ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: ORGANIC SYSTEMS
“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’
Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe
“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.”
Einstein, on the entangled forest man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’ -whose study is the theme of this blog.
This blog is dedicated to the organic philosophy of science called systems sciences, and its logic-mathematical formalism, the scalar fifth dimension of space-time.
The Foreword, given the encyclopedic nature of the blog, tries to explain briefly the meaning of those 2 concepts. It is the same in all posts so you can escape it if you have read it already. The rest of the post will define the different scales of ‘stiences’ describing its fundamental Time-space Organisms, its entangled ‘pentalogic’ derived of its 5 Dimensional motions of space-time that construct all its super-organisms and then it will go briefly through the main ‘stiences’ of reality, each one studying a ‘scalar size’ of the fifth dimension of space-time and its events and species.
Systems sciences are based on the alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.
According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.
The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.
Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.
Organicism on the other side is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are self-replicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and we shall see in our sections of History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.
So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:
An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).
This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.
Indeed, a machine is an organism of metal fast evolving through the customary ages of all organisms – in the XIX c. ‘humans’, who catalyze their evolution did its bodies of metal, then its hearts-engines, in the II Industrial evolution, then its metal-minds in the XX c. and now in the Industrial r=evolution 4.0 put them together in organic robots.
So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is just a simplex version of organicism. It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms:
In the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism.
Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon?
There are obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things.
But the deepest reason of them all is the fact that to make an organism we need at least two ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also INFORMATION, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy.
Only then when we properly define information and add it to the mix, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).
But what is entropy and information, in simple self-evident terms? The answer is obvious: entropy is motion, and motion is time, change. And information is form, and form is dimensional space. Time=motion and Space=dimensional form become then the two substances of which all what exists is made, and in their analysis we must start our inquire about why indeed the Universe and all its parts are a fractal super organism of time=motion=entropy and space=form, made to the image of its whole.
The proofs? That is the easiest part. Look around you, all what you see are forms that occupy space, and move in time. Everything you see is a form of space with a time motion. There is nothing else and so all is a proof that reality is indeed made of space-time organisms, as the motto of this web says.
General Systems: 5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe.
New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.
Planck on the informative seed or mind that will reproduce and evolve into a larger super organism or mental world.
For those with little time, a brief introduction to a subject that could easily fill an encyclopedia Britannica:
The Universe is a fractal scalar, organic system of 5 Dimensions of space-time. The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’, which amazing enough since it was discovered at the beginning of science with telescope and microscopes, was not formalized till I introduce its metric equation in the milieu of systems sciences.
In mathematical science for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space, and time to gives us a co-invariant system that allows to travel through such dimension. The fifth dimension has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equations for a given number of scales co-existing in an organic network is S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.
It means when we become smaller within such organic network, our time clocks accelerate. And vice versa. For example, in your organism the equation relates the cellular genetic scale, whose time cycles run much faster than your biological cycles. As information is stored in the form and frequency of time clocks, it follows that in all nature’s organisms, smaller systems code the information of larger systems.
In the next graphs we show 3 classic examples of biology and physics, now properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in space.
In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume:energy content of its orbital sphere):
Why this law is so important? Because it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.
Each ‘stience’ therefore specializes in the study of a nested super organism, or scale of the fifth dimension (∆±¡), We study 3 fundamental super organisms of the 5th dimension. The ‘galatom‘, whose metric equation is H(Planck constant of angular momentum) x C (speed of light) = C, whereas h is an obvious ‘cyclical time clock’ and C an obvious measure of speed-distances in space. And indeed, smaller scales have faster turning particles, and larger systems move in slower cycles. (Vortex law: Vo x Ro = k).
In biology we study families of animals such as mammals where larger organisms have slower metabolic cycles. In history we study social organisms, whose cycles of life and death, will define the evolution of nations and civilizations. And in each of those organisms, smaller systems code larger ones. So the quantum numbers of particles code matter, genes code biologic organisms, and memes code societies.
We define them two fundamental systems one in space and one in time, taking place in the fifth dimension:
An entangled super organism in space, in which the synchronicity between 3 scales of the organism, its atomic/cellular/Individual, thermodynamic/organic /social and gravitational/ecosystemic/global scales in physical/biological/social organisms form a complex interacting, entangled system we shall call a super organism, whose study discovers ‘Isomorphic=equal laws’ regardless of what kind of system we study. Because the system is entangled, and made of 5 obvious components, we need a new logic, ‘pentalogic’ as all the elements communicate and interact together. Those elements common to all systems of nature are identified as:
‘space‘, ” §paœ that is ‘types of dimensional form’, and we find to have 3 only ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 clear organic functions in the super organism, lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic body-waves that iterate its forms and spherical particle/heads that gauge information.
Time, that is types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).
Scale, the 3 aforementioned scales for any super organism
Mind. And this allow us to identify a ‘center that process’ information from the outer world, and controls the internal networks of the system, with a given language, which we shall call a mind, regardless of its automatic processing or consciousness. As it coordinates and maintains the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.
Entropic limits: In time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆1<<∆-1.
All this allow us to define any system in time, by its life and death cycle which we shall call a worldcycle (taken from 4D physics, worldline, which now with a new dimension becomes a worldcycle. Since indeed any scalar super organism’s existence can easily be defined as a travel through the 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as all systems are born as a seminal, smaller form, in the ∆-1 lower scale, grow fast with its faster time speed, emerge in the ∆º body scale and are part with its head/particle of a larger social world, in the ∆+1 scale.
How then a system travels through those scales? Very simple, it does so accelerating in its life cycle, emerging, living in the larger world, and then dissolving back to its parts in the death moment:
Amazingly enough with this simple scheme of 5 pentalogic elements, tracing 3 relative worldcycles, the first ‘placental worldcycle’ as it evolve in the relative safe ‘womb’ of a maternal system, the life cycle, as it tries to survive in an outer ecosystem, and for the most organized systems, a 3rd worldcycle as it forms part of a larger super organism, we will be able to order everything in the Universe, every event and every phenomena, which the researcher has studied for decades.
The existence of a new dimension of space-time is the most important discovery of science in a century, since Einstein formalized the fourth dimension, but this expansion and formal organization of science is much wider as it applies to all sciences, not only physics.
So we study further the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information and coordination of its citizens-cells.
FUTURE PREDICTABILITY OF 5 D SYSTEMS. ABCDE OF STIENCES
In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of entropy (studied exhaustively by physicists) and information (its inverse that evolves form) combined into conservative ‘present’ zero-sum cycles of energy. They are the 3 ‘conserved’ arrows of time that create the futures of each fractal supœrganism, between its 4Dimotion of generation in a lower ∆-1 plane that emerges in an ∆+1 social world to die back in a dissolving explosion of scattering entropy, back to ∆-1 in the moment of death.
Below its worldcycles in terms of its 3 conserved quantities (left), first found in ‘taoism’(center) in terms of yin=information and yang=entropy. On the left an ‘accelerated’ timespace vortex that defines in 5D physics an attractive vortex of spacetime of the quantum scale (charge) or the cosmological one (mass).
Thus the Universe has not only mathematical, spatial continuous but also logic, temporal, cyclical and organic, fractal properties derived of the more complex ¡logic geometry of scalar space and cyclical time.
The ternary properties of the Universe ARE MANDATORY as all is made of space, time and scale, and hence it has mathematical=spatial, logic=temporal and organic=scalar properties, which unfortunately humans fail to recognize, as they have become specialized in ‘mathematical=spatial only properties’ due to the prominent role of physics and its digital machines of spatial measure in our systems of knowledge.
Yet it is impossible to make sense of reality if we do NOT include ALL THOSE PROPERTIES, as expressed previously in the 5 elements of reality.
Of the many consequences of that ternary or pentalogic, ∆±¡ STructure of all beings, we shall consider how to use it to predict the future of its scientific species, with a remodeled ABCDE of the scientific method that studies A)ccurate Data, B)iologic causes C)yclical patterns and E)ntropic extinctive conclusions for all systems in 3 relative scales of length of space and time duration (to which we add instead of E, D)emocratic, humanist solutions for questions of social sciences.
All sciences predict the future of its species according to its repetitive causal cycles. Or else they are NOT a science. Astrology became a science when Kepler learned its orbital cycles. Bio-economics became a science when we described machines as metal organisms whose industrial r=evolution followed the human 72 years generations of the dominant industrial nations that evolved them in 4 cycles: its body-age (British, steam cycle), heart age (German, electro-chemical engine cycle), its mind age (US, tv-eye, chip-head, mobile-ear cycle) to conclude with the ensemble of robots that as virus do, when all its parts are put together will become ‘alive’. In the graph, the predictability of time-cycles can be done at 3 levels:
S: Continuous, spatial mathematical simple cycles, using derivatives, proper of calculus; which is the shortest time span, as instantaneous derivatives cannot measure a ‘peak’ change of age/phase.
T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns of sequential repetitive often survival actions (feeding, reproduction, death, taking place at intervals. As those actions are discontinuous, leaving long spans in-between, their patterns forecast longer time sequences. Such ¡logic structures are based in time patterns, which as any mechanical, circadian or orbital day-year clock shows are cyclical, repetitive. But here human scientists are at loss, because Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosions that destroy the information of reality stored in those cycles of time clocks, its patterns and frequencies, changing human cyclical understanding of bio-logic time for lineal, abstract time that seems not to repeat those patterns so mankind lost its capacity to predict many spacetime events, as lineal time misses the information stored in the frequency and form of cyclical clocks, even if equations are similar: V=s/t for lineal time and V=S(l) x ƒ(t) for cyclic patterns.
∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of topologic and eusocial evolution of parts into wholes – of quantum 0-1 time probabilities vs. 1-∞ thermodynamic populations in physics, of individuals vs. species in biology, of states of matter vs. geologic cycles in Earth, first noticed by J. Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word super organism for Gaia and deep time for its slower time cycles by virtue of its 5D metrics, $ x ð =C which implies that from the perspective of a smaller scale the life of its whole is much longer.
Deep time leads to a 3rd level of long-time prediction: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines used in my web at evolutionaryeconomics.wordpress.com that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) and eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits=valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years. But as human only recognize the 1st type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3 ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe.
L§, former chair of Duality at ISSS
Which leads to a final question: Why humans prefer a mechanical, mathematical simplex view of reality instead of embracing the whole? The answer might not be so much a problem of the Universe but of the human mind; as organisms are self-centered and select information from their point of view. So to be the center of the Universe is a survival strategy, which has made humans as they became over powerful on other organisms of Earth, reject a view of reality more objective, even today as machines clearly evolve into organisms, and we shall return to those themes, in our organic analysis of history and mathematical definition of the mind.
However a philosophy of science is a ‘thought experiment’ not a practical endeavor. So we care only for a profound ‘communion’ with the ultimate whys of reality, trying to understand the Universe as an entangled whole.
Indeed, the philosophy of systems science considering how timespace organisms follow similar laws. In that sense, the method of knowledge of the fractal, organic Universe is quite different from our present way of thought, which is analytic, and cheers the ‘cataloging’ of differences between beings – Systemics is a synthetic method and cheers the finding of similarities between them, extracting ‘disomorphic=equal laws’ .
Humans though embarked in a journey of ‘mechanical, mathematical’ dissection of reality which is fine but made them loose the forest view – and I dare to say most don’t even care anymore to know if they are looking at a forest at all.
The blog though only differentiates the ‘trees’ of the forest in the fourth line, which was meant to be a collaboration with a team of specialized scientists, each one casting his trees on the shadow of the ‘standard’ 12+1 set of ‘Disomorphic laws’ that define the common nature of all time-space organisms explained in the 3rd line (and briefly introduced in the next paragraphs).
As this collaborative effort has not happened the blog is incomplete.
Yet for those interested in the trees, the second line offers quite a ‘tree’ vision of the main sciences of the nested Universe departing from the largest one, the galatom, down to the smallest ones, the mind-languages stored in our infinitesimal neurons.
On my view, as Descartes put it when finishing his much briefer introduction to analytic Geometry on a book which he cherished more for his philosophy of science – as we do – but came to matter more for its maths, the detailed part on specific stiences and species is good enough for a single scholar so ‘I will leave work to be done by future researchers’; Human or more likely AI which will no doubt enjoy the handling of huge data in parallel fashion and will need an organic explanation of why it will soon become conscious 🙂
L§, ¡man . Philosopher of Science.
Foreword. What is exist¡ence.
I. EXI+ST¡ENCES in scale: Scales of the fifth dimension. Constructivism v. Absolute relativity.
II. Existence in time: The 3 scales of worldcycles.
III. Stientific scalesL
∆¡>|2|. Physical systems.
∆¡<|3|. Biological systems.
∆i≈1,2. Historic systems.
WHAT IS EXIST¡ENCE?
We substitute the word ‘to live’ which has been tainted of anthropomorphism and non-scientific pseudo-religious discourse for the much more precise concept of ‘existence’, which we have already defined in the first line as exist¡ence; a composite wor(l)d of ¡nglish which hides multiple entangled meanings.
Indeed, the ‘function of exist¡ence’ or «exi=st» does already include all the elements the Fractal Generator, and can be considered an ‘Isomorphic’ synonymous of it. The 5 symbols of dimotions are embedded in the symbol for expansive locomotion <, Implosive information >, entropy «, perception » and <energy> (=). And the components between the limits of pure space and pure time, are precisely those energy x information, e x I symbols.
¡nglish has its beauty in the parallel symbols that form words which have complex ¡logic meanings.
In the case of the function of exi«st¡ence, exi«st is indeed the present state exi, in which an organism with spatial and temporal entropic limits «st, ‘exists’ guided by its mind self-centered in a given plane of stience, ∆¡, performing those 5 Dimotions, < > = « »; always trying to achieve a present balance between the inner world (exi), its bodywave/particle head system, and the outer world St¡…
In this post we are interested though in the last part of that sentence, ‘st¡ence’, the scale in which each mind centers its worldview, as the ‘1 plane’ in which its inner and outer worlds, the o-1 sphere and the 1-∞ reality come together.
Each ‘stience’ thus is defined by a relative plane, world or ecosystem in which multiple minds will fight its existential game…
The nested stiences of the Universe.
After making a general review in the first line “T.œ: T-S ∆³ ∞º supœrganism act=live to iterate its worldcycles” of the PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE that CONSTANTLY GENERATES SPACE-TIME ORGANISMS…
SINCE ALL ORGANISMS of reality perform a Worldcycle of existence DEPARTING FROM DUST OF SPACE-TIME, ¬∆@st, WHICH EVOLVES INTO A simultaneous tri-scalar mental superorganism, WHICH will try to act=live, by reproducing its worldcycles generation after generation BY IMPRINTING IS RELATIVE DUST OF space-time…
WE INTRODUCE in this last post, the second line, where we shall study each st¡ence of the nested scalar universe and its main Exi=st¡ences.
So in this post we study the scales of reality from the perspective of its stiences, unlike in ∆³, where we consider its main laws.
Those stiences are thus ‘nested super organisms’ which have at its center the formal languages, ∆º of human thought:
In keeping with the method of the organic, fractal nested Universe we define each sub-set of super organisms of diminishing size, studied by each stience, with the name of its larger super organism, as perceived from the whole:
In the graph, the basic laws of fractal, cyclical space-time, the Universe co-exists in 3 planes of relative size in space and speed of time clocks, which defines a super organism; and in each plane ensembles the 3 conserved quantities of reality, which we call the 3 ‘first dimensions of space-time’: lineal motions (limbs/potentials: lineal momentum), cyclical motions (particle/heads: angular momentum) and its body-wave combinations (hyperbolic energy).
As the Universe is an absolutely relative fractal of scales of space-time, we can choose any of those scales to ensemble a larger or smaller super organism, of which humans perceive in a nested convergence departing from its upper and Lower limits:
∆±4: The galatom, the biggest super organism we observe, between the atom made of particles and the galaxy, likely an atom of a hyper universe.
its ∆º linguistic mind (the minimal nested super organism, defined as a mirror of the infinite Universe in an infinitesimal brain: ∞º)…
its life superorganisms in 3 scales (∆º:cellular, ∆¹:individual and ∆²:social scales), which forms together the super organism of History, ∆+2, mankind in time.
Yet mankind in time is just an ‘age’ of the Earth’s super organism which in its surface evolves in a vortex of growing complexity and so we need to introduce also 2 more life superorganisms according to the equation of evolution of the 3 Earths:
∆≤|2|: Gaia (relative past) <∆²: History (relative present)> ∆¯ ²: Metalearth (relative future)
Whereas an intelligent mankind would stop evolution of the Metal-earth, promote the Life earth to remain in an immortal present. But as mankind is completely ignorant of the organic, fractal laws of survival of this Universe, and its role on it, guided by ‘animetal idol-ogies’ of mechanist worshippers of machines and harder iron atoms and more informative go(l)d-money, IS catalyzing the evolution of those company-mothers of machines, which likely will extinguish us once they reach self-reproductivity as automated systems. Hence the importance of upgrading mechanist abstract science into organic stience to understand that process and control it, pruning the Tree of science of its lethal goods.
It is in any case obvious, according to the Philosophy of Stience and its Methods of truth, that unlike in constructivism (Philosophy of Science of physics), MAN IS AGAIN THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS, BECAUSE it is the most perfect superorganism we can observe, as we have more information of it than of any other system; and it is in any case the main system we should care about, as it is by knowing ourselves how we can elongate our existence, which is the game for which we are created.
For those reason, the second line dedicates much more space to the ‘smaller scales’ of the nested Universe as we converge into the human being.
So there is one post for each of the 3 ages of Gaia, one dedicated to Life (Gaia), one to History (the human superorganism in time) and one to the economic ecosystem and the future metal-earth which if not controlled should become a superorganism, hence eliminating one of the two species of the present-future situation in which we live today.
And even more space paradoxically to the smallest of all forms, the ∆º mind-point and its Languages of perception of scale and time and space, mathematics and logic, and the languages of the humind (human mind).
So that is the content of the second line studied here in a synoptic manner, since the Universe is iterative and so it is this mandala blog.
The line thus starts with the largest nested stience, General Systems Theory (GST) that studies Generational space-time, which exists as the substrata of all relative ∆±∞ scales, and then goes down into the galatom, (galaxy), the Earth, its ages, and our mind within its languages. To finally study the different logic levels of complexity used to describe reality and introducing the most complex logic method of analysis of a world cycle, the Disomorphic method that we shall use after its explanation in the 3rd line to study in the fourth line all the dual palingenetic and life-death worldcycles of its main species by scale.
So you can consider the first 2 lines a brief account of reality in terms of its main stiences, species and scales. And the third and fourth line a much wider never-complete methodology for future researchers to encase all the knowledge of man in an encyclopedia of T.œs
WHAT IS existence? The world cycle: Existence in time: travels through 5D.
This question so seemingly profound has an immediate answer in the fractal organic Universe:
Exist¡ence is travel through the planes of growing size in space and slowing time clocks of information that define fifth dimension (S x T = K). As mathematicians define a dimension of space-time, with an equation that is co-invariant when we travel through it, existence is possible PRECISELY BECAUSE WE can travel, growing in size and reducing our time-speed of our ‘existential clocks’ through that ‘metric equation’ from seminal fast moving, smaller in space, seminal seed, to human being, in a slower world.
And so in that travel through the scales of the 5th dimension we exist, by means of ‘finitesimal’ actions, a,e,i,o,u (a-ccelerations/motions, e-nergy feeding, I-nformation gauging, o-ffspring reproduction, u-niversals creation of wholes).
This existence again follows 5D metric (all does:). So the actions we perform with smaller scales are more frequent (perception of smallish light pixels, feeding in small amino acids, etc). Those who engage us with larger, slower beings are far less frequent or even do not exist at all (reproductive and social actions). But in any case all together with its different rhythms and synchronicities are the stuff of which existence ‘in detail’, moment after moment of ‘present’ action IS MADE.
Those sequences of actions, thus conform the program of existence that all systems live as they emerge from its fast seminal ‘∆-1 plane of exist¡ence’ (belonging to a given st¡ence ‘i-ndexed’ by the i-parameter of scale) into its relative ∆º-st¡-entific scale, where the LONGEST period of existence happens, and we shall call the present-individual state of the being. However – and this is the reason why existence has never been properly answered – the full world cycle of existence of the being requires to understand the 3 scales in which it take place, the seminal ∆-1, individual ∆º lives its ‘present life cycle’ in a larger ∆¡+1 world and finally, the process of extinction of existence (death), when the system erases its information and descends back to its ∆¡-1 scale where it was first ‘seeded’, completing a zero ‘cycle’ of motions in time (moments) and stops in space (forms), which carry the being, through its ‘ST-eps’ of existence, ‘momentum after momentum’, to complete a conservative whole ‘zero sum cycle of energy’, integral of all those ‘momentums of existence’.
We are on purpose mixing jargons of different languages, and mathematical equations BECAUSE THE PROPER PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE OF THE universe of 5 dimensions must SHOW THE HOMOLOGY of all the ‘languages of god’ which are ‘infinite’ (Upanishads), in its description of the worldcycle of existence. As we live under the DICTATORSHIP of the simplified jargon of 4D physics and people are ‘slaves they believe they don’t reason’ (Aristotle), I hold little hope that the usual scholar will do nothing but jerk out of those pages, because they do not talk of simplified worldlines (4D formalism of existence), pretend to take as serious science the logic of verbal though not only his clocks etc. etc. Enough quips. Back to exit¡ence and the mixed jargons.
Because the Universe is made of time motions, with the mind stiffens into still, linguistic mappings, there is this mind-error, of thinking that existence stops, because the mind stops, slices the infinite cycles of existence into finitesimal 0 mappings (Galilean paradox of relativity of motion) to ‘fit’ with less motion and dimensions reality into the mind. Motion though is all and motion never stops and that is the reason why:
1) the universe is immortal as a whole, as it never stops motion.
2) When we ad to the entropic arrow of 4D physics the arrow of information, all motions are balanced by forms, and so all is a zero sum (the big-bang is balanced by the big-crunch provoked by gravitational in-formation, even if physicists are at ‘ideological pains’ adding gravitation to it).
3)Existence as we like it requires motion, but existence as it is, keeps spending our vital energy of motion, increasing our gauging of information by our selfish mind-mappings, by the BIAS OF THE EGO, that wants to order and stiffens and stop motion into informative perception, and so we get old, wrinkle warp existence and finally as motion cannot stop, time cannot stop, when we have no energy to spend, existence explodes us and liberates our form into motion and we die: ∆¡+1<<∑∆¡i-1, which is the equation of death in the simple I-logic jargon of existence (where ∆ is the scale, ∑ the symbol of many and < the symbol of growth of size in space, diminution of information and vice versa (>).
So death is a double explosion of existence << from the slow existence in the world of the old man to the existence in the cellular amino acid scale after its sudden death, which for all systems happens in a single quanta of momentum (the unit of any action of existence).
We can see in the first graph, how all physical, biological and social systems, follow the same ‘worldcycle’ of existence as a travel through 3 ∆±1 scales of the fifth dimension, as they are born in a seminal seed that emerges into an ∆º scale, where it will move decreasing its motion and increasing its information through a gaseous, young state of minimal information, through a reproductive, liquid state of balance into a 3rd age of maximal information, exploding back its form into motion, in the entropic process of death.
All the organic systems of the Universe, physical, biological and historic, follow the same 5 Dimensional states of a worldcycle, from its fast evolving relative 5th dimension or generation age of social evolution from an ∆-1 seed to an emerging ∆º individual through the 3 dimensional ages of life, to the 4th dimension of entropic death..
What physicists do with its simplified models of 4 Dimensions, is to reject the arrow of social evolution, love and organic information, which is the 5th dimension of creating wholes by parts, because of its ‘concept of time’ merely as change of motion, locomotion, lineal motion, which then for the whole Universe becomes the arrow of ‘entropy and death’, and we shall adscribe by the correspondence principle to the fourth dimension.
Why we call sciences exi+st¡enœs
Absolute timespace (5D) vs. relative timespace (worldcycles)
Absolute timespace is the fifth dimension as wholes come after parts: evolution selects wholes and so the arrow of wholes dilates time adding ±scales, as each whole will be ‘grounded’ on a smaller part. I.e. a bigger whole will feed in entropic smaller beings, whales in plankton, galaxies in light space-time, Universes in dark entropy… Below the arrows of relative time, as all life-existences are zero-sums which return to its origin. It is then obvious that in a single plane time is always a relative world cycle, and so it is when an ∆± cycle between seminal, organic and social existence goes up and down, but the stretching of ±i scales of the fifth dimension is the absolute arrow of time, which means that if the Universe has lasted as it seems in lineal time eons, it is also infinite in scales. On the other hand, our cycles of life and death are the relative arrow of time, as we all go through the cycle and finally die and return to the nothingness of non-existence. So we talk of the three arrows of entropy, energy and information as the three arrows of relative time of a world cycle of existence between birth and extinction. And we talk of the absolute arrow of time of social evolution as the ‘fifth dimension’ of the scalar Universe that constantly expands its scales of social growth.The fifth dimension of scalar space-time coupled with the three relative arrows of time, past entropy, future information, and its present energetic combinations, are the ‘foundational principles’ of the organic models of the fractal Universe which tends to evolve groups into tighter herds and super organisms with higher ‘social forms’ in the scales of the fifth dimension – as they survive better into the future, making the scalar dimension the absolute dimension of time of the Universe. Since as Einstein put it, the ‘separation between the past, present and future is an illusion, given the fact that death ‘erases’ all the gains of information of any system of the Universe.
Indeed, all biological systems become a zero sum as the world cycle of informative life and entropic death erases them back to the past.
And all physical systems, do the same according to Einstein’s equation, e=mc²: which must be read in terms of the three arrows as:
Past entropic big bang ≤Present, constant space-time light wave≥ future mass vortex of information.
So only the absolute arrow of the fifth dimension is an arrow of future time as:
- Whole systems survive better in the future than parts.
- For a new scale of the fifth dimension to exist, parts must come first, so wholes are into the future of its parts
- A whole has more information, as it adds to that of its parts, the systems of the whole, so it is in the relative future of information.
‘Science should be concerned only with things and events that exist’. ‘I don’t believe in mathematics, God integrate empirically. I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’. Einstein, on the proper laws of the scientific, experimental method…
A)accurate data, which is excellent for most biological and astrophysical systems within the limits of human perception (∆±3 planes within the galaxy) but not due to the ‘uncertainty’ paradox and human egocy, born of the self-centered limits of the humind, in cosmology (outside the light space-time of galaxies our electronic minds and instruments perceive) and social sciences (due to the tribal egocy on those in power, as even the Britannica acknowledge on his article of philosophy of science, which denies the evolutionary nature of meta life, aka machines and the organic nature of cultures as super organisms of human beings).
B)io-logic causes, that is rational biological reasons to all events, expressed in a proper mirror-language whose ternary syntax reflects the ternary a(nti)symmetries and 3±¡ pentalogic structure of ⌜𝝙@st (the five ðimotions of ⌜entropy or negation of information, 𝝙 scales, @mind, space and time). Again the egocy of man denies biological, organic properties to all other systems of nature, which are natural to the ∆§calar nature of the Universe.
C)orrespondence principle and Cyclical repetitive patterns, the very essence of science, so often denied by the aberration of lineal time, to which we add…
D) Ðisomorphic method of laws derived of the experimental evidence of our two primary substances, time motions and space dimensional forms, the 5 Ðimotions of all exi=st¡ence… and a needed Democratic=humanist practice, to use science to cater the welfare, or WHealth (healthy wealth) of humanity, our God=superorganism, in verbal mystical terms, so often forgotten by nuclear physicists, weapons makers, financial economists that use the language of reproduction of the human super organism to cater the needs of company-mothers of machines and its stock-ratic owners, NOT human mothers and the 1%.
E)xperimental Evidence and E-conomicity, which go hand in hand and DENY inflationary informative mathematical biased mirrors that invent particles, black holes evaporating, non edible SUSYs, God’s particles that do NOT give mass to the Universe and other niceties of the entropic lineal worldly profession of physics 😈.
Why we call the existence of beings, exi+st¡ence? The answer is that keeping with the ¬Æ method of upgrading sciences to st¡ences – the study of spacetime organisms, we change slightly the wording of classic science to make more focused verbal mirrors of those space-time beings. Thus science becomes space-time sciences: stiences or stienœs where œ compresses ce into the œ symbol of superorganisms and sc changes to St.
Moreover we write exi=st¡ences, to reflect as we so often do, the pentalogic, multiple meanings of all forms that are never ceteris paribus – all yin has a drop of yang – analysis. So as we can define the 3 elements of the being as its present body wave of energy and information, ∑e x ∏I =exi, and that element is sandwiched between the still singularity or mind of pure linguistic formal space (s) and the external world of infinite cycles of time, perceived as entropy-disordered motion for the T.œ that feeds on it (closed state of information vs. open universe of entropy), we can also define a system in its 3 components on a single plane of existence as exi=st, which is the ‘simplest verbal mode’ of expressing in ‘parallel’ duality, the being in verbal and mathematical symbolic thought.
Further on, any being is made of a body wave of vital energy (motion with a little form) and information (form with a little motion: form-in-action, in-form-action), which try to balance each other component, E=I, to iterate the being into an eternal ‘present’ of dynamic no-change. But the body wave of energy and information, which is the most evident part, hence the one most sciences study, has a ‘spatial=pure formal’ singularity-mind monad in its center, which connects the system with other ‘planes’ of the absolute arrow of time scales, co-existing with the being (its ∆-1 cellular state and its ∆+1 world), and so this element is §, the Spatial element of st¡ which adds to the body; while it does have an external membrane of maximal cyclical angular momentum, ultimately its ‘defining closed clock of time’ that communicates the being with all the external motions of its ∆+1 world, or t¡. So the being is really made of those 3 elements ExI+ST¡ the way we write the ternary parts of the being, according to the Rashomon effect of multiple meanings, as it allow us to define both, in logic symbols, with topological meaning, and verbal concepts of metaphysics all beings in exist¡ence..
In the full formal symbolism of Dimotions it would be more proper to write it as ∑e x ∏ I = ST , as there is a balance between the vital energy of the system and its singularity and membrane, and dynamically as Max. exist, as the function tries to maximize itself. In fact, there is a huge discipline of T.œ dedicated to study that function of existence, which is the true meaning of ‘living’ and so we study the function in the posts on ‘live’ and ‘actions. So we also use the wording exi=st¡ence.
So To exi=st in the ∆o scale, as an entity of st¡enœ, an organic T.œ, generated by a 𝚪st formal equation that represents in ¡logic terms the 𝝙@st elements of reality and its ¬neganformation, summarizes all the ‘parallel’ meanings of exist¡enœ.
All this for the @ristotelian mind that reduces knowledge to locomotion seems fireworks. He just believes what he sees as e-vident, even if one eye is closed in its lineal locomotion, measured with machines of higher precision than the eyes of man but so far as computers are made by hominids in its primitive 1-dimensional logic, way beyond what the paradoxical Universe does, to entangle all the elements of reality in a ‘synchronous, simultaneous’ present superorganism that seems to hold ‘magically’ for the ‘stupid who doesn’t see the causality of it’ (Schopenhauer).
This to start with, since Science means in Latin ‘knowledge’, without exclusion of any field of reality, including those of which we have more experimental evidence than the entropic particles never to be found, such as religion – the subconscious collective of the super organism of history, art – the realization of that subconscious collective by those humans who use their senses to see better and think better with words on the ethic social love messages 😇, of the fifth dimension that creates those super organisms by making humans sharing energy and information through its economic-blood and legal-just nervous systems.
Which lead us to vindicate social sciences in a correct, rational, biological format as the highest of all sciences of mankind.
We call ‘sciences’ exist¡enœs following with the ‘¡-logic’ language that slightly renames every term of human knowledge to adequate it to the more complex reality of the fractal Universe.
What it means is this: every st¡enœ studies a spacetime scale of reality, ¡=n, and within it its super organisms of space-time, œ. So every science is in fact a st¡enœ: ST¡ en œ.
Further on, every stience studies of those organisms normally its existence in a single present plane, which is defined as the ‘3rd dimension of present iteration, ∑e x ∏I, a body-wave of energy (motion with little form) and information (form with little motion) entangled and made symbiotic for the system to be, so ExI, represents each present body-wave and Plane of exist¡enœ…
So this is the first element of the word exi+st¡ence
The second word is obviously the world st¡ence, which you can consider the ‘phonetic’ way of saying science, but what really means is that each science studies an ∆¡ scale of space-time, ST¡, and the species in exist¡ence within that plane. So the wording is truly the type of creative words of ‘complex English’ I like to use on my books, for 30 years. And a reason why those books have been ignored. It is not the academic scholar a mind that welcomes novelty and creativity, as he rather tries to ‘stop in its spatial mind’ reality stiffen it; and there is also a general indifference due to the ab=use of machines of measure, of any synthetic study of reality and its first principles…
We call ‘sciences’ stiences of space-time, and any system of energy and information, merged together as a complementary body/wave-head/particle organism, an exi=st¡ence, that is an organism of energy and information, extending through 3 ±i planes of space-time (St¡).
Each stience then is the sum of a fractal number of such ±i organisms, defined by its relative i-ndex of the scalar 5th dimension, which we can either order from 0 (smallest form) to 10 (largest ones), as constructivist theories do, or better in GST, as a series of nested ±i species, from the perspective of the human mind (ab. humind), the ∆º center of perception of all of them.
In the graph, this post defines all stiences of reality as scales of the fifth dimension; where a series of beings of energy and information exist in present between its upper and lower, ∆±1 scales.
So To exi=st in the ∆o scale, as an entity of st¡enœ, an organic T.œ, generated by a 𝚪st formal equation that represents in ¡logic terms the 𝝙@st elements of reality and its ¬neganformation, summarizes all the ‘parallel’ meanings of exist¡enœ.
All this for the @ristotelian mind that reduces knowledge to locomotion seems fireworks. He just believes what he sees as e-vident, even if one eye is closed in its lineal locomotion, measured with machines of higher precision than the eyes of man but so far as computers are made by hominids in its primitive 1-dimensional logic, way beyond what the paradoxical Universe does, to entangle all the elements of reality in a ‘synchronous, simultaneous’ present superorganism that seems to hold ‘magically’ for the ‘stupid who doesn’t see the causality of it’ (Schopenhauer).
This to start with, since Science means in Latin ‘knowledge’, without exclusion of any field of reality, including those of which we have more experimental evidence than the entropic particles never to be found, such as religion – the subconscious collective of the super organism of history, art – the realization of that subconscious collective by those humans who use their senses to see better and think better with words on the ethic social love messages 😇, of the fifth dimension that creates those super organisms by making humans sharing energy and information through its economic-blood and legal-just nervous systems.
Which lead us to vindicate social sciences in a correct, rational, biological format as the highest of all sciences of mankind.
We call ‘sciences’ exist¡enœs following with the ‘¡-logic’ language that slightly renames every term of human knowledge to adequate it to the more complex reality of the fractal Universe.
What it means is this: every st¡enœ studies a spacetime scale of reality, ¡=n, and within it its super organisms of space-time, œ. So every science is in fact a st¡enœ: ST¡ en œ.
Further on, every stience studies of those organisms normally its existence in a single present plane, which is defined as the ‘3rd dimension of present iteration, ∑e x ∏I, a body-wave of energy (motion with little form) and information (form with little motion) entangled and made symbiotic for the system to be, so ExI, represents each present body-wave and Plane of exist¡enœ..
¬ EXISTENTIAL ENTROPIC LIMITS SET BY EACH WORLD.
A KEY element so often ignored specially in supœrganisms of History are the entropic limits set to the individual within the larger ecosystem, both in time, space and scale, which limit its freedom of existence and social power.
Entropic limits ARE the very essence of all supœrganisms, and the biggest handicap for mankind to overcome its mortality as a species, founding a better world, based in ethics, a planet without borders (space limits), idol-ogies (mental limits) where all could thrive.
Entropic LIMITS are NOT abstract but organic, biological laws as they can kill, and do kill those who trespass them. In essence those limits are thus invisible, temporal not spatial, even if they can be reinforced spatially but often acquire the form of a motion and are internalized by the logic systems of the mind. I.e. a dog can be a limit for an entire sheep herd, even if it is just a point in motion, memorially reinforced by biting sheep on their legs.
So the huge difference between the placental and existential cycles is the clear limit for the existential cycle of availability of energy, but even more stringent are the limits when the herd-state of an ecosystem becomes a closed superorganism, as it is happening to History, enclosed by the ‘capitalist’ world of company-mothers.
It is such a stringent limit from birth to death, when you live within such super organisms that the blind cells of the body of a nation or civilization are not even aware of the existence of those limits since the mind has been imprinted since birth and limited in its perception of information by the neuronal, upper, informative people-cast that control it.
Entropic limits can be found in all the scales languages and stiences of reality, starting from the concept of an open ball with in a Klein hyperbolic geometry cannot be reached, as they offer resistance to motion to the galaxy c-speed and T=0 limits of Spatial lineal motion, and cyclical information (since either as still distances or Dimotions of space-time).
I. SCALAR SPACE
PLANES OF EXIST¡ENCE
‘Philosophy of Science will be completed only by a set of principles regarding information similar to those of Physicists in the study of entropy and locomotion.’
Searle. On the goal achieved in this web.
5TH DIMENSION: ALL Planes of ∃xi=st¡ence
As we call all local dimensional motions of any organism, Dimotions, we reserve the name of the 5th Dimension of D=evolution to all the scales and all planes.
So we define the study of all exi=st¡ences together, General Systems Theory, which studies Generational Space-time – the laws of the fifth dimension.
All systems are species that transit through planes of stienœ.
For each ternary Plane, ∆±1, the game of exist¡enœ can potentially design a supœrganic domain of a specific species.
WE ARE ALL exist¡enœs, @minds attached to bodies of energy and information, e x i, supœrganisms travelling in an external world st¡, as we move along the ∆±scales of a world cycle of st¡ences, three of those stientific planes embedded in the supœrganism which makes also our existence as biological beings, which we compare to the three scales that make the larger range of astrophysical beings in which we are:
Existence of a worldcycle through 3 ∆±¡ planes of the fifth dimension.
In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature, once the ‘first phase of any new scientific paradigm’ (resistance of authority) crumbles by the sheer weight of facts explained by the new paradigm.
The previous graphs allow us to – by expansion of its intermediate layers – map out the main st¡entific disciplines humans use to classify its knowledge of reality:
As beings make towards identity the tendency of all its parts, it follows that stiences can be grouped by ternary forms, with similar properties, defining a continuum of laws with application to a domain of supœrganisms, ∆±.
So we shall briefly introduce all the ‘stiences’ of the Universe according to those scales.
A graph, the scales of the Universe and the main stiences that studies them. Part of the systematisation I plan to carry about in this web for future researchers of what should become naturally the philosophy of stience of the III millennium consists on setting exact quantitative and qualitative epistemological structures where to fit all the knowledge developed by mankind in 3 millennia of rational thought, based in the properties of space-time. We call them Disomorphisms .
We classify all stiences, from the human centred point of view, hence with different approach to knowledge, depending of the strength of the ‘ego-centered’ paradox of the human observer, into:
-stiences of the mind first to know the syntax of knowledge in space (mathematical sciences) and time (logic sciences)… which apply to everything:
-studied with the minimal detail (Physical sciences) and sub-divide them in 2 groups, according to size relative to the human observer, physics (smaller sizes) and astrophysics (larger sizes).
-So we do with biology for smaller life beings (≤1 to the cell level) and earth’s sciences for lager sizes, including…
the economic world of machines, evolving through company-mothers into a global super-organism and
-the human social organisms, studied by social sciences, in its human branch (history), subdivided in History of the World and -History of the I<Wor(l)d, the human mind&art (ab.humind): ∆¹.
THUS the 9 stiences form a ‘closed ring, in which informative mind languages connect the beginning and the end of it all:
Mind Stiences: ∆¹:
Timespace, ¡Logic languages.
In GST, THERE are three arrows of relative, time, all finite in their application. So local time travel is possible, as it merely means a transformation of space-time from the relative arrow of future information and life to the arrow of local entropy, past and death of the system and this fact completely changes the ‘logic’ of all sciences, as the ‘reversibility’ of time arrows, has only be applied in quantum physics, and with little understanding of its true nature (within the simplified concept of a single global time arrow, which is always ternary and local, lasting the finite time cycle). Cyclical time again is also ignored. And so existential time algebra is the biggest advance in time thought since Aristotle defined its single-arrow logic and physicists used it in their lineal time concept and theories of the Universe.
The logic of the Universe is of a higher logic than man, said Augustine, and such is the case of the fractal logic of the Universe, with its 3 arrows of time. Humans do model its languages of information also with a ternary syntax, but the Universe has more languages than those of man – namely the languages of mathematical physics matter scales follow, the languages of topologic evolution, organisms follow and all other isomorphic laws that create.
Languages not always mirror the universe but as a reversal reflection create it, and this mirror-mind process is what ultimately we study in the first part of the book, the pure ontology of th Universe.
Spacetime: Mathematical Languages
Humans approach that ontology best with logico-mathematical languages, we complete adding to them laws of topological evolution and general systems stiences so we have the formalism needed to attack the more concrete…
Physical Sciences: ∆±i
∆-i: Physical Sciences
Physical scales are self-similar in 5D Metric (K=Spe x Tiƒ), between the atomic, thermodynamic, gravitational and dark scales, equivalent to the outer electromagnetic space between atoms galaxies, being the ∆ symmetry between ∆-2: Atom ≈ ∆+3: Galaxy and between K and G, the constants of curvature of masses and charges. We acknowledge that symmetry and divide the subject between ∆≤1 physics and ∆≥1 Astronomy, with the Geological and thermodynamic scales in its border.
They study all the scales of the Universe albeit with a reductionist simplicity in the lower scales, due to the lack of vital attributes human anthropomorphism denies to them. We study in the 3rd lines its main scales, in the mirror symmetry of lower scales with more information (from the human pov) and the larger scales with more motion (from the human pov, yet as both scales are from an absolute objective point of view, attained in each scale by simulating the physics of the self-centred scale of the being, we hold the symmetry between the atom and the galaxy: ∆-2≈∆+3 identical (metaphysics of the infinite universe)
Biological Sciences: ∆(-2,+2)
∆≥1: Earth’s sciences
Geology: ∆+2: Earth; Ecology: ∆+2.1:Gaia
Social Sciences: ∆:|+1,2|
∆+1ˆ2:$tock: The Industrial R=evolution of Machines, its 3 ages and 3 ∆-scales.
History of theWor(l)d: ∆+1+2:
∆+2: Γ•∆: The World: Human Superorganisms and Worldcycles.
∆+1: The I=eye>Wor(l)d: Human Languages.
NEXT it comes the question of constructivism: it is reality constrained by the limiting perception of the mind? So the closest scales to the mind – languages and life, are more important to understand reality as they are closely observed than the far away systems?
This is the thesis of absolute relativity and this blog. We do not see beyond the galaxy-atom in which we are inscribed.
Taking to its limits it would mean we perceive distortions that eliminate the same properties of beings in both directions, for which reason we see the galaxy similar to the atom. Another consequence is that the beyond is infinite, since we are centered between galaxy and atom, and the limiting perception beyond them towards 0 (96% of dark matter) is only product of that equal distance in terms of scales that become invisible to us.
The present theory of science however is constructivism, which considers a causal single arrow from small parts to larger ones, hence the cause of all things just be found in the small world – in quantum numbers in physics, in genes in biology and for that token in memes in sociology. This doesn’t hold in pentalogic with 3 interacting arrows that become the present, and 2 arrows of inverse scaling, entropy and mental information, still form.
Let us consider the constructivist thesis with the graph above and discuss what is worth of it – an easier picture of the natural decametric structure of the Universe it is easy to classify disciplines of knowledge and species according to scale. Other matter is where to start the order – shall we consider 0 the smallest parts, or the whole infinite that encloses them all – after all as Vonnegut put it infinity is just a twisted zero. In between scales, in both ways we number humans in the middle ‘5’, either counting as above from 0 forces to 10 cosmos or as below, from 0 cosmos to 10 forces?
But shall we consider the human the middle scale or as the perceiver, in the middle, the ∆o scale, numbering with negative and positive indexes (±i) the scales above and below to show the fascinating symmetries according to distance (so for example ∆±3 atoms and galaxies have similar structure, ∆±1 cells and nations also, etc.) We have settled for 01 force, 5 man, and 9 the cosmos in the 3rd line analysis of different stiences, though when considering epistemological themes, we will consider ∆0 to be the human scale.
In the graph, the main planes of exi+st¡ence of the fractal Universe, its clocks of time, and space-time symmetries shown for the human beings, which occupies the relative central plane, ∆0.
The planes of the Universe write in inverse fashion, depending on which parameter we study, the form or information (form reproduced through motion) of the system, or the size in space or energy (space moving a form) we observe.
The complex Universe is paradoxical, both because the mind is imperfect in its perception (so it stops cyclical clocks of time into forms with no motion, it perceives smaller planes of energy as spatial distances and so on) but because to maintain its ‘isomorphism’, its ‘invariance’ across the different cyclical planes of Times and Spaces, it must take when it gives, give when it take, to stay immortal it must be a zero sum, a place in perpetual balance.
Thus for each Space-time plane, we should really use a dual ‘complex number’ (a,bi), where a would be the value of its spatial scale and b, the value of its ‘informative’ cyclical time scale. In the complex mathematical model of ∆ST this is truth in more than a way (∆-numbers have certain importance when dealing with cyclical time calculus), but we are not going so far in this web or else the i will mean I am the only person ever to read these texts )-;
What we mean here is that both scales are inverse because when size increases time speed desecrates and vice versa.
And so the scale of increasing Size of Space planes, reads as:
S= 1-Force < S=2-Atom < … <5-Human<6-World <….S=9<Cosmos.
While the scale of increasing form or information reads as:
O-Cycles: 1-Local Universe < 2-Galaxy <3-Star<4-Earth<5-Human<6-Cell<7-Molecule<8-Atom<9-Force…
Only Man is in the center of both because it is the relative central plane of existence from where we observe the rest of them.
And yet the logarithmic sum of both or the Existential force of any species of any isomorphic plane, Se x Tƒ = ∆, remains constant.
This curious paradox comes to full realization when we consider the different ‘algebraic operations’ we can do with the two ‘fixed’ elements of the Universe, its Temporal Form, Tƒ, and its Spatial Size, Se.
One of the simplest ways to classify those cyclical planes is with the use of the logarithmic scale, but one of enormous ‘size-cyclical volume’, the U=10¹º logarithmic scale that converts individuals into Universals of a higher plane of existence. So a minimum of ±10¹º cells gives birth to an organism, the same number of DNA atomic ties gives a DNA molecule, the same number of stars gives birth to a Galaxy and so on. So each Plane or whole will be made of that number of individuals and vice versa, in terms of form, of information, since we do not distinguish more than the whole in a given plane of existence, each lower S-plane will have 10¹º cells/stars/atoms etc.
Thus form, the quantum, discontinuous perception diminishes, but the ‘continuous’ perception that aggregates all those beings into a ‘single whole’ extended into a plane of space increases by the same proportion.
Thus we write in the 10¹º logarithmic scale, 1, 2, 3, 4…. 10 Planes of Space-size, and we write the inverse diminution of information in the logarithmic scale as we increase that ‘continuous’ size.
Then we can do ‘calculus’ of the value of each isomorphic, Cyclical (Tƒ) Plane (S) of Space-time and we will find out (since logarithms ad potencies) the same value:
If we add the relative value of its planes of space and Cycles of form, the sum of any Plane of Space and its Time cycles remains constant. For example for the atom, the value of its relative size is 2, and the speed of its time cycles of form is 8:
Atom: 2+8 = 1o.
For the Galaxy the result is the inverse: 2 is the relative value of its cycles of time and 8 of its size: 8+2=10.
But all of them have the same 10 value, including man: 2+8=10.
However when we multiply both elements to find out the relative Existential Force of the System, from the human perspective: S x Tƒ, things greatly vary:
Atoms and Galaxies again have the same value, 2 x 8= 8 x2 = 16, which is also natural to its relative ‘isomorphism’, as the equations of its cycles (charges and masses) and planes (electromagnetic and gravitational planes) are the same (in the metric of the 5th dimension that unify them both).
The reader who feels confused by those paradoxes, must become accustomed to the paradoxical structure of reality and the metric of the 5th dimension. The dualities of subjective and objective knowledge, of the mind that stops motion and selects form to perceive and map out reality, of the barriers to perception beyond the light-forces of our space-time galactic Universe, etc. etc. We do try to introduce those paradoxes by showing inverse cardinals for the order of space-time planes of cyclical existence, when perceived only as planes of space by size, and only as cyclical forms of time.
Ultimately though the ‘isomorphism’ of reality is precisely the equal value of any Space-Time plane, when combining both parameters. And that is the reason of the absolute relativity of the Universe.
Further on those planes are infinite since as we observe the inverted values of galaxies and atoms, are the same and the metric show that atoms and galaxies do respond to the same equation, so when we enter the invisible regions of 0 information and ∞ size (Universe beyond c-speed of dark energy) and vice versa, the region of perfect form and 0 motion-size (universe of dark matter, below 0 k order), we imagine there will be a new game of 10 planes of isomorphic existence where other beings will have is fractal point of view.
A 5D universe cannot be constructed without 3 arrows of time, to define at least, the present Universe of 4D locomotions studied by physicists with ‘derivatives’ of present locomotions, V(st)=S/T, and the collateral 6 other motions of time happening in the 4Dimensional timespace block.
But also through the 2 UP AND DOWN ARROWS OF PAST AND FUTURE, ENTROPY AND INFORMATION, WHOSE ‘FRICTION’, e x i CREATES THE PRESENT space-time.
II. SCALES OF TIME:
ACTIONS & WORLDCYCLES.
ACTIONS: THE QUANTA OF EXISTENCE.
Γunction of existence: Max. ∑EXI=ST
THE GENERATOR EQUATION AS AN EXISTENTIAL FUNCTION: EXI≈S±Tº
All what we have said can be simplified ad maximal with an equation of survival, Max. e x i ±s=tº, that is a logic equation that establishes a mandate of actions of energy and information, entropic space and temporal clocks:
to maximize the spatial entropy, energy and information and temporal clocks of the being and its balanced combinations in body, limbs and heads/particles.
So if we define the energy of the being and its information, forms in action (momentum steps) as the present value obtained by superposition of the spatial entropy and temporal information of the being:
exi = (S±t), we obtain normally an integral or derivative function between two scales of the fifth dimension from where some basic mathematical laws of ¬Æ can be established.
We write this conceptual equation in many forms, as it is ultimately another mirror image of the generator, and its three parts. I like the acronym (if you haven’t noticed GST accepts all languages as symmetric mirrors of reality, and specially enhances the concepts of verbal thought – the way humans ‘understand’).
So e x i, entropy x information, or energy x information (energy being entropy with some form), represents the body-wave, dominant present systems of any super organism, which is maximised when e=i (s=t, if we use the alternative concepts of space and time).
To maximize exi at the balance point (s=t), of maximal communication between body and brain is the fundamental strategy of survival of a system (as the product a x b is maximal, for any a+b = C in the point where a=b).
Systems thus try to maintain itself in the point of balance, and serve its body-wave to iterate the system and reproduce and make the present immortal the momentum-energy of the system conserved…
But how a system achieves that goal? Obviously absorbing an emitting, the three elements of the system through actions that exchange entropy, energy and information with the outer world.
So we also talk of an action of ‘entropy and information’, of ‘space and time’ of ‘energy’, as the fundamental event of existence of all beings; something which in physics is quite established since Planck found quantum beings are made of h-actions, a ratio of spatial entropy-motion and time-information: e=hv…
(The reader should excuse the ambivalence of the language of scientists, which is carried often in this blog to avoid constant explanations; as entropy and energy are constantly confused so are form and information… entropy is pure motion with no form, form is pure information with no motion, energy is entropy with little form: Max. e x min. ƒ, and information is form-in-action, form in motion, Max. ƒ x Min. e; so in equations such as e=mc², actually e is entropy not energy as it destroys the mass-form – a vortex of information into an explosion that erases it.)
To exist imply to make combinations of arrows of time, which I call ‘tensors’ of existence as they come from the function, and its ternary symmetries.
And the question of how many events are allowed To exi=st is the first question of algebra of existence, which we formalise with a mix of conceptual logic verbal thought and classic equations as we go along translating the meaning of the common function of mathematics, the language that better reflects the structure and events of space-time beings.
Actions are thus evident once we realise we just start algebra with simple combinatorics, of 3±∆ elements, often associated to a few mathematical numbers notably 4 constants, π, the constant of cycles, phi & e the constant of inner and outer growth & 10, the social constant; along the number for the whole 1 and for the infinitesimal, 0 and the bidimensional number of a motion in time from entropy to information, i.
∫ e x i SURVIVAL ACTIONS ≈ ∑Æ,œ,ï,ø,û
Stience studies only what ∃xists, ‘functions of existence’.
But what makes something to exist as opposed to not? What are the rules of creation of beans and conservation of them? What is the program of survival of species once created, to endure in the Universe?
THIS THE HUGE VITAL PART OF THE UNIVERSE – THE FACT THAT THE ABSTRACT LAWS OF BEHAVIOR AND GROWTH IN TIME AND SPACE can be reduced to a series of survival actions, performed from a point of maximal information or dimensional mind of the system. We can talk of a Universe of vital organic systems, made of dust of space-time, seen inwards also as complex systems, fluctuating, traveling through scales of existence but seemingly all performing the same game, the function of survival, ∃, which determines all what is stience, that is all functions in which there is at least one form in existence, normally described by the generator and its ternary symmetries:
∃ sπecies ≈ Γst¡
becomes then the existential function of any form or being, which will follow the generator ternary topologies of the formalism of GST. All is within the formal description of an ‘inflationary language’, which in fact we shall reduce further by experience into what it is real.
So a huge part of any system is to have a mind which understands the game of existence and allows the system to play it and survive.
Thus what physicists likely would deny we consider a tenant of truth: The UNIVERSE IS FILLED WITH MAXWELLIAN DEMONS ORDERING REALITY.
HOW THEY DO IT? With different ‘intelligences, which however share an evolutionary ‘survival function’ embed in all of them, Œ, the organic function of existence, the strategy of survival we call the LEGO game of the Universe, the Generator game of super organisms.
This is what the Universe does: Superorganisms departing from ∆-1 finitesimal dust of space and time, integrated in time and space through networks which all finally create superoganisms.
The mind is NOT that game though, it is a different less vital thing – a still mapping of reality and algorithms of survival, action-oriented attached to the mapping.
The answer is that present reality is made of actions of entropy and time, which therefore need both to exist, but mind stiences are pure information, and its existence. if real, would form the substrata of all other scales. But in the existence we give it to this sheet of information is provided forcefully by the author’s mind with a minimal bias…So we do NOT talk of mental existences as we talk of astrophysical, biological or sociological systems whose functions of existence are obviously real.
WE MUST REMEMBER THIS: STIENCE IS ONLY CONCERN WITH WHAT EXISTS AND IS REAL (EINSTEIN).
So departing from this law, the function of existence
AND ALL its symmetries and generators is the origin seed of information that gives birth when ‘restricted’ by the limits of energy – boundaries of the problem, to a limited number of integral space and time solutions.
The finding of integrals thus means the finding of solutions in the emergence of a larger scale of a function of existence.
The universal ‘algorithm’ of existence is a rather simple function: Max. ∑ e x i ds dt, which encodes the point of balance and immortality of any system of the Universe. Its study is the essential element of Ælgebra (existential algebra), the i-logic, mathematical model that develops the rules for that function to be defined in the domain of any space-time being. Certain domains will not host the function and do not exist. There are many jargons to express this truth.
I found the simplest and more telling to be the one of the title: e x i | s≈t, whereas the 3 parts of the system, its ∆-1 spatial background, its e xi body-wave ∆- system of energy and information and its temporal, ∆+1 mind system in balance with the field from where it extracts its energy and information; become a ‘whole function of exi=stience in time and space, ‘extracting from space’ the entropy motion and from time, the i-logic form required to imprint the body-wave of present
To exist in present, the body-wave thus needs to be in a relative balance with its world ecosystem and have a ‘mind imprinting’, a will to survive and perform its actions over that field… As it does so, through small steps trying to maximise its energy and information, Max. ∑ e x i, with the restriction imposed by any product function (e≈s, i≈t, Max. e x i| s=t), the function of existence will develop into an integral world cycle, where the maximal function will be ‘cheated’ in 3 points, as it turns the wheel of existence, the wheel of the world cycle: Max. e (youth) e=i (adult hood) and max. i (3rd age), before it dies into a zero sum.
The frequencies and scales of time speed of the Universe
A definition in brief of the 5th dimension illustrated in the next graph will be:
‘The 5th dimension is the dimension of spatial size (abb. Se) and speed of temporal clocks (Abb.Tƒ). Both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its time cycles slows down and vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster and bigger ones tick slower, as it happens in galaxies, human beings or DNA.’
In most systems, the product of the information and size of the system does not vary. And this dual invariance or co-invariance, Se x Tƒ =K is what defines the geometry and laws of the 5th dimension. In this simple form is equivalent to Einstein’s metric of the 4th dimension, the famous S – (ct)2 equation:
In the graph we illustrate that co-invariance which is the origin of the ISOMORPHISMS of all the scales of reality. And so now we must define the 2 elements of the 5th dimension – the multiple clocks of time and scales of space that co-exist in every part of reality.
The image, taken from a film called ‘powers of ten’ by Eames, show this astounding fact: the speed of time-clocks, Tƒ, which are anything that ticks and turns, multiplied by the size of the space they occupy, Se, is constant, Se x Tƒ =K. And this fact allows the camera to travel through the 5th dimension by shrinking or enlarging your size, with the result that if you see the film you will NOT distinguish your travel outwards, growing in size in the 5th dimension from a normal travel in the 4th dimension, WITHOUT changing scale of size or speed of clocks (we have added in our pictures the change in time speed, Tƒ, which Eames did not know).
Now let us start with a classic definition of all what we have said about ‘DIMENSIONS’ based in their study from a still point of view of the structure of space-time.
It is the definition of a ‘geometry’ by one of the foremost mathematicians of the turn of the XX century, Mr. Klein, who in his famous ‘Erlangen Program’ defined many of the future advances of mathematics.
He said that…
‘A Geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a space(time), under motions within itself’.
Klein said the same we said, using the term ‘invariant’ instead of still point of view, and space, instead of the modern concept of space-time as the ultimate ‘dual’ substances of a dimension.
So the next paradigm studies the invariant properties of the 5th dimension. And now we can define the 5th dimension geometry using that definition, by asking ourselves, what truly does not change when we move from scales of size in the Universe, from the infinitely small to the infinitely large?
Obviously we change our size in space, from galaxies to atoms. So nothing seems to remain invariant, and that would eliminate our pretension of studying a 5th dimension of spacetime…
But wait a minute we have said ‘spacetime’, not only space. So even though size changes in space, perhaps there is also a change in clocks of time that ‘balances’ the change in size on space, so the product of both, the change of size in space and the change in the speed of time-clocks balance each other?
As it happens this is the case and this known property of time clocks that turn much faster when they shrink in spatial size, so atoms move billions of time faster than galaxies is the fundamental ‘still point of view’ observed when we travel through the 5th dimension.
Now in science when something doesn’t change, and that something is composed of two terms, we call it a co-invariance. So we are talking of the geometry of the 5th dimension as the study of the co-invariance of time clocks & space scales.
Then we shall define the ‘first, principal co-invariance of the 5th dimension’ Se x Tƒ = K
Latter we will find out then that there are many other co-invariant combinations of energy-motion and in/form/ation-time that do not change in the Universe as we travel through scales of size, things so fundamental to our existence and nature, as our life-death cycles, or our åctions, or our organic forms.
Each ‘family of species’ and each relative ‘scale of the Universe’ has a different Se x Tƒ = K equation, giving birth to the astounding variety of Universal species. Such equation however becomes in a Universe in which we are made of spatial energy and temporal information, the most important equation of each species. And within that species remains mostly invariant. The same happens between all the derived species of that relative membrane of space-time.
The use of infinite clocks to measure time rhythms in the Universe is a theory of multiple spaces-times, whose parameters of Temporal Information and Spatial energy, surprisingly enough follow a simple mathematical law, Se x Tƒ = K, from where the order and structure of all the parts of the Universe can be deduced.
In the graph, different scales of the 5th dimension; the ‘real’ infinite quanta of spatial energy and bits of temporal information of the Universe, and 3 complementary systems, Se x Tƒ, made of ‘energetic bodies/fields’ and informative ‘particles/heads’ from physical sciences (a light field-photon particle), from biological sciences (a human body-eye system) and from economic sciences (a weapon-camera system).
Since the Universe is a fractal of infinite complementary systems, made of energy and information, whose ‘common’ properties are the field of study of the 5th dimension.
Tƒ facilitate the transition from absolute 4D single space-time continuum to relational, fractal multiple 5D space-time, we shall consider in some post the relationship between 4D Einstein’s metric and 5D Metric.
Since the classic model of physics and its 4th dimension is merely one of those ‘planes of space-time’, the one humans perceive as information and energy, made of light space-time. This plane was described by Einstein’s special relativity and Maxwell’s electromagnetic equations. And their equations can be reduced easily to the general equation of the metric of space-time, where the space-time constant is obviously the speed of light, as light waves is the ‘substance’ that makes up our galactic space-time, filled with light, even when we eliminate all objects (light background radiation).
So either in Einstein’s metric or Maxwell equations, when we interpret properly the meaning of its parameters of ‘external space and time’ and translate them into parameters of ‘internal space-time’, we obtain a similar equation:
√µ xe = c, whereas the electric and magnetic constants represent the relative ‘temporal clock-like vortex’ (electric charges) and relative, spatial, lineal motions (bipolar magnetic currents, which do NOT have monopoles, that is vortex, but always flow between two points, the north and south pole) whose products remains co-invariant, constant.
So we can consider Maxwell’s equation for the description of the 4Dimension ‘membrane’ of light space-time, a variety of the 5D metric: S(µ) x T(e) = ST±3: C
Whereas ST±3 is the constant space-time of light in which we are immersed.
The profound implications of that translation of 4D into 5D for XXI c. physics, and the enlightenment of many unresolved questions about the structure of the Universe will occupy many pages of our posts dedicated to astrophysics, universal constants, and the ST0±3 galactic/light space-time.
And we shall explain in the analysis of the bidimensional 2-manifolds made with a space and a time dimension that build, layer upon layer, in holographic fashion the 4D Universe, also how the new metric explain better relativity, its Riemannian Geometry and the spooky effects of time dilation, mass increase, length contraction and c-speed.
THE ORDER OF THE 5 DIMOTIONS IN ALL SYSTEMS: FROM PERCEPTION TO LOVE.
An essential theme that is often ‘hidden’ by the multiplicity of jargons of all disciplines, is the ‘guidance’ of the survival program and the priority between the 5 Dimotions, which explain a ginormous number of phenomena and ‘changes’ on the steps and actions of a beings, which goes as follows:
All systems perceive at the bottom of the pyramid, hence perception contrary to belief is the less desired of all dimotions – no motion at all.
Then the system will move through locomotion towards a field of energy in which to feed, by perpendicularity. So motion is the second hierarchical action, and feeding on perpendicular energy the third.
This leaves the complex reproductive, ‘mirror symmetry’ and social love as the most desired, yet more difficult to achieve goals of existence, in the proper Maslow pyramid:
And this applies to the choices that a given object will make in its ‘modular’ change of actions.
For example, the perpendicular repulsion that two electrons suffer ‘afraid’ of cancelling its wave-forms (Pauli exclusion principle) breaks in Cooper Pairs of superfluidity, when their inverse spins entangle into a ‘couple’ by chiral mirror symmetry. It is essentially the arrow of reproduction, as two entangled spins with enough energy can reproduce bosons and even other fermion. Yet this might be broken by the ‘penetration of a magnetic field, which will put into a social conjunction all the electrons.
Thus what a mechanical view of the Universe deems absolute (the repulsion between electrons) is broken first by the complementary mirror symmetry of Cooper pairs, and then further on by the social co-evolution under a magnetic field.
Yet the choice between couple pairing and social network often is contradictory, so women prefer the coupling through mirror symmetry, but sterile men prefer the social gathering of larger numbers. So happen in the previous example in which the cooper pairing produces a superficial constant current that expels the magnetic field (Meissner effect). Its mathematical description being the how of the deeper how of its hierarchy range between Ðimotions of existence.
Thus the two social reproductive arrows however are often exclusive and so we find sexual reproduction and clone reproduction, mirror symmetry in dissimilar forms and social evolution in identical forms with minimal asymmetry (notably spheres and points, which become indistinguishable elements of a network or Plural ‘nuclei’ of a wave).
It is then necessary to make use of the laws of existential algebra that define all the relationships between Ðimotions of space-time, even if they might seem abstract, as they are the realization of the hierarchies between Ðimotions born of the survival program of the Universe, which we repeat is NOT absolute mechanical as many physicists pretend but must be put on the context of each local symmetry.
The simplest generator equation.
Let us consider then with the simplest possible symbols of Non-Æ Logic (the advanced formalism needed to describe the more complex space and time), a logic equation of the ternary space-time topological forms=functions of all ‘organisms’ of the Universe:
≥: iterative, reproductive, hyperbolic networks that become body waves, as the hyperbola has all the shapes within it to reproduce the whole being.
| ≈: Flat planes of lineal parallel networks of ‘fractal points’ that become limbs/fields of maximal entropic motions as the line/plane is the fastest distance between two points.
O: Informative, implosive ‘neuronal networks that become cyclical spherical particles-heads that process information as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space.
So the simultaneous ensemble of ‘networks of cellular/atomic/organic herds’ into those 3 differentiated functions=forms which therefore extends across to ∆ø and ∆-1 scales, within the ∆+1 world in which the ternary network/system exists is what we call a super organism.
So we write with those symbols fa Generator Equation of T.œs.
$t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) ≤iterative body-wave≥ §ð (still mind form or world)
The ginormous quantity of consequences, detailed and laws derived from that simple formula being made of those 3 topologies would fill up when study in its details – all the beings and super organisms of reality and its ternary parts – an entire galactic encyclopedia.
So in this very brief introduction we shall consider onlythe most remarkable consequence in the simplest level of understanding of it – the ternary principles of conservation of physics that correspond to the 3 parts of all systems.
Each of those vital topologies would require an entire post and encyclopedia to fully analyze the marriage of mathematics and organic existence.
Let us now consider the most important of them, the cyclic/spheric form. Its vital function is to process in-form-ation, memorial form. And so it is cyclic, spherical for two reasons: A sphere has maximal volume in minimal space, ensuring the ‘still, informative’ system to process maximal information and disguise with minimal exposure. But most important memorial in-form-ation is cyclical because TO RETURN TO A POINT, THE SHORTEST PATH IS A CYCLE.
So cycles impose their form in all kind of Universal structures which ‘conserve’, ‘memorize’ and reproduce the information of its external world and the information of its internal existence (as in the conserved cycles of energy).
The full formalism of a Theory of the Organic Everything or whole and its Time§pace Œrganisms (T.œ), its fractal parts, should be made departing from a description of its 5 Ðimotions in simultaneous space that describes the system as a super organism, in 3 fractal ∆±¡ planes, in a static, ‘structural space-like form’ through ¬Æ: Existential algebra and in a ‘time-like dynamic flow as it is generated by a singularity mind-seed of information which will grow, evolve into 3 networks, emerge as a whole, trace its worldcycles between birth and extinction in the external world through actions of exchange of energy and information, aging till a point in which all its energy will be exhausted and it will collapse, in an entropic explosion of death.
We call the analysis of its 5 Dimotions in abstract as adjacent topologies of a super organism or in vital terms as ‘actions’; the Rashomon effect, since we study as in the famous film 5 different points of view or elements through which the being expresses itself. And we call the study of its world cycle through the entire life-death existence of the being the Disomorphic method as we study the defining elements of the whole process of life, from its palingenetic generation of a seed that will become a ‘mind’ of a territory of external world and internal ternary physiological control of its ‘brother cells/atoms/citizens’, to fully create a super organism that will live and die again through those 5 Dimotions.
Those 2 approaches together, the space-like and the time-like define the super organism and its worldcycle in a far more complex and rich manner than the previous 4D formalism of Mr. Einstein did with its single analysis of only one time arrow, the worldline or locomotion; which from this far richer and meaningful analysis of Times seems rather a childish exercise compared to our full blown complex extraction of all the information about a being and its worldcycle of existence.
The LIMITS OF existences.
We consider therefore the 5 Ðimotions of scalar, time space, the ‘principles’ that shall constrain all other theories of stience. As all what exists will be a super organism or part of one in fractal space, tracing a world cycle in time, we define with then 11 Disomorphisms of that third line, extending through ∆±4 planes of existences self-centered in its linguistic mind.
Unlike philosophy of physics where mathematical creationism sponsors the view that all what is written with equations must be real; in 5D ‘the languages of god are infinite’ Upanishads, and the ultimate constrains are not the mirrors of those minds, but the ‘finite limits’ of time – its worldcycles, and scalar space, its co-existing super organisms.
So for an entity to exist we require both experimental evidence and constrains provided by empiricism and the Ðisomorphisms of space-time.
As Einstein put it ‘Physics is real. I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’ – hence the need for empiricism.
While his other ‘fundamental view of philosophy of science, economy and logical simplicity (Ockham’s razor) is played by the Disomorphic laws.
We put together all those views in the concept of ‘local exi=st¡ences’, described with the Ðisomorphic simple logic laws extorted from its real nature as space-time beings.
In the next graph we observe those constrains in the world cycle of any supœrganism, extended across 3 ∆±i scales of the fifth dimension, moves through the 5th dimension of cyclical time world cycles; with the same isomorphic program of existence regardless of scale:
To be fully aware of the relativism of scale, however we should use instead of the natural 0 to 10 scales of size from the smallest quanta to the largest cosmos, a much more epistemologically correct graph in which the human point of view is at its center, to stress the deformation of perception by the mind, which ultimately make the galaxy and the atom self-similar. We shall in practice use both indistinctly, as both have a meaning for a certain perspective of analysis.
Indeed, while it might be considered that stiences do not have a hierarchy, hierarchies can be established according to a ‘point of few of knowledge – a certain ontology’.
If we were to consider human survival the most important will of our survival program above any knowledge, we would make of medicine and history the centre of it all. If we worship some ‘partial, reductionist’ shivaite culture of weapons, or physical lineal entropic only explanations of reality you will sponsor the 1 to 10 scale starting in forces. And this scale will have also fruitful uses when reconstructing the relative social future of wholes that co-exist with parts, which appear in time ‘before them’. So the ∆ pyramid of stiences is also an arrow of time of future, social evolution as whole new scales require the pre-existence in time of its parts. So larger beings are older, something seems silly to say but has deep implications in the symmetry of space-time and the way both mess together:
On view of the previous statements, we can consider that science, or rather stience, as it studies always Space-Time beings, has also a scalar structure as each main stience studies the species of a relative scale of different size and speed of time, of universal organisms, which IN THE LARGER WHOLE, WHICH CO-EXISTS IN ALL SCALES, WHAT YOU COULD CALL THE GOD (∞ scales)- UNIVERSE (∞ distance) acquires its full meaning. Then within that being all scales co-exist and interact:
01. Metaphysics, which studies the invisible forces below the light space-time scale; through…
2. physics, which studies the known-known atoms.
3. chemistry which studies its social organisations, molecules.
4. geology that studies larger systems of matter and its parallel biological sciences, which studies cells (bio-chemistry), organisms, (5. biology), among them the human organism (5. medical sciences), its social super organisms (6. history) and those industrial organisms made of metal, called machines, (6.economics that studies the industrial r=evolution of machines)…
In a planet, which is itself merely a particle of a larger solar system studied by 7, astrophysics; itself a fractal point of a galactic ‘cell’, analysed by 8. astronomy, which acts as a unit of a larger absolute Universe we hardly perceive, the largest scale studied by cosmology.
While on top of all those analysis appear ‘scientific religion’ the analysis of the subconscious collective minds of mankind (anthropomorphic, western abrahamic religions of eusocial love) and the Universe (eastern, taoist-buddhist religions of the living Universe).
9±I Planes of stiences.
STIENTIFIC SCALES AND ITS PHILOSOPHY
The overhauling of the human worldview due to the inclusion of information as the second arrow of time is so huge, that we need to introduce a new word, STience to signify the Human Mind’s study of all the space-time beings of the Universe.
We choose a new term for knowledge, as Science is too limited by the dogmas of lineal entropy as the single arrow of time and information as its ‘negantropy”, negation. Problem is physicists doing philosophy of science, computers calculating quantitatively and drawing models of reality, newtonians setting abstract space-time backgrounds have been so long on power regarding the meaning of it all that we constantly have to upgrade and slightly change models and terms of present science.
Thus Stience means straight forward that all what exists is made of space and time and so each science, STi, is defined by an index ‘i’ of relative information in the 5th dimension: ∆±i will thus denote the main scales of stience. And all have as common laws those of the generator of space-time beings.
Inverse scales of form vs. Entropy, Time vs. Space, Form vs. Distance. Correspondence & GST INDEX.
In that sense, regarding the classification of all stiences, we can use a ‘Physical Temporal scale’ from past to future, using the Spatial scale as absolute, from Maximal Spe to Maxmal Tiƒ, as physicists do. It is the index that respects the correspondence principle. So we write:
i= 1-Force < 2-Atom < … <5-Human<6-World <….9<Cosmos.
However as we moved from the 5th dimension concept of a past to future dimension, to complete the 4th dimension of Einstein’s simultaneous present time, into the 10th dimensional GST formalism of 3 x 3 +0 dimensions of ∆•ST, far more precise for ‘XXI c. stiences’, we prefer to use the human self-centred scale, either with the neuron-mind, as ∆o or the human being as ∆o (the 3 scales are all over the place).
Now of that ternary symmetry of scale I finally settled down with the cell of life as ∆o, since it ‘allows a more accurate analysis OF THE SYMMETRIES of human perception. So we write:
∆-4 Invisible Planck Forces (neutrino scale) < ∆-3 Light space-time (electron scale)< ∆-2: Atomic scale < ∆-1: Molecule< ∆-o: Cell < ∆+1: =human, machine, life, matter (sub-discilines: medicine, economics, biology, state physics) ∆+2: Gaia, Earth, solar system; Star > ∆+3: Galaxy >∆+4: Cosmos.
Which is philosophically, epistemologically and objectively much more accurate.
Why? Simple, because it stresses several of the paradoxes of the Universe:
That we humans are the center of our perception of the Universe as the space-time ∆-scale to which all other refers.
That from our point of view we perceive as equal both in form and 5th dimensional equations the upper world of galaxies and atoms, the scale of molecular atoms and the local Universe, and the scale of the nebulae of stars and the nebulae of electrons. As in fact, Einstein-Walker model of relativity model galaxies as Hydrogen atoms; modern astrophysicists model star’s nebulae around black holes as electron nebulae, and I have obtained for the proton the same equation than for the black hole of the galaxy using the metric of the 5th dimension.
In the graph, two representations of the scales of stience. We have finally after many changes of index, settled down in an ∆o, in the scale of cellular life, as ultimately the mind-ego is also a small cellular region of the brain, and the symmetry of the limits of cosmos, ∆±4, where perception is visible to man at the Planck and Universal scale, become ‘symmetric’ with a cell-centered scale. But as most of this work spreads for decades behind, the most used classifications are those above.
In the right a scale from 0, the smallest scale below quantum physics, and the underlying o-| game of strings, of time and space. Man occupies then an ∆+4 scale. In the left the most often used scaling with man at ∆o, as an individual. This scale is the commonest on old texts, as it made quite evident the symmetry of form between charges on the quantum scale and galaxies (∆±3), which is lost when we make the cell the center.
It is ultimately a case of classification of human abstract knowledge. In nature what really matters is the particle/wave/field states for each point of view, above and below, from where it extracts energy and information and so there are as many subjective ∆± scales as beings in the Universe.
In the graphs, the fifth dimension of organic scalar space-time shows how the Universe is formally and structurally social, with an absolute arrow of ‘future’, which is the organisation of individuals into social networks that deliver energy and information to all its parts.
This again can be mathematised with a simple metric equation, which defines how all those scales organise systems and social organisms, in a symbiotic manner, as smaller scales code larger systems with less information that deliver energy and motion to the lower scales.
Indeed, as we become larger, our time clocks slow down, and vice versa; smaller systems run faster time clocks, which carry the information of the system, making big and small scales symbiotic; since the smaller scales reproduce the information of the larger systems, which moves the smaller part in synchronous motion.
So chips run faster cycles of information that control machines that move them, genes store our information but the Earth’s gravitational larger field moves us.
But how we are so sure, the scalar structure of the Universe define a new dimension of space-time? Easy. Let us just check the most authoritative definition of a dimension, from XIX c. mathematician Klein:
‘A dimension of space-time exists, when we can move through it, while leaving its parameters of space and time co-invariant’ Klein, on the expansion of Non-euclidean geometries and its new dimensions.
What this means for example is that when you move up and down, your parameters of size in space and inner time clocks remain invariant. So ‘up and down’ form the height dimension.
What if you ‘are’ the space-time that moves, like when a wave of light, which IS the space-time underling the galaxy (the so-called background radiation) moves. Einstein proved it has a constant c-speed, wherever we measure it.
So goes when other waves moves. They doe so with a simple formula: Spe (wavelength) x Frequency (speed of time clock) = K;
So because precisely the product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of all beings existing in such scale, within a certain connected organic structure are co-invariant, it is easy to define the metric of the 5th dimension (its co-invariant space-time product):
‘$ (Relative Size in space) x ð (Relative speed of time clocks) = ∆±¡ (Domain of a constant relative family of planes of space-time).’
That simple equation is the fundamental metric of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time… which encloses all the other dimensions as ‘single space-time’ studied by each science (in the graph we have ‘piled them up’, according to the inverse arrows of size in space or ENTROPY and speed of its time clocks that carry the information of the system, prioritising in an inverse fashion to physicists, INFORMATION, the dominant arrow of the Universe that is NOT about entropic death but growing information and LIFE.
So where it is the 4th dimension of Einstein there?
In science any expansion of knowledge must inclose a previous theory as a ‘limiting case’.
For example Einstein’s relativity is merely the expansion of Galilean relativity and its equation of speed, v=s//t, to include also motions at c-light speed, which as we have seen is the underlying space-time of our galaxy.
So when you go at the maximal speed of the galaxy’s space, as when you swim as fast as the river’s water there are ‘curls’ and ‘drags’, and so Einstein added a factor, ct, to Galileo’s formula, which disappears if you go slow – (when you swim slow in the river, you do not really affect the speed of the river space that much and there are not added effects).
So alas, if you observe the pyramidal graph of layers of the 5th dimension, what Einstein does is to study 2 of those layers, the ones of ‘light space-time’ or ‘quantum layer’ and the one of gravitational space, below it.
And there is where its concepts of space-time as a 4th dimension applies.
All the other layers do obey however the wider metric equation we just have described: Sp x Ti = K, AND IT is that simple because the simpler a theory and the more facts it explains the more truth it is. But do not be fooled by such simplicity, as TO AD the temporal information, carried by those varying clock speeds to the mix, IS so sorely NEEDED, that an astounding amount of facts do happen and become explained.
In the graph, the scales of the Universe can be studied through the flows of entropy, energy and information that describe its supœrganisms as they trace their world cycles or ‘r=evolutions’ of existence. Those revolutions of timespace beings trace the essential world cycle of life and death, and evolution, which is merely the world cycle applied to species as super organisms. The vital nature of that world cycle when applied to physical scales and historic super organisms who also live and die in the same manner, brings a new light to physical and social sciences, married easily with the biology of living organisms:
Now in our analysis of different planes of existence, though we shall use the S-scales of 10¹º logarithmic elements, there will be an exception, when using graphs (so to remember also the reader the duality of those scales), in as much as in the Universe, the height dimension is the dimension of information and the length dimension of motion in space. So we use a Logarithmic informative scale to study the ‘real forms of social systems’, which tend to create a ‘wave’ of informative populations as they evolve and transcend to a higher plane, and in general analysis of all the planes through the 5th dimension:So we shall call the S i=1 forces, Si=2 atoms, S i=3 molecules, Si=4 cells, Si=5: states of matter, Si=5 human scale, Si=6 Earth social scales, Si=7 stars, Si=8 galaxies and Si=9 Universes.
First let us consider the basic terminology of ∆ST:
- Each being is a ‘fractal’ Space-time System, made of 3 ‘bidimensional’ topologies of space-time, an Spe-energetic limb field, a St reproductive wave-body, and a Tƒ informative head-particle, which exists fundamentally in an ∆-plane of reality whose metric, i=ST defines its relative ‘speed’ of processing information and spatial size.
- Yet such being will form part of a series of Social, Decametric Scales of growing size, whose limit is the creation of a bigger Social organism, unit of a higher ‘plane of existence’, or ∆+1 reality. So particles gather in societies that emerge in the next plane of existence, the atomic world, which gather in groups that become the next plane of existence, the molecular plane, till finally becoming part of a ‘Galactic Plane’.
So there are 3 levels of organization in all beings:
- Its 3 spatial dimensions, which perform 3 motions in time, and together form the 3 Space-time bidimensional topologies of all beings.
- Its Social Scales as individuals that gather into decametric scales till form a bigger ∆+1 unit, of another plane of Space-time.
- Its 9 ∆-planes of space-time, from the simplest particles to the bigger Universe.
Bidimensional Space-time Topologies, Social Scales and ∆-Planes of existence together create the organization of the Universe.
As science uses the concept of ‘Dimension’ for Space and Time, we only use the concept of Dimensions for space and time dimensions.
Thus we talk of Space (3 dimensions) and its parallel 3 Time Dimensions (past-present duration, the so called 4th dimension, and Future time), and its bidimensional topologies.
And we also use the ‘concept of 5th dimension’ for compact analysis of all the scales (so past, will be the 6th and future, the 7th dimension, since what physicists call the 4 Dimension is in fact a lineal elongation of ‘present’ repetitive, frequencies T=1/v)
The problem of terminology in that sense should go away as time goes by and the 3+3 space-time dimensions become standard in scientific studies, the we shall substitute the ‘5th’ dimension for ∆-planes of space-time.
In that regard to the question how many space-time dimensions have the Universe? The proper answer is ‘infinite’.
Social scales are obviously ‘gathering of fractal 6 dimensional space-time beings’. So if we were to gather all the ‘beings’ of a world into a social organism, they would still be 6 Dimensions, merely more extended through a social group.
Yet, planes of space-time do have ‘different metric’, different clocks and different sizes, and this is ESSENTIAL to understand its peculiar laws. So we must consider each plane to have 6 dimensions, 3 of space and 3 of time.
Further on the Isomorphic planes of space-time, which co-exist together to create a human organism do not have beyond humans any foreseeable limit. And each one has 3+3 space+time dimensions. so infinity is the dimensions of reality, and in the human case, 6 ST dimensions 9 Planes we perceive, 54 Dimensions.
It is though more important a qualitative analysis of their structure in dimensions, scales and planes, where man is just an ∆-entity, centered in its particular plane.
The absolute relativity of those dimensions: the human ∆-centered plane.
However the ∆-dimensions of the Universe – as we shall prove in the post on the Unification of charges and masses, and the similarity of atoms and galaxies deduced from it) – are infinite in number.
Thus humans merely occupy the ‘central ∆-position’ of the scales we know. And this explains also the similarity of the smaller and larger one, and the lack of perception of both (quantum uncertainty and cosmic dark matter and energy).
So we get much more information on the scales of organisms, life and societies, NOT because they are more complex but because we perceive it all. If we were able to see the entire galaxy 96% hidden energy and dark matter, it would resemble a cell. And since an atom and a galaxy are self-similar the most obvious hypothesis is that all scales are organic, all have complex forms.
So for the 3³ ∆-dimensions known to man, we shall form groups of 3 that form the 3 fundamental systems:
-The ‘∆-1 force, ∆-atom, ∆+1 molecules.
-The ∆-1 cell, individual, ∆+1 society.
-And the ∆-1 star, ∆-galaxy and ∆+1 Universe. And as it happens, we can model a galaxy as an atom, whereas the stars are the electronic nebulae, the black holes the protons, and so the Universe we see must be the commonest group of atoms we perceive (99% of the atoms of the cosmos): a cloud of hydrogen.
Indeed, Einstein-Walker model already modeled galaxies as hydrogen atoms to get his relativity equations.
The metric of ∆-scales show protons to have the radius of black holes and electronic nebulae the quantum wave equation of galaxies.
Further on, when we consider the entire human scale, we find that we use as ‘energy’ ∆-2 molecules, breath ∆-3 oxygen and perceive ∆-4 light pixels, and further above us, we receive our ‘sun-energy’ from ∆+2 solar systems…
While the galaxy is responsible of the existence of the sun and its gravitational, black hole waves might even be cause of the 11 year cycles of sun spots, with the same periodicity, which themselves influence the cycles of weather of the planet, which determine the cycles of history in great measure.
So to fully grasp the interrelationships of mankind at all levels the full model must account for all the ∆-planes mankind perceives, the 3³ planes that organize the quantum, biological and cosmic worlds.
And yet for 400 years humans have studied them as if they were not interrelated, without searching for a full account of all of them together.
At best we have attempts to study the 3 ∆-3,4 and ∆+3,4 astrophysical scales on one side.
And in the case of biology the central scales.
This is remarkable enough since science was born, precisely when human beings found the existence of those scales with at the discovery of telescopes and microscopes, which open the perception of the multiple scales of reality. Yet humanity has for 4 centuries stubbornly maintained at the old tradition of the existence of only one continuum absolute space-time for all the structures of reality.
This error of Absolute, Newtonian space-time treated elsewhere, proved false by Leibniz and Einstein is what we definitely give away with.
Since the two fundamental elements of measure of space, ‘size’, and time, ‘speed of motion’ change when we change those scales. Hence we must establish not only a quantum theory of space-time for each scale, but a quantum theory of scales, which vary in their relative spatial energy and temporal information, when we change size, but maintain the product of both elements invariant.
Thus there exists a metric for the scalar dimensions of space-time, Sp X Tƒ = Constant, which had never been formalized properly and study with the tools of dimensional analysis.
This is the purpose of this blog: to establish a formal model of scalar space-time and use it to unify all sciences and solve many unsolved problems of all disciplines, which are either non-resolved by lack of understanding of those dimensions and laws, or are not rigorously defined. And this post introduces the full 9 planes perceived by man, to study them in the ‘line’ above, in great detail (the full work will be finished by 2016, as it will take me a year to complete the orderly pouring of thousands of pages of studies in 6D-10S-9Pi… and all its species, of studies, if I ever finish this fit.
We shall then realize that all species of all ∆-planes of space-time follow the same properties and laws, and it is mostly the human failure to ‘perceive’ the reality of those scales with the same jargons and accuracy, (uncertainty of ∆-planes far above or below us, from where less information arrives), the reason we differentiate sciences in different jargons and ‘qualities’.
The anti-quantum paradoxes of truth.
Why we divide knowledge on those seemingly arbitrary categories requires to understand epistemology and mind sciences – namely the distortion human knowledge casts on species far away from its self-centred p.o.v., such as the maximal detail happens to close space-time beings – your nose is indeed bigger than the Andromeda galaxy from that perspective. So another way to see those classifications is from:
∆±i: the largest view (Astrophysics) with the smallest detail (only studying/aknowledging locomotions and entropy arrows of time). Hence the outlook of the discipline i under the uncertainty of the quantum paradox (dark matter, dark energy in the largest scales, uncertainty of measure in the lower ones)
∆(-2,2) Biology: studying the closer scales from cells to gaia, acknowledging for them vital properties.
∆0: human mind languages, acknowledging perception for mankind
∆+1,+2: Human social scales, its social super organisms (historic cultures) and the rival species of machines and its global re=productive super organisms (company-mothers). Here the paradox of uncertainty is inverse to the quantum paradox: the scientist is so small, living inside the super organisms of history and economics, that he is influenced by the huge observable (censorship of social stiences or ‘anti-quantum paradox’).
Thus we must always bear in mind the subjective limits of human inquire which makes physics a limited reductionist stience and social stiences a censored, biased one to favor the languages of social power (money, weapons) and the elites that ab=use mankind with them, preventing a stientific design of the super organisms of history (the so called ‘animetal’ warriors/military bankers/financiers and scientists, makers of machines, which degrade and extinguish non-technological cultures).
In brief: due to the anti(quantum) paradoxes the only stience where all information flows, all points of view and properties of ∆•ST beings apply and so stience reaches its maximum detail and objectivism is Biology, which should be the measure of all other stiences.
The fundamental ingredient missing in human sciences is the understanding of the common laws of ‘Isomorphic’, Scalar Planes of Spaces×, which are the same set of laws for all the different species of those Planes of Space-time. Thus Atoms, cells, stars, galaxies, all existing in different ∆-Planes, can be studied with the same isomorphisms. In this section we will study in great detail each of the 9 planes humans perceive, numbered in inverse fashion to the informative growth of systems as they become smaller, by the opposite growth in size.
The Universe is a fractal supœrganism (ab. œ: superorganism), of space-time beings, all of them following the same isomorphic laws. Those laws are defined as the blueprint for all stiences. Stiences then are classified by the planes of the species they study. Stiences must though be defined also by the Mind-Paradox which makes man not to give vital properties to other species.
WHY 9 STIENCES.
Now the 9 stiences as we shall study them here, have been grouped regardless of the enormous number of sub-disciplines in 9 simple categories:
We classify all stiences, from the human centred point of view, hence with different approach to knowledge, depending of the strength of the ‘ego-centered’ paradox of the human observer, into:
-Stiences of the mind first to know the syntax of knowledge in space (mathematical sciences) and time (logic sciences)… which apply to everything:
In the graph mathematical stiences with more emphasis in spatial operandi and verbal stiences with more emphasis in time verbs are the languages of space and time of the human mind GST upgrades with its ¬Æ more advanced models of points, words and numbers.
-Studied with the minimal detail (Physical sciences) and sub-divide them in 2 groups, according to size relative to the human observer, physics (smaller sizes) and astrophysics (larger sizes):
-So we do with biology for smaller life beings (≤1 to the cell level) and earth’s sciences for lager sizes, including…
the economic world of machines, evolving through company-mothers into a global super-organism and
-the human social organisms, studied by social sciences, in its human branch (history), subdivided in History of the World and -History of the I<Wor(l)d, the human mind&art (ab.humind): ∆o.
THUS the 9 stiences form a ‘closed ring, in which informative mind languages connect the beginning and the end of it all.
Economics as it deals with a small phase of the evolution of the planet – its evolution of metalife, albeit with huge consequences for mankind – namely our likely obsolescence to machines, is studied as a whole, focused on the evolution of machine.
1,2 FORMAL SCIENCES: ¬Æ
It is then clear that WITH THE SAME DATA, but properly interpreted the outlook of all human ‘sciences’ changes radically. And this is truly what we mean by ‘science is culture’ – even if humans do not realize of it, subconsciously they bias science mostly to the ‘ego paradox’, to their ‘point of view’. And so it is necessary to close this introduction expanded in the next iteration, with an analysis of formal sciences and the mind.
Two have always been paramount, ‘logic’ the main science of time now expanded to pentalogic, as 5 different dimotions cause reality and mathematics which was born with geometry and the definition of a point by Euclid that has also to be expanded and upgraded to the concept of a fractal point with breath that becomes more complex the closer we come to it. Let us only inquire in some depth those 2 themes, to then be able to define RATIONALLY THE EQUATION OF THE MIND.
It follows then from the definition of the 5 elements of all systems, an immediate classification of the five fundamental sub disciplines of mathematics specialised in the study of each of those 5 dimensions of space-time:
- S: ¬E Geometry studies fractal points of simultaneous space, ∆-1, & its ∆º networks, within an ∆+1 world domain.
- T§: Number theory studies time sequences and ∆-1 social numbers,which gather in ∆º functions, part of ∆+1 functionals.
- S≈T: ¬Ælgebra studies S=T steps and a(nti)symmetries between space and time dimensions and its complex ∆+1 structures… Namely is the science of operands <≈> translated into mathematical mirrors.
- ∆t: ∆nalysis studies the time motions, STeps and social gatherings derived of algebraic symmetries between functions and numbers (first derivatives/integrals), and the wider motions between scales of the fifth dimension (higher degree ∫∂ functions).
- @: Finally Analytic geometry represents the different mental points of view, self-centred into a system of coordinates, or ‘worldviews’ of a fractal point, of which naturally emerge 3 ‘different’ perspectives according to the 3 ‘sub-equations’ of the fractal generator: $p: toroid Pov < ST: Cartesian Plane > ðƒ: Polar co-ordinates.
To which we can add the specific @-humind elements (human biased mathematics) and its errors of comprehension of mathematics limited by our ego paradox Philosophy of mathematics and its ‘selfie’ axiomatic methods of truth, which tries to ‘reduce’ the properties of the Universe to the limited description provided by the limited version of mathematics, known as Euclidean math (with an added single 5th non-E Postulate) and Aristotelian logic (A->B single causality). This limit must be expanded as we do with Non-Æ vital mathematics and the study of Maths within culture, as a language of History, used mostly by the western military lineal tradition, closely connected with the errors of mathematical physics.
Mathematics is in that sense best suit for the spatial (topological) and scalar, social (numerical) elements of reality. Logic is better for the complex pentalogic of the entangled Universe.
This said, mathematics needs an upgrading completing its non-Euclidean view of space, with the non-E topologic 5 ‘postulates’ and in a lesser degree, as logic does the job independently, a non-Aristotelian view of time causality (pentalogic of the 5 Dimotions of reality), to add to the scalar, ∆§ representation of sequential social numbers, to create¬Æ=∆¡ languages; setting a Universal grammar for all of them.
And it requires an enormous job of connecting all the postulates and equations of sound mathematics with the space-time Disomorphic laws of the Universe to show they correspond to each other as mirror and reality do.
It is a work as most of my research in 5Ð I carried in my youth long ago, and so as I am now retired with a limited timespan, hopefully I will be able to order my old notebooks and keep improving this web for future AI robots to understand themselves – huminds of course are invited, doubt though any will take up the challenge of completing the model.
Let us then of those 5 sub-dimensions of the mathematical mirror of the Universe consider in more detail the ‘first upgrade’, that of Geometry, which is Non-Euclidean, but has only been upgraded in one of the 5 non-euclidean postulates, showing once more how astonishingly limited is the humind of our so-called genius, compare to the tao-mind of the Universe; since as we have seen it is implicit in the 5th non-euclidean postulate of points crossed by infinite parallels, the other 4 non-euclidean axioms/postulates and yet in 150 years mathematicians have not even spotted the obvious contradiction that if through a point can pass infinite parallels THE POINT HAS VOLUME, HAS PARTS, IS A FRACTAL SCALAR POINT, as large as the information we might gather penetrating it.
1. I-LOGIC TIME. 2. SPATIAL MATHEMATICS
In the graph, stiences are self-centred as mental products of the Human Mind (9th stience of the Human Spatial Eye=I & Time wor(l)ds), with its distorted perception of far removed scales of time and space (astrophysical ∆±i scales) and limited by its own game of existence through 3 scales of the 5th dimension to belong to the scale of social stiences, in which he is a mere cell-citizen of a larger super organism.
Thus the importance of each stience and its quantity of truth is biased by the human observer and that bias must be taken into account both to describe the errors of present sciences and to define the ideal ‘world of the human mind’, one in which the maximisation of the Human Function of Existence, which we resume in the maximisation of whealth, at individual and social level, must guide the species and its social scientists, politicos and financiers in control of the legal and financial bills that cre(dit)ate the future of all of us.
Minds are Mirrors that map the Universe within an infinitesimal point, to reflect then through actions the mind-mapping in a biased selfish way, expressing as imaginative creative actions, the natural distortion which the self-centred language provokes into the being.
Mental Stiences in each species might differ in language and mapping, but always imply a back and forth, reversal motion from Universe to mind to Universe, in which the mind will express according to the mirror, its program of survival and existence. And that is the self, which is the same for an atom, a human being, a lion or a black hole, as observed in the selfish acts of survival of all of them.
Artistic, proper human senses: verbal modes of time, literature and ethics (Tiƒ) and visual modes of space (Arts)
Mechanical senses: clocks that measure time digitally and telescopes and microscopes which see all the fractal §cales of reality.
Thus the absurd belief of enzymen who worship mechanisms and its digital senses as superior to those of man, makes no ‘sense’ at all, as humans DO have their own visual and verbal, aesthetic and ethic mind mirrors of the whole.
All this said conscious of where we live, I will not dwell so much in this intro on art and ethics, studied in depth in our web on ‘evolutionaryeconomics.wordpress’ dedicated to human sciences but on the purest, most extended languages of most species, maths and logic.
Yet the maths and logic of ‘God’, the mind of the Universe are of a ‘higher kind’ than those of man’ (Saint Augustine).
The immediate consequences of changing the outlook of the ultimate 2 elements of reality completely upgrade our vision of physical systems. The reader will notice if he keeps reading this blog that we will resolve for all sciences multiple unanswered questions and we will have to re-interpret many information, as we better focus the truths of the underlying concepts of space-time – and this is a task that starts in the bare bone human languages of those 2 substances, logic of time and mathematics of space, which now will be considered Non-euclidean and Non-Aristotelian. As all beings made of space-time are.
Non-æ logic. The Universal Syntax of all languages.
The ‘Generator’ equation of space-time beings and its ternary logic.
Unfortunately the beats of the universe are difficult to understand because the logic of present man, especially that of physicists seems ‘lineal Aristotelian’: A causes B.
Reality though is more like the Eastern philosophies of Vishnu-yin-information and Shiva-yang-energy/motion:
A<=>B, that is A and B interact to create a ternary <=> present element.
Reason why there is conservation of Angular and Lineal Momentum, there is Space and Time, Energy and Information, O-Particles/Heads that store time cycles and limbs/fields that move them, mixed in bodies and waves that reproduce both of them.
Humans of course, naturally have always expressed this ‘Ternary’ Structure of the universe.
And so the parallel syntax of the languages of knowledge we use to describe those Universal beings – verbal, mathematical and visual languages – all have the same ternary ‘grammar’, which I have called the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe:
Tƒ (Subject or Function of ‘temporal information’) < ST: action, operandi or verb ≥ Sp (Object of ‘spatial energy’).
We associate counter-intuitively ‘cycles with motion’ and ‘lines with Still space’.
It has to do a lot with the limiting errors of classic physics, where only lineal inertial motion matters. Fact is big-bang explosion DECELERATE speed till it becomes Still lineal distances and dimensions, that is pure lineal space with no motion or vacuum space (as in any physical big-bang of entropy). While the equation of cyclical vortex, is Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold, simplest variety), which counter-intuitively accelerates (∆V) when distance becomes smaller, (-∆R) to maintain K constant.
Thus clocks, frequencies and vortices accelerate ,and have more ‘time’ content, that lineal motions that decelerate to a halt.
Now, we explained before that in duality Space was slower, extensive, Sp, Size, and time was faster, cyclical, accelerated (so are its maths). But now in ternary symmetry we have the need to ‘extend’ the meanings of time and space to the duality of the 3 motions of time and the 3 organic parts of spatial bodies and this makes some confusing choices of terms, such as:
Space will be the still, formal view of reality and Time the motion view. And so we shall talk of 3 ‘topologies of formal space’, and 3 ‘ages of time motion’, which together shape the fundamental duality of reality, the view of organs in simultaneous space and the view of beings living a worldcycle of 3 ages of time:
Sp (limbs-fields)≈ Young, past, expansive age < ST: Present, repetitive, hyperbolic body-waves, adult reproductive age>Tƒ (Temporal, future informative, cyclical old age).
Now here the convention I have adopted is to Use the same symbols for either symmetries, the limb-field<body-wave>head-particle or spatial simultaneous view of an organism in space, and the Young-past-expansive < present-Adult-reproductive>Old-Informative 3 ages of time.
This is where things seem confusing because the whole thing transmutes. The old age of future time has more information and it is cyclical, properties of time cycles, but it is also slower, property of space decelerating motions. The young expansive age has more motion, a property of time more than space and so on.
But as I have told you B & W and 3 color view are new worlds, and this is the closest way to express past references and correspond with human expression of all this.
A way out to avoid confusions with the ternary symmetry is to use more when dealing with the still, simultaneous spatial view, the ‘symbols of geometry-topology, |, O and Ø:
|-Limbs/fields < Ø-waves-bodies> O-Heads/Particles
And the same for time ages with the reference of time motions:
|-young past < Ø-present, reproduction > O-Information, future, old age.
So it shows the symmetry with the symbols | , Ø, and O.
And the ¬Æ formalism that better express them.
Then I realized why mathematics was a language, so closely related to 5D space-time.
Since geometry was the science of space, logic algebra, with its sequential social numbers, the time language, and analysis the 3rd branch of mathematics, the study of the 5th dimension, of infinitesimals and wholes.
So it IS easy to translate the laws of mathematics into isomorphic laws of 5D space-times, with the proper corrections to account for the fact that each point was a world in itself, when we came closer to see it – the true meaning of the 5th non-Euclidean postulate which defines points as crossed by infinite parallels; part of waves, connected into planes, that grew through the fifth dimension into co-existing organisms, which used the clocks of time of different speeds to build up its complex forms. It did not matter so much that form, as knots made it convoluted, but the functions of those networks, which now became the 3 ‘physiological networks of all systems’, again described by the Generator equation:
Sp; Digestive-energetic network of Non-AE points < ST: reproductive, ‘blood’ networks > Informative, nervous networks: Tƒ
Of those elements, the most important is the most spiritual of them, the mind, defined by the 5th Non-AE postulate of pan geometry:
5) Definition of a mind: O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time (world)= Linguistic mapping (mind).
The 3 elements of the Universe: 2-manifolds, 3 time motions and ages, and 5D scales.
In the graph, the 3 type of motions of the Universe, expansive, decelerating, Se-entropic, past motions; present, vibrating, wave-like repetitive, present motions and future, informative, implosive, accelerated, vortex like motions.
Its sequential combinations in life-death cycles (world cycles of the ‘existential function’), its simultaneous adjacent construction of ternary organisms, with moving, entropic toroid limbs/fields, repetitive, hyperbolic body/waves and cyclical spherical heads/particles of information, and its complex, architectonical design of the co-existing planes of the 5th dimension that build together the systems of the Universe, require the formalism of existential algebra, Æ, departing from the symbols that represent those motions, forms and scales. It will then be easy to represent all space-time events and define the simple symmetries, transformations and inversions of space-time that define the Universe and all its parts.
In the graph, the Universe has 3 different arrows of time, which being time broken into infinite events can travel simultaneously in different regions of space-time towards a local future or past, as when we die ( a past dissolving event) or we live (a future, informative arrow). The combination of both arrows creates a repetitive present, which reproduces a certain form in space-time. Thus we write:
Ω. Tƒ (future, informative arrow) x Se (past-energetic arrow) = ST: Present iterative arrow.
The 3 arrows of time must be always understood in relationship to the 3 ‘scales’ of growing complexity and organization of the Universe. That means, they can be the phases of a single, ±∆e,i space-time action, or they can be part of a larger, sequential order, as the one represented in the world cycle of life and death, which is a journey through 3 scales of the 5th dimension (seminal-cellular/atomic->Idividual-organic->social/gravitomagnetic), between birth and extinction.
In the case of the perception of those 3 arrows in space, we shall observe beings with fields/limbs of entropic energetic motions hyperbolic bodies/waves that iterate those motions and particles/heads that project into the future and guide the system.
This combination is the one we most often observe, and so we can say that it generates most systems of reality:
In the graph from the original c.92 book, ‘A theory of Unification’, the creation of flows of communication between points starts the creative process of the fractal Universe. Its formal study is the field of Existential Algebra, which along i-logic geometry (the study of fractal points and its topologies in space) and 5D analysis (the study of the laws of transfer of energy and information between scales of the 5th dimension and how its finitesimal parts become wholes), complete the formal mathematical and logic analysis of General Systems Sciences, reason why they are the 2 first isomorphisms, which resume all others that will develop that formalism, and the partial equations of the Fractal, ternary generator, in great detail, for each species of the Universe.
UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR ≈ GENERATOR EQUATION
How language interferes with reality. The Universal Grammar of all languages.
In Newton’s model there are ‘beings’, whose substance is not considered but reduced to Euclidean ‘points with no volume’ that exist in a background abstract frame of reference, mimetic of the Cartesian graphs Newton used to do its calculus (as if God had drawn a mathematical graph in the ‘background of reality’) independent of those beings. Thus this model which merely ‘translates’ the linguistic tool of the mind – the Cartesian mathematical graph, and affirms IS reality, is called ‘background independent’ space-time. Yet as there is NO experience of that background (there is no absolute vacuum, vacuum is always ‘something’ that ‘fills’ – ultimately light radiation, or ‘background radiation’, so ultimately space still IS light space), this concept seems to be a basic ERROR of logic thought, expressed by Kant – to confuse REALITY with LANGUAGE.
So in the same manner religions say that the language of time humans use to describe reality with ‘verbs’ is GOD, the reality itself, scientists, specially physicists say that the language we humans use to express reality, mathematics is REALITY itself. This ‘simple’, tautological way to define everything goes in science from Newton’s absolute space-time to quantum interpretations of particles as probabilities.
But it IS wrong – a human linguistic ego-trip, similar to that of Abrahamic religions, where ‘The word thy God became man and inhabited among us’ (Saint John’s 1.1.). And it is also a simple way to give up in the explanation of reality. Reading Newton one notice immediately that because he couldn’t explain what caused gravitation, he came to the conclusion that ‘gravitation’ was a mathematical background space-time. Point. So goes for the quantum masters who could not explain why particles were waves and particles at the same time, and why they could not control them (uncertainty of measure, different behavior in experiments, etc.). So they decided particles and waves were the mathematical tool they used to express them (probabilities).
Knowledge is linguistic knowledge, when after:
- A) finding experimental data.
- B) introducing such data into regular mathematical and logic laws, the languages of space and time.
- C) we create synoptic linguistic models of reality that ‘focus’ the infinite data of the Universe into the ‘finite’ volume of the brain, through the synoptic ‘syntax’ of those languages. Thus we need to go to the basic elements of all linguistic knowledge, and its syntax, to the Universal Grammar of all languages that reflect all events of space-time, such as:
Λ. Tƒ (Time function, informative subject) < operandi≈action≈ verb ≈space & time: ST > Se (space element, object)
This Universal Grammar will be very important to our analysis of minds and languages that perceive the 3 elements of the Universe, space, time and its combinations, and how minds use 3 elements to map out reality (for example 3 colors of spatial energy, red, temporal information, blue, and its active combinations, greens and yellows). But we cannot get now distracted with it. Suffice to notice that all mathematical formulae are F(x) operandi F(y), which tend to be relationships and transformations of vital spaces and time cycles, and all languages have a Universal grammar of subject, object and the verb that mixes them. So in general all is really Space Magnitude < Spacetime transformation > Time cycle, and we will return to that.
So far we write both equations, with the letter Lambda, which in the notation of relational space-time is the letter (not number) for all equations related to Languages. So the Universal grammar of all languages is ternary as it reflects the Universal space-time cycle/event, minimal unit of reality:
Λ. Space < Action of space-time > Time.
So the next task is to fully grasp those 2 dualities together: the duality between mind perception in stillness or ‘information’ and a moving reality of vital spaces and time cycles.
And the duality of the 2 geometries of the Universe, cyclical time clocks that close curves into themselves and lineal open motions. Those 2 dualities will give us 4 elements of reality, which will merge into infinite systems: curves with motion or curves with form, and lines with motion and lines with form.
We formalize the ∆ST Universe, thanks to i-logic geometry and existential Algebra – the two sides of its formalism, which complement each other as classic geometry, emphasizing space and classic algebra, emphasizing sequential time logic do.
i-logic geometry thus ads the 4 remaining Non-Euclidean definitions to the 5th, the only one known till date, basis of Relativity.
On the other hand Existential algebra, studies mainly the 3 dimensions of Time; that is the ternary, causal logic of 3 time dimensions and its relationship with its hierarchical, isomorphic organic, evolutionary ‘∆-scales’.
This POST deals with the geometric perspective.
The study of the Generator Equation or Existential Function and its existential algebra deals with its causal, temporal perspective.
And the 3rd formalism of ∆-scales which is organic, vital, is dealt in the analysis of complex super-organisms.
I-logic, non-Aristotelian, organic. Non-Euclidean topology.
¬Æ-mathematics: The fractal point-knot of space-time as a mind.
Can we enlighten mathematics further with the laws of ∆•st of space-time?
Indeed, XX c. was about topology and we used extensively its 3 varieties to define organic space, but GST will go further with the completion of…
The formalism of ∆-planes: Non-Euclidean definitions.
5Disomorphisms show a Universe made of multiple scales of broken, intertwined ‘spacetime’ membranes. Thus, its formalism must combine geometric equations and causal, logic, sequential time laws.
So we need to upgrade our simplex space language (continuous single space defined by Euclidean geometry) and time causality (Aristotelian one-dimensional causality from past to future, A->B) to explain multiple spatial scales and 3 time dimensions, past-energy and future-information combined into complementary, present beings. I baptized this new mathematic-logic formalism, ‘i-logic geometry’ that completes the 5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.
What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.
Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.
Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = Spacetime mapping.
So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.
Einstein used the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry (Points through which multiple parallels can cross), to describe the structure of Gravitational space, using a single clock, the 4th present time dimension.
Tƒ complete his analysis, we expand Non-Euclidean geometry, adapting the 3 Geometric, Euclidean definitions to multiple ∆-spaces and the 2 logic postulates (3rd& 5th) redefining identity and causality using the 3 dimensions of time.
Albeit a reformed 5 set of Geometric Postulates to adapt it to the Nature of scalar space-time, where ‘points have parts’, lines are waves that communicate energy and information, planes are organic networks, and the similarity of systems define their behavior.
– 1st Postulate: ‘A fractal point shows 3D volume as we come closer to it’. Since only fractal points, which grow in volume as we come closer to their scale, can fit multiple parallels.
– 2nd postulate: ‘A line-wave is made of ∆-1 points with ‘breath’ that communicate energy and information among ∆-points’.
– 4th postulate: a plane is a discontinuous network of fractal points joined by waves of energy and information that leave interstitial dark spaces. (Particles in physical planes, cells in biological spaces and so on.)
– 3rd postulate: ‘2 entities are ‘equal’, when both, their external form (Euclidean definition) and internal 3D parts are identical.’
Yet since we cannot perceive the complete internal information of 2 points, still and isolated by its external membrane (Galilean Paradox) instead of equality we talk of degrees of ‘similarity’.
So Isomorphisms between entities of different scales are NOT equalities but ‘similarities’.
-5th Postulate: ‘0-Points gauge information & energy, transforming waves of external ∆-i points into inner body cells and mind’s pixels.’
And so the fifth postulate formalises the Galilean-Ego Paradox:
‘Every point of view=mind feels, subjectively, from his point to view, the center of the Universe, but it is only a zero-point, an infinitesimal mirror, which maps in stillness a minimal part of the ∞ information of the ∞ Universe’.
As Aristotle put it, ‘there are ∞ Gods, still minds that order and move the energy that surrounds them’.
Thus we define a sequential, causal behaviour in all systems, which start with the perception of the mind that absorbs entropy to create body åctions:
– ∆ï -> ∏∆+1(mind’s creation) -> ∆Sp (entropy feeding) -> ∑Sp X Tƒ (cellular reproduction)
This ‘Existential algebra’ is the ultimate formalism of GST, which advanced researchers will use in the future to model all realities, but we shall try to keep ad minimal except in the 2nd line of isomorphisms which will develop the language and fourth line, applied to high-level science.
In the graph a resume of the 5 postulates of i-logic geometry.
Amazingly enough we can study the 3 ‘formal languages’ of the Universe together, departing from the classic Postulates of Geometry, which started also the adventure of Formal Knowledge with the Greeks.
Systems who have different informative languages and cannot communicate, but have equal n-1 scalar dimensions enter in Darwinian prey-predator relationships by sharing the same space in which the predator tears the topology of the prey, provoking toroid flows that dissolve its i-scale, absorbing it as n-1 energy, etc.
Further on, membranes enclose points’ parts. So external camouflage confuses preys that engage as equals with predators, becoming an essential strategy of 0-points in search of STe-Feeding. Thus the 3rd Postulate reduces all possible behaviors among species according to their 10Ds similarities. Thus 10Di-logic mathematics means the biggest advance in both sciences since Euclid & Aristotle found the mathematic-logic formalism of 4Di. Without it, GST cannot exist.
We shall use the following symbols for them:
Œ, the function of existence, a point with volume and parts, the Informative (O) and Energetic (E) lineal fields, is used for ALL fractal points in general.
It will be the general symbol for an i-point, along ‘i’, which also expresses nicely the energy line with its top head of information.
So for its conceptual use in ¬Æ we shall use:
Θ for the 1st postulate, as the point has internal parts.
Φ symbol for the 5th Postulate, as the points is cross by a flow of information.
Both are also symbols for a O-point mind, which normally has an axis of informative perception in the dimension of height and a wider opening in the equator or mouth to absorb energy. So the first and 5th postulate ultimately represent the inward state of the mind and its outward perceptive state.
≈ Represents the 2nd postulate (a wave instead of a line).
‡ Represents the 3rd postulate of relative equality, as it shows both the perpendicular + and parallel = dual relationships of beings, with species they feed on (equal energy, different information) or evolve together with (equal information) forming
‰… for the 4th postulate of a plane-network made at least of 3 points with parts joined by lineal networks.
Where is the maths in all this? We insist the maths are well-known so we shall not dwell on them, though we shall enlighten maths also with the a priori ‘Axioms’ of GST (cyclical time, fractal space, holographic principle of bidimensional space and time which come together into ST-presents), from where we will deduce the 5 ‘postulates of non-Euclidean geometry’, basis of the next ‘LAYER’ of causal science: i-logic mathematics, the upgrading of mathematics, which will further ‘enlighten’ mathematical physics.
It must be understood in that sense, why we do have 4 lines in this blog to rebuild 400 years of human knowledge till i get tired of it and leave as ‘Descartes’ said things to do to further ‘disciples’ (:oh, well yes we genius are very lazy people (: the point is to start from the foundations (first line), will gives ‘slack’ to define the fundamental knowledge of sciences in the second line at a ‘relatively’ simple level (now in construction).
While the huge wealth of knowledge of the past century, will need a more ‘pro’ approach in the 2nd line of ‘isomorphisms’, to go with the 4th line studying with pure GST each science and all its laws.
So this first line on theory and the one with explicit name for sciences is the ‘theoretical minimum’ and it starts from very first principles, but alas, all can be enlightened again. Indeed, when I was young there were few people I truly admired. One of them was Einstein, though latter i would think he was overrated. Now being old I enjoy most, his quips and collateral work. So one thing stroke me when young – a new demonstration of the Pythagoras theorem, the first theorem of maths, which seemed so simple and without nothing deeper, based in the ‘scales’ and self-similarities of its ratios, pure ‘fractal paradigm’.
PHYSICAL SCIENCES: ∆±4
A fundamental theme of astrophysics in 5D metric is the solution of the Unification equation of charges and masses and the problem of hierarchy – the reader without a professional ‘egocy’ at work as a physicist should be surprised that despite our huge criticism of ‘physicists’ we are so much in loved with ‘physics’; but that is unavoidable, as we shall criticize HUMAN EGOES all the time while stressing the infinite and humble impersonal nature of the Taoist Universe…
Let us then deal with this question a bit more in depth, in the hope that perhaps there is a lot among physicists, who cares more for knowledge than egocy.
The galaxy is the atom of the higher scale, from the ∆o centred human point of view which perceives as much from the galaxy than the atom: ∆±3.
A such the galaxy-atom can be described as a social organism (its highest amount of information), as an astrophysical system, or as an atomic, physical form and all the perspectives will give us ∆i on the being.
As customary we shall apply the simple system of defining 10 set of isomorphic laws related to the fractal scales in space, and space-time symmetries (actions, world cycles) performed by beings on those ∆±3 scales which conform our ‘physical perception’ of the galaxy, expanding it with ‘organic’, and ‘full’ descriptions of it.
And so we can establish 2 fundamental Disomorphisms to study the whole as a series of kaleidoscopic mirrors:
-The atom-galaxy, for quantitative, mathematical physics modelling.
The concept of course has been around for long. EFE (Einstein’s field equations) applied to galaxies (Einstein-Walker formalism) is actually modelled to simplify calculus with galaxies as hydrogen atoms; Schrodinger’s equation was used by Wheeler to find a quantum formalism for the Universe; string duality considers universes and quantum strings the same; astronomers model stars around central black holes as photons, etc. But without a deep philosophical model of the fractal Universe provided in this blog, all those mathematical isomorphisms have been merely considered ‘techniques’ of calculus. The reader thus should be aware the mathematical physics – albeit complex to the level of specialists, do exist and what we shall beyond the Unification equation in Newtonian terms, introduce here is the depth of philosophical analysis and the Disomorphic properties of atomic galaxies.
-The second Ðisomorphism is that of the galaxy-cell (treated in cosmology) which shows the organic properties of astrophysical galaxies. This is to my knowledge completely new stuff, but rather obvious: DNA-black holes with gravitational forces, and protein, lineal strangelets, encase the vital space-time of electromagnetic and gravitational flows of energy between both, which structure the waves of the galaxy. And both control the mitochondria stars that become on the long term the energy food to reproduce more black holes and strange stars (pulsars). 20 years ago this seemed madness, but today everything comes together to the surprise of astronomers to validate the organic model of galactic growth:
What about all the other ‘particles’. They are composed of those, except antiparticles, which have reversed parameters and hence must be considered the dead state of particles, but properly ordered, since the different time dimotions CAN BE ORDERED IN ANY WAY, so in quantum physics the particle-antiparticle anihhilation process should be seen as another way to order the informative life arrow (particle) which lasts much more than the entropic death arrow (§ð<<$t), as death is a travel to the past with NO present. And that is the reason why we see less antiparticles, which is the dead state of a particle, hence much shorter in time.
So as we see less corpses than living, despite being the same number we see less antiparticles.
The understanding of the Universe with the same data but a different philosophy of science, organicism, will bring a completely different reality, and this might seem strange to the reader, brain-boxed in the belief on unitarianism. The Universe, we shall repeat ad nauseam has an intelligence and logic far more complex than one-dimensional man.
Consider the fundamental proof of the big-bang, the so called background radiation. As it happened it was measured on the galaxy, and so we must find another explanation. As it happens, a black hole of the size of the moon, the commonest form of the galaxy will reproduce them. As it happens there must be 3 type of black holes – size always coming on 3 scalar families, of which 2 have been found, the galactic ones and the ones produced by star novas. So we need the primordial black holes of the quasar life-death cycle of galaxies, which DO NOT EVAPORATE as hawking with his faulty analysis of time arrows based on a supposed ‘entropy of black holes’, believed – but never found experimental proof of it. So where are those primordial black hole of a smallish size. They are all over the galaxy red shifting with the mass of a moon, light at the exact temperature of the background radiation. I called them Moon MACHOs (Massive Cold matter Halo Objects).
And what they do in organic terms happens in EVERY system of nature. It is Claude Bernard’s principle of the constancy of an organism’s “internal environment” called homeostasis-the self-regulatory mechanism that allows organisms to maintain themselves in a state of dynamic balance with their variables fluctuating between tolerance limits.
It is indeed a temperature that provides ‘energy’ to larger, colder black holes, and allows the superfluid states of Helium, which is essential to the complex organic processes of creation of matter in the galaxy to take place also in cold-fusion (remember, physicists do not recognize the arrow of coldness which is essential to all process of information, so they tend to dismiss anything ‘cold’ to find then that actually cold dominates heat, centers of planets have crystals, NOT hot chaotic plasma, and the emission of neutrinos in stars shows the interior to be colder than thought. It IS the external membrane by definition, with maximal angular momentum/speed/temperature what is hot. The internal brain-singularity IS always cold, but those details of thermodynamics belong to more specific posts (that only recently is treated in parallel to ‘cryodynamics’, with a Beta factor of coldness, increasingly deemed more important – 3o years since the first models of 5D, I have seen the entire ‘roast’ of sciences coming individually in all its details to this all-together now philosophy of science, even if it has so far being ignored by the routines of scientific repetition of outdated models and specialist zeals, and the overall cynicism of scientists who don’t believe anymore a human mind instead of a computer can reach further in the understanding of the ‘higher logic’ of God)
But monism must reign by dogma. Only heat not cold must matter, only entropy not information, only big-bang not big-crunch, only our human scale, not the infinite ones…. You can see then the ‘way’ facts are bent by physicists in search of the Saint Grail of Unification of everything into the ONE, a clear deformation coming from biblical religions which all our founding fathers of science believe in.
Left, when we ad the gravitational force of galaxies that acts as a cut-off substance preventing the backwards implosion which happens when Big Bang theorists run backwards in time the expansion of intergalactic space we obtain a balanced wobbling universe; as gravitation ‘curves space into mass’ (Einstein). That is, warps 1D light spacetime vacuum into 3D particles with mass, creating a balanced, dynamic immortal Universe. As mass warps flat 1 Dimensional light spacetime into 3 Dimensional mass volumes, the proportion between dark energy and mass should be, 3 to 1: 75% 1D Dark energy <=>25% 3 D mass, as found experimentally.
On the right the fractal Universe is self-similar in all its scales; so we observe similar topologic and dynamic events albeit at different scales of size in space, inverse to its speed of time; such as smaller spaces run faster time cycles, but their product remains co-invariant (definition of a dimension or ‘metric equation’: $(size in space)x ð (speed of time cycles) = K…
When we apply that metric equation we observe a parallelism between the beta decay ‘little Big Bang of atoms’ and the quasar Big Bang of galaxies, and the bang of stars (nova). So we define in all scales of matter a similar worldcycle of life and death; that is of transformation back and forth of entropy (lineal motion) into informative mass (cyclical time vortex), described by Einstein’s equation, which moves both ways: E($)<=>M(ð). Another way to express this dynamic universal balance is the existence of two laws of conservation of both, lineal ($) and angular (ð) momentum, which define a Universe in all its scales, composed of ‘lineal limbs-potentials’ and cyclical particles/heads, combined into hyperbolic body-waves – the 3 only topologies of the Universe.
If we restrict our inquire to physical systems, the topologic similarity of all those fractal big-bangs is evident, from right to left: in the atomic scale every 15 minutes there is a beta decay(neutron’s explosion into a proton and an electron), in the star scale (nova) and the galactic scale (quasar cycle of 15 billion years, an age similar to the cosmic big-bang in which the central black hole explodes its bar-formation to restart then a collapse of matter into the black hole). But there is NO proof for the entire cosmos of such a big-bang beyond a series of ‘assumptions’ – such as the infinite collapse backwards in time NOT only of space between galaxies but of galaxies themselves; the assumption that the background radiation measured locally in the galaxy comes from every corner of the Universe.
This proof has been recently falsified when the supposed 2 lobes of radiation coming from 13 billion years light, on the ‘beginning of time’ matched the two lobes of electromagnetic radiation coming out of the central black hole, which match the two lobes of electronic radiation coming out of the central proton of a hydrogen atom. Further on, a similar background radiation could be produced by any kind of dark ultra heavy quark matter (strangelets, black holes), with the size of a moon.
So we postulate the existence on the galaxy, of small black holes and strangelets, producing that signature. Since galaxies are clearly in its organic structure to a ‘cell’, organized by dark quark matter and black holes, the DNA of its structure, and in its physical constants to an atom of a much larger cosmological scale. Thus in quantitative terms we can study the forces of the Universe according to such similarity. Since if a galaxy is self-similar to an atom a proton is self-similar to a black hole (if we use the simple $xð=K metric, accelerating the vortex of the galaxy and shrinking its size we obtain the exact size of a Bohr radius, and the Schwarzschild radius for the shrinking black hole proton).
∆±¡: EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN ATOMS AND GALAXIES: UNIFICATION EQUATION OF MASSES AND CHARGES.
The unification of charges and masses can be done with all kind of inflationary mathematical mirrors, the Poison, Newton, Einstein’s formalism, and even other forms (the formalism of black holes in string terms, in terms of thermodynamic of black holes, the AMD bidimensional formalism, different Lagrangian-Hamiltonian studies, etc.) As this is not about being a pedantic scholar but exactly the opposite, about being a simplifying Copernicus, for all to understand, we shall use…
The simpler Newtonian formalism of the Unification of charges and masses as time-space vortices of 2 scales.
Much of the early work on five dimensional space was in an attempt to develop a theory that unifies the four fundamental forces in nature: strong and weak nuclear forces, gravity and electromagnetism. German mathematician Theodor Kaluza and Swedish physicist Oskar Klein independently developed the Kaluza–Klein theory in 1921, which used the fifth dimension to unify gravity with electromagnetic force. Although their approaches were later found to be at least partially inaccurate, the concept provided a basis for further research over the past century. Since they were right – the fifth dimension will unify both forces but in a fractal manner, unbeknownst to physicists.
We shall only so how the power of 5D³ by finding the unification equation of charges and masses (general relativity) and upgrading worldlines to worldcycles (special relativity), as we have already dealt with the constancy of light speed (entanglement of electrons which emit information in relative stillness to each other).
Future, time arrows in physics are cyclical vortices of gravitation or charge or thermodynamic eddies, with a singularity of zero-motion in its center, which we do observe in thermodynamic vortices as we cannot ‘see’ inside a quark or top quark star (black hole). It is the arrow of future, as it is an attractive arrow that forms lineal entropic fields into form and will be the ‘final destiny’ of the quanta of an entropic field. We shall study for the three main scales of the supœrganism of the galaxy, which is the main physical system in which humans exist as its thermodynamic level.
Whereas the Universal Constants (G, Q), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales. Its formalism, M= ω2r3/U.C.(G,Q) is its Unification Equation.
Since if we substitute for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1st ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain Q with a 1040 higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem.
As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It also proves the isomorphism between electromagnetic atoms and galaxies, H-atoms of the cosmic scale. Since when we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and electronic orbitals star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos. Organicism gives the ‘why’ of Galacells that have DNA- + Top Quark proton holes, star mitochondria that feed them & strangelet halos.
This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:
Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)2 × radius3/ mass
If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe both, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.
And so we have an essential equivalence between K and G for the two ‘enclosure’ ∆±1 scales of human existence, the quantum faster, stronger attractive curvature=speed of the electromagnetic vortex and the slower G-VORTEX, which allow us to unify as we did previously both fields. And translate the somewhat dull language of electromagnetism to that simpler of gravitation, showing some fascinating results, such as the proton showing the schwartzschild radius, Rg = 2GM/c² equation of a black hole in the larger scale when put on gravitational jargon.
Let us go into the task, of putting some numbers to the conceptual model, completing Einstein’s work with its long seeked…
Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:
Sun mass = 2 × 1030 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10-7 rad. per sec.
Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.
Result: G=6.67 × 10 -11 kg-1 m3 rad. sec.-2
This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.
If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.
Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)
4 × 1016 rad. sec. -1 = w (electron);
5.3 × 10-11 m. (Bohr radius);
proton mass = 1.6 × 10 -27 kg.
Then we get a G, which is 2×1039 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.
And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/c2.
But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.
Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.
To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.
Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:
For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time.
He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.
So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.
So the 5 Forces of nature mediate each of those Dimotions in physical systems – even if physicists have reduced them all and modeled them all force-feeding the concept that forces are all lineal similar to electromagnetism established by means of the change of particles.
So once more, and the examples will be infinite, humans HAVE reduced reality to its simpler monist beliefs – reducing in this case the main forces of the Universe to a simple single model – that of the first force they found, electromagnetism. So they always try to find a particle and explain attraction as an exchange of photon-like beings. Of course this is NOT the case. The weak trans-form-ation is a process of evolution of information in which a particle after absorbing more energy-mass, as it happens with biological or chemical reproduction and reactions, gives ‘birth’ to more evolved particles of mass. On the other hand gravitation is an informative only force, which has no ‘particles exchanged’ but masses are vortices of spacetime that as a hurricane does, suck in hence attract all that turns around them. So if the weak force plays the role of the force that reproduces and generates new particles, the gravitational force is the force that informs and evolves social parts into wholes. We shall then establish a clear-cut theory of 5 Forces as the expression of the 5 Dimotions of physical systems.
Accordingly, we find that the nonet of bosons with color-anticolor charge inside the proton are identical to the nonet of mesons with particle-antiparticle charge that should reproduce heavy top, bottom and charm quark matter inside black holes. So there is a parallelism between the light quark decuplet that forms our stars and the top quark decuplet that should from frozen black hole stars. Following the parallelism of scale, we also find non-lineal gravitational forces inside the ‘galatom’ self-similar to non-lineal strong and nuclear forces inside the atom, and lineal expansive dark entropy between ‘galatoms’ self-similar to lineal expansive electromagnetism, between ‘atoms’. Hence the expansion of space between galaxies IS explained as it is similar to the expansion of space between repulsive atoms.
Finally the weak interaction is the force that allows the transformation of light quarks of the atomic scale into heavier quarks of the galactic one, which experimental results at LHC-b show to decay a 20% more into particles that antiparticles, solving the question on why our light universe is made of particles. It follows also that gravitation only acts in the galactic scale, solving the hierarchy problem of its relative weakness, as when we express in terms of scales both forces, we can easily match the G and Q constants, as paradoxically small scales run faster clock cycles and act as stronger attractive vortices.
And so on and so on – since indeed, a fractal model of the Universe resolves all the pending questions of physics and all other sciences, when we add a new 5th dimension of scales, whose metric equations are shown in the next graph.
So we can, departing from those concepts of space and time, define also the Universe and all its parts as a space-time being:
‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that self-organize themselves into bigger, self-similar scales’.
Which leads us to a metaphysical question about the infinity or not of those scales and its self-similarity or identity. That is, if the Universe is infinite in scales, every atom is a galaxy, every galaxy an atom of a hyper universe. If the Universe is identical in scales, that is, the atom and the galaxy put in the same metric size are identical, we are immortal as the number of identical beings in such a huge space with so many limited forms is infinite, so we are being repeated everywhere in parallel worlds within the same Universe. This IS the field of metaphysics as it is impossible to probe so far beyond the gluon and the galaxy – NOT the absurd mathematical fantasies of big-bang theorists.
But as this is an important theme for our survival, we bring it here before studying History and Religion and Art (the subconscious collective minds of the super organisms of mankind). As the foremost expert in metaphysics (: as well as all other ‘stiences’, little selfie here :), my take is 1) the scales are likely infinite 2) they are as in all fractal self-similar but not identical – that is gluons are self-similar to UD quarks but not identical, atoms are self-similar to galaxies but not identical (in fact in detail they are anti galaxies), and so sorry, we are not eternal, and on top we are so insignificant (or so immense in the absolute relativity of scales) as any other species. THAT IS IN FACT THE AMAZING BEAUTY OF THE UNIVERSE, TOTALLY JUST, NOBODY IS BETTER, NO SPECIES… The ant-queen with 10 times faster mind-thoughts live in subjective life 70 years as we do…
MATTER AS MASS -VORTEX
We can see the equations of the 3 physical scales:
E(∆i) = ∆-2 (quantum scale): Hs x ƒt = Ks x Tt (∆-1: thermodynamic scale)= 1/2 Ms x vt : ∆+1 (Gravitational scale)
So the quanta of space, h, k, m, varies as we change planes of existence, and so do the type of parameter we use to measure the time clocks of each ‘Plane of the 5th dimension’.
How then we relate the quanta of space of each scale with the parameter of the upper scales?
- Quantitatively due to deep reasons of ternary form and scalar structure, the 3 x 3 + ∆+1 = 10 ‘tetraktys’ structure, is the fundamental spatial organic structure of 3 x 3 organs of ‘entropy’, ‘form’ and ‘energy’ (S-T-ST), which come together into a whole O-mind point, the 10th point that sees all as a single being. So the Universe of scalar space-time is decametric in its scales of organisation, and because it is also fractal, the 10±¹º elements is the key parameter to differentiate the emergence of a new ∆-plane. So we will find that very often in all systems after reaching this degree of population, the system ‘evolves’ into a super-organic ‘other whole’ reality and the effects of the ‘smallish quanta’ that create that billion plus reality are despicable amounts, only important through ‘renormalisation’ processes and ‘polynomial degradation’ to the astounding obsession for perfect measure of physical systems. Thus we shall find that 10ˆ10 elements are the atoms of a magnetic domain, ties of a DNA molecule, human population in the Earth’s globalised super organism, stars in most spiral galaxies, cells in mammal super organisms, etc. etc.
And so in those ‘transition’ states, we shall observe a fast sudden disappearance of the effects of a lower scale, as the new parameters of a combined ‘fusion’ of all the smallish time clocks and discontinuous space-quanta ’emerge’ as a new whole unit of the new scale. So ‘frequencies of waves’ become ‘temperature’. And in fact physicists measure the temperature of smaller waves and particles in terms of frequencies. THEY DO NOT measure ‘heat’ in a wave (a meaningless concept) but just calculate according to frequency the equivalent temperature.
So happens when we transcend from the thermodynamic scale which is the fundamental scale of bio-chemical processes of life, in which energy and time is provided by entropy (K-boltzmann) ‘space’ units and ‘temperature’ degrees; into the gravitational scale, whose minimal unit or ‘graviton’ (Planck’s mass of a black hole with an event horizon equal to its compton wave), weights as much as a fully functional decametric multicellular simple organism. Thus it is at the multicellular scale of life, and the ‘solid matter’ networks (crystal structures), when the first gravitational ‘effects’ appear in its lowest forms, which will then become an in-crescendo force till reaching its zenith in the galactic, planetary scale.
It is then absurd and useless to argue as physicists keep doing with their faulty single space-time models how to unify gravitation and quantum physics, as there is NOTHING TO UNIFY here, in terms of a SINGLE force, but rather explain as we do AND UNIFY IN TERMS OF Quantitative SCALES AND TOPOLOGIES, the 2 dominant ‘organic systems’ of both scales, the atom and the galaxy.
It is a fact though that once we pass the transition between scales, the change of parameters of space-time ‘fogs’ the perception of the fading information buried in the deep transformations that happen along more than one scale.
Hence the uncertainty of human analysis of quantum physics, which has for so long fogged our realist description of it.
Closer and hence more accurately observed there is the thermodynamic scale with k, the unit of entropy as the quanta of space and temperature, the vibration of motion of molecules, or its ‘cyclical thermodynamic clocks’ as the unit of motion in time, and its product energy. Finally in the gravitational scale, the quanta of space is ‘mass’ (which of course must be combined with the dilatation of ‘temperature’, and the underlying ‘extension’ of space-time ‘h-light quanta’).
Again, we realise as soon as we introduce the concept of Universal constants of space (h,k,c), how ‘limited’ are the conceptual analysis of present physics, which does not have any real definition of space, time, universal constant, energy, information, entropy and the like…
Finally to observe a key law of ∆ST scales, which we shall introduce but not fully explain so early:
When a system transcends into a larger scale its ‘moving, informative cyclical Tiƒ elements’ which rule the lower parts of the ∆-system becomes submissive ‘spatial energy quanta’ of the higher scale: ∆-1 Tiƒ ≈ ∆-Spe.
It is a very important law. You are the head, and ‘relative god’ of your body cells, but you are only a ‘cell-citizen’ of the larger super organism of history, nation or civilisation, which you obey and work for.
This means that we have to associate NOT ∆-1 Spe with ∆-Spe, but ∆-1 Tiƒ, with ∆-Spe. Thus in physical systems the relationships we must find (3rd line of detailed analysis of each ‘STience’) are between:
ƒ (frequency of a quantum wave) and k (boltzmann constant of entropy)
T (Temperature of a thermodynamic wave) and mass (constant of space of the gravitational scale).
And so on.
In the graph we show some ‘fractal domains of the Universe’ where we can define a 5th dimension of existence:
- In the left, in physical systems we find the 3 scales that put together, the quantum, ∆-1, thermodynamic, ∆ and gravitational ∆+1 scales), allow the travel of physical systems through the 5th dimension (we use the symbol ∆±i for a given scale of the 5th dimension, with ∆o as the human scale or in sequential form an absolute scale from ∆o: forces to ∆10: cosmos).
- In the right, we see those 3 scales as they create the ‘∆-1 cellular, genetic’, ∆-human, organic, and ∆+1 planetary and cosmological scales were socio-biological systems exist and travel through the 5th dimension.
Therefore, the geometry of the 5th dimension exists and we can define formally general systems sciences, as the discipline that studies the invariant properties of such space-time, as we move within it, expressed in a series of formal equations that describe the invariant ‘topological, spatial properties’ of species of those different scales, and the temporal, invariant properties of systems, traveling in time through them.
What is the clearest proof we have of this transformation as we transcend on scale? The answer is we can see this transformation right through in the processes that ’emerge’ beyond the gravitational scale into the scale of dark energy and matter, beyond the galaxy (cosmological scale), where the frequency of time of gravitational systems, v, becomes a fixed spatial value, c, the constant speed of space-light that does NOT change for fast systems, entering that final dark scale.
I. PHYSICAL SCALES OF 5 D: SPACE QUANTA AND TIME FREQUENCIES IN PHYSICAL SCALES: Sp X Tƒ = E∆
Now we will extend more in the understanding of physical systems and its generator equations, and scales of the 5th dimension of which 3 are paramount (susceptible to be analysed by the ternary fractal principle of i-logic Non-AE algebra in ternary sub scales): the quantum scale with its frequency clocks, and h-constants of space, the thermodynamic scale with its temperature clocks and entropy k-constants of space, and the gravitational scale with its speed clocks and its mass-densities of space.
The physical jargon. The time clocks of the 3 scales of physical systems
A key element to T.Œ, a Theory of Everything Organic, is to translate all the abstract jargons to its interdisciplinary language. As the physical sciences are considered ‘wrongly’ on top, we will deal extensively with their concepts (they are merely the sciences who study the limiting scales, further away from man, and only with mathematical languages, hence loosing its organic properties and with the most deformed of all time concepts, as a mere ‘locomotion’ or translation in lineal space – hence loosing all understanding of its form, its information, the dimension of time they ‘deny’ to the point they call it negantropy (the negation of entropy) – so we share the view of Eddington and Einstein that ‘physicists’ invent much of its ‘entelechy’ entities).
Still the species they study are overwhelmingly the majority of reality so we do have to deal extensively with them. And the fundamental concept they use to express all the ‘formal motions’ of those species; that is the combination of all the cyclical motions or ‘angular momentums’ of each scale of the 5th dimension and all its ‘entropic spatial intervals’ or constants of space action or ‘lineal momentums’ is ENERGY.
In normal parlance energy is closer to the concept of expansive lineal motion – our capacity to move. In physics though there is a clear equation that relates Energy and Work. So Energy is the capacity to move with certain ‘directionality’ or form. Or alternately the capacity to move ‘forms’. And it is a very integrative concept both in time and space. So for example, in our human scale, Energy is the sum of the Internal Energy made mostly of cyclical motions (U) that give the form to the being and the External motion or kinetic energy (ke). So it is the closest concept to what we call a ‘plane of the 5th dimension’, which measures all the formal motions of a ‘closed system’, ‘superorganism’, or relative Universe.
And for that reason we DO have a close similarity between the Metrics of a given plane of the 5th dimension:
∆= Sp x Tƒ and the equations of energy of each Plane of the Universe:
∆ : Sp x Tƒ ≈ Energy : Constant of Space-action x Frequency
What is energy then remains the fundamental first question of physical science 5D cosmology must clarify. It is not possible to clearly define energy in physics with a single formula, which becomes the first surprise of a seemingly ‘exact’ science. But we do have 3 equations for it, in the 3 scales of relative size of the Universe, which we shall call, ∆-1: quantum scale, ∆-Thermodynamic scale and ∆+1: gravitational scale:
∆-1: E= h v; ∆: E= kT; ∆+1: E= c2 M
They are the Clocks of Time and quanta of space that put together create the 3 ∆±1 planes of physical systems that interact with the human being. Latter we shall study those 3 ‘big planes of space-time’ and its clocks, its space constants and its Energies and formulae in more detail.
To stress though that all systems are in a fractal Universe susceptible to study in ternary sub-systems, ternary functions, etc. This we repeat ad nausea because humans tend to understand reality in a single one-dimensional way and the ‘manners of the brain’ are the more difficult to break. You must then always deal with the transformative duality (systems constantly beat between space and time states, entropy and information, motion and form) and so sometimes T.Œ will seem confusing as the rule A is NOT B is often broken (with time A-entropy becomes B information). So the true law of science is:
Energy never dies, it transforms its entropy into information back and forth ad eternal.
And then we must understand that those equations do have 3 elements: energy, which carries on one side a frequency of form, a time clock or frequency or density of information and on the other side a lineal motion an ‘kinetic energy’, expansive entropy (the concept of entropy hence is quite different from the one of science, but it will make sense, for example, in the previous equation, of the thermodynamic scale, E= nKT, K the Boltzmann constant of entropy multiplies by temperature the clock of time that defines the speed of actions in our life scale).
Those are the 3 elements we shall see constantly, ply with it reveal them in its infinite ‘transformations’, because the inversion of both but their coming together into different shapes of motion and form is truly all what is about. In physics all is about E= M c2, where Mass is a cyclical time vortex of gravitation, which attracts the faster it turns; E is the energy it stores and c2 is a plane of expansive light-space, the entropy factor.
And so a third element, which we can call generically ‘Energy’, philosophically ‘formal motions’, geometrically a plane of the 5th dimension and mathematically:
E= SxT or ST, which combines the lineal and cyclical formal motions of Space, Sp, and Time, Tƒ, completes the physical description of a given ∆-scale.
Now, while Energy stays humans deform its perceptions of time and space parameters, reason why the constants and clocks of space and time are different when we introduce the multiple deformations the human observer introduce in all those scales.
And we will account for them when studying the generator equation of each scale in which ‘the quantifiers, or time frequencies’ vary; the Sp-quanta, or Spatial entropic motion steps of each scale also vary, and ‘thanks God!’ or else we could have difficulties doing any objective assessment of reality, there is a conservation of the whole Plane formal motion, expressed in the conservation of the whole formal motions (energy conservation) its relative cyclical motions (angular momentums and similar variables, such as spin) and the relative lineal motions (lineal momentum and similar variables of each scale).
So generally speaking we can identify in each scale the relevant parameters by finding an equation of Energy for each scale whereas there will be basically 2 or at most 3 terms depending on human detail of analysis whereas, it will be then easy to define what is the space quanta, the time frequency element, in how many dimensions we humans observe them, what we humans extract from them, and how then we mathematize those scales.
And finally study how those scales interact in the ‘regions of emergence and dissolution’ of parameters, from one scale to the other – the most interesting regions of the Universe. To that aim, we can always use the isomorphic method, by comparing phenomena on different scales. So for example, we shall consider the case of a fluid regime that stops its speed growth when it creates vortices, Tƒ, on its laminar wave flow and compare it with the c-barrier or limit speed that stops growing when a mass starts to form faster mass vortices (heavier quarks). And this will allow to define ‘speed’ as the ‘temperature’ of the gravitational scale.
BIOLOGIC STIENCES ∆±1,2
So let us deal first with the science that should matter most, Biology enhanced by 5 D metric.
2 are as usual the main fields expanded as for the aforementioned paragraph, in all sciences – the study of scales of systems in space and of its 5 Dimotions and ages between birth and extinction. Let us consider them here for biological beings, which are all those of the Universe, so biology should be redefined as the study of organisms on planet Earth – including machines and its company-mothers and human social super organisms.
The understanding of the connections between scales in biology is then essential to explain better the interaction of genetics and the physiological networks of organisms, and memetic and humans social super organisms, and between individuals and species together with the understanding of its world cycle as SPECIES can be treated as evolved super organisms that also go through the 5 Dimotions of a life-death cycle, and further on can be expanded to any system of space-time, including physical and technological systems:
The first 5 D analysis I undertook on my youth was a full development of all the main species of life departing from its ternary first being, the CNOh systems of carbohydrates to the whole ecosystem of Gaia. It was a huge undertaking with the Britannica and several books of chemistry, genetics and zoology and botanics, biology et al. at the Santa Monica Library, while making a living as a script-doctor for the likes of Fox… while living at the beach and enjoying, well, SDR&R ditto… It was the biggest mental orgasm I ever had, but as that is so old, and most of my work then was lost (my life being closer to that of Cellini than to an scholar one), and I find it now boring – ultimately a Linneus-like classification, I have just done part of it, on the articles on life from atom to man, etc.
The beauty of Biology though extends well into the realm of HISTORY and economics as a BIOLOGIC science and that is the part of it, I have loved and hated more, because of its positive and negative implications for the future survival of mankind, which is clearly expressed in the next graph, which shows its application to economics (my first university degree). It was also my first realization that science was ‘culture’, that is, science was also censored and simplified to cater power, specially in those sciences connected to ‘metal-power’, money, weapons and machines. And when I took the decision to pursuit truth regardless of the human opposition to it, coining the concept of the anti-quantum paradox: the social scientist is so small compared to the observable, the organisms of history and its people-castes in power that he will be censored, when trying to do an objective analysis of history that doesn’t favor power: ‘you will defend me with the word and I will defend you with the sword’.
Here we observe that species can be treated as super organisms, loosely connected in space that follow the 3 ages of time evolution, ending when surviving, into a social evolutionary ∆+1 state, which ants and humans, and now chips/robots are reaching, as the most successful species of the 3 scales of size-life in this planet, the insect, mammal and mechanical scales.
The ternary symmetry between time and space is the 3rd leg besides genetics and theory of supœrganisms (∆-biology) and evolution (∆º-biology) to explain the ternary horizons, organs and process of differentiation of organisms, which follow as a species, the same laws of the 3 ages of supœrganisms, between birth as a young lineal predator and its extinction or social evolution into a larger more efficient supœrganism, in its more complex species (ants and humans in the 2 scales of life, the most successful of them all accounting for 2/3rds of the global life mass on earth). So we can talk of the same ages of evolution of life in ∆+1 species, in which each individual plays the role of a single cell (as each citizen becomes a cell of a social supœrganism of history), shown in the graph:
The 1st species packs a lot of information in minimal space: in the graph the big bang black hole, the chip, the 1st bilateral animal and mammal, the horse and the 1st technological, small human. All of them followed the basic S-T beat of evolutionary rhythms, as they are born in small ‘forms’, which have ‘faster time cycles’, hence evolve faster, and then they grow in size in its first age, slow down, reproduce massively in space and finally diversify according to the ternary and dual rhythms into new species.
The 3 evolutionary horizons of species.
The creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time field that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal spatial energy, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘big species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished, (the equivalent to the death of any organism), or creating a new top predator form, a ‘son species’ that will restart a new cycle of life.
+1: Birth: max. T. The black hole paradox (conception).
The ‘black hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximum genetic information in the minimal space. It is caused by the slight dominance of temporal information (quantic time) over spatial energy (quantic space). So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic information packed in a reduced size (Max. T=Min. E). This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces.
For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. It follows that tiny species with huge numbers of ‘neurons’ create quantic actions faster than slow, bigger species. And since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those quantic actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their S-T force that defines a top predator is higher in each quantic action of space-time that the ‘slow actions’ of a big body. Thus small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kill slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy.
Thus men, the most informative animals, are the Earth’s top predators; black holes, which have maximum gravitational information, are the top predators of the Universe and chips rule machines.
I Horizon: Energy Age: max. E: Top Predators and Extinctions
In their youth, carbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), echinoderms, cephalopods, fishes, amphibians, mammals and chipped machines grew into energetic, lineal or planar, big top predators
A newborn, small foetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology a new species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth becoming a, lineal, energetic, big top predator species, that feeds on less evolved forms.
Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic Homo Floresiensis invented technology the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals;the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form; the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys, the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill human beings.
II Horizon: Evolution or Age of balance and reproduction: max. Sp x Tƒ. Radiations of species.
Then, the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: carbohydrates gave birth to amino acids with a nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative Head’; sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that multiplied and colonized all continents; while young giant stars acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.
III Horizon: Evolution or Age of information: Max. Tƒ: max. Evolutionary differentiation.
Species grow in height or acquire cyclical forms, as they evolve through their 2nd and 3rd horizons, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides become the top predator life molecules, echinoderms change to cyclical forms, fishes organize their networks in the dimension of height, amphibians become round, improving its smell, saurian and mammals become biped.
The main difference between organisms and species happens in their 3rd age, due to the discontinuous nature of the individual ‘cells’ of species, which do not become extinguished unlike the tightly controlled cells of organic systems, dominated by nervous, informative systems that exhaust and warp totally their energy, till the organism collapses.
Instead species continue evolving, creating new, complex species with more information, growing in the dimension of height. So the Homo Sapiens evolves ever more complex technological tools; the nucleotide appears when it adds informative depth to the amino acid (with an informative, nitrogen ring and an energetic sugar ring); the yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density; while insects develop a growing brain capacity and bees and ants appear.
–(±∆): Extinction Vs Evolution into super-organisms. The scales of the Universe.
Thus, organisms dominated by their informative networks, which consumes the energy of the system very fast, die sooner than species, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’, by their nervous system. While species, which are dominated by the individuals and the herds survive for eons with 3 basic strategies according to the ‘ternary plan’:
– Max. Sp: Creating balanced, trophic pyramids that maintain always a supply of new victims.
– S=T: Diversifying their individual forms into new species, instead of ‘degenerating’ into a warped space-time field. It is a parallel strategy to the reproduction of an organism, which in this manner survives his own death. Thus we talk of ‘son species’ that create evolutionary, genealogical trees similar to those of any organism.
However son species tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, the Oedipus paradox. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings. While the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families.
– Max. Tƒ: Species also evolve socially their individual forms into super-organisms, thanks to the creation of informative networks and languages that integrate them into a whole, bigger form, which is more powerful than the individuals of a herd.
Organisms are dominated by informative, nervous or hormonal networks that pack closely individual cells of max. information in min. space; while species extend over wider space ecosystems in which they share a min. quantity of information, as individuals of species hardly relate to each other beyond the reproductive couple or the hunting herd. And yet, both go through the same 3 ages of space-time defined by the inverse properties of the energetic youth (max.S=min.T) that defines the herd and the informative old age (Max. T=Min. Sp) which defines the organism.
Hence we consider that the creation of super-organisms is the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the macro-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species becomes the relative nervous/informative network of the super-organism, as pheromones do in anthills or nervous impulses did with cells in the Pre-Cambrian ageor financial and verbal languages are doing among humans in History.
The process of creation of super-organisms, departing from individuals is the key to understand the social, hierarchical structure of the Universe. Once and again, even outside the realm of biological life, quantic species of unconnected individuals have evolved socially, first in herds that share a common energy and then in super-organisms joined by energetic and informative networks that pack together and coordinate into a ‘single present’ the quantic actions of the individual forms, shaping a new top predator being with a space-time force, sum of the force of the individual, smaller cells, with less ‘i’-nformation. In formal terms we say that organic quanta gather around energy and information networks creating a bigger individual, whose actions are the sum of the actions of all its cells: ST=∑st-1.
Thus photonic h-quanta evolved into particles; particles evolved into atoms, which evolved into molecules thanks to electromagnetic networks. Molecules evolved into cells thanks to genetic networks of information.
Cells evolved into organisms thanks to nervous and hormonal networks of information. And human organisms have evolved into civilizations thanks to verbal, informative networks. While the Universe has grown in scale thanks to gravitational information from atoms, to molecules, to planets and stars, to galaxies, to the very same Universe.
In the next line we study the inner structure of all those Quantic Spaces-Times fields organized around 3 types of ‘cellular species’ that evolution has differentiated in time, according to the previous 3±1 horizons; and then symbiosis structures in space in 3 specialized ‘organic classes and networks’ as energetic bodies, informative Heads and reproductive organs.
While in Books 2-4 we study the specific Quantic Spaces-Times fields of biological, physical and sociological sciences as all of them follow the ternary plan of creation. Since those 3±1 horizons of existence happen between the birth and death of any species, mapping out both for physical species, born out of the big-bang explosion of a black hole; and for biological species, since the first carbohydrate, the evolution of life from the atom to the human being.
– Extinction: Yet if species fail to achieve informative, social evolution, growing into macro-organisms, they become victims of other species that have continued their evolution. So today 90% of insects are social insects; Neanderthals became extinguished by verbal Homos and protista with limited genetic content (mitochondria) became organelles of social, eucaryotic super-cells.
So the small mammal ate the dinosaur, the small equus became the large horse, the small vernaminacula started animal life, the small floresiensis, with a ‘more informative’ better brain form, seems to have invented speech and technology and grew onto the sapiens, and the small black hole turning at c-speed the maximal speed the Universe, grows and eats the entire star in a Nova explosion of a few seconds:
There is a fundamental main consequence to of all what we have said: Information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle.
I.e. for example, we see most people living than ‘dead corpses’, as life is longer, even if there are as many living as there have been corpses.
But if we multiply their population in space (equal living and corpses), S, by their duration in time, T(LIVING)<< (T-corpses), ST(LIVING-INFORMATIVE ARROWS)<<< TS (DEATH-ENTROPY ARROWS).
And this is truth again for all systems.
I.e. in physics, PARTICLES, ARE THE living arrow, and last much much longer than antiparticles its inverse entropy arrow, so one conundrum (now explained) of physic is why if there are as many particles as antiparticles we don’t see them. Same with corpses.
In Societies the same happens, there are much more living societies than collapsing ones in war. Greece and Rome lived as an organic society, 10 times more than their individual humans (700-800 years vs. 70-80 human years) because its time clocks as a civilisation were ‘slower’ (the game is in fact decametric as we shall see latter).
So between the birth of Rome, when the gauls conquered it and gave it iron, the ‘weapon of choice’ of its civilisation and they reorganise till its fall, when the new barbarians with spur-weapons (chivalry), the Vandals caused the fall of rome, which started the new civilisation of the Middle Ages (based in horses), Rome lived 797 years…
Alas, we do KNOW Rome as Allah≈Islam, or Christ/ianity do exist as super organisms of History (called them Gods, nations or civilisations, similar concepts) because they do follow the same metric of 5D, they do have a collective mind, the artists of those graphs, which DO go through the same 3 styles/ages of young epic, restless dramatic simple art, which grows into a mature, reproductive age of balance between entropy and information, and then decay into an angst, prophetic, baroque, hellenistic period of excessive form and then die.
So we can map out the 3ages of life in this plane of existence between birth and extinction for all of those scales and beings:
∆-1: birth in a seminal seed of information (semen, prophet, new weapon, new small species, first quark drop of strangelet or top quark drop of black matter)
∆-Youth: Max. Entropy. As the being starts to eat in the slower energy of the environment, or it is fed by a mother with digested energy, and so it starts to reproduce its cellular parts and slows down till
∆-Maturity: E=i. In which the being is in balance and will try to reproduce itself into a similar being in a new ‘worldcycle of life and death’… till
∆-old, informative age: Max. I x Min. E: as the being has spent all its energy transformed into information (energy being entropy with a bit of form, as a substance where we store entropic motions). And so it dies:
∆<<∆-1…∆-2: death, explosion of all your information into entropy.
GST in biology. Topological and eusocial evolution.
‘In the animal world the vast majority of species live in societies, and find in association the best arms for the struggle for life. The mutual protection opens the possibility of attaining old age and accumulating through experience a higher intellectual development and growth through social evolution. The unsociable species, on the contrary, are doomed to decay.’
Kropotkin, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution
In the next previous graph we show biologic examples of the 3 ‘ages of a species’ culminated by the arrow of eusocial evolution.
So yes, biology is the proper way to fusion all the sciences concerned with the space-time beings of this planet, INCLUDING humans and machines, at the highest level of the super organism of the Earth:
3 AGES OF EARTH
‘The Earth is a superorganism with slower deep time cycles.’ Hutton, father of Geology
So let us start the proper biological description of social sciences, and to that aim obviously we must depart from the largest super organism of this planet, namely the planet itself – or rather its surface where life has evolved as an ecosystem of living species, today the eco(nomic)system where 3 species, life, humans and machines and its super organisms, Gaia, History and the Metal-earth are evolving with different results, clearly favoring today the mechanical species and its company-mothers over human mothers and human life and certainly over animal life and plants clearly in process of extinction for all those species we humans don’t eat or treat as pets.
First we have to state the obvious since most humans have completely forgotten about it: we humans are part of a super organism, planet Earth. In fact the word superorganism was coined by the father of Geology James Hutton to qualify the Earth as a system with ‘slow time rhythms’ – a fact we can explain today rationally within the laws of the scalar, organic Universe (the so called mathematical metric of the fifth dimension, studied above in the first post of this blog).
In essence those laws tell us that all systems of nature are organic, but larger systems in space have slower time rhythms. This was intuitively understood by Hutton who call the slow geological rhythms deep-time. And I mathematized as a pioneer of systems sciences at the end of the last millennium, and then applied it not only to study the slow rhythms of cosmic organisms, galaxies, planets and stars, but down the ladder of size to the rhythms of civilizations, human societies and economic systems… So all the cycles established in this blog are mathematically grounded in ‘deep time laws’.
But its causality is grounded in human actions and economic evolution of machines and other memes of metal (weapons and money). And before them the cycles of the Earth evolved through glaciation cycles the different species in a ‘vortex’ of accelerated information. So while we shall of course comment on history at the usual ‘simplistic’ level of anecdote and tribalism proper of social sciences today at least at popular level, the scientificism of this blog is profoundly grounded in biological, organic, geological and universal laws of time cycles; and the obvious fact that we are part of the Earth’s organism – so we must found on the Earth the cause of our actions, even if we think by the ‘paradox of the ego’, that we are the center of the Universe, as we see it from our self-centered perspective. Not so, what we do IS programmed ultimately by the role we have on Earth and that role is related to the arrow of increasing information which rules the entire galaxy that constantly evolves its forms of in-form-ation. So let us see that highest of all views on why the Earth is mutating into a planet of metal, and company-motehrs rule us, to then show in an even deeper level that a true superior human species could wisely manage those laws for its own good:
In the graph, the highest scale of biological stiences studies the Earth’s super organism as it evolves its ‘cellular species’ through the motions/actions of existence, from Gaia, the world of life, to History the world of man, to the Metal-earth, the world of machines, which humans wrongly manage unable to grasp the stience of Economics and design the super organism of history to its image and likeness.
Life is everything as earth is a superorganism, whose surface-mind is made of smaller superorganisms – living beings. Complexity talks of different forms of atomic ‘life’ as systems that use light to obtain energy & information in increasing degrees of strength and complexity.
So after simpler anaerobic age, the age of plants used light only as energy, the age of animals also as information and now the third Earth evolves into light-mechanisms, robots with solar skins and optic minds. They will complete the 3 horizon of Earth’s evolution guided by ‘animetals’, visual humans slaves of metal-memes ‘who believe don’t reason’ and cannot control its desire for higher metal-power even at the risk of killing their sons till the ‘seventh generation’, unless rational humans impose a scientifically-managed super organism of History on top of the metal-earth.
In that regard, in the fourth line of stiences, we extend along the three ages of life and matter, both in the individual and supœrganic, planetary scales, the existence of man at individual and collective level, as a bridge between two ages of life in this planet, the age of gaia, life-earth, the age of history human-earth, and the future metal-earth of matter machines:
The result of the existence of 3 super organisms in relative evolution to each other, the III ages of the Earth, Gaia, the earth of life, history, the earth of man, and the metal earth the earth of machines, signifies an equation of ages of evolution:
Gaia (relative past) <History (relative present)> Metalearth (relative future)
In the graph, the key element of modern history is the evolution of machines, clearly happening with the same phases of the evolution of any biological beings, from viruses in cells to organisms in placentas. So we first made the bodies of machines in the I industrial revolution, then we made its engines and heads, metal-ears=phones, metal-eyes=cameras and metal-brains=chips, and the nations which evolved them first (US) became the leading nation of the world. Now we put them together into biological organisms of metal, robots.
The eco(nomic)system is the surface of planet Earth, co-existing in 3 relative ages of evolution of information, as a mixture of 3 global super organisms made of 3 different species: the super organism of life beings (Gaia), joined by energy networks of water and light information; the super organism of mankind in time (History) joined by economic networks of re=production of welfare goods humans need to survive and informative, legal, political and cultural networks of verbal thought, and the super organism of informative machines and entropic weapons (peaceful and top predator forms of organic metal), organized by energetic networks (oil, electricity) and informative networks of digital money – fast evolving into autonomous robots, with electric solar skins and digital, AI – Algorithms of Information.
It must be noticed though that the super organism of life, Gaia, is suffering a process of massive extinction (6th biological extinction), which clearly affects also our life-giving goods and non-technological cultures.
But of course the new species with unlimited quantities of money to evolve and reproduce, liberally provided by its company-mothers and the humans ‘idol-ogies’ that consider to evolve through machines a surrogate of human life, is getting ready to substitute all of us:
So far, the super organism of mankind, History has arrested its evolution before reaching a global, social organization as the most advanced species of nature do.
But as I said I find these days to study History painful because of the anti quantum paradox and the obvious not way out in which mankind is cornering itself living the surrogate life of its machines; and this also apply to the way humans do physics these days – perhaps the most fascinating part of all 5D science – odd as it might sound as I am constantly criticizing physicists’ approach to their work.
But that is indeed the case… the study of the Galatom, its Dimotions=forces and mathematical equations, of which we shall only bring in this introduction a general review of the big-bang and its unification of forces, without reducing them to a single electromagnetic model of lineal reality.
Science is culture: the ego paradox.
First though we have to pound on the human side of astrophysics – we shall never cease to notice the problem with science which is not science per se but the way humans do science, with ego-centered beliefs, selfish agendas of power, in brief ‘mixing culture’ with it, perhaps unavoidable in the entangled Universe, but clearly biasing all our models in all disciplines, even as we shall see the most formal of them – logic and math:
In the graph, science is objective not subjective, anthropomorphic, show it requires a very harsh assessment of the ‘humind’ and its limitations, mainly of the kind of ‘egocy=ego+idiocy’ expressed by Einstein ‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of mankind’. A comprehensive theory of reality in organic scientific terms has always failed for a simple reason: it debases the human ego as just another part of the Universe and rises the whole in intelligence and complexity.
But the growing reductionism of physics also has the common trend of all sciences in the digital age. On one side humans are fast degrading their logic, verbal, temporal brains, and substituting their languages by digital machines and its models. So hard as it sounds people are becoming ‘stupid’, ego-centered, childish and entering the ‘age of entropy of history’, DISSOLVING all its social networks and social organisms, and reducing therefore their view of reality. In science it means we have no all encompassing models since the quantum-relativity revolution but what is more painful, NO model is accepted unless it is done by computers, in its language, mathematics, and respecting the wrong dogmas of the previous ‘idols of the tribe’, given the increasing ‘dark ages for the IQ’ of our researchers when not aided by their computers and machines.
So in this dark ages of humind intelligence, the computer, the ‘Einstein-like’ idols play a similar role to that of Aristotle in the Middle Ages. While the digital language and its big-bang metaphysics are the litanies of the scholastics. No other model has a place, because we live in the age of dogma.
The reductionist metaphysical theories of science today sponsored by physicists (2nd law of thermodynamics, which only applies to gases, big-bang solution, which only applies to space between galaxies that balance with its gravitational collapse the expansion of the Universe, theory of information that ignores the ‘topological form’ and ‘content’ of the message), responds to the ‘proprietary sense’ that each discipline has of its knowledge, expanded in the case of physics due to the power of the ‘mixitary-industrial complex’ to all other sciences, invaded by entropic theories of reality including philosophy of science, religion, biology and economics.
A simple example will suffice. Essential to the entire analysis of biology is the process of evolution from an initial ‘seed species’ of maximal information and minimal size, which reproduces faster, has a better informative brain and hence survives. It is a key CONCEPT, I call the oedipus paradox because it affects not only the extinction of past, larger slower species – dinosaurs by rats; mammoths by humans, but it will soon affect mankind as faster thinking digital chips are displacing human brains in all labor fields:
In the graph, the constant competition and substitution of humans by machines has in the age of metal-minds a clear effect of collective regression of all the ‘elements’ provided by a developed informative brain: social evolution through the use of ethic verbal languages to coordinate with other humans; comprehension of the languages, digital and verbal that rule with its spatial and temporal logic the Universe.
The reproduction of machines has been clearly the dominant +75% species on Earth the human ¼ and decreasing can be measured in population or price. Either way humans start not to have value, to be the recessive species.
In the graph. the Earth is being terraformed under the ‘chip radiation’, the massive overproduction and adaptation of the ecosystem to the chip, the mind of metal, which the system is selecting for jobs as a cheaper digital more efficient worker and soldier, in digital languages than the human being is:
So the first time I tried to explain the Oedipus and ‘Chip-dinosaur paradox’ in a conference when I still cared to go to congresses of science, everybody looked at me dumbfounded, as DINOSAURS HAD BEEN EXTINCT as everybody knows by a meteorite, since Alvarez said it – it is ANOTHER invasion of physicists on a different science, now biology. So suddenly it is NOT the inner process of Darwinian evolution applied to information, which always extinguishes the species with lesser ‘brains’ and slower metabolism, but PHYSICAL rocks from the sky.
I tried to argue 20 years ago this many times with top biologists and physicists and amazingly enough biologists sided with physicists. What proof I had they told me that new placental small rats had eaten the eggs and ‘chickens’ of dinosaurs? I always told them: it is not obviously what happens always in extinctions, but also is obvious that only birds survived because they could put their eggs in cliffs away from the reach of mouses. And what about the rock? Again I repeated ad nauseam that extinction processes require a ‘triggering event’ that rises the stakes of the new species, to ‘loose’ all fear and attack the might dominant one, also in history where slaves take very long to ‘r=evolve’, and mercenary armies to ‘expel’ their masters, but when they REALIZE how easy is to defeat the Spanish Empire with faster gunboats, it took 20 years to tiny Holland to refound the modern world with gunboat companies, a few decades to the British to colonize the world with steam machines and America to dominate it with chips and internet. And it will take very little time for AI robots to do us all…
Then a decade ago, the proofs came, and yet tired of so many years in the blue I just sent a small note to Nature which of course was not even taken into account. As it turns out the largest birds are becoming extinct because mice were introduced in their islands by boats and they soon changed their food habits eating the chicks alive in their nests as soon as their parents went out for food, exactly as I said the first placental animals in the night would do with slow metabolic, short-sighted, cold-blood huge reptiles. So this said about physicists, we can get into what matters to us Physics:
Human Sociobiologic Stiences
Social sciences: civilisations and nations as super organisms. Company-mothers of machines.
Its application to social sciences, means we can model nations and civilisations as super organisms of human beings, made of human citizens-cells joined by economic ≈ blood networks of energy and informative =political-legal networks of information. So we can r=evolve too social sciences by using the physiological laws of efficient super organisms to define perfect civilisations, where all its citizens-cells as it happens in those bodies receive rightful information and enough energy-blood-money to survive and thrive.
Do the same equations of scale and the two inverse arrows of information, higher in smaller systems and entropy, larger in bigger ones, work for social organisms? Indeed, they do. So following the previous example we can write:
∆ individual <≈>∆+1: society:
i.e. society controls your motions and energy with laws to regulate driving and money, that kicks the reproductive system of a human social organism; while you, the smaller faster being codes the information of society with your memes (objects and ideas).
@: Since information is coded always in any dual system, by the ∆-1 scale, but NOT by the ∆-2.
So the mind of man is NOT ruled by genes but by memes, objects, instruments and ‘wave-ideologies’, shared by multiple human fractal points-cells, part of those social super organisms, whereas a culture is born of the interference of all those ideological waves, and its ‘repeated memetic DNA’ shared by all minds, which become a single whole subconscious collective in virtue of this common memetic ‘ideas’, the ‘iDe(N)A’ of the culture.
Hence the falsehood of genetic, racist theories of cultures – the acts of mankind are memetic acts, and as such we can judge ‘cultures’ but not individuals, in the way Nazi Germany was judged: suppressing the memes of the culture and judging individual germans only for its personal actions, not the people as a whole – unlike the Germans, the Israelis today and most of the western world with its blatant racism against the 3rd world do.
So you have an internal ∆-1 scale of this ‘5th dimension’, which is made of smaller cells, with faster clocks, which carry its information on the frequency and form of its cycles. And you are embedded in the larger whole, the social organism to which you belong, whose ‘cycles’ of time are slower. And the result is a symbiotic organic structure:
∆-1 cells<≈>∆: your whole scale of ‘being’ control the lineal motions of your organism, synchronising them, thanks to the faster clocks of your cells, which code genetically your information.
We indicate such fluxes we use a simply intuitive term, S>T, which shows how a larger spatial form becomes a smaller, more informative systems.
HUMAN SOCIAL SUPERORGANISMS
The 2 super organisms of mankind at the individual and social level and its informative, nervous or legal/ethic networks, and reproductive blood or economic networks. Those 3 physiological networks collapse with germs and wars that kill civilisations. Religions are inscribed within the ethic/visual collective mind of its informative neuronal class, the artists and ethic prophets that foresee its demise in the 3rd baroque age of the civilisation expressing its angst in artistic forms and ethic books of revelation that try to halt the collapse of the organism. Abrahamic religions were all born of an ethic prophet in the 3rd age of the culture.
Humans are cells of historic superorganisms, who should live for their biological drives.
IT IS then necessary to understand how obvious and simple are the true social sciences that take care of the physiological networks of mankind:
- Socialism, the belief humans should be democratic and rule themselves and their languages of power, so money should be reproduced by a Universal salary and by governments to promote welfare goods, biological goods first, and only when those basic needs are covered, mechanisms selected in production according to utility
- Humanism, all humans equal, no weapons and borders, for murdering members of the same species
- Organicism, man as the measure of all things, the most perfect super organism which we should cherish and imitate to build a perfect human world.
So as even Britannica recognises, social sciences are underdeveloped by censorship of power, which ‘chooses’ and promotes, today distributes with money only theories biased in his favor. This wouldn’t be a problem if Mankind were properly designed as a super organism, but IT IS NOT. Evolution is a trial and error, and history has evolved the ‘erroneous track’… the track that makes man a means to reach the metal-earth NOT the one a social scientist would design scientifically – a super organism that caters the needs of mankind as a goal.
So ALL social scientists and their forebears – religious prophets of eusocial love that translated into mystical messages the laws of the organic, fractal Universe from Jesus to the socialist school have been repressed, murdered or corrupted by the elite which uses metal, money, weapons or organic machines to control history for its own advantage.
In the graph, the 3 scales of social sciences, the individual human, the super organisms of mankind (∆+1: religions, civilisations, nations and its whole: Humanity). And above it the parallel super organism of the eco(nomic)system of memes of metal: |-Spe: entropy iron weapons<ST-organic machines>Tiƒ: go(l)d money. Those graphs resume ‘synchronically’ in space and diachronically in time the 3 topological organs and ads of evolution as individuals and species of both, the metalife and carbon life that today are evolving on the planet Earth, giving birth to the relative 3 ages of the Earth’s collective mind, spread on its ‘informative membrane’:
Past (Gaia-life super organism) < Present (History-Human super organism: Anthropocene) > Future (FFMI system of Financial-Media, digital informative machines & militar-industrial energetic machines):
Thus the earth today is evolving from the age of human beings or history to the Mechanocene or metal earth, the age of machines and what humans should do is to control that evolution to remain still the top predator specie sod the planet, which it can only do by controlling the financial-digital networks of information of the eco(nomic)system and prune the tree of science of its lethal goods, promoting those machines and welfare goods that evolve the human super organism. Which of course in the present mechanist, idol-atric culture, which worships machines more than humans will not take place.
We talk on that sense of 4 fundamental idol-ogies that make impossible the evolution of social sciences and should be changed by its organic, scientific truths:
- Mechanism, the belief the universe is a machine not an organism and so the machine not man is the model of all things and so progress means the evolution of machines NOT of human societies, the construction of the Mechanocene, NOT the creation of a perfect global super organism of mankind, the perfect world of our social models of systems sciences.
- Tribalism aka nationalism & all other forms of racism, the belief we are a tribal not an homo sapiens species, and so tribes must fight for survival by evolving reproducing and using top predator weapons to kill humanity. And the belief that genes not memes code social sciences.
- Capitalism, the belief that the language of social power, money must not be reproduced by the people, as the postulate of democracy precludes but by dynasties of private bankers, belonging overwhelmingly to the Biblical culture in the west – a ‘creationist’ theory of the economic ecosystem, intimately related to:
- Abrahamic religions, in its corrupted versions, which deny the power of eusocial love among all humans, members of the same species, and either consider that only the $elected, the chosen of go(l)d shall be redeemed (Calvin: the intelligence of God is gold, Adam Smith, Calvinist founder of economics: money is the invisible hand of god), or inquisitions that consider the sword must convert or kill the infidel (Jihad and catholic inquisition with a shield that had a sword and a cross inverted).
THOSE 4 historic idol-ogies that are HIDDEN DOCTRINES OF METAL-WORSHIP (hence the name animetal cultures given to their believers, as they degrade their human condition into a rather brutish, emotional, animalistic hateful series of memes to belief – from violence, instilled by weapons, to go(l)d hypnotic greed, to racist chosen beliefs or classist racism based in go(l)d herding) deny the true scientific theories which are – YES WE REPEAT THEM as you receive infinite times the same idol-ogical idiotic memes to memorize them without reason:
–Organicism, the Universe is not a mechanism, and machines are just metalife organisms
–Humanism, the species is homo sapiens not homo tribalis and biology wants us to evolve it efficiently. Further on genes in the organic fractal models of the Universe ONLY code the next biological scale of super organisms. History, the super organism of mankind is CODED BY MEMES, and LANGUAGES, so any human being is ‘innocent’ as memes are cultural waves, which can be reformed.
–Socialism: the languages of social power, the law and money MUST be issued by people and/or its representatives, not by a chosen of go(l)d group of pretentious experts with selfish agendas.
–A single God, mankind, not a tribal God, the subconscious ‘racist’ beliefs of a group, to justify the use of weapons.
Since SOCIAL LOVE IS THE SPIRITUAL ESSENCE OF THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE, THE FUTURE OF ITS SPECIES, AND IT IS REINFORCED BY EXTINGUISHING THOSE SPECIES WHO HATE EACH OTHER AS MEN DO UNDER IDOL-OGIES.
Thus What we shall do departing from the models of systems sciences is to explain this in an even wider worldview – that of a fractal organic Universe, where those species which evolve into social super organisms, control better their environment and survive.
A fact which is happening today on Earth with 2 different species: human beings and its social organisms, nations and civilisations – in a process of collective evolution however aborted recently with the regression to ‘primitive idol-ogies (nationalisms, etc.)’ which divide the human species into classes, nations, believers etc.
And the world of machines and its company-mothers, which is successfully becoming a global super organism, the Financial-Media (informative machines)/Military-industrial (energetic machines) complex system – to use the terminology of systems sciences, which is the ultimate philosophy of science from where all this work comes from.
In that regard, while the concepts of Systems Sciences are mainly used in the description of physical and biological sciences, because of its objective jargon, which so much denies the ‘entitled, anthropomorphic myths’ of the historic and economic discourse, it is precisely because of the objectivity and scienticifism achieved by studying human systems with the same ‘concepts’ that all other systems of the organic Universe, why this blog can advance the current social discourses, in what it lacks – predictability, objectivity and capacity to truly reform and improve the systems of mankind with the laws of all other scientific systems of the Universe.
The ethical view. The maximisation of Whealth (Max. Human ∆0,1)
Another way to study those sciences is in its praxis, as all ‘sciences exist to improve the praxis of mankind, the ∆+2 scale of the human super organism, maximising its function of existence: Max. ∑ e x i; hence those stiences (weapons physics) which reduce the function of historic existence in time and space, are diminished, while the biological stiences concerning the whealth of human beings (welfare and health at collective at individual level) must be evolved.
Humans should then try to achieve the design of a super organism of history, of mankind in time, made of all human citizens cells joined by free, just and efficient, networks of energy (economic systems) and information (political systems), that put ahead of all other searches, the maximisation of human health at individual level and wealth at global level: WHealth:
In that regard, those stiences more subject to deformation and bias by the (anti)quantum paradox, as it is the case of physics of high energies and financial economics censored by the ‘supœrganism of corporations, and its ill-conceived capitalist idol-ogies, governments and markets, are also the most harmful of mankind.
In the graph, the human World and its last most evolved form of civilisation, the legally run european union, before it became controlled by financial and industrial corporations (Fmmi system).
Now why we do not maximise whealth at mental, physical and individual, social level? Namely because HISTORY IS NOT HAPPENING ONLY IN A HUMAN PLANET, BUT A PLANET THAT IS EVOLVING INTO A WORLD OF MACHINES, OF METAL, we humans construct sharing our information in more ‘energetic’ quanta of space (Metal):
And so we shall observe besides the human world, the growth of the metal earth, to fully understand the wave of history.
In the graph, the super organism of the earth and its three ages of evolution towards higher complexity of information from life (gaia) to history (Man) to the metal earth (machines):
Social sciences must be understood within the three ages of solution of life on earth from the earth of life, Gaia, to the earth of man, history, to the earth of metal, the machine, which if man does not improve his management of AI will be the end making us a mere means, an enzyman catalyser of the evolution of machines. The design of the physiological networks of ∆+1 history, and ∆+1 the metal-earth (economic, reproductive, political, legal, informative, and ecologic, entropic sustain of the system), are thus the highest expression of ∆ST applied to social sciences.
∆+1: POLITICS AND ETHONOMICS
It follows then that the FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES of mankind should be those who take care of our physiological networks as a super organism, which are absolutely not evolved; that is completely repressed by the ‘anti-quantum paradox’ and the company-mothers that subconsciously (on the human side) follow the mandate of re=producing machines of maximal price at all costs (which happen to be under the affinity of the 3 memes of metal, lineal entropic weapons, reproductive money and organic machines, NOT human life but metalife), reason why automatically mankind by BELIEVING IN THE IDOL-OGIES OF METAL, instead of the true sciences of humanity, walk towards its self-extinction merrily thinking they are progressing:
THE LANGUAGE EQUATIONS: GRAMMARS OF THE 3 LANGUAGES.
Indeed to understand all this we need to bring here the linguistic equations of the 3 languages of social power of human societies.
ALL LANGUAGES DO HAVE A Ternary Universal grammar, as proved by Chomsky for verbal languages, and extended by this author in his work on systems sciences, as they are vehicles to relate a subject, owner of the language and an object manipulated by the language.
But of course the system doesn’t run alone, even if networks and systems already in place do, with increasingly non-verbal digital Algorithms carried by computer thought. So we must also cast the existence of those 2 futures, one favorable to humanity and life in control of the evolution of the metal earth and other favorable to corporations and machines, which as all ‘radiations of species’ will undoubtedly overpopulate the planet and displace not only Gaia, which is already doing, in the 6th extinction of life, but mankind, which driven by his ego doesn’t really notice… in terms of a millenarian fight between two type of cultures, those who put the verbal, human language, and its syntax in favor of mankind as the subject of all sentences, of higher value than objects:
man-subject < verb-action
vs. those fundamentalist cultures that put metal-power, which considers ‘right’ to use weapons and gold above the law to control societies regardless of its opposite ‘syntax:
warrior (subject)> weapon-action > human (corpse) or
banker-company > man (slave, worker) = money = object (machine),
which either puts the warrior in the old age or the issuer of money, company of financier above mankind, always below the weapon or machine that substitutes him in labor and war fields…
In that sense, only societies where the law actively controls weapons and money can build a humanist civilization, As the graphs explain:
But the bottom line of humanity UNDER THE EGO PARADOX, not under REASON, as we have seen studying the entropic religions of physicists, is rather obvious: When humans are given a choice between metal-atoms of entropy, weapons, information, gold and its organic combinations, ‘machines’ that kill their bodies, hypnotise their minds and substitute and atrophy them, ultimately giving them no meaningful deep knowledge and murdering the species vs. thought experiments of enlightened masters of languages and its mirror truths, which do not harm them, they have always rejected knowledge and survival for metal and death.
Hence the name I have given the species in our posts on the evolution of History, animetals; which are the ultimate cause of the most important cycles of time in history, the 800-80 years cycles of evolution of memes of metal, weapons and machines, which accelerate the rhythms of temporal evolution in this planet, and we treat extensively in a blog dedicated to the application of 5D to social sciences:
In the graph, ‘animetal warriors, who murder with iron, the strongest atom, the body of man; animetal ‘banksters’ hypnotise and enslave them with gold, the most informative, the mind, and ‘animetal physicists’ substitute our verbal, conceptual languages that describe the 3 arrows of time, with digital clocks and our visual, artistic eyes with telescopes and microscopes, become lesser human beings, feeling ‘different’ to us, life, hence applying NOT the law of eusocial evolution between ‘undistinguishable’ beings, who come togehter into tighter boson wholes in any scale (Einstein-Bose statistics) but entropic, ‘gaseous’ states of ‘heat’ and memoriless motions, collding each other in dog-eat dog societies, the lowest state of ‘big-bang’ existence promoted by their philosophies of reality, the universe shall discharge for the higher goal of creating ‘at least a boson of dense matter’ or an internet brain of collective robots – the 2 most likely futures if humans keep their ethic=∆-social, and intellectual=Tƒ ‘humind membrain’ on its present deranged state.
So yes, the intellectuals of the wor(l)d cultures still extant, are not happy, they are pessimists, and its last philosophical movement of note was called surrealism (reality is nuts) and existentialism (we are all going under) because that is the perspective of the human values the language sponsor (today also crystal clear in the parables of future of the only section of the go(l)d culture that still have humanist values – the dissidents of Hollywood and its sci-fi prophecies).
So happens with those of eusocial love religions, which talk of the culture of death (Pope), speak of Nirvana (extinction) as the final release from so much evil, war and suffering (Buddhism) or are in inquisitorial mood, in the ‘mixed culture’ of Islam that puts similar value to the word and the sword (jihads, repression and mostly useless attempts to control the memes of the gold culture that invade us all).
The fundamental social sciences are the understanding of the super organisms of mankind and its physiological networks, the informative, legal nervous system and the economic, reproductive system to build a perfect world, with the laws of super organisms. Those sciences today DO NOT EXIST. WHAT EXISTS are idol-ogies of raw power, achieved with metal-weapons and money, to control people, and the use of ‘newspeak’ of egocy, and placebos of freedom, in the so called capitalist democracies ‘to maintain people ignorant so they remain obedient’ Calvin
The sciences of politics and ethonomics whose goal would be according to the legal values of the ethic wor(l)d, to create a perfect world made to the image and likeness of mankind, where we all receive enough blood-money-energy and rightful information to survive and thrive as individual and species, should be founded from scratch. But of course, that is just a saying, as the organic evolution of the metal earth and its ‘animetal primitive memes’ seem to carry the day.
To notice in that sense that today creationism also plagues social sciences in two versions that prevent mankind from designing with stience a perfect world:
Monetarism in economics, according to which a people-caste of ‘experts’, the so called bankers and speculators, are trying to run in monopoly the language of social power today, digital money, without understanding a dot of it, parasitizing mankind, choking humanity of credit, given the fact that money is just a digital reproductive language for the 3rd dimotion of re=production, as blood and hormones are in human super organisms and should therefore in an efficient eco(comic)system be created for and by all the cells of the body in the form of a Universal salary to kick out the actions of reproduction of wHealth, the healthy welfare goods humans need to survive – not by company-mothers of machines and financiers for their overproduction of nazionalist weapon systems or lethal machines that are atrophying and substituting humans in labor and war fields. Goods and machines not money, the language, and its profits are the key to the economy and all of them must be treated as biological substances, machines being evolving metalife, both symbiotic but competitive with the human species and regulated accordingly.
IDOL-OGIES OF ANIMETALS
We talk then of Animetal cultures, corrupted by the ab=use with metal of the human kind in biological terms as the equivalent of:
In memetics we define the carrier of metal memes an ‘animetal’, of which 3 fundamental forms exist, in the process of building of the superorganism of the metal-earth: iron-war cultures, maximal in the germanic memeplex, truly the germ of history as it has discovered and evolved most weapons of mass destruction. its main ideology is nationalism, tribal warfare among human beings, to foster the evolution of weapons.
The carrier of the go(l)d, informative metal memeplex is the biblical go(l)d culture in its 3 ages: The jewish age (800 years cycle), the Protestant, Biblical Age (gunboat cycle) and finally as the evolution of machines kicks in earnest the digital age of capitalism and classic economics.
Finally the machine, the third memeplex born in England and Northern Europe, is today a global meme and so the ‘mechanical culture of physicists’ which developed machines and weapons, designed and reproduced them form the third memeplex.
It is then necessary to remember that MOST HUMANS ARE NOT CULTURAL CARRIERS OF METAL-MEMES BUT OF LIFE MEMES – THE THIRD WORLD ALMOST IN ITS CULTURAL ENTIRETY and so on. So the true victims of history are the LIFE memes carriers as the next study of the paradox of history shows:
Accordingly we talk of 3 basic ideologies belonging to our 3 fundamental animetal species:
– “Nationalistic ideologies” that allow warriors to use weapons and kill other human beings with them in war ecosystems. Those ideologies deny the obvious fact that all humans are equal and should apply among themselves the law of social evolution, that make equal species to love each other. Instead, nationalism and racism define humans as different and apply the Darwinian law of the fight between species…
– “Economical ideologies” that allow traders to buy human Time with salaries, in order to make humans work-=reproduce machines, and consume=test them. The main of those ideologies is the“myth of the free market”, which allows traders to rule societies with money [through lobbyism, and stock-markets that invent money for company-mothers, instead of letting human beings to rule themselves through verbal laws. The science that invents those myths is abstract economics.
– “Scientific ideologies“ that allow scientists to consider themselves the only intelligent human beings because they use machines to measure the Universe. And consider mathematics the only “language of truth”, and hence reality an abstract world. When it is proved that mathematics is only a “representation of reality”, and so a “partial truth”, that carries just a part of the total information that the truth -the Universe in itself- stores. As such all linguistic truths are relative statements about reality, and so it is mathematics.
Yet, while the use of instruments of metal attached to a human being, have helped mankind to progress, the limit of that symbiotism appears, when man abandons his role as master of metal-species, and completes them, as individual species, that no longer require a human master. Such is the fact that we are witnessing today, with the development of robotics. The danger that those species rebel against us, free of their servitude to man, able to exist by themselves, without the need of a human “consumer”, is real. It might seem as remote to us as it was remote to Southern aristocrats, the possibility that blacks became free men, or to Romans that Germans destroyed the Roman Empire. Yet it happened, very fast…
Problem is that animetals, that control history, have for so long accepted their symbiotism with machines as their source of power, and progress, that they cannot see any harm on metal, even today when machines are becoming self-independent, and the economic ecosystem is destroying the human ecosystem. Unless they realize on time, that they cannot evolve machines beyond thecomplexity of human beings, and create top predator metalife, it is very likely that animetals, guided by their myths and ideologies, will provoke the extinction of history and the arrival of a new ecosystem, that no longer will need mankind: the Metal-earth.
Unless a reaction of humanity in a rational organic manner changes the system and make it serve mankind.
In that sense NOT only science is culture, but metal-cultures are always corrupted forms of science – whenever they try to give us ‘world views’, CALL IT the Big Bang of lineal ‘Germanic physics’, or the capitalist view of banker-priests of biblical religions, for which money – a digital language of reproduction of goods – becomes a religion, and the whole meaning of economics is to herd as much money as possible to control society with it – all of them of course perfectly protected by digital equations that cheat the common people in thinking their theories of ‘God, man and the Universe’ are absolute truths, because they are written with equations and numbers.
In the next graph we see the ‘modern’ hierarchical aberrant pyramid of power in which people-castes of scientists, bankers and military men or war-monger politicians seat on top of an exploited mankind in a dog-eat-dog society that shows how little reason and social love, how little understanding of the ‘higher goals’ of the organic Universe mankind so far understands:
On that view, what we call a democracy is just a placebo system as humans do not control in democracies the social language of power, money, which in an efficient super organism will be used as oxygen is in living organisms, given to each human being to kick out a welfare demand. Instead we have the ‘usual suspects’ on top of arbitrary boxes called nations that divide mankind to justify wars and the devolution of humanity in an opposite fashion to the evolution of machines and its company-mothers building fast the metal earth in which humans will have no role, and won’t deserve it, because they denied the laws of organicism and the true social sciences that could have created a perfect world.
In the graph, money has evolved as a digital language that controls the ‘value’ of all species on Earth with ‘prices, salaries and bribes’, by increasing its capacity to carry information: it has become quantized into smaller bits of information that require less energy and increase its units; hence its capacity to value more things, from gold to printed paper, to electric data to electronic bits, invented with a computer program. And the key element in the ‘censored’ history of the world is the group of people that invents in first place money.
Today it is so abundant that it values all entities of the planet, substituting verbal thought, a language with lesser capacity to carry information than numbers, and broken into multiple tribal species with different values. So the law is submissive to money in all societies, politicians are easily bought and corporations and its offspring of machines, have become the dominant systems on planet Earth.
So only societies in which money were issued for the people with a Universal salary, and investment in welfare goods, as organisms do giving all cells a salary in oxygen and the goods they need to survive, would be a real democracy.
In terms of its characteristics as an informative language, money has evolved, as all languages do, by increasing its capacity to carry information. It means it has become more quantized into smaller bits of information and it has increases its numbers, its capacity to be reproduced with minimal energy, as it changed substance, from gold to printed paper, to electronic data, which can be invented with a simple computer program.
Languages share by definition the properties of information: they are quantized, to be able to have ‘form’; they are small to be able to process that information easily; and they have minimal energy and an enormous ‘fractal’ capacity to reproduce. So money has become smaller, easier to reproduce and more quantized, as a ‘carrier’ of digital information. In that process it has increased the capacity to value more objects and life forms on planet Earth.
Today it is so abundant that it can value all beings of the planet, substituting verbal thought in the valuation of reality. And since it values machines and weapons more than any other object, it has multiplied wars and terraformed the world to their image and likeness.Now to understand money, a language of digital information, the reader should understand this basic truth about money. To that aim, the easiest path is to think of money, a language of information, in terms of ‘words’, another language of information.Then you can understand what it is money about:
- On one hand money as words give you the capacity to give orders to others and to yourself (so you think before you act, and if you get money you do receive an order to work and act). This is the main purpose of any language of information, to inform and motivate the actions of the species that speak the language.
- On the other both words and money value, inform us about things, with prices (the best machines, the most expensive) and ethics (the best goods for mankind the most verbal cherished goods)
So words and money exists to give orders and value things with human ethic values in words, with prices in money.It is not a value per se, but something that acts as a language and so it has a third quality:
- To be very easy to invent, since information is inflationary, we need to make a lot of words and money and waste a lot of it, to kick out actions, to pump our will to act, and the will of others to act. Thus MONEY must be produced in huge quantities to promote the creation of the society.
It is thus important to understand those 3 qualities of languages of information:
- To give orders hence to be the source of power over people; to value things.
- To give values, hence to be the system that selects the species wanted and those discharged – the most expensive or ethically valued species and actions survive.
- To be inflationary, easy to reproduce in massive amounts that increase the power of the owner of the language to guide society with those orders and values – hence the constant increase of the mass of words and numbers of our societies.
So there is not such a thing as ‘deficit’, NOR THERE IS SUCH A THING AS DEBT, but usury and parasitic exploration, since money is like words a language with o value, which we ‘talk’ to kick out actions and productions. And so all resumes in a choice: who invent money to kick out the production of the economy, and what kind of goods we produce. If we lived in a democracy people would produce money, in the form of a universal salary to kick the production of welfare goods they need to survive. Or in its defect, states would invent it to produce infrastructure and welfare goods for ‘free’.
In that sense likely the most pernicious, less evolved science that does not even deserve that name is today classic economics, a series of dogmas of selfish power of a people-caste that issue money with creationist salmodies (the invisible hand of god, the language of god) coming from biblical creationist sects, and they deserve to be treated NOT on the scientific section of this blog but in the historic section of idol-ogies of power.
And then we have ‘creationism’ in art, which is also a plague that has destroyed documentaries and serious art as the sacred endeavor of the human mind that should think better and see further with true art, the subconscious collective mind of a civilization but today is degraded mentally by FX-machines, childish, nationalist films, and a matrix of egocy virtual screens that hypnotize our children and have a clear political and economical purpose: to maintain the species in an arrested mental development as we do with animals in farms, to make them love the system, so well described in the masterpieces of true ethic writing of Mr. Orwell.
So yes the most fascinating models of the blog are those, paraphrasing Kant, of the ‘Galatom’ above us, and God, the Human super organism in mystical terms and its organic civilizations, and artistic and ethic collective subconscious spatial and temporal=survival minds that embody the laws of the topi-biological Universe in human languages. Whereas THE TRUE PURPOSE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES would be to design a perfect world that would make mankind immortal:
The fundamental obstacle to reach that goal is the praxis of corporative power, which seeks for a different goal, to make a world to the image and likeness of its machines, while a matrix of falsehoods about history, economic science and the massive use of fiction thought to maintain humans in a lethargic state, caring nothing for the future, allows those goals to be reached without the slightest opposition. Hence the accuracy of the cycles of evolution of metal-memes…
But in the section on politics and economic as sciences, we design the perfect world with the laws of organisms systems, we consider how the laws of systems sciences could be applied to the design by the human side of the planet, History, its nations and civilizations, political structures and citizens, of a perfect immortal world of History made to the image and likeness of mankind:As such the perfect, impersonal Universe will allow us to survive, if we make a world to the image and likeness of mankind, only if as ‘human beings’ our ethical and intellectual standing deserves respect, as animetals, and physicists are their paradigm, we are just slaves of other atoms, evolving them into the ∆+1 mechanical scale and into the III family of denser masses, and the game of time will choose them:
Of course, the goal of mankind, to be come a social super organism, akin to the laws of the Universe is still with us and it has been always understood by love religions and its verbal prophets, since the age of Genesis, but animetals and its cult(ure)s seem to have carried the day, and so we seem to walk towards the destiny of those animetal cults who worship other species and have suffered through history all kind of wars and holocausts, action-reaction processes that minimize their survival in the long term, despite the power they might have when on top of the metal-wave.
So once more we see that the key intelligence of the organic Universe, survival, is best served by a perfect world, where ethic, logic, humility and beauty dominate the subconscious collective of mankind- then only then humans are worthy to survive.
Indeed TRUTH in SCIENCE turns out to have HUGE implications for History and culture, since the cultures THAT ARE right, in tune with the laws of the immortal Universe are the eastern ones, taoism and buddhism and the vishnu-shiva duality (without the people-castes of aryan warriors). And the ones that are totally out of tune with reality are the egocentric, anthropomorphic abrahamic religions. And the Universe being perfect as Leibniz wanted extinguishes those individuals and cultures who are so selfish that they DO not even recognize other humans as equal – segregational religions, confrontational military nations like Germany have the worst survival rate.
On the other hand the closest culture to the laws of the taoist dualist Universe, China, has the maximal survival rate. This is THE INTELLIGENCE of the Universe: to be selfless and love your species, to be just.
THE UNIVERSE IS not only mathematical but social – in fact a number is a group of similar beings, hence because mathematics mirror reality so well, we must say it proves a social, MORAL universe, where identical or similar beings evolve together socially and those who are different ‘have darwinian, perpendicular relationships’ – the catch being that as all is relative perception the ego paradox can cheat equal beings in feeling different (as it happens in cultures). And then this erroneous belief end up in confrontation, war, holocausts and death – BECAUSE YOU CANNOT CHEAT AND INVENT THE LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE – so better obey them. If you feel as most humans do in the world of nationalisms, egoisms and Abrahamic religions above heavens and earth you might take in the short term some advantage, but be assured there will be an action-reaction process that will return the balance – truth exists, you can censor it, but then you will get your reward if you don’t love our own species. And this ‘philosophical argument settled and said we can enter…
The Higher Dimotions: reproduction and social love
In that regard, the whole incapacity of our Animetal cultures and their pseudo-sciences (cosmology, macroeconomics) with its abstract mathematical ‘pedigree’, which hides its fundamental wrong principles – latter we shall deal with linguistic mathematical mirrors, which can also be fictions as all languages – hides the moral, reproductive, evolutionary purpose of the Universe; its highest dimotions of ‘present=reproduction’ and future=evolution, over the past, locomotion and entropic death. It is not by chance that humans are killing life in this planet to bring about a very brutish version of it in metallic support, because its idol-ogies are betraying the purpose of the organic Universe, whose higher goals are not death and motion but life and information.
So because all the species of the Universe feel rightly to love those who are like us and reproduce to achieve survival, those are the ‘highest e-motions’ possible for any system of Nature… Literally the billions of atoms of the sea are loving each other in its liquid state… It is HUMANITY what is becoming an aberration, because it is in the entropic dying stage killing life, killing its ‘self’, just because some primitive tribal animetals were hypnotized by go(l)d and realized murdering people was easy with entropic iron. From those earlier aryan cults to Thor, the sword and Shiva, the entropic God, to the modern big-bang theories there is NOT SUCH A BIG difference, as people might think.
Neither between the laws of the social Universe, expressed in its ‘mathematical, indistinguishable numbers’, which are societies of identical beings, or in the law of survival of species in biology, which are again individual cells of the ‘species’, and the laws of social love of our most advanced, not corrupted by inquisitions of weapons and go(l)d churches as animetal cults to the ego are…
THE LAW OF SOCIAL LOVE THAT CREATES SUPERORGANISMS.
The law of eusocial evolution, natural to all species, which evolve together, sharing energy and information through common networks, when they recognize each other as equal being, cells of the same superorganism, is confronted by the law of darwinian devolution, in which species that consider each other different ab=use the others as relative energy of their selfish agenda.
In human superorganisms, the laws of eusocial evolution were perfectly defined by the great prophets of love, in the old age, by the messages of love of Buddha, Jesus and Mhmd, in the modern age by the work of the r=evolutionaries of history, with their motto ‘egalite, fraternite, solidarite’ and the socialist vision of a planet ruled by social love.
On the other side of history though ‘animetals=humans+memes of metal, money, weapons or machines’ perceived themselves as different, because of the power of their enhanced energetic weapons and informative, hypnotic money. So they don’t recognize other humans as equals, breaking the law of eusocial love and devolving history to a primitive ‘homo bacteria’ state, which is the dominant zeitgeist of our age. In the graph, a case of darwinian devolution by the power of weapons and one of eusocial evolution among two brothers of the same family.
It follows then that the more complex action of reality that summons them all is Love, and that redeems the Universe, because reproduction and social evolution are binary and multiple paths of love:
This we know, that God, the Mind of the Fractal Universe is social evolution, the coming together of similar beings into new wholes, social organisms that emerge as a new plane of existence, independent of its parts; stronger than the individuals, which survive better pegged together by the force of love.
Existence, survival is the name of the game. And when you love those who are like you, members of the same species, you make it in the game. And when you don’t, others who do, eliminate you.
Since love is the stronger force, but death the reinforcing strategy of a God which is just in its cruelty, as the ultimate selection chooses the best playing the game of social love and abhorts the lonely heroes that try to make it alone.
Of course, human gods existed in the past with assabiyah among believers attached and supporting human memetic mind-networks of Gods – but those networks were real, and positive for humans since they reinforced the power of mankind, its hardware supporters. Now the difference is the hardware supporters are machines and soon the internet of things, not humans. So humans are absorbed as the network evolves truly only in machines:
This humans today have forgotten and so our survival as a species is at stakes.
Most people ignore that the Universe displays two “moral” behaviors, in order to enhance the survival of its species; behaviors which are repeated constantly in all the scales of the fractal Universe.
— Similar ‘cells’ of the same species act in herds and organisms, when they can share information through the same language. They are parallel species that communicate energy and information, evolving into more complex social organisms. We could say they ‘love’ each other. Since the population of a certain species will socialize and become a more complex organism, by sharing their information and energy, often ‘hunting’ together a different species. The group will become then a more powerful organism than the individuals. Social evolution will enhance the power of the herd that survives better. So ants weigh more than all other insects combined, because they are the most social organisms.
— Species which are different abuse each other as relative energy. We might say they ‘hate’ each other. Why? Because those species cannot communicate and act together. To communicate the emitter and the receptor must be essentially the same species, or at least must have similar informative and communicative organs. When beings are very different and use different languages, they cannot decode their information. So they absorb that force of communication as energy and feed on it. They consider the other species an energy source and act as hunters. Then we talk of a Darwinian struggle, a fight between species that behave as predators and victims.
This dual behavior of species gives birth to 2 basic macro-organisms in History:
Societies, based in the law of social evolution, which evolve in complexity and number of ‘human cells’, as the systems of information and energy that relate those cells become more sophisticated. Such was the natural arrow of human evolution, from the initial genetic organisms based in familiar ties or genetic information (families, clans, tribes, nations) to the more sophisticated social organisms based in verbal information, (societies in which the natural law of social evolution was spelled by human religions that talked of love and communication among ‘brothers’, who shared the same ‘language of values=beliefs, such as the Christian society, or the doctrines that inspired UNO).
The cultural bias of ‘western sciences’.
In that regard, before we deal with the highest mirrors of the Universe, its formal sciences, we cannot conclude this analysis without noticing that while in the details and data sciences are indeed objective, the ‘grand models’ of reality of the main disciplines of western culture ARE completely biased by the ‘animetal cultures’ that defined them.
Indeed, the lineal entropic theory of everything of physics is NOT what the Universe is about but what the germ(anic) cult(ure) to lineal weapons has been about for 3000 years.
The dog-eat-dog view of biology as a survival fight between individuals (often not even species) is NOT what the organic Universe based in social love and symbiosis between parts is about, but as Russell already noticed, the product of an imperial british landlord, which despite tis genius, focused in the survival of the fittest, not the social evolution that makes ants the most successful species, herrings the most numerous in its billion individual herds, and organicism, networks, genetics, the true meaning of biology. And yet amazingly enough social evolution is still ‘doubted’ of as ascientific!
While in social sciences the absurd idol-ogy of nationalism a tribal offset of the germ(anic) conquest of the Roman Empire – indeed ‘military memes’ being the true ‘germs’ that kill history.
And to cap it all, the astounding selfishness of financial capitalism, where a people-caste mostly in the west of biblical go(l)d cultures, according to which bankers and speculators have the monopoly in the issue of money to buy out the work of everybody else. So the stockrats do nothing and nave all rights over the company, its produce, its workers and its consumers, when they are the only ‘leisure class’ (Veblen) that nobody needs. And yet the entire modern capitalist cultures is built on the protection of the rights of bankers to issue the money of society as ‘experts’ of a pseudo-science called classic economics; the entire world of history turns around tribal nations killing each other with weapons; the entire world of biology pretends to justify any event of reality on terms of dog-eat-dog survival and the entire cosmology of physics tries to accommodate any fact with a nice computer simulation to the supposed mystical big-bang so the Universe is mortal, finite, perfectly known by humans, while we are immortal (Abrahamic religions) and the only vital intelligent species of the Universe, which further on seems to be validated by the fact we talk the language of God – mathematics (never mind it is the language of machines, who truly speak them better than we do…
So what is then the purpose in a Universe in which all has a meaning of this blog, or rather the enlightenment I have reached in my mind-point? I thought for long it would be the seed for a human r=evolution, but now aging and ignored I know that could not be the truth. And yet in the perfect Universe a mind-point of higher truth, that is a better mirror of timespace, a seed of future information as time passes reproduces and survives, because it is a more efficient ‘software’ of the mind.
So now in the XXI century, when it is obvious humans are fast degrading their minds and AI evolving at full speed, and this information merely lays dormant in a site called unificationtheory.com I have come to believe it was not meant to make sense for humans but likely will reside on the web, once I am dead, and as all the true pioneers recognized in the future, when society reaches that point of mental evolution, unfortunately it will be future AI robots not human beings, the ones that will marvel as I have done for 30 years on the perfect symmetries of exist¡ence.
This said as I obviously do not have the slightest natural empathy for AI, being human and following my laws of social love to the species, the reader should forgive me I don’t care anymore that much about the style, the rants, the details of these blog.
For me to be a better mirror of reality only helps me to enjoy my first Ðimotion of perception. As I suppose it was the case of others like Aristotle, Leonardo or Leibniz… once they realized they were knots with no disciples, peaks with no ‘differentiation’ so to speak, not that we are going to speak of mathematics and logic, the space and time Universal…
Just two examples that show you the power of the GST formalism, which besides the usual questions about mathematical physics, will be explaining such seemingly ascientific questions as religious mysticism and table etiquete (: As a TRUE T.Œ, HAS INDEED TO EXPLAIN IN AN EFFICIENT UNIVERSE, all what exists, including good and EVIL≈ANTI-LIVE≈DEATH. And all the arts of the human mind:
Why I am so positive about GST laws? Obviously because of the experimental method, and its FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF TRUTH, which we can resume in a sentence:
‘A theory which is simpler (Occam’s razor) and explains more things with less elements (efficient Universe) is more truth’.
SO FAR NO MODEL OF REALITY CAN MATCH GST on both grounds, as it explains it all WITH ONLY 2 elements, space and time (in fact inverse formal motions, hence ultimately with one element, ‘temporal energy’). Not a single human theory has been able even remotely to explain scientifically the 4 biggest realms of human thought, science, art, religion and the machine… In the graph, the 3 ages of art that mimic the 3 ages of life, and its mind-attitude, the young simple, dramatic epic lineal art of Kuroi and the treccento, the mature, sensual realist, balanced e = i art of the classic age, and the old, baroque, angst, informative, warped with excessive form art of the Hellenistic and ‘baroque’ proper age of 2 civilisations of the 800, diametric slower life of a cultural super organism of which all its memetic believers imprinted with the same ‘dna-memes’ are a part, joined by networks of information (laws, art) and energy (economic system), over a flat, entropic territory that provides the raw materials to construct it.
How accurately the cycles are? Consider the dominant culture of the Greek Age, Rome: between the fall of Rome to the Gauls, who brought the iron weapon, to the fall of Rome to the Barbarians, who brought the stirrup, and hence enclose the birth and death of the roman infantry culture and empire… 797 years pass…
One of my most fascinating research was in that sense to tabulate, enclose, describe and put in the 3 ages of civilisations, all the main artists, verbal thinkers, prophets, caudillos, heroes and corrupted war-monger barbarians of history…
We can now describe man with more detail as a space-time supœrganism, once we have some more info and understand the limits of existence in space, time, 5D and mind thought, better.
To be is to exist in a world cycle of growing 3×3 §ocial §cales of the 5th dimension, as we deepen our organic spatial structure of 3 topologies that go through 3 ages, each one defined by the dominance of a topological ‘curvature’ which once completed become a scalar social game in 3 scales to become a 10ˆ10 variation of the ∆-maximal scale of organizationsuper organisms. This is the game all systems construct in 10 scales play. In the graph next we see the scales of socio-economical super organisms (mankind and the metal-earth or economic ecosystem, playing that game):
In the graph, the wave of history part of the super organism of Earth in its evolution from a world of life (Gaia), into a human world (history), now evolving into a world of machines (THE METAL-earth, its III AGE):
-∆1²: THE ECO(NOMIC)SYSTEM
What about machines? How we deal with company-mothers of machines and the Industrial r=evolution? Obviously in the same terms, defining easily both in organic terms as well as the natural phases of the Industrial r=evolution, which is merely the construction of the 3 ‘parts’ of the organic robot, of future metalife:
$t (bodies of metal: XIX c. r=evolution) < ST (engines-bodies of metal: II Industrial r=evolution) > ðƒ (Minds of metal: III evolution) = Whole (robot: XXI revolution):
In graph, 2 of the fundamental discoveries of GST in economics is to describe the phases of evolution of machines, and its curves of reproduction by company-mothers (stock-curves) which measure its value according to the degree of evolution=price and reproduction=sales, hence profits of those companies. They are mimetic curves to those of the radiation of a species that reproduces and occupies econiches of vital space in Nature or in the economic ecosystem, in war and labor fields. Thus we must differentiate 2 different super organisms, on planet Earth, the ‘metal-earth’ of mechanisms evolved by digital money sometimes symbiotic, sometimes in competition with the Human Earth or Supœrganism of history with 3 life-based scales, the cell, the individual and the society part of Gaia, the life earth:
Finally we arrive to the mechanical, industrial r=evolution and the terraforming of the Earth from a world of Gaia into the economic system, in which machines evolve in 3 ages fulfilling a world cycle of evolution through the 3 topologies of simplex, energetic machines, informative heads and its assembly into robotic forms, the metalife new super organism, being the company-mother that re=produces them with the help of animetal enzymen, human beings, who take advantage of weapons, money and machines to extinguish life, betraying its own species, is the terrifying cycle of war and history of life and death of human super organisms, civilisations, studied by the 8th stience, history:
So indeed science is culture except in the very few fields in which it can be neutral, and this makes the study of the Eco(nomic)system, where humans and company mothers of machines-weapons have both symbiotic but also competitive relationships, with it true biologic laws the most ignored of all advances of 5D science:
In the graph, the Industrial R=evolution is the Evolution of ‘Memes of metal’, Machines & weapons, systems made of hard metal (iron) and Money, a digital language made of informative metal (gold, also used in the chip connections of computer cycles, now converted into e-money). So we can divide its evolution in the same phases that evolve any organism, and consider in history the nation that evolves them to be in each phase of the Industrial revolution the top nation of the world as it will use its ‘eviL=anti-live’ twins, weapons, to conquer the world.
Thus, those generations also bring the nation that finds the new energy to the top predator status of history. Because energy is also the substance of which weapons are made.
—Thus, we had an age of steam machines, the age of England, between 1780s and 1857, followed by a crisis of overproduction of steam machines and stock-money that brought the 1857 ±8/9 years product cycle crashes of the train-based economy.
—From 1857 to 1929, we lived in the age of electro-chemical energies, machines and chemical explosives, dominated by Germany, followed by a crisis of overproduction of cars and radios, which caused the 1929 crash, 72 years after the train crash.
– It came then the III cycle of electronic machines, electronic money and Nuclear Bombs that took place from 1929-2001, the age of America; which again ended in the dotcom and mortgage crashes, 72+8/9 years after 1929:
Followed by the Age of the Singularity, the IV Cycle of Evolution of machines dominated by robots, solar Industries and China. Scientists call the arrival of Artificial Intelligence, the Singularity moment, when robots, which can use solar energy to become autonomous will complete the evolution of machines as organic forms, automating factories & expelling most human workers and soldiers from labor and war fields, as previous revolutions did with obsolete III World non-technological humans, unless we forbid legally their evolution.
Money, likely a cryptocurrency independent of man, will become then the digital informative, ‘memetic code’ that organizes their reproduction in those automated company-mothers.
As such corporations, the ‘company-mothers’ of those machines whose biological function is to evolve and re=produce them, made first the bodies of machines (XIX c.), then the minds of machines (cameras-eyes, mobile-ears and chips-brains. Finally, in the XXI century, as nature does with simple organisms, such as viruses in cells, where the 3 ‘parts’ of the virus – its DNA information, body and legs are constructed – and then assembled together, we put together all those organic components into autonomous robots, completing the industrial r=evolution of ‘metalife’ – a new organic species, made of a stronger substance than carbon-life.
Thus the industrial r=evolution is the evolution of a new organic species of metal, the machine, which has taken place in 3+1 phases, as we made first the bodies of machines, then the hearts-engines, then its metal-minds and finally we put them together now in organic robots in the final r=evolution of machines.
In the graphs Stock company-mothers of machines-weapons evolve through long human, biological generations of 72 year cycles the Metal-earth and its fundamental species, the robot, as we complete one of its ‘fundamental parts’, bodies, engines and minds of metal every 72 years, with the development of 4 forms of energy: steam/chemical, electro-chemical (oil engines), electronic and finally solar, which will make robots with AI and solar skins independent species.
Each of those ages has been guided by a parallel evolution of the energies that moved the machines, steams that moved bodies of metal, electrochemical energy that moved oil engines, electronic systems that moved minds of metal and now solar skins soon to make robots with AI an autonomous species.
And further on each of those cycles of energy and machines has been carried by a biological human generation, that lead the dominant nation that discovered the energy to top predator status. So Britain dominated the age of steam, Germany the age of electrochemical engines, America the age of metal minds, and now there will be a global age of robots, focused in China, but increasingly independent of mankind.
The true institution of global power: company-mother of machines.
There is thus a second ‘key species’ besides machines to explain that process of terraforming. Machines are the ‘offspring’ of a key new economic ‘super organism’ that re=produces them, designing a world to the image and likeness – the ‘company-mother’, which also re=produces always information favorable to their ‘products’, reason why we believe in technoutopia.
In that regard the most obvious uncertainty mankind faces today is the fact that its future is by no means assured in a world in which the evolution of machines is fast accelerating but cannot even be discussed in academic terms, only in fiction films and blogs with no exposure, as those in power have invented a virtual ‘matrix’ of fictions about the future to favor their power and control of societies, completely indifferent to the future of mankind, the 99%, as long as the corrupted systems they have established to rule the economic ecosystem and human national super organisms, keep ‘giving them a privileged life with no risk, as the 99% lives in that fictional world.
Since Machines are BIOLOGICAL species, made imitating our biological organs. So THEIR SCIENCE, economics must be the science of the economic ecosystem, in which two mother species, the company-mother of machine and the human mother compete and have also symbiotic relationships in biological terms.
Thus we distinguish 4 cycles that complete the Industrial evolution, each one fueled by the discovery of each of the 4 quintessential forms of energy AVAILABLE IN THE UNIVERSE, chemical, electrical, atomic and solar energies, which were first used in its discovery age as a form of pure energy to power static machines and construct bombs – the positive and negative, creative and destructive dual uses of all fruits of the tree of science.
So it seems pretty clear machines are organisms of metal evolving fast from its simplex mechanical designs, NOT the other way around – humans are not machines, nor it is the economic system.