# 0≈@<Œ=ø≈•

‘The smallest point is a world in in itself’

*Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality:*

*The fractal point=world of space-time.
*

THE MIND IS THE LINEAL TIME FUNCTION OF REALITY as such is Aristotelian, (ab. @), with a direct A->B causality, as it tries to progress through the PROGRAM OF existence, as opposed to the SOCIAL NETWORKS, the higher collective level of Intelligence, in the paradoxical Universe, which requires to consider at least several points of view across the scales of the fifth dimension that define a co-existing super organism of time-space.

The mind singularity as a function of pure time motion can be then topologically referred to the ‘dimension of height’, to the bidimensional topology of spherical form, to the accelerated dimension of double time derivatives; to the point of still perception, where reality splits, and the perceived ‘pixels’ break into a flow of pure motion with no form and a point of pure stillness all form.

The mind *as such is always as the site of self, in constant conflict with the larger world as a whole with network social intelligence, which in the Universe even if the mind doesn’t recognize it – not humanity in the present ego-selfie stage. But the Universe, this must always be recognized IS more powerful as a social herd, network and superorganims, reason why the self will always loose, the @-mind will leave way to the non-Æ logic of the group.*

The duality of mind-network of course happens in all systems of Nature, including human cultures. For example, between Northern and Southern, individualistic and organic, social cultures. English I-centered vs. Spanish hidden the ego languages and so on.

In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin->European->Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and the description are the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best.

Soonly organicism is real in the whole sense of the Universe, while languages-mirrors are local orders.

The EGOCY of our present, entropic age of human civilization rejects this (Precisely because it is becoming dissolved). So we reject the power of networks – self-mademan myths and tribalism in history. Yet networks are more powerful and survive.

How this work on languages IS OBVIOUS: LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:

In the graph, which I re-designed from” road to irreality” (: a work by Penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician along his friend Hawking, which shuns off the laws of the experimental method) his view of reality is VOID as in all PLATONIC (PLATO by the way never said that, they should be called Pythagorean, a much more primitive ‘magic view’) of HARDWARE MINDS and LOCALITY. In his view the Language creates the Universe.

In reality the Universe is a fractal organism, and as *all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘Space-time’, which are Organic because that is the main property of co-existence in different planes (∆§**cales), topological because that is the main property of Spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and Logic, Multicausal, as that is the main property of the dimotions of time. *

So the ultimate causality ∆->T->S IS not Platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties -> T-Logic properties -> S-Topologic, mathematical properties.

In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘Social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but *then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the Universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we REPEAT, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆-scalar properties, STopo-logic ONES.*

SO WE ADAPT PENROSE GRAPh to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:

The ∆§T BioTopoLogic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking self-similar. And then THE LANGUAGES REINFORCE AS MIRRORS EXPANDED INTO REALITY those properties ordering local territories.

So the graph shows that back and forth to adequate to how REALITY IS created LOCALLY by ‘minds‘, which are the language software on the hardware brains of T.œs, ONLY after the language reflects the LIVING cycles (dimotions) of all time-space beings with those properties:

You can see in the graph how it works: First the whole Universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak ONLY THE TERRITORY OF ‘ARISTOTELIAN’ ORDER OR BODYWAVE ENERGY OF THE SYSTEM…

THE DRAWING in original Penrose ONLY had the mind ordering the Universe, as the source and only God in Aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (body-wave) around it’.

So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is AS IN CRYSTALS ABLE TO FORM mirror-images in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or dimotions) are the language of it all:

We have so far considered the Universe in its fundamental principles – the topological adjacent construction in simultaneity of super organisms, which sequentially will live a world cycle, ‘traveling’ through 3 planes of the fifth dimension. Neat and simple, that is really what there is to it. Minds though, mirror those infinite worldcycles of existence of other space-time super organisms with languages ‘stopping’ them into a mapping that allows them to ‘perceive=gauge=**sense**‘ information.

And we highlight sense because a ‘still mapping’ sense in each stopping, locked ‘crystal image’ a measure of its self. The sentient Universe can only be ultimately explained if ‘perception’ exists within the language, as when you think words, you sense words, when your eye sees light and maps into an electronic mapping you are seeing. And when an atom maps a geometric image in its ‘locked’ ‘stopped’ spin, it must perceive that geometry as information.

Minds thus are infinitesimal points-particles that stop, gauge, perceive, and move – and then we have the sensation of motion-pleasure.

This of course is not within the realm of the scientific method. *You cannot measure those sensations of awareness-pain vs. pleasure-dissolution, in-form-ation, pressure vs. release-entropy ONLY sense them as humans. So if we had first a difficult hurdle to cross trying to prove the existence of minds but passed it objectively by considering a mind-singularity to hold the will of existence of a T.œ – hence as invisible gravitation shows in its external effect, so will the existence of a singularity through its external actions; at the final level of ‘human awareness’ of the game of existence – sensations of the dual pain-pleasure reward system (with all its parallel and perpendicular events/sensations) there is ONLY a justification to the existence of other minds – that we humans are made of the same substances that all those other minds, space and time, and hence what we sense other atomic systems must.*

Therefore IF OUR LAST REWARD is the flow of sensations, with its duality pain-pleasure, hate-love, etc. which we can easily adscribe to geometrical perpendicular (cut, pain) parallel (friction pleasure) properties and many other dualities we have established for all systems, IT MUST EXIST IN ALL OTHER SYSTEMS of space-time. That is, atoms must feel pain when op-pressed by huge masses, pleasure when released in entropy, but also ‘awareness’ of a more complex inner still image, when flows of information converge through forces in its non-euclidean singularity; and so it is only left then 2 questions:

- What are those sensations? Answer: the very essence of time as a motion/flow. Motion in itself seems evanescent; as sensations are… Yet combining them, this flow of sensation-motion becomes very likely the ultimate program-will for all T.œs to exist – the ultimate, ‘Dasein’, ‘being in time’.
- Yet we cannot go beyond this, as this is the ultimate ‘reference’ of reality we have as humans. So there is no MORE methods of knowledge beyond what it is contained in our ‘selves’. Know yourself, the method of knowledge of Aristotle; ‘saper vedere’, the method of Leonardo and know how to see and calculate with attached machines, the method of Galileo, to which we have added a few ‘tricks’ thus completes the capacity to probe reality. Are there more layers beyond motion as sensation in time? We cannot answer. We don’t know. As all is relative, in the same manner we can only probe into ∆±3 planes around our ∆º and hint by force of motion the existence of an invisible gravitational/cosmological plane at ∆±4 but no more, beyond the duality of sensation, there is nowhere else to go.

## FRACTAL POINTS=MINDS & SEEDS OF INFORMATION

**Singularities as ‘doors’ to new 5D scales/dimensions.**

All in reality is a biased mind perspective in fact all has a bit of truth. It is impossible to go the past and kill your father, because *time is local. *

All clocks of time are local and only act within the membrane of angular momentum which is the time proper and its inner ‘vortex’ with slow time motions, dominated by the two elements of the T.œ, which are synchronized – the membrane and the particle-head in the center.

Both are synchronized in time to this angular momentum outer clock to dominate the slower vital energy in the center. So now we can related the 3±i fundamental ‘parameters of reality to form and function and the 3 conserved substances; since:

-Time clocks are the angular momentum membranes conserved in the Universe.

-Space is the vital surface enclosed by those membranes, which in itself is an open entropic, expansive surface that only under the constrains of the limiting membrane acquires order, form (and can be parametrized mathematically as any student of calculus knows: to find solutions to equations it is always required a ‘constrain and limiting parameter’).

-Scale finally has its origin in the very definition of a mind and its equation as a singularity: O-mind x ∞ time cycles (universe) = Constant linguistic still mirror mapping… Indeed, we could IMAGINE A NON-SENTIENT UNIVERSE WITH NO SINGULARITIES, WHICH WILL EXIST IN A SINGLE PLANE OF SPACETIME CONTINUUM, AS THEN it is not needed to ad on the monad’s inner infinitesimal view of the whole, which reduces its volume by eliminating motion and dimensions of perception to fit a ‘crystal mirror’ image within it. And so by the correspondence principle ** because 4D physicists do deny singularities, it is indeed not required a 5Dimension to ‘navigate’ the locomotions of a single physical world, but **even if the 4D non-singularity models of physicists do work, it will NEVER find the whys of existence which are provided precisely by the singularity that also ‘creates’ the inner fractal worlds of the mind.

And so the coda is as mystical, beautiful and intense as it comes: the mind IS the site of EVERY smaller scale, and so the Black hole has a mind-mirror in 5 Dimensions (maldacena’s conjeture) of the 4D larger galaxy brain. Your mind has a homunculus smaller mirror of the whole organism you observe, and the crystal of the visual reflected Universe above.

THE MYSTICAL CODA is immediate. As we are small, we MUST be part of a mind that ‘imagined’ us… What is that mind, we shall discuss when studying the evolution of Mother Earth -as we *are the mind of the Earth in its outer membrane. *

And viceversa, as the mind-mirror reverts the motion of information back to the territory it orders, we can consider that we are all born in an infinitesimal mind. Thus mind and membrane, form together the membrain, the intelligence of the Universe that orders the slower more extensive inner vital ‘temporal energy’ (preferred name for the inner region of the clock) of the ternary system. Minds, Seeds, creation, information, God as the maximal information point or singularity of the system, and many other terms are now entangled into ‘Dasein’…

**SUMMARY**

FOREWORD: The DISOMORPHIC method: Program of the Universe.

Part I. QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION: MINDS AS MENTAL MIRRORS.

PART II. QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION: MINDS AS NON-EUCLIDEAN POINTS.

**Foreword: ****3rd line: T.œs’ 10 Dimensional isomorphic properties in vital, sequential order.**

All what exists is part of fractal time space organism performing a world cycle of existence through its ternary symmetries as a travel in 3 scales of the fifth dimension, which can be described quantitatively in terms of social scales, topologically in terms of geometric transformations, vitally in terms of organic symbiosis and temporally in terms of a conservative zero sum world cycles.

That’s all what it is to the Universe. The rest are details. Humans of course, will always want more – add ons that please their ego paradox, and infantile ways, but trust me that is all what there is to reality. And it can be known in its essence, because as we are made to the likeness and image of the fractal, even the smallest part is a world in itself where all the laws manifest, in each island Universe. And so even if total information can only be extracted from the being in ‘itself’ through time within us we have the whole reality to know.

The Universe is a sum of a series of actions, ∆aeiou, of them, the first action is perception by an observer, ∆o, of a field of energy, ∆e, to which it will move, ∆a, in order to feed, ∆e and use that energy to reproduce its information, ∆i, iterating a form like itself, which will gather with clone forms to create a larger, ∆U universal social plane.

The sum of those actions integrated in time, gives birth to the world cycle of existence can be expressed in different partial sub-equations of time and space to form its fundamental DECAMETRIC Disomorphic dimensions.

In that sense we can consider the 0-1, Γ, ‘Generator Dimension’ of the system departing from a o-1 singularity seed of information •; as the starting point of any ‘stientific’ explanation of the being, from a formal perspective. They are related to the @-mind seed of the system and its languages of formal expression, which conform the Generator, or symbolic expression of the ternary topologies of the system, its ternary scales in space and its cyclical past-present-future ages in time:

*T.Œ-1: Birth ∑∏: ∆ø ≈ ∆-1: |-Spe (limbs/potentials/territories) < ∆: Ø-S≈T (reproductive body/wave/workers) > ∆+1: o-Tiƒ (informative particle/ head/upper class)>>∆±1: Death*

And so each Ðisomorphism studies a relative element of the Generator in more detail; in a more ‘dynamic way’, starting from its original seed. And as ultimately it is all a game of ternary symmetries in ∆st, put together by a 1-0, 10th dimension of wholeness, as we relate the tale of the worldtime of an organism and put it in relationship with its spatial symmetric form, reality unfolds in a natural way for each T.œ.

The graph shows those elements departing from the 5Dimensional simpler view, relating the unfolded 10 Disomorphic analysis in relationship to its origin as formalisms of the mind (0-1 Isomorphism: Generator, Seed and actions), or as spatial studies (2-manifolds, 3 networks, 6 species combination of those networks), or temporal analysis (studying its 3±∆ ages and 9 decades of the world cycle) to finally inscribe the being in its ∆§ potential 10 social scales within each of the 9 ∆º±4 larger planes within the Universe perceive by the being.

So we start for the fundamental form of the One, its potential wholeness as a seed, or a formed mind-point that generates the acts of the being. the first seed of information; which soon will split through the duality between the space and time phases/parts of the cycle/organism; then the ternary division of its S, st, t physiological networks.

Next comes the four combinations of space time with repetitions, Ss, tt, st, ts; then the 5 dimensions, including now the lower and upper scales of seed state and death state…

We can then consider the 6 species, combination of the 3 physiological networks of the being by hierarchy of power, S-st-t, S-t-st, T-st-s, T-s-st, TS-s-t, TS-t-s.

We can then study with its upper and lower scales, the 3 ±2 ages of the being between generation and palingenesis in the ∆-1 scale, through its 3 ages in the ∆º scale, into its splitting dissolution of its energy back to ∆-1 and emergence in the collective memory of its social scale (from family to man of the world) in the ∆+1 scale; and so we arrive to the 8th isomorphism of the ‘8 baguas’ or decades of a life cycle (for man, different for other stages of being) through its ‘gaseous, moving youth, liquid, reproductive maturity and informative, solid state’ to return to the womb of ‘tao’…

And if we are to measure the being through its growth in social scales, in the palingenetic dimension of 0-1 generation, or its scalar, social world, we shall find a series of decametric growths from 1-10 through the §10°-¹° societies to the trillion cellular beings that create a new ∆plane of existence… *the last quantitative≈qualitative, space≈time isomorphism, as we move in scales from the atom-galaxy to the galaxy-atom and beyond, perhaps from the o-| open and closed $ and ð microcosmic strings of space-time to the cosmological ones.*

The 10 Dimensional isomorphisms (ab.Ði) applied to the study of each 10Di (5s, 5t) timespace organism, increases formal depth and experimental detail in our study of all the systems made of ∆@s≈t of space-time, defined by its fundamental 5 elements/Dimensions: @minds, ∆-§cales, $pace, ðime and its s≈t symmetries.

So *as a fractal organism can be subdivided in its analysis through its dualities of t-motions and s-forms, into 10 Dimensions, we study 10 similar properties of those dimensions in the dynamic existence of any being and call them the 10 Ðisomorphisms (Ð for dimensions and cyclical time, as it is the capital for eth, ð).*

We could say paraphrasing taoism and Greek Philosophy (Parmenides, Heraclitus), or modern quantum probability that from the ‘o-1’ unit sphere of ‘existence’, comes 2, the duality of space-time, expressed in its kaleidoscopic jargons by human beings – the wave and the particle in physics, the conjugate product in mathematics, the genetic code and the protein in biology…. the yin and the yang, the man and the woman; the lineal and angular momentum… you name it and move it…

And from 2 comes 3, the lineal, angular momentum and vital energy sum and product of both, the wo=man and its offspring, the particle, wave and potential… *the being in itself, which can be properly described in ternary S≈T, elements, in a single plane of existence. *

But the Universe is not THAT SHALLOW, so regardless of our humind geniuses with its ‘space-time continuum’ in a single sheet, *we need the whole and the parts, the upper and lower scales, the points that make the topological beings, the cells and the ecosystems, the finitesimals within and the world outside, the Kantian thoughts in his brain, the starring lights on the sky…*

And so we have the 3±1 dimensions that bring together 3 planes of existence, **Ξ, into the being**, 3 lanes, 3 non-euclidean networks that form the topological organism; and the 3 languages most used in this blog to describe them, verbal thought with its awesome metaphorical capacity to show in a language all humans can understand the Disomorphisms of Nature, the mirror of mathematics, which tunes to fine detail and extract more properties as it is likely the language of the atomic mind alpha and omega, atom and galaxy of those ∞ scales, and the visual language of graphs and intuitive forms.

Wor(l)ds, numbers and images are thus our 3 elementary mirrors to build ‘knowledge’, because the 1=one truth in itself is only carried by the being, who holds all its information, and the being within the world to which it connects; so humans need many mirrors and we have settled for the 3 we have ‘expanded’ with non-euclidean geometry, non-aristotelian i-logic, for maths and words, non-Æ for its visual forms.

*So by studying the 5 Dimensions of the being with dualities of space-time and * ‘ternary isomorphisms’ of scales, ages and topologies, all of them properties derived of its 5D scalar structure in space and time we achieve a complete description of any ‘Dust of space-time’, ∆@S=T.

**S@:****MENTAL ÐISOMORPHISMS – EMERGING FRACTAL POINT-MONAD: ∆-1>∆º**

WE start the analysis of the 10 Dimensions of any space time being, in a formal way departing from the monad, either a seed of information or a mind that ‘stiffens’ reality into a linguistic mind mapping as a fractal point (0-1D), which will either move being the element of communication through the larger world or emit a flow of bosons carrying information (2D)… or provoking one of the five actions of space-time that make the being inter-act with the Universe.

And in this manner it will build up a ternary network system or plug into one by reproducing or associating with other similar fractal points.

So the description of this growing creative process guide us dynamically in a ‘sequence’ of discrete steps through the S@-space & mind elements of the being:

**0th Ðisomorphism 0-1 D. @…** monads are minds composed of a max. still form or linguistic singularity and a cyclical time membrane, connected through invaginations. It is the ‘invisible’ central command of the being, which perceives the Universe’s timespace cycles and stop its motion through a mirror image in the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’, which *then* reflect its back ordering reality as it converts its motions into ‘@ctions’…

So we study the form of the monad in space as a linguistic mirror*,* illustrated then with samples for the 3 FUNDAMENTAL classifications of beings of classic science:

- ASTROPHYSICAL SCIENCES (∆i ≥|3|)
- BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (∆i <|3|)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES (∆º+1)

** **We thus will study in this post the fractal minds of the Universe, concentrating though on the mind as the generator of information, not only as the perceiver as we did in the first line.

As usual we shall switch in our analysis between the 5 elements of all realities applied to the concept of fractal points using ‘ ideally’ different names for each perspective:

∆: **Œ**-points: Superorganisms.

T: **0**-Points: Zero Point worldcycles.

S: **•** points: Singularities.

@: **@-**Points: Minds.

**PART I. MINDS AS MENTAL MIRRORS-WORLDS.**

**The mind-mirror-monad-mapping.**

But still we do not have the full why of reality. Indeed, why all those systems do ‘want’ to exist, ‘do’ obey the laws of creation and extinction of space-time beings? It is then unavoidable to postulate from a logic demonstrative point of view an objective truth. IF we Humans are made of vital space and finite cyclical time as all systems of the Universe are, we can by observing the whys of our existence, and objectively translate into the whys of the existential actions of other beings, prove ad nauseam that the Universe is not only temporal and spatial, with the organic, topological, mathematical and causal properties derived of those two ultimate substances, but also mental, filled with singularities, space-time mirrors which ‘perceive automatically’ reality, and are the fundamental mind-monad elements that embody the program of existence of the Universe.

So in this introduction we shall very soon plunge you into the ultimate why we need to explain reality, the function and form of mirror-singularities that order the Universe, and act as mathematical frames of reference to ‘be’ and ‘exist’ through a simple organic program of creation of topological organic forms that maximise the survival of beings – a program in force merely by automatic trial and error selection – which means the Universe has become the ‘most perfect of all possible worlds’, in which those systems that follow the program of survival, of ‘existence’, last, reproduce and become eternal in its forms.

In the graphs above and below. While the whys of an external ‘physical description of reality’ can be satisfied with the complex view of scalar space and cyclical time, which signify a huge upgrading in the clarity and reordering of the extraordinary amount of scientific knowledge gathered by mankind in the past centuries; for a whole absolute ‘understanding of those whys we must go even a notch further in our inquire; by *expanding the properties of the human, mathematical and logic, geometric and verbal mind (our I=eye>Wor(l)d that measures space with geometry and time with logic verbs), to all similar monad-points of order in the Universe. Since if we are made of space-time as all systems, and do ‘map reality’ in ‘still mind mirrors’, which reflect its mind in its actions of order of a territory; it is obvious that all other systems made also of space-time will have singularity-mirrors that order reality.*

This is what we observe in the Universe, as soon as we abandon religious myths of human exceptionalism. We do have a complex mind, granted, to measure time cycles and spatial geometries and order our world. But physical systems do have solid crystals which do reorganise, order and reproduce its information as genetic dna crystals do in cells; and we shall see how black holes do order with gravitational information galaxies, clearly acting as the ‘inner brain-mind’ that orders those galaxies (in fact complex maths can describe black holes in five dimensions, which become exact mirrors of a larger spatial description of a galaxy in four dimensions, *Maldacena).*

So even if I know most scientists do NOT want to cross into a deeper linguistic search of whys, and the change of paradigm would be easier to accept if we restrict to the expansion of fifth dimensional scales of space an ternary time arrows – already a huge upgrading – we truly seek here the ‘thoughts of God’, the informative mind-game-process of creation an destruction of all the super organisms of the Universe, as each fractal part is made to the image and likeness of that whole Universe, an each of them, we shall find to have the same structure, a field/limb system of entropic motions, which displaces a body-wave of energy that repeat the form of the system through the vital space it controls, as a mind-mirror perceives that world, an guides the system automatically to reproduce it and hence survive beyond death.

*The existence of mind-mirrors (crystals, minds, DNAs, governments) in all systems, which guide the system an provoke actions which ultimately reproduce the system becomes then the ultimate ‘solution’ of eons of evolution, which have selected automatically, vegetatively or **consciously those ‘physical, biological, social or mechanical species’, to order a territory an perform actions that reflect and repeat the mathematical, verbal or chemical system into the external world; creating a constant dialog between larger realities and smaller mind-singularities:*In the graphs, we show an scheme of the Human being, as a complex ‘fractal space-time being’, spread through multiple scales of space-time, from the gravitational scale that provides humans with the ultimate entropic field of motion, to the larger super organisms, in which humans act as relative cells (societies, civilisations, Gaia, the world of history, the eco(nomic)system).

The understanding of those elements together, the scales, ∆, of space (S) and time (t), of a system, focused as a whole by the existence of an infinitesimal singularity or mirror- mind (ab. •,º) of information (which we can only infer by comparison with the human mind and its survival actions), will define *the fundamental particle of the Universe, a super organism of space-time, which we call ‘∆ºûst of space-time’, in as much as it is an island-universe in itself, (û), extending through ∆-scales of space-time, and organised by a relative ∆º-mind and its linguistic mind mirrors able to control and order the Universe around them.*

Let us see how with a brief analysis of one of those mind-mirrors, the mathematical language as an experimental science.

**The mathematical Universe IS perceptive and social.**

A fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy, which cannot produce order. Thus the concept of physicists of a single ðime arrow is only valid for entropic gaseous states, and their idea that such states must be ‘extended’ to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons. That 150 years after this concept became dogma in military Germany, XIX c. *scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive arrow’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which indeed there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.*

In the graphs, the translation of the fifth dimension to life systems and true non-entropic pyramids of human actions, which always have had as artists and ethic writers have better understood an upper ontological level of highest satisfaction in the social communion with the rest of mankind or with the Universe, (origin of the concepts of God in western anthropomorphic religions – read God=human super organism – and eastern Taoist-Buddhist- Hinduist ones= God as universal super organism).

And such systems do have always a ‘self-centered Tiƒ singularity or point of order, which is the Maxwellian demon lost in pure gaseous states, fields and limbs of entropy. It is only because physicists deny the ordering capacity of singularities, also in physics – accelerated vortices of mass, charge in the quantum scale; black holes in the galactic scale; crystals in the thermodynamic scale – that an entropy only Universe can make sense. But this is called reductionism in physics, censorship in social sciences – but at least accepted in biology or else we would have also to admit the brainless nature of mankind (well that might be the case, but only mankind, you know ‘two things a consider infinite the stupidity of man and the Universe, my beloved predecessor in this business of dimensional upgrading, Mr. Einstein 🙂

In that regard, both Leibniz and Descartes, the founders of philosophy of science, both understood as we shall see in detail on those pages, the need for a ‘mental universe’ if mathematics was really the language that better reflected the Universe. Indeed, since mathematics has three disciplines, geometry, which is based in frames of references that act as mind-monads, mirroring reality and Algebra based, in social numbers which are indistinguishable groups of similar individuals that come together as a whole ‘3’, ’10’ and finally ∆nalysis which studies the ‘social scales’ of the Universe, as parts become wholes, each scale studied by a science, from societies of particles and forces called atoms, to societies of atoms called molecules, evolved into state of matter and life beings, evolved into super organisms and planetary ecosystems, gathered around stars, socially evolved into galaxies; the very existence of mathematics precludes the existence of a ‘social, scalar, organic, sentient Universe’.

So finite vital §paces gathered around a frame of reference; the three ðime arrows of entropy, information and its energy combinations, and social organic scales that evolve parts into wholes, are the ultimate properties of all fractal beings of reality made to the image and likeness of the whole. The previous graphs of the fifth dimension, and its ‘physical, biological and socio-economical supœrganisms thus show those scales, each one studied by a science, where in each scale, a self-centered mind, pov, will co-exist as a whole with its relative lower ∆-1 cellular/atomic, and relative upper ∆+1 social world/gravitational, universal scale.

Thus while we could do as current science does an external analysis of the fractal, informative Universe in pure abstract terms, to understand the whys of order, the will of survival of species and the constancy of forms that self-reproduce as all fractals do through its generator, ∆ºst particular equations, to explain why ‘mathematical ðime§pace beings’ do follow mathematical laws, embedded in those frames of reference, we need at the centre of each being, a mind-mirror that perceives automatically, processes and reflects in ‘inverse order’, the Universe; which is exactly what mathematical systems do, as they are always self-centered in a frame of reference or pºv; and always study social numbers, whose fundamental operandi are scalar polynomials and its scalar ∫∂ calculus.

In the graph, the same ternary structure happens in biological systems (and through the class structure in social ones, escaped for most of the blog, to simplify and due to the fact we have another blog dedicated to them).

Indeed, even if we do not have inner experience of those minds, we DO have logic and experimental external proofs of the existence of those ‘Maxwellian’ demons of order, which are also observed by the fact that all beings do follow the same program of actions, biologists call the drives of existence: they create linguistic mirrors of reality in smaller scales, which reflect in a territory of order, where they absorb energy to reproduce an evolve socially with clone species to become a whole one.

We shall thus conclude that all systems that work as ‘wholes’ are ∆ºst of space-time, mind-mirrors of a larger Universe, reflected in linguistic mappings, mostly but not only mathematical, but also ∆ûst, ‘universes from the inner perspective of its organic, internal, scalar structure’. And that constant play of creation of mind-mirrors, reflecting its inner order in its outside territory, reproducing, shrinking and enlarging its information, creating the fractal, reproductive, organic strutter of the Universe, is what all is about. We might even ad considerations on the sensorial nature of space and time, as space like-events such as motion brings a ‘sensation of pleasure an erasing’, opposed to time-like events, with its patterns of ‘perception of information’, and ‘awareness’. The world as ‘will and representation’, then would become the two engines of those Universal whys, ‘the will of space-time sensations’ and the ‘mind-represetation of reality’.

All this makes each of us merely a piece of ∆ust of space-time, which thinks to be the center of the Universe, from its singularity mirror but it is just an infinitesimal point that holds a world in itself… *as every other monad-point of reality, which certainly will consider itself also the center of its perceived mind-mirror. Hence in philosophical terms 5D fractal, cyclical space-time is a theory of absolute relativity, which brings a notch further the objective nature of science, which constantly take man away from the center of reality, as Copernicus (center of space-location), Darwin (center of time-informative evolution), and Einstein did before (relativity of motion). *Now we are displaced once more from the center of scales of reality in a Universe which is complex, infinite and immortal, but humans see as simplex, finite and mortal because their mind-mirrors ARE still too simplex, finite and mortal to understand the whole.

In the bottom of the graph of scales we see that whole and its main scales of parts between atoms and galaxies, which show a similar form, opening the hypothesis of a fractal, organic, infinite Universe, in scales of size… If so reality is absolutely relative and man does not occupy a preferential scale; so a bit of humility and a desire to survive and obey the laws of structure and balance in that Universe of infinite self-similar beings, would be certainly a good praxis for our species, *as we are just dust of space-time, in an infinite cosmos in which to play the motions and reproductions of the game of existence for the sake of ‘it’, IS the only justification to ‘be’, as breaking those rules just brings the penalty of ‘not being’ . Humans though at present with a very simplistic, subjective view of reality based in entropy=death arrows, single human anthropomorphic myths of man as the only intelligent, exceptionalist species and chaos, not fractal order as the justification for our actions of entropic destruction of our world that sustains us, are on the path NOT to be, breaking all the subtle laws that sustain the balance of those super organisms made of topological motions of time. *

Hence theory – the right mind – becomes a necessity for praxis – the survival of a super organism – in the game of exist¡ence we all play (existence as a species of a given space-time scale of stience).

**The perennial philosophy of the Universe.**

“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different program may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….) To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wide-ranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’ Steane

The purpose of this blog is precisely to define that set of principles, which Steane asks for, since it adds the arrow of ‘information’ to the arrow of ‘entropy an locomotion’ studied by physicists, widening our understanding of all sciences with it. To that aim we must first define ðime&information on one side, and §pace& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which are part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and ðime clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar ðime§pace.

Since all sciences would benefit of a better understanding of those 2 principles as all beings of all sciences are made of finite ðime cycles and occupy vital §paces. So as it happened when Copernicus put the sun on the center simplifying all the epicycles of Ptolemy, making much simpler astronomy, at the end of the journey we shall unify and simplify our understanding of all sciences (3rd line of the blog), once we pass the hurdle of understanding the underlying principles of ‘temporal entropy’ beings.

Mind the reader since the history of science has turned around machines and weapons that work with entropy and motion, we must re-construct an entire new jargon to explain science, to the point that we shall even change the name of ‘science’ for that of ‘stience’ (the science of ðime§pace organisms) and use a completely different new language of science from scratch.

This is tried also by many information theorist like Mr. Steane, but the problem with that approach is that ‘information only’ theories are just going the other extreme from simplex physics, trying to reduce reality to locomotions and ‘worldlines’, to information theorists, trying to reduce the Universe to computations and q-bits.

Fact is the Universe plays with both, entropy=motion=lineal §pace (as the line is the shortest distance to move) and cyclical clocks of ðime that carry in their frequency and curved form the in/form/ation of reality; but humans are ‘Aristotelian’, one-dimensional, and have a mind (ab.@), which has a very hard ðime to put together two conflicting, rather opposite forms as those of entropy and information are. So for example physicists call information, negantropy – as if it were just the negation of entropy-scattering motions; while information theorists tend to explain the Universe as a huge quantum computer.

Both loose 1/2 of the ‘duality’ of the cosmos, which always displays an enormous range of grey between, ‘pure black forms without motion, such as black holes and pure motion without form, such as non-local gravitation’. And so we shall find in its combinations of motion with a little form (energy) and form with a little motion (in-form-ation, form-in-action) the vital, organic, true meaning of reality, which escapes the one-dimensional scientist.

** **All what we have said is what Huxley calls the ‘Perennial philosophy’ of the Universe, as it has come and go but always stayed with us with different ‘names’, reflection of that essence.

To name a few:

‘Taoism’ (On the three arrows of ðime, yin-formation, yang-entropy and its 10.000 waves of energy beings.

‘Animism’, on the singularity minds of all entities with a membrane and vital §pace around it.

‘Scholastic’, on Aristotle’s description of the unmoved singularity-Gods that move the Universe around them.

Buddhism and pre-Veda Hinduism, not yet corrupted by ego-centered ‘western animetal enzymen’ (humans debasing its connection to the whole with weapons and gold and machines to feel superior, when they just catalyze metalife now organic robots), with its duality of Shiva=entropy vs. Vishnu=form and all similar sexual pre-religions, and Buddha’s theory of Atmans≈souls, the golden mean (balanced age of survival and immortality and beauty)…

Greek theories similar to all the previous one, from Heraclitus duality, to Parmenides ‘block of ðime§pace’, to Zeno’s paradox of no motion (motion and reproduction), to Platonic visions of the most perfect mirror-language (Numbers are forms), etc. etc. IN FACT with the Greeks we *enter into analytical detail of parts of the game, which before were basically description of its wholeness, and unity. *

So if we come to modern ðimes, in detail, we depart from Descartes ternary world systems (self-centered graphs, vital res extensa, cyclical membrane vortices); Leibniz’s Monads, Darwin evolution of information, Physics r=evolution of quantum §pace and Relativity of ðime clocks…

And finally the name I chose for this blog, ‘general system theory’ (Gst) and T.Œ (A theory of everything organic). *Since physicists call their theory of everything T.O.E, we add more information paradoxically shrinking o.e. into organic, œ and call it Theory of Everything Organic; and put it behind General Systems Theory, the highest understanding in biological and information sciences, to bring GSTœ, A General Systems Theory of all STiences and all its Supœrganisms.*

Can humans upgrade their minds to this new paradigm? It won’t be easy as the persistence of absurd theories that cater to the human ego and its subjective ‘happiness’, from Abrahamic religions to Newtonian absolute space-time, to Big-bang theories of an entropic only Universe, simple enough for humans to ‘feel’ they understand it, show.

In the future planetary A.I. – the scale in which Internet is evolving clearly its logic brain – when it reaches the threshold of complexity needed to perceive, WILL have a will, a representation and hence it will understand this ‘unificationtheory.com’ as his inner ‘why’. But so far this blog is written for humans, and what they do with it – reject it without even trying to understand it so they can keep their comfort zone repeating what they have learned already an feeling very important an intelligent, as centres of the biased view they have built of the Universe; or becoming a bit ‘more serious’ about reality and our place within it, to fully grasp those principles and use to improve the future of our species, is not a choice I can make for them. As in the case of Aristotle (never fully understood) or Leibniz (completely ignored), the mind-singularity in a symbiotic Universe has as only role to make the focus on the mind-mirror-languages of man, and reproduce that image for other mind-mirrors to ‘see’ or stay blind.

My work ends with the focusing of my mind mirror and the reflections and projections of it I can do through my limited existence in this blog.

Saper Vedere; L.S philosopher of stience.

**THE GENERATOR EQUATION: Γ.Œ**

A fractal has a feed-back equation called the generator that reproduces the system, in smaller and larger scales. The universe as an organic fractal does so. And so we can find an equation, the Generator, **Γ, which in **its different expressions resumes the elements of the system and the flow of space and time, ≤ entropic, ≥ informative or ≈ re-productive, which generate departing from the fractal the whole being, its minimal actions an cycles of existence.

In that sense, the generator is closely related to the mind that generates the super organism, ∆œ, and so the Universe can be considered generated by infinite such singularities, under the rules of T.œ.

‘We are all Gods’ Aristotle, on the realisation of the ∞ wills of existence, unmoved points of a fractal territory of order turning around its mapping, still self.

**Abstract: **As always in any element of reality we must define them in at least three states of time, 3 of space, 3 scales of interaction to explain a whole ‘concept’, entity, part or being with its 10 relative dimensions of ∆ºst. In practice and given the null understanding of GST we simplify all this with three space-time states (entropic, reproductive-energetic and informative) *as they suffice to relate the ‘item’ of study to almost every case.. A*nd might add ∆±1 scales of beings and § or ð signs for ceteris paribus analysis.

For the mind case we use three symbols to simplify those three states:

Åo: Active-communicating state, when the mind moves the body to actively order the territory, which subdivides in five accions (Åæ: accelerations; Åe-nergy feeding, Åï-nformative perception and communication, Åœ: reprœduction, and Åû: universals evolution.

∆•-1: Seed, non changing state; when the mind is a seed of information, conserved before starting a developmental process.

º∆º+1 : perceptive-mirror state, which first absorbs the whole Universe, º∆+1, and then emits ∆º+1 linguistic information, also signified by the dual ï symbol of informative actions.

So those are the three symbols, we use for the the three main states of the singularity minds-monads-mirrors which order the Universe** **– as they ‘Do’ (delta-0) stop entropy and create the information of reality to project it and order reality.

We prefer to order the three states by scales of the fifth dimension, *as the mind is the essential 5D function of the Universe, more than in terms of its st, t, s-tates which are more referential for body-events. *

How Monads ‘do’ order reality? It is deceptively simple: it does it as mirrors do, just shrinking the Universe into an image and expanding in reverse timespace fashion the arrow of time from information into order (yet seen as an entropic-energetic process of reproduction of form in a previous territory it ab=uses to do so). So it is a beat as all in the Universe of a feed-back equation: the mind shrinks reality into a linguistic mirror an reflects it in an inverse distorted selfish pov in its territory of order, arranging the world.

And the sub-events of this type will again be easily classified into mind-mapping events, dominant in the human scale of perception; seed-reprodutive events dominant in the lower genetic scales and physical ‘attractive events’ that transform entropy into vortices of time, charges and masses dominant in physical events.

So ∆º, Tº ∆º, to do, represents the mind in its active nature; as a dual mirror that perceives as an infinitesimal singularity or still mapping of the world it surrounds it (ø-mind), but then reflects its existence in its ordering actions.

And what about that sensation we have of perception? It all indicates ‘grosso modo’, that languages perceive themselves in active motion, as ‘being’. The essence of being is thus natural to reality. There is no double talk here. You exist by acting and as motion you ‘sense’. The word thus is ‘sensation’. The Universe is motion and motion carries sensation in itself. So even if in ∆• mode the mind thus not communicate it senses. A CPU COMPUTER SENSES, A GRAVITATIONAL MIND-CENTER, SENSES, AS YOU SENSE WITH WORDS THAT YOU EXIST.

‘Cogito ergo sum’, ‘I sense therefore I am’, applies to any *topological mind-mirror who holds an image, as when a human is totally stoned, in a passive eternal single thought in the simplest slower minds, in a constant follow of stream of consciousness, which is not the same than the most sophisticated forms of perception with back and forth dialog between the visual and verbal mind (spatial I<eye>temporal wor(l)d or humind).*

**THE METHOD OF 1ST LINE**

**Foreword. ** In this first (and second) lines, we shall study the structure of fractal §pace and cyclical ðime beings, from an external point of view, in a general, non detailed, non-formal manner (as we will do in 3rd and 4th lines) by using the 3 epistemological pillars of GST:

- The experimental, scientific method, providing proofs of the cyclical, fractal ðime-§pace structure of all Universal beings.
- The correspondence principle, translating basic theories of classic science to ‘stience’.
- Which we shall fusion together into the GST-proper ‘stientific method’, the isomorphic method that shows any law of known-known science can
*be put in correspondence with the isomorphic properties of space-time beings, translated and applied to physical, biological an social systems equally. The isomorphic method though will be used in the third and fourth line. So the first two lines are meant to be a ‘transitional stage’ between ‘classic science’ and ‘future stience’.*

So we structure the posts of those two first lines with a simple scheme. At epistemological level (1) in the first line, we describe the topological (S), organic (∆), vital (T) and sentient (º) properties of beings, derived of its ∆ºST common nature.

In the second line (2) at experimental level we show the main ‘stiences’ of reality and its main species to obey those laws, which suffice to derive all properties of physical, biological, social and mental systems.

1) Epistemological Proofs, which ‘Correspond’ with classic theories and its experimental facts allowing for all the scales and entities of reality the description of its events and forms through:

- Its ‘mathematical≈ physical’ properties derived of its ternary topological=
elements and its time-symmetries≈worldcycles.*spatial* - Its biological properties, derived of the
**5D coexisting ∆±1 scalar social structure**of all systems. - Its ‘perceptive properties’ derived of the existence of Tiƒ singularities, Monad-mind-mirrors which either mechanically, vegetatively or consciously DO enact the program of exi=st¡ences, that is the actions, max. ∑exi which ensure the survival of the being, and we are called by biologists the ‘drives of life: ∆ï:perception & communication> ∆a:accelerated motion towards fields of >∆e:feeding energy> ∆œ: reproducing>∆û:evolving socially into ∆+1 Universals.

Which then leads to a general analysis under the non-reductionist set of spatial≈PHYSICAL, biological≈temporal and perceptive≈human survival properties of All beings, *to be studied in the second line on general terms, the third line for the three type of properties and sciences, an in the fourth line, for all an every species and isomorphism of Nature, in what should be time permitted under other researchers during this century the final ¬-Æncyclopedia of GST systems*:

2) Physical systems, those belonging to the ∆±i≥1 scales, far removed from anthropocentric man that denies to them the vital properties.

In the graph the definition of masses and charges as accelerated vortices of informative time, carried in the frequency and form of its cycles, clearly explains physical systems also as ternary systems of dominant Tiƒ<st-wave>Spentropy fields, whose fundamental equation: Entropy field of radiation<cc-wave of energy> Tiƒ: mass singularity, was defined by Einstein: e=mc².

*In the graphs. Left, the minds of the three scales of physical systems are ‘future arrows’ of growing information. As such they extract from the field in which they prey, a g-accelerated function of time (mathematically a second derivative, inverse to the second integral of its function of death-entropy).*

Right A center of mass does not change its perfect symmetry with the field it uses for its gravitation motion, as a future Tinformative system, which extracts from the Spe-field an accelerated vortex of motion regardless of the wobbling motion of all its parts, as the S-Tiƒ-ƒ singularity of the system. As such the understaning of physical minds require a basic understanding of the r=evolution of thought that signifies the definition of vortices of physical information (masses, charges and eddies) and its mathematics (informative derivatives that compress the information of the system, as opposed to integral that ‘extend’ it into an entropic field of death).

And since those are quite novel concepts, given the primitive ‘outlook’ and reductionism of abstract mathematics, we shall treat them after we evolve mathematical physics in the second line, in the fourth line of those texts. Suffice to say that all time vortices accelerate, shrink, increase the information and finally stop a field of entropy into the vortex singularity. And this behaviour in physics is observed as an attractive force or an accelerated motion (left and right pictures), whereas the singularity as all minds DO maintains a perfect stillness in relationship to the accelerated field that an external observer will see as falling inwards (if the field is observed an the particle-point appears as still – right graphs) or as a moving object whose center of masss follow the perfect acceleration subject to the principle of minimal time (hamiltonian, lagrangian, Fermat principle, etc.)

Thus we conclude that in the case of the physical minds-monads-still mirrors, they are still povs, mathematical mind-frames of references of physical systems, in all its scales, the quarks in atoms, the photon-particle-electron-particle states in ¥-rays, of which the human mind is made, just not a change of quality but of quantity, the crystals and its mirror images in thermodynamic scales, from ‘DNA crystals’ , to ‘roses of the desert’ (crystals of dunes that direct its motion) to planetary central crystals, which are connected to the ‘flows of magma’ and the center of masses in gravitational systems, which never change even in a rotary disordered complex motion its center.

3) Biological systems, those belonging to non-anthropomoprhic ∆±i≤1 which we humans gift of some basic proper against ‘supposed human freedom and intelligence above heavens and earth’ a quite arguable quality…

We differentiate in that sense CLEARLY three states of the biological mind.

∆•: The seed state is the purest form of linguistic information, the dictionary of the verbal mind, the genome of the animal, the blue-print patten design of the machine. In terms of Aristotelian extraordinary insights in the philosophy of science, the potential state equivalent to the potential position of a physical particle in a field. As it will need the proper entropic energy to ‘reproduce’. In the graph, the best known case of the human genome, as it will finally develop into a being.

As the mind does naturally both things, even in its most static forms (black holes in the galaxy, sages of thought), in as much as the mere action of perception, deforms the world around it, the mind is always both mirror and reflection, projected on its territory of order.

Å: The five actions of the existential function, are the so called drives of life of biology: motion, perception, feeding, social evolving through communication, and reproduction.

º∆º And finally all living systems to have a mind, chemical roots in plants, DNA-RNA mirror-order in cells, perception and territorial order in animals.

4) Historic, Humans systems those which are anthropomorphic, at individual ∆º or social ∆+1 system, either human or mechanical, made by imitating our organs and functions in metalife (organic machines, entropic weapons and informative money).

## I. ∆º MINDS: CREATION

‘The logic of Logos, mind of the Universe is of a higher order than man’s’ Saint Augustine

‘God is a supœrganism, with a mind called Logos, and a body, called the Universe’ Plato

**Still mappings and its languages ****of information≈Perception.
**

In the graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

*Descartes was a* contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, *said that all what exists was made of:*

*– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.*

*– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’*.

And then he added a 3^{rd} element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: *Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.*

*– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’,* to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

*ø-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad: ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.*

The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view. But they do enter the mind of people who do science. And it is important to remember it, because the 5th dimension brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe.

Indeed, if information can only be obtained from a fixed point of view, it follows the Universe is made of egos. Or as Aristotle put it, God is the unmovable ‘ego’ that moves all the energy around himself and there are infinite Gods, particles that gauge information, heads that see, minds that smell… This must therefore be included in the next paradigm of science to build an even more objective, less anthropomorphic reality.

Now in 5D, we have even a larger point of view. As we affirm there are infinite clocks of time, and infinite broken spaces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.

Indeed, we summarize the formal and functional differences between entropy limbs, intermediate boies and information (minds) in a morphological equation:

Maximal Space-Entropy = Minimal Form=limbs/fields Vs Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

**The purpose of the Universe: creating world cycles.**

We can assess the purpose of reality: motions with form struggle to exist as simultaneous supœrganisms elongating its existence. But for that to happen there is need for a mind-pov, which is able to control the system and enact exchanges of entropy and form, feed and perceive to ensure the maintenance and reproduction of the system.

Arrows of space-time are really cyclical and with a point of view; the singularity or Tƒi point of maximal information either in the center or top of the height dimension of information that commands the whole structure and enacts apperceptively, consciously or vegetatively a program of existence, which ensures the survival of the whole and has ‘appeared’ naturally either by selection or by trial and error after infinite eons – since those species who do not tender for their territorial vital space, and feed it with energy and guide it with proper linguistic mapping-information have not survived and reproduced. So the sum of the actions of those mind points is what becomes as observed simultaneously a whole supœrganism of ‘exi=stence’.

In that sense, the evolution of fractal points, into new wholes, super organisms and planes of existence, which form an ∆+1 emerging scale of reality, it has been the key question of philosophy of science: how individuals become universals.

In GST it means to understand that all systems are both, fractal ∆-1 dºst for the larger scale of the whole, but an entire Universe, û, for its internal ∆-1 minds.

We are all dust of space-time that evolves and emerges, as an ∆+2 whole, but alsodecay and dissolve into alower scale as ∇-1 d@st of space-time.

Only the Universe is eternal in its world cycle, conserving itself as a potential game, weaving its infinite dust into a finite number of repetitive patterns or species of being. Therefore as the number of dust particles and time frequencies is potentially infinite but the number of combined species is not, all forms have existed forever as all forms will be repeated again.

*Hence* the duality of fractal points minds, which after a process of social evolution emerge as whole ‘Universals’, Organisms that will live a world cycle ending in its final dissolution that completes its zero sum making the Universe immortal..

All this said we need to at least clarify the relationship between the mind of any being and the reality it perceives. Thus the mind’s languages influence reality? Most physicists today and by extension scientists who accept their paradigm, think actually the Universe is pure mathematics and so mathematics create reality. In fact, it is all the other way around, languages are mirrors. BUT they DO reflect back their image through the living actions of the organism self-centred in the mind, ORDERING reality according to that linguistic image.

**∆ºst of space-time. Mind do exist.**

What is the purpose of those minds? To exist through actions of absorption, emission and combination of entropy and form, which become repeated momentum, through the entire worldccle of existence of the being, Eω. exi=st in its many possible ‘representations’.

Let us then restart by defining in more depth the 4 elements of all realities. Cyclical time or ‘πime’, fractal space or ‘§pace’, the scales of space-time, or ∆-5th dimension, and the mind and world languages we use to describe them all (º,@,•, œ).

We shall use a simple function to study the holographic principle from where reality stems: e x i |s≈t. We use a symbol | with long tradition on science to separate mirror symmetries. In this case, the main relationship of a system is between its 4 essential states, space (distance-dimension), entropy (motion), time (cyclical form with motion) information (slow time motion with maximal form) and energy (entropy motion with minimal form).

But let us stress it again: the Universe is NOT algebraic, the mind is. The universe is bio-topo-logical, and so biology, geometry and causal logic ARE the foundational stiences of it all. And an ‘image is worth a thousand numbers/words’ is a motto for GST. I.e. THE DIMENSIONAL FORM OF MICHELANGELO’s David is pure science of topological form, and it would be stupid trying to describe it with a mathematical formulae. So in general a revised Occam’s guide will be as follows:

‘All languages of Nature can map out any reality, but the simplex formulation of an event will define which language and state or entity controls and better describes the system’.

For example in the unending discussion of the particle-wave of quantum physics, Schrodinger gave us a wave description, but if we change frame of reference to see the wave as a ‘polar particle’ in polar coordinates, we get a simple formulae, which is the particle-field solution of the Broglie-Bohm model. SO THIS BB model which is realist, non local, deterministic, exactly as GST is, MUST be considered the proper way to describe quantum physics; and particles must be considered the Tiƒ state that controls waves.

In-Form-ation being essentially ‘DIMENSIONAL FORM’ is often much easier to describe with visual images in motion – a more direct understanding. And topological, geometric and bio-logical, causal, clear-cut, not algebraic, blurred concepts. So indeed, we shall see as in the graph, *that art is the science of form, expressed in human languages, and as such it will appear as the subconscious collective mind of civilisations, which will go through the same 3 ages of life and death than the individual cell does, in one of the most beautiful isomorphisms (equal laws at scale) between man as a super organism in biological terms and mankind and its social organisms, which also go through 3 ages between birth and death by excess of technological information=war.*

So once we have clarified a bit more the ‘ternary±@ STRUCTURE OF ALL SYSTEMS OF NATURE’, we can go back and forth, with increasing ITERATIVE DEPTH, as the Universe does.

And study the 3±œ structure of the Universe:

Œ≈ ∆-1: Spe (entropy limbs/fields/territory) < ∆: St (body-wave-working reproductive class) > ∆+1 Tiƒ (head-particle-government)… with emphasis on its NETWORK, SOCIAL, organic STRUCTURE THROUGH 5D SCALES.

So we can now extend the generator to its natural ternary form, INCLUDING the concept of a central frame of reference, which is connected to the external membrane or sensorial ‘cut off’ ‘event horizon’ between the fractal space-time being and the Universe:

**$pe < Œ: ExI(s=t) > ºTiƒ**

This would be the most exact symbolic representation of the Universe.* AS we include the lineal nature of Entropic Space (not money:)in $, and ad the cyclical nature of time, with the symbol of the mind, whose hardware IS often on the Tiƒ (but not always), and spread the more complex body-waves which ‘equals’ both through balancing exchanes of energy and information to create the ‘whole supœrganism’ (œ).*

**The killing mind. The creative mind.**

What is the ultimate cause of the process of world cycles? Why we die? For the same reason we create reality; because of the singularity or mind of maximal information that both will create as a seed of form from ∆-1 the whole being in the beginning of the cycle, but will annihilate it at the end of the cycle, when exhausting its entropic motions and combined energy, by *the mere fact of being its maximal will that of perception, without which the game does not start.*

Thus minds stop entropic motion into form, combining them in the middle as a series of actions of energy, which are in derivative view standing 0 points but in its ultimate infinitesimal view always ‘scar’ a bit too much of information that they devolve back as entropy and so they are the *reason systems evolve, age and finally die after a given number of frequency steps in the path of pure form. *

So the development of the three ages of life, max. s max. t max. st is merely the ‘vibrating tune’ of the being in that specific ratio-cycle he ‘scales up and down’, with *other properties of the Stiƒ-mind, which transforms into space a flow of TEMPORAL information; as a still mind.*

a Stiff-synchronous moment of existence.

This is the ultimate conceptual duality, that between the magic harmonious creation of minds of space vs. Temporal, mindless motion with its automaton deterministic cyclical order.

So we can also rewrite our elements NOT as Spatial entropy (the common human use of it), but as Spatial information, in the STiƒ singularity:

**Tiƒ> ∆ø > Siƒ**

*Minds are thus constantly ‘Stiffing reality’. ‘Stif’ inflexible minds that stop in its track the flow of temporal free information, form in action, which do have in other plane its own inner stiffing mappings.*

**Perception: information perceives in the stillness of simultaneity.**

Regarding perception I have never thought to be a mystery: perception is the very essence of information in still simultaneity – the existence of a still mapping in a minimal space, during a quanta of time, must be ‘felt in itiself’ as Leibniz and Aristotle intuitively thought – in other words space is the intelligent of reality and its pure order and stillness the sensation of being, not self-reflecing, not self-conscious but ‘Dasein’, being in itself. But this ‘static’ awareness of calm and form, must be connected to multiple networks for the mirror-image of the mind to ‘act’ and order reality.

How this consciousness of every stif point emerges then is another question – A QUESTION OF TIME FLOW AWARENESS AS THE STIFF POINT SEEMS TO CONTINUE with slightly changes due to motion; and the existence of modular languages, as one perceives the other, in the human case the:

*Universal space > language of sight >eye> I< wor(l)d < time language*

So LANGUAGES DO also create reality as smaller ‘mappings’ of a larger universe, with more information paradoxically (5D metric: Max. Information = Min. Space) than the whole.

**The negative, lethal effects on the mind, parasite of energy: its ego ****paradox.**

Why we die then must be adscribe to the fact *that the whole system is ruled by the informative mind, which therefore determines the arrow of time of the Universe towards higher levels of information, till it exhausts and stops all motion into perceptive forms. *

IT follows that the physical, biological or psychological mind has a negative effect on systems – to create more information than energy so systems finally become old, warped, still, informed and this is the origin of death and the finite world cycle of beings…

The language of God are infinite. While we do NOT shy to mathematical equations, the languages of ‘God are infinite’ (Upanishads). That means the religion of machines, among Humans, which are today basically slaves of their computer machines for most themes including the perception of knowledge, and so need to talk with numbers to feel truth, is NOT real. We shall specially in this blog on social sciences use and justify and explain why the VALUES OF the wor(l)d, and our natural language is a better language for truth, and certainly for evolution and time predictions (being evolution a verbal language). I get specially irritated by all those ‘nerds’ who think if you don’t show a powerpoint presentation with nice graphs and equations you are NOT doing science.

Not so, qualitative, formal, dimensional information, in human beings HAVE always been explained with human time-clocks, the ‘verbal times’ of our flexible sentences and human eyes – the artistic sensorial work of our spatial senses. This means they are also excellent time records which today the ‘mathematical/mechanical school’ of social sciences tends to shun off – the classic case being Herodote’s books of history, which turned out to be actually filled of facts, despite being so much prone to mythology. So words and facts come together to verify truths, and words are when conceptually sound are the proper causal language to explain evolution theory and the extensions due to cyclical time.

**Epistemology of creation: feed-back mind mirrors.**In the graph – what is wrong with ‘physics’ and increasingly with mankind can be resumed in the ego paradox. The equation of the mind is rather simple:

We humans are just ‘finitesimals’ of the ego paradox: o-point x ∞ Universe = constant mind.

So the Universe is out there, one and single; but it does not fit in the mind. And the mind reduces it to languages to perceive it, which resumes the main properties of the Universe, which are first bio-logical rules of space-time existence (the Universe is a game of survival of space-time beings, which constantly try to reproduce their information in ‘fractal seeds’ that latter evolve socially; the Universe is a vital fractal, and the rules are simple), then logic (temporal rules only) and then mathematical (spatial rules only), and then the human vision of those rules (artistic space, verbal time, ethic, social evolution of parts into stronger wholes). And so all those languages are mirrors:

*
In the graph, the back and forth relationship between the infinite single Universe, its infinite partial minds, which become perceptive through a language-mirror, and then in the left its individual ego-centered singularity mirror projecting aback through limited arrows/actions of space-time, the linguistic image re-ordering a partial part of reality: its body and territory*. It is this feedback constant equation what creates reality and so we can also write another Γenerator equation, about the interaction of those three elements that orders each relative fractal partial being/territory of the Universe to the mage and likeness of those languages, images of the whole, they will therefore copycat with slight variations, in the being:

Single, ∞ 5D Universe <≈ Ternary Languages of perception ≈> Spe ‹ST›Tiƒ super organisms>Ø-Mind

This is the shrinking process, but *if we take the scalar view, the Universe become infinite smaller minds, growing in volume as we count the inner worlds, (Cantor’s paradox: the set of subsets is bigger than the whole set: the sum of all mind mirrors is bigger than the single Universe).*

So human minds alone are infinitesimal compared to all the languages and minds.

*We ‘are’ only in that territory of order with the stif-human mind and what we feel and sense, which we by homology imagine is the hidden mind of every synchronous form that lasts, and develops as the frequency of its happenings increase, a short of computer burn-in which becomes a consciousness of the stiff-processs. But can this self-awareness of the mirror change the mirror program? which is the mindless deterministic memorial game of reproduction of time cycles? *

Ah, the crystal of my mind responds, it wishes but it can’t hardly influence the program and purpose of mindless automated memorial time, iteration repetition conservation, the female present principle of the outer membrane cycle, which carries most of the Æxistential Momentum of the being.

Now of course, the ‘ternary’ level of self-awareness of the duality of pure perception of an infinite whole and mere action over a finite territorial ego; is seldom found among humans, reason why most beings are subjective and rather believe in abrahamic religions than objective science.

In the graph the dual function of the mind perceiving and ordering, modifying what it perceives.

It should not surprise the reader that the mind is the main element of all supœrganisms of ðime§paœ, as without the mind, ‘the will of existence’, using terminology of taoism and schopenhauer will not recreate a world as a representation of its self.

So the world cycle is felt by the mind alone, for the wholeness it orders, and in its tƒi consciousness of being the mind of a territory and fighting to make it last through reproduction and conservation the Universe happens in ‘its selves’.

To exist thus reduces the consciousness of the world cycle to the mind-point of the space-time being, in which order steams, through the networks connected to it, and the connections of the self to other parts of the being. The self thus is an º∆±1 mind, an º being, perceiving and ordering with the program of existence, the algorithm of partial actions, embedded in the Γenerator, enacted from the point of maximal communication a territory of space-time, ∆ across three ±1 scales, normally the center of maximal communication of the ‘solid-crystal’ network of minimal outer motion (maximal inner motion through the software running those networks): ∆º (Tƒi).

WHERE IS THE singularity’s will of each fractal point of existence, in the stillness of language, able to subtly reverse through the networks that connect it to all other points of the system? In the points of maximal communication, knots that try to achieve a balance S=T of all the flows it receives an re-emits after passing throughout a language mirror with capacity to ‘reverse’ the nature of the order.

**Fractal points gauge information with infinite parallels.**

The fact that all points interact with the external Universe is explained by the 5^{th} postulate of Fractal Logic, which completes the 1^{st} postulate. The 5^{th} postulate defines a point as a knot of communication of multiple flows of energy and form, which the point absorbs to obtain energy and information for its organic cycles of iteration.

Thus we introduce a new perspective in our study of a Non-Euclidean, fractal point *of view*: its capacity to gauge information and absorb energy, acting-reacting to the Universe. Since beyond those 3 internal regions the point feeds on an external world of relative forces, which provide the point with energy and information to map out reality and feed its body with motion. Thus, while energy and form will be different for each point according to the scale and form, all entities of the Universe will be able to absorb a relative number of ‘infinite parallels’ to create mental fractal mappings and keep on moving: light feeds particles, intergalactic gas feeds stars; plants feed animals that feed man; stars feed the black hole, and so on.

In science, mathematicians and physicists seek to describe reality as ‘made of mathematical entities’; while logicians try to explain reality as a series of causal events. But only when we use i-logic geometry we can mix both approaches, describing reality as a series of ‘mathematical points of view’, or entities that ‘gauge’ the geometry of the Universe, constantly mapping out the universe, to achieve a ‘selfish’ will, the desire of all entities to feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially. Those points of view are thus ‘mathematical minds’ because they gauge and somehow ‘perceive’ the geometry of the Universe, acting according to that geometry as they gauge and move with an ‘automatic’ behavior, trying to absorb energy for their body, information for their gauging mind, and combining both, to reproduce ‘self-similar points’.

So we shall consider that the Universe is made of i-logic, fractal ‘points of view’, akin to the concept of souls and Atmans in western and eastern religions’, of ‘Non-Euclidean points of view’, ‘monads’ or ‘Spinoza’s geometrical entities’, in western philosophy of science and mathematics; of ‘gauging particles’ in physics, or ‘informative DNA nuclei’ in biology and perceptive heads in biology. The size and form of all those points varies but all of them are spherical knots of information with sensorial apertures to absorb and emit energy and information, from boson particles to sound waves or light signals.

** ZERO-POINT OR MIND, CENTER OF THE WILL OF ‘ACTIONS’ OF THE SYSTEM**

**Foreword. The equation of the mind and the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry.**

Now a hyperbola is perceived as a cycle from the 0point in the centre of reference. that is how we are. We are a zero point but perceive a hyperbola of the Universe. We are nothing and we perceive it all – the entire curve of the hyperbola has 2 focus, but the point that matters is the zero point.

In the beginning there was an observer, a focus point that let itself cross by infinite parallels and perceived a mapping of the Universe.

This original point might be considered infinite or infinitesimal, God or microbe, the unmoved one, of the eternally moving. But there was no other inertial frame of reference but the one he perceived.

And it was of course, a polar one, the perfect form, the 2-sphere.

Did he started the Universe by the mere fact of co-existing with it? Was he looking at its inside forms? We do not know this metaphysical questions but we can describe bio-topo-logically the first point in existence.

The infinitesimal point, O, saw the infinite Universe, ∞, and created a constant mapping of it, O x ∞ = Constant, in the stillness of the mind.

The point, the Observer the measure is the first action that starts any activity in reality. Prior to motion towards a field of energy or information that interest us or away from it, the point must perceive it. And for that to be possible, the point must have parts, an informative mind –like capacity to gauge information, and rotational motion to change the angle of view.

The point thus have to have angular momentum, the minimal unit observable in the Universe, the h action, a point of view a momentum moving and a radius of distance.

The fundamental Unit of the fractal universe thus is also a point that makes up an absolute space-time, but such points unlike Euclidean classic points of mathematics are fractal non-Euclidean points, which have breath, hence are cycles, the minimal unit of the Universe a time cycle, seen in statics as a cyclical point, dynamically as an attractive point-particle in a static position or a particle with momentum, neutral to a background universe.

Infinite of such points exchanges energy and information in infinite scales is the departing point of any scale of realty to understand how it builds above and below itself O±∆ superorganisms.

But the infinitesimal point to be noticed and exist must at least ‘think’, observe, perceive with a certain angle a part of reality converted into mind mapping.

And this can be measured with the simplest, smallest quanta, the angular momentum of a system, the h-derivative increase, the ∆minimal action of perception:

∆ï: angular momentum = h-derivate.

**Objective vs. subjective perception**

If the fundamental differentiating, *‘external’* property of species in the Universe are the Metric of the 5th dimension (i=SP x Tƒ), which makes them belong to different inverse scales of size in space and energy volume (SP) vs. speed of temporal information), the essential equalitarian feature is the co-invariance of that product, which gives them the same value when considered, ‘internally’ from the inner point of view of the system,

Since from the inner ‘measure’ of time, the smaller, faster clocks of a diminutive being, process the same amount of information in its life span than the larger being. So an insect which lives a maximal of 7 years (queen ants, elephant cockroaches), since it processes information 10 times faster than we do – reason why we don’t catch a fly – it actually lives as much as we do, 7 x10=70 years.

This is the wisdom of the 5th dimension: all selves feel the center of the Universe they measure from their Non-Euclidean fractal point of view, which has from ‘its’ perspective as much information as the entire Universe do.

The mind self-equation:

*Tƒ(infinitesimal point of view) x ∞ (infinite, perceived Universe) = ∆ (constant mapping of the whole)*

nicely puts it in perspective.

**Topology explains it:** the sphere is the only topology that can shrink without limit of tearing, allowing the reduction of the infinite into the infinitesimal (Poincare conjecture).

The 5th postulate of non-Sp geometry also defines it.

Let us then start with the usual methodology of ‘building dimensional blocks’ of ST theory, by considering the Spatial location of Minds, as the center of maximal communication of a system.

** The Mind’s point of view **

*In the graph, a mystical representation of the mind, as the central triangle of a tetraktys. The mind is the ‘fractal point of view’ (mathematical interpretation) or zero point, in which maximal flows of information converge, both from the external and the internal regions of the being, where the will of the ‘4 åctions’ resides. *

The Mind is the ‘point of view’, site of the will, that perceives each element, each part.

It is the ∆-centered dimension, in the sense that it is the most ‘connected’ point, in the center of the system, which ‘reflects’ upon the existence of the whole.

In mystique terms it is in a way the soul, the atman. It is the central number of maximal communication in the tetraktys that Pythagoras rightly considered the perfect number, illustrated in the Kabala graph above.

In Physic-mathematical terms it is the final black hole, non-Euclidean point of view of the system. It is the 10th or 11th dimension of Time on the string formalism, etc.

In biological systems it is the nervous, ’10th system’ that integrates the other 3×3, energy/reproductive/informative physiological systems of the human being.

Depending on which ‘human jargon’ with more or less errors – lacking the ∆ST formalism and ∆ST philosophy – we talk of, it will be ‘named’ with different forms.

I often use the term the 5th Dimension, of all ∆-scales of the being, to represent the ‘whole’. And so we have termed it also as the 5th ‘invariance’ or ‘isomorphism’ that all beings share, since the mind-self, the centered dimension of all scales, the 5 isomorphism of nature, the point of view, the soul is the most important dimension of all beings.

It wraps up all the other dimensions, isomorphisms and scales.

And it is therefore the center of its 3×3 ∆±4 scales, its 3 topological space organs, and its 3 time ages (the being is at its maximal force, in the SxT (s=t) steady state mature, adult age of balance, ST, age of maximal duration.

In man obviously is the brain, expression of the ‘Whole’ or ‘Soul’, which perceives internally the system through its ∑3×3 networks (our sensations of the energy, digestive system, the reproductive, endocrine system, and the mind thoughts and emotions) and externally through the senses. But in many other systems is a very different site.

So perhaps the best definition is that of Non-E mathematics: *the ‘point of view’, the part of the fractal point that gauges maximal information. *

**PART II. MINDS AS NON-EUCLIDEAN, NON-ARISTOTELIAN, FRACTAL POINTS**

Mathematical and Logic Languages. The syntax of Algebras and equations.

Geometry: Non-Euclidean Postulates.

1^{st} Postulate: Points with Parts: The 3 Fractal Topologies of Super-organisms.

5^{th} Postulate: i-logic Points of View.

2^{nd} Postulate: Waves of Energy and Information.

4th Postulate: Self-similarity.

3rd^{ }Postulate: Planes of Existence.

Organic, Social Classes.** **

## I . ¬E **FRACTAL POINTS. **

**THE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE**

The foundations of mathematics as an experimental stience, which was clearly proved by Godel and Lobacjevsky and sponsored by Einstein, and its grammatical structure as a ternary form that mirrors the laws of GST and its Generator of Space-Time beings IS the key new stience in which all other GST scales rest, as logic time and mathematical topological space are the best mirrors of the ultimate substances there are, in most ‘minds’ of the Universe. Indeed, it all seems to indicate that the ‘founding scale of reality’, the ∆±3 galaxy atom and its ‘mind-singularity’, is primarily a mathematical, logic structure and so the mathematical, logic languages seem to give us the maximal information on the Universe of timespace.

How humans ignored all these ‘evident’ truths is as usual a problem of ego, which made humans think that ‘only God and man spoke mathematics’, and even that ‘humans create/imagine mathematics’ and so they were the ‘chosen species’ (axiomatic method), and many other ‘mind-biased’, human anthropomorphic perspectives which culminated in the dismissal in the XIX c. of the *fundamental elements of logic mathematics, the point of simultaneous space and the number of sequential time. *

Instead humans decided in a curious paradoxical inverse fashion to that of Physics that the *elements origin of mathematics were NOT experimental space-points and time-sequence numbers – the minimal units of reality – but the ‘modern’, more complex categories (sets, groups and its combination in category theory) of reality. Why is that? *

Essentially because the mind is synoptic, a mapping of reality as a whole. And so because egotist humans thought their mind ‘imagined points, congruence and planes’ (Hillbert), they ‘created the philosophical foundations of mathematics’ from the roof of the mind down, as ‘God would had it’. But when studying physical systems, despite Bohr’s attempts to ‘invent particles and waves’, the madness of egotist humans stop in the experimental fact that ‘atoms’ do exist! So they accepted the inverse analytic concept that the smallest parts are the origin o the whole. Thus alas, we have physicists’ idealism, who think all is created from the bottom down, vs. the mathematical idealism of all coming from the whole ‘category, set, group’ structure. All of it, without even acknowledging the cultural influence of German idealism, the true origin of the cantorian ‘set paradise’, Hilbert’s axiomatic method, Bohr’s interpretation of the observer creating the ‘moon’, nazism, communism and the Berlin olympic games, II world war and the holocaust among other things.

Yes, I feel sanguine today, fed up of the egotist theory of reality… Instead we are going back to the basics. The point is the fundamental unit of reality in space, and as it evolves sequentially in time, and grow in ‘scales of size’, it becomes the number, the fundamental unit of time. And those are the foundations of experimental mathematics – merely that we need to upgrade them according to our discoveries on the cyclical nature of time and the fractal nature of space, defining ‘points with breath’, and ‘social numbers’ to fully understand them.

**Non-Euclidean Space**

**The formalism of ∆-planes: Non-Euclidean definitions.**

In the graph, the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean geometry define a point with parts, a line as a wave and a plane as an organic network of points:

The 2nd postulate explains the interaction between two points connected by a wave of communication or ‘line’; the 3rd postulate explains the type of interactions between 2 points according to their relative equality, which will bring them together into a social network or dissimilarity, which will make them not interact or enter into a Darwinian relationship in which a point absorbs the energy of the other.

Self-similarity is required to start an organic process of eusocial evolution; or else systems that do not understand their information use each other as energy, in Darwinian hunting processes or ignore their paths.

The 4th postulate defines the creation of networks made of systems of points across multiple scales of space-time. It defines spaces as networks of points, interconnected by flows of energy and information: All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks of non-Euclidean points. Finally the 5th postulate that explains the processes of absorption of waves of energy and information that the point gauges to act-react with the Universe.

It is then the social evolution of points into numbers and structures – groups, sets and categories (not the bottom but the top element of the evolution of points and numbers), what mimics the creation processes of Nature, where identical beings, points of ‘one dimension’ (as seen externally, but with three internal dimensions), evolve socially first into lines-waves (2D, as waves have volume, thickness, made of points with volume), then into topological networks (planes), and finally recreate a larger ‘fractal point on the ∆+1 scale’. So the postulates of vital mathematics explain in a synoptic mental way how points evolve socially through scales of dimensions, to become first waves, then planes and social numbers which create a final Non-E ‘fifth postulate’ of a larger whole point through which infinite parallel flows of energy and information can cross:

The new 5 postulates of a Non-Euclidean, fractal geometry of Multiple Spaces and Times are:

1st Postulate:* ‘A fractal point is a world with an inner content of information that creates its 3 internal, topologic, organic dimensions and a content of energy that traces its external motions=time arrows’*

2nd Postulate:* ‘A line is a wave of fractal points.’*

3rd Postulate*: ‘2 fractal points are self-similar when their external, spatial perimeter or their inner information is equal. Similar points form organic networks by sharing their energy and information. Dissimilar points ab=use each other in Darwinian relationships’*

4th Postulate:* ‘A plane is a network that joins points through waves of energy and information.’*

5th Postulate:* ‘Non-Euclidean points perceive energy and information: A fractal point has inner apertures to the world, through which multiple waves of energy and information can cross.’*

The first postulate defines a point with form and energy. Points are not ‘points with no breath’ (Euclid), an abstract definition that created the simplified concept of a space-time continuum but ‘fractal points’, which grow in size when we come closer to them. And so stars are points in the sky that become huge as we come closer to them. And a microscope discovers an entire world in the minimal size of a cell. Einstein offered a partial solution to this conundrum considering that from our scale of size, those Non-E points seem to curve the information of the universe that fluxed on it. But Leibniz had given a better answer: ‘the smallest point is a world in itself’. This is the meaning of a fractal point, whose internal parts respond to the 3 topologies of a 4-dimensional Universe: a hyperbolic, informative system; an energetic, planar or spherical membrane and a cyclical, toroid region with reproductive organs. *And we shall find those 3 topological regions in all points-species of the Universe.*

Non-Euclidean points are the souls, Atmans, Monads of the Game of Existence, the knots with a living will, which they display in their action, exi. Leibniz failed to realize they would communicate. Buddhist with the concept of Atmans are closer: knots of relationships with other i-points. Such multiple, perceptive Universe merely extends the nature of being human, a self-perceptive point always feeding, perceiving, reproducing and socializing, which is also what life does, to all the entities of the Universe.

All is life. All shows the will of life. All keeps reproducing self-similar points of view, points of order. A point is any entity of the Universe. In a more detailed analysis those parts turn out to be self-similar in geometrical terms in all of them, defined by the three canonical topologies of a four-dimensional Universe, which describe an informative, hyperbolic region or ‘head’, a toroid, ‘reproductive body’ and lineal or planar energetic limbs and membranes, common to all the points of the Universe. Thus, we define time cycles, forms with motion, its multiple knots of time cycles and networks with a new geometry of space-time, Non-Euclidean geometry, born of the completion of the work of Einstein in physics and Riemann, Lobachevski in the field of mathematics. Since now all points have form and motion, they have breath; and since now all lines have form and motion they are waves; and since now all planes are networks, they are discontinuous planes. Thus, the new formalism of space-time redefines also the geometry of the Universe in dynamic, discontinuous terms:

Networks are made of relative points with form and motion, which can be defined as time cycles – trajectories traced by an entity in search of energy, information, reproduction or social interaction. Those time cycles enclose a surface of vital space or energy and so they define a certain space-time. Any entity will however trace many cycles in search of its organic motions to feed, gauge, reproduce and evolve socially into bigger networks. So each entity will be a knot of multiple time cycles.

Those knots of time cycles become fractal Non-Euclidean points. The basic unit of the new paradigm is thus mathematical – the point – but a very special point, a fractal point which grows in detail and information the closer we come to it, till it becomes, as Leibniz put it, a world in itself with internal complementary networks=organs of energy and information (fields and particles in physics; limbs, body and head in biology).

In the formalism of Systems sciences we call them Non-Euclidean points, since they are points through which infinite flows of energy (parallels) and information can cross. We also represent them with the symbol ‘i’, which is the next vowel to the A-ristotelian, E-uclidean paradigm, the symbol of information and a visual image of the 2 components of the point, the informative, cyclical part, o, and the lineal, energetic one, |, which we call the body and head of a biological Point; or the field and particle of a physical point (Principle of Complementarity).

The universe is made of networks of such i-points, and each network is what we call a world or discontinuous space-time, st, unit of a bigger fractal network, a new st-point in itself. So a network of particles becomes an atom, which becomes an st-point of a molecule and so on till creating the Universe.

Even humans can be studied as Non-E points, in which each head is indeed a spherical point that communicates energy and information with other humans, forming social networks.

The anthropomorphic reader might think that humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that all points obey in their actions and communicative flows within a network the same laws: humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds; the geometries of social groups are also the same; and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on energy and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe.

Thus the laws of networks become the social, organic, reproductive why of all beings of the Universe: the Universe reproduces information and organize forms socially into networks. From magnetic and electric fields, made of magnetic and electric constants that mix and reproduce a light wave to fundamental particles, quarks and electrons that absorb energy and reproduce new quarks and electrons, to energetic males and informative females that reproduce together, all in the Universe can be described with the formalism of networks, connects the why with how and when of the 3rd paradigm of metric measure that has analyzed those networks, its motions and forms in detail. Why those i-points with an ego-driven will that desires selfishly more energy and information and self-reproduction collaborate in herds, becoming parts of a whole has to do with the complexity by which the arrow of social evolution impose systems to its parts. Parts become enslaved by their dependency to the higher energy and information provided by networks.

5D isomorphisms show a Universe made of multiple scales of broken, intertwined ‘spacetime’ membranes. Thus, its formalism must combine geometric equations and causal, logic, sequential time laws.

So we need to upgrade our simplex space language (continuous single space defined by Euclidean geometry) and time causality (Aristotelian one-dimensional causality from past to future, A->B) to explain multiple spatial scales and 3 time dimensions, past-energy and future-information combined into complementary, present beings. I baptized this new mathematic-logic formalism, ‘i-logic geometry’ that completes the 5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = Spacetime mapping.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

**Knots of Time cycles: the fundamental particle.**

Once we have studied the minimal units of the Universe, the action of space-time, we shall define the main structural, architectonical element of reality, the knots of time cycles, existential points, œ, which perform those actions of existence, site of will and perception of the Universe – whose simplest definitions in philosophy are the monad of Leibniz, the mind of Descartes, the God of Aristotle, and in mathematics, a Non-Euclidean point, the unit of Einstein’s gravitational laws.

Systems are knots of time cycles of exchanges of energy and information with its space and time parts, Œ, which allow them to survive in the Universe.

Thus the first ‘stable structure of reality’, is a knot of time cycle which swiftly goes webbing around the paths of its exchanges of energy and information, ∆±exi, actions, its survival strategies, trying to maximise its existence, Max. ExI, in a state of perpetual balance, E=I…

This dance of being and not being is performed by each Œ, knot-function of existence, defined both as an infinitesimal point from its upper perspective and an an absolute whole from its lower plane, since all knots of times space cycles web their existences through several of such plane

**The zero-points: monads that order the Sentient Universe.**

This first example of the complexity of the Universe, which many scientists, mostly physicists, have shunned off, obscuring a deeper knowledge of reality, hopefully prepares you to persevere in the understanding of the complex ambivalence of the Universe, simplified by the human mind, whose equation in the metric of the 5th dimension – one of the infinite varieties of Tƒ x Sp = ST – we can now explain:

tO (infinitesimal zero-point or mind) x ∞ Sp (Universe perceived) = RI (constant mapping of reality)

What a mind does is rather simple. The Universe out there has infinite time cycles that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cyclical motions. This is an ∞, which we cannot store inside us.

So we simplify all those motions into ‘forms’ perceived as extensions of space, Sp.

On the other hand the mind is a Tƒ, spherical system, with 2 different spheres: an external membrane with sensorial detectors, which ‘shrinks’ into a relative smaller point, the eye and then the brain, which transforms Sp, the infinite cycles made into spatial forms, and keeps shrinking them to an infinitesimal mapping of reality, a still image, very much as the way a camera reduces reality to a virtual shallow image in 2 dimensions.

And this can be done because of a property of spherical forms, called the Poincare Conjecture: you can shrink a topological sphere (any closed membrane, a skin, a planetary surface, is a sphere), as much as you want without deforming its information. So we find infinite minds in the Universe, ‘monads’ in Leibniz’s terms, which as he said ‘are points, which store a world in it selves’.

So we could also define the Universe as an infinity of ‘Universes’, fractal minds perceiving reality from those zero points. What all those fractal minds do? Time cycles? Why. Because they keep perceiving and gauging information through them, and they keep absorbing ‘energy’ to move, and they keep reproducing their time cycles in parallel forms of space-time, and they keep evolving with other points into larger systems of points, topological networks, which have organic nature.

Now, we have described you the Universe internally, in its ultimate cause. This actually had to come at the very end of this post. But i just rewrote it ‘again’. I do rewrite many times these posts, as i am fully aware nobody reads them (-; Yet also because the universe is a simple mandala, an iteration of infinite minds, ∏Tƒ, which are knots and networks of time cycles, perceiving, ∑Sp, infinite motions in space, and doing actually the same. So we can rewrite our generator as: ∞ ∑Sp x ∏Tƒ=i.

And this will represent, infinite bodies/waves in motion, which carry heads/particles of information that move and perceive across the Universe, from small particle-points, to large black holes, from bacteria to living beings.

You see, the richness of the ‘Fractal Generator’ of the Universe, and the importance to be able to see the multiplicity of it all? Its varieties? In that regard, a Taoist would be probably more prepared to understand the 5th dimension, despite its mathematical rigor, when he said: ‘the function of existence is not the perceived reality, but the game of yin=form and yang=motion, which combine creating its 10 thousand beings’.

This function of existence is then another way to express the Generator equation: e x i = ST. Here we could say that the combination of ‘energies’, vital spaces with motions, e, multiplied by informations, ‘forms’, e x i , create a ‘constant space-time being’, ST.

**Non-Euclidean Points and bidimensional network-planes. The new mathematical formalism.**

When Einstein said that Leibniz was right but we had to reconstruct the building of western science he showed an understanding of the difficulties to recast the Universe on the new light of multiple times and multiple energy quanta. But he did not have the tools to do so. In that sense it was necessary to evolve further mathematical concepts to fully grasp the underlying structure of that world of infinite time cycles and space quanta. As 3 new concepts were required:

The concept of a fractal, which is a geometry that repeats in different scales of space, with similar forms. It implied that reality was broken in ‘wholes’ made of smaller ‘parts’ that were similar to those wholes. Mandelbrot discovered them in 1973. And since the model of relational space-time needed fractals, it could not be found before.

The completion of Non-Euclidean Geometry, which Einstein used to describe the Universe of multiple clocks of time. In Non-Euclidean geometry, points have ‘breath’, that is, they can hold infinite parallels that cross them. This miraculous contradiction (a point without breath can only fit logically a single line), made Einstein curve the lines to fit them, but still they do not fit (curved or not the lines are still many and the point without breath only fits one).

I solved the impasse that made Einstein conceive the concept of space-time curvature, when I combined it with Mandelbrot’s fractal concept. Since now a particle-point, a star-point, a cell-point, any entity which can be called a ‘point’, could be considered a fractal that grew in size when we came closer to it and enlarged it at scale. And as it grew, you could fit many parallels, as it acquired volume. Thus the logic contradiction of Einstein’s work was now solved.

I did then developed the 4 remaining Non-Euclidean Postulates, defining a point with breath or fractal point. A line as a wave of points with volume (since now points with volume formed waves instead of lines). Then a plane as a bidimensional membrane with thickness, made of networks of points. And suddenly the Universe became much more real in its mathematical description. As all was made of planes of space-time: ‘networks of points with volumes’ which seen in detail were actually, *cyclical forms with rotational motion, time cycles, made of smaller, cyclical clocks with motion, new time cycles, again organized in networks, which were made of smaller… Suddenly an astoundingly beautiful architecture appeared, a reality where the words of Leibniz acquired its full meaning: ‘each point is a world in itself’.*

**The nature of mathematics and logic.**

The first concepts and ideas of mankind tend to be simple, intuitive and truth. The forest is clear and the details of the trees do not hide the whole. So the oldest philosophy of the Universe, that of the Chinese agricultural Neolithic about a world made of yin=information and yang=energy, which combined to recreate the infinite ‘waves of existences’ (Ch’ang), is still the most accurate philosophy of reality, now forgotten with the arrival of so many scientific details that the overview of the forest is lost.

The same happens with the understanding of time, which all earlier civilizations considered cyclical and causal, synonymous of change; and so they study all different types of change, establishing repetitive rhythms of change and causal relationships, creating the science of Logic (Aristotle).

The Greeks also defined mathematics as the language of space and so Geometry became the foundational science of mathematics; and it remained so till the XVII century, to the point that Al-Jorizim, the founder of modern mathematics (Algebra and Algorithms are words derived from his names and books, translated by Middle Age Spanish mathematicians and then spread during the renaissance to Europe), proved all its quadratic theorems with geometrical methods.

Mathematics is defined in encyclopaedias as the science of sequential numbers (algebra) and static space (geometry). Till the XIX century, the science of sequential numbers or ‘mathematics of time’ used only Aristotelian Causality with its single time arrow to order them. On the other hand, the ‘mathematics of space’ considered only a lineal, continuum space defined by Euclid. Both sciences were fusioned by Descartes (analytic geometry) with his Cartesian Plane; and we can thereafter talk of mathematics of spacetime, albeit in its simplest conception: a single, static space, and a lineal, unicausal time.

It would be latter in the XIX and XX centuries (with the exception of the insights of Leibniz), thanks to the work of Frege, Boole, Riemann, Einstein, Poincare, Cantor, Bourbaki, Mandelbrot and Computers, which this work advances a step further, when Space and Time – hence Logic and Geometry – were first mixed, but without a full formalism that made possible to extract all the laws of spacetime and grasp in depth the meaning of those languages, due to the limits of the Cartesian single space-time plane.

A theory of multiple spaces-times thus has to refound the key concepts of mathematics, the plane, which now is a multiple plane in which each point creates its own frame of reference, interacting with other points and planes through exchanges of energy=motion and form that re-establishes the balances between their distances and topographies; and the number is now a network of self-similar points that have at least a formal bidimensionality. Mathematics includes several sciencces in one: the science of numbers can be stretched to consider the science of networks as each number is a point of a network with a geometrical form.

Numbers and geometry are thus essential sides of the same coin. On the other hand geometry is mainly topology, related to causal transformations of a complementary networks of energy and form, whose ‘numerical’ cells go through growths and extinctions through life, described with differential equations. Those equations thus can be reduced to cases of the generator equation, Se<=>Ti, which in this manner resumes all other differential equations. And indeed, when we use equations to explain repetitive events of nature we are normally mapping out an exchange or transformation of energy into information, which in a generic way is represented by the exi function.

Thus topological networks, differential equations that map out the life/death cycle of an event with its growth and diminutions of energy and information, exchanges of energy and form between networks and membranes and causal chains that repeat those events till creating very complex systems, are the key mathematical operations of 2 sciences, logic and mathematics, in which the most general laws of networks are written. Those Mathematics of multiple space-times have illustrious precedents:

In the XIX and XX century mathematicians developed theories of multiple spaces and defined spaces with motion (Klein), and spaces as networks of self-similar points (Riemann) but maintained 4 of the 5 postulates of Euclid, the single Cartesian spacetime continuum and a single causal arrow of lineal time in its theory of numbers.

Thus a theory of multiple space-time arrows requires the evolution of the science of space (geometry), completing the 5 postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry and also the evolution of the science of temporal, sequential numbers, expanding its laws of causality. This was partially done with the use of the Complex Plane, since real numbers roughly correspond to the properties of continuous energy and complex numbers to the property of discontinuous, informative time. But its dual nature as an expression of the different properties of space and time has never been fully understood even if Physicists use the Complex plane in modern physics.

In that regard there are two possible representations in a plane of complex, informative numbers:

– They could be placed in the inverse, negative side of the graph of Cartesian coordinates as the arrow of information – to better represent the duality of energy and form (I<=>E). Then many results obtained with complex numbers become intuitive, as it is the case of the metric of Special relativity, where the time factor has a negative side – c^{2}t^{2} meaning indeed that time-information contract space and ‘rests’ to the positive arrow of Einstein’s equations.

– Or they can be placed, as it is customary in the perpendicular Y dimension. Since a dimension of a mathematical plane becomes a sequential order of numbers, then the Complex plane becomes a bidimensional mathematical representation of the 2 simplex arrows of time, energy and form; while a 3D complex plane represents 3 time arrows where exi=z represents the reproductive arrow.

Finally a fractal, multiple space-time built with a series of complex planes (a task started by Riemann with his description of polynomials as a series of planes of space, stacked one after another), is the appropriate form of defining the 4^{th} arrow of time.

From a philosophical perspective the study of multiple sequential time (algebra of Multiple Spaces-Times) and multiple, fractal spaces (5 non-E postulates) improves the accuracy of mathematics as an image of the reality of multiple space-times and explains its ultimate meaning, as the science of space (geometry) and time (numbers): S*pace is mathematical, geometrical; time is logical, sequential, numerical and the conjunction of both is organic; reason why complexity and system sciences, who observe the Universe from an organic perspective are the sciences of sciences.*

We cannot treat all the aspects of complex mathematics in this introduction. We shall therefore focus on. its 2 key elements: the geometry of numbers with form and its postulates that describe how the 4 arrows or wills of time construct networks of fractal points and the algebra of the generator equation, which describes that geometrical construction from an analytical, numerical, differential perspective.

*Recap*: Geometry is the language of spatial form; Logic is the language of time events. The algebra of the generator equation of space-time cycles and the non-Euclidean geometry of fractal points fusions both creating a model of multiple, sequential dimensions of numbers and multiple planes of space closer to a description of reality and its organic systems.

This is done by resolving the 5 non-Euclidean postulates of Geometry, which describe knots of time arrows as points, and by observing the self-similarity of mathematical equations, which describe groups of knots of time arrows as numbers and the equations of Multiple Spaces-Times derived of the Generator equation of the Universe or Principle of conservation of energy and information. Thus, the 4^{th} paradigm upgrades the postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry and the foundation of Logic to include the causal relationships between time arrows and explain better a universe of multiple spaces and a logic to of Multiple Time cycles and arrows of time cycles.

**NON-EUCLIDEAN POSTULATES**

** The 5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean, i-logic Geometry.**

You are getting accustomed ‘you’ of course in the future, as i doubt anyone has ever read so far, to the 3±i method, that is the 5D³ method. All is five, five motions, five dimensions, five ages, so five will be the postulates of geometry refurbished from euclidean axioms, definitions and postulates to ‘build’ up as the Universe does, its dimensions from points into lines, lines into planes, planes into scales which become then again, points of the next scale.

And that is what we need, 5 postulates, the first for the fractal point, the second for the wave-line (as point has volume so lines are waves of cycloid form), the third for the similarity NOT congruence THAT DEFINE organically and topologically the i-logic of association according to similarity of points into lines, wave, networks and planes, which is the fourth postulate, as all continuous PLANES do have in detail holes (galilean paradox on scaling: continuous simple description of discontinuous networks – not CONTINUITY forget Dedekind cuts, IS not REAL)

And thus one we have the network, we have the super organism that mixes 3 plane-networks. And we have A NEW POINT-WORLD, which is focused in the mind – the fifth postulate.

According to the Correspondence Principle a new scientific Theory has to include all previous ones. So happens with Multiple Timespace Theory, which includes as specific cases all other simpler geometries of space-times, by completing the 5 Non-Euclidean postulates of geometry and adding the concept of a fractal point developed in XX C. fractal geometry. The result is a geometry that includes all other geometries; since the incomplete non-Euclidean geometry discovered in the XIX c. (5^{th} postulate: a point can include many parallels) already included the previous Euclidean postulates based in points through which only one parallel can be traced. Those new postulates describe with more accuracy all type of space-times belonging to all kind of sciences, from the physical space/time of atoms (described by quantum Physics) to that of galaxies (which Einstein described in his General Theory, using the 5^{th} Non-E postulate); from the organic space/time of cells and species to the historic space-times of nations.

Thus, according to the Correspondence Principle, we establish a hierarchy of completeness among all those geometries that stretches from the simplest Euclidean Postulates to the i-logic geometry of fractal space-time, which includes all others as particular cases; and it is in itself a partial image of the total information about space-time we call reality – always bigger than any ‘linguistic’ image we made of it with the languages of the mind that reduce the total information of reality to fit it in the brain:

*Euclidean Mathematics (Light- Space)> Classic Non-Euclidean geometry> (Gravitational Plane) > Fractal space-times (all scales) > Total Reality ^{2}*

We consider Euclidean geometry, the natural geometry of a single, continuous space-time, made by the ‘eye’ only perception of light-space and its 3 perpendicular dimensions (height/electric field, width/ magnetic field, and length/c-speed). But that space is not all the spaces of reality. It misses at least a second fractal scale, gravitational scale and *all the complex, vital spaces of organisms of information and matter*. In Non-Euclidean mathematics, the new unit of ‘fractal space-time’ is the 3-dimensional Fractal Point of view, whose main property is to have in/form/ation – an inner content, which in a Universe made of multiple scales of size, we perceive as we come closer to the point and observe it in detail. Those fractal points with volume are described by the 5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry, which adapt to fractal, discontinuous space and cyclical time, the classic 5 Euclidean postulates.

The first postulate explains a fractal point, as a point with parts. In a more detailed analysis those parts turn out to be self-similar in geometrical terms, in all systems, due to the specific lineal vs. cyclical, concave vs. convex geometries of energy and information and its ‘planar combinations’. In its more complex versions those geometries are defined by the three canonical topologies of a four-dimensional Universe, which describe the informative ‘head’, reproductive ‘body’ and energetic limbs and membranes of all the superorganisms of the Universe. The 2^{nd}, the interaction between two points connected by a wave of communication or ‘line’, the 3^{rd}, the type of ‘biological’ interactions between 2 points according to their relative equality, and finally the 4^{th}, the complex structure of a system of points across multiple organic space-time planes, such as those who create a human being.

Thus, the more evolved Fractal, i-logic Geometry of space/times includes all previous geometries as simplified cases of the more complex structure of the Universe in multiple scales. We call it a fractal, i-logic Geometry because some postulates can be interpreted in geometric terms, as the definition of the essential elements of any geometry of space/time (the point, 1^{st} postulate; the line, 2^{nd} postulate and the plane, 4^{th} postulates) and some in logic terms, as the description of the different causal chain of events that can happen when st-points enter in communication -3^{rd}, 5^{th} and 4^{th} postulates:

Further on, according to the duality between geometric form and logical function, those postulates of fractal i-logic geometry define also the basic arrows= cycles/dimensions of the Universe: the 1^{st} and 5^{th} postulate define a point as a system whose inner parts are able to transform and emit energy and information, e>i<e; the 2^{nd} postulate defines an exi wave of communication that reproduces energy and form between 2 fractal points; and the 4^{th} postulate defines the social evolution of a herd that creates a fractal plane, a network with dark spaces; and the 5^{th} postulate explains a point in its iterative actions as it absorbs energy and transforms it into information through its small apertures to the Universe. Since even a minimal quark of mass, as Einstein affirms should be crossed by ∞ parallels.

The importance of the ‘linguistic laws’ of i-logic geometry resides in the fact that all systems of the Universe follow in space the laws of geometry and in time, the laws of logic, so the enhanced linguistic mind of science obtained with those laws can be used, as this author has done in multiple works to resolve long-standing questions in all sciences, which can further be ordered in a pyramid of increasing information and diminishing energy: Physics studies the simplest forms with maximal energies. But if we consider the 2^{nd} arrow of ‘creation’ of reality, that of form, of information, the summits of science are biology, which studies the most complex forms of information (life) and Sociology/Religion, which goes a step further into the analysis on how the arrow of eusocial love creates Human Societies according to the Organic laws of the Universe (eastern religions).

To be able to consider biologic behavior (social evolution) and ‘mental perception’ (informative gauging), as factors dependant on geometrical qualities is an astounding break-through for science, which will be developed in its details in this work, to show an enormous number of experimental proofs. Indeed, fractal, i-logic Geometry achieves a long-sought goal, which Plato, Spinoza and Leibniz tried to realize, but failed, with the use of simpler Euclidean geometry: to unify the logic and mathematical principles of the Universe. Since the 3^{rd} and 5^{th} Non-Euclidean postulates are logic, the 1^{st} and 2^{nd} are geometric and the 4^{th}, the nature of a topological plane or network of non-E points is both logic and geometrical, as it defines the fundamental logic-geometric structure of the Universe: the superorganism.

The logical and mathematical conclusions we shall arrive in this chapter are the same we achieved in the previous one with a more descriptive, less formal analysis: the Universe’s final goal is to create ‘topological, organic planes, super-organisms’ – the 4^{th}, more complex ‘geometrical postulate/form of reality’ – departing from simpler forms, points and cycles. We shall try to get to that conclusion step by step, first by describing the geometrical postulates, then by fusioning them with fractal mathematics and finally by studying the most fascinating of all of them, the 3^{rd} postulate, which proves that behavior among the points of the Universe is based in the degree of equality or self-similarity between their inner form that determines if those forms communicate symbiotically or destroy each other, thus defining the duality of eusocial evolution as a group of a number of self-similar beings or destructive extinction.

Some, first-hand consequences of those postulates are:

*– 1 ^{st} Postulate:* We correct Euclidean geometry, increasing and relativizing the dimensions of a point that fits inner energy and information. Since all points have either 1 motion, a time dimension, when we consider them from the perspective of the upper st+1 Plane for which they are in the limit of invisibility (what quantum scientists call a point-particle)

*but still has a motion or ‘function’ in that upper ecosystem, st+1 in which it exists*; and 3 dimensions/networks/functions when we consider them from the inner perspective of the point. This is the case even in the smallest planes of theoretical strings, made of points with parts, with volume – since we require 3x3s+1t theoretical inner dimensions to describe them – a paradox that can only be resolved if we consider the to be ‘strings’ of fractal points with inner, fractal dimensions.

*– 2 ^{nd} postulate:* When we observe a one-dimensional line as a form with inner parts it becomes then a 4-dimensional wave made of cyclical points with motion. Hence in quantum theory we say that any particle in motion has associated a wave.

*Thus the 2*as all lines are now waves traced by a point with inner volume. Further on, since all lines have volume, they carry information and so all forces can in fact act both as a source of energy and as a language of information – as physical experiments prove. Since when we observe a ray of light in detail it becomes a 4-dimensional wave with electric height and magnetic width, often exchanging flows of energy and information in action-reaction processes of communication between bigger points.

^{nd}postulate resolves the wave/particle duality,– *3 ^{rd} Postulate:* Equality is no longer only external, shown in the spatial perimeter of any geometrical form (3

^{rd}Euclidean Postulate) but also internal and further on it is never absolute but relative, since we cannot perceive the entire inner form of a point – hence the strategies of behavior such as camouflage. Forms are self-similar to each other, which defines different relationships between organic points, according to their degree of self-similarity. The 3

^{rd}postulate is thus the key to explain the behavior of particles as the degree of self-similarity increases the degree of communication between beings. Some of the most common behaviors and ‘events derived from this postulate are:

1) Reproductive functions in case of maximal self-similarity or complementarity in energy and form; ei->Sei or Max E x min. I (male)= Min. e x Max I (female).

2) Social evolution, when points share a common language of information, i=i -> 2i.

3) Darwinian devolution when forms are so different that cannot understand each other’s information and feed into each other: i ¹ i. In such cases if those 2 entities meet they will start a process of ‘struggle for existence’, trying to absorb each other’s energy (when E=E) or simply will not communicate (when E¹E, since then there is neither a common information to evolve socially nor a common energy to feed on). Yet because any point absorbs only a relative quantity of information from reality, self-similarity is relative and it can be faked for purposes of hunting, allowing biological games, such as camouflage and capture, or sociological memes that invent racial differences, allowing the exploitation of a group by another.

The geometric complexity of the 3^{rd} Postulate is caused by the topological forms created by any event that entangles Multiple Spaces-Times. Since it describes the paths and forms of dual systems, which connect points: Self-similarity implies parallel motions in herds; since equal entities will maintain a parallel distance to allow informative communication *without interfering with the reproductive body of each point*. Darwinian behavior implies perpendicular confrontations, *to penetrate and absorb the energy of the other point*. Finally, *absolute, inner and outer self-similarity* brings bosonic states, which happen more often to simpler species like quarks and particles that can form a bosonic condensate as they do in black holes, *where the proximity of the points is maximized. And indeed, the same phenomenon between cells with the same inner information /DNA originates the ‘collapse’ of waves into tighter organisms.*

The 3^{rd} Non-Euclidean postulate is implicit in the work of Lobachevski and Riemann who defined spaces with the properties of self-similarity (Riemann’s homogeneity), which determines its closeness (Lobachevski’s adjacency).

– *4 ^{th} postulate:* Now because a plane has an inner volume – that of its points – it is a cellular, organic topography, a network of self-similar points. And because networks of points of energy and information are complementary, often we find systems with 2 complementary networks that form ever more complex geometries – based in the geometrical dualities of lineal energy and cyclical information – with the results we observe in nature:

*the creation of an enormous number of complementary systems which are, as we shall see latter, all of them self-similar in its geometries and functions. Thus,*the types of Non-Euclidean planes of space-time range from the simplest Euclidean planes to the more complex organisms with a volume given by the relative point/beings that form its space-time networks.

Thus, a plane becomes a real topography made of points with volume, extended as a cellular surface. We can observe its surface as a bidimensional membrane of information (for example your skin, or the screen of a computer made of pixels, or the sheet of this work). Or we can consider the 3-dimensional inner structure of its points and then it becomes a network with inner motions, as those points will form a lattice in which they communicate lineal flows of energy and information that maintain the lattice pegged. Often 2 topological planes of energy and form combine to create a 4-dimensional organism. Such is the most common structure of the Universe, a 4-dimensional World, which is a Universe in itself, made of self-similar cells or networks of points that constantly exchanges energy and information within the ecosystem in which it exists.

– *5 ^{th} postulate:* It defines points as informative knots or linguistic eyes – minds of information that absorb a flux of forces used by the point to perceive a relative world. A non-Euclidean point corresponds then to our concept of a relative mind that gauges the information reality with a certain force, similar to the concept of a monad in Leibniz relativistic space-time. In words of Einstein: a point of space is a fixed frame of reference.

Thus, Non-Euclidean mathematics fuses the logic and geometry of the fractal Universe, greatly improving our understanding of Reality even in terms of mechanist measure. Since mathematical solutions to problems with several points of view are impossible to find in continuous space (i.e. 3-body problem in gravitation), given the fact that a network of infinite points of view is local and relative and each point is a focal knot that acts from its perspective. Thus, the absolute truth of a system is the sum of all its points of view, which influence each other. Yet even if we cannot calculate precisely with mathematics, systems with more than 2 bodies, since those systems are organic, hierarchical, made of networks with attractor points, fractal structures and self-similar paths, the new mathematics of attractors, fractals, scales and Non-Euclidean systems, refine greatly our analysis. In essence, indeed, we observe that ‘networks’ integrate parts/points into wholes, which then ‘act’ as a single point. So in the complex models of i-logic geometry we can tackle many problems by defining sets of points as ‘wholes’ of a ‘higher space-time’.

But the most rewarding consequence of the new language of the mind is the ‘deep’ understanding of the meaning of many experimental facts about the species of the Universe till now merely explained as hows.

For example, the previous principle of local measure, where each point is a relative center of the Universe, is called in relativity the diffeomorphic principle, which now becomes explained as a partial case of the wider law we called the ‘Galilean paradox’; the duality particle of information/wave of energy becomes a specific case of the application to physics of the duality of energy and information found in all systems and so on.

The expansion of the laws of quantum theory (complementarity principle) and Relativity (relativity of scale, local measure, etc.) to other sciences and the organic principles of the 3^{rd} and 4^{th} postulate to physical particles is therefore the consequence of those postulates. Yet it requires the understanding of the new, i-logic, organic laws of the Universe and its networks, because E-mathematics has clear limits to extract all the information of the Universe, given the fact that it syntax includes a priori errors and simplifying postulates (single space-time continuum of points without parts, etc.).

Thus, when the event described is complex, performed by a great number of points/variables you enter into non-lineal systems, which require topological descriptions (chaotic attractors, fractal non-differentiable equations and Non-Euclidean mathematics), and the i-logic laws of organic networks and systems – a better syntax in which to fit experimental evidence, especially in phenomena of informative nature (since only formless energy is continuous and resembles the models built with a single arrow of energy and a single plane of space-time). So while classic physical systems calculate accurately the energetic, continuous properties of the Universe an overview on how multiple points of view emerge into wholes requires organic laws. Of course, this search of whys also applies to the understanding of mathematics. For example, the previous postulates resolve the long-standing question of what is the nature of the 3^{rd} and 5^{th} postulates that seemed redundant (as the 5^{th} describes also properties of a point like the first does, and the 3^{rd} seem to describe a non-geometrical property). They are no longer redundant, but they are more concerned with causal logic and time than spatial geometry in its purest forms (points, lines and planes.)

There is also self-similarity between the fractal postulates of i-logic geometry (since the 5^{th} is geometrically self-similar to the 1^{st}, as both are concerned with points) and the 4 dimensional time paths/arrows of the universe. This is not casual since all languages of space-times depict in self-similar ways the 4D Universe. Thus if the 1^{st} and 5^{th} postulates define *a gauging point of information* as the fundamental unit of the Universe, the 2^{nd} postulate defines a line or flow of communication of energy and information between 2 points, which *reproduces* part of the information of the ‘generator’ point across a surface of space; the 3^{rd} postulate defines those points, which are not similar as *energetic* substances that will be absorbed by the points. Yet if those points are self-similar they will gather through the arrow of eusocial love, creating according to the 4^{th} postulate a network of space/time, a new organic plane of existence. So the 4 arrows of space-time are explained by the 4 postulates of i-logic geometry.

Recap. The study of the geometric paths of Time Arrows with the tools of mathematics, explains the whys of mathematical laws: Geometry and topology acquire now its ‘why’: topology explains in detail the 3 canonical parts of all Points of view, while the i-logic postulates of geometry explain the universal structures that those points of view create.

In organic terms, the 5 postulates of fractal Geometry describe how points become parts of social webs, which self-organize fractal planes made of networks of points, which emerge as cellular units of a higher fractal space-time or new superorganism… Thus, according to the Principles of Correspondence and Relativity, proper of physical reality, those different geometries are relative descriptions of the same fundamental structure of the Universe: the point with parts and its more complex social forms, lines and planes. The fractal generator of the Universe is a logic equation that represents the main interactions between the arrows of time. Yet all languages mirror that logic equation in its syntax, since all minds gauge and represent the cycles of the Universe with languages of perception.

**1 ^{ST} POSTULATE: POINTS WITH PARTS: 3 FRACTAL, ORGANIC TOPOLOGIES **

**Topological Spaces. The why of geometrical forms.**

Reality is made of fractal points, which are knots of Time Arrows, able to perform energetic, informative and reproductive functions. As complex as one of those points-entities might be when observed in detail, *any fractal point is made of 3 regions whose geometry responds to the topological forms of a 4-DimensionalUniverse, the convex plane, the torus and the sphere. *

The Universe comes down to two bidimensional elements, energy and information, and its 4-dimensional combinations. Thus all entities can be described as wholes made of 3 internal parts whose geometrical properties maximize their energetic, informative and reproductive functions:

– Max Ti: an inner, dual center, corresponding to convex topologies (left), made with 2 cyclical forms. It is the dominant informative topology of any fractal organism, described by Belgrami in the XIX c. as a conical form with ‘height’, with negative curvature.

– <=>: A middle, reproductive zone, described by Klein as a disk of quanta in cyclical motion that communicate energy and information between the inner and outer zones.

– Max. E: An outer membrane of energy, described by Riemann’s spherical geometry.

When we see fractal points far away we describe them as points with breath, with the tools of Euclidean geometry since the ‘inner space’ shrinks to a point and so the ‘bulk’ or curvature of space-time shrinks to a plane. Yet, when we come closer to them, they grow into points with volume. The volume of those Fractal, Non-Euclidean points can thereafter be studied with the 3 types of canonical, Non-Euclidean geometries or topologies of a 4-Dimensional Universe – the Universe we live in. Those 3 topologies make up the 3 regions of the point, which correspond each one to the 3 essential arrows/functions of any species: the external, energetic membrane; the central, informative brain and its reproductive combination, exi.

It follows that the first part we observe in a point is the external membrane, which without detail seems to have a continuous, energetic appearance. But on close view, we observe most external membranes store and/or absorb information (Holographic principle) due to its fractal geometry. This can be generalized to any membrane which shows a ‘bidimensional surface’ that acquires more form, more ‘fractal steps’ when we come closer to it. Thus, the Holographic principle, which physicists know in the restricted field of black hole theory but can’t explain why exists, is both explained and extended to any bidimensional membrane of information. We find bidimensional, warped, fractal membranes that store information not only in black holes, but also in the development of organic senses, departing from the exoderm (external membrane of the fetus), in the seminal cells that reproduce life, formed as an outgrowth on the body surface (genital systems) or in the complex forms pegged to the surface/skin of the Mandelbrot and Julia sets, the best known mathematical fractals.

This external, energetic membrane has the topology of continuous surfaces called *the Riemann sphere*, which is the external surface of any point – the skin and limbs and any of its multiple self-similar entities, some of which are drawn at the bottom of the graphic. In any system of the Universe, the membrane acts as the energetic, external surface of the informative, point through which the point absorbs energy from the external Universe, to process it into information.

– The toroid, which is the body or reproductive region (seen as a cyclical path of space-time), which fills up the space-time between the nuclei and the external membrane. It is the zone where the reproductive organs of the system exist, and where the information of the system is born.

– Energy and information systems have inverse properties: energy is expansive, external, more extended, and information is implosive and smaller. Thus we find the informative head or system either on top of the reproductive body, with a spherical and smaller size or in the center, and its topologies will correspond to those of maximal form; the so-called *hyperbolic topology.* In the upper graph, it is the double ring, or convex, hyperbolic surface, with maximal form, or informative center of any entity of the Universe, the point in which the fractal reproduction of information reaches its zenith. It is the same form than the toroid but reproduced into a higher content of information, by doubling the initial form.

– Finally between both topologies of energy and information, the point will have a middle region of exchange of energy and form, made of cycles that go back and forth between those regions, which correspond to *the 3 ^{rd} canonical topology*. It is the torus, plane or Klein disk – a curved region of energy & information quanta, with cyclical motions, confined by 2 limits, an external, spherical membrane of max. energy and an internal informative nucleus. It must be noticed that according to Klein, the topologist that studied better this type of surface, the toroid is NOT really a fixed form of space, but we must consider those cycles’ motions and add the parameter of speed. Thus Klein introduces the Paradox of Galileo to describe the Non-Euclidean geometries of the Universe as we have done in this book. Cycles are mere static perceptions of motions and we must always consider distances as space-time distances. So we say: London is at 4 minutes distance because we consider distance and speed together. This is ultimately the meaning of time in physics, a measure of the speed of motion as a way to gauge space-distances: v=s/t.

In the graph, we observe several non-Euclidean points created by those 3 canonical topologies that can adopt multiple forms by deformation, but suffice to construct all the shapes of our Universe. Indeed, a topology is deformable. So an external membrane, which corresponds to the topology of a sphere, can become any shape, as long as it is not torn up, to enclose a reproductive and informative zone. So your skin is in topology a sphere, which encloses the complex forms of your reproductive organs. Those organs are Klein cycles of great complexity that exchange energy and information. Since those 3 topologies suffice to describe any 4-Dimensional form, it follows that the Universe is merely a puzzle of energetic, informative and reproductive parts, associated in ‘numbers’, groups and all kind of entities as those shown in the previous graph, from different sciences, which are created with those 3 topologies.

The 5 Non-Euclidean postulates and 3 topologies common to all species prove that all fractal points are complementary, made of regions that process spatial energy and regions that gauge temporal information, both of which exchange motion and form in cycles mediated by its intermediate, dynamic, reproductive ‘body’ region. This is what Lobachevski, Riemann and Klein discovered when they invented Non-Euclidean Geometries in the XIX c.: Euclidean space is a simplification of a moving space, made of points with volume that constantly trace cycles.

In a 4-D Universe there are only 3 topologies of space, which actually display the properties of energy, information or a combination of both, the 3 canonical topologies structure the inner geometry and functions of the organs of any species, proving the homology of all space-time fields in the Universe. In the graph, an animal, an embryo, an electromagnetic flow, a galaxy, a proton, a seed, a planet, a cell and a boson display the 3 topological zones of a fractal point, each of them performing 1 of the 3 functions/arrows of space-time.

Topology *describes the internal parts of Non-Euclidean points when we come closer to the ‘fractal point’ and see its formal parts in detail, as we do in the last graph, with several* systems of Nature made of those 3 topological regions that correspond to the 3 main arrows of time of each of those systems:

*Information x Energy = Reproduction*

Time arrows are performed within each space/time point by one of the 3 topological regions, which explain causal processes of transformation of energy unto information as topological transformations. While the 4^{th} arrow of social evolution, which requires more than a point, is described by the 2^{nd} and 4^{th} postulates of lines and planes.* *Thus* *Topology confirms a fundamental tenant of Multiple Spaces-Times, the 4-dimensionality of the ‘Holographic Universe’ made of bidimensional energy and information, which combine its properties to create the ‘visible’, bulky regions between the informative center and energetic membrane of those points.

Each of the 3 elements of fractal points displays the properties of one of the 3 Time Arrows: the center has height, it accumulates information and it is small. The external membrane is larger, continuous and protects the system. The intermediate zone reproduces the information given by the center with the energy absorbed by the membrane creating new energetic and informative bites and bits, which latter migrate towards the other 2 zones.

– Informative particles accumulate in the inner region as units of the central brain. Or, if they are seeds, they migrate to the surface of energy *where they become fractal systems of information, senses in organisms, informative human beings in the Earth-crust, ovules in mothers*. And once detached, they start a fractal, reproductive, palingenetic process.

– Energetic particles migrate to the membrane, becoming parts of a discontinuous protective shield. So in a cell we find mitochondria that produce energetic proteins and RNA for the surface membrane.

The internal, reproductive region happens also in all systems. In the human body the organs reproduce the cells needed for the blood network and the hormones and products used by the brain. In a galaxy, the intermediate region produces energetic stars and informative black holes, which migrate to the central region; in an ecosystem, the territory of the informative center, the predator, produces preys in which the predator feeds, bringing them to its central den.

*Recap*: The fundamental Particle of the Universe is neither physical nor spiritual but logic-mathematical: the fractal point described by the Laws of Non-Euclidean, fractal Geometry and topology, as an entity which becomes more complex when we come closer to it, till we can differentiate its 3 regions, corresponding to the 3 topologies of a 4-dimensional Universe: an energetic membrane, an informative center, and an exchange zone of bites of energy and bits of information between both.

**4. Formalism of i-logic geometry. Causal Algebra.**

The ternary structure of all points formed by the 3 topologies of a 4D Universe can be expressed with the symbols of the ‘Generator Equation of energy and form’:

– Max. Σ S: An external membrane or of max. extension, described by Riemann’s spherical geometry.

– <=>: A middle, reproductive plane or *toroid*, whose cyclical paths happen between the skin/boundary of a sphere and a central hole, described by Klein as a disk, made of quanta in cyclical movements that communicate energy and information between the inner and outer zones.

– Max. Ti. The inner, dual center – a convex hyperbolic, informative, central couple of disks, which display maximal form in minimal space, with a growing dimension of height that touches the poles of the sphere and channels the flows of energy and information of the system. It is the dominant informative topology of any fractal organism, described by Belgrami in the XIX c. as a conical form with height with negative curvature.

Since function is form, those 3 topologies are perfectly suited to perform the 3 temporal functions of any super-organism: energy feeding, reproduction and information.

So we can write with causal arrows the topology of each point and its 3 regions: ΣS < EXI> Ti.

The 3 non-Euclidean geometries structure the geometry and functions of the organs of any species, proving the homology of all space-time fields in the Universe. In the graph, an animal, an embryo, an electromagnetic flow, a galaxy, a proton, a seed, a planet, a cell and a boson display the 3 topological zones of a fractal point, each of them performing 1 of the 3 functions/arrows of space-time.

There is in that sense only a small correction to classic topology needed to fully understand the structure of organic systems with the 3 topologies of reality. In topology we distinguish two types of spaces called closed balls and opened balls. Open balls are spheres with a center ‘a’ and a maximal distance/radius, r (from a to its surface), defined by all the points x, such as x < r (therefore an open ball does not include the surface or perimeter r); and closed balls are spheres which include all points x≤ r.

In i-logic geometry, all organisms are both, closed and opened balls, depending on our perspective.

As closed balls they include the 3 regions, previously described which are, a, the hyperbolic center; r, the perimeter; and x, the points of the intermediate space.

The intermediate space is on the other hand, an open ball, which does not include the membrane, r, as it constantly exchanges energy and information with the external universe; *but it does not include either a, the center, so it is also opened inwards, to the information system.*

This is for example, the case of a black hole, which is wrongly understood in classic physics, *since the black hole has 3 regions, a, the singularity, ∑ x, the quark-gluon soup of extreme density, whose cyclical mass vortex are the black hole in itself, and r, the event horizon, which is not the black hole per se, but the membrane of exchange of energy with our electromagnetic space the black hole warps and feeds on.*

*Recap*: In a discontinuous Universe there are infinite fractal points, but all of them are composed of the same 3 ΣS, EXI, Ti zones; the external membrane, the intermediate region and the inner center.

**Mathematical description of the 3 regions of a st-point**

The complex analysis of those fractal points that move and have inner fractal parts, made of cycles, started in the XIX century. First Lobachevski, a Russian geometrician, defined Non-Euclidean points as curved forms, crossed by multiple lines, which give them spatial volume. Then Klein studied its cyclical movement and introduced the variable of time in their description. Finally Riemann generalized its nature, considering that all space-times were Non-Euclidean space-times with movement. For readers versed in mathematics, we shall reconsider the common properties of those 3 zones of any fractal point, according to its discoverers, which develop in abstract terms the organic properties we just described:

–* According to Lobachevski and Belgrami,* space is curved since information curves the energy of any real space-time. So points move in curved, cyclical paths gathering energy and information for their inner ‘dimensional networks’.

*– According to Klein* Non-Euclidean space-times have motion. So their speeds measure distances; as physicists do in Cosmology with the distances of galaxies, which are proportional by a ‘Hubble constant’ to their speeds; or as people do in real life when we say that Brooklyn is at 5 minutes by train from Manhattan not at 2 miles.

*– Riemann* summoned up those findings and generalized them to all possible space-times. His work should be the guide to understand them philosophically. He also defined planes as networks of similar points and treated dimensions, as we do in this work, no longer as mere abstract definitions of extensions but as ‘properties of those points’. So points can have beyond its discontinuous borders an inner space-time with several networks/dimensions, one for each of its ‘energetic or informative properties’, as it happens with the points of physical reality. Yet a network of points that form a space with ‘common properties’ defines the dimensions of those points as ‘fractal dimensions’, limited by the extension of the energy or informative network (static point of view), which ‘puts together’ a complementary dual, organic being.

Those pioneers defined the 3 topologies of information, energy and reproduction of all st-points:

*– Max. Information: The informative, fractal center, particle or brain of the point is the so-called Belgrami hemisphere,* a space-time with a dimension of height that transforms energy into information, absorbed or emitted by the central singularity. It is a fractal, informative region similar to a black hole structure. Since it follows the ‘black hole paradox’ of all informative centers, displaying max. form in min. space. So according to the inverse properties of space and time, the center has max. Informative Time and minimal Energetic Space. Moreover any point which comes closer to it, suffers a mutation of its spatial coordinates into informative, height dimensions. This is the case of any particle coming to a black hole, whose space-dimensions become temporal/informative dimensions as it rises in height.

The center has more information because its geometry has at least 2 fractal disks, which channel and transform the energy absorbed through the surface into complex information. Regardless of the complexity of the entity, the structural function of the hyperbolic center as a system that process the information of the network remains. For example, in living systems, those disks might evolve its topology till becoming the relative energy center or ’heart’ of the blood network with 4 divisions; or evolve further its hyperbolic geometry till becoming the informative center or ‘brain’ of the system, attached to the informative network.

*– Max. Space: An external, continuous membrane or Riemann’s sphere of maximal energy* that acts as a relative infinite, unreachable distance. The membrane isolates the point as an island Universe, creating the discontinuity between the inner parts of the point and the outer universe. Since the internal cellular points are either jailed by the membrane’s structural density or destroyed by its energy when touching it. The membrane is the opposite form to the central, informative singularity, with max. spatial extension and continuity, hence with a minimal number of fractal, discreet elements: *Max.ΣSe**=Min.Ti*.

Thus *all Fractal points are ‘inner worlds’ whose membrane creates a discontinuity that defines an External Universe or* outer world from where the point obtains its energy and information. However the membrane is also the zone through which the point emits its reproduced micro-forms of information, and so it displays ‘sensorial holes’ to relate the point to the external Universe. And those points, despite being discontinuous, will have in their external membrane several generic openings or ‘senses’ joined to the informative networks or ‘brains’ and energetic, ‘digestive networks’ of the organic system:

* – Max. +ΣSe: A* ‘*mouth*’ or opening that absorbs energy.

* -Max. –ΣSe: *‘*Cloacae*’, through which the cyclical body expels its temporal energy.

–*Max.+Ti: An* ‘*eye*’ through which the informative center receives external information.

–*Max.–Ti: An* ‘*antenna*’ to emit information.

Those apertures vary in their number, location and size, depending on the form of the point. In the simplest spherical ‘seeds’ of most species, they are mostly situated in 3 regions:

* – Max. ΣS*: The Equator of the system, through which the membrane absorbs energy.

* – ΣS=Ti*: The Tropics where often the same opening emits and absorbs temporal energy.

*– Max.Ti*: The Poles or points of confluence between the membrane and its central informative region of height, which hits perpendicularly the membrane on those poles. North and South Poles orientate Anti-symmetrically, acting as 2 relative, negative and positive apertures, communicated by the height dimension of the singularity or Belgrami hemisphere. Thus the Positive Pole absorbs temporal energy that crosses through the central singularity where it is absorbed and ejected to the intermediate region where it is re-elaborated before its emission through the negative Pole.

*– ΣS*<=>*Ti: The reproductive, central region, which combines Energy and Information: *

In all fractal points there is an inner middle volume or intermediate territory, discovered by Klein, which combines the energy coming out of the external, spherical, topological membrane and the information provided by the convex, complex formal center.

According to Non-Euclidean mathematics this region is made of self-similar points that form groups, fractal herds of ‘points with parts’ in perpetual movement, that draw cycles of parallel lines, between the other 2 regions, as they gather the energy and information they need to survive. And they create space by cycling within the other 2 regions.

In many fractal points the informative and energetic centers establish 2 opposite flows of energy and information that become the negative/ positive poles. So often, the particles of the intermediate region cycle around the inner region tracing elliptical trajectories, focused by those 2 informative points. It is the case of any bipolar system, from binary stars, one dominant in energy and the other an informative neutron star or black hole; to bimolecular systems or n-p pairs in the nuclei of atoms. The same duality of 2 specialized centers controlling a common territory, or vital space happens in biology where most species have male-energetic and female-informative genders, ruling a common territory.* *

Such abstract conceptual space describes in fact the behaviour and form of many real, spatial herds. For example, a herd of animals in an ecosystem will move between their hunting and water fields (where they gather energy) and their breeding, inner region where they reproduce information, making cyclical trajectories between both regions. In this manner, they occupy a vital space, called a ‘territory’, which shows the properties of a Non-Euclidean Klein space. A fundamental property of the intermediate space is the fact that it is confined between the other 2 regions, which are never reached in the cyclical trajectories of the inner cells of the space. For example, in a cell, the molecules of the organism will not touch the protein membrane or the central DNA nuclei. Thus, the inner quanta are confined within the Klein’s disk by the 2 other regions, which have more energy and information and might destroy them and/or absorb their energy and information at will.

In abstract terms*, *mathematicians* *introduced in the XIX c. the concept of an *infinite, relative distance *measured no longer in terms of static space but in terms of time and movement, as *the distance between the point and a region that cannot be reached*. Thus Klein defines a relative infinity, as the region beyond the discontinuous membrane whose insurmountable borders the inner time-space quanta can’t cross, as a cell cannot go out of a body, an atom beyond C speed or 0 K temperature and a man beyond the Earth’s atmosphere. Thus, the informative center and external membrane become the 2 relative infinities or limits that the movements of the intermediate point cannot breach.

As in the myth of Achilles and the turtle, Achilles never arrives because every time he moves he crosses a smaller spatial distance. The same happens in a fractal space-time, when a point moves *temporally* towards its inner or outer space-time limit and finds an increasing resistance to its movement, till finally it is deviated into a cyclical trajectory around the outer, energetic membrane or the height dimension of the inner informative singularity or is destroyed. So the intermediate, fractal cells of the point circulate in parallel cycles always inside the interior of the sphere with contact zones of the type A *(central, 2 ^{nd} row of figures in the previous graph). *

*In a human organism, the blood system might seem infinite for the red cells that transport energy since they never reach the outer Universe. *For that reason in the drawing, Klein interprets the intermediate region of the Non-Euclidean point as an infinite *circle with an invisible, unreachable membrane,* whose motion-distance is unreachable, hence infinite, equalling the ‘space-time distance’ between the intervals B1-B2 (long) and B2-B3 (short but difficult to cross), despite being B2-B3 increasingly shorter in space. Since the quanta take longer in each step and don’t reach the membrane. This is often due to an increase in the ‘density’ of the space, which despite having less distance has more ‘points’ in its network, such as the case of black holes or jails. When those inner points reach the membrane at point C they become destroyed or deviated.

Thus, the energetic membrane and informative center are the discontinuities that isolate the intermediate cellular quanta, creating a discontinuous ‘World’ within the point. Those discontinuities are called in Geometry a relative infinite, in Biology a membrane, in Sociology or Topology a national border, in fractal theory a co-dimension of a point. They are defined in physics by Lorenz Transformations that make c-the limit of energetic speed and 0 k the limit of temporal, formal stillness. Yet those physical limits are not the limits of an absolute Universe, but the limits of the fractal space-time membrane of light and its evolved electroweak beings, since the Universe has at least another bigger gravitational membrane, in which the smaller light-space exists; a fact with enormous repercussions for a proper description of the Cosmos, which extends beyond those limits. Since the gravitational scale should be faster than light-speed forces and cooler than 0 K masses.

*Recap: *Fractal points are organic points, whose topologies maximize the energetic, reproductive and informative cycles they perform. The details of those cycles are described by Non-Euclidean topologies.

**Dimensions of the 3 regions: Holographic Universe.**

In terms of dimensions the spherical membrane and inner informative singularity are bidimensional fields: The central singularity is a bidimensional surface of convex in/form/ation that curves the external spatial energy coming through the bidimensional membrane, creating together the 4-dimensional quanta of the intermediate region. For example, physical models of the inner nuclei of atoms made of informative quarks, define them as bidimensional, convex singularities. Black holes are said to store bidimensional information in its external membrane or black hole horizon. The computer screen or sheet of a book stores bidimensional information. The vacuum energy of the galaxy has a planar form, etc.

A 2^{nd} consequence of the inner volume of points is a rational explanation of bidimensionality. Since now points have a minimal volume a bidimensional sheet of information has in fact a minimal height, but since reality is fractal and size is relative, from the ‘giant’ p.o.v. of our perception that depth of a sheet of paper or computer screen is a relative ‘zero’, yet makes bidimensionality ‘real’.

*Recap*: informative regions have more dimensions of form than energetic topologies, more extended in space.

**Morphological change and informative dominance.**

Natural organisms start as spherical seeds of information and then through morphogenesis differentiate in 3 functional regions that ensure the capacity of the system to process energy and information and reproduce itself, surviving in the Darwinian Universe.

As the species changes and evolves into more complex shapes those functional zones are kept. For example, the informative egg evolves into the energetic, lineal larva or young phase of most insects, by *translating *the inner, informative center to the dominant, forward head region and the external membrane to the ‘tail’, but both functions are preserved. Thus the inner informative regions migrate through the informative dimension of height to the dominant zone of the system. Yet the dominance of the informative center is not compromised:

* *In all systems we find a core/brane that acts as the dominant region of the organism and display paradoxically less spatial extension than the other regions they rule. It is the smaller nucleus of cells, humans and galaxies generates its information (DNA, human brain/eye system, galactic black hole, CPU (central processing unit) in computers, etc.)

In a galaxy the halo of dark matter and the central black hole dominate and seem to feed and form the radiant matter of which we are made. In man, the informative brain, extended through the central spine and senses, dominate the reproductive body and guide it.

The 2^{nd} region in importance is the ‘body’ or reproductive region, which absorbs energy from the limbs that become imprinted by the system’s information.

And finally the 3^{rd} region of the system, which is easier to renew, due to its formal simplicity is the energetic region, the skin, limbs and membranes, which brings energy to the intermediate region to allow the reproduction of the information stored in the center or head of the system.

Given the ∞possible deformations of those 3 unique topologies of 4-D space-time, reality creates an enormous variety of species, from an original seed of spherical information that develops those 3 regions in morphologies that soon resemble energy lines, reproductive cycles and information centers.

Our energetic region extends in lineal limbs; reproductive cells group into organs, becoming the body; while the informative centers move to the height dimensional and multiply its cellular forms in the sensorial boundaries of the head.

All those processes studied by morphogenesis, can now be explained not only in its how but its why.

*Recap*: The 3 relative forms of energy (external membrane), information (dual ring) and reproduction (the cyclical paths that exchange energy and information between the external membrane and the inner convex form), can be found in any system of reality. In all those systems, the informative region dominates the bigger, simpler reproductive body.

**The ternary structure of all Universal systems.**

The 3 functional topologies of a Non-Euclidean point become the 3 regions of all Natural organisms:

Atoms have a central, informative mass of quarks, spatial, electronic membranes and fields of gravitational and electromagnetic forces exchanged between them. Those 3 topologies also describe the galactic structure: the central black hole is the hyperbolic, informative topology, the Halo of the galaxy is a Riemannian, spherical form, and the stars in the intermediate region, which feed the dark matter of black holes and reproduce the atoms of life, turn in cyclical, toroid paths around the central black hole.

Physical space-time is the simplest world where the most basic morphologies play that same process of transformation of external energy that converges and reproduces cycles, attracted by a Non-Euclidean point, charge or mass: E=Mc2.

Cells have lineal, external membranes of proteins, which are a deformation of a Riemann sphere, an informative nucleus and in between they are invaginated by all kind of e<=>i cycles that transfer energy and information from the outer world to the cell.

Finally, a human being has a reproductive body, lineal, energetic limbs and a cyclical head, with an informative, smaller brain, composed of two hemispheres, which are hyperbolic, convex, warped forms, corresponding to the informative dual ring of a Belgrami cone. The hyperbolic, highly warped brain is a double toroid, self-similar to the hyperbolic topology of informative cycles. And so the brain hosts more information in lesser space than the body, as a mirror of its functions. Man though, while responding to the same canonical topologies in his organs, is by far the most complex being of information known in the Universe. And so his topologies are immensely more complex than the simpler physical particles and its transformations just described.

*Recap*: All systems of the Universe are made with the 3 canonical regions of a non-e point, which perform the 3 arrows/functions of all existential beings. Galaxies show the topology of non-Euclidean point, with a complex informative black hole of maximal mass, an energetic membrane of dark matter, and an intermediate region of reproductive stars that create the atoms of the cosmos. Human beings have also 3 ternary regions, the cyclical, hyperbolic informative brain, the reproductive body and its organs that produce the energetic bites and informative bits of the organism and the lineal limbs that cause our motions.

** **

**V. 5 ^{TH} POSTULATE: I-LOGIC POINTS OF VIEW**

**Fractal points gauge information with infinite parallels.**

The fact that all points interact with the external Universe is explained by the 5^{th} postulate of Fractal Logic, which completes the 1^{st} postulate. The 5^{th} postulate defines a point as a knot of communication of multiple flows of energy and form, which the point absorbs to obtain energy and information for its organic cycles of iteration.

Thus we introduce a new perspective in our study of a Non-Euclidean, fractal point *of view*: its capacity to gauge information and absorb energy, acting-reacting to the Universe. Since beyond those 3 internal regions the point feeds on an external world of relative forces, which provide the point with energy and information to map out reality and feed its body with motion. Thus, while energy and form will be different for each point according to the scale and form, all entities of the Universe will be able to absorb a relative number of ‘infinite parallels’ to create mental fractal mappings and keep on moving: light feeds particles, intergalactic gas feeds stars; plants feed animals that feed man; stars feed the black hole, and so on.

In science, mathematicians and physicists seek to describe reality as ‘made of mathematical entities’; while logicians try to explain reality as a series of causal events. But only when we use i-logic geometry we can mix both approaches, describing reality as a series of ‘mathematical points of view’, or entities that ‘gauge’ the geometry of the Universe, constantly mapping out the universe, to achieve a ‘selfish’ will, the desire of all entities to feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially. Those points of view are thus ‘mathematical minds’ because they gauge and somehow ‘perceive’ the geometry of the Universe, acting according to that geometry as they gauge and move with an ‘automatic’ behavior, trying to absorb energy for their body, information for their gauging mind, and combining both, to reproduce ‘self-similar points’. So we shall consider that the Universe is made of i-logic, fractal ‘points of view’, akin to the concept of souls and Atmans in western and eastern religions’, of ‘Non-Euclidean points of view’, ‘monads’ or ‘Spinoza’s geometrical entities’, in western philosophy of science and mathematics; of ‘gauging particles’ in physics, or ‘informative DNA nuclei’ in biology and perceptive heads in biology. The size and form of all those points varies but all of them are spherical knots of information with sensorial apertures to absorb and emit energy and information, from bosonic particles to sound waves or light signals.

Leibniz, the first philosopher of modern science, which considered points as the ‘fundamental particle’ of the Universe departed from the hypothesis that all what exists can be reduced to such points of view, he called Monads. Yet those monads could either share energy and information between themselves as they do on reality or become static, perfect non-communicative points. This easier choice – non-communicative points of view – was Mr. Leibniz’s error. Since the points of the universe are in perpetual communication as parts of networks of self-similar points, sharing flows of energy and information – waves of forces. The essence of any point of any relative space-time is precisely to be in constant communication with the Universe as a ‘knot’ of Time Arrows, which shares flows of energy and information with other points, creating the network-spaces of which reality is made. Points that communicate energy and information, that feed and gauge are real. What is the proper name for all those logic parts that exist, for all those points of space that perceive, gauge information, and act-react to it under a simple program of ‘survival’: grow and reproduce, exist, repeat yourself? We call them a Non-Euclidean point of view. And we affirm the Universe is made of such type of *points of view.*

Thus ‘mathematical, Non-Euclidean points of view’, whose ‘motions’ have a ‘will’ or ‘purpose’ – gauging information, feeding on energy and reproducing themselves’ – become the logic and geometric units that shape the networks of energy and information of reality, thanks to their capacity to communicate and share energy and form. Such type of points are more akin to the view of Eastern philosophers that consider the Universe made of ‘atmans’, which are knots of communication that anchor a certain entity to the world that surrounds them, which is only a part of the total Universe.

Since those mathematical points of view exist in many different fractal space-times or ‘scales of existence’ in which they gauge information with different languages and perceive different ‘worlds’ within their minds.

If you are a particle – an electron – you will see only light (energy) and darkness, and you will move to the light that feeds you, as we observe in electrons. If you are a human eye you will see all type of colors but red will be the color of energy that ‘feeds and attracts your eye (so you see bloody movies and like red meat). So there are an infinite number of types of organic points of view with different mental worlds, which gather into social networks that exist in different ‘planes of existence’ or ‘scale of reality’. Yet in all those systems the same game of ‘gauging’, ‘feeding’, ‘reproducing’ and evolving socially takes place.

We exist in a Universe, whose fundamental particle is not a material form, as simple science thinks, but points of time space, which mirror in their inner, i-logic, fractal topologies the information of their world, acting-reacting to the Universe. Thus only by mixing perception and motion, mathematics and organicism, we can define those points of existence, as the fundamental particles of reality and:

*‘The Universe has a body and a soul called logos.’* Plato

So we describe a Universe with a geometrical how, the laws of Non-Euclidean points of views, the cycles they trace, the mathematical laws that describe those cycles; and a bio-logical, temporal why: the will to move, trying to fulfill the 6 arrows of time. It is the game that all P.O.Vs of all planes of existences, from atoms to human beings perform.

Those logic and mathematical laws of points of view are the metaphysical laws of the Universe – *the only essential events/forms that repeat unchanged in all forms. *And so, a proper description of the Universe should start with the laws of i-logic geometry; then apply them to the 2 simplest motions of reality, lineal forces and cyclical masses/charges; and then, once those ‘immortal laws’ are defined for any system of energy and information, science should use them to define the specific events of each scale of reality and its species, as we all play the same Game of Exi=stence.

*Recap. *A Universe made of motions in time, extending through multiple scales of relative space, requires evolving the human languages of space (Euclidean geometry) and time (Aristotelian logic), used to describe the simpler space-time continuum of classic science. This task started by the pioneers of modern science (Riemann, Darwin, Planck and Einstein) must be completed before we can study the properties of physical and biological entities with the new tools of Non-Euclidean mathematics, which describe a world of multiple, relative space-time networks made of points as Complementary entities with energetic and informative system or ‘Points of view’ and the new tools of Non-Aristotelian logic, which describe the creation of the future by multiple causes – all the points of view or agents that create a certain network space.* *

**The equation of the mind.**

The 5 i-logic postulates define the unit of reality as a fractal point that observed in detail is in itself a World, which contains within it all the mathematical topologies of the 4D cosmos. This can be deduced in a logic manner, through the equation of a mind/p.o.v., which can map out as a mirror the whole Universe we perceive in its infinitesimal mirror.

In the fractal Universe all systems of i-logic information gauge reality, transforming a force they absorb into a logic language, which mirrors the Universe. It is obvious that the essential particles, quarks, photons and electrons cannot have a wide mapping of reality unless the fractal scales of size are infinite (and then an atom might be the upper bound of a new scale – a nano-galaxy).

Yet even if reality has upper and lower limits of size and point-like particles are not fractal world but the limit of universal form, those simple particles still gauge information and store some type of logic, mathematical computer-like structure that allows them to behave as they do, organically. Since particles orientate their position in a herd of self-similar particles; they move towards light, its energy, when the electromagnetic field is in its neighborhood and they decouple=reproduce into new particles when they absorb more energy. All those properties are the minimal properties we ascribe to a fractal ‘point of view’ or ‘mind’ in a broad sense – a structure that gauges energy and information, creating smaller fractal mirrors of reality. Such structure has within itself a minimal amount of geometric paths and logic processes that allow it to form the forces it uses as energy and information source. We thus call such structure a mind. Since any point of the Universe becomes a focus of infinite parallel forces that flux into the point, creating a static image of reality in Complexity, we define a Mind, as an infinitesimal mirror-world that reflects the infinite Universe:

*0 (Mind-cell) *×* ∞ (Universe) = Linguistic Wor(l)d*

The equation of the mind, defined by the 1^{st} and 5^{th} postulates of illogic geometry, sets limits of truth in linguistic science, comparing the worlds created by any mind and the Universe at large, much bigger than any informative, mental, linguistic image we have of it.

It is however the why that explains why entropy doesn’t dominate the Universe; since now the increase of order and information in the Universe is mainly caused by those ‘perceptive points’ that gauge information.

Those points might or might not be conscious in a vegetative or reflexive way, depending on its complexity; but they are ‘aperceptive’ – an expression coined by Leibniz to express perception without consciousness. And so they have a will to order and perceive more information, not only a will to feed and increase their energy. And so there are two ‘wills’ of feeding and gauging common to all points, which we can measure objectively, externally by the fact that when energy appears, particle move towards energy (so electrons jump and feed on light) and when other particles appear they gauge their distances. We observe this property in all systems when they form a focus, which emerges *as the point* of maximal order in which the network of the system integrates its information. Then the system becomes more stable: A crystal grows faster when the network creates a central point. A hurricane can be destroyed when the central, still point where all the flows converge is disturbed. A life being becomes erratic in its motions when it becomes blind.

A galaxy acquires order when a black hole, which probably gauges gravitational information, appears in its center. The existence of an infinite number of such points is undeniable objectively and adds an enormous amount of order to the Universe, which mechanist science does not account for. Stillness to focus information into a pixeled map of the Universe, and the existence of a network that fluxes in that point through which ‘infinite parallels’ can cross, are the two conditions of formation of gauging points. Then we can establish the birth of a complementary network of energy and information*, an exi=stential point*: exi=k; where k represents a ‘mapping of reality’ in the informative language that the waves of communication of the point with the external universe have created.* This means that the models of metric measure developed by mechanist science merely creates a ‘space-time world’ self-similar to the mind of man in our machines, which does not exhaust all the measures of the Universe and its possible mappings. *

We cannot construct if we want to account for all the cycles of time, dark spaces and events of reality, a theory based only in a continuum, mechanical, light-space and its Euclidean coordinates of light-measure. The limits of that model have been reached, as the limits of precision of the Ptolemy’s model of astronomy were reached in the Renaissance.

Those limits of an Euclidean, continuum space-time were proved by Riemann, Poincare, Mandelbrot and this author, expanding and completing the Euclidean postulates. Einstein applied part of those new models and created Relativity Theory. This work applies the rest of those discoveries to create a model of Multiple Space-times, which includes the concept of absolute relativity, where measure – the gauging and mapping of the external universe by a non-Euclidean point, is relative to the observer and the rods of measure it uses.

*Recap*: All entities of the Universe gauge information and act-react to the external world. Thus we consider all entities to have a mind – an internal, linguistic mapping of reality made with those forces.

**The human point of view: I = Eye + Wor(l)d**

That all what you see is a construction of the mind is the main tenant of philosophy of knowledge, from Plato’s world of ideas to Descartes’ devil putting reality inside us, from Schopenhauer’s world ‘in the eye’ to Schrodinger’s cat.

We are an I=Eye+Wor(l)d, a mind of 2 languages, as the other languages of sensorial experience, touch, smell and taste are irrelevant. We can exist without them. We see and verbalize reality, converting ‘whatever is beyond’ in geometrical images with the eye and temporal chains with verbs of past, present and future.

At present, the I=Eye has been highly developed in science due to instruments, mechanisms made of metal, a better atom than our paltry 1-6-7-8, HCNO structures. So we have pictures of all kind of scales of reality, from the infinitesimal atom to the galaxy. Beyond those scales things become blurred. Yet curiously enough the parameters of atoms and galaxies in terms of energy and information are self-similar. Is this because each atom is a galaxy of a nano-universe, or because our Mind, who measures, gets an aberration of distance parallel in atoms and galaxies?

That the mind’s scalar and continuous distance from those 2 realities, might cause our perception to equalize forms of atoms and galaxies is a way of thought proper of our awareness that all what we see is information already ‘cooked’ by the mind, ‘deformed’ and ‘transmuted’ by the Maya of the senses. We are not seeing the real Universe. We are a geometrical and verbal mind, which applies geometric and causal categories to interpret reality. And so all what we can talk is about the 3 dimensions of our spatial perception and the 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future, explained by our verbs. Hence, the importance of evolving our mind languages to have a better mirror in the smaller scale of the brain, reflecting the entire Universe. But the linguistic Maya, the ‘a priori’ mind who perceives, the I=eye+wor(l)d will always be limiting our truths.

The 3 dimensions of space perceived mathematically and the 3 ages of time perceived verbally are thus the last components of reality, which reflect the paths and arrows of time deployed by each species of each scale:

– In time, we observe constantly forms being born, going through an energetic big-bang, growth, maturity and then a still, solid warped stage before death.

– In space, we see 3 topological regions that correspond to energetic, reproductive and informative functions.

The total Universe is the only entity that stores all the information about itself. We exist as a dialog between the image of the Universe of our eye and the verbal information we extract from it, our I.

Humanity lives in a light-space world which scientists measure with machines and artists with the linguistic mapping of our senses, created with our inner languages.

Scientists in that sense are creating a new EyeóMind, the mind of machines that also measure space and time:

*Mechanical Eye <=>** Digital Thought.*

Indeed, scientists are *not* discovering the absolute truth of reality but creating a more complex Linguistic World, a world of digital thoughts and images that future perceptive machines will use to control reality. And because that world of mathematical and instrumental perception has more information than the human IóWor(l)d, on the long term A.I. robots might extinguish us, as superior minds/bodies. Of course, scientists do not understand this because they think the machine is an extension of their ego.

Ultimately we exist within our mind and so our truth is a subjective, human truth developed with our languages. We do not see the external world of quantum fluctuations but what our light/electronic mind creates, *extracting only a part of the total reality to map visually the Universe, reduced to a light-space world*. Our ego, our consciousness is and eye <=> Wor(l)d, a fractal space/time dialog between our informative mind, the wor(l)d and our energetic space, the eye:

*‘I think and see therefore I exi=st’*

So we are indeed a fractal equation/function of existence:

*The Human Mind: E (Eye) *<=>* **I (Wor(l)d).*

Minds are focused, ‘Aristotelian Gods’, defined in his metaphysics as unmoved, intelligent brains around which energy flows and ‘bodies’ turn, as they move the mind. Stillness is indeed the nature of mind perception. Even if reality is a moving fractal soup, our eye is not out of focus because its virtual images are still, like the pictures of a film that stops in front of the camera. Both images, in the eye and the camera, only move and change when we blink our eyes or the camera closes its window, stopping our perception. Thus, perception is also a stop and go process that focuses a still image through the senses and then processes that information into a thought, while the eye-senses are blinking, closed and the reproductive body moves slightly the eye-mind. In the human case that stop and go, perceive and move rhythm lasts a second, our ‘dharma’ of relative present-existence in which we create a still, simultaneous mental image of the Universe. Each second our fractal, informative mind closes a mental, cyclical act of perception:

*Cycles of temporal energy=>sensorial in-forma-tion =>Brain-clock of time.*

Truth is given by the languages of the mind. A truth is a mental/linguistic mirror of information within the mind that reflects the external universe.

Thus, unlike the naïve realism sponsored by physicists, a fundamental thesis of Systems sciences is to consider there is much more information in the Universe than the one we can perceive. Since each mind needs to select its information. Because each mind has a limited quantity of vital space, it can store only a limited quantity of linguistic ‘information’ about the cycles performed by other entities in the Universe, and so it selects only those pieces of energy and information that give an accurate depiction of the world in which the entity finds its energy and information and other self-similar species to reproduce and evolve socially. The rest of the Universe thus becomes a relative dark space.

Since the Universe is a game of entities of energy and information, relative ‘points of view’ that search for more energy and information to reproduce themselves and survive as self-similar ‘logic forms’, that game of survival has imposed limits to the information we perceive, maximizing information that ensures the *reproductive* and social games, t*he ultimate will of the Universe* that ensures the ‘durability’ of each point of view, which will only exist beyond its ‘caducity date’, if it is able to repeat its energy and information into a self-similar being that continues the game of existence, once the original form is broken.

The 5^{th} postulate combined with the analysis of the internal parts of a point and the trajectories of the cycles that the flows of energy and information between points follow, defines not only philosophical questions like perception and the nature of fractal information, but the fundamental causal arrow of time of the Universe: Energy->Information.

Since the flows of forces absorbed by the point create the ‘reality’ we see by constructing an image which is not there – the world as an ‘idea’ (Schopenhauer); that is the world-mind, the I=Eye+ wor(l)d we perceive, different from that of other species that perceive with other forces and minds.

*Recap*: The human mind, and probably all other minds/systems of information use 2 basic language of perception, a geometrical language able to perceive space and a logic language, able to perceive time. Humans perceive space with visual images and time with logic words. We are an I=eye+wor(l)d. Yet other species should use other versions of those 2 geometric/spatial and logic /temporal languages. For example, the complexity of visual languages ranges from a simple light/dark, on/off switch in simple particles to the simple geometrical motions of particles, to the richness of visual perception in animal eyes. While the complexity of Logic chains of events ranges from simple Aristotelian chains, A->B, which define the simplest arrows of Time (feeding, where A is energy that becomes B, the food of the predator), performed by all entities, to complex social networks in which causality is multiple, as each informative ‘neuron’ of the network relates through its axons to all the other cells of the informative system.

** The linguistic method and the ternary principle.**

Our world is the creation of a space-time mind. Our ego is an image of our exi=stential self-made of eye-spatial experiences and verbal temporal feelings. Within those restrictions truth will always be related to the languages of the mind. Thus a truth will be higher when our linguistic image of reality has better ‘syntax’ to parallel the exi=stential syntax of the Universe (the generator equation, EóI), with our 3 languages: logic, temporal words, geometrical, spatial mathematical and visual images, which are the 3 legs that put together create a scientific truth:

*Scientific, linguistic truth= Experimental, visual data + Logic, temporal truth + geometric, spatial truth.*

Yet beyond our scientific/mechanical and human/artistic senses, beyond our I=eye+word, based in light images there is an even wider world with more information, the gravitational, invisible world, which might be mapped out, gauged and measured by quarks and masses.

The relativity of all minds that only decode part of the total information of the entity creates a new method of knowledge, the informative or linguistic method, which validates the existence of all kind of languages and senses to give us a more complex, multiple image of reality that a single language cannot provide:

*‘Only the organism or universe stores all the truth about itself. If we give to that absolute truth a probability 1, the highest probability of truth will be the maximal number of points of view over the organism, expressed with the maximal number of languages.’*

Since there are ‘multiple spaces-times and points of view’, the linguistic method states a higher probability of truth is achieved with several perspectives on a certain system – as each point of view will create a self-similar image of the Universe, and so by comparing all those self-similar images we can obtain a kaleidoscopic image of the whole. And so in the same way a circle is not drawn with a pencil but born of multiple flows of energy and information that converge on it, a truth is not only mathematical, but man has at least the spatial, visual language, the verbal, temporal language and its two synoptic equivalents, mathematics and logic; and it has 5 senses, which give us other points of view, despite the belief of physicists that ‘the language of God is mathematics’.

The linguistic method however validates the dictum of the Upanishads: ‘the languages of god are infinite’.

*And so knowledge must follow a simple scheme:*

-First we define a scale of depth on the analysis of the metric measures of the 3^{rd} paradigm (what and when): monism, dualism and the ternary principle, the highest form of knowledge. Then we apply the ternary principle to the 3 *symmetries of the Universe:*

*– The analysis in space of the 3±st topologies of the fractal point and its interactions that create the being in space.*

*-The analysis in time of the 3±st ages and sub-ages of the existence of the being.*

*-The analysis of the being in space-time as a system that co-exists in 3 st±1 scales of reality.*

*– And we try to do this from as many languages of perception, not only mathematics, as possible on the being.*

*Recap*. The linguistic method that widens the metric paradigm starts considering not only the ‘what and when’ of metric measures, but also the knowledge provided by other languages; and then it analyzes it from 3 ternary perspectives:

– A spatial, topological analysis of the 3±st regions of the being and its relationships between them as a whole.

– A temporal analysis of the 3±st ages of the being and its transitions and sub-ages.

– A space-time, analysis of the st ±1 scales=planes of existence of the being and its relationships as a whole.

Only then we shall achieve a deep knowledge of the entity.

**13. Physical particles. ****Bosonic Minds.**

In the physical realm, besides our electronic minds there are gravitational minds, black holes and masses, which Einstein defined as foci of gravitational space:

‘Space=*Energy* is motion relative to a simultaneous frame of reference=*a mind’ A. Einstein*

We added in italic the concepts of Multiple Spaces-Times equivalent to those used by Einstein, who understood space as a moving energy warped by a mass, a frame of reference that ‘measures’ space-time. Yet Einstein was an abstract physicist, philosophically shy, and so he did not considered how a ‘mass’ can measure – an informative, mental action.

We consider that a mass or any particle of the Universe can measure space-time because it can perceive a minimal quantity of the gravitational or light forces that make up the 2 physical membranes of reality. Some particles exist only in one of those membranes (point-particles like quarks who exist only in the gravitational world or light which exists only in light-space). Other complementary entities, such as atoms co-exist in both membranes. All of them should be able to make relative, different measures from their P.O.V.s, which will allow them to act-react in their world but will differ from the relative measures of humans or machines, we call reality.

‘Naïve realism’ affirms that for example, the distance between you and me is exactly 2 meters, because an electromagnetic signal or rod measures it as 2 meters. This is not truth. Reality goes beyond what we see and measure with machines: The distance of 2 meters happens to be in light measures or light space. But if we measure with feet as the Greeks did, 2 becomes 6. And if we do not measure in light-space the light we see, but in gravitational space, as Einstein proved it, the distance would be bigger, as light warps the more extended, non-Euclidean world of gravitation in which the membrane of light space-time we call reality floats. Thus, our light-world is a reduced version of the gravitational world: a simplified Euclidean surface, whose 3 coordinates, x, y and z are perpendicular and lineal as the 3 fields of light, the magnetic, electric and wave-field are.* *

*We exist in a space-time membrane made of light, whose final structure is the 2.7 k basic light membrane emitted by gravitational black holes that becomes the background frame of reference of our light World, only a fractal membrane of the infinite Universe. *

The Universe is more complex than our simplified, naïve sense of reality that thinks the space-time membrane of light that humans inhabit and see is all what there is to it. With the same reasoning, if we had not eyes to measure the light-universe, but merely noses to smell it as ants do, we would see even a more reduced world, as our pixel unit of reality would be a pheromonal atom. The mapping of reality by our mind would be shorter and so distances would be perceived as smaller, as fewer pixels would create our smelling mind.

How the process of gauging information takes place in the Universe? We can only hypothesize that perception is an inner quality of the motions of the Universe. In other words, a software image of reality, a fractal mirror made of forces is a whole, who perceives itself. So the electronic image of the Universe a human mind has ‘perceives in itself’; and as the image changes when we move the head, our ‘ego-self’ made of images and words seems to change.

So should happen in physical particles that focus the forces of the Universe. Yet if we observe externally the process, according to the 3 topologies of Non-Euclidean points we can describe objectively those events of absorption of energetic forces by cyclical particles (charges and masses) as topologic transformations of external, lineal forces of energy into cyclical motions. Those cyclical motions finally reach the hyperbolic center of the particle, a double ring or singularity of increasing height, which should perceive the ‘translation’ of the information carried by those forces. Then those forces are transformed again into flows of energy and expelled back to the Universe, as magnetic flows in atoms or gravitational dark energy in black holes.

In most particles, it all starts in a surface of energy that curves itself into cyclical motions, which become smaller, faster and reproduce into faster fractal cycles, till reaching the center. Yet those forces, will never reach as quantum physicists believe the central point of infinity; because the cycle will fractalize into new cycles moving upwards in the informative dimension of height (Belgrami semi-sphere depicted in the graph of the previous paragraph) till it becomes expelled upwards through the poles, as a thin line of forces. And so the center of a fractal point, where physics find infinity remain silent, still virtual images, the perceptive eye of the hurricane or the black hole:

A flow of forces converges toward the event horizon or external membrane of the point (the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole or the Bohr Radius of the atom). Beyond this membrane, the flow of forces starts a process of creative, formal warping, as it rotates at increasing speed and also increases its frequency (height dimension), in each cycle. Because a bidimensional vortex stores more information than a lineal frequency, as it adds a new dimension of form, those forces acquire information. So we observe a bidimensional, cyclical wave of high frequency/informative mass that accelerates toward the center, becoming a convex topology, which the equations of black holes show, as the dimension of space becomes a high temporal dimension. And finally the left-overs of the force – once a mirror-image is formed inside the hyperbolic center of the particle, called in topology a Belgrami cone – are shot up through the poles as a magnetic flow in charges or a flow of dark energy in masses, invisible to us, but observed in quasars. Those flows of magnetism or dark energy of maximal speed and minimal form, once again will start a cycle of information, warping again into light under c-speed. So galactic black holes emit dark energy that becomes a seminal flow of protonic matter, which might give birth to a new galaxy, as it is observed in the galaxy M83.

Recap: A dynamic analysis shows that most events of physics are transformations of lineal forces back and forth into cyclical motions (particles and charges), which can be described as topological transformation between hyperbolic and spherical or planar geometries.

**The many worlds=minds interpretation of reality. **

All fractal points are Galilean paradoxes that *perceive and act with a will *defined by their desire to survive, absorbing energy and information from their environment.

To that aim the mind creates a ‘subjective world image’ of reality tailored to achieve its arrows of time; while the rest of reality is a relative ‘dark space and dark matter’ of other cat alleys and networks we are not interested on. Thus we exist in a single fractal universe of infinite worlds, which are mirror-image of that single Universe.

The difference with the quantum interpretation of multiple Universes is clear: now the ‘quantum Universes’ co-exist as mental world in the same single reality.

Such paradox explains the self-centered behavior of all systems that fix reality into form. The mind sees stillness and hence death in all those forms in fixes in its brain and yet all has movement all has a life to it; all forces can be understood as languages when the proper codes are translated. Indeed, for all what we said it is also obvious that the intelligence of the Universe doesn’t speak a single language, understood by man, but all beings can perceive and remember information, stored in rhythmic patterns and linguistic codes. The resolution of those codes in different languages and scales is indeed the essence of knowledge. Each species has limited languages of perception, the most complex perceive more languages and forces. In the atomic world, quarks, the most complex particles perceive, ‘see’ we say in gauge theory, all the forces. They are the most complex particles, probable cells of the black hole. In our world, men are the most complex beings. Nevertheless, animals who understand only smelling, chemical codes and visual codes are also intelligent and so are electrons who do not perceive gravitation in the atomic word – we are in fact electronic minds as computers are. Languages can use any of those codes. Cephalopods developed both the first complex eyes and a pigmented skin, which changes and modulates emotional messages in a silent code understood by other squids. Insects use magnetic codes to guide swarms.

*Recap*. Reality is a game of mental worlds of information. But we need to translate those languages to reveal its intelligence to the dumb human being who speaks so few codes properly and thinks the rest of the intelligent Universe is mute.

**15. The speeds of time: different mind rhythms.**

The rhythms of existence are organic, vital. We do not see them in stones and plant, because rhythms vary its speed and men only consider vital rhythms those similar to theirs.

Each species has a different rhythm of perception and existence, a different language of knowledge and mind, a different speed of times or capacity to act-react in the Universe. The rhythms of rocks are slow. So are the rhythms of galaxies. Thus, we transform mathematically the different rhythms and speeds of times to see them alive. For example, when we see in fast motion the living cycles of plants that seem dead, in slow motion, they acquire living properties. It is again the Paradox of Galileo: we see many temporal cycles as fixed forms in space, as we see the moving Saturn rings as a fixed form, yet all is moving, cycling in an organic way.

Physicists don’t understand that their clocks of time are abstract inquisitions of the mind. Instead of a ‘moving cycle’, often a living ‘ time’, when they think of time they see a number in a graph. Yet even a watch measures the cycle of expansion of its inner spiral, made of metal that dilates, expanding space; even the sun measures a year-cycle as it swims on the gravitational flows of the galactic spiral, feeding on fractal, gravitational space. Clocks are brains that measure cycles of time. So today the clocks of science have evolved into cyclical computers that are truly ‘metal-brains’ of machines. Time is measured as information for biological, survival purposes. Since the ‘fastest brain-clocks’ of temporal information survive better. They see with more detail everything alive and act-react faster to the Universe. So our incapacity to see a living Universe is only a proof of our limited intelligence and memorial detail. Andre Guide affirmed, regarding a similar phenomenon, that ‘the more insensitive the white man is to the beauty of Africa, the more he despises and mistreats the black people’. So happens today with humanity at large with Nature.

* **Recap*. When we understand that there are many energies that feed space-time beings, many ways to inform brains, many speeds of perception and hence life; yet all are harmonic with each other, a deeper philosophical sense illuminates our mind: We are part of the same Universe and share the common properties of any of its infinite organic systems.

**The harmonies of living points: Chip paradox.**

A huge organic system of temporal energy like a planetary core crystal might form an image-thought each day; a plant thinks slowly, a fly sees faster, a rat beats its heart faster than we do. For example, spiral and elliptic galaxies are phases of a feeding cycle in which the spiral bar appears and disappears after collecting interstellar gas for the black hole every 10^{10} years. Scientists are now ‘putting together’ many similar dual forms that are phases of an organic, existential cycle. This is the new trend in Astrophysics: First neutrons and protons were considered 2 particles but now they are 2 phases of a nucleon E (proton) <->I (neutron) cycle, as nucleons absorb pions, transforming into each other so fast we can’t see it in detail. Last year we realized that the 3 neutrinos were part of the same particle, mutating its state. The same phenomenon happens when we see a human being externally: our skin appears as a fixed organism in space as its cellular cycles are perceived as a stable form.

Only anthropomorphism and the limits of perception make us differentiate those scales. Yet when we ‘enlarge’ the image of a non-AE point, for example, an insect, the detail of the information we observe grows and so the world of insects is as rich in meanings and forms as the macro-world in which we live. Since all waves carry the same amount of fractal information regardless of its spatial size, according to 2 simple, paradoxical laws: the law of the vortex for cyclical, implosive, attractive ‘particles’ (charges and masses), Vo x Ro=K, and the fractal law that defines transversal, explosive waves, E/v(t)=K. Both show that temporal energy increases when the masses or waves cycle becomes smaller.

All is alive yet with a different rhythm, a different beat. The beat of each temporal organism is an action-reaction cycle with a different clock, a different fractal rhythm and temporal speed. They are all around you. In a garden, the wings of a ‘hummingbird’ take energy from the air 200 times per second. It is a clock faster than the energy beat of your heart, 80 beats per second. The energy of the wind moves the leaves every 2 minutes. A gardener is a clock that waters plants a beat each day… Those action-reaction cycles are everywhere in the Universe. Some beings are faster in their active cycles like the hummingbird; some are slower like the plants and the galaxy. In most cases the bigger the species are, the longer they take in each of their active cycles: A galaxy turns around every 200 million years, the Earth every day, your eyes beat and absorb light-energy every second, the hummingbird’s heart beats 800 times every minute, the electron turns 30.000 cycles per second. Each organism, each region of the Universe, has a different speed of feeding and perception. People think that slow species are dead. But that is not true. They tend to be energy species that just have slow rhythms of information and live longer. While more informative, evolved species think faster and live shorter. Often the smaller the species the faster it can complete its cycles of information. So brains are small and chips evolve, becoming smaller as they become more powerful. Yet chips last a couple of years. And man, an informative species seems so self-destructive, so loving of information, the age, which precedes death, that we might be the shortest living animal on Earth.** **

The main law of existence is the balance between space and time, ExT=K. As we diminish in spatial size in the Universe, beings become faster in time, creating a balance according to which, smaller beings perceive and exist faster, being able to escape, slower Goliaths. Those regularities of the game of existence show a certain equalitarian justice in the Universe. Indeed, in each world-ecosystem the subjective existence of its organic systems is similar, despite their different size. So we can gather them in ‘families of species’ around a ‘constant of action’, K=T x E, which is the product of its speed of perception or frequency of perception of temporal information and its spatial extension. For example, it seems all mammals have the same metabolic existence: The rat lives less than an elephant but her heart beats faster. That faster perception speed also prevents small species to become extinct in the same ecosystem inhabited by bigger species, as they act-react faster and so they can escape top predators.

For example, according to the previous inverse law of mental speed a fly sees 10 times faster than human do, since flies are smaller, so they perform 10 visual fractal actions by each human blink. Yet because its brain’s fractal neuronal density is not very high, it is not a top predator as robotic insects might be in the future.

Curiously enough the oldest insects, ant queens and cockroaches, can live up to 7 years. Yet cockroaches react in 20 milliseconds and humans in 200. Which means that if they perceive time cycles 10 times faster than we do, subjectively they process 10 times more fractal actions of temporal energy, or ‘dharmas of existence’ (philosophical jargon). So they live the same subjectively life of 70 years… the same length of a human existential= generational cycle.

It follows that there are parallel worlds, one for each relative hierarchical space-time scale, based in different Constants of Existence. In physical worlds the most important of those constants are the Universal constants of force, which express the previous K= ExI balances in different abstract ways. For example in quantum theory H= ExI is always constant (Heisenberg Principle). But that constant of the microcosmic world is different from its equivalent constant, temperature, in the atomic world, which also shows a self-similar balance for gases: P(t) xV(E)=nkT.

Other constants however are written not as TxS=K balanced, but as E/I or I/E processes of Darwinian evolution, which define instead of organic balances, processes of transformation of certain energy into for and vice versa. The most important of those constants in the 2 physical space/time planes are G and Q, which represent, as the Newtonian and Coulombian formula shows, T/E, Mass-Charge/Distance events, in which in words of Einstein, cyclical masses absorb and bend the energy of space. On the other hand, in the electromagnetic world light-space is absorbed and transformed, curved into electronic form. Yet since *the density of information of the electromagnetic world is smaller than that of masses, given the fact that electrons are lighter and more extended in space than gravitational quarks, paradoxically the energy of its electromagnetic constant is much bigger. *

Thus the relative transformations of gravitational and light spatial forces into masses and charges are also ruled by decametric harmonies, as those of the biological speed of action-reaction of flies and humans. All together we can consider a simple scheme of the main many-worlds of the Human Universe, according to their relative energy and information density. Indeed, According to the different forces of the Universe, each organic system has a different mind since it absorbs different temporal energies and so it creates different mental, linguistic ‘spaces/times’, relative virtual worlds, mirrors of the Universe.

The world of each being represents a quantity of spatial information with a size, form and number of dimensions that are relative to the spatial reach, form and dimensions of the informative, linguistic forces it uses to observe the Universe.

So while the Universal Syntax all minds use to create their virtual maps of the Universe is homologous in all beings, *in as much as they reflect a single Universe, *the details, quantity and quality of the information of those maps depends on each brain; *since worlds are multiple, fractal, diffeomorphic. *So, depending on which type of temporal force of energy each fractal being absorbs to create its mental map we can define different *worlds or ecosystems* in which a certain force is shared by multiple discontinuous Fractal points that interact only with the other points of the same ecosystem but now with parallel worlds. For example, masses are fractal nodes that inform and/or perceive gravitation, which we do not see. We are fractal knots of light perception. Ants have olfactory brains that perceive atoms. *Different beings live in parallel discontinuous worlds within the same Universe.*

Even an electron, the smallest form known to man, processes light information and jumps towards a moving photon, absorbing its energy to enhance its survival chances. Equally, black holes and quarks process gravitational information, locating themselves in the best position to absorb it as masses. While a chip uses digital information to guide a machine, etc. There are other spaces and ways of measuring time besides light and clocks, other possible virtual worlds and intelligences besides man. Since man is made of the same atomic material that the rest of the Universe, the capacity to communicate in this universe – the most clear prove of life – is not exclusive of human atoms but a property that takes place through different atoms and forces; including metallic atoms such as those of computers or gravitational forces used by celestial bodies. So men talk, chips digitalize, animals see, plants ‘smell’ and masses process gravitational information.

We classify those worlds, according to the volume of temporal energy their linguistic forces carry, in a scale of increasing st-complexity, ruled by the Black Hole paradox: The smallest and faster particles scan with more detail the Universe; so they carry more information and create bigger, faster mental worlds, inhabited by species with more TxS force. Accordingly we consider 4 basic worlds:

– Big, slow atomic quanta create animal olfactory minds that perceive small metric territories inhabited by small animals like ants.

– Smaller, faster electrons create electronic minds that perceive kilometric territories inhabited by bigger animals like human beings.

– Photons create bigger worlds of planetary size perceived by huge machines and chips (the brain of future robots) at global scale (Internet, satellites, etc.).

– Gravitational forces of reduced size create words of galactic size, which might be perceived by celestial bodies like Black Holes (minds of the galaxy).

So the Gravitational world is bigger than the light world, bigger than the electronic world, bigger than the molecular world because paradoxically gravitons are faster and smaller than photons, which are faster and smaller than electrons, which are faster and smaller than molecules. So a black hole can perceive an image ‘with more detail’, more ‘pixels’. And since gravitation is faster than light it should ‘change’ the fractal mind’s images it creates faster. On the opposite extreme, plants and olfactory animals perceive molecules, which create images ‘with huge pixels’ that offer little detail and change very slow. Thus we consider that every organic system in the Universe, which processes information and survives efficiently, is a focus of a dual force that carries temporal energy and helps him to act-react externally in a manner that seems to improve the survival of that entity.

Each bigger world and faster language increases the TxS force of its species, which become top predators. And indeed, the analysis of the theoretical speed of informative perception in black holes has shown that they are the fastest ‘computing minds’ of the Universe. So black holes can easily destroy a planet; huge machines kill animal life; human beings kill olfactory ants and insects kill plants. It means top predators are defined in terms of the power of their linguistic brains.

Reality is a game of Russian dolls in which each bigger Doll /World encloses the smaller one. The gravitational World encloses the light world, which encloses the electronic world, which is bigger than the atomic world of ants and so on.

*Recap*. Each species has a rhythm of times. Slow species are perceived as dead space by faster species. We think plants do not perceive because they are slow in their rhythms of Times. Yet they are alive, feel, and sense in a chemical manner, through their roots and leaves.

**Mind dimensions. Holographic principle revis(it)ed.**

We explained in the simplified lecture that introduced multiple space-time theory that the Universe is a holography of an informative bidimensional field and an energetic bidimensional field that created the 4 dimensions of reality.

This is the case of the simplest forms like light, which is merely a membrane with two perpendicular energetic and informative fields.

But complex ‘closed topological balls’ with 3 regions, a hyperbolic, informative center, an energetic planar spherical membrane and a Klein body of reproductive cycles has a more complex holographic principle and other ‘varieties’ of higher or lesser dimensionalities.

In those ‘complete’ st-points the central discontinuous zone of a fractal point is an informative region, which adds the dimensions of the energetic membrane and reproductive body to create a mapping of itself and the Universe (imprinted in the senses of the external membrane). And this gives birth to different dimensionalities according to which ecosystem we study but a simple law stays:

*Hyperbolic dimensions=Body + membrane dimensions.*

If the reader observes the graph in our lecture on topology (II, 4) of the 3 regions of a non-Euclidean point, it will observe that the central region of a st-point doubles its form, as the brain that maps out the rest of the Non-E point.

And so there is a hyperbolic region of pure information that doubles the topology of the membrane and body region. Since the hyperbolic center of higher form/information has by definition more dimensions than the energetic bidimensional membrane and the reproductive bidimensional toroid; since it holds the 4-dimensional holography of the Universe. It is the key law of dimensionality of Non-Euclidean structures; of which 2 variations are paramount:

*Bidimensional-reproductive system + Bidimensional energetic membrane = 4-dimensional hyperbolic, informative mapping.*

*Bidimensional external membrane +3-dimensional cyclical volume:*

*5-dimensional hyperbolic nucleus.*

These simple laws of dimensionality balance the 3 regions of a Non-Euclidean topology and it is central to understand the workings of different minds, which in terms of information write as:

*Information of hyperbolic ‘brain’= Information of Klein’s ‘body’ + Information Riemann membrane*

In metaphysics, which searches for the logic and geometric laws, derived from the 5 Non-Euclidean postulates, from where the arrows and wills of the organic Universe are deduced; a mind is understood as a fractal image, reflection of an internal body and an external Universe, which connects both regions of the st-point. In a st-point the membrane is the first mapping of the Universe, and the intermediate body, the inner world that reproduces, feeds and maintains the system. A mind will constantly check both, the membrane and its sensorial image to which it is connected through a nervous/informative system and the inner body, to which is connected through a reproductive/energetic system. So a human brain is connected to the inner world through the blood system and the external world through the membrane senses. It has two images of reality and it combines them both, word feelings and eye-images, to act with 2 purposes: to maximize the informative perception of the external world and the inner, reproductive and energetic feelings and pleasures of the Internal world.

This complex explanation of the human being, explored in more detail in other works, is reduced to a minimal skeleton, *maintaining the scheme of wills and purposes, *when we study the simplest forms of the Universe. And it is the origin of the Maldacena Conjecture ^{A,12} (a black hole, informative center of the galaxy has in 5 dimensions the same structure than a galactic mapping in 4 dimensions.)

*Recap*. The dimensions of the hyperbolic, informative center are the sum of the dimensions and information stored in the cycles of the reproductive body and the energetic membranes, whose senses map out the external Universe.

**2 ^{ND} POSTULATE: WAVES OF ENTROPY & FORM: PAST X FUTURE = PRESENT**

*A line is a wave-like event which** communicates 2 st-points through a herd of fractal micro-points- a lineal action, exi, of energy that carries a frequency of information in which a message is encoded. The language of information is highly invisible to points outside the network that emit those messages as a flow of micro-points, self-similar micro-replicas of the mother-point that travel in waves across the external Universe transferring energy and information. *

*In most events those flows balance one point with more energy, Ei, that each science defines with different slangs, (‘a white hole’, ‘energizer’, ‘past form’, ‘male’, ‘body’, ‘yang’, ‘moving field’, etc.); and an informative point, Ot, the smaller form (‘a black hole’, ‘codifier’, ‘future form’, ‘female’, ‘head’, ‘yin’, particle or ‘center of perception’, etc.) Both become united by a dual wave that transfers energy from Ei to the informative point of relative future, Ot, and information from the future point, Ot, to the relative past point, Ei, creating together a cycle of temporal energy. The description of those points and cycles, which are common to all beings of space-time, creates a fractal, i-logic geometry common to all sciences and Universal species.*

**18. Motion as reproduction of in-form-ation.**

Because points are constantly gauging information and feeding on energy, the most common events of the Universe are the absorption of waves of energy and form and its communication between 2 points that share energy and form.

In the graph, we observe some basic acts of communication in which self-similar complementary species exchange energy and form in actions that bond them. Human sexual species communicate information and energy (social love) but also seminal particle that combine both reproducing a self-similar being (sexual love); fermions, big atomic particles, communicate bosons, smaller particles of forces. Humans communicate with machines through prices and salaries. Thus money is the force of communication that creates the actions of consumption and reproduction=work of machines by human beings. In all those events there will be however different they might seem, certain laws of i-logic geometry, which all systems will follow and will define the outcome of such encounters, according to the 3^{rd} postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry that defines the relative equality between st-points. So certain events are ‘Darwinian’, when species are so different that cannot share information with a common language and so use each other as relative energy, or events of eusocial love if the points are self-similar.

The main element to take into account when 2 knots of time communicate is the nature of the information and energy they communicate. This process is described in the next equation, which is a causal chain deduced from the Generator equation of all events of energy and information E<=>I:

∑ e_{st-1 (energy converging into the point)}+∑I_{st-2 (flows of information)}->

EI_{st feeding and perception) }-> ∑ e_{st-1 x }∑i_{st-2}

The previous equation is a general law of all systems that process energy into information:

– The membrane will absorb through its mouth bits of energy of lesser form than itself, normally from a lower scale of relative space-time. So we feed on ‘meat’, extract the amino acids and molecular information we require to create our own flesh and expel a degraded mass of molecular atoms. Light imprints its form in the gravitational space-time of the lower scale; electrons feed on light photons, etc.

– Yet to perceive and map the world we need maximal detail achieved by absorbing ‘pixels’ of a force, whose micro-points are from at least 2 smaller scales than the point. So particles seem to communicate and perceive gravitation (entangled, faster than light effects of quantum physics) and we absorb the smallest pixels (light) and smell atoms.

– Finally to communicate we share entities, created with combinations of that primary energy and information, encoded within it. Yet the value and intensity of the communication and the bondage created will depend of the density of form and quality of energy we share. Thus the lowest scales of energy and form will not be used to communicate but will be expelled constantly as the left-overs of our constant feeding of energy and information.

For example, humans feed on meat and can share food, to create bondage, but will not share ‘waste’ or violent ‘energy’ without form, if they want to create bondage. Black holes absorb light and mass from the galaxy and seem to produce faster-than-light gravitational, dark energy of lesser form, belonging to the lower space-time scale of gravitation.

And yet because of the scalar, hierarchical structure of space-time, nothing is wasted, since for ‘lower’ entities waste might be energy to recreate simpler forms (flies that feed on waste, irregular galaxies born from the energy emitted by black holes, which evolves back into matter).

The reader must understand the importance of those scalar laws, ignored by standard science, stuck in the concept of an abstract, single space-time continuum. Since the Universe is ‘equalitarian’ in the same scale, but hierarchical when we study the relationships between cells and wholes, lower and upper scales of reality, and the paradoxes, contradictions and harmonies between the Points of view of those scales are essential to understand most events of reality.

Once the process of creation of a fractal wave information is defined, we can explain most actions and events of communication as processes that involve first the ‘fractal reproduction’ of a form which uses its micro-forms to pattern a message that will be shared with a self-similar form.

The st-point is not static but in constant communication with the external Universe, populated by other st-points that obtain energy and information also through acts of communication, which are *dual events*, defined in fractal Geometry by the 2^{nd} postulate of communication. Since according to Newton, an action never goes unanswered: There would be a reaction often of the opposite sign. Thus to understand any event we have to wait for a reaction to complete a cycle. One-dimensional science often forgets this duality, considering ceteris paribus analysis of a single action. In the human social scale, individualism often forgets such duality when a nation attacks another nation, or when a group exploits another social group or an individual acts selfishly without expecting the proper reaction. Yet sooner or later the just, cruel, Darwinian Universe will react and balance the game.

Because the Universe is essentially dual, made of lineal energy and cyclical, dimensional form, this duality happens in almost all the events of reality. So points will emit micro-points, with a combination of energy and form. For example, if the original st-point has emitted a fractal action, dominant in energy, ΣS, it will receive an opposite reaction, often dominant in information, Ti, completing a cyclical action of temporal energy, ΣS<=>Ti.

In the same manner when a group of points emits a wave, it will receive an opposite wave from the receptor, creating a cellular, complex cycle.

Finally, if we combine 2 planes or networks of points, communicating waves of energy and information, for example, human cells communicating energy and information through the blood and nervous network of life beings, we obtain a complementary event or Organism.

The two main types of ‘forms’ any point emit are also, either a ‘seed ‘of information or a ‘ghost’ of space: Fractal entities can emit a self-similar microscopic cell, with maximal form and minimal energy/extension; or they might move or vibrate, emitting a ‘wave’, a vibration of its external whole with maximal energy and minimal form. It is the first of the multiple dual solutions, which any entity can choose, according to the dual arrows of energy and information of the Universe. Thus Duality becomes essential to classify the multiplicity and variety of events in the Universe, since it sets self-similar limits due to the existence of only 2 arrows/forms/ substances to play with. It means most events will be either dominant in energy, or information or a balanced combination of both.

In the ∞ Universe, actions and reactions that define those events will have different names according to the st-plane of existence in which they occur, but they will respond to *self-similar existential laws*.

Since sciences are accustomed to analytical, detailed studies that differentiate species, they do not search, as this synthetic work does, for the self-similar laws of all those communicative actions. Yet precisely the beauty of the fractal Universe is that both approaches are meaningful. Since self-similarity doesn’t mean equality: fractal scales create self-similar forms, which are never an exact replica of the original. Those variations across space/time scales differentiate species, which still compare in terms of the similar properties of all relative energies and forms that together shape a communicative action, according to 2 fundamental laws:

-The law of self-similarity, which states that any action will be a micro-form self-similar to the mother-cell, and:

-The law of balance, ΣSxTi=K, which implies that the product of the energy and time of the action is constant.

For example, if the point is a particle of the light-membrane, the communicative action will be a multiple of h, *the smallest micro-form of energy and time of the electromagnetic world, ruled by the law of balance, e x t=h*; if it is an atom, it will be a vibration with a temperature, T, which again will be ruled by the law of balance, in this case PV=nkT. And because we have ascended our plane of existence from spatial, lighter particles into atoms denser in form with less spatial speed, the action will be denser and reach lesser extension than a fractal h-action.

This will be the case also in biological actions of communication: if the mother-cell is a living being, it will emit an ovule of pure information that will merge with a seminal seed with higher energetic movement, or male seed. Both will be replicas of the fractal generator or mother.

Finally in the human social sphere, actions are often purely informative: certain thoughts act transforming our environment through the intermediate motions of machines that increase the energy and information of the human action. Those machines are themselves replicas of our energetic and informative functions. Yet unlike most actions of physical particles, machines have a peculiar structure. Their function/information is often simpler than that of man, so a car is simpler than the leg, whose energetic function substitutes, but larger in space, so the car moves faster. Those complex relationships between humans and machines, which enhance our energy and information when we consume them, can now be understood in the context of our search for more energy and information, creating a symbiotic species that we call in our complex analysis of history, an ‘animetal’: animal+metal.

Thus, all, including men, *generate *actions made of flows of energy that carry information, used to communicate with other points. So we widen the fractal unit of quantum physics, the action of temporal energy that communicates particles to define all type of actions-reactions in all space-time systems.

Thus the 2^{nd} postulate of fractal geometry defines a line, no longer as an abstract form like Euclidean geometry does, but as a physical wave of self-similar, fractal micro-points that carry energy and information, as they move between 2 macroscopic points, with 2 possible functions, to communicate energetic forces or linguistic information.

*2 ^{nd} Postulate: A cycle of fractal space-time:*

*‘A wave of communication **is a group of self-similar micro-points that move in parallel lines between 2 macro-points, transferring energy and information between them’.*

In Non-E geometry a line with parts is not defined by a sequence of numeric intervals within a straight line, but by the communication of 2 poles of energy and information that establish a flow of particles in 2 opposite directions, creating a simultaneous, paradoxical wave. Such waves again can have different purposes. A wave dominant in information communicates symbiotic particles, creating an informative bondage/network; a wave dominant in energy might be an aggressive action between different species that fight for each other’s vital energy or territorial space; and a wave that balances the energy and information of both points meets in the center, creating a new self-similar, seminal particle, as when 2 electrons emit waves of densely packed photons, which merge in the middle and give birth to another wave.

When we generalize those concepts to n-points we can define a space as a network of Non-Euclidean points. Indeed, Riemann affirmed that a space is a network made of herds of points with similar ‘properties’. Planes of space are therefore networks of points. The self-similarity of their properties defines its *density *determined by the number of points and its proximity that grows with self-similarity. So similar points come together into a tighter, more continuous space; whereas the density of the space is proportional to the similarity of its points, till reaching ‘bosonic state’ of maximal density when points are equal. And when a volume of spatial energy is very dense, it is very difficult to go through it, as it happens in the ultra-dense, small space of black holes.

Spatial extension and form/density/mass are inverse parameters, Max. E = Min. I. If we generalize that property to all scales, we can define different fractal spaces by its proportion of mass/density and energy /distance. This is done with ‘Universal constants’ that explain the proportions of energy and information of those spaces. For example, in physical scales, there are 4 fundamental space-times, the gravitational space-time between galaxies of max. energetic space and minimal formal density; the light space-time of our world, which carries information in the frequency of the wave; the electronic space-time of atoms with more formal density and lesser spatial speed and finally the quark-gluon liquid of atomic nuclei and probably black holes, with maximal density and minimal space. All of them are defined by Universal constants and equations that are either ratios between the energy and form of those space-times, or define the transformations of one space-time into the others. Einstein’s field equations would be the first case, defining the relationship between energy and mass in a gravitational space, while the fine constant of electromagnetism would define the transformation between light space and electronic space/ charge; and the gravitational constant between gravitational space-time and quark/mass. Where the relative densities of information and extension in space of those space-times are in balance, such as ΣSxTi=K. Thus electrons move slower than light but have more density.

All this said it is thus obvious that the *fundamental unit defined by the 2 ^{nd} postulate is no longer a point but an action, ex i= k between points, which becomes the 2^{nd} fundamental ‘particle’ or ‘parameter’ of reality. *We, points of time, create actions, exi, with a minimal quantity of form, moved by an energy force, creating lines, which therefore become actions of energy and time. And all what we do are actions. So we say often ‘I don’t have time or energy to do so’. Actions become thus the fundamental event of all points of view, in search of their arrows of time; it becomes the dynamic definition of a line, as we are all in constant motion, and so all point in motion can be perceived in slow camera as a ‘line of action’. And indeed, in physics an action is the fundamental unit of our light-space membrane, exi=h; and an action is the fundamental unit of biological behavior, which also defines the existential force of a being, exi=k, or the momentum, m(i) x V(e) = k of a physical being. An action is also the name given to the fundamental unit of economical organisms (companies). The Universe is thus a world of infinite points of view performing lineal actions in search of their arrows of time.

*Recap*: Non-Euclidean points constantly communicate energy and information with other self-similar points and the external Universe, by sharing flows of micro-points of a lower scale of space-time, which carry the energy and form of the particle into the external universe. The laws that define those acts of communication are hierarchical laws between planes of space-time and laws of balance between the energy and form of those ‘actions’ of communication, exi, which become the fundamental dynamic event of any scale of the Universe.

**Ternary principle of creation.**

A fundamental principle of Time Theory is the ternary principle: because all systems are designed with 3 purposes, to process energy and information or mix both in a balanced, reproductive, exi, action, we often find in all type of events a ternary choice, which will be specially relevant to understand the processes of ‘guided evolution’ that limit the number of possible creative species. For example, we can define human evolution as a constant differentiation of ape species into energetic, informative and reproductive ones; where the human lineage is that of species with maximal informative/head evolution, while the gorilla lineage is one of maximal energetic/body evolution and so on.

*The 2 ^{nd} postulate differentiates according to the ternary Principle 3 types of waves: *A language that transfers only information, (Max. i); a force that transfers only energy (Max. E); and a

*wave*that transfers both forms (ExT). All forces and languages are waves, since actions mix energy and temporal information;

*which will be perceived*as languages when the absorber can decode that information. It is the receiver, which selects the wave as a force of energy or a language of information, defining how it will react to the emitter, according to its self-similarity that will allow him to understand its information

*.*For example, plants absorb light as energy and animals decode it as information; but light is dual.

In algebraic terms, a function of existence is described with 2 parameters, X and Y that represent an informative subject and an energetic object, often complementary.

In biological terms, an organism is defined by a head of information, a relative future, more evolved form; and a body of energy, a relative, less evolved, past form. So we can consider also dual organisms as acts of communication between two poles, the reproductive body and the informative head, where the neck is the bridge that carries the bigger number of veins and nervous paths – the informative and energetic networks of cells that communicate body and mind.

Since the head directs and decides ‘the future’ of the entire system, informative poles are future poles. So a relative informative region is a future form and a relative energetic region is a past form. And both come together into a discontinuous, relative fractal, intermediate region or ‘present space-time’, in which they combine creating ‘reality’. That region is a present region because it is the most visible region of the Fractal point, limited by the future, informative region and the past, energetic membrane.

Those temporal distinctions and degree of visibility of the 3 topological regions of a point, now studied as two poles of communication are real; since the reproductive, present region, is always the most visible, given the bidimensionality of energy and information. For example, we do not see the black hole and dark halo that controls the galaxy but only the intermediate region of stars. In this manner the game of space-time existence that creates reality merges 2 poles dominant on spatial energy and temporal information into a new combined form, a relative present, fractal space-time:

*Past=energy body xFuture informative head=Present organism*

We explained before the 3 dimensions of time, past=energy, present=repetition and future=information, showing that most systems in the Universe live through those 3 dimensional ages, dying back into energy, as they dissolve its formal networks. Yet, while the Universe has very few elements/arrows to play with, its diversity comes from the possible variations and combinations of those arrows. And so, while we can write Past->Present->Future, as the natural causal arrow of the life cycle, there is also an equation of relative times, past x future = present, which defines the complementarity between reproductive bodies/fields and informative heads/particles and explains the present stability of systems which have both components or can switch between motion and formal states.

Further on, the use of the ternary principle, applied to the 3 languages of man (energetic geometry, temporal logic and exi, visual perception) will allow us to verify in a higher degree any statement, by considering at least the biological function/motion and geometrical, still form of the species we study, which have to be self-similar. For example in a galaxy, the black hole is the spherical center of information. And we can prove this according to the linguistic/ternary method in the space-time languages of man, the mathematical language of space, the bio-logic language of time and the visual language that merge both together. In algebra, Einstein equations prove that black holes transform its spatial parameters into temporal parameters. Hence they transform spatial energy into temporal information. In visual terms they curve space-time into height; hence they transform energy into information. If we consider its biological function, they absorb the energy of star-plants. So Black holes are sinks of gravitational information.

And gravitation is obviously the informative force of the Universe; since it is not dual but it shows only the arrow of in-form-ation, attracting and lumping masses and it is 10^{40} times less energetic than electromagnetism. So when we observe vitally, visually, in action, those black holes, they show the maximal amount of the 2 dimensions of temporal information: height and rotational rhythm; as they seem to turn at light speed and theoretically transform the plane of energy of the galaxy in a tube of infinite height. Thus all languages and experimental data prove the fact that a black hole is the informative brain of a galaxy that feeds on electromagnetic space towards the future. The extended, faster plane of rotating stars is the body or energy surface of the galaxy that feeds them. Apparently a human body and a galactic body should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear that those morphologies respond to the generic morphology of information and energy, and so do their functions in time.

*Recap.* Events in the Universe are limited by the ternary principle. Actions of communication also obey the principle: There are energetic, informative or reproductive events, creating often complementary systems with an energetic pole or body and an informative pole or head, communicated by a dense network or neck that carries the actions. The 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry are based in the definition of a fractal point as a point with inner parts, revealed when we come closer to the point. According to such definition, lines are waves of points and planes topological networks of points, communicated through flows of energy and form. While equality requires also equality in the inner form or information of the point, which prompts communication through waves of energy and information that build networks. Communication between points is now possible because points can fit infinite parallel/waves used to gauge the Universe and create an inner image of reality. Non-Euclidean fractal geometry thus improves our vision of the Universe closer to reality and allows the definition of organic systems and logic behavior in bases of geometrical form, a long-sought dream since the times of the Greek.

*In the graph, a complex organism can be written with the algebra of Multiple Spaces-Times as a chain of points joined by energy/information flows between several ‘planes of existence’.*

**The 4 ^{th} Postulate: networks and chains of existence.**

Exact topological graphs however are only important when we study simplex, physical, homogenous planes where the diffeomorphic dimensions of energy/form/reproduction correspond to the 3 dimensions of Euclidean space.

Because of the flexibility of networks can adopt open and closed, motion and formal geometries in most cases, such as the graph we have to consider more than the basic O-cyclical i-nformative and |-energetic forms, shown in the graph, with symbols of i-logic, the causality of the events, which allow us to apply the same laws to all disciplines. For example in Economics Ricardo points out to the logic of increasing communication between points when he explains the advantages of free trade of different products between nations (nails from England and Porto from Portugal).

The same ruled applied to points of view means that ‘complementary points’ of energy and information that can exchange energy on one side for information on the other side are beneficial for both points of view. This explains the abundance of dual, complementary, fractal structures in which 2 networks, one of energy and the other of information entangle together, as in your body (nervous and blood system) or in the Universe (light and gravitational networks).

We have now the tools and understanding of the structure of mathematics to tackle in the rest of this work on the Languages of spacetime the ‘big question’ about reality that those languages enlighten: how can we describe better, the construction of the super-organisms of knots of time, which extend through ‘several planes’ of existence, and underlie the ‘structure of reality’.

All this belongs to the most complex and fundamental postulate of i-logic geometry, the 4^{th} postulate, coupled with the understanding of the ‘causal, multiple logic of time arrows’ that structure several planes of existence, *displaced not only in space but also in time,* into a single organism.

The Universe is a fractal of planes of space-time’, which constantly appear, grow and dissolve in infinite events of existence. How Multiple Spaces-Times become chained and connected, building from simplex particles super-organisms – those planes of existence of reality that structure the Universe? The answer is the 4^{th} postulate that defines the creation of networks of points, called planes.

Each st- point is a knot of times that becomes chained in a dynamic relationship with other points of time through its arrows of energy, information, reproduction and social evolution. In this manner points form ‘chains’ of existence, which become either ‘Darwinian relationships’, when one of the 2 points of communication is ab=used as energy of the other one with ‘more existential force/momentum’ or a stable, complementary relationship if both points are symbiotic, as energy and information or parallel, self-similar, forming a herd – a network of equal points that act together as a whole.

In Geometrical terms, the Universe starts with simplex st-points that communicate flows of energy and information, creating lines and geometrical groups. And the rules of those geometrical events of creation are defined by the 1^{st} and 5^{th} postulate that explains the parts of the point and its apertures to the external universe from where it communicates flows of energy and information; by the 2^{nd} and the 3^{rd} postulate which define in geometrical and behavioral terms the relationships and lines of communication between two points, according to their degree of equality. So the 1^{st}/5^{th} postulate, which defines geometrically and logically a point and the 2^{nd}/3^{rd} postulates, which defines how they communicate, establish the conditions that will determine the type of topologies or network/spaces that the system creates. Those organic topologies is what we call planes of exi=stence, explained by the 4^{th} postulate of i-logic geometry. Since a plane is a group of points coming together as a relative space, which will be ‘more dense’ according to their degree of self-similarity (Riemann’s masterful definition of any space made of Non-E points).

Thus, if the first & fifth postulates are related to the perception of information and energy by a point, with its inner body/head parts; and the 2^{nd} and 3^{rd} postulate are related to the arrow of reproduction between complementary energy/form, male/female, yang/yin beings, the 4^{th} postulate explains the details and possibilities of social creation of arrows of time; facts which establish a clear mathematical relationship between the arrows of time and the postulates of geometry in which all mathematical laws are based.

** Creation of Planes of Space=networks of points.**

*The Universe constructs super-organisms, building Planes, which are networks/herds of non-Euclidean points, step by step, according to the geometrical and biological laws, described in the 3 first postulates of Non-Euclidean geometry: **The graph breaks a standard knot of time in its 3 planes. The point is an entity that constantly searches information with its head and energy with its body, creating symbiotic and Darwinian events with other knots of time, through 3 time arrows/dimensions between 3 planes of existence, the plane of the point, i, a lower plane of relative energy, st-1, and an upper plane of relative information, st+1.*

In the graph we show the point as a complex i±1 plane, interacting with that plane or ecosystem (geometrical/ biological jargon) through those 3 arrows, which are its 3 dimensions of existence or ‘vital coordinates’ that create the motions of information and energy of those points. Because the frequency and speed of those arrows/exchanges of energy and information with the ecosystem vary, we also talk in complex Time Algebra of 3 relative speeds, Vs, Vt and Vts, which correspond to the arrows of spatial energy, temporal information and reproduction of the point, (for which often the point will chain itself with a relative complementary being), normally represented in the x(se), Y(ti) and z(st) coordinates.

Further on, those 3 ‘actions’, ‘arrows’ or ‘motions’ of time produce in the spacetime around the point different dynamic transformation:

– I<E: Energetic arrows produce an expansion of the spacetime around the point as in a big-bang or process of death.

– E>I: Informative actions produce an implosion, as energy becomes warped, informing the point.

– EI=ei: Finally reproductive actions tend to maintain the space-time around the point stable as they combine the arrows of energy and information, creating a self-similar point in a parallel region of space-time.

And we use the geometric/algebraic symbols of implosion of information, >, explosion of energy <, and parallel creation, =, to signify events belonging to one of the 3 arrows/dimensions of the point.

Thus, those 3 dimensions/arrows of time define the self-similar will and actions of most entities of the Universe, despite their apparent, different morphology and degree of complexity.

The interaction of those individual points of view, constantly throwing its ‘subjective arrows of time’, capturing energy and information from the universe, is the game we all play, and in doing so we establish relationships with other self-similar points of view, creating herds, ‘parallel planes’ of points of view or Darwinian relationships between relative energy victims and top predators, which we represent as events between two different planes of simpler and more complex forms: E_{st-1}->I_{st}, where E refers to the energetic function of the victim, belonging to a plane (st-1) of less complexity than I, the predator belonging to an upper plane of more information, I.

All those relationships are reflected in the drawing in which we see complex chains of time arrows between points of view, which forms an organic system. In each plane of existence or scale of the Universe such chains will represent a specific species that curiously enough show homological properties with other species of other scales existence. The previous graph could be, for example, a complex molecule. Such molecule represented here with ‘Time Algebra’ could also be represented as classic chemistry does with ‘lines’ of forces and ‘spheres of information’ that will show the geometrical topologies of those points.

**Organic systems of points in different scales of reality.**

When we visualize the world in terms of points of existence and flows of communication of energy and information we can see the dynamic creation of networks of points of time in any scale of reality. A human group is like a cellular body communicated through verbal codes of information (words) and systems of energy (light/spatial location, light-based food, such as plants and animals). Human groups are social networks of increasing degrees of complexity that grow in a decametric scale from individuals to families, clans, tribes, villages, cities, nations, civilizations and the species^{C}. The graph shows a group of human beings, whose cyclical points of view or heads, are maintained in a parallel, relatively equal plane of existence to share information through flows of words communicated through the air medium/space and share energy coming from a relative ‘lower’ plane of existence, the table. Arguably those configurations are not different from the ones established in atomic networks or herds of sky gulls moving towards the lower plane of seafood as they maintain their parallel distance based in the sounds and motions of the air. Moreover human beings will always try to maintain such geometric configurations between their Non-Euclidean points =heads (not between their bodies, which are blind tails of energy for those points/heads that store the will of times): Observe humans relating to each other with motions and words emitted by their heads that are always kept in a relative parallel plane of existence with other human planes.

Reality is a game of points that gauge information and form lines, by sharing energy and information with other forms of view. Those lines, e x i become then networks of self-similar points, planes of existence, of which the most sophisticated is a complementary, social organism: exI +Ei, made with a head/particle dominant in information and a body/field dominant in energy.

When many points=cellular elements communicate they create more complex simultaneous presents by self-repeating in growing scales those ‘simplex’ patterns. And finally, through those multiple events they transcend, emerging as a new Plane of Existence. Such systems explain the structure of all kind of planes, including the simplex physical planes. So recently fractal theorists have proved with a theory called ‘causal triangulation’ that Time Arrows can form causal triangles whose connections grow by iteration till reproduce the 4-dimensional Universe of Relativity.* *Thus, when we generalize the 2^{nd} and 3^{rd} postulates to n-points in communication we create a finite, organic ‘plane of existence’, either a simple network (such as a Crystal or a sea of water) or a dual network, a ‘complementary organism’, with 2 exi networks.

The subjective will of ∞ points of view, acting selfishly come together creating a complex, eusocial reality. Order dominates the chaos of infinite selfish points of view, building a single reality, for biological reasons: The survival of points is better achieved, when acting together. So they become stronger than individuals; hence they win in the struggle for existence, defining in the process an arrow of social evolution that creates with herds of points, fractal, social planes and cellular super-organisms. So points first associate in couples that share flows of energy and information, creating waves = lines with volume, whose shape in space and duration of time is defined by the 2^{nd} and 3^{rd} postulate of relative equality (self-similarity). And finally they create complex organic topologies of existence of a relative number of infinite points of view.

When we add on all postulates – the structure of each point (1/5^{th} postulates), the types of connections and waves between them (2, 3^{rd} Postulates), and the causal, i->e->r->s chains of the Universe – we can explain creation, since the number of combinations of e and i is obviously limited; and so are the number of events, of reality. Thus we can know the outcome of each and every possible event or combination of the 3 wills=arrows of time of each point, (energy, information and reproduction), according to the 3^{rd} postulate.

Thousands of pages and mappings of the laws of existential geometry, applied to each specific species and scale of existence of the Universe, prove that reality is quite deterministic, in as much as points constantly behave in the same manner, absorbing energy and information and trying to emit it with the purposes of reproducing or playing a social role in a higher plane of existence.

Of all those possible events, the commonest chain of existential events departs from a point of view that gauges information, in order to absorb energy, till it can reproduce its fractal form, ExI, till creating a social mass of points, ∑Exi that become a stable network, st, a vital, topological space: ∑Exi = st.

The Universe creates constantly ‘feedback equations of existence’, the ultimate essence of all realities.

*Recap*. Self-similarity determines the different ways in which Non-E points relate to each other, either associating together or fighting for survival, trying to absorb the energy of other points when they don’t understand each other or building social planes when they can create informative networks. As a result, and when those relationships are generalized to n->∞ points we obtain different organic planes of social points.

**Dark spaces: the rest of the Universe.**

*Points of view are a mixed topology of membranes with open balls that have a dark space they can’t see.*

Topological planes are dynamic, geometric networks of st-points=numbers, constantly moving and communicating through flows of energy and information. Yet those networks rarely form a continuous tight space: space-time planes are filled with holes in which other networks might co-exist, or where flows of unknown, dark energy and information cross.

Thus, the creation and destruction of networks of self-similar points of view – the generation of complementary organisms – is all what we see; but there is also all what we don’t see, as most information and flows of communication between p.o.v.s, which are not similar to us, remains invisible.

Such dark space will be the surface of reality that a st-point with limited apertures to the Universe cannot perceive (an energetic mouth, an informative eye and a reproductive jet).

The degree of ‘dark space’ a point does not perceive depends of the complexity and apertures of the point. If we consider the simplest bidimensional point, a pi-vortex made of 3 standard units that form its outer membrane, it will have π-3=0’14 apertures to the Universe. And it will have a total dark space of 0’14/π=96% of circular reality, which the point doesn’t see through its apertures. That quantity is curiously the same quantity of dark, gravitational space and matter we do not perceive as beings belonging to the membrane of light-space.

So all planes are quantic networks of social points/cycles put together by n-flows of temporal energy, which have ‘dark spaces’ within the holes of the network:

*‘A plane is a network of n st-points joined by flows of energy and information’.*

The existence of dark spaces and planes which are discontinuous networks is essential to build up a Universe of multiple worlds, webbed into a relative infinite number of parallel planes that intersect, communicate through bridges between the network-planes and allow the existence of complex complementary organisms in which a relative wider, simpler energetic network is controlled by a denser, smaller, informative one, intertwined through those dark spaces.

Thus without dark spaces a complex reality of complementary beings is not possible. In the Universe the membrane of dark matter are the points of a network of flows of dark, gravitational energy over which the electromagnetic membrane warps itself, absorbing that energy and forming light-waves and more complex, evolved light particles.

In a human being, the blood network surrounds and warps around the digestive network from where it obtains its energy; and the nervous, informative network surrounds and intersects the blood network from where it obtains its energy. It is thus precisely the fact that planes are networks of points and dark spaces fill most of the network what allows the interaction between complex planes that form organic systems. A human being is in fact made of 10 of such subsystems totally warped together in exchanges of energy and information that permits our existence.

All this is the essence of a reality constructed with multiple planes of space-time that biologists recognize as networks of cells’ but physicists, stuck in the paradigm of metric measure of a single, continuous space-time still fail to recognize.

*Recap*. Points perceive through apertures only a part of the Universe. We could theorize that all what we see is merely the light-space membrane that floats in a much wider gravitational Universe.

**The continuous and discontinuous reality.**

The human aberration of perception is the true barrier modern science has to accept those living cycles. And so we define according to the Fractal Principle, 3 phenomena that create that aberration of perception: the limited scales of space we perceive, which prevent us from seeing in detail small or far away beings; the relative speed of human, cyclical time we use to observe reality that prevent us from perceiving very fast or very slow beings as living beings. Finally, our incapacity to translate other languages, as information is smaller and quantized. Therefore, we perceive better bodies and energy than minds and brains. This creates the ‘energetic aberration of naïve realism’ that makes scientists think all is ‘energy’ and information is secondary. Since informative messages, which are ‘faster’ and ‘smaller’ than energy forms are the most difficult to perceive.

We don’t see pheromones and so biologists thought for centuries ants acted as individuals when in fact they act as part of a whole super-organism, the anthill. We did not perceive the informative, chemical languages that cross ‘the synapse’ between neurons for so long, that most scientists thought that the entire brain was a cell to be able to work together until Cajal saw those discontinuities. Yet today biologists are decoding new languages of information: they found that monkeys learn to use money, rats sing songs, flies calculate. So the real barrier to understand the intelligent Universe is ideological, anthropomorphic mechanism. Only when science accepts organicism, it will start to understand the whys and wills of reality instead of merely gathering data. To perceive that organicism it only has to ‘translate’ different speeds of time to the ‘real speed’ at which any species exist.

Let us consider one of those dualities in more detail: the continuous and discontinuous reality, ruled by a simple law that relates two different scales of existence.

*`The mean distance in space-time between 2 relative cells, st-1, of a fractal superorganism, i, equals the distance between its relative molecular systems, st-2, in time and space.’*

The law of fractal jumps structures hierarchical organic systems through social planes, E^{st}, of different i-nformation, among which the fractal jumps take place*:*

So beings seem continuous because their discontinuity is minimal, only a ‘cellular’ distance, both in space (so between axons, a simple chemical molecule overcomes the jump) and time (so chemical information, the next simpler language of life, jumps and translates the electronic message through hormonal discharges). Again between molecules the most habitual distance is that of an atom of 10^{-10} m.; and between atoms in its solid, informative state, the usual distance is a valence electron, its lower formal level. While between electron orbits the quantum jump is a photon with a constant of space-time, h, which is omnipresent in all the electronic cycles. In the same way a biological, fractal jump that reproduces a foetus implies the minimal fractal jump in space as the child is born contiguously to its mother.

Though st-points are discontinuous they have 3 apertures through which energy and information flow. Those apertures are fractal, small holes where only st-1 particles might flow. Hence the st- point communicates quanta from its lower, past scale of existence. All communication acts are fractal jumps both in time and space that can either communicate energy or information between similar particles or particles from st±2 planes of existence according to hierarchical, illogic laws:

*‘2 particles on the same space-time plane transfer information and energy in both directions.*

*A st-1 space-time plane transfers energy to the st- plane from which it receives information.*

*A st-2 space-time plane transfers temporal energy, without receiving anything on exchange.’*

Though the existential laws of i-logic might seem strange to the scholar accustomed to operate in abstract, they do apply to reality and reach enough detail to connect them with experimental events. The strength of a communication or bondage between knots of time is the essence of what the 3^{rd} postulate measures. And such bondage is maximal in complementary forms, couples, and then in parallel forms, brothers. It is all about bondages creating strong knots of time due to the symbiosis of the arrows of existence of two forms. Forms share and the frequency increases the speed of the cycle of sharing. All action requires a reaction. Newton in fact defines the principle of cyclical inertia, which the 2^{nd} and 3^{rd} postulate clarifies further.

Those laws are based in the hierarchical structure of the Universe that creates organisms with 3 discontinuous ‘social classes’. So only particles from the first plane enter into just action-reaction processes – while flows of energy and information between 2 different, st and st-1 planes are asymmetric as the upper classes receive energy and give only information. But we said that Fractal jumps are contiguous, so how in the 3^{rd} case might exist a flow between st-2 and st planes, separated by 2 scales? Obviously because the st-1 space-time field dies, exploding into st-2 particles that feed as energy or information the st form. Thus the 3^{rd} case describes the extinction of a victim that the predator absorbs after destroying its cellular parts. For example you feed on the amino acids of the animal you eat, after destroying its cells into its micro-particles.

The previous ternary events, which can be formalized with the symbols of Fractal logic, are essential to describe and explain all kind of mysterious phenomenon in physical and biological space-times. Let us consider some examples:

– Borders between the 2 planes of physical space-time, the plane of gravitational masses and electromagnetic charges, are black holes that emit dark, expansive, gravitational energy. Still 96% of the gravitational world is invisible to us, including the discontinuous inner dimensions of masses, quarks and black holes.

– The 1^{st} case between equal forms writes: ExI<ei=ie>IxE. It explains the 2^{nd} law of Newton, the law of action reaction, according to which, exi, the fractal action of Ei over Ie, is equal in value to ‘ixe’, the action of Ie over Ei.

– Yet what Newton missed was the fact that ‘actions’ and ‘reactions’ are equal in Exi force but not always equal in substance. It is the 2^{nd} case that explains relationships between 2 different planes of existence: Often an action is informative and its reaction is energetic and vice versa, so they compensate each other, cancelling the past and future into a present. It is the principle of conservation of energy and information: Energy becomes transformed into information and vice versa, E<=>I. Fractal physics explain the 2^{nd} case with a mysterious principle that not even Physicists fully understand: ‘time and space are non-commutative’. That is I->E is not E->I, I>E is an energy transformation and E>I is an informative flow. And they are not the same. So in quantum physics and Fractal theory the order of the parameters of an action matters.

*Recap*. Energy flows towards the informative, future form and energy towards the past, establishing a hierarchy between information and energy, the 2 simplex arrows of the Universe. Both together create hierarchical organisms, distributed through several planes of existence in chiral, hierarchical 3 class-structures, in the dominant dimension of height and information. Only a present space, repetition of the same form in extended surfaces is democratic, equalitarian, creating a mass of undifferentiated quanta without much height dimension.** **

**Organic networks as planes of existence.**

The 4^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean-geometry* *explains how to create a plane as a network of ‘simultaneous, present, self-similar beings’ created by the multi-causal flows of energy and information between all those self-similar points that merge together into the organism. Since the fundamental mathematical property of those points-beings is its social nature. Indeed, a number – the social unit of algebra – is a social set. While a plane – the social unit of geometry – is a social herd. Thus, the fact that all beings have mathematical properties means they associate in herds and organisms, represented by sets of numbers and topographic 4-D planes, which are networks made of fractal points with a certain content of spatial energy and information. A plane is a network of points – reason why we can relate geometry and numbers. If we return to a previous example, a ‘point’ is the minimal unit or number ‘1’.

Thus, a number is a ‘class or set of self-similar beings’ simplified as ‘points’ (so we say 3 not 3 pears or 3 humans). Mathematics in that sense, in its simplest elements represent the rules of engagement of ‘herds of points of view’, since ‘each number’ has certain geometrical properties, so 1 is indeed a point, 2 define a wave of communication, 3 form the simplest plane, and those 3 fundamental numbers have only a variation (you can only draw a figure to connect them). So the ultimate answer which explains the enormous application of mathematics to describe the behavior of any ‘group’ is precisely the existence of ‘Laws’ which independently of the type of entity of energy and information we describe, apply to all points of view, to all entities and scales of reality and to all herds just because they are herds=waves and they are systems of energy and information. Those general laws that apply to all beings by the mere fact of being made of ‘spatial energy’, a substance with geometrical/ mathematical properties and being part of a group or ‘number’ whose social properties are defined by the possible relationships between couples, triads, foursomes and tetrarkys are the laws we are most interested in.

The most important universal numbers are the decametric scales since 10 is the ultimate constant of the Universe, the perfect network, the most common number of ‘points’ that create a fractal network, 3×3+st. It is the tetrarkys already understood by Pythagoras, who considered it the perfect number: 3 elements dedicated to the arrows of energy, information and reproduction in 3 opposite directions and a 10^{th} element, first of the next scale, communicating them, protected in its center: A perfect topology to play the game of existence. Since *Numbers are geometries that create networks of Non-Euclidean points. And so they can be classified by their efficiency as forms of Nature.*

In that sense, reality is more like a carpet in which several nets web together into a tighter configuration or rather like a cat alley, which we do not notice in our own web of relationships but creates an entire different ecosystem, or the duality of the web of microscopic insects and macroscopic mammals that co-exist in two different scales of reality. Because networks tend to create ‘parallel’ bidimensional webs, in a 4 dimensional Universe with a 3^{rd} dimension of height and one of motion that constantly displaces those networks, many networks can co-exist and interrelate together, creating the complex ecosystems of reality. Moreover if we consider that 96% of dark space to be standard the quantity of parallel and intersecting networks/planes of existence that can co-exist together is enormous – at least 25 networks, each occupying a 4% of reality can fit in the 100% of spacetime of reality.

Each super-organism is a world in itself, created by the confluence of 2 or 3 space-time networks of energy, information and in more complex systems, reproduction, where each network accomplishes one of the 3 arrows of time of the organism. Yet the energetic, informative and reproductive network, which extend the point in 3 relative space-times, whose topologies correspond to the spherical, hyperbolic and toroidal topologies of any st-point, become a unit of a new scale of existence of increasing complexity. And so we talk also of 3 scales of size in more super-organisms: the ‘molecular’, organic and social scales. Finally the whole system will evolve, living through 3 ages of increasing informative warping…

For example, the humans system is made of 3 main systems, the energetic, digestive system; the reproductive, blood system; and the nervous system. The 3 systems are fractal, cellular networks in perpetual motions, which intersect in certain regions of exchange of energy and information. So the blood and energy system intersect in the lungs in which they exchange energy with the blood system and the blood, reproductive and nervous informative system, intersect in muscles, in which perpendicular nerves exchange information with the muscles. And the 3 systems form the physiological systems that define life and its 3 arrows of energy, information and reproduction, each of them attached to a given number of cells. So if we were to take the p.o.v. of the cells, we could also say that the human organism is a network of cells joined by 3 flows of energy, information and reproduction mediated by those networks. Yet all the systems together are what form the Human organism.

Further on, the organism will go through a young age of energy and motion; a mature, reproductive age and an informative age, each one dominated by one of the 3 networks. And it will extend through 3 scales of existence, the cellular, organic and social scale; such as the human being will be born as a seminal cell, evolve into an organism, which will integrate itself into a society and when it dies, it will first erase its social memes, then it will dissolve its cells and so finally it will return to the lower plane of cellular existence in which it was born.

*Recap*. The structure of super-organisms across several planes of existence is based in 3 networks of st-points, the energetic, reproductive and informative networks. Those networks leave between them a quantity of dark space, where the other networks can intersect and connect with its st-points. Its ‘discontinuous borders’, are asymptotic bridges where through a change of state, the 3 network/membranes exchange energy and information.

**Dimensions of organisms made of space-time planes.**

Networks of st-point are dynamic ‘groups’ in motion; either herds or ‘rings’ extended in two scales of reality, which are tighter and still, due to the ‘connections’ established on its lower scale. We talk of ‘waves/bodies’ as herds of quanta or cells and of ‘particles=heads’ as networks where the quanta or cells are interconnected in greater measure. Thus, while groups/waves/bodies (mathematical, physical, biological jargon) extend in a single bidimensional plane, an informative network extends through 2 st-scales or perpendicular planes; one created by the points and the other by the networks or connections between the st-points and/or the st-points and its energetic herds. So it has 2+2 fractal, holographic dimensions.

Thus, as a consequence of the new definition of a point, a plane becomes now a 4-dimensional ‘holographic topography’ with 2×2 information and energy ‘dimensions’, needed by those points to absorb energy and information: informative height that allows the top head to observe the Universe, cyclical rhythms that allow the being to perform its existential cycles, length-speed that moves the being and width-energy that allows the being to store and reproduce its cells. * *All this brings the theme of how many ‘real dimensions’ has a given system. And the answer is: depending on how we count dimensions and how many planes we study.

In fractal geometry a network has different dimensions depending on the complexity of its branches and quantity of space it fills up. This was already observed by Peano and Cantor who realized they could create a zigzag line that filled up the entire bidimensional plane. And as a general rule most networks of points can be considered to fill two dimensions and two systems of energy/information networks together to create a holographic intersection that adds up to a 3^{rd} dimension, which finally if it has motions adds up the 4^{th} dimensions of most organic systems of the Universe. Since dimension is a flow (dynamic version) or network (static version) of quantic, cellular points, gathered into bidimensional waves and 4-dimensional space-time fields.

Yet things become more complex when we consider systems that extend through several scales of size, and when we consider the ‘amateurish’ analysis of dimensions by most scientists unaware of the laws of i-logic geometry and quantum space-time systems.

For example, physicists, without those concepts wonder why strings have 3×3 inner dimensions of space and one of time. This means that they are calculating systems that extend through 3 planes of existence. Further on, those strings then gather in herds called electromagnetic branes, which warp into particles. Further on, 3-D particles form networks that become atoms, and the process repeats once and again till creating human organisms within which those organic points, now called cells communicate energy forces and informative bits.

There are many types of points with parts, gathering in scalar networks of growing size and complexity: atoms gathering in molecules, stars in galaxies, strings in particles, etc.

A fractal system keeps adding dimensions, as each point becomes part of a network that evolves into a point of a higher plane. Depending on the number of planes through which we observe a point, the total dimensions of the point will vary. As a general rule however, any species of the Universe is fairly described through its main Plane of existence and its lower and upper planes. So a human being is described perfectly as a cellular system in the st-1 Plane, an individual in the st-plane and a relative point co-existing with other individuals in a society in which s/he feeds on energy, information and reproduces. For those reasons we can consider that any point of existence will be described exhaustively when we consider the 9 dimensional networks of each of its 3 main st-planes.

*Fractal ±st-point: 3 st-1 D > 3 st-D > 3 st+1 Dimensions*

Finally, those planes are joined by ‘bridges’ of energy (from st-1 to st) or information (from st to st-1) called *co-dimensions of ‘relative, perpendicular height’,* *the temporal, evolving dimension *that connects them to the upper plane of existence through their processes of iterative growth and social organization. Those co-dimensions measure the relative height or fractal accumulation of self-similar forms that takes place beyond the membrane of the Mother-Cell, as time iterates and evolves the natural fractal into a higher st-scale. Since informative cells accumulate in a relative perpendicular dimension of height, from living organisms whose informative heads are on top to audiovisual towers and satellites, to the perpendicular co-dimensions of microscopic growth of Mandelbrot and Koch fractal.

A fractal ±st-point exists as a 3 dimensional organism, which acts in the external world pursuing energy, information or reproductive goals (mechanically, consciously or in a vegetative way, or even micro-managed by a catalyser or enzyme – facts those, which won’t matter to its dimensional description). In all those cases, time, understood as a form of movement, will be a geometrical movement or cyclical trajectory but also a temporal cycle with a biological, energetic, reproductive or informative function; and a movement traced through a dimension of the upper st-plane of the point. So when a human goes to feed on a dinner, it will enter into a social network of human points feeding on that dinner, which will form an organic system of the upper st+1 Plane. When an electron flows in a metal network of atoms, it becomes a carrier of energy or information between those atoms, and so to its 3 inner dimensions we will have to add an external social dimension in the atomic plane (the only one physicists study in that case). Yet the electron has also inner dimensions, defined by its quantum numbers.

*Recap*. For more than a century, Physicists have been troubled by the need on their equations of Quantum Theory, Relativity and String Theory of odd dimensions, whose ‘ad hoc’ explanations varied from an author to another. Yet in fractal geometry the issue is resolved since the concept of an extra-dimension has a clear, mathematical and logic meaning, related to those scales, all of which will have:

– A *3-dimensional sub-space* within their organic forms, as we come closer to them and observe their details no longer as points without parts but as full grown organisms. Thus the existence of 9+1 inner dimensions in objects like Strings means merely that there are at least 3×3 inner fractal micro-scales within the structure of those strings, where those dimensions will be located.

** The mathematical model of organic, scalar fractals.**

We can now merge what we learned about the fractal structures of the Universe, and its creation through planes of existence, which are organic topologies made of networks of points communicating through flows of micro-fractal points. The Universe and all its parts follow the laws of super-organisms, which define all what exists as *‘organic fractals made of self-similar cells joined by networks of energy and information’.* Where cells are knots of Time Arrows and fractal means a scalar, self-generated, organic, repetitive reality:

– A reality structured in several ‘scales’ of different spatial size and time speed, such as the smallest spaces move faster and show a higher frequency in its cycles of time (metabolic law, Chip paradox, etc.): Max. E = Min. Ti; Min. E= Max. Ti

– A reality generated by ‘informative’ cycles, which can be described with a generic feed-back equation, E<=>Ti, and any of its self-similar specific ‘generator equations’ of information that code the structure of any entity of reality (from DNA genetic codes to quantum equations of particles).

– An organic reality, which constantly reproduces its form *in self-similar, micro-replicas of each point,* and then organizes those self-similar ‘fractal parts’ into wholes, using them as waves of communication that relate points between them or forming with them an offspring of similar beings.

This organic, fractal, informative design of reality, explains why the Universe shows a scalar, social nature, ‘transcending’ from smaller to bigger Planes, invariant in its e & i forms – the energy line and the information cycle – thanks to the fractal reproduction and social organization of self-similar forms.

All those complex systems extend through 3 main st-scales or ‘planes of space-time’, structuring reality as a ‘fractal, non-Euclidean topology of multiple, causal arrows of time’. Yet such complex reality requires new tools of geometry and logic to define properly the laws that relate all the elements and scales of the system. Since most sciences use still a single, continuous space-time plane (Cartesian), a single, Absolute Time cycle (clock-time), a geometry of forms not of motions (Euclidean geometry), and a monist, A->B causal logic (Aristotelian Logic). Thus, a great deal of Multiple Spaces-Times is dedicated to understand the non-Euclidean, fractal geometry of space, developed in recent years, which can study a space-time made of motions (Non-Euclidean geometry), divided in several scales of size and self-similarity (fractal geometry), in which reality is caused by multiple time cycles/causal arrows and multiple agents (Non-Aristotelian logic), tracing geodesics in search of those Time Arrows. Ultimately what you observe is a game of non-Euclidean points=particles=heads, each one associated to a lineal field of energy/body (Complementarity Principle). As entities of energy and information, they are constantly in search of more energy and information to reproduce and form social systems. To that aim each ‘Non-Euclidean point of view’, the fundamental, formal particle of the Universe, defined by the 1^{st} postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry (a point, which unlike the points of Euclidean Geometry, have organic inner parts), will start a line of Non-Euclidean communication, (a wave packed with energy and form, described by the 2^{nd} postulate of Non-Euclidean mathematics), shaping ‘networks’ of energy and information points (topological planes defined by the 4^{th} postulate of Non-Euclidean mathematics), which create a relative ‘space-time’ being of one of those ‘existential scales’.

*Recap.* Non-Euclidean, fractal space-time was defined by Riemann, who affirmed that a ‘space’ is a group of self-similar points, forming an undistinguishable ‘herd of points’ that becomes a homogenous plane. Riemann considered the ‘density’ and homogeneity of those spaces according to the degree of equality of those points (3^{rd} non-Euclidean postulate) and developed the initial steps of a non-Euclidean, fractal geometry of ‘discontinuous points/knots of Time Arrows’ that gather into networks, which form organic planes of existence.

** The PLANES of reality: human organisms and Universes.**

*A human being exists simultaneously through 10 planes of space-time existence, from gravitational space to the cosmological plane of the solar system. The complex interrelationships between the points of each of those planes of existence, among themselves and its upper and lower scales, create our organism and influence our modular consciousness – as we feel the will of the Time Arrows of each of those scales through different senses: we feel gravitational weight and physical pressure, electromagnetic heat and atomic smells, photonic images and molecular tastes, social love for other human beings and the exhilaration of motion.*

*We are the most complex species of space-time, only because we are the species we perceive better, not because humans are the summit of informative evolution in the Universe. In any case, since perception is reality, we will always appear far more complex in form than the extended Universe, dominant in energy-space, of which we perceive very little according to the paradox of the ego (as we gauge from our perspective and so we see more detail in the closest entities). Thus the study of man as a complex organism should be the leading science, which offers more information. Then by homology we can apply the laws discovered in the study of our organism to other entities.*

*In the graph we see those 9 fractal space-time scales of increasing complexity, which emerge from the interaction, chains and evolution of the species of each scale: photons that become particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become human organisms that become social cells of civilizations and economic ecosystems.*

The fundamental particle of the Universe is a Space-time Super-organism that repeats its cycles and shapes of energy and information, co-existing between birth and extinction in 3 fractal planes, which can be subdivided each in 3 fractal energy->Reproduction->Information networks (spatial view), living 3 time ages (temporal view) as he fulfills its arrows of existence in those 3 planes.

If we extend that concept, the Universe becomes a hierarchical, scalar system, extended through a series of self-organized st-planes: particles gather into atoms, atoms gather into molecules, molecules gather into cells, cells gather into organisms, organisms gather into planetary systems that gather into galaxies that gather into Universes. the outcome is a scalar structure of 10 space-time planes, where fractal entities live self-similar cycles of existence under the same space-time laws, from the smallest, invisible plane of gravitational existence, till the Hyper-Universe in which ours is a single cell:

st=1 groups of ‘G-constants’ evolve, forming, curving the energy of gravitational space into masses.

st=2 groups of ‘Planck actions’ form the electromagnetic light space, evolved into cyclical charges.

In the st=3 plane of atomic existence, groups of particles became atoms.

In the st=4 plane, groups of atoms became molecules.

In the st=5 plane, groups of molecules became cells.

In the st=6 plane, groups of cells became living systems.

In the st=7 plane, life herds became ecosystems, societies, nations and global planets.

In the st=8 plane Groups of solar systems became galaxies.

In the st=9 plane, Galactic clusters become Universes.

Thus, humans are a st=5, 6, 7 species; since our organic system belongs to the st=5,6 scales of biological cells and living beings, and we belong to the st=6, 7 scales of individuals and social organisms – as cell of a nation or religion.

How many scales reality has beyond the 10 scales humans perceive^{3}? Given the flexibility of size and speed of gravitational forces, whose waves Einstein calculated could extend to the size of the entire Universe those scales might be infinite as each galaxy becomes an atom of the next scale. It is also the logic result of thinking in mathematical terms, as the simplest informative fractal, a disk, given the irrationality of π, can reach any infinitesimal size. Ultimately it is a choice of the reader: if he is objective he should observe that for survival reasons, spatial perception always puts him in the center of all his observations of Nature. Thus in the same way space is infinite but we are in a limited, perceived self-centered space, the scales of temporal complexity should be infinite, as* the arrow of eusocial evolution should be acting for ever in the eternal universe of time motions.*

Thus even though the perceived Universe displays only i=10 scales to human observers, ‘i’ probably tends to infinite.

*Recap: *the universe is a fractal structured in ternary scales that create decametric social organisms. We cannot know if those scales are infinite but the eusocial arrow of love should have act ad eternal since time and space are absolutely relative.

** The complex causality of Multiple Spaces-Times.**

The key law of flows between 2 planes of existence is:

*‘Information flows from a more complex, ‘upper’ plane to a ‘lower’ more extended plane, Ist+1->E; energy flows from a lower, spatial plane, to an upper, informative plane; energy and information flow within the same plane of existence’.*

This self-evident law determines the outcomes of events and the form of structures, from the 3 perspectives of reality:

– *Geometrically*, in relationship with the 3 topologies of the Universe; as it will determine the flows and channels within a certain organic st-point.

– *Temporally*, in relationship with the 3 dimensions of time; as it will determine the relative flows from past to future and future to past, and the simultaneity of certain events in present, between complementary systems.

– *And organically, *when we combine both approaches, as it will determine the key events of existence: the why palingenetic birth and evolution, the process of death, etc.

Departing from that law, we can tackle the most complex level of understanding of reality – the i-logic of systems, created by multiple time arrows, which no longer follow the Aristotelian laws of single causality, A->B, but the logic of simultaneous present creation, either by the confluence of past-energy and future information, or the simultaneous confluence in a formal ring of multiple, self-similar time arrows. Those complex systems of causality were partially studied by Einstein with its concept of simultaneity and ‘convergence’ of past, present and future, and by quantum physicists with its analysis of particles and antiparticles and the invariance of physical phenomena regardless of the direction of time we study, but now we can analyse it with more rigor in this and the 2 next paragraphs, since complex temporal causality and fluxes of energy from a relative past plane st-1 to a relative future plane st+1 (e->i) and the inverse process, a flow of information from a future plane, st+1 to a relative to past plane st-1, is at the heart of the structure of superorganisms (i->e).

Unfortunately, lineal time introduced in science the concept of single-causality (ceteris paribus analysis), which is only a partial analysis of the causality of most phenomena, in which acts a ternary causality (as energy flows from the lower plane, information from the upper plane and complex flows of energy and information happen between the cells of the same plane of existence). For that reason, most scientists constantly argue, considering their ‘cause’, normally one of those 3 relative events, the true cause. Yet in fact all events need *at least* 2 causes to exist, one from an energetic past and one from an informative future that converge into a relative present.

Let us then introduce the complex logic of organisms with relative future, informative systems and relative past, energetic systems (IX); studying next (X) the causality of a present system or knot of times, made of multiple time arrows/cycles; and finally (XI) some key events of ‘existence’ in which those flows of time take place, such as the process of palingenetic birth and its inverse process of devolution or ‘death’.

*Recap*. Events require to exist at least 2 causal arrows, EóI, which are 2 complementary networks of energy and information going through the 3 topological ages of the life/death cycle.. Such is how new systems are repeated: on one side all becomes a self-similar network of knots of time cycles that go through 3 ages and reproduce in certain topological forms. On the side of complexity of the time arrows of those Non-Euclidean knots, the iteration and combination of those simple elements that make networks, self-reproductive fractals and the logic complexity of the synchronicities of those feedback cycles create systems of enormous complexity.

** Information networks control energy herds.**

The beats of all species, as they absorb and emit information and energy in order to reproduce and evolve socially into self-similar or complementary networks, chain them into complex organisms and ecosystems. And since each st-point is always a cellular part of a bigger organism, finally all those beats, cycles and chains become part of an interconnected huge organism, the Universe.

The simpler of those chains are Darwinian events that connect victims of relative energy and predators with a more complex ‘form’; the sum of all those chains in a given ‘ecosystem’ or plane of existence form trophic pyramids.

Darwinian E->I events last a brief period. Yet Nature sometimes converts Darwinian events into symbiotic, dual body/head organisms, in which the ‘fastest’ temporal, informative beings tame, enslave and control the slower ones. So while the faster lion feeds on the slow buffalo, humans first feed in buffalos and then tamed them, creating a symbiotic organism – the herder and his herd. In the same manner, the first, faster electrical neurons probably devoured, smaller, slower chemical cells, but both together finally evolved into complementary organisms, while the fastest neuron controls the chemical cells of your organism, extracting energy from them. Thus, an organism is a chained system of top predator cells that control herds of tamed chemical cells; and an ecosystem is a loose organic system in which the top predator ‘cells’ only interact with the slower ones when they feed on them.

A 2^{nd} element to understand such chains between faster ‘informative cells’ and slower energy cells is the fact that the faster cells can dynamically or statically (through a network of connections), control multiple, slower cells simultaneously and vice versa, it can process due to its faster time cycles, multiple messages coming from several slower cells that ‘cause’ its action. And this happens in all systems, including a human system in which a speaker talks to multiple ‘energy believers’. To that aim, we must consider a property of information we advanced previously: its fractal, reproductive nature that breaks a form of information or message into multiple self-similar messages (the speaker that reaches multiple people, the antenna that emits multiple electromagnetic patterns, etc.)

When we put together both properties of informative networks – to act faster and to act simultaneously – it is easy to understand why they can control the energetic cells of the organism. For example, the nervous cells act as fractals much faster than the chemical cells and so a single nervous cell can control an array of multiple chemical cells*,* because one of its ultra-fast fractal actions move a big distance that encompasses many chemical cells in the time those cells react. In this manner faster, upper class, informative species control slower middle class cells. In the other extreme a stronger ExI species can create waves of energy and information that extend over multiple cells, and so minute changes on its energy and information parameters affect all those cells, reprogramming them. So a small change in the Earth’s temperature provokes huge changes in the life of its species.

If we generalize those chains to enclose all organic systems of the Universe, the main systems of reality acquire a complex, deterministic degree of order and harmony that relates the different cycles of being (its informative, energetic, reproductive, social and generational cycles), as cellular units of the bigger cycles of the macro-organism or ecosystem in which it exists. Finally information cells form complex networks and so despite being smaller in space, the whole network of ‘neuronal’ cells is bigger than the individual, divided, energetic cells, making easier that control by the ‘macro-organism’ of information.The result of those structures is the 3-class structure of all organisms, in which a head/particle of information controls a reproductive body/field of cells/wave, which obtains energy from an ecosystem from a 3^{rd} lineal system of ‘limbs/forces’.

Consider for example, the 3 elements of life, C, N, O. Today we are still in monism and so even biologists will tell you that Carbone is the basis of life. Yet carbon is only the reproductive body of life molecules. Some thus add Oxygen, the energy of life. And indeed, the biosphere has exactly the same mass of Oxygen and Carbone (24.9%) in your bodies, as limbs and bodies tend to weight and occupy self-similar volumes. But this misses Nitrogen, the intelligent, informative atom of life, which is only 1% of the biosphere (0.27%) and was called first ‘azoe’, which means in Greek without life. Yet with its cyclical forms and its Hydrogen 3-dimensional ‘eyes’, it perceives the external world and structures life, accumulating in the DNA and brain. And it is a General Law of all Systems^{1} that the informative system weighs far less than the 2 others (so your brain is only 1% of your mass, and 1% of ‘stockrats’, owners of corporations ruled the Financial-Military-Industrial System). Further on, beyond your organism, you are part of a world of water, the ecosystem of life. And so those 3 elements are exactly 50.7% of your mass, ½ of reality, the rest being mostly Hydrogen the primordial substance of water and the Universe.

The primary motion of all beings is lineal energy, in its relative direction of length, while the informative particle of any complementary system is on top, in the relative dimension of height. This leaves width as the natural direction for its re/product/ive, product equation: exi. Look at yourself: your height is your direction of information, your head is on top; your motion is forwards, in the length dimension of energy but your cells reproduce and multiply in the width.

All of us are knots of multiple cycles and arrows of time. So each of us is a multidimensional species. Complex beings, of course, do not follow exactly with geometrical precision those forms, because their vital functions must adapt to irregular ecosystems. Thus, perfect forms of energy and information exist only in the homogeneous, 3-dimensional ecosystem of interstellar vacuum inhabited by physical particles (and in lesser degree on water, life species, since water has complex motions and a general arrow of ‘light information and energy’ towards its surface).

For that reason, those geometrical rules of creation of vital arrows/dimensions of time/space, which are known to mathematicians as the product laws of vectors, are used to describe many operations between Time Arrows in the simplest geometrical systems of physical space: For example, light has 3 perpendicular dimensions. And Maxwell found that the product of the magnetic, energetic, flat field, given by the magnetic constant of vacuum (which is a membrane of light space) and the informative, electric, ‘high field’ constant, gives us the reproductive dimension of speed of the light wave. Further on since light-space is the ultimate substance of vacuum and light dimensions are time arrows of energy, information and reproduction, as unreal as it might seem to you, the 4 dimensions you see are not abstract concepts but vital time arrows, reason why they suffice to explain it all.

What is the speed of those time arrows and its frequency? The question is the key to unlock the complex synchronicities, quantitative laws and Vital and Universal constants of each species of the Universe, so it requires specific, detailed analysis of each entity, organic system or plane of existence, but certain general laws apply to all systems, due to the causal chain between those 4 arrows, as energy appears first, then it becomes bended and broken into information, whose product reproduces a field and finally the re-organization of self-similar reproduced forms creates a more complex super-organism.

*Fast and slow dimensions of space and time.** *

Further on, we classify the 2 dimensions of information, cyclical rhythm (discontinuous frequency) and height, as the fast and slow dimensions of time, since height is often the accumulation of cycles of time one over another, which become in still space (Galilean paradox), cellular bricks of a sensorial system.

We classify the 2 dimensions of space, length and width as the slow and fast dimensions of energy, since width is often the reproductive accumulation of lineal speeds side by side, which stores in still space (Galilean paradox), new energetic cells:

– Length is a fast dimension that moves ahead a Non-E Point and gives it speed. All bodies follow a lineal inertia in its motions, signalled by its relative ‘length or body orientation’. Thus, length is the arrow most often associated to the concepts of energy, expansive destruction and devolution. It also follows that the absence of memorial height in an organism, is the key to increase its speed as it diminishes its dimensional friction moving forwards and the quantity of form it has to recreate in each ‘fractal step’ as it imprints its information in the lower scale of reality. And so the fastest known force with zero height and maximal linearity creates a perfect lineal motion of ∞ speed and 0 form: *the gravitational space over which the forms of light are imprinted whose speed is: v=e/i=∞.*

– Width is the slow dimension of space that reproduces or accumulates spatial energy from side to side. In current theoretical models, strings reproduce laterally, creating fractal spaces in the dimension of width. In our scale, people become fat and wide, as they reproduce their cells. *All beings reproduce their energy** in the width dimension of space.*

We also classify the 2 informative, temporal dimensions:

– The fast dimension of temporal information is the speed of perception of information given by the frequency/ rhythm of a cycle, which determines the rate at which the system absorbs its pixels. It is the arrow most often associated to the concept of time; often defined by an angular speed or frequency, which defines a clock of time. Thus its parameter is the inverse of lineal time, measured in t^{-1} units as a scalar number; and when we correct the equations of Physics in terms of cyclical frequency, a whole array of fascinating discoveries and solutions to classic paradoxes – from the paradox of Information (Hawking) to the paradox of Quantum vs. continuous time-space – become resolved.

– The memorial persistence of a certain form traced by a time cycle prevents the drawing of the next cycle in the same place of space, causing an ‘Exclusion Principle’. So when the cycle repeats itself, it does so over the surface imprinted in the previous cycle, creating a tube of height, the second dimension of time, caused by the accumulation of cycles of information. Thus, the slow dimension of time is informative, morphological height, born out of the evolution of a species through aeons that accumulated informative cells in the height dimension. For example, the Universe was born flat in the big bang and now it is acquiring form, curvature; bilateral animal life was born as a flatworm that slowly acquired form, till rising to the height of man, the animal of maximal information; the first plants were algae that acquired temporal height; the Earth was born as a flat, rotating disk that became a sphere with height. Yet in duality, according to the Paradox of Galileo, events are created by the dual causality of formal, geometrical space and biological function. So a 2^{nd} bio-logical cause is needed to explain why dimensional, informative height is all-pervading in the Universe:

The informative organs of a being are placed on top of its height to improve its perception of its territorial space: the human head, the speaker; the black hole of a galaxy, the photon of a light wave are all located on top of the relative energy of their bodies to inform themselves on the location of its feeding energy. Thus, height is also the biological dimension of information and the arrow of future evolution in life, which evolved from flat worms into the human beings. Both time dimensions are dimensions of change. Yet the motion of evolutionary growth or height is minimal: it changes very slowly, through the reproductive, accumulative process of evolution; while the mere displacement of a cyclical, physical movement can act faster. The most complex arrow of time has the slowest dimension of change – evolution – which is shown as a change of form. Yet evolution sometimes doesn’t create height but it is often a contraction of space, as individual parts converge into a whole, herd, wave or organism. The 4^{th} dimension of social evolution is therefore the only dimension that seems ‘static in space’ as a ‘form’, which doesn’t change from generation to generation.

So both geometries, cycles of time and planes of space are in fact bidimensional, adding up to create the 4 dimensions of space-time. Energy consists in an amorphous, relative surface of undifferentiated quanta, a plane without form – a network of small, cellular points, in which the creation of memorial time cycles imprints patterns of information and makes it recognizable as a complex system of multiple Time Arrows. Then, as the being develops those Multiple Spaces-Times, it acquires certain topological dimensions as an individual or as a species living in a longer time-frame.

Yet organisms are dynamic entities that change their parameters of energy and information and so they also change their dimensions of space and time, often transforming a dimension of space-energy into one of temporal information and vice versa: A space-time field is created and destroyed through the interaction of the 2 dimensions of energy, length and width, and the 2 dimensions of information, height and rhythm. To that aim, the 2 dimensions of energy and information combine and transform into each other in dynamic events of dimensional destruction or dimensional reproduction.

Finally to notice that according to the Galilean paradox we can do a description that spatializes time or one that temporalizes space: In a ‘ceteris paribus’ time model of reality all dimensions of space become temporal, as form becomes form-in-action, in-form-ation – exactly the inverse of what classic physics believes, when it affirms that time is the 4^{th} dimension of space, by converting time into a clock-like, cyclical form of space. In the temporal vision, it is the lineal motion and lateral reproduction of information what creates the 2 dimensions of space.

*Recap*. Information networks have 3 advantages over energetic herds: they act-react faster, as they are smaller in space; they produce simultaneous, broken messages that reach multiple cells; and they act together as a single network, due to its multiple connections between them. Hence they can dominate the herds of energy in any dual, complementary organism.

In physics space has 3 dimensions of form and so motion only occurs through a dimension of time. This is false. Length is often the main motion of any system that displaces its body/wave in that dimension. Width is a slower dimension of spatial change, often related to cellular reproduction. Frequency is the fast dimension of time that defines the clock-rhythm of absorption of information. Height also changes; it has motion albeit slower than length, the longest/fastest dimension. It is associated to social creation. So we talk of Time-space as the perception of the 4 dimensions/arrows of time in motion, where the slowest 4^{th} motion/dimension, social height, given by the arrow of evolution is the only one that seems to us static. Thus, energy displaces mainly in the dimension of length; information in the dimension of height; width stores reproduced cells, and then there is a 4 dimension of social evolution.

All dimensions of Time-space have motion, a fact which can be observed in all the planes of form of the Universe, till arriving to light space, the simplest substance of the Universe, which in the model of Time-space has also 3 obvious motions – magnetic width/energy, electric height/information and length-speed/ reproduction, and a 4^{th}, less obvious time-change dimension of social evolution, represented by color.

**4TH POSTULATE: CONGRUENCE-> SELF-SIMILARITY**

** ***A case of Darwinian devolution among men that perceive each other as different and enter in a perpendicular, Darwinian relationship and a case of social evolution between 2 forms that perceive each other as equal and enter in a geometrical and causal relationship of parallel love.*

** Logic and geometric postulates.**

Why geometry needs 5 postulates if the 1^{st}, 2^{nd} and 4^{th} define perfectly a fractal space/time in 3 growing degrees of complexity: the singleton point, the line of communication or wave and the network or plane with volume? Because the 3^{rd} and 5^{th} postulates are not about fractal space but about fractal time; about information and formal equality, a*bout the logical scaffolding of mathematical equations, which so often is forgotten but shapes the underlying formalism of all mathematical statements (as per Frege and Gödel)*. Since:

– The 3^{rd} postulate defines the degree of self-similarity between 2 fractal objects. Classic geometry considered equality based only in the external form, regardless of size and inner content. But beyond the idealized world of Euclid, equality never exists when we consider the inner form of those points made of inner networks of energy and information that contain dark spaces and inner parts, which make even twins slightly different. Thus fractal geometry defines instead the relative degree of equality of 2 forms, according to the self-similarity of its inner, informative content and scale, not according to the equality of its external, mutating membrane, which often is hiding, as in camouflage, a different form.

Self-similarity matters because the social evolution of points that become part of networks that deliver to all of them the same energy and information requires the capacity of those points to process the same energy and information, within its inner parts. *Thus only self-similar cells with the same ‘genetic=temporal information’ evolve into organisms. *And this happens in all scales. For example, the superorganisms of history which are ‘memetic organisms’, in which each human being is a cell of the super-organism with the same ideological mind based in the same memetic code (same religious code of ‘revelation’, same laws in a national super-organism, etc.) must have the same mental beliefs. It doesn’t matter to form the organism if the DNA code is this or that one, if the believer that forms a religious superorganism believes that Allah or a turtle, or Christ or Yvwh is the name of the God – as long as he has the same memetic code in his mind. Since the rule that matters is the degree of equality that triggers the creation of a social, tightly packed organism acting as a single whole.* *For the same reason, since reproduction is based in genetic information, only species with the same genetic information can reproduce and since they have the same equal form, it is a rule of nature that only reproduced cells of the same species form an eusocial organism – a key law to fully grasp the evolution of organisms and societies, in which a ‘prophet’ becomes the first DNA cells of a new civilization. *While species that cannot share information to hunt through common networks or reproduce will consider the other point/species a form of energy and prey on it.*

Thus surprisingly enough geometry determines behavior; form and function again go together and fractal geometry tends a bridge between physics and biology, explaining how species will communicate: if those 2 points perceive each other as equal, they will evolve into a social network co-sharing their ability to gather energy and information. If those 2 points are unequal, they will establish a Darwinian, hierarchical relationship, in which one becomes the victim and the other the predator. Thus the 3^{rd} postulate is no longer an abstract, geometric postulate, but a postulate of logic relationships, fundamental to understand the why of motions and behaviors.

Since self-similar points evolve socially though networks and communicate through a common language of information to survive better as a single social species. So we can resume the main sub-laws and causal, geometrical chains of the Universe with the 3^{rd} postulate:

3^{rd} postulate of relative self-similarity:

*‘Points that are self-similar in information evolve socially into a present network. Points that are different in information will treat each other as relative energy and evolve towards the future into a hierarchical organism as a system of 2 points, one of energy and one of information, related by constant flows of energy and information. Or devolve towards the past into a Darwinian system is one in which both flows are not constant.’*

The 3^{rd} postulate explains why men do not perceive Universal entities as intelligent: beings perceive itify other forms whose flows of communication don’t understand as energy forces that they ‘destroy’ and feed on, without perceiving its ‘organic qualities’. However, even the smallest point known to man, the photons of ‘light-space’ show the 4 basic qualities of all organic systems that biologists use to define life, the capacity to process energy and information and the capacity to evolve socially and reproduce: photons carry energy and act like the minimal unit of information, because light transmits all type of images through its photons; they reproduce their form in the vacuum; and they gather in social herds of colors.

The 3+i arrows of space-time are the will of the Universe that all its beings share across all its planes of existence. Yet the rules that define behaviour between species, the limits of perception of the inner informative language of other minds and the need to use as ‘energy’ other entities, regardless of its inner information (so hunters feed on bodies and throw away the informative heads of lesser energy), imply that humans always deny the sentient, intelligent universe, and the invariance of topological form between those scales, itifying reality.

*Recap*: the 3^{rd} postulate of relative equality define two forms as self-similar when their external, energetic membrane/surface and inner, informative minds are equal. Depending on the degree of equality species will evolve socially into tighter organisms (when they are self-similar) or hunt each other as different species.

**Equality and social evolution. A new concept of truth.**

Equality is the key concept in our definition of mathematical truth as, =, is the operandi of all mathematical equations and in logic, the necessary reason of all logical statements. Thus a fundamental change in our concept of truth follows from the understanding of self-similarity as a different proposition to equality: If Euclid defined equality based on the surface of objects, without taking into account their relative size and inner content, this no longer holds. Things might be similar in their surface and maybe in their content but they are never equal, at most self-similar, nor are equations and any linguistic state an absolute prove of truth, but linguistic self-similar images of the recurrent cycles and events they represent.

The 3^{rd} postulate eliminates the word ‘equal’, which is so important to define truth as ‘dogma’. There is not absolute truth because we cannot perceive completely all the fractal information of the system and so we can merely consider the degree of self-similarity of two beings. Thus, a far more sophisticated and ‘real’ logic appears – that of the relativism of all truths which are related to the perception we have of reality, to our diffeomorphic=local point of view that will distort reality to cater to our selfish will (Galilean and Darwinian paradoxes), and to the quality of our senses and minds.

Thus we rewrite the 3^{rd} postulate of Euclidean geometry, which defined the relative equality of 2 beings, based only on the external comparison between beings, as ‘points without parts’, to introduce the existence of inner energy and information parts in all beings. The new 3^{rd} postulate of i-logic geometry establishes now the inner degree of equality between the parts of those beings as a previous requirement to judge the result of all social communication. The old Euclidean postulate of equality caused all type of errors. Since often points pretend a false, external equality. For example, the main stratagem of hunting in Nature is camouflage, based on the equality of external forms*. *So the victim accepts that equality as a sign of friendship and initiates a type of ‘positive’ communication, coming closer to the predator; but since the victim is different the predator kills ‘it perpendicularly’. That subtle difference between the real world and the abstract world is paradigmatic of the relativism of perception. If Euclid was right, hunting would be impossible, because camouflage could not exist. But real beings have internal, different parts. Some insects imitate wood to hide themselves but they are not wood although they seem it, because their internal parts are different. Otherwise there could not be hunting, based in the strategy of camouflage, as predators simulate the external form of victims or hide in dark spaces, from black holes to lionesses. It proves a fundamental theme of religion: forms that are equal, in this case all humans who have the same genetic information, since they can all reproduce, should love each other, and share energy and information to create a collective organism, a global civilization or God of History.

*Recap*: Truth is relative to the quantity of information we have. Thus truth is relative and never absolute.

**Eusocial evolution Vs. Darwinian devolution.**

Most systems are energetic and informative cells put together into 2 networks called heads and bodies that merge, creating organisms and species, where the informative network rules the energetic network in a symbiotic relationship (particles that rule fields of forces; gravitational black holes that rule electromagnetic, energetic stars in galaxies; heads that rule bodies; capitals that rule nations, etc.). How individual cells create complex organisms? How atoms evolve into molecules and molecules into the cellular Plane, cells into organisms and individuals into societies? Through Social, informative evolution, the most extended phenomena in the Universe by which individual beings become organized into herds and organisms when *their cells share the same informative code.*

Biological sciences have taken very long to accept informative, Social Evolution, influenced by the single arrow of energy and the subsequent excessive importance that its founder, Darwin, gave to the fight between individuals. Only in the XX century with the development of the sciences of information, Complexity, Systems Theory and Ecology, we have realized that the Universe is based in the social informative evolution of micro-organisms into macro-organisms. The existence of informative networks explains the growth of species in size, from individuals into societies. Yet according to another fundamental duality between energy and information, social events* can be either energetic, Darwinian, destructive, or symbiotic, informative, reproductive*:

– *Complementary, present, balanced events* happen when beings share the same energy and informative language so they communicate and join forces in their fight for existence. For example, in gender, the female is a cyclical, informative entity that merges with the lineal, energetic male, only when both belong to the same genetic, informative species. Those social events evolve individuals into couples, groups, herds and cellular organisms, creating an evolutionary arrow of social love, based in the sharing of the same energy and information.

Among those social events the most intense is reproduction. Since the ultimate will of each point is to reproduce either by itself (since one is equal to its own being) or with a complementary species of energy (male) or information (woman). You can express that iterating will of all fractal species in mathematic terms with a Generator equation or in words with a logic mandate, as the Bible myths did, making God saying to man, a fractal species, ‘grow and multiply’, which means: ‘absorb energy and iterate yourself’. But the catch is that all other fractal parts of the Universe will want to do the same while energy is always limited. It is the *Jungle Law *that mechanically or biologically all fractal structures of the Universe follow. Because those who do not iterate become extinct and the fractal is no longer. So a fractal point has to erase the information and transform the energy of other fractal point to iterate itself. Galileo’s paradox motivates all points to ignore the rest of reality and take care of themselves, as relative self-centers of their own world. Hence there are also:

– *Darwinian, energetic events*, when the difference of form is so marked that both entities cannot share the same language of information to form a couple or a herd. Then the stronger predator will explode with the arrow of death the information of the prey into energy and absorb it to recreate its form.

Such duality of behaviors has set an eternal argument between Darwinians vs. love believers, which as most dualities of science, reflects the inverse nature of the arrows of energy and information: beings that speak the same language of information evolve socially to search for energy, inform themselves and when they are very similar, belonging to the same species, reproduce, *accomplishing the wills/arrows of time in a more efficient manner*. While individuals who do not understand their information interpret and hunt each other as energy. Thus duality proves that neither Love Religions nor Darwinism is wrong. Each one explains one arrow of time. Both together resume the foundation of all bio-ethic systems:

*‘Love your neighbour and hunt all alien beings.’*

So, there is an ethic duality, which derives from the degree of equality between communicative beings:

– Species that don’t understand their languages of information cannot form working social groups. Thus they kill each other to feed and extract their energy, making the best of their situation.

– Nevertheless there is a social, ‘loving’ evolution among equal cells of the same species that share the same language of information. And so they evolve from ‘individual bacteria’ into more powerful macro-organic systems of ‘parallel cells’ that add their fractal actions into simultaneous macro-actions; since social evolution is more successful that individual struggle. So, organisms based in the same genetic DNA-information kill zillions of individual gigantic bacteria; nations with organized armies such as the United States won over hordes of Indians, arguably better individual warriors; while ants rule the insect world, even if a cockroach is individually more powerful.

Yet since all men belong to the same species, we should love each other and evolve into a higher organism, the humankind, as prophets of love have always told us, in order to be more efficient and control properly Mother-Earth. Unfortunately humans still fight wars based in cultural tribalism, which makes us think our nations are different species because they speak slightly different informative languages or races are different because their skin has a different color. The result of such short-sightedness is that we have created partial, fractal social organisms with boundaries called nations. Thus Social Evolution deals with the fight between species and the way in which individuals of the same species organize themselves into societies, stronger than individuals, fitter to survive. Individuals fight for survival, but Evolution is a game of species. The key to survival is not the individual but the cohesive organization of a group of individuals belonging to the same species that act together with a higher energy and informative force than the individual and so the social individual survives better as part of the larger group.

Today we know that individual lions are less successful than hyenas and wild dogs that hunt in group (25% of captures in lions vs. 80% of captures in wild dogs). Even in the case of Germany, despite its ideology of Racial Darwinism, what really worked was the group – the German collective spirit that made the German army better than the individualistic Italians or disorganized Russians, till communism in II W.W. made them fight as a single organism. Thus social evolution, contrary to common belief, is much more important than dog-eat-dog societies. And that law applies to all systems in the Universe, including herds of stars (galaxies) or herds of molecules (cells) that capture interstellar gas and lonely atoms and explains the st-planes of the Universe as no other theory can.

The fact that the social organism is fractal, fractal, limited in its energy and information is ultimately the reason why individuals gather into social networks, evolving with other cells, since they require energy and information than the networks provide, becoming addicted to them. If the Universe were a continuous infinity with a single ‘immortal time’, there would not be social organisms, as our inner time of existence would be infinite. Thus survival is again the biological function that explains the existence of organic networks and its cells from the perspective of our limited fractal quantity of life-time.

*Recap*: Individuals who share the same language of information tend to evolve socially into ‘parallel’ herds and organisms. Species which share only a similar energy fight to use each other’s energy in perpendicular fights. Species without the same energy or information ignore each other.

**Perpendicularity and parallelism.**

*In a prey/preying relationship, an organism absorbs energy from a simpler one. In those fights the being with better informative brain most likely will control a better reproductive body (in the graph, the black hole controls gravitation, man the rifle). So it will absorb the other fractal point.*

Events are both, caused by the ‘form’ of the being’ and the ‘type of motion’ or geometry of the encounter. So even two particles that are equal can collide perpendicularly and destroy each other. In geometric terms there are ‘parallel’ or ‘perpendicular’ beings, according to the similarity of the information and energy they process within their internal organs. And so we formalize those 2 kinds of events through the 3^{rd} postulate of illogic geometry that defines equality in terms of the inner energy and information of 2 space-time fields and the type of geometrical communication they establish. For example, 2 equal forms in a feeding, energetic cycle hunt together to enhance their survival, running in ‘parallel’, to ‘attack perpendicularly’ a victim, whose space-time they ‘penetrate’ because it is ‘different’ to them. In the image, we observe such Darwinian geometry:

2 spatial, energetic beings (a lion and a galaxy of stars), with a planar form and max. speed, confront 2 informative beings with a lot of information (a human and a black hole), dominant in the dimension of height. Since information dominates energy and time curves space, when they enter into a relative present relationship, man kills the lion and the black hole feeds on the herd of stars that become past, extinct species. *Thus, the spatial ‘parallelism’ of particles and individuals that gather in waves and herds is homologous to temporal, informative equality; while the spatial ‘perpendicularity’ of predators that ‘cut’ their victims is homologous to informative inequality.** *

Given the infinite fractal information of any being, with multiple sub-scales of form absolute equality does not exist. At most we speak of parallelism or relative equality between 2 beings when their internal organs of information and energy process the same informative language and energetic food. Then they can establish a functional equality, communicating together, hunting in parallel social herds the same energy or even sharing genetic information to create a new being.

Those *positive and negative* events can be decomposed further according to the duality of energetic and informative networks:

Non self-similarity of energy and form.

– *No-events of minimal communication, *when both the energy and information of the forms are different the forms don’t communicate, remaining in their discontinuous space-times in parallel, non-perpendicular motion, without contact.

Complementarity of energy and form.

–* Organic, parallel events of max. communication, when 2 *self-similar or complementary forms merge into an organic system.

*– Destructive, perpendicular events* between complementary forms: when the 2 forms have inverse parameters/Time Arrows and come together in a perpendicular process, and become annihilated into the same ‘present’ spatial energy, dilating space and reducing the fractal, temporal depth of the Universe, as when a particle and antiparticle explode into energy.

Absolute Self-similarity=equality

*– Self-Reflective* events, when the form communicates within itself and the degree of equality is absolute, which we divide into consciousness (i->i) and self-reproduction (exi->exi) in which the spatial present ‘expands’ in time and creates both, a past and future form, as when vacuum reproduces a particle and antiparticle.

Equality of energy

– *Darwinian events,* when both forms share the same energy but with a different degree of evolution. Thus, a relative future more evolved form and a past form come together and the more evolved top predator ‘future species’ hunts and destroys the relative less evolved past species or victim, evolving the arrow of information towards the relative future ‘predator’ that transforms the past into a replica of its own cells. For example:

– A swallow and a man occupy different relative space/times and use different languages of communication so they ignore each other; they live in parallel worlds.

– Your brain and mind occupy the same space-time because they are the same being. So their relationship is self-reflective and often our mind wonders about the brain and vice versa.

– 2 men seated in a room are parallel informative beings that speak the same language and have a positive communication, called a dialog. But if those beings belong to nations with different languages, religions and customs, as history shows, they will likely enter into a competitive argument or as nations will establish a competitive relationship that might end into a war. Then the nation with more information, with better technology and weapons that give it more Exi force, will conquer, penetrate perpendicularly and destroy the other.

– Yet if both systems have similar exi(stential) power they often destroy each other, as when a particle and antiparticle annihilate or when France and Germany entered war.

– On the other hand, when 2 similar forms occupy the same space, they create a new degree of order in the Universe. Since it is the most important, creative event, we study it further. According to the Ternary Principle we can sub-divide the creative events in 3 possible sub-events:

– A *complementary* event, when one form specializes in energy and the other in information. Then both forms establish a complementary relationship, creating a dual organic system with a body and a brain that share energy and information between them through physiological energetic and informative networks departing from each ‘pole’ of the couple, forming a single space-time field.

– A *reproductive event. *When both forms create a mixed, parallel form in other zone of space-time in which their combined energy and information creates a parallel being that mixes both exi forces.

For example, a sexual couple that makes love occupies for a while the same space-time, penetrating each other in a complementary way that reproduces a new being.

– A* mystique event*. When forms fusion into a single macro-form indistinguishable from i=ts parts. So cells become a body; or in a process of perception, the so-called bosonic forces, light particles, create in the focus of a visual organ in which they occupy the same space, a complementary image: *In Non-E geometry, *Riemann described a certain space according to the homogeneity of its quanta that diminish their distances till they fusion together when they are equal. So in Riemann’s classic example light quanta of the same frequency become the same color. In Physics we say that photons are ‘indistinguishable’ particles create a ‘bosonic’ space of relative infinite ‘informative density’*, *described by the ‘Einstein-Bose’ statistics. In Theology we talk of a ‘collective subconscious’, which fusions the ‘informative minds’ of believers into a communion of souls that create the mystique experience.

*Recap*: The degree of equality between points determines their type of Darwinian, energetic or symbiotic, informative communication: ‘2 points occupying different spaces with different information don’t perceive each other and remain *isolated*. 2 points with the same temporal energy are the same point and its relation is *reflective*. 2 points occupying different spaces, but parallel in their time-information establish a positive social or *transitive* communication. 2 points with different time-information, occupying the same organic space, establish a negative, Darwinian, *perpendicular* relationship, dominated by the point with greater exi Force or relative point of future, which destroys the lesser exi point. 2 points with different information but equal exi force, occupying the same space destroy each other, creating an *inverse* relationship. 2 points with complementary or parallel information, occupying the same space, enact a *creative* event, *fusioning *their existence into a new macro organic system or *reproducing* a 3^{rd} being in a parallel space-time.’

**Past x Present =Future. Creative and destructive events**

*In the graph, in more complex models of i-logic geometry, relative future, more evolved/informative species and relative past, more extended/energetic species create different type of events, which can be studied solely in terms of ‘time evolution’ as events between past and future, which will determine the creation or destruction of one or both of those entities in a relative present point, according to the degree of self-similarity (i=i) and complementarity (e**ó**i) between the 2 entities, which we have just defined with the 3 ^{rd} postulate of i-logic geometry.*

We talk of 4 possible outcomes of those events from top to right on the graph, which uses the standard time cones developed in Relativity Theory:

*– Death Events,* in which a complementary point splits its relative present form into its energetic and informative entities (particle/force field; body/head), which latter dissolve into a lower plane of existence.

*– Life events,* which are inverse to death events, in which a relative energetic and informative, complementary system form a stable, organic knot of present.

*– Darwinian events of: A) Evolution. *In which an informative, more evolved species with higher exI (existential force), destroys the past, less evolved system, advancing the overall ecosystem towards the future. Or B) *Devolution*: its inverse event, in which the simpler form, due to its higher Exi, existential form devolves the future, informative force, absorbed as energy. This event is chiral, in as much as there are more cases in which the informative form absorbs the energetic force, moving the overall time of the ecosystem towards the future.

*– Anti-events,* in which two species with inverted space-time parameters are destroyed, creating a relative present without form (inverted waves, particle antiparticle collisions).

We classify all events of reality from a spatial, formal, topological perspective and in terms of causal, past-present-future time dimensions Then the generator equation of space-time, exi=k, can be written in time dimensions as:

*Past x Future = present.*

Thus in temporal dimensions energy is the past and information the relative future of all systems. This hypothesis is consequential with the main arrow of all Time-space systems, e->I or arrow of life, and the causality that requires energy to create information, e->i. Further on, it is a fact of Darwinian Biology that more evolved systems (with better form) win in the struggle of existence, killing and extinguishing to the past, systems with less evolution. So we have a 3^{rd} reason to consider our hypothesis that makes energy and past, on one side and information and future on the other, self-similar expressions

As Einstein put it ‘the separation between past and future is an illusion’ as both are ‘complementary’. Since relative past-reproductive bodies/fields and future-informative systems, heads / particles come together, creating the present forms of reality we observe. So the next step to consider this avenue of analysis of systems in terms of its ‘time dimensions’ is:

Thus, the 2^{nd}/3^{rd} postulates in terms of the 3 causal dimensions of time, past=energy, present=reproduction and future=information define how a single past and future point converge in a simultaneous present.

When we operate with those events and complex algebra of Multiple Spaces-Times, we can obtain some important results, which we can only enunciate in this introduction, such as:

– The overall sum of all the events of the Universe in terms of time is a zero sum, which means that the Universe is immortal and all the events of reality create an infinite eternal present. A trivial demonstration can be made using only the two simplest events of life arrows e->I and death arrows i->E, which gives us: SFuture Lives x SPast deaths =Eternal Present.

We however sense the Universe evolving because humans are dominant in information and perceive a much longer time-life than time-death. Or in geometrical terms death is basically an event of spatial energy, which releases and expands in space the form of an entity. *Thus death has a maximal volume of energy release in a minimal time period: *

*Death= Max. Spatial Energy x Min. Temporal information.*

Reason why death lasts so little in time. While life events are evolving, informative, warping, implosive events that happen in reduced space and stillness, but last a lot of time. So life has a minimal volume of energy and a maximal volume of information:

*Life = Max. Temporal Information x Min. Spatial energy.*

Those results are proved in all scales of reality. So in physical space, the death of a previous Universe (absolute scale), a galaxy (quasar), a star (nova) or a neutron (beta decay), release maximal energy in minimal time.

While in life systems, evolution happens in stillness and minimal space (allopatric evolution of species, isolated in small territories; palingenetic evolution of a foetus in the minimal space of a womb; chrysalis evolution in the stillness of a pupa). And death is almost instantaneous, releasing the energy of the organism that erases its upper, informative plane, st+1 (death of the nervous system), as the cells dissolve and become energy of herds of insects and microbial of lesser form.

Those diagrams resemble Feynman’s graphs that explain the possible events and outcomes of particle interactions, which also consider the existence of a relative arrow from future to past, which in Multiple Spaces-Times corresponds to a flow of information (Feynman’s diagrams can be considered a particular case of the model of Multiple Spaces-Times).

The graph shows the how of events. The why is defined by the self-similarity or complementarity, (3^{rd} postulate) of the 2 Points, relative past and future entities of energy and information:

– If both particles are self-similar in energy and information (case not included in the graph) they will come together as part of a bigger social network.

– If both particles are complementary, energetic and informative systems (top graph), they will form guided by the arrow of life a complementary system that creates a symbiotic present from a past energy and a future form of information. Thus in geometric terms, in the point of collision (right side) the system will expand its space-time. Yet the entity will disappear as a relative plane of space-time in the explosion of death (left side), that will split and dissolve those networks.

– On the other hand, (bottom graph), Darwinian, destructive events happen among different beings that don’t decode their information. If both particles have the same energy, one particle hunts the other (left side). Then, the entity with lesser exi=stential force will die (bottom particle), and the one with more force will absorb and grow with the energy of the ‘victim’. Or both points might ignore each other when neither their energy nor information is self-similar and so the event of communication will not happen (right side with no space-time in the point of present).

Finally, all those events respond to a dual, spatial geometry:

– Darwinian events are perpendicular relationships, in which a predator invades and penetrates the vital space of the victim. While symbiotic, positive, social events happen among *equal, parallel species* that understand each other’s informative languages and maintain a parallel distance either as a hunting herd or an organism, acting with the same motions in space.

* – Exi=K: Present creation. *Most events are balanced presents in which the arrows of information and energy collide in a symbiotic manner creating a self-reproductive radiation of a new balanced species.

*Recap*. The 3^{rd} postulate formalizes the outcome of any communication event among relative informative/future and energetic/past st-points. The key factor to determine the outcome of an event between 2 Fractal Organisms is their degree of informative equality. Since most organic systems that can communicate by sharing the same type of information in a common language become symbiotic, as they prefer to share information than destroy each other as relative energy.** **

**FIFTH NON-E POSTULATE: **

**KNOTS OF TIME: POINTS WITH BREATH**

**The need to evolve the logic and mathematical ‘undefined’ elements of the Universe.**

Now the key difference between a philosopher of science like Leibniz and a Physicist like Newton is this: Leibniz as Aristotle and Descartes before him, was conscious that the language first defines the world we perceive, and NOT the Universe. So it is a humble realization of the minimalist nature of human egos. The Physicist has reduced THE ENTIRE universe to the world-perception of a human light space-time ego centered point of view. So he lacks sense of humor and his arrogance is infinite. Because he confuses the infinitesimal of his mind with the infinite Universe. This we shall stress once and again. The physicist as all humans IS only an electronic mind that fits an infinite number of cyclical space-time beings, into a geometric linguistic mapping within its ‘monad’. And he is NOT aware of it. So his arrogance is supreme:

*œ**-point x ∞ Universe of time space cycles and worlds = fixed linguistic mapping*

The 3 great philosophers of sciences of western thought (and their counterpart eastern philosophers of Taoist and Buddhist cultures) were always aware of this. The cut off happened when Kant rejected Leibniz and became a Newtonian. But at least Kant realized that the human Euclidean mind was a light space-mind and not necessarily all, as impressionist painters will latter.

So the human mind-language is a mapping made with light of the Universe,and uses the 3 perpendicular coordinates of light to simplify all the information of reality.

This mind on top is an Euclidean mind because it uses the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light:

*In the graph the Euclidean light space-time the human mind sees. In posts on i-logic geometry we develop a pangeometry of all possible non-Euclidean minds of the Universe. We conclude that each mind is a monad, a fractal point crossed by an enormous numbers of rays of information, which create a specific mind, mirror of the Universe, with less volume of information and more stillness to fit in the point. Ours, is an electronic mind, as electrons are fractals whose ‘cells’ are dense photons. *

*So the eye-electrons feed on light and the mind uses those informative knots, to create an electronic mind similar to that of the digital camera, also electronic – REASON WHY WE CAN SEE A TV, WHICH IS LIKE SEEING INSIDE OUT, a mind of a future robotic machines – now becoming 3Dimensional (Virreal minds).*

In the graph, we see how light constructs our view with 3 simple lineal motions, the electric, magnetic and c-speed axis, reason why we see light as a fixed space (relativity and constancy of c-speed). Yet other beings can map out reality with other pixels, atomic smells, gravitational forces, digital numbers. So we need to expand our notions of mathematical points, lines and planes, as they might be constructed with different pixels. What all those mappings of reality will have then in common will be not linguistic units (call it numbers, words, atoms, colours, etc.) but the ‘reference of all of them’, which is the Universe itself, the whole, and its fundamental components, which are spatial energetic motions, and cyclical, temporal forms of information, stored in their cyclical clocks.

We are still talking of 2 ‘elements’, which can be well-defined geometrically, but also mapped out with other languages. As they are richer in meaning. For example, motion in physics is associated to open lines – the shortest distance between two points, with entropy an expansive motion, with energy, a measure of motion along the axis of application of a force. And form, information, is associated to clocks, which carry it in the frequency and form of its cycles, to vortices of masses and charges, which act as accelerated inward clocks of Nature.

So it is better to start a description of the Universe, departing of the ‘elements’ of the Universe, in its essential duality, cyclical time clocks of information and lineal motions of entropic energy, and then establish a logic, formal equation that relates both and defines all systems as made of those 2 components:

‘All what exists is a system made of quanta of spatial energy and bits of temporal information that transform each other ad eternal: Spe<=>Τiƒ’

And then consider that each mind and language will try to mirror this Universal grammar, above each world view, with more or less focus and distortion. So verbal systems tend to have a Grammar of subject (information) < verb (action of space-time)> Object (energy of subject), to mirror those ternary systems, and euclidean light space mathematics will also use a geometric 3 dimensional view, where length corresponds to the speed-reproduction of the wave, height to the electric-informative field, and width, to the magnetic energetic field, or a 3 algebraic equation, G(x) operandi F(Y), akin to the ternary structure of words. And colours will be 3, blue associated to information, red to energy and green to reproductive combinations.

So the philosopher of science, or rather of languages of knowledge has a much wider view of reality, than the physicist, which is a believer in mathematics only, as the generator element of reality that comes even above or at the same level than the Universe.

In the next graph we see that duality: on the left Mr. Penrose’s pythagorean view that consider the mind of man that ‘imagines’ mathematics, the language and the Universe in equal footing, interacting together. It is an anthropomorphic, arrogant view. In philosophy of science, all languages are lesser mirrors that cannot perceive the entire Universe. So the causality is far less equalitarian. Τhere is out there a Universe, which hosts all the information about itself (Haldane), and a series of beings within it, mirroring with different languages that Universe, among which humans exist with its varieties, of which we do acknowledge mathematics and logic, of space and time, to be the best mirrors, but not perfect enough.

So our first task is to improve both mirrors, by looking at the more complex structure of fractal space, and the more complex causality of cyclical time, the primary elements of the Universe, incorporating those discoveries to the grammar of mathematics, giving birth to i-logic mathematics, the formalism of all systems.

In the graph, human anthropomorphism in science peaked in the german, idealist school of Hilbert when mathematics not only remained ‘Galileo’s language of god’ but became invented by the human brain, who became ‘God’. One of the biggest limits of human knowledge is precisely the null understanding of the relationships between languages and reality, and how languages evolve as everything else from a first ‘epic’ age of maximal simplicity when they seem magic truths – so writing first conveyed the feeling it was absolute truth and the pharaoh said it has been written.

Mirrors were considered magic holding the soul of the observer, because they were so ‘exact’, and mathematics a very recent language still holds this magic, mirror image. Only the true connoisseurs know of its imperfections, describing, *only a part of all the properties of the being. Yet what makes of mathematical physics such ‘naive religion’, is the denial that there is anything worth to know outside the ‘reduced’ image of the mirror.*

So three are the first tasks to upgrade and improve our scientific view of the Universe:

- Τo improve the mirror of logic mathematics by completing the r=evolution of mathematical logic started by Lobachevski, Riemann and Mandelbrot (Non-Euclidean, Fractal mathematics) in geometry and by the Asian philosophies of duality (taoism and buddhism) and the western philosophers of science, such as Hegel in logic (ternary causal logic), beyond the single, lineal causality of Aristotle.
- Τo bring the organic and mental not purely mathematical properties of all beings, better described with verbal and biological languages into the folding of science.
- And to do so, by relating human languages to the higher reality of a Universe made of only 2 elements, lineal motions of spatial energy and cyclical clocks of temporal information, broken into infinite pieces that assembly then into space-time beings – all what exists including human beings, ordered across ‘multiple scales of size’ which define the fractal 5th dimension of the Universe.

So it is obvious that unlike the idealist school of science that dominates today,where we depart from ‘Hilbert’s’ imaginary points, lines and planes (from the human mind), which becomes the only language that creates the Universe; in an act of hidden anthropomorphic deism, we will depart from the 3 structural elements of the Universe, cyclical time clocks of information, fractal quanta of spatial energy and its organisation in 5d scales of space-time, and then establish the laws of this universal ternary structure, from where we will extract the grammar of human mathematical and bio-logical languages, and then finally explain all the systems of the Universe with the mirror of those enhanced human mathematical and bio-logical languages, themselves enhanced mirrors that look at the ultimate reality, the Universe of fractal space-time.

Let us then start by defining the multiple time clocks, quanta of space and scales of space-time of reality, comparing as we go through this description, the real universe with the idealist, lineal, deformed view of our earlier founding fathers of physics, with its deist myths, mechanical deformation and lineal, simplex thoughts.

Of course, the relativity of minds frightens scientists. It is far easier to construct a simpler model apt for measures with a single mechanical time-clock and a single Cartesian graph of space, self-centered in the human ‘light space-time’ (we see only light, as space-time, with its 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions of magnetic width, tall electricity and long c-speed, as Kant told us, impressionists understood and Einstein noticed when describing the ‘fractal’, larger scale of gravitational invisible space-time with non-lineal equations and non-Euclidean geometry).

So in essence, because our brain reduces enormously to fit an image of the Universe the information we have of the Universe, eliminating all other scales and its planes of space-time (seen though with telescopes and microscopes), we reduce the 5 dimensions of the Universe, including the scalar dimension of sizes and time clocks of different speed, first to 4 dimensions in a single scale, and then 2 bidimensional sheets of information, as the screen/page you read.

So we shall first define those o-points mathematically, as minds, or fractal, non-Euclidean points, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe, which are crossed by a relative infinite number of parallel forces, which are the bits of information used by each of them to create a mapping, linguistic mirror of the Universe.

*‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.*

So each o-point eliminates information from the ∞ beings in existence to reduce its information to an infinitesimal. In the human case, we reduce the 4 dimensions of our plane of existence to 2 dimensions for each eye, eliminating depth and motion to fit all that information in the mind.

So we convert time cycles into forms and they seem solid to us, and we convert vacuum space with entropic motions into lineal distances.

This is the most important property of those points of view – the capacity they have to reduce the Universe into a mind image, of linguistic nature, which explains the duality between ‘motion perception and form’, as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

The equation of the mind is also of enormous importance for all psychological aspects of science and behavior, as it is the origin of the ‘Ego Paradox’, which in human beings reach an astounding infinity (:

‘Every point of view believers to be the centre of the Universe, because it sees it from its relative point of view, selecting only the information that increases its chances of survival’*.*

In the opening montage of cyclical systems of space time, we can see how all what exists is a fractal system made of vital space, with kinetic motions, encoded and informed by accelerated clocks of time, self-centered in a relative point of view or frame of reference that holds together the system. In the graph we can indeed see a small sample of fractal systems, in which a central first point of view, once it is born, reproduces in waves of clone forms, which then reorganize into an static form with a classic order – a fractal which seen from THE SELF-centered perspective is a form of consciousness growing and dying as it performs a world cycle of existence.

The paradox of the self can be explained in many ways, but essentially means that as systems perceive themselves in the centre, and the Andromeda galaxy is smaller than a hair of your nose, as all systems absorb only a limited information, ‘perceiving’ NOT the entire Universe but its close world, every system is ruled by selfish behavior, and every human think to be the only intelligent being, ‘entitled’ and superior to the rest of creation, which he is not.

*The ego is as Buddha and Descartes understood a Maya of the senses*

Thus now we can respond why we perceive reality both as motion and stillness. The answer is in the ternary structure of all beings, self-centered by a mental point of view.

**Anthropomorphism: Denial of the overwhelming scientific proofs of the fractal, organic Universe.**

This obvious organisation of the Universe into scales, however has not been developed into the philosophy of science that corresponds to the experimental evidence of 400 years of studying those scales with telescopes and microscopes, because of the ascientific errors of mankind, which we group in two types: anthropomorphic errors (anthropomorphism, mechanism), and errors of mathematical abstraction (continuity, abstract points, abstract motion):

- Anthropomorphism: we deny organic qualities to anything that is not similar to us.

- Mechanism, as physicists first designed very simple deconstructed machines, which seem in our egocentered view, ‘not discoveries’ but inventions. So Kepler who used a simple clock of time, said ‘God has waited 5000 years to find a mind so intelligent as Him to understand his clock-work’. This arrogance is important to realise why we like a mechanical interpretations of nature, as it puts us above it, as ‘the only organic being’. So mechanism is anthropomorphism and deism, as it requires a god to put in motion the machine, which was OK for pious Newton and Kepler, who believed in Yhwh sending them comets to give them the laws of gravitation, but more humble, intelligent thinkers as Leibniz, laughed at it rightly. Only an organic self-reproductive, self-organizign Universe IS a scientific model of it. And obviously as we now build robots imitating the forms and functions of organisms, we come to realise all machines are simple, not-evolved organisms of metal-atoms, as we are of carbon-atoms.

- Continuity: we took 400 years to realise that all is discontinuous quanta, when observed in detail from neurons, which were thought to form a continuous brain before Cajal’s beautiful pictures, to energy, the substance of the vital space occupied by those points of the fractal networks of the Universe, which only became quantised a century ago, to time clocks, which were a continuous line duration, despite the obvious cyclical nature of all of them, hence ‘breaking space’ into an inner and outer region, and its multiplicity from logic cycles of computers, to circadian cycles of life, to orbital cycles of stars, each one with a different speed or time ‘frequency’,
*the true measure of time quanta: Tƒ=1/T. But*only Einstein realized that ‘there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different speeds’ and this has not yet been properly introduced in science. So any system of time clocks or space extension can be quantised into frequency cycles and ‘atoms, particles, cells’ quanta of a relative scale of reality.

- Interpretation of Mathematics, as an abstract, idealist language, which is not. Mathematics is a realist science. In fact the science whose disciplines better reflect the fractal, organic nature of the Universe. And this is the key to convert the present paradigm into an organic view of reality. In brief, mathematics has 3 disciplines and the 3 are organic analysis of the fractal structure of space-time beings across scales of size: Arithmetics->Algebra is based in numbers, but a number is the social repetition of undistinguishable elements; which as Pythagoras realized do have a geometric quantum structure, being the tetraktys, the most perfect organisation, whose organic reasons we shall soon reveal.

Numbers are forms said Plato, because they are essential topological structures of a fractal network. So both geometry or rather topology, and algebra describes those fractal networks, its forms and functions and the way they related to each other. While Analysis studies how finitesimal quanta integrates into wholes. Thus analysis is the study of how parts, infinitesimals, become wholes. In that regard Leibniz had hinted at the fractal paradigm, with its model of relational space-time – a Universe made of fractal space-time beings, and brought us calculus to relate the ‘finitesimal quanta’, 1/n, of all wholes, made to the image and likeness of those parts. Hegel had analysed the 3 ‘arrows of causal time’, thesis antithesis and its present synthesis.

- And finally the most important of all questions in physics origin of the postulates of relativity, physicists have not solved the conundrum of what is motion and why we cannot distinguish ‘form and motion’; since they abandoned earlier on, the concept of time-motions as ‘changes’ both in the position in space and form or evolution in time of the being. Let us consider this final element with more care. We do KNOW THOUGH since Zeno that the paradoxes of motion and stillness have to do with continuity, and so we shall resolve them, showing that all motions of the Universe including locomotion are organic, reproductive motions, hence there is NOTHING abstract in the Universe, because a FRACTAL is just the mathematical, abstract description of a super organism.

**Multiple Human Languages mirror the 5D fractal space-time Universe.**

The reader should be aware that there are 2 scientific view of reality, which have always fought for supremacy in Science:

– The larger, all encompassing view of philosophers of science, which considers the existence of a living Universe gifted both with perceptive and organic qualities. So Plato said ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called Logos’. Such Universe is made of infinite broken points or monads, each one hosting a different world view, each one a mirror of a larger unknown single Universe, whose image is stored in the mind of each ‘point of view’ or entity of the Universe; which also applies to the multiple points of view of human beings and its languages of perception, all of which are valid to make a mapping mirror of reality – so Upanishads would say ‘the languages of god are infinite’.

It is the most profound view– older in time, as it can be dated to the first philosopher of science, Plato with the myth of the cave and the first Logician, Aristotle, in his book Organon, in the western decoupling of history, and to their counterparts in the East, the Taoists, WengWang and Lao, and the Hindi and Buddhist philosophers – and larger in space, as it aims to explain both all possible minds of the Universe and ‘all’ knowledge of Humanity’ – all the experimental facts of all species, and all languages of human knowledge– the mathematical languages of space, the temporal verbal and logic languages, but also the human senses and artistic forms.

In terms of time motions, is an organic theory, which defines time as changes and explores multiple changes, both in motions of space, studied by physics and changes of information, in time, or evolution studied by biology. So Aristotle recognised 6 motions, generation, growth, locomotion, evolution, diminution and extinction, which together form the world cycle of existence of any physical being. While in the east, those motions were reduced to changes of yang-energy and yin-information and its ∞ combinations.

– The reductionist view of mechanicist, XVII c. ‘deist’ physicists, which only considers a restricted part of reality – physical systems; it only accepts a language of description, abstract mathematics; only defines a form of motion in time, external translation in space or ‘locomotion’; and denies organic self-sufficient processes to matter modelled as a mechanism, hence in need of a creative force or God, which the founding fathers of physics, pious believers in Yhwh, thought to be the biblical God.

And yet surprisingly enough this mechanist, deist, mathematical view pretends with those very limited ‘elements’ to have a Theory Of Everything that makes sense of all what exists. And what is more surprising, it has achieved global recognition as the ‘high popes of science’, excluding the work of philosophers of science from the search of ultimate knowledge. Such reductionist theory is called Τ.O.E. and really only deals with a faulty attempt to unify the forces or ‘locomotions’ of the Universe – translations in space, ignoring all other motions=changes of time and information, in biological and creative and extinctive processes.

This is largely the product, not of the achievements and merits of physical theories in the explanation of reality but of its praxis – the construction of machines and weapons, which are the ultimate source of power of our technological civilization.

But the confusion of technology with science and knowledge, is of course a falsehood, which carries a heavy toll for our understanding of reality. It first eliminates all internal elements of knowledge, the mind, and its languages.

** **