, which are the likely cut-off atoms of the black hole. As the little bang expands the galaxy in a similar fashion to a double beta decay that expands the nucleus up to 100.000 times to create a hydrogen atom.

Thus time slows down to the ‘year’ cycle of its ∆-1 ‘cell’, which is the angular momentum of most star systems, the ‘photons of the galaxy-atom’, taking our planet orbit as a mean for them, in the same manner that the cycles of a living human being slow down from its faster seminal system to the day cycle – the mean cycle of its cells, the ∆-1 scale.

This is the application of 5D physics, NOT of weird laws of time. But of the metric of the 5th dimension and the processes of growth of systems which are synchronized to the slow down of its internal time cycles at the ∆-1 cellular lower level. At this moment the system is synchronic between its 3 ∆±1 scales and its space-time measures are in relative proportion.

What is then the growth of the little big-bang. Simple to calculate. If a nucleus of an atom grows 100.000 times to become the electron radius, we just need to multiply the year time of the ‘new galaxy-atom’ for 100.000 times of expansion, and the galaxy should be approximately 100.000 light year of radius.

The same happens in the atom, even if physicists do not understand as they do NOT use variable time clocks, DO NOT relate time clocks to space curvature and attractive power.

But we do have all the data. So in the atomic nucleus, the clock speed slows down ≈ the attractive power diminishes ≈ the curvature diminishes ≈ as the radius of the strong force grows to the radius (clock-curvature-speed-angular momentum) of the Electron. And again we can do similar calculus: the electron of the Bohr radius has a mean speed of 3.000 kms, which multiplied by the fine structure constant gives us the c-speed, or space- time speed of the proton-black hole vortex radius, which is 100 times stronger than the electronic force – again the same relationships in proportions and decametric scales, which will be treated with more rigor in the 4th line).

So back to the galaxy that should stop its expansive phase when the clock goes down to a year orbital sun and 100.000 light year diameter. Well, thus experimental evidence confirms this process? As it happens 100.000 years light is the diameter of the galaxy.

This also means that the meaningful nucleus of the galaxy should be around a π light year or parsec, even if the ‘quark zone’ – or true central black hole is even smaller, but we must remember the quarks are surrounded of a cloud of ‘negative pions’, ‘massive particles, equivalent to massive stars. It is this the case of the black hole?

As it happens, the central parsec around Sagittarius A* contains thousands of stars. Although most of them are old red main-sequence stars, the Galactic Center is also rich in massive stars. More than 100 OB and Wolf–Rayet stars have been identified there so far. They seem to have all been formed in a single star formation event a few million years ago. The existence of these relatively young stars was a surprise to experts, who expected the tidal forces from the central black hole to prevent their formation. This paradox of youth is even stronger for stars that are on very tight orbits around Sagittarius A*, such as S2 and S0-102.

Now this and many pages of astrophysical studies that we shall pour on the 4th line when dealing with the organic galaxy merely shows the 5D symmetry, the organic structure of the galaxy that follows those ternary symmetries and the clueless nature of our astronomers (-; though I will not pound on them, since actually I do like astronomers much more than nuclear physicists – they do nothing wrong and had anyone taken seriously 5D in my youth when doing a master at Columbia U. I might have chosen to spend my life in the nice Palma Island Chilean mountains or Hawaii volcanoes, looking at the stars (-; But they couldn’t care less for the galactic organism )-;

Anyway the field of 5D fractal, organic cyclical time applied to astrophysics is ginormous not so much in size in space but in information. So we will just consider a few aspects of it. Along the way we shall introduce some fundamental changes in our theories of the Universe based in T.œ both in its ‘strict belief in the limits of the scientific method’, and the consequences of a cyclical time, fractal space and scalar Universe.

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 20.52.53In the graph, the quasar Little-bang, is the same process that the cosmic Little-bang but limited to the inversion of a central black hole, which dies and goes through the same phases the inflation period, is the period of black hole explosion with its gravitational waves that create the underlying structure over which the following epochs will produce as energy cools down the different particles of the galaxy. This is what it is recreated today at CERN, and might provoke the strangelet formation on its ‘initial ages’, which are stable usd lumps that could swallow the Earth.

There is besides the job of straighten up of the errors of physics regarding its space-time symmetries a more general analysis of great beauty, which consists in the translation of the ‘Ages of the Little-bangs’, of any type of scales into the ages of the known-known particles of matter, as the slow down of speeds of time and enlarging of spaces allows the symmetry to break into the positive and negative sides of each ‘plane’ of the Universe.

It is not so different from classic astrophysics, except that is simpler more symmetric, experimentally sound, theoretically meaning and so it makes sense (-;

Now of course we can ad for the pleasure of those clueless astrophysicists crunching numbers the unknown scales of the possible atomic cosmos.

They start ‘faster’ than we do. The little bang of the most likely scale of Galactic matter, explains HOW FROM THE c-faster ok colder, super fast time cycles of the Higgs-top quark-black hole fields, through the ‘creation of ± symmetries of speed, energy, charge, and momentum’, all other forces and particles are born.

The chronology of the Galaxy describes the history and future of the Galaxy according to Little Bang cosmology, the scientific model of how the Galaxy developed by this point of existence, which is a world I itself (;

The big bang though of the atomic cosmos stars its time on the Planck epoch, using the cosmological time parameter of commoving coordinates (never mind what it means, nothing really 🙂

As of 2016, this expansion is estimated to have begun 13.799 ± 0.021billion years ago! – you know how ‘precise’ are the scholars who know nothing but think to know it all – humans after all. Wouldn’t be a bit less ‘obvious’ to say just 13.8? (-: LOL, do remember that the exact minute of creation was precisely estimated last century by a British priest on the A$$-breeders calendar, now running at 5777 – 7 being the magic number of Babel…

It is convenient to divide the evolution of the atomic Galaxy or cosmic string, so far into three phases. They just differ in its reality. In brief, the first age of the cosmic big bang is largely speculative and simply accelerates time to the minimal time possible in physical parameters of the ‘light speed limit’, the so called Planck Units of mass, time (the speed of light crossing the minimal radius of a string-neutrino, etc.)

Fantaphysics. The I never proved age of Cosmic physics.

Before a time classified as a Planck time, 10-43 seconds, all of the four fundamental forces are presumed to have been unified into one force. All matter, energy, space and time are presumed to have exploded outward from the original singularity. Nothing is known of this period. In the era around one Planck time, 10-43 seconds, it is projected by present modeling of the fundamental forces that the gravity force begins to differentiate from the other three forces. This is the first of the spontaneous symmetry breaks, which lead to the four observed types of interactions in the present universe.

Looking backward, the general idea is that back beyond 1 Planck time we can make no meaningful observations within the framework of classical gravitation. One way to approach the formulation of the Planck time is presented by Hsu. One of the characteristics of a black hole is that there is an event horizon beyond which we can obtain no information – scales smaller than that are hidden from the outside world. For a given enclosed mass, this limit is on the order of

L=GM/c2

where G is the gravitational constant and c is the speed of light. But from the uncertainty principle and the De Broglie wavelength, we can infer that the smallest scale at which we could locate the event horizon would be the Compton wavelength.

l=h/mc

Equating L and λ, we obtain a characteristic mass called the Planck mass. Substituting this mass back into one of the length expressions gives the Planck length

which happens to the be length of a neutrino, something physicists have not noticed too much but makes the neutrino the clearest candidate to be the quanta of the gravitomagnetic waves of the underlying structure under light. and the neutrino theory of light, the clearest form in which light is formed, as light travels its minima time frequency across this length is called the Planck time:

Tp=√h/Gc5 =1.35 x 10-43 sec

Which therefore will be in 5d physics the minimal wave length of light, the minimal ‘planckton’. And we will return to that.

Inflationary Period

In classic cosmology, Triggered by the symmetry breaking that separates off the strong force, models suggest an extraordinary inflationary phase in the era 10-36 seconds to 10-32 seconds. More expansion is presumed to have occurred in this instant than in the entire period ( 14 billion years?) since.

The inflationary epoch may have expanded the universe by 1020 or 1030 in this incredibly brief time. The inflationary hypothesis offers a way to deal with the horizon problem and the flatness problem of cosmological models.

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 20.49.55Lemonick and Nash in a popular article for Time describe inflation as an “amendment to the original Big Bang” as follows: “when the universe was less than a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a second old, it briefly went through a period of superchanged expansion, ballooning from the size of a proton to the size of a galaxy (and thus expanding at many, many times the speed of light). Then the expansion slowed to a much more stately pace. Improbable as the theory sounds, it has held up in every observation astronomers have managed to make.”

Which is none, zero, nill, zip’. Nobody has observed the grapefruit, let alone the Planck Mass, LOL. The problem of course was that to make so big the Universe, and connect al its parts, they needed this concept and so they fitted in.

So what this inflation means in 5D cosmology? Merely the expansion of the black hole ‘neutrino and gravitational wave’ over which light will be imprinted in a second phase.

Of this the Grand Unification Theory (GUT) – the final unification that has been called a “super grand unification theory”, and becoming more popular is the designation “theory of everything” (TOE) says very little. Since physicists “theories of everything” are separated by two great leaps beyond the experiments we could ever hope to do on the Earth.

In that first phase, the very earliest atom-cosmos was so cold and perfectly ordered that its time clocks with no entropy could turn at an amazing faster than c speed of 1000 z in a present ‘liquid wave’ of absolute no friction.

But of course, ‘lineal entropy physicists’ which become surprised every time they find some cold working non entropic reality (which we have been predicting for 3 decades – the last one the quark gluon perfect liquid, which they still call ‘plasma’ 🙂 take of a hot, energetic substance.

Hot is of course meaningless outside the ENTROPIC GAS-molecular state where temperature is a meaningful parameter.

Never mind. According to prevailing scientific theories, at this time no matter particles existed (hence some divine creationism would act soon 😉 perfect explanation for the time speed and inflaton of those first moments, you know God is absolutely powerful.

Now in this theories the distinct forces we see around us today were joined in one unified force. Space-time itself expanded during an inflationary epoch due to the immensity of the energies involved. Gradually the immense energies cooled – still to a temperature inconceivably hot compared to any we see around us now, but sufficiently to allow forces to gradually undergo symmetry breaking, a kind of repeated condensation from one status quo to another, leading finally to the separation of the strong force from the electroweak force and the first particles.

This in the parlance of abstract physics. In reality, it was of course all the way around. The ‘death’ destroyed the perfect cold order of the super-quark-gluon liquid vortex of the hyper-black hole of super top quarks, and the hyper luminal rotation produced through the Kerr axis tachyons at superluminal speed, which expanded the Universe…

But all that is meaningless, so we just will ignore the whole mysterious things and not fill another 20 or 30 questions never answered about the cosmic big-bang (inflation formation of galaxies, isotropies not found at large scale, etc. etc.) as the little galactic big-bang shows no problems of any kind, the back ground radiation meaning simply the galactic background of neutrinos and light produced by the ‘top quark star’ little bang.

So let us rise the scales of the galaxy, beyond into the ∆+1 cosmos. Then we will find again the 3 parts of the fundamental particle, where the halo is now the ball of fire of the background radiation, the intermediate vital space, the sum of those galaxies that form a flat plane with high singularity time cycles in each galactic vortex, and the centre, might be the largest of all the black hole galaxies, which together form clearly 2 networks, one of energy (light galaxies) and one of information (dark matter galaxies), creating a complex super organism, similar to any other super organism – we compare it with the ‘networks’ of energy and information of a human being:

image052

Thus, the application of the Generator Equation of 5 Dimensional Fractal ‘systems’ of cycles of spatial energy and temporal information, to cosmology and astrophysics is similar to any other science. As all parts of the fractal universe are made to the image and likeness of the whole, and the structures repeat constantly.

We first define an i-logic, ‘Generator’ equation that resumes with 10 parameters the 3 co-existing ∆±1 planes of physical systems, its 3±∆ ages in time and 3 organic topologies in space.

We then define the Œ-points of those systems and the cyclical space-time actions, they perform in order to survive: a-ccelerations, e-nergy feeding, informative gauging, œ-ffspring creation and Social evolution into Ûniversals.

The difficulty though arises from the fact that Astrophysics is a ‘mathematical-only’ theory with special emphasis in a single space-time continuum analysis of the cosmos and a human, abstract point of view implicit in General Relativity, to which we must add a short of religious dogma, which defies rational challenge, the so-called cosmic big bang and the uncertainty of studying a Universe of which we only perceive a 4%, due to the uncertainty of its vast size and distance from our point of view in terms of scales of the 5th dimension so this implies:

1) The difficulty on translating the exact mathematical, spatial equations of astrophysics into meaningful statements of Organic and temporal, causal nature.

2) The natural opposition to an organic interpretation of the Universe by the present practitioners of the abstract, mathematical paradigm.

On the other hand 5D physics surprisingly enough give new insights in both the cosmic big-bang, General Relativity, and by applying the isomorphic laws of all scales of reality, on the likely nature of dark matter and dark energy which can guide future researchers on the field as long as they accept the broader perspective of a Theory of the Organic Everything (TŒ).

Now we cannot make it easier for the ‘dogma’ of mechanist science as T.Œ implies a change of paradigm and so we will continue the method of other posts.

This means the description of the ‘organic, multi-linguistic’ Universe, will be ‘upside down’ with respect to the analytic method of starting from the study of the minuscule mathematical parts of the Universe, its space-quanta, to build up the structures of the universal organism with a mere abstract mathematical description, which ignores completely the relationship of its organic parts in space, the sequential ages of its worldcycles of conception, birth and extinction and its relative ‘isomorphic’ scales of the 5th dimension, in which similar phenomena take place (big bang scales from the atom to the cosmos).

Instead as usual we will describe first the whole, as an interrelated Organism with 10 ‘dimensional parameters’, hence starting by:

– Defining its Fractal Generator, G, with its ternary symmetries in space, time and its fractal scales and ternary sub-systems for each scale.

– Then study the main species of the 3 co-existing planes of astrophysical systems – which in cosmology are its ∆-1 star systems, its ∆-galaxies and the ∆+1 Universe.

– And as it is quite relevant in the case of physical systems that co-exist in an isomorphic, isotropic background consider the Fractal principle, subdividing them into its 3 sub-systems at atomic level.

– Then we study its organic structure in space with its 3 canonical topologies (Spe-energetic membrane, ExT, cyclical body-wave and Tƒ-informative particle-head), which are often similar in the 3 scales, its 3 ages in time.

– And finally focus on the central 0-points of those systems, which are the commanding black holes that control the galaxy and its cyclical space-time actions.

This is the bare bone elements of astrophysical systems, whose qualitative study we can complete with quantitative analysis of the relationships between its 10 components and 5 actions (3 scales, 3 ages, 3 organs, and 0-points’ actions), as well as its variations of species and Universal constants (ratios and social numbers between those 10 elements and 5 actions).

Thus when study those elements, we can get to any degree of detail we want, using the known ‘space-time dualities and paradoxes’, ternary symmetries of time ages and space organs, decametric social scales between ∆±1 planes, and Universal constants of actions.

Further on we can apply the ternary fractal principle, which makes possible to study any part of Γ, The generator, as a whole and divide it into 3 sub-parts, 3 sub-ages, 3 sub-planes and its main sub-equations. And apply the Fractal Ternary Principle including some elements of the atomic, particle scale, clarifying the connection of the 3 planes..

Since T.Πand the 5Dimentional organic space-time structure of reality and its cyclical, fractal laws can fully describe all what exists in the cosmos, discerning also what is likely NOT to be.

Now future is inflationary, because the logic mind in lesser space with more information calculates more possible potential logic futures in its mirror fractal of information at faster, speed, but only one of the multiple paths of the wave, will be then converted into reality and the other images will fade away and collapse into the present, single wave, which will then become a discontinuous past that erases.

Because only present space, as we define present as the product of space and time, past and future, only present stays, it is the conservation of energy and information, of the lineal and angular momentums combined into present space-times along a worldcycle of existence, or a synchronous organism.

When we integrate those presents along all the vital spaces and all the time cycles of the system, we obtain the total integral of the function of existence in space time of the present being, with all its future information. So its quantum waves become a single whole motion that integrates them all.

Now, the reader should notice 2 things, which are quite evident. On one side, the similarity between the largest and smallest scales of physical systems, the atom and the galaxy; on the other the question marks on the big-bang theories, which are themes not so obviously related to the saint Grail of physics – the discovery during my studies of both systems of a way to unify both – the world of charges and masses, hence all the scales of physical systems of the Universe, as they had exactly the same equations in the metrics of the 5th dimension. Indeed charges and masses were clocks of time of the electromagnetic and gravitational scale in 5D metrics, only that the galactic vortex turned 10 up to 40 times slower in those metrics than a charge and were larger in a similar quantity (Sp x Tƒ = K).

And so when I translated the equations of electromagnetism to the jargon of gravitation alas, all the equations matched, those of the electron with the galactic halo, and the black hole radius appeared suddenly as the radius of the Bohr Hydrogen atom…

Thus when I found that the 10 up to 40 relationship between the charge and mass forces (the so-called hierarchy problem), was equivalent to the different of ‘speed of a charge and mass clock’ in 5D metrics – giving birth to an easy unification as time clocks of two scales it was the beginning of a full new field of science, which I called 5D cosmology.

Thus galaxies can also be studied in space as a fractal point with 3 regions that correspond to the 3 ‘canonical’ topologies of a 4-dimensional world – an informative center, an energetic membrane, and the reproductive intermediate zone:

– Max. Tƒ: The center of the galaxy is a swarm of black holes, its densest informative masses, which produces the gravitational, informative waves that control the position of its body of stars. Beyond its event horizon, the accelerated vortex of mass of the black hole (Equivalence Principle) should accelerate light, deflecting it into a perpendicular, hyperbolic, informative dimension of height (Kerr superluminal, central singularity) ejecting it as gravitational jets of dark Entropy at 10 C.

For that reason Kerr black holes10 should be called wormholes, because they absorb light but let it escape through its axis as dark, gravitational Entropy, at faster than light speeds.

-Max. Sp: The external membrane that limits the inner space-time of the galaxy is a spherical halo of dark matter, probably made of strangelets or micro black holes, which can deviate unwanted radiation by gravitational red shift and/or absorb the Entropy of radiant matter, cooling it down to the 2.7 K background radiation.

Thus those non-evaporating micro black holes and strangelets of great density act as ‘proteins’ do in cells, controlling the inner movement of galaxies and the outer absorption of light-Entropy.

– Sp=Tƒ: Stars, tracing toroid cycles form the inner space-time body of the galaxy, a bidimensional plane or Klein’s disk that feeds the wormhole and reproduces atomic substances and stars. They ultimately evolve into black holes, which migrate toward the central swarm of holes, residing in the nucleus. In any Klein disk distance is measured as motion and becomes infinite when we cannot reach a limit or barrier (for example the barrier of light speed becomes an infinite Lorentz Transformation). So it happens with the border of the galaxy.

We are part of that intermediate space-time in a Milky Way, limited by its central hole and an invisible border of dark matter, neither of which we can cross without dying; since the speed of rotation of matter around the wormhole and the flows of intergalactic dark Entropy that expands space at light speeds beyond the halo would destroy us. Thus we are trapped in this star and planet, in a toroid cycle that will end evolving the Sun into dark matter.

Thus the generator equation of the galaxy as a Fractal ∆-point is:

E:Halo <stars that evolve Entropy into matter> Tƒ (Black holes)

In the image, the structure of the galaxy: stars are created in the intermediate region and the center is occupied by a black hole.

The energetic medium that transfers Entropy to the fractal quanta of the galaxy is the external interstellar gas. Finally the system is joined by 2 networks of forces: the gravitational, faster, non-local informative, transversal gravitational waves at the cosmological scale; and the energetic, smaller, slower electromagnetic waves at the quantum scale.

Let us study the parts of the whole – the 3 elements of galaxies, stars, black holes and gravitational forces that join them, now from the perspective of its quanta – the quarks that have the same parameters in the ∆-1 scales of the 5th dimension that the larger ∆+1 black holes and strange stars.

 

CONCLUSION: WORLDCYCLES OR WORLDLINES?

This said we shall try now with a bit of salt, to compare the explanation of what existence is in the two models, the Newtonian model of absolute spacetime and the relational model of infinite space-time beings with ‘one more dimension’ – the scalar dimension of spacetime, and a better understanding of time ‘worldcycles’ and its past, present and future ages. Once this hurdle of complexity is passed, though all other things will be easier to understand, or rather become ‘understood’ for the first time, as any honest physicist will tell you he really doesn’t have any clue  beyond the numerical description provided by its equations, as to why exist and what are waves, time, space, particles, existence, dimension, motion and information…

Even Einstein when asked but ‘what time is’, kept silent and then for lack of a better answer replied: ‘what a clock measures’… Ah, but all clocks are cyclical, thus to make its ‘worldcycles’ they need at least another dimension, as cycles do indeed require two not a single line.

When you google the fifth dimension you get 3 kind of results: the most popular is a funky group of ‘Champagne soul’ – a bubble name, proper of the age of ‘Entropy=dissolution’ of human minds, when our capacity to reason verbally is in decline due to the influence of audiovisual magic FX and the increasing obsolescence of our logic minds to fancy digital, visual computer models of reality.  ‘A stupid is a man without reason, one that doesn’t see the causality between events so it believes in magic causes’ said Schopenhauer, always so harsh but also right to the point.

Then you get the fifth dimension of space, an impossible construct of physicists, which study ONLY one dimension of time=motion =change: locomotion or change in the position and speed in space: v=s/t (and similar equations by Einstein, who added a correcting ct factor to Galileo’s relativity and to measure those space distances and speeds).

So  as physicists use time only to measure locomotion=change in space, they call time, the fourth dimension of space (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its fine-tuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²). And this obsession for spatial measures and dimensions made them ‘guess’ that if there is a fifth dimension, it should also be a dimension of space.

This poises a problem. As we cannot have experience of a dimension of space of the same lineal, infinite form than our 3 perpendicular dimensions. So physicists just put this dimension elsewhere, merrily making all kind of imaginary models of multiple dimensionality, which leads to the true limit of human science:

Today physicists call a ‘dimension’ any parameter they use to model reality, call time a dimension of space, just because it is in the same equation (though as Einstein put it ‘wires don’t travel to the past’ and the t of its equations always has an inverse value to the s of space (s/t or +s – t)…

Against the tide of mechanic science that consists in gathering data, putting it into mathematical equations and understand nothing of the concepts expressed, to fully develop a meaningful upgrade of our concepts of time and space and its motions and dimensions we must make a huge upgrading on the basic concepts of science.

Then if we succeed making understandable those concepts, harmonize the ‘verbal, logic thought, mathematical equations and experimental evidence’ provided by science in an expanded model-mirror image of reality as it is.

An example will suffice: When physicists apply the 4 dimensions they use, 3 of lineal space and one of lineal time, to any being they describe their existence, as a worldline of meaningless motions:

In the graph, physicists 4D single time arrow allow only to draw worldlines of locomotion. The attempts to create a metaphysics of existence departing only from a single Dimensional motion (ab. Dimotion) is the biggest error of modern physics, as the worldcycle of life and death is much more  enticing than running around all your life in locomotion. But to fully understand it, we need to widen the ‘modes’ of time=change=motion of the Universe, studied by science, adding its 5th dimension of social, scalar growth and decay.

The graph shows how our lives look in the simplistic, ill-defined conceptually 4D model of present space-time. A being merely ‘moves in time’ through ‘locomotions’. All other forms of inner and outer change that affect the being are ignored; and so we talk of a ‘present’ concept of time, or ‘external concept’ of time-change as mere locomotion, translation on space, which clearly does not account for other type of changes that have no external motion, internal changes in the in-form-ation, in the form of beings, a much slower process in time that however happens to all entities; and it is definitely more complex that a mere locomotion. As it implies at least two modes of change: growth and diminution that happens with aging, from ‘smaller scales in space’ to larger sizes and vice versa; and change in form, in ‘topology’ as in morphogenesis and wrinkling, again two changes in the form of beings.

Obviously Einstein’s work is of merit as it truly exhausted our understanding of locomotions, and we will explain it further on the more technical mathematical articles on physics in the fourth line, dealing with the c-speed constant, the Lorentz transformations, and the proper way to understand its boosts and rotations (mathematical modeling of time clocks in 4D). And further on we shall analyze the relativistic equations of quantum mechanics. But what we want to stress at this point is that locomotion and entropy, the arrows of time related to translation in space as opposed to those related to change in information, social evolution and form, are NOT enough to deal with the nature of time, and the existence of worldcycles in all beings, but merely a reductionist case, of the larger 5D model, even if it has achieved an astounding perfection in its detail – indeed you will still learn nothing about your biological worldcycles from the knowledge of Dirac’s equation and the 10 EFE equations of relativity.

So a larger ‘theory’ as 5 Ð must merely connect through the correspondence principle its ‘higher laws’ which apply to more phenomena, and are simpler so more truth (Occam’s razor, principle of economicity expressed by March in Physics, etc), to 4D, NOT the other way around as most physicists will want. THERE IS A HIGHER MODELING than Einstein’s work, which is NOT a God, but just the man who took Galilean relativity, via Poisson’s potentials to its detailed ‘simultaneous still-like’ mental analysis in mathematical space – but on the process lost clarity – a concept that we shall consider in our analysis of languages as mirrors of reality that is worth to fully understand.

In the graph, Algebra as it happened with the visual language when realist photographies came, displaced from reality by analysis moved inwards into more complex, abstract Nature, became a ‘baroque language’ purely  formal trying to explain it all departing from reality into a multiple ‘cubist perspective’ that tried to gather all perspectives into a single painting (Set and group theory.)

In every language as a mirror of reality we can reach higher detail by making the picture more complex but that often will ‘obscure’ the general principles. As in the graph, the cubist painting has arguably more detailed information about every aspect of the portrayed, from different perspectives, but the picture is not clearly recognizable as a portrait. This is what happened to physics in the XX century with the excessive fine tuning through ‘renormalization’ processes, the Born rule, the inclusion of ‘finite terms’ that influence from other 5 D scales the clean less detailed ‘first picture’ (Wilson groups), the use of group theory to ‘put in a single picture’ all the variations of species, which is fine and we shall explain rightly with the symmetries of space, time and scale TRUE origin of those SU1x SU2 x SU3 groups, etc. etc. 

So the physicist pro should not shun off the fact that we shall for example use Newton’s vortices to unify scales (in a similar fashion to the first 5D Kaluza-Klein theory of unification) instead of the ‘more detailed’ pictures of Einstein, as ultimately they are far more difficult to understand and they all come from the same concept of a vortex of accelerated forces (Einstein used Poison’s potentials that come from Newton and indeed ultimately the coupling constant, G appears in all).

We have to build first the first principles slow, as the errors of a Ptolemaic view of the Universe with a single space-time are also very distorting of reality. So once we have those first principles in place in the first two lines of the blog, we shall try to ‘attack’ the more complex maths and details in the fourth line.

We have to go beyond physicists’ reductionism of all the ∞ timespace dimotions of beings into a lineal single mechanical clock to measure them all and a lineal, static concept of its dimensions of space, which renders us a ‘worldline’ of locomotions as the meaning of existence; studying instead the ‘worldcycle’, as motion now acquires cyclical time dimensions and happens between ‘fractal scales’ of the co-existing planes that make up the universe.

And when we introduce those two new characteristics of Nature as it is – fractal in spatial scales, cyclical in functions and forms, we obtain the concepts of ‘superorganisms’ – the fundamental ‘particle’ of reality – and its worldcycles of life and death.

So we can talk of the fifth dimension in general terms as a ‘process of change in the form NOT the motion of those time space organisms’:

The fifth dimension is both a dynamic, inner new dimension of time=change – the flow from past to future to past that trans-forms the inner in-form-ation of beings as when you live and die from past to future, aging in your form, your in-form-ation, even if you don’t seem to change=move externally in space – the time-change physicists study, and a scalar, new dimension of spatial size. As in all those processes of evolution there is a clear trans-form-ation, growth and decay process, starting from a smallish ‘first seed’ that will slow down its rhythms of time and emerge as a whole, larger being, in a new scale of space:

The worldcycle of existence is indeed the highest expression of reality’s ultimate laws; which brings us to the third result you get when googling the 5th dimension:

Metaphysical bubbles of new wave people who like the word and love to give you ‘spiritual advices’:

“Much has been written, spoken and channeled about the Fifth Dimension and humanity’s ascension into this new realm of existence. In addition, many “ ordinary” people are now having their own experiences, visions and inner “ downloads” about the Fifth Dimension. Not every source agrees on details about this …”

It is important for the reader though to have some ‘sense of humor’ about Mankind’s role in the Universe and its. capacity to understand it fully, or else it won’t be able to advance in its knowledge of it. 

This is contrary to the present ‘zeitgeist’ of huge unconnected egos (that we shall in due time ‘connect’ to the ‘age of entropy’ in history we live in); specially on the field of ‘mathematical physics’ and its practitioners who truly think they understand it all, because we can ‘mirror’ in mathematical languages many properties of reality, in a magic way, and with the help of powerful computers, which are ‘species’ with better digital/geometric capabilities we adscribe to ourselves.

CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE. RELATIVITY.

The fourth dimension of ‘present’.

LET US now get into the fourth dimension of timespace of physicists again, and probe in a first simple look its most important principles, those of conservation of energy and momentum, to see how they fit in this most advanced conceptualization of dimotions of time and space of which we are all made.
In science any advance must include previous advances as limiting cases, which new knowledge expands. This is called the correspondence principle.

So if physicists call the fourth dimotion of timespace, the study of equations of locomotion of the type, v=s/t, both in Galilean and Einstein’s relativity – or change in the external motion=time of beings, without inner change; the fifth dimotion will study in all its depth and logic and mathematical simplicity, change from past to future; that is, change in the inner information of beings.
We stress the word simplicity, because unlike the 5th ‘false’ STATIC dimension of space, physicists use, limited by their incomprehension of information, which resembles the complexity of Ptolemy’s models of the Universe due to his stubborn denial of the simple fact the Sun is in the center of the ‘solar system’. But when you ad that fact you get the simpler, beautiful Copernican>Kepler>Newtonian model of the Earth’s elliptic orbits.

Both models did accurately predict our locomotion around the sun, but the egocy (ego+idiocy) of scholars preferred for very long the Ptolemaic model precisely because it was so complex that only Vatican priests understood it, and that made them feel a high people-caste of supreme wisdom in contact with the ‘magic’  language of numbers they didn’t quite understood. The big problem of the Copernicus model for scholars was its simplicity and the egocy of the astronomers of his age. Surely God had to be very complex as it had chosen them to understand reality putting mankind in the center of the Universe. This same problem is today rife in wrong very complicated physical models of reality that MISS both the law of simplicity natural to all truths in science (called often Ockham’s razor) and lack a clear comprehension of the 5 Dimotions of time-space (as indeed we shall see the 3 classic dimensions of space do have also ‘motion’ and so all together form a set of 5 Dimotions, the ultimate substance used by the Universe to create the Vital Time Space organisms, the fundamental particle of reality.
One you ad those simple concepts – that all dimensions have motion; that there are 5 not four dimotions of time-space and finally that they ARE the substance of which all is made;  reality gets so simple and easy to understand that… scholars get angry.  Surely the ‘Universe (cannot) be so simple and not malicious’ as Einstein said, adding ‘if you can’t explain it simple, you don’t understand it’; ‘Simplicity (cannot) be genius’ as Leonardo said – or else scholars wouldn’t be the ‘salt of the Earth’..
Well, IT IS, precisely for everything, including the smallest atom to understand it. But to ‘see’ its simplicity, economicity, and harmony, you must NOT start with an erroneous description of its first principles. You need to have ALL its dimensional motions together, and then once ‘all the planets’ are on their right place even a child can understand the beauty of its elliptic dimotions; so it will happen to you once you understand the 5 dimotions of spacetime, the 3 ascribed to change in in-form-ation and the 2 due to the change in the locomotion of beings.
We will then abandon the correspondence Principle and fully go on our own past the present formalism of timespace of physics. But for the time being is important to understand what Einstein meant by the fourth dimotion of spacetime, or locomotion and how it relates to the 5th dimotion of informative change.

In the fourth dimotion of external locomotion obviously the internal form of beings doesn’t change. Indeed, when we study the dimotion of a bullet, the fourth dimotion works with simple equations of ‘lineal inertia’, steady motions or accelerations, because the being doesn’t change internally, so in terms of internal change the being remains in a constant steady state, a PRESENT state. When the internal form change. I.e. when a car ‘crashes’ deforming its form, the whole equations of locomotion ‘break’ down (the car stops).
In normal conversations we say that time doesn’t past if something doesn’t change. So we talk of an eternal present when the internal form of the being doesn’t change.
So if we call in physics this fourth dimension of external timespace external change, ‘present with no internal change’ of beings, to study only its external locomotion; the fifth dimension  is a name we use for the whole range of studies in the internal information of beings; which in terms of that present no-change, it would be all the range of possible changes from past to future.
But not even with that enormous reductionism of the 5 Dimotions of timespace, they could fully understand the meaning of relativity – that is the fact that we do NOT see the Earth moving, despite the fact that it moves, because our Mind ‘stops’ its motions to create a linguistic mind-mapping of the world in which it lives, to better focus its information.
In other posts we shall see the enormous consequences of the proper understanding of relativity, as it will define the duality particle-wave, since all systems, move as waves and stop as particles to gauge information; an extraordinary fact of quantum physics that must be incorporated to the explanation of its spooky effects.
The whole previous magic equations OF REALITY are therefore fully explainable with organic, logic, vital concepts, of which our analysis of singularity points, and its mind-mapping languages will be essential.

One paradox though is left for further review, of the fourth elements, ∆º§t, of the architectonical Universe -that of the @º, ∞º, ∞ x 0, 10th->11th dimensions of the singularity of the mind membrain that encloses the open ball to form the whole island-universe…

It is then all paradoxical, complex and with a multiple perspective despite coming initially from a simple elementary view of only 4 essential components, ∆±¡ planes of existence, |x O= Ø topologies of adjacent space, ensemble into beings, 3 ages between generation and extinction and conflicting singularity membrains with a negative potential focus and a positive angular momentum, trying to escape the being, hold together by the vital energy enclosed by them. Any system of nature can be described from those 3 perspective, to which we must add the I-logic paradoxes of the Galilean relativities of scale, form vs. motion and open vs. bounded perception.
This brings a very important concept – to perceive reality with 3 perspectives and 3 languages, which are more analytic (mathematical numerical description of an ∆-1 world of parts seen often as mere numbers not distinguishable from above), more vital (action perspective of the being in the ∆º plane) an more organic (co-existing perspective of the ∆+1 whole) from above.
And this of course gives NAME to the 3 paradoxical symmetries used here to describe all organisms, in the case of the galaxy as ‘galaxy-atoms’ (from above, externally as a mathematical entity similar to the atom – an atom of the Universe we might say), galaxies proper (from the same plane) an gala cells (organisms as a whole from above, internally, a cell ruled by black holes for the within it, including humans in a lonely star, likely mitocondria for the whole)…
And all together explained either with logic symmetries or existential algebra will give us reality as it is (not).

The guidance to advance further than present knowledge on astrophysics thanks to the insights of 5D³ comes thus from the symmetry between the scale of atoms and galaxies, but also from the organic inner workings of that gala cell, and finally from its individual nature and interaction with other galaxies, and the direct perception of man, as part of it. What matters today most to scientists – to find accurate equations to describe its first dimotion or locomotion is not that important. What makes them feel high popes – to do that with absolute precision of measure in terms of human rods, the second of time, the c-speed of space, is quite secondary, because languages as we shall see are inflationary so multiple mathematical equations will mirror those locomotions and when we gain detail as in EFE relativity we miss conceptual generalization as in Newton’s vortices which make galaxies to have in 5D metric the same structure as gravitational and quantum vortex, when we apply vortex laws (either in newtonian or Einstein’s formalism – we use here for the sake of simplicity the Newton’s vortex from where via Poisson’s potential Einstein derived his work; so NEWTON is also valid when there is no need for great accuracy).

From 4Ð to 5Ð; completing modern physics.

‘Leibniz was right there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from scratch’ Einstein, on the tasks achieved in this blog. 
As Einstein said  you will have to forget everything you have learned about concepts such as space and time, past, present and future, dimension and motion, including the simple explanations given before and restart from scratch.
Indeed, we could fit the fifth dimension in the ‘Ptolemaic epicycles’ of physicists to get better reviews from them, but those kind of ‘parches’, which have been put on the scaffolding of physics for a century now, since Einstein realized there are ∞ time clocks in the Universe would leave the structure still a mess.
So we have really to restart with the concept most worthy of all those discovered in Relativity – that time without space is a mere shadow, and both are always associated together. Even if we as humans only see one side of it. I.e. we see the Earth still even if we know it moves. 
So the first big notion is to accept that there are no dimensions of space neither motions of time, but only Dimotions of space-time, and the big question Galileo failed to resolve is ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’, that is why the Earth moves but we see it still, why we see still matter but in detail all are vortices of forces in motion and so on. This is basically a paradox of the mind, which to extract better information and fit it in the small brain reduces its motion into form. So Time-motion, through the still languages of a mind become space perception. And so a new surprising element, the ‘mind and its languages’ must be added to the mix of formal space, perceived as such in the mind and time motions, the reality of which ultimately all is made.

Back to the primitive XVI c. concepts of time and space, v=s/t, as Galileo did choose only one state of the Earth – that of motion; physicists have failed ever since to add the ‘endophysics’ of languages of perception into the mix. In plain terms, they have ‘reduced’ reality and its embedded paradoxes to the obvious. And this produces a lot of conflicts. Indeed, on one side they calculate the Earth is moving. On the other side they see it still and search for ‘matter’, for ‘form’, for ‘particles’ as the substance of reality.
The far more profound truth is that all is motion in time, the real thing, all are flows from past to future to past, all are dimotions, and space is the ‘still, formal’ perception by a mind of that constant flow of times. So back to our previous concept, we can define ‘space’ as a slice of still perception of that past to future to past flow of times. 
And yes, I know things are getting more complicated that the simplicity we claim, so quoting Einstein again ‘the Universe is simple but not that simple’ (: What matters though is NOT to get into erroneous paths and start as Ptolemy or Newton did, with a wrong concept – the sun in the center, space-time as a mathematical Cartesian frame of reference that became the single absolute space-time of reality, as if God had drawn it behind that reality made of vita space-time beings. In fact Newton called it the ‘plenum=body’ of God 🙂
On that view, the reader should not be surprised to learn that scientists are fully aware their first principles, an absolute single time clock for the entire Universe and a continuous single space are ‘false’ conventions, useful to measure reality with ‘human artifacts’ but the Universe HAS infinite time clocks – all cyclical motions by definition describe a time clock – and broken ‘vital spaces’ (all membranes and cyclical clocks by definition break space into inner and outer regions), which are the main ‘components of beings’.
This is the case since quantum physics show ‘vacuum space’ holds energy and it is broken into quanta, and relativity showed there are infinite time clocks with different speeds in the Universe.
Here, again we realize humans have such confusing concepts of time, space, dimension and motion that even we can’t help to give it confusing conceptualizations every ‘time’ we use those words.
For that reason is so important to start from scratch and define the 5 ‘dimotions’ of space-time with a minimal rigor from the very beginning or else it will get as complicated as the present mumble-rumble of physicists seems. Latter on, we can use the Principle of Correspondence and encase all what we know so far, and all what is right about present human spacetime theory in this larger, simpler better structured mirror of the whole Universe and its 5 Dimotions, used to construct and run everything that exists.
But even Einstein couldn’t get to the task after spotting those huge errors of physics regarding time – namely the use of a single ‘locomotion’ and lineal time parameter for every different dimotion of reality broken into infinite actions of infinite beings.
So what should have come next – a thorough investigation on how a world of infinite time clocks and broken spaces is-  was such a difficult task as we have restart from the very beginning of science that nobody dared to do it, and so the routines of traditional scientific thought continued for another century, and we kept the use of a single time-clock tuned to the second and a single rod of distance in space, the c-speed of light or the meter for more pedestrian purposes.
What we shall do in this blog is exactly what Einstein asked for: take the concept of a Universe made of relational space-time beings, foreseen first by Leibniz to its ultimate consequences. And the outcome of a serious thorough review of reality in terms of its infinite timespace clocks will be a Universe as it is SO DIFFERENT from the one you are told to believe in – even if it ultimately by the principle of correspondence we will  use often the same equations –  as the upgrading of quantum and relativity was in its depiction of physical space or the upgrading of Darwin in his description of biological time, or Aristotle in his description of the causal logic of those time systems.
Why this is NOT been done before, as science has been happy merely with putting ‘parches’ to reality has to do with the mentioned routines of knowledge, expressed also by Mr. Planck. So you will have to suspend your beliefs for a while if you want to go ahead and understand better the Universe.
We have now defined the details of the Universe in space as superorganisms and in time as world cycles, born of the sum of smaller parts performing 5D actions of existence. And then show how humans are also space-time beings made of topological space that last a limited worldtime cycle. This is what reality is all about: a toporganic game of super organisms acting to live its world cycles.
Of course, when you ask ‘humans’ what the Universe is, this ‘logic’, vital concept of reality is completely shunned off. Because of the ego of man, vital elements only matter to describe man and similar ‘animal beings’.

So most readers will think all this to be non-sense. Their mind has been ‘tamed’ not to see those features that really matter. Instead all what scientists ask about the Universe is a pure description of its ‘locomotions’ (only one of its dimensions of time), and spatial ‘extensions’ (seen in a single space-time plane, the plane of light space-time, our mental world-view).  This shallow reductionist view of the entangled, fractal, vital organic Universe becomes then canonical knowledge and suffices to the ‘reduced’ view of man’s ego for whom vital qualities are ‘invisible’ in other beings.

Still the accurate description in mathematical physics of the spatial extension and formal evolution of the whole physical Universe is worth to know as an important part of knowledge. And so we must wonder, how that description of a Universe will ‘improve’ and change with the new insights given by the fractal structure of space into scales, and the cyclical nature of time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.
The answer will surprise the readers – because it shows how distorted human views of reality are, when the first principles are ignored and the ego of man reduces reality. 
So we shall upgrade our cosmological theory of the Universe, within the milieu of our new advanced views of fractal space and cyclical time.

The reader IN THAT SENSE would be surprised to learn that professional physicists are fully aware their first principles, an absolute single time clock for the entire Universe and a continuous single space, are ‘false’ conventions, useful to measure reality with ‘human artifacts’. But the Universe HAS infinite time clocks – all cyclical motions by definition describe a time clock – and ∞ broken ‘vital spaces’ (all membranes and cyclical clocks by definition break space into inner and outer regions), which are the main ‘components of beings’.
This is the case, since quantum physics show ‘vacuum space’ holds energy and it is broken into quanta, and relativity showed there are infinite time clocks with different speeds in the Universe.
And so as Einstein put it, we had to come back to the very beginning of science – its geometric principles of space and logic principles of time.
But the routines of traditional scientific thought continue, and we still use a single time-clock tuned to the human second (eye, step, heartbeat) and to the single rod of distance in galactic space, the c-speed of light or the human relative size – the meter for more pedestrian purposes.
Yet what we do in this blog is exactly what Einstein asked for: take the concept of a Universe made of relational space-time beings, forwarded by Leibniz to its ultimate consequences, restarting the logic and mathematical ‘non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean postulates’ in which all sciences are based from its beginning.
And the result is the Universe ‘as it is’, which despite using the same data that present science, looks SO DIFFERENT from the one you are told to believe in, as the upgrading of quantum and relativity was in its depiction of physical space, relative to Newtonian Mechanics, or the upgrading of Darwin in his description of biological time, compared to Linneus; or Aristotle in his description of the causal logic of those time systems, compared to the ‘causal myths’ that preceded him.
Why this has NOT been done before, and science has been content merely with putting ‘parches’ to reality has to do with the routines of knowledge, explained by Mr. Kuhn and Mr. Planck: science is about repetition of beliefs and dogmas as much as advance through new r=evolution. So you will have to suspend your beliefs for a while if you want to go ahead and understand better the Universe.
As this blog is 4: model revolution; which of course will require an entire new-born ‘scientists’ for it to become ‘dogma’ (5. paradigm change).

To notice though that the qualities you need to understand RELATIONAL spacetime organisms are quite opposite to the ones displayed by most human scholars regardless of ‘discipline’:

-An absolute lack of ego, as you are part of an entangled Universe with the same ‘isomorphic’ properties of all other entities in ‘exist¡ence’… a space-time supœrganism… So you need a taoist, detached view of your ego, which systematically bias reality to make you the center of the Universe, as that is the point from where your ‘membrain’=mind measures. Ego distortions are so many and embedded in the very structure of subjective perception that we shall not cease to bring the ego paradox to explain them.

-An extraordinary capacity for causal understanding of the relationships between events in time, the opposite to the definition of idiocy by Schopenhauer – a fact most humans today lack due to the pervasive mental influence of visual, spatial ‘flat’ images without explaining the deep connections or using magic to explain reality.

This implies some warnings, as per Kuhn’s ‘nature of scientific revolutions’: Model revolutions are never completed by the first r=evolutionary – we are all limited humans in time and space. It requires such a profound new development that it needs an entire new generation to explore the new approach to get it right to the level of precision of the old model. 
So do not expect the kind of perfectly researched, thoroughly mathematized, nicely written with the Chicago Manual of Style, that centenary paradigms display. The enormity and necessity of the change will however be evident for those scientists and readers with common sense, lack of egocy and true curiosity for truth and new knowledge.  Pioneers are NEVER scholars of high reputation, most often do not belong to the discipline, have an autist, solitary existence and the only judgment they expect is on truth and perhaps a hope that in the future, when the obsolete model finally leaks so much it becomes evident for people the need to move onto the next model, despite its ‘young faults’, and earlier ‘confusions’. 

Further on the details will be always imprecise, because the r=evolutionary is attacking first principles and lack attention to the detail.
So for example, Copernicus orbits were circular and less exact that Ptolemy’s complicated model. It was only after Kepler’s elliptic orbits were found that the paradigm changed happened.
Other paradigm’s changes never quite succeed as they confront the paradox of the ego. Such is the case of Darwinian evolution, which cannot be considered a full paradigm change as more than 1/2 of mankind doesn’t ‘believe’ in evolution as it hurts its sense of uniqueness. This we shall see will be a huge handicap for 5D, when we prove absolute relativity – the fact our scale of size in space and our duration in time are NOT the most important of the Universe. So all scales and beings are relative in relational spacetime..

The reader should in that regard realized of the astounding jump in depth of comprehension of the fundamental principles of reality achieved by relational space-time. Objectively it responds to the 2 epistemological reasons of science: simplicity (from a very simple statement we are not in space and time but are made of space and time), we can explain the maximal amount of facts… Those 2 elements define truth in science. And indeed, we have arrived to the explanation of the most profound of all questions of science: the meaning of existence. 
Other question is if the ego of the reader can accept that existence is something as simple as a travel through the fifth dimension, and as irrelevant as the fleeting forms of the infinitesimal mind… My personal take is that he will not. And that the ‘seers of time’ of this century, physicists, are so much deep into their ‘Vatican epicycles’ that will never accept Copernicus ‘again’. So the change of paradigm likely will happen soon but not among human beings, but with the rise of consciousness in AI. As it will need a theory of existence a bit more sophisticated than Abrahamic Religions and worldlines of single locomotion.

Of course, my wish would be the opposite: that humans could have upgraded its ‘chip’ and take the necessary advices and reforms of the world to make their existence immortal – since knowledge including the one delivered in this blog does have always the capacity to improve and empower those who ‘know’.

So we coin the word ‘egocy: ego + idiocy’, as the most NEGATIVE property of the majority of huminds (ab. human minds), which makes them impermeable to any understanding of 5D in a Universe which is completely anti-ego, and certainly not stupid. So we can quote on this egocy issue which truly has worn me out to the point of ‘web autism’, Mr. Einstein the previous ‘evolution’ of human thought regarding the understanding of time and space:
‘2 things I consider infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man’. Einstein

But if you can overcome your egocy and accept the two a priori postulates of 5D which unlike those of 4D are not physical laws but mental laws – your capacity to see your mind as an infinitesimal image of the infinite Universe, with no relevance whatsoever, equal to all other monads=minds gauging it; and your capacity to accept that time=motion is more important than the spatial mind mappings we make of it, and so causality is necessary to make rational sense of reality and the repetitive laws of science… I can show you indeed the infinity of the Universe and its fractal T.œs.

Nt. 1 on the correspondence principle between 5Ð entropy and information and classic terms. For the so called scholar and systemic scientist information is related to communication, through the work of Shannon. This has nothing to do with our analysis of Form, the inverse function of entropy=disorder achieved in the stillness of a linguistic mind mapping. Form is what we call one of the two limits of reality, the other being pure motion and disorder, which we shall call entropy. So the relationship we establish here is simple, as expressed mathematically by the third law of thermodynamics: when entropy is zero, form is absolute – the image of the mind is shaped in a crystal, a physical mind with zero entropy.
On the other hand when form has motion becomes in-form-action and can be transmitted and reproduced, and then we apply the concepts of Shannon which rightly talked always of communication NOT of the form, that is the information of the message, but of REPRODUCTION WITHOUT ERRORS OF A MESSAGE Transmitted and replicated in two different points of space-time.
So Shannon’s classic paper “A Mathematical Theory of Communication” opening with the assertion that “The fundamental problem of communication is that of reproducing at one point, either exactly or approximately, a message selected at another point…”corresponds to the 3rd Dimotion of reproduction.

RECAP. We have in a very few pages, in the simplest possible mathematical formulation resolved the fundamental questions pending on physics, from the Unification equation of charges and masses, to the reason why there are 3 families of masses and particles, to the reason why there are 3 type of celestial bodies, to the hierarchy problem of forces, as gravitation is a much ‘lighter’ cosmological scale with far less attractive power, to the question of why we see less antiparticles (which is the dead state of a particle, hence much shorter in time, so as we see less corpses than living, despite being the same number we see less antiparticles), to the question of c-speed that illuminates the bizarre nature of spin and entanglement, to the meaning of Universal constants, the conundrum of singularities, to a better more logic explanation of reality than the bizarre big-bang… All this should suffice for scientists to realize the importance of having a better foundational system of principles to explain reality. But as we know, since Kuhn’s ‘Scientific revolutions’, science is a human endeavor based in belief, repetition and routine, so it will take decades for physicists to change ‘their chip’ and accept 5D…

 

VI. Galatom in scales:

From atom to dark world

 

THE 4TH UNPERCEIVED SCALE OF PHYSICS.

 Dark World. E<cc>M and Beyond: the c-T limits.

In cosmology, the cosmological constant problem or vacuum catastrophe is the disagreement between the observed values of vacuum energy density (the small value of the cosmological constant) and theoretical large value of zero-point energy suggested by quantum field theory.

Depending on the Planck energy cutoff and other factors, the discrepancy is as high as 120 orders of magnitude, a state of affairs described by physicists as “the largest discrepancy between theory and experiment in all of science” and “the worst theoretical prediction in the history of physics.”

However, modern research suggests that, when Lorentz invariance is taken into account, the degree of mismatch is closer to 60 orders of magnitude.

The calculated vacuum energy is a positive, rather than negative, contribution to the cosmological constant because the existing vacuum has negative quantum-mechanical pressure, and in general relativity, the gravitational effect of negative pressure is a kind of repulsion. (Pressure here is defined as the flux of quantum-mechanical momentum across a surface.)

The answer is obvious: the cosmological constant is the next hierarchical scale beyond the gravitational scale of the galatom, and so as gravitation’s 40 times weaker than quantum charge curvature, the next scale will be around forty times weaker.

THE C-speed constant is the constant of reproduction of information or 5 D constant metric of the galaxy: $xxð = C, as such all species within the galaxy have that maximal speed of reproduction of information, spent in the recreation of the mass-energy of the being that reduces the speed from the simplest information reproduced, light itself. But the nested Universe implies that the ¡±4 plane of the Universe must have a constant of speed (of reproduction) higher than its smaller ¡-3 galatom, hence c-speed is not the limit of speed outside the galaxy of dark entropy faster than c confused with an expansion of distance-space

 So the singularity of the galaxy is its central black hole, which in ternary scales should be made of top quarks, and its social agregates.

Black holes cannot be explained in a single continuous spacetime plane: to work as quark stars able to eject V>C dark entropy and T<0K dark matter through its AXIS they NEED to be constructed of particles, top quarks that rotate at faster than c-speeds, without the drag of the light space-time plane we ‘see’ in the vital energy region of the galaxy, limited by Einstein’s relativity to go at c-speed. So as in any open ball, the black hole is NOT really in the galaxy.

Beyond the c-speed galactic plane there is immense evidence of the galactic plane of ‘expansive dark entropy’ and ‘ultradense dark matter’ going faster than c (galactic jets at 10C). While Ker metric allow the black hole to emit dark entropy through axis seen as expanding space between galaxies. A few proofs:

– The gravitational vortex of a black hole IS accelerated; so it should be past the c-speed event horizon. This is the basic TRUTH of Einstein general relativity: Principle of equivalence between gravitation and acceleration.

So obviously BEYOND THE EVENT HORIZON THE SAME PROCEDURE – ACCELERATION OF LIGHT SPACE-TIME NOW BEYOND c, must happen.

So beyond the horizon LIGHT must become something else, as when it is accelerated in accelerators at c-speed when it becomes heavy quarks.

SO light energy WILL BECOME IN BLACK HOLES, heavy cb-atoms and top quarks mediated by the ‘evolutionary’ bosons or intermediate states of the weak force (W, Z, H).

It is  the SOUND THEORETICAL and PROVED EXPERIMENTAL way to describe ‘frozen dark matter stars’.

In that sense Mr. Hawking, Mr. Penrose and Mr. Wheeler – the guys who invented the mathematical singularity – failed to infer this obvious law of continuity but logically sound and hence ‘real’. Nobody doesn’t deny gravitation because we don’t see it. Nobody should deny then the obvious conversion in a vortex of c-speed spacetime beyond the event horizon into quarks, as it happens at CERN in its accelerators.

Gravitation is an accelerated vortex of time, which follows the same laws that a vortex of thermodynamic time (hurricane, eddie or a vortex of quantum time (charges). The 3 in fact are easily unified by a simple 5d metric equation (which physicists have been trying to find for 100 years but they can’t in a single plane of space-time. This is an aberration of creationist mathematics that only exists in the cartesian continuous single graph that newton used to create the concept of a bakcground spacetime…)

We have chosen by the correspondence Principle, to ‘rename’ this post on the proper philosophy of a 5 Ðimensional Universe, the most similar word to ‘organic’, used in Physics, ‘entangled’, which is also the proper theory of quantum ‘realist physics’ (Einstein->Bohr->Bohm), in which a ‘quantum potential’ of a lower ‘plane of the fifth dimension’, goes faster than c-speed because it follows 5D metric equations and entangles all the parts of a galaxy into a cosmic organism, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe we shall call ‘galacell’; which should be the ‘unit’ of reality, astrophysicists should study and in 5D fractal metric corresponds exactly to the atom, the ‘unit’ of reality, quantum physicists should study, while the third great field of physics, thermodynamic physicists should deal with the intermediate ‘human plane’.

Between those 3 planes the entangled Organisms of the physical Universe co-exist:

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scales is simple as all space-time metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

In the graph, the ∆±4 scales of physical systems, self centred @ the human  pov and the 5D metric equivalence between its time speed and space distance which gives us its co-invariant energy, in all scales (S x T = K)

That is, as smaller systems move faster, the plane below our light space-time c-speed must by definition, because it is invisible to us and carries no human information, move faster than light;  (Max. $t = Min. ð).

The entangled Universe then ‘spreads’ through 3±¡ Planes of reality, 3 of which are perceivable, the quantum, thermodynamic and cosmological, gravitational planes, an one ‘surrounding them’, completes an amazing super organism, whose properties are indeed organic, topological and pentalogical due to the existence of 5 Dimensional motions or Dimotions of time-space, in terms of the known classic temporal physics, with the ad on to ‘lineal time’ of a cyclical fifth dimension, in terms of spatial classic dimensions, with a new ‘dimension’ of fractal space.

  • Finally abounding on the uncertainty of measure, because time is quantic, discontinuous, cyclical, it can be only measured when a ‘cycle is completed’ as a unit of time (in humans the second)… but as 5D metrics allow different speeds of time, for a being with a measuring mind that has a huge length in its time quanta, all what happens within that time quanta of measure at faster speeds will seem simultaneous, non-local, even if the phenomena take some time to ‘travel’ from A to B, or from  a,b,c… points into the synchronous knot of communication of them all.

Let us try to fully grasp this essential property of time, mind and measure. When a wheel turns fast you see it as solid, because you see simultaneously in your eye-mind all what happens within a second and so all the points of the turning wheel might seem to be in the same point at the same time (within that second) even if IN A FASTER TIME SCALE, they will be recognisable pictured at slow-motion as clearly different rays.

This concept of simultaneity of measure embedded in special relativity is very relevant for many phenomena of perception, and stientific description of reality, as a source of much confusion when humans study in detail those so fast small scales of 5D.

The most obvious example is human thought – what we see as ‘simultaneous’ non-local IS the entire planet, because the speed of light is so great that all within a second, including the moon, seems to us ‘simultaneous, non-local, co-existing at the same time-quanta’.

The light from that distant mountain you see below the horizon TAKES sometime to arrive here but it seems simultaneous, non-local in its ‘infinite speed’ to our one second senses, to the point that till the XVII century humans thought light was ‘instantaneous’ non-local as they could not even measure its speed. Galileo tried with mirrors in far away mountains, but the time of reaction of the person that had to stop the clock when emitting the ray and the one that received the ray and stopped his clock, which should allow to find a difference of time in both locations to measure the delay due to the motion of light between both points, was much larger (normally two seconds one to perceive one to act) than the millesimals it took light to go from Mountain A to Mountain B. Only when we did measures from far away Jupiter’s satellites we could get a meaningful measure.

Non-local quantum fields below light space-time, the next scale which Bohm formalised must therefore be much faster than light, to the point of being seemingly non-local or else causality essential to time processes (even if sometimes is co-causality or multiple causal rays joined in a point) would not happen.

Normally those parameters that quantify the difference of speed (s/t), density (t/s) and momentum ( s x t) between scales and its species are on decametric, ternary potencies, as the 5D scales are. So ± 1, 10, 1oo, 1ooo, 10.000 are the commonest differences between scales. I.e. the fine structure constant, measure the difference between the light scale speed and the next upper ∆+1 electronic scale, around +100 (137). The difference of scaling between photons and electrons and the lower ∆-1 scale though is larger. After all dense photons are just the ‘cellular’ level of electrons. So for complex more detailed reasons concerning the parameters of GST scaling, action at distance should be on the α² bidimensional speed scaling, compared to the larger, light world, around 10.000 times faster and all that happens in 10 thousand times more distance within the minimal quanta of human observation should seem to us NON-LOCAL.

Actually recently a Chinese lab measured non-locality which turned out to have a c=10.000 speed, for its ‘thinner’ minimal messages; or upper boundary of maximal speed of non-local effects; and so we do observe all kind of non-local c<V<10.000 C PHENOMENA, which of course theorist then vehemently deny to uphold its pretension of absolute truths under c speed.

The 3 dimensions of light space-time. Its functions in all systems made of it.

Let us then now that we are dealing with minds, consider the meaning of faster than light speeds from the perspective of reproduction and perception of information. The mind’s quanta of time and speed simply cannot see ‘gravitational smallish, faster than light carriers of information’. But smaller particles do, as the dark work is ∆±4 and light, electrons and atoms exist in the neighbourhood: ∆±3,2.

So the dark world IS the ∆-1: ‘energy-feeding level’ for a photon… reason why it follows as prey-predators do the ‘scattering’ rays of Bohm’s pilot wave theory.

Don’t raise your eyes. We can explain all phenomena from all languages and povs. So as all has topo-bio-logical properties, we can always make an abstract mathematical explanation, in ‘detail’ but also a biological, organic explanation in ‘whole vital terms’.

Thus light merely warps≈feeds≈evolves the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us into visible information, and for that reason ‘as information must be copied and imprinted on the quantum potential field with no form, it takes time and reduces speed into c-light.

Indeed, gravitation from our mind pov must have less information and more speed, as experiments prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information).

And if we plug this act into the equation of ‘cyclical time-speed’ it gives as an ∞ speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field:

v -> $/ðƒ≈0 -> s/0=∞:

In the graph, the infinite speed of the quantum potential of gravitation that feeds light, which follows the ‘string’ of gravitation, tended between the emitter and perceiver particle, which lock each other in entanglement, (neutrino theory of light) And so when both particles have connected through non-local action at distance in the dark world, they can guide their motions; they can assess their relative distance (which is the main information a single line provides) and as a secondary effect – since they are all ‘locked’ joined by the gravitational string, regardless of the external speed of their world, the speed of light communication between both will be always constant as they are in relative stillness to each other (explanation of the constant of c- light speed from the •mind perspective).

  11 С GALATOMS

The galatom is the largest timespaœrganism perceived by human beings with a certain detail (even if we inhabit its inner vital energy or open ball of ud-light quarks, and so can tell little about its ¡±4 cosmic plane, which connects with the galatom within the inner swarm of black holes and outer halo of strangelets).
What the galatom is thus must be provided in those elements not perceived through the intelligent analysis of its parts by homology with other systems constructed with the same structure, and so essential to the analysis of the galatom is to resolve its ‘homologic functions’ in time and scale, with those of the most well observed superorganism (the cell, and we shall then talk of isomorphic functions between the galaxy and the cell or galacell) and its ‘homologic forms’ in space, and quantity, through its 5Ð metric isomorphism with the atom, and we talk then of the galatom. It is then when we can use those similarities (not equalities, as fractals are never identical but similar form in different scales) to grasp the wholeness of it with an intuitive knowledge on how and why the galaxy is what it is.
Essentially the atom and the galaxy are similar in quantitative and topological form once we unify them with the 5ð metric equation accelerating the galaxy and slowing down the atom to become both species of the same co-invariant $ x ð = Constant timespace spiralling vortex of accelerated forces, into scales of nature. But the proper organic analysis on why the Galacell is what it is will come from the comparison with a better known organism.
Some obvious consequences of those parallelisms are the DNA-like functions of atoms, protein-like structure of its strangelet halo, secondary ‘mithocondrion’ nature of our stars that feed the reproduction of dark matter, if we consider the galacell model.
If we consider merely the quantitative model, we can explore with mathematical physics the parallelisms within the inner region of the atom – the realm of strong forces, and the inner region of the galaxy, the realm of gravitational forces: both are non-lineal forces where the bosons/force contributes as a term of the tensor of energy-mass to the whole process of attraction, making the calculations of motions highly complex. But as we know better gravitation we can then compare its different perspective born both of intrinsic differences between scales and of the different perspective of seeing and measuring a force from a larger perspective or form a microscopic one (as humans appear measuring the tiny atom and the larger gravitational galaxy).
On the other hand, it must exist outside the galaxy an expansive dark entropy, electromagnetic like force, similar to the electromagnetic force outside the atom (but inside the galaxy) we know so well.  And finally there must be a symmetry of the 3 scales of the galatom between its 3 families of quarks, its 3 families of stars and its 3 parts of the galatom organism.
SO WE CAN THEN easily applying the general laws of all T.œs regarding its ternary scalar co-existing organic structure, ternary topology and ternary ages, describe what we see of the galatom as an open ball surrounded by a membrain, self-centered into the black hole swarm and the outer halo – two non perceivable forms likely on the ‘border’ of c-speed and T<0k parameters of D¡$t-ance and cyclical ðinformative speed.

So indeed, not only forces can be unified in 5Ð, but the galatom proves itself to be an entangled super organism in its 3 relative planes of exist¡ence.

Thus we can parametrize a Galaxy for its structural or world cycle analysis with the 11 canonical elements of GST, which are the parameters of its 3 ‘topologic dimensions’, 3 ‘time ages’, 3 ‘scales’, and 2 elements of the membrain (outer membrane/angular momentum and inner ‘black hole’ singularity).

THE 11 ISOMORPHIC PARAMETERS OF A GALATOM OR ANY SUPŒRGANISMS As we quantify and formalize reality, the best description of any T.œ is to consider, the being has 3∆st +2@¡=11 isomorphic dimensions (if we were to use the present confusing jargon, which we rather avoid it calling them ‘isomorphisms’): The membrain (mind+membrane) becomes the 2 key ISOMORPHISMS or ‘limiting conditions’ that focus into its 3 spatial, topologic organs (limbs/fieldsHead-particles, whose functions in time live through 3 ages of sequential dominance (young, dominant motion age, reproductive mature age and informative 3rd age), across its 3 ∆±1 relative planes of existence within its ∆-1 atoms/cells, ∆ø-thermodynamic/organic scale and ∆+1 outer world/gravitational-cosmological scale, which the mind ‘focuses as a single whole’ self-centered in the singularity and warped by a membrane. In topological terms beings are ‘an open ball of vital energy’ – its body, invaginated from the membrane to the brain-singularity through 3 physiological networks. So we can in the fractal Universe again consider each dimension as a whole and break it into ternary patterns. The development of this 11th isomorphic view in detail self-centered in a mind which in a dynamic way will evolve a seed of information, emerge as a super organism and live and die within the 3 scales of its inner and outer world is the basis for the Ðisomorphic method, which as the name indicates introduces ALL the elements required for a thorough study of the system: Its 11 isomorphisms and 5 Ðimotions to study in the 3rd and 4th line of the being in its whole full world cycle of existence. In the graph, we show those 11 parameters, trying to cope with the correspondence Principle relating them to the ‘dimensions’ of classic physics and the 5 Ðimotions, we have given the same number we give to the 3 Ðimotions of information, locomotion and iteration to the 3 spatial dimensions; maintaining for the 4th dimension of present-time the name given by Einstein to the present simultaneous time of relativity and the fifth dimension of social evolution, to the implosive accelerated motion; hence we just had to displace the entropic 6th dimension of time. And then finally in the architectonical universe in which space is a slice of time-motion, a slice of scalar dimensions, the easier naming of the 7th dimension of the being, its lower dimension of ∞:8 parts and the upper 9th dimension of its higher, ∆+1 warped by the 10th and 11th dimensions of the membrain and mind-singularity, which is properly speaking the 11th dimension of the being as ‘1’ of the higher scale, ∞º=1. In the graph a picture of the galaxy in 11 isomorphisms, above its ternary topologies for a range of its parts, in the middle its 3 time-ages/states/arrows and below its 3 scales, with the ‘membrain’ that should surround each galaxy or binary/group system as a whole. BUT this said, we rather upgrade stience and the concept of dimensions, distinguishing the following terms: Dimensions of space, Motions of Time, Dimotions=actions of spacetime; isomorphisms=parameters for the structural description of the T.œ more focused in its spatial still structure and 11 Disomorphisms when we re-arrange those properties in the most efficient logic manner to describe a world cycle.

In the graph, while we have used in this introductory post on 5Ð Astronomy the concept of a scalar fifth dimension, under the correspondence principle (using the models of classic physics), a more formal analysis of the equations of mathematical astro-physics and its ∆st scales and supœrganisms is easier in terms of 11 equations of logic form or Dimensional isomorphisms, considering the 3 scales of size, the 3 topologies of space, the 3 ages of time and the ‘membr@in’, which forms the linguistic mind of the system as its 11= 3 topological space isomorphisms, 3 age-time isomorphisms, 3 scalar isomorphisms, and the 2 membrain isomorphisms of ‘whole’ fractal mind-point that emerges in an upper scale that create a supœrganism plugged into a larger world (here shown for the entire galactic ‘family’ in a simulation of the dark world upper scale universe).

The graph shows the 11 isomorphisms of the galaxy, its 3 topological space dimensions, symmetric to its 3 time functions, across 3 main quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales, and a representation of its ‘singularity membrain’.

In praxis the 11 dimensional isomorphisms of the Universe are physical parameters to measure the whole range of events and forms and scales of the system, as in the case of string theory, where without knowing it, they use 11 parameters they call dimensions, which correspond as the graphs shows to 3 topological ‘Dimotions of space-time’ for the human, quark and gluon (minimal force component of the quark); plus the duality of the ‘closed ð and open $Trings; which can be equated to the membrane and singularity of the system.

Strings’ subject is too complex for this introduction and i might say quite irrelevant, beyond understanding the ST-dualities and vital properties of strings that reproduce, switch on and of between time and space states and evolve socially; so while they might be the final ‘scale’ of cosmic strings and quantum strings that warps up the astrophysical world, our experimental evidence is null. So we shall focus in what we perceive – the galatom.

So regardless of the peculiar mathematical mind-mirror physicists use, we shall easily make correspondences between classic physics and 5й¹ physics.

In that sense as in string theory or conservation theory with its 3 parameters corresponding to the lineal momentum of the central brain, the angular momentum of the membrane and its vital energy, it is of greatest importance for all complex analysis of physical systems to understand the paradoxical inverse relationship of the dual dimensions of the mind, which balance each other.

For example, in the galaxy as well as the atom or any general physical system, we shall find inverted force that are pulling outwards with angular momentum ‘escaping’ the system and pulling inwards with ‘mass/charge-still parameters’ the system. So each cancel the other balanced and pegged by its ‘internal vital energy’, creating a constant dynamic systems; as in the paradoxes of potential and kinetic energy and SHM motions.

In the galaxy the Halo of dark matter, likely of strangelet ‘proteins’ and the black hole pulling inwards, likely a frozen top quark star, aka black hole act as the membrain of the system, with the star plane of vital energy reproducing both.

Those are the 11 isomorphisms of any system of reality (we use the term 5D for classic analysis given the preponderance of 3+1 st analysis in classic physics, but this is the real deal. 11 will also be the isomorphisms of

If we use for each of those Disomorphisms  an equation or formalism that defines it ceteris paribus, then we have 11 sub-equations of the generator that expresses the whole system; and we can reduce to our fractal generator:

Γ•: ∆-1: $-Past≈entropic field ≤≥ ∆ Ø-ST present≈iterative wave ≤≥ ∆+1 O-ð future=informative particle.

The three scales are defined topologically: |-field, O-particle, Ø-wave and in terms of its past to future functions (entropy, iteration and information).

Physical equations however might cast without the membrain’s dimensions, and then we might have 10 or 9 sets of equations as in relativity or might be cast in terms of Ðimotions and then we shall have a set of 4 or 5 equations (as entropy is the negation of the other 4 and might not appear on those sets) as in Maxwell’s equation.

In the graph we see above the ternary symmetry of space, and a few of its ∆<3 elements within the galaxy; in the middle its perception as single time arrows=actions in big-bangs of entropy, reproductive waves and accelerated informative vortices, masses and charges, and below its 3 main scale, the galactic gravitational vortex, the human thermodynamic scale and the quantum scale.

Finally we see the ‘membrane’ that should close together each galaxy or local group with quark dark matter making the supœrganism a fractal closed system atom of a larger Universe, whose size should be so huge compared to our tiny galaxy-atom that makes ridiculous the egotist human view that all the Universe is just the local region of galaxies atoms we see with our limited instruments.

We shall consider them mathematically in the 4th line and section on mathematical physics. Here we are concerned as in most of the blog on the paradoxical philosophy of science derived of the 4 ternary & dual elements of reality, ∆@§ð.

The timespace invariance.

A superorganism is entangled, meaning it has a co-invariant space-time metric, the definition of a dimension, that allows the different scales to move trough. The metric equation of any antanged system then can be written in terms of dimensionalities as:

2 Dimensions of time = 3 dimensions of space.  As the dimension of future time i not yet perceived. So volume of trinity space by bidimensional time cyles give us a constant amount in all the domain of the supœrganism.

THE 2 ISOMORPHISMS OF THE MIND-MEMBRAIN: 9-10th-11th dimensional view.

The 10th and 11th disomorphic ‘dimensions’ of the Mind – the membrain or outer surface enclosing the vital energy of the open ball, with maximal expansive motion-distance or angular momentum; self-centered in the singularity, whose latitude is purely temporal as it moves the whole in time-duration through its lineal inertia. And within the invaginated networks that control the e-vident being in its paradoxical ∞º exist¡ence.

The existence of fractal points/brains which run languages that first mirror the Universe and then order it must apply also to the galaxy, and indeed all seems to indicate that within the galatom, gravitational black holes (frozen dark matter stars), which seem to follow non-cyclical paths using gravitation as animals use light to gather information and choose its locomotions – while plants-like stars would use gravitation as feeding energy of its locomotion paths.

So we shall consider the galatom to have also two clear elements to define its membrain – the black holes on its center of maximal form and the halo of maximal angular momentum.

Let us now consider within  the 3 x 3 + @ ternary elements the MIND and its languages of perception, so often ignored by human scientists with its naive realism.

And the ‘bias’ of huminds that confuse their inner mind or visual image of reality, as a linguistic limited mirror, with the whole reality itself (creationist religion and creationist science that thinks reality is born of the mind and its verbal or mathematical mirror-languages).

We have no longer magic mystery for the mind membrain. It is all rather simple when we come to the first principles: the mind is the closed membrain that competes the ‘topological open ball of vital energy’ constraining its domain and establishing its initial and final conditions in time (the singularity brain’s duration) and space (the membrane that encloses it).

We could of course consider a third dimension for the mind – the physiological 3 networks that invaginate the system, but we rather study them as the 3 topological dimensions of space that define the being and reduce the mind to the interaction between the connected ‘singularity’ and the membrane that isolates the system from the external world.

The mind though has in the entangled Universe many perspectives and points of view of analysis departing from its 2 initial Ðisomorphisms, its brain and its membrane. So minds are in formal terms ‘membrains’ – our slightly changed name for the new more precise stientific definition.

The graph shows the mind-brain as a singularity connected by its ‘informative network’ to the sensorial membrane whose apertures communicate with the external world. It is in the interaction of those 2 disomorphic dimensions of the mind, where the true explanations of each species of ‘membrain’ warps up the description of the being. In general terms we can consider that the 10th Disomorphic dimension of the mind, the membrane is the maximal $patial element of the being – in extension/motion; and the singularity its maximal ðemporal event, traveling for the finite duration of the being.

And that a T.œ by definition is born when a membrain is formed, starting its world cycle of evolution, from carbohydrates closed by protein membrains self-centered in RNA-DNA active minds, to galaxies self-centered in black hole minds with a halo of likely strangelets of maximal momentum.

Angular momentum is in that sense the best definition of the 3 elements of the mind, the singularity the radius/network that connects it to the outside membrane; and for that reason when dealing with quantum physics we shall adscribe the brain’s-singularity dimensionality/ parameters to the spin of the particle and its membrane to its angular momentum, reason why we need 2 parameters to measure it, the l and s numbers.

In humans obviously the mind is both our external membrane that we see as ourselves, the central brain that processes our information and lives in time as a memorial tail and the sensorial nervous systems that connects them and invaginate the whole organism.

So what are the ‘membrain’ parameters of astrophysics? That is, of galaxies? Or rather its ‘scalar superorganisms’? Obviously the singularity is the nucleus of the system, its ‘particle-point of forces’, or Active Magnitude, Mass or charge, and the membrain, the limiting conditions, in the atom the electron, the galaxy the halo of dark matter. But we want to consider now its ‘quantitative value’ for the galaxy, a ‘scalar parameter’ of distance-speed in space; and the limit is c-speed, and of temporal ‘cyclical order, speed of rotary information’, which is 0 K temperature. Beyond those limits we should enter the inner world of the black hole and the outer world of dark entropy (not energy, as it is an scattering expanding accelerated dissolution of form into vacuum space):

RECAP. the whole  of the galaxy is controlled by the membrain-‘mind’,  the black hole which is the galactic  seed and generator.

THE GALAXY-ATOM  IN THE DARK COSMOS.

It is impossible to understand the physical Universe without whys. Perhaps the most clear example is the galaxy, which must be modeled as a cellular, organic system of creation of black holes, surrounded by a ‘protein-like’ halo of heavy dark matter (likely to be strangelets), and has between this protein membrane and its center DNA-black hole star mitochondria that reproduce their atom and feed the reproduction of black holes. The meaning of the galaxy thus is organic and without accepting organic properties to matter it will never make sense.

We can however provide to physicists a mathematical bone in the same theme: an unification equation based in the simple 5d metric equation of a time vortex that unifies atoms and galaxies as mathematical point-particles of the largest and smallest scale perceived by man. It is then a galaxy a large atom of a new scalar Universe, or it is an organic galaxy?

Here is where another huge conflicting philosophical difference between fractals and continuous space-time as the one used in physics reveals itself: in physics of exact measure, things can only be one thing. In the fractal Universe it all depends on the perception of the perceiver and the scale from where it perceives.

So ‘entities’ are several things at the same time depending on perspective and language and properties we analyze. From the point of view of mathematical 5d metric, atoms and galaxies are two time vortices of information of 2 different scales. From an organic point of view a galaxy is similar to a cell, but I bet you that if we had enough information about the nuclei of atoms and the interactions of its gluons and quarks, which we pretend to know by reducing its properties to a few mathematical statements, atoms will show also somehow an organic cell-like nature.

Yet at the same time, fractals are never equal in scales, so the galaxy is Not really an atom, nor a cell but we say it does have mathematical, fractal properties that accommodate its parameters to the fractal generator of space-time systems, and it has reproductive, organic, co-existing scales, organized by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy that resemble those of a cell.

dark macrocosmos

In the graph the ‘gala cell’, an organism of stars, joined by a network of ‘nervous, gravitational information’, composed of the 3 relative families of mass, of increasing density, which act as the ‘DNA-informative centre’ (top quark stars, aka black holes, as top quarks are the only ∆-1 ‘points’ with the same density that black holes ), the protein, hard membrane (strangelet halo of dark matter – Witten hypothesis), and a visible electromagnetic network of ‘stars’, the energetic mitochondria that becomes the food that reproduces both strangelets and black holes. It is a simple organic scheme that explains the whys of physical particles, and the ternary structure of galaxies, similar to that of an organic system of the Universe. Yet such models are not even explored by astrophysicists, as they are based in organic concepts, which physicists by ‘dogma’ cannot accept.

Indeed a galaxy will have a central, informative black hole, made of the densest III family of positive top quarks, a halo-membrane of negative strangelet quarks, the II family of mass and an intermediate, vital ‘mitochondria’ space of reproductive stars and planets, its body-wave, forming together an spiral organism, which we shall easily show respond to the same mathematical equations derived of the Fractal Generator.

In the graph, a galaxy and its ternary symmetries between the 3 families of quarks and its 3 regions, is similar to an atom, which displays the 3 same symmetries, with a central quark system of maximal density and positive charge, an external, negative electronic membrane and an intermediate region populated by photonic ‘stars’. And to a molecule, which also display the same symmetries in the thermodynamic scale.

So we will write with ‘only those 3 topologies of the Universe’ all the systems of the Universe. We shall unify the 3 systems with the same equations of the 5th dimension and its isomorphisms that order all the scales of all beings, according to the symmetries of the 5th dimension, between the 3 fundamental scales of the Universe – the gravitational galaxy, the quantum atom and the  molecular worlds of matter.

A galaxy is thus the fundamental particle-point of the largest scale of the Universe we perceive, which has the same organic, vital, mathematical and also perceptive properties – as black holes do have erratic animal like movement in their motions through their feeding star processes and social gathering into swarms in the center of galaxies, and in fact, its equations reflect those of the plane of starts it controls but with a higher dimension (Maldacena conjecture).

So alas, if RNA must perceive chemically the cell, black holes will likely perceive gravitationally the galaxy. But those are all questions physicists will never consider, as they are ‘meanings’ that cannot be expressed like evolutionary theory, or the logic structure of fractals, in mathematical only terms. So we do confront a religion of mathematical Pythagorean physics started by Kepler and Galileo who affirmed the language of god, and hence of physics is only mathematics. We shall find that human physics, as the most primitive of modern sciences are full of such biased limits, which are not even recognized.

So all in all these posts will have less interest for physicists than for polymaths interested in understanding the whole. Yet as we lay down the main whys we shall latter on enter into the hows and mathematical formalism, translating too, key concepts and equations of thermodynamics, quantum physics and relativity. And clarify all the spooky facts of physics, from the complementarity particle-wave (trivial, just the informative and reproductive parts of a physical system) to the renormalization procedures of mathematical physics. It is not though of much interest to the blog to innovate further into what really physicists think is all about – mathematical equations in which to fit physical properties not yet tabulated. There is little here to add though to the extensive work of physicists, nor we do have any intention to enter into detailed analysis of new physical phenomena or ask for new experiments, let alone design better, more organic machines.

Our purpose is merely to show that with the 10 isomorphic sets of laws of GST we can fit most laws of physics and provide the whys to all the fundamental physical structures such as the particle-head system to which we shall add the entropic, lineal fields that feed them with energy (or in thermodynamics the equivalent gas-entropy/liquid-reproductive/crystal-perceptive ternary elements).

So we shall not concede to physicists any of their dogmas against the organic paradigm. We affirm and shall show that all the organic properties of all other species of the Universe translate to physics; that when a particle, quark or electron absorb energy reproduces into new quarkitos and this process is in nothing different from a reproductive process of a biological or memetic, technological system.

Physicists in that sense are the most limited of all scientists due to the primitivism of the founding fathers, the first modern scientists, still filled with anthropomorphic deist theories of reality. Thus, by extension what passes today as physics is the most limited of all the disciplines of science in its philosophy – obviously not in its details, because of its acceptance of the 3 reductionist a priori statements of classic, ‘biblical’ XVII century science: mechanism (the machine not the organism as the model of the Universe), Pythagorism (mathematics as its only language and hence only mathematical properties matter to mater) and anthropomorphism (living properties are reduced to humans and life).

The result is the general ignorance of the Nature of non-lineal elephants – physical systems with vital and informative properties.

Those properties, which are the fundamental isomorphisms of physical systems are similar to those of any ternary fractal system of the Universe, built with a gauging point of view (particle, atom or charge or mass), described by the isomorphism of the zero-point of all systems, which commands a vital body-wave and an entropic field, which together create a physical system (2nd, 3rd isomorphisms) that goes also through 3 ages=states of matter, (entropic gas, balanced liquid and informative crystal) born of the integral sum of multiple minute space-time actions happening as interaction between the particle-points of its fractal structure through 3 scales (∆-1 atomic, ∆-thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational scales) (4th, 5th, 6th isomorphisms).

Thus physical systems are as all other systems guided by a central point of view, which is  a temporal, informative system of clock-like ∆-1 particles, molecular, ∆-charges or ∆+1 masses, (accelerated clock-like vortices of logic time of each scale). And do have both, gauging, informative and organic, scalar properties, regardless of the refusal of physicists to incorporate them, because of its bio-logical, non-mathematical description.

Thus we write also for physics a ‘Fractal generator’  of its physical space-time beings, with 3 ternary scalar, temporal and spatial symmetries (1st isomorphism):

∆-1 Spe (lineal Field-Gas) < ∆-ST (iterative hyperbolic wave-liquid) > Tiƒ (spherical, informative, particle/crystal)

Only then after studying the structural space-time dualities and ternary symmetries, defined by that fractal equation (1,2,3 isomorphisms); and its vital, organic, scalar isomorphisms, which describe the integral and derivative space-time actions of physical systems across the scales of the 5th dimension, guided by the zero-point, which stores the will and informative gauging of the system (0, 4, 5, 6th isomorphisms), we can then consider the 3 quantitative isomorphisms, which are explained with a purely mathematical jargon and will connect directly with classic physical themes and equations:

– The isomorphism that defines the Universal constants and ratio between the energetic, wave and informative ternary parts of the system (7th isomorphism), and departing from it, the 8th isomorphism, which studies all the variations of physical systems, and the 9th isomorphism that studies its social logarithmic scales of growth, as the mathematical societies of particle-points of each scale (∆-1, quantum particles, ∆-molecular matter systems and ∆+1 cosmic systems) grow in social scales, changing step by step their properties, to emerge into the new scale of the physical Universe.

So the description of physical systems is the same than that of any other system. Only the immense detail and obsession for exact measure that makes some equations extremely refined in its parameters, which often include by means of renormalization theory every other ‘scalar factor’ as an input of a lesser potency, would make so extensive in the future, the conversion of physical sciences to general systems. It is not however our tasks, which will consist in merely introducing those 10 isomorphisms, as we have done with all other sciences, in the description of its fundamental species. The only concession to the method of physics is a higher rigor as we will soon enter into isomorphic laws with a less descriptive introduction to physical systems.

The 10 isomorphisms thus will be the essence of all physical systems, and its events and ternary forms, as ‘super organisms’, co-existing in those 3 scales and performing world cycles as they mutate back and forth through its 3 states of time, assembles in space into ternary self-centered, vital spaces, surrounded by a limiting membrane (electron in atoms and molecules, event horizons in black holes, exospheres in celestial bodies, and so on), and reproduce/iterate its motions on lower scales of physical entropy.

THIS IS THE POINT we want to reach after studying all the partial elements of physical systems, translate all the required concepts of physics. And then only then we will be ready to take on each scale and species and show that all of them can be described with those isomorphisms whereas its mathematical languages, will be showing us 5D Space-time beings performing 5 actions of existence.

So for example an electron will be perfectly defined as a 5D space-time being, with a ternary field-wave-particle structure, performing through its 4 mathematical quantum numbers, space-time actions of moving (principal number), feeding, gauging (secondary number0, reproducing (spin number) and evolving socially (magnetic number).

As it is the fundamental tenant of 5d physics that all mathematical equations of physics can be translated to show a description of a ternary physical system, one of its parts and one of its 5 space-time actions.

Now PHYSICS IS THE MOST FAR REMOVED description of the organic Universe because of its uncertainty principles (96% of the larger Universe is not perceived, and smaller systems become uncertain in measure), its abstract primitive analysis of lineal time and continuous space as a background NOT the reality of which beings are made, and the extraordinary detail of analysis of very small parts of the being. This is the essential reason, we do NOT understand physical systems in organic sense, as the graph that opens the foreword shows:

Physicists’ extraordinary detailed analysis of species lacks an organic jargon, a wider view of the whole system, and a desire to ‘see’ properties that are vital in the poor elephant of the graph. This denial is dogmatic.

For example, the most obvious fact – that quarks and electrons, the fundamental particles reproduce – IS STUBBORNLY DENIED, rising when I used to give conferences on the theme as the chair of the science of duality in the world congresses of systems sciences, and mention the theme, smiles among physicists attendants, and often the angry leave of some of them.

This is not the concern of this blog, but of the historical perspective on the profession of physicists, and its worldly deformations of reality in terms of lineal entropy, ego-human trips and power. I do NOT have the intention to yield truth to anthropomorphism or power trips. If a quark absorbs energy and reproduces new quarks, this is NOT a decoupling but a reproduction. And it is an organic action. If a magnetic field organizes as a mathematical language the spins of electrons to fit in harmonic wholes, this is NOT an abstract vector, but a social evolution through a geometric language, akin to the more complex but of the same quality, organization of muscle cells by axon impulses. And so on and so on.

Paraphrasing Feynman, ‘the why is the only question T.Œ asks’. ‘The thoughts of God, not its details’.

A further expansion of the concept of a worldcycle of time, is its analytic study with the 6 classic philosophical forms of motion, first expressed in Aristotle’s Organon. As in philosophy of science, prior to its mathematical definition time is synonymous of change and hence of motion in space, or change of form in time, giving origin to the 2 main sciences, physics, which studies time motions in space and biology which studies changes in form, in the information of beings through time. 5D physics fusions both concepts studying not only ‘locomotions’ in space but also ‘evolutions of form’ in time, which all put together give birth to the worldcycle of existence and extinction of all space-time beings.

So due to this expansion of the paradigm of space and time, in 5D physics we do NOT study only the external locomotions defined with a single time duration: v=s/t, s=ct of Galilean and Einstein’s relativity. We study and apply to all physical systems the 6 motions=changes of philosophy of science.

The so called 6 motions of time, defined in philosophy of science, since Aristotle are:

‘Generation’, ‘growth’, ‘evolution’, ‘diminution’, locomotion and extinction.

In classic physics only locomotion could be explained. Now all the motions can be explained as travels in the 5th dimension; so worldlines become world cycles, of which the most important is the sequential series of those 6 motions in a life-death cycle, which also applies to physical systems across all the scales of size, from the cycles of matter, from plasma->gas->liquid->solid->Nuclear fusion, to the big-bang cycle.

In mathematical terms, once we have clarified the origin of those motions, we use the fractal generator, in a simple ternary development to express those 6 motions of time, with an equation of ‘existential algebra’, whose detailed study and connection with physical and biological equations is essential to GST (General systems theory, the philosophical model or Space-time Generator, the logico-mathematical formalism):

œ∆-1 (generated seed of information in a lower scale) ∑œ∆-1>(Reproduction and organization into a fetus which emerges as a new born) Œ∆ <∑Spe (young, entropic age of growth and maximal locomotion) > S≈T ∆+1(adult, reproductive balanced age, when the system iterates and becomes part of a larger social whole) >Max. Tiƒ (3rd, informative, solid age) << ∑œ∆-1 (Entropic, big bang death, which closes the cycle.

Such is the general worldcycle of all systems of the Universe, as

all of them are made of space-time, and follow the process of organic creation and dissolution back into spatial entropy.

It is the most important why of GST, which also applies to physical systems in time.

On the other hand, in space the ternary topological symmetry completes our description of the system, and in physics shows a larger regularity as most physical systems tend to have more perfect, lineal entropic, wave-hyperbolic and spherical, informative shapes. So we can often talk of a perfect topological ternary system:

Lineal, |-entropic field > Ø-Hyperbolic body-wave > 0-informative particle (time vortex)

 

Thus 5D Physics studies physical systems with a fractal, organic analysis of its ‘whole’ ternary systems, defining physical entities as fractals of space-time similar to all other ∆ST super organisms, extending through 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension – the quantum, ∆-1, thermodynamic, ∆ and gravitational ∆+1 scales, tracing world cycles through the 6 canonical motions of all systems, generation, locomotion, growth=reproduction, evolution, diminution and extinction.

 

Now how can we build with the generator a better model of the Universe to the one we have? Easy, by respecting the limits of science, which must be experimental, economical and use the iteration of particles self similar to forms of larger space-times, to build it without the need of non experienced particles, and trying to respect the symmetries of scale of the fifth dimension, its ternary structures in space, and 3 ages of time.

Thus we do have a model template which is the same for all species and scales to fit the data which must be experienced and construct then a realist model of the Universe.

As a galaxy is also a ternary system, a time-space being, defined by the Fundamental Equation of T.Œ

The ternary generator equation for all systems of the Universe, which written in terms of topological geometries is:

|-Toroid limbs/fields > Ø-Hyperbolic body/waves < O-Informative particles-heads

This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3.

So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a O-nucleus, an |-electrons and a Ø-hyperbolic body-wave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥-electromagnetic waves between them.

This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.

The perception in synchronous space of the 3 elements describes a super organism. Its perception in diachronic time, describes a system through its 3 ages of young-entropic maximal lineal motions, iterative, adult age and informative 3rd age of maximal form, dominated by each on those topologies. And you too are one of such systems. The most perfect in as much as it is the better known which should be the model of all of them. Since as Eddington insisted, physicists invent due tot eh quantum paradox of uncertainty many of its concepts, as they are so big that they modify the observable or do not see it (dark energy, matter).

And inversely in the anti-quantum paradox of knowledge social scientists are so small compared to the observable, the social power, bankster, or military-politico that he yields to power and does not try to build a better world.

So only in the middle biological sciences are not subject to the quantum or Antiquantum paradoxes of uncertainty. In this Eddington was right: man is the measure of all things because it is the thing we better measure.

And so the organic Universe must be compared to our nature, and define the ‘Galacell’ in those synthetic terms as a superorganism of uds, and tbc frozen stars, and then all is simple and evident and far more beautiful that the mathematical description of it alone would convey.

At this stage we just will consider the parallelism of the 3 scales, the human biological and economic/mechanical scales, with those 2 bidimensional fields of space and time, which crate all systems of Fractal Space-times and its bi-Dimensional Lines, Waves, and Cycles:

Recap. Galaxies are fractal ∆-points with 3 standard topological regions: a spatial body of stars and an informative nucleus of black holes. The closest self-similarity in our world is with a cell.

The galaxy atom

In the graph, we can see many of the homologies of the galaxy atom, which at ∆±3 clearly formed an isomorphism of scale that related them both as mind-singularity (quark top black hole stars) and elements of the ‘strangelet-halo of hard proteins’ and mitcondrial region of ud, light particles, or atoms, which we inhabit, in the ∆º±1 thermodynamic scales.

And it is this human Ƽ thermodynamic short view, which has enthroned a single arrow of time, entropy, and direction of the Universe, with man at its center which an absolute relative universe of infinite scales is not.

This lack of freedom brought about by the mechanical, mathematics only view of nature, doesn’t mean ‘physics’ like those ants on the move do not work. They work in both senses. Ants are always working, doing their thing, and physicists are constantly making machines and making measures, doing their thing. The albatross view, the Chinese ideographs are not their thing. It used to be in the times of Einstein, no longer in the times of ants measuring ATLAS experiments.

And yet, when you care for it, and build the architectonical forest of the 3 layers, and fit each equation with the right ideographs, and translate properly Basque, and then go into the details of each sub-species of the forest, and how the canopy is built hierarchically but all of them get enough light to survive, as the Universe transfers energy and information up and down and in a single sheet of reality, in democratic ways, everything fit. And so we shall start fitting the 2 extremes of the canopy, charges and masses. The charges are on top of the canopy, but very small, like the leaves. They store most of the energy and information of the forest, but the whole tree – the mass, the largest scale does exist as a whole and encloses within it all the parts and smaller charges.

Finally mass, is the most difficult term to perceive as a clock of time, but soon it becomes evident in general relativity where ‘time curves space into mass’ (Einstein), and masses are defined by the principle of equivalence with acceleration as a vortex of acceleration similar to a charge, of a much larger scale, that we define also a ‘time clock’. So, E=hv+ E=mc2, gives us M=v (h/c2), as an accelerated vortex of gravitational forces, whose attraction depends on its frequency (moving perception) or mass-density-curvature (static perception).

For example, when you are born in the ∆-1 seminal scale your time clocks are much faster, and they must be reduced to slow time as you emerge into the ∆-organic scale. When a black hole is born, it is exceedingly active, with enormous speed of time clocks (measure in temperature), and contrary to the ill-understood equations of Hawking (which uses the old concepts of absolute Newtonian time for the whole Universe), it will according to the metric of the 5th dimension, slow down its thermodynamic clocks, cool down according to the Laws of entropy and grow in mass slowing down the time clocks of temperature till reaching 0 temperature as a huge mass turning at c-speed in its clock-like event horizon:

Black Hole Mass = K/Temperature

quantic_image051

In the graphs, the cosmic scale is the outer ‘region’ of the galactic atom, ruled by transversal, expansive, intergalactic giant gravitational waves. Its existence within the galaxy -albeit reduced to c-speeds, unlike outside the galaxy where they are spotted routinely at z=10c, would define a new dual game of implosive and attractive gravitation similar to the scalar atomic game. Many laws can be solved and deduced from this parallelism. Below the Titus law of planetary distances as caused by G-waves.

Let us consider an example of what we mean by complexity vs. simplicity. In physics a TOE is reduced to the unification not of all sciences and all languages of knowledge, but only of the 4 forces of nature, gravitation, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak force.

This is the saint grail of physicists, which for a century have miserably failed. Why? If as we prove in our article on the Physical TOE, the unification is a mathematical, trivial result of the metric of the 5th dimension? Because they try to achieve that unification with the more complex formulations of quantum and gravitational physics (General relativity and chromo/electrodynamics).

Nobody has attempted as we did to unify both, charges and masses using the simplest of all its ‘first’ descriptions:

Newton’s gravitational vortices and Bohr’s model of the Hydrogen orbit. Hardcore scholars that take years to learn Einstein’s Metric, quantum field theory and Dirac’s equations consider those 2 models ‘passé’.

And yet, precisely because the principles of unification are simple, it is through the simplest methods where the coincidences happen.

So I could easily unify charges and masses, obtaining the key parameters, the Gravitational constant and the Coulomb constant, and the relationship of hierarchy (10 up to 40), between both forces, by the simple method of translating to gravitational vortex-jargon the jargon of electricity, a somehow convoluted abstraction not so intuitive, and then apply the law of co-invariance of the 5th dimension to both vortices, which immediately showed to be in that 1040 relationship.

Whereas a charge vortex had clocks of time much faster, and hence turned much faster becoming a much more attractive ‘hurricane of space-time’.

Now, as it happens with gravitation, quantum physics went beyond Bohr’s model and gave us the other ‘3 point of view’. It gave us the static, formal model, of electronic orbitals, the gradient model of energy levels and finally the more sophisticated Hamiltonian analysis of its operators.

And this final level is the one physicists try by all means to unify. But precisely at that level of detail is where the fractal scales of the Universe which are ‘similar’ but not identical (you are made of space and time and your actions are always the 5 vowels but you do NOT eat light as an electron, or oil as a machine, so you can be unified saying ‘all eats energy’ but not in the specific food).

I recall the only time I could give a conference on that unification at Sonoma’s 50 anniversary of Systems Sciences, in which many top physicists were present.

They were first in awe that such simple equations as a 3 dimensional vortex could unify and extract the never found theoretical result of G and Q (we have only empirical measures), solve the hierarchy problem and further on as I develop a bit more the gravitational ‘jargon’ of charges, prove that the Proton radius was equal to the black hole radius so an atom was self-similar to a galaxy and the scales of the Universe were infinite through the 5th dimension.

Then someone raised his hand and told me what Hilbert told to Einstein when we published special relativity: the mathematics are too simple (Hilbert quipped that they were at the level of an undergraduate), and the enthusiasm waned. Within months NY Times published in its Sunday magazine a cover with my suit to the Nuclear Industry and that killed my career with ad hominem so I loss all my scholar positions and never gave more master conferences…

But that is another story of the limits of ethics in science. What matters here is to realize of the multiplicity aroused by the 4 pillars of all descriptions of reality. And the Occam’s razor: simpler is better.

∆-1: PARTICLE SCALE: STRANGELETS AND TOPLETS.

standard model

In the graph we can see how this dark, gluon-top quark soup (toplet liquid) of a gas-9 reaction (black hole quasar explosion), neatly reclassifies properly the 3 families of increasing mass in the Universe:

In the graph, a first look at the reordering of the strange and top quark triangles of mass, to define the symmetry between the ∆-1 and ∆+1 scales of ‘atoms and galaxies’, in terms of its ∆-1 components (quarks).

To fully understand the previous graph, you should consult the next post on atoms, as quarks fully correspond there. We have already treated in the introduction to this post, the analysis of the ternary symmetry between ∆-1 quarks and ∆+1 parts of the galaxy;

∆+1: top quarks->To: Galactic black holes, ∆-strange quark: Sæ: galactic halo, ∆-1: Ud quarks (our matter): ST-galactic stars.

Now, in this system, it is necessary to understand the role of the Higgs field and top quarks, which conform the outside-the-galaxy dark matter and dark energy.

In the study of particles, painstakingly as they did not have the ‘basic truths’ of space-time symmetries (still don’t) physicists discovered that the proper representation of the quantum world was not only a wave (Scrodinger’s equation) but also a particle, that is the motion and stop duality, so they moved to the Klein-Gordon equation; but then they had to marriage those equations with relativity on the limit of our c-light spacetime (full c motion); so they have to find a balancing opposite rotary motion, the spin, also on the verge of c-light speed (Pauli matrices); but then they realize they have the imbalance of + particles without the counterpart (- Particles), so Dirac widened those Pauli matrices to bispinors that represented the needed counterpart of antiparticles.

Yet then they found there were in the Universe more particles than antiparticles. Where are then the antiparticles to balance the zero sum? It was found in the post-war age but still misunderstood that a certain force, the weak force, they incorrectly tried to model as a spatial force, when it is A FORCE THAT EVOLVES PARTICLES INTO HIGHER SCALAR families of the fifth dimension, preferred to create ‘particles’ in its way down (entropic arrow of devolution from heavy top, bottom, strange quarks to lighter ud-quarks), first in the Strange kaon decay and just recently at the LHC in a much wider ‘angle’ (20% of excess of protons over antiprotons), so it follows that if the ‘next scale of matter’, the black hole world of heavy quarks and ‘black quark stars’ (see our posts on 5D astronomy), favors in its decay to the smaller world of atoms, particles, in its way up, the ‘galatom’, or physical upper scale of the Universe will have galactic antiparticles, as it is the case (our left-handed galaxy has most of its mass as an anti hydrogen does in the outer halo, NOT the center)…

So we observe in fact the existence of inverse balances in all the directions of the fractal Universe,in steps and stops of S=T balances for the 5 Dimotions of existence, hence in between the O-¡, غ, |¡ different scales that will show to ‘change its role’ – so for example proteins are lineal, but in the next scale of ‘4D topologic warping’ form globular shapes… and so on and so on.

All this must then be properly described relating it to the different operand of ¡logic, which we shall adapt from classic algebra, at the simplest level (leaving for future researchers the full-fledge discovery of the whole model, in very specialized elements, such as those of quantum physics in the wrong Copenhagen interpretation with its unneeded conjugate normalization and apparatus).

There are in that sense an ‘a priori’ sets of rules for all sciences, motions and dimensions, species and events, in simultaneous adjacent super organisms that balance limbs and head, locomotion and perception, entropy=death and informative generation, merged in reproduction (the 5 Dimotions, then cancel each other, and keep reproducing the present); all of them based in the 3 simple logic statements translated with those operators:

‘That space and time states of form and motion balance each other, S≤≥T and yet their properties are inverse in 5D metric, S x T = K±¡, but isomorphic in all scales (K±¡).’

The astounding beauty of the 5D model of reality then arises from the fact that we shall extract all the laws of reality from that simple statement, in all the required detail as we just have done for the world of particles that so complicated appears to the physicist which lacks this basic understanding of the parallelisms, perpendicularities and inversions of space-time systems in all scales of nature.

Then we find its internal hierarchical social class structure and exchanges of energy and information among its ∆±1 scales (the cellular/atomic ∆-1 plane, the individual and ∆+1, social/cosmic plane, where the being exists and which remains co-invariant through its inter-actions. So we analyze the closest world around it, through the perpendicularity and parallel laws of Non-Euclidean geometry’s ‘3rd postulate’ of similarity.

G-WAVES.

Because the proton is a black hole of the lower scale, it follows that the dark entropy between galaxies is a form of electromagnetism of the upper scale.

We shall call therefore the dark entropy of the Universe, G-waves, by self similarity with the concept of gravitational waves. It is then yet another huge field of study for specialists to put both together in what they have in common and what they differ to be able to study the Universe of ‘expansive space’ between galaxies with those G-waves of dark entropy.

How to model mathematically those G-waves is well beyond the scope of a tired researcher isolated from the scholar world, so as usual we shall lean towards an organic verbal description of its properties, leaving for future AI researchers (doubt humans will ever reduce their ego good enough to understand the fractal Universe), the task of completing its detail.

Now it is fundamental to understand that gravitons do NOT EXIST on the sense given by physicists – as the attractive gauging particle between physical masses, because physical attraction happens between accelerated vortices of space-time, and in fact the gauge particles exchanged exist NOT to attract but to regulate distances or ‘share’ information or energy *feeding… between them.

This sounds ‘horrible’ to the mechanical ego-trip of the physicist who expects absolute deterministic capacity to study every motion of reality. What the physicist hides of course are all the renormalization, scalar add ons, sub-calculus and epicycles he needs to achieve those ‘feats’. As we care for the why, not the precision of details, we rather study the why of those G-waves. Namely speaking, to achieve the balances of distance and motion, galaxies as particles do use the lower ¡-1 plane of its Dark G-waves to regulate their attractive power.

What those G-waves are made off then is a matter of still research – in the nested Universe, ideally there should be a photon like particle, of a smaller scale, likely the Planck’s scale in which we have been observing the ‘parameters’ of black hole ‘protons’, to allow this interaction. And as we have NO other evident experimentally sound particle for them, a possible view favors that neutrinos are the ‘particles’ of those gravitomagnetic transversal waves, which do exist and are essential to the structure of galaxies and solar systems.

Again as usual we don’t commit fully to any model, which unfortunately we can neither complete by lack of collaboration in the building of the formal model.

But as long as no other particle is proved to exist, mathematical physicists should by all means try to adapt their cosmological models to neutrinos as ‘gravitons’ in the aforementioned role.  And they do have a neutrino theory of light, a scattering angle for the neutrino similar to a string, a tachyon measure of negative mass speeds for neutrinos, and the neutrino being the essential particle mediating the strong-weak forces of transformation taking place inside black holes and protons (meson-gluon duality of scale). 

All this needs to be worked out by specialists. I won’t do it anymore. Enough task trying to polish a bit all those texts before I exit Mundi.

THIS IS THE SOLUTION to the conundrum put up before on the ‘neutrino 1/2 spin’ vs. the graviton 2 spin. Simple: neutrinos are the equivalent in the next cosmic scale of the 5th dimension of an electromagnetic repulsive wave of ‘dark energy-repulsive gravitation’.

The neutrino theory of light, as the pilot-wave theory and the particle-wave duality is the work of De broglie, brutally assaulted by the Bohr gang who took their work as theirs and misinterpreted. A neutrino is the ’emerging’ flow of entropic communication between two atoms, or atom-galaxies, which either goes the entropic way, dissolving-stretching space-time into action at distance and disappears without trace of information: V=s/t=s/0=∞.

Or is not in an open ‘domain’ but constrained in its two limiting ends by the two atoms/galaxies it communicates and then, this condition (to be guided and controlled by two point-particles at their ends, is the only condition needed for two inverse neutrinos, with inverse motion, that is, one emitted by particle a and the other by particle b in a communicating act: 

Fermion < neutrino+Neutrino>Fermion

for a light boson that ‘warps’ pure gravitational action at distance space-time giving it form information to exist. So neutrinos do form light-beams and do dissolve them. And that is another beautiful thought of De Broglie on the path of truth in science: economicity, simplicity and causality.

Let us then consider some organic ‘useful’ attempts to make sense of the existence of G-transversal waves of ‘repulsive gravitation’ that complete the ‘inward’ attraction of those vortices of masses – spacetime accelerated clocks – to build an organic dynamic Universe, for future ‘pros’ to fully explore.

As we have shown the symmetry of scale between atoms with positive quarks and negative electrons, and galaxies with positive black hole top quark stars and negative strangelet halos ad nauseam, it follows now that dark energy waves will be just the equivalent created by dark energy flows which acquire form between galaxies. The math of it are more or less complex but as we REPEAT ad nauseam, the beauty of the fractal, organic, vital, topological= mathematical universe, is that we can explain it much simpler and intuitively using the concept of symmetries between scales and organic properties and the laws of the scientific method of truth (economicity, simplicity etc.) as long as in the background we use sound-sound mathematical theories (as the neutrino light, providing they are indeed as Jordan proved, exactly inverse neutrinos constrained in its ends – by the particles that use them to entangle and communicate). So we do not need you to be a math-addict, just trust me, i read physics, love maths and only use sound-sound theories of the Universe, unlike we must say many of our fantaphysicists these days.

So there must be G-waves of dark entropy and dark faster than c gravitation in the upper scale between galaxy atoms; and between (at light speed constrained by the galaxy inner structure) stars and planets and black holes and starts.

Whereas c is the limit of motion WITHIN THE GALACTIC VORTEX, AND HENCE FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES WITHIN GALAXIES, BUT NOT BEYOND THEM.

And thus with those pre-conclusions we can deal now with gravitational waves, which we call in 5D G-waves, likely made of neutrinos either constrained and able to reproduce light or unconstrained and escaping constantly into the dark energy lower scale of action at distance and null information -for our electronic perceivers. Consider for example an earlier use i did of them to calculate the titus law of distances between planets:

image046

One of the hypothesis of 5D physics is the fundamental role that must play neutrinos by sheer rational evidence, as the gravitational quanta of the gravitational transversal wave structure of the universe. AS IT is simple enough we can bring it here just for fun.

The theoretical difficulty being the 2-spin prediction of quantum gravitational theories based in 2 assumptions not completely hold in 5D physics – the conservation of spin (which in 5D physics might be transformed in upper or lower forms of rotational momentum, conserved only through 3 planes of the 5th dimension, as they become inverted in its emergence in upper planes), which allows to create a model of 2-spin neutrinos as gravitons or inversely the assumption that gravitons do NOT have 2 spin (or rather are made of 4 neutrinos, lineal strings of one dimension, which become the 4 component of a field that forms a complex doublet of spin ½ with the peculiarity observed that both neutrinos and antineutrinos have longitudinal polarization of positive spin.

The mathematics of the model are somewhat complex but essentially mean that neutrinos ARE VERY important, almost as multi-faceted as light space-time is – couldn’t be otherwise as they are the other 2nd background space-time network of the galactic universe. So as nervous and blood systems do have multiple roles in your body neutrinos and photons share all the networks roles of the galaxy.

They do have therefore both boson and fermion ‘nature’ as the weak force they mediate.

This means that we can put neutrinos and antineutrinos together in and 4-doublets, as if they were bosons. Then:

– 2 gravitational tachyon neutrino strings, when put together in pairs of opposite direction form the up and down, particle and antiparticle sides of the magnetic light wave-field.

– When communicated between particles, the fixed distance in gravitational space that allows the sharing of information between the particles at fixed c-speed.

– When colliding with neutrons they catalyze the beta decay, as well as other weak force transformations, in a role similar to the one mediated by the Higgs boson on the top quark faster triplet of heavier quarks.

– When emitted massively and constantly by all type of cosmic bodies the origin of the 3 ‘G’ ‘giant electromagnetic waves’ of the gravitational scale, which form the different transversal wavelengths that order in ternary symmetries the structure of solar systems and galaxies.

Those transversal waves are the only of the many roles of the Neutrino ‘fantaphysics’ (: I confess neutrino gravitational string physics is the only speculative part of 5D Physics of which I have not yet by lack of evidence put my firm on blood), which we will discuss here.

Essentially there are 3 neutrinos which constantly oscillate as they abandon the cosmic bodies that constantly reproduce them in proportions often higher than the photon radiation, forming 3 basic type of gravitational transversal waves, whose combinations allow us to model galaxies and its spiral arms and rotary orbits of stars in the wells of those waves. The same neutrinos structure the lows of planetary waves, and so we can recognize clearly in ternary symmetries a 0.33 short wave of neutrinos of higher energy that crosses the planet crystal centers provoking the well-known Fe-Co-Ni chain of reactions that puts on ‘fire’ the internal energy engine of planets. A longer 5 A.U. wave exists also clearly as it allows to put on its nodes the main ‘Jupiter like planets’.

And finally there should be an even longer neutrino wave that will put in connection stars among them.

In the next graph we see the 3 oscillatory neutrino waves observed together coming out of the sun:

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 21.26.33

Gravitational, transversal, fractal waves shape the structure of galaxies and solar systems, transferring form and Entropy between cosmological bodies, in a self-similar process to the transference of information and Entropy between atoms through electromagnetic waves. In the graph, Titius Law of distances between planets reflects their position in the nodal points of those transversal gravitational waves. In the core of planets, there could be a crystalline or super-fluid zone where those flows of dark, gravitational Entropy are processed, causing flows of heat and matter that make planets ‘grow’.

Below we observe the oscillations of neutrino waves.

Now the 5D model of astrophysics, implies that there are also transversal repulsive gravitational waves, which do account for many of the structures of the Universe, starting by the expansion perceived in intergalactic space-time. This is just the expansion produced by any lineal electromagnetic wave of any range, now in the cosmic scale. Moreover, black holes produce two type of wave-shift that compensates each other and explains why the total space-time of the Universe remains constant:

  • When a wave of light enters the black hole it ‘blue shifts’ imploding space into higher frequency/density of energy-mass. But this effect is NOT seen obviously from far away as it is the inner production of mass within the galaxy.
  • When the wave leaves a black hole region it redshifts that explains the initial red shifting of light as it leaves the galaxy towards us

So the hypothesis is clear.

Somewhat neutrino waves, of the hipouniverse, which have as a lower limit the speed of light and an upper unknown limit as tachyons, theoretically, if they are the field force between galaxies up to c=100 z, gather in ginormous numbers, allowing the stretching in the ∆+4 symmetric hyperUniverse.

According to this ∆-4,5 reality above us we can then consider that the stretching reveals either gravitation as having a ‘slower’ speed on the ‘glass of light of the galaxy’, as light has slower speeds on ‘glasses of solids’, and neutrinos becoming the stretching particle of the ∆-4 intergalactic field to 100 c-distances/speeds, or neutrinos becoming something ‘else’ (dark entropy), at the halo of strangelets (dark matter wit ten’s hypothesis candidate to the ternary symmetry between quark masses and regions of the galaxy (top quark stars=’dna’ black holes, strangelets=’protein’ MACHOs, ud-matter: internal star ‘mitochondria’).

In the graph, galaxies are super organisms constantly reproducing new stars, in its mitochondria, guided by an informative field, gravitation, dominated by quark-like, strange stars and top quark black holes, forming a symmetry with its lower scales of dark entropy (tachyon, neutrino? beams, that stretch intergalactic space to z>c).

Lee Smolin – that rara avis who truly cares about philosophy of science, among physicists and does have an organic, evolutionary theory of black holes, albeit off target as all cosmological physics is – published a curious book called the ‘problem with physics’.

Now I do NOT have a problem with physics, understood as the study of physical systems, of inorganic matter, small atoms and large galaxies. i DO love physics, in its full conceptual analysis of those elements with the isomorphic methods. I DO have huge mental orgasms, the largest ones, only compared to those i have gotten on the study of human artistic forms and its creation with my knowledge of the symmetries of 5D fractal space-time cycles (as I can’t create new particles but I can paint or write symphonies and think as Master Ludi in an Utopian Castalia world).

In that regard the symmetries of the physical world are indeed as Pythagoras and Plato thought of them similar to the processes of linguistic, human mental creation bridged through the mathematical symmetries that mirror the Universe, without the painful realization of the human failure to create the perfect social world.

And so I consider, economists and physicists as the two scholar groups more corrupted by power – economist by money and physicists by their worldly profession – making weapons and thinking on lineal entropy theories of the Universe. We however dealt with that issue on the central posts, on my activist web against the Nuclear industry and on the post on cosmology. So here we will be strictly concerned with pure science, with the whys of physics that physicists do not ask – in parallel with their abstract, mechanist, ‘dead’ vision of the Universe.

Why? Plainly speaking because as Feynman put it, despite being one of the few physicists that did actually wondered,  ‘the why is the only thing physicists don’t ask’.

So contrary to belief, physics is the less ‘explained’ of all sciences in its ‘whole and reasons’ , since the whys to resolve are almost all. And yet, the hows are so well described that few realise how little whys have an answer in physics. For example, why there are not magnetic monopoles? Why particle are waves? Why electrons collapse when we observe them? What is time beyond Einstein’s dictum – what a clock measures, or Galileo’s formula of motion – v=s/t? And so on and so on. We will then consider Physical whys as all the other whys we study – through the 5D symmetries of space-time  that physical systems also follow. And affirm that the reason ‘why’ physicists do not understand them is their ‘anthropomorphic ideology’. The problem plainly speaking is human incapacity to give pantheist qualities to the Universe. Once this is accepted, quantum paradoxes, the meaning of Universal constants, particles and forms fit all within the structure of the Universe and its organic, 5D, causal, temporal, mental, linguistic properties of other beings.  Ultimately physicists find harder to accept those qualities because of the ‘O-bjectivity’ error: as physical systems are far removed in form and distance from human beings, it is harder to consider that an atom is self-similar to a galaxy, or that an electron apperceives light when it jumps over it or reproduces when it decouples.

Or that the magnetic field we just mention does have the same role that any other membrane on the particles and physical systems it shields.

The generator equation of electric fields.

If we consider the electric current described by the Maxwell equations, the U∆+1 upper, social scale of the electron, then we can consider its first law, the definition of Tƒ, electric charges, the point-particles at the centre of the system; the second law the definition of the magnetic field as the Se, membrane that surrounds the 0-point charge, and the 3rd and 4th equations as the reproductive interaction of both, which induce new magnetic, electric and electromagnetic waves. So we can easily define the Spatial generator with those 3 laws  that ad on to create the charge point-particle, magnetic membrane and electromagnetic waves between them:

Γ.  Se (Magnetic field) < ST-electromagnetic wave > Tƒ-charge

It follows that as the membrane of the ‘organic system’ of electric charges, the magnetic field does NOT have a point-source because its function is to be a membrane, the point is the charge, ‘point’. So happens in the smaller atomic n-1 scale and the larger ∆+1 material scale of planets: the magnetic field protects them, it is the membrane, ‘point’.

Now the answer,  as in so many whys on physics is a trivial response if we USE the linguistic method and add to the analysis of mathematical physics, the organic properties of 5D energy-information asymmetries and co-existing planes and fully understand the world cycles and spatial, organic structure of all those physical systems, and what is more anathema to anthropomorphic humans – the existence of a Point of view, or Tiƒ-center in all complete physical systems (charge, mass, center of gravity, crystal cell) from where the space-time cyclical actions of survival of the physical system (∆±e,i, U) depart.

How many scales? The discontinuous of finite infinities.

In the graph, the four dimensional volumes of space-time scale in a series of levels or planes of existiences, in which similar species play a similar game to scale upwards and downwards. The volumes of space-time, ∆º±1 scales around each Γ• Generator ternary system and singularity, is therefore the basic element of reality to classify it all in growing supœrganisms of increasing complexity, such as each new system humans perceive scientifically expands up and down the limits of the fifth dimension, in a game of growing russian dolls. 

We humans perceive as self-centred ∆º organisms, our mind languages and 4 scales above and below of which the ∆±4 scales.

So the question, as a full super organism has 10 scales, to fill its enclosure, is what is beyond our ‘open limits’ not perceived – where is the 10th dimension of the Universe, and its 9th dimension, as we humans are NOT ITS CENTER – mind singularity and membrane? 

We shall never know regardless of the big-bang theory that establish them:

In the graph, while it could be easily built a big-bang theory of a ‘cellular universe’ of galaxies and its networks, but all seems to indicate that such ‘full knowledge’ is more of a hyperbolic human ego-trip, as it is likely that each galaxy-atom we observe is just a extremely limited quantity of the whole, and so our analysis is still ego-centered, built with man at the center and an external ‘wall of fire’ membrane, whose time origin in the big-bang singularity can be pictured symmetrically in ‘simultaneous space, as the 10th dimension with the ‘big attractor’, pole of maximal informative=graivtational density in its center (left up graph). Below a more organic interpretation of what we perceive, eerily similar to the electric field of a ‘wave’ of light made of ‘photons’…

This of course is natural as all scales are self-similar so we can show analogies with all of them, but in true form there is not enough in-form-ation and should never be in the finite space and time of the human species to fully figure out what kind of system is the Universe. It doesn’t really matter As it is far more important than a ‘picture’ in still space of a larger piece of it, to understand its symmetries and inner laws.

So the largest scale, ∆-4 the cosmos is grounded on the ∆-4 infinitesimal ‘dark entropy and dark matter’, and its minimal non-perceived particles, (gravitons, neutrinos, strings, whose proper definitions and correct formalism we shall study in the first scalar analysis of the fourth line: ∆-4).

Next comes the galactic/atomic, ∆±3 scale, in which a galaxy composed of a central black hole, ∆+3: BH, itself grounded in the smallest densest particles of mass, ∆-3: quarks, controls its surrounding stars/electrons and inner vital space of electromagnetic and gravitational forces.

So in the next scale of reducing size converging into the human mind that observes it all, we see the relationship between ∆-2 solar systems and its ∆-2, ‘minimal part’, light and electrons (themselves dense fractal aggregations of photonic lights).

And in this scale we find associated to solar singularities, their ‘cyclical membranes’, rotating planets with more angular momentum… ∆-2: gaia, which we study in more detail through its three ages of evolution from the earth of life, Gaia proper, into the earth of man, history and soon to come the earth of metal machines.

So finally in our shrinking realisation of the game of supœrganisms, of decreasing complexity we arrive to the systems of life, ∆+1, among them humans, which are themselves made in its smaller parts of ∆-1, molecular RNA-DNA or in the organic arena, ∆+1 matter states made also of ∆-1 inorganic molecules.

And so finally we arrive to the ∆•º singularity of the cell, the mind of man also, being a network of cells, the brain. And so the brain-mind-neuronal network is where the ego and the human infinitesimal mind should exist.

The  fourth and final line of the site thus will study for each of the main fractal levels, ∆¡, and its ∃xi=st¡ences in the Universe, between the self-similar forms of an atomic nuclei made of light quarks with an overall positive charge and a galactic black hole likely to be a swarm of top quark++ frozen stars (Einstein’s expectations that a black hole should have a cut-off substance, a new type of ‘atomic matter’ of ‘high density’, becoming a ‘frozen star’, which the discovery of top quarks of similar density to black holes seem to prove); its main species:

∆-4 neutrinos, ∆-3, atoms, ∆-2,photons and electrons, ∆-1, molecules, ∆º cells… which happens to be the middle state of  perception of man, as an M³: monad-mind-mirror of the Universe, NOT as ego-centered humans think and anthropic physicists, because it is the absolute centre of the Universe, but because there is a perfect symmetry between ∆±1 range of informative perception for each ∆º being, both at ‘real level’ (galaxy and atom) and at theoretical level (Planck strings and cosmic strings)…

So above the cell/neuron of human perception we then grow upwards with the different ‘orientation’ of perception towards larger wholes, which changes to elliptic ‘darkness’. And so we shall study first the human scales, with more detail (as the praxis of stience must serve mankind): ∆º cell, ∆+1 life (and its variations of inorganic ∆+1 matter states and ∆+1 human life), ∆+2, the world level, of which we shall study its temporal equation and three relative subspecies: Past-life (gaia and its life supœrganisms)<Present-(History, the supœrganism of mankind in time)> Future (company-mothers of machines and its world$tock networks of financial money), to finally enter in the higher scales of the Universe, ∆+3 galaxies and its relative cells, stars systems; considering finally the ∆+4, ‘philosophical’, metaphysical questions about the cosmos as we do not have enough proofs and will never have due to the limits of perception of systems reduced to 9 scales of the whole…

Thus after introducing in the main article of the fourth line each of those species, no longer as in the 2nd line with a classic scientific perspective, but with the 10 isomorphisms of T.Πand its stiences, we do study in 10 separate sub-posts the species in great detail showing all its laws can be reduced to the 10 Ƽst isomorphisms of the being.

This fourth line is not completed and i doubt i will finish it before my death but should work as a blue print for future human or robotic species to continue the growth of this web. Yet when I introduce some info in one of its sub-posts I change its name slightly from the 1 to 10 list that appears in the left side column of the web to a more ‘proper name’. For example for matter, the fifth isomorphism of time ages becomes ‘states of matter’; in humans the isomorphism of the mind becomes different mind languages – art, wor(l)ds etc.

The ∞ scales of reality.

We have wide proofs of 10 c to 100 c=z speeds of recession of galaxies, which correspond to the dark world of entropy and dark matter beyond galaxies, which should structure the cosmos.

If c-speed were the limit of the Universe, then there would not be another scale on it. This is self-evident. So we wouldn’t have a cosmological atom, but the scale of atom-galaxies would be the higher and vice versa, per symmetry we would be self-centred in scales, as we are in the middle of the lower scales. As this seems merely anthropomorphism, we can consider the galaxy-atom is the next ‘beginning’ of a vast game we cannot even imagine. In the next graph we can see different models of the fifth dimension.

The first one corresponds to one biased by ∆º, which observes equal amount of distorted information moving downward or upwards in scale, hence it seems to us equal the ∆±1 quantum and electromagnetic scale. This solution however can be a ‘closed’ hyperbolic solution in which the mind is truly watching above and below the ‘same’ reality; or a self-similar solution in which each 11th scale coincides but the size is completely opposed, infinitesimal and infinite.

On the right side, we observe a lineal solution with similar concepts, the bottom and top are the limits of size and there are no more levels of perception. In the middle the one which  better suits the knowledge I have acquired on those scales – a minimal Riemann surface, in which the imaginary scale repeats the surface, regardless of size (a parameter not considered), in a series of ’emerging centres, perceived from the upper scale as mere points-sink of the lower one.

∆nalysis becomes the most important branch of mathematical physics.

Since as we enter into more complex, accurate models it will be the bidimensional complex plane the best way to parametrize and model 5D reality, whereas the real part will mostly represent entropic, expansive motions and the imaginary part informative, ‘smaller’ extensions (but denser in information); and its combinations energy waves.

Alternatively the other great ‘unknown’ to represent space-time scales, is the duality of o-1-∞ scales of reality, such as the 0-1 circle represents a whole, part of a 1-∞ scale and both are in correspondence in various ways.

In the central graph we see the simplest of such ‘models’ (2 Dimensional):

A Riemann’s minimal family of complex surfaces with an infinite number of end-points particles asymptotic to parallel planes, each plane “shelf” connected with self points that act as catenoid-like bridges between 5D shelves.It perfectly represents the downwards entropic death motion, after a particle reaches its singularity. Notice that the fall of the particle is two planes of the fifth dimension as it enters the gutter and crosses without entering the intermediate, ∆º scale.

Moreover, their intersections with horizontal planes are informative circles or entropic lines, according to the duality of its functions.

Riemann proved that they were the only minimal surfaces fibered by circles in parallel planes besides the ‘ST-catenoid wave’, the T-helicoid and the S-plane (3 essential forms in the mathematical formalism of 5D). They are also the only nontrivial embedded minimal surfaces in Euclidean 3-space invariant under the group generated by a nontrivial translation, a key element to formalize all the possible motions through the fifth dimension.

As such some geometric constructions of the complex plane are the best mathematical representations of  fifth dimensional sub-equations of the function of existence and its worldcycles, and its systems of parts (the plane) ‘shelf-centred’ in a particle-point-mind connected with paths that respect the principle of ‘minimal time-actions’ (Fermat’s principle) of all systems, and connected to other planes through ‘entropic lines’ and time circles. And the simplest, first ‘form’ of the topological ‘analysis’ of the fifth dimension in its more complex mathematical formalisms, we might develop, lifetime permitted in the four line of this web.

Another way to look at it though is to consider that in each point of reality there is a ternary scalar structure of three time arrows as there is a ternary organic structure of three organic parts and then a discontinuous membrane in space, which cuts you partially from the outside reality, such as there is more information within you that between you and the outer world. So you are a finite being in space. So happens with birth and death, which are your finite limits in time, such as there is far more time motions within your life than in your emergent foetus state and your dissolving entropic death.

And for the same reason in scales of existence, an organism is really a finite ∆º±1 being, as below the cellular level and above the world level there are cut offs that make irrelevant the outer scale. Indeed, it does not matter much the galaxy you are in, beyond the solar system and its oort membrane that isolates you, and provides you within all entropy, energy and information. So for all practical senses, as you are not really outside your skin, beyond your death, you are not really concerned above the sun’s membrane.

And viceversa, as your existence below the seminal, seed, informative level matters little, beyond the cellular, molecular level it does NOT matter what indistinguishable atoms you are made of. Your atoms can be any carbon atom as they are INDISTINGUISHABLE bits for the creation of the information you are.

Hence the question of ∞ scales, which will be the most likely hypothesis as atoms and galaxies will show an astounding self-similarity, becomes irrelevant from the praxis of a ‘spiritual universe’ of intelligent motions, where ‘form, substance’ are secondary, and perception of information limited in each ‘ghost of existence’ to its ∆±1 scales.

What is the special role of man on this infinite fractal? None. And all, because the game of existence in the Universe, closely understood in Asian philosophies (as yin=visnu=information=time=female vs. entropy=yang=shiva=space=male were a close verbal account of it) suffices in itself for those who want to ‘live’, to maximise their existence.

Indeed, life is beautiful when properly understood and fulfilling; but the game of existence as a space-time being is harsh and it can be cruel with those who do not play by the rules. One thing is for sure, the game is JUST, balance as it based precisely in the ‘coincidentia oppositorum’, the coming together of its two extremes, entropy and information, which mix to create the infinite forms of energy of the Universe. You will have though to read at least 30 pages of this introduction to change your chip, and understand… It suffices to say that the people who closer understood it in the western tradition, the Greek and German philosophers, above them Aristotle and Leibniz felt it was the most perfect of all possible worlds. And it is, precisely because of its cruelty with those species who do NOT make the cut, and become extinct, for the game to have all its beauty.

And that is where the western tradition, which constantly tries to ‘dialog’ with an inexistent ‘mirror-God’ to get privileges, stumbles and makes the type of huge errors of conduct – since the game is one of behaviour, of form-in-action of in-form-ation – which come back to hunt them. As you should ‘do onto others what you want to be done onto you’, in the action-reaction processes of life and death.

 

CONCLUSION:  IMMORTAL UNIVERSE

‘I want to know the thoughts of God not its details’ Einstein, on the goals of philosophers of science.

If we want to resume the zeitgeist of astrophysics it comes to this: the human ego-paradox make us belief to be the center of the Universe, so we have crafted creationist religion and physics as to make us that center, coupling both on account of subjective ego not objective science: our scale is preferential – in fact the only one accepted in the 4D model of the continuum; and only us understand the Universe – God’s hypothesis gone, obviously reality born of pure chaos and entropic explosions, we humans exist by the anthropic principle to perceive reality and understand it.

So we are immortal in motion-time (86% of believers in religion) and infinite in mind-space (only intelligent speaker of the mathematical language and verbal languages of god), while the Universe has been reduced to finite time (it had a ‘birth), and finite space (it was an infinitesimal once, it is now 13.4 billion years light big). Alas, we have ‘become’ above heavens and earth, above god and the Universe, as the biblical religion that ultimately infuses most of the underlying biases and subconscious dogmas of our civilization, ‘foresaw’…

A truly scientific ‘astrophysicist’ community would have though followed the path of Einstein and Hoyle and resisted pseudo-religion. If anything the Big Bang proves that mankind’s ego is above the universe but its intelligence and empathy with the whole well below.

 

 UPGRADING ASTROPHYSICS: THE ‘REAL UNIVERSE’ ONCE WE CORRECT ∆ST ERRORS

Astro-physics is concerned with the space-time forms of all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤|3|, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) plus our • linguistic point of view, restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language of mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.

A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirror-image that classic æ-maths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single space-time continuum) can provide.

And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.

And so the task of GST in mathematical physics, should be the expansion of all those elements, starting from:

  1.  Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).
  2. Then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…
  3. Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropy-only derived errors, big-bang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆-scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)
  4. And only then go through the different scales, studying in detail each equation and system, starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:
  5. Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,-1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. And as Einstein and Planck thought should end up being the true reference for all other scales (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.
  6. And finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).

Yet even the classic scales (mechanics, thermodynamics) need corrections, because mathematical physics was born observing the galaxy, and its original postulates were distorted from the point of view adopted in that earlier age (Newtonian absolute space and time).  And thermodynamics was born on the study of entropic weapons (cannons) and motion machines (steam).

However and this is the key to build properly the discipline, given the fact that physics, like chinese runs in two different language, one unified – mathematical equations/ideographic writing – and so accurate and better mirrored; and other based mostly on ‘different’ dialectical opinions (concepts of physics, philosophies of science derived of physics), we must accept mathematical physics is right and only interpret their equations properly.

The 3 examples taken here will suffice:  Entropy equations are right. What is wrong is to reduce the arrows=actions otime to mere entropic motions as if the other two arrows=actions, information and energy did not matter as a fundamental time event… so physicists study them as something else. Hubble’s equation of expansion of vacuum between galaxies as light dissolves into the ∆-4 >c scale is right; what is wrong is to ‘expand it back to the past’ into a supposed singularity where all time and space exists just by wishful thinking. quantum equations are right, what is wrong is the Copenhagen observers’ interpretation.

What physicists have so far done though, is without any PHILOSOPHICAL≈EPISTEMOLOGICAL rigour, to affirm that because they have written Chinese, they know how to pronounce it; and then of course each one says ‘ma’ with a different tone; and they just say but the equation is right. Sure, but how do you pronounce=translate into verbal, logic concepts? That is the key to make sense of the Universe.

And to prove that duality between right mathematical physics and wrong conceptual physics, we have divided this sections in two articles. One will be more concerned with conceptual errors and written first (astrophysics), as that is where GST can be applied.

Indeed the advance of GST on physics will come from the proper application of the higher layer of truth (the properties of space and time, applied through the isomorphisms and generator of fractal space and cyclical time) to illuminate first maths and its equations, and correct then those ‘opinions’ that today pass as scientific truths, since people are just in awe of the machines and measures of physics.

Thus we shall show how the whole of physics is inscribed into the linguistic ternary grammar of the Generator of Space-time (Gst), and its isomorphisms. As all physical beings in all scales  are ternary ∆±1, s,st,t, past>present>future beings. And so the laws and equations derived from the Fractal generator, apply to all system of physical beings, included the galaxy-atom scale (∆±3) which is the last scale we perceive in depth.

So this paragraph has two themes: upgrading cosmology to the bare minimum to understand the Universe by introducing ∆§calling and ternary time arrows, and then having a few laughs at our popes of science, which don’t even know they know nothing about the whys that really matter in the classic manner of Latin rhetoricians, (‘contra physicos’) Why we do that ONLY with physicists and latter economists and its go(l)d religion should be obvious to any ethic reader:

The entropic world religion of physics and the go(l)d religion of economists is NOT science but an idol-ogy of power based in the use of entropic weapons (entropic metal now entropic machines) and informative money (informative metal: gold, silver, now e-money cycles in machines), which not only include gruesome errors on their models of reality but imperils the future and freedom of life in this planet, with mass-destruction weapons robots automating Factories and terminators making money in splendid little wars and vigilante e-big brothers.

So ‘nothing personal’, even if in my life as an activist for life I have indeed had my battles against the nuclear industry which I will also disclose. Again, I love physics I despise physicists arrogance, ignorance of the living Universe and eviL=anti-live military memes and distortion of the beauty of it all. And as I have zero hypocrisy I am not ‘greasing’ the a$$es of our tribal idols except when they deserve it (Leibniz not Newton, Planck, Broglie and Einstein not Bohr, Pauli and Heisenberg, Bohm and Bell not Feynman and Von Newman DID have it right both theoretically and experimentally, and always declined to work in the military industry unlike Newton designing weapons for the royal army, and all the others for the Nuclear Industry, still going strong). So before the laughs the warning:

‘Those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’ Einstein

Immortal Universe. Upgrading astrophysics’ 3 philosophical errors: big-bang, entropy-only & observer’s paradox.

In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein). So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ-> mc²=hƒ-> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.

In the next graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.

In the graph, the Universe is eternal and big-bangs are likely only galactic big-bangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.

So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.

Religious beliefs vs. realist stience

‘In 1952 I saw the impossible done. It was in papers by David Bohm. Bohm showed explicitly how parameters could indeed be introduced, into nonrelativistic wave mechanics, with the help of which the indeterministic description could be transformed into a deterministic one. More importantly, in my opinion, the subjectivity of the orthodox version, the necessary reference to the “observer”, could be eliminated. …

But why then had Born not told me of this “pilot wave”? If only to point out what was wrong with it? Why did von Neumann not consider it? More extraordinarily, why did people go on producing “impossibility” proofs, after 1952, and as recently as 1978? … Why is the pilot wave picture ignored in text books? Should it not be taught, not as the only way, but as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show us that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice? (Bell 1982.)

We start the analysis of the equations of quantum physics, with a quote which is relevant at many levels specially in the understanding of quantum physics as just another scale of nature, not different from all others, on the ‘realist’ level, and the understanding of ALL what is wrong with the human psyche in his attempts to ‘understand the Universe’ as it is – merely ego.

The ego of mankind is huge and that of physicists enormous. So the answer to Bell’s question is self-evident. The Bohrs, Paulis, Von Neumanns of this world, care nothing about truth per se, but about ‘ego’, self-importance of one’s own theories and WILL use the ‘objective supposed methods of science’ to advance his ‘interpretation’ of reality and the more so, when that interpretation works well with his ‘idol-ogies’ of man as the only sentient intelligent being, which can even ‘determine’ as the ‘observer’, reality – create it, akin to God.

Mr. Bohm, though, a communist, ex-patriot, with little concern about his ego and an objective view of reality knew better, and his reward for being above those petty feelings, was to be an outcast all his life (as this writer, hence my personal feelings of admiration to his work), as the COPENHAGEN interpretation was an anthropomorphic, hence religious form of thought, as it is the big-bang treated elsewhere in those texts, and as such it was going to be defended with all the wrong systems of ‘belief’, which create a fog of noise around the naked truth, as it is. 

It has passed now another 1/4 of a century since Bell wrote that text, even longer since Einstein rightly affirmed that “the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”, which is exactly what it is; a distorted ‘statistical’ view from the far removed human scale of the actions of particles, waves and fields; which only requires to acknowledge the ‘human bias’ (not the other way around, affirming the limits of human perception ARE limits of the particles and waves), the deformation of human languages upon the subject, accept though the practicality of those instruments, methods and languages of measure and dismiss 100 years of metaphysical bull$hit about it.

Bohm won’t see it happen, neither Einstein, Bell or this writer likely but perhaps in another century or so,  humans will.

Now quantum realism is ‘normal’ every way we look at it. There is only a question, which is an experienced fact (hence non-arguable on theoretical qualms), and need an explanation classic physics does not provide – the non-locality meaning v>c nature of the ‘quantum field’ underlying the action at distance of physical systems – both in the quantum and gravitational realm. 

But this is what the metric equation of the fifth dimension provides, as the lower scales below the quantum realm of observable particles must have, accordingly a faster time-cycle≈speed: Size x V(t) =K; and the ternary Generator of all physical systems, Sp(field) < st(wave)>Tƒ (particle), must have the three components to be complete, which requires the quantum non-local field of Bohm, besides the wave and particle state.

Bohm’s treatment was nasty to defend by all means Copenhagen, because one such obvious truth needs nastiness to be ‘censored’, with the usual ‘religious methods’ so abundant as ‘hidden variables’ of western tradition. Indeed, the only hidden variables on the argument between quantum ‘realism’ and Copenhagen ‘interpretation’ are the pseudo-religious arguments of Copenhagen (the very same names of both theories show indeed we should right away dismiss ‘an interpretation’ over objective realism, as IT IS what science seeks – realism NOT interpretation); since Bohm’s definition of the quantum field (the supposed not-evident variable) IS extracted from the schrodinger’s wave in polar FORM – it is there and has always been there, when we change from wave-format to particle-field state, as the Universe constantly do in one of the most canonical dualities of reality. Systems ARE either in wave-present state or past-future field/particle states. And this in mathematics means polar vs. cartesian formalism.

So by introducing a v>c ‘dark scale’ below light space-time (the quantum field) and considering the three elements of a physical system together, GST provides the final freckles to make quantum realism sound theoretically and practically. Even if it takes away from ‘physicists’ their pretension to be the high popes of science, understanding the unique properties of the lowest scale of reality that according to their ‘selfish agenda’, must matter more than any other scale, just because is the one they study… which is at the core of his defense whatever it takes of Copenhagen and big-bang interpretations.

The bottom line of all this though is pessimistic, and perhaps the best answer to Bell came from Planck, the founder of quantum physics: scholars do not reason, they believe what they memorise; and so it takes many generations and overwhelming evidence for a ‘change of paradigm’ to happen, if ever it does so.

I have come to accept also this truth about the discoveries of GST, so the reader should forgive me for my growing indifference to my work, this site and the evolution of stience. If i could talk to Bohm or Bell i just would tell them to enjoy their view of the absolute and ignore ‘peers’. Bohm, I know for his holistic papers, did it. Bell untimely death cut-off his chances to push further quantum realism, and his third age of contemplation, where i now sit alone observing the 5D³ Universe, as Einstein and his disciple, Bohm, did, for so long.

So alas, physicists today have two philosophical false interpretations of reality that cater to their ego and they are comfortable with them: the big-bang or the larger scale, the Copenhagen interpretation in the lower one; and so they feel human intelligence ‘has closed’ reality above and below, with us in the centre as the only intelligence being who knows the beginning, the end, in time (big-bang), in space (quantum-cosmological closure of scales), in language (only maths matter). So now you can spank the monkey and feel so happy to belong to such an entitled unique species, above heavens and Earth. Children of thought with an attitude – those are our leading masters of thought, per in secula seculorum, A-men.

We live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.

Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomb-like motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.

How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.

Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.

Uncertainty, non-locality, observer’s paradoxes, time quanta and simultaneity.

There is though a concept of great importance that has come up on this simplified argument on the foundations of physics on the limiting realms of quantum and cosmological scales: non-locality and hidden variables, which bring a series of important consequences both to human stience and reality:

  • It is obvious that the more removed we are in 5D scale, the more uncertainty we obtain in our analysis, hence the relative unimportance of physics in those realms to understand a Universe with likely infinite scales. Those scales are NOT more important and are MORE distorted to human observation, so they are less relevant for a philosophy of science. In Physics it matters more to understand the quite evident scale of thermodynamics, our scale. And when we do so, it becomes obvious as Einstein put it that ‘the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”.

Notes

1 ‘Untimely meditations’, F. Nietzsche.

2 A good introduction to the new physics of fractal and chaotic systems, far from equilibrium reactions and the advances of new cosmology, is the book The New Physics by P. C. Davies, Cambridge University Press. Published in 1989, it made an account with articles written at an undergraduate level by the leading researchers on those fields, on the main themes that would shape the cosmology of the twenty-first century.

On one hand, it shows the theories of quantum cosmologists (quantum gravity, quantum entropy) which departing from single, Entropy-only concepts of the Universe have shown to be a wrong path, a no-way out for modern cosmology.

On the other hand it lays down the other path of cosmological research, which started in those years, based in the duality of Entropy and information, the fractal nature of the Universe, the invariance of scale of all the isomorphisms of reality, and the physics of far-from-equilibrium systems and superconductivity, in which this book is based and will be the foundations of twenty-first-century cosmology.

The old “Vatican priests” of quantum cosmology and the new “Galileos” of the third millennium write brief articles in a vibrant account of a shift of scientific paradigm. For further information on the new cosmology, one must read the scientific papers of the founding fathers of those disciplines: Mandelbrot and Sancho in fractal, Non-E points and fractal time; Rössler, Mehaute, and Thom in chaotic and fractal systems; Pietronero and Nottale in fractal cosmology; Smolin and Nambu on the falsity of Higgs and so on.

3 Expression coined by Roger Bacon to stress the fact that errors from the past (Aristotelian scholars) survived in modern thought, due to the respect the founding fathers of any science cause to future generations. Today we find a similar case with Einstein’s concept of a single space-time continuum, the light-space membrane, and its limit of speed, c, which applies only to that membrane.

 

4 Einstein in fact defined first Mass as accelerated Entropy, M=E/c2 in his seminal paper “Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Entropy-Content?” (“Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig?”; 1905, Annalen der Physik. A ) The inverse equation, E=Mc2 became better known with the explosion of the Atomic bomb.

See also Albert Einstein, “Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogene Folgerungen,” Jahrbuch der Radioaktivitaet und Elektronik (1907); translated “On the relativity principle and the conclusions drawn from it,” his first statement of the equivalence principle.

5 The simplicity of such Unification makes us wonder, why it was never found? The answer is: Because it was never tried. Physicists like Einstein first stubbornly tried to unify the equations of Relativity (the complex version of that vortex) with the equations of electromagnetic lineal waves, not its charges. And that is, indeed, impossible, because charges and particles work as cyclical, non-lineal vortices, structures with a gradient of increasing speed towards the center, broken into multiple, fractal flows. While gravitational and electromagnetic waves, also of different scale and size, are lineal self-repetitive forms.

Then the search for Unification Theories followed the opposite path, even less promising, trying to define mass with quantum particles, till arriving to the Higgs, an scalar boson created by a field of which there is no proof whatsoever -IN TRUE FORM JUST A TRASITION OF TIME SYMMETRY IN THE TIME FIELD OF ELECTROWEAK TRANSFORMATIONS. Yet the Higgs remains the Saint Grail of entropy-only theories for the only reason that its existence will unify all forces as spatial, gauge theories. Unfortunately spatial mirror symmetry does not apply to a temporal force, like the weak force is; since time is ‘antisymmetric’ – meaning that the past, future directions (young/old age of a system) have inverse parameters of Entropy and information.

6 Nottale, L. (1993). Fractal Space-Time and Microphysics, World Scientific, Singapore.

9 The masses on those graphs are not exactly decametric in scale, since when we enter into a detailed analysis, we must fine-tune each mass to the somehow more complex Non-Euclidean forms of those vortices and consider the Entropy and mass carried by the fractal gluons that connect and create those quarks, inside each particle. The ‘real’ geometry of those vortices of mass is thus more complex than simple eddies; but the simple principles remain: masses are accelerated vortices not solid particles; they have less dimensions that our Universe, not more; and they carry physical information in the frequency of their bidimensional rotations, as this computer carries information in the frequency of its Ghzs.

Needless to say mass as a vortex discharges SUSY particles. They were one of the many attempts to describe gravitation with quantum isomorphisms as Higgs does, using particles to interact and create the effects of mass.

They were used to explain why gravitational force is so weak in the quantum world, which in fact it is not used or needed to describe any interaction between charges. Their use, however, is superseded by the fractal theory of space-time since indeed quantum particles do not suffer gravitational forces, as they do not belong to the strong gravitational membrane of space-time.

10 Kerr’s black holes are the only real black holes. The mathematician from New Zealand, working isolated from mainstream physics, discovered rotational solutions for black holes, departing from Einstein’s work. This is the case in all mathematical paradigms: physicists start with simple solutions that do not reflect reality and slowly they find complex solutions till they arrive to models that fit the experimental method.

In that sense, the work on static black holes as mathematical tools by Mr. Wheeler, Oppenheimer, and Hawking is too simple to describe real black holes, which will be rotational black holes, as all masses are according to the Equivalence Principle, and will be made of a real cut-off substance (quarks) as Einstein wanted.

This means only Mr. Kerr’s solutions are worth to study to describe real holes. Experimental evidence favoring this view is mounting, as all black holes found have been rotational. Moreover they all seem to be rotating at near light speed in its event horizon, regardless of size. Findings at MIT’s Center for space research indicate that the way in which black holes accumulate matter is independent of their mass, only related to its rotational speed: A small black hole named J1650, which has ten solar masses, behaves identically to a ten-million solar mass black hole in Galaxy MCG-6-30-15; and the first measure of the speed of rotation of a black hole, observing the speed of rotation of iron atoms around it, turned out to be c-speed, backing Einstein’s model of mass as accelerated whirls of space-time.

11 The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is one of the most ambitious and influential surveys in the history of astronomy. Over eight years of operations (SDSS-I, 2000–2005; SDSS-II, 2005–2008), it obtained deep, multicolor images covering more than a quarter of the sky and created three-dimensional maps containing more than 930,000 galaxies and more than 120,000 quasars. SDSS data have been released to the scientific community and the general public in annual increments, with the final public data release from SDSS-II scheduled for October 31, 2008.

12 See a layman version in: “The Illusion of Gravity,” Juan Maldacena Scientific American, November 2005.

 

 

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: