**Abstract**. In formal terms, Time Space-constants for each superorganism have 3 ¡logic main origins:

**The metric equation of the 5th dimension SxT=K,**which defines the co-invariance of all super organisms across its 3 ∆±¡ scales of existence. So for each scale we shall find co-invariant equations that determine the vital constants of systems.**The 5 Dimotions that set CERTAIN repetitive actions**for each species, which will try to maximize its ‘Function of Existence:**Max Se x Max Ti (S¡=Te)**- The ¬ Entropic limits of motion and form limits beyond which the system becomes disordered, which are set by its singularity of information and membrane, and therefore

CONSTANCY HENCE IMMORTALITY OF TIME and space in the Universe is now a ‘fractal scalar constancy’ manifested in multiple ‘sets of Universal constants’, *corresponding to the key values of its 5 Dimotions, not necessarily expressed in quantitative mathematical terms – as it is the case for physical systems, but in the grammar and values of the language of each scale (as it will happen with verbal super organisms of history)…*

So we should rather call all those constants, vital ‘local’ scalar spacetime constants, for each superorganism’s scale and language.

The most important of those constants are always THE LIMITING CONSTANTS that define the ‘angular momentum-membrane-borders’ (physical, biological and social elements)

It follows of course that the scale in which have a more general use are the constants of form and motion of the galaxy,** h-constant and c-constant** of angular momentum (informative clock cycles) and light speed, *which are all pervading in any sub-fractal system of the Universe; and perhaps the external constant of *

Space-time steps are the substance of which the actions and Dimotions of the holographic bidimensional Universe are made, as to result in an inverse zero sum, through all its Ðimotions and mathematical operators. This understanding of the essential search for virtual zero sum balances, in all the stop and go, dual entropy-form, motion-perception, merged into iterative reproductive presents, expressed most often through the algebra of mathematical physics, is at the core of classic sciences, without the proper understanding of what it truly means.

We thus shall to establish in this post, the different steps and stops, dimensions and motions of the sequential actions of existence, that keep the game going for any entity of any scale of reality.

In mathematical physics we shall discover the need for particles and antiparticles, of + and – arrows of time, to form a zero sum world cycle, with the exceptionalism of the weak evolutionary force, which shall always live a surplus of particles to keep the arrow of future-life longer than the arrow of past-death. In life we shall see the ± sides of the young and third age of the world cycle.

**I.**** 3 SPATIAL SCALES=3 TIME LENGTHS**

**5 ∆-1 Actions integrated in ∆o worldcycles part of the larger ∆+1 Dimotions of the external world.**

We said all systems are super organisms tracing worldcycles in a larger world, with smaller parts of faster time cycles, according to the metric of 5D: S x T = ∆±¡

Now, it is necessary to understand that as there are 3 scales of size in space, there are 3 scales of time quanta parallel to them. So we talk of smaller, faster ‘actions’ as the minimal unit of time dimotions, of larger sums of them, the world cycle of individuals as the time-range of organisms, and the slower ‘deep time’ cycles of the superorganism or world in which the system co-exists with other systems as the 3rd level of time clocks.

And while spatial, visual man might have an easier time to understand the 3 scales of spatial size of super organisms, they are ALWAYS ENTANGLED WITH THE 3 SCALES OF TIME CLOCKS OF REALITY AND WHAT TRULY MATTERS TO THE ORDER OF REALITY are the games of synchronicity of those actions, as some are larger in time-scale than others. Reason why we have a post on synchronicity which is likely the hidden gem of this blog.

The minimal description of a species of space-time implies to define its 5 Dimensions of space that make up its organic structure in simultaneous, time, its sequential motions through its world cycle between generation and extinction as it travels through the 3 planes of co-existence, in its cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic and ecosystemic/cosmological scales; and the 5 actions of exchange of energy and information it performs in those relative scales.

This description in pentalogic terms of all systems of reality that perform those 5 actions gathered in worldcycles giving birth to the isomorphic dimotions of all systems is then a subtle process of synchronicities and simultaneities.

So we shall use 3 terms for the scales of time duration, parallel to the scales of size of beings:

**∆-1 5 actions which are the minimal quanta of time, for the relative ¡-1 scale of the being.**So all beings will first perceive (D1) to move (D2) towards a source of entropy where they will feed (D4) or be killed (prey predator game), converted into entropy themselves. And if successful will use that entropy, reconverted into their own form as ‘energy’ to reproduce (D3), and integrate the reproduced cell or clone being into a social group part of a Universal whole (D5). We thus use for each of those action a mnemonic vowel which first perceive information (i), to define the change in motion of all beings (a-ccelerations), going towards the feeding fields where entropic death happens ending the o-sum worldcycle (ø) of predator or prey, that will reproduce with the reconverted energy (e),**Nt.1,**to start its social evolution (u)**: ï->a->ø->e->û,**thus being the natural series in sequential time of the actions of existence of beings, which we shall call the Program of existence.

But those actions, which are short time actions that involve only a small part of the being (an ∆-1 organ) keep accumulating in a larger scale of time giving origin to the worldcycles of the being, as they keep…

**Gathering in 5 ∆º ages,**which gather those actions in each age of life, dominated by one of those 5 type of actions (genesis dominated by social evolution; youth dominated by locomotion, maturity by acts of reproduction, third age by acts of information and death age by entropic processes).

It is then worth to notice that in the ∆º SCALE ages have a DIFFERENT ORDER THAN ACTIONS, AS actions start with an informative dual process of perception and communication with the outer world, which correspond to the third age of the being, and follow by locomotion and entropic feeding, while the entropic death of the system is the final age, which in actions tends to be the positive first age of social evolution (palingenesis).

To notice that in PHYSICS AND MATTER, THOSE AGES ARE CALLED ‘STATES’ OF MATTER, entropic gaseous youth, liquid balanced age and informative solid crystal age between plasma generation and social evolution into boson and quark matter.

IT IS INDEED THE KEY TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE UNIVERSE the understanding that when we start to combine 5 Dimotions in different scales, with different synchronicities and different variations of forms and motions, entangled to shape different super organisms the ‘variations’ on the same theme are truly infinite, giving birth to the astounding variety of reality.

**Deep time Horizons,**which correspond to the ∆+1 ecosystem or world in which the individual as part of a larger whole belongs – in human individuals the superorganism of History. The terms are taken from Hutton’s father of geology who first coined the word superorganism to refer to the Earth ‘geological horizons’, whose ‘deep time’ he rightly considered to be slow expressions of what now systems sciences defines as the metric of 5D (well that is me, I and myself but you know as Planck said, all ‘scientific r=evolutions start in the mind-point of a pioneer ):

In the graph, if we apply the ages to species, the paths of future define the 3 Horizons of the species, its process of final social evolution into super organisms, or extinction, as evolution resolves in 3 type of evolutionary branching, one species of more ‘information’ – higher §ð, one of more reproductive energy, S=T, and one of more entropic force, $t…

3 subspecies that are strategies of survival, by killing more rivals (predator strategy), reproducing faster (generator strategy) or becoming more intelligent able to evolve socially through languages of common information (social strategy) – SO ALWAYS THOSE 3 SPECIALIZED SUB-SPECIES SUCCEED – which will easily applied to mankind to resolve the tree of anthropology, the 3 dominant sub races and the 3 type of sexes.

Ultimately though the darwinian predator strategy is the less successful… and so we call it the ‘past horizon’, as it also comes first, the reproductive present strategy is on the short term the most successful so we call it the present but the future will be dominated by the arrow of eusocial evolution that creates wholes…

Or rather we talk of 2 relative future horizons: if the species fails to evolve socially it will face entropic extinction, into a lower plane of the fifth dimension, ¡-1 but if it is successful in social evolution it will evolve into a more efficient survival super organism, ¡+1.

Since the longest surviving future is that of the arrow of wholes, of eusocial love, denied by the simplex lineal logic of entropic, Aristotelian military human cultures, which therefore are FACING EXTINCTION BY KILLING EACH OTHER IN UNENDING WAR CYCLES – themes those extensively treated in the posts on the 3 ages of time and the paths of evolution and the posts on the failure of History to evolve by the power of social love.

Indeed evolution is supposed to be chaotic, as all human models of reality are ‘entropic’ regardless of evidence, since Science is culture, and we live in a military-based culture originated in the gunpowder age of mankind, so as big-bang is the model of physics, chaotic evolution is the model of biology born on the hunter’s mind of Darwin, who emphasized the LESS important dimotion of species, its dog-eat-dog struggle for entropic energy – themes those treated in our post on æntropic science as culture.

So we shall CALL THE LARGEST TIME-SPAN belonging to the species or ¡+1 world, ‘**DEEP TIME**‘ and its time spans, **Horizons**, honoring Hutton, and so its 5 Dimotions are **∆-1: Evolution** (the generator fast phase, similar to the palingenesis of the individual); ‘**past**= the top predator horizon’, **PRESENT**, the reproductive species, horizon, and **future**, the informative horizon, which branches into two probabilities, social evolution, the relative **∆+1** of the species which therefore is a new **palingenetic Evolution, or a **process of collective death, back to ∆-2 (as individuals also die in death, which is a double jeopardy, considered in detail in other posts) or **extinction, the entropic Dimotion of species and worlds.**

TO notice that Horizons are closer to ages in its natural order, as palingenesis is similar to evolution, the 3 horizons of past, present and future to the 3 ages, and death to extinction, reason why I so often use for Horizon the term ages, which might make it a bit confusing sometimes.

THE REAL DIFFERENCE is in the final phase, as Individuals are super organisms, of the maximal possible informative dominance of the mind; so there is ONLY a future for a superorganism in which the selfish MIND TOTALLY DOMINATES AND WARPS the organism as nervous systems do in humans, and it seems, financial and legal-military neuronal people-castes ab=using the reproductive middle class do in our societies (treated in our posts on history). So when the @-mind exhausts the present energy of the system, there is NO future but death, in a final entropic big-bang.

Species however are NOT so controlled by information but rather form Herds, and so when they evolve into social super organisms, as ants did, they can maintain still a balance between the individual and the whole, not so deeply controlled by information and to maintain an open longer future.

IT IS THEN OBVIOUS that death can be by excess of information (selfish nervous system, gravitational black hole eating the whole galaxy, selfish financial and legal corrupted neuronal, informative upper castes, in biologic, physical or social organisms) or excess of entropic power (worms that die poisoned by eating all kind of substances without control, lonely top predators like neanderthals or tooth tigers that are cornered by social hunters, humans and wolves, military societies that kill their own body in wars, nova and quasar explosions that kill astrophysical systems).

And so survival is once more a balanced S=T, PRESENT ASCENSION INTO AN EMERGENT SUPERORGANISM THAT BALANCES THE DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS OF THE PARTS, of the working reproductive body to which the mind-neurons must serve.

Needless to say time reversal from future to past, which is the definition of local entropy is always possible through r=evolution (societies), turning back the clock of aging (simple jellyfish do it), or when as we shall see in astrophysics the nucleon beta decays into its components and the galaxy suffers a quasar cycle of renewal. So TIME TRAVELS ARE LOCAL LOSS OF INFORMATION DECELERATING AGING and creating a back and forth beating between past and future, to remain in present.

IT IS THEN ESSENTIAL TO FULLY GRASP IN PARALLEL TO THE 3 SCALES OF REALITY, ITS 3 TYPE OF SUPERORGANISMS, THE 3 TYPE OF TIME DIMOTIONS OF EXISTENCE, which we formalize in ¡logic with the following terms (my apologies though for many of the posts that mix jargons, as only recently I have come to take seriously the diffusion of this blog and so will try to rewrite slowly and standardize all the posts to the quality of this central one, which should be taken at the template for future researchers):

The basic symbols of pentalogic for the * 3±¡ Dimotions in its different actions, ages-states and horizons are:*

**@¡-1:** seminal seed-mind

P:$t=relative lineal past, youth (age view)=**|=(ab:$t)**: lineal space-time (topological view)=limbs/fields

R:S≈T=relative present, **reproductive** maturity (age view)=**Ø=(ab.ST)**: hyperbolic space-time (topological view)=body-waves

ƒ:ð§=relative futures =informative 3rd age=**O=(ab.ð§)**: cyclical space-time (topological view)=particles-heads

¡±1: social evolution or entropic death.

To notice that ‘p$t’ is a single one, but the ‘futures=ƒð§’ have 3 paths, departing from the horizon of information, which might decline into entropic extinction or might evolve into social evolution and we shall return to it.

Finally to notice we compose its acronyms with 3 self-evident letters:

- Those of
**P**ast are lineal space-distances,**$**and lineal time,**t**, which shows its main dimotion=action=function, locomotion. - Those of present, are its main action=dimotion=function,
**R**eproduction, which repeats dynamically time seemingly never changing its**S**pace-**T**ime, in caps as it is the dominant dimension of reality. - Those of future shows its main function,
**ƒ**requency of**ð**ime clocks of cyclical information, and its multiple 3±i future paths,**§.**

Their application is truly wide, as they are the components of the ‘Generator Equation’ of pentalogic that describes all Timespace-organisms, both in simultaneous space and in its worldcycle, across its 3 main planes of existence.

The parallelisms, synchronicities and entanglements of all those scales of space and time IS THEN THE detailed knots and bolts of each science, as they happen in all scales: indeed, there is a parallelism in the external world scales of cosmology in time, years and mass, between the active magnitude and the life age span – NOTHING of this being coincidence but part of the infinite intelligence of the immortal universe always based in balances and symmetries between the spatial, scalar, temporal and mind-languages of the being in its 3 scales, of inner parts, wholes and worlds/ecosystems.

How we measure then the total value of spacetime of a system in its parallel from and world cycle? Easy, with the concept of energy.

So we left for the final basic parameter **the concept of energy,** which in physics is the integral of a force, itself, the change of momentum of the being, along a path in space, and so for a fractal entity *Is the best measure of its total world cycle as it ads to the momentum, its change in time through its existence and change in spatial position through its worldline… Acceleration as we saw in the graph of masses, is in fact the measure of the arrow of time towards the future of a system; while displacement defines its territorial space in which it will perform its actions of existence, so beyond the MECHANICAL VIEW of displacement and forces, in 5D vital space-time, displacement measures territory (body-energy) and acceleration, the total time frequency of actions. *

*The total energy of a being thus become a parallel ‘symmetric’ quantity to measure its potential world cycle duration and territorial power, when we transform the concepts of abstract physics into vital ‘generational space-time’.*

Since it is precisely what the game does as we depart from the perfect, ideal immortal scales of atomic physics into the functions and organs, territories and life-death cycles of less ‘perfect’ species, of higher scales, a fact which proves that ultimately the game is not about mathematical abstractions but about survival and life.

SO THE KEY CONSTANTS OF ALL SYSTEMS OF NATURE, WILL BE DERIVED FROM THE PARALLELISMS OF TIME AND SPATIAL SCALES, THEMSELVES RELATED TO THE METRIC EQUATION OF 5D, WHICH WILL ESTABLISH FOR EACH BEING, THE…

**II. INVARIANCE OF ¡T=S 5 DIMOTIONS.**

*Totally disregarded by modern science and yet by far the most important invariance of the Universe, is the invariance of topological form, represented in the previous graph. All are complementary systems made with 3 ‘topological functions’: Limbs, heads and bodies.*

*Since any** 4-Dimensional Universe has 3 canonical topologies, which correspond to the 3 organs of all systems:*

* Max. I: Head/Particle/Informative caste: They display the hyperbolic topology of information, observed in most ‘heads’ as an excess of warping and form (cortex, black holes, Chromosomes, Chip design).*

*Max. E: Moving Limbs/Forces/Energy class: They show a relative plane, or concave topology; such as the one observed in an external membrane, often the cover of a sphere of a bilateral form.*

*E=I: Reproductive Body/Atom/Working class: The topology of the reproductive system is a combination of the other two, performing cycles that communicate the energetic membrane and informative center.*

*Observe in the bottom of the graph samples of the 3 form-assembly in different systems of the Universe. Man also is a complex system with 3 interconnected zero points, around cellular toruses, with external and internal membranes of exchange of energy and information with the external universe, and apertures called senses… So we shall first explain the general form of all zero points, spherical membranes and torus and then analyze in specifically the human one.*

In the graph, concave, energetic; toroid, reproductive; and convex, informative topologies are the 3 forms found in all complex systems of the 4-Dimensional Universe. Since topology proves that in a 4 dimensional Universe, there are only those 3 topologies: hyperbolic, informative topologies, energetic planes, and reproductive disks. All structures of the Universe are composed of only those 3 topologies. This astounding simplification is the result of 2500 years of mathematical evolution since Pythagoras discovered the laws that rule the bidimensional topology of those 3 forms, the concave-planar sphere (or cycle in a 2 dimensional world), the toroid body with its regular cycles that transfer energy and information between the external surface of the sphere and its center; which is the informative, hyperbolic region or zero point, the ‘eyes’ that perceive in stillness a pixelled map of the Universe brought about by the flows of energy and information of the Torus.

After 2500 years since Pythagoras discovered the circle as the most perfect form, geometry have come to the conclusion there are only 3 forms in the Universe: The sphere, the torus and the zero point.

With those 3 forms you can build all the other forms of reality. All is reduced to those 3. So what they mean? What is their function? And how they combine in the puzzles we call reality? Those are the first questions we shall answer.

They correspond to the functions and morphologies of the 3 sub-systems of stable entities – heads, limbs and bodies:

Beings are not pure motions; neither they are only made of information.

Lao understood it when he said: all yin has a drop of yang (energy), all yang has a drop of yin (information). Hemingway understood, when he said to Dietrich: “Never confuse movement with action”. Indeed, energy ‘or lineal motion’ is not an action ‘per se’. It needs form, in/form/ation, which directs energy to create an action able to change reality. All actions require some energy and some information to create an event. And all systems require an information center and an energy center to create an entity.

Thus, all what you see will be a combination of at least two of the ternary topologies of a 4-Dimensional Universe – a particle/head and a field of energy/limb. And the more complex systems will also have a reproductive, toroid body.

And so we write a general equation to define those 3 forms: ∑E <=> ∑I, where < = > represents the toroid body that exchanges energy and information between limbs and heads, fields and particles.

In those complementary systems, the information center gauges reality (cyclical particles and heads of physical and biological entities) and the lineal fields of forces and limbs move them.

This leads to a third system that combines both, energy and form, the reproductive system, exi or elliptic/toroid body.

Yet since form is function, in yet another duality of the Galilean Paradox, bodies are conical, elliptic combinations of lines and forms.

*Thus Three Geometric Forms in space determines 3 functions in time*: cyclical clocks of information, Energetic, lineal or planar limbs of space, and its combination, ‘complementary systems’. And so *Geometry* and topology are fundamental sciences that apply to all ‘scales of reality’ and all its entities.

**ITS CONSTANTS.**

**The invariance of momentum across scales.**

Let us consider now the most important invariances of physics, the invariances of momentum, which is the product of two relative parameters of energy/space, the speed of the system, v, plus its informative/time clocks, the mass or charge of the system, m,q. Those quantities are not always conserved, as in the case of accelerations close to light speed (Lorentz Transformations). Yet its product, the momentum is not conserved, and when the momentum is no longer conserved (emission of a neutrino) is because the system is broken and the particle transformed in other particle or dissolved.

Thus the relativity of motion vs. form of all systems is balanced by the invariance of its product, m x v or momentum.

When we apply the concept of invariance with rigor, however we must consider the i±1 scales that ‘surround’ the i-system as the ‘domain of the event’. For example, in the previous example, the neutrino is not perceived in the light space-time membrane in which we exist, so it will probably carry energy and information into the gravitational membrane in which we are included. But the total i±1 scales will keep the total invariance.

**A glimpse to the laws of invariance between 3 i****±****1 scales.**

So what is the meaning of the Lorentz Transformations and self-similar processes in which the E and I parameters change?

Obviously an action that transcends or descends a certain i-system into its lower i-1 scale, with faster time-speed and smaller spatial-distances or an upper i+1 scale, with slower time-speed and bigger spatial distances (hence taking longer to close a cycle). Yet the product of both is constant, reason why forms can transcend or descend scales maintaining the invariance of momentum, which is the main parameter of survival.

ExI=K, represents the power of a system. Thus because their total volume remains invariant to changes of scale, the top predator species with maximal momentum cannot extinguish all the species of an inferior scale.

Absolute Relativity shows that in a fractal Universe charges and masses are self-similar vortices, clocks of time that carry a self-similar amount of information, (as Lorentz contractions accelerate the information processed in smaller space-scales). So all scales are relatively equal in its volume of energy and information:

[∑(ExI)_{i=n }= ∑(ExI)_{i=x}] for any relative value of x and n

Which means the total volume of ‘functions of existence’ of an scale is approximately equal to the volume of the upper and lower scales. There are though small differences, which respond to the laws of entropy that are also slightly changed when we consider the i±1, ternary scales in which entropy processes take place and latter we shall study in more detail.

Further on those laws are kept for all the invariances studied here, time-frequency, energy-motion, actions and forms across all the scales. For example, in the biological realm, if we compare the two main animal scales of size and speed, the human and ant scales, it turns out that those invariances are kept for the two most powerful top predator, social species, the ant and the man: the weight mass of all ants equals that of all humans, even if the ants are much smaller. Hence they have a faster time speed of information processing/perception; but to keep the invariance of ‘time frequency’, they must live shorter. And in fact given the ‘decametric’ scale of most i±1 systems, the longest living ant lives 7 years, but since insects process information 10 times faster than we do – reason why you never catch a flight – she lives 7 x10 years, the life of a human being.

All clocks of time measure the same cycle, the larger cycles go slower, the slower cycles are more extended in time. As in the sci-fi movie, the shrinking man, reality shrinks but accelerates. Vortices of mass accelerate to the c-speed limit of the event horizon of a black hole, which is extremely tiny.

**Definition of the Universe in terms of the 5 invariances.**

We conclude from the existence of 5 invariances, energy, form, action, scale and frequency that:

‘The Universe is a system of networks of knots of actions of energy and time, perceived as forms and motions. Beings perform cyclical discontinuous actions as they switch between feeding, perceiving, reproducing and acting in social networks, in a sequential order which is the absolute invariance of the game – the life and death generational cycle… in which the game is preserved…

The cycle is formalized by a single function, max. E x I, the function of existence,, whose developments show the selection, extinction, recreation, fusion and fission of all those cycles and beings.’

*Recap.* The fifth dimension organizes space-time cycles into more complex structures, keeping a balance in the product of the energy and information of the Universe, exi=k. The fractal structure of space-time is revealed through the 5^{th} dimension, which changes our view of the Universe and corrects many errors of science, acquired using only a space-time continuum with only 4 dimensions, 3 of space and one of time. The fifth dimension from a logic perspective is related to the evolution of form and its social structures.

**IV. INVARIANCE OF QUANTUM ACTIONS.**

The main discovery of quantum physics was the understanding that the Universe was not made of substances but of motions called actions that combined energy and time. So from a quantum particle to a human that states ‘I don’t have time or energy to do this’, we find those two ‘actions’ to be the essence of all realities. We are all ‘knots’ of actions of energy and time. And the next step is to define properly those parameters, classify all possible Universal actions, find its ‘functions and forms’ and systematize all that knowledge in a series of basic laws that all physical, biological and sociological systems follow. Let us then describe those actions, motions and forms in its simplest terms, departing from the fact that all what exists is a complementary system of actions of energy and time.

The Universe is made of actions of energy and time, of motions with form, of in-form-actions, of information. So we say we don’t have energy and time to do something, as we are also made of such actions.

Physicists have explored mainly the mathematical formalism of those actions in the realm of quantum particles, but we want to expand the concept *to all the systems of the Universe.*

And the main question we want to resolve is the types of quantum actions that exist in all those scales.

Beings constantly create actions of energy and time. What you see are knots of such cyclical actions… fabricating time. What we see are the trajectories of beings performing in an alternately causal way their cycles of time. One of the most common cycles is to have a p.o.v. becoming a focus of a force, which acts as its source of energy and information. A first paradox of Galileo happens here, as we can perceive the point as static and feeding, moving along the field of energy and so we can establish a static or dynamic analysis. Those points then ill feed along that path and a certain moment satisfied that action will try to fulfill others, and in that switching on and off actions will seem to disappear and new, different trajectories motivated for another action appear. If we see densely packed in time and space those actions they will be sequential and those causal sequences are the stuff that latter (paradox of Galileo) seen as a package of space-time or organism, are the reality we see in its infinite fields.

The why of the Universe turned out to be rather simple and biological, more than physical, even if it was a discovery that starts in physics with Planck’s realization that the simplest Unit of reality is NOT a substance but a cyclical action of energy and time. Quantum and cyclical are treated as synonymous, a quantum is a form that we might perceive as fixed and substance but it is really nothing but a morphological motion, traced by a being, that in the specific scale Planck studied, we could hardly see, the light-space. But all what that being did were actions of energy and time.

But can build the Universe departing of those two primary substances or ‘arrows of the Universe’? Yes we can. And that is what I did back in the 90s. The concepts are easy, if you are able to transcend your memetic imprinting and ignore Mr. Planck’s desperado dictum when nobody listened to his astounding discovery that we were made not of substances but actions and hence motions (‘for a new paradigm to be imposed all those who learned the previous paradigm must die’).

So try to follow me with a ‘Tabula Rassa’. You have two entities, energy and time, and they have motion, so they create actions. The simplest combination is called an h-Planck constant. That gives us a first ‘being’. Now forget your abstract, earlier Hegelian imprinting (this you might not know, but history of science tells us earlier German thinkers were idealist as philosophers of science and did not consider the Universe made of ‘realities’ but of ‘mathematical probabilities’). Think rational. h-Plancks are ‘real’, the simplest bricks of the Universe, and they are made of energy and time. In fact you perceive light, when you stop seeing light you stop seeing the Universe of space-time.

Therefore the space-time Universe we perceive is made of actions of light of energy and time. And physicists have discovered that indeed the vacuum is made of energy, which moves and change in time. But we said the Universe of space-time instead of the Universe of energy and time. Space has become energy. And indeed, space and energy are two ways of seeing the same thing. Then we come to the other term Time…. But we use in many sciences instead of space and time, energy and information, so time and information, ‘form-in-action’, form must be related. And yet we use clocks of time, cyclical forms to measure time. All what exists is made of space-time, in abstract, of energy and information, self-similar terms.

Now when you say ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this’, it is obvious that subconsciously you know the two substances of what you are made, energy and time and you are right. Because what you are, what we shall describe in this book in great detail is how you ‘become’ yourself, departing from the two primary substances of the Universe, energy and time, which together form an action, the basic unit of reality.

So Duality deals with that fact, and extracts the laws of energy and information. Now, think again, what else can be there? The simplest thing is to combine energy and information, and you get a 3rd entity. This combination e x i, or e x t, if you want to use Quantum or Einstein’s notation, turns out to be the essential equations of physics. So we are on the good path.

Thus now we have 3 arrows, energy, information and exi, that we shall call the arrow of reproduction or creation, as it creates a third entity, one which is made of two substances, and turns to be an ‘action’.

What else can we find there? Since there are many bites of energy and bits of information, we can combine them, and then we find the 4th arrow:

*∑ e x i*

This equation, which the reader should observe includes all the others, is what I have called the Generator equation of all the entities of energy and information or space and time of the Universe. And from that simplest equation and the interaction of its two ‘simple arrows’ or motions, we create its two complex forms, actions and societies. And this, my friend is all what we shall need to explain you all what exists and more… what you don’t see but it exists also in other fractal scale of reality.

So now it is clear what it is the game of existence, the Universe: a game of relative organisms, of each scale of reality, performing externally in an ecosystem, its space-time, cyclical actions, switching among its tasks of energy feeding, informative perceiving, reproducing and keep in harmony with the self-similar points of its energetic, informative and reproductive social networks. We exist in a series of parallel games of feeding, perceiving, evolving and reproducing. All of us can be perceived externally as ‘points of view’, Non-Euclidean points, playing this geometric and biological, existential game:

We are all knots of discontinuous=quantum, cyclical actions of energy and time. Since the Universe is continuously differentiable during the cycles of time their beings perform, but when the p.o.v. switches its action, it has a point of discontinuity, *as the system changes its trajectory and goal towards a new action. And then again will return to its feeding, perceiving or reproductive or social action. Thus actions are quantum actions, as the modular being switches between the. And *we see this process is the trace of those cyclical actions that ‘draw’ the 4 dimensional space-time universe.

If actions were all of a certain type, the Universe and all its species would be far more continuous, always repeating the same cycle. This is not the case as all of them switch between 4 possible cycles with different frequencies and forms, and as they switch they abruptly change direction, extinguish a cycle and start one, and then return to the same type of cycle, creating the discontinuous forms of the Universe.

*Relationships between the simplex and complex arrows.*

The dualities between external, spatial and informative, simplex forces/ actions and complex, internal forces/actions/networks create a series of patterns and synchronicities that are repeated in all systems. The simplest relationship is one of causality between the simplex and complex arrows:

*∆ Energy->Reproduction* and *∆ In/Form/ation->Social evolution* through a common language.

Complex reproduction requires a great deal of energy to be achieved, so for example women cannot have children without a proportion of body fat, and most cells do not undergo mitosis without a cytoplasmic growth. So reproduction is the complex arrow of energy and we observe many causal relationships and ‘cycles’ of the type: E->Re. On the other hand social evolution depends of a language of information that the different ‘cellular elements’ understand. Thus social evolution is the complex arrow of information and we shall also observe many relationships of the type: ∆i-> ∑ e x I.

Further on the 4th social arrow creates stronger top predators, either herds (loose groups of self-similar organisms of the same type) or organisms proper (more connected systems that organize 3 sub-systems, heads, bodies and limbs, specialized in information or formal structure, reproduction and energy, all of them connected by a 4 system, the linguistic system that organizes them all).

And this reduces all actions perceived as discontinuous cycles of time in which a particle comes to a point in which it absorbs or emits different types of energy and information, to the 3+∑ combinations of them: energy feeding, information processing, reproduction of both, exi, and social organization of self-similar beings, ∑exi.

*So we define any entity of existence as a knot of the 4 quantum actions it performs in its cycles of space-time.*

To do so the point must perceive and gauge. If it is an electron it will gauge and move to capture energy to structure its form (2nd quantum number) and it will use a language of information to evolve socially (magnetic number). Points thus are moved by the need to perform their 4 cycles of existence, a desire to acquire more energy and form which they better achieve in networks, with the flexibility of herd hunting and network thinking. But in each scale of reality there is a rational point of view calculating its strategies to get more energy and form.

That we have no free will but we have will is the deepest consequence of stating that all points of view search for its 3+1 actions or ‘dimensions’ of existence, its energy, informative, reproductive and social arrows.

But what means to measure time through the internal frequencies of reproduction of information of an entity of the Universe? What is the meaning of those cycles, what events of frequency we measure?

The answer is actions. We measure the frequency of actions of particles of existence that trace certain geodesics as non-Euclidean points of time, travelling through a 6-dimensinal non-Euclidean Universe, switching between those cycles with patterns that create frequencies, waves of time, of 4 type of ‘energetic actions’.

And we will return to that. Because it is the second invariance of the Universe. All its entities follow 4 quantum numbers or basic frequencies between its actions of energy and time.

The invariances of frequencies of time, I, and actions of time, exi, are in that sense the key invariances to interpret properly in physical and biological sciences the meaning of time cycles, and frequencies. What we observe in the Universe are particles of many scales, which perform trajectories in which a particle will feed on energy or information and the frequency of those actions in which there is absorption or energy or imprinting of information appears to us as information over the entity. Information thus become encoded in the trajectories of entities that with a given frequency different for each species absorbs energy and information or recombines it, exi, emitting a self-similar form. The Universe of motions of time is in that sense a harmony of 4 basic frequencies, actions.

*Recap.*

Why particles of existence turn into cycles? The answer is vital: to make certain actions that ensure the survival of its systems of energy and information. Non-Euclidean points are points of view that gauge information and move their complementary body with a will, seeking for more energy and information and reproduction, seeking for an organic will to repeat their cycles and motions. And this will make the point a mind, Atman or soul – a perceptive point of view that absorbs information and moves its body accordingly after ‘thinking’ the information to cater its will.

All systems perform 4 actions to survive that define a simple program of ‘existence’, which all species of energy and information follow*. *

*The deduction of the program is simple. *First, all what exist in time is an event, called an action, made by a complementary system of energy and information. Hence all actions have at most 2 components, energy and form, exi=k or exT=k (depending on which self-similar concept you choose information or time). Further on there are many quantic actions performed by many systems. So all what we can do is 4 type of actions that we shall call ‘arrows or motions of time’:

Those arrows or actions performed by complementary bodies/fields of energy and heads/particles of information to last in time and space will be:

– ∆E: Systems feed on energy for their bodies/fields.

– ∆I: They absorb information for their heads/particles.

– Exi: They act combining both, often to reproduce the entity in other zone of space and time to survive after death. While some systems become reproduced by an external catalyzer, enzyme or ‘enzyman: human enzyme’ – machines).

– ∑ e x I=Ii+1. They evolve socially in more complex networks that survive longer in time and space.

The 4 arrows are ‘necessary’ for any complementary system of energy and information to exist. As any system will die if it doesn’t replenish its energy and information, or reproduce before death.

** **

‘All yin has a drop of yang, all yang has a drop of yin’ Taoist proverb.

We use 5 terms for the same event according to the ‘entangled principles of the Universe’ which make a ternary ‘minimum’ ¡logic view necessary to absorb in present space-time a minimal amount of truth on the being.

Dimensions, Motions, Ðimotions, Åctions & ±∆¡motions, which express the concept of Dimotion from different perspectives, being obviously ∆imotion, the scalar perspective, Åctions, the O-mind perspective and Dimotions the external, entropic, all gathering perspective; Dimensions the spatial perspective and Motions the time perspective.

The simplest description of a being thus happens when we consider its 5=3±∆ dimensions in space, motions in time and actions in space-time, which define the existence of the being. Hence our title, 5Ð³; observed in the next graph for the human being:

**5 Dimotions and worldcycles.**

The minimal description of an species of space-time implies to define its 5 Dimensions of space that make up its organic structure in simultaneous, time, its sequential motions through its world cycle between generation and extinction as it travels through the 3 planes of co-existence, in its cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic and ecosystemic/cosmological scales; and the 5 actions of exchange of energy and information it performs in those relative scales. This description is what we call the 5Ð³isomorphic method, as all systems of reality perform those 5 dimotions and actions. In a dynamic way the best ‘tale’ of the being is a sequential story of its existence from birth as a relative fractal point in a lower plane, through its palingenesis, clone reproduction, social evolution, emergence and a ternary physiological network of cells, who will then life a cycle through the 3 ages of life and death, in a larger ∆+1 world till its entropic extinction and desegregation into its cellular/atomic components. In the graph, the Human world cycle and the 5 actions in scalar space-time of different species of the Universe.

What of those 3 elements, dimensions, motions or actions matter most? Obviously actions, as they combine ALL the elements of reality, dimension, motion and scale. So we can say as Planck realized a century ago that the unit of reality is an action, but unlike Physicists who basically study only an action (the first, locomotion) we shall consider a more complex pentagonal Universe of 5 different active dimotions.

When we order those ‘dimotions’ in space we get a superorganism,when we order them in time we obtain a worldcycle of existence, when we order them in scales, we obtain the 5 actions of all systems that absorb energy from its lower ∆-2 scale (humans absorb amino acids), information from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb light), motion from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb gravitation) or simplex actions, while developing two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution from its higher, ∆-1 seminal scale, ∆o scale and ∆+1 social scale.

*Actions are thus the FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE of the limits of perception of any ∆ø and relate directly ‘perception’ and ‘stientific’ knowledge to the relative position of the mind that perceives. They are also the essential element to fully grasp WHY we perceive only a limit number of scales of reality with us at the center: namely because we ‘HAVE THOSE ∆±¡ practical limits in our actions’ – NOT because there are NO more scales above or below.*

It is also important to realize that actions are either predatory (those involving smaller beings), equalitarian (reproduction with an ∆ø equal form) or submissive to the ∆+1 social world. We are, as Shakespeare put it, buffoons citizens or kings depending of our perspective.

So in this post we shall introduce briefly the model from the home page and then talk a bit of each of the 5 D³imotions (dimension, motions and action) of reality, which in the future will be the main method of study of beings, to understand its structure in space (dimensions of the superorganism) its worldcycle in time (ordered as sequential motions by the symmetry S=T) and combined use for the program of survival – the program of its 5 actions.

IN THE GRAPH, we see the five dimensions of reality, 3 of present organic ensembles of beings, two in scales of lower smaller parts and larger wholes. They are symmetric to the 3±1 ages of a world cycle between its 5D generation as a seed that evolves socially into a whole and its entropic death:

**The basic symbology of i-logic dimotions.**

We shall study this ‘organic, vital reformulation’ of the Universe based in a simple ‘first principle’: we are all super organisms in space tracing worldcycles in time, which we shall elaborate in the first line.

So the 5 Dimotions (ab. of dimension in space and motion in time) that create the form and function of all systems and its parts, between its generation by a mind-seed and extinction in entropic explosions are:

*First Ðimotion: Non-Euclidean points-singularities: particles/heads: Informative perception: §ð**Second Ðimotion: limbs/potentials: Lineal momentum: $t.**Third Ðimotion: ∑e x ∏i: Bod waves iterate energy & information: ∑∏.**Fourth Ðimotion: Entropic Universe: Death: S∂.**Fifth Ðimotion: @-Mind Worlds: Social, organic evolution: ∫T*

Some basic rules:

Since dimotions evolve in time they acquire form. So we move from ‘lineal $pace’ (line crossing not money), and the symbol of lineal time in physics, t into…

the ‘curved symbol of time’ ð, and the ‘complex view’ of space, as ‘extending through 3 planes’ self-centered into the o-point, §…

W*ith the intermediate phase of reproductive in body-waves organized around the duality body-head, wave-particle, whose main difference is this: body waves are blind herds of minimal connection, hence sums, ∑energy (which also resembles a wave put upwards) while * neuronal, informative particle-heads are networks that exist across 2 scales the whole and its axons (hence the ∏ multiplicative symbol for a ‘crossed’ network, since if we have 5 and 5 elements, the number of axons to join them will be 5 x 5).

FINALLY for the two scalar dimension of entropy and generational organic evolution, the symbols which look like S and T are running out (:

S and T in capitals though have not been used and stress the capital importance of those dimensions which include all others as present sheets in a single plane of the fifth dimension. So those are actually the FULL meanings. Since Entropy is symbolized in physics by S, the choice is not rocket science. As the main operation to extract a part from a whole is a derivative, a ‘moment in time’ tangential to the function we study, ∂S is therefore a clear representation of Entropy (it does in fact happen mathematically very often as we shall study in mathematical physics and non-AElgebra).

So we are left with T, the capital Time of all times, for the most important dimension of them all the fifth dimension of social evolution, love, mind wholeness, organic generation, you name it. And aptly enough we still have an s left!, ∫, the symbol of integration, which is what truly social evolution is: the integration of similar clones into networks that become single wholes with an inner time synchronized externally by the mind (ok, im here letting my stream of consciousness flow, so we shall stop).

It follows some simplex symbols that define a logic equation of life and death with 3 phases:

$t: young age when motion dominates.

∑=∏: an age of balance and reproduction of the being, into waves of clone ‘cells’ that become reorganized by physiological networks emerging as a larger whole.

§ð: 3rd age of excess of information…

§ð<<∑∆-1: $t when death reverses the whole process as explode back a whole into its parts…

And as we observe *death is fast and short and it exists only because it is necessary, as the positive arrows of information, reproduction and social evolution through a language of information increases so much the form of beings that finally there is no motion left, no energy to re-form… So to replenish the simplest motions for reality to keep moving, death must come but fast…*

Further on, when we apply those organic structures also to social and physical systems, whose organic properties have been denied in the case of physics or reduced to the individual human scale in the case of social super organisms of history, WE CAN describe THEM all in terms of an homologic ‘worldcycle of existence’ in the graphs, explained in great detail.

The previous ‘equation’ thus uses the symbols of ‘I-logic’ topology and causal time chains of information (>) and entropy (<), intuitive in its expansive and implosive forms, is thus an expression of the generator in ‘time terms’, as the ‘flow of spacetime cycles of the fractal Universe’ (∆ð±¡) becomes ‘formed’ after feeding head and body into meaningful forms and motions of the 3 supeorganic parts of the plane of existence of the system (∆ø=| xO). Yet as information constantly increases in the ‘minute’ actions of the being, accumulating errors of reproduction, the system warps and gets older and the mind-language-head-system (§@) STILLS reality.

For example, humans keep ‘growing in the fifth dimension of space’ in territorial property as they get old till finally all its motionless – the old man, his money in the account, his territories of orders, homes and properties but there is NO vitality on it. The maximal ‘reach in space’ is achieved the minimal motion in time and at that point the system dies ‘fast’ << in entropic explosion that returns the timespace being, to the lower ‘plane of the fifth dimension, ∆ð¡-1.

The world cycle is an impressive element to study, as *we travel through the fifth dimension precisely as we grow in size, by clone reproduction and self-organization of similar ∆-1 faster units (atoms, cells, citizens), which slow down the whole as first they have to evolve inner networks of simultaneous organization and synchronous motions which consume time. Then the being once it is perfectly synchronized internally but with a SLOWER time-clock for all those synchronous systems OUTWARDLY, emerges as a whole, and keeps ‘increasing its territorial size’ that will ‘slow down its vital rhythms’ till ending and old stultified property ‘thingy’.*

We can see in the first graph, how all physical, biological and social systems, follow the same ‘worldcycle’ of existence as a travel through 3 ∆±1 scales of the fifth dimension, as they are born in a seminal seed that emerges into an ∆º scale, where it will move decreasing its motion and increasing its information through a gaseous, young state of minimal information, through a reproductive, liquid state of balance into a 3rd age of maximal information, exploding back its form into motion, in the entropic process of death.

∆ð±¡≈≥>S@< informative third age age exploded black to its ∆-1 beings and as memories in its larger world place.

All the organic systems of the Universe, physical, biological and historic, follow the same 5 Dimensional states of a worldcycle, from its fast evolving relative 5th dimension or generation age of social evolution from an ∆-1 seed to an emerging ∆º individual through the 3 dimensional ages of life, to the 4th dimension of entropic death..

What physicists do with its simplified models of 4 Dimensions, is to reject the arrow of social evolution, love and organic information, which is the 5th dimension of creating wholes by parts, because of its ‘concept of time’ merely as change of motion, locomotion, lineal motion, which then for the whole Universe becomes the arrow of ‘entropy and death’, and we shall adscribe by the correspondence principle to the fourth dimension.

The ultimate whys of 5D metric… are thus in fact, as we anticipated, organic. Indeed, the reduction of speed of motion and cyclical events in larger beings happen because they must first establish a simultaneous, present, co-existence of its clone reproduced parts, necessary to act externally as a whole. So the ‘whole’ clock of the system must slow down as it enlarges into multiple organic clone-like beings which will then adopt the ‘slower collective clock’ as its new ‘unit’ of simultaneous action as a whole.

# ITS FORMALISM: SUB-EQUATIONS

# OF THE FRACTAL GENERATOR

**The simplest generator equation.**

** **Let us consider then with the simplest possible symbols of Non-Æ Logic (the advanced formalism needed to describe the more complex space and time), a logic equation of the ternary space-time topological forms=functions of all ‘organisms’ of the Universe:

≥: iterative, reproductive, hyperbolic networks that become body waves, as the hyperbola has all the shapes within it to reproduce the whole being.

| ≈: Flat planes of lineal parallel networks of ‘fractal points’ that become limbs/fields of maximal entropic motions as the line/plane is the fastest distance between two points.

O: Informative, implosive ‘neuronal networks that become cyclical spherical particles-heads that process information as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space.

So the simultaneous ensemble of ‘networks of cellular/atomic/organic herds’ into those 3 differentiated functions=forms which therefore extends across to ∆ø and ∆-1 scales, within the ∆+1 world in which the ternary network/system exists is what we call a super organism.

So we write with those symbols fa Generator Equation of T.œs.

*$t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) ≤iterative body-wave≥ §ð (still mind form or world)*

The ginormous quantity of consequences, detailed and laws derived from that simple formula being made of those 3 topologies would fill up when study in its details – all the beings and super organisms of reality and its ternary parts – an entire galactic encyclopedia.

So in this very brief introduction we shall consider onlythe most remarkable consequence in the simplest level of understanding of it – the ternary principles of conservation of physics that correspond to the 3 parts of all systems.

*Each of those vital topologies would require an entire post and encyclopedia to fully analyze the marriage of mathematics and organic existence.*

*Let us now consider the most important of them, the cyclic/spheric form.* Its vital function is to process in-form-ation, memorial form. And so it is cyclic, spherical for two reasons: A sphere has maximal volume in minimal space, ensuring the ‘still, informative’ system to process maximal information and disguise with minimal exposure. But most important memorial in-form-ation is cyclical because* TO RETURN TO A POINT, THE SHORTEST PATH IS A CYCLE. *

*So cycles impose their form in all kind of Universal structures which ‘conserve’, ‘memorize’ and reproduce the information of its external world and the information of its internal existence (as in the conserved cycles of energy).*

The full formalism of a **T**heory of the **O**rganic **E**verything or whole and its **T**ime§pace **Œ**rganisms (T.œ), its fractal parts, should be made departing from a description of its 5 Ðimotions in simultaneous space that describes the system as a super organism, in 3 fractal ∆±¡ planes, in a static, ‘structural space-like form’ through ¬Æ: Existential algebra and in a ‘time-like dynamic flow as it is generated by a singularity mind-seed of information which will grow, evolve into 3 networks, emerge as a whole, trace its worldcycles between birth and extinction in the external world through actions of exchange of energy and information, aging till a point in which all its energy will be exhausted and it will collapse, in an entropic explosion of death.

We call the analysis of its 5 Dimotions in abstract as adjacent topologies of a super organism or in vital terms as ‘actions’; the Rashomon effect, since we study as in the famous film 5 different points of view or elements through which the being expresses itself. And we call the study of its world cycle through the entire life-death existence of the being the Disomorphic method as we study the defining elements of the whole process of life, from its palingenetic generation of a seed that will become a ‘mind’ of a territory of external world and internal ternary physiological control of its ‘brother cells/atoms/citizens’, to fully create a super organism that will live and die again through those 5 Dimotions.

Those 2 approaches together, the space-like and the time-like define the super organism and its worldcycle in a far more complex and rich manner than the previous 4D formalism of Mr. Einstein did with its single analysis of only one time arrow, the worldline or locomotion; which from this far richer and meaningful analysis of Times seems rather a childish exercise compared to our full blown complex extraction of all the information about a being and its worldcycle of existence.

**3 only topologies of all systems of Nature. Internal ‘bidimensional’ and external classic dimensions.**

5Ðimotional beings, are complex entities that travel through the 5 dimensions of space-time, as they move through it, tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence. Such a simple game of Ðimotional beings, can be observed from many perspectives, in an entagled Universe, in which can at least observe constantly those 5 Ðimotions, Social Generation, entropic death, locomotion, reproduction and gauging of information, aeiou… borriquito como tu.

The devil though is in the details so the first obvious question we must answer is what MEANS in REAL terms, the fact that all what exists is MADE OF SPATIAL topologies and TEMPORAL ages, of Space and Time? The answer is fascinating, as *there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies.*

Alas we can break our concept of internal change more properly in 3 ‘topological variations’, we shall call the 3 ‘first dimotions’ of the Universe.

And so the fact that we are made of spacetime means ultimately we are made of 3 type of organic topological dimotions – and we say organic because as it will turn out all systems of life are made of ensembles of those 3 topological dimotions. And this justifies our concept of ‘relational vital space-time beings’ that is beings made of spacetime with motion. Since as Aristotle put it – when things move they are alive. Welcome then to the study of ‘vital spacetime’.

The insight that there are *only 3 topologies in 4 and 5D nature is the key mathematical finding to fully account for topological evolution, the ternary nature of all systems and its functions and physiological networks, resolved NOT through intelligent design but through the limiting fact that *there are only 3 topologies in space in the Universe. So by force al systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the next graphs:

So this is the second ternary spatial element of reality:

*|-moving limbs/potentials x O-head/particles = Ø-body waves*

This is the simplest expression of the FRACTAL GENERATOR of space-time beings, as all of them will display those ternary topologies.

The study of the ‘fractal generator of space-time beings’ (ab. Γst, Γ, Gst) *will be the key formalism of the expansion of timespace ‘stiences’ achieved in this blog. It will fully give the model *the needed connections with the topologic, organic and numerical equations of classic ‘science’. Stience obviously is the slightly modified term – a necessary pattern of the blog to upgrade concepts without making them too strange – we shall use for all classic sciences, now that we know they study vital space-time beings, such as those of the next graph.

Let us start with a visual, topologic analysis of the dimensions of space-time, both internally (first graph) and externally (second graph):

*Internal dimensions are topologic, bidimensional **varieties: spheres of maximal in-form-ation, planes of maximal motion/distance, and hyperbolic body/waves of maximal reproduction.*

The full understanding of these 3 parts of the being comes when we consider ‘bidimensional’, topological networks, which will show to correspond in form and function, *as topology is geometry with inner motion: a topological variety can ‘change its inner form’ and remain the same as long as it does NOT tear.*

*So we talk in fact of 3 topologies of space=form +time=motion that will define in vital formal and moving terms all entities in existence. *

And so in a single plane of reality, we perceive systems as ensembles of the 3 varieties of space, (*to which we soon will add the 2 scalar dimensions of entropic parts, and social wholes). *

Moreover as topology is form with motion, topology ARE space-time Dimensions:

So we can build reality with the 3 dimensions of space and its motions in time, we shall call ÐIMOTIONS or actions of space-time.

I*n the graph, a first hint to how the 3 ‘vital dimensions of space-time’ ensemble into parts and organic wholes in all physical, biological and social systems; since there are only 3 topological forms (geometries with motion) in the Universe. *

*So evolutionary topology BECOMES a new key discipline to understand how the forms of species evolve as ensembles of* the 3 ‘form of space & functions of time that define 3 topological varieties of space-time in all the fractal organisms of the Universe made of lineal maximal motions-functions (limbs/potentials), maximal informative storages (spherical heads/particles) and its iterative, hyperbolic combinations (body-waves); *which is the dominant element of the organism as it embodies the iterative, ‘present’ discontinuous reproduction of all the parts of the being that defines the immortality of the ‘information’ it stores, and the essence of any ‘fractal’ *

**FRACTAL ORGANIC SCALES. THE 5th DIMENSION. TOPOLOGY**

Why then we have taken so long to define time as cyclical information, and cyclical motion?

Because ‘military physicists’, as opposed to the pure thinkers of this discipline, carried the day with power and canonised a single, lineal time, due to their worldly profession, which was to measure the lineal extension of military weapons. In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

And indeed, lineal time motions were instrumental to the development of ‘ballistics’ (the first name of the book of Galileo on physics), and the degradation of our understanding of time, hand in hand with the mechanical clock who established a single tick for the entire Universe, that of the mechanical machine.But as I know 99% will leave the blog, if i just keep criticizing those obvious falsities, as ‘believers in lineal time physics’, I GIVE the benefit of DOUBT to open-minded physicists who really care and reason truth, and do put many candies≈solutions to the ultimate questions on this introduction.

**The Fractal, organic structure of the Universe in scales of size is what we call formally ‘the 5th dimension’.**

Since all those systems were constructed in an organic way, not only as complementary systems of energy and information, but also as systems in which its parts and wholes spread through different scales of size in space, each one with a different clocks of time. So smaller being had faster motions – metabolic rates in biology; chips speed in mechanism; rotary, gravitational power in cosmic bodies.

*In the previous graphs, the most surprising omission of science, since it was born of the study of the upper and lower scales of the Universe with telescopes and microscopes, is the lack of studies on the relationship between the different scales of size and time speed in the Universe, which put together form a new space-time dimension.*

For a ‘5th’ dimension of space-time to exist as such geometry precludes that a quantity must remain invariant when we move through the dimension. As we define the dimension by 2 parameters, spatial size and time speed, Spe x Tiƒ, this quantity must remain invariant as we ‘grow in size’ slowing down our time clocks, and viceversa. Systems that diminish in size trace its cycles of information much faster. So a huge galaxy turns much slower than an atom, and vortices accelerate inwards, as their cycles become slower.

So since the product of both, its spatial size, Spe, and Temporal information, Tiƒ, remain invariant: Spe x Tiƒ = C, systems can co-exist symbiotically in several scales, giving origin to the organic, symbiotic structure of wholes and parts. As smaller systems will code information of larger ones (genes code organisms, quantum numbers molecules and memes societies).

While larger wholes will synchronise the energy and motion of smaller parts. And this asymmetry of time arrows, which allows information to flow upwards without loss and motion-energy to flow downwards without entropy-disorder is the key to understand the organisation of the Universe, as a fractal super organism of space-time.

** **

# II. ∆±¡

**MATHEMATICAL SPACE-TIME**

**Universal Constants are ratios of energy and form.**

The previous analysis of the generator equation of the Universe brings an essential element of all formalisms of physics, the meaning of Universal constants and the key complex parameters of science, measures that combine energy and motions such as speed or momentum, which are conserved as complex ‘time arrows’ and show certain constants in each specific species, which are the vital and universal constants of biological and physical, complementary beings.

We thus define Universal constants as ratios between the energy and information systems of a certain ‘space-time membrane’ (the bigger organic structures of the universe, the light membrane and the gravitational membrane, origin of most physical constants), or complementary being (the constants of mass-information, momentum, the social constants that measure the number of particles and field quanta put together to create a physical entity; the vital constants that are ratios and proportions between the energetic reproductive and informative systems of living beings, etc.):

*‘Existential constants are ratios between energy and information parameters of any system. Universal constants measure those ratios in the more extended systems, the membranes of the Universe, its quanta and fundamental particles. Vital constants measure those ratios for specific biological beings.’*

Let us consider the main of those constants:

*Simple, social numerical constants.*

-Social constants of space, which define the number of cells that form an efficient spatial structure. They tend to follow pairs, as 2 is the natural symmetry of left-right of bidimensional space.

– Social constants of time, which define the number of events needed for a transformation or completion of a time cycle; the most common of which is the number 3 of past-energy horizon or youth, present, reproductive state of the event and future, informative state.

– space-time constants, which combine both spatial symmetries and temporal events; Pi belongs to this concept as it is a self-similar number to 3, with ‘small’ apertures between the 3 cyclic elements or phases of the cycle, which taken as a single picture of space-time form the spatial shape of the cycle when perceived in space.

Yet the most important of those numerical constants is the number 10 or tetrakys, the perfect social number that creates a unit of the higher scale with 3 x 3 energetic, reproductive and informative elements, and a 10^{th} central point that ‘emerges’ to become a unit of the next scale.

Among those decametric scales, made famous by Eames in his film ‘potencies of 10’, it is natural to consider the ‘scale of all perfect scales’ S^{t } to be (9-11)^{9-11} systems; that is groups of 9 to 11 spatial units organized in 3×3=9 to 11 scales of growing social complexity. And indeed we find that number to be extremely common to the point that we could consider it the ultimate number of scales of the complex universe between the fractal entities humans perceive (atoms and galaxies, unified in fractal, complex physics as self-similar forms of the quantum, electronic and gravitational, cosmic membrane): We find it as the difference of force between those 2 membranes (electromagnetism is 10^{4×10} times stronger than gravitation). Then 10^{11 }atomic ties make a DNA molecule; 10^{11 }neurons make a brain; 10^{11 }humans have lived in this planet; 10^{11} stars form a galaxy and 10^{11} galaxies make up the cellular Universe.

In that regard, Einstein said that the ultimate Nature of Universal Constants could not be ‘physical values’ but special numbers, which would be ‘relationships’ between substances that constantly appear in Physical equations, ‘like pi and e’. And he was right.

*Existential parameters: reproductive speed and momentum*

On the other hand, the simplest algebraic operations between energy and information parameters become the essential ‘complex parameters of the Universe and all its species’:

*Speed = V=s/t=spatial energy/temporal information.*

Speed is in complex science no longer a mere measure of the translation of a form but in detail, all forms (paradox of Zenon) move not, but reproduce its form, step by step, as a wave of light does. The wave affects a lower scale or network of relative energy, making it to adopt its formal configuration. So form becomes reproduce, imprinted along a previous scale of reality and motion becomes reproduction. Light reproduces over the simple energy of gravitational space and the wave displaces. A wave in the water does the same imprinting one after another the form of the network of atoms and so on. So it follows that the systems which are simpler with less information move faster because they have to imprint less form. And so V=s/o information=infinite, which is the perceived speed of gravitational space whose information we do not perceive, while the more complex life structures move slow as they have to keep its huge amount of stable informative shapes unaltered. And each 3 months we change all our atoms to reshape our form.

So the new parameter should be called ’reproductive speed’ as we consider that motion is a manner of reproduction of form.

*ExI= Momentum or existential force.*

This is the second key ratio of reality which multiplies the energetic and informative strength of the system. In physics is equivalent to momentum, mv where M(i) is a measure of cyclical form, and V(e) a measure of motion, the definition of energy in this work. In biology measures the top predator power of the system which will dominate its ecosystem when it has the strongest energy body and the more intelligent informative brain. And each species will have a certain existential force, reproductive speed and energetic, ∑ and informative ∏ social parameters, which will be its 4 ‘main numbers, needed to define the form (from the quantum numbers of physics to the vital constants of living beings – metabolic constant, brain/body ratio, brain volume, physical strength, etc.)

*Irrational constants.*

Because arrows of time are back and forth transformations of energy into information or its combination to reproduce together a self-similar form, and certain numbers define certain ‘efficient’ social geometries, there are Universal constants, which define for each species of the Universe a given ratio of transformation of energy into form or a reproductive ratio that combines two simpler energetic and informative bits and bites to reproduce a new form (h constant, c-constant, etc.)

The dynamic relationships between the 2 motions of the Universe, energy and information are invariant in form, motion and scale; therefore fluctuating around fixed equilibrium values, which is the ultimate meaning of Universal Constants.

Thus, all of them can be reduced to the generator equation of the Universe, the feed-back cycle of energy and information, from where all laws of reality can be derived:

*Energy <=> Information; ExTi= Irrational Constant*

A Universal constant cannot be a perfect number, because it will create a fixed Universe; thus Universal constants are irrational numbers, which show a minimal fluctuation. Consider for example the main constant of the Universe, pi. If pi were exact then the spiral made with 3’14 lines would not be a vortex but a perfect, static cycle. Yet if pi is either +pi or –pi, the cycle will not close by defect or close in excess. What this means is that the cycle will be a bit more curved inward, and so it will be an informative cycle; or it will be cured outward by defect and so it will be an expansive, energetic spiral.

We know, for example, that the orbits of planets are decreasing by a few centimeters a year, so they will finally fall into the sun. They are, if we consider a dynamic, temporal view of them, inward, informative spirals. Yet an antiparticle, which is exploding information into energy, ‘dying’ in a big-bang that annihilates it, is bending outward.

So irrational numbers are the absolute constants of the basic exchanges and transformations of energy and information of the Universe. The main ones are:

– Pi, the formal constant of creation of in/form/ation. Since pi transforms 3 lines of energy into a ternary cycle with one more dimension of form: a string of 3 lines with 3 dark apertures for a total 0.14. Within those 3 lines there is a 2^{nd} dimension of height, or information and a volume of space. The entity has grown

– Phi, the Golden Ratio, which is the constant of reproduction that multiplies an organic system into self-similar forms.

– e, which is the constant of extinction of form back into a lower scale of energy that devolves a formal being into its cellular subspecies. Its most common ternary form is et=3=20.

We find those constants, both in physical and biological processes related to those transformations of energy and form – showing the fundamental equality of all Universal Systems.

For example, *e* appears in the decay of radioactive atoms that release energy; phi appears in the organization of a sunflower spiral; pi appears in the h-constant of transformation of light flows into electronic actions.

How many Universal constants there are for any system? We advanced 3 basic U.C. at the beginning, pi, the ratio of creation of information, phi, a reproductive ratio and e, an extinctive ratio of destruction of information into energy. And indeed, all systems have at least those 3 basic constants.

*Vital Constants**: proportions between brains and bodies.*

A final type of constants expresses quantitative proportions between the reproductive body elements and informative particles/heads of a complementary system. As a general rule the commonest proportions of energy/information are:

– The particle/head of information is dominant in information parameters, (dimensions, mass-weight or number of network connections of the informative system, cellular density, etc.), in a 3 to 1 proportion with the body/field of energy, both in time (so in genetics, the dominant, informative element has a 75% chances and the recessive element, 25% chances); and in space (so the Universe has 76% of dark mass).

– In terms of spatial, energetic parameters however the body is dominant (spatial dimensions, cellular numbers, energy volume etc.) usually in a proportion of 90-80% to 10-20%. This is due to the fact that the informative element tends to be the central 1-element of a body tetrarkys, so we have a captain every 10 sergeants and a sergeant every 10 soldiers; 9 glial cells that give energy to every neuron, a 10% of taxes that go to the Middle age Priest, which directs the herd of believers, and so on. Yet another simpler, very common dual structure is a spatial square with a central knot, which gives us a 20% of informative elements (the center) and an 80% of energetic elements (the vertices of the square).* *

*Recap*. The generator equation of space-time and its 4 main arrows of time, understood as symmetric transformations of energy into information or reproductive combinations of both, coupled with the invariance of topological form, scale and motion of the universe explains for the first time the meaning of universal constants.

**Inverted constants: The chip/black hole/mouse paradox**

The inverted properties of energy and form, shown in the law of Range, apply also to any complementary system of the Universe. So smaller animals have faster metabolic rates because its energy /form cycles are faster. Their ‘clocks of time’, we could say move faster. Further on, in complexity this implies that paradoxically the smaller beings have more information (chip/black hole paradox). So the smaller the chip is the faster it calculates. This paradox is essential to understand the dangers of black holes. Precisely because they are so small they will reproduce faster and accrete faster, in the same manner a smallish virus reproduces much faster and it is more dangerous for an organism than a bigger bacteria.

If we adopt according to Galileo’s paradox a static point of view, universal constants are NOT only algebraic values, but invariant geometries that repeat in all scales of reality. And this is the ultimate meaning of General Relativity, since Einstein made a precise, simultaneous, present measure of the ‘static form’ of those vortices of mass obtaining G as a measure of the relative curvature of the gravitational force in each point of the vortex.

The central concept of a Fractal, scalar relativistic Universe is obvious: the same invariant game, the same forms, the same motions, happen in all the scales of reality. And so the Universe is relative and invariant in its energetic motions (original Theory of Relativity), in its forms (cyclical forms of information and lineal energy) that repeat in all scales, which therefore are also invariant.

We have seen now how that invariance is played as a ‘ratio’, ExTi=K, which allows smaller beings to live shorter but live faster. As we have seen the properties of energy and information are inverted. So the smaller we become the faster we rotate, the faster we live, the faster we beat. For example, we know that a fly sees 10 times faster than a human being, reason why we cannot catch it. Yet the ant who lives longer lives 7 years × 10 times faster=70 years of inner, subjective existence.

The same concept applies to a physical vortex of information, V(t) × R(s)=K than to a living being that processes energy into form (a mouse beats its heart faster than a human; a cell divides and reproduces faster than a mouse, every 24 hours, etc.).

The entire cosmos and all its scales are related by that simple paradox: the smaller we become the more information we process. It is the Moore Law: the smaller the chip the faster it thinks. The reason is obvious: smaller, faster systems, close ‘logic cycles’ of information faster. In complex beings it means faster thoughts in smaller neurons, packed in tighter groups. In the physical world, the bigger rotational motions of cosmic masses are slower than the cyclical rotation of particles, but their product remains constant. And we can write this fundamental law of the Universe, with multiple self-similar applications in any entity made of fractal space-time, again as a general case of the generator equation:

*Universal ExTi = Universal Space Extension × Time-frequency = Constant Entity = K*

An expression, which appears in all scales of reality (Heisenberg Principle, Vital Constants, etc.)

*Recap*. The Universe is just and harmonic: small beings are more intelligent, faster than big ones. It is the paradox of David and Goliath; the paradox of the chip, the paradox of the black hole…

**III. PHYSICAL SCALES.**

**THE 5 MOTIONS OF A WORLDCYCLE REDUCED TO LOCOMOTION IN CLASSIC PHYSICS.**

*‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals*“. Ulam

*In the graph, a bunch of physicists studying ‘ non-lineal elephants’ (: physical super organisms tracing world cycles :), as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Fractal Universe. In essence, physicists, reduce the 6 changes in time=motions that form a world cycle (generation>evolution>entropic, moving youth> reproductive maturity>informative 3rd age>entropic death), represented here by 6 blind physicists, into a single one, ENTROPIC ‘young’ locomotions and its worldlines (which we will show to be partial cases of the reproduction of information carried by a wave), unable to integrate them into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which in nothing differs from the 5 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.*

So a world cycle has 5 motions, where locomotion is the dominant motion of an entropic young system (gaseous, youngster, predator animal).

And so for each species we can study in depth a world cycle through the sequence of its 5 motions and also study each motion as an entire discipline, which is basically what physicists do, as the ‘science of motion’ (definition in the XIX c. of the overblown discipline).

Now, the most important of those motions is reproduction, as the universe is a reproductive fractal, so we could actually consider locomotion also a form of reproduction. Let us then upgrade by the correspondence system the present scientific concept of locomotion, as wave reproduction of form by translation in space.

**REPRODUCTIVE-SPEED.**

**Motion as reproduction of information along the path of a wave.**

The Universe reproduces information. It does both: it erases it with entropic big-bangs, and evolves it with the arrow of informative warping of fields of entropy into vortices of charges and masses.

But *the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ and its integral of energy in all systems of nature. IT is what the Universe preserves.*

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, *a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality. And this is exactly what nature does.*

Indeed, it is evident that all biological systems are about reproduction of genetic form in a lower scale of reality (cellular scale), which then reproduces and evolves, ’emerging’ into a higher scale. It is also evident that our historic civilisations are about reproduction of technological information in a lower ‘dimensional scale’ (blue prints for machines), which then ‘company-mothers’ reproduce.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

But motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in as much as particles travel as waves, and only become particles of information when they ‘stop’, on an instrument of measure, and so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

For example, you are the vital information which becomes imprinted in changing, indistinguishable CHNO atoms, as your ‘real scale’ of being, is ∆-1, the cellular genetic code; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom. A wave Motion is the simplest information and moves faster because it need only to print a surface below, and again, the wave form that moves is independents of that indistinguishable lower level. So the wave keeps its form and travels truly fast as the in/form/ation, v=s/ti to imprint, is minimal.

And so there is no need to reproduce a wave of ðime§pace motion below the level of ¥- light ðime§pace the ultimate level that matters in our Universe.

How the simple mathematical reproductions take place in Nature? Obviously through the mathematical proportions of the ternary Universe, as reproduction of information in ternary moving ‘fractal points’ self-centred in the singularity move the system along the path of the point wave.

The graphs illustrate those simple principles and the resulting three fundamental constants of nature, pi, phi and e, which appear constantly because indeed, the universe is a reproductive fractal and those are the equations that define those proportional morons along the pi-phi-path; and its exponential growth through ∆-scales. In the middle we can see a simple example of this ternary pi-phi motion: a proton, intersection of three paths, which expands dynamically one of them to produce an electron, or inversely absorb it.

*Mathematical physics has discovered all those relationships, but lacking a true philosophy of time-space behind it, it just thinks its all ‘magic’ of the ‘language of God’, and feels Ok without answering the whys as we do in GST. Since it has given up to go deeper, or as Feynman infamously put it ‘the why is the only thing physicists do not ask’.*

This is the fact at the bottom of big science who thinks the biggest discovery of physics is to make a picture of ‘God’s particle’, without having any idea of what it is all about, as ‘magic God’s language will provide’ (: and of course the reason 5D will not interest the ‘religion’ of physicists, as it is even blasphemous to reveal ‘the name of God’… the whys of experimental science which are not mathematical only.

Back to the understanding of motion as reproduction of information.

What this means is that motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system, so as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases. So as we humans *perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we **have *to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process).

Thus light merely warps the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us and hence must have less information and more speed, as experiment prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information, which gives a speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field of: v -> s/ti≈0 -> s/0=∞):

In the graph, the new ‘foundational equation of speed’ for the fractal paradigm: V=Space-distance/Temporal Information, is embedded in relativity and recognised in the concept that the speed of light is really a limit of speed of transmission of ‘human perceivable’ information.

Wave motion is also reproduction of form in the lower ∆-1 scale of action at distance (gravitation, quantum potential). Thus even motion is reproduction of form as a wave of information over a simpler scale of space-time. It solves the paradox of a Achiles – the wave reproduces its form in a series of discontinuous steps. It also explains why indeed the Universe is a fractal that reproduces as all fractals do, its form in a lower scale of reality which then reproduces into a wave-train that collapses into a particle (physical systems), or a seed that emerges after palingenesis into an ambulatory trillion cells systems (biological systems), or into an idea or patent of an instrument that a company-mother of machines will re=produce in socio-economical systems.

Indeed, when we consider as Steane wanted a Universe from the perspective of ‘information’ and its ‘conserved present momentums and energies’, it all becomes simple and philosophically obvious. And so we just must explains the laws of reproduction of information along scales of reality to describe the ‘world cycles’ of existence, no longer worldlines – that is the motions across scales of the fifth dimension, which define all systems of nature.

Yet to fully understand how reproduction of form takes place, we need to understand reproduction across ‘scales’ of size. That is, the meaning of world cycles, just explained, as they require motion from a seminal seed ∆-1, into a larger scale; as opposed to what physicists study with their reductionist model of a single space-time continuum: worldlines.

Since what physicist call time is ONLY one of those 6 motions, locomotion. Indeed, Galileo used a simple lineal time formula to study only ‘locomotions’ in space, which he called speed. So he wrote V=s/t, latter improved by Einstein with the add on of an s=ct, fourth parameter. But that is only locomotion in space. So it ‘reduced’ to a single ‘entropic’, lineal, kinetic arrow of time all the organic motions of the Universe. And now we regain them all and further on prove that locomotion is also organic, reproductive motion in a lower scale of space:

Motion is in more profound terms, the ‘repetition’ of a form several times over the same place, which creates a ‘density of form’.

Now all this concepts can be easily related to each other, as the reproduction of form produces in a single point of perception a frequency of time and as such it can be perceived from an external point of view that integrates the iterative function as a form in time (tic or frequency of reproduction) or a form in space (tic of the system in space, perceived as each tick lasts, as a single wave with a dispersion that increases with the speed of reproduction of the wave.

This simple law with profound applications in quantum physics describes each wave of time, either as a population of simultaneously living (such as the speed of reproduction/ duration of each particle point in time=memorial inertia in time), or as a being reproducing in waves.

Thus form is THE REPETITION, the REPRODUCTION of motion.

The profundity and implications of this fact, to explain all kind of phenomena, from the quantum complementarity of waves and particles, to the paradoxes Zeno will become evident as we go along, and solve some of the most striking paradoxes of Philosophy of Science that dates from the times of the Greeks.

What matters now OF QUANTUM PHYSICS is to understand two things:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

A particle is just the next plane, ∆, of an ∆-1 wave, which reproduces through a relative lower, ∆-1 field. And as it does it moving to the past and emerging into the contiguous, adjacent present it seems to move. But *motion is reproduction! of a wave of form*.

And it is in present, because it has traveled back to the past, descended a scale to seminal state in the adjacent region, where it has reproduced, literally.

So motion to the past and the future do happen in the ‘perceived’ present 3 scales of a super organism. It is like when we talk on the phone, the voice is translated to a faster, smaller electromagnetic wave that moves and seems to be after ‘reproducing’ the wave over the vacuum, or through the electric wire, to happen in present time, with no space between us.

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental dual function of beings, is that a wave is a present reproductive motion and a particle an |- field of energy x O-particle of information, or ‘momentum’, a past x Future state.

Here the advances of Mathematics, with its concept of ‘metric’, solve it: Klein defined motion as a ‘group translation’, symmetry. So motion is a ‘reproduction of form’ in the adjacent region of space. A mirror symmetry, which happens in the adjacent region of reality.

This is clear in the wave state of the system that reproduces its form as it goes along its path. And it implies that a system with lesser information, form, takes shorter in repeating its form along its path of ‘present, repetitive motion’. So light with minimal form is much faster than particles and human beings.

And hence we can deduce the fastest, infinite non-local speed of invisible gravitation with no form: V=S/Tƒ (understood here as cyclical motion-form). Since gravitation has no information, T here is 0, hence, speed is v=s/o = ∞, non-local, as perceived by a human observer.

Motion thus will ultimate appear as the reproduction of form, of information. And we shall return to it. What matters at this point is to realize that the marriage of mathematical, conceptual and precise definitions of the dimensions of time and space and the metric of the 5th dimension are powerful tools to explain an infinite number of questions of all sciences and unify them, ultimately departing from that simple beat, S<T>S<T (where < is an expansive motion, and > and implosive, informative one, a past to future, future to past, through present space rhythms).

**The reproduction of presents: conservation laws of the Universe.**

Now the fundamental principle of reality is what we have so far explained: the Universe is a fractal that reproduces the motions and forms of all its parts constantly, substituting those forms that become worn and erased by similar new forms.

And this essence of reality is a Universal mandate, the program that all systems coded in all languages follow. So humans were told in the bible ‘grow and multiply’, that is iterate your fractal (multiply) in a lower scale and the reproduce, evolve, grow and emerge as a new being. All systems do grow and multiply, reproducing, iterating its information, from the simplest moving particle-wave (both quarks and electrons do absorb energy and reproduce) to the largest galaxy through all biological beings.

It is then very important to harmonize and translate into each jargon of science and culture the common laws of reality.

For example, we said that Nature’s fractals basically reproduce their information and that is the essence of the Universal game. But when dealing with physics, this ‘biological jargon’ sounds strange. So the proper jargon will be that of the ‘conservation laws of energy and information’ related to the isotropic and isomorphic nature of time and space (Noether’s theorem), and the ‘co-invariance’ laws of space-time ‘observed together’ (the so called Minkowski’s formalism). Now it would be pedantic and reductionist to explain such a ‘larger’ law – the purpose of reality, to iterate fractal information, to the specific application of this law to physics. So how we resume all these laws of conservation and relate it to the reproductive nature of reality?

Simple enough: The Universe conserves its presents. A present is precisely a reality that seems not to change because it repeats itself. What repeats a present is the lineal and cyclical motions and forms of space and time. So the reproduction of the same forms and motions of space-time means the conservation of ‘present space-time’, the wave-body-reproductive class of physical, biological and social systems. Then we can derive from this fundamental principle: the Universe conserves by iteration the present forms of reality, all other principles of conservation which means the isotropism and isomorphism of space on one side and time on the other, which means he conservation of closed pays of space-time as energy and information.

Because the Universe has motion, ultimately all this means that the Universe is the sum of infinite motions and all of them will end up closing a time cycle, or becoming absorbed as a part by a larger reality closing its space-time cyclical actions.

## The world cycle of PHYSICAL EXI=ST¡ences**. **

**Recap. Basic dualities of relational space-time:**

**|-S.** lineal space dimensions.

Tƒ<**Se**: Spatial energy (lineal motion);

Se>**Tƒ**: Temporal In-form-ation;

**Tƒ**: cyclical time clocks.

Ternary Symmetry of space and time:

In this more precise definition Time is motion and has 3 ‘ages’ or types of motion.

Space is static form, an infinitesimal, present quanta of tie, and it has 3 ‘forms’. And there is a direct symmetry between the motion states of time and the spatial forms, such as:

- <; Entropic, lineal expansive, energetic time motions or past, have lineal, field/limb forms in space.
- >; Future informative, cyclical, time-clock motions have spherical, circular forms/functions in space
- ≈; And its combination, present, repetitive motions have ovoid, hyperbolic wave and body forms.

The interaction in the complex model of the 3 spatial forms and temporal motions-functions, is the ‘fundamental space-time’ elements that define all systems of Nature, including physical systems.

So now we can expand our definition that ‘time is a cyclical motion and space a lineal open motion’. And affirm that:

“All what exists is a combination of open’ vital’ spaces, enclosed by membrane-like Time cycles, which are centered in a fractal particle –point that gauges and process energy and information from its relative still frame of reference’.”

Now the precise definitions in physical space of those elements in the ∆-space time perceived by man is immediate, as Planck Length x Planck Time (angular frequency, ƒ) has the value of c-speed:

What this means is that the wave Space-time, present state of the Universe we live in, the wave that reproduces the information of the Universe in its minimal form and entropy (angular frequency and length) is c-speed, our light space-time.

Light is composed of cyclical time, angular frequency and lineal space, length. And it sets the limit of maximal speed of reproduction of in-form-ation in the Universe: light is form-in-motion, in-form-ation.

**Motion as reproduction of form.**Motion is in more profound terms, the ‘repetition’ of a form several times over the same place, which creates a ‘density of form’. Thus form is THE REPETITION, the REPRODUCTION of motion.

The profundity and implications of this fact, to explain all kind of phenomena, from the quantum complementarity of waves and particles, to the paradoxes Zeno will become evident as we go along, and solve some of the most striking paradoxes of Philosophy of Science that dates from the times of the Greeks.

What matters now OF QUANTUM PHYSICS is to understand two things:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

A particle is just the next plane, ∆, of an ∆-1 wave, which reproduces through a relative lower, ∆-1 field. And as it does it moving to the past and emerging into the contiguous, adjacent present it seems to move. But *motion is reproduction! of a wave of form*.

And it is in present, because it has travelled back to the past, descended an scale to seminal state in the adjacent region, where it has reproduced, literally.

So motion to the past and the future do happen in the ‘perceived’ present 3 scales of a super organism. It is like when we talk on the phone, the voice is translated to a faster, smaller electromagnetic wave that moves and seems to be after ‘reproducing’ the wave over the vacuum, or through the electric wire, to happen in present time, with no space between us.

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental dual function of beings, is that a wave is a present reproductive motion and a particle an |- field of energy x O-particle of information, or ‘momentum’, a past x Future state.

Here the advances of Mathematics, with its concept of ‘metric’, solves it: Klein defined motion as a ‘group translation’, a symmetry. So motion is a ‘reproduction of form’ in the adjacent region of space. A mirror symmetry, which happens in the adjacent region of reality.

This is clear in the wave state of the system that reproduces its form as it goes along its path. And it implies that a system with lesser information, form, takes shorter in repeating its form along its path of ‘present, repetitive motion’. So light with minimal form is much faster than particles and human beings.

And hence we can deduce the fastest, infinite non local speed of invisible gravitation with no form: V=S/Tƒ (understood here as cyclical motion-form). Since gravitation has no information, T here is 0, hence, speed is v=s/o = ∞, non local, as perceived by a human observer.

Motion thus will ultimate appear as the reproduction of form, of information. And we shall return to it. What matters at this point is to realize that the marriage of mathematical, conceptual and precise definitions of the dimensions of time and space and the metric of the 5th dimension are powerful tools to explain an infinite number of questions of all sciences and unify them, ultimately departing from that simple beat, S<T>S<T (where < is an expansive motion, and > and implosive, informative one, a past to future, future to past, through present space rhythms).

So we finally turn around the whole scaffolding of sciences, as we shall discover that actually the only arrow of time that was NOT organic of the 6 motions found by Aristotle – locomotion is ALSO REPRODUCTIVE, ORGANIC, SO WE LIVE IN A SENTIENT, LIVING UNIVERSE!!

*Since, what all those physical and biological system want to do is obvious: grow and multiply, that is keep moving and reproducing their information on the process, keep absorbing external exi from the outer world, and when enough of it is swallowed, keep reproducing similar forms, emitting seeds through their polar axis, and keep evolving socially into larger wholes, through networks connected by those poles.*

And to do the 5 actions of existence, ∆±e,ï and ∆œ and ∆û, the systems will use the 3 components, beat them, in different manners, use its axis and equators to emit and absorb energy and information, reproduce through motions in the lower scale in which they feed on entropic fields, and all the other physical things, things do.

The fundamental task of T.Œ becomes then to make sense of all those physical events interpreted as actions of space-time performed by the ternary elements in time and space and across 5D scales of the physical system we describe.

And the first fundamental differentiation we must establish is between the ternary space-time symmetry of a single plane of existence, which follows its rules.

And the inverse asymmetric processes taken place between larger scales and smaller points, between the O and Ä parts of the point, between different 5D scales. Those are the 2 great fields to classify all events of reality. Such as:

Motions as reproductions in a single space-time are part of the wave, present state actions.

Informative shrinking, mapping, feeding, evolving and reproducing are actions that happen across several scales of the 5^{th} dimension.

So 5^{th} dimension motions proper are the bulk of reality. Let us define in those terms the essential actions of physical systems:

**Travels through the 5th dimension. The world cycle of super organisms.**

The 6^{th} isomorphism deals with the analysis of the 3 internal planes-physiological of the 5th dimension as social classes, and its relationship with the 3 external planes of its larger world or ecosystem from where they obtain energy, reproduce with and absorb information. And the 6 motions perform through them to integrate together a worldcycle of existence.

Here we have the general rule that Se-1 fields are the digestive networks and lower class of bits and bites indistinguishable from the upper parts of the system, waves are the reproductive body part of systems, its reproductive, blood networks which is complementary to Tƒ-particles heads, its nervous informative networks.

And both body-wave and head-particle do act together preying on the field (switching into state by the Principle of complementarity, without any relevant expenditure of energy or information). So as a rule body and mind have the same internal clock, in a steady state bit. The mind beats a second wink of an eye thought tuned to the motion of the heart. So for example in quantum physics the particle state is used to absorb or emit transmit faster information with phase wave velocity while as De Broglie proved, the wave state as a group velocity in tune with the particle internal clock are is used to move, and both form the entity ‘proper time’, while the field is the lower energy class relatively unconnected.

Yet the body does have also a steady rate of 1 step per second in its limbs. And so the 6th isomorphism studies also the synchronicities of the different parts of the system and its time clocks, which is the ‘deeper’ level of understanding of a worldcycle system. It is this isomorphism the one I have always enjoyed most, and it is closely related (we might say it is the inverse perspective) with the 3rd isomorphism, which observers in a simplified manner the symmetries between those 3 inner and outer networks and the actions, motions and worldcycle of the being).

As we have studied already the worldcycle on the 3rd isomorphism, we shall here merely consider the ternary stricture of physical systems, in fields-waves and particles, whose inner networks are more clear in solid systems, based in crystal regularities, with a central perfectly regular point of view (atom or cell of atoms) in its centre.

**Aristotle vs. Kepler: The 5 motions of times.**

Indeed due to the reduction of all time motions or ‘changes’, which already Aristotle, the philosopher, classified in 6 types, ‘conception’, ‘change of internal form or evolution’, ‘extinction’, ‘growth in size’, ‘diminution’ and ‘locomotion’ to a single time motion ‘locomotion’, today called ‘translation in space’, physicists reduce time to a parameter that measures exactly and only that – translations in space.

And that would be Ok, if they acknowledge the other forms of time-change as relevant to truth. Yet when Kepler found the laws of locomotion of stars he affirmed, ‘God has waited 5000 biblical years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clockwork’. So for Kepler all knowledge was to know, F=ma.

Now, as Physicists call its Theory of Locomotions, the Theory Of Everything or T.O.E, we shall call the theory of Philosophers of Science, which includes ALL the 6th Times motions of the beings of the Universe, a Theory of the Organic Everything or T.Œ as:

– it includes all things, and all motions, among which the most– 5 of them – have an organic nature (generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction). So we consider the not even found T.O.E, an inorganic simplex, description of physicists with a single lineal time motion a ‘limiting’ reduced version of the larger T.Œ.

Further on as all modern developments in mathematics and physics consider lineal inertial systems, just a short small view of cyclical, accelerated/decelerated systems – such is the case of the pan geometry of Lobachevski, where only for reduced distances space is Euclidean, becoming exponential, hyperbolic for larger ones; of the study of General Relativity and the motions of the galaxy at large scale, where all motions happen in an accelerated galactic vortex, towards its center; in the study of fields; in the study of fractal spaces; in the study of Earth geodesics that only in short distances become planes; in the study of life cycles that only in small moments become invariable, in the study of the theory of Lineal Functions and Analysis, where only in short distances a curve function is approximated by a lineal tangent, etc. etc. we shall consider the lineal concepts of time and space, a limit of a much larger cyclical view of the Universe.

It will then be evident through a survey of the fundamental opposition between the worldview of physicists and Philosophers of science that advanced both opposite worldview of time and space, Galileo vs. Descartes, Newton vs. Leibniz, Darwin vs. Clausius that T..O.E vs. T.Œ gives us a very different outlook of the Universe. One describes only the how of reality, and its small details. While T.Œ gives us the larger whys and the thoughts of God.

The article will first introduce the work of the previous masters in its antinomies and then concentrate in the last of those ‘lineal parts’ of a larger whole, considering the ‘lineal part, the 4th dimensional model of Minkowski, which will turn out to be just a plane of the 5th dimension of infinite scales of size and speeds of time cycles that describe the more general laws of T.Œ with application to all the sciences and worlds of reality.

In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

Now we shall return to the proper definition of time and space in simple terms, from where we shall derive much more meaningful truths about reality:

*‘Times are cyclical, closed motions . Spaces are lineal, open extensions’.*

The concept of cyclical times is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical times. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if times were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in time of patterns of behavior and causality. So to deny cyclical times is to deny science, logic and objectivity. But it also means to deny the fundamental particle of the Universe – a being made of space-time cycles that ‘thinks, therefore exists’ as a world in itself.

Now we shall state why biology is the most correct of science. It is not only because the relationships between co-existing scales of the 5^{th} dimension are organic as they exist in simultaneity and must balance and coordinate and synchronize its exchanges of energy and information working together, but because they have the maximal information due to its closeness, and since each scale follows the same laws, it ‘follows’ it does not matter size, scaling, and so the supposed advantage of physics (to study the smallish and largest scales) is irrelevant. On the contrary it introduces paradoxes of perception that made them ‘less correct in their interpretations’ of reality.

Of course, given the paradoxical transformations of the Universe, and the lack of true understanding of its structure by any science, there is a lot of puzzling and ambivalence on the treatment of Energy, as there is in biology with the understanding of the arrow of genetics that carries information from the lower cellular to the larger organic scales as opposed to synchronous motion carried from upper to lower scales, or ‘energy arrow’. And even more in the social organisms, between the re=productive ‘working’, energetic middle class and the informative ‘neuronal’ upper class and how they must manage together a society.

It must be clear though that the confusion is a lack of ‘proper rightful mirrors of information’ on the parameters of the Universe. The Universe has not that confusion. It is paradoxical, dual and ternary in its logic structure, which is NOT the same as confusing. It is rather efficient, and dynamic, vital, so systems are ternary. They tend to have ternary uses and each part can be broken into ternary systems, and they have dual opposite function, entropy vs. mass, limbs vs. heads and so on. But it is because of its efficiency and economicity.

For that reason we must ‘FIRST’ depart from the mathematical formalism and generator equations of the fractal Universe, and coin a language of philosophy of science above any science, and only then when the reader does HAVE a referential language above those of physical, biological and sociological and mental, linguistic systems, the 4 legs of scientific knowledge we will be able to deal with ambiguities in science without being too confusing.

This physicist re the less prepared to accept because they pretend due mainly to its praxis power (as makers of the mechanisms and weapons that dominate our society) that their language is the ‘first’ one, above the scientific method, above the mathematical and logic language sand above all other scales of the 5^{th} dimension – so somewhat to study particles is more important that to study human organism. In this T.Œ differs greatly and considers rightfully the opinion of the triad of geniuses and friends of the beginning of the past century rm. Einstein, Mr. Eddington, who put Einstein in the map with his proof of relativity and Mr. Gödel, his closest, who proved that mathematics is also an empiric science. They were fully aware and often express it in cutthroat sentences disliked by their peers that physicists ‘invent’ by lack of direct evidence many concepts, and simplify Nature, and so organic closer sciences, like biology are the most accurate depicting each scale of reality.

We talk of 2 ‘paradoxes of knowledge’ that affect the upper sciences and lower sciences to the direct biological scale:

– The quantum paradox of uncertainty (the human observer is so huge it affects the observable, making measure uncertain)

– The Antiquantum paradox of social sciences (the human observer is so small and within the social body that the observable, the elites in control of the informative languages of power, bankers with money, politicians and military with laws and weapons affect the observer and bias its message in its favor).

So biological sciences ARE the top sciences in certainty, detail of observation and capacity to be objective, and that is why THEY USE ALL THE LANGUAGES (Mathematic, quantitative measure, verbal logic, bio-logical evolutionary theories) and study ALL the relationships between scales (genetic information, mechanic motion, ecosystems).

And so T.Œ is a Theory of Everything Organic because the Universe is organic. But of course we do USE concepts of all the other sciences, drawing heavily on Physical sciences, and true social sciences, which surprisingly enough will have little to do with academic history but more with art and love (as academia in history hugely biased by the Antiquantum paradox, so nationalism, the belief that the humans species must NOT help each other to survive as a single species as Darwin and the prophets of eusocial love explained in our languages, but must be divided in tribal military groups, so the people-caste of parasites on power, the military and bankers who monopolize the issue of our social languages of power, can have a ‘excuse’ to justify themselves).

Entropy is the proper name for expansive motion, but physicists use it as expressing disorder. Its proper nature as opposed to order or form, is quite accurate. Energy on the other hand is an ‘all encompassing concept’, which puts together lineal and angular momentum, better specific synonymous in physical systems of lineal and cyclical motions. So energy aggregates both and its principle of conservation means the immortality of the Universe as a game that constantly transforms energy into information. Further on energy integrates multiple ‘motions’, multiple momentums, and so as a ‘larger scale concept’ will be related to time, understood as the sum of multiple ‘space-moments’ or ‘steps’ or ‘space-time cycles. We do advance all those ambiguities, for skeptical physicists, though they are not of so much importance at this stage.

Thus the reader should not search for the specific equations used in physics, except when we do specific analysis of this discipline.

In physics in that sense, energy IS both, lineal motion (kinetic energy), cyclical form (potential energy), and its ultimate meaning means merely that our 4 concepts, of entropy(energy), Space, information, time, are constantly transforming into each other. So we would rather write:

“Energy never dies it transforms constantly back and forth, from Spatial Extension into Temporal Form: Sp < =>Tƒ’

Thus Past, is better understood as Sp, Spatial Extension and we shall use that symbol constantly instead to familiarize the reader with the relationship between space and past entropy and future and time-form.

Of course, physicists will not like it. But T.Œ departs not from physical reductionism, but from philosophy of science, and aims to explain much wider principles, regardless of its capacity to enter then into details on each science. Ad Maximal what Physicists call a T.Œ is the search for a unification equation of charges and masses, a trivial result when we understand the 5^{th} dimension, found in other posts of this web. We go well beyond.

While physics is essentially the science of ‘perceiving’ the Universe with technology – time with clocks instead of words, space with telescopes and microscopes instead of eyes – and its langauges of measure – mathematics. But that IS not all what there is to reality.

We shall use thus our larger terms, which will make more complex and ambivalent our general analysis, but far more flexible when we apply those universal logic principles to different disciplines and specific species.

**Clocks of time with 3 different accelerated, decelerated and steady speeds.**

Now to understand 5 Dimensional physics, and the 3 scales of relative ‘size’ and ‘time speed’ of physical systems, the faster, smaller quantum scale; the human, thermodynamic, molecular scale and the larger, slower, gravitational scale, we must start by defining mathematically the metric of the 5th dimension (∆), which encompasses all the relative scales of Spatial size (S) and time speed (Tƒ) that co-exist in the Universe:

Sp x Tƒ = ∆

That is the product of the size of a system and its time speed is constant. So smaller beings cycle faster than larger ones, but as the product of both is constant, we can ‘constantly’ convert one parameter into the other moving through the 5^{th} dimension. The simplest of those motions could be then defined with a simple physical equation, of an accelerated time clock or bidimensional ‘vortex’:

V(t) x R(s) = K

That is the product of the speed of a cyclical vortex and the radius of its cycle is constant, meaning that as we diminish in size, the system accelerates its orbital time clocks. And this holds in the 4 aforementioned scales.

So in the dark world scale, black holes rotate faster, despite being much smaller than stars, reaching c-speed rotary motions on its event horizons.

In the gravitational scale planetary systems move faster the closer they are to the Sun (it is in fact the origin of Kepler’s second law).

In mechanical, thermodynamic systems the skater spins up its turning speed by closing its arms.

In atomic systems the molecule, the atom, the electron and the quark, increase its turning speed and clocks in decreasing amounts.

And vice versa, in all explosive processes of disorder and entropy, in all big bangs of matter, M=E/c2 and bombs, as the explosion expands increasing the entropy and space it occupies, it diminishes its speed till it comes to a halt.

So surprisingly enough, a larger space moves slower in lineal explosive fashion that an ordered cyclical vortex, despite diminishing its size.

*That equation, decomposed sequentially in 3 phases, a first age of max. energy, a second age of balance and a third age of max. information, explains the existential cycle of any space-time field.*

*In a graph with energy vs. information coordinates the 3 ages resemble the geometrical form of a cycle that moves upwards, absorbing energy and information till in its 3rd age looses its temporal energy, collapsing back to its origin. On the right side, the same 3 ages show in the Taoist, Korean flag, where a line is the symbol of continuous yang-energy, which yin-time quantizes into ‘in-form-ation’, from youth to death. Finally the proper way in which all the time clocks of nature act, increasing its frequency on a vortex (mass or charge vortex, galaxy, frequency acceleration as the particle collapses, etc.), of 3 ages towards a point of maximal information when the system dies.*

In that regard, the less advanced concept of time in physics, which still hangs on despite Feynman and Einstein is the idea of a dying entropic Universe.

This concept of ‘entropy’ as the only future arrow of time, or death arrow of expansive disorder, obtained in XIX c. studies of expansive gas, is completely outdated even by the standards of modern physics.

Unfortunately cosmologists have expanded that arrow to the entire universe, because they don’t understand Feynman, Einstein and their findings: that ‘time curves space into accelerated vortices of mass-information’ in galaxies, which balance the entropic arrow of expansive space between galaxies (hence both arrows as in E<=>Mc² , the fundamental equation of time in physics balance each other).

This, Einstein insisted as he obtained first that equation in its inverse form: M=E/c², in his paper ‘can energy create mass?’

And he added, ‘the separation between past, present and future is an illusion’. So did Feynman, with its deep insight on the 3 ‘time arrows’ of particle physics: present, reproductive waves of light-space and ‘bosons’, past arrows of entropic antiparticles and future arrows of informative particles that last much longer in time. So another fascinating, ‘immediate’ equation of 5D physics are the equations of life and death for all systems of the Universe such as:

*Life arrow:* Max. Time duration x Min. Space extension: Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp

*Death arrow:* Max. Space expansion (big-bang, dissolution of organisms into cells and atoms) x Min. Time (instant of death).

Yet again, the sum of both: Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp + Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ = 0-sum, which makes all scales and closed systems of the Universe eternal presents.

In physics this is the meaning of Feynman’s diagram:

Past-anti-particle x Future-particle = Present light wave, whereas particles last max. Time as they collapse space into minimal size and antiparticles last minimal time while they expand space annihilating particles in the moment of death.

As such Feynman’s work is more advanced that the outdated entropy theory and the so much praised Einstein’s revolution of space-time, who still missed, the ternary fractal, multiple Nature of times and the existence of its 3 time arrows. He simply ‘froze’ space-time in present slates to measure with differential equations (by definition infinitesimal moments) as Galileo did, every instant of an external time=change = physical motion.

Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3^{rd} time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.

The best way to describe mathematical physics is therefore to connect its classic continuous space-time equations with those of the ternary fractal 5D space-time Universe. And to that aim we need to define the 3 fundamental elements of mathematical physics, fields, waves and particles as the 3 ternary elements of 5D fractal space-time through the…

Now this is how we formalize T.Œ, by advancing also the fundamental sciences – geometry, completing the work of Riemann, Einstein and others who study the 5th non-Euclidean postulate – the fact that points hosted multiple parallels, and improving over Aristotelian logic, because reality and the languages that express it are ternary langauges where relative past energies and future information merge into present existence in space:

Past-energy < Present-body/wave > Future-information

Or are sequential in time, past (youth) > mature age > Future 3^{rd} age of information.

On this Feynman had the insight in physics to give antiparticles a past arrow, as it is the case, and Einstein had some insight on it when it said that the separation between past, present and future was an illusion, and of course Leibniz, the genius, and the Eastern Taoists… did imagine the whole thing. Now we are truly formalizing this ternary logic proper of the Universal Grammar of all languages.

** **Now to streamline and make sense of physics beyond the how, obvious statements of its present discourse we must correct its concepts of space and time, from its astoundingly primitive conceptualization – the oldest of all sciences, and the most stubbornly preserved because as in earlier Ptolemaic models, it fairly works with all the complex epicycles needed to fit data.

So we shall without further ado correct lineal physics to match the perceived evidence of the fractal Universe, with the aim of making our linguistic mental mirror more apt to focus reality as it is, not a single space continuum and a single lineal, mechanical clock with a steady rate, but *a Universe made of infinite dynamic games of trans-formation between closed cyclical clocks of time and entropic motions of expansive *space:

Sp (∆-1:Field/∆:Gas/∆+1:Entropy, big-bang state) < ST (∆-1:Wave/∆:Liquid÷∆+1:steady state) > Tiƒ (∆-1:particle/∆-solid/∆+1:Clock, vortex state)

This is in the parlance of physics the Fractal Generator of its events and forms, in its 3 ∆-1 quantum, ∆-thermodynamic and ∆+1: gravitational main physical scales, which we must explain properly to start making sense of physical systems, its mathematical equations and forms and events. Let us then start by understanding its 3 arrows of space-time, correcting the 3 main errors of physics, regarding time which *is not lineal but cyclical, it is not a single entropic arrow but 3 arrows, and it is not the 4 ^{th} dimension of space.*

All in all the understanding of the ternary structure of all beings IS the essential element for the understanding of the constant beats of species between ‘motion’ and still form, space and time states, diachronic evolution and synchronous organic, spatial structure. It is to a certain extend the easiest part to understand. Yet the more difficult part because of its essential different nature, is the analysis of the fundamental novelty of the Fractal paradigm: the 5^{th} dimension and how dissentious planes of different size (cells/atoms; organisms, matter; cosmic systems/societies), interact together internally, thorough exchange energy and information and externally synchronize its existence.

How indeed you move your hand and your atoms in a different plane of existence move with you? What is the meaning of locomotion through 5D scales?

Of course all those are new questions that the shallow interpretation of a single space-time continuum does not require. Problem is reality is not according to sheer evidence a space-time continuum, so we cannot just as physicists do shun off all the questions that our shallow representation of reality does not fit in.

Let us then deal with the ultimate ‘metaphysical question’ about physics – the meaning and origin of motion.

Reality is eternal, in a constant process of reproduction of form, as motion , as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

A quanta of present time, is the relative duration of a closed, conservative timespace cycle.

Such as the product of the time duration and the spatial quanta content of that present time, becomes a measure of the ‘energy’ value of the entity per unit of existence.

The value of a time quanta, or ST parameter therefore becomes essential to calculate he power of a system, such as Max. ST will be a better system in any plane of existence we study.

What happens then at the end of the relative ST, whereas T becomes a quantifier of present time and s a quanta of space, when the time cycle closes?

According to the principles of transformation of energy into information, energy never dies but transforms itself back and forth into information.

This means that when a cycle of energy closes into itself, it repeats itself, creating a wave of relative present time, in which energy becomes reproduced.

The Universe does constantly reproduces present forms, formal motions of energy with different ‘existential force’ or ‘total momentum’ that never stops.

If the cycle closes into itself an inertial act of reproduction has taken place and the system conserves its energy, but if the cycle interacts with the environment, part of its present-time is worn out and the system looses motion and increases its form, displacing slowly towards the future.

This concept of energy as a repetition of closed cycles, which when not fully reproduced are partially spent do apply to all systems of nature, including the processes of aging of biological systems. And so it requires to deal with a second fundamental theme: the translation of motions of mathematical physics to T.Œ. intimately related to the energy of the system.

Now of the many aspects of the 6th isomorphism, in physics we deal mainly with the ternary symmetries due to the different place in the scales of parts and wholes that the 3 ‘elements of space’, ∆-1-limbs/fields, ∆-waves bodies and ∆+1-particles/heads play on the system, and between the system and the external world.

*And how the dominance of the informative systems in all scales of physics do determine a world cycle that will increase the density of information of the system as in living beings till it collapses the information of the system into a point-particle, dense crystal structure or black hole.
*

In the last graph, we see the intimate connection between the 3 ages of time, in the accelerated clocks of the Universe, in which each species walks steadily towards a spiral of maximal information and the 3 networks of its spatial systems, which follow a natural order towards higher form departing from simpler space, as *the dominant network is the mental informative network that consumes motion into still worlds, and so all physical systems follow the same 3 arrows of time of life systems. But what physicists do NOT realise is that this organic order of the 6 motions of time, also ends into entropic death, when they study the very fast smaller scales of the 5th dimension (particles). So they commit the error of thinking that particles are ‘immortal’, by confusing the particle-anti-particle states, which are life-death arrows.*

Antiparticles ‘die’ particles, and so both together at the point they form a ‘meson’, with no ‘spin’ (no life on it), physicists should understand they are seeing the moment of death of the particle, which then resurrects, starting a new life-death cycle. The same happens with waves, whose photons ‘die and explode’ into a wave and the implode and collapse back. And so it happens to galaxies in the quasar cycle.

In the graph the general structure of physical systems, in which a central point of view absorbs maximal information transforming entropy into form (mass, charge, solid states), while expelling the unwanted entropy, the graph applies to almost all physical systems from galaxies that expand entropically dark energy into intergalactic expansive space, to growth processes following fibonnaci series in crystals.

A few examples of the 3 ages-network dominance in different biological and physical systems. Galaxies therefore go as stars do through the same cyclical vortices:

It is generally speaking an isomorphism of hierarchical ‘social classes’, which considers in depth the asymmetric relationships established between relative past, simpler, micro-forms and larger, more complex formal wholes. Such as there will be always an arrow towards the dominant creation of future wholes, which defines the surviving part of a ‘lanwave’ or social structure:The graph compares both analysis that of space and its 3 relative forms, fields of entropy, waves of reproduction and informative particles, and its order in time, as the system becomes in an isomorphic world (as most physical systems, living in isomorphic vacuum) do, a spiral of growing density of information and diminishing mass, with the central black hole or densest atomic region in the centre slowly killing the motion of the being, through the 6 steps of birth-growth-reproduction-diminution(collapse of the wave into particle) and final extinction.

Yet physical systems, being simpler than biological one in information do have very slow processes of life and death, and they might remain in its most perfect simpler, iterative states (solid crystals) almost immortal. In any case the process is the same that all other systems: a central point of view or mind will create images of its whole (black holes have a 5D image of the galaxy, crystals the obvious images, and memorial traces of their growth in the structure of the crystal). A geometric proof of this structure happens in crystals as only those 7 crystal configurations in which there is a centred point of view, which maximises the perception of all the territory in the 3 dimensions of euclidean space exist. All other irregular crystals die away, do not exist, are not regular enough for the central point of view to focus an efficient image of reality that allows it to process information and guide the reproduction of new crystal cells, and the same happens with smaller atomic systems (ions), self-centred in the strongest atomic point of view:

**THE MOTIONS OF TIME in different scales. Particles, waves and fields.**

Those examples of the world cycles of physical species, ruled by the same informative overall arrow that orders its 6 motions displayed through small momentums into a complete whole world cycle of life and death shows that it is NOT the physical species, which is qualitative different but the way humans extract information from SUPERORGANISMS.

The process of seed generation, and growth is the common game that makes emerge through the 4^{th} postulate of ¬æ networks as a whole super organism, with a Tiƒ, central point of view and an atomic/cellular ST body-wave of organic parts, which preys on an entropic field of indistinguishable from the mass of individuals that loose its individuality and become exchangeable, as the system handles information with general fields.

This structure implies a social class structure in which the limbs/fields of entropy loose the game and end up being curved into form and mass, evolving increasing its information, easily masterminded by the central point of view of the system.

The same happens as we shall observe in evolution when the Earth handles its species with massive fields of energy (changes of glaciation temperatures) that determine the accelerate evolution of its species. And the question remaining in social sciences is if humans and its cycles of life and death of civilisation and growth of technology is part of a larger memorial plan of evolution of the planet, which seems to have a centre connected through flows of magma to specific regions of the Earth to perform its cycles of volcano activity and continental breaking that sets up the rhythms of evolution.

So T.Œ can explain the world cycle of physical species beyond the simplest locomotion description with the 6 Aristotelian motions of time (which we adapt to the world cycle of existence in the jargon of ¬Æ and plug them all within the general game of existence and evolution from parts into wholes (5^{th} more complex set of reproductive and social actions, ∑œ=û+1) and final big-bang dissolution in a quanta of time as an antiparticle, quasar or hypothetical big-bang Universe.

And once we do understand the 6th isomorphism of the Universe we can plug into it all the physical systems of reality and enter into the details of the thoughts of god.

Among them the main perception of classic physical equations are in terms of:

– The entropic field of physical systems which *are imploded into information, *as polar forces, enclose the field in its ‘surrounding net’ of attractive power (classic newton and coulomb, F=U.C. (Å.Magnitude x Å.M./d²), giving birth to the commonest flow of time of the Universe: Sp>Tiƒ, which can be seen as an attractive force between those 2 poles or as a motion of a particle that implodes entropic fields ahead and explodes them behind.

The wave process of reproduction of information, which is more stable: Sp<ST(ExI)>Tƒ and its ternary analysis. So to complete the main ways of studying physical systems, we must add studies in which we consider the duality of information processing, either as Sp>Tƒ or ExI>Tƒ ‘true physical system of wave-particles, body-heads’, which are the essential vital element of physical Universes.

**ExI>Tƒ ternary analysis**

Now, the complementary principle of body-heads, waves-particles, imply that there is an extraordinary symbiosis between light-photon waves-particles, electron-nucleon, liquid-crystals, uds-star herds/cbt-black holes systems, as there is a complete synergy and synchronicity between heads and bodies in biological systems or the neuronal people-castes in control of the languages of social information (politicians with laws, bankers with digital money) and the working, reproductive classes in social system.

So one of the fundamental fields of any T.œ scale is the study together of the present-future, ExI ≥ Tƒ complementary system alone. There are in that sense many perspectives of the system, the most obvious one is to consider its different states and configurations according to the actions its develops.

Of which there are 3 fundamental states, if we group the actions in ±∆energy (motion-feeding), ±∆ïnformation (perception-communication) and ∑œ>û (social reproductive events).

This is the bulk of analysis in any science. How the systems of body-head, waves-particles go about their ‘business’ of survival space-time actions, moving, feeding, perceiving, communicating, reproducing and evolving socially into larger systems. And for physical systems is not different, albeit a much larger field as physical systems study so many ranges of ∆-planes and have overdeveloped so much in our mechanist society where social and biological sciences (though now experiencing a huge development in the specific field of informative flows, mainly between ∆-1:∑œ>û:∆o scales or genetics), and the irrelevant field of using the robotic life species of the eco(nomic)system to observe the soon to be extinct life species of the ecosystem they also murder through its economic superorganism.

Again sorry for the ‘deviations’ of my T.Œ mind as it constantly establishes parallelisms between systems. To the point. We do have for each scale an ‘organism, in which the energy is absorbed from the ‘lower field of entropy’ Spe invisible to the system as a mass of indistinguishable particles, absorbed to move the system and perform the previous actions, the core field of physical system analysis. And those analysis are of many types according to the action we study.

The classic Fermion < Boson-wave>Fermion equation of particle physics responds to the ∆±I, ∆±e actions of two particles which will exchange energy and information and according to the type of exchange, gauge information, and attract each other, as they will ‘warp into form’ the distance between them, in a dual parallel action: -∆e-=+∆ï so the wave between them will grow in frequency-form and the distance will diminish. And this can also be studied from the perspective of the boson wave, which will collapse into particle of information absorbed by the receiving system.

And the system most likely will reach a dynamic equilibrium, or if not it will merge, into a social event, ∑œ>û, which can be according to the third postulate of ¬æ, a Darwinian event, in which the larger system with more ExI existential force measured as total momentum or total energy of the system, swallows and transforms the smaller system into a part of itself; socially if they belong to two ‘different’ species or scales with different 5D metrics (as in biology between animals and plants, or predators more efficient in their use of energy and information than herbivores). And the rule here is the same, the species with more existential force (maximal momentum), whereas the Tƒ-component (speed of time) dominates the Spe (component), as animals dominate slower planets, will become the predator element.

So when a black hole of maximal momentum (faster time clock and Tƒ/Spe density of mass) collides with a star it transforms after devouring and killing the star part of its matter into itself, and might even leave an offspring of smaller black holes as it keeps cruising as ‘a gravitational animal in control’ of the forces-fields of gravitation the galaxy for new ‘victims’. And a planet will slowly but steadily in a very long process fall down into the star that will devour it, or if in the eccentrically further orbits, steal some orbital momentum from the star and break loose. So will the electron falling and collapsing into a reverse beta decay event, into the nucleus, converting a proton into a neutron, or vice versa, escape from the outer orbits not freedom evolving from its wave state into a particle form.

Thus there is a lot of didn’t events to study on this specific realm of relationships between particles but them all follow the general laws of the ¬æ 3^{rd} postulate which defines according to the relative similarity of particles the nature of an event as ‘symbiotic’ social, evolving event when the systems are very similar or very complementary, forming then parallel social structures in which the identity of the individual still exists but a whole starts to emerge, or will form, unbalanced ionic states of null further growth in which individuals still hold their relative nature but one dominates clearly over the other (atomic orbital configurations), or will form Darwinian events in which the smaller, lesser ExI form is devoured and absorbed by the larger form, which will take part of it to renew its internal structures and waste their spacetime as energy, of the two type of fields of which the system is made (neutron and photon emission in beta decay events).

Now within those schemes, we might access after an ∆o: perceptive, gauging event (1^{st} postulate rules)->∆ï: communicative event (2^{nd} postulate rules)-≥Symmetry breaking event (Darwinian split) or Coordinated complementary event (3^{rd} postulate rules)> 4^{th} social networks growth, or 5^{th} Absorption of one point by the other as a flow of multiple parallels of energy and information.

This is then the BASIC TŒ language that merges Non-AE evolved mathematical formalisms, and Physical events, into a completely new way to understand mathematical physics which explains the same events within the conceptual frame of T.Œ and the laws of ¬æ that explain all other systems of the Universe.

Indeed, in all formal T.œ sciences we depart form the evolved logic, mathematical formalism and the Generator equation to define a series of general events that applied to each science will be able nicely to fit all the events of the science, within this jargon and its isomorphisms.

But that, which will be the task of the 3^{rd} and 4^{th} line will be too much of a future ideal world of Tƒ scientist nowhere to be seen in this planet.

It will sound as if I were coming from mars (perhaps : ) and since physicists are all spineless bastards to paraphrase Zwicky (that is spin 0 rounded particles, which are bastards and look like bastards from any way you look at them), and won’t admit any other jargon than theirs, what we will do in those posts on Physics is to go the middle wave, and mix jargons and explain facts of physics – not all as it would mean to rewrite my McGill encyclopedia of physics into T.Œ 0 in this manner So we shall just give you a taste of the whole nouvelle cuisine, or rather molecular cooking (being myself a Catalan, like Mr. Adrian) that will r=evolve science into the III millennia, if physicists do not eliminate us with their mechanisms, robots and weapons before, they become enlightened, which is unlikely.

All this said, the game of T.Œ simplifies enormously the language of physics through the simplification of its modern Hilbert-like Mathematical spaces. As all becomes reduced to the same 5 events across the 3 x 3 planes and scales of physical systems, by interaction of the 3 states of entropy-past, present-waves and future-particles of the different scales of physics, which perform either antisymmetric conception-3 ages-extinction events, asymmetric events that related the 3 parts of the system or 5D social evolutions.

But we do need to straighten up many conceptual dualities and ternary symmetries of physics to encase them within those Generator Equations.

For example some easy translations are:

The classic interaction of a weak field of magnetism with the electrons of an electric current or an atomic field on the other hand will correspond to an ∑œ>û, social evolution as the larger ‘magnetic Tƒ loop’ organizes as an external cyclical membrane a series of relative parts, electrons or atoms to create a larger whole.

The classic action-reaction processes of Newtonian Dynamics will respond to exchanges of ‘momentum, m(t)xV(s)’, between two relative Tƒ, and so can be written also as a Tƒ<±Force>Tƒ event in space-time in which a dynamic equilibrium is reached.

When studying physics in space thus we shall study the relative Spe fields of past spatial entropy, and Tƒ point-particles of future existential information, which converge into present, balanced Spe x Tƒ, systems of efficient spatial energy and temporal information that peg together the 3 elements, the past-field, the present-wave and the future-particle (or the entropic gaseous, liquid, balanced and informative crystal-solid states; or the Top-field/Strange Halo/ and Light Space on the cosmic largest plane of reality that create the atomic material and galactic superorganisms of the Universe.

A game of future accelerated vortices of time, Tƒ, which store the information of the system and Spatial, entropic motions, Spe and its co-invariant metrics that relate in opposite fashion the dualities of cyclical, accelerated time clocks of the future, past, decelerating extensions of spatial entropy and its present merging into systems of ‘workable’ energy and ‘relevant information ‘that create the balanced systems of the Universe.

**The homologies between scales.**

The intelligent reader will then realize that the same description happen for smaller scales of reality, of which we will bring here the 3 more important, the scale of electric currents, the scale of thermodynamic fields and the scale of quantum fields, and merely enunciate its equations:

– In the ∆ electromagnetic plane of existence, the field-wave equations are the Maxwell equations, and the ‘Geodesic equation’ is the Lorentz equation (whereas we consider the electron social group as the fundamental element of study):

Now, here we can see those Maxwell and Lorentz equations with a fascinating parallelism, which will give you a better sense of the whole and unity of physics. They are the expression of Maxwell equations for the wave-field of electromagnetism (above) and the equivalent equations of Einstein written by Heaviside, called Gravitomagnetic equations with its translation of jargon from gravity to electromagnetism. They ARE the same equations differing basically in the ‘constant’ of curvature of space-time, G and Q, which belong to two planes of size of the Universe, the cosmic and microcosmic planes.

We will very soon unify mathematically the values of Q and G in this post – a prime of 5D physics, proving therefore that ultimately 5D physics IS the proper model and only form to unify conceptually and mathematically the scales of the Universe. Now the scales are not exactly equal as no fractal is equal in all scales: you are not like your cells, but the astounding parallelism shows that conceptually the Universe IS a fractal of 5D planes. The only difference between those two constants will BE one of strength, due to the fact that according to 5D metrics, paradoxically smaller sales ARE stronger, faster in its time clocks: Spe x Tƒ = L. Below we see also the geodesics of both fields – the motion of particles on it.

The forest thus is clear; the details have been there for a century.

– In the ∆ thermodynamic equations of molecular atoms (where we consider the atom as the fundamental field of study), the Field-wave equation is the Heat equation (Gibbs equation of Free energy: G=H-ST, once more with 3 components) or equation of present, and the Geodesic equation of motion of a particle are Boltzmann equations for ideal gases, of the motion of individual particles, which gave birth to the understanding of the laws of thermodynamics.

– In the ∆-2 scale of quantum physics the Dirac equation becomes the present-wave equation (and the Schrodinger simpler version) which are in essence Hamiltonians of energy, that describe all its elements, and the geodesic equation are the Feynman formalism of motions and diagrams that express how particles move along paths exchanging energy and information with other particles.

And again for any physicist who wants to think on 5D terms, it should be evident that the thermodynamic and quantum scale use the same mathematical formalisms, statistical probabilities, to account for the massive amounts of particles with multiple degrees of freedom, and ‘canonical ensembles’, that study their motions in group, and aleatory paths in which particles stop and go, collide, exchange energy and keep moving and stopping (Brownian paths, Feynman paths), since we are describing basically two scales of motions which are telling us similar stories, a series of particles or molecules which are free to move around and perform actions of storage of energy and information, regulated by simple terms. So we can conclude this description of it with the understanding of the 4 quantum numbers that particles obey in terms of the actions of space-time they display to ‘exist’:

In the graph, the ∆-principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the l-number codes its form and informative gauging, ∆ï, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).

The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze masses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (mass-media) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.

In the graph, the ∆-principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the l-number codes its form and informative gauging, ∆i, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).

The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze masses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (mass-media) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.

**Ceteris paribus analysis of 2 elements of the 5St symmetries**

Now it is essential to keep always in mind and study complex associated symmetries of the type 5s, 5T, ST, 5ST, that is analysis which consider the relationship of space elements with the 5^{th} dimension, time ages, space-time together in a single plane and the 3 elements together. Thus after understanding each element separated, we need to study the associated to each other element and then only then we can fully understand the whole relationship. So let us consider some basic rules of those relationships:

– 5S, if we consider the relationship of the Se, ST, and Tƒ elements with the 3 dimensions of space:

∆-1 Se-fields/gas will be observed as quanta of the ∆-1 scale and as such they will be in that state dissociated susceptible to be study with statistical methods as indistinguishable parts, NOT because they do not have individuality but because form a larger point of view.

∆-waves/liquids. Waves and liquids are transitional present states, in which the information is provided by a particle to the ∆-1 field which however does NO evolve into the particle but imitates its vibrational, external action, transferring through its herd. And so we differentiate in a wave the group speed and the phase speed, which is in fact an action at distance that constantly grows with the perimeter of the front of the wave. All waves in that sense will have a faster ‘longitudinal wave’ or phase wave, or front wave and the group wave, which is the sum of reinforced frequencies, that requires multiple vibrations up and down the particle or rotations left right of its angular momentum. But in general the equation of the wave will be:

Se-1:Provides the Energy of the wave –its micro point < ST: wave provides energy (group reinforcement) and form (phase)>Tƒ (provides information.

Waves are thus Se-1 points in a process of evolution, when the reinforcement group starts to create a ‘higher frequency-form’ in the wave, which could finally collapse into particle state.

It is also interesting to realize that the Universe is communicative, and often it is a 3^{rd} observer who really starts a process, of which the ‘actors’, might believe to be protagonists but are from the other point of view mere translators or boundaries activated by the 3^{rd} player. Indeed, a phase wave is produced by the larger particle, Tƒ+1, but as it expands its diameter, and accelerates its perpendicular speed, it might put in synchronicity two far away micro particles , which will seem from their perspective to be sending each other the perpendicular message of the front wave, but in fact they are spectators of the larger entity. Now from the larger entity, the perpendicular phase wave does not carry energy only is an information message, which travels at –c speed, but for the smaller micro points activated simultaneously the larger wave DOES HAVE ACTION AT DISTANCE, and because it DOES move and makes vibrate œ-1 points it does carry energy (more than information).

So when we apply this fact to us, as micro points of galaxies, in which black holes produce c-speed gravitational waves of gigantic wave lengths we will find a mechanism that without breaking the relativity principle, due to the 5D dimensional structure of the Universe and the different elliptic and hyperbolic perception from a relative œ-1 and ∆+1 point of view, will explain the ‘action at distance’ or infinite relative speed of gravitational waves, OUTSIDE galaxies, where its wave front perimeter, with an instantaneous speed larger than > π x r(galaxy radius).

How fast this speed can be? An easy calculus that an astrophysicist can of course refine with all his specialist knowledge comes as follows. Let us consider that gravitational waves from the black hole do extend with energy and form at least at the limit of extension of the galaxy (or else it won’t order the stars into its spiral branches). Let us consider that perception is at least the standard radian, which is often the mean perception of any eye-Tƒ system of the Universe. Does the Milky way which has a 100.000 light years diameter (some giant galaxies have 3 million light years radius), will certainly, produce 50.000 light years simultaneous waves as a radian, in a quanta of time; that is the time in which a black hole vibrates to produce those waves. This is an enormous speed and the true meaning of action at distance- the phase velocity of a gravitational wave.

The group wave, which will be transversal wave, though will have a slower speed, which in normal waves is recognized by dividing the Young modulus and the tension of the wave.

Now Maxwell did find his transversal waves considering those classic equations of waves √tension/density and while relativity ‘idealist, German interpretations’ of measure in the trendy age of Germanic idealism that brought us also the idealism of Hilbert in mathematics (axiomatic method in which he ‘imagines’ the existence of points and lines, lol; and Copenhagen interpretation where the ‘observer’ limits became the observable properties), it is about time despite so many ‘believers’, who ‘are so vain, that will always think the sun turns around them’, to accept the obvious: light waves are not different from any other waves, despite the fact we do not perceive the gravitational space-time on which they move, as mathematical points with parts are as real as the star, head, (maybe not that of Mr. Hilbert:) they describe and quantum observables are both particles and waves as all species, are distinguishable if we were as small as they are, are points with parts if we could see them closer. Here we are real.

Relativity waves were as Maxwell understood born of two function, tension and density, but because the universe is made of formal motions, what we call tension is motion and what we call density is form. And so the true equation of the speed of a universal wave which applies to waves of thought, social waves, biological waves(radiations) and the astoundingly beautiful generalization of waves in all the scales of reality is in a way ‘purely spiritual’, based in the fact that all is motion and form, so, the speedo f the wave is very simple:

V= S/T, for lineal motions, but being space bidimensional, a wave speed is the bidimensional motion of space, relative to the bidimensional motion of information

V^{2}= S/T=Se/Tƒ= bidimensional speed/Density of form. V^{2 = ‘}Elasticity=Â/Tƒ=Form density V=√ Â/r.

Which is the general Laplace equation for all waves, where we must define the specific motion-distance-elasticity of the medium and density of form, which for an electromagnetic wave as Maxwell deduced is given by the permittivity and permeability of gravitational space-time, the invisible ‘scale’ of the 5^{th} dimension on which light Planckton feeds and moves.

We can in that sense consider the that group wave of a gravitational wave is c-speed and it carries energy but the phase wave is the action at distance, and it is far weaker, which is another way to explain the hierarchy problem, latter analyzed with the equation of unification of charges and masses.

Those considerations can also be applied to the mechanical waves (thermodynamic waves) transferred in solids (earthquake waves), liquids (heat waves) and gases (sound waves), of the thermodynamic scale> here we observe the inversion so often found between scales: solid waves transfer maximal energy, heat waves in liquids are balanced and sound waves in gases transfer maximal information.

Now there are many ways in 5D metric to arrive to all those conclusions. In several parts we have obtained the action at distance speed very simply: V=s/Tƒ=S/o (information perceived in gravitational invisible waves) = ∞.

That is, a relative infinite for humans that perceives the phase wave as simultaneous.

But now we can make a dimensional analysis, whereas V2=Elasticity/Density (Laplace equation), which in dimensional terms writes as

V^{2}=ML^{-1}T^{-2 (}elastic dimensions)/ML^{-3} (density dimensions) from where we obtain L^{2}/T^{2}

Thus the wave speed is actually merely a bidimensional speed that transforms lineal physics into bidimensional physics and as such a fundamental equation of 5D physics, as we defined time and space as bidimensional ‘information’ and energy.

If we add for a specific medium a certain mass parameter and length for a 3 dimensional medium we obtain the elastic and density dimensions. But here the ‘substance’ matters not, as Mass is erased.

This is obviously telling us that the active magnitude Tƒ+1, which is mass (charge in the lower scale of electromagnetic waves) is not relevant because waves do not travel through the i+1 scale, but through the lower scale, in which we perceive space and time frequencies. Waves are thus with this simple analysis bidimensional space/time relationships.

But further on we can obtain instead of the infinity of ‘relative perception’ the relationship most often bound in speeds, ±10-11 growth of speed between scales or 100-121 growth of speed in 3 dimensional relationships (electron-light relationship given by the fine structure constant, which varies obviously according to the variation of energy, being 137 its lowest energy value, but this we will treat briefly on quantum physics as it is for 4 line advanced studies). What maters here is to realize that

V^{2} =S^{2} for each T^{2 }quanta of acceleration, in a decametric space universe, where the fundamental unit of space is 1-10 tetraktys structures means, that S grows from 10 to 100, 10 times more. And since speed is the perception of space as motion (Galilean Paradox), when we grow in scale a new dimension will imply 10 times faster speeds in bidimensional space/time

But if we measure from a lineal observer point of view, instead of T2 we measure t, and since now there are 100 T, time frequency in lineal time has increased also by 10, so we will observe a 100 increase in speed. Those are the parameters to consider when studying speeds in intergalactic speeds (10 C) and when considering the lineal measure of speeds in electronic speed (±1/100 c speed).

Finally the third type of waves in the scale of….

Tƒ notice finally that waves are ruled by superposition laws, of sum, as they are ultimately vibrations of the micro-states of the field, œ-1, which are in 5D metric much faster, able to accumulate much more information and hence easily handling the limited information provide by the larger, Œ-vibrator particle.

This means the wave can within its much faster speed of vibration accumulate and superpose many different vibrations, each one in a quanta of its much faster time, coming from the larger being. The saturation of those superposition waves is where ‘wave collapse’ starts, and a new ‘envelope’ integral starts to evolve the group of n-1 micrŒ-Points into a synchronic particle. Synchronicity is efficiency, and so saturated waves synchronize by superimposition, in one of the most fascinating mathematical ‘intelligent’ equations of the Universe (Fourier analysis/modulus).

**The Lagrangian and Hamiltonian: the worldcycle of physical beings.**

For all what has been said, and the definitions of present waves, v= Se x Tƒ, particles, Max. Tƒ/Se and fields, Max. Se/Tƒ, we are coming to understand 3 fundamental definitions of T.Œ for all sciences: the 3 ages of time in terms of the Se and Tƒ parameters:

Max. Se/Tƒ = Young energetic state (∂L=0; +∂’L); Max. Tƒ/Se= Old, future state (∂L=0; -∂’L); Max. Se x Tƒ (Se=Tƒ): (∂L=0; +∂’L=0).

Those 3 points which in the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian expression of ALL equations of physics represent the 3 stationary points of value 0 in the Lagrangian and maximal and minimal or 0 values in the Hamiltonian are the 3 points in which any System of Nature varies along its worldcycle. In physical systems however, the back and forth motion along those 3 points can clear a 0-sum time-loop that repeats itself constantly without the apparent need, at least from the human perspective of 2 Lorentzian regions in which the system breaks down:

In the graph we can see the interpretations of those 3 points, the Field in ∆-1, of Max. Se x Min. Tƒ, the wave of present, of Spe=Tƒ and the particle of future of Max. Tƒ x Min. Spe, with the present wave in the center. I call this graph the Lorentzian-Newtonian-Kelvinian (ab. LNK) graph as it represents in our Universe the 3 natural limits of existence of forms in the 4D present pace-time described by special relativity, the region of max. entropy when particles accelerate towards c-speed dying away, the region of present balance, or liquid/wave states an the regions of maximal information closer to Tƒ perfect vortex super fluidity and 0 degrees.

The 3 regions thus establish also a clear difference in the regions in which information grows, towards a higher ‘plane of existence’, in which the particle reaches its maximal form (collapse of waves into particles, when coming closer to the ∆+1 œ, such as when photons collide with electrons or electrons collide with atoms or atoms with molecules and so on.

The graph thus explains many elements of physics. It is ultimately a graph that represents and explains the power of the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian formalism that localizes those 3 ‘canonical solutions’ to physical systems and planes of existence, where the field quanta, the wave state and the Entropy element appear. Now in physical terms the wave will be defined by a wave equation:

Present = Se x Tƒ = S/T=V in lineal time notation or wavelength x frequency = Speed

The particle will be on the other hand defined by the density of information, Tƒ/Se = K, which is a fundamental parameter in all scales of reality; and we shall observe immediately that relates to the constants of curvature, G and Q in the equations of force : G, Q ( e x e or m x m /d^{2})

And the field will be defined by the density of energy Se/Tƒ = K, Se x Tƒ = K , E x T = K, which are the constant of actions of the two main fields of quantum physics (H=E x T) and Thermodynamics K = E x T.

Thus we resolve here the meaning of those Universal constants, beyond the ‘Germanic, idealist’ definition.

** BIOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL MOTIONS**

**Enlarging the reductionist concept of physical time≈locomotion. Worldlines vs. world cycles.**

It is important in that sense, given the enormous prestige and power that ‘physicists’ have, in a world which worships the machines and weapons they manufacture, to realise that their concept of ‘times≈changes≈motions’, called locomotion, is NOT AS THEIR SIMPLEX, reductionist models of the Universe seem to imply the ONLY * type of time≈change in the Universe worth to study; as if it were all the types of times≈changes of reality.*

There are in fact 7 forms of time≈change of which locomotion IS ONLY ONE, defined and studied exhaustively by physicists, with a simple formula, v=s/t, (Galilean relativity), latter refined by Einstein, which added a – ct parameter to provide for the ‘drag’ of the lower gravitational scale of space-time, when a larger, ∆+1 light space-time ray ‘feeds’ and ‘transforms’ gravitomagnetic energy into electric motion, warping and hence ‘diminishing by -ct’ (the warping), its motion.

All this is very interesting stuff for those who study the ∆±4 physical scales (taking the human self-centred scale as ∆0) ONLY, as they are dominant in the time=change of locomotion. But physicists ignore all about the other types of motion already defined by Aristotle, who talked of 8 motions≈changes: generation, growth, evolution, locomotion, diminution and extinction; to which he added ‘informative, still perception’ by a mind-God, focus of all the energy around it (which we shall also consider a form of motion).

In the organic paradigm the 8 motions of reality are all together studied with similar laws.

And so *what physicists call time is merely the time=change of locomotion* or translation in space, where obviously the parameter of time, t, measures only the speed and translation in space of a given entity – one of the 7 motions of the being: v=s/t, t=s/v. So time=change becomes ONLY for that specific study of locomotion, the 4th parameter-dimension of motion.

What has become a ridiculous ego-trip of dogmatic physicists obsessed by their worldly profession (in as much as they make all the weapons and machines of motion of our world) is to *think that locomotion is all what there is about time.*

So physicists of locomotion have created an entire philosophy of science and time=change BY REDUCING ALL the forms of change TO simplex LOCOMOTION…

As if all other motions were NOT important motions and HAD nothing to do with time.

Now I am fully aware that the ‘religion of technology’, is so strong that most people believe that Physicists, as fathers of the machine, must also have a special understanding of the meaning of it all’ – a concept perfectly assumed by our concepts of knowledge, modelled on the Universe and man as a mechanism. So most readers will simply abandon this web if we affirm simply that Mr. Einstein’s work is a minor footnote in time theory – but *it is really a very limited view of the entire Universe of time cycles and motions, which will never be able to harmonise and explain all other phenomena happening in time, such as evolution, **history, technological advances and the overall arrow of increasing information – the arrow of life and eusocial evolution that dominates the Universe.*

Indeed, what you ‘are’ will never be explained by physicists’ ultimate concept of time as a mere series of locomotions, which Einstein and Minkowski finally defined as a ‘worldline’ according to which your life in time is just the sum of your locomotions in space-time from birth to extinction. In other words, because they study physical locomotions, they reduce life to a world of locomotions and change=time, to changes in your position in space.

So indeed, we owe awe to physicists for its exhaustive analysis of locomotion, the ‘theme’ of science most profoundly studied by those who make of the machine and its energetic locomotions the meaning of all realities.

But we need a healthy dose of skepticism, when what was rightly defined in the XIX century, as the science of motion – not the science of ‘everything’ pretends to expand its limited ‘notions’ (n here for a change:) of motions to all phenomena of reality.

All other forms of motion DO happen also in time but those other kind of time=changes, *which require the understanding of 5D metric equations CANNOT* be studied in A SINGLE PLANE OF CONTINUOUS SPACE, in which locomotion happens. In that sense, physicists’ time will be a mere 1/7th of the whole time=change philosophy of science studied here, and by the principle of correspondence, perfectly embedded within phenomena happening in a single space-time plane.

**Simplex wordlines vs. complex, organic worldcycles of time.**

WHEN WE SAY THAT TIME IS ALL AND WE ARE TIME-SPACE BEINGS, we say so because we shall expand and explain the 6 motions of time, and hence when we study all forms of time=change in the Universe, indeed, time will be all, as all phenomena of reality can be reduced to those 6 motions themselves varieties or ‘parts’ of a WORLDCYCLE of existence, no longer a physicists’ worldline (as now we have at least two arrows of future, energy and information so time must have at least 2 dimensions and hence it cannot be a line but a cycle).

So we can for example order those 6 motions as: generation->locomotion->growth->evolution->reproduction->diminution->extinction and we DO have the fundamental composite, sequential mode of time-change of a being, between birth and extinction, whose reasons of existence we shall fully unveil. So we will make a huge LEAP on the complexity of our analysis of time=change to encompass it all.

A task I believe the model of fractal space-time beings fully achieves, by considering the model of 4D continuous space-time, a simplified analysis of the whole range of scales of space-time beings, circumscribed to the simplest ‘forms’ of the two ‘limiting’ scales of our perception, hence the less ‘observed’ and easier to describe because of its limited information (the gravitational scale, of which we see only 4%, the rest being dark matter and energy, and the quantum scale, we perceive distorted in the case of the smaller light space-time scales, due to the uncertainty principle.)

So while as Eddington rightly affirmed physicists are plagued with idealist theories, it is quite remarkable that with those limits of experimental perception, they consider that only those partially ‘unknown’ scales are ‘important’ to understand the meaning of it all, and ‘only’ locomotions matter to that aim, as if the other 6 motions were ‘lesser’ ones or would not exist, *just because a single scale of space-time cannot be used to define them, but at least 3 ∆±1 are needed.*

This is really the problem of ‘physics’, not one of quality of its work on locomotion, but one of arrogance in its desire to explain it all and discharge as irrelevant what their models of single time, cannot explain. So alas, those other 6 ‘events’ are not time-like…

Yet evolution of in-form-ation, of biological form, is obviously a theory of time=change perfectly defined by biologists, which we shall expand introducing topological evolution and organic evolution of parts into whole.

So it is reproduction, generation and extinction, 3 inverse motions in the 5th dimension, as they are travels through 5D metric ±∆ (S x T) =K. where the being first reproduces and organises similar cells or atoms (in a much larger scale of time), which ’emerge’ into a larger ∆+1 whole, departing from those ∆-1 atomic or cellular parts, which finally extinction will dissolve back into the ∆-1 lower scale of the 5th dimension.

And the same happens with growth and diminution, also inverse motions, in a shorter volume of space and time.

Indeed, those 3+2 motions imply a growth of size in space, coupled according to 5D metric with a slow down in time of the vital rhythms of the seminal cell, when the seed of ∆-1 information becomes a larger ∆- foetus).

Finally in-form-ation is as the name suggests form-in-action.

So we have fast defined in GST terms the 7 motions of the Universe that generate the world cycle of ‘existence’ of any physical or biological being (don’t worry if you don’t get all my definitions and terms so fast – it will take some ‘time’ for you to familiarise with those metric, albeit far less than the exhaustive analysis of locomotions of physics, with far more depth in the understanding of why we ‘are here’ and the meaning of it all).

Such wider model, which includes by the Principle of correspondence the quantum and relativity description as those 2 limiting ‘boundary-scales’, is therefore the next enlarged understanding of philosophy of science, and a giant step in the purpose of knowledge – to fully grasp, objectively, without anthropomorphisms that distinguish man from all other beings, the meaning of the Universe, and *our position within it, as a part made to its image and likeness, like everything else.*

The more complex all-encompassing analysis of time motions and its sequential different orders in the Universe thus becomes an essential vastly enlarged new field of knowledge about time, which humans have always intuitively know – and Taoism developed in its pre-magic era, into some amazing ‘insights’ on the laws of time and the ternary structure of the fractal Universe (central drawing). On the right side we see the commonest time-clock of the Universe an accelerated vortex, which follows 5D metric equation: V (t) x R (s) = K, giving origin to the time-clocks of two fundamental physical scales, charges and masses, we shall easily unify with those metric. In the left, the simplest description of a world cycle of life and death sum of the sequential 6 motions of the Universe.

It follows then that the physical motions of biological and human systems are by the same token reproductions of form in smaller scales.

While the other motions, generation>evolution>GROWTH>locomotion>reproduction>decay>death, merely transcribe a world cycle of existence of any system of the Universe:

**SUMMARY**

- Ternary Constants.
- Non-Æ: 4th Isomorphism
- Constants of mathematical systems
- Constants physical systems
- Constants of biological systems
- Constants of social systems.

*****

The third line increases formal depth and experimental detail in our study of the 5 Dimotions of all systems of ∆@st, defined by 4 fundamental elements, it spatial @-minds, ∆-§cales, and 5 time dimotions.

Further on each sub-element of a species, can be *studied as a fractal by subdividing its analysis again in its 5 sub-dimotions and* 4 sub-elements.

So we describe:

@… the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’ and ‘its actions’ that

**$**… create S-patial, ‘bidimensional’, ‘ternary, constant’, ‘organic networks’ or ‘species’ …

**ð…** which live in T-ime, through ‘3±1 ages’ ‘traveling=moving’… through

**∆…** §scales’ and ‘planes’ of the fifth dimension of ‘Γœ∆’ the whole of wholes…

Each of those ternary sub-properties of the four elements of reality are then illustrated for:

- ASTROPHYSICAL SCIENCES
- BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES.

Leaving for the fourth line of maximal detail, an analysis in depth of the 9 scales of ‘stience’, from the smallest quantum forces, to the largest cosmos, showing that all what exists is ∆@st sharing the same properties of exist¡ence.

**I. ****VITAL, UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS**

Dimotions can be measured as STeps of Space-time, whose variety increases, from the initial 2 states, pure form (language of perception) and pure locomotion (motion without stopping as a particle-head, always in wave state):

S<T>S, and so on. Now those steps as ternary steps start to trace forms in the spacetime background or larger scale in which they can play at least 2 scales around in acts of entropy (Death and absorbtion of energy). When we see a superorganism thus it will have a vital energy encircled which is able to destroy at two levels below into entropy the regions around it, to extract the bits necessary for the steps of inner self-replication, ST=ST.

We shall call the following steps:

SS (AB. §): Mental, Solid Form

$<t: Locomotion

$<t>§: energy becoming information

t>§: Information; perception.

TT: Entropic motion.

As soon as we observe the previous equation an astounding discovery comes in, by virtue of the state of space-time in which each action is defined, there is only a possible form to connect them repetitive cylcles, $<t>§.

**Constants of Nature: vital ratios and dimotions of nested supœrganisms.**

Constants of Nature are mostly ratios that define specifically for each super organism of reality the main ‘dimotions’ of a system. As the Universe is a nested system of larger ∆±¡ super organisms, it follows that there will be different sets of constants of Nature for each of those ‘scalar super organisms’, starting by the constants of nature of the ∆±4 cosmos, which contrary to belief is NOT born in a big-bang, but an immortal self-reproductive fractal, of which we can’t perceive much outside the galactic super organism in which we exist. So the constants of the Universe are NOT known, beyond the galactic scale, and many of the so-called Universal constants, as usual with huminds are hyperbolic generalizations of constants that apply only the smaller next ‘scale’ super organism, the galatom (∆±3 planes).

So most Universal constants of Nature are ‘local, organic constants’ of the galaxy, notably c-speed (the v=s/t constant background space-time of the galaxy), and h-planck (the constant of information within the galaxy), which *do not apply to the outer galactic dark world, where h-planck is no longer a feature (Higgs scalar boson), c-speed is no longer a limit (10 C galactic jets, z>c redshifts) and 0 K is likely not the limit of order… *

It follows then that all constants of nature must be closely related to the specific 5Ð metric of the system studied, as it defines the time and space and space-time co-invariance of the system. And so when considering any super organism we shall start by defining its ‘co-invariant’ 5Ð metric constants, $, ð and $ x ð = K, and then break down its 3 variations in ¡±1 planes, and keep studying its dimotions, topological constants, etc. etc. to get the 11 parameters of its dimensional isomorphisms, which will allow us to ‘reconstruct’ its world cycle, similar to all other clone species, within the ‘variation’ allowed to those constants for the species studied.

**Present co-invariant constants.**

Of all those constants the most important are co-invariant ST ratios that define each dimotion of the system through a constant.

The actions of those Space=time Ðisomorphic beings turn around the concept of present, dynamic repetition that seems not to change. As such quantitatively appear as a game of vital and Universal constants, which are in fact constant ratios that have patterns of frequencies, populations and exchanges of energy and information that remain constant.

The fundamental vital constants of each species are its scalar social ratios (ab.∆§) in ‘absolute 5D time’, an its three dynamic ratios (s/t≈speed, t/s≈density, s x t≈momentum constants) in relative worldcycles of timespace.

We can then consider the ‘symmetries’ of those ratios in topological variable forms – simultaneous space or synchronous time (maximal points of the world cycle, or ageing constants).

And break the ∆§ constants constants of scale, either growth an emergence, or diminution an dissolution.

*Those are the 3±∆ basic constants to define a system of nature; the rest are details – reason why we call it the fourth isomorphism of nature.*

For *every step motion there is a stop state. States change in time, topologically ‘tearing’ its variety in space. Topological transformations in this manner become changes of states, and mathematically both are equivalent – as it is the ¡-1 0-1 sphere and the 1=in**finite plane.*

**The details.**

An external undetailed viewer who don’t see the time-passing back and forth feed-back motions and ratios of exchange, will seem ‘abstract, constant, balanced numbers’ on its mean Gaussian topping, most transited central point.

But the constancy of reality is REAL, because, and this will be the content of the next isomorphism, *ultimately all comes to a simple principle: reproduction≈conservation of information, forms-in-action, the immortal thoughts of ›Γœº∆, the Game of existence we all play.*

What are then the initial key constants that we can extract from the 5Ð metric of the system? S x T = K, Obviously the immediate 3 combinations of those parameters we call:

**Density/****Volume****: ð/$.**** Existential, Reproductive speed: $xð.**

We call the speed of a system in its dimotions of space-time its reproductive, existential force, and as such the concept of moving through the fifth dimension incorporates all the elements of classic science with the complexity of pentalogic.

The existential reproductive speed of a system encodes all others, and directly expresses the metric, but for existential speed we talk of any speed in any of the 5 dimotions, so how we averate the 5 dimotions? Shall we add them or multiply them, rest entropy, or equal entropy to all others? Those are themes studied in existential algebra, which studies the dimotions as worldcycles imprinted by species on its states of exist¡ence.

The 2 defining Universal constants express for each superorganism, its two main parameters of lineal space-time (motion), informative density (form) and its combination, which defines its existential force, or 5Ð metric equation, $ x ð. They are the obvious manipulation with the basic x / operandi of existential algebra, so obviously the theme of physical and vital constants cannot be understood with the undertanding of vital algebra, that is, the meaning of the operandi of mathematics in terms of dimotions. To state first that the most important dimotions are re=prodictive dimotions and that the ‘product’, as the name indicates is the operandi that studies reproductive events. So we shall start considering those – the immediate understanding then of the ± operandi as a social dimotion of adding or substracting to a herd clone elements comes; for the more complex ∫∂ ∆imotions, we refer to the 4th line.

How to adapt then the constants human sciences to the 3 parameters of ‘stience’, is quite easy, as we have conceptual and formal elements to discern among them.

We shall start by those of physics.

In physics locomotion is the fundamental Ðimotion. External locomotion is related translations in space, which can be derived of its speed, either expressed in terms of time-duration, s/t or its preferred inverse, $ x ð wavelength frequency, which for ‘inertial constant speeds’ is exactly the expression of 5D metric.

Then we can easily consider, with the parameter of information, obtained from the ð-cycles of the being (its frequency in hertzs being useful in humind physics), the ‘inverse’ dimotions of information, with the parameter of density, ð/$, which will give us a proper expression of its informative poweress.

SYSTEMS are knots of timespace cycles, repeated as actions with a frequency (we eat three times a day, sleep one, reproduce ad maximal every year, perceive every second) which determine the next level of organisation through complex synchronicity.

The result is a being as knot of space-time cycles, which are in fact actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information with the external world.

So what are the minimal elements for this ‘building up’ of existences? We found in the previous isomorphism that the minimal unit of reality is bidimensional, even if we do not perceive some of those dimensions (waves instead of lines, cycles instead of points and so on). And we defined two elements of bidimensional nature, space-entropy, and information-time; combined in four-dimensional momentum-energy beings.

And so we do need three *fundamental parameters in all sciences to **describe reality.*

For example, in physics all can be described with spatial length, time clocks and ∆-mass/charge parameters.

But we also stated clearly the principle of absolute relativity: in the scalar Universe the ‘stif’ mind-singularity that stops those tƒi cycles into a 0-motion mapping *is a relative perceiver of only 3 ∆±1 scales (which can be as extended in 5D as the physical scales of the galaxy, or as constrained as those of a pheromonal ant).*

So *ratios between limiting scales (of temperature in ∆º thermodynamic systems, of frequency in ∆-1 quantum systems, and so on); is what the universe is about. And three of those ratios are fundamental, in a Universe of essentially two elements (seen still or in motion): S/T or speed to measure space-distances, T/S or density to measure informative charge/masses and SxT or momentum/energy to measure present-time. *

It is then departing from those elements through combinations and interactions how we can build mathematical physics in quantitative terms and in other more complex sciences, not so easily described by numbers, we cane explain conceptually in qualitative terms the meaning of existence, its ‘actions’ and fractal structures, motions and forms.

**Constants as efficient standing points that maximise the three functions of beings.**

−Why in a Universe in perpetual motion, composed of time arrows we see the kønstancy of it all? The reasons of the existence of universal and vital constants (ab. kø) in all systems which make us feel the perennial immortality of form is dual:

In that sense, 3 are the fundamental constants used to define any system of the Universe, as perceived in a single scale of existence, related to the ratios of dynamic exchange between entropy an information within the being an its actions.

WE SHALL call them, S≈T motions.

Reality structures itself in parallel, through the underlying language of space and time, into functional ternary systems symbiotic to each other, which create dynamic interactions, which are feed-back partial equations of the generator that survive better by complementarity and functional symbiosis, so order prevails in time over disorder, when function and form become harmonious – and we sense it as beauty.

*Those are the proportional ratios and topological constants of the ternary symmetries of space-time: *

*S/T or speed of a system, s x T or power/force/momentum of the system and t/s or density of the system.*

Thus those are the 3 fundamental constant ratios of the being, which define its entropic, reproductive an informative capacity as a species.

**∆ºst symmetric sub-constants.**

However as all systems do have an ∆ºst±1 structure there are MIRROR SYMMETRIES OF THOSE CONSTANTS IN THE OTHER TERNARY ELEMENTS, giving birth to secondary constants related those three. So in a ‘future exhaustive analysis’ the researcher could also consider:

- ∆º: Linguistic constants which mirror them in the mind language. This are ‘more solid’, because the mind ‘S<tiƒƒ>S’ reality into a spatial fixed form, slowing the motions of time into pixels of spatial simultaneous, synchronous image, pegged magically through the ‘fractal networks’, paths of ‘meaning’, which guide entropy into forms in action, in-form-ation which becomes ordered and finally reached a ‘locked’ puzzle-like fitted form.
*Those are the syntactic constants of mind languages that see those constants as ‘solid informative names’ (density constants), action/forces (Sxt constants) and entropic objects destroyed and ab=used by names.* - Ωt: 3±∆: On the other hand, as all constants are really dynamical processes, ratios and exchanges of entropy and form, balanced in a conserved present, repetitive momentum, when in ‘perfect, efficient’ tune with the world they live in, but leaning towards the ‘destructive ends’ of entropy and ‘s<tiff’ stillness of the involute mind, sooner or latter the system will go out of balance, and as the mind dominates, it will save error or accident, predation or defective form, move ahead in three ages, S>st>t which implies also a series of time constant of ageing cycles, and ‘limits’ of existence, beyond which the system shall collapse. And those are the constants of time of each being in ‘existence’, within its variability domain: Max. E x t > e=t > Max. t x e.

**Decametric scales.**

The fourth constant though deserves a special treatment, as it is the ∆-scalar type of decametric growth of social dimensions: 3 x 3+0=S+1; ∆+1. In the graph the commonest topological form of a whole, a tetraktys, where the five, ‘black, informative ball’ of maximal communication with all other points is the mind-point (when in motion moving to the 1 position). The fact that humans in pool use 10 balls and put the ‘mind-location’ in black, the color of information, shows how ‘immanent is the game’.

So for all systems there should be constants of space, of size, of social growth and scales, as the system grows and evokes with other beings, logarithmic and integral constants, or disintegration ones, Tˆs and Sˆt. As systems come into social groups and evolve together, both during its internal 0-1 interval from finitesimal parts to wholes, mostly exponential – since this is the fortunate time for the being, when the placenta-mother gives him unlimited energy till the system emerges; and the 1 to ∞ social external constants, mostly decametric, the most efficient configuration, to fight out in the struggle for ‘∃xi≈st¡enœ as the system struggles in the larger world.

So we talk of three fundamental constants, *speed, density, existential momentum; and three set of constants related to the social scales of the system and its size in space, to its time ages, and to its mind mappings; which explains why we give the sixth number to the isomorphism of Universal constants.*

Now, in the physical details of the web we do mathematize and relate those concepts to the laws of physics and see how broad those conceptualizations are to explain all kind of laws in its whys, here we are more interested in the whole understanding of the ‘game’ of the Universe, which consists in mixing iterative Se and Tƒ cycles and ‘—motions’ in multiple dimensions across multiple space-times, creating balanced, constant quantities.

*And so in the 3rd post here, dedicated to constants, is where we shall truly ‘define’ the LAWS, that is the ‘combinations’ of Se and Tƒ that the Universe keeps steady and makes immortal, mostly those which are balanced, with equal Se x Tƒ quantities, as this ‘function of existence’, Se x Tƒ is maximized when Se =Tƒ (5×5>6×4>7×3; even if 5+5=7+3).*

This simple rule, that the Universe conserves combinations of ‘Spatial ‘Ðʼmotions’’ and “temporal Form’ which are balanced, is THE MAIN LAW OF THE WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE. And those species which in a certain ecosystem find those balances and maximize their existential force, survive better.

So in physics Momentum is conserved. Se x Tƒ=ST. And this can be seen in all kind of ‘physical planes’. Another matter is to analyze detail by detail the laws of physics that reflect that law.

Often those laws are of the form Se x Tƒ = Energy (potential and kinetic together) or = momentum.

For example, the fundamental law of electricity is J = σ Sp, this says that the density of a current, is proportional to the energy of the field.

Now here, ‘density’ is a quantity that measures q ∆ v. Whereas q is the charge, the vortex of the electric space-time field, the equivalent to the mass on the cosmic plane, the informative ‘clock of time’ of the quantum world, and ∆ its number of charges.

So q ∆ is the total quantity of clocks of time, Tƒ, of the current, v its is speed or |-Motion, so J actually measures the product of the Tƒ and Se of the electric world. It is *really the measure of the momentum of the electric world. Whereas Sp is the best expression as sum of all its kinetic and potential energies, of the space-time world in which the momentum happens, from where the momentum extracts all its space-time fractal parts. So really this writes as an expression of the existential equation:*

*$t x ƒð = ST. A fractal entity of space-time, of energy and form, is in balance, in proportionality with the space-time field in which it exists: *

*$t (v) x ðƒ (qn) ≈ Energy field. *

From this first equation of electricity physicists define ‘intensity’ (qnv x S) by multiplying density by the cross surface through which the current goes. And this is the magnitude they use for almost everything, measured in amperes which is the standard unit for electricity. Yet when we come to fundamental laws, they are related to J, the electric momentum. For example, the fundamental law of electronics, Richardson’s equation, relates J electric momentum to temperature.

And so we shall once and again find this big problem with physics, which is a practical science of measure and mechanical building. It is more convenient for electric construction to deal with intensity, but density is the ‘nature’s conserved’ principle. It is easier to deal with ‘lineal time duration’ to measure motions in space, without entering into the details of the steps of the legs, the cycles of the wheel of the car, or the frequency of the wave that moves, but the universal real magnitude is cyclical time.

it is easier to calculate and extract motion from beings to add up the kinetic and potential energy and put them all in the same ‘bag’, mass, as a form of energy, position as a form of energy. But that simplifies enormously our understanding of the duality of the Universe, between its two poles, in this case

Sp=Mc^{2}: Sp(Se): < c^{2}: ∆-constant > M (Tƒ)

That is, a vortex-clock of time called a mass, can be uncoiled into an explosive, entropic radiation of kinetic energy, Sp, and this will be done in a proportion, which is again a constant of the space-time field in which the process takes place, across a bidimensional space-time plane called ‘light’, c^{2}.

Now the explanation of what that equation means: the back and forth transformation of mass time clocks into entropic motion, measured in the light space-time plane filled with ‘bidimensional fields of lights-space, c^{2}, is ‘philosophy of science’ and ‘principles’, ‘thoughts of god’, and that is what this web is about. the details and the practical use of them, is what classic physics is about.

Both are not mutually exclusive. Personally i find more fascinating the thoughts. Most physicists as Feynman put it, don’t care about the whys, the thoughts, which is ‘the only question a physicist must not ask’. He did work on the atomic bomb. I have wasted my active life opposing to nuclear weapons. So did Einstein who cared for thoughts, and found the 4th dimension. But the truth is we live in a world of praxis, which obscure the thoughts, the forest. And that is bringing us to the end of Gaia’s existence.

*Because the thoughts are ultimately about existences.*

Today the numbers and praxis of measure and construction of machines is the only thought understood by physicists. And that is a problem.

So returning to ‘Ðimotions’, Se, is distance in stillness, and entropic motion, as Ðimotions’ is a measure of all the ways a molecule in a gas can increase its space because it is an expansive |-Motion.

When you see the word ‘energy’ printed as synonymous of space, I am using the concept of kinetic energy, or energy as a synonymous, but we shall try to be more rigorous and define always Se as what truly means: Spatial expansive, lineal distances/entropic motions).

**The ultimate mathematical principles.**

In that regard, while we have stressed the mirror function of mathematics, NOT a literalist or creationist method, as our mind is linguistic, obviously languages do matter. And mathematics as the most synoptic efficient language is the right choice for physicist, but its use must be ground in the higher truths of space-time properties – the reality- and its logic laws of epistemological truth – the method to refer the mirror to that reality, and connect them through experimental and logic veracity. Only then we can fully understand mathematical physics.

The mathematical mirror in that sense *is excellent because it embeds in its synoptic language the fundamental properties of fractal space (in a larger measure than those of cyclical time, for whose symmetries uses distorted mirrors of the ‘generator’ and a simpler Aristotelian logic of a single arrow of time). And both will become simpler, filled with more meanings and more powerful when we complete its ‘r=evolution’.*

Consider another simplex example: the relationship between Universal constants and *arrows and dimensions of time-space.*

## The fundamental functions and constants *correspond to those arrows, but there is no magic about it, but synoptical power and EFFICIENCY:*

- So pi is the constant of informative perception and trans-form-ation of motion into form: 3 |> O+ 4% apertures to the world; and as the inverse arrow of form into entropy is just the contrary function, also the inverse ‘unwinding of form into motion’. But then is most often a multiple of π, (as in k and G equations) or a ‘radian’ of π (as in
~~h)~~, because*the dense curvature merely ‘peels off’ in parallel a ‘thin membrane’ of its curvature or perceives a ‘radius angle’ of the external universe.* - Phi is the constant of reproduction also because the efficiency of its spatial distribution that packs the maximal number of ‘reproductive events’ from an initial generator in minimal space.

And so *two simple, related constants suffice for most simpler, geometrically perfect actions of the 3 arrows of time: motion to form, form to motion and **reproduction.*

What about the 4th and 5th dimensions? Again the answer is self-evident (if you understand the organic Universe):

As those dimensions are concerned with fractal discontinuous or differential continuous functions from wholes to infinitesimals, it *must maximise the growth, and so polynomials and logarithms are used. Specifically:*

- e is the number of the fourth dimension of decay and death, which is the fastest possible process of dissolution of a single whole into infinitesimals, as those ‘cells/atoms/citizens’ ARE already reproduced and must merely be liberated from the single whole-membrane. So we find it in all decay process because of a simple property: e IS the fastest growing exponential function of any two numbers, in the Universe (and many related properties). Interesting enough to notice that it was found NOT as decay but as ‘interest=usury money’, what says a lot of the astounding ‘grab-theft’ of the financial profession, which found the maximal parasitic growth on account of doing NOTHING; just lend useless gold.
- While inversely the Log¹º function is the scaling of social evolution because the ‘tetrarkys’ with 3 x 3 elements as networks of entropy, energy and information with the central whole-singularity mind emerging in the new scale as ‘1’, is the most perfect form to deal as a time§paœrganism with the survival exigencies of any ecosystem of ‘fractal points’.

So we shall study mathematics *as the most efficient, synoptic language of the properties of timespace beings, after the very essence of the game, the formal generator, its symmetries and ∆•st logic, for which obviously the pretentious guru-magic of mathematical physicsts and the like, is just a barren “latin’; *and simplify, explain and evolve its Non-a logic and ‘fractal units’ (non-e points) from ‘space-time reality’ into mathematical mirroring.

All this said mathematics is one of the best languages to mirror efficiently the Universe, specially in spatial dimensions, but *since all languages are inflationary it is a key element in mathematical analysis of ∆st systems to break down what is ‘experimental truth’ and what is fiction. Consider the case of ‘dimensional analysis’. As it happens there are only 3 bidimensional topologies which correspond to the 3 functions=forms of all systems. And there are *only manifolds of rank 3 or lower which are ‘smooth’, differentiable, meaning systems where ‘time’ moves smooth through ‘present derivatives’.

So in a single plane of present only ternary space and ternary time dimensions are possible. As the mathematical mirror gets distorted, outside those 3s = 3t, the mirror guide us – but the experience must confirm them. This was the essence of Lobachevksi’s thought when he found non-euclidean points now forgotten: that maths are inflationary in its diverse theories so we cannot just do as mechanon physicists do, to write an equation and expects to be there, but a more subtle approach of mirrors observing reality and ordering it in local regions is required.

Soon we will see the interaction languages-reality where reality dominates but the mirror can also deform reality to make it seem like the mirror. Space-time thus comes first, and its dimensions *are the origin of reality; as Mirror-languages are both more concise and specific, so they cannot show all its properties and they all have a distortion to reduce information I.e. euclidean points have no ‘breath-information’ inside and so on.*

As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

Let us then show how those constants appear to the three great disciplines of science as:

**THE METRIC EQUATIONS OF THE GALATOM.**

*The existential force=momentum of galactic systems: hc*

When we study the strong nuclear force as an entropic death of particles that ‘extract’ from them its ‘existential force’ hc, we realize we have found the two key parameters of the ‘galatom’, the superorganism in which we exist.

This concept $=c; ð=h, gives us a product $ð, which is the fundamental constant of any system of nature; and as usual in the entangled universe, will have different forms of ‘measuring it’… conceptually and physically but we shall call generally the 5Ð metric of a system or in terms of its ‘value’, the *existential force or existential momentum of the system, its ‘power’ to survive. And so it is closely related to the vital Energy of the system, which other systems will absorb as in the case of the decay of pions in the strong force… as indeed happens in Einstein’s formulae: E=hc/λ*

Let us re-examine this formula, as it tells us a lot on the nature of physical light spacetime systems as we are, in the context of the fifth scalar dimension:

Paradoxically the minimal unit of the galatom, the ‘planckton’, defined by its existential force, hc, *has more energy the smaller λ, its wavelength is. The explanation though is immediate in 5D metric: as the larger wholes are ‘ghosts’ rising from the lower scales, obviously they must have a lesser quantity of energy, because they are ultimately parasites of its parts. So the inner Russian dolls of reality concentrate more ‘energy and information’ to supply the potential ghost-wholes that will enclose them.*

So we talk of a ‘nested Universe’, in which the space and time, form and motion, relative h and c parameters that define the existential constants of the being grow for larger wholes (larger c-like speeds) made of smaller informative parts (denser h-like informative positions). And this implies that outside the galatom, there must be other scales, with larger than c speeds and lower than h-uncertainties-temperatures, informative ‘cooler’ orders – more focused angles of perception – similar jargons…

SO the compound constant of the 5th dimension for the galatom is simple and as such it will be all pervading when considering the meaning of the ‘real constants’ of the Universe:

5D Galatom Supœrganism’s metric: $(c) ð (h) = Constant.

How then can we relate the ‘human’ constants of perception (length, mass and time) to the galatom’s ‘real objective, natural constants’?

Easy… As there was a genius of physics that figure them out:

*G, the constant of curvature that encases the quantum world and absorbs its ‘energy’ to make it emerge in the upper cosmological scale. Thus the key constants of space and time can be extracted from them, as we shall do in our posts on physics.*

*vortex of accelerated frequency, hence the proper measure of time is angular acceleration, 1/t², which in Planck’s natural units render*~~h~~G/cˆ5, getting rid of the meaningless ‘root’. So goes for lineal distance: in the bidimensional universe where all line has volume as it is made of fractal points, the unit of space is ‘area’ and so we get rid of the root again: Area=hG/c³.

*time and space have the same units but time has a c², reproductive factor added. So we might say that a worldcycle of time, is the reproductive sum of a ‘step in space’ in enough numbers to complete the worldcycle.*

*the maximal quantity of mass-energy that the galaxy can enclose by volume of space; and so we must consider G the constant of scale, H, the constant of information-time-angular momentum and c, the constant of reproduction of information or ‘motion’ as the 3 constants that define the ‘domain’ of a galatom, and Q, shown to be merely the same metric reduced to the quantum scale with the unification of both, the other limiting vortex of time of the galatom.*

*a different region of the Universe.*

As in the same manner that hc and temperature emerges as ‘cold mass’ in the cosmological scale of the galatom, for the same token, mass in our scale should be transfered to the dark world of the halo of likely heavy ultradense quarks beyond the c-speed limit and the 0 K activity of temperature…

**The parameters of the main physical scales of the Universe.**

The first form of space and first expression of the ∆-gravitational scale symmetry is c-speed.

In the translation of 4D physics to 5 Ð Physics, we start from c-speed, the constant, then we multiply C= $p x ðƒ = Length x Angular frequency (in Planck Units).

On the other hand the principle of relativity translates into the principle of Galileo the gal ilea paradox: all moves and has form at the same time.

Light therefore splits into space-distance, and time-frequency, and its constancy in 4D is particular case of the Sp x ðƒ constancy of the 5th dimension.

And for that reason we DO have a close similarity between the Metrics of a given plane of the 5^{th} dimension:

∆= $p x ðƒ and the equations of energy of each Plane of the Universe:

∆ : $p x ðƒ ≈ Energy : Constant of Space-action x Frequency:

*In the graph, the 3 main constants of space-time of the physical Universe, of the 3 scales among which human beings interact. Those constants, the boatsman constant of our ∆-thermodynamic scale, the c-speed constant of cosmological space-time and the H-planck quanta of electromagnetic space time are 3 Universes in themselves.*

On the other hand , in the right we see the minimal space-time quanta of the ∆-1 quantum scale, ~~h~~, which therefore has the same metric equation:

$p x ðƒ = ~~h~~ = E x I , the uncertainty equation of Heisenberg that merely states the constancy and minimal quanta of space-time of the quantum scale. Between both we are sandwiched with the informative clocks of temperature and the minimal quanta of space-time called a Boltzman quanta.

In the graph, we can see the main species of the physical Universe, a charge and a mass, which clock-like accelerated vortices of smaller and larger space-time membranes, and the middle thermodynamic scale we inhabit.

The 2 time-space vortices, charges and masses, which are the limiting scales of the Fractal Universe perceived by human beings, thus become now crystal clear in its nature. In between them, there is the thermodynamic scale of forms of matter, *which is more complex, because we perceive all its information and it is connected to the other 2 scales with whom it exchanges energy and information through different flows and parameters which we shall study in detail in the physical blogs, beyond the simple concepts of this introduction.*

Let us then move one with the more general principles that apply to all systems of the Universe, considering now the geometry of space and time, its bidimensional fractal-network nature, and how both combine to form those 5 Dimensional systems.

**C, H, K: 5D ****GALATOM’S**** CONSTANTS **

Two immediate consequences of this duality of stopping and moving, particle and wave states are evident. First we find an ¡logic cause to the constancy of light speed: particles in still state entangled when they emit bosons of information, regardless of the motion around them, in its fractal local space, so c-speed is always measured as c.

It is then obvious that even locomotion the less relevant dimotion is more than a simple measure of ‘speed’. ONLY obsessed physicists as high priests of time with his shallow ‘brief history’ of those ‘5 Dimotions reduced to the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion can really think tracing speeds and worldlines is the meaning of its existence. Because physicists make weapons of mass destruction unable to love even their own species and so do humans embedded in a civilization of machines of entropy and dog-eat-dog people, who cannot emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms… we have converted the less important arrows in the meaning of the Universe.

But in that constant S-T, stop and MOVE, game of information and motion, it il NOT with locomotions, overrated and exhaustively studied by humans but with its inverse Dimotion, that of the mind that perceives in stillness. So there is a duality between motion and stillness, which allow us to define the state of ‘mind perception’.

Which finally leads us to the last element we cannot avoid any longer to fully define the Universe in both objective and subjective terms, the 2 dimensions of the Mind, as a membrain, self-centered into a singularity whose linguistic mappings and ternary syntax reflects the world of ternary beings of space-time in which the being exists, performing its survival actions.

Specifically in the Light space-time ‘galatom superorganism’ in which humans co-exist, all systems have a speed of reproduction of information of c-speed above which all the other planes of light exist¡ence happen. So as the system becomes more complex its motion implies the reproduction of multiple layers of being, in adjacent ‘wave-like’ states of reproduction of information.

And so the fastest form is the one that must reproduce less information, life itself, all other particles, atoms and atomic configurations are slower.

Because C-speed is the speed of reproduction of information along all the ∆±¡ scales of a system, it follows that larger systems that try to be synchronous as supœrganisms must have constants of reproduction of speed, faster.

What other ‘constants’ matter to a system? Obviously a system must have 3 constants, for the 3 parts of the being.

So we define the 3 physiological constants of physics in terms of its 3 ‘galatom’s parts’ and scales:

**c or rather c²**to keep the bidimensional holographic principle of information, is the constant of maximal speed of reproduction of form in the ∆+¡ relative planes of galatom’s ‘fractals’ (all of us made of evolved light particles). In fact all systems of nature should be able to reproduce form as ‘light space-time systems’ at c-speed. However as this happens in different scales; the larger parts of the galaxy as they reproduce through the path of c-speed diminish its translation, in an inverse form to the in-form-ation they must reproduce: V (ST) = $(λ) x ƒ (ð). If in terms of scale, it must be considered the constant of the ∆+1 gravitational scales, in terms of topology it must considered the constant of the vital ‘plenum’ body-wave of energy of the galatom as a superorganism. As such is the main constant of our island-universes.**h or rather h/2π=**is the constant of ‘informative gauging’, the ‘particle-state’ constant, the informative particle-head constant of all systems of light that gauge information in reality, and as such is the second most important constant of Nature. It belongs to the ∆-¡ planes. h will then become all pervading in theory of information and the building of all kind of social structures with particles and atoms. H is measured as Energy x Time or Momentum x Distance, which gives us the ‘long time’ cyclical and ‘short time’ open paths of the ‘Galilean paradox’ (all lineal motions become closed paths with enough time, momentum becomes energy and distance in space motion in time).~~h,~~**K**is then the constant of ‘motion-entropy’, for all atomic systems in the intermediate thermodynamic plane of reality; and as such it corresponds to the ‘limbic/potential’, moving elements of atomic supœrganisms, made to the image and likeness of its larger supœrganism, the galatom, in its ∆º ‘human-size’ plane. K is measured in terms of entropy also.

And so we have 3 constants of Nature to define the galatom, each of them normally associated to a ‘parameter’ of frequency of its time cycles to give us the time-energy total for the system measured. This implies each of those 3 constants will associate to a ‘membrane’-frequency parameter specific for each local system:

- Mass, the enclosure for energy systems at the cosmological scale, which allows when an energy is enclosed within a domain to calculate its ‘weight’ or frequency of its angular enclosure as a mass vortex of accelerated time (Principle of equivalence mass-acceleration: E=hƒ+e=mc2, M=ƒ(h/c2).
- ƒrequency for the quantum-photon scale, or rather density of photons in a single point of space, in its color configuration, for the quantum h-scale: E=hv
- Temperature, for the entropic, human thermodynamic ¡0 plane, which also measures the ‘frequency’ of vibration of an enclosed ‘gas-like’ system’ as perceived thermodynamically in the UPPER scale above the quantum ensemble of particles and molecules it is enclosing with the concept of ‘heat-temperature’ of the upper scale.

It also follows that those ‘enclosures’ – frequency of a radiation measured in the upper plane, temperature of a molecular ensemble also measured in the upper plane, and gravitational mass of an ensemble measured in the cosmological scale, *are ∆+1 membrane enclosures of ∆º relative ensembles and as such the parameters of frequency, temperature and mass belong to a larger plane than the vital energy particles they trap. The minimal quanta of each scale, h, c and k become in this manner ‘gatherered’ to extract from them from the perspective of the larger scale energy, entropy or information: h accumulate in a single parameter of ‘wholeness’ as a color perceived by our electronic eyes, which extract information from it; k becomes then multiplied by nT to give us the ‘whole heat’ sensation provided by the system from where we shall extract motion; and *

It is difficult to stress the importance of the 3 vital constants of the galatom, in all formulae of physics, which will study normally ‘fractal supœrganisms’ of matter within the galatom and its 5 Dimotions of exist¡ence. And the *ginormous number of conceptual insights we can get in all fields of physics but the proper understanding in organic terms of the vital constants of Nature, and physical systems, which will loose its ‘abstract’ outlook. *

How this work will require a thorough analysis of each of the main equations of physics, but it seems obvious that those dimotions involving entropic actions such as radiation, will see a ‘decay’ of exponential nature (the maximal speed of dissolution of any function of nature), involving ratios that transform one of those parameters into the other constants, such as in the equations of radiation (Planck’s law), where we observe the constant of decay, transforming kT into hƒ and vice versa, as temperature becomes radiation or radiation is upgraded into measure as heat (and appears as a huge temperature, which is not the proper way to measure it, since we should just refer in the quantum scale to frequencies, being temperature the untranslatable state for measuring molecular activity).

We could in that sense more properly consider that frequency is ‘grouped’ into ‘colors’ of temperature, and ‘transfers’ its activity to the higher scale, beyond the Curie limit.

By the same token in the other direction, we could consider that ‘heat’ is transferred to mass and so mass systems ‘cool down’ the previous scale as they acquire mass-energy (translation movement in the upper scale).

Now to fully grasp that graph, and the meaning of tose equations we must understand the meaning of a conservative energy cycle. Energy is not spent when there is no motion in a given length of time. Thus time can be run without end in energy conservaton terms, as long as we return always to the same point doing a time cycle. The principle of conservation of energy ths become the principle of repetition of presents, whih are sums of time cycles in which a trajectory returns to a point. In this manner we can resume all those principles is the Generator equation of energy and time:

∑E∆-1<≈> ∏ T∆

-And the discontinuous, quantum nature of space, which carries the kinetic energy of the Universe in its constant motions (proved by quantum physics, by the life and death cycle of biological systems, and the principles of conservation of energy, shown in the left side picture, where we describe the 3 fundamental scales of the Universe, and its co-invariant, product of the speed of its time clocks and spatial quanta, conserved as a product: E=hƒ, E=knT, E=mc²)

*So human sciences, all of which use time and space parameters, are in sore need to change its paradigm, in its description of the scalar space-time fractal structure of the Universe, if they want to advance in its comprehension of reality.*

**Physical Systems of self-centered space-time.**

In the graph we can see 3 of such scales and its relative size and speed measure in frequency (the inverse of lineal time duration: T=1/ƒ=1/Tiƒ, whereas Tiƒ is the fundamental symbol for cyclical time): The galaxy, the human and the DNA. Those scales create in groups of 3 ∆±1 ‘universal planes’, complex organic systems, in which the faster speeds and information of smaller systems, codes larger wholes, which in turn control the motions of the smaller systems. And those are precisely the organic properties of the Universe, which extend also to physical systems.

Now, in the Human Universe, the previous equation has an immediate lecture in terms of the fundamental Universal Constants of the Universe:

C-light speed, which is the parameter of space-motion (Spe) of our Universe, and calculates the speed of reproduction of information across the scales of the 5th dimension.

quanta of information which is the minimal Tiƒ unit of information, and multiplied by 2π, gives us the minimal time cycle, H-Planck of our Universe.

And so both together, c become the minimal unit of space-time of the Universal reality.

How those minimal space-time Units ‘scale’ in the 3 scales of physical reality, the ∆-1 quantum, electromagnetic scale, the ∆+1 gravitation scale and the human, thermodynamic scale?

Easy. They form the 2 fundamental species of those scales: charge and mass. Indeed, in Planck Units we define the minimal dual charge and dual mass forming a system of electromagnetic or gravitational space-time as:

Qp x Qp = c (SxT) /K ∆-1

Mp x Mp = c (SxT) /G ∆+1

Thus a charge field basically is a Universal space-time, ST, hc, curved extremely by the constant of the quantum scale of the 5th dimension, Ke, till forming a vortex like space-time species.

And a mass field is basically the same, curved by a constant, G, which form a much larger scale, (a Planck mass is huge compared to a plank charge).

**II. MATHEMATICAL CONSTANTS**

The body wave that reproduces is wide, the wave-dimension. Bodies are wide.

Length is the dimotion of field-potential speed, limbs speed, simple, lineal motions over the entropy of a lower scale. The body-wave however balances both head and limbs. Height is the dimension of particles-heads.

Dimotions of space-time are really cyclical and with a point of view; the singularity or Tƒi point of maximal information either in the center or top of the height dimension of information that commands the whole structure and enacts apperceptively, consciously or vegetatively a program of existence, which ensures the survival of the whole and has ‘appeared’ naturally either by selection or by trial and error after infinite eons – since those species who do not tender for their territorial vital space, and feed it with energy and guide it with proper linguistic mapping-information have not survived and reproduced. So the sum of the actions of those mind points is what becomes as observed simultaneously a whole supœrganism of ‘exi=stence’.

So the point of view becomes focus of multiple arrows, cycles o space-time, how it his managing them, through invagination and palingenesis of a more complex being.

So each super organism in space is a knot of space-time cyclical actions in time:

In graph, a time-functon of development and differentiation which follows a mathematical ratio. bEING THE UNIVERSE, A GAME OF RELATIVE SCALES, ratios are what it measures. And three are its main ratios:

- ∂s/∂t: speed of space.
- ∂t/∂s: density of information
- v x ρ= 1

Whereas the one, is the Knotted mind-being, an ageing species moving through social scales of planes of existence, describes the actions of space-time arrows from the perspective of the whole supœrganism of §paœ, ‘social, vital, simultaneous space’.

Indeed, ‘minds produce bidimensional space-time actions that exchange entropy, energy and information with the world outside and the intrinsic hyperbolic ∆-1 world of cellular parts inside.

As such beings are knotted space-time cyclical constant action perceived in simultaneous space as a species of physical, biological or social space-time, whose varieties through scales are the details of reality, the larger view below the final ‘unifying layer of gst isomorphic laws.

And the simplest way to define one of such variety of species is by its ratios of density, scale and speed, its fundamental…

**III. BIOLOGICAL, VITAL CONSTANTS**

‘The ultimate principles of science must depart from the simplest Universal constants, e, pi and the like’ (Einstein quoted from memory).

‘The world cycle of existence is determined by i, 0, 1, √2, phi, e and π which describe the world cycle of existence, in each of 3 ages acting as the standing points for a Lagrangian zero sum of all the actions of the space-time organism. We are born between i and 0, becoming a whole at 1, which will start a second growth, by sexual reproduction at √2, differentiating in proportion to phi between our 3 component parts, which start an exponential growth, in e³ stages till reaching 20 units in space or time, during our second age, which collapses inwards, through pi-warping, till death reverses the process into an e¯³ decay, death’. (Sancho, quoted from intelligence)

In biology, those constants are far more complex in its ‘elements’, and are called vital constants, studied partially in greater detail as ‘balance states’ of the being.

While s x t, THE MOMENTUM, IS EQUIVALENT TO THE ‘TOP PREDATOR POWER’ OF THE SYSTEM. That is, the system with maximal momentum, means with better brain and stronger body, becomes the top predator system that dominates and reproduces.

As it is the case in physics, where the densest, fastest ‘black hole’ devours all other physical forms.

**SUMMARY**

**Introduction. **Beings as knots of Constant, cyclical space-time motions/actions.

**I. ∆•ST:** Types of Constants.

**II. **Conservation Principles.

**III**. A classification of Constants for each organic being in 7 groups.

**IV.** Examples in physical, biological and social systems.

**Abstract.** The generator equation of fractal space-time beings (ab. GST, Γ) is created by dynamic ∆-1 finitesimal exchanges of energy and information, which define ratios of Spe/Tiƒ entropy/information relationships. They are the Universal constants that become the fundamental partial equations of parts of the fractal generator:

Spe≤≥ st ≤≥Tiƒ

For example, the partial equation, ∑ Spe≤≥ Tiƒ is defined by the pi constant that turns around the interval 3 (hexagonal pi) 3+1/3 (10/3), as its limits for a different form of lineal transformations into cyclical information. As such is the fundamental constant of the Universe of world cycles.

## MATHEMATICAL CONSTANTS.

The first expression of Ðimotions are mathematical constants that establish her relationships between the String and its action-vibrations. The simplest one being, ∏ $

All this said of course, mathematics is with words and images, the three dominant, spatial, temporal and space-time languages of the human mind and as such they are very good mirrors of reality. To the point that maths, the less understood by man (which is a verbal, visual I=eye>wor(l)d basically), as it seems to be a better language for ‘digital machines’, natural to them; seems so often magic, when it reflects reality.

It is in that sense part, its richness as a mirror, part the human limits of thought what makes math so ill-understood and revered. So we shall introduce a few concepts of that ‘mirror-reflection’ before we apply them to mathematical physics.

… STARTING from what Einstein considered the ‘initial elements’ of reality (of the mirroreality of mathematics we would say). Its universa constants.

**e, p(h)i. ****Beings as Knots of Constant ****Cyclic Space-Time Actions**

We said that the Universe is absolutely relative, and so we can ono investigate potentials and ratios, not more is needed. And since we start with bidimensional entropy and information, only three combinations of presents, four if we consider the inverse to be different in multiplication, main ‘group’ parameters:

∂s/∂t or speed, ∂t/∂s or density and ∂s x ∂ t or momentum.

In practice though the change of ages of a being from an age dominant in speed through an age of ‘unitarianism’, s/t x t/s= present momentum, must be account for each physical constant with different speeds.

So there is a more fundamental form of a game of ratios? Indeed, that of mathematical constants, which reflect better the game of all games.

And the first of those ratios are the Universal constants of density, pi, momentum, e and speed,

*In graph, the 2 fundamental mathematical and physical constants of Nature*

*We shall depart from their ‘unification’ to explain how the Universe creates reality departing from those ‘perfect rations of energy and information’. As such G and Q can be easily unified as two space time vortices of 2 scales of nature, the quantum and gravitational scale, showing the ratios between distance/speed/lineal space and time cycles/curvatures.*

*The 3 main constants of mathematics are directly related to the fundamental generator of space-time:*

*pi, relates the transformation of spatial field of entropy into a vortex of temporal information: 3 x ( Spe) > ∏ Tiƒ.**e the constant of the only function, which is a derivative of itself, eª represents the fundamental function of reproduction of any system, at the lower ‘cellular scale’, as the system increases by a derivative at each step.Or in terms of 3: e+e/10=3, where 10 is the commonest growth ‘finitesimal’ as 10, is the simplest ‘whole organism’, with 3 x 3 ‘corners’ that represent the 3 arrows of time and a 10th central unit, the mind that ‘transcends’ as the 1 of a higher social scale.*- Phi, the golden ratio is essentially the demising ratio that relates the entropic ‘length’ and ‘informative’ height of a bidimensional ‘page of information, whereas ST=φ and Tiƒ=1. Therefore it is connected to the proportion of energy needed to breed an ‘informative’ head. Yet both the particle and the body-wave arise from a field of entropy, and so if we consider the whole to be Spe, the field of entropy which feeds both: Spe= ST+Tiƒ, gives us the golden ratio and once more, ST gives rise to the particle head, in a series of inclusive parts. So Spe, the whole is to ST as ST is to Tiƒ.
- Logarithmic functions represent the explosive growth of the first age of the system. After it reaches maturity it decays inversely, exponentially in the curve of death, forming together and intersecting function.

*To notice that both, π (+3.14) and e (2.81) are close to 3 by a minimal difference of +0.1, as ultimately the curvature of 3 lineal elements makes a larger cycle with aperture-wholes, while the reproduction of a system extracts energy from its ternary parts to reproduce an infinitesimal or transfer a quanta of energy to the larger whole, x².*

**Abstract: **Dynamically we can define any space-time being as a knot of cyclical space-time actions, ruled by the simple metric of 5D which define the parameters, limits and gradients of its exchanges of energy and information, with the different planes of the ∆-universe.

It is the detailed analysis of bit and bite by bit and bite of the being, as its r=evolves in its world cycles, pushed by quantum motions and stops that consume and feed its energy, ±∆3, splitting the ratios of energy and information of a ‘smaller being’; or ratios between the information and energy of a system, that gives us its ‘exi=st-ential power, in actions that put together as universal constants. Or exchanges of information in processes of social evolution that happen often in decametric scales, and measured as a population in space or process of evolution in time will show also its numeral constants.

Such constants tend to be constants of actions or ratios of feeding and perceiving energy and information or social evolution, and it will affect to ∆±∞ species of scales. Yet from the human ∆0 perspective, when they belong to huge super organisms (earth, galaxy, universe) they tend to be considered ‘universal’ and treated with the abstract reductionism of physics. They are though not different from the vital constants of local biological beings, and its functions are similar for the whole organism of the Universe. Consider for example, the Lamba cosmological constant that merely defines the 3 ages of an EFE space-time (gravitational). If it changes from 0 to ±0, it will define one of the 3 ‘topological ages’ of the Universe, the elliptic, hyperbolic or flat, old steady state, young age of the Universe.

Other constants represent flows between ∆±1 scales, when two species exchange energy and information ,as part of their social activity and creation of symbiotic space-time cycles.

Thus constants express form and function and ratios of energy and information, within the generator equation. It follows that each system of the Universe has its constants. And while we seem obsessed by physical constants of the larger Universe, those are a small part of them.

Indeed, the number of Universal constants of the larger super organisms of mankind – the galaxy-universe and its symmetries in the lower ∆-3 scale, the atom – is far inferior though to the enormous number of local constants, as the creative Universe form resonant frequencies, synchronicities and flows of energy and information between ∆st• beings constantly.

Finally to notice that those constants are dynamic motions and exchanges of energy and information. So while here we treat them mostly quantitatively in the next isomorphism, we develop them from a qualitative point of view.

Now the fact that mathematical constants are RATIOS NOT NUMBERS, AND HENCE IRRATIONAL NUMBERS ARE RATIOS TOO, and they are most of the numbers of the real line sets up the possibility of infinite mathematical games of existence encoded in the ratios of those irrational numbers. But ratios of what? Normally of topological *motions which exchange energy and information, between parts or entities of the Universe. So they are ultimately the constants of time motions of the Universe, * which change state along its ternary elements of Γ=GST and dual or ternary ‘social structures and networks’.

Now, in as much as pi and e are the constant ratios of the 2 main events of the Universe, an Spe≤>Tiƒ transform of entropy into information; an ∆±1 scaling growth or motion of entropy and information between scales and its combined reproductive motions; we can find that most fundamental equations of mathematical supœrganisms and world cycles can be interpreted in terms of those numbers. But the proper way to see those numbers are as preferred points of a larger cycle, the circle and the hyperbola, which becomes in this way the 2 limits of the conic bidimensional S, st, T, elements of the holographic Universe:

In the graph, all curves are conic sections, of which the 2 extremes of inversion of sp<st>tiƒ orientations are the hyperbola and the circle, with the related second closed curve of the ellipse and the parabola. So we can classify them as MAX. tiƒ=circle, defined by the ratio Spe>Tiƒ AND WE could signify by the concept S=T, Pi, the hyperbola, whose function is S=1/T, its inverse, the perfect entropic function both of pure predatory death and pure exponential growth, whose most perfect form can be defined by e. And then the intermediate quadratic and elliptic forms in between, with its infinite 0° solutions, in its variations of ‘elliptic information’ and parabolic energy (the intermediate ST forms) as the pure circle and the pure hyperbola does not really exist, but are the perfect i-logic forms… (irrational ratios).

**√2**

The growth of reality between two scales starts with the √2 a bidimensional triangular pair, which starts the growth on dimensions of information, and space-extension by reproduction of the same event through a series of different forms of growth:

Let us then analyse this first event and its variations. Two lines of thought, the particles 1 x and 1 y, meet themselves in the relative 0 point, of an x-y automatically created coordinates, which will give us an √2, wave with origin in o, and an xy, expansion front of space-time, reproduced by pairs of xy points along the front-wave till √2 reaches the two ‘membranes of the x y tail of past momentum’.

At this point √2 can be measured as a sum of discontinuous wave-points, and gives us a variation of ±1, or be considered as a continuous wave of energy; never mind, in both descriptions we have created a bidimensional, triangular, straight triangle, which can now grow in different 0/0 tangents to the exponential wave of its second age, of geometric growth.

**The constants of motion. Building blocks of reality**

It is then evident that the key to function perception is to model the different equalities as different entities that co-exist together in ∆±1 wav particle or field states, unveiling of an ∆ºSt±1 organism different parts in dynamic relationships of transference of entropy, information and energy between different parts of the being:

All this said, we are writing in a sequential order the isomorphisms of the Universe for a reason, as they are closely related in ‘pairs’. So the defining quantitative element of those motions are its ‘constant ratios’ and functions, which describes them in terms of algebraic operandi and space and time values. We can then wonder, which is the fundamental equation or Universal, mathematical physical, mental, topological or organic-biological constant for each of those 8 motions of the Universe.

It is self-evident that those constants will be the simplest, most repeated constants of reality. So we can easily realise that:

*The constant of the 2 motions of information is ±pi,*which converts lineal into cyclical form. In the perceptive motion the constant will curve inwards the flow of energy, and radially select from its apertures, the relevant information to map out reality. In the communicating case, it will be a trigonometric π-wave of sines and cosines. But in both cases information will be preserved in the frequency and form of those pi cycles. Hence for transformations of lineal entropy into cyclical information we always find a πi constant.- THE CONSTANT OF THE 2 motions of growth and diminution is ±eª, as e=(1+1/a)ª, clearly represents the growth of a whole system, by 1 finitesimal cellular part, 1/a, in a times; and viceversa, its diminution along the same proportions – hence for growth and decay, we always find an e-constant.
- The constant of reproduction is often related to the golden ratio and its variations on the Fibonacci series, from his famous ‘2 rabbits reproducing rabbits’, for complex informative systems, but for pure translative motion, the λ-wave length of the moving form is the specific ‘constant of reproduction’ of each waveform. And in explosive ratios of growth between scales, we shall often find pure logarithmic scales in base 3×3+0 (the perfect tetraktys) or e-numbers of ∆-1 unit growth.
- So this leaves us the 2 remaining motions, which are processes of emergence and dissolution of the being across an ∆±1 discontinuum of existence, which cannot be measured with absolute precision as information disappears or it is newly created within scales. So there is a certain degree of uncertainty, which will be the constant to use for each ‘different space scale’, in the case of physical scales, the well known constants of H-planck (quantum uncertainty), entropy (Boltzmann constant) and cosmological constant for the dark matter, beyond c-speed and below ∆0 Temperature. So there is not a clear ‘universal constant’ as each different super organism and its different scalar planes requires a specific analysis of its own. But again we find often this finitesimal quanta to be 1/n, and hence also related to the e number (1 +1/n)ˆn; as emergence and dissolution might be considered the final stage or ‘limiting barrier’ of an e-progression

So 2 mathematical constants are found everywhere in the Universe and suffice almost to describe everything:

Pi the* constant of Spe≤≥Tiƒ transformations and e, the constant of ∆º±1 transformations.*

**The beauty of 3. Pi=+3 & e+e/10=3, the major constants.**

The most beautiful part of this blog is in that sense, the enormous simplicity of the fundamental equations of the fifth dimension and its immediate connection with the simple elements o reality, which by iteration of its dual and ternary principles we and future researchers shall raise through the 4 lines of this blog to encompass all what exist.

In such a simple, iterative Universe, where there are only 2 ‘fundamental events’:

A motion in the 5th dimension between scales.

And a transformation of lineal entropy into cyclical information and vice versa,

As Einstein wanted the ultimate principles of reality are Universal ratios/constants, which transform space into time or rise through the scales of the 5th dimension, a reproductive sum of parts into a whole. So we shall find 2 absolute magic ratios in all systems:

π: 3|s>Ot: Pi, transforms back and forth lineal entropy into temporal information, through cycles or sinusoidal hyperbolic waves.

∆±i: e is the constant of growth and diminution that rises a group through the scales of the 5th dimension: e= (1+1/n)ˆn.

Now, why those pi, e, values exist and no others is the next layer of understanding of Universal constants. Since the 3 are closely related… to 3, ah the beauty of trinity, which only I and God seems to have understood (: and Saint Augustine, just kidding:)

Pi is indeed 3 in excess, exactly 3 in the hexagon; e is 3=e +e/10, in defect of a classic growth of one tenth every ‘part’.

Phi is another scalar argument: the whole (trinity) is to the larger part (body) as the larger part (body) is to the smaller one (head).

So we are finding *some perfect ratios, harmonic, the first pi (on the interval from 3-the hexagonal pi to 3.14, the circular pi), and the second e is the ratio of growth of a ten dimensional tetraktys, one by one, as 2.718..+0.271..=2.99…*

The absolute truths of this specific universe are encoded into those numbers; so are many mysteries yet to resolve by science. They are all pervading, but what they really mean? And why they are so closer, yes you guess it… to 3, and how many of its decimals matter?

A couple of teasers on this last question:

You need only 39 pi decimals to calculate the horizon of the universe, with the precision of a single atom; *yet 10ˆ39 is the difference between the gravitational cosmic force and the quantum force of the atom.*

Today, students in elementary schools routinely use the estimate of 22/7, as archimedes did, for it, which despite its simplicity is only 0.04% off its correct value.

Phi thus is the number of the palingenesis, or inner distribution of growth, during the first age of the being, above 1; e is the number of scalar growth, above 2 : e+e/10= 3…

And Pi, above 3, is the number that converts entropy into information, (Poincare’s conjeture).

And of course pi and e are ever present, around 3. Of its many definitions the one mathematicians ignore of e, is the more proper one, e+ e/10 = 3, a unit of growth of the perfect game of decametric scales of social numbers, which is a good way to introduce…

**The power of first principles: mathematical constants as a proof of dark matter.**

How important those simplest constants are can be seen considering some simple solutions of mathematical physics, which have cost enormous experimental effort in classic physics. We often bring here the two of cosmology – the meaning and proportion of dark matter, and the meaning and value of the G constant of gravitation, both only obtained with experimental evidence, but which are rather trivial theoretical results from GST.

So let us consider one of those conundrums. What is dark matter? We shall see *how a simple thought experiment reveals as the Greeks and Einsteins always knew much more than machines of huge cost, for the cheap price of a few words and a kilo of old grey healthy matter. Indeed, it took millions of $ to calculate the dark matter of the Universe. Another trivial margin (:*

How simple indeed can be the answer to all the great questions?

Extremely simple as 3 is really a small number and the numbers around it, suffice to explain the 3 ages of life.

So all the important numbers of science turn around 1, 2 and 3, which as Einstein put it would have to be ‘the final essential constants that reflect best the game of existence’ :

Yet pi is not perfect. And if we were to consider the real pi of nature, as all ‘membranes’ do have ‘holes’ through which parallels of entropy and information cross, we would say that a membrane is π=3+0.14 apertures, through which the singularity mind in the center can see behind the membrane, the outer world. So we have always a 96% of dark matter, which allows us to see through: π-3/π

How much of dark matter there is? We know is 96% and we see only 4%. Again this took enormous effort of machines to measure it, but it is another ‘proof on the margin’, once you understand properly maths. We said that pi is NOT perfect. In fact, the closure of pi is 3 lineal parts that become a closed topology. It is the hexagonal pi (perimeter 3, radius 1) the strongest polygon; and that of the most curved gravitational space in relativity. But if we consider that 3 diameters of entropy create a circle, then there are 0.14 potential windows to see from its center, surrounded by the dark matter halo.

This means: π-3/3=4% of reality is WHAT we see. And indeed 96% of reality is invisible dark matter and energy, ‘screened’ by the halo. We are *inside a relative gravitational **gala cell and the homunculus should know his position in the Universe, which likely if we could see it all would look much more as a local organism till the horizon beyond we cannot even see that 4%.*

**NUMBERS**.

Now, once we have solved a simple example with the ‘first layer of mathematical reality’, its Universal constants, we can give a try to the second layer, ‘numbers’. You might of course consider that constants are ratios of numbers, and they are. So what are numbers?

The answer is numbers are ‘the sequential, temporal view of points, the simultaneous spatial view’. So numbers and points are the time-space species of mathematics, its foundational elements (NOT sets, categories or any other axiomatic imaginary arrogant mind-madness of human selfie mathematicians, indeed Cantor ended in a madhouse, but before converted mathematics in a mad-science with its ‘sets’ – the mind category that substituted the real ‘beings’ experimentally sound, ‘fractal points’ with inner volume (∆º) and its equivalent sequential elements in time, numbers.

This of course, is just the start, to build complex space-time systems in several dimensions, which polynomial functions, which are ‘functions’ that cover several scales of the fifth dimension. And we do have analysis which does the same exploration of parts and wholes in a more sophisticated way. But all *those functions will ultimately be mirrors of the 3 elements of all languages that reflect the 3 space-time elements of the Universe: *

F(s) < Operandi/ST-action > G (T)

Reason why, and it is astounding we have to stay this, mathematics works so well as a mirror of so many systems, due to its capacity to carry so much detailed information about their spatial entropy and temporal information, and the operandi/actions that combine them. But alas, Mr. Hilbert changed all this for ‘his mind images’ as he couldn’t figure out the fractal points of Lobacjevski and he joined forces with Mr. Cantor’s paradoxes and paradises of ‘sets’ – another mind construct to substitute the number. And so they founded the axiomatic method – which of course Godel, Einstein’s best friend proved wrong, as Broglie and then Bohm, Einstein’s favourite student did with the Copenhagen ego. Do you think mathematicians who had entered their own ‘godlike’ paradise, as the only ‘language’ which existed and proved within itself (in its imaginary sets and points with no breath) cared?

No, they just started a runaway train of ever more complicated distortions of the beautiful mirror of geometric points, social numbers and its organic functions, as Copenhagen did, to make it all *so complex nobody could understand, and alas! they could dismiss forever since any criticism as experts into the language of God, like priests talking latin, Allah talking arab, and bankers issuing go(l)d in toxic derivatives nobody understood. *

This is the trick: to make the language inflationary, multiplying its ‘ptolemaic epicycles’ to pass as an expert of something you no longer understand or refer to reality.

It is then evident that fractal Non-E *points in space and numbers in time are the ‘real’ units of mathematics, which refer to the real elements of the Universe; not sets and imaginary points, neither physical theories based in inflationary distortions of the mathematical reality. *

Then instead of GOING up in complexity, we can go down in simplicity to the real Universe of space points and temporal numbers, and show that the structure of ‘social numbers’ the minimal units of temporal algebra, *have the properties of discontinuous time cycles, similar but not equal to the continuous, simultaneous space surfaces, and keep illuminating the world with mathematics. For example, *the first, oldest simplest conundrum we notice when we realise points are continuous space and numbers discontinuous time is the oldest paradox of maths: the explanation of why in geometry pi & √2 exist, but in algebra, we ‘miss’ its perfect closure as numbers are discontinuous, so *all algebraic formulae of √2 miss a ±1; and all approximations to π, are slightly above or below.*

And so we must consider that *for systems of most ternary ∆±1 scales this is its value.*

*Almost a interesting is the 0.04%>0.4% > 4% scalar series. As 4% happens to be the ‘openings left’ **in a pi cycle, with only 3 diameters… π-3/π=4%, the quantity of open space seeing from inside the circle, which gives a 96% of dark matter to an observer inside a circle of any pi-related spiral-like structure, as it happens in the Universe at large (per-cent-age of dark matter). *

It i then important to realise the dynamics around the perfect numbers, 0, 1, 2, 3 from where all other systems can be deduced, in lower and upper scales, which normally do not need the full range of the irrational number, but with 3 or 10 digits suffice to establish the ∆º±1 or decametric scales of reality.

**e**

In that sense 3 is indeed the number and 10 the series. Consider the case of the other key number of reality:

*e+e/10=3. The scalar Universe, we shall see soon, has 10 decametric scales, but e breaks its regularity after 10 decimals: 2’718282828..459*

… And those 2 Euler equations yes, what truly ‘i’ means?

NOW THE FIRST EQUATION is the equation of the zero-worldcycle, only observing the beginning and the end. The second equation is the equation of the world cycle with all its internal fluctuations, and possibilities as pi is not closed, the angle is not COMPLETE.

**Phi, the ‘minor’ universal constant: the golden ratio.**

While phi is the golden ratio of proportions of the 3 topological parts of the being, expressly the commonest ratio of the function Tiƒ (height)/Spe (length), proper of a bidimensional form of in-form-ation.

Thus the answer to why those are the constants of nature and no others is obvious: ONCE THOSE RATIOS CAN BE understood as the perfect algebraic expression of the main motions/events of any species of ternary Spe<ST>Tiƒ elements in the Universe, CERTAINLY, those ratios/events are more efficient and SURVIVE BETTER AS THEY ARE MORE HARMONIC.

Why those ratios exist is obvious, given the analytic and geometric properties of the golden ratio of which the less quoted is curiously the most important: φ²-φ=1

In essence the a-b ratio determines the internal relationship as relative ST>Tiƒ dimensions of a holographic sheet of entropy/energy and/or information, where the reproductive energy is the *previous part of which a more informative element offshoots, with less size, as in the proportions of the human figure:*

For example in the growth of plants, arms and any lineal one-dimensional or spiral 2-dimensional structure, each new ‘element’ of the ternary structure, which will have a relative more ‘informative’ role in relationship with the previous element, will have therefore to compensate to balance the ‘5D metric’ equation of both parts together (S x T = K), with a smaller size according to the golden ratio.

It follows that on general basis a ‘sheet of bidimesional information’, i.e. the human head, the screen of a computer/page has also the X-Y, (S-T) elements in a golden ratio.

What is important of a bidimensional growth through the golden ratio (which must be understood as the ratio of the inner structure of growth, coupled therefore to e, the ratio of outer structure and √2, the ratio of dual growth from 2 relative S-T poles), is that it is self-centred in a central seed, or informative singularity which will therefore use the ratio to ‘fill’ the inner space hold by the external membrane, invaginating with its cells the internal space-time, *maintaining its balance as distance and weight, the ST elements of the growth process remain always equal with the spiral distribution of the golden ratio; so the system does not HAVE To adjust all the other elements of its structure to compensate from growth, as it will remain in the same relative distance/weight to the central singularity. The graph shows that ternary balance of the 3 branching of the spiral.*

In that regard, there is an internal ‘symmetry’ between the T-Algebraic Fibonacci numbers (the series of a growth caused by reproduction, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, etc.) and the ‘geometric ratio’ the phi number. And here we observe also the ‘quality’ found between the ‘similar’ but not equal mathematical formulations in space (which are exact geometric enclosures) and time (which are fluctuations around a ±1 value, as it happens also in √2 or pi, and it is the ‘ultimate’ meaning of irrationality in time-sequences of numbers vs. continuity in geometric forms on a *single space-time SIMULTANEOUS scale:*

In the graph we can see how this duality unfold for phi and √2: in geometric analysis it is always possible by means of a single trick of division and reorganisation to break a square into two equal squares of smaller size. When we do so arithmetically with numbers however we shall always approximate the series by ±1 ‘infinitesimal part’ more or less. So happens in the phi line approached above or below.

What this ultimately means is that *a time series is a sequence which does have a beginning and an end, in an above or lower scale of the ∆-dimension, in which the last entropic death moment or the first seed on the lower scale IS not in the same plane and has NOT to be included. **So we say that:*

*‘Time sequences are open at the beginning and the end as the seed and death happens into another ∆-dimension. Space structures are closed in a single ∆-scale, where the enclosure is possible’.*

It remains to notice that *all those games of reality worth to study occur in the 1, 2, 3, natural structure of the ternary Universe. So happens to all series, which are defined as ternary series (time being always ternary) as opposed to phi which is essential a spatial ratio (pure space being essentially one-dimensional as in the fingers ratio, or at best bidimensional space-time as in the screen of information)*

Next comes of course, 5, which is intimately connected to the Fibonnaci series, and the golden ratio, as it is *the natural number for ∆-fifth dimensional self-similar growth inwards into the lower scales of maximal information, which implies we find the ratio also in fractal structures such as those of the Mandelbrot set.*

This pentagonal inner growth, is also *represented algebraically given the duality of each of those constants as observed in space (golden ratio) and in time (Fibonacci open solution as a series of **numbers). Thus we get the pentagonal equation that defines the golden ratio.*

*Yet ultimately we can reduce those ratios to the 3 fundamental geometric figures based in relative S/T bidimensions which when not completely regular, show the ratio as its fundamental s/t relationship, giving birth to the golden rectangle (ST), triangle (S) and circular angle (Tiƒ), which as we know already ARE the canonical 3 bidimensional figures of Spe (Δ) <ST (◊) > Tiƒ (Ο) components. Thus, we find the golden angle in most systems, with self-centred elements from where it departs the growth and latter informative control of the system. So it is canonical with slight variations in molecules with self-centred atoms. The rectangle is canonical for bidimensional sheets of information. And the triangle for ‘frontal’ lineal locomotion ‘spear heads’; where the ‘informative rectangle’ transforms the larger arm’ into an entropic perpendicular penetrating line-point.*

**∏**

Pi is the number of the 3rd age and any Spe<=>Tiƒ transformations back and forth, which can be classified in 3 degrees of entropy, the cycle with its pi radius, the sinusoidal function, with regular curved forms (ST) and the more entropic, seemingly disorder geodesic on curved space, as the case of a river in flat lands, meandering for a value of: π-length=|-distance. So we shall find pi in all S>T Transformations and geodesic flows and transmissions of energy and information through hyperbolic iterative waves.

Less understood is the next degree of complexity of GST Number theory, which is the relationships between all those constants, which is new ground I will leave here for future researchers. Consider indeed just 3 questions and muse why they are so. 2 new, hardly researched:

π²±√2/10=10 Why? And the related result:

πˆ√2=5

Then a well-known result:

If we ad all the squares of reciprocal finitesimals: ∑1/n²=π²/6

It is the simplest Euler’s function z(n)=∑1/nˆn

In general those reciprocal series, being a reciprocal the fundamental finitesimal part of a form of n vertex points within an imperfect circle (trivial) are closely related to π. What makes them specially interesting is the fact they are *decreasing sequential series on the ∆-scalar dimension and so combine ∆πe concepts together.*

But why is so important and what is its relationship to GST? This is the first of my 10 ‘Millennium problems’, which of course involves the resolution of the Riemann conjeture, found elsewhere on those texts, as you can find a proof of Fermat’s theorem that fits in a margin and many other curiosities for those who consider trivia and details more important than the thoughts of God (almost all humans, given the indifference to this blog – something that finally no longer bothers me.)

In any case, this section will be further expanded on GST number theory (∞|º).

Let us then complete our analysis of those mathematical constants all together now.

**THE WORLDCYCLE AS MANIFESTATION OF THE MAIN NUMBERS & CONSTANTS of age: i, 0, √2, φ, e, π, 1**

For what we have studied more exhaustively for the golden ratio it is easy to deduce that we should be able to construct both in space as a super organism and in time as a world cycle in abstract (without emphasis on ∆±1 organic structures and ∆º sensorial survival instincts; which are *parallel properties of the ∆º**st universe not expressed in the language of mathematics, one of the many languages systems of reality). So we shall introduce the meaning of all those symbols in the world cycle series:*

Indeed, a world cycle thus have some key elements defined by its general equation, the moment of seed in a lower ∆-1 scale or ‘finitesimal birth’, 1/n≈0, the moment of emergence as a whole, or ‘1’, which can also be considered the 0-∞ points, in the larger scale, and the standing points of the 3 ages of time, related to the √2, e¤ and π. We shall study this general program of number theory.

Here we shall consider only some preliminaries of the concept.

**e & π ****The world cycle as expression of a few Universal ratios of Spe/ST/tiƒ actions. **

The FUNDAMENTAL TO THE LOGIC-MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURE OF THE world cycle, we shall describe it in the simplest games of mathematical and physical constants, which determine the standing point of the world cycle, being √2, e and π the constants of the 3 ages and its multiple manifestations from algebraic equations, such as the world cycle description in limits and domain:

as well as the exponential reproductive growth of the 2nd age, to its final warping in -π cycles of increasing information, which will finally explode into its chaotic end.

now the question is to know first and all how i the seed of existence, pi its cycles of life and death and e its exponential growth as it emerges between planes order in a worldcycle, and the answer is immediate, they play in the complex plane as the positive and negative roots of the emerging seed are better represented in that space.

Now the world we live in is ultimately selected from possible mathematical systems in which the values of pi, e and √2 are different from those of this world. As it is, there are variations within our world of those values. i.e. in relativity the ‘curvature’ of space-time will determine different pis. The hexagonal world with pi as a 3 value (ratio of the hexagon perimeter to its diameter) is one of such worlds, in which ‘spheres’ have a limit of polygonal form, 6. As such the bee heave has this structure, the graphene ‘planiland’ world has this structure, the Fuller Dome… and any triangulation in only 6 parts.

So we can talk in fact of many ‘mathematical worlds’ within a single Universe, and pi = 3, 14 etc. as the most perfect, complex potential world of cyclical time structures.

In the same manner we could talk of other different exponential growths from ∆-1 to ∆1, which do not have an e-xponential perfect function, which is the function of maximal growth, as eˆx IS always bigger than xˆe, which merely means that e is the perfect exponential growth number, whose magic properties as those of pi, as an |>O function are the best we can conceive of.

So e is the fastest, most efficient form of an ∆>∆+i event on the 5th dimension and pi, is the most efficient translation from an |>O state, and both together gives us the perfect ‘space-time wave’. Consider for example a classic probability distribution with a Gauss norm creating a bell curve. We can use it to define both in space and time, a wave of populations and define a few of the recurrent symmetries we shall find in all space-time events and symmetry.

If the curve were perfect, the blue top ‘semicircle’ would be a pi semicircle, the orange, exponential function would be an e-function, which will have a tail that should start in the infinitesimal 1/n=∆-1, first quanta that initiates an exponential growth, surfaces into the ∆º scale a e (where the integral of its lower population is 1, the whole) and then starts a second growth till eˆ3=20, when it becomes ∆+1, or in the case of a world cycle, in which the being does not become a new ∆+1 ‘whole’ (the commonest case) the system will go through 3 ages, the exponential growth of youth (orange region), the blue region of maturity with its maximal growth, 100-peak point and then diminish in a symmetric 3rd age to the first.

The graph thus has an infinite number of uses both to map out in time, the worldccle of a being and in space its population of ‘cellular/atomic’ infinitesimals). This specific sample is on an IQ population. Parts of the graph either as a graph of space population or time frequencies, or space-time actions, or exponential growth (only the orange part) or exponential decay, etc. etc. are essential to real physical, biological and social systems, because their underlying cause are the space-time Universal world cycles and super organisms’ ∆-1 cellular/social/atomic structures that create and dissolve wholes:

So the Universe is indeed ultimately a mathematical game of ratios and balances and simultaneous structures of Spe<St>Tiƒ based in the symmetries of space and time, and the scales of ∆-dimensions.

**Poetic license: the homology of all ‘constant world cycles’.**

The simplest expression of a world cycle, Ø, is its constants and ratios of energy and form, cos and sin fluctuations, into fourier transforms of scalar emergence, mediated by the constant fusion of diagonals, √2. Ø thus shows fundamentally the nature in time and space of a space-time present cyclical hyperbolic flow, through its Konstants of detail, species with certain magnificent ratios shown into particular equation, such as the SMH, harmonic motions, lagrangians and Hamilitonians, of energetic explosions and collapses to 0.

0° indeed, 0/0 are all possible functional combinations, whose details become valuable indications of a ratio that survives when the game of tao i-logic thought returns to reality.

Such a simple, iterative Universe, where there are only 2 ‘fundamental events’, a motion in the 5th dimension between scales and a transformation of lineal entropy into cyclical information and vice versa, Einstein was right: the ultimate principles are Universal ratios/constants, which transform one number into another, of which 2 are paramount: the Constant of Pi, which transforms back and forth lineal entropy into temporal information, through sinusoidal hyperbolic waves; and the Constant of Euler, e, which is the constant of growth and diminution through scales of the 5th dimension.

Now in the future, when people do understand how close vital mathematics describes a world cycle through the 3 constants of existence, those standing i, seminal points that creep through the emergent ±1, o interval to fully start its e-xponential growth in the new ∆+1 plane of existence, leaving behind a rce of pi-cycles, in Castalia, that place where all languages of expression of the game of exi=stiences is known, you will hear strange languages of homologic poetry describing ∆ºstravels like this:

YOU START AS AN I-MAGINARY NUMBER, IN THE REGION OF I-LOGIC COORDINATES, THE NEGATIVE SIDE OF THE emergent world cycle, when you are nothing but a seed of √-1, in the ∆-1 region of the coordinates, how well you perform in that imaginary region as you emerge into the e-consciousness of being fully mature and ready to explode in waves of √2, now real no longer foetus creeping through the eternity of ±1, 0 domains.

Alas you explode hyperbolically full of energy and growing form towards the stratosphere, of being 20, e³, the limit of amino-acid forms for the game of existence you perform assenblied into genetic molecules ready to implode and explode and implode and explode… till once more a zero, opening your eyes, beyond 3 to the pi-existence, trembling nothingness into the wor(l)d beyond, static first fractal point of a new go(l)d… open your eyes to the eternal tao-game.

This tells us some things about the world cycle and its form, which turns out to be a distribution of Gauss in maximal detail:

2017 will be dedicated to complete the sections of mathematics and physics at the simplest, most telling level.

Now, the nature of those Universal constants as fundamental to Nature is not clearly understood in its whys. So I used to start my conferences with this little tease. And I ended THEM explaining the 2 fundamental combinations of those constants, the probability distribution of a population in space (Gauss curve) and Euler’s formula for the world cycle (with its simpler mode of Euler’s identity) which mathematicians consider the most beautiful equations of the Universe, and are certainly the commonest, along the ‘lineal motions’ described by Hamiltonians/Lagrangians.

*Yet Euler’s formula in a dynamic way, and Gauss formula, which can be interpreted as the waveform derived of the constant creation of ‘new points’ in the Euler’s cycle, ultimately define a **world cycle of space-time, hence showing in a rather simple profound way how all is about a world cycle of space-time and its synchronous form – a super organism.*

**The main numbers.**

Thus, we stress again that √2, π, e, and φ, the ratios of basic Spe<st>Tiƒ transformations and events; with 3 other numbers for the infinitesimal, the whole and the ‘seed’ of information, (o, 1, i), they complete a ‘basic’ world cycle of any system of the Universe:

- i: seed of information
- 0: finitesimal, point of view
- √2: s x t merge
- π: 3 |spe > O-Tiƒ;
- e: ∇1 e->∆1+∆º
- φ: œ=Tif/ST & ST/Spe & Spe/1 RATIOS of being
- 10: 10 §º ≈ §¹

And so those are the fundamental constants of the game of space-time beings in Nature, which will keep prompting during the world cycle of beings, specially when considering the process of ’emergence’ of the organism in its informative, developmental states.

All this said and not said, let us now move on to the next scale of constants:

**The constants of physics**

Since those metric, Sp x Tƒ = k∆, ARE FUNDAMENTALLY simple, the equations and constants of nature, will be simple ratios, often of the exact same type as the metric equation is. This means that for each ‘interval’ of ∆ and its main ‘ternary’ §-ubdivisions in smaller scales, we shall find such simple equations defining the existence of the being.

It follows that we shall immediately find a set of ternary constants or parameters, for each of those scales that shall correspond to Sp (S-entropy-past), Tƒ (T-Future, frequency) and Kst (present-energy).

This is specially truth in physical systems, as humans disregard all other more complex qualities of them. So we can find for each plane and ternary sub§cale of physics, 3 constants or equations focused on the ∆, S and T components of the being:

**∆energy**: A general, fundamental equation , of the type SxT=k, which *does not change as we move through the ∆§cales of the being*, to define the ‘present ‘bidimensional-energy of the system’ in terms of a product of a constant quanta of space and a growing temporal frequency of ‘social populations’ in space and/or its symmetric frequencies in time, which carry the growth of the being through ∆-scales: E=hv, for the quantum scale; E=knT for the thermodynamic scale, e=mv², for the gravitational scale; and similar formulae for intermediate §-meanningful scales.

Then departing from that present equation we can study the space-entropy and time-frequency component.

In terms of dimensions we are dealing with a 2, or 3 even 4-dimensional concept of ST-present energy for each scale of reality (depending of the detailed mind view and degree of space-time aggregation we study).

In terms of orientation, the Energy component is the present, reproductive storage of the being. Thus it will be a bidimensional plane of width (added along a length component for the total being and in some occasions, in a 4-vector for the whole being both in its space volume and time existence) . For example, for waves we shall measure energy by the square amplitude of the wave. To notice that those variations on the parameters and formulae of present energy, must be often considered choices of the human mind, and the instruments it uses to perceive the being. For example in quantum physics, humans perceive mostly the lineal motion or thrust of the particle onto the instrument, so the angle of form, a Tiƒ component, is not required and in our quantum formulae, the square of the amplitude that gives us the intensity of its energy does NOT require the rotational imaginary angle on those equations, reasons why we multiply/square it with its conjugate: Ψ x Ψ*, as our instruments are rough detectors of such far away scales (a fact that has produced much speculation as what this product is, a probability in time or a density in space, ST-symmetric concept of similar value)

**S-peed**: Regarding the space-component equations a similar simple equation will define its ‘entropic’ motion component. And since we have defined entropy as expansive motion, the best mathematical description will be a one-dimensional lineal vectorial ‘speed’, which we write in terms of *a ratio between the spatial field from where motion is obtained, described as a gradient, potential, tension or attractive force between the 2 points of the motion, and a component that describes the density of form, or information, the system must ‘reproduce’, ‘iterate’ and ‘carry through’ that gradient of tension/force/potential/voltage. *

Again as pure entropy is not observed, we need to measure that speed as a ratio with the information of the being, which is carried and reproduced along the line of length-entropy. So for all scales we find the best way to measure that entropy a parameter of speed, as a ratio of Space & information:

v=s/t (particle speed)≈ s x ƒ (as frequency measures cyclical time-information, the inverse of lineal t-duration: ƒi=1/t) , v=λ ω (wave speed); etc.

Again, humans combine those parameters so we have different combinations of energy and speed formulae, such as flows, intensities, etc.

For example in electric flows, a scale between the thermodynamic and gravitational scales, which measure packs of electronic motion, the key equation is Intensity=Voltage x conductance (flow of electricity); and it combines a speed component and a volume of energy/particles/populations of electrons. Moreover humans prefer to measure it with a more obscure inverse parameter, not the conductance but its inverse, the resistance of the medium to the motion of the flow: R=V(tension-entropic gradient)/I.

While we can find for each type of wave a different parameter for the general formulae, v= S-entropic gradient/ƒ(informative density). So for S, we find the Young modulus of tension, and similar concepts for different waves, divided by the mass density of the wave that moves with different terms.

Special mention deserves the case of the light speed, which is also written in terms of the k-curvature or tension/gradient of the vacuum space over which the light wave travels, and its magnetic density of information.

Yet again here humans use the inverse of k, ε and write the formulae v2≈ k/µ, as 1/ε(s)µ(ƒ). And further on reduce the bidimensional speed plane, c², as one-dimensional c, so they get Maxwell equations of the form c=1/√εµ. And finally as we measure light speed-motions with electrons in its static entangled state of the stop & go, form and motion beat of all systems, the electron IS always in relative entangled stoppage in reference to the emitter of the light wave, and so c-speed always is measured constant between the entangled, electronic emitter and observer of information, locked in the lower ∆-1 neutrino/gravitational scale. Hence we perceive c-speed as constant regardless of the macroscopic ∆+i motion of the observer since the real measure of speed happens in the ∆-2 locked scale which is in relative no motion.

**
Time/informative** parameter. Which lead us to the final time-informative parameter of the system, a measure of frequency that grows in speed and leaves a larger trail of informative populations, or density that becomes storage of energy and also changes from scale to scale (frequency, temperature and curvature vortices for charge and gravitation, k and G, being the most common parameters for those time frequencies). And so we get the classic formulae of physics of the graph, which ultimately are expressions of 5D metric.

**I. ∆•ST CONSTANTS.**

Let us then define those constants, as usual considering its different types:

**S: Topological Constants: e x i |s=t flows**

In the graph, the first type of constants are those defined by geometry and topology, as the different structure of beings have quantitative fixed values and exist with a form and function in balance, mimicking the generator equation and its parts:

**ST: Constants of action: K=s x t.**

In the graph in any exchange of energy and information between two polar particles of time, through a wave that mixes both, there are certain relationships that establish stable, topologically correct changes of curvature and motion, ruled by ‘vital constants’ that measure the fixed content of energy and information, motion and curvature transferred in each exchange.

** **In the graph, the exchange, generally a ratio of energy and information (so the growth of both elements remains co-invariant) or a product (based in the invariance of 5D metric) shows that in fact there is a dynamic exchange between both, expressed with rhythmic simplicity.

**∆ constants.**

Now, what most people care about are the constants of each scale of the Universe as a whole, not of its parts. Those are the huge physical system of constants that inform each huge scale of reality, shown in the left side.

The beauty of 5D metric equations, applied to those constants is shown on those graphs. On the left, we can unify them all conceptually considering that Energy is the st-present parameter product of an Spe-constant and an T-frequency. On the right, we can find the Unification Equation of charges and masses, which we easily obtain in fractal terms, as a galaxy acts as an atom of the ∆±4 dimension.

Finally between scales we will find decametric socia scales, from the structure of human societies from the individual 10ˆ0 to the global society, 10ˆ9, to the magic 10 ˆ10 number between scales, (galaxies in the Universe, atoms in a magnetic domain, ties in a DNA molecule, people on earth’s super organism, etc.)

The main Universal constants of space thus are those of the parameters of 5D metric shown in the left graph:

the constant of action of the quantum world, H, the constant of action of the thermodynamic world, or K and the constant of action of the light-gravitational world or c.

The derivate operations to K = ST which defines a constant of present action, or secondary @ctions of the being will define minor Universal constants, and when those events are exhaustively studied as in physics, the number of such parameters keep growing, but at the end they can be reduced to the simple ‘elements’ that matter in reality, the ternary symmetries, scales, social parameters, and topologies common to all space-time beings. Hence the enormous parallelism we shall find in the mathematical equations applied to each of those scales of reality.

Physical events, densities and speeds, determine ‘fluxes’ of actions-forces that became the parameters of mathematical physics, elaborated with calculus (to calculate wholesale the total ratio for volume of ∆-1 beings). Quantitative science is often the result of dealing with infinitesimals of an ∆-1 scale that become a flux of energy and information transferred within the co-existing 3 scales of a given world-superorganism.

So let us put the key example of physical Universal constants, which *mimic the game of existence of the perfect game of √2, e, π 3 ages of universal constant (young fusion of e and i, perpendicular into a diagonal 2-root; mature age of massive reπroduction, and final cyclical 3rd pi age.* IN THIS CASE WE TALK THE 3 CONSTANTS OF A GAME OF EMERGENCE OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, THROUGH 3 CONSTANTS, FROM THE √2 QUANTUM WORLD, THROUGH THE E-LIGHT WAVE, TO THE ∏-GRAVITATIONAL INFORMATIVE COLLAPSE:

**Comparison of constants across scale: metric of Unification. Inverse equations of big-bang deaths.**

We indicate constants of Information as fluxes for which we use a simply intuitive term, S>T, which shows how a larger spatial form becomes a smaller, more informative systems.

Now consider its inverse symbol, T<S, which shows how information dissolves into entropy as in the case of human biological deaths, when our information is erased and our body expands back into cells gaining space.

It is a big-bang equation of the previous ‘constant’ E<c2>M which can go both ‘arrows of time’, the arrow of entropy (M<c2>e) or of information (E<c2>m)

Does this inverse ‘arrow of time’, of pure entropy holds also for physical systems? Of course it does. In fact it is embedded in the most important equation of physics: E<=>M(t) c², which as it happens can go one way or another. And so when Mass explodes into pure entropy-radiation, we are ultimately also observing a specific case of 5D metric.

Which is a good way to introduce how we apply it to physics:

*A sample case of fractal 5D physics: Unification equation of charges and masses.*

And we shall also relate some of those Universal Constants across ∆-scales are based in the isomorphism of all those scales, derived of the metric of the 5th dimension, ∆=Se xTƒ – the most important of which is the isomorphism between the Q-constant of charges and the G-constant of masses, the so-called Unification Equation of Forces.

It is the application of such simple metric equation to the physical systems of the Universe. As we find immediately that we can describe all its physical scales, the atomic, planetary, galactic and big-bang scales, with the same topological forms and 5D metric, giving us a simplex ‘vortex equation’ that unifies both charges and masses as relative ‘accelerated time clocks’ of all those scales – the so long searched for ‘unification equation of charges and masses’, which Einstein failed to discover as mathematics did not come out with a fractal concept of scales till Mandelbrot’s 73 seminal work.

So we can unify them with a single equation once we observe the only difference between its attractive power (hierarchy problem) is the fact that according to 5D metric, charges turn much faster and hence as any fast rotating vortex, attract much more strongly than cosmological masses, whose minimal quanta and force is 10ˆ40 times larger in space and weaker in cyclical speed, which i at ‘logic level’ (in the posts of cosmology at quantitative level) yields:

5D Unification: Atom* Charge vortex: ∆-3≈ Max. Tiƒ x min. Spe ≈ Max. Sp x Min. Tif ≈ ∆+3 Galaxy mass vortex: **w² x r³ = U.C (G,Q) X A.M. (Active magnitude).*

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10ˆ30 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10ˆ-7 rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ˆ-11 kgˆ-1 mˆ3 rad. secˆ-2

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10ˆ16 rad. secˆ -1 = w (electron);

5.3 × 10ˆ-11 m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10ˆ -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10ˆ39 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/cˆ2.

But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Of course, this result is obtained using the underlying concepts of Newton->Poisson (gradient of gravitational potential), refined in Einstein’s ‘simultaneous pictures’ of those vortices, to study its relative curvature, *which is the static view of an informative clock of time. So we can observe the similarities of all those concepts: curvature, speed of time, relative fractal scale, vortex attraction & universal constant as a ratio between the ‘curvature=speed in time’ and ‘size-distance’ in space of the system.*

It thus though completely change the way we understand the Universe, its ‘accelerated clocks of time’ of the 2 limiting fractal scales perceived by human beings, the quantum and galactic scale, which turn out to be ∆±3 similar, at least from the human point of view, in the middle ∆o scale between them. And needless to say it will reverberate in all the fields of physics and the metaphysics of the whole, as it makes the Universe not only immortal in time (as motions never stop), in space (as it is symmetric to time) and in scales, as each atom-galaxy starts a new game, but *not necessarily in the number of variations, which are given by the ‘potential’ of creation of a limiting game of ‘only’ 3 varieties of time, or ages, space, or topologies, and scales, or micro-normal-macro sizes for all systems of reality.*

So this simple account of the 5 more important physical constants, G, Q, h, c, k,.

**– S**o those are the Universal constants, in which the external actions of the being will be displayed, which therefore will come constantly in our equations. In physics, as we are thermodynamic ∆-beings sandwiched between the ∆-1 atomic and ∆+1 galactic gravitational world, those essential constants of the larger and smaller world that come in almost all the equations of interaction between thermodynamic man and reality are graphed in the next picture, as functions of Time and space, and its integrals of Energy, AND BELOW in the Universal Units, void of human anthropomorphism (Planck Units):

To fully understand the meaning of physical equations, before its thorough study through its different scales, we must understand the previous equations and its meaning, as they are void of human interference in its measure, and further on, show that instead of the 3 human ‘parameters’, mass, length and time of current physics, all can be studied with the 3 equivalent but not equal parameters of the Universe, G for mass, c for length and h for time.

So this is the first thing the system reveals to us. In the Universe time is cyclical and measured through angular momentum, of which the simplest unit is h; the constant of universal information, in the Universe space is measure with speed (space in motion), whose fundamental unit is c-speed, the constant of universal space. And so it only rest to consider that in the Universe, the 3^{rd} element which is the active magnitude of the scalar 5D being is measured with the relative unit of curvature/force/5D metric value, which in the Universe is G and Ke in the equivalent lower scale of reality, and in the remaining thermodynamic scale, H-Boltzmann, the entropy unit. And this transversal constants of the 5^{th} dimension close therefore the fundamental units of realty from where all others can be derived. (whereas 1/4πeo=Ke is the unit that should be used).

No other constant is fundamental to the Universe, and those are also enough constants to express in 5D physics all what exists, regardless of the specific world (human physics) that observe that Universe.

So the first and obvious truth we observe is the difference between 5D fractal space-time and the human continuous single still space and single time clock of the Universe, and its single scale.

As we have already considered the meaning of h, G and c in certain depth in the 0th and 4^{th} isomorphisms – the actions of physical systems, it is easy now consider a few more details, on the difference between human perceptions and Universal perceptions of the 2 parameters of reality, Tƒ and Sp, Let us be clear, the Planck units, subject to much speculation are REAL. They are the maximal and minimal quanta of different scales of reality, such as a new scale quanta is made of a social gathering of smaller quanta, regarding time clocks that slow down or accelerate in frequency and space units that grow and diminish in size, and its ratios that define the different planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

So as we advance in the III part of this section, studying each scale we will consider in more detail the consequences of this insight – that space has a fundamental constant c, information, h (a quanta of time) or h/2π, a ‘radius’ or bit of the minimal quanta of information, and its combinations into space-time clock-like vortices (M g, Q k), vary with the scale of the 5^{th} dimension we study.

Once the 5 key isomorphisms of Reality are studied in detail, It is left to apply to that generator equation the Universal Constants or ratios between the different ‘parameters’ of that equation, to start resolving the equations of physics; of which the most obvious and important will be the ‘Constants of 5D planes’, finitesimals of each of those scales of three types, Tƒ/Se: informative densities, Se/Tƒ: energy densities and Se=Tƒ, Action constants. They define the 5^{th} dimension in each plane, studied in the next isomorphism. So here we just consider the 4 more important:

Tƒ/Se: Constants of informative density or ‘Curvature constants’: ∆-1: Q-constant of charge attraction≈curvature; ∆+1: G-constant of mass attraction≈curvature; which obviously are the origin, when considering in ‘isolation’ as Tƒ, of the ∆-1: e: constant of charge of the electron and ∆+1: m_{n}: Constant of mass of the electron.

5D metrics= SexTƒ= K, which defines the Constants of action: ∆-1: quantum plane: h-Planck (‘Planckton’)= E x T , which translates 5D metrics to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane and…

∆: Thermodynamic Plane: k-Boltzmann constant (‘Bolt)= E x T, which translates 5D metrics to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane.

And finally Se/Tƒ: Constants of energetic Density or ‘speed constants’: ∆-1: c-speed, constant of motion of the light space plane, which being the Se-constant for the entire Galaxy in which our system exists, it is the only constant of energy-space or ‘rod of measure’ of all the systems of space we perceive.

**The Lagrangian and Hamiltonian: the worldcycle of physical beings.**

For all what has been said, and the definitions of present waves, v= Se x Tƒ, particles, Max. Tƒ/Se and fields, Max. Se/Tƒ, we are coming to understand 3 fundamental definitions of T.Œ for all sciences: the 3 ages of time in terms of the Se and Tƒ parameters:

Max. Se/Tƒ = Young energetic state (∂L=0; +∂’L); Max. Tƒ/Se= Old, future state (∂L=0; -∂’L); Max. Se x Tƒ (Se=Tƒ): (∂L=0; +∂’L=0).

Those 3 points which in the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian expression of ALL equations of physics represent the 3 stationary points of value 0 in the Lagrangian and maximal and minimal or 0 values in the Hamiltonian are the 3 points in which any System of Nature varies along its worldcycle. In physical systems however, the back and forth motion along those 3 points can clear a 0-sum time-loop that repeats itself constantly without the apparent need, at least from the human perspective of 2 Lorentzian regions in which the system breaks down:

In the graph we can see the interpretations of those 3 points, the Field in ∆-1, of Max. Se x Min. Tƒ, the wave of present, of Spe=Tƒ and the particle of future of Max. Tƒ x Min. Spe, with the present wave in the center. I call this graph the Lorentzian-Newtonian-Kelvinian (ab. LNK) graph as it represents in our Universe the 3 natural limits of existence of forms in the 4D present pace-time described by special relativity, the region of max. entropy when particles accelerate towards c-speed dying away, the region of present balance, or liquid/wave states an the regions of maximal information closer to Tƒ perfect vortex super fluidity and 0 degrees.

The 3 regions thus establish also a clear difference in the regions in which information grows, towards a higher ‘plane of existence’, in which the particle reaches its maximal form (collapse of waves into particles, when coming closer to the ∆+1 œ, such as when photons collide with electrons or electrons collide with atoms or atoms with molecules and so on.

The graph thus explains many elements of physics. It is ultimately a graph that represents and explains the power of the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian formalism that localizes those 3 ‘canonical solutions’ to physical systems and planes of existence, where the field quanta, the wave state and the Entropy element appear. Now in physical terms the wave will be defined by a wave equation:

Present = Se x Tƒ = S/T=V in lineal time notation or wavelength x frequency = Speed

The particle will be on the other hand defined by the density of information, Tƒ/Se = K, which is a fundamental parameter in all scales of reality; and we shall observe immediately that relates to the constants of curvature, G and Q in the equations of force : G, Q ( e x e or m x m /d^{2})

And the field will be defined by the density of energy Se/Tƒ = K, Se x Tƒ = K , E x T = K, which are the constant of actions of the two main fields of quantum physics (H=E x T) and Thermodynamics K = E x T.

Thus we resolve here the meaning of those Universal constants, beyond the ‘Germanic, idealist’ definition.

In that regard we can establish as the fundamental parameters of the Human World, the constants of energy density of the quantum and thermodynamic fields, H and q, the constants of informative curvature/density, Q and G, and the constants of Present Speed, C.

Now those are the constants of the Human word, which is NOT the whole Universe. This must be clear. And certainly while in the previous article on cosmological systems we have studied further beyond the Human Universe the dark world, there is no reason why to do so in this post on the atomic and molecular matter sales of human beings.

It should be noticed that there is ONLY a constant of speed-space, c the constant of light because WE are created in a pyramid in which the minimal continuum is light space-time, from where the symmetry breaks, that is quanta evolve socially into larger systems.

Of course we do know that in the interior of atoms there are quarks and outside galaxies dark energy and dark matter, but those themes have dealt with ion the previous post, because in the ‘known known evident Universe they DO NOT PLAY ANY ROLE, they are beyond the human Universe. We are a Universe in which those are the constant that matter. Strong forces and dark energies, which are related as a Russian Doll game, in which smaller parts and larger beings come together, as it happens with smaller food and larger animals in the world (where the smallest quanta, light feeds plants, the smallest plancktons whales, the smallest krills, whale sharks, and so according to the metric of the 5^{th} dimension Min. Tƒ (food ) x Max. Se (predator) = K, in this game of nested Russian dolls from below and above, our world is reduced to:

Constant of Energy density in the Light scale: H-Planck

_____________

Constant of Present speed-distance: Light space-time (relativity theory)

Constant of Information density in the light scale: Q

To: time clock: e-charge

Constant of energy density in the matter, thermodynamic scale k-Bolt

_____________

Constant of information density in the matter, thermodynamic scale G

To: time clock: T-mass (the mass of the top quark, which however is outside our Universe).

Again it is important to notice the scalar nature of the Universe, as the two limits of our perception while influencing our world, are NOT in our world, that is the H-Planck, the uncertain limit in the below scale and the top quark, the dark matter in the above scale, since systems do have a symmetry that adapts them on the 3 levels such as:

|-1>Oo…

That is, the H-Planck as a Planckton, as a To of the lower ‘neutrino scale’ is NOT visible to us, it is the uncertain limit, but we can perceive it as an |-1 quanta of energy of the electron scale where perception starts, as the To time clock of our Universe. It does appear in our equations despite being the constant of action we do not distinguish ‘alone’. On the other limit, the clock of mass, the top quark with its faster speed of time, is neither perceived, nor its boson of dark energy, the H-fields and particle. But we can perceive its influence in the Mach’s rotary inertia of the galaxy and its left-chirality, transmitted to our particles (which die as anti-particles with right chirality).

Thus the certain human word is reduced to a few parameters:

c-speed the constant of spacetime speed

e-charge, the constant of time

k Bolt the constant of energy density

And Q the constant of information density:

**ST (c ) <E (k: S/T) x I (Q: T/S) >ðƒ (e ^{–})**

In the graph, the key equation that started quantum physics in which most of the constants of our world appear. It is the equation of radiation of a black body.

This is the ‘Constant World’ In which we live, exist, and perceive, which is ultimately made of light spatial entropy and electronic Temporal Form in which our present actions of energy and information are regulated by Thermodynamic temperature.

It is encased in a larger world of strong forces and gravitational forces, which however hardly affects us; and beyond it into the Dark world of Top quark, its superluminal hyper-forces, and its superluminal Higgs fields and bosons, which we can now theoretically by isomorphisms but it is totaling alien to us unless we bring it here in our accelerators to devour and destroy our world.

Of all those elements and parameters of the standard model and classic physics, the only element which I have not yet fully inserted due to some contradictor properties, namely its spin, which makes it seem a fermion when its speed would make it seem a boson is the neutrino, of which we will speak in due term. It seems that its most clear role is to be a partner or half ‘component’ of light, forming together a space-time broken symmetry as the electro-weak force also forms a space-time broken symmetry, themes those to explore fully on the 4^{th} line.

**Breaking of symmetry: universal constants as limits of the existence of physical systems.**

Universal constants are vital constants of a larger scale of existence of a physical system, while its scalar constants are the active magnitude,

often the value of the specific Metric of the being, its most important value: ∆=Sp x T

Once this is understood and the space-time main events and systems of physics are described we can consider the next phase of T.Œ, which is specially relevant in a mathematical science as physics, hence we shall mention it so early in the introduction: the study of the 7 fundamental Universal/vital constants of al systems of the Universe:

- The Sp/Tƒ ratio energy density of the system.
- Its inverse, Tƒ/Sp information density.
- The Sp=Tƒ, balance that maximizes its existential ‘momentum (Sp x Tƒ).

They are the internal space-time parameters of the being.

Then there are the external constants that related the whole being, Œ, Active Magnitude, ÅC, to the external world also made of 3 ∆+1 Sp- field of energy, Tƒ-world of informative cycles and ST- parallel elements with whom it communicates. So we find the following ratios:

ÅC/Sp World Field, which provides energy to the being.

ÅC/ST World Body-wave, which provides reproductive actions to the being.

ÅC/Tƒ World Informative field, which provides information to the being.

Whereas ÅC is the parameter, which humans use to classify each variation as a whole with a constant (mass for particles, charge for fields, IQ for human brains, etc.)

Thus in physics the key to harmonize TŒ and classic studies and equations will be to to consider the Universal Constants or ratios between the different ‘parameters’ of its generator equation, to start resolving the equations of physics; of which the most obvious and important will be the ‘Constants of 5D planes’, finitesimals of each of those scales of three types, Tƒ/Sp: informative densities, Sp/Tƒ: energy densities and Sp=Tƒ, Action constants. They define the 5^{th} dimension in each plane, studied in the next isomorphism. So here we just consider the 4 more important:

Tƒ/Sp: Constants of informative density or ‘Curvature constants’: Λ-1: Q-constant of charge attraction≈curvature; Λ+1: G-constant of mass attraction≈curvature; which obviously are the origin, when considering in ‘isolation’ as Tƒ, of theΛ-1: e: constant of charge of the electron and Λ+1: m_{n}: Constant of mass of the electron.

5D metric= SexTi= K, which defines the Constants of action: Λ-1: quantum plane: h-Planck (‘Planckton’)= E x T , which translates 5D metric to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane and…

Λ: Thermodynamic Plane: k-Boltzmann constant (‘Bolt’)= E x T, which translates 5D metric to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane.

And finally Sp/Tƒ: Constants of energetic Density or ‘speed constants’:

Λ-1: c-speed, constant of motion of the light space plane, which being the Sp-constant for the entire Galaxy in which our system exists, it is the only constant of energy-space or ‘rod of measure’ of all the systems of space we perceive.

Now the reader should observe nothing else is needed really to describe physical systems isomorphic to all other descriptions of reality, as this still taken from Britannica’s article on Universal constants show:

Those are the fundamental constants because they define the 3 ‘stationary points’ of the world cycle of all physical systems, which the Hamiltonian-Lagrangian equations translate mathematically (Britannica ads the Faraday constant related to charge, I presume because of nationalist memes 🙂

Now what is really the world we live in? The answer is that we are sandwiched between the cosmological dark world and the invisible world below light, the space-time we ‘see’. Thus of all those constants really the ones that matter are:

** The splitting of symmetries and universal constants in physics. ****The conservation of ST-presents.**

The conservation laws of the Universe can be resumed in the conservation of the total Sp<ST>Tƒ reality and its ternary symmetries across space, time and the 5th dimension. So angular and lineal, Sp and Tƒ momentum is conserved, and its larger, 5D vision as integrated planes of systems or energy and information (kinetic and potential energy) is conserved. And the number of particles and antiparticles, or life and death states of a world cycle is conserved. Yet because Sp and Tƒ are relative past and future arrows merged into ST-waves-bodies of present, which constantly iterate its forms, actually all reduces to the conservation of ST dual fields. Present Fields. We do exist always in present.

Thus all starts with a simple philosophical statement: *‘The Universe exists constantly in present’.*

This seemingly simple statement, is a powerful instrument as soon as we realise that the present, ST, is a bidimensional system with a parameter of a dimension of relative space-frm and time-motion, or O-x |=Ø, that is an event which is creative.

The study of the Function of present, Spast, x Tƒuture = Ø-Present, a Constant of existence, which ‘exists’ in one of the scales of the 10th dimension ‘alone at a time’, and the study of other ‘simplex dimensional conservations in any ∆-Plane of the energy and information, Sp and Tƒ, quanta and infinite continuum vibration in space of two poles, which brome a harmonic oscillator creative event:

Sp = ∞ x O = Time point -> Constant of existence which fluctuates through its differential equations from a lineal function ∂y to a full cyclical function, Dy/dx, in any of the two possible upwards and downward social dimensions of affine or topological spas.

Thus a constant of existence, Sp x Tƒ = E∆i, can be also perceived as a sum of quanta of space, of discrete volume dimensions which are seen as fixed and a seemingly continuous due to its extreme range f harmonic oscillator functions between 2 poles.

The line then becomes the true ‘minimal entity of the Universe’, and as such, since lines have breath soon become waves of points, extended also transversally till finally are organised in a different type of vibration, that of a plane.

Which has by definition, *one more dimension and so has points of view, called particles, with a larger gravitational mind of dimensions that the simpler, thermodynamic and electromagnetic, j, µ and h quanta.*

So we could say that the mind is gravitational because of the way we perceives geometry operate with eyes, etc. and so it is cold because it makes a reduction of thermodynamic form – hence its gravitational in the scale it measures.

What are the quanta of gravitation? The only known candidate is the neutrino hence, IT IS the neutrino. How to adapt the equations of present mathematical physics is through the Jordan theory of neutrino light in which particles, first exchange along the invisible side of the c, m, t barriers, a measure line, invisible but that we know it is there to form the first informative neutrino-giravtational connections.

So we are gravitational beings.

We become then frames of references of mechanics in the equation of the mind which is the equation that truly defines as the relative constant of existence, c-speed or 0 temperature or H-planck.

The Universe is immortal in 0-sum time cycles that never end, perfectly anti(symmetric) between the two directions/forms/motions on the extreme of those two cycles, which converge into present, static forms and its infinite-simal up and down in the 5^{th} dimension. And having that on mind we can describe it all.

The main of those laws is the immortality of the Universe, and its dualist formal motions, which are a zero-sum when we put together its antisymmetries of space-time, which conserve together its potential vs. kinetic energy, angular vs. lineal momentum, time vs. space anti-symmetries, across 3 ∆±1 planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

This is the ‘essence’ of it we must grasp. The immortality of the whole is based in the inverse symmetry of its 2 elements: form vs. motion, left vs. right, expansion vs. implosion; lineal, decelerating, expansive stillness vs. accelerating implosive cyclical motion; faster than c speed vs. slower than c speed, positive charge vs. negative charge, particle vs. antiparticle… Positive vs. negative wave sides. opposite genders, a ‘male’ or ‘female’ element, which are complementary and fusion in a reproductive present or divide in two opposite fractions.

Thus 5D Physics explains in a much more natural manner what many physicists came to call the group theory disease; that is, the use of the abstract jargons of modern mathematics, without understanding what they truly mean, and what is ‘truth’ and what is mere mathematics, provoking the present inflation of ‘Group transformations and Symmetries’.

Reality is rather simple, and the proper jargon slightly different. There is not a breaking of symmetry as physicists express it but rather the creation of a symmetry of opposite elements, departing from a universal constant, of Present State, Sp=Tƒ, an immortal point of balance in any plane of reality, which diverges both sides, to one side of MORE INFORMATION, Max. Tƒ and a side of larger spatial energy, as that is the ONLY ternary elements of 5D space-time that might ‘’diverge or converge’ in any scale.

In brief, the 3 ‘standing points’ of the e ages of a Worldcycle in time or ternary symmetry in space or ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension might diverse from present to relative past and future, lineal and cyclical, higher or lower scales and that gives birth to diversity. So we shall first consider in the domain around our local scale, space and time parameters-constants, how those divergences might happen.

So zero systems expand into the negative (past-Sp in our conventional choice) and positive (future, Tƒ in our choice) relative sides of a constant of symmetry, Sp=Tƒ, which is expressed by giving birth to two cancelling opposites.

*Coincidentia Oppositorum, said* Nicola da Cusa, the infinitely large and slow, the infinitely small and fast, the 0 and the ∞ which are relative and multiplied give us a constant ‘o’ for adding operations or 1 for multiplicative inversions, or a Universal constant for logarithmic scales of the 5^{th} dimension (log vs. e, ln vs. 10, log2 vs. 2 vs. √2 being the most important of those inversions).

Let us recall from this or other posts, what those 3 Sp, Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, standing points and constants are in our world:

__Sp=Tƒ: constants of present action on 3 scales.__

– C: the space-time fundamental constant of the galaxy, or present wave of energy and information, in the ∆+1 scale, k or Boltzmann constant in the thermodynamic scale and H or Planck constant in the quantum scale.

__Max. Sp & Max. Tƒ: Young-energetic and old Informative, antisymmetries on 3 scales.__

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call lineal and cyclical momentum, and its integral sum, kinetic and potential energy, in the ∆+1 scale of cosmic bodies.

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call, negative and positive ‘charge’ in the quantum scale.

– And finally lineal vs. cyclical order in the thermodynamic scale which we consider to have a constant called 0-Kelvin temperature.

It is that reality which must tilt one or the other side of the constant to create the worlds and anti-worlds, light and dark worlds of our Universes and Anti-Universes.

In other worlds the Universe which conserves, Sp, Tƒ, Sp=Tƒ, and ∆±1 elements, the 3 scales and its cyclical and lineal momentums must in its origin be made of both, in its Sp=Tƒ original symmetries and this is the first being or constant of action, a particle, with lineal momentum, a wave, with c-speed a plane of space with angular momentum or spin.

We can in that sense define several possible births of Universes, but to be strict, we just will consider the quasar Universe of our light space-time galaxy, which is the only one we have enough information to fully understand.

In such Universe we do know there is a space-time, which is light space-time. So we can consider it spit above or below a certain dividing constant Sp x Tƒ, speed, ‘c’.

We know that the island galaxy, in which we are as masses and particles, have a c-speed barrier, we cannot cross. And we know

outside our Galaxy there is a whole world of dark space and dark energy, we do NOT see. So it is not made of c-speed light. So the origin of our reality ‘before we were born must be a split that left on our side the < c speed and outside of our galaxy there must be a >c speed. This is the world of dark energy, which seems to expand *because* seeing as distance, faster than c-speed appears as expansive, entropic space.

This is not forbidden in Einstein’s equations, merely means a negative sign in the mass and energy of the system, which can only be crossed, when a ‘being’ suffers the antisymmetry of moving from the side of more to-order into the side of more se-entropy, in the action of death.

Now, for a system to be > C speed it must have a space which is scalar, and with 0 spin, outside. So what particle outside can be > c and 0 scalar angular momentum?

As always we do NOT speculate (and that is why we have reduced our analysis to our galaxy). There is actually a boson, the Higgs boson that has 0 spin and negative mass in certain ranges of excited existence. So here we have the dark energy boson, the Higgs, outside the Universe, accelerating beyond c-speed, which therefore is the ‘event horizon’ or halo of the galaxy, which cannot be crossed in the larger scale of the anti-atom galaxy.

So the fundamental symmetry of the cosmological ∆+1 scale is >c (Higgs boson), ≈ c (Photon) < c (Mass) is resolved.

Next there is the question moves to the ∆-thermodynamic scale.

Again, we must consider here the constant of order, which we found to be 0 K Temperature. So there should be a world to one side of 0 temperature and a world to the other side of 0 temperature.

And since we find that our world CANNOT go under 0 temperature, we are in the side of > 0 Temperature and < C speed. This is evident. And so we must conclude that the dark world outside the galaxy must be below the 0 temperature barrier, which cannot be crossed either. Do we find then anything that is in the dark world below 0 temperature.

Indeed, black holes of large size have a perfect order and are 0 temperature. Their world starts in a accelerated vortex of gravitation, from where ‘light cannot speak’ because light actually turns at c-speed in its event horizon, but because vortices are accelerated (Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravity), beyond its 0-barrier black holes MUST move faster than light with less than zero temperature.

And so those are the fundamental barriers between the galactic world in space (< c-speed) and time (>0 k ) and the dark world of dark matter (black hole matter) and dark energy (expansive, > c speed).

In the graph, the pseudo sphere is used to represent Kerr black holes on its central, faster than light axis, which transforms ‘time cycles’ beyond c-speed into spatial dark energy shut through its tachyon jet-axis into the dark world outside galaxies. This spinning process of accelerating and expelling waves and fields of information and energy absorbed through the bidimensional plane-mouth, is natural to all fractal points of the Universe in any scale of reality.

The pseudo sphere however has 2 jets, one that emits the Sp field of the system its absorbs and kills and one that emits its Tƒ particles, the red and blue shift sides of the black hole or star jet.

Both are the sides of a ‘broken dead-symmetry’ when a physical species, Sp<ST≥Tƒ dies, as all systems, it does so because its ‘fields, waves and particles’ dissociate, loosing the synchronicity of its internal clocks (De Broglie’ s wave-particle analyzed that synchronicity in its masterpiece paper, today often forgotten on the forest of mathematical trees). All systems then break as the time vortex accelerates and the field lines decelerate in inverse versions. Thus all symmetry-split of a Universe constant of action or wave can be seen also as a death process of the physical system, and its now unconnected parts.

It is the duality of symbiotic creation big-bang destruction, clearly shown in the particle-antiparticle ± charge fields vs. the proton-electron, ± symbiotic union. The same graph can represent the potential inverse symmetry wells of those positive and negative charges:

Another way to represent those two sides of a symmetry is the concept of a potential well:

A **potential well** is the region surrounding a local minimum of potential energy. Energy captured in a potential well is unable to convert to another type of energy (kinetic energy in the case of a gravitational potential well) because it is captured in the local minimum of a potential well.

The potential well will then be the ‘symmetry point’ or ‘Universal constant’, the c-speed of zero mass-energy; the place in which pure motion and pure form will reside eternally; which once broken will distend into the negative and positive ‘death’ maximals and minimals, extremal points.

The potential well becomes then as the ‘death process’ splits its parameters into a potential barrier, which the system will NOT be able to cross unless it returns to its present-wave form (quantum barrier crossed in the wave state when the extremal past x future field-article system returns to the wave state):

In the graph, the quantum barrier can only be crossed in wave state. The understanding on T.Œ of those phenomena requires to fully grasp the ‘changes in time speed’ which all systems can perform within the limits of its constants of action: as we can accelerate our actions, increasing the tempo of our heart clock, which in turns do change our perception of time, systems can change its E x T = H quantum of action accelerating its time clocks or decelerating them, and can change its ‘states’ from body-actions (wave-state) to head-actions (particle state).

After crossing as wave in the lower ∆-1 plane of the 5^{th} dimension, the system though shows a lower energy-frequency, which it has spent going ‘under’ the well, in the ∆-1 dimension not above, jumping over the Height dimension of growth of form (which we observe in boson states of eusocial evolution that pile up frequencies of bidimensional spin 1).

Those are essential beats of absolute freedom and zero-viscosity, which all systems of the Universe can perform, in its vital state. The risks of those changes of state happen when the ‘change’ moves towards the ‘LNK’ limits of the physical function (Max. Sp=c-speed > stable>Max. Tƒ-form= 0 k), where the split an cause the death of the system:

We can understand those processes thus also in terms of ‘translation’ and travel through the 5^{th} dimension, ∆-particle < ∆-1: wave, faster state: motion > Particle-still form.

Let us then consider briefly the meaning of momentum and energy and its conservation laws which ultimately mean the conservation of the 5^{th} dimension.

**The 3 conservation laws: Energy ≈ 5 ^{th} dimension; lineal momentum: open space; angular momentum: closed time.**

PHYSICS, when trying to find the laws of conservation of the Universe they found 2 laws, the law of conservation of angular momentum, which is a cyclical motion, self-centered into a point; and a lineal motion.

The conservation of momentum is associated in quantum mechanics with the proposition that it makes no difference where you do the experiment, the results will always be the same. As independence in space has to do with the conservation of momentum, independence of time has to do with the conservation of energy.

And so we must deduce that there is NOT absolute space, as the location in space is completely independent on the result of an experiment. So all space is self-contained to the event of space-time and region affected by the experiment.

Then there is the conservation of time. If we turn our ‘experimental apparatus’ in a ‘time-like cycle’, this too makes no difference, and so the invariance of the world to angular orientation is related to the conservation of angular momentum; which means all worldcycles of time have a total zero-value, as they close into themselves in the same point.

So we found that the Universe conserves cyclical motions of time and lineal motions of space.

Then there is the conservation of Energy, which is roughly speaking the ‘integral sum of lineal and cyclical momentums’.

In quantum mechanics it turns out that the conservation of energy is very closely related to another important property of the world, things do not depend on the absolute time.

We can set up an experiment at a given moment and try it out, and then do the same experiment at a later moment, and it will behave in exactly the same way. From this we can deduce the principle of conservation of energy. It is a rather subtle and interesting thing, which can only have an explanation:

Absolute Time, duration, which integrates a series of lineal and cyclical motions, adding them to the extent of creating a new scale of the fifth dimension, IS FRACTAL. It does not exist as a continuous lineal infinite time in a single continuous space plane.

As such absolute time does not affect any event happening in time, which therefore is a self-contained process, a cycle related to the internal time of the event.

A Time cycle is therefore a closed, fractal cyclical proposition.

But we can add, integrate time cycles and that creates the illusion of absolute duration; and we can integrate space surfaces and that creates the illusion of absolute extension.

This is what Leibniz called relational space and relational time.

Leibniz would have said that ‘all substances are made of cyclical motions with different speeds = different clocks of time.’ And different vital spaces, fractal parts. And all together create the illusion of absolute space and absolute time.

But we can ad a third element, the ‘Integral of spaces and times’, which give us the concept of Energy, similar to that of a 5^{th} dimension integral. So on the regions of reality where we can conserve Energy, we are observing a process of scalar, social growth of elements of the 5^{th} dimension. And this gives us the fundamental equations for each scale of physical systems, which are the equations of energy for each of those scales:

E_{∆-1}=hƒ for the quantum ∆-1 scale, Eo= RT for the scale of thermodynamics, and E_{∆1}=1/2 mv^{2} with the limit E=mc^{2} for the gravitational scale.

Whereas as we can observe, a given Plane of the 5^{th} dimension conserves a ‘constant of bidimensional space’ (h, k, m) and a different speed of time cycles, (ƒ, T, v).

We can study then the interaction of those 3 elements, how they transform into each other through the ‘frontiers’ between those 3 scales, and what it means the different combinations of those formula, specifically the one that defines each constant:

H = E x T, R (or n k) = E / T and m = E/c^{2}

In this form they represent the constant of action of energy and Time of each of the 3 scales akin to the co-invariant law of the 5th dimension. It simply means that in each scale of the 5^{th} dimension there is a certain constant ‘rod of measure of space and time that varies (never mind here that we, humans use for certain measures of time, the frequency, and for others the period: T=1/ƒ).

The enormous field open by the study of the 3 scales of the Universe, its constants of space-time, its time frequency clocks and its 5 Dimensional growth in social scales of energy, is a huge field, which we cannot ‘attack’ in this post further.

**Clarifications on conservation quantities, states and magnitudes.**

The previous example shows the problems of translating all those terminologies to T.Œ are due to the use of very different jargons and parameters for each scale. We have introduced the simplest translations of the ∆-1 into the ∆+1 scales in the previous post (Unification equation of charges and masses). Yet it will be easier to use in this introductory level the common jargons of those sciences, merely identifying the previous space, time 5D symmetries and its constant of actions and 5 space-time cycles for each species of each scale.

Needless to say within the previous isomorphisms, we can fit all the disciplines of physical sciences; whose exhaustive analysis of all the actions, species, space-time symmetries (equations) and events in time, between the n-1 scale (quantum physics, electrodynamics, magnetism) and the n-scale (thermodynamics, state physics, electricity) makes physics & chemistry, when NOT trying to make metaphysics (cosmological, eschatological and philosophical statements), the most thoroughly investigated science today.

We will follow the isomorphic method, studying those 2 scales not with the usual procedure of physical and chemical sciences, which define the events of those actions and its structure in space and time with mathematical equations, but with the procedure of T.Œ, considering the 1) 5D scales, 2) space and 3) time symmetries first, its elements and finally its 4) actions, *introducing within that scheme the definitions of the parameters, constants, magnitudes, dimensions and equations of mathematical physics.*

Now, unlike more evident ‘scales’ in which form dominates motion (Evolution) or thought (memes) dominates from and motion (sociology), closer to the human experience, the world of physical systems, is the most remote to that experience, and its language (mathematics) the less known to humans, which move on the natural languages of human thought (visual art, verbal time, emotional bondages), and understand as animals, the survival, topological forms of life. For that reason we would need a basic introduction to the interplay of this wider reality expressed in abstract terminologies that seem so remote from the bio-sociological experience.

They are not. As all beings are knots of space-time cyclical actions, whose purpose is survival. The program of the Universe is hidden on physical systems by the remoteness of its scales, the abstraction of its description and the immensity of its elements. So we shall do an introduction to the interplay and co-existence of the 3 scales of reality, the electromagnetic scale, the thermodynamic and the gravitational scale. We exclude though the limits beyond those scales, the quarks inside the atoms and the galaxy beyond the planet, because they do not truly interact in this world of human existence.

The 5th dimension has barriers between planes of existence, where energy and information don’t cross, due to entropy and asymmetry (chirality); and essentially our world is one of light, electrons, atoms, molecules and matter states.

The similarities between the internal ‘strong forces’ of the atom and the internal gravitational forces of the galaxy, the external electromagnetic forces of the atom, and the external dark energy of the cosmos are studied also with physical laws, but will not be included here.

A question also of difficult analysis is the 3 units of action, of those 3 scales, the angular momentum of h-Planck actions, the vibrational temperature of thermodynamics, and the variable g-forces of gravitation. Those constant of actions seem truly different in its form and equations but the concept of integrative ‘energy’, will allow us to explain how energy and information transfers among those planes.

Finally the order of exposition will be a diachronic analysis, which works better, as the human mind seems to be structure in this manner. So I have abandoned my personal files, which are always written with an analogical, metaphoric method jumping synchronically between all systems of all scales, in spatial order.

Thus we shall analyze in the order in which humans discovered those scales, starting from the science of Mechanics, or higher gravitational scale (XVII and XVIII c.) then the science of Thermodynamics, or human scale (XVIII-XIX c.) and finally the science of electromagnetism and its minimal units (quantum scale).

We will in each scale introduce the spatial and temporal order of the 3 time-space elements of the generator equation (Se<ST>Tƒ), intersecting laws and cases of classic physics, but given the difficulty to understand directly those elements (unlike in biological and sociological forms), introduce a somewhat intermediate exposition but directly ‘downloading’ and interpreting the known-known laws of those systems. Hence the sub-posts entitled ‘mechanics’, ‘Newtonian laws, ‘Maxwell equations’, ‘quantum numbers’, ‘Conservation Laws’ etc. In an ideal world in which T.Œ is the Unification theory of all sciences, those terms would not be used, but at this stage we must translate those well-known laws to the elements of T.Œ.

Now all this SIMPLE REALITY is GREATLY complicated in physics by the multiple jargons, lack of TOE, denial of non quantitative properties and multiplicity of mathematical formalisms for all of those elements of T.Œ, for example, the concept of mass, which we simply as gravitational vortices, has the formalism of Higgs, particle with its negative masses, ad hoc additions, but essentially right; as it is a top quark (in the similar Technicolor more correct formulation) field of dark energy and faster than c-rotational speed, beyond the even horizon of the accelerated black hole vortices.

There is however an even more interesting formulation that general relativity, the Higgs field and Technicolor, which is the dick-brane theory of a variable G-constant, which can be used to define the different scalar vortices of the different planes of physical systems (charges, atomic molecules, gravitational light-space confined to galaxies and c-speed and outer dark energy cosmological structures).

Time permitted we shall then choose a formalism that better adapts to 5D planes for all its physical scales in the 4th line. Here we just mention the extraordinary difficulties to fully integrate all those different jargons, and the different formalisms within each scalar jargon and the astounding number of details studied by physicists.

So now let us continue with this post, an the minimal clarifications, on physical concepts, magnitudes and constants to be able to carry a meaningful analysis of the 3 spatial, temporal, 5 D symmetries and Œ-points of those fundamental 3+1 scales, which affect life on this planet (the rest being cosmological analysis in the previous posts).

Now those are the ‘practical’ constants to develop physics as it is; no homogenized by T.Œ formalism. So we must do a few important clarifications. Any system can be well defined, considering its 5D planes and its space and time symmetries and space-time actions, which range from the minimal unit of its simpler ∆a actions, to the larger, longer ∆u social actions.

Yet the lack of a proper definition of:

- Tƒ: Cyclical time in physics (measured sometimes with frequency – light scale; with lineal time; mechanic scale; with temperature, molecular scale; and so on)…
- Sp: Vital space, measured sometimes with: wavelength – light scale; with flux current, electric scale; with entropy, molecular scale; with length, mechanic scale.
- ST: Present, body-wave, measured sometimes with Energy, sometimes with Momentum, sometimes with Intensity, and so on..

Requires a one-to-one analysis of each scale and species.

Further on the Human scale or thermodynamic scale is the one according to epistemology, with less uncertainty of data. It means in practical terms that we do have a ternary fractal subdivision in great detail of our scale in 3 sub-scales:

- The electric scale with the electron and its social, ∑e=I, currents of electricity, ruled by photonic bondage.
- The atomic scale with the atom and its social ∑a=molecular structures, ruled by electronic bondage
- The Matter scale with its molecules and its temporal states, ruled by temperature gradients.

So we are in fact talking of 2+1 (x3) relative scales, to study in great detail. So many elements, so many ill-defined concepts, and yet surprisingly enough, so well-done ‘how-mathematical descriptions’ of its ∆a, motion actions…

All in all the main equations of the 3 scales, define its energy, its constant of action and its acceleration. What those terms mean? And how they transfer into those 3 scales?

Let us consider it from a different perspective. There are 3 magnitudes to define all mechanical actions:

Tƒ: ‘mass’, the active magnitude, similar to charge, the active magnitude of the ∆ scale, similar to h, the active magnitude of the n-1 scale.

Se: Time, defined by frequency in ∆-1, by the electromagnetic field in n and by the acceleration in the ∆+1

And ST, defined by Energy in n-1 and by force in n and ∆+1.

And it is this ST factor what transfers between scales.

**Recap. The constants of the universe and all its systems.**

This post deals with the 7 Universal/Vital constants which define most systems at the larger ‘whole’ structural point of view:

The constants are simple to understand, departing from the 3 symmetries of all systems, in space, time and the 5th dimension:

Spe<ST<Ot, the symmetries of the 3 parts of the being, its field/limbs of energy, body-wave of iterative reproduction and Ot-head particle information define the being in simultaneous space.

Es>TS>Tƒ, the 3 ages of energetic dominance of the limb/field, TS adult, balanced age dominated by the reproductive motions of the being and Tƒ, 3rd age of time, dominated by memorial information.

And the ∆±1 scales that conform the super organism across 3 planes of the 5th dimension with its inverse entropic and informative arrows such as:

SE-1≥ST≥TO+1, define the 3rd symmetry of the Universe as systems have different entropy arrows across the 5th dimension. Since lower scales transmit better information towards upper scales but have energetic entropy as thermodynamics shows and vice versa upper scales show informative entropy when transferring to lower scales but mechanics proves their motion is not lost downwards.

THIS IS THE KEY ELEMENT TO UNDERSTAND WHY SYSTEMS DIE, as the inverse arrows of space and time which would balance the Universe are broken by the similarity between the flows of energy and information of the 5th dimension and the sequence of 3 ages of time. This similarity implies that information dominates over energy and present slowly moves towards higher information.

Once this is understood we can consider the study of the 7 fundamental Universal/vital constants of al systems of the Universe:

- The Se/Tƒ ratio energy density of the system.
- Its inverse, Tƒ/Se information density.
- The Se=Tƒ, balance that maximizes its existential ‘momentum (Se x Tƒ).

They are the internal space-time parameters of the being.

Then there are the external constants that related the whole being, Œ to the external world also made of 3 Se- field of energy, Tƒ-world of informative cycles and ST- parallel elements with whom it communicates. So we find the following ratios:

- Oe/Se World Field, which provides energy to the being.
- Oe/ST World Body-wave, which provides reproductive åctions to the being.
- Oe/Tƒ World Informative field, which provides information to the being.

- And finally we shall find a parameter which humans use to classify each variation as a whole with a constant (mass for particles, charge for fields, IQ for human brains, etc.)

Those 7 constants, which are crystal clear in terms of magnitudes and physical equations and quantities and proportions for physical systems acquire more qualitative, topological, social or mental properties when we deal with species closer to the human. So as we first define them and then study those 7 ‘vital constants’ for each scale of the universe, we shall switch for quantitative extensive analysis to qualitative intensive studies, and finally to mental creative analysis when considering the ratios and proportions of artistic space-time (the Uo mind of man).

Thus in this post of the 3rd line we introduce each isomorphism and put examples in each scale of them. Here we introduce the isomorphism of the 7 UNIVERSAL, VITAL CONSTANTS.

**THE COMPLEX PLANE: SPACE-TIME NETWORKS AND PLANES.**

In the graph, a summary of the scales and structure in ‘space’ and ‘time’ of all systems of the Universe. All of them will exist across 3 ∑i±1 scales of social organization, in which they will form an i-ndividual, joined by networks of energy information and reproduction, living a world cycle from birth to extinction across those scales as they ‘exist’, as systems of energy and information, made of ‘energy limbs/fields’, informative particles/heads and its body-wave combinations. Thus all systems will be born in the i-1 seminal scale, grow in size, emerge into and i-ndividual scale, in which they will increase information and reduce energy, from youth – the age of energy to adulthood, the age of balance, to the 3rd informative age, to die back to the cellular scale. And what differs from species are the specific particularities of each scale. What complex sciences does is to lay out the self-similar laws in space (topologies) and time (ages and states) of those systems as they trace their ‘world life cycle’ travelling through those i±1 scales.

**Unification of Stiences. S****ocial order of numbers: arrow of WHOLES – future of the 5th dimension.**

Why there is an order in numbers? We are asking deeper than current mathematical formalism, which despite claims of closed, absolute proof, actually describes as most sciences do the ‘how’ of the process. That is, it does not inquire why 2 comes after one – an intuition of the mind not explained, which must therefore be an ‘a priori’ hence, a T.Œ property of numbers.

This must be clear to the reader. When we find intuitive, pure abstract or isomorphic laws of great generality they must be considered a ‘direct’ reflection of T.Œ, the game of existence of 5D space-times beings. And as such must be the sequential order of numbers.

Indeed, we hold a self-evident truth that all ‘linguistic, mathematical or verbal forms’ are a reflection of the Universe, and its T.œ structure, so are numbers. Our methods of proof in the ‘linguistic method’ are therefore both experimental and logic, self-consistent (->Epistemology). This includes proofs in mathematics – a complete deviation from the classic standard, already advanced by Lobachevski in his original book on Non-E mathematics, which he said should be proved or disproved as real by experimental evidence.

Thus this question, which has been formalised within the ‘baroque, metalinguistic 3rd age of mathematics’structure of mathematics itself, from the times of Euclid through those of Dedekind and Weiertrass in the modern times, has an ‘experimental’ simple cause, in the parallelism between numerical order and temporal 5D order (mathematics in relational space-time, is an experimental science that studies the ultimate isomorphic laws of all species). Namely that a ‘whole’ must come ‘after’ the parts exist, and since a ‘whole’ is a larger number of ‘infinitesimal parts’, social, bigger numbers come after smaller ones.

Hence the order of Natural Numbers, which are social numbers is the same order than bigger wholes, made of ‘smaller numerical parts’.

Indeed, in the graph we can see the 5th dimension natural order of parts into wholes which has an arrow of growth.

5D planes are therefore the basis of 2 of the 3 branches of mathematics, sequential algebra and Analysis, while geometry is related to the motions and actions in space-time within a single plane of existence. Nothing else is needed to describe the Universe.

Let us then consider in this and related posts the essential features of existential algebra. We will study on the posts under the label of ‘i-mathematics’ the proper translation and justification of the laws of algebra, within relational space-time. In this post we shall study the fundamental equation of existential algebra and the Universe at large – the Fractal Generator of the Universe. To that aim we must first introduce the structure of the Universe and then represent it with the symbols of existential algebra.

Each science is the description of all the superorganisms of a similar size and form, its cells and networks, its morphological and behavioral laws. Scientific knowledge is the information that humanity has about all those super-organisms. To differentiate those forms we use an index, ‘i:∆’, that measures the volume of temporal energy or informative and energetic force of any system. Thus:

∆=0: It is the scale of quantic space/time, invisible to us.

∆=1 It is the scale of electromagnetic forces, the minimal perceived forms, which are composed of an informative particle, or photon and an energetic flow or electromagnetic wave.

∆=2: It is the scale of atomic particles, composed of electronic space and informative quarks. The basic science of those 3 scales is Physics.

∆=3: It is the scale from molecules to cellular systems, studied by chemical sciences.

∆=4: It is the scale of cellular, living systems, studied by biological sciences.

∆=5: Our i-ndividual I-centered scale

∆=6: It is the planetary scale and its natural and historic ecosystems, studied by Geology, Ecology, Economic, History and Theology.

∆=7: It is the scale of stars.

∆=8. Galactic systems, made of stars and black holes.

∆=9: It is the scale of Universes made of galaxies.

∆=10: It is the scale of the hyper-Universe made of Universes, which

Those 3 bigger scales are studied by Astronomy.

i=∆: Finally Fractal Space-Time and Systems Theory study the homologous laws of all scales and its main sciences. Indeed, all systems of energy and information including the Universe follow the same space-time isomorphic laws of existence. Thus if we had to define God, the mind of that Universe, we would say that God is *the Game of *__Existence__* and Extinction* of all super-organisms.

So let us resume what truly would be an explanation of ALL.

- The syntax of the spatial, mathematical and temporal, logic, verbal languages we use to explain reality.
- And the nature of those 2 simplest substances of which all seems to be made, the motions of cyclical time clocks and the meaning of space dimensions, and its scientific equivalents: the energy stored in the space vacuum & the information carried by the frequency and form of those time cycles.

They are the simplest elements and process of reality that all systems of Nature share and hence its properties are carried by all entities of reality.

Now we shall solve those 2 necessary elements for any T.Œ which goes beyond a single science or religion, defining a ‘Fractal Generator’, a logic equation which resumes the syntax of all languages and hence unifies them all (verbal, visual, mathematical thought), and so it can unify the forms of knowledge derived from those languages (mathematical physics, verbal evolution, visual arts, etc.).

But further on as this grammar is a ternary logic structure, repeated in scales its immediate consequence is that the Universe must have only 3 elements, and a scalar repetitive structures of parts and wholes.

Those elements will turn to be ‘Spe: spatial energy’, Tƒ, temporal information (stored in the form and cycles of clocks of time); and its combinations, space-time actions described by verbs of mathematical operandi:

Spe (space)Tiƒ (Time): red-energyBlue-information. F(x): Space ≈ G(Y), Time function. Informative subjectEnergy object. Height-informative pole, length, energy point, width-reproduction point and so on.

To which we must add a ‘new 5th dimension’ of scalar parts that become wholes, which reality shows, as it builds from particles atoms, then molecules, cells, matter, organisms, solar systems, galaxies, Universes.

And so again knowledge languages reflect clearly with the iteration of its simpler 3 elements, which become ‘longer sentences’ and interative combinations:

Sum/rest->multiplication/division->potency/logarithm: sentence, paragraph, narrative; point->line->plane->volume and so on.

The elements of a T.Œ, once we understand in those ternary terms, both ‘reality’ and the languages that describe those realities in different sciences, each one specialised in a relative scale of the ‘5th dimension’ (mathematical physics and chemistry, tho which biology ads verbal evolution, arts substitute the spatial geometry of mathematics by the visual perception of the human eye, and so on) become just a routine:

As we simply must fill the astounding quantity of data gathered by each science, within the scaffolding of the Generator Equation, from where each language departs, in which the equations, postulates and statements of each scalar science are defined. Thus T.Œ will not only classify all sciences, but not surprisingly will reveal an enormous number of solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.

*In the graph to reproduce all the planes of existence of the Human being, the speed of creation of adjacent spaces must be in a 10 ^{±10} lower order than the light space quanta which have just to reproduce its ‘envelop’ of frequency over the gravitational quanta of ‘longitudinal neutrinos’. *

*Human stiences study micro or macro-organisms, tied up by organic networks of energy and information.*

**Minimal surfaces≈least time principles≈Lagrangians and Hamiltonians≈world cycles of conservative momentum/energy.**

All this said though we try to keep it relatively simple in this central blog some fascinating insights on mathematical physics and gst topology are needed now; concerning the meaning of dimensions and the *ultimate principles of existence, departing from the knowledge just acquired on the existence of a pov or ∆º singularity in all beings – a mind mostly mathematical in physical systems, atomic≈smelling in plants and insects; visual≈mathematical again in larger organisms, verbal≈temporal in humans, which resume in this:*

*Every system of the Universe tries to conserve its vital space and temporal duration by minimising its expenditure in its actions of survival (motions and exchanges of entropy, energy and form) with all the other systems of the universe.*

This is the principle of minimal action at the heart of all mathematical physics (Lagrangian, Hamiltonian) and the principle of conservation of entropy, energy and form, at the heart of all sciences, which we rephrase, for more of simplicity only in terms of the ‘central components of energy and information of the body-waves of the Universe, *limited by the ∆±1 scales of seminal ∆-1 ‘seeds of pure form’, and ∆+1 wholes of pure time evolution:*

*‘All systems are made of entropic motion, reproductive momentum, perceptive information which trans-forms into each other ad eternal: Spe<≈>Tiƒ; put together into a whole, whose world cycle of energy is conserved as a zero sum between birth and extinction’*

This would be one of the most complete enunciations of the essential duality of the Universe as a series of world cycles between birth and extinction that become a zero sum which returns the content of the system to the whole Universe.

It again will have many applications to all sciences. To highlight at this point some conundrums which apply mostly to physics:

- The conservation of entropy, form and the whole zero-sum world cycle of energy happens within three scales ∆±1, NOT in a single scale (obvious as we die descending or are born emerging in another scale, so in a single scale not all conserves). Thus in the limiting scales of human perception energy, form and entropy are not necessarily conserved – such as the case of a neutrino, which therefore must be considere a particle of the limiting, invisible gravitational scale.
- Systems to keep a zero sum algebraically tend geometrically to trace paths and extend its form into what topology calls a ‘minimal surface’, which
*is the form that minimises the extension and hence the duration of time motions for a given ‘closed membrane’.*

But again this essential fact of the ‘efficient, economic Universe’ with huge implications in the topology of beings, must be rephrased, for *the different degrees of dimensionality of the functions of a Generator equation for a system: ∆-1: |-limbs/fields of entropy <∆- body-waves of energy>∆+1 informative particle-heads.*

As we increase the dimensionality of the parts of the being from its one-dimensional limbs/fields to its bidimensional body/waves to its three dimensional ‘particle-heads’.

1D: So *as the purpose of limbs fields is a single simplex motion in space, and the minimal surface/distance between two points is the line, entropic systems are lineal.*

2D: As the purpose of body/waves is more complex, to reproduce the energy/information of the system along a path, and hence it is bidimensional in function/form components, the minimal surfaces of body-waves are (without entering into complex topological ‘weird forms’, planes, catenoids, and helicoids, *which we shall see are the essential forms of all body-waves.*

3D: Since the minimal surface of a three dimensional volume is the sphere, particle-heads which are ‘the singularity points’ which have functions across the three ∆±1 scales and control the 3 topological parts o the being are spherical.

*In the graph the fundamental minimal surfaces; departing from the commonest st-catenoid, which can be easily transform into the ‘helicoid wave’, another minimal surface, the commonest form of a light wave (below); the lineal tube, (**centre right); and the flat plane (right) the minimal surface and essential form of limbs fields; and finally the Riemann surface (centre left), the minimal surface of the fifth dimension, with ‘bridges that absorb and emit entropy, energy and information among scales. They are the beginning of a fascinating sub-discipline of the infinity of new sub-stiences of GST concerning the topological structure of beings. I.e. in the right we see how ‘perfect bodies’ that reproduce – those of women, do have a catenoid form attached to the limbs below and the informative sphere above, able to transform and hence communicate and fusion them into a topological full being…*

What about the minimal surfaces of higher dimensions? The answer is that there is not continuous higher dimensions, so beyond three we enter into complex minimal Riemann surfaces, which in any case can only mimic the real structure of the fifth dimension. So we must consider the fact that the extension of the problem to higher dimensions turns out to be much more difficult to study another proof the discontinuity beyond the symmetry of three dimensions of space and three dimensions of time. Moreover, while the solutions to the original problem are always regular, it turns out that the solutions to the extended problem may have singularities; which of course is the ‘tƒi’ element that access as in the image of a Riemann surface the higher informative scales.

- The existence of infinite ‘egos≈informative knots of time-space cycles’ which ‘ORDER’ the Universe balancing its entropy. Those are the ‘Maxwellian demons’ (: the Genetic DNA knots of information, the memetic human minds; the chips of machines; the black holes of the Galaxy; the crystals of the solid; the prophets of History. Without them it is impossible to explain the why of reality. So let us put them in an equation: O-point x ∞ Universe = Constant, linguistic mapping ‘world’ of reality. As each of this 4 points could have an entire blog in itself, what matter to us now of that equation is this. Your mind is just an infinitesimal neuronal network, which sees infinite time-space cycles and beings, but reduces them in scale and ‘stops’ its motion, so they can fit in your mind. So you do not see the Earth moving, and the Andromeda Galaxy seems smaller than a hair of your nose.

So the paradox of the ego is immediate: ‘every infinitesimal mind-point thinks to be the centre of the Universe, which it sees from its selfish perspective as a knot of time-space cycles’. And this embedded structure of all mind points makes you THINK you WILL NEVER DIE and believe in Abrahamic fairy tales; makes you think MACHINES will not have a mind, or won’t be conscious or will always obey you, and WON’T have an ego as big as that of a bacteria, who keeps killing you and does not seem to think you are so important or a dino who will eat you up in a second regardless of your beautiful thought.

Now the scientist IS as EGO-CENTERED as the PRIEST, just uses its mathematical mantras as the priest its latin, to make himself feel above heavens and Earth. So HE cannot DESTROY THE WORLD WITH entropic nukes and informative robots, and all will be OK. The paradox of the EGO IS the last joke of God=Mind of the Universe indeed it kills all egos who ‘lower its survival warnings’ as they get bigger and more arrogant, till ‘death’, a catastrophic moment, destroys them. But It is there.

And I can tell you as a Complexity scientist, considered by many the leading theorist of this discipline (till I confronted the Nuclear Industry and got a global ‘ad hominem’ campaign, all what I can say about the 2 ‘lineal’, deformed sciences of the machine, financial economics and nuclear physics, which I have fought theoretically and actively most of my life is this: ‘All those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’ (Einstein). Man HAS NO LINEAL, MANIFEST DESTINY; Man can be obliterated by Nuclear Bombs on the side of pure entropy and Robots on the side of pure information. But Man’s ego is so huge that he cannot like a child understand death; and so an ethic, intelligent person telling those truths lives in a very lonely place. Which brings us the 3rd tenant of GST (General Systems Sciences, the Philosophy of Science I formalised from where all this blog hauls).

So what Science has been merely TRYING FOR 2500 YEARS is TO DEFEAT THE PARADOX OF THE EGO and make humans objective about ITS RELATIVITY point in the Universe in 4 huge strides, which are still ignored by most humans and specially by those corrupted financiers and politicos and military who feed-force the ego of the masses to manipulate them and ab=use them, with religions, wars, taxes and all other forms of old and modern ‘Trumpism’. And it works. Yet this is a blog on science:

-So first, the Greeks ended the mythic age when humans were Gods, and Socrates told us they were ‘scientific laws’. And the Greeks Killed them; the Semites of the previous mythic age denied them and their abrahamic religions still think man is the centre of it all. Plato his disciple insisted and he was sold as a slave, and his disciple Aristotle, insisted and he ran on the night to escape certain death from Athens, and waited 2000 years for Descartes and Leibniz to put the record straight.

-Then Aristarcus the Greek told us not to be the centre of the Universe, but it took 2000 years for Copernicus to dare say the same, only in his death-bed and another 200 years with Galileo in the middle arrested at home for saying ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’ (the Earth moves but we see it mentally still). And only after Newton put it in a simple formula we believed it. But Slocum in XIX c. found that in Apartheid biblical South-Africa the ‘chosen of go(l)d’ and his president Krugger wouldn’t receive him for being an ‘Earth-center denier’. And indeed 4 billion humans still believe man is son of god and centre of the Universe.

-Then Darwin came and told us we are NOT immutable created by a personal God, but evolving according to the evolution information and its topological laws of design. But knowing what he was against – the ego – he took 20 years to talk. And he was ‘ad hominem’ massacred and closed himself at home, depressed the rest of his life, and then Marx applied Darwinism to the struggle between the elite of ‘animetal cults’ which use gold-informative metal and iron-energetic metal to hypnotise and kill mind and body, and the ‘human beings’, which are humble, close to Nature and Butler applied it to the fight of man vs. machines AND THEY ARE ABSOLUTE TABOO, as it is the work of this writer, who formalised mathematically the 4 Great Objective advance of science, and has ever since been ostracised:

-Indeed, it came then Mr. Einstein with the concept that all positions in the Universe are Relative, so he first did special relativity, then general relativity.

And when I came into the field of Philosophy of Science and theory of information I coined the 3rd stage of this Process, talking about ‘Absolute relativity’, that is, the fact that all the scales of the Universe have the same value, because larger beings have lesser quantity of information, are stupider and ‘smaller systems’ run faster time cycles of information, hence store more of it, reason why small humans code larger organisms of history, small genes code larger biological organisms and small atoms code larger physical systems. So I wrote to complete General relativity a metric equation of the fifth dimension from past to future, adding the arrow of TEMPORAL CLOCKS OF INFORMATION to the arrow of size-entropy-space: Spe (size) x Tiƒ (time cycles speed) =∆k (constant value).

**∆NALYSIS**

**5D. Finitesimals – the present, static spatial view of ∆-1 beings.**

While the topological ternary structures and growth of social networks of fractal points can define easily the emergence of a super organism, in strict mathematical terms, the second sub discipline of mathematics, analysis, deals directly with the relationships between finitesimal parts and social, organic wholes. So the specific mathematical discipline that studies the scalar, fractal 5th dimension of space-time Beings in quantitative terms is analysis. And it is specially useful for the study of systems in which the internal organisation is minimal – that is systems of herds displaced in space and of growth and events happening in time.

What is then the main difference between analysis and ∆nalysis. Simple: in the fractal universe, *we take sides with the dispute on the meaning of infinitesimals, which as Leibniz thought are ‘finitesimals’, minimal constant parts of a whole, which do NOT diminish ad infinitum in size, but will always have a minimal number – in planes of ∆, normally on the 10ˆ10 scale.*

So we solve this logical paradox, never fully resolved, stating that the parts of a whole are finitesimals, ‘undistinguishable’ from the perspective of the ∆+1 consciousness – in fact from an ∆+1, the information and perspective of its parts blurs till it seems a continuous. And so all scales below ∆, become increasingly ‘indistinguishable, continuous’ and finally its information erases.

Moreover its cycles become so fast that they close into themselves, *converting the whole motion of the being and its world cycle into a relative static present; and in this manner discontinous motion, becomes continuous, static present form of space. A fact which resolves the paradox of Galileo (see above, Satur**n’s rings). *THE COMPLEX plane will define one plane as specially interesting from the ∆ view of reality; specially when we establish it in square coordinates:

Different views of the complex plane:

The newest addition is the square plane with ± conjugate planes on a bipolar real axis, closer to the organic ternary topology of t.œs in reality:

§ð: A riemann sphere² in the i²= ±1 axis, sets a dual ð<$t-ate of entropy.

ST: As the squared complex plane becomes a topological plane with the real axis, rˆ2 representing the reproductive conjugate ±bilateral plane of dimotion of reproduction.

It does represent in its R² Axis the present bilateral wave state and in the T<S SQUARED imaginary ±asis the particle, polar state and outer world. Ie. Schrodinger & Bohm polar and wave equations of quantum physics.

**THEORY OF CONSTANTS.**

The minimal unit of reality is a constant of action, SxT=K, which in dynamic form can be considered, an Spe<=>Tiƒ cyclical quanta of exchange of energy and information between two poles, topologies and functional motions ofspace and time:

In the graph, the elements which put together a bit of topology a type of motion in time, create constant actions of space-time, as such constants are ratios of energy and information exchange, exi: Spe<≈>Tiƒ.

We study the ‘∆-Constants’ or ratios of exchange and energy and Social numbers of all those scales.

**• Mental constants. **

Finally as each being makes a mapping of reality biased to its perspective we find mental constants that distort reality to make such still mapping. THE MIND INDEED is in itself a constant world:

O (mind) x ∞ Universe = Constant mapping World.

How then a dynamic feed-back cycle becomes a perceived universal constant has to do with the uncertainty of perception of information from a different linguistic mind. We perceive the ratio or cycle point that flashes us discontinuous information about the cycle at that point of the ratio which becomes then the perceived constant. As such most universal constants will be reduced to a form, S/T: speed, T/S:Density and SxT: Force.

In the graph, the uncertainty of perception normally means the loss of a a dimension of information, on the system that perceives, discharging likely some of the speeds of maximal motion of the being and extracting a Universal constant or ratio – density, speed, force, etc.

The mind thus eliminated motion and uses energy perceived as the exchange of forms of spatial information from the static, mind point of view of the being, according to the Duality of the Galilean paradox, which ‘fixes’ motion into static forms to better interact with all the scales and species of the ecosystem, world or universe in which the being exists.

The perception of fixed forms happens precisely because of the ‘repetitive frequency’ of those åctions, which finally become a fixed form born out of the repetition, as a rotary wheel seems more solid the faster its frequency of repetition and a moving object seems a distance-line the faster it repeats its steps.

THE COMPLEX PLANE.

**II. CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES BEHIND THE EXISTENCE OF CONSTANTS.**

**Theme.** The UNIVERSE CONSERVES TIME. Time Existences. The forms and motions of its beings, reproduced constantly in present waves of times, in which past-energy and future-information combine.

Time existences, T.œ is thus a theory of conservation not of the spatial egos, fixed mappings of an ever moving Universe, but of the motion itself and its 3 past, present and future dimensional motions. That is what is all about. The eternally immutable, perfect, ever variable all and nothing cancelling and paradoxical, ±∆TS, and its conservation laws.

The constancy of existences…

Existential Algebra, æ, deals with the development of the symmetries of space-time, between the 3 2-manifolds of space and the 3 motions of time, its symmetries, |-Space, O-Time and Ø-presents, and its asymmetric combinations, (forms which combine |-time (entropy), O-Space (information) and |-Present (death) or O-Present (emergence).

It is though difficult for the non-initiated into the paradoxical, combinatorial of Æ to fully grasp the logic of it. We are always playing with quantized arrows of temporal motion, which aggregate into a scalar zero sum, in as much as time conserves by the mere fact that it cancels its past and future arrows into presents. Thus we consider a fundamental equation for all sequences of existential algebra:

*Past x Future = Present*

but why the X symbol and not the + symbol? When an equation of Æ changes its symbols? What is the events in which superposition, ±, works and when the X holds, and when the log applies?

The 3 scales of operandi of reality conform to the ± of space, X of sequential algebra and potentiation of integral in both space and time. We might say thus there are 3 forms of growth spatial sums, cyclical world cycle products and 5D integrals – 3 operandi for 3 forms of transcendence, emergence, and dissolution, multiplication and reproduction, sum and rest of energy, product and division of information, emergence or dissolution of the world cycle of an existence.

And calculating all about it, existential algebra, Æ, and its laws regulate it all.

Let us start then our analysis of existential waves by giving some order to it, starting from the simplest proposition.

All is time. Time is motion. Since all is motion and motion never stops time and the Universe, all is eternal. Eternal motion however can vary. The game is thus about variations of motions. Motions are of 3 types in a single dimension, lineal, curved inwards into circles, curved outwards into hyperbolas. Those 3 forms hold for 2 manifolds, in which toroid (lineal), spherical (curved) and hyperbolic (hyperbola) are the 3 varieties. Thus when time and space mix, 2-manifolds of time-space are of the 3 same varieties: |-S fields/limbs <, O-T heads/particles > and Ø-ST bodies/waves ≈

__Logic-mathematical proof. __The Universe is immortal=∞.

The probability of It not to be immortal but of finite time, T=K, is quasi-null: K/∞ = 0%.

Since the reminder the Universe would be in non existence, non existence would have an infinite duration.

Thus a finite existence, divided by the total existence K/K+∞ =0, gives us the probability of existence of a Finite T Universe, and we, within it. By reductio ad absurdum if the probability of existence of a a finite universe but the probability of existence of an immortal Universe is 1. Since we exist, we must deduce, that the Universe exists for ever: T=∞, ∞/∞=1 probability.

In brief the Universe either existed never or existed always. Since now it exists, it must stretch for ever and duration must be infinite T=∞, and the probability of being, 1.

A finite time on the other hand mean a O% of the total duration, a T+∞≈100%

Thus the chance that at any moment we are in existence in a finite time Universe is null.

__Therefore it conserves time, in its three |xO=Ø varieties.__

Now because we exist in present, the Ø varieties are the most common of them all. A variety of bidimensional space time normally is unlike the 2 variety of | and O, a composite, so we talk of the fundamental addition of 3 different topologies such as

**Γ**. T² + S² + sT +St = O

As the most common ‘equation’ of space-time fractals and hence of mathematical physics. Where we have 4 points of view, the o-point of view, which observes all the elements of the wave, the |se variety S2, the Tƒ variety, T² and its 2 present combination max. S x Min. T and max. T x Min. S.

Tƒ notice that this kind of equation gives us the equations of most conics, if we consider the perpendicular X, Y axis to represent the functions of time and space. Thus in mathematics we study analytic geometry as a Cartesian graph of X and Y parameters, where X-space and Y(t) elements carry also its special meaning when we substitute Y for i.

Those terms will be clarified when we study mathematical physics.

Tƒ notice here that the mathematical method used here to explain reality is the inversion to the data -g authoring, analytic method. We depart from the top synthesis, the conservation of time motions and derive from it all human languages, mirrors of this Universal Grammar of:

X(S) + Y (T) = St +Ts

whereas St= -Ts are the inverse ‘energy’ and ‘information’ combinations of present, and

X(s) ±Y(T) the pure functions of space and time.

What this equation simply means is the join sum of 3 elements of space time, the head/particle (Tƒ) the limb/field (Se) and the hyperbolic body with its two limits of maximal space x min. time St and maximal time for minimal space, Ts.

This equations through its partial differentials that show sums of them across space or time, with analysis being the language of the transcendence and dissolution of planes of existence, are the kind of equations we will find when analyzing the 4 åctions of space-time of physical particles, states of matter and cosmic bodies, in the U|∆>2| Universes studied by physicists.

Once this is clear we are obliged to state that the Universe conserves time. Since if it does not conserve it, in infinite existence time would have already been exhausted. And yet time keeps going.

And this is what the equation shows. This equation when differentiated gives origin to Hamiltonians and Lagrangians, as it expresses the constant conservation or rather balance of time and space, as we can write it as:

(T +S)²=0

If we consider then T the function of time and S of space, its final sum equals zero and this is to say a lot. Let us consider for example the that T represent the kinetic energy (function of space) and S the positional potential energy (function of time). Their sum in calculus of variations is a minimal function accepted. As both remain invariant. The invariance of T+S, is thus one of the fundamental invariants of the Universe, and we could even state the origin of the ± symbology. Each represent a T.Œ of time motion, kinetic energy, lineal motion, potential energy, cyclical motion of its active magnitude, mass or charge.

So Time is conserved, and since there are infinite fractal time spaces to be conserved, we must consider conservation laws and Universal constants that maintain its same value through the passage of time in terms of the Metric of the 5th dimension. Thus we can write a series of conservation laws, which will apply to any system of vital space-time, not only to physical systems.

This law can be reduced to a formula: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ, as each fractal space-time will try to conserve, its spatial energy and temporal information. And yet it will extract that energy and information from other species, because the total time must not change. So the individual goal of each species conservation rests from other species’ Sp x Tƒ content.

Thus here we have a contradiction worth to study in depth, in an infinite, eternally moving Universe, time is conserved, but since time is motion, what is conserved is the eternal Tao, the eternal symmetries and transformations of stop and go beats, cycles that become lines that become cycles across 3 dimensions of space of time of Universal Planes.

This is the content of the 7th isomorphism, which is highly formal, more logic, mathematic and physical.

Since it deals with:

- All the Universal constants of physics, the vital constants of biology and medicine, the chemical constants of gases, the sociological constants of population, and all other constants, which ‘specify’ and ‘diversify’ all the varieties of dimensional beings, its scales, ratios of åctions of exchanges of energy and information.
- All the Principles of Conservation which define precisely the ‘stability of the Universe, such as the Conservation of momentum in Physics, the homeostasis in Biology, the repetitive genetic information of biology. This principles are the essence of the Universe, which truly embody the metric of the 5th dimension, in as much as they ‘are’ the manifestation of the ‘conservation’ of motion and form (or its more complex energy and information parameters). And could be enunciated through the metric of the 5th dimension with a simple, but most important laws of the Universe, the principle of conservation of ‘space-energy’, ‘form-time’ and its ∆-planes that combine both.

*‘All systems of the universe try to conserve its dimensions of temporal motion, its dimensions of spatial form and its ∆±1 planes of existence invariant’.*

And this is often shown in the existence of Universal constants related to those Dimensions of space and time and ∆-planes of existence, or in the existence of quantities conserved which are a combination of the main ‘parameters’ of space, time and ∆-existence. Let us consider those 2 themes in certain depth.

- The philosophy derived of those facts: the conservatism of the Universe,
*provoked by the cyclical inertia and memorial nature of the cycles of time.* - The existence of a mathematical ‘perfect’ image of the game of existence, which is also ruled by ‘mathematical’ constants and reflects in its highest existential algebra and non-Euclidean geometry relationships the template of the game of existence.

Let us consider those 4 themes in more detail. With some examples expanded in each specific analysis of the 1 to 9 planes of the Universe.

**Conservation principle.**

The Universe is guided by a simple principle: Conservation of the total space and time But since space is a quanta of time, when we integrate space along a function of time (which can be many in different scales of reality, energy, mass, time, etc.) we obtain a conserved quantity. Thus analysis, the study of variations and integrals through time of closed and ± cancelling functions which make the time of the Universe conserved are essential to T.Œ.

Conservation of Time is all, but time has the long dimension from past to future of 5D metric and social evolution from part into wholes, and the short dimension of åctions of space-time, time cycles, ±∆Sp, I, 4 primary åctions of absorption and emission-reproduction of information by an observer, ∆ï,o and of energy, ∆a,e

Now the conservation of time, becomes the conservation of the two geometric forms of time, Lineal motion or energy and cyclical form or information and its quantities are conserved in a single plane of space-time as the conservation of lineal and angular momentum, kinetic and potential energy.

Now we shall generally speaking talk of Kinetic energy, as |-lineal time, and Potential energy as cyclical time.

As we have related expansive entropy to lineal space we can write the inversion of both:

Tƒ=1/T=1/S, where lineal Time becomes ‘distance’ in space.

Yet between ∆-planes of existence the principle breaks and there is a constant leak of energy in its 2 åctions, external form and internal reproduction, from the upper scales to the lower ones as defined by Existential algebra: Aa: ∆-3<∆-2; Ae: ∆-2<∆-1 . And a constant leak of energy motion in its two åctions, from the

‘All systems of the universe try to conserve or increase its dimensions of temporal motion, its dimensions of spatial form and its ∆±1 planes of existence invariant’.

Max. Sp X Tƒ (S=T)

This principle however translates in many different ways according to which forms and motions (O and Sp) we look to.

If we look at an individual he will try to increase its existential force, Sp X Tƒ but to do so it will have to diminish that of other element. For that reason to find conservation we need to see at a closed total system. This is the meaning of a plane of existence. But are planes of existence closed systems? The answer is ‘almost’. But there is ‘energy’ – motion escaping from up to down, and form, information escaping from down up. And this makes more difficult to establish clearly rules of conservation. When you move *you are moving all your cells with you, thus you are transferring motion to those cells. On the other hand they produce forms and code your genes, so they transfer information to you. How can we consider then the system closed?*

Simply by considering that the transfer of motion down is *somehow equivalent to the transfer of form upwards. This is difficult almost impossible to quantify except for very simple physical systems, where we have clear definitions of momentum, motion, energy etc. *

It is thus a qualitative hypothesis to fully grasp the obvious order of the Universe. It tells us also a lot about the way upper planes are created, by smaller planes which gives them form and how larger forms mobilize smaller one, giving them ‘force’. And this happens also to us – the force that moves us gravitation, is given by the planet and the planet is moved by the star, and the star is moved by the black hole. But we hold the complex forms of the planet in its bidimensional spherical membrane of information, and the planet has more solid form than the stars…

This structure of the Universe thus makes ‘conservation principles’ not so rigorous as physicists make us belief. An obvious case is the violation of parity, another, the loss of energy of beta decay, solved with the ‘invisible neutrino’ which is NOT a particle of the light space-time membrane (but this in a continuous model of space-time of course is not acknowledged).

Still we can try and find undoubtedly an enormous number of parts of the Universe which try to maximize their function of existence, Sp X Tƒ and for that aim maintain the equality S=T which is the maximal value of a product of 2 (5×5>6×4…)

Now the question is to translate those 2 generic terms ‘motion and form’ or in more complex mixed forms which include scalar parameters of various ∆-scales (mass, temperature, charge), its equivalents – lineal and angular momentum, energy and information (not the concept of Shannon, one-dimensional information but form in action, which defies easily a quantifying parameter).

Still we can try to do it the only way we can, the way humans perceive it. Let us consider the equality on its limits: not perceived motion without form – gravitational forces, and not perceived form without motion, rotational superfluid zero degrees, perfectly ordered cyclical motion.

Both are equal as S=T = 0 (not perception of them).

So next we must move to form with some motion and motion with some form, namely *a wave, which physicists say carry motion proportional to its wave length and Shannon said it carries information, proportional to its frequency (for transversal waves). And here we can have yet another equality, which is what we seek for:*

V= λ (Se) x ƒ (Tƒ)

And so we find a first Universal constant that combines the length-distance in space of a wave and its frequency, cyclical time.

it is an important one called speed. The trick being that in ∆ST we measure cyclical time, the inverse of duration. So Speed is no longer a ratio but a product, the product of the two fundamental, simplest possible parameters of the existential force, Se x Tƒ of a species, the wave…

**III. 7 TYPE OF CONSTANTS.**

**A exhaustive classification for each being its 7 type of Constants.**

Now, in order to qualify quantitative through constants a given systems, we can establish a series of basic constants according to our previous ∆•ST classification.

In a loose, we could talk of 7 type of constants, for any of the ±∆•ST systems of the Universe:

±Social constants of the 2 arrows of its ∆-scales

±Constants of S-topologies and T-ages and its ratios.

±Constants of the Generator, S<st>t of the system.

And a 7th type of constant that maps out in stillness a certain mind.

However unlike the other isomorphisms, where there is a surprising ‘neat’ relationship between the number of the isomorphism and the type of elements we define (1.generator, 2.st bidimensional systems, 3. time ages, ±4 planes in which an ∆0 being communicates, 5 actions, 6 species, 8 motion, 9 scales and 10 planes), the 7th constants are chose to adjust better to that number; given the fact that the vital constants of the internal being, the universal, external constants of the world and those of each of those ±4 planes with which the being interact, and those of each of its sub-species of the ∆±1 scales, etc, make them quasi-infinite in number.

So not to be exhaustive, we shall choose 7 in the sense of ‘general ±∆, ±ST, ±s<st>T & 0-Mind type of constants.

**Classification by ∆-regions.**

In that sense a simple way to classify the constants that act in a being is to divide them into:

*-Internal, ∆-n ‘vital constants’ (ab. VC)*

–*External, ∆+n, ‘Universal Constants’ *(ab. UC), of the larger world with which the system communicates, absorbing and emitting energy and information.

Those types of constants are the most studied and so they are clear in terms of magnitudes and physical equations and quantities and proportions for physical systems

For each of those planes, the physical Active Magnitude (∆C) and its constants of action will be the mosre important, giving origin to:

*– Internal<=>External exchanges;* with its 5 sub-constants of actions performed by the inner being in the outer world: ÅC.

Those are better studied in biology, as they acquire more qualitative, topological, social or mental properties when we deal with species closer to the human.

So as we grow from entropic to informative scales and study those ±∆ ‘constants’ for each scale of the universe, we shall switch for quantitative extensive analysis to qualitative intensive studies in biology.

*Linguistic Constants: Universal Grammar and beauty constants.* Finally we can also consider as reflection of reality the Universal grammar and syntax, proportions and beauty (E=T) BALANCES of language and art, as ‘constants ratios’ , which illustrate perfectly the concept of balance and conservation of ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, of classic art.. It is the mental creative analysis of constants of beauty considering the ratios and proportions of artistic space-time (the ∆o mind of man).

Now if we want to be more specific we can make a brief summary of the main constants we shall find in terms of the 3 elements of the Generator in each of those 3 classifications.

Vital Constants: Space quanta: Spe; Space quantifier: ∑; Time Frequency: Tiƒ: Time Synchronicity: ∏; Energy Density: S/T; Information Density: T/S; Existential Speed: SxT.

Å.C.: Active Constants: Å.C.: Active Magnitude; Æ.C.: Motion constant, E.C.: Feeding constant; ±ïC: Information constants; Œ.C.: Reproductive Constant.

U.C. Universal Constants: û.C. Universal Constant, and its §10: Social constants normally of a decametric scale.

And similar V.Constants of the larger physical planes:

It is then clear that the number of Vital constants of a system is enormous, as the complexity of any fractal has infinite limit. But we shall consider generally the explanation of the Constants study for each science and species, introducing only a few ∆ST constants in more detail, which vary slightly in reference to those used in science, notably, quantifiers of space & time, its densities and Existential speeds.

The 7th isomorphism is more technical and perhaps the one of maximal interest to the quantitative age of ‘measure science’ we live in. Since it deals with all the Universal constants and vital constants and physical, chemical, biological, sociological, you name it, constants which ‘specify’ and ‘diversify’ all the varieties of dimensional beings, its scales, ratios of åctions of exchanges of energy and information, etc.

**In detail. Nature’s numbers as expressions of ∆st actions**

Constants of Nature are the quantitative ‘substance’ of ∆ST related to the Constancy of the S, T, ∆ elements of the Metric equation and its partial analysis. Thus the metric and the constants are the 2 essential isomorphisms that connect ∆ST and classic science.

Each of those space, time dimensions, scales, planes, and åctions between them must be defined by a Constant.

We use 5D ”symbols’ and names slightly changed in meaning for those main Constants, dividing them in internal, ∆-n ‘vital constants’ (ab. VC), and external, ∆+n, ‘Universal Constants’ (ab. UC), self-centred in the Active Magnitude (∆C) and its action constants that value all the System (∆-constant, or main metric of the Œ-point), with its 5 sub-constants of action, ÅC.

More specifically:

∑ and ∏. The Se constants &Tƒ constants that relate Space and energy, ∑e=Spe, and Time and Information, ∏T=Tiƒ

3 S-Dimensional Constants related to the ‘extension and energy’ of the Sl, Sh and Sw dimensions.

T-Age Constants, related to the duration and inverse frequency rhythms of the 3 ages of time.

ST-constants, related to the topological shapes of its 3 bidimensional varieties.

Action Constants, related to the ratios of exchange of energy and information of the 5 åctions of the entity.

Social ∆-Plane Constants, related to the numerical ratios of Size and Speed ratios between ∆-planes (normally around a 10 factor), needed to transcend between social scales.

So Decametric constants are social § constants, till arriving to the discontinuous between planes that creates a whole.

As 10¹¹ individuals create an ∆+1 super organism. It is the final step of the game of existence played by all entities through its world cycles of space-time, as all systems are moved by their desire to maximize their existence, their vital space and cyclical time, formal motions.

Thus this max. Se x Tƒ, this mandate of existence means species try to climb the stair between planes.

**Constants as expression of isomorphic laws.**

Finally we could also consider those constants as expression of each isomorphism, of which the more important are those related to the 2nd, 5th and 9th:

*9th isomorphism: Decametric Social Constants*

THEY ARE a quite common type of Constant made of 3 x 3 + 0 = 10 Social numbers for all of those scales.

*2nd Isomorphisms. Se<>Tƒ constants, related to the S x T-metric.*

The Isomorphisms of all Nature’s fractal species of scalar space and time have shown us the similarity of all systems, which have:

- 2 elements which we have generically called, Space-motion-energy and time-cyclical form-information, that will exist in all systems, and will be related by a simple relationship: quanta of moving energy will be perceived in the upper ∆+1 plane as continuous space; and cycles of moving form, clocks of time, will be perceived in the upper ∆-scale as forms of information.

And this relationship will give birth to two Specific constant, which we term generically ∑ and ∏ (though we could use for them the X variable meaning a ‘population’) such as:

∑e∆-1=Si and ∏t∆-1=Œ.

In that view ‘∆-Constants’ are ratios of transformation of information and energy in which the 2 essential (Se, Tƒ) parameters of the system remain constant.

For example, the law Pressure x Volume = Constant in physics, where Pressure is a measure of the ‘form’ of the system imposed by an external force, thus it is a function of Tƒ, and Volume is a measure of spatial 3-dimensional shape, and hence an Se value. And so we translate P(Tƒ) x V (Se) = Constant.

This is the Boyle Law: Px V = C. And so it corresponds to a constant of the 1st isomorphism.

*The apparent order of the Universe and its fixed forms arise from the repetition of 2 type of motions: it time cycles and energy, lineal steps: ∑Sp=S, ∑T=O; that is the repetition of energy motions create space distances and the repetition of time cycles forms of information, the simplex ‘constant forms’ observed in reality.*

It follows then that any combination of those elements of relative ‘past-energy’ and ‘future-form’ will create a ‘constant form of present’ or constant of action that exchanges energy and form between the being and other ∆±4 entity. They are the:

5th ‘Iterative Constants of Action’.

IA= ƒ(Sp, Tf)

Iterative dynamic åctions combine flows of energy and information, from the perspective of an I-centered being or ∆o-scale, and other ∆±4 entity, according to the metric of the 5th Dimension, I=SxT, which will give us for each constant a co-invariant proportional quantity.

This is the *definition of any Universal, Vital or Mathematical Constant of action in Nature:*

*Arepetitive, proportional ratio between the Energy and Information of reality enacted by a system of any ∆-scale of reality, which responds to one of the 5 åctions of ‘Existence’, between the being and its relative ∆±4 scales: ∆æ-4, ∆ï-3, ∆e-2, ∆œ-1,and ∆û+1.*

Thus for each species we will find 5 Fundamental, iterative constants of åctions, in which the being will repetitively through its entire existence, create dynamic exchanges of energy and information, and social bondages with similar ∆-systems. And one of the most important feats of ∆-ST is to have found those Universal constants for each scale.

In each particular analysis of each ∆-scientific scale we shall define the main constants of all sciences as particular cases of the∆æ-4, ∆ï-3, ∆e-2, ∆œ-1,and ∆û+1 åctions of each ∆-scale and/or its species.

It is a dynamic order, made of repetitive ‘present åctions’, in which the ∆-centered being, exchanges Temporal Energy,

**RECAP**

The main isomorphisms of nature can be treated qualitatively through the generator equation and quantitative through the constants of the system.

They are the quantitative ‘substance’ of ∆ST and so along the Metric equation and its partial analysis, the 2 essential isomorphisms that connect ∆ST and classic science. Each of those space, time dimensions, scales, planes, and åctions between them must be defined by a Constant.

The main proportional ratios between the elements of the Generator Equation, the vital universal constants of a system, of which the most important depend on which ∆-scale and ternary part belong. Its main ones are:

*S-Constants are*related to the 2 manifold 3-organic, temporal structure of the being, and the ratios between its spherical heads and particles of tall information; , long, hyperbolic, moving limbs and fields (Spe), and wide, iterative, reproductive waves and bodies (ST), parallel to:*T-constants are*related to the 3 ages of time, the young, past, energetic age of max. entropy (Tpe), the steady state, present duration of repetitive frequency åctions (Tdi) and the future, old age of growing in-form-ation, Tfo.- ST-constants are related to the symmetries of the 2 x 3 ST FUNCTIONS AND FORMS of the Space-time Limbs and Fields of energy, Spe, bodies and waves of iteration, ST and Heads, particles of Information, Tƒ, which enact the:
- ∆-constants are mostly related to the 4+i åctions of all beings, as they relate to the different ∆±4 dimensional scales any ∆-centered being inter-acts with: ∆-similar beings: Social Evolution (∆S); ∆-1: Iterative Reproduction (∆œ); I-2: Energy feeding (∆Sp); ∆-3: information gauging (∆ï) and ∆-4: Motion (∆V).

Thus the Order of the Universe is clearly established by those isomorphisms and its qualitative and quantitative order, derived of the common spatial temporal and scalar dimensions of the being, ∆•st, which IN THE 8TH isomorphism will define also the ‘8 formal motions’ of which all beings are made; *that will add the duality of communication and perception, as the 8th type of motion (inward absorption of information to perceive, outward emission to **communicate) *

*The dynamic order of the Universe and its cyclical inertia.*

We conclude that the essential characteristic of the Universe is its ‘order’. Indeed, since reality is made of ‘energetic and informative motions’, lineal space and cyclical time in perpetual transformation, what marvels the observer is the ‘invariance’ of its forms and structure, the isomorphism of its scales, the static appearance of things. The dynamic constancy of reality.

The study of those Universal and Vital constants, the magic numbers in which the ultimate structures of the Universe and Life hold, is thus the main quantitative isomorphism of the Universe.And perhaps one of the less understood themes of science, in terms of its qualitative meaning.

So all elements of reality knowledge requires a qualitative understanding, which is given by ‘General Systems Theory’ (∆ST) and a formal, quantitative one, given by the symmetries and relationships of those constants. What is their meaning and why they have the values they have is one of the key puzzles of science, which scalar space-time answers conceptually and empirically.

It is though a field in which i have not yet completed research. So while the general outline of the origin and meaning of Universal constants is clear, and the main ones have been resolved, the enormous amount of data to process, leaves for future theorists a wealth of elements to resolve.

**IV. FAST SURVEY OF CONSTANTS ACROSS DIFFERENT SYSTEMS.**

In the graph, to fully build up a theory of Universal constants as ratios between different Dimensions of space-time we must start from the beginning – the simplest forms, the ‘irrational numbers’, or ‘vital ratios’ without a perfect, static solution that appear in mathematics, and Einstein rightly considered the ‘first magic numbers’ of the Universe.

**MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL CONSTANTS.**

The first constants are thus mathematical numbers, which are ratios of Spe/tif events. And this also translates into physical constants.

For example πi is merely the ratio between 3 lineal forms of space and its ∆+1 evolution by adding a dimension of height to form a cycle. c is the constant ratio between the distance and curvature of light space-time. Charges and masses are scalar constants, which express a ratio of mass-charge (temporal frequency) to distance-force (attractive field) and so on.

Let us consider the simplest Universal constant:

| < π > O

In this simple ratio 3 forms of space, 3 lines curve to create a cycle of time, by virtue of a curvature function, π, which therefore is the Universal constant most often repeated in all |πO: > transformations of entropy into information, which are an enormous array of physical equations.

A polynomial on base 10 on the other hand will be a sign most often of an ∆-motions, in equations of resonance, herding, reproduction and social evolution.

Finally the golden ratio is a simple process of generation, as in the graph of a bidimensional ‘basic being’, where a+b is the underlying Spe-entropy field that feeds both, a, the body and b the head, generated by a.

Now, Pi is kind’a obvious, phi, is beautiful and beauty, which is the proportional balance of Spe, Tiƒ & ST we will find to be the key to survival (specifically its equation, S=T, harmony of ‘size and form’, ‘energy and information’ ‘body and mind’). Yet the most fascinating of all constants for me, is e, because it is the constant of the ∆-dimension scalar processes. And IT IS OBVIOUSLY FOR THAT REASON, along the imaginary numbers of cyclical time that complete the fractal, cyclical algebraic structure of the Universe, the less understood of them all. So we do have to complete ‘in the future’ on our section of maths, the meaning of its ‘awesome’ properties.

Thus, we can obtain from those regular exchanges, motions, rations and transformations of | , Ø, O, >≈ < functions/flows o space and time. This type of constants, as we are space-time beings carry into:

**Physical Universal constants**

**The main** constants of a PHYSICAL system are divided into active magnitudes, vital internal constants and universal external constants: Å.V.U.C.

The study of the quantitative constants and hence the algebraic equations of the being, which is fundamental to physics. We study the main proportional ratios between the Sp-ST-Tiƒ, elements of the Generator Equation, internally, the vital constants of a system, externally the Universal constants of its world, both connected by the active magnitude or value of the being

Thus 3 are the types of parameters and equations related to the ternary rule of subdivision of those Universal constants:

**– 1.Å: **__Åctive Magnitude (å), this is the scalar number__, most systems use to define the whole. It is the charge of a molecule, the rest mass of a cosmic body, the Z-number of an atom, for the 3 physical ∆±1 scales in its static state.

But obviously for each species and each study is diverse. For example, in America, where the language of valuation is money, this is the ‘credit number’ or fortune of each citizen – all other things dependent on this. And generally as the example shows, this active magnitude is connected to the Œ-isomorphism of the language of value of the world in which the being is: IT IS ITS FACE VALUE, its Tiƒ value in the parameter of information of the larger world. The dominant value, naked. And also the fundamental element of survival (as systems tend to be in balance, S=T, by defining Tiƒ, we often define the Sp x Tiƒ metric existential force of the being).

In the cosmological realm, your mass defines your survival, in a molecule your charge-valence, in an economic society your ‘money’. In a genetic society your ‘surname’. And of this *always the fractal is aware. In the old times, when someone asked you what you were, or rather who you were, you said your kinship, name or tribe, in the modern world you say your profession (as it would be a bit rude on the sense of ‘balance’ to state your wealth, but this is implied by the profession’s salary). So this is the key constant, ∆-1Tiƒ put often in relationship to the total amount of the world, so it is also in physics, the Potential magnitude, the ratio between the Å-ctive magnitude of the being and the total value of the field-world below or above. *

Now again we must realize that the languages of God are infinite, meaning that while no physicist would perhaps accept that Mass and Surname are similar concepts they are both å-ctive magnitudes of the language of cosmology and the language of genetic societies that *resume the value of the being for the whole system, and its master-god, the black hole origin of cosmic mass and the king, master of the tribal nation. So again, the closer your parameter is to that of the central element of the ∆+1 hierarchy, the more value you have, the closer you will be seated at the side of ‘God’ (the Max. Tiƒ point of your ∆+1 world is the definition of God).*

Now associated to this according to duality principles (according to the duality, motion-static form, and | vs. O-motions) we can talk of other key parameters, related to moving active magnitudes, performing | or O cycles. Hence in physics it is the Lorentz Force of a charged molecule or particle (subdivided into its charge and magnetic motions), the momentum of a mass (subdivided in |-lineal momentum and O-angular momentum).

And so happens for particle parameters, in which the quantum numbers perform the same conceptual tasks, further subdivided into 2 x 2 numbers (principal for lineal kinetic energy, secondary for angular momentum, being the spin number for perception and reproduction and the magnetic number for social evolution).

Thus we can see now that departing from an active magnitude, *we can start to find all kind of combined parameters and active constants, once we give motion to the active magnitude and put it to task, performing its 5 canonical actions that give ‘living purpose’ to the being. *

**-2,3,4 ‘V’:** Next we consider a set of 3 ‘Vital Constants’ internal to the being, which relate Tƒ and Sp, and hence are the main parameters of fields-limbs/body-waves and particles-heads.

They write in terms of Tiƒ=1/T, cyclical time or frequency: the inverse of period-duration, T. So we write 2 formats, the classic T- duration equation; and the inverse Tiƒ -frequency equation, which is the one T.Œ uses.

-Se/Tƒ=SxT = density of reproduction of energy And its inverse:

-Tƒ/Se= 1/TxS: density of reproduction of information; or speed of reproduction of the Œ- form in a lower scale (quite obvious for waves, S=T, not so evident for particle-field systems, S>T)

It again does have different jargons in physics, as *most parameters of the fractal,* bidimensional Universe are squares, while in lineal physics, they tend to use one-dimensional parameters. For example, the density of information is closely related to curvature, which in lineal physics at each point of a line is defined to be 1/r, where r is the radius of the osculating, or “kissing,” circle that best approximates the line at the given point. This for the explorer of physical equations is one of the fundamental, albeit cumbersome corrections of most physics, to give it a focused mirror: the transformation of parameters to the proper dimensions of time and space.

Another example is Maxwell’s equation of light speed, c=1√µxe, which in the bidimensional Universe must be therefore squared, to give us the fundamental parameter, c^{2} = 1/µ(sp) x e (Tiƒ). Alas (-; we does have here by the simple procedure of applying the general concepts of T.Œ to a physical formula the understanding of 3 fundamental parameters, µ, the magnetic constant that defines µ as the quanta of energy of the electromagnetic space, eo, the electric constant, which defines it as the informative parameter (or in its inverse lineal time concept, as Ke, the coulomb constant of force of the electromagnetic field), and finally c2, the density of information of light space, which as it happens comes also in a fundamental equation, E=Mc2, or E(sp) < C2 (Tƒ/Sp) > M (Tƒ), which simply states that an entropic field of space-time light, becomes converted into a cyclical vortex of time or mass, through the ratio of conversion of ‘entropy into information’ of our Universe.

And needless to say since we have discovered the meaning of µ, eo, k and M and c2, it will be easy to understand as Ke and G are closely related the meaning of G, when we study the Œ isomorphism of physical systems and define charges and masses unifying them, as the two time vortices of information of the ∆-1 and ∆+1 scales.

Now we can relate also those terms, µ and eo to the normal speed of material waves (concepts of tension and mass of the string that ‘waves’), when dealing with our world.

And all this led us to the understanding of speed of information transmission. It is the most often used constant of the Universe, c-speed, albeit eliminating *the informative parameter of the Tiƒ element, and making it lineal, which we will show to be determinant to misunderstand speed. Since ultimately speed is reproduction of information along a path of motion on a lower, ∆-1 scale. So physicists come to realize that for exampled the c-speed limit is NOT one of mere locomotion but one of ‘reproduction of information and transmission of information’ along the Universe.*

We shall obtain wondrous results as the ∞ relative speed of gravitation, which carries no information or ‘action at distance’, but does carry energy-motion, that is locates forms in space. Why? Simple, we are talking of a density of reproduction of energy NOT of information, carried by the gravitational force. And this process SxT≈Se/Tiƒ= K/o=∞ is a pure action at distance.

The consequences of this will be daring in all the conceptual analysis of all the scales of reality, determining the inverse arrows of the 5^{th} dimension: the larger scales of gravitational forces who do NOT carry internal information are however able to control externally and locate with perfect motions all its lower scales. So when you move your hand, all your lower scales ‘act at distance’ in simultaneity, with infinite synchronicity. But Information does have limits of speed to code and reproduce its forms, in other systems, so genetic informative preproduction is far slower. We say that motion from upper to lower scales carries no information except the motion-distance itself and it is synchronic with no loss of order (entropy in the old jargon), and vice versa, information from lower to upper scales reproduces with no loss (entropy), but has a limited speed.

Or in even more profound metaphysical terms, we say that ‘present’ space co-existence is proper of upper motion scales, the larger spatial action at distance relative pure space motions with no time, but information reproduction implies ‘expenditure of time’, reason why indeed time and information are so closely related, and space and no-time processes of motion and expansion of space are also closely related. From these facts we do obtain the equation of death by entropic expansion in space in no time: Death = max. Sp x Min. T (death happens in a single time quanta) and its inverse, life arrow, Life=Max. Tiƒ x Min. Sp. Life happens in a long time but consumes little information and happens in systems in relative rest motion, specially when the fetus evolves.

Thus we do have the reproduction of energy and the reproduction of information as two different parameters, quite ill-understood in the fog of modern physics (but hinted at in many comments and equations).

– So now we do have the 3^{rd} fundamental physical parameter: Se x Tƒ=S/T, or existential force-potency of the being, all related concepts which basically give us the capacity of the system to interact efficiently with the outer world. I like to call it the Predator Force, as it determines who wins in fights for existence of any kind of species.

In that sense, in biology means to have a perfect head and a perfect body, which defines the top predator. In physics it is often similar to the momentum when we take Tƒ as the active magnitude, and Sp, and the ‘distance-lineal speed’ of the being. And indeed the physical system with maximal momentum survives better in collisions, so black holes that traverse stars with less momentum devour them.

Now those 3 constants are maximized in the ages of the being, in youth, the Maximal spatial value, in old age the maximal density of information, in the mature, adult age, the balanced existential force which gives us the reproductive age of the being, dominating its environment where it seeds its offspring. In physics, they are the ‘stationary points’ of its young, energetic, Max Se, adult Se=Tƒ and max. Tiƒ, ‘stationary points’ of its world cycle or ‘Hamiltonian’ (in physical system) the most important in time.

In physics this set of 3 laws are tremendously important for each species, and for a full description of the system, they must be coupled with the 3 ‘Universal Constants’ of the larger ∆±|2| worlds in which the being exist.

**Definition of Universal constants.**

IN THE GRAPH, we can explain the nature of Universal constants and unify its origin across scales.

Scalar Space Time has a simple, telling answer to this question: they are ratios between the 10 dimensions of each system of the Universe, which can be derived from the ‘metric equations’ of those dimensions.

For example, the fundamental equation Se x Tƒ = ∆, that tell us the size of a system and the speed at which it processes information with its clock-like time cycles is co-invariant.

So the smaller we become, ∇Se, the faster our clocks tick, ∆Tƒ, from rotating black holes turning at c-speed to chips calculating faster through its computer Hertz cycles to atoms rotating much faster than galaxies.

But within a certain family of species that relationship holds ‘invariant’, constant, ∆.

And this is signaled by a Universal Constant.

*‘Planckton’, the minimal space-time unit of the light-universe.*

The most famous of them is the H-Planck Constant, that writes:

Sp x T = h.

It means that the product of the energy and the time clock of a certain particle, called an action, remains constant.

And it is all pervading in Quantum Physics. In ∆ST – the organic paradigm – you can interpret it no longer in abstract terms but in organic terms as the ‘minimal cell’ of space-time of the ∆-scale of light space in which we live.

For that reason we give it a different name, ‘Planckton’. So in the same manner the minimal life cell is often a Plankton, a unicellular plant; all what you see is ultimately made of a bunch of h-plancktons, ‘literally’. Light is the sum of a series of Plancktons and so a photon has an energy Sp= hv, the product of a Planckton and its frequency (the number of them).

Particles are also born in its ‘first’ cycle, from light-space that condensates into the particle, according to the uncertainty principle: Sp x T = h, and the faster the cycle is (∇T), the more energy-space it has (∆Es), but the product of both remains invariant, h.

**Simple physical constants.**

Can we treat other universal constants as pi functions that transform back and forth entropy into information?

Yes, if we consider the same algorithm for the main scales of physical systems such as:

|-E < h-planck > O-ƒrequency for the quantum scale

|-E < k-boltzmann <> O-Temperature for the thermodynamic scale

|-E<c2>O-Mass for the gravitational scale.

So what we observe on those physical scales is the transformation of an entropy-energy arrow into one of time-frequency/information through a constant of action/entropy/speed square which is the transformative < π> factor back and forth, and as such an Ø-present constant of action combination of the other 2.

So, Universal constants are ratios of those transformations, which become all pervading for those who relate the largest possible physical space-time scales (the gravitational, thermodynamic and quantum scales):

In the graph on the left side we can see the different Universal constants as metric and ratios of exchange of energy and information between the 3 main scales of human actions, the gravitational, thermodynamic and quantum scales.

In the graph the equations of the 3 physical scales and its ‘constants of space’:

Est = ∆-2 (quantum scale): Hs x ƒt = Ks x Tt (∆-1: thermodynamic scale)= 1/2 Ms x vt : ∆+i (Gravitational scales)

*How each of those parameters of space-time, constants of space and speed of time cycles, of a 10¹° scale of the Universe emerges in the next scale? *When we transcend scale a function of space emerges as a function of time and one of time as space.

So the quanta of space, h, k, m, varies as we change planes of existence, since the transition between points into superoranisms ‘fogs’ the vision of information along more than one scale. Closer and hence more accurately observed there is the thermodynamic scale with k, the unit of entropy as the quanta of space and temperature, the vibration of motion of molecules, or its ‘cyclical thermodynamic clocks’ as the unit of motion in time, and its product energy.

Finally in the gravitational scale, the quanta of space is ‘mass’ (which of course must be combined with the dilatation of ‘temperature’, and the underlying ‘extension’ of space-time ‘h-light quanta’). All in all mass (not necessarily matter) and more often ‘momentum’, which ads to mass speed, might be consider the quanta of space, which the different motions of those masses, of which angular and lineal speed are the commonest ones, give us even closer analysis of some of the features of physical systems of space-time.

It is quite interesting to make some deep philosophical thoughts about the last paragraph – the fact that mass and speed *change their functions when we move from ∆+3, galactic space to ∆+4, cosmological space. So mass which is fixed in value at ∆+3, becomes close to c-speed, in the fringe of the galactic organism (at its membrane and nuclei).*

Now, again we must refer to the general structure of fractal space-time points, when fully constructed as functional ternary super organisms. It will then have a simple ternary structure with its membrane fine-tuned and synchronized sensorially to its singularity. Yet for the enclosed territorial vital space, or body-wave system, those 2 ‘invisible’ unreachable limits of maximal information (singularity) and maximal energy (enclosure), determines the limits of ‘energetic speed’ and ‘density of information’ of the system, *which as long as it is within the membrane and singularity cannot colder/superfluid in its informative density-mass, than the center, and have a harder, faster, simultaneous, longer constant of space than the surrounding membrane.*

This means as each scale will find a perfect ‘frozen’, efficient particle-head, and body-wave to ensemble a dominant super organism in practical terms that each scale will be populated from the perspective of its minimal space-quanta *by what was the maximal space quanta of its ∆-1 scale, which then becomes in the upper scale the entropic unit.*

Yet as the ∆-1 scale maximal space quanta, by the law of balance, S=T, will be also the max. S xT, as it turns out it is the top predator element on the lower scale which sets the constant parameters of the upper scale. And so the function of this ‘being’ changes from ∆-1, Top Predator vital being, to ∆-space, entropic cell of the larger whole.

And this brings a long way our understanding of the 3 previous constants h, k, m and how as we focus in larger scales, their role transmutes from active to passive System.

**II. SCALAR CONSTANTS OF ACTION: THE 10 GAMES OF THE UNIVERSE**

**III. PHYSICAL CONSTANTS**

**IV. BIOLOGICAL CONSTANTS.**

Biological constants are both topological in space, structuring the form of living systems and dynamical in time, defining the vital ratios and balances of the organism

**V. SOCIAL, HUMAN SYSTEMS.**

(to be cont’ed)